Video summary
Chris Voss, a former FBI hostage negotiator and author of *Never Split the Difference*, shares his insights on mastering high-stakes exchanges by leveraging an understanding of human nature rather than relying solely on aggression or strategy. He recounts harrowing experiences from his time in law enforcement, including the tragic Burnham-Sillabero case in the Philippines where hostages were killed over a period of thirteen months due to poor cooperation and government interference. Voss explains that while he initially felt less responsible for outcomes when others failed him, subsequent deaths hit harder because he had eventually "wrapped his arms around" the situation better. He emphasizes that negotiators must be resilient enough to handle failure without quitting, noting that those who leave after a few losses often lack the courage required for long-term success in high-pressure environments where lives are at stake. A central theme of Voss's philosophy is the concept of "two lines of code" deep within every person—the core values and beliefs that drive their behavior regardless of external circumstances. He argues that humans are not inherently predatory wolves but rather scared rabbits who may act out of self-preservation when backed into a corner, citing examples like captors in the Philippines who treated hostages with kindness simply because they needed them to be mobile assets for escape. Voss suggests that we all possess an internal capacity for both great evil and great good depending on our environment and mindset, referencing Solzhenitsyn's observation about evil running through every human heart but advocating instead for getting "night vision goggles" to understand these dynamics rather than cursing the darkness. He encourages individuals to remember who they are when facing adversity, using this affirmation to shift their neurochemistry from pessimism to optimism within seconds and reframe challenges as opportunities rather than ordeals. Voss details specific tactical approaches used in negotiations that apply universally across cultures and contexts, such as asking "how" questions instead of accusatory "why" questions to trigger the other party's slow-thinking mode and encourage problem-solving without triggering defensiveness. He advocates for letting the counterpart speak five times more than oneself to gather data on their emotional state and underlying motivations, using labels like "seems," "sounds," or "feels" to disarm hostility by validating emotions before addressing facts. Furthermore, he highlights the counterintuitive power of getting people to say "no"; when individuals feel safe saying no, they are more likely to collaborate honestly and reveal problems that need solving, whereas feeling obligated to say yes often leads them to hide issues or agree superficially while harboring resentment. The discussion extends to practical applications in everyday life, including parenting and business leadership, where Voss illustrates how his son Brandon was raised with values of resilience by being sent back on a bike rather than given rides for small tasks like going to the pool. This upbringing fostered an ability to pick oneself up after falling down, mirroring the antifragile mindset seen in athletes like Cooper Kupp who used traumatic injuries as opportunities to rebuild and improve. Voss concludes that successful negotiation is not about winning at all costs or achieving a perfect win-win scenario but rather guiding parties toward a place where they feel good about the outcome by understanding their deeper values and fears. He promotes his Black Swan Group's free newsletter, which offers concise scenarios and applications of these principles to help leaders navigate conflicts with empathy and strategic clarity.
Read the full video transcript
We used to talk about this all the time.
Like, what's your opening line?
And we would go back and forth on a lot
of stuff. Um
for the longest time my favorite was,
"I'm here to talk to you about coming
out."
Knowing that they're going to respond,
"I ain't coming out."
Now, my next line, which and and that's
all unscripted is, "I know you're not
coming out now.
I just want you to know that when you
do,
we're going to make sure that you feel
treated with dignity and respect. And I
got to make sure you don't get hurt."
Chris Voss, welcome to the show. Um
thank you. Pleasure to be here. Dude,
I'm really excited to have you on. I I'm
actually a little shocked at myself that
we haven't had you on sooner. I find
your book, Never Split the Difference,
absolutely incredible. And where I want
to start, so I think I'm a terrible
negotiator. So, let's start with that.
We will definitely today cover some of
the principles of that, but what I
really want to talk about is
in the book, when you're talking about
some of the scenarios that you were in,
where people it's a life and death
situation, Right.
and you're the line of defense, how do
you deal with that emotionally? Like,
that's My job feels high stress, but
that's no one's life is on the line.
How do you deal with that? Yeah, well,
there's a couple things. I mean, first
of all, you just don't know any better.
Maybe when you first started, but
not long term. Uh you know, in training
in the FBI, they start out really good.
Um
I mean, they hit you, uh you know, with
the Tyson uh line, "Everybody has a plan
till they get punched."
Like, the second day of the negotiation
training in the FBI, they hit you square
between the eyes with something really
hard.
Like, a real story or something like
that?
You know, they spend they spend the
first day laying out a philosophy, which
if you understand the nuances of the
words,
you I still completely agree with.
A hostage has never been killed on
deadline in the United States, ever.
And so like you get kind of comfortable
and you got a sense that negotiation is
pretty successful overall. I mean in
reality it's about a 93% success rate.
Wow. And then and then the very next day
they present a scenario where it looks
like a hostage got murdered right on
deadline, right in front of everybody.
And you're just like
I mean you were hit in a head
words you use in the book? Because this
was when I realized I don't want your
job or the one that you had back then.
You said she was shot twice in the back
with a shotgun. Almost cut her in half
Yeah. as she flew through the glass
window. Yeah, and then
And I thought god damn. Like I I don't
know
I'd find a way but Chris, I don't know
how I'd come back from that. Like that
would
that would damage me in ways that I
can't imagine.
Well, that that ends up kind of getting
into a secondary characteristic because
then when I was running a program
I went out of my way to look for
negotiators that had been involved in a
siege where somebody got killed.
And they bounced back. Mhm. You know,
typically with a success rate that
that's that high
if anytime you're under less than double
digits of a job, sieges, whatever you
want to call them
probably everything you touch is going
to turn out good and you're going to get
a little overconfident.
You know, once you start climbing past
double digits, I mean odds are starting
to run against you.
And what happens with pretty much every
time is the negotiator will be like, you
know, I I didn't get into this
to watch people die. I'm going to find
another thing to do.
Or they're going to say, I'm never going
to let this happen again.
And those people will double down
and they'll be more courageous in s-
speaking truth to command.
Whether it be an ambassador or a
non-sent commander and basically saying
like "No, we can't do it like this."
Have you ever involved in an operation
where somebody got killed?
Yeah.
So, how did you
How did you Did you need to put yourself
back together or do you not react like
that? Let's start with that question.
Um I've been
uh repeating one phrase in my head for a
long time leading up to that that I
didn't really realize what it meant. My
old boss Gary Nesner used to always
teach us
best chance of success.
What we're doing is the best chance of
success.
And so then when uh the
Burnham-Sillabero case in the
Philippines, a lot of people got killed.
And finally it was a quick
Break down. What happened? Um uh
Gracia and Martin Burnham
and another American citizen named
Guillermo Sillabero got scooped up in a
dive resort in the Philippines in a
region of the Philippines that we
thought was completely safe.
Uh the bad guys, the Abu Sayyaf, were
looking for Westerners.
They'd been a siege earlier in the same
year in another part of the Philippines
where they
looking for Americans and Westerners.
They got nothing but Western Europeans.
And they ultimately that that case was a
train wreck which I was not involved in
cuz there were no Americans there. And
the bad guys ended up scoring about $20
million as a result. Oh.
Which made a rival gang jealous of the
score.
So, they go out and they do an even more
daring raid. They cross like 400 miles
of open ocean on these lousy little
boats.
Scooped everybody up in a dive resort
and ended up getting three Americans and
a bunch of Filipinos.
Um Sillabero ends up getting murdered by
the
the terrorists about uh
three-ish weeks in, 21-ish days. How
does a siege go on for that long? Oh,
this late thing lasted 13 months.
So, yeah, that was just that was just
the beginning. That wasn't even the
opening act.
So,
Did they kill them to make a point to
just prove like we're serious? Well, you
know, they were
Western American arrogance, if you will.
When Sabella finally got killed or got
killed early on, you know, there had
been Filipinos the bad guys were killing
Filipinos regularly, like it was no big
deal.
And I can remember that point of time
when we tried to stir up a little
outrage over it.
I thought, you know, we have sat here
and not really said much at all
while these Filipinos are getting
beheaded. Mhm. Now all of a sudden we
want everybody to be bent out of shape.
And I remember thinking like if I if I
was a host country, my reaction would be
like, oh, now it's important to you?
So, um, but that the group that was
doing it at the time, I mean, they were
they did all the bad things that that
terrorist murders do. I mean, all of
them. How do you So, one, was that the
first time that you were on a call where
somebody got killed? It's the first
kidnapping that I was directly involved
in
where somebody or people getting killed,
yes.
So, when the first body shows up, what
are you the one talking to them?
No, we coached.
Okay. Uh, one of the reasons why, you
know, what I'm doing now is applicable.
Uh, the
the Black Swan method is based on
hostage negotiation, which is universal.
Human nature. Everybody's human.
So,
I could show up in any country. I mean,
literally any country, any culture,
Philippines,
Nigeria,
Cape Town, Baghdad.
All I need to do is find somebody that's
coachable.
And that person probably knows the
market, if you will.
And I understand the human wiring.
So, we put together their their their
knowledge of the market
in very general terms
and my knowledge of how to get people
to engage.
And then we can negotiate anywhere.
Hope you enjoy this episode brought to
you by our sponsors at BetterHelp. Go to
betterhelp.com/impact
to get 10% off your first month. Enjoy
the episode.
Okay, so
when the first body comes out
what happens to you?
It's the first time that this has gone
awry. We're in the 7% now Yeah. that
don't go well.
It for me when I think about the way
that that would
like impact my mind and force me to like
regroup.
Did it knock you off or are you just
laser focused?
Well, you got to keep rolling cuz the
case was still ongoing.
And So no time for emotions right now.
Is that what you're telling yourself? Uh
Yeah, kind of probably. You know, we
just I mean you got no choice. The case
is still going on. You got to you got a
team. You want to go fast, go alone. You
want to go far, go as a team. You can
always run screaming from the building.
But really and this this is where life
gets interesting for me is that
by nature I would say I'm a run
screaming from the building person, but
I had to flip it all cuz I don't respect
that.
And Right. in discovering that you don't
respect your initial impulse
becomes a fascinating journey if you're
willing to walk it. So I'm I'm always
curious if if other people are having to
do what I have to do to keep myself
centered in there
or if it's just like nah, it didn't
occur to me to run screaming from the
building.
Well, and when you're when you're in the
midst of
you know, when you're in the battle
I mean you can't you can't you can't
bail. I mean people looking at you to
lead. There are other people's lives
that are still on the line. So identity.
You up.
You wouldn't allow yourself to do that.
Probably, yeah.
Good. Did you cuz I know you at least
have one son. Did you teach him that?
Like, "Hey, in this family we don't tuck
tail. We don't run." Cuz what? Fight,
flee, make friends?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So, I mean, did
you have those kind of conversations
with him? Cuz this like I don't know how
much of this is your character from
birth and how much of this is you've
built this incredible
um value system that allows you to be in
the most insanely difficult situations
on planet Earth. You go into great
detail about this in the book and it's
so true. Most people are so
uncomfortable with conflict that even
when it's asking for a raise or
negotiating for a car, they can't do it.
They can't sit in that discomfort.
Right, right, right.
