Video summary
Dr. Marc Brackett, a professor of psychology at Yale University and director of the Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence, joins Andrew Huberman to redefine emotion regulation not as eliminating feelings but as establishing a wise relationship with them to achieve life goals. Dr. Brackett introduces his formula ER = G + S (Goals plus Strategies) functioning across three domains: Emotion, Person, and Context. He emphasizes that while all emotions are valid signals—such as anxiety indicating uncertainty about the future or anger signaling perceived injustice—their expression must be context-specific. A key distinction is made between self-awareness and obsessive rumination; Dr. Brackett argues that constantly checking in with one's feelings throughout the day is unproductive, whereas regulation becomes essential when emotions shift due to environmental changes or interpersonal conflicts, requiring immediate strategic choices rather than constant monitoring. The conversation highlights how deeply personal assumptions and upbringing shape our emotional responses, often creating barriers like fear of happiness or suppression of anger based on gender roles learned in childhood. Dr. Brackett illustrates this with an anecdote about his reaction to a bird flying into a window versus imagining the same scenario for a female animal, revealing unconscious biases that can hinder effective regulation. He stresses that strategies must be tailored to the individual's neurotype and history; what works for one person may not work for another because of their specific developmental programming. Furthermore, he warns against "quick fix" mentalities seen in social media influencers who claim they are throwing away anxiety, noting that emotions cannot simply be discarded but must be managed through cognitive reappraisal, reframing, or distancing techniques to prevent dysregulation and improve performance. A central theme of the discussion is the necessity for a universal nomenclature regarding emotions to bridge gaps between different generations and social groups within hierarchical institutions like schools and workplaces. Dr. Brackett advocates for systemic approaches where leaders, teachers, students, and parents share the same language about emotional intelligence, moving away from judgmental labels toward curiosity and empathy. He references his work on "coregulation," which aims to instill resilience in children by helping them feel capable of managing their own emotions rather than coddling them or projecting parental fears onto them. This approach is supported by evidence showing that these skills predict success in well-being, leadership, decision-making, and mental health outcomes, suggesting a cultural shift where emotional intelligence becomes as standard as physical fitness education. To make this work tangible, Dr. Brackett draws parallels between the phases of building physical fitness and developing an identity around emotional regulation. He describes his own journey with exercise, moving from a learning phase to seeing changes in sleep and relationships before reaching an "identity phase" where healthy habits become non-negotiable parts of who he is. This process mirrors the development of emotional skills, which requires consistent practice over time rather than intense bursts that lead to burnout or self-sabotage. The dialogue concludes with a game called "Point of Connection," designed to foster deep listening and understanding among strangers by sharing personal stories and values, reinforcing Dr. Brackett's belief that knowing someone's story reduces judgment and increases compassion, ultimately creating the civil society needed for everyone to thrive.
Read the full video transcript
A lot of people think emotion regulation
is getting rid of a feeling. It's not
what it is. It's just having another
relationship to it. I've had anxiety or
live with it for a lot of my life,
but sometimes I just say hello to it.
It's like, "Hey, how you doing today?"
And it goes away pretty quickly or it
just sits there. I think that's the
other thing about emotion regulation
that people kind of misunderstand. They
think it's like, "I got to check in with
how I'm feeling all day long and then
regulate. Check in regulate." Like you'd
become psychotic if you did that all day
long. Most of the time our emotions are
in the background. You know, like if you
thought about your feelings all day
long, you wouldn't be able to do this
podcast. Like that's unproductive.
Emotions matter when there's a shift in
our environment or the relationships,
you know. If you said something that
offended me, boom, I'm activated. I'm
feeling angry or kind of shocked. Then I
have to make a choice in that moment,
like how do I manage it? That's where
the magic happens.
Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast
where we discuss science [music]
and science-based tools for everyday
life.
I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor
of neurobiology and ophthalmology at
Stanford School of Medicine. My guest
today is Dr. Marc Brackett. Dr. Marc
Brackett is a professor of psychology at
Yale University where he is also the
director of Yale Center for Emotional
Intelligence. He's an expert in the
science of emotions and how to apply
that to improve communication and
relationships and performance in school
and work. One common problem around
discussions of emotions and emotional
intelligence is that they are often
vague and frankly somewhat soft and
cliche. But not when Marc Brackett
explains emotional intelligence as he
does today because he talks about the
practical tools that emerge from the
science of emotional intelligence that
you can use to improve your emotional
life both with yourself and with others.
And he's not just going to tell us to
feel our emotions more deeply. While
that could be important in certain
settings, his His in and out of the
laboratory is really focused on the
small things that we can all do both in
moments of emotion, but also on our own
that can greatly increase our ability to
understand what we're feeling,
communicate it effectively, and to be
better listeners, especially in moments
that would otherwise create tension or
confusion. In fact, what he shares today
are life skills, the sort of life skills
that make everything, school,
friendships, romantic relationships,
professional life, and family life far
more effective and enriching. So, I'm
confident that you'll come away from
today's episode with Marc Brackett
knowing what to do and when to use the
tools that you'll learn, and they are
indeed very powerful to improve your
life. Before [snorts] we begin, I'd like
to emphasize that this podcast is
separate from my teaching and research
roles at Stanford. It is, however, part
of my desire and effort to bring zero
cost to consumer information about
science and science-related tools to the
general public. In keeping with that
theme, today's episode does include
sponsors.
And now for my discussion with Dr. Marc
Brackett. Dr. Marc Brackett, welcome.
Thank you. Glad to be back. So much to
discuss today about emotion regulation,
about
the kids, the future. Are the kids all
right? They could be better. Mhm.
And our
obligation,
our generation, other generations in
you know, providing a world where kids
can thrive and where everyone can
thrive. It's It's a bit of a mess out
there, but you're going to put some
clarification on things for people.
You're doing amazing work to give people
tools for emotion regulation
and more. So, let's start off and define
emotion regulation. What is that? Yeah.
Well, I think
the simplest way to define it is using
your emotions wisely to achieve your
goals in life.
It's a little bit too broad.
And so, it's funny. As I was writing my
book, I decided, I need a formula.
And so, my formula is ER, which is
emotion regulation,
is a set of goals and strategies. So,
it's ER {parentheses} G + S.
And that equals a function of
E + P + C.
>> [snorts]
>> You know, made me feel smart.
Emotion Mhm. person, context. Mhm.
So, what I mean by that specifically is
that it's a goal-oriented process. You
have to want to regulate.
You can prevent unwanted emotions.
I have an acronym for that, too. It's
PRIME. You can prevent unwanted
emotions. You can reduce the difficult
ones.
I think people forget the I, initiate
emotions. Like, when you're teaching or
leading or presenting, like, you want to
create an emotion in the room that's
upregulating. You can maintain an
emotion. Like, you know, what? I'm
having a good day.
Going to avoid these things to just keep
it going.
Savor the moment. And then there's
enhancing, which is kind of boosting an
emotion. So, that's PRIME. That's the
goals.
The strategies we can talk about
for hours. Um, we'll get into that a
little bit later.
And then I think what most people
misunderstand is that
like, what we
regulate are emotions. And like, what I
do, for example, to deal with my anxiety
is really different than my anger
than my worry
or other emotions. And that it's a
function of the emotion you're feeling.
It's a function of me as an individual,
you know.
I am on the neurotic side.
Uh, I'm on the introverted side. And so,
my strategy selection would be
influenced by that. And then the
context. Like, right here, right now.
Like, I know you're into fitness and
like, running and, you know, all this
kind of stuff.
I'm like, Andrew, you know, I'm really
nervous right now. Like, do you mind if
we take a break and I go for a run?
You're like, you know, it's a little
weird, Mark. So, context matters. You
got to You're like, right now, if I were
anxious, it's like, Mark,
you got to use some cognitive strategies
or breathing work. I can't go anywhere,
so I'm stuck. And I think people need to
see that kind of full spectrum.
I feel like there's a close tie between
emotion regulation and self-awareness.
Yeah, but I feel like there's a
tension between self-awareness and being
able to experience and enjoy life. For
instance,
if I'm feeling anxious,
I I'm thinking about how I'm appearing,
how I'm sounding, that it's
uncomfortable.
Uh but if I get totally outside of that
and just
be in the experience that I'm in,
uh
then there's the potential to say the
wrong thing, or you know, uh
offend somebody, or who knows. So, when
we talk about emotion regulation, what's
the best approach to that that doesn't
keep us in a subtext in our mind and and
sort of out of the room? Because when
we're alone, it's quite a bit different.
We can we can breathe, we can use
whatever self-regulation tools we want.
Or ruminate, uh or write, or you know,
or text or call a friend, whatever it
is, but when we're at work, at school,
uh on a podcast, if if there's that
subtext, like, uh I'm I'm not locked in
here, I'm not in the experience
completely, I'm I'm I'm self-regulating
or paying attention to myself, that can
be very uncomfortable in its own right.
It's work. Yeah. It's effortful.
Uh and not always the best effort if
it's going down the rabbit hole. I think
that you're getting at, which is this
mindset piece,
that the first step is our mindset about
our feelings.
So, let me ask you, what's your mindset
around anxiety?
Mhm.
Um
I
Well, I have assumptions around it. I
was telling someone the other day, if
because I spend a lot of time alone, and
I'm fairly introverted, but if I go into
a crowded environment, for the first 5 6
minutes, I'm feeling kind of
overwhelmed, like, "Wow, it's is crowded
in here. There are a lot of people." And
I I actually feel like I have a bit of a
uh social interaction disorder for those
first few minutes.
But then after about 20, 30 minutes, I'm
in that experience and I'm feel like I
very comfortable. So, I have this
mindset that social anxiety is something
that um is like wading into water. It's
always a little bit too cold at first or
usually it's a little too cold, but over
time you acclimate.
All right, you didn't answer the
question. Okay.
>> [laughter]
>> So, let's try to rephrase it another
way. What's your relationship to
anxiety? I hate it. Okay. There you go.
See how your automatic was like, "I hate
anxiety."
I did too for most of my life.
And then I was with a friend who is a
neuroscientist about anxiety and she
said to me, "Mark, tell me
all the things that make you anxious." I
said, "Well, I'm anxious about
fundraising.
And you know, I got to raise the money
to keep the research going. I'm anxious
to make sure I want to make sure that
like everything we do is high quality."
And I went on and on. And then she asked
me another question. She said, "Well,
what do those
have in common?"
I'm like, "What are you talking about?"
And then I thought about it and I said,
"Well,
those are things that are important to
me."
And so she said, "So, why would anxiety
be a bad thing?"
And I think that we have to learn how to
adopt a mindset around emotions that
there are no bad emotions. It's what we
do with our emotions that makes them
harmful or difficult for us to live our
lives. But anxiety
is a good thing. It's saying there's
perceived uncertainty around the future.
Like, "I'm anxious about how I'm going
to act in this environment or how I'm
going to be perceived in this
environment." It's not a bad thing cuz
you want to be perceived well.
But if you automatically assume it's
bad,
then
it's going to put you on the path to
dysregulation.
So, if we accept the idea that all
emotions are okay. Yeah. But that the
expression of all emotions is
in every context is not okay. That it
should be context specific.
>> Yes. Um I actually think that provides
some freedom. I can feel that freedom.
Like it's okay to be super angry. It's
okay to be frustrated. It's okay to be
anxious. Uh but how that's expressed is
what's critical.
Uh it makes good intuitive sense. I
think that what's hard to know
is what to do with the emotion
if there is no outward expression of it.
Like like where should it go? Well, it
doesn't have to go anywhere sometimes.
Sometimes it can just be. Mhm. And
that's a big part of regulation, which
is that a lot of people think emotion
regulation is getting rid of a feeling.
It's not what it is. It's just having
another relationship to it. Like I've
been I'm 56.
I've had anxiety, lived with it for a
lot of my life.
But sometimes I just say hello to it.
It's like, "Hey, how you doing today?"
And it goes away pretty quickly. Or it
just sits there. I think that's the
other thing about emotion regulation
that people kind of misunderstand. They
think it's like, "I got to check in with
how I'm feeling all day long and then
regulate. Check in regulate." Like you'd
become psychotic if you did that all day
long. Most of the time our emotions are
in the background. You know, like if you
thought about your feelings all day
long, you wouldn't be able to do this
podcast. Like that's unproductive.
Emotions matter when there's a shift in
our environment or the relationships,
you know. If you said something that
offended me, boom, I'm activated. I'm
feeling angry or kind of shocked. Then I
have to make a choice in that moment,
like how do I manage it? That's where
the magic happens. But on a day-to-day
basis, thank God we're not, you know,
we wouldn't want to do that.
I would like to take a quick break and
acknowledge one of our sponsors, Joovv.
Joovv makes medical grade red light
therapy devices.
Now, if there's one thing that I have
consistently emphasized on this podcast,
it's the incredible impact that light
can have on our biology and our health.
Now, in addition to sunlight, which I've
talked about a lot on this podcast, red
light, near infrared, and infrared light
have been specifically shown to have
positive effects on improving numerous
aspects of cellular and organ health.
These include faster muscle recovery,
improved skin health, wound healing,
improvements in acne, reduced pain and
inflammation, improved mitochondrial
function, and even improvements in
vision. Nowadays, there are a lot of red
light devices out there, but what sets
Joovv lights apart, and why they're my
preferred red light therapy device, is
that they use clinically proven
wavelengths, meaning they use the
specific wavelength of red light, near
infrared, and infrared light in
combination to trigger the optimal
cellular adaptations. Personally, I use
the Joovv whole body panel about three
to four times a week, usually for about
10 to 20 minutes per session, and I use
the Joovv handheld light both at home
and when I travel. If you would like to
try Joovv, they're offering up to $400
off select products for listeners of
this podcast. To learn more, visit
Joovv, spelled j o o v v dot com slash
Huberman. Again, that's j o o v v dot
com slash Huberman. Today's episode is
also brought to us by Lingo. One of the
most important factors in your short and
long-term health is your body's ability
to manage glucose over time. Glucose
directly impacts our brain function,
mood, and energy. You want your glucose
relatively stable across the day without
big peaks or valleys. This is why I use
the continuous glucose monitor and app
from Lingo by Abbott. Lingo provides
minute-by-minute glucose data directly
within the app, showing you how your
glucose responds to food, exercise, and
stress. This information can help you
make smarter choices to support your
health both now and in the long term.
The CDC estimates that more than one in
three American adults has prediabetes,
and that many of these people don't know
they are living with prediabetes.
Visibility about how your diet and
activity affect your glucose can be the
first step toward informed conversations
with your doctor and making smarter
daily choices. If you'd like to try
Lingo, Lingo is offering Huberman Lab
listeners in the US and UK 10% off a
4-week plan. Just visit
hellolingo.com/huberman
for more information. Terms and
conditions apply. Again, that's
hellolingo.com/huberman.
I'd love to poke at some of the
assumptions that I know I have, but I
wonder if other people have as well.
>> My dad's from South America, and I
remember long ago he said because he
went to formal schools, um he said that
he was raised with this terrible idea.
He called it terrible. That um if
somebody was happy, and they smiled a
lot, that they were stupid. And I said,
"What is that about?" And he said,
"Well, that came, in his words, from the
British school system where uh the idea
was that you were supposed to be um
skeptical of things. And that if you
were happy or happy-go-lucky,
and you weren't drinking,
that people would assume that you were
an idiot because you weren't bothered by
the problems in the world, and you were
accepting of the things that you heard
and were told. In other words, you're an
idiot."
And my dad's a very happy person now,
and
he has talked about, you know, having to
break that mold, that like it's okay to
wake up and take a walk and and be
happy. That it's okay to be happy and so
I That's just one thing that I I think I
grew up thinking, too, and maybe not to
that extreme, that that if especially in
academia, like if you're not just like
to be happy is to not be discerning.
It's a totally false, right?
