Video summary
Jessica Baum defines safety not merely as an internal state but as a profound sense of connection, togetherness, and physical relaxation that is deeply rooted in secure attachment. She argues that while individuals often strive for self-sufficiency—a trait culturally rewarded through "workcoholism" or relentless productivity—this approach keeps the nervous system stuck in sympathetic activation, leading to isolation and loneliness. True safety comes from knowing one will be okay regardless of external circumstances because a supportive network is present; this allows people to internalize that security rather than relying solely on their own limited capacity for regulation. Baum explains that when we live primarily in our left hemispheres focused on tasks and survival, we become disembodied and disconnected from the sensations stored in our bodies where relational trauma resides. Consequently, many successful but lonely individuals find themselves trapped in a cycle of doing more to avoid feeling unsafe, mistaking this avoidance for strength rather than recognizing it as a protective mechanism against deeper emotional pain. The podcast highlights how early childhood dynamics create implicit memories that dictate adult relationship patterns, often causing people to confuse familiarity with safety and intensity with intimacy. Individuals are biologically wired to seek out partners who match their "familiar" experiences; if one grew up in chaos or neglect, they may be unconsciously attracted to similar chaotic or intense relationships because the brain interprets this known discomfort as home. This dynamic is particularly evident in the attraction between anxious and avoidant attachment styles, where both parties are seeking what the other cannot provide due to their own unresolved wounds: the anxious partner seeks connection out of fear of abandonment while the avoidant partner needs space for regulation. Baum emphasizes that without healing these original childhood wounds through co-regulation with safe adults or partners, individuals will repeatedly recreate early trauma dynamics in search of a parent figure who can finally hold them and provide the emotional availability they missed as children. Baum introduces critical concepts such as "ventral states," derived from Stephen Porges's polyvagal theory, which describe a state of social engagement where eye contact is held, breathing is calm, and thoughts are expansive. She explains that deep healing requires moving out of protective survival modes into this ventral state through co-regulation with another person who can hold space without trying to fix or change the distressed individual. A key practice for couples involves understanding their nervous system responses during conflict—whether one shuts down, fights, flees, or collapses—and communicating these needs rather than reacting automatically. The concept of "rupture and repair" is presented as essential for building intimacy; while many fear conflict, true rupture followed by genuine repair allows partners to understand each other's internal worlds better, deepening the bond beyond a simple return to baseline. However, this process requires emotional capacity from both parties, particularly regarding shame management, which often blocks effective repair and leads to defensive cycles that prevent resolution. Ultimately, Baum challenges the meritocratic narrative that equates independence with success and happiness, asserting instead that meaning is found in deep connection rather than material achievement or status. She notes that money cannot fix internal unhappiness once basic survival needs are met, debunking the illusion that reaching a specific goal like wealth or fame will finally bring fulfillment. The path to healing involves slowing down enough to become present with one's felt sense and inviting others into that vulnerability, even though this feels terrifying for those accustomed to controlling their environment. While she acknowledges the difficulty of asking for help due to cultural stigmas around masculinity and emotional expression, Baum insists that true strength lies in admitting when we need support from safe people or professional anchors like EFT therapists. The conclusion is clear: developmental trauma cannot be healed alone through self-help books; it requires a relational environment where individuals can experience disconfirming evidence of safety, allowing them to rewrite their nervous system's blueprint for how the world works and move toward lasting security.
Read the full video transcript
What's your best definition of safety?
>> Oh wow. Um I I get so technical because
safety means so much to me now. So
safety is just to feel really connected
and like a sense of togetherness when
you're with people and and a feeling of
relaxed and openness in your body.
>> Mhm.
I
recently did a week-long retreat uh
working on emotions for 12 hours a day.
Did your book just fall down behind you?
There's a poltergeist in there. That's
okay. Um, I recently did a uh a
week-long retreat uh working on emotions
for 12 12 hours a day. And um
>> 12 hours a day.
>> 12 hours a day. 9:00 a.m. till 9:00 p.m.
uh for 6 and a half days. And um one of
the best definitions of safety that I
came across while I was there was uh
knowing that you'll be okay no matter
what happens. And I really love that as
a a a definition of safety because it
feels
even if things are difficult, it's not
about hard stuff not happening. It's
about knowing that you'll be there on
the other side of it and knowing that
you'll be okay on the other side of it
as well. I wanted to get your thoughts
on that given you've just written an
entire book about it. Well, I actually I
explain not even about my book, but like
sometimes in life we're not okay. But I
think what gives me safety is knowing
that I have the support that no matter
what, even if not okay things happen,
war, crisis, that I have people around
me that will be there and support me no
matter what. which that actually gives
me a sense of safety because we live in
such a world that where anything can
happen and there's so much uncertainty
and the support system that I have
actually gives me more safety than
anything else.
>> So safety is not just something that
exists inside of you. You can actually
outsource it. You can be unsafe and the
people around you can make you safe or
you can be not okay and the people
around you can make you safe.
>> Yeah. I mean so now we're getting into
the book but we're talking about secure
attachment. I mean, secure attachment is
built from people who have um what we
call a window of tolerance, a sense of
safety within their nervous system and
they're around you and you've
internalized that. So, the more you
internalize that safety from other
people, the more you feel safe in and
around out the world. And if you don't
get that, that's when we get the
insecure types of attachment.
>> What are some of the signs that somebody
feels unsafe in a relationship? Signals
from their nervous system. What will
they feel like?
>> I mean, everything from your gut
dropping, your heart racing, feeling
like the ball's going to drop, um,
feeling smothered, feeling like you're
going to lose yourself, feeling
abandonment. All of those things are
usually felt sensationally in your body
through close connections and through
small behaviors that you share with your
partner or anyone that's close and
important.
>> What are some of the small behaviors
that people might not think of that
contribute to this? You know, one that
comes to me comes to mind is the blank
stare. So, like when you're really
engaging with someone and they
dissociate and they kind of check out,
my system will register, "Oh my god,
you're not with me right now." And that
can kind of set my my system on fire.
And that's actually what a baby feels
when they're with their primary
caregiver. And the caregiver checks out
because we need connection so badly.
It's a biological imperative. When we
can sense that someone's not with us,
our nervous system responds to that and
it signals danger.
[snorts]
>> That's the blank face experiment.
>> Yeah. Stare
>> blank stare blank stare experiment.
Yeah. Uh so you write about um
protective strategies, inner protectors.
What are some of the common protection
strategies and inner protectors that
people develop?
>> Oh man, we all develop so many
protectors and we need them so badly.
For me, one was workcoholism. But it's
anything that we might do compulsively
or we might do even unconsciously to
avoid feelings that might be inside our
body. So, if we don't have safe places
and safe ways to process what's going on
with us, we usually develop behaviors. I
mean, it can be drinking, it can be
exercising, um it can be workcoholism,
it can be hitting your vape, it could be
internet. And I'm not saying that these
behaviors are bad. It's when we turn to
them over and over and over as a way to
avoid what's going on inside that they
become ways that we use to protect
ourselves from deeper feelings that
we're not ready to face.
>> So the role of them is to distance us
from feeling stuff,
>> protect us. Yeah. Yeah. Sometimes we
can't handle what's going on inside. So
we need to go for a run or we might need
to have that extra glass of wine. We
don't know how to process what's going
on inside.
