Essentials: How to Build Strength, Muscle Size & Endurance | Dr. Andy Galpin

Welcome to Huberman Lab Essentials, where we revisit past episodes for the most potent and actionable science-based tools for mental health, physical health, and performance. I'm Andrew Huberman, and I'm a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine. And now, for my discussion with Dr. Andy Galpin. Welcome, Dr. Professor Andy Galpin. There are only a handful, meaning about three or four people who I trust enough in the exercise physiology space that when they speak, I not only listen, but I modify my protocols, and you are among those three or four people. I would love to have you share with us what you think most everybody or even everybody should know about principles of strength training and principles of let's call it hypertrophy, power, and the other sort of categories of training. >> There's about nine different adaptations you can get from exercise. First one to think about is well, we'll just call it skill. So, this is improving anything from say a golf swing to a squatting technique to running. This is just simply moving mechanically how you want your body to move. From there, we're going to get into speed. So, this is moving as fast as possible. The next one is power. And power is a function of speed, but it's also a function of the next one, which is strength. So, if you actually multiply strength by speed, you get power. So, there's carryover. So, like a lot of things that you would do for the development of strength and power um they are somewhat similar, but then there's differences. Once you get past strength, then the next one kind of down the list is hypertrophy. This is muscle size, right? Growing muscle mass is one way to think about it. After hypertrophy, you get into these categories of The next one is um these are all globally endurance-based issues, and the very first one is called muscular endurance. So, this is your ability to do How many push-ups can you do in 1 minute? You know, things like that. Past muscular endurance, you're now into more of an energetic or even cardiovascular fatigue. So, you've left the local muscle and you're now into the entire physiological system and its ability to produce and sustain work. Think about this as um I call this anaerobic power, right? So, this is your ability to produce a lot of work for say 30 seconds to maybe 1 minute, kind of 2 minutes like that. The next one down then is more closely aligned to what we call your VO2 max. So, this is your ability to kind of do the same thing but more of a time domain of say 3 to 12 minutes. So, this is going to be a maximum heart rate but it's going to be well past just max heart rate. Then after that, we have what I call long duration endurance. So, this is your ability to sustain work. The time domain doesn't matter in terms of how fast going you're going. It's how long can you sustain work? This is 30 plus minutes of no break like that. So, as just an high-level overview, those are the the different things you can target. And again, some of those cross over and some are actually a little bit contrary to the other ones. So, pushing towards one is maybe going to sacrifice something else. There is a handful of things you have got to do to make all of those things work. One of them is functionally called progressive overload. If you want to continue to improve, you have to have some method of overload. Adaptation physiologically happens as a byproduct of stress. So, you have to push your system. So, if you continue to do say the exact same workout over time, you better not expect much improvement. You can keep maintenance but you're not going to be adding additional stress. In general, you have to have some sort of progressive overload. This could come from adding more weights. This could come from adding more repetitions. It could come from doing it more often in the week. It could come from adding complexity to the movement. So, there's a lot of different ways to progress but you have to have some sort of movement forward. So, if you have this kind of routine you've built Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday or something and you just do that infinitely, um you're not going to get very far. So, what are the progressive overload principles um, that are most effective over time for strength and hypertrophy? >> You have what we call your modifiable variables. So, this is a very short list of all the things you can modify, the different variables within your workout that can be modified that will change the outcome. Fancy way of saying, if you do this differently, then you're going to get a different result. Um, so modifiable variables, um, the very first one of those is called choice. So, this is the exercise choice that you select. So, if you choose, I want to get stronger, I'm going to do a bench press. Well, if you do the wrong set range, the wrong repetition range, the wrong speed, you won't get strength, you may be get muscular endurance and very little strength adaptation. So, the exercise selection itself is important, but it does not determine the outcome adaptation, right? It is the application of the exercise. What are the sets, what are the reps, what are the uh, rest ranges are you using? That's going to be your primary determinant. The second one is the intensity, and that refers to in this context not perceived effort, like, "Wow, that was a really intense workout." It is quite literally either a percentage of your one rep at max or a