That's nothing compared to they just
dumped a beheaded body
at our feet to say, "You're not
convincing." Basically. Right.
not getting anywhere. That's a real
life, man. Like I can
I can understand why most people would
not want to do that. So I'm curious
and it I I find that asking people how
they raise their kids often gets to what
they do internally. So, what did you
teach your son or sons
uh about who we are as a family?
Yeah, I think it was me and my father
simultaneously. And you know, and
everybody else is what my mother as
well.
Because um uh yeah, my son Brandon, who
runs my company,
is the best negotiator, or so I'm told.
He's a star. He's really good. Um
he's basically a Jersey guy. You know,
he's mixed race.
But he's this bizarre combination of
Jersey and Iowa cuz we started sending
him back to Iowa. My father's very blue
blue-collar, hard worker.
Expects you to figure stuff out, get
stuff done. We started sending my son
back to Iowa in the summertime when he
was about six.
So, he's so comfortable in both worlds
that actually back in Iowa they like to
call him Metro Jethro.
Because he he he loves it there. He fits
in completely.
And you know, he's growing up. He's 8
years old.
Uh
grandpa's got him working in the
business first half of the day cuz the
town pool doesn't open till noon.
So, he he'd have to get out of bed in
the morning and have breakfast with his
grandpa his grandparents.
And then he'd have to get on his bike
and ride
to the same location as grandfather was
driving to.
His grandfather wouldn't give him a
ride. He's like, "Look, you get on your
bike, you get out there. You're supposed
to be there at 8:30. Get yourself out of
bed,
get yourself fed. I will see you at the
office."
And they would leave at approximately
the same time. And you know, he'd be
like, "Why am I not getting a ride?"
But that was just sort of the way that
he grew up
with you know, my my parents' help and
then then at home it was always
Yeah, you get knocked down, pick
yourself up.
He's he's got a memory from when he was
playing football
in uh
uh he went to fifth year of high school
cuz he was really young.
So, there was a special program to get
him ready for college ball.
And he was I mean, he made a great play.
Uh he's playing middle linebacker. He
hustled all the way across the field,
missed the tackle, just barely missed
the guy. I mean, phenomenal hustle.
Ended up diving through the air, landing
on the ground out of bounds.
And put just such effort into it and he
was laying on the ground and he
remembers hearing my voice in the
distance go, "Great hustle.
Now get up."
And he was like,
"All right. Well, this is the
environment I grew up in."
So, I think it's yeah, it's sort of a
family thing that we inherited from
my dad and you know,
my dad picked out a woman
that believed in those values and his
mom believed Brandon's mom believed in
hard work. So, that's just kind of how
he came up.
Yeah, I love that value system. I'm a
fan, for sure.
Uh okay, so
at what point do you start articulating
those values out loud? And
are you talking about toughness,
resilience, um like what what is it?
Like
I read your book before I saw interviews
with you. And so, I wasn't expecting the
sort of East Coast uh attitude. And it
was um
then suddenly
it asked an interesting question for me
because
what I'm trying to tease out is, okay,
how much of like the your ability to
negotiate is just this like aggressive,
tough nut, you know, it's all about
being hardcore, and how much of it is
learned resilience and strategy.
I'm a little bit of a believer in um
that pretty much everything is learned.
Um
The Talent Code, Daniel Coyle, I think.
That's the point that he tries to make.
That, you know, the the human beings
that we think are prodigies,
they just got interested before anybody
noticed.
And then
bang, suddenly they were good at it, but
they'd been interested in practicing for
a while. I think that's pretty close to
being true.
Um
I wish I could think of his name, a
documentary I saw recently on uh
uh phenomenally successful uh music
producer.
He picked out uh the correct key when he
was 3 years old when uh somebody was
cleaning a piano and hit one of hit one
of the the the the key. So, he probably
was born with some extra. Mhm.
But, um I pretty much think everything
is learned. Now, how did my son learn
it?
Well, um right after I left the FBI, I
attended a training session.
And it was the first time it occurred to
me, I remember saying to myself,
"Leading by example is not enough."
So, I don't think I ever told him
anything explicitly. I think I both he
myself, you know, his grandfather,
we sought lead by example.
You know, you want somebody
to learn how to do something or to learn
how to live, I mean, then set a great
example, I expect them to pick it up.
So, but if it's not enough, what is the
magic formula? Yeah, great question. Um
depend upon the age of the human being,
you know, probably they got to you got
to you got to find somebody else
hopefully to mentor them or you got to
let them find their own way.
And it's going to be messy. And ideally,
you've but led by example enough till,
you know, some that stuff is you were
talking about the age of imprinting,
right?
Mhm.
So, by the time they're starting to get
into trouble in their mid-teens or
later,
I mean, they're kind of imprinted.
You you got to go with whatever you you
put in them.
And then,
ideally, their mistakes
um that they're going to have to make,
uh ideally, they're not costly enough
where they're crippled for life over it.
But give them some space, make them ride
their bike to the pool, pick yourself
back up, Yeah. be tough,
be resilient, face it.
Yeah, I think all that stuff's amazing.
Okay, so now
And you know, and even to take a little
bit further cuz
you know, and
um
Taleb's book, Antifragile.
Mhm.
Great book. Post-traumatic stress
growth,
right? And then I'm reading an art piece
about Cooper Kupp today. Who? Uh uh
receiver for the Rams. Cooper Kupp?
Cooper Kupp. Cooper Kupp. The guy who
set all he won a triple crown this year.
Everybody forgot that the guy recovered
from an ACL tear several years ago.
Normally the end of a football player's
effectiveness, if not their career.
Like normally they're never the same
after this traumatic injury. Torn ACL
none of these almost none of these guys
are ever the same.
Kupp says to himself,
"This is my opportunity to rebuild
myself.
Get rid of my bad habits.
You know,
fix what I was ever doing wrong."
And Rams are in the Super Bowl and he
won the triple crown for receivers. I
mean, he's got he's number one in all
these categories.
And you're and I'm like, "Wait a minute.
I
he tore his ACL? Nobody comes back from
an ACL tear."
And I'm reading that and I'm thinking
post-traumatic stress growth. He made
the decision not just to recover,
but to be better
as a result of this massively traumatic
injury.
That's you know, that's that's beyond
resilience. That's That's what Taleb
would talk about being anti-fragile.
Yeah, no. I love that. Such a powerful
idea that getting hurt can actually make
you stronger.
But in the human anyway, it comes down
to your mindset, how you respond to it.
So, now that's we're back in the
Philippines. The first body just gets
dropped off. You obviously decide that
you're going to get stronger. You don't
want it to happen again.
How do you like are you just really good
at re-centering yourself emotionally? Or
have you are is it a meditative
practice? Like when the body hits, I I
know what that would be like for me.
That rush of blood to my head where my
ears almost feel like they're closing
in. You can hear your heartbeat beating
in your ears. Um
how did you Did that happen? And you had
to calm yourself down? Or does that just
not happen and and you're just so
laser-focused?
Well, it was principally because we were
still in the midst of the siege. There
was still two
still two Americans whose lives were at
stake.
And up to that point in time
the inter-govern- the intergovernmental
organization was probably at its worst.
Like we had previously gotten through a
case and everybody gotten away with kind
of half cooperating and
the bodies hadn't been the case we just
finished
just a couple of months earlier. Like
nobody got killed.
And it's a little bit like like success.
You wouldn't, you know, a football
analogy again, it's tough for a football
team to repeat after they won the Super
Bowl cuz people are a little more
focused on their own success versus team
success once they reach the pinnacle.
So, the cooperation in the early part of
the second case was horrible. I mean
horrible cuz they'd gotten away with it
previously.
And there was no body count, but now
there was there was people were dying.
So, we really had to we got our arms
more around the case.
We pushed a little harder on
cooperation.
People got a little more serious about
not cooperating.
Which in the long run
12 months later was when the final round
uh
two out of three remaining Americans got
killed in a botched rescue attempt.
And that that case had gotten really
ugly again at that point. Now, that one
hit me harder
than the first one because in the first
one
nobody had been cooperating with us.
So, I felt less responsible for the
outcome because government of the
Philippines
was playing games with us. You know,
they they they felt out of control on
the last case.
So, they gave us a guy who was supposed
to handle the negotiations that was just
completely going missing in action on a
regular basis.
When he was supposed to be with us. I I
he went and and they pulled him
right after the first series of deaths.
They were like, "All right, this ain't
working out so good."
So, I felt
you know, we still had the case going
and
I hadn't got my arms wrapped around it
that well.
Now, 12 months later
I had had my arms wrapped around it and
then when Martin Burnham, when the word
came in that he got killed, that
that hit me. That was a That was a real
I'll never forget that moment. I was I
was at home in the US when I when I got
the call that he'd been killed.
That, for me, at the time
was difficult.
Uh worst moment of my professional
career.
One of my worst personal moments until
I'm listening to a case a couple years
later
listening to a negotiator talk about how
hard it was on him
when a baby got killed in a siege.
Oh, god. And I remember thinking at the
time, and it was a guy I had a
tremendous amount of respect for.
I thought, "Hard on you?"
That wasn't your relative.
And then when I thought about that, I
thought, "And how am I
you know,
feeling sorry for myself over Martin
Burnham's death because he wasn't my
father.
He wasn't, you know, my spouse. He
wasn't my brother.
You know, I I got no right feeling bad
about this.
Or at least to the extent that his
family members do."
So, that, you know, that was a bit of,
you know, the overall journey that put
things in perspective. Like, you asked
to be in the middle of this stuff.
It's a volunteer job. You going to feel
sorry for yourself when you volunteered?
That's probably out of perspective.
Why did you volunteer?
You know, I I found myself I was in
crisis response. I was a member of the
FBI SWAT team
and I had re-injured my knee and I
wanted to stay in crisis response. I
liked
crisis response. People got to make up
their mind.
You know, you can't go, "Well, let's
sleep on this. You know, let's give this
24 hours to think about it." You know,
you can't do that. You get You know, you
got to make a decision.
And I've always been in favor of
decision-making.
So, I'd been a SWAT guy and we had a
hostage negotiators and it was a little
bit like what we were talking about
earlier, you know.
Some stuff is a lot harder than it looks
from the outside.
Oh, yeah.
And I literally remember thinking to
myself, "I talk to people every day. I
can talk to terrorists. How hard could
it be?"
You know, my son and I joke that our
divorce family motto is, "How hard could
it be?"
Which is a little bit like, you know,
it's like a little bit like the
redneck's famous last words, "Hey, watch
this."
Yeah. "Hold my beer." "Hold my beer."
So, uh but then I got into it and
I've been volunteering when I finally
got trained, I got volunteered on a
suicide hotline. And then
when I'm in it, I'm like, "I'm a
around these extraordinary people that
are doing phenomenal things with words.
I mean, with words.
Not actual actions, just words.
Making a huge difference and being in
the middle of these sieges
and making a difference simply by what
they said.
And I thought, "Nah, I You know, I could
get into this. This This This could be
good."
And it was.
And so,
How does that journey begin of learning
what to say?
Like what are they What are the sort of
magic words? Like take us back to the
Philippines, the
bodies start coming out.
How do you talk somebody down like that?
Like it It just seems like all hope is
lost once they killed the first person.
There's no backing out.
Yeah, man, they still got more people
that are at stake.
And so,
you you you you can't not communicate.