>> You mentioned workcoholism is one of or
was one of your uh protectors. Why do so
many women who appear strong and
independent actually feel unsafe or
disconnected inside?
>> Yeah, I talk about this a lot in the
book and I talk about the right
hemisphere and the left hemisphere of
the brain. And I geek out on the
science, but we grow up in a culture,
male and female, where we're like so
pushed to be independent,
self-sufficient, self-regulating, which
I could go on forever about, and we
shift into our left hemispheres and we
become like productive little doers and
very successful. The problem is when
we're living life like like that, we're
in survival mode most of the time and
we're not in our right hemisphere and we
are not relating and we're not
connecting deep and deeply and we're
just like doing all the time. And I did
that and I think it's it's pushed on us
as as women and men to in our culture to
be successful and that that's the most
important thing and then that will make
you happy. And I mean I don't want to
speak for you but I know that being
successful is not what makes me happy.
It's my connections. It's my
relationships. It's those that's what
gives me meaning. But I I think that
we're all misled a lot. And we can be
very lonely in that that category of
just go go go be successful kind of
arena.
>> It's a vicious combination because doing
the independent thing is it it it
achieves two two goals. First off, it
the lack of reliance on other people
means that you're never at the mercy of
them. So safety may be very low, but
it's only ever generated internally and
it's only ever at the mercy of what you
do internally. Now, that forgets the
fact that we need people around us and
connection is very important and all the
rest of the stuff, but that's like a
slow drip drip drip of disconnection and
misery as opposed to the big roller
coaster carousel that is I'm with
somebody and I don't know if they like
me and I don't know if I can trust them
and maybe I can and oh my god, what's
going on? So, I think that's one side of
it. It it is this um prophylactic that
makes life much grayer but kind of more
predictable at least in that regard
because it's on your shoulders. Um, the
other side of that is that it's rewarded
by the world because the independence is
great in a meritocracy. It looks like
agency. It looks like intentionality. It
looks like you're able to take on things
and you're a doer. And all of this is
very compelling is, you know, it's it's
beguiling. It's electric. The people
around you think, "Oh, look at what a
what a a wonderful person. They're an
upstart and they can do it themselves
and that's the sort of person that I
want to be around." So it is um
protective albeit in a sort of quite
unholistic way internally and it's
rewarded albeit in a very shallow
meritocratic capitalist way externally.
So I I totally see why
the independence thing the sort of boss
lady energy I is especially for women uh
is very attractive. Well, look, I'm no
longer at the mercy. For almost all of
human history, women have been at the
mercy of the resources and and the
ability of their partner to protect
them, the ability of their family around
them to protect them. And now I've been
able to do it on my own.
And I don't feel connected to anybody.
>> And I don't feel connected to my
emotions. And I don't understand why I
don't feelings. And I don't have to
engage with my felt sense of unsafety
fully, but I don't ever fully feel safe.
>> And I'm not connected to my body.
talk to me about that.
>> So, we store our relational trauma and
attachment wounds in our body and um a
lot of sensations move up through our
body into our right hemisphere and we
can make sense and and we develop
introsception and all this stuff. But
when we live in a left shifted society,
so when we live in a space where we're
constantly going, we're on sympathetic
activation, we're more in our left
hemisphere, which is important for
survival. It's important for, you know,
accomplishing tasks. It's important for
a lot of things, but it disconnects us
from our body. So, we become more um
disembodied, um more dissociated, and
we're not connected to what's going on
inside as much. And it actually protects
us. Like, I needed to be protected from
what was going on inside of me cuz I
wasn't ready to face it. But, you know,
you kind of feel like a bobblehead or
you don't you're not you're not
embodied. you're you're disconnected
from self as a self-protective way and
then you keep feeding the monster by
saying, "Well, I'm just going to do
more, do more, do more, do more." And
75% of our western culture lives more
left shifted. And it is the underlying
reason for our epidemic of loneliness
right now going on because you cannot
connect relationally when you're in
sympathetic activation and you're living
more in that mode.
>> [snorts]
>> How can somebody tell if they are in
their independence disconnection energy?
What are the telltale signs?
>> I mean, a lot of it is you're not
connecting to your body. When you do
slow it down, you can't tolerate what's
going inside. You're in sympathetic
activation. So, if you're listening,
that means like you're stressed out all
the time. There's cortisol going through
your body all the time. You're busy all
the time. You have a hard time slowing
down. You have a hard time being
present. You have a hard time connecting
with others. You feel lonely. You feel
isolated. Like this is going on for so
many people and they don't even
understand why. And they're just going
to work and they're living in their
apartment and they're doing what they
need to do and they're working out and
they're like, why am I feeling so empty
and meaningless or why am I having so
much anxiety or yeah, mostly it's
aloneeness.
>> Isn't it strange?
It's such a applauded type of coping
mechanism. It's like an odd type of
coping mechanism that the world and your
bank account and your career title
uh and your status will all give you
props for.
>> Absolutely. Yeah. And it's like for me,
I mean, I'm 42 years old and and for me
it was so disheartening because I didn't
get the connection and the understanding
of what would truly bring me meaning and
happiness in life. And I went down that
that success rabbit hole. And I had to
learn I had to learn the hard way. You
know, I got to the top and I was pretty
alone. Like I had to slow down, be with
what was inside, figure out how
relationships are literally
relationships determine the quality of
our life and are the most important
things in our life.
>> Yeah, it's an interesting one because
without true safety, without fully
tapping into that, you can't take proper
risks anywhere else. like the the the
fundamental sort of safety that you get
from your relationship allows you to go
and do bigger, more extravagant, more
risk-taking things in the real world,
but people see opening up to an intimate
partner as the very thing that is going
to limit what it is that they can
achieve in the real world. It's not that
the everything is upside down. As far as
I can see, everything's upside down.
Because if you know that no matter what
happens in your career or your creative
pursuits or this new project that you're
going to start or this change that
you're trying for,
you have home base and home base is
deeply intimately connected to you. That
that seems like a really powerful
foundation for you to go and do big
stuff in the world. But the very reason
that people are scared about doing the
safety thing is that they've already got
so much big stuff going on in the world
that they don't have time for it. Yeah.
And you're you're describing secure
attachment, you know, so when you've had
the experience of secure attachment as
an infant and as an adult, you
internalize the fact that this is safe
for me and this is my home base. And
when you have that sense of safety
that's actually a felt sense in your
body from early on, you feel expansive
in the world. You can take risks in the
world. You move out. You move through
the world in an easier way. I mean, it's
literally a felt sense that gets like
like a blueprint that gets it's a felt
sense in your body. But not everybody
has that. Uh most people walk around
with a lot of avoidance, a lot of
insecurity, a lot of fear, abandonment.
So, they're not expansive and they don't
have this internal sense of safety and
they they can't make free choices
because they're kind of um trapped to
whatever they need to do to survive and
have the illusion of safety in their
world. What would you say to somebody
that's listening that identifies with
the I don't feel much stuff below the
neck. Um I'm quite disconnected but
career is going very well at the moment.
What would be because you're asking
somebody to give up the thing that they
know gives them some meaning for the
thing which is scary and new and they
have no idea whether it's going to
actually lead to any happiness.