percentage of your maximum heart rate or VO2 max. So, for the strength-based things, you want to think about what's percentage of the maximum weight I could lift one time, and that's that's what we're going to call one rep max. Or it's a percentage of my heart rate, right? So, if I tell you to get on a bike and I want you to do intervals and I want you to get 75%, I'm typically referring to 75% of your max heart rate or VO2 max or, you know, something like that. If I tell you to do squats at 75%, that means 75% of the maximum amount of weight you could lift one time or close. The third one is what we call volume. And so, this is just how many reps and how many sets are you doing, right? So, if you're going to do three sets of 10, that volume would be 30. Right? Five sets of five, that volume is 25. It's just a simple equation, how much work are you totally doing? Uh, the next one past that is called rest intervals. So, this is the amount of time you're taking in between typically a set. Um, then from there you have progression, which is what we started to talk about this progressive overload. Are you increasing by weight or reps or rest intervals or complexity? All of those things can be changed as a method of progression. And so, maybe you want to go um progressing from a single joint exercise like a a leg extension on a machine. And you want to progress by moving to a whole body movement like a squat. That in of itself, you don't have to change the load or the reps or the rest. That is a representation of progressive overload. And it's probably a pretty good place to start because number one, especially for beginners, you want to make sure that the movement pattern is correct. Don't worry about intensity. Don't worry about rep ranges or any of these things. You need to learn to move correctly and you need to give your body some time to develop some tissue tolerance. So, that you're not getting overtly sore. In general, soreness is a terrible proxy for exercise quality. It's a really bad way to estimate whether it was a good or a bad workout, especially for people in that beginner to middle to moderate. In fact, even the that for our professional athletes, um we do not use soreness as a metric of a good workout. On the same token, because stress is required for adaptation, you don't want to leave at the gym and feel like, I didn't really do much. Like I If you're sore of like you're moving around a little bit and you're like, man, this is a little bit sore, you can train. If you're like, I can't sit on the couch without crying because my glutes are so sore, in that particular case, I'd say you've actually gone to a place of detriment because now you're going to have to skip a training session. And now you're behind, so your actual total volume, say across the month, is actually going to be lower because you went way too hard in those workouts, had to take too many days off in between. You're going to see that you're going to cover less distance over the course of a month or 6 month or even a year. So, you want to walk a pretty fine line and for most people, I would say hedge a little bit on the side of less sore than more sore. Because frequency is very, very important for almost all these adaptations. It's training frequency, which is the last modifiable variable, right? Frequency. Which is how many times per week are you are you doing that thing? So, those are of our global things that we can play with. So, when I'm trying to manipulate and and get strength versus hypertrophy or, you know what? I want like a little bit of both. All those variables are the things that are going through my mind. Which one do I need to move in which direction so that I can get this outcome and not this outcome over here? For example, some folks might want to get stronger, but not put muscle mass on. Some folks are just kind of want both. And that's a lot of the general public. I want to get a little stronger and a little bit more muscle. Great. But, there are instances where people for performance reasons or for purely personal preference, like I don't want to get any more muscle. Great, but I want to get stronger. Awesome. If you manipulate those variables correctly, you can get exactly that. Very little development of muscle size and a lot of development in strength. And this is why we continue to break world records in sports like powerlifting and weightlifting that have weight classes. So, there's a top number that we can hit in terms of body size, but yet we continue to get stronger and faster. So, this is very possible if you understand how to manipulate all those variables. >> How should we uh modify the variables? >> Love it. All right, great. So, one of my other laws of strength and conditioning is, in general, the default is all joints through all range of motion. So, this is important because it's going to answer your very first question on this strength category. In general, the ankle should go through the full range of motion in the ankle. The knee should go through the full range of motion in the knee, the hip, the elbow, etc., etc., right? So, across I would even say it doesn't even have to be the day, but maybe throughout the week. Try to get every joint through full range of motion. When I say full range of motion, that's the default. That doesn't mean every single person can do that for every single exercise. It means that's where we should be striving to and that's our starting point. You're going to see a lot less injury and a lot more productivity out of