And
you know, it's kind of like any other
negotiation where the other side is
doing stuff that is just not in their
interest, but they're absolutely
convinced that they're right.
I mean, these guys want to get paid.
And
negotiation is not what it is to you,
it's what it is to the other side. You
get all bent out of shape that it's a
horrific horrible thing. That was
something I heard you say, I think in in
an interview. Yeah. So, there is no such
thing as logical. There's only what
matters to you. Yeah.
like, oh my god, that is so true. You
literally just cut through decades worth
of economics textbooks that try to make
people seem rational.
With that one sentence. That that the
second I heard you say that, I was like,
oh my god, that is absolutely true.
There is no such thing as logical.
There's only what matters to you. Yeah.
Okay, so is that like when you come into
a situation like that, are you just
asking yourself, what matters to this
person? Yeah.
Is that is that the most fundamental
question, what matters?
Well, then what matters and and then
ultimately people make up their mind
principally on what they perceive
the loss to be.
Um
and that's that's human nature, doesn't
matter the scenario. When you say the
loss, the loss that led them to do this
or what losing in that scenario would
look like? You got to look at both.
Loss that drove them to the table in the
first place to take the action.
And then what loss are they avoiding by
the action?
And you want to get in their head and
find out what it is.
And since what loss are they avoiding is
all perception, you know, vision of the
future,
then depending upon how you got in their
head, if you're in there by invitation,
which is the whole point of empathy or
the tactical application of empathy,
to get in by invitation,
since you're in there by the invitation,
then the idea is to get them to look at
another loss.
So, if it's a kidnapping,
it's a question that's as as seems as um
merciless
as
"How you going to get paid if you kill
people?"
Now, how how we going to how we going to
collaborate?
You know, how much are you losing
by getting rid of hostages
when you could have gotten paid for
them?
Cuz somebody's going to scare up the
money for the hostage.
Right.
Somebody's going to.
A hostage negotiator's real job
internationally
is to make sure that if somebody scares
up that money,
that there's enough of a trail left
that you can hunt them down afterwards.
That's exactly why you give a bank
teller bait money.
You don't want the bank teller to get
shot over money.
Now, you also don't want the bank robber
to leave the bank with the entire
contents of the vault.
You give them enough money so the bank
teller doesn't get shot,
the bad guy leaves,
and you chase him down afterwards.
That's the way to save lives and put the
bad guys out of business.
So, you want to get them focused back on
the money again.
And then if they kill more hostages,
it's their loss.
And that's when they start to think
like, "All right, well, maybe we made
our point."
You know, let let them let them let them
feel that way. Who cares how they feel
as long as you get what you want.
And that's the idea to try to
re-engineer the outcome. That's really
interesting. That
um
is Is an easy position to take because
it definitely makes them feel like
we're a game, this is a game, or they're
a chip versus like you almost have to
divorce yourself from their humanity and
meaning the hostages. I can't even think
about them as people right now because
that may stop me from actually getting
them back.
Is that do you approach it that way or
are you trying to hold front and center
this is somebody's mom, daughter,
whatever and keep that front of mind?
Like how do you what's the best tactic?
Well, you you know, you you actually you
learn the success tactic tactic again
and I learned it from Gary.
The process is you you you lower their
value as a bargaining chip, you increase
your value as a human being to the bad
guys.
So, that decreases the chances not only
the bad guys will kill them
but also you impact how they're treated
in the meantime.
That's incredibly shrewd. So, how do we
lower their value as a bargaining chip?
And then how do we increase their value
as a human without the person feeling
like they're being manipulated? That's
always the fine line. Right. Right.
Well,
it's one of the reasons for potentially
for a proof of life question.
Not necessarily that you getting proof
of life but you making them thinking
about them as a human being. Mhm.
Like all right, at this point in time we
got to know hostage is still alive.
What's
uh you know, Martin Burnham's favorite
thing to do with his kids first thing in
the morning.
And by asking that question
you force a thought pattern into the bad
guys.
Cuz they were kids at one point in time.
You know, um terrorists
really bad guys
it's not that they're completely lacking
in emotion, they're completely lacking
in certain emotions, which means they've
had some emotional experiences.
You want to see which ones are there
that they resonate positively with.
You know, one of the crazy things that I
learned a long time after the fact is
terrorists got moms.
I mean, you'd be shocked
at the emotional vulnerability across
the board
to the power of a well-crafted message
from a mom. Really?
I mean, and if like the first we found
this out
and again, my boss Gary Noesner, he had
a great feel for this.
One of the midst of the first case,
the
Jeff Schilling case,
which bad guy, nobody died, hostage
walks away cuz the bad guys got so
um
disorganized and disheartened
and 2 months after the case, the the the
serial killer terrorist on the other
side
calls the negotiator that I coached
to congratulate him on how effective he
was.
Not in a rage,
but to to literally say,
"You know, you're really good at what
you do. Wow.
They should promote you."
So, in the midst of that one,
bad guys are threatening that they're
torturing the American. Not that they're
going to kill him, but they're torturing
him.
And the State Department is like, "You
know, we got to get this torture threat
off the table."
And I remember thinking like, "You're
not really bent out of shape unless
you're being made to look bad here." Cuz
having an American tortured overseas
makes you look bad and that's what
you're concerned about.
I'm like, "All right, so we'll see what
we can do." And I talk I talked to my
boss Gary and I'm like,
"All right, so how do we
go from release him release him to be
nice to him?"
This is absurd.
And
uh
you know, Gary says to me, says um
"Tell him that his mom is worried about
him."
I can remember literally in that moment
like I held the phone away from my head
and I remember looking at the phone
and I thought to myself
that is the dumbest effing thing I have
ever heard in my life.
And I kind of rolled my eyes
and and I used to ignore so much of what
Gary told me anyway. You know, he was
good. He gave me a lot of rope.
And so I go, "Okay.
We'll see if we can work that into the
conversation." Cuz I want to make him
feel like I was paying attention to him.
So we coach up the negotiator the next
day and you know, we got the negotiation
operation center set up and we got
sheets of paper with dialogue and we're
going to be there with him the whole
time. We're You can hear tone of voice.
When you get the cadence, you got a
pretty good idea what's being said just
based on tone.
And we tell him he says, "You know, you
got to work this mom thing into the
conversation." And he looks at us like
"You're kidding, right?"
I'm like,
"Yeah, you know, just find a way to work
it in."
So he's on the phone with the bad guy
and we're we're all but getting him to
come right out that they're not
torturing him cuz they're not. I mean,
there's no need to, but it makes him
look good
to claim they are.
And and Benji says to the bad guy
says, "You know, his mom's worried about
him."
And the sociopathic
terrorist on the other end of the phone
literally says
"His mom knows about this?
You tell her he's okay." Wow.
And we're like,
"This is the dumbest thing I've ever
heard."
And you know, we're on the other side of
the clock in Manila. You know, we're 12
hours on the other side of the clock. So
it's the middle of the afternoon for me.
It's middle It's 1:30 in the morning for
Gary.
And I'm like, "I got to get this out of
the way. I mean, I I I have to get this
out of the way."
So I immediately call Gary and I wake
him up in the middle of the night.
You know, he always took the calls. 1:30
in the morning, his phone rings and I
hear him, "Hello."
And I go,
"Do you always have to have to be
right?"
And he's like,
"What do you mean?"
And I go,
"I don't know how you knew that this guy
was going to resonate with the mom
stuff, but it worked perfectly." How did
he know? Did he say? You know, a great
gut instinct, but once we started
looking for it, then it would show up in
case after case.
And which is really hard, you know, once
I was looking for that dynamic, every
terrorist got a mom.
And if you had to bet,
it's a good bet that they're bonded to
their mom.
Like physically, they were born. They
had to have a mom.
Mom was probably nurturing, all the
different stuff that bent them out of
shape and turned them into the twisted
human being that they became.
I didn't have any anything to do with
mom.
So, they still got
deep inside, you know, first year of
their life, they were nurtured by mom.
Mom
did everything she could she possibly
could. Even terrorists got moms.
And I saw this show up a couple times
later on,
and I started realizing it was probably
if I you took me to Vegas, which I live
there now,
and you said, "Place a bet.
Is this guy going to resonate
emotionally with the mom?"
And I'd say, "Based on our data, we got
an 85 to 90% chance
that the mom is a button we can punch."
And so, then in subsequent cases,
knowing this,
I'd bring it up with ambassadors or or,
you know, FBI headquarters or the White
House.
And they'd all react the exact same way
that I did. "That's the dumbest thing I
ever heard. That ain't, you know,
they're inhuman."
Uh that ain't ever going to work. And we
saw I saw evidence of it in 20
12 when um
son of Al-Qaeda,
uh the group in in uh Iraq that was
chopping people's heads in 2012, 2014,
2014 time frame.
Um
Uh their name will come to me after the
fact. But there was uh there was one
case there
where the mom card got played really
strongly.
And the head of head of the group
responded.
And I remember thinking like, "I've been
tell you know, I know this sounds crazy,
but we see it
over and over and over again."
So there's a common humanity thread to
every human being regardless of
circumstances.
That's really interesting. So we've got
the mom thread. We've got What are some
of the other threads? A desire to be
heard, They want to be heard. want to be
in control. Like what are what are some
known knowns when you roll up on
average, the sort of 80, 85% range, when
you roll up, you know, okay, mom,
probably going to be a button. They want
to be in control. They want to be heard.
Um
Are there any others? Sense of loss.
And you know, an idea of some sort of a
loss. Loss is a strongest be true uh
behavior trigger of human nature,
period.
Period. How do you track that down? Um
well, first of all,
it's it's like you know what you're
looking for to begin with.
And it's not really active listening,
it's proactive listening. And there's
certain things are the tactical
application of empathy. What do we know
to be true?
What do we got to bet on?
Loss is the primary
the biggest impact on decision-making of
human beings across the board.
Danny Kahneman, 2002 Nobel Prize winner
behavioral economics, loss weighs twice
as much as an equivalent gain
for people.
Period. If you're human, you're wired
that way, which makes it the biggest
trigger in thinking.
So, if they're engaged in a behavior
that we don't understand, they perceive
the loss.
And we got to start, you know, sniffing
around for it, looking for the hints.
Knowing it's there. And then
consequently, you're going to get them
change their mind about something, you
reformulate the loss.
If I say to you, "If you do this,
there's a 90% chance you'll fail." Like,
"I'm not doing that."
But if I say, "Do this, there's, you
know, you got a 10% chance to success."
Ooh, that sounds and lands completely
different.
10% I could succeed. 10% I'm a winner.
I'm in the 10%.
You know, it it lands differently. But
if you want to make sure they don't do
it,
"90% chance you'll fail here." I'm not
doing that. I'm not taking that risk.
That's too far against me. I mean, that
will shut somebody down for sure.
10% success might move them forward. But
I guarantee you I shut you down with a
90% failure rate.
There is no difference in those numbers.
Exact same numbers.
And so you start to see it across the
board and like, all right, so we're
going to get them to change their mind,
we just
change the frame of the loss. You're in
a merger and an acquisition negotiation.
Entrepreneur, sole proprietor is trying
to sell his company.
Wants to get, you know, whatever, um,
10x EBITDA.
Cuz a buddy of his got 10x.