>> Of course. And now, we're a long way
from England right now. Um
uh and that's probably something more of
my dad's generation than mine, but I
think
the idea nowadays does seem to be that
if you're happy-go-lucky and you're
feeling good,
that you must not be thinking about all
the terrible things going on in the
world, or that it's insensitive to those
that are suffering, etc., etc. I'd love
your thoughts on this this idea that we
don't give ourselves permission to feel
as good as we might feel
because of some social pressure or
assumptions that we've internalized.
Which is all learned.
And so this is these are learned
phenomenon.
And it's sometimes
outside influence. So talk about
happiness. You know, as I was writing,
and I was doing the chapter on mindsets
around emotion, and talking about this
relationship with different emotions.
And you know, we could play around with
this all day long. I could say, "What's
your relationship to anger?
What's your relationship to happiness
and contentment?" And all of a sudden
you start realizing, "Wow, I have a
complicated relationship with my
emotions."
And I was thinking about it with
happiness, too. And for me, what's
interesting, which is different
completely from your dad's, is because
of my kind of tough childhood and a lot
of bullying,
is that I would go to school one day and
I would be happy. And I'd see the
bullies, and all of a sudden they'd say
things like, "You know, what are you so
happy about today, Bracket?"
And I didn't realize that
until I was writing. And then I would
get on stage and give a I do a lot of
public speaking.
And I'd be standing there like feeling
really good with my speaking.
And then I'd get the applause at the
end, and I would start kind of looking
down.
And I started realizing,
I'm uncomfortable being happy.
Like I'm I'm waiting for something to go
wrong
because, you know, in my childhood, like
happy meant like, you know, we're going
to bring you down. We all have these
kind of developmental
um connections, for lack of a better
term, to our different emotions.
And I think that
it gets back to the phenomenon. There's
no good or bad emotions.
Life Firstly, some of it is genetic and
biological, you know, our proclivity to
experience certain emotions.
The regulation piece is all learned.
Like you're not born with a you know,
a pocket full of evidence-based
strategies to regulate
>> [laughter]
>> Like
you know, I don't know about you growing
up, you know, my father was very
different. My father was the angry guy
and he'd say, "Son, you got to toughen
up."
I'm like, "Dad, look at me, you know,
come on. Let's move on. It's not
happening."
And you know that I have a 5th degree
black belt, I became the tough guy that
my father wanted me to be, but
nevertheless, you know,
what does that even mean?
But, you know, growing up when I was
struggling, my parents missed a lot of
the cues. Come down the stairs, I didn't
have my father say, "Son, I'm noticing a
shift in your emotions today. Your
posture's different. Your facial
expression is different. Let me give you
a research-based strategy to help you
regulate your anxiety, stress, pressure,
fear."
No, it was just There was no
It wasn't even a construct.
I mean, I don't know, but did you grow
up with a
a concept of emotion regulation?
Definitely. You did? And it
>> was There was a big gender split. In my
home, I had the
sort of belief
uh based on the context that women could
express their emotions, big or small,
and that uh
men weren't supposed to lose their
temper. Men weren't supposed to uh be
angry. That's interesting. It's kind of
counter to the way people think about it
nowadays, right?
>> Oh, yeah. The men are like the more
power you have, the more anger you can
express.
>> Oh, the complete opposite of that. In
fact, and I don't think he'll mind, my
dad's been on this podcast and we have a
great relationship uh now, and um and
we've done work and it's been awesome. I
mean, it's really it really has. I mean,
uh
and I remember when I was a kid, if he
got angry, he would blink. And I And now
I know that as like behavioral
suppression, you know? Um he was like
blinking, but I can't ever remember my
dad having an outburst ever.
So I just internalize this idea like
okay, you you don't have outbursts. But
I have a certain side of my family that
my extended family that's
from New Jersey. Oh, okay. Yeah. Where
words are sometimes used as weapons.
Okay.
>> And [clears throat] anger is a bit more
outward sometimes at least in that side.
And then I have a South American side
where things are more
you know, formal and boxed away and and
I think I internalized a bit of both and
and
so I have all sorts of constructs around
who's allowed to express
emotions and what extremes but now I
didn't observe a lot of uh
anger or maybe a little suppression.
Lots of suppression. Lots of
suppression.
>> regulation. It just Yeah. Not the
adaptive kind usually. Right. Right. And
I you know, I probably averaged two you
know, in my own life. But in terms of
happiness, I I think uh the same thing
now that I I think about it that um so
okay
for
women to be fully expressive and for men
to be you know, it's a bit more of the
you know, it's kind of the 1950s model
was that was very present in in my home
and in my mind. In my mind. Yeah. Yeah,
I can think with happiness as with any
emotion
it's about
like the time and the place for
happiness. Like you can't we have
research that shows that people who
strive to be happy all the time actually
are more miserable.
Because it's hard to
live up to that all the time.
You know, people who strive for more
contentment in their life actually seem
to have greater well-being.
Um and so I just think again, it goes
back to these mindsets around emotions
that
there's no good or bad emotion.
Anger is fine.
Obviously if it's too intense and it's
lasting too long, it's probably not
going to be good. Happiness is something
that we should, you know, experience,
but you know, if we're attached to it,
it's going to be problematic because
every day is not a sunny day. There are
rainy days, too, and you got to be
comfortable with the rainy days.
And
the important thing also is not just our
feelings about our feelings. It's also
about our mindsets around our capacity
to deal with those feelings. Like, do I
believe I am capable of managing my
anger? Do I believe I'm capable of
dealing with the disappointment? And we
find a distribution of scores for that,
too. Like, going back to my dad, we have
very different fathers. My father would
say things like, "Son, this is where I
deal with my anger. You're going to have
to get used to it."
You know, I would say now, like, "Sounds
like you got a fixed mindset, dad. Like,
there are other options, you know, to to
deal with your anger." But he was sort
of like, "This is the way I am. You're
going to have to deal with it. No
learning interests."
Whereas nowadays, I hope to help people
see, "Wait a minute.
Is that emotion working for you in your
relationships or not? If it's not,
there are alternatives."
We were talking about boys and men quite
a bit already here. So, maybe we just
continue in that in that direction, even
though we will touch on um
uh girls and women and uh emotions as it
relates to them, too. I I hear a lot
nowadays [clears throat]
about
problems for boys and young men in
emotion regulation, in defining
masculinity. Um I'm obviously interested
in this, but I also acknowledge that I'm
Gen X. I was born in 1975. Things were
very different, and I and I know I have
a giant blind spot to their experience,
right? I just do. I acknowledge that
because
I don't really have a finger on the
pulse of of what life is like for a
15-year-old or 12-year-old or
20-year-old guy out there. What are the
pain points and what's going right?
Yeah, there's a lot going on and I think
probably the big issue here with gender
is vulnerability.
That historically, this is not just now,
this is going back to when we were kids,
when our parents were kids, you know,
go back to other periods in
you know, in the in time is that
vulnerability, especially for men, is
weak. You got to be tough. You you're
the, you know,
the person who has to, you know, make
the ends meet. You're the, you know, the
hunter-gatherer.
And obviously times have changed and
what we find is that
the thought
today for many boys and men
to be
emotional, firstly emotional alone has a
connotation of feminine and out of
control.
That's just the way people think about
it.
>> Still? Yes. Really? Wow. When you say,
"Don't be so emotional."
It's
considered to be a negative thing. It's
considered to be feminine and it's
considered to be like a hysterical.
Um that's why we I call emotions skills,
not emotional skills.
>> [snorts]
>> That's anyway. So, vulnerability is a a
big piece of it. Let's
This is going to be a great conversation
between two guys. So,
what's your relationship to
vulnerability?
Totally context dependent. Okay. I mean,
there are people who um not afraid at
all to
cry in front of. Mhm. And there are
contexts and people that I would never
cry. I mean, I've cried on very public
podcasts, too. Mhm. Maybe three. One
here, when Martha Beck came on, she
really
she uh she wasn't trying, but uh you
know, it was happening. And then on
Steven Bartlett's podcast, I think
perhaps on another and it was tough. I
mean, it was I I didn't want to watch
those clips, but I'm glad I did it. Um
Uh so it's totally context-dependent.
Yeah, and that makes sense.
What I'm really pushing for is like
around emotion and about talking about
feelings. Mhm.
And so
what we find is that boys generally feel
more inhibited just saying how they
feel, especially when it comes to kind
of the sad, disappointment,
you know, ashamed emotions. It's much
easier to express the anger, you know,
and the outwardly expressive emotions,
but the deep ones that are
self-conscious,
you know, that make you vulnerable,
um tends to be tough. And uh and the
question is why is that the case? What
are your hypotheses? Why would it be
that so many boys feel
like they're going to be perceived as
feminine if they say they're
disappointed or sad
or ashamed?
What immediately comes to mind is
that somehow
it is linked with
the word incapable or incapability.
Exactly.
There's an incredible video of David
Goggins breaking down crying on stage.
Um and he was celebrated for that.
But David Goggins did a lot of things
beforehand.
>> And no one denies his capability.
>> Yeah. His ability.
Uh so when he cried it was like,
"Awesome. He's willing to go to this
really hard place." Yet another
difficult thing that David can do that
most people can't do.
>> And you just go like, "Awesome." And
he's owning it. And
I step back from that and realize
that we already knew former Navy SEAL,
went from 300-plus pounds to this fit
individual, like
you know, Goggins. He's a verb, an
adjective, and and a you know, and a
pronoun, right? So it's like
you know, if someone else just breaks
down on stage, you know,
okay, of
"I hope this guy can make it in life."
That's the the narrative.
>> like weak. You worry sometimes for
people like that. I don't worry about
David Goggins. Because he's a superstar
and we have a different mindset around
him again. And so he has the permission
to do whatever the hell he wants.
Yeah, that permission thing, if you'll
forgive me, but this this notion of
earned the right,
I mean, there are
people like James Cameron who wrote all
these movies, most famous for like doing
all these super difficult things, and
then a few years back was like
claiming that testosterone poisoned men
and that his testosterone was the worst
thing and everyone that liked his movies
said, "Hey, [clears throat] listen, easy
for you to say now. You built that
career
on some of that."
So, it wasn't, in my opinion, taken that
seriously.
He may not like it if he hears this, but
like I'm like, "Pff, that's like when
our colleagues are like, 'Oh, I'm no
longer going to publish in Nature and
Science. I'm going to go to these like,
you know, these [snorts] open-source
journals.'" Like, you got in the
National Academy on Nature and Science
papers, so like, you're not kidding
anybody. Well, that you're making an
important point, which is that once you,
you know, I always find it interesting
with celebrities, once they become
super famous, I can now disclose, you
know, I've been depressed or I've been
anxious or I've been overwhelmed, but
for some reason, you know, they didn't
want to take that risk when they were
younger in their careers because again,
the perception is like, "Oh, anxiety,
depression,
whatever it is, that's weak."
And so, that's the point. The point is
is that we raise kids,
boys in particular, to believe that
these feminine type emotions, which are
not feminine by nature, they're just
human emotions, are weak. And therefore,
that means I'm going to be perceived as
not only weak,
but potentially homosexual,
and that's also a stigma. And so, what
do I do? I suppress. I deny. I ignore.
Interestingly enough,
for women, what the research shows is
that much less likely to suppress or
deny,
much more likely to ruminate. A couple
of things. First of all, I I feel like,
and I could be wrong, but I feel like
the the stereotype of gay men
being feminine has fallen away somewhat.
You know, I grew up as
you know, in the skateboarding
community, there's Brian Anderson. He
had this big expose in the not expose
where they exposed him where he
voluntarily, you know, came out in the
New York Times. And he's like he's one
of the most aggressive, you know, you
know, skateboarders out there.
Aggressive in the skateboarding, right?
So, and he's big dude, you know. So, I
feel like that stereotype is kind of
shifted a bit where people
assume that there's a range.
I think you're ambitious there.
I think you're right. I mean, we know
So, being gay is still
Yeah, for sure. Hm. Okay. I mean, if you
ask
100 people to
uh run like a gay man,
they're still caught in the Revenge of
the Nerds.
>> Yeah. They're going to They're going to
show you someone who's, you know, more
feminine or, you know, kind of
stereotypically feminine, to be honest
with you.
So, while there, you know, we know, I
mean, certainly
I remember
um
when I was 18, I went to a gay bar,
and I I I grew up in New Jersey. It was
very homophobic. The only gay person I
really knew was my mother's hairdresser,
who was very flamboyant.
And then I went to this gay bar, and I
was like, "Oh my god, there's like Wall
Street executives here. You know,
there's football players there." It was
a total, you know,
um shift in my perception.
Nevertheless, if you ask the majority of
people, it's still considered to be, you
know, the mindset is
feminine. Got it. Yeah, I guess if you
um grew up training in gyms, which I
did, you're around a lot of like very
strong uh physically strong
>> Yeah. um gay men. Cuz they're the they
were kind of early to the gym culture,
you know, as a uh
so so maybe my my lens on that is a
little distorted. There's something
interesting around this notion of
um
showing emotion
and boys. And we earlier we were talking
about the movie Stand by Me, movie I
absolutely love. And it's just like a
perfect story. It's a Stephen King
story, right, turned into a movie. Um
I think Rob Reiner wrote that movie.
Um uh
and
what's interesting about that movie is
the transition be cuz that happens right
around puberty and between junior high
It's right before junior high school or
Oh, it's between junior high and high
school. I can't remember. Some some
transition and the kids are at different
developmental stages. I feel like this
is a big part of it where like let's say
a kid is
um
a little bit more emotional, a little
more um
coddled at home, perhaps. This is I'm
making a lot of assumptions here. And
cries in front of a group of boys when
you're in the seventh or eighth grade.
Some of those boys are
are because of their stage of
maturation, they're not really little
kids anymore. They're like, "Dude, what
are you doing?"
And then
you've mixed all those kids together and
because of the way that schools and
social dynamics are, that can stay with
a kid for a long time. Like being sort
of having an emotional expression
that can stick with you for like two,
three years of school, right? So I feel
like some of this stuff comes about that
way, which is very different than like
an
um just
I guess like a hypothetical scenario uh
an adult male um in the business place.
Maybe he's new at you know, where
there's things tend to uh equalize a bit
in terms of maturational stage. And so
these are two different things. Boys
crying versus young men crying versus
grown men cry.
>> Again, this is all nurture.
So if you go to schools that do our
work, I just interviewed a bunch of
teenage boys actually.
It'll blow your mind. They have a whole
different perception of emotion.
I I ask them these questions about men
and boys and you know
and their responses are like huh?
Like what's wrong with crying? Like
if you feel like crying you cry. Like
are you sure? You know, even I No no
ridicule. No ridicule.
I said, "Well, what if you get into a
fight? Can you like
talk to the kid about what happened and
like tell them how you felt when they
left you out?" And they're like
of course, that's what that's how we
grew up. That's But they grew up in a
school that took emotion seriously. They
gave them the skills and the resources
to do it. It reminds me actually, I
never forget this.
You know, since we're on this topic of
boys and men, I was
in the beginning of my career doing
training in emotional regulation in
London. Outside of London in a a very
kind of
rough and tough neighborhood.
And uh the headmistress, as they call it
back then, of the school, she looked at
me and she's like, "You know something,
Mark?
This program's going to turn the boys
into homosexuals." I'm like okay, like
where'd that come from? You know, like
I'm thinking to myself like you need a
lot more training than just emotional
intelligence, but I'll put that aside
for a minute. Anyhow,
I said, "You know, I'm here. So can we
just go and do it? Let me let me
demonstrate it."
Not a problem. They go in like a
fishbowl. Here I am like the teacher in
the middle of the room. I have like 25
teachers around me and like 20 kids in
the middle.