your training sessions. In fact, the science is fairly clear on this one. Well, strength development as well as hypertrophy is generally enhanced with a larger range of motion of training. So, if you need if you're doing a say a deadlift, and in order to take your knee through a full range of motion a deadlift, you have to compromise your back position, that's no bueno. So, caveats there aside, don't kill me. Like, in good positions always. >> kill yourselves, more importantly. >> So, why that matters is if we walk through strength, the very first thing I'm going to go through is the the exercise selection. So, let's choose an exercise which ideally has a full range of motion or close to it, that doesn't induce injury for you, that you can still maintain good neck and low back and in position and everything else. Um you feel comfortable with, so you can feel strong, but you don't feel like oh my gosh. If you've never snatched before, having you do a snatch for a maximum, even, you know, 75% like it's a terrible idea. You're not going to feel confident, it's going to be a train wreck. I would rather put you on a machine bench press, so you can go I feel stable, I feel safe here, and I can just express my strength. So, exercise choice in general, full range of motion, and you want to kind of balance between the movement areas. So, this is an upper body press, so this is pushing away from you, bench press, things like that. Upper body pull, pulling an implement towards you, uh bent row, pull up. Um the pressing should be horizontal, so perpendicular to your body, as well as vertical. So, this is lifting a weight over top of your head, lifting a weight away from you. The pull version is pulling horizontally to you and pulling vertically down, pull up, things like that. So, if you were going to do a single workout, you could choose four exercises. And you could choose one of each, one press, upper body press, one upper body pull, one lower body hinge, one lower body press. And then that would be like a decently well-rounded exercise. Um that's your exercise selection. And if you're taking those through a full range of motion, you're in a pretty good spot, as close as you can. The next one is intensity. So, if you want to develop strength, there is a certain recruitment threshold needed for neurons to fire, and we have muscle fibers in what we call fast-twitch muscle fibers and slow-twitch muscle fibers. And in general, you're going to activate the slow-twitch ones first because they tend to be associated with low-threshold motor neurons. It's not exactly that way, but it's it's close enough, right? Well, the only way that you activate some of these higher threshold neurons is to demand the muscle to produce more force. So, in general, the only way to use these big chunks of your muscle, which are incredibly important for aging, by the way. One of the major problems we have with aging developing or development of aging related issues with muscle is the fact that we lose fast-twitch fibers preferentially. And then we have major problems as we go down the line because we've lost a big chunk of our strength and size. So, you want to make sure these fibers stay alive and intact. So, with that being said, the only way to develop strength is then to challenge the muscle to produce more total force. So, if you want to get stronger, you need to impose a demand of strength, not repetitions. So, this has to be the load has to be very high. Um in general, you're probably looking at above 85% of your one-rep max. If you're moderately trained, maybe 75%. So, because the intensity demand is so high, that is going to enforce you to do a low repetition range. You can't do 12 reps at 95%. That then it wouldn't be 95% of your one-rep max. So, by definition, true strength training is really going to be in like five repetitions per set or less range. So, we've covered choice, intensity, and um repetitions, right? The total amount of sets that you do is is really kind of up to your personal fitness level, right? Um if you did as little as like three sets per exercise, that's probably enough. >> Work sets. >> Totally. Yeah, totally work sets, right. So, you'll be fully warmed up and build up to that 85%. Don't just walk into the gym and throw 85% on and go. Thank you. That's a That's an important distinction. A very classic warm-up thing would be like a set of 10 at 50%, a set of eight at 60%, a set of maybe eight again at 70%, and then maybe like a set of five at 75%. So, two or three or four sets kind of building intensity and lowering the rep range, and then you would go after your two or three working sets. Also, in terms of rest intervals, the primary driver of strength is intensity. It's It's not the volume, right? It's the intensity. So, in order to maintain that, we have to do a low repetition range, but in addition, we also have to have a high rest interval. Because if we have any amount of fatigue can occur, and we have to then either reduce the reps or reduce the intensity, we've lost the primary driver. We've lost that main signal. So, the number we're going to throw out typically is like two to four minutes. Um so, imagine you did you know, your set of bench press, and you did five repetitions at 85%. You probably want to rest two to four minutes before coming back to the bench. That doesn't mean you have to sit there on your phone. Like In fact, please don't. Like Everyone will thank you for not doing that, I promise. You can engage other muscle groups. This is what we call