Now,
the person buying his company wants to
take him wants him to take a lower
multiple,
so that in 2 years, he retains a piece,
and he makes 30, 40, 50, 100 million
dollars more
by taking less now.
Guys thinking is lost I you know I can't
I can't take a million dollars less for
this. I can't take nine when I should
take 10. I'll lose a million dollars.
Take nine, take a piece.
You're willing to risk a hundred million
dollars seven years from now. You want
to lose a hundred million dollars over a
million dollars now.
And they'll be like, "No, that's crazy.
That's the dumbest thing I ever heard."
You just reframed
what the loss is.
And that's where you get people to
change their mind because of whether
it's a terrorist thinking
we have lost you know we've been harmed
in the past. We've lost our homeland.
You know we've lost our identity.
Terrorism is about
choosing violence as a way to make up
for loss.
Interesting. I have never heard that
before.
Uh
is that universal?
Um it's the universal driver of human
decision-making.
Now how they're looking at the loss, you
know
you know there's kind of three groups
that are out there
that you see over and over again.
You know lethal triad they called it the
charismatic leader, the sociopathic
um middle men, you know the number twos,
captains lieutenants, and then the
inadequate followers.
There was a terrorism book from way back
when called Crusaders, Criminals, and
Crazies.
Uh friend of mine Tom Strentz wrote a
book called The Bad, The Man, The Sad.
So it kind of breaks down into you know
the complete charismatic leader. Maybe
he believes in a cause, maybe just
believes in himself.
The criminals aren't involved. They're
just doing it because it's a way to
combat the status quo and continue to
commit crime.
The people that are looking for
identity, you know it was harsh to
describe them as the our followers.
But they're sad.
You know, they looking for an identity
and
the leadership has convinced them that
they've been harmed by this perceived
loss and they have to make up for it.
So, it's kind of packaged along those
lines. And is that who's going to be
there actually doing the hostage part?
So, you're not dealing with the
charismatic leader, you're dealing with
the sad underlings?
Principally, the sad underlings are
their implementers.
Because they're the cannon fodder
for the leader. You know, the the
leadership, whether it's a charismatic
leader or a sociopathic
enabler.
Who are they going to put at risk? Who
are you going to send out to conduct a
kidnapping?
Who's going to Who's going to hold the
hostage? Who's going to be the hostage's
jailer?
That's the worst job
on their side, you know, to have to sit
around with a hostage day after day.
It's a It's a It's you know, you're not
You're not giving that to your talented
people. How did these guys 13 months?
Yeah.
How did they not just get bored and
wanted to end?
Um they're prepared for a little longer
siege.
They've got a vision of a big payoff in
the end. That $20 million payout
the year previous painted visions of
wealth.
Which means if they don't get their 20
million, they're losing.
So, you'll stay in the game longer
because of this perceived loss. And are
you guys letting food get in or have
they stocked up enough food to get
through all this? Well, we're trying to
We're trying to get stuff in.
Um
you know, didn't know this was going on
at the time, but um
Dan Bowden, the author of Black Hawk
Down,
wrote an article in Vanity Fair
probably about a year after this case
went down
revealing a whole bunch of information
that I was not privy to in the case.
So, according to Dan Bowden, who
evidently has great resources in the US
government, not in the FBI,
there were unnamed government agencies
that were setting in sending in food
deliveries with informants that had
tracking devices in them. Oh.
That again, according to Dan Bowden in
his article in Vanity Fair,
you know, I am quoting a publicly
source. I am not quoting pri you know,
secret government information.
That there were food deliveries that
were being made with trackers on them.
Okay, so that starts getting complicated
with all kinds of different agencies
pulling in different directions. Right.
Um what is all this like seeing people
beheaded, uh recognizing the sad, the
mad, the sad? Yeah, like
there, huh? Thank you, Tom Streithorst.
I'll I'll try to remember it better, but
um
what is all of this revealing to you
like about humanity? Do you Do you have
a
a look at humanity like this is
crazy, that this is ugly? Are you
optimistic? Like I mean, you've seen
some gnarly [ __ ] Like what does this
give you a takeaway? Cuz you said I
could drop you anywhere and you know
enough about human wiring Right. to to
go into this. Yeah.
And it does not paint a pretty picture
with the ways in which we are
manipulable. Between this is all about
loss and just reframing the loss,
completely reframing like the fact that
we would do this kind of crazy [ __ ] over
loss,
that my mother is going to like trigger
some
very strange reaction given the
circumstances. Like how do you
conceptualize of human nature at this
point?
Well, yeah, I'm first of all, I'm very
optimistic.
Um
you know, to me it's relief
that we're kind of
that we're kind of all wired the same.
Interesting. You know, this Even though
it means that we are all then in Oh God,
who was it? Solzhenitsyn, I think, that
said either Solzhenitsyn or Frankl that
evil runs through the center of every
human heart.
I wouldn't go that far.
I think um
the the the capability of doing
something that appears to be very evil
and heartless
when people get really scared
and afraid for their own survival.
I am I am somewhat like when people
start getting really afraid for their
own survival.
People's ability to
discard the humanity of people around
them as a defense mechanism.
You know, that saddens me to some
degree.
Um
but it it is.
So
you know, don't curse the darkness, get
a flashlight, figure it out, get night
vision goggles. You know, just there's
certain things that simply are. Mhm.
Um but they're they're consistent.
So if I understand what is and it's
consistent and you don't get it doesn't
do you any good
to get angry at people for having a
propensity to to do really bad things
inadvertently or just out of self
self-protection. And but maybe it makes
it more forgivable to know that
when backed into a corner, people are
more scared rabbits
than they are predatory wolves.
So most people are not predatory wolves.
They're they're they're out there.
But the vast majority of people are not.
Have you come across predatory wolves?
Well, I you know, I think you know, the
guy in the in the um
the the Schilling case
who was on the on the other end of the
phone. Yeah, he was
he was a predatory wolf. I mean, he was
a bad guy.
He was the one that was batting people?
Yeah.
And then then the crazy thing was I mean
it's really interesting the way that
plays out cuz in the second case instead
of being in charge of the negotiations
second case he's in a charge in charge
of the hostages.
Same guy? Same guy. He got
He got demoted.
From negotiator to jailer. Okay.
But the hostages loved them.
Cuz he he understood
that a a hostage who was so spiritually
broken
that they couldn't get up off the ground
was a logistical problem.
Cuz they were on the run for most of the
13 months. They were moving from place
to place. They were staying ahead of
drones. They were staying ahead of
patrols.
sitting in in one house and you guys are
surrounding it. Nah, nah, no.
Kidnapping's a mobile operation. Wow,
I've had the wrong impression this whole
time. Well, there's there's two kinds of
cases I could be working. I could be
working a contained case like what
you're talking about where they're not
getting away.
Or I could I could be working the
uncontained, you know, to use real
simple terminology.
So, you know, talking with Gracia
Burnham
uh the American who lived, she got shot
by friendly fire in the leg and she
survived. Phenomenal human being and her
kids whom I'm acquainted with
um are
wonderful people.
Every every member of her their family,
wonderful human being. And that's the
father that got killed, right?
Yeah.
Now, she's telling us about this after
the fact cuz we're always de- debriefing
hostages who survived cuz we want to
understand the dynamics behind the
scenes. Number one, number two
our survival debriefings happen to be
great
stress debriefings for them.
Two kinds of interviews, information
gathering and stress debriefing. Why is
it a stress debriefing? What do they get
out of it? Um you know, the opportunity
to talk somebody through a horrific
situation from beginning to end
and for the listener to be genuinely
curious
as opposed to trying to extract
information.
Like an interview of a released hostage
by an investigator is exhausting. I mean
exhausting.
And they don't like it and it sucks the
life out of them.
If they sit we sit around and we ask
them questions about what was the
experience like?
What were the bad guys what were they
like?
How did you survive?
You know, what emotional triggers did
you go through?
It's very cathartic for the hostage.
So
we're talking to Gracia Burnham and like
you know, of your captors what was your
reaction
to this guy this guy this guy?
And we bring up the sociopathic
murderer.
And she said yeah, we kind of liked him.
I mean he could tell when we were really
down
and if he sensed that I was really down
he would say, you know, I'll take her
down to the river, you know, give her
some time alone.
Let her clean herself up, you know, just
just give her a break. Take it a little
bit easier on her. This is the guy that
was beheading people. Yeah.
Because
So weird to me.
he's responsible for moving these people
if they need to move in a hurry. See
this this is something that
from a what what are humans like? Chris
Voss let us answer the question what are
humans like?
So
it is really strange to me that a human
can in one scenario be beheading people
and then get a slightly different job
description and be like all right, take
them down to the water and let them
wash.
Um that does say to me that the line of
evil runs through every human heart. How
does that not say it to you? Do you
think that
it is that not the predictable part?
Like you just of course like that makes
sense. He's going to have bonded with
them cuz that's his job now.
with them. He's He's He's To him,
they're a commodity
that he has to be able to move in a
hurry. And so, he's just letting him go
down to the river so they they will move
quickly when he needs them to. Exactly.
Yeah, he knows he's got to he you know,
he he doesn't want them like happy to be
there.
But, if they're completely
disabled emotionally, they're going to
be disabled physically.
Mhm. And if a military patrol comes too
close, they're not going to be able to
bug out of there in a hurry.
And this is a valuable commodity he's
got to take care of.
And so, he he's agnostic.
Now, some of the other captors
are messing with them
cuz they're bored and they're inadequate
followers and they're inadequate human
beings.
And
that's a completely different approach,
which is what most hostages go through
on a regular basis. You know, the people
Out of boredom, they just start [ __ ]
with them. Yeah. And what does that take
the look of? Throwing rocks at them?
You know, I've I've heard plenty of
stories in
you know, in in some of the rougher
kidnappings in South America
where just for entertainment, they'll
put a rifle to somebody's head and pull
a trigger on an empty chamber just to
watch them flinch.
Just.
And you know, cuz they got nothing
better to do.
Mental health is a huge priority in my
life and I encourage everyone to
prioritize it. And one of the best ways
to follow through on healthy mental
health habits is by working with a
licensed therapist. Better Help is
available for clients worldwide. You can
log in to your account anytime and send
a message to your therapist. Better Help
is committed to facilitating great
therapeutic matches, so they make it
easy and free to change therapists if
needed. It's more affordable than
traditional offline therapy and
financial aid is available. Better Help
wants you to start living a happier life
today. Visit betterhelp.com/impact.
That's better h e l p and join the over
1 million people taking charge of their
mental health with the help of an
experienced professional. And with a
special offer for our Impact Theory
audience, you can get 10% off your first
month at betterhelp.com/impact.
Again, that's betterhelp. com/impact.
Take care and be legendary.
What do you take away from that? Like
that's so sadistic.
Yeah. So, have you read um
Solzhenitsyn's book uh the Gulag
Archipelago?
I have not. Oh my god, read it, Chris.
I'm so curious to know what you think
about this. So, it's interesting. I I am
not yet sure I understand what you have
taken away from all of these people. I
have thankfully not encountered anything
like this. There was one guy in high
school that people said he beat kittens
to death. And I remember thinking, "Oh
my god, that's so dark." I almost
couldn't allow myself to believe that it
was true. So, I was like, "Ah, maybe
he's exaggerating, whatever."