>> Yeah. No, it's it's [ __ ] terrifying
and I get it. [laughter]
And I I'm not asking them to give it up.
Like I am not ask I did not change my my
life overnight. Like I gave up control
inch by inch. I I run two companies. I
delegated. I slowed down and I just gave
up just a little bit of control. Like
you're not meant to like listen to this
podcast today or even read my book and
like give up your career. Like that
would not be good advice. But you can
slow down a little and you can start to
invite people in and you can become more
present with what's going on inside you
and you can re-evaluate
what might actually make you happy and
rethink things so that you don't get to
my age or older and you're like you have
all this money and success but you don't
have the relational happiness or the
deeper fulfillment that comes from
leading with a little bit more of the
right right hemisphere leading and being
more embodied.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, look, the the least
popular thing to say on the internet is
money won't make you happy because
almost everybody has less money than
they want. And almost everybody
therefore looks at people who have the
thing that they're after, which is more
cash, more freedom, more time, uh, fewer
restrictions, less stress that's derived
from success and status and and and
resources and stuff like that. and they
say, "Well, how ungrateful that they
have the thing that I'm lacking and they
still say that didn't fix my happiness
or selfworth problem." But unless
there's some weird cabal, like a a a
secret club that all rich people are a
part of that they get inducted into that
tells them once they become rich to tell
all of the poor people, hey, by the way,
money won't fix your happiness problems
despite the fact that secretly it will.
Unless that has happened for like almost
all rich people, it you can be pretty
reliable in the realization that they're
not lying about the fact that they
achieved the things materially that they
said that they wanted to and they
thought would fix their problems. And
when they got there, they didn't feel
anything other than like a tarnished
sense of despondency that, oh [ __ ] I
did the thing and still feel this way
and it hasn't fixed my internal problem.
So, it's an unteachable lesson. It's
something that I don't think people can
arrive at. It's actually quicker, I
would I would argue it's quicker to just
become rich and realize that it's not
going to fix your problem than it is to
try and dispense with the dream the the
the mirage that this is going to be the
answer to my questions. That being said,
you can probably start to work on your
connection on route to also realizing
that thing too.
>> Yeah. I mean, and this is like a deep
topic and we can talk about like Maslo's
hierarchy of needs. Like the truth is if
you're struggling to make your bills,
like you're in survival mode and you're
not going to be happy. You need to
survive. You need to figure out how to
survive. But once you you like once you
move past a certain point, happiness
becomes very relative. Um I've had a
unique, you know, upbringing. I I would
grew up with extensive wealth and then I
had nothing and then I made I made some
wealth back, not a lot. And I think it
becomes all relative once you kind of
start getting in your life. And and you
know for men I think it's even harder
because I think there's a lot of
pressure on them to you know succeed. I
had a client who lived in his left
hemisphere was very very successful and
his biggest dream was get to the
Olympics and he got to the Olympics and
he did really well and then he crashed
and he said I was all alone at the top.
So, it's not just wealth. It's these
stories we're telling ourselves that
when I get here or when I have the
perfect body or when I have this in my
bank account or when I publish this
book, right? Or when I make like we keep
thinking that we're going to get to this
idea of perfection or wealth or whatever
and then we're going to be happy. And
that's just an illusion that keeps us
trapped into like this constant go and
workcoholism or whatever we need to do.
It's a dopamine trap. And um it's just
not true. You're not going to get
somewhere else. You might be temporarily
happy, but true meaning and and
connection and fulfillment come from
deepening within and deepening in
relationships. At least that's been my
experience and that's what the science
says and that's the message I'm trying
to get out there in the world.
I would have agreed with you uh
intellectually but disagreed with you uh
in terms of a nervous system a little
while ago but this last year I've been
really obsessed with talking about
emotions. I was trying to become uh less
emotionally decapitated as I called it
and start to try and live below the
neck. And um yeah, that week that I
spent which was there was nothing to do
except for follow the process and and
and sit in emotions. And it was the most
sort of seen deeply connected week that
I've ever spent in my entire life. And
it's a unique kind of
happiness
presence um that you there is no number
of subscribers or or [ __ ] like
paychecks that can get that because it's
it's like saying how much food do I need
to eat to hydrate myself and you go well
no you're doing the wrong thing. It's
the wrong pathway. Yes, you do need some
of this thing. You need some of the
achievement thing but you also need a
lot of the connection thing. So I guess
one
interesting question is how how are our
patterns associated with our past? How
is the way that we're showing up now
with regards to safety, our relationship
to safety, our relationship to other
people, [gasps] how is that uh a mirror
of what's happened in our past?
>> Yeah. I mean, I talk about this a lot in
the book, but I talk about implicit
memory and I talk about our original
childhood dynamics. I have the wheel of
attachment in there and how we related
to different people and what it was like
in our home, what the temperature was
like and how we adapted and I go into
that into deep detail. So the you know
the reader really gets that. But what
happens is as we grow up we attract the
familiar. So we tend to people will say
like I manifested this or we literally
can pull or go towards a person, a job,
a situation and feel like oh my god this
is the one or this is right for me and
it recreates familiar patterns from our
childhood because that's what our system
knows. What's our nervous system knows
that's what our nervous system expects.
So many people who grow up in homes with
a lot of neglect or abuse or trauma end
up attracting work environments and
partnerships that recreate the familiar
patterns all over again. So a lot of
this is about getting conscious of the
original um wounds and patterns so that
we can break you know trauma bonds and
you know have healthier relationships.
So, it's a lot of getting out of what
our system knows and reorienting towards
sa true safety and what true safety
really is.
>> Why do we find people who repeat old
wounds? What is it we're trying to
achieve through that?
>> Well, there's several ways you can look
at this, but the scientific way would
say because that's what our system knows
and our system will gravitate towards
what it knows to expect from others. So,
if I got my needs met and I was met, you
know, and I had um emotional presence
and my parents were available to me, I'm
going to attract someone who's going to
probably meet my needs most likely
because this is what I know and this was
what feels familiar. So, we tend to
recreate our familiar. So, most people
with insecure childhoods and in insecure
patterns tend to feel more resonant with
someone who matches that. and ironically
repeats the very trauma that they
experienced. I can't tell you how many
clients come to me and they're like,
"I'm reliving my childhood again in this
in this marriage." And I'm like, "Yes,
you are. And now it's time to get
conscious of that because we can heal
it."
>> It feels so [ __ ] cosmically unfair
that our nervous systems confuse
familiarity with safety.
You're telling me, Chris, like
[laughter]
I wrote the books on it and like I think
even understanding interpersonal
neurobiology to the level that I did, I
still couldn't prevent myself from
making choices or being drawn towards
familiar situations that recreated some
pain for me. And I it just it's just
science. It's just the way we're we're
wired.
>> What were what were some of those
situations? What were some of the ways
that you recreated that?