supersetting. So, you're doing your bench press, and while that two-minute clock is running for your chest to rest, you can go over and do your deadlifts. You can kind of move back and forth, and this is how you can make strength training not a 7-hour workout. If you're a professional athlete, you're going to take that time because you want to maximize the outcome. Um sup- We've done this actually in our lab, too. Supersets will reduce the strength gains, but by a tiny amount. And most of us don't care enough relative to it's going to triple the length of your training session. It's not worth it. So, for the average person, I will tell them, "Yeah, superset." For someone who's trying to break a world record in weightlifting or powerlifting, I don't superset. >> How often can can and should one train a muscle? And how do you know if a muscle is recovered locally? And how do you know if your nervous system is recovered systemically? >> One of the question is, what are you training for? If you're training for hypertrophy, right? Muscle size, muscle growth. We need to hedge towards recovery. Because what you're trying to do is cause a massive insult there, allow then protein synthesis to occur, building of new tissue, which takes time, 48 to 72 hours like kind of at a minimum. That process needs to occur. If you're doing actually more strength, strength is not going to cause a lot of soreness. Therefore, intensity is the driver, therefore frequency can be as high as you want. So, you can train every single day the same exact muscle if speed or power or strength are the primary training tools. But, if you want to allow for that process of connect and contract our proteins to to add and grow, then you're going to have to allow some recovery because if you go back into that muscle too soon, you're going to blunt the response. You're going to stop it. You're going to cut it off. You have all kinds of of problems going on in the cell that are going to um just attenuate that that growth response. So, the answer for hypertrophy is probably less than three out of 10 on level of soreness, you can go again. In general, you're probably looking at 72 hours is the optimal window. So, if you trained your your shoulders on Monday, you probably wouldn't want to train them again on Tuesday if hypertrophy is the goal. Maybe Wednesday, maybe Thursday's best. So, something like an every two to three-day window is is probably um and we know a little bit more now about why that is. Um the gene cascade, the signaling response happens well, the signaling happens instantaneously, right? Within seconds. The gene cascade is probably in the peak in the four-hour window, like the depending on which gene you want to look at, but it's just kind of a snapshot. But, the protein synthesis process is 24 to 48-hour thing. And so, it tends to kind of look like let that thing finish and let that signal go back to the baseline and then hit it again. And then hit it again. And now, as long as you're providing the nutrients, the recovery should happen and you should be able to sustain the same work output in the training session. So, the stimulus stays high and the recovery's there and you can now continue to grow muscle. >> What if the the training split, uh lifestyle factors, etc. Somebody, say let's use your example, trains uh shoulders on Monday. Um Ideally, they would train them again on Thursday. >> Yep. >> In their particular instance, somewhere Wednesday or Thursday. But, they don't. They wait until Saturday or Sunday for whatever reason. Maybe it's more compatible with their work work and other exercise schedule. Are they actually losing hypertrophy that they gained or they've missed out a window to induce further hypertrophy? >> It's probably better to think about it the the latter. It's not that you're you've lost, it's just you've just kind of lost an opportunity to to make more progress. If you want to take 5 days or 6 days in between each muscle group, you can do that. In fact, if you look at the research, it's going to show that frequency it can handle changes as long as you get to the same total volume. So, you can do that. You just have to do a lot more work in that one workout. The challenge with splitting up your training sessions for hypertrophy into smaller numbers, like once or twice a week, it's just difficult to get that number. It's difficult to get that volume done. Volume-wise, the more recent meta-analyses are going to say that you're probably looking at about 10 working sets per muscle group per week. Seems to be kind of the minimum threshold that you're going to want to hit. So, if you did three sets of 10 at your shoulders on Monday, three sets of 10 shoulders Wednesday and three on Friday, that's nine working sets. The problem is 10 is kind of the minimum. You probably want to look for more like 15 to 20. And in fact, well-trained folks, 20 25. That becomes very challenging in one workout. In fact, de facto, you're not going to be able to do it, right? And so, that is where it's not the frequency that looks like it kills you, it's just the fact you have got to get because the total driver of strength is intensity, but the total driver of hypertrophy is volume. Assume you're taking it to fatigue, right? Or muscular failure. So, it's just tough to get enough done >> for hypertrophy. >> Sure. >> What are the repetition ranges that are effective? And what are the ones that are most effective if one is trying to maximize some of the other variables? Like, people don't want