So, anyway, that always stuck in the
back of my head. Did that guy really
beat kittens to death? So, that just
freaks me out. But,
when I read the Gulag Archipelago and
it's basically Solzhenitsyn screaming
for like
a thousand pages. It's unreal.
Cataloging the cruelty that befell him,
the way that people turn on each other,
the way that you could get a prisoner to
turn into a guard and that they would
then be cruel to other prisoners just as
a way to like get themselves out of it.
And
that so easily
we could turn on each other and pluck,
you know, fingernails and just torture
people, cruelly kill them, uh send them
away to, you know, these prison camps
that were almost certainly death
sentences. And it was like
Jordan Peterson introduced this idea to
me, which has been useful. He said,
"Don't think of yourself as the one that
hides
Jews in the attic. Think of yourself as
a Nazi guard." Huh. And I was like,
"Whoa." Because you want to talk about
something I just always No way. Like I
could never ever ever." And then when
you
allow yourself to
go, "Do I have weakness inside of me?" I
do. And is there a threshold at which
just to save my own family that I would
do something horrendous? I worry that I
would. And so hearing Solzhenitsyn
basically say, "You're all capable of
it. We're all capable of it." And it's
like, "Oh, man." So when you talk about
somebody going from Cuz I don't know I
don't read that guy like you obviously
were in the mix and so I could just be
totally misreading this. But when I hear
the guy in one kidnapping time is
beheading people, "Hey, no problem." And
the next is like letting them go down to
the river, that to me is more of a
mother moment than it is a This guy's a
logistical genius and he knows I have to
like keep them to a certain level of
prime Maybe he is. Maybe he is. You
heard first-hand experience.
But to me, I just hear
when you're in a different role, and I
don't know how real the Stanford prison
experiment is and if it's ever been
replicated, but I'm sure you've heard
that classic thing where they had some
students they said, "You guys are the
guards. You guys are the prisoners." But
they were classmates. And within 3 days
they had to shut the experiment down
because the prison guards started acting
so abusively towards the prisoners, even
though they were randomly assigned, that
they ethically they just couldn't
continue. And so that's
what I hear in this story.
And I'm not sure if that means that you
have a way more optimistic
view because you're just a better person
than I am or I don't know. That's really
interesting.
flawed person.
Yeah.
It's very intriguing. What do you
believe to be true about the individual?
Are we capable, are all of us capable of
great kindness and great evil or it's a
spectrum and some of us are tighter on
the scale?
What what is true of humans? Yeah, you
know, um, I think it's a spectrum.
Um,
you know, just because you can get some
people to do horrific things doesn't
mean you can get everybody to do
horrific things. It, you know, it's kind
of in the in the environment and then
things go a little at a time, you know,
the the the boiling frog analogy.
Can't drop a frog in a boiling water,
but you can start them out in warm water
and raise the temperature and they'll
stay. You know, the degree of change is
and then as we as we grow,
um, and go through life then then what
have what have we experienced
that we failed? Everybody fails.
Everybody goes down a tubes. Everybody's
got something who's got a moment where
they were fragile or they did something
that they they they
uh, probably deeply regret.
Now, again, are you do you become a
better person as a result
and forgive yourself
uh, for failing to step up?
You know, what do you do as a result?
You know, everybody's going to do stuff
where they failed themselves, where they
were fragile, they made a bad decision.
They were heartless either intentionally
or accidentally. Like how do you how do
you how do you pick it up after that? Is
what the real issue is.
And how do you pick yourself up? Like
for me, it would be I would assess what
I believe to be
right, true aren't quite there, but I
would figure out what what do I want my
values to be? What do I aspire to be?
And I would have to reorient myself
towards aspiration. So, I failed and I
would be very careful not to allow the
failure to become what I perceive of
myself. You're Thank you for letting me
talk through something I've never had to
articulate. But, here is a really
interesting idea that I've had on my
mind lately
that
you can
who you believe yourself to be
is a frame of reference unto itself.
Yeah. And you see things and experience
things through that frame of reference,
what you believe to be true about
yourself. If you believe yourself to be
capable, if you believe yourself to be a
good person, you will
act accordingly and view your actions
accordingly and view as you imagine the
future, you will imagine, "I'm going to
be successful." You'll have optimism.
"I'm going to handle this well." Because
that's your frame of reference. But, if
something happens that knocks your frame
of reference, a failure or whatever,
then suddenly your frame of reference
shifts in an instant. "I'm a failure.
I'm a loser. I'm not good at this." And
as you imagine the future, the future is
bleak. And all of it is suddenly
neurochemically real and you were there.
And what I have found interesting is if
I ever find myself going to a dark place
and it feels heavy and it feels like um
I'm pessimistic about the future,
I say there is a single phrase that I
will say to myself and it changes my
neurochemistry in like 4 seconds. Yeah.
And that's remember who you are. Yeah.
Now, what's interesting is I know that's
a game. I know it's a gimmick cuz I'm
I'm not anybody, right? I am I am the
person who can be confident and I am the
person who can be scared. I am both of
those things. But, somehow along the way
that phrase triggers a neurochemical
state for me and I can shift myself out
of a negative viewpoint and get there.
And so, as I think about like
okay, you fail and this big traumatic
thing happens to you.
How do you grab the right, and maybe we
need to debate this idea of frame of
reference, but how do you grab a hold of
the right frame of reference, which is
going to completely distort
good or bad
what you see, think, and feel.
Yeah, I think it very definitely gets
back to
cuz when you're saying remember who you
are
it's like remember what your core values
are.
You know, get back on track.
Sometimes I refer to that as two lines
of code.
You know, computer code. Everybody got
two lines of code somewhere very deep in
their brain which kind of drives who
they are.
God knows what it is in some cases or
how I got that. Like how did how did
those two lines of code How did the two
lines of code that I believe probably
drive me
how did they get in my head? I I don't
know. Do we all literally have two lines
of code? Is there Is there a duality or
cuz I think it's probably pretty simple.
Okay.
For whatever it is. It might either be
like life, you know, it doesn't matter
for some people and you know, then then
when they do something wrong, well, it
doesn't matter. Let it go. Or
look,
um you're a good guy.
Like that doesn't mean you're perfect.
Or be a good person.
Or you can succeed. You know, I don't
remember My mom whispered that in my ear
at some point in time when I was three.
I don't know I don't know how I got it
in there. I don't know exactly what it
is.
But I you know, I think it would it
would gives me the ability at some point
in time pick yourself up and get and
learn from this.
You know, you you're you're not here to
be to take up to use oxygen.
You got a purpose. Whatever it is. You
know, you're you're spiritual outlook on
life.
Um the bigger picture.
You know, we talked about uh in Never
Split the Difference,
you know, finding out somebody's
religion. What is it that they believe
in that's bigger than them, that they
would
you know, they they would work forever
and be happy and one another person
would consider it to be
um a disparaging
uh
and ruining their life. Like, how do how
do people take the exact same
circumstances
seen completely differently?
Now, it's maybe it's a two-line of code
or if they got defeated and they and
they never got up.
So, yeah, I I guess, you know, mine's
got to be largely optimistic, whatever
it is.
Um and that's so then when, you know, I
find myself
curled up in a fetal position, uh unable
to get off the floor, eventually
I'm going to say, "Look, it's time to
get up."
And get smarter.
Time to get up and get smarter. Smarter.
Okay. So, let's talk about what makes
somebody a good negotiator. What does
the smarter look like? So, if all of
this is about two lines of code, like so
much of your book revolves around, once
you understand how people are wired,
once you understand what their religion
is, once you understand their two lines
of code,
we become controllable isn't the right
word, but we become movable.
Influenceable, if that's a word.
So,
how do we begin to suss that out? So,
when you're sitting across the table,
and I like I know that a lot of this
deploys against business negotiations,
but I want to keep it when lives are on
the line. So, ultra-high stakes, literal
life and death.
What are you
asking? What are you looking for? How
much of Like, the fact that you guys
have these teams and everybody's broken
up, okay, you're looking for positive
statements, you're looking for negative.
Walk us through that.
What what's the setup? And then how are
we going to tease out this information?
Well, yeah, the setup is yeah, we you
know, we're we're going to pull together
a team because there's so much in what's
said and the way it's said.
Even more in the way it's said.
But there's just there's more
information coming off a person if even
if you can't see him.
There's more information that you can
keep up with
if you're not trying to respond.
And then, you know, you formulate a
statement in your mind in the amount of
time that you're formulating a
statement, you're not listening.
So, there's just more data there than
one person
can handle.
So, we built a team concept
and we had different people listen for
different things.
And the more we thought about it, like
how long did the conversation go?
How much
profanity, which is, you know, emotional
adjectives.
How many emotional adjectives were in
there? Negative emotional adjectives.
As there's few as the conversations get
longer and there's fewer negative
emotional adjectives, you're making
progress.
It's never a straight line, so it's
going to go and come. So, you know,
what's our pulse? What's our frequency?
And then would people really start
listening for the nuances?
And you you get five people together. I
mean, if you want to listen for
everything, you probably need at least
five people keeping track of everything.
And it then then then the patterns start
to emerge really fast.
Or
like in the in the Tractor Man siege in
DC in
Tractor Man?
Yeah, the way Lloyd Watson drove a
tractor to the middle of Washington DC
in 2003
just before the beginning of the first
Iraq war.
And his family had been crushed by that
tobacco industry settlement.
They were no longer able to
farm and sell enough tobacco. You know,
I don't know, but this the tobacco
industry settlement ended up crushing
his family business.
He tried to protest in DC a couple
times, got legal permits to protest,
nobody cared.
You know, save the tobacco farmer. That
ain't exactly a hashtag that's real
popular. Yeah.
And it's not their fault that that's how
they grew up making a living, which was
completely legal, acceptable, and
nothing wrong, and then the world
suddenly decides it's a bad thing.
So, he protested a couple years in a
row, nobody cares.
So, he rolls back into DC now with his
tractor and and his and his trailer and
his
his 4x4
and claims he's got bombs.
Which gets everybody's attention. Has a
way of doing that.
You'll get somebody's attention.
But, working a case,
park police negotiators were backing him
up, were coaching him, were doing all
the analysis for him.
You know, we're the team that we put up
around him cuz we work a a good team.
And we get to the point where
he's found a face-saving way to
surrender.
You know, he said, "I was in the 82nd
Airborne. The 82nd Airborne
parachutes behind enemy lines, and
you're there for for 72 hours with no
backup, you can withdraw."
So, basically, he's agreed to come out
after 72 hours. Now, the problem is
he's a volatile dude,
and since we don't know for sure whether
or not he's got explosives,
in a fit of rage, if he goes a wrong
direction,
the sniper's got a green light on him.
And we're thinking like, all right,
we got to keep this guy from getting
himself killed.
Cuz when you're in a rage, you're going
to do something stupid, and there's a
very specific protocol where we suspect
the explosives might be, and if he makes
a move for the explosives, we cannot
wait and find out if they're there.
And so we're thinking like, we got to
get this guy out of here in less than 72
hours cuz that's just too much
for for stable behavior. We cannot
expect him to stay cool for 72 hours.