Yeah. So, I left a relationship not that
long ago with someone I I I deeply loved
and I I did a lot of work with, but I
grew up in a home with a dad who um
struggled with a lot of substance abuse
and a lot of wealth and um had a certain
mentality and my mom is beautiful model
and all of this and I attracted someone
who met all my emotional needs but later
in in our relationship really struggled
with substance abuse. So when he was
struggling and and back in the substance
abuse, it awakened a very young part of
me who had a dad who was high a lot. And
so I had to work really hard to not make
it about him and his use and be with the
part of me that was really young that
remembered being with a father who
enjoyed substances on a regular basis
and how scary that was for my nervous
system and how much my nervous system
remembered that when it reappeared in my
relationship. And that's just one
example of how we awaken early memories,
early dynamics in our current
relationships. Implicit memory is like
water. It will go to the most familiar
pattern, the most familiar tone,
something that is familiar, and it will
awaken. Oh my god, I've I've been here
before. Is this safe or is this
dangerous?
>> What are some of the more normal ways
that this might show up? You know, you
mentioned if somebody has been through
extreme trauma, if somebody has had, you
know, a parent that's got a substance
abuse problem. Now, that's probably
sadly actually less rare uh than we
might think. Uh but still probably out
toward the tail of the distribution,
right? What about I'm trying to think
about common
but damaging ways that someone's
childhood might be showing up in in
adulthood. might not be substance abuse,
but what are some of the sort of
smaller, more normal
uh lower grade uh ways that childhood
might be being repeated in partner
choice and and what we look for
familiarity masquerading as safety?
>> Oh my god. Yeah. Like I'm like I want to
I want to come up with the perfect
answer for you right now. And we're
talking intergenerational trauma here.
Like our parents are doing the best that
they can, but most parents are not
showing up emotionally present enough.
So most parents are passing down some
avoidant tendencies and more avoidance.
So as we focus on success as as parents
are trying to get tasks done and they're
not showing up emotionally in the way
that their child needed needed and it's
not their fault. They probably didn't
get it from their parents and that's how
this gets passed down
intergenerationally. So until you do the
work um and you start to meet with
what's going on inside and you're with
someone who's emotionally attuning and
you're like, "Oh my god,
this is new for me. This is new for my
nervous system." Like someone is being
very emotionally present with me and
available and I have to be vulnerable,
which that's like another whole
conversation we can get into. We don't
realize that we didn't get that. We
didn't we we needed it. We didn't get it
until we start to receive it now. And I
would say emotional availability is
something that a lot of children are not
getting because their parents didn't
receive it from their parents. And now
we're talking intergenerational
um trauma and we're talking about
nervous systems and we're talking about
parents doing that the best they can,
but also focusing on success and tasks
rather than really meeting the emotional
needs of the child. Isn't
>> that strange? I was thinking about this
on that week's retreat that I'd done. Um
quite rightly we look at parents who
dedicate their time to earning money to
providing a better life for their kids
better in terms of sort of raw resources
than um they had when they were children
with the kids' grandparents.
I reckon if you actually asked people
especially people that are tapped in I I
I kind of see the world is split into
two groups people that are tapped in and
people that aren't. And if you ask the
people that are tapped in, that have
done a little bit of work, that have a
bit of an understanding about what
life is about, especially emotionally,
would you have rather grown up with less
money but more emotional availability? I
really think that all of them would say
yes. And it's so ruthless because again,
it seems and is noble for a parent who's
saying, "Wait, so you're saying that
working 5 days a week, 10-hour shifts
for two decades to provide for a family
of four?" Are you saying that that
wasn't so that wasn't right? That wasn't
something that's noble. Yes, of course.
Of course it is. [sighs]
But if you ask the kids when they grow
up to be adults, if they start to tune
into themselves what it is that they
needed more of, it probably wasn't a
bigger birthday party. It was for mom or
dad to pick them up and hold them. It It
wasn't for more lifts to soccer
practice. It was to have their needs met
when they felt scared. And uh it's kind
of a ruthless realization
>> 100%. And it it's also, you know, it's
having that parent allow you to be upset
without fixing you or changing you or
giving you a cookie or buying. It's that
parent that has the ability to be with
you through your emotional experience.
And it's the feeling of with that gives
a child safety. And it's the feeling of
width that gives us all safety. And I
think that um parents who didn't
experience their parents being with
them, they're doing the best they can
and they're providing and they will do
what they can for their child. So it's
it's kind of being passed down, but
you're you're just not aware of it until
you slow down and do the work. Like I've
slowed down and done a lot of work, and
I'm sure there'll be much more work in
my life. Um it never ends. But now I
know how to be with people in such a
deeper way because I've had people be
with me in such a deep and profound way
that it's cultivated that ability to
give that to another.
>> What do you say to people who call the
inner child stuff woo woo?
>> You know in safe I talk about memory and
like I get so deep into interpersonal
neurobiology and neuroscience. I talk
about implicit memory. I talk about
sensations. think the body keeps the
score. That if you don't want to call it
your inner child, we still need to start
to look at how memory systems work in
your body and how that your memory
system is constantly speaking to you.
Your past is internally present through
these streams. And so that's not woowoo,
that's science. And I got the science to
back it up. So you want to take the word
inner child out or little me out, we
still need to work with memory because
memory, our memory, our past is living
right now in our present. It's it's
alive. It's in our body and it's right
here all the time.
>> How is that
encoded?
>> Um mostly through sensation. So when
we're born, we're born as right
hemisphere more creatures. And we're not
as humans, we're not like fully
developed. We don't come out with like a
fully developed nervous system or fully
developed organs. We come out like think
of it, we're like these little like
sensing beings and we don't store
explicit memory till like little bit
later on four or five. So explicit
memory is like memory like a movie
screen. We only store sensations. We can
only our body can only store sensations
from womb to about four. And we're
storing I forgot the statistics but so
much more sensational memory even in
this sec
second between you and me more
sensations are being stored than like
explicit memory. So we're constantly
storing sensations as memory. Then if
we're we're growing up in a home where
there's trauma and we're not processing
our emotions, these sensations go into
our body. They get tucked into our our
gut, our heart, our heart, our fascia,
our body, and they stay there and they
they'll stay there until we can tune
into our body and become embodied again.
And so these sensational memory streams
and the sensations moving through our
body, that's just the science. And those
are the things that we have to start um
being more aware of if we want to heal.
>> Okay.
Why do we confuse chaos with chemistry?
Like what is it about this sort of
sparkiness that happens in relationships
and how do we get sort of taken taken
aside by it?
>> Yeah. And it's not just chaos. I would
say it's intensity with chemistry. So it
can be chaos. So, if you grew up in a
home that had a lot of chaos and you
meet someone, even if they don't appear
like they have chaos on on the surface,
but they have chaos underneath, you're
going to be attracted to them because
that's your familiar. So, it's it's less
about it's more about how your familiar
matches with somebody else's familiar.
But I think intensity um love bombing
intensity um euphoric chemicals being
released in our brain all of that like
someone getting close really fast. All
of that can be feel like love, but it's
not true vulnerability and it's not true
closeness, but it can feel so euphoric
inside that like we're kind of blinded
by it. Um, and depending on what your
familiar is, you're going to be
attracted to someone and that intensity
will feel like home. It's funny because
my book is like safe, an attachment
informed guide to building more secure
relationships and coming home to
yourself and others. And there's a part
in the book where I talk about hugging
my partner and feeling like I was home.
And like he was he represented the home
I wanted because he was so attentive.