want more than an hour to 75 minutes in the gym. >> The quick answer there is anywhere between like 5 to 30 reps per set. That's going to show across the literature pretty much equal hypertrophy gains. Um but I'm just remembering one thing from a second ago. I want to give a better answer for the frequency. You can do every single day for strength. If you want though, like what's probably minimally viable, two twice per week per muscle. So hamstrings strength twice per week. That That's a good number to get most people really strong. >> Okay. >> You can do every single day. You don't need to though. So I I want to make sure that like I wasn't saying you have to train a muscle 85% every single day to get it strong. Two is a good number. Three is great, but probably even two is really effective. When it comes to hypertrophy training, the way I like to explain it is it's kind of idiot-proof. The programming is idiot-proof. The work is hard though. So you here's your range. Anywhere between you know, five reps and 30. Like can you hit somewhere in there? Perfect. It's all equally effective. You can't screw that up. The only caveat for hypertrophy is you have to take it to muscular failure. >> And you need enough rest for the adaptation and protein synthesis to occur. >> Yep. >> Yeah. >> And if you recover faster, you can maybe do it more frequently. And if you don't, maybe less frequently. >> Should people perhaps experiment and figure out what repetition range allows them to recover um in concert with the training frequency that they can do consistently? >> My recommendation is I think you should actually use the repetition range as a way to have some variation. Because most people don't want to go in the gym and do three sets of 10. They're going to get very bored very quickly. And so I I think you should actually intentionally change the rep schemes for simple sake of having more fun. It is a very different challenge. The mechanisms that are inducing hypertrophy are different. But there's only a maximum amount of growth that one can get, right? But the three most likely drivers are one, metabolic stress, two, mechanical tension, and then three, muscular damage. You don't have to have all three. One is sufficient. You can have a little bit of one or two, and you can kind of So you get to to play here. We've already talked about the muscular damage. Again, it's very clear more damage is not better. But it is somewhat a decent proxy, right? Like I get a little bit of soreness is good. Just don't get so sore it's compromising your total volume. All right? Um mechanical tension is kind of like strength and this is why if you do even sets of five or eight and you're kind of close to that strength range, you will gain a little bit of muscle. It's not optimal muscle gain, but you're going to gain some because everything in these like physiology doesn't cut off at four reps and then five reps is a different thing, right? It's It's always a blend so think of it as like a a fading curve. As you get closer to the end, it fades less effective. As you get closer to the middle, it's more effective. Anywhere between eight reps per set to 30, it's equally effective. Past 30, it's going to blend out. Past eight to five to four to three, it's going to blend you know, less or there. So, mechanical tension is the one that's heavy. Muscle damage is the other one. The third one is metabolic stress. And this is um a get a a bit of an area of scientific contention, but something's there. I know something's there. We just We're just kind of fumbling to figure out what exactly it is. And this is Metabolic stress is the burn, right? It It's there. So, you want to train to failure, but you don't need to go to extreme failure. So, you don't need to necessarily go to that like a partner has to lift the barbell off my chest. But you have to get close. If you'd be willing to throw out a few sort of sets and rep parameters that could act as broad guidelines for people who want to explore further. A really fast answer is what I just call the three to five concept, all right? So, pick three to five exercises. If you're feeling better that day, choose on the higher end. If you're feeling less that day or you have a shorter time frame to train, go less. So, three to five exercises, do three to five reps, three to five sets, take three to five minutes rest in between, and do it three to five times a week. So, that can be as little as three sets of three for three exercises, three times a week. That's that's a 20-minute workout three times a week. It can be as high as five sets of five for five exercises five days a week. So, it's very broad and allows people to still stay within the domains of strength and power while still being able to move and contour toward their lifestyle and and soreness and time and all those things. The only differentiator to pay attention to between power and strength is intensity. So, if you want strength, this is now 85% plus of your max, right? If you want power, it needs to be a lot lighter cuz you need to move more towards the velocity end of the spectrum because power is strength multiplied by speed. So, while getting stronger by definition can help power, you probably want to spend more of your time in the 40% to 70% range. Like plus or minus. So, that's it. Both of them conceptually though work everything else. The exercise, the reps, the the frequency, all that can be still in the three to five range. Just change the intensity depending on which outcome you