So,
there's a disagreement within in the
negotiation cell as to when he said he's
going to come out.
And I look at the negotiators and I go,
"When's When's Dwight coming out?" They
go like, "He's coming out tomorrow."
And I said, uh
I don't think he is.
I think we're still 36 hours away, you
know, we're not we're not 8 hours away.
Well, we'll call him and ask him. And
I'm like, "Ho ho ho ho ho Before we call
him,
in the event
he's not coming out tomorrow morning,
what are we going to say to get him to
change his mind?"
And we've heard all this military stuff,
all this hyper-masculine stuff.
And buried in
the military jargon and the
hyper-masculine stuff, there hints
of his religion,
which is Christianity.
Just hints of it. Just hints.
And Winnie Miller, a female negotiator
on my team,
sitting in the back of the room. And
we're What do we say? What do we say?
What do we say? And Winnie goes,
"Tell him tomorrow's the dawn of the
third day."
Because, you know, in the Christian
religion, Jesus crucified on Friday, he
gets up on Sunday. That's 48 hours. That
ain't 3 days. That's not 72.
It's 1 day to Saturday, it's 2 days to
Sunday.
So, we're thinking about this and we're
like, "Yeah, okay."
Dawn of the third day.
So, we call him back on the phone. They
go, "Dwight, when you coming out? You
coming out tomorrow, right?" He goes,
"No, I'm not coming out tomorrow."
And then the negotiator brilliantly,
cuz deliveries is important as awards,
she brilliantly says,
"The white."
"Tomorrow's a donor, the third day."
There's this long silence on the other
end of the line.
He goes, "I'll come out tomorrow."
Now, she saved his life cuz I promise
you the 24 more hours he'd have cracked
and he'd have made some move where the
sniper would have taken him out.
And we did not want that to happen.
By this point in time, we're talking to
this and this this poor schmuck has just
been crushed. He's tried to get the
world's attention.
We don't think he's got bombs, but we
don't know he doesn't have bombs and we
can't take that chance. We got to get
him out of there before he gets himself
killed.
And so that was kind of
you know, here's a guy doing something
that looked really bad,
but there was still
possibly to your point, what's inside
somebody?
You know, what are those kernels
those grains that are still in there
that maybe we can uncover them, maybe we
can reach in and reach.
And and and we got him out. He came out,
didn't nobody nobody got hurt. Okay, so
that was a case of literally knowing
their religion and also there's
something in there about knowing that he
needs to save face and the military
thing about 72 hours and having an
honorable exit and all of that. Um
how do you tease out this stuff? So,
somebody that wants to use this in their
real life.
Yeah. The most interesting thing that
you cover in the book in great detail is
how you begin to like pull this
information out. You mentioned earlier,
but it's worth noting that the name of
your company is Black Swan and the whole
idea of it's the unknown unknowns. The
tiny little things that make all the
difference, yeah.
And so, how do you get to that? Well,
yeah,
again, what are you listening for?
You're Now now I know what to to tell
you to look for. You know, look for the
hints of loss.
You know, what impacted their identity?
Look for the narratives.
That they're telling themselves? That
they're telling themselves.
You know, how does this make sense to
them?
You know, what's the trigger here?
What's the opening question? Do you have
a standard opening question that you ask
them to get them to start talking? Yeah,
you know,
you know, one one of a couple things. Um
which is like how every negotiation
should go.
Script out your first two or three lines
and then you're into an ad-lib from that
point on. You got to prepared
it's a dance, let the other person lead.
And they'll take you where you want to
go. Give them a chance.
And the opening is going to be some
catch them off guard and expression of
concern for them.
And we used to talk about this all the
time. Like, what's your opening line?
And we would go back and forth on a lot
of stuff. Um
For the longest time my favorite was I'm
here to talk to you about coming out.
Knowing that they're going to respond I
ain't coming out.
Now my next line, which and and that's
all I'm scripted, is I know you're not
coming out now.
I just want you to know that when you do
we're going to make sure that you feel
treated with dignity and respect.
And I got to make sure you don't get
hurt.
And now we're off to the races wherever
he wants to go. But I put a vision in
his head
with that statement. It doesn't matter
what he says.
He said I got a chance to draw that
picture.
And then a buddy of mine, super talented
guy, Vince D'Afonzo.
He says, I want to call in and say
are you okay?
Cuz they're expecting us to call in and
ask about the hostages.
But are you okay?
Now I'm I'm in a confrontation in a
parking lot here in LA
about two months ago.
Really? Yeah. Just on a personal level.
Yeah. Okay.
And um
this guy honks at me.
You know, he's clearly bent out of
shape.
And I you know, I'm I'm not being
aggressive and I'm in a parking lot and
and I happen to be standing I think I'm
out of his way, but he wants to park
where I am.
And he honks at me and he drives by me.
He happens to be a black dude, doesn't
really matter and he's running his mouth
as he goes by.
And it clearly something has got him
wound up before he ever saw me.
And for whatever reason
I'm there at the wrong time.
Now,
I ain't letting this pass
and I'm also not getting into a fight
with this guy.
You're not letting it pass that he
honked at you and was aggressive?
Uh yeah and and he's running his mouth
as he goes by. You know, he's about 5-6
ft away and as it turns out we're both
headed to the same restaurant anyway.
But I'm like I'm just in a mood like I
you know, I'm I'm not the type to let
this pass for a whole variety of
reasons.
So of course I walk right over to his
car.
And as he's getting out and he's glaring
at me, I'm like, "Are you okay?"
He was, "Yeah, of course I'm okay.
You're in my way." I said, "Yeah, no no
no, seriously seriously.
Are you okay? Are you okay?"
And he was so caught off guard by that
that it initially deactivated him. He
said, "Yeah, well you know, I'm trying
to I'm trying to park, you know, you're
in the way."
I'm like, "Yeah yeah, man. Oh man, I'm
so you know, I'm so sorry. I That was
stupid of me. I didn't I didn't I was
trying to look at the at the front of
the um
the store to make sure I was at the
right place."
And now he he's come down about halfway.
You know, he's clearly he's coming down
and I again, this dude has been
triggered by something he's carrying
inside him before I'm even on the scene
and I'm not going to aggravate this.
So we both of course we both head to the
same restaurant door at the same time.
So, I go to hold hold the door for him,
and he's he picks up his phone and acts
like he's not going in. He is not going
to accept a gesture of kindness from me.
Right.
And then I go inside, and you know, my
girlfriend is there, and she's like, "Is
Is everything okay? You know, did What
did we do wrong?"
And he's like, "Oh, you you got You guys
didn't do anything wrong."
And so, he lurks outside the restaurant
till I'm getting ready to leave, but
decides
to come in at the same time
that I'm leaving cuz it's a takeout.
And I go to hold the door for him the
second time,
and he walks through.
So, he goes from being combative and
calling me names and refusing to walk
through the door when I'm being polite
and not accepting a gesture of kindness
from me,
to now I, you know, I haven't been
confrontive combative, but I kind of
have been confrontive, but confronted
him about is he okay? Are you okay? Are
you okay?
And saying it in a way where I gently
genuinely meant it.
When I get ready to leave the second
time, he's good with accepting a gesture
of goodwill from me. I hold the door,
and he comes through.
All right. So, from a technique
standpoint,
you knock him off guard by asking him if
he's okay.
And be genuinely concerned and let it
come across in my voice. Cuz I didn't
plant that anger in him. I may, you
know, I inadvertently added to it.
But he rolled into this.
You know, I There's a phrase that I've
seen, which is like, if you understood
half the stuff that people are
struggling with, you take it a lot
easier on them.
Like this dude is struggling with
something before he shows up.
It's a nice car.
You know, I'm I'm judging from his
demeanor. You know, he's a black guy.
He's He's a white-collar dude. He's got
He's in a nice car. As I recall, it was
a nice Jeep.
You know, everything about him is just
like another regular guy
making probably a pretty good living,
and something is eating him up before he
even shows up there. And I happen to be
there at the moment when inadvertently,
you know, I add to it.
By standing in his way.
So, for you, the idea of not letting it
go, you weren't
you confronted him like you said, but it
wasn't
I don't know. It Is there emotional
gratification to you just to engage?
Like, or you said I I'm not going to let
it go for a whole host of reasons. So,
now I need to understand what reasons
are those. Is it Did that feel like an
affront to you in some way? And now you
just need to engage. You need to
like lower his anger and that gives you
the the sense of
justice? Like, I'm not sure. Cuz I If
you had gone up to him and been like
"Listen, asshole." That I would
understand. Dumb, but I would
understand.
But What's your problem? Yeah, but if Is
it emotionally Are you looking for
emotional catharsis in the
confrontation? And is it catharsis that
you get by helping him come down?
Well, I could promise you that this is
mostly selfish. Okay. You know, there's
almost a joke out there, the myth of
altruism. You're not helping people cuz
you care about people, you help them cuz
it makes you feel good. Therefore, it's
very selfish to be altruistic. That's so
You can get into a whole circular
argument over all this and knock
yourself out unnecessarily.
So, it it does make me feel good to
to help somebody out.
Um
So, yeah, I get it I get a I feel
genuinely
better about it.
Part of my philosophy is life, you know,
I I didn't invent this phrase, leave
people better than you found them.
You know, you're making the world a
better place. I'm also a very strong
believer in karma. The more positive
stuff I do, the more positive stuff
comes back to me.
I think there's actually There's more
and more reason to believe that there's
something to this energy feeling karma.
There's probably science behind karma
and it probably in fact impacts how
people react to us and what comes our
direction and what we repel. We know we
attract You put out positivity, you're
going to attract positivity.
I'm also naturally born assertive type.
Somebody runs their mouth at me,
I'm not good at letting that go.
I'm also not interested in making it
worse.
You know, um
what's that? You make a speech when
you're angry, it's the greatest speech
you'll ever regret.
I'm not looking I'm not looking to make
it worse. And I know that, you know, if
I got my negotiator hat on,
you know, I I can leave this guy better
off.
And probably in that particular moment,
I've talked my way out of confrontations
that I did not start.
Other times, I've talked my talked
people out of confrontations that I've
seen in public that I had nothing to do
with.
Cuz I just didn't want to see it go down
the tubes.
When somebody's hyped up, they feel an
injustice has been done,
what's the path to
helping them out of that? I'm a train
I'm on a train in Jersey on a Saturday
morning a couple years ago.
And bunch of regular folks on a PATH
train headed into Manhattan.
And I see this again, and skin color's
got nothing to do with it. Could be
Irish, could be Jewish, you know,
they're just they're just human beings.
See what looks to be like a basically a
hard-working blue-collar black guy
sitting on a on on a train.
Another hard-working
decent human being, black female sits
down next to him. I mean, just slams in
onto the There's like about 6 in.
She plants herself, shoves him
forcefully to the side, and says, "I
said excuse me, move over."
And I And you know, I I see this poor
guy. He's just sitting there minding his
own business.
Probably struggling with whatever he's
doing.
And I can see her pushing him, and she's
got something she's struggling with on a
completely separate
And I can see this getting ready to go
bad.
Cuz at some point I'm on the other side
of car. At some point of time he's going
to get pushed to his limit.
Cuz he was sitting there minding his own
business. And no matter how he reacts,
unless he gets up and walks away,
he's going down over it.