But he also brought me home [gasps] to
all of my earliest experiences. And I
think a lot of relationships do that.
Like when you hear a lot of big people
talk, it's like our closest
relationships will bring up our earliest
wounds. They will bring up our earliest
patterns. They will recreate those
dynamics. They will literally bring you
home.
>> Yeah. It's a a very again, it's like so
[ __ ] poetically ironic, right, that
you have this early intimate
relationship with your caregiver
and then you go through life to try and
find one that, you know, hopefully
transcends and includes and elevates
what you did before to only realize
like, I don't know, some Groundhog Day
thing. I'm I'm [ __ ] back to where I
started. Like I mean they're saying it's
the same thing all over again. I mean
it's 20 two decades, three decades later
and I'm doing the same thing.
>> Well, that's exactly why I wrote this
book because like I've been I mean we've
all been there. Like here I am again
right in my core wound. I'm being left.
I'm not good enough. I'm unworthy.
Right? And I it's not it's science. I
mean until we heal the original wound
until we go back until we become more
embodied until we grieve what we didn't
get we will try to recreate it like we
will seek out something that actually we
think will protect us and ironically it
will recreate it so it's like a little
it's kind of like it's yeah it's a
little twisted. I I completely agree.
The two things that uh I've taken away
at least so far this confusion between
familiarity and safety I think is it
familiarity is not safety it is
familiarity um and this confusion
between intensity and intimacy that that
that is also not the same thing. Uh, and
often I would imagine that the intensity
is born out of some of the familiarity
too that you your ability to be able to
tolerate that like your tolerance window
for bad stuff that you're familiar with
is actually going to be greater than for
bad stuff that you're not familiar with.
Like you have this um a pallet, you
know, like you're a a fine diner or
something and you have this particular,
ooh, Italian food, I can really eat a
lot of that, but I'm not so, you know,
Chinese I'm not so used to. Um, yeah.
Well, and also like let's say your
familiar is violence or your familiar is
neglect or your familiar is I don't know
what it is. When you're in a
relationship, you regress. And think
about a young kid. Like they don't have
the choice to be like, you know what,
you're neglecting me. I'm just going to
go over here. They just keep trying and
trying and trying. So you just keep
trying with the same pattern with
someone who can't give you what you need
because that's literally what you did as
a kid. So that's why you have more
capacity for it. If you didn't get
neglect or you didn't get rejection or
shame as a kid and someone starts to
shame you, you're like, "This doesn't
feel familiar. I'm not even I don't even
need to work through this. I'm going to
go over there." You're more likely to
walk away.
>> So clever. Yes. Yes. Yes. Your your
capacity for tolerating familiar
mistreatment is greater as well.
>> Mhm. Absolutely. And I think that
there's another piece like if you grew
up with neglect or abuse or anything and
someone comes along and they present as
like the perfect
parent, but they're also feeding a very
young part of your brain all this
attention. They're flooding your brain
and they're showing up as Mr. or Mrs.
Wonderful. You're now projecting like
this is what I didn't get in my
childhood. Look how wonderful this
person is showing up. They're filling a
a developmental part of your brain, a
wound. They're filling it. And then what
happens later in the relationship, if
they change and become abusive or
whatever happens, you stay hooked
because you got flooded with that in the
beginning because of the neglect,
because they treated you so well. you.
We're wired to stay in connection and
we'll stay in relationships longer
because at the beginning might have been
so hopeful or more of an escape or a
safety from your own inner trauma.
>> Okay. Does that mean that safe and calm
love feels boring at first?
I think that for me, and I'm not going
to speak so much on love, but I feel
like sometimes safe safety for me felt
very vulnerable at first. Like I think
it can feel like, holy [ __ ] this is
real. We're not in intensity. We're so
much in reality and that's scary because
it's not an escape and it's not serving
that that need to escape my life. Um,
as I've done my own work and I've let
more what I call anchors in and my
nervous system has gotten so used to
people being more present with me, I'm
like, "This is love. This emotional
presence needs to register as love." So
now I can attract more of that because
my nervous system has experienced more
of it in my life. But I had to
experience enough of it for me to even
recognize it. Does that make sense?
Yeah, it does. I I'm interested in why
safety felt vulnerable to you. Um I
Yeah, dig into that for me.
>> Yeah. I mean, I think Bnee Brown's work
really speaks on this, but in order to
heal, we need to become vulnerable. In
order to be vulnerable, we need to feel
safe. And if I was living my life in a
lot of chaos and intensity and
workcoholism and someone showed up and
what slowed me down and was really
present with me, I had a lot of
protectors show up. I'm like, this is
uncomfortable. Like I have to, you know,
be here and just see more of me, show
more of me, be more vulnerable. So I
think a lot of people
>> struggle if they haven't received a lot
of that. When true safety shows up, it
can feel very foreign.
>> I suppose the ruthless thing in that
situation as well is this person showed
up and they're prepared to wade through
the obvious amber flags that are pouring
out of this person that's across from
them. It's like, huh, that was a strange
that was a strange way to react to me
doing something nice or that was a
strange way to to respond to me saying
that we should just spend this afternoon
relaxing and and talking to each other
or whatever it might be. And if I
suppose
not everybody is going to have the
tolerance to be able to do that, not not
all partners that show up for you as the
un unhealed, unhole person uh that's got
a ton of protectors and coping
mechanisms. Uh so you found someone and
hooray isn't that great. Problem is
there is kind of a little bit of a
ticking clock because there is only if
that person is securely attached there
is only so long that they are going to
put up put up with showing up for you in
a way that you are unable to show up for
yourself, show up in relation to what
they're doing and then reciprocally show
up for them. Uh before they go, [gasps]
I just don't think I don't think we're
in the same place. I I I don't think
we're compatible. I don't think that
we're aiming in the same direction here.
I I I don't think that this can go on.
So there is
there is a
uh
you have an obligation if you want to
have a really good relationship. You
have an obligation to see when people
show up for you in a manner that not
that you don't deserve, but that you're
almost like not ready for. It's like,
"Oh my god, there's a lot going on
here." You say, "Okay, is this the sort
of relationship that you want?" Yes.
Okay, get to [ __ ] work. Because if
you don't, this person is going to go
and be that amazing anchor for somebody
else. And that means that yeah, you do
need to face your coping mechanisms and
you do need to learn to let go of those
things probably sooner rather than
later, ideally.
>> Yeah. I mean, listen, I'm I'm a I'm a
coup's counselor and I love it when
people do the work together. But if this
feels like you, you don't need to start
off with a romantic relationship. You
can get really intimate with anchors,
professionals. Let your nervous system
start to take in what true safety feels
like, what healing feels like, so that
you can do the work and you can be that
anchor for somebody else. Um, if this is
really going on for you, you might have
a little more individual work to do
before you can really provide that for
another.
>> Okay. You mentioned anchors. Uh, we
haven't talked spaceolding and
vententral states.
what what this separate out separate out
all of this for me.