want. >> The nervous system obviously plays an important role at the level of nerves controlling the contraction of muscle fibers. But, of course, we have these upper motor neurons, which are the ones that reside in our brain that control the lower motor neurons that control muscle. This takes us into the realm of where the mind is at during a particular movement. I can imagine doing workouts that are mainly focused on strength or mainly focused on hypertrophy. And in the case of strength, am I trying to move weights? And when I'm trying to generate hypertrophy, am I trying to {quote} challenge muscles? That subtle mental shift changes the patterns of nerve fiber recruitment. So, can we say to get stronger, focus on moving weights still with proper form and safely? And to get hypertrophy, focus on challenging muscles still with proper form and safely. >> Intentionality matters for both. In other words, if you look at some interesting science that's been done on power development and speed development, the intent to move is actually more important than the actual movement velocity. So, if if you're doing say something for power or strength and you're doing just enough to get the bar up, that will result in less improvements in strength than even if you're moving at the exact same speed, but you're intending to move faster. And this is one of the reasons why good coaching matters. So, if you're coaching an athlete through a power workout especially, and they're doing enough to just lift 50% of their one-rep max, it's not going to generate as much speed development as them trying to move that bar as fast as they can, even if the net result is the same barbell velocity. Turns out nerves matter. >> Even if the bar is moving at the same speed, same weight, >> Yeah. >> if my internal representation, my thoughts are I'm trying to move this as fast as possible, versus I'm just trying to get the bar away from me, and and get the weight up, I'm going to get different outcomes. >> Yep, this is quality of work, right? This is Did you do enough to just check off the box or did you actually strive for adaptation, right? Si- Similar concept actually works for hypertrophy. In terms of there is a handful of very recent studies that have looked at what we'll call the mind-muscle connection. And this is doing things like imagine a bicep curl, and you're simply looking at and watching your biceps and you're thinking about contracting it harder, even though you execute the same repetitions at the same exact intensity, initial indications are the mind-body connection are going to result in more growth than not. I think it's very much worth your time to do a higher quality training session, be more intentional, be present, than just executing the same exact workout. I think that's globally very clear to be to your advantage. So, if you're thinking like I'm going to like I don't want to work out today. I got all this going on or I'm tired or whatever. I'm just going to do the work out anyways and get through it. Okay. If you can go, you know what though? Like I'm going to cut 15 minutes out of this thing. I'm going to get my head right. I'm going to go get 20 minutes of quality work done. That's that's your best option by far. >> Are there ways that people can learn to engage particular muscle groups more effectively over time for sake of hypertrophy or strength or for cases of trying to overcome injury potential or injury because imbalances are bad across the board. >> Yeah, this is actually very common and I think everyone has probably gone through this. There's some part that you just can't get going. This goes back to earlier part of our conversation, which is why exercises themselves do not determine the adaptation. It's the execution that matters, right? It's the technique, it's the rep range. All of those are going to determine your actual result. So if anytime you were you're you're banging your head against the wall and thinking like why am I not getting movement here? Growth or strength or whatever. It's guaranteed to be one of those areas, right? You're probably not getting um the muscle groups to activate. Whenever I'm diagnosing movement quality, I look for a handful of things, but very first one is awareness. You'd be surprised how many folks um when you just simply tell them that muscle group right there and maybe you give them a a tactical prompt. So you touch it and you just tell them things like, "Hey, squeeze my finger. Squeeze my finger." As you're doing your bent row or your pull down, you can touch the lat. All this stuff can help get people uh to activate. Outside of simple awareness, eccentric overload is a very effective way for um activation of a difficult to target muscle. Things like a pull-up. Okay, so if if if I'm going to do a pull-up and I have poor lat activation, to make the movement simpler, I'm going to go all the way to the top. So imagine stepping on a box or something going all the way to that top of that pull-up position and starting from there and I want you to simply lower it under control. And so you're just simply breaking the movement down into smaller pieces that allow you to to focus on the execution more. Eccentrics are great for strength development, very good for hypertrophy, and allow you to focus on control. I I I'm willing to bet a huge percentage of you out there who've like I've never had a sore lat, even though I've done a lot of pull-ups and things like that. If you do that eccentric only, you'll probably wake up the next day