And I start sharing a story about my
life, whatever it was. I was about
probably feeling discouraged. I think it
was one of when I first got into the
martial arts, you know, it was tough. I
was not a tough boy and I was afraid of
my shadow and I had been then had all
this bullying and abuse and you know,
going to a karate studio was a big shock
for me. I happen to have an amazing
teacher who transformed my life and
became a career of mine in martial arts.
Anyhow,
I told the story about that about how I
failed my yellow belt and I just I hated
myself and like not only was I bullied,
but I couldn't even get a freaking
yellow belt. Discouraged, hopeless and
he's everybody's looking at me like
where's this going the teachers. The
kids were like glued. They loved hearing
the story.
And then I said,
I'm just curious.
Has anyone else ever felt the way I
felt?
And I said just raise your hand if
you've had that kind of feeling. Every
freaking kid in the classroom raised
their hand. And of course I look over at
that headmistress and I'm like, you
know, let's let's talk later.
Kids are dying to express their
emotions, boys and girls. We had we
we've just socialized it and it the
socialization piece is really important
because even the way fathers talk to
their
boy children, you know,
is different.
You know, it's the toughen up. It's the
da da da use more feeling words with
their with girls than with boys.
We're not born that way. We are
socialized into,
you know, having these complicated
relationships with sharing emotions, but
it's not something
that can't be modified with good
instruction.
You're saying this I'm realizing I
internalized so many things that skew my
perspective on this. I guess I should
say I'm relieved to hear that
expression of emotions among boys is
more accepted now. I think that's The
generation that's going through this
work, the kids who are growing up in
places that are not taking emotions
seriously are growing up in a more
or with a more stereotypical way of
viewing it.
It's got to be infused into your life.
You got to have these conversations. You
got to be in situations where like in
our work, just to give you an example,
like we're really rigorous about
teaching this stuff. This isn't just
sort of like Kumbaya sitting in a
circle. This is like
all right, everyone, we've got a problem
here. There's, you know, the gaga pit,
which is in these, you know, this thing
in schools, you know, there's a kid who
nobody is, you know, allowing to
participate. That kid feels awful.
What's our obligation? What are we
supposed to do to handle that? Imagine
you're that kid. Imagine you're the one
that nobody wants to be, you know, part
of the game.
Now we're going to get into groups and
we're going to think about A, what are
the feelings? B, what are the solutions?
What do you do for yourself? What do you
do for the other person? And it's like
rigorous conversations around the
techniques and they got to role play it.
And then we ask questions about the role
plays like, well, what if it goes wrong?
What happens if you say this and they
say go blank yourself? What do you do
then? And that's the kind of complex,
you know,
muscle building we're giving kids in
terms of dealing with emotions.
As many of you know, I've been taking
AG1 for nearly 15 years now. I
discovered it way back in 2012, long
before I ever had a podcast, and I've
been taking it every day since. The
reason I started taking it, and the
reason I still take it, is because AG1
is to my knowledge the highest quality
and most comprehensive of the
foundational nutritional supplements on
the market. It combines vitamins,
minerals, prebiotics, probiotics, and
adaptogens into a single scoop that's
easy to drink, and it tastes great. It's
designed to support things like gut
health, immune health, and overall
energy. And it does so by helping to
fill any gaps you might have in your
daily nutrition. Now, of course,
everyone should strive to eat nutritious
whole foods. I certainly do that every
day. But, I'm often asked if you could
take just one supplement, what would
that supplement be? And my answer is
always AG1, because it has just been oh
so critical to supporting all aspects of
my physical health, mental health, and
performance. I know this from my own
experience with AG1, and I continually
hear this from other people who use AG1
daily. If you would like to try AG1, you
can go to drinkag1.com/huberman
to get a special offer. For a limited
time, AG1 is giving away six free travel
packs of AG1 and a bottle of vitamin
D3K2 with your subscription. Again,
that's drinkag1 with the numeral one
{dot} com {slash} huberman to get six
free travel packs and a bottle of
vitamin D3K2 with your subscription.
There is a hardwired bias towards
rough-and-tumble play in males of all of
all species including ours. I think what
you're talking about a little bit is a
capacity also for kind of
rough-and-tumble
verbal and emotional exchange, which is
not necessarily like FU and this and
that like but some of that is
can be in jest.
Some of it can be really damaging.
There's a something interesting that I
learned a long time ago it even in
academia. He's now dead, but there was a
a very famous neuroscientist. I'll never
forget. Uh I went to my first McKnight
meeting. I was so like excited to be
there and he came over. He was you know,
he's
pretty large guy and he grabbed me.
He grabbed me and he and he goes, "So,
where are you I was picking between
laboratories between this place and that
place. He goes, "Where's it's going to
Where's it going to be?" And then he had
gave me his advice. And then
and that was a very comfortable exchange
for me cuz like I grew up with a lot of
physical interaction. Usually guys not
putting their arm around me and and like
tell me like, "So, what's it going to
be?" kind of thing. But
often times, you know, if I interact
with somebody that's kind of like an old
friend or something, there's they'll
grab my shoulder.
You know, just walking by. There's a lot
of just kind of physical interaction
that just happens. It certainly doesn't
feel weird or averse.
>> Sure.
And I could see if somebody for instance
was not used to like just a lot of
physical interaction
uh with other people that that could
feel like a lot. And so I'm wondering
nowadays where where are things with
respect to sort of just the amount of
physical interaction between kids? Are
they like just feeling and voicing their
emotions, but they're like at at a
physical distance? Or are they uh you
know, seeing one another in like
handshakes and hugs, what's up? And you
know, or like you know, just friendly,
the kind of physical banter. I think
it's cultural. It's there's a lot of
there's a lot going on there in terms
of, you know, the type of school and,
you know, where it is in the United
States or in the world.
You know, touch is a is a cultural
thing.
But I think, you know, what I want to
say about what you said
is that
rough and tumble is fine. Of course,
you know, rough and tumble.
But there's when it becomes a power
over, that's when it becomes a problem.
When you have no concern
for the emotional life of the other.
That's bullying. Yeah. Yeah, exactly.
>> Yeah. The dialogue that sort of
establishes hierarchy, I guess is what
if I'm really blunt about it. I just
feel like that just sort of just
happened naturally in my friend group
when I was a kid. Like there were some
kids who were more developed and more
athletic or better at this or better at
that. And
we just kind of all fell into place.
It wasn't necessarily about being at the
apex or being at the bottom.
>> There's no intention to harm. Yeah, we
we we sort of formed a a team where you
understood that yeah, this kid was fast
and this one was strong and this one was
clever and this one was creative. And
actually there was a goofy kid on our
street who was always the comedian. I
think later he actually tried to become
a comedian or became a comedian. And
everyone just kind of like was like, all
right. You didn't expect him to be like
the other kid and you didn't expect
yourself to kind of check off all boxes.
I wonder
uh the extent to which
young males in particular nowadays feel
the need
to check off all the boxes of what it is
to be a guy. Play a sport, be good in
school, be you know
whatever.
Well, that's again
the developmental thing. And I think
what happens is that and you know, you
watch kids play in kindergarten, they're
not thinking about this kind of stuff.
Although it's it's it's it's
sinking in or it's seeping in, what's
the word? Um I was in a school recently
uh and a boy
raised his hand that he was in the blue
quadrant of our mood meter and he was
feeling down or sad.
And I said, "Do you Do you need anything
right now?" And he said, "No."
And I got I got kind of like taken by
surprise and I said, "You know, you sure
you can talk about it?" He's like, "I
don't want to bother you, sir."
And that was a eye-opener for me.
You know, that already
like his emotions were a nuisance.
And that's what I want to make sure that
we
address. No one's emotion should be a
burden. A kid should be able to talk
about it and deal with it. We want that
kid to be a good learner. We want that
kid to be a good friend. And if he's
already suppressing, denying, ignoring,
you know, in kindergarten,
it's not going to be a pretty ride.
And those things change developmentally.
Um kids are much more comfortable
talking to each other about their
feelings in elementary school and middle
school, you know, it starts getting you
know, you got to look around and again
with the homophobia piece and then in
high school you see
um less and less touching, you know, or
you know, kind of the
the
the kind of
friendship kind of stuff that you might
have seen early on.
And that goes back to the you know, the
things that we were kind of chatting
about, toxic masculinity, kind of this
manosphere.
And again, you know, my hope is that we
rethink child development.
We have spent so much time
thinking about some of the unnecessary
things.
You know, reading and writing and
arithmetic obviously are important.
But if you don't recognize that how
we feel and how we deal with our
feelings is going to drive
the quality of your relationships,
your well-being,
your ability to deal with life's ups and
downs and the harsh feedback you're
going to get in life,
um and ultimately, you know, having your
dreams come true. You know, it's
interesting as someone who works at a
university where everyone has perfect
SAT scores.
Everyone has grade point averages that
are better than mine were.
Everyone plays an instrument I never
heard [snorts] of before.
Everyone has done everything to get into
this place. And so, I have like 700, 800
students right there. And I look at them
all and I'm like, "Guess what?
Your SAT scores have no predictive
validity."
None. You can't Remember, it's range
restriction. Mhm.
It's like basket All basketball players
are tall. The height is not going to
make or break your your basketball
performance. Same thing applies in a
room filled with people with, you know,
high academic performance. And then, all
right, well, what is the predictor?
Well, obviously, it's going to be
something else.
And then we start thinking about, well,
what are the
attributes
that employers are looking for?
Right now, it's not technical skills as
much as it used to be. Right now, it's
like,
"Can this person
like take feedback well?
Can this person, you know, lead a team
and people will want to be around that
person?"
I found in my research, for example,
that managers and leaders who are good
coregulators,
that for example, during the pandemic, I
did this longitudinal study,
and I found that
in schools in particular where I do a
lot of work, that when a teacher
perceive their leader
as both self-regulated
and who was good at co-regulating. So,
what that means is that like I'm looking
at you right now and thinking, "Okay,
you know, it feels like the world's
coming to an end. Are you going to fall
apart or are you going to make it?"
That's number one. Number two is
are you going to be there for me? Are
you going to be able to support me and
deal with the chaos that I've got to
deal with? And what we found in our
research is that highly predictive of
the culture of a school, highly
predictive of burnout, highly predictive
of job satisfaction. Frustration levels
were 40% lower in schools where there
were leaders with these skills.
That's what people are looking for these
days, more so than anything else, you
know, more so than beforehand.
I feel like the word that comes to mind
is is calibration. And in anticipation
of today's discussion, I I I was
speaking to a friend and I said, "You
know, where are you at with uh
kind of um
men expressing emotions?" You know, and
and you know, she said, "Well, I've seen
you cry." And I was like, "Yeah." You
know, she said, "And it can be
beautiful." Like, you know, the You hear
that, right? It can be beautiful. And I
said, "But when is a man expressing
emotion um a problem for you?" Like,
assuming it's not like outward anger or
abuse or you know, his sadness. Okay,
was the example I gave. And she said,
"If he gets very sad about things that
happen a lot,
it makes it hard to imagine that uh how
he would hold it together if really big
stuff happened." And so, it's it's
exactly what you described in the
workplace, right? This notion of
calibration. So, uh
let's say I'm okay with people
expressing their emotion, crying when
they're sad, etc.
But if that's happening a lot under
everyday conditions,
I could imagine, let's say you're in a
work or a relationship with this person
and then think, "Well, goodness, like
people die, right? You know, more I'm 50
now and I
people die as you get older, more and
more people die. That's just kind of the
way it works." What's going to happen
then? I think there's this
underlying question, which is
are you going to be available for all
the other things we depend on each other
for? And this could be romantic
relationship, it could be in the
workplace. So, I I do wonder whether or
not people are trying to work out So,
what people are calibrated to. They're
trying to understand somebody's I don't
want to say emotional set point, but
when they're able to
you know, just pack it down and deal
with it on their own later, or whether
it really needs to become the focus.
Like
just uh to just quickly layer in another
example, I have a friend who runs a big
scientific laboratory. Their laboratory
gathered together and did a presentation
for
this lab director and had created a
statistical bubble map of their
experience of being in the lab. And
there was a giant bubble in the middle
that just said, "Stress."
And they invited someone from HR, and
the whole idea here was to let the boss
know that they were really stressed out.
And I said, "Let me guess, you were
probably thinking
he came up in a very, very hard branch
of science." And I said, "Let me guess,
you're probably thinking, what happened
to science?" And he said
>> Uh-huh. He said, "For a little while,
and then I figured, well, this is the
next generation. I have to work with
this." So, they were calibrated to
different set points. And I could
imagine that's hard across generations,
but
even within that's got to be really,
really tricky. So, you're all about
measurement, Mhm. creating actionable
tools.
Is there a language around this? Is
there a way that we can, yes, learn to
process and deal with our emotions,
express our emotions in a more healthy
way?
Also understanding of other people's
emotion calibration point.
A couple of things. One is
that
going back to the kind of partner-leader
position is
I think the confusion that people have,
well again going back to vulnerability
and emotion dysregulation, is that me
being vulnerable or me sharing that I'm
anxious or overwhelmed or afraid means
that I'm weak.
And I think what leaders need to do is
recognize like during the pandemic, I
never forget this like wait the
university shut down everything was
freaking out. I knew my team was freaked
out. They were stressed out about their
jobs. They were dealing with being
parents and also employees
and working from home and all that
stuff. Here I was like the head of the
emotional intelligence lab and like how
you doing Mark? And I'm like great.
Everything's fine. And meanwhile I'm
like I hate my life and I hate everybody
around me. You know I had this my
mother-in-law, you know that story? She
was stuck with me.
And um
and then I realized one day like I'm
being a terrible role model.
I'm not being authentic.
And I'm not demonstrating the skill.
So I decided to be really honest and say
I'm going to be frank.
It's tough right now.
But here's what I'm doing.
I'm going for that walk every day at
5:00.
I can't go to my hot yoga class but
guess what? I'm I found new workouts
online that I'm doing and doing X, Y,
and Z. So the point is is that I think
vulnerability that's like sharing and
like you know you know
spewing out all the fears that you have
is not helpful.
When it's not accompanied by
the strategy.
And that's the key is that
I'm feeling this way but here's what I'm
doing about it. That's what a role model
is and that's what a parent needs to do.
A parent, you know,
has to come home and say, you know, I
can imagine this like you're a a dad and
you're trying to be a role model for
your kid.
And my here's my dad. I my dad would
have a hard day at work. Daddy, let's
play. Son,
leave me alone. Done. Like
that was the end of it. As opposed to
Dad comes home. Daddy, let's play. Son,
you know, you have to realize I have to
just tell you something. I just had a
really rough day at work. I actually got
into a fight with a colleague of mine.
Didn't go well. And I said something
that I really feel bad about. And so
Daddy just needs a little bit of time to
just process that.
To just think about what I can say
tomorrow to kind of help my
relationship. And if you don't mind, I
need that time right now. I love you and
we'll play later, but right now I'm just
not in the right space for it. Okay,
son?
Okay, Dad. All right, let's stop there.
What did I just teach my
son or daughter about feelings? All
right. I'm a dude. I'm a dad who has
feelings.
I am someone who makes mistakes. I say
things that I regret. I reflect on the
things that I make mistakes about. I
problem-solve about the things that I
make mistakes about. I need time to, you
know, recoup, you know, my energy and
then I can come back and be with you.
How much time did that take? Seconds.
>> Yeah.
But how many of us, you know, are around
people that can process emotion that
way, that have the capacity to say I'm
in a dark place, things didn't go well,
I made a mistake, I feel bad about it, I
need to strategize, and then we'll come
back and be together? What happens to
most of us?
We're activated. Like I'm pissed off at
the person at work and I project it on
everybody else that's, you know, in my
next situation. And the power of
emotional self-awareness, going back to
what we started with, and the power of
emotion regulation,
is that I notice
that there's a shift.