There ain't no excuse for pushing back
physically with a female under any
circumstances.
L- legally, morally, however you look at
it. And I'm looking at this poor bastard
and I'm thinking like
I don't want to see this guy go down.
So I walk across
the train
and I lead with I'm sorry. And when I'm
sorry is the first thing out of your
mouth, it startles people in a really
good way.
Like, what are you sorry for?
And I And And I'm going to personalize
myself.
I go, I'm sorry. I'm Chris.
And I hold out my hand, which he refuses
to take.
And he snaps back, Chris, I'm not
looking to meet you, Chris.
Now, I'm pointing the fact he has met
me.
He's using my first name. I went from
being this bozo on the other side of the
train to Chris.
And I said, look, man, I just don't want
to see anything bad happen to you.
That's all.
And I go back to the other side of the
train.
And I can see the wheels in his head
turning a completely different way.
And I can see from the look on his face
he's thinking like
this is stupid.
This is just dumb.
And he sits there for a few more seconds
and he gets up. He doesn't stay in the
ward and he gets crosses the car to get
away from this girl.
And that was it.
You know, two people living their lives
being triggered by something got nothing
to do with one another
and a potential conversation between
just two regular people getting ready to
go bad. He just needed an intervention
to rethink what was going on.
So, did that work because of the idea of
trying to So, you talk about Daniel
Kahneman and thinking fast and thinking
slow, and you're trying to shock him out
of the sort of emotional moment and get
him to think more deeply about the
situation? I'm look Well, I'm looking
I'm definitely looking for a thought
pattern interrupt. It's not where I'm
not threatening.
And and I'm trying to trigger an
emotional moment, which very much as you
talked about earlier, triggering a brain
chemistry, the neurochemicals. We got to
get some different neurochemicals
coursing through the brain.
Get somebody thinking again. Cuz like if
if you were to think about that
dispassionately,
if somebody's a jerk to me in public,
which I didn't do anything to cause it.
Like this person walked into the
situation by being eaten up by their own
amygdala before I even got got here.
Something else has been triggering them.
They're struggling with something. If I
were to completely understand, I'd walk
away.
And you need to get somebody in that
mindset. Like, look, I didn't do
anything wrong.
This person's been out of shape, you
know, they're struggling with something.
If they had time to tell me,
I'd I'd I'd I might give them money.
But instead, it's turned into a
confrontational thing. In the moment,
people are the negative neurochemicals
are triggering them. And again, if you
you make a speech when you're angry,
it's the greatest speech you'll ever
regret. You don't do smart stuff when
you're mad.
Very true. But you have said that you if
you can control the anger, that it can
actually be useful in a negotiation.
And I'd love to know
it to a higher level.
What does that mean?
Well, anger and this is what a lot of
people miss about anger.
Um like if you're if you're if you're if
you've been shattered, if you're fra-
fragile,
if you're laying on the floor and you
can't get up,
if you're in the depths of sadness,
anger will get you out of it in a
heartbeat.
And I've actually used it some in the
past.
Um, if I if if for if something has made
me incredibly
deeply sad, loss of a loved one.
I pulled myself out of it and I can feel
the neurochemical change.
I think of somebody I'm really mad at.
Or someone or something that has made me
intensely angry.
And I'm instantly lifted out of sadness,
grief, despair.
The problem that most people don't see
is
that doesn't lift you to your highest
level of performance.
Like in on a
grading scale of A to F.
Like if you're in the in the F
emotionally.
Anger will will instantly bring you up
to a C level performance, maybe even B
minus.
Now you won't know how much
more room there is at the top.
All you know is in comparison
the anger pulled you out of your depths.
So you're capable of much more, but if
you got no way of knowing that.
You don't know that that the really the
next level up is the state of flow is
human beings highest performance level.
Steven Kotler's got a lot of research on
it.
People are doing stuff that they should
not be able to do
just because they've gotten into flow.
That's highly positive. That ain't There
ain't no anger in flow.
Flow is highly positive.
It's borderline euphoria.
You know, Evil Knievel crashed his
motorcycle trying to jump the the
fountain at Caesar's Palace in 1970
something.
Um, Mike can't think of Mike's last name
before they tore the fountain down and
an X Games athlete does a backflip on
his motorcycle over Caesar's Palace
fountain.
Flow.
What are you capable of in flow?
The first kid and I again, it's in
Kotler's book, The Rise of Superman.
Who jumped the Great Wall of China on a
skateboard. Anyway.
Did it with a broken ankle.
Crazy.
Cuz he was in flow. Not only did he do
it with a broken He did it several times
that day.
He was in flow. Nobody had ever done
that before and he did it with injuries
that should have put in anybody else,
you know, in in a hospital bed.
But he's in flow. It's highly positive.
So, we don't know that if the anger has
lifted us out of our depths. You can
lift yourself out of the depths with
anger. You probably can't lift yourself
out of the depths as quickly
with a positive emotion.
So, that you know, there's a sequencing.
There's a staging there.
But you cannot get to your peak
performance in a negative state of mind.
And anger's a negative state of mind.
So, as somebody who knows the power of
emotional control, how do you get to
your ideal state of mind? I've read
Waiting um
Not Waiting for Superman, Becoming
Superman.
of Superman.
The Rise, thank you. Steven Kotler's
book, I've read that. I'm very familiar
with the ideas that he puts out around
flow. Um but let's say that we're in a
negotiating situation, our anxiety
spikes massively, or we're in a big
confrontation in a parking lot,
anxiety's up. How do you bring that
down, recenter, and get to your best
self? You know, some of some of the the
mantras that you were talking about, you
know, who am I? Remember who you are.
It's a great mantra. You have You have
to have There has to be some preparation
in advance.
You know, and then you have to have
found some success with it.
You know, you're not going to try
anything if you haven't applied it
successfully. You're not going to try it
when it's really important if you
haven't applied it when
the stakes are low.
It's like, so what are you doing first
thing in the morning?
You know, am I lucky to be up or oh God,
is it another day? Is the day a gift?
What's the difference between adventure
and ordeal? Only you're the way that you
perceive it. I threw that out on my
Instagram a couple of months back.
You know, what's the difference between
adventure and ordeal or stress and
stimulation?
You know, and I got a bunch of neuro
cows. Stress is cortisol, you know,
people want to give me the I know the
neuroscience. The answer is how you
filter it.
Completely.
You know, how how do you look at it? Is
it happening for you or to you?
Are you lucky to be here or
or you're unlucky? I'm in a negotiation
a couple years ago with somebody
whose values I detested.
And thinking about this person made me
angry every time.
hostage or business?
Business negotiation. But you still
despise
was a liar.
Person Person lied. Had no problem
lying.
And uh they you know
I got an ex-girlfriend that once said to
me, you'd sooner get your arm torn off
than tell me a lie.
And I remember thinking at the time
well, the words I find highly
complimentary, but the way that you said
it makes it sound like an insult.
Like that's, you know, yeah, but wait a
minute. You said that like it's a bad
thing.
So, integrity is really important to me.
So, when I deal with somebody who lacks
it they're going to trigger me.
And if they're triggering me negatively,
I'm having trouble prepping for the
conversation. Cuz I'm dumber when I'm
angry.
And then I remember the only person
reason this person is persistent in
these negotiations
is because my company is a success.
And in point of fact, I'm lucky to be in
this conversation.
And as soon as I did that, I reframed
that I was like I instantly
I found myself in a in a different frame
of mind.
So, you know, you got to find a phrase.
Tony Robbins says, I think he's the guy
that said, you know, does life happen
for you or to you?
Life is happening for you, for you.
Like, wow. I don't have to do this, I
get to do this.
You know, however do you reframe that?
Which takes some practice. Pick Pick out
your phrase.
Practice it up a little bit.
Because your your negative circuitry is
going to kick in. The The default
circuitry for human beings is negative.
Interesting.
We inherited from the caveman and the
optimistic caveman got eaten by the
saber tooth and the negative pessimistic
caveman made a run for it or killed it.
But the optimistic guy was like, you
know, yeah, you know, I I got this.
I know I you know, this this thing it it
look it's not you know, it just needs a
How hard could it be? How hard could it
be?
Just needs a hug.
Yeah, so
the negative caveman that we were gifted
with the wiring of our ancestors and the
negative guy survived.
It's interesting how much you've
leveraged an understanding of human
nature to get people where you want to
go.
I want to talk about some of your
open-ended questions. I think these are
really powerful. So, the
the way that why questions are
accusatory Mhm. but how questions invite
people to do the thinking for you
and
explain that. Like the
Explain the power of how.
Yeah, it well, it
to use common common phraseology, it
triggers slow thinking or in-depth
thinking.
You know, because it's logistical?
Uh yeah, you know, how how largely is
implementation or logistical is another
How's this going to get done?
Um it feels differential. So, I'm going
to kill these [ __ ] if you don't
give me $20 million right now. And you
say, I'm not supposed to do that.
Go to the bank. Call the president. Do
whatever you need to do. This is
somebody's life. Give me the $20 million
right now.
How am I supposed to do that right now?
You want me to call the president?
You want me to go to the bank?
Do they not just keep screaming? Yes,
that's exactly what I want you to do.
All they got to do is come down a little
at a time.
Now, I'm not resisting.
I'm an implementation.
And it triggers in-depth thinking.
Any point of fact,
those are legitimate questions.
You know, the
ask a question
that the whether the other side likes it
or not
is actually a legitimate question.
Not resisting.
I'm asking in a way where I'm
differential.
I'm not saying I ain't doing it.
I'm asking for your help.
Now, how you respond to that is going to
tell me where this is really going.
You know, there's 93% success rate means
7% of the time it ain't going to go
anywhere. This is nothing but bad.
I got to know which one I'm dealing
with.
And some of you know, my how and what
questions early on
and occasional the the strategical use
of why's, surgical use of why.
I got to diagnose what I'm really
dealing with.
And I got to do it in a way where you're
not feeling like you're being diagnosed.
But, you know, I cuz I got to do
everything I can do to avoid triggering
you, but I got I got I got to get a
diagnostic on what I'm actually dealing
with to begin with.
And how do you handle telling people no
in a way that doesn't shut them down?
Yeah, you know,
a friend of mine here in town, Ned
Colletti, used to be the GM for the
Dodgers.
Brilliant negotiator, good guy, like him
a lot. Ned is still around.
Uh, still affiliated with the Dodgers.
First year he was, uh, GM, they went
from worst to first. That's a sign of a
capable GM.
You know, and and we're talking about
this one time and Ned said that someone
had taught him to let out no a little at
a time.
I'm like, that's exactly what we're
doing.
Like, you have to be able to say no to
people.
What your job is to not let them get
blindsided by it, where they feel like
they were clotheslined and caught off
guard.
So, you let it out a little at a time.
And how am I supposed to do that?
Is really a way to get the other side
thinking
about the difficulty of the situation,
about the difficulty of the ask.
And it's the first way to start letting
no out.
"That's really going to be hard?"
Further down the line, we're going to
get there.
But first, I really kind of need the how
question is designed to get stop you in
your chat in your tracks and get you
thinking.
It's calibrated, which is why we call
them calibrated questions,
to start to trigger a state change in
the other side.