>> Yeah. So, I mean, you're probably so
familiar with the nervous system. I'm
sure you do lots of talks on this, but
um a big part of the book is based on
Stephen Porges's work that our social uh
engagement system, the way we've evolved
is to be in social connection and in
safety. And we call this the vententral
state. So, like you and I are pretty
much in ventil vententral. I mean, it it
mixes. I'm a little nervous now so I'm
sure it goes in and out of ventral but
um so when when we are both in a
vententral state we are in a state of
safety and that's when we can be more
intimate and like I said we shift all
the time we're shifting in nanconds
actually but in order to heal deep
attachment wounds and it I guess this is
an important theme like out there is
that we do need sometimes adult
anchoring in the vententral state of
safety to hold space for our embodied
experience. So we can't move trauma
alone. We actually need co-regulation
and adult anchoring to be with what's in
the body with us so we can start to move
the earlier wounds. Does that make
sense?
>> It does. Yeah. What um
with the vententral states thing, what's
a good indication that you're in it and
what's a good indication that you're not
in it? Yeah. So, eye contact, um, your
breath, feeling calm, feeling expansive,
your thoughts being expansive. I
sometimes I can tell my thoughts are not
in a ventral state when I get protective
or, you know, in a survival state. So,
your thoughts, your breathing, the way
you're connecting, feeling free, feeling
open, feeling safe. I have more awe in
the world. Like, I'm looking out my
window. Like, the world is more
beautiful when I'm in a vententral
state. like things are more magical,
music feels even more heightened. I just
feel more connected to myself and
others.
>> Okay, talking about the other side of it
now, then you mentioned spaceholding.
There has to be an adult in the room,
uh, figurative or literal.
What does good spaceholding look like?
Let's say that you're somebody who's
listening who has a relationship with
someone and you think, I want to become
better at at sitting with them. What
what is good space holding?
>> Yeah. I mean from the basic anchoring is
someone who doesn't try to fix you,
change you. I mean truly learning how to
listen to people is good spaceing. But
if we were in like a therapeutic
relationship or you were my anchor,
Chris, and I was experiencing pain or
dysregulation, your nervous system being
in vententral holds my experience and
allows my nervous system to move, but
eventually helps my nervous system get
back into vententral. So good space
holding is ability to hold safety
>> for the other person. And your nervous
system is literally helping to regulate
and that's what we call co-regulation.
So that is true spaceolding.
>> Is that why anxious and avoidant people
find each other so magnetic that there
is something in the push and pull which
is almost the antithesis of that there
isn't one anchor. There are two boats
getting ragged around by the sea at the
same time.
>> There's so many reasons why anxious and
avoidant are attracted. I mean, the the
the anxious is very lively and full of
life and feels expressive. The avoidant
um feels stoic and grounded and
independent and in control. So, they're
really attracted to these like lost
parts of themselves. The problem with
anxious and avoidant is that um when
[clears throat] an anxious person gets
scared, the illusion of safety is I'm
going to run towards my partner. I need
to connect or else I'm going to feel my
abandonment wound. And when an avoidant
person gets scared, they need space and
they need to run away to regulate their
nervous system. So when they're both
activated and they move out of
vententral and they move into protective
states, they both actually need the
opposite of what the other can provide.
>> So one needs connection right away and
that's out of fear and one needs space
right away it out of fear. And so they
get stuck in these cycles which are
quite miserable particularly because
their nervous system can't get back into
connection and and eventual state fast
enough.
>> That's ruthless.
>> I've been stuck in I mean and I'm sure
many listeners have been stuck in that
pattern. It is it's an important one to
get conscious of so that you don't spend
the rest of your life in it because it
does cause havoc on your nervous system
and sematically um inflammation can
happen if you're constantly in these um
you know activated states.
>> How can someone help an anxiously
attached partner to feel less anxious?
What would you say? You have a a partner
that is regularly getting into or even
every so often intermittently getting
into these anxious states. What is a a
good way to bring them back into
vententral?
>> Actually, more reassurance. For the most
part, more reassurance calms them down.
So, if if I'm dating someone and I'm
anxious and they can show up for me in a
secure way, over time, my system will
internalize that. But if they're
avoidant and they get anxious when I get
anxious, then we start the whole dance
again. So, the more we can feel secure
and reassured. If you're really, really,
really anxious, you might need to do
some healing first around your
abandonment wound so that you're not
constantly projecting this fear into the
relationship because your partner might
feel like, "Oh my god, nothing's
happening and I'm constantly reassuring
and this terror just keeps living inside
that person."
>> What does healing attachment wounds
really look like?
>> I mean, it's like more like what does it
really feel like? Um
it feels like holding states and places
within yourself that maybe you have not
met before and letting other people
witness you um regress. It it means like
getting in touch with the things you
might have been avoiding. It means being
vulnerable. Um it mean it was probably
most humbling experience that I've gone
through. [laughter]
I definitely think it's it's humbling to
>> to allow yourself to feel or
reexperience what you originally went
through. And it's also a gift because
you're becoming more embodied and you're
actually you're becoming conscious of
your original experience. Like I became
conscious of what it's like to feel like
in my crib. Like I regress like I know
what it's like to be a baby now, you
know? And it was hard but also I guess
enlightening or just awakening and and
helps me feel more alive in the world
and I feel more free and I have more
internal space. I could go on and on
about what comes from doing this type of
work.
>> How come we can only heal in
relationship?
>> Yeah. I mean so what was wounded in
relationship must be healed in
relationship. And this is like
neuroscience. And so when let's say the
abandonment wound, we could go to a lot
of different wounds. If you were
abandoned emotionally when you were
little, in order to heal a wound, at
least in in this philosophy, is you need
to meet the wound. And the wound needs
to receive what it didn't get at the
time
it was created. So I need to be
witnessed. I need to acknowledge what I
didn't get. And then I need to also be
received by somebody else. I need to not
feel alone in the memory of the
experience as I'm reexperiencing.
>> I was ashamed. I need to be in touch
with that and I need unconditional
acceptance. I need someone to accept
these parts of me. So I need to
reexperience the experience. We call we
need to have a disisconfirming
experience. So we need to have the
experience and then revisit it and
actually have it met very differently.
That's so good. I I've kind of got it in
my head about the again the ruthlessness
that people need. If we have childhood
wounds and we need to heal them in
relationship with somebody else, that
means that we need to find somebody who
is able to do the work to accumulate the
capacity or already has the capacity to
be able to sit with us so that we can go
through this. And I'm thinking, you
know, we talked earlier on about one of
the challenges that women have, which is
where you've got to let go of this only
like, you know, uh, civilizationally
relatively recently acquired
independence socioeconomically,
uh, in order to tap into getting below
the neck to not being hard charging, all
the rest of it. But I think this is one
in particular that guys will have an
issue with, which is in order to heal in
relationship, we need to be vulnerable.
We need to be prepared to revisit
something from our past which is
shameful or difficult or challenging or
makes us feel insufficient or scared and
we need to do that in relationship.
Doing that with another guy friend is
going to be really tough. There are all
of the concerns about your friends
seeing you as weak, about you no longer
being a an ally or a compatriate that is
competent. And you go, "Okay, well, I'll
I'll turn to my intimate relationship."
And you go, "Okay, well, brilliant."