I notice that
I'm feeling this anger, this
frustration. I'm about to go into a new
environment with my family. And I know,
because I'm emotionally intelligent,
that it's not going to be pretty if I
don't process that emotion before I move
into the next situation. So, what I'm
going to do is I'm going to take a
breath.
I'm going to take what I call a meta
moment.
I'm going to pause. I'm going to take a
breath. I'm going to think about the
best version of Mark,
the father I want to be, the husband I
want to be,
and then I'm going to open the door and
arrive through that lens.
That's what this work is about. It's
what
people need to learn.
Uh I'm fascinated by time perception,
and I feel like the human brain is so
incredible at being in the moment and
also getting ahead and thinking behind.
And what you're really talking about is
projecting into the future in a healthy
way, not not future tripping as they
call it, but in a healthy way. And I
think that I mean, broadly speaking, I'm
almost embarrassed to say this as a
neuroscientist, uh but you know, the
more limbic
uh we are, so to speak. I realize it's
not really a thing, but the more limbic
we are, um the more in the moment we
tend to be. And and it's harder to get
that version of ourself. When we're
relaxed, it's very easy to be like,
"Well, I'm going to remember this time."
Or I'm going to project into the future.
So, to some extent, healthy recognition
of one's emotions, it seems, healthy
expression of one's emotions is the
ability to
with feel, but also split off from the
present enough to get perspective. That
the time perspective. I mean, it's all
in or shift in the time domain. You
know, like, "I'm going to go to this you
know, this island in the Caribbean for a
moment." Although that might be a good
useful tactic. But that ability
to tolerate stress and
and segment a piece of one's mind and
emotions and go, "Okay, that's all
happening, and I'm going to get like
right over here." That is a skill. So,
the way I like to think about it is that
we have to move from
automatic, habitual, unhelpful reactions
to deliberate,
conscious, helpful responses.
Because we become more automatic when
we're flooded with our emotions, we rely
more on habits and usually bad habits.
And so to build that space between the
stimulus and response, like the question
always people say, "What is that What do
you do with that space? How long is the
space?" And you know, some people say,
"I don't need a meta moment, which is
one of our tools. I need a mega moment,
you know?"
And maybe you do. Maybe you need to take
three loops around the house before you
walk into the door to get your kind of
parasympathetic nervous system where it
needs to be.
That is the key to emotion regulation
right there.
We had um Richie Davidson on the podcast
and he talked about this myth about
meditation that it's supposed to clear
the mind and make you relax. And he said
it's it's actually really about stress
tolerance. You're supposed to sit there
and
resist the temptation to get up and
move. Like it's really stress
inoculation, which I think is a really
beautiful way of thinking about and
different way of thinking about
meditation. So, do you recommend that
people meditate in order to become
better emotion regulators? 100%.
Especially because
if you can't be still, it's going to be
hard to access the good strategies.
It's a necessary but insufficient
strategy. I know that we're obsessed in
our world right now with breathing and
mindfulness and
it's great.
Um but it's not enough.
You at the end I'm going to have to have
the difficult conversation and and
regulate during that conversation. I
can't be in my room by myself
meditating.
I always joke with my, you know, I open
my book with that story of my
mother-in-law and I would take a breath.
Ah, it's even clearer why you have to
get the hell out of my house. Right? So,
like the breath may help you deactivate,
but it doesn't necessarily shift your
perspective. Mhm. That's the mindfulness
work. Mhm. And I want to jump in now
because I think
even the taking the moment to recognize
you need to take this meta moment is a
mindset piece. It's saying
emotion regulation is important.
I'll be a better version of myself if I
don't walk into my house in this angry
state and project it onto everybody
else.
But that's we've only gone through one
of like eight domains that I think are
important. The next is like you got to
know what you're feeling
because
the feeling, as I said in my formula
earlier, is going to drive the strategy
selection.
So that labeling piece is really
important and I find that people's
vocabularies is just awful.
People I'm fine. Okay, I'm upset.
Yeah, I don't think we did this last
time, but if I were to push you
anxiety versus fear versus pressure
Um Um
>> versus stress. Uh I've thought about
these before, so it but it ends up being
hairsplitting.
And then I go into scientific
operational definitions, so
yeah, you know, anxiety kind of a a
generalized state of too much
sympathetic arousal, you know, stress
is one or usually I'd add to that, you
know, one or several things that I can
pinpoint as kind of a source of that
elevated level of arousal. Um
you know, panic would be if it if you
gotten so far outside the um time domain
perspective like that
the physiology overtakes and overwhelms.
Like I get into my scientific definition
>> interesting because
a lot of people well, some most people
by the way say it's all the same
Mhm. They it's all one big Yeah.
>> Yeah, you're you know, technical. You're
like, well, this is cortisol and this
is, you know, epinephrine and this is
this. And that's all good, too. But in
the end
what you're regulating often times is
the
underneath the emotion.
And so anxiety
uncertainty around the future.
Right, I get anxious when I can't
predict.
That's really what deep anxiety is. I
want everything to be exactly the way I
want it to be
and I can't control that. So, oh.
Stress is having too many demands and
not enough resources.
Pressure or something at stake is
dependent upon your behavior. Fear is
immediate danger.
So, when I give you those kind of what
we call in psychology the core
relational themes,
the appraisals that are part of those
emotions.
Does it make you see how your strategy
choice might be different? Yeah,
definitely.
Um
and speaking of, you know,
I doubt it's just two bins, but
I've heard once that, you know, some
people need to learn to externalize and
or to talk about their feelings more,
other people probably less. I've heard
this.
>> Uh-huh.
For sure.
>> I'm I'm I'm friends with a couple and
one of them says
she's a She calls herself an external
processor. So, if something's bothering
her, she has to externally process it.
And then her wife is an internal
processor. And so, this obviously
they've worked this out and it's pretty
cool to see how they do it, but but I
was like, is that really a thing?
External processor, internal processor?
And then, of course, my gender biases
show up. I go, well, you're two women,
so like that maybe that language is used
but like in in heterosexual
relationships it's different, you know.
Sure. And we laughed about it and they
explained like, no, cuz actually one of
them turns out to be a therapist. So,
she's like, no, I have actually many
male, female couple clients. So, she's a
couples therapist. So, I got flipped on
my back with that one. The thing that I
I find that I I keep projecting into
everything I'm hearing. And and
I want to put the little asterisk here
and say that
the reason I share these like things
that are happening inside is I like to
think that they're perhaps a proxy for
what some people are thinking.
Um or not.
But
it's that
we really at least in in the United
States, we really are not a culture
that's clearly defined its terms, let
alone its ways of being around emotions.
>> Mhm. Like this is not like my dad
growing up in Argentina in a certain era
where sure there was a range but um the
culture was fairly clearly defined. I
mean here we've got it all like I do men
expressing anger.
Some people call that passionate
depending on what it's about. Other
people call that scary and disregulated.
>> Mhm. It goes back to your relationship
with anger. And so, you know, we
construct these emotions in our brains
based on our experiences.
So, I grew up with a dad who had, you
know, you know, pressed lips and red
face and look like he was going to like
take his belt off and whack me. And so,
my
perception of anger is probably
different than your perception
perception based on our upbringing. And
that's just we have to acknowledge that.
Now,
I could be over reacting to anger, which
is not going to be helpful in my life.
So, I've got to learn to realize not
everybody's like your dad. Some people
can be angry and not aggressive. But
that's that's the emotional intelligence
journey of learning. If I had no
cultivating of skills,
I would just assume
that's anger. Mhm. And that's not anger.
That's one way of expressing anger that
I learned. And I think people get caught
up in that. They get attached to what
they learned early in life and don't
realize there's a there's another way.
It's kind of why people often times get
stuck with trauma.
Because they they are fixated on that
experience that they had. And they
haven't learned how to reframe or
haven't learned how to compartmentalize
that particular experience in their
lives.
I'd like to take a quick break and
acknowledge one of our sponsors,
Element. Element is an electrolyte drink
that has everything you need and nothing
you don't. That means the electrolytes,
sodium, magnesium, and potassium, all in
the correct ratios, but no sugar. Proper
hydration is critical for brain and body
function. Even a slight degree of
dehydration can diminish your cognitive
and physical performance. It's also
important that you get adequate
electrolytes. The electrolytes, sodium,
magnesium, and potassium, are vital for
the functioning of all cells in your
body, especially your neurons or your
nerve cells. Drinking Element makes it
very easy to ensure that you're getting
adequate hydration and adequate
electrolytes. My days tend to start
really fast, meaning I have to jump
right into work or right into exercise.
So, to make sure that I'm hydrated and I
have sufficient electrolytes, when I
first wake up in the morning, I drink 16
to 32 oz of water with an Element packet
dissolved in it. I also drink Element
dissolved in water during any kind of
physical exercise that I'm doing,
especially on hot days when I'm sweating
a lot and losing water and electrolytes.
Element has a bunch of great-tasting
flavors. In fact, I love them all. I
love the watermelon, the raspberry, the
citrus, and I really love the lemonade
flavor. So, if you'd like to try
Element, you can go to
drinkelement.com/huberman
to claim a free Element sample pack with
any purchase. Again, that's
drinkelement.com/huberman
to claim a free sample pack.
So, thus far we've highlighted at least
one thing that can be very useful
for emotion regulation, which is
the, you know, some short form of
meditation for stress tolerance that can
give somebody a a create a gap or a
an opportunity in a moment to at least
take some time and regulate a bit.
>> Mhm. I'd like to layer on something else
which I'm hearing, I don't want to put
words in your mouth, but that I'm
hearing which is we should all
know
our assumptions or our presumptions
based on our upbringing.
>> Correct. Like we need to do this for
ourselves. No one can do it for us. No
single article is going to spell out the
full array of ways that one
conceptualizes anger or sadness for men,
for women, for straight people, for gay
people. Like, but this space is actually
worth thinking about, right? Uh right
now there's a there's a little bit of a
battle against introspection. This is
not introspection, I want to be very
clear. Um that's a separate matter, but
this is really just what any really good
scientist would do is to know your
assumptions before you generate a
hypothesis. I mean, it is introspection.
I mean Okay, fair.
>> But just like anything
over introspection leads to rumination.
Mhm.
>> [clears throat]
>> And so, we're not recommending like I
don't want you, Andrew, to like be
obsessively, compulsively checking in
with how you're feeling all day long.
That is unhelpful. It's bad, bad, bad.
Some people would say that's I need to
do more of that. Maybe you do. I I I
don't. I don't think so.
Emotions matter when they're going to
either help or interfere with our
performance. That's when we have to
check in. Most of the time, thank
goodness, they're in the background.
Yeah. You know, when you're driving, you
know, you're not thinking, "How am I
feeling? How am I feeling?" It'd be
weird. Like that would just be weird.
And you don't want to do that. But
checking in with one's assumptions based
on our upbringing, I think would be very
useful.
>> Very. Well, that's the point.
>> And has that been formalized into a You
know, people love questionnaires. I I
think if it hasn't been done, I think
it'd be amazing. About 8 months ago, I
had this wild experience
where
I realized I
had this massive assumption worked into
my framework. So, I had these friends
and I was visiting them and they called
me upstairs and there was a bird flying
around and it was like flying into the
windows.
>> Mhm.
And
I was like, "Oh my god." You know, I had
birds growing up.
Kiwi and Sugar Ray Leonard were like my
life before I hit puberty and
birds were my life, you know, I
loved birds. I loved animals of all
kinds. And I I was looking up there and
this bird's just flying into the window.
It's not going to make it out and it's
just doing immense damage to itself.
And one of them said, you know, oh, he
keeps
flying against the window.
I was like, okay, and I tried to get him
out and I I couldn't get him out. Really
high ceilings. We didn't have the right
thing. And I said, you know, I'm just
going to open the windows, go
downstairs, come back, and check and and
I ended up going back.
And um they said, "What Is he okay? Is
he okay?" And I'm like, no, this this is
some like this
idiot bird is like flying into the
window. He's like this
is going to kill himself.
He got out eventually. And about 2 weeks
later, one of them called me and said,
"Listen, I really need to talk to you
about something. It's really been on my
mind." I was like, okay.
And uh
and she said, "You know, I was really
disturbed how you reacted."
>> Mhm. I was like, what do you mean? I was
like, I was like trying to help the
bird. Like, you know, I love animals. I
mean, I really do. I mean, one of the
reasons I like doing the work I do now
instead of what I used to do is I don't
have to work on animals anymore. I hated
it, honestly. Um you know, I understand
why it has to be done in many cases, but
I hated it. So,
she said, "Well, just you're talking to
this bird like he's an idiot."
And I realized in that moment, I was
like, oh,
I was like, if you had said, "Oh, that
poor girl, she's she's flying against
the window." I've been like, "Oh, the
poor thing. Like, she really needs it."
You know, and I immediately realized
this like strong
sex / gender bias that I had that if a
that if a
female animal is somehow damaging
herself, like, "Oh, my god, help her,
save her." And with with him, same if
it's a boy, same thing. I want to help.
But then my my assumption was, "You
idiot."
Like, you idiot. Like like I would, you
know, and I realized I grew up in a big
pack of dudes. When someone does
something stupid, you're like, "Dude,
you're an idiot. Like, what are you
doing?" But it's a it was actually to me
it was a it was a motive affection. I'm
sure I
I upset some people by saying this, but
in full disclosure, I just had this
massive assumption. And I've actually
had to pay attention to that going
forward. But I didn't realize I had that
really strong bias.
I guess this is all going to that
mindset area of emotion regulation. I
mean, parents have that with their kids.
I can't tell you how many kids, you
know, you observe a parent with their
son or daughter, it doesn't matter, and
the kid is trying to um
like climb a rock,
and the parent, because of their own
fears, you know, "Oh my god, honey, be
careful. Be careful. Be careful."
And all of a sudden the kid is losing
their self-confidence to climb the
thing, as opposed to a parent who's
skillful,
you know, who
checks their assumptions, you know, "I'm
nervous. Okay, fine, you're nervous. You
know, you're probably your kid's
probably not going to get hurt. Take a
deep breath. Take a breath."
And maybe say something like, "Honey,
gosh, that looks like it's really hard.
I'm pretty confident you're going to get
there.
Let me just come a little closer to be
there just in case something goes wrong,
but I really do think you're going to
make it."
What do you think that's instilling in
the kid?
Totally different way of thinking about
it.
And so that parent's assumption that
person parent's fears is being
projected. If they're a more
skilled at coregulating and recognizing
my job is to instill resilience in my
kid. My job is to help my kid feel like
they can do it on their own, cuz that's
what this work on coregulation I'm
doing, which I think is so important, is
this intentional
You're being super intentional about
supporting other people in managing
their emotions,
but they the whole goal of it is
to support the other person in being
capable of regulating on their own
eventually.
Not codependent, not coddling, but
actually instilling the belief
in the other person that they can do it.
I love that. I I guess what I'd love to
know is is there a formal process
or questionnaire, etc., to learning to
understand one's own
kind of the word bias is so loaded. The
word bias is biased, but to really parse
like, oh, this is how I conceive the
world in and around emotions, gender
gender specific emotions cuz I think
that'd just be very useful. Because then
it allows somebody to do what you just
described
and really know the difference between
helping somebody get to the point where
they can manage their
work with their emotions on their own
versus projecting our own beliefs
around, hey, this is the way it's
supposed to be done. Exactly. Yes, there
are plenty of surveys actually. In my
book I even give people a list of them.
You can play around with that and just
look at your mindsets and attitudes
about them and you'll see patterns. I
had no cognitive awareness that I had
this weird relationship to happiness
until I did my own exercise.
And it was eye-opening for me. And it's
actually I've set goals for myself. It's
like, Mark,
people want when they're applauding you,
when you're giving your speech, let them
enjoy it. They're If they're applauding,
it means it was good. Don't be like, uh,
you know, like
breathe, be present,
and take it in. And actually it works.