Now, we got to let out a little more no
and a little firmer way as we go along.
Then, we got we we got a whole
succession of ways to eventually,
ultimately, if forced into it, to say
no.
Which then also is not, "No!"
It's no.
But we don't need to go, like if if you
hear no from me or my side,
we've been hinting at it for a while.
So, you're not going to be
feel blindsided by it.
You you're going to you're and we're
going to continue to demonstrate
collaboration.
Cuz I you know, I don't want to go all
the way to no. If we're talking, there's
a reason for us to talk.
The adversary is a situation.
So, if there's a reason for us to
collaborate and talk where we can both
be better off, I also don't want to let
out no too quickly cuz there might be a
better way and I want to discover that.
So, let's let me let me let me start
telegraphing that there are problems
here, inviting collaboration, see if we
can tease out a solution before this
thing goes down at tops.
Have you ever had a negotiator
hostage taker give you an answer to
something that you were like, "I
actually don't have a rebuttal to that.
We should try that."
Not yet. Yeah, I was
I'm running these scenarios through my
head and I'm like, "What would I do if
they like offered a suggestion?" I'm
like, "Yeah, like actually sounds Maybe
we should try that."
Like how do you cuz there are scenarios
where you end up paying apparently $20
million. Well, we we first of all, it
wasn't a US who paid that or anybody on
a US side.
So, the US would never do that.
Uh correct. The US US does not pay
ransom. Now, that doesn't mean
that there can't be bait money
go down range.
Meaning you give them money that you
know you're going to take back? Or
you're going to trace.
Like like money is ridiculously easy to
trace. Like ridiculously easy.
And it could be a very smart move. It's
like a jack injecting dye into their
financial circulatory system.
Where they buying weapons?
Who they paying safe houses for? They
got a larger criminal network.
Terrorists are not supported by the Red
Cross.
They're supported by a larger criminal
network of illegal arms dealers and
illegal this and illegal that. And you
want to know who they're buying their
guns from.
And the best way to find out who they're
buying their guns from is to give them
some money that you could trace and find
out where it goes. Follow the money, as
they said a long time ago in in the
Watergate scandal.
That's a tremendous investigative tool.
And if you there was a
in 2000
that was exactly what happened because
there was a criminal gang out of Ecuador
that had been taking hostages on oil
platforms
every year about October.
And they were a combination of former
terrorists and criminals.
And so the third time it went down, a
payment was made
because they if they had assaulted the
the oil platform, they'd only got the
kidnappers who were the low end of the
food chain.
But they made a payment and they ended
up dismantling the gang in its entirety
and they never hit again. Oh. Over 50
people were rounded up because they were
tracking the money. Tracking the money,
the whole organization was dismantled as
a result of the ransom payment. So it
became a great way to take out a
criminal organization
that had been operating completely
freely prior to that. And a rescue would
have only taken out the bad guys on a
platform. It would not have taken out
the whole organization. They took the
whole thing down and these guys never
resurfaced as an organization again.
So going back to the magic words that
you use as a negotiator, why is getting
them to say no
more important or better, much better if
I remember your words correctly
Yeah. than yes? Yeah, it's it's
shocking. Um and a friend of mine that
I'm flattered that we're acquainted
Andrew Huberman, Huberman Lab's podcast.
well, amazing guy. Brilliant
neuroscience stuff.
Uh met him for the first time recently.
We sit down at lunch and I'm like
all right, so I don't know what the
neuroscience behind this is.
But people feel safe and protected when
they say no.
They feel better.
They're more likely to collaborate. And
then plus we know
weird. Well, the other thing that's
crazy that we know for sure is
like when you're exhausted mentally, you
could still say no. Mhm.
But yes is hard. Yes is hard or even as
answering how.
Like if if you
uh if if you're tired
and one of my colleagues did this to me
recently and I could instantly tell the
difference.
They wanted to follow up with me when I
was exhausted and I knew that if they'd
asked me, "What are you thinking?" What?
Great question, trigger deep thinking. I
didn't have the mental gas in the tank
to answer that question.
But they answered me a question that was
built around no and I went boom boom
boom boom boom. I laid it all out. I was
like, "Wow."
I don't I don't know how that happens.
I just know it does.
And we've seen time after time
if I need to close a deal
at all
especially if I know that you're tired
instead of saying, "Do you agree? Do you
want to do this? Are you in favor of
this?"
I say, "Do you Do you disagree? Is this
a bad idea? Are you against this? Is
this ridiculous?"
And you'll either go, "No, let's do it."
Or you'll go, "No, but here are the
problems." And you'll lay them all out
for me.
And feel no obligation.
Which means you're going to lay them out
to me honestly. Like if I say, "Do you
agree with this?"
You're going to afraid to say, "Yes, but
here are the problems." cuz you feel
that yes is an obligation.
And you're going to be worried about
digging yourself deeper in by saying
anything after that.
But having said no
you feel you have no obligation.
Think it might be that simple. So, you
will you will lay the rest of the stuff
out
not being worried about digging yourself
into a hole.
It's really interesting that some part
of our brain is tracking
the even though it's not like obviously
a contract, but that some part of our
brain is like
yeah, we've just agreed to that and now
I have a sense of obligation and they
have the right to like take me to task
on it.
Very interesting. Yeah. Yeah, and we
stumbled over that one by by accident
and it is just
the the good and the bad about getting
people to say no is it makes such a huge
difference in all interactions
that sometimes that's the only thing
somebody learns.
And we're like look, there is so much
more here. Like I know you're making a
lot more money now.
And you're doing better than anybody
that you see around you.
But you're not doing as good as you
could be doing and you cannot stop
there.
But a lot of people, I see it all the
time. They just learn how to trigger no
instead of yes
and they're instantly significantly more
successful.
And they quit there. They don't keep
going.
All right, what then if you were going
to bring this all together?
If no is that first bit that shows
people like whoa, you can frame this in
a new way.
What are the the few key tenants of like
all right, if you had to bestow quickly
upon somebody what the core tenants of
the Black Swan way are? Yeah, you know,
let the other side go first.
Um
and then
you know, the cliche, the other side's
got to talk five times as much as you.
Not twice as much, five times as much.
It doesn't mean that you go
uh
that you go mute.
You drop in occasionally.
You let the other person know that
whatever they're thinking is it's okay
to share it.
Like
one of our favorite things, you got to
have some go-to labels.
Go-to labels?
Yeah, the label is one of our
negotiation techniques. Seems like,
sounds like, looks like, feels like.
No matter what anybody says, you can say
"Seems like he had a reason for saying
that."
Like no matter what they say.
"I hate you and everything you stand
for."
Seems like he got a reason for saying
that.
It's disarming.
They'll talk with you about it.
"I want to do business with you and I
want to deal with you right now."
Seems like he had a reason for saying
that.
"Well, yeah, here's why I want to do
business with you."
Um
one one of my son came up with again,
like brilliant guy. We you know, we
would not be our team without him.
Clients call on a phone.
Say, "How are you today?"
"How are you today?" is a diagnostic.
They want to know if they could talk if
you're in a mood to talk about what they
want to talk about.
Brandon's response is,
"Seems like you got something on your
mind."
"Yes, as a MATTER OF FACT." YOU KNOW,
cuz they've been they've been planning
this call.
"How are you today?" is not like
genuinely how some people really want to
know, but most people want to know, "Are
you prepared to listen to what I have on
my mind?"
"How are you?" is a temperature check.
Are you in a bad mood? Cuz I'm wasting
my time. You're in a good mood, we could
talk.
And you don't the only pushback you ever
got on that
was he had a guy say, "Yeah, you know,
there's stuff I want to talk about.
Really, I want to know how you are
today."
So Brandon said, "Yeah, I'm good, you
know." And talked about it and then they
got down to business.
So,
you know,
the more you encourage the other side to
talk,
the more likely it is that you're going
to get to this moment of collaboration
quicker.
Never be so sure of what you want that
you wouldn't take something better. How
do you get something better? You get the
other side to talk.
You spend a lot less time talking
and appreciate that they're bringing
something to the table that you could
use. The black swan, the tiny little
thing that's going to change everything.
You trigger that,
you're going to make great deals.
And that's it. That's we've got our our
basic principles.
Chris, I found your book just
so interesting and it makes me want to
really go back through this stuff over
and over and over picking up the
different using how's, watching out for
your why's, getting people to know,
getting them to talk more.
Um
it's really incredible that this stuff
works in the most tense situations
possible. That you can use it in the
board room. I am definitely going to be
using it with my team, with my wife. Uh
it's
it's about human wiring. Yeah.
That's that's what I find so interesting
about
Yeah, thank you. Pleasure, man. And I'd
like to offer way for people want more
from the Black Swan Group, how how do
they get it?
You tell me.
You know, we got everybody's got a
newsletter.
Um everybody's got a free newsletter.
That's not what makes ours valuable.
Ours is concise.
Like most newsletters, you got 10
choices.
Ours is complimentary, but the value is
the fact that it's concise.
You're going to get one scenario,
specific application. And plus we got a
whole library. We got job negotiations
in the past. We got leadership
application, whatever you need.
So, the Black Swan website is
blackswanltd.com.
Upper right hand corner of the the home
screen is a tab for the blog. The blog
is the edge. Sign up for the edge. You
get an email to you on a Tuesday morning
after you got Monday behind you, but
it's concise.
And it's free. And a lot of people get a
long way. It's a great compliment to the
book.
We got a bunch of other stuff that's
free, too.
You You take the free stuff.
You know, buy the book, take the free
stuff, see where that gets you. Yeah, if
it's for you, then you can dig in
and learn more. Would it be crazy to get
people to sign up for something free
At all.
Now, now we've got them. Now we've got
them. Somehow I'm compelled to say no,
and I feel so much better
I feel secure. I feel safe. I have this
feeling of safety now.
It's like drinking a Starbucks latte.
There's a funny
comedic video along those lines
recently. So you know, you're safe if
you drinking a latte. The The police
aren't going to beat you up if you're if
you're drinking a Starbucks.
That's the key.
That's hilarious.
All right, anything else you want to uh
people with? They're going to the
newsletter, they're going to sign up for
the edge, they're ready to rock and
roll. Anything else?
Go through your catalog of podcasts and
go back and listen to the stuff you
haven't listened to yet. Very kind. I
will say read your book, Never Split the
Difference. It is phenomenal.
Speaking of which, guys, the book really
is amazing. The tactics, I haven't
started deploying them yet, so I can't
swear they work, but when you hear the
stories, it is very compelling. And as I
ran through them in my own mind, it
actually did make me feel differently.
Uh so, I invite you guys to try the
stuff out. And like you said, don't just
stop at getting people to say no, dive
into this stuff because the ability to
um
help people get to and he he's very
careful to talk about this in the book,
that you're not trying to get people
into where they're losing, but you are
and you're not trying to get win-win
either. He's careful to talk about that
as well.
Uh but you're getting them to a place
where they feel good at the end of the
exchange. Um it's really some pretty
powerful insights into human nature. For
that, Chris Voss, I thank you very much
for coming on the show Thanks, brother.
and uh for being a part of this. And to
all of you at home, I hope that you
enjoyed this and you got as much out of
it as I have. And until next time, my
friends, be legendary. Take care. Peace.