going, "Oh gosh, I feel it there." And that's a sign, even if you didn't feel it in the workout, but it got a little sore the next day, keep down that path. And eventually work that into a progression where you can do the concentric, eccentric, and isometric portions and get activation. So, that that may take you 6 weeks. May take you 6 months. But, that's generally a pretty good strategy for learning how to activate a muscle group. >> Is there a uh prescriptive for how to breathe during resistance training that applies 75% of the time to 75% of people? >> In general, a a decent strategy is to maintain a breath hold during the lowering or eccentric or most dangerous part of the movement, and then you can exhale on the concentric portion. So, if the bench press is our example, if you held in, braced, lowered under control, and now started the concentric pushing away force, and then you wanted to take an expiration during the last half of the concentric portion, that's that's an okay strategy. If you're going to do a single rep, you don't need to worry about it. You you can just avoid or omit breathing entirely. You're going to be just fine. If you're doing more than that, especially three to four to five to seven eight, you're going to have to have some breathing strategy. A very common one is um probably every third breath. I'm going to do like Shh. Exhale on the third. Reset, re-breathe. Something like that. If you feel like you need to breathe after every one, that's okay, but it's going to get wasteful cuz you have to take time in between reps of sitting there. If it's a squat, that's different um versus a deadlift if you're resting at the bottom. So, there there is a little bit of game here. So, in general though is that is that 75 75 kind of rule you thrown out. You threw out Breathe in. Do the lowering and exhale on the out. If you have to, less reps, don't worry about it. More reps, then you need to come up with some sort of breathing strategy. >> How about breathing in between sets? Um and maybe even after the workout. >> Yeah. We're not going to just finish a workout, high-five, drink water, and walk out of the gym. There will be a down-regulation strategy that is heavily involved with some sort of light control as well as breath control. Um the individual prescription on that there's a ton of variation with what you can do. The easiest thing is do something that calms you down. Most likely that's going to be move towards as much nasal breathing as you can possibly do. And a a really easy rule of thumb is a double exhale length relative to inhale. So, if you need to take a like 4-second inhale, double that time and breathe out for 8 seconds. A box breathing is fine, so equal inhale, equal hold, equal exhale, equal hold. So, 4-second inhale, 4-second hold, etc., etc. And just breathe for 5 minutes. >> And I started doing this and it completely changed the rate of recovery for me. I realized that I was leaving workouts, both endurance workouts and strength hypertrophy workouts, feeling great, but looking at my phone, getting right into email and meetings, not concentrating on my breathing. And all I did was to introduce a on your recommendation a 5-minute down-regulation, so exhale emphasized breathing of a bunch of different varieties, physiological sighs, box breathing, exhale emphasized twice as long as the inhale component for 5 minutes. And I noticed two things. One, I recovered more quickly workout to workout, no question about it. >> Yeah. >> And the other is that I used to have this dip in energy that would occur 3 or 4 hours after a hard workout, and I always thought that had to do with the fact that I generally eaten a meal at some point post-workout. >> Mhm. >> Turns out it wasn't the meal at all. It's that that that adrenaline ramp up during the workouts. I wasn't clamping that at the end and so I think eventually it just crashed. Turns out the down regulations allowed me to work through the afternoon. It's really been quite powerful and so I'm grateful to you for that and I think this is something that I think 98% of people are not doing and it's only 5 minutes. >> You don't even have to do five. Give me three. If you really have to push it, give me three. You can do this in the shower if you have to. You need some sort of internal signal that we're safe. Throttle down here. We're going to move on. That has to happen. >> Yeah, and you're saving energy. I mean the energy here is neural energy. I think fighters do this good fighters learn to do this between rounds. Sprinters learn to do this between events. I think humans should learn how to do this between any social engagement. I mean this is so such a powerful tool. >> Do this for 1 minute after every important whether it's an individual high volatile interaction or if it's a you just did a nice 45 minute sprint to work and you're deep into it or whatever, fine. Just give me 1 minute and that also will pay dividends. >> I think the listeners and I can well appreciate on the basis of today's discussion what a enormous wealth of information you are, how clear and and potently you communicate that information and also how you can take a huge cloud of information and still distill it into protocols that ought to work for 75% of people 75% of the time which is an immensely valuable thing to do. So, for me and from the listeners I just want to say thank you so much. >> My pleasure, man. I'm fine. I'm glad we finally got to connect. >> Professor Andy Galpin, thank you ever so much. >> My pleasure.