It's a beautiful phenomenon.
The awareness of our programming
can liberate us from so many painful
things.
>> Yeah.
We spent a lot of time on this, which is
interesting cuz I don't usually spend so
much time talking about these
assumptions and mindsets and beliefs.
We spent some time talking about the
vocabulary words, which is very
important. You got to be self-aware.
Anger is not the same as disappointment.
Envy is not the same as jealousy.
Happiness is not the same as
contentment. Anxiety, stress, pressure,
and fear, and overwhelmed are all
different.
And I know people listening might be
like, oh my god, you're overwhelming me,
but you know, we have our app that
you've seen, the How We Feel app, to
give you that vocabulary.
And it really does matter. It matters
for communication. It matters for
getting your needs met. It matters for
choosing the strategy.
But again, it's not enough.
So you got to know how to breathe and
you have to do your mindfulness work to
bring the temperature down, to still
your mind.
I mean, think about our minds nowadays.
I mean, they're just
the ability to process information has
dwindled completely. Just to give you
one example, we used to do like 2 and
1/2 minute videos for trainings.
People won't get through them.
30 seconds.
And this is why people aren't learning
anything anymore, cuz you How you going
to teach an emotion regulation strategy
in 30 seconds? It's like an Instagram
post.
Of course, that's driving me crazy, too,
cuz so many influencers are My favorite
one recently was this very famous
influencer teaching about emotion
regulation.
And she said, you know, I've decided to
throw away my anxiety.
And so, she's in the car, and she opens
the door, and she's like, "Goodbye,
anxiety."
And I'm thinking to myself, like, that
door is going to hit you so hard in the
face.
But yet, 3,000, 5,000, 25, whatever
likes, and people are like, "Oh my god,
I'm throwing away my anxiety." It's
like, you can't throw away your anxiety.
It It doesn't It doesn't work that way.
The quick fix thing is an issue. Then we
got to learn how to
rethink our feelings.
That's the programming we have to do. We
have to learn some of the things that
you've spoken about another podcast
here, whether it's the cognitive
reappraisal, whether it's the reframing,
whether it's the distancing,
whether it's you know, having gratitude
as opposed to resentment and envy.
I mean, I I never
had anyone help me practice
cognitive regulation. Nobody ever taught
me there was even a I never knew there
was a thing called reframing.
And it's saved my life as an adult,
because again, we go in with the
assumption about other people, too.
And if you can say, "Wait a minute,
Mark. Is there another way to look at
this? Is there another story you can be
telling yourself around this?"
This goes back to something we talked
about earlier. We want to be careful
about that cuz in abusive relationships
it can become gaslighting.
Right? Honey, you know, you're too
sensitive.
No, you're a jerk. I'm not too
sensitive. You're trying to make me feel
like, you know, bad about the fact that
you're lying to me all the time. Not
helpful.
And that can be that's also reframing,
but it's a
form of deception,
you know, where
another person is trying to define your
reality for you.
Super
scary. And we can do that to ourselves,
too. We can trick ourselves into
believing things that way.
Reframing
is playing with this idea of telling
yourself a new story, but you have to
always be a scientist about it. And
that's the one thing about all the
strategies is that you have to come back
as a scientist and ask yourself the
question,
is this helping me live the life I want?
Am I in a better relationship? Am I
better able at managing my anxiety
applying these kind of strategies or
these labeling strategies?
I find psychology fascinating. Uh the
reason I became a biologist, however, is
because um
I got confused by psychology.
>> Uh-huh.
And It's too big of a field. Well, and
the field wasn't as evolved as it is
now, as structured as it is now. But I
remember thinking, okay,
you know,
I could see the argument, maybe even the
experiment for
healthy expression of emotion allows
that emotion to move through, allows us
to be healthier physically and mentally.
I can also probably find a manuscript
that shows that the longer for every
minute longer we focus on being angry
that our anger grows, and I don't know
what the answer is. I I
um I sense it's that's probably not the
case, but I just remember being very
afraid of the contradictions. Absence
makes the heart grow fine fonder. Out of
sight, out of mind. It was like, which
one is it? And of course it's both,
right? I mean
>> And that's the complexity of the human
mind. So, I decided to think about cells
and circuits instead. And
um served me well in my career. I
probably in my life I I remain
intensely interested in the sorts of
issues we're talking about.
>> Mhm.
Now, including these generational
differences. And And here's my question.
Typically, most work, school, and other
environments are hierarchical in the
sense that the older people have more
seniority and more power.
>> I sense that nowadays
there's an understandable concern
and interest in young people's emotions
and emotional processing.
But I also get the sense from my peers
that there's this kind of fear of the
younger generation, like they're
actually in control. I just got through
doing
three 2-hour long trainings cuz Stanford
understandably has you do like
harassment training and workplace
safety, workplace violence, you know,
you have to learn what the rules are.
>> And I was very surprised to realize that
all faculty and staff and some postdocs
take this training. Students don't take
it.
Meaning, you have two completely
different views of what the rules are.
And this is not unique to Stanford. This
is unique to a lot of big organizations.
>> Mhm.
And um it's not even a criticism. I I'm
sure like everything at Stanford there's
a rationale. But it's kind of
interesting. You would hope that there
would be a universal at least
nomenclature.
Sure. Just like we know what
mitochondria are here and in Nicaragua.
It'd be nice to know that
>> you know, anger and disappointment,
while those words are spoken differently
in two different countries, that there's
sort of a a basic universal
understanding of what emotions are, what
they're not.
How much comes from our past, how much
is about our physiology, and kind of how
to work with them. And I'm not saying
this is going to solve all the problems
in the world, but a lot of the problems
that I see out there are
misunderstandings about where the line
is.
>> Mhm.
That's No, that's healthy
emotional expression. Okay, that's
anger. No, that's passion. That person's
a narcissist. No, that person just isn't
spending a lot of time thinking about
their own thoughts.
And on and on and on. I'm certain that
one of the reasons your work and your
colleagues work is so important is
because we need
a universal nomenclature. We need a an
agreement that there's at least a way to
understand and navigate this stuff. This
is why the work I do in schools it's not
like a teacher comes to a training and
does it in their classroom. It doesn't
work that way. I learned this the hard
way. It's got to be a systemic approach.
The leaders, the teachers, the students,
and the parents need all the same
language to describe the work we do on
emotional intelligence. It makes a huge
difference.
The superintendent can go into the
kindergarten room and have that same
conversation. We all know what these
emotions mean and we're all thinking
like scientists around emotions. I want
to just go back though because something
you said I think is important to
address.
And I wish I only wish
that there was the correct answer to how
we should feel and what we should do
with our feelings. It just doesn't work
that way.
A funny story about this. So, I'm giving
a speech to 1,500 police officers who I
don't think were told in advance that
some guy from Connecticut was going to
be giving a speech for 3 and 1/2 hours
about feelings.
And so, I walk into the room. It was
like out of a freaking movie. And
all of a sudden it's like, "And we're
welcoming Mark to talk about emotions."
And all of a sudden you can
>> [laughter]
>> see these facial expressions. And like
some of the I mean, these guys are
sitting People who can't see me right
now are like slouching in their seats.
Like, you know, with their guns in their
pockets. I'm thinking to myself, "What
have I gotten myself into?"
And so, I start, you know, playing
around. I'm telling them jokes. I've got
to figure out how to meet these this
group. And
the thing that struck me that I haven't
forgotten was one guy just stood up.
And he's like,
"I'm not sure I'm interested in this."
I said, "Okay." He said, "But I am I do
want to know one thing, Doc.
What's the only strategy that works?"
And I said, and of course, I'm a
psychologist, like, it doesn't work that
way. There's many strategies. It's an
emotion by person by context phenomenon.
And I people are so desperate for the
right answer.
I think the beauty of it
is that it's messy.
The beauty of it is that it's a journey.
The beauty of it is that it's a process.
The beauty of it is that we have to ask
ourselves questions over the course of
our development, is how I'm living my
life working for me or against me to
achieve my goals.
And we have to check in with other
people, like our partners and our
friends and our kids and whoever else
and our colleagues.
And
I hate to say that, but
the people who, you know, are dying for
the correct strategy, there is no
correct strategy.
Every you know, I worked as a fitness
instructor for 10 years of my life while
I taught martial arts. I saw so many
people use exercise as a way to escape
their reality.
They just wanted the treadmill for 10
hours a day
with an eating disorder who were
thinking, "This is, you know, my healthy
strategy." and they were ruining their
lives.
Same thing with food, the same thing
with you can trick yourself into
believing things.
The goal of this work is to help people
pause,
consider ideas, and then you have to go
back and say,
"How is my life?
How are my relationships? How's my work
going?"
etc. And that's where the
the real beauty comes out of the
learning.
I'm using my
checking back into my uh developmental
biases as a way to uh
ask questions that I hope are relevant
to everyone and now especially. And one
of the things that I've observed is that
there seems to be a broadening of the
context in which
broader ranges of emotions are allowed.
Online is a really good example of all
of it.
All of it, right? And I think that the
the judgments about, well, this person
is
losing their cool, and then someone say,
well, you know, so-and-so stepped in
front of his motorcycle, for instance.
You know, maybe these are the debates
that reflect all these develop- mental
biases. And in some cases there's a
legal line. And those legal channels, by
the way, are very interesting. Um
there's a great channel.
Um
It's a little too Hollywood in cuz the
guy worked in Hollywood, but he's a
lawyer, and it's called The Legal Beef.
I don't know him, but he does these
everyday cases of like if someone says
like, "It's illegal to film here. You
can't touch my camera." Or, you know,
and then he goes, "Well, that's the
legal beef." Tells you, and he gives you
exactly what the law says.
And so, I think we tend to like that. I
certainly like that. Like where I like
thick black lines, clear operational
definitions.
But
it is true that, for instance,
growing up, I I wasn't of the mind that,
you know, it's not okay to cry. I just
but was definitely certain places,
certain times.
>> Yeah. It does seem like the workplace
and school and online, it's become
either more accepted or it just happens
that people are bringing more of their
own stuff.
And I think one thing I worry about, I'm
showing my age here, but the one thing
that I worry about as people
think about their emotions without
having really good strategies to work
with them
is that they lose the ability to be
effective. I agree. Because time is
running.
And I hear from a fair number of friends
whose kid is struggling because
they're dealing with depression, or
they're dealing with anxiety, or they
have a cannabis use disorder, or they're
Time's ticking.
And developmental milestones are real.
And so the question I have is
how should
people think about evolving their own
ability to work with their emotions cuz
you said it's a process, it's a dance,
it's a takes time with the need to
really show up and get things done in
life.
Yeah.
>> Cuz you and I are two people who are
degreed and have steady jobs and and
it's
we have space to think about this stuff.
>> Well, we do. And I always tell people
that like for example, there's a school,
I won't mention its name cuz this is not
a good story.
Uh post the election, this past
election, wrote a note to every student
and said, "We recognize that some of you
may be feeling overwhelmed by your
feelings and if you need to take the day
off,
it's okay."
I almost had a conniption about that. I
was the that's my father speaking,
conniption. But I was like
I cannot believe this is happening. They
weren't what it was school that I work
with. I wanted to call on the head of
that school and say like this is the
worst advice you can give people. People
have to learn how to live with difficult
feelings. And if we're going to give
excuses to people
to like, you know, they can just like
I'm just overwhelmed by what's happened
and not get to process it and manage it
and move forward in their life,
we're going to create a generation of
very weak people. So I couldn't agree
more. And that's not what this work is
about. Like that's the confusion. It's
been politicized in many ways sometimes
and there's groups of people now that
say this is you're making kids fragile
by having them talk about their
feelings. And I say it's called
emotional intelligence, emotion
regulation.
We're not letting them
like sit in their feelings all day long.
We want them to recognize is that
feeling helping or hurting them achieve
their goals. If it's getting in the way,
you need to strategize.
And the goal is to move forward, not to
be stuck in. I think that's a huge huge
issue right now. And the same thing with
discomfort. Like it's okay to be uncom-
I mean
my whole career is built upon being
uncomfortable. People saying, "I don't
like your work. Your Your program's
going to turn kids into homosexuals. I
don't want to talk about feelings, you
know. You're this
>> psychologist, but you recreate your
childhood with the public. Yeah. There
you go.
Sublimated.
Um but, you know, I love that feeling.
That discomfort. I sit with it. I don't
try to push it away. And I think, Mark,
what's your creative solution?
That to me is like the beauty of the
work. I don't get it If I were
If I just got paralyzed,
you know, by that, I would Where would I
go in life? I would be frozen. We don't
want kids to be frozen. We don't want
anyone to be frozen. We want people to
be able to
live their lives, experience the full
range of emotions, regulate effectively,
and achieve their goals.
I'm no psychologist. I've said that four
times. Uh but, I have the strong feeling
that your martial arts training prepared
you to be public-facing, cuz it is a
relationship, right? And I'd like to
talk a little bit about that
relationship specifically, because
you've been this amazing ambassador for
emotions, what they are, how to work
with them in a healthy way, and to also
still show up in life, to not
necessarily take the day off, right? I
mean, if you lose a
close family member, it makes We would
all say like, of course, stay home, take
a day, take what you need, right? But
eventually come back. You know, that's
an important piece, too. It's an
important piece, too, to not um as one
scientist I used to work with say, you
know, dissolve into a puddle. He used to
say when someone's paper came back, he
said, "And if it gets
Before you look, if it gets rejected,
don't dissolve into a puddle of your own
tears." It was that kind of old-school
harsh thing, but I think it came from a
place of care, cuz you're like, "Listen,
it's not the end of the world." And
there have been graduate students who
have killed themselves on the basis of
their PhD not going well. I I know
stories about this, sadly. You
have taken some heat
for both being a champion of this
process,
but also by not giving in to this idea
that we're all just supposed to take the
decade off.
>> Yeah.
Um and so you get it from both sides.
You're in a unique position. Um and I
feel for you because some people will
say, "Hey, listen, you're teaching
people to be soft and clearly that's not
what you're
um advocating for.
And
people have also said, "Hey, you're
pushing us to
like push our feelings away and there's
a lot that we're really angry about in
the world and how can you be talking
about this when
fascism is taking over, there's a war,
this and you know, and and on and on and
on and on and on and on. So, how have
you, just personally, if you're willing,
how have how has that landed and how
have you decided to respond to that?
I love challenge. And so, you know, I
wrote this piece for Time magazine. It
was and of course, you probably know
this, but when you're writing an op-ed,
the publisher decides on the title. And
they like to be provocative, so they
called it the overreaction epidemic and
I got slammed for it.
You know, we're overreacting, we're not
overreacting, the world's coming to an
end. And it does feel like for many of
us, you know, between wars and
everything else happening, political
polarization,
you know, it does feel that way for many
on both sides.
And I say,
"Yes,
but
running around yelling and screaming at
people, how is that helpful? Like where
is the benefit to you and to the other
person
to move forward?"
And so, to me it just makes me think
more creatively about the work I do.
And the other side, you know, where
people have said that I'm now making
people fragile
because I'm getting kids and boys to
talk about their feelings and it's going
to make them more fragile.
Um as a matter of fact, I saw somebody
said recently that this work
>> [snorts]
>> causes kids
to have mental illness.
And I was like, "Wow, that's a good one.
And
again, this stems from misunderstanding
of the concepts. A,
I'm a big stickler, like you said,
operational [snorts] definitions. I want
to be super clear about what I'm
teaching.
I'm not teaching
la la la la. I'm teaching you how to be
emotionally self-aware.
Would you agree that it matters to be
clear
about what you're feeling? Yes. Thank
you.
Okay. So, when you're clear about how
you're feeling, and if that feeling is
disrupting you from being a good student
or being a good partner or being a good
manager leader, do you think that you
should use techniques to help you figure
out how to
manage it? Yes, absolutely. Perfect.