Like you need to find a woman who is
able to sit with you going back into the
most painful, shameful, vulnerable part
of your life
and be comfortable enough to come out
the other side of it. Guys already have
enough fear around emasculating
themselves. Don't ever show your
emotions to your partner. She's just
going to leave you as soon as that is. I
think almost every definition of
masculinity that I've come across has
some version of emotional mastery or
emotional control in there as one of the
definitions of masculinity. So, you're
saying that I need to literally let go
of perhaps the keystone of my
masculinity
in order to be able to heal this thing,
but if I go through that, perhaps my
partner's going to leave me. So, it does
not surprise me that most guys just
going, "Ah, way safer, way easier for me
to just swallow this and never actually
tap into that." It doesn't seem
particularly wellrewarded or
incentivized.
>> Yeah. I mean, I'm smiling, but you like
hit one of the most actually painful
like truths out there is that it's
actually a lot harder for men to heal
because um being vulnerable at a as a
man was not even supported and it feels
very dangerous for most men. I mean, and
when it was hard for me as a woman to be
vulnerable. So, you're hitting on a
point and I'm smiling because I'm like,
this is not going to sell my book,
right? Like, who wants to walk into this
kind of work? But it like the research
shows that if you do and you are
courageous enough to get vulnerable
like your life changes like things
change inside. Um you have more freedom.
You I I can't even put it into words
what it's like to go through the work
and yet it is probably the scariest
thing most people will do. And that's
why you start slow and it's not about
like you get anchors and you start slow
and you find safe people and it's not
like but it is like you're hitting the
nail on the head Chris like it's really
hard for men a lot of men and in the UK
too. I mean, I have one UK client and
you know, feelings are not supposed to
be talked about and this is
intergenerational and this is cultural
and the truth is I think that true
masculinity comes through from this
portal of being vulnerable and going
there and it's what women a lot of women
say they want, right? And it's it's what
we have to go through to get to the
other side of this. So, you're hitting a
very valid point and it's a very sad
point to be honest.
>> Yeah. Especially in a world that tells
men your primary problem is that you're
too masculine. Like if you were just
more like women, a lot of your problems
would go if you just talked about your
emotions more. It's like I think
somewhere in the '9s%
of middle-aged men who take their own
life had already sought help through
some kind of therapy or had reached out
to some sort of uh group or
organization. You go, okay, it's evident
that just talk about it, bro, isn't
working. And also all of the incentives
align for guys to find that hard. So
yeah, I think you know, sympathy for the
challenges that women face, but sympathy
for the challenges that men face there
as well. Um I'm interested
in sort of getting practical and looking
at some of the practices that couples
could do together um to help regulate
maybe well I don't know, you tell me.
Like maybe they're about to have a
difficult conversation or they want to
do some emotional work. How should that
be done? or maybe they've been apart for
a little while and they're coming back
together and they want to have this
sense of safety and deepen connection or
maybe they've just had an argument. Like
what are the big buckets of practices
that you think are powerful for couples
to do together?
>> Um, well, I mean, I'm an imotherapist. I
would say if you're struggling, find an
amo therapist or an EFT therapist. But I
think understanding your nervous system
and the basics around when I'm scared.
This is how my nervous system responds
and do I shut down? Do I get activated?
Um do I fight? Do I flee? Do I collapse?
Do I people please? And what do I really
need in those moments? And when you shut
down, you can tell your partner. Or when
you're upset, how does your body
respond? And instead of getting caught
in the behaviors that we might be doing,
can we start having conversations around
our nervous system? Hey, I'm not in a
state of safety right now. I'm feeling
very protective and I want to get
critical or, you know, this is where I'm
at or what I need right now because I'm
not feeling safe. And how can we get
back into connection and safety faster
by having more conversations about where
our nervous systems at rather than
repeating the behaviors over and over
again? Okay. So, that's the
conversation. Are there any other
practices that you think are good for
couples to co-regulate together or is
that not an area that you like to get
into?
>> No, no. I mean, co-regulation is great.
I think that, you know, what happens
most of the time is one couple gets
activated. Like when we're in intimate
relationship, we're telepaththing. We're
we're having a telepathic conversation.
and your nervous system and my nervous
system are speaking to each other every
nancond. Am I safe? Are you with me? So
what happens a lot of the time where
couples get stuck is one person gets
activated and unconsciously and with
automatically the other person gets
activated at the same time. You can't
even help that because we're so
connected. So, I think just slowing down
and starting to understand like I have
couples who get upset because their
partner comes home activated and then
they get activated. I'm like, you can't
help being activated and you can't help
getting activated back. So, slowing down
and starting to understand that and then
figuring out what does regulate me? What
do I need need when I'm activated? Get
out of the story. Stop putting gasoline
on the fire. How can I get back into a
state of safety? What makes me feel
connected to my partner? And can they
give that from to me? Can I ask for it?
Right? It's really hard for a lot of men
and women, but to even ask for what is
it that I need when I am disregulated?
>> I need space. Can you give your partner
space?
>> What
I guess the challenge there is if you
can only do it with somebody else. This
kind of flies in the face of a lot of
self-development, personal development
stuff, which is you can lone ranger
monk mode, sigma wolf your way through
like whatever the problems are in your
life. You're saying, "Hey, if you've got
some wounds and some patterns from
childhood that keep showing up and kind
of controlling you in later life,
this is something this is a weight that
you need a second person to help you
lift as well."
>> Yeah. And it's like as a self-help
author,
I like I think this is such an important
and as someone who does want people to
read my book, like the truth is I would
be doing the science and injustice if I
said read this book and fix yourself
because that's just not how
developmental trauma heals. And I have
spent too much of my life with every
freaking self-help book that I get could
get my hands on trying to help myself.
not realizing that a lot of what I
needed to heal inside, I needed the
right support to heal. I needed safe
people, safe environments, and now I
understand the neuroscience behind it.
So, I don't want to put that message
out. Read this book in three steps,
you're going to be healed. That's that's
just not how it works. But I provide
such a rich understanding of how it
works that I hope you walk away feeling
really grounded in the science around
healing. So, it's not woowoo. So you do
feel like, oh my god, there is a lot of
science backing up why we can't heal a
lot of things alone.
>> What's the role? I'm interested in the
role of rupture and repair here.
>> So yeah, I mean that goes deep. So when
we're an infant and we're crying and
we're fussing and we're reaching out in
sympathetic activation, our parent is
usually trying to figure out what what
do we want? Do we want are they hungry?
Are they thirsty? Are they hot? Right?
There's a rupture and then the parent
takes some time sometime and a repair.
So rupture and repair is when we get
disregulated and the other person kind
of works on figuring out what's wrong
and we get back into connection and
calmness together. Actually, rupture and
repair happens a lot when we're infants.
And how well our parents rupture and
repair indicate how well we handle
conflict and we rupture and repair as
adults. So a lot of people think, oh,
I hate the word codependency, but like a
lot of people think, oh, if we're
fighting this is bad or conflict is bad.
It's like, no, actually true rupture and
repair, like real rupture and repair,
really understanding what your partner's
going through, really getting to what's
going on inside their body, really
seeing their perspective and they're
seeing your perspective. When we have
conflict, it's an opportunity not only
to repair on a deep level, but to build
deeper intimacy. And so rupture even
though it disregulates us, it's
uncomfortable, it's a very important
part of close relationships, rupture and
repair.