That's what we teach.
It's really clear.
When you have conceptual clarity,
I think there's less confusion.
What happens that people it's gotten
politicized,
you know, it's confusing around going
back to what we spoke about earlier that
this is obsessive checking in, this is
prying into kids' personal lives. Here's
the deal.
A kid comes to school
with feelings.
We all have feelings from the moment
we wake up in the morning to the time we
go to bed at night, even when we sleep.
Have you ever been irritable in the
morning?
Definitely. Yeah. Definitely.
>> And have you ever noticed that we call
it incidental leakage. It's not a great
term. But like you're irritable, you
really haven't processed it and you get
maybe to the studio here and then maybe
people are trying to interact with you
but and you're not like the best version
of you.
Definitely.
>> Yeah.
That's
what happens. And so that happens to a
kid who's gotten bullied on the bus or
had a fight at home and you want that
kid, like every parent does, I want my
kid to be a good learner,
you know, have good friends, etc. All
right. So, now I'm teaching you a
process,
Andrew, that before you walk into the
studio, I want you to take 30 seconds,
maybe 20 if you get good at it, to just
check in. Take a breath. How you
feeling? Gosh, I'm pissed off at that
phone call I had or I'm annoyed at this.
Okay. How do you want to be seen and
talked about and experienced in that
studio today?
Oh, wow. But
it's a whole Did you see how like I even
saying that like it makes you like
stand still and like reflect? Well,
I want to be
this cool
dude who's, you know,
compassionate and um creative. Okay.
Well, what do you need to get there?
And then you walk in.
And all of a sudden, you have attributed
the emotion to its actual cause, which
is that stupid phone call or whatever
happened, and you're no longer going to
displace that or project it or take it
out on somebody else.
Do you think that would be a useful
process for
kids, couples, leaders to use?
Definitely.
How long does it take? Seconds. There
you go.
This is not obsession with feeling. This
is not You know, this is at at opportune
moments.
You know, when I come home from work,
I'm I work long hours and I'm tired and
I'm irritable a lot of the time. I just
am.
I got to switch my mindset
to be the best version of myself as a
husband.
So,
that's what we're trying to help people
do.
And
I don't want people to be confused by
that. I want people to be super I want
real clarity.
It's articulating what your experience
is,
recognizing that it may be helpful. If
it's helpful,
you got nothing to do. Congratulations.
If it's not going to be helpful, you
need to think about those strategies. Is
it labeling it? Maybe.
Is it taking the breath? Maybe. There
have been times I've taken 15 deep
breaths and I'm still irritable. I need
a new strategy. I need to call a good
friend. I need to say, "Hey Doug, can
you like I'm really struggling with this
right now. Do you have some thoughts?
Not a problem. Getting social support is
not weak. It's smart.
Maybe I need to take another walk around
the block to just decompress. Maybe I
got a really shitty night's sleep and I
just need to recognize that I'm never
going to be the best version of myself,
no matter how hard I try, cuz I haven't
replenished, you know, the resources of
my brain to be the best version of
myself.
It's an unfortunate reality, but tap
water often contains contaminants that
negatively impact our health. In fact, a
2020 study by the Environmental Working
Group estimated that more than 200
million Americans are exposed to PFAS
chemicals, also known as forever
chemicals, through drinking of tap
water. These forever chemicals are
linked to serious health issues, such as
hormone disruption, gut microbiome
disruption, fertility issues, and many
other health problems.
The Environmental Working Group has also
shown that over 122 million Americans
drink tap water with high levels of
chemicals known to cause cancer. It's
for all these reasons that I'm thrilled
to have Aura as a sponsor of this
podcast. I've been using the Aura
countertop system for almost a year now.
Aura's filtration technology removes
harmful substances, including endocrine
disruptors and disinfection byproducts,
while preserving beneficial minerals
like magnesium and calcium. It requires
no installation or plumbing. It's built
from medical-grade stainless steel, and
its sleek design fits beautifully on
your countertop. In fact, I consider it
a welcome addition to my kitchen. It
looks great, and the water is delicious.
If you'd like to try Aura, you can go to
auraring.com/huberman
and get an exclusive discount. Again,
that's auraring.com/huberman.
I love it, and I've two reflections I'd
love your reflections on. The first one
is positive states and emotions that are
also dangerous. When people are feeling
over-affiliative, over-comfortable, they
sometimes say things that get them into
real trouble. They either disclose
things or they
make jokes that later they pay the the
price for.
This is I think maybe not as common as
anger and sadness and anxiety, but given
that some very prominent uh
very very smart people I've seen
completely destroy their careers by
it used to be called tweeting. You go,
"What this is crazy. This person
actually a chair of psychiatry, I'm not
going to beat around the bush here was
fired for saying something that was
totally it was actually inappropriate
and lame and stupid. You just go, "But
this person is clearly intelligent.
They're the chair of a of a Ivy League
school in psychiatry.
And you say, "Well, what happened?" And
what was interesting to me were the
tweets leading up to it.
You could say he was
showing his true self, but there was
this sort of like ease and comfort
around joking. And there's certain jokes
you just don't make. And so I think what
you're describing is equally important
for not overstepping, not um
you know
hurting oneself or other people.
Activation is activation. So
your heart rate and your you know
different chemicals get released when
you're super excited and when you're
anxious.
Activation might be the same.
The psychology of it is different.
Right, one is like anticipation of like
positive things, one is anticipation of
you know the negative things.
And of course emotions drive our
thinking, our decision making,
everything.
So you know, how many of us have made a
mistake when we were too excited, when
we were young?
You know, we won't go into those stories
now.
Excitement
without regulation is not helpful.
It's funny cuz you tell that then I'm
going back to the school situation. And
that's a big problem with a lot of
teachers. They're like, "The kid is so
excited. They just They're going to see
grandma after school and they can't stop
talking about it all day long and it's
driving me crazy."
So positive emotions can be a pain in
the butt, too.
And but they're afraid that they don't
want to squelch the kids' excitement.
And I say, "Well, let's talk about it.
What do you think?"
I mean, this is like the easiest
solution I I came up with on the spot.
I said, "What's the challenge?" He just
can't stop talking about going to see
his grandmother. I said, "Well,
he must love his grandmother. That's a
great thing.
Have you given him an opportunity to
stand up in the front of the class and
just tell everybody how excited he is
and just let him get it out." "What do
you mean? You want me to give him the
like give him like the throne?" I said,
"Yeah, I want you to try this out. I
want you to let him when he's like
He can't stop talking about wanting to
say,
'Johnny, I'm going to give you a minute
to get up and tell everybody how excited
you are, but then we're going to go back
to math. We're going to go back to
science.'
And let me know how that works." And of
course, 2 weeks later I go back and
visit. She's like, "You're a magician."
I'm like, "I'm not a magician. He just
needed an outlet for his emotions. Give
the kid the 1 minute to just tell
everybody how excited it is, but also
let him know that the expectations that
I have for you are not changing.
Just because you're excited about going
to see grandma doesn't mean you have to
focus.
That's the magic of the work. Be a
channel, not a dam. There you go.
I didn't make that up. I learned that
when I was a camp counselor in Yosemite.
You get a kid that you know, back then
we didn't have concepts of ADHD. Yeah.
>> You had a kid that back then you would
just be like,
Mhm.
>> "This kid is he's out of control." He
wasn't harming anyone. He was just like
would not settle down. You can't like
just say, "Hey, sit down." Or I mean,
that kid would always be getting in
trouble, get sent home. So, you give
them an opportunity to do something.
Mhm. But then you have to like let them
settle down. Likewise for the kid that
was more creative and less physical, if
your entire bunk was a bunch of kids who
were super physical, that always would
happen. But then you find out this kid
who was like had some some something of
value to share with the other kids and
then it would establish his place in in
this group. There's a very weird thing
happening lately online.
Which is this obsession with the '90s.
Um,
I grew up in the '90s. So, I tuned in
the '90s. What do you say?
>> [clears throat]
>> And there's an example that I saw
recently that I think is really relevant
to what you're describing. It was a
picture of a classroom sitting around
listening to a radio.
I remember doing this. It was an actual
picture and it said
when the Challenger space shuttle blew
up, we all listened to it with our
teachers cuz we were listening to that
space shuttle launch. And then
afterwards, we went back to
our lesson plan. We didn't process it
for weeks and weeks. And someone said,
"Gosh, I miss the '90s." Now, at my
school it was a little bit different. I
actually remember the teacher going
around the room the next day and asking
people if they had anything they wanted
to share. And people would share their
thoughts and then like one kid said like
I heard they found a foot, you know, and
then she was like, "Okay, Garrett, you
know, like settle down." You know, like
some kids were being a bit morbid and
stuff. Maybe she shouldn't have done
that. I don't know. But there was an
opportunity. But I think that was the
last it was ever discussed. And we
witnessed with our ears. It's not the
same as seeing it, but we witnessed with
our ears
um
a bunch of people blowing up.
And it was true. It was like, "Okay,
this happened. This is tragic. We're
going to talk about it for a bit and
then we're not going to talk about it
anymore."
Love your thoughts on
the picture I just laid out. What
happened? What's happening now? This
kind of emphasis on let's get back to
when things were not as coddled. Um I'm
just curious what your thoughts are.
You know, we were talking about this a
little while ago.
The world that kids are growing up in
now is different. It is a different
world. I was not thinking about climate
change when I was a kid. I really didn't
worry about who is president or not
president and the whatever's going on
politically.
I wasn't thinking about, you know, wars
as much as people are thinking about
right now.
Um I wasn't thinking about artificial
intelligence and technology is going to
take over my career. So, there are real
concerns that high school kids tell me
they're feeling and it's really causing
them a lot of stress.
We haven't created solutions. We're not
teaching them how to manage it. We're
going to have to learn how to
manage it in this world we're living in.
So, I do think it, you know, the
challenge is there. I just want to say
one thing that's related, which is
this artificial intelligence piece that
is
obviously prominent right now in
society, which people are freaked out
about for some reasons and thrilled
about for other reasons.
The thing that I'm most concerned about
is this
is that about 20% of adolescents now
report using technology AI as a
therapist, you know, as a companion.
Now, do I think you can get advice from
AI about like stress? Definitely.
Do I think um
it's going to help a little bit.
Do I want people to be in relationship
with a chatbot? Absolutely not.
And here's the deal.
When I was a kid who was being bullied
and like spit on in the bus and my head
being banged in the windows
and I came off the bus,
what I needed was a human being
to say I love you.
A human being to grab my hand.
A human being to say, "We're going to
get through this together."
There's no way the technology is going
to replace that.
And I would argue that this this
obsession with technology to solve our
emotional problems
is
a symptom
of
the thing we started talking about from
the beginning, which is this fear of
intimacy, this fear of connection, this
fear of being present with people's
emotions. It's so scary for parents to
be with their kids' emotions.
They're I never learned how to deal with
my anxiety. I can't deal with my kids'
anxiety. I'd rather not know that
they're feeling anxious.
And then I said, "Do you want your kid
married to a chatbot?"
And so,
the real issue, in my
humble opinion,
is that we are
cultivating
more and more disconnection. And I think
about this, you know, developmentally.
And I don't think, you know, in general,
you know, I was stressed out as a kid.
And I was I was at the age where video
games were becoming popular. And I got
that first little football game. I could
spend 10 hours a day on that. That was
my way of not being in the real world,
of not dealing with my challenges, of my
parents not connecting with me. Then I
got a Walkman.
And then the internet came. And then I
got email. And then I got social media.
And now it's AI. This is just an endless
trajectory
of
outside influences that are pulling us
away from being in relationship.
And uh
I think I wouldn't say this
I would say I wouldn't say this
publicly. This is a podcast. Is that
I never thought evolution can move so
quickly.
But I do feel that way all of a sudden
with what's happening now, this chronic
disconnection.
And kids are preferring to text instead
of to communicate with their friends.
There's research, you know,
anxiety, stress, and depression are
increasing consistently.
And it comes back to
connection
and strategies.
Yeah. A good friend of mine who's a
geneticist said, "It's You know, it
takes a very long time to evolve a
species. It doesn't take very long to
de-volve a species. You can crash a
species very quickly."
In terms of
people feeling overwhelmed and saying,
"I can't do anything right now because
of what's happening in the world."
Uh I remember when I was an
undergraduate, the '90s were pretty
peaceful time. I mean, we had Gulf War
and things like that. But relatively
speaking. And the professor whose lab I
worked in told me this was in Santa
Barbara where they burned the bank down
during the Vietnam War protests. But he
said that in the early 70s
uh very early 70s and and late 60s that
you'd be giving a lecture, he was a
young professor, and students would just
stand up. What about the war in Vietnam?
And he's like, this is a physiology
class. We're talking about this. And
they'd say, what about And the students
would start protesting. So this is not a
really new phenomenon.
>> I agree. I mean, this was happening.
People feeling overwhelmed, people
feeling like the campus was theirs.
They're going to make noise. I'm not
justifying unlawful protest. I'm not I'm
certainly not justifying any kind of
protest where certain students are being
restricted. I'm fundamental out going
right. I'm fundamentally opposed to
that. But this notion that people are
feeling overwhelmed
and young people are full of energy, you
know, and they want people to know how
overwhelmed they feel and how angry they
feel. But in the backdrop
the line's moving for the conveyor's
moving forward. I agree. But I think
that
in order for people to feel like
and this comes from the article that was
written by you,
uh you
quoted a comment someone said, we're not
overreacting, we're under reacting. So
in order for people to feel heard, I
want to double click on that comment.
But in order for people to feel really
heard and and understood in their
reaction
I think it's also important that
our society just can't sit around
protesting all day and and and we can't
collapse into we can't dissolve into a
puddle of our own tears. And I do want
to talk to you about the ways to that
you're formalizing this work because
one thing that I think is wonderful
that's happened in the last 10 years or
so
is that we've moved from the language of
consciousness and mindfulness, which I
think are great terms
>> Of course. to long exhale breathing
to the notion that stress can be
adaptive, Ali Crum's lab, it can make us
better, To
an understanding that there's a way of
working with your physiology
to be stronger and yet acknowledge your
physiology. I'm feeling stressed.
Now I need to bring my stress down. I'm
I'm exhausted. I need to figure out a
way to have more energy. Work on sleep,
etc. etc. I don't think it's happened
yet, but I think it's starting that
psychology needs the same kind of
organizational principles so that people
can move past narcissism, gaslighting,
claiming everyone that they don't like
is is being abusive. And there's been a
sort of psychological
I don't want to say collapse, but I
don't think people know how to navigate
this space. Whereas I think mindfulness,
consciousness, and the idea that we need
to take care of our sleep, we need
exercise, we need sunlight, you know, I
and others have worked very hard to try
and get people to understand like you
need to work with your body. You're not
trying to conquer your body, but you do
need to nudge it and sometimes push it.
You don't want to be that person 10
hours on the treadmill who's suppressing
everything. And I think where psychology
has been a little bit self-defeating is
that there's a lot of language. Mhm. And
it can start to feel like, "Ugh,
this is a lot. I got to do." So,
along those lines, if
you are told, you know, "So-and-so's
gaslighting me. They're a narcissist.
They you know, uh fascism is taking over
and like you expect me to not be
outraged."
Quote, "We're not overreacting, we're
underreacting."
You're a martial artist. You're a very
staid guy. Where do you start? What do
you say to that person?
Well, I think we have to ask them if
they're being effective.
And so, is whatever you're doing
leading to the change that you want it
to have?
And if they know about emotions, you
know, I don't know about you, but when
someone is yelling and screaming at me,
I shut down.
I'm no longer present. And so, they're
actually not getting their goal
achieved.
>> If they're asking me to do something
different, or they're trying to help me
understand something, if they can't
communicate in a way that I can
understand it, and I want to actually
listen,
it's not going anywhere.
So, I think that people need to
recognize that
I'm a person who is both and. So,
just to give you a concrete example,
our program RULER, which is the
school-based work that we do, is in all
the schools in one district of Harlem,
New York. 21 schools, thousands of kids,
the teachers, the leaders, the deputy
superintendent Don is my former student.
They're facing food scarcity.
These are really troubled families in
many instances. They're facing,
obviously, racism. They're facing
poverty, you know, home insecurity.
Of course, I want to solve for that
problem. I would do anything I could to
make sure everybody has a meal.
At the same time, every one of those
kids is being dropped off at school.
And we're expecting that kid to thrive
for 8 hours a day in that classroom. How
can I not teach that kid skills to
thrive?
I have to.
There's no obligation. There's no
There's It's It's my moral obligation to
help that kid be the best version of
themselves,
no matter what their background is, no
matter what their circumstances are. It
doesn't mean that I'm not also thinking
about that.
And I think that people in our society
today, this is part of that article, is
that we're so focused on the big change.
Many of us have very little control over
the big change.
I feel blessed that I have some control
over the lives of thousands of kids that
are waking up every morning and trying
to be the best versions of themselves,
but they need help. They need
strategies. They need teachers who are
well, who can be the best versions of
themselves for them. They need leaders
who care about the teachers.
And so,
I think that we have to find, in our own
way, I know my way and I sleep well at
night thinking I'm doing important work
to support people
in having well-being.
It doesn't mean I don't think about the
larger issues.
Um, but I do think that the more well
people are the better they're able to be
at
problem-solving around the larger
societal issues.
I don't think a dysregulated society is
going to solve its problems.
I agree completely and I'm grateful for
the work you're doing. I am
I feel like that
again, I I just draw the parallel to
what's happened around sleep, stress
regulation, exercise, nutrition. I feel
like there's always resistance at the
beginning. Like what is this stuff? Like
I don't want a morning routine. I just
want to get up and do my thing. Like I
don't want to hear that alcohol is bad
for me. Like I
I mean when I was coming up in academia
like alcohol was everywhere. The happy
hour is that it was a source of a lot of
problems. I was never a big drinker. So
for me it was like great opportunity to
go do something else, but if you didn't
drink with your senior colleagues, it
was kind of like people like what's
wrong with you or something like that.
I think what causes a tide change
is when first of all someone creates a
structure around things that science
shows work. You've been doing that and I
love that you're taking this broader
through books, through podcasts, uh um
into the school districts. We'll talk
more about the ways you're doing it,
ways people can
incorporate some of this.
But I think at some point
a few or more brave individuals start
incorporating a structure like oh wow,
maybe Matt Walker's right. Maybe sleep
when you're dead is not a good
philosophy. And now the mindset is
well,
if you sleep, you're smarter. If you're
smarter, you're more effective. And so
the people who are doing best are
incorporating a structure.
And then I also think inevitably what
happens and we're kind of edging up
against this now at least in the sorts
of things that I teach, is that a
pushback. Like, okay, enough structure.
Like, we need some freedom. I'm sensing
that now. People like, how many things
am I supposed to do? And the idea is
like, you're not supposed to do them
all. You're supposed to do what you
need, right? And and I acknowledge that
that's happening now.
Um
that's the contour of sort of the areas
that that I've worked in and tried to
share. In the area that you work in or
trying to share, and I realize there's
overlap, I feel like the structure is
there.
I think great examples of
people, kids and adults, who are really
not just succeeding, not just getting
by, but are like really kicking butt
by virtue of doing the things that
you're talking about. That's what's
going to lead to a systemic change. I
think about Steve Kerr talks about
meditation. And he's Steve Kerr, so
you're like, okay, people who like
basketball, like, this guy's a stud and
he meditates. And so, meditation is no
longer considered magic carpet stuff.
Yeah. Right? For every one of these
things, that's kind of how it is. It's
like, breath work, okay, like, I know
Wim Hof. Wim is a little bit eccentric.
People are like, oh yeah, breathe,
exhale. That's like, everyone does that
now. So, no one's going to be like, oh,
now we're breathing. And they're like,
but how much time do we have to spend
breathing? And so, I think with what
you're talking about, I feel like it's
central to everything. I actually worry
about our species if we don't
incorporate the sorts of things that
you're talking about.
You talk about, you know, the idea of
regulating is not suppressing.
Like, I think the the concepts are
critical.
And the practices are critical. So,
could you give us a couple examples of
the concepts that are just core
concepts? You We started off this way,
but and then maybe a few practical tools
so that people can start to think about
this in the same way that 10 years ago
we might have talked about like, hey,
like, you think sleep when you're dead
is working for you, but you're actually
kind of an idiot when you don't sleep.
And you're in a job that requires you to
be smart, not an idiot.
This kind of thing.
Yeah. I think, firstly, you know, in my
book I have something called the dealing
with feeling wheel.
And this goes directly to what you're
thinking about. When people are
dysregulated, when parents are like
dealing with a kid, for example, who's
dysregulated, they get desperate. Let's
take a deep breath. Breathe, breathe.
No, let's go for a walk. No, let's cook
together. No, let's play a game. No,
let's do this. And you go crazy. That's
not helpful.
I'll give you an example for myself.
For about a couple of months I've been
just I have so much work and I have not
slept well. The last week
I've prioritized going to bed early.
I prioritized like real dark, you know,
the darkened room. And like to I got
like I woke up today at 7:30. I was
like, "God, God, this is a miracle."
Like 7:30 it's like, you know, it's the
middle of the afternoon. And I feel
energized today. I feel, you know, and
I'm in a good place. And I've I felt
that way for like a week now.
I recognize I'm building new patterns
for my sleep. It's no longer in my wheel
a priority.
I figured it out. There are some days
where my I just feel I can't think
straight.
I'm like all over the place. I realize
that I've been maybe on social media too
much. I realize I have like 85 things on
my to-do list. And I'm like, "Mark,
you got to go back to your mindfulness
work. You need some breath work. You
need to just sit around. You need to
take that space. You need to get to that
hot yoga class. You need to do this. You
need this back into your routine." There
are other days I sit around and think,
"I'm so lonely. You know, like I don't
talk to anybody anymore. You know, I
feel like so like, you know, whatever."
And I'm like, "I need connection. I'm
desperate for connection."
I think that's the way we have to look
at it. That there are these components
of our well-being and of that are
correlated and are the same as what we
do to regulate our emotions.
There's the self-awareness piece. Am I
Am I at all like paying attention to my
emotions right now? There's that breath
work piece. There's the cognitive work.
There's the relational work. There's the
biology of it, the sleep, the nutrition,
the physical activity. Like for example,
one of the things that happened for me
in writing this new book was that I
became very, very committed to my own
fitness.
Much Martial Arts was like, you know,
that was like teaching 10 karate classes
a week. I was younger than I was in the
best shape of my life. Then I got like
professor dumpy professor syndrome. I'm
like, that is not I'm not getting on
that stage looking that way anymore. I
was like, "Whoa." And I made this major
commitment.
And one of the things that happened to
me
was that it became my go-to strategy for
my overwhelming stress while writing my
book. And I remember saying to myself
one day like, "Mark,
you may not finish this book, but you're
going to be in the best freaking shape
of your life."
And truthfully, it transformed my life.
Now here's why I'm telling you that
story.
Cuz in the conversation with this friend
Marco who is a trainer,
we started having these conversations
around
fitness identity
and how it relates to emotional
intelligence identity.
And I realized something magical.
Which is that
now
at 56, it's been 4 years that I've like
done my four workouts a week. I mean, I
haven't really missed a workout unless
I'm like on a vacation, but I'll still
do something else.
I cannot not exercise.
And this morning just to be, you know,
talking about you know, coming on
Huberman Lab, I'm like, I woke up at
7:30. I'm like, I got to get there by
this time, but like I got I got I can't
work out. I have to work out before I go
to Huberman. Like, I can't show up not
doing my workout.
And um I knew I would feel better. I
knew I'd be more present. And I did my
hour, you know, back workout.
But the point I'm really making here is
that
I identify
as a person
who exercises
I I and I it's like just who I am.
My vision for the world is that we
cultivate people who identify
as well-regulated.
Because if you walk into a room thinking
to yourself, "I got this. Nothing you
can say can trigger me.
I can get through this or I can manage
my emotions." Life is going to be
completely different.
And that's why I end my book with this
concept that people talk a lot about
like be the best self and you
everybody's talking about their best
selves.
But it really does relate to emotion
regulation and there's good research to
support it.
That you asked me for like a concrete
like technique. Well, this is that thing
we call the meta moment.
And I cultivated this technique with my
colleague Robin.
She was a therapist working with
patients in New York City and she's
like, "I teach them all strategies and
then they go home and they yell at each
other."
And I'm like, "I'm a scientist working
in schools and everybody's like this is
boring and then nobody wants to do
this." I'm like, "The motivation is not
there. People don't see the benefit."
People they don't see that their life is
going to be better, going to make better
choices, have better relationships, etc.
So, what's going to make it a
difference? Well, as we know between
stimulus and response
there is space.
Okay, so what do I do to fill the space?
Well, the first step
is
I got to sense that something's going
on. I got to be aware.
Wow,
that just triggered me. Wow, that was
not cool.
My automatic habitual response is going
to be who the F do you think you are?
Like, don't talk to me that way or
whatever it might be.
Mark who is identifies as the most
well-regulated person in the whole wide
world, the feelings master, the
emotional guru, he has a process.
He automatically takes the breath. He
automatically builds a space. He
automatically takes a step back. He does
not go on that gut. He says there's a
better way.
But that's not enough.
So now I have to think about my best
version of myself
in my role as a husband.
How do I want to be seen?
How do I want to be talked about?
How do I want to be experienced?
In my role as a professor, in my role as
a presenter.
Different roles, different selves.
And
I've helped millions of people engage in
this process, by the way.
And
when you
build the space
to think about your best self, what it
does is it pulls you away from the
trigger.
And it brings you back to your values.
And then through the lens of Mark, the
director of the Center for Emotional
Intelligence, like he's a different
dude. He's a totally different guy than
Mark who grew up in New Jersey being
bullied and is triggered.
Mark as a center director is like a
you know, Oz.
You know, the the Yoda of emotional
intelligence. Well, well, how would he
respond to this moment?
This is a beautiful challenge. I love
it.
And so my point is is that we can do
that for ourselves. We can help other
people do it. We can do it in a moment.
Ideally, we'll do it proactively.
So when you go home or when you come
into work, you pause, you identify, and
you think about the best version of
yourself, and you enter into that lens.
My favorite story about this
was, you know, we teach this in schools.
And this one kid, you know, when you
know when you when people joke about
things, you know they got it. So I'm in
this school and this teacher is like,
Mark, you know, this stuff is you know,
it's really funny. I said, what do you
mean? She goes, well, this kid was
really really not being kind to someone
on the playground, and I called him out
on it. And he came over and I said, you
know, I need to know exactly what
happened.
And the kid said, you know,
Mrs. Johnson,
I'm going to tell you what happened, but
I need you to take a meta moment first.
Like the kid knew that if he if she were
looking at what he had done through the
best version of herself, she would
respond differently.
That's the magic of the work. Well, I
think that the language around meta
moment is something that I'm going to
with your permission, I'm going to help
propagate because I do think languaging
and labels is very, very important in
terms of getting useful tools out more
broadly. You know, again, not to knock
on the mindfulness meditation work
that's gone goes back thousands of
years, but you know, it occurred to me
at some point like there's there's
genuine power for mental and physical
health in these practices, yoga nidra,
etc. And I had to
like have a conversation with myself and
go, you know what? I'm going to take
some heat for this, but I'm not going to
call it yoga nidra. I'm going to call it
non-sleep deep rest so more people do
it. And I and I apologize, but that's
you know,
there was a reason. There's a reason to
say this is the physiological sigh, you
know, eventually now we know you can
just do long exhale breathing, right? Um
principle's the same, but languaging is
so key for people to adopt these
concepts and they can't drink from the
fire hose. This is also what I've
realized. They can't take it all at
once, but you're building a curriculum
for people and and it's
so important. I I also I'm so struck by
this
the link that you discovered and uh
and in clearly embody of internalizing a
a
a fit person identification. You know,
you're a coach of a team, you're not
going to be a slovenly coach. You're
going to show that you also could you
did all this and you could continue to
do it if if your students and your
players challenge you to, right?
Identifying with a certain emotional
maturity, regulation level. That that is
also key because for myself, I mean, you
many years ago I remember thinking, you
know, I don't miss workouts. I just
decided. I just don't miss them. To the
point where sometimes I probably should
miss them. I probably overshot the mark
at times. Like, you know, and I learned
I don't train sick. I now take weeks off
every once in a while. So, those are
structured around that. So, it's not
push, push, push to the point of
self-destruction. But with a having an
emotional identity that you see in
yourself and and can live into.
I think that's a beautiful thing. I
mean, David Goggins talks about having
to have the old Goggins and the new one
in order to be the new one because both
live inside his head. He sat in the very
chair and explained both of them are in
here, but he has to take actions to be
one and not the other every single day.
And I think um
as this language around what we're
talking about evolves,
I do think it's going to go really far
and wide. I I have a theory right now.
Tell me where it's wrong wrong cuz it's
almost certainly wrong. That many people
are very in touch with their extreme
emotions of anger, sadness,
um
feeling like they're just, you know,
they're too woke, they're too they're a
fascist. Like, they're they're just in
touch with the emotions. And then we
have we're really good at putting labels
on other people's identities,
right? They're a narcissist. They're a
fascist. They're extreme woke. But we
don't really think about our own
identity as much.
>> Yeah. We're kind of lost in the
emotions. And that
uh political parties people usually know
where they stand. But what would this
look like to come up like I'm not asking
you to do this on the fly, but I'm
asking you to do this on the fly. Like
like is should we be thinking about
emotional maturity, emotional
intelligence? Is there a word that that
like we can internalize? Like, I'd like
to be in shape. I kind of know what that
is.
I want to be a certain amount of
strength, certain amount of endurance,
certain amount of I want want able to
run for the plane and not cough up a
lung. I also want to be able to open the
pickle jar. Want to be able to go up the
stairs without pain.
I know I have a concept of what that is
for me. What is a label that works
really well that people can start to
fill in the bins of what it is to be an
emotionally intelligent person. I think
it's emotional intelligence because it's
again, we need concepts that are
clear
that can be defined, that can be
measured, and that demonstrate
predictive validity.
And so every one of the skills, I wrote
a book on emotion regulation because
that was the area that I wanted to focus
on right now because that is at the top
of the hierarchy. At the end,
it's what you do with the feelings.
That's the regulation piece. But to do
that, you need to recognize your
feelings, understand them, label them,
decide whether you don't want to you
want to express them or regulate it's
the ruler framework.
Emotion perception, yes, it's
complicated,
but at the end, it's about building
relationships. I I can't know how you're
feeling about your facial expression.
You know that from Lisa's Feldman
Barrett's work. But I can make a
hypothesis and I can check in and say,
"Hey,
did what I say land on you well or not
so well? Let's talk about it." The
intelligence is the courage
to engage.
The understanding is listen,
because of my childhood, I have a
different relationship to anger than you
do. We learned that today together.
I see anger and I I it I have a fear
comes in my blood because I knew I was
going to get hit or yelled at or
screamed or punished. You have a
different relationship with anger.
Anger still is about injustice.
Period. We have to agree that the
definition is about perceived injustice.
However, my relationship to that and
yours is different. Just like whether
you're gay or straight or bi or trans,
um
homophobia
to someone who is LGBTQIA
is different than to someone who's not.
I can't relate
if I'm not you, but I can have the
the courage to have empathy for your
experience.
That's the understanding piece. I'm not
going to ever be a fully empathic to
your life because I didn't live your
life. It's your life. So, you can't
understand my life. You can relate to
pieces of it, but I can be curious about
it and not judge it.