>> What about when it come you you work
with a lot of couples. What is the what
do couples get wrong and get right when
it comes to rupture and repair within a
relationship?
I think that most people like they don't
like rupture because it feels
uncomfortable and they don't know how to
use it as an opportunity for deeper
understanding and more intimacy. So they
get frustrated right away that they're
uncomfortable and they're disregulated.
But I think once they learn the tools
and they can step back and really
understand and have more dialogue around
what's going on inside and your side and
my side and it's just never about who's
right. It's always about can I
understand your world better and um get
back into connection then rupture and
repair becomes
easier. It's like it's like it's like
people pleasing. It's like if if I am
such a people pleaser and I I can't
handle conflict then I'm not going to
tell you Chris if something's really
bothering me. I'm going to hold it in.
>> I learned that conflict isn't okay. I
didn't learn healthy rupture and repair.
But if I have a healthy friendship and
let's say you're my friend and I can
come to you and I can say, "You know
what? What you said to me really hurt me
and you don't have all this shame
getting kicked up on you and you can
say, you know, Jess, I didn't realize
that. Tell me what what was going on
inside of you." And you can join my
world instead of reacting and getting
defensive. you have an opportunity to
get so much closer to me and I have an
opportunity to work through what's
upsetting me versus people pleasing and
fawning and just kind of keeping it all
in. That's like the best example I can
get on like a micro.
It really is important to have people
that are emotionally
fluent around you because I can imagine
how in a friendship like that um you
have a pattern of um compromising
boundaries, people pleasing uh in order
to not upset somebody else because you
learned as a kid that other people's
emotions need to be managed by you. uh
and your friend maybe the one time that
you pluck up the courage to do that does
break down and does cry a load and you
think well this just I knew that this is
how the world was going to show up for
me this is exactly what I predicted was
going to happen and your
friend's inability to tolerate a fair
piece of feedback has reinforced and
worsened this pattern that you're trying
to get over. So yeah, surrounding
yourself with with people who are um a
little bit at least as regulated as you
or at least trying to do the work to get
close to that seems to be really
important. I I was thinking about as
well there must be a unique challenge
to healing from wounds that are created
inside of the relationship that you're
trying to heal them in. Like that's
that's got to be a real difficulty.
>> Yeah. I mean like you're kind of saying
two different things, but absolutely.
And I would the one thing that blocks
people from true repair is shame. So
like if I told you, hey Chris, that
really upset me and like you had so much
shame and you can't you can't you got
defensive, it means that you didn't have
the capacity. But here's what I'll say.
If you can experience true rupture and
repair with one friend and say, "Hey, I
want to come to you with this." And
really experience it once in your
system, you can keep recreating it and
you can know who has the capacity and
who doesn't. Right? And so if we keep
going back to people who don't have the
capacity, we're just confirming that we
can't rupture, that we can't reach out,
that we can't share what's bothering us.
But if we orient towards a person who
does have the capacity and we're like,
"Oh my god, I was able to share and I
had a disisconfirming experience, we
only need one or two of them to be like,
"Oh my god, rupture might not be as
scary as as we think."
>> I love the idea of disisconfirming
experiences. It's really cool. It sounds
like the sort of thing you don't want,
but I guess in this world, it's actually
something that you're looking for.
>> Mhm. Yeah. Especially when you want to
change a belief system or a pattern
inside. We want to show your nervous
system actually you're not going to get
left this time or this person is going
to show up differently. But you do need
to go to people who have the emotional
capacity.
>> What about when people should stay or
when they should leave?
>> I have a whole chapter on that. Um,
sometimes the wounding is so early I go
into narcissism and I go into borderline
personality and I really describe them
as complex infant trauma and sometimes
you can be with someone and your trauma
overlaps so much that either you're so
focused on saving them, you're so
invested in their trauma or you're
regressed so much that you can't get out
of the dynamic. Sometimes the wounding
when it's so early
um people need to heal a little bit more
individually before they can have a
healthy relationship. And it's important
to understand where the trauma bond or
the trauma cycle keeps repeating itself
and to get conscious like I got
conscious in my last relationship
because I didn't make it about his drug
use. I was able to go back to like how
this really impacted me when I was tiny.
So, it's important for people who are
repeating patterns and are stuck and are
miserable to get conscious of the
original wound that is actually being
recreated so they can get out of the
here and now and dive deeper and then
break the paradigm.
>> It's interesting that you said about
sort of very early wounds, sort of very
extreme ones. I think about that in
relationships as well, like the idea of
very early rupture without repair. Um,
creating a signature that sort of
defines all other um, uh, interactions
that occur from there. Like the early
months of a relationship are pretty
formative and they kind of set the tone
for a lot of things that are moving
forward. Like for instance, if you were
to have a uh a series of big blowups 3
years into a relationship that had been
relatively stable until then, the
difference between that and what it says
for the next 3 years after that,
compared with this was how the
relationship started and now you've got
to kind of undo all of these coping
mechanisms. So yeah, I have to assume
that there is such a thing as too much
rupture to repair inside of a
relationship as well.
>> Yeah. I mean, and you're you're kind of
describing a couple things, but if you
rupture a lot and you don't have the
tools to deeply repair, then you kind of
just repeat the same thing without
getting to the core of it. Um, but most
healthy rupture and repair usually
actually gets you closer. So, that just
a sign that you're not really repairing.
You're just coming back together into
connection, but you're not really
resolving or getting to the root of of
the issue. I I know like also I don't
know if this is relevant but I had a
friend once and we never fought and I
even tell people who are dating like
fighting is good and two years into our
relationship something happened and we
had a fight and she never talked to me
again
>> and I was like okay we ruptured and we
couldn't repair and I think that happens
a lot like you don't know how someone is
going to really like how to work through
it with someone until you've had rupture
and repair when you're dating someone
you need to have a conflict. You need to
see if they can validate you. You need
to see if you guys can see each other's
side of you. You need to use your voice.
You need to have these ruptures and
repairs because it really tells you a
lot about how you can evolve together or
not.
>> Yeah, it's an interesting one. I I've
had um the friendships and relationships
in the past that have been like that,
too. And you're right. Never testing the
water with that does result in you
like a pretty catastrophic blow up
happening. That being said, there is
such a thing as too frequent and too
large rupture. And obviously, if you're
testing the waters regularly, oh, this
is great. You know, it's building our
resilience. Look at how much we're
getting used to being in conflict with
each other. Like, yeah, but only if you
can actually come back together, hold
each other, look each other in the eyes,
and say, I'm still here. This is, you
know, we're now stronger. You're right.
the the difference it should actually be
called like rupture and and build up as
opposed to rupture and repair because
repair looks like you go zero minus one
zero again but the goal is to go 0 minus
one plus one and each time that you
rupture you end up in a stronger place
than you were previously more deeply
connected more aware
>> yeah I mean yes repair on a real level
gets you deeper it brings you deeper
into intimacy and this might be a really
bad example But let's say you've been
cheated on. That might be a behavior
that you'll walk away in a rupture and
you never want to repair. No judgment
here. And you could do the deep work
with that person and get to the root of
it. And you might actually evolve past
that and understand what was really
going on and have a closer relationship
than ever. And that's probably not the
best example cuz people are going to be
like, "Someone cheats on you, just lead
them." But I'