The labeling piece is having that
language, you know, what is really
happening here? What is the experience?
The expression piece is knowing how and
when to express with different people
across contexts. It's saying, is how I'm
communicating landing well?
Is my intended outcome a possibility
here? Or is the person going to just,
you know, run away?
And then the last piece is the
regulation, which is in the end,
is this emotion helping or hurting me
achieve my goals in life?
And if it's going to hurt your goals,
you need strategies to deal with it.
Life is difficult.
I don't know about you, but this journey
in becoming an emotion revolutionary
ain't easy. You know, now I got it's
politicized and like we were talking
about earlier, it's like, really?
All right, come on. Like, what happened?
Who was your mother? That's what I want
to say. Like, tell me about the
relationship you have with your mother.
I probably shouldn't have said that, but
anyway, I'm okay with that. It's all
good. Maybe your father, whoever. The
point is is that
I feel very confident
in that what I teach
is easily defined.
It's measurable.
And I can show you my own and thousands
of other studies where these skills
predict things that we care about in
life, whether it's well-being, whether
it's leadership, whether it's
decision-making, whether it's
um
just mental health outcomes.
And so, it's
I kind of have incontrovertible evidence
for the effectiveness of it.
And so, you can still say I'm not into
it."
But you have to be educated first.
And once you once you really understand
the value proposition, the why behind
learning the skills,
I can't imagine that
every parent in the world wouldn't want
their kid
to develop these skills.
Especially if these skills are going to
be the defining skills of who succeeds
and who doesn't. I feel like that's when
a culture evolves. And I'm just
imagining a future not too long from now
where
the debate around
we all know who we're talking about
here. One group is saying, "They're all
fascists with no empathy."
And the other side is saying, "Well,
they're so caught up in
inclusivity that nothing's getting done
and people are being treated unfairly."
That's what the Yeah, that's our
society. That's the dialogue. And at
some point we got to go, "Okay,
everyone. Like, we understand your
positions.
But what are we going to do?" We got we
got to move forward. I don't know that
there's going to be a meeting in the
middle for a while. What is going to
happen, I think, is that young people
will
strive, hopefully, or they'll give up.
And I think if the people who strive
incorporate these tools and are rewarded
for them,
then that will become the standard.
>> Exactly.
>> kind of interesting that the obesity
crisis was real. Mhm. And there was also
a discussion around inclusivity. And
that is now shifted, in part because of
the GLP's, but there's now this idea
that
um
you know, being obese is unhealthy. You
couldn't say that five, six years ago. I
remember during the pandemic a colleague
of mine, very senior colleague, said,
"We're seeing people dying of COVID and
these people who are obese." And he
said, "But you can't say that publicly."
He told me, Yeah, I remember that. And
so now there's this acknowledgement,
right? Um
that
you know,
physical health is in is important and
people are striving for that more. And I
think there's uh
that's a I think that's generally a
positive shift. It can be taken too far.
But I think that
there's this weird moment that we're in
where
the name-calling and the labeling of
others, it's not getting us anywhere.
The opportunity cost is that we're not
actually figuring out like what we're
responsible for. And I I'm pointing
fingers at both sides. And I'm also
pointing fingers at myself because I can
sit here and say all sorts of things, uh
but I you know, clearly
we all have this work to do. Something
important about that is that you don't
know someone until you know their story.
Like I know a little bit about your
story now.
You know, I want to know more.
But, you know, and you know a little bit
more about my story. And once you know
someone's story, you start having
more interest in them, more compassion
for them.
You know, uh my partner made a movie
during the pandemic called America
Unfiltered, which was him and his
friend. So, it's a gay Panamanian
running around with a straight Russian
around America for a year interviewing
people about what it means to live in
America today. And they went to Trump
rallies and Biden rallies, and they went
into poverty, you know, and they went
into all over America, gun shop owners,
and black moms whose kids had been
murdered by the police, and
um people who wanted to become
Americans, you know, citizens.
And it was a listening journey.
And it was a remarkable uh how I did a
study on this, actually. I showed people
the expressions of people, and I had
them judge, you know, would you want to
get to know this person? How warm is
this person? Et cetera. Before they
watched the movie.
And what we found was that uh people
were very judgmental based on race,
based on if they were holding a gun or
not. And then you watch the movie and
you see the gun shop owner cry when he's
talking about his relationship with his
father.
And that the only way he
and his father
could bond was over
uh you know, with
And you start hearing his story and
you're sort of like
This guy's like a
really nice guy actually.
And then you we tested people afterwards
and we found that people had completely
different judgments of people after
hearing them and listening to their
stories.
And that's what we need in our society.
We need more curiosity and less
judgment.
And that goes to, you know, ourselves.
We'll be much more regulated. We'll have
better relationships. We don't have to
agree. I don't want But there's no need
to agree.
But there is a need
to be civil.
What you're talking about are standards.
Mhm. I think what you're talking about
is some standards of emotional
intelligence or at least str-
standards for striving. Cuz if we say
like oh there's standards of physical
presence and there's what does that
mean? No. Does that mean everyone has to
have like eight-pack abs and be
perfectly, you know, and then and then
you have older people trying to reverse
their age and ending up looking like
like totally artificial and yeah and it
can go too far, right? Um but I think
having standards of striving like
every kid does physical education
because even if you're not going to be a
great athlete, it's good to develop a
relationship to your body and take care
of it. Every kid should do emotional
intelligence training if you're even if
you're not going to become Mark
Brackett.
>> You you can learn to regulate better
than your parents and if you if you're
rewarded
We love rewards, right? We're
we're obsessed with if we if the
promotions and the the money and the
status, let's face it, people care about
that stuff comes from being healthier
physically and emotionally, who wouldn't
want that? I agree and it goes back
again. I think
I'm obsessive about this like being a
scientist about yourself.
You said this earlier, you know, you
based on whatever, you know, you we
won't have to go into go into this right
now, but like working out is your big
thing.
But then you realize, you know, like I
need a little break. I can take a break.
It's okay. It's okay to take a day off.
I can go walking on the beach or
whatever it is.
But that's the reflection process.
That's you having that metacognitive
ability to say, let me evaluate my life
right now. Like,
I can have a day like without the gym.
It's going to be good. I can go have
some fun with some friends.
I'm the same way.
All of this work that we do is about
that level of reflection. I have to ask
myself,
when I don't do my workout, is this an
excuse?
Like, what's really Am I really tired or
am I just like lazy right now?
Um and that's the work. You know, I was
thinking about this as we were talking
that it's a process. And you know, this
I came up with this process for myself
as I was, you know, writing which with
the workouts. You know, in the beginning
you look in the mirror. By the way, I
took photos of myself every month.
Every month religiously.
And the proof is in the photos. I'm in
like Sometimes I look at them like,
"Wow, Mark, you really did a good job."
Cuz I really got out of shape and I was
not happy with myself. I was used to
being an athlete as a martial artist.
And now I have 4 years of photos, you
know, front, side, back.
Every month. And you look at the day one
and you look at today and it's a
completely different human being.
I have to look at that once in a while
cuz I still have weird issues and I look
in the mirror and I'm like, "Uh
I'm like, wait, the picture tells the
truth."
But the phases of that are important.
The first phase is like, can I get
through this? Can I like I can't
do four workouts, go from 3,500 calories
a day down to 1,800 calories a day.
There's no way to do all that. Just like
you can't take every strategy in my book
and like be obsessive about it. Like,
I'm going to breathe, then I'm going to
walk, no I'm going to sleep, no I'm
going to talk positively, no I'm going
to reach out. You'll go nuts.
It's a process. This is life's work.
Like, the good news you got your whole
life to work on it cuz you're going to
need it forever.
So, that first phase
is kind of just a learning phase. Like,
what can I like what's the little steps
I can take?
The second phase is like,
you start seeing a little bit of
changes. Oh, my life's a little bit
better. Feel a little better. I'm
sleeping better. My relations are
better. I'm more positive. I even during
that phase of my workouts, I went
through this whole phase of negativity
cuz I'm like, Mark, you're married for
30 years. You're 56 years old. Who gives
a about your body?
And I would I I mean, I would do like
deadlifts and like, this is ridiculous
like when I'm deadlifting at 55 years
old.
And I would catch myself every time and
like, Mark, this is what you do. You're
you are a self-sabotager right now.
You got to pause
and you got to like, where is this
coming from? And how you going to get
that
self-sabotager self out of here? The
best version of you is not someone who
does just two sets of those deadlifts.
You do all four.
But it was so much work, I can't tell
you. But the beauty of all that, of like
working through the discomfort, is that
is that identity phase.
Cuz now it's not an option.
And so if you just do it and it becomes
part of your identity,
you don't have those struggles anymore.
I love it. And the the parallel between
physical fitness and emotional
intelligence is not something I
predicted before this conversation, but
I I love it and I I'm certain that it's
resonating with people because it's just
physical stuff is just so tangible. It's
so concrete. And look, I just want to
thank you for making the emotional
intelligence piece so concrete and for
laying out these steps. We'll obviously
provide links to your books.
>> I have a I want to play a game with you
for a minute though. Okay. You ready?
Okay. Because one of my former
colleagues and I got together a couple
weeks ago about a month ago and we
decided like, people are so
disconnected. We so we took all the
contents of my my books and we made a
game. So that you actually when you have
your party,
it's called the point of connection.
And so I did these are random cards.
>> And it involve an app or a Wi-Fi
connection.
>> got to be with people. Awesome. So,
uh there's your first card.
What's the best advice a mentor ever
gave you and how has it shaped the way
you live or work?
Two pieces.
Briefly.
The Mike Mentzer, one of the great
trainers,
gave me the advice to do
low volume, high intensity resistance
training.
>> Mhm.
Each body part once a week and train
only three times per week, maybe four.
Never more than 75 minutes, but to
really learn to enjoy training extremely
hard. And I followed that advice for 30
plus years and I look forward to
workouts. So, I don't work out every
day.
Um amazing advice. And then the
other advice, which is separate from
fitness, comes from a guy named
Bob Knight, who is a neurologist at UC
Berkeley,
who said, "Figure out how much work you
can do each week consistently
and then find some way to reset yourself
each week that is not destructive." And
I said, "What's yours?" And he said,
"Fishing." And I I was like, "Okay, I've
done a lot of fishing cuz my mom's side
all the men went fishing and
I like it. Decent fisherman, but I
thought, "What is that for me?" For me
it's hiking. Mhm. So, it could for
someone else it could be something else,
but I taught my lab that and I would
teach a career development course at
where I would pass that on at Cold
Spring Harbor during the summer, which
is kind of geek summer camp. And I said,
"That doesn't mean drinking."
But maybe one or two drinks. Someone
said, "Okay, fine." As long as it's
non-destructive, find a way to reset
every week. And just keep coming back.
And so, both of those things were about
consistency and intensity. So, two
mentors. All right, last one because I
think this one is more relevant to our
specific conversation.
>> right?
What's one emotion you've been carrying
a lot lately that you'd like to
experience less often? Oof.
Man. Sorry. What might help soften it?
>> [snorts]
>> All right.
Um
I don't know the name of this emotion.
Maybe you can help me. I'll try and
describe it briefly.
Lately I've been having these moments
of
feeling so much love and affection for
someone and it like opens and then I go
and then it shuts. But it's not opening
and shutting cuz of them. I'm like
and I know this feeling because in a
different version of it, I'm about to
get a new puppy. He's already picked
out. He's already
he's waiting. And
I know the difference between
what I just described and you're like
and I just let it rip with the with the
dog. Two different things, person, dog.
I acknowledge there's a fundamental
difference. But I feel this sort of like
like I shut it down. So what is that
emotion of closing down? I guess like
shutting off to love. Is that an
emotion? Or did I probably just revealed
way more than I am?
>> Well, love is a feeling obviously and
um
but I think
you know, um we're going to go back to
that opening a little bit about that
fear and vulnerability. Like just
allowing yourself to be with. There's
something that's
getting in the way there.
So what might help soften it?
Time?
Yeah. Just be with it. Let it let it
>> Right.
>> [snorts]
>> Man.
>> [laughter]
>> Thank you for that opportunity. Thank
you. I actually really appreciate the
opportunity. I hadn't thought about that
until I read this. Are you willing to
answer one? Yeah, sure. You're the
guest. I feel like you should speak
last. I spoke a lot today. All right. Um
I can pick one or you can pick one.
How's the game work? You basically you
can go in circles and everybody shares
and you look for the point of
connection. So it's
get to know people at a party.
You know, in the workplace.
Who is one of your heroes and what does
that reveal about what you value?
Well, as you know from our prior
um conversation, my the hero in my life
was my uncle Marvin because he helped me
get through my very traumatic experience
as a kid.
And what I value
about him now that I think about it more
was that nothing I could say
could startle him, nothing I could say
would make him run away.
He would He was just fully present
and a listener and a learner
and provided steady support.
Well, clearly you've internalized that.
Um
Mark, thank you so much for coming back.
Your your work is evolving so fast and
uh you're doing such good in the world
and uh
do come back again. I feel like you're
you're clearly on the move.
>> There you go. Um and doing amazing
things and uh again, I'll put links to
your book and your books plural and and
other work, but just want to say thank
you as a
as a
co-public educator um and uh somebody
who's really doing important work in the
world. Thank you. You're a really good
man.
Thank you. Appreciate it. Appreciate
you.
Thank you for joining me for today's
discussion with Dr. Marc Brackett. To
learn more about his work and to find
links to his books, please see the links
in the show note captions. If you're
learning from and or enjoying this
podcast, please subscribe to our YouTube
channel. That's a terrific zero-cost way
to support us. In addition, please
follow the podcast by clicking the
follow button on both Spotify and Apple.
And on both Spotify and Apple, you can
leave us up to a five-star review. And
you can now leave us comments at both
Spotify and Apple. Please also check out
the sponsors mentioned at the beginning
and throughout today's episode. That's
the best way to support this podcast. If
you have questions for me or comments
about the podcast or guests or topics
that you'd like me to consider for the
Huberman Lab podcast, please put those
in the comment section on YouTube. I do
read all the comments. For those of you
that haven't heard, I have a new book
coming out. It's my very first book.
It's entitled Protocols, an Operating
Manual for the Human Body. This is a
book that I've been working on for more
than 5 years and that's based on more
than 30 years of research and
experience. And it covers protocols for
everything from sleep to exercise, to
stress control, protocols related to
focus and motivation. And of course, I
provide the scientific substantiation
for the protocols that are included. The
book is now available by pre-sale at
protocolsbook.com.
There you can find links to various
vendors. You can pick the one that you
like best. Again, the book is called
Protocols, an Operating Manual for the
Human Body. And if you're not already
following me on social media, I am
Huberman Lab on all social media
platforms. So, that's Instagram, X,
Threads, Facebook, and LinkedIn. And on
all those platforms, I discuss science
and science-related tools, some of which
overlaps with the content of the
Huberman Lab podcast, but much of which
is distinct from the information on the
Huberman Lab podcast. Again, it's
Huberman Lab on all social media
platforms. And if you haven't already
subscribed to our Neural Network
Newsletter, the Neural Network
Newsletter is a zero-cost monthly
newsletter that includes podcast
summaries as well as what we call
protocols in the form of one-to-three
page PDFs that cover everything from how
to optimize your sleep, how to optimize
dopamine, deliberate cold exposure. We
have a foundational fitness protocol
that covers cardiovascular training and
resistance training. All of that is
available completely zero cost. You
simply go to hubermanlab.com, go to the
menu tab in the top right corner, scroll
down to newsletter, and enter your
email. And I should emphasize that we do
not share your email with anybody. Thank
you once again for joining me for
today's discussion with Dr. Mark
Brackett. And last, but certainly not
least, thank you for your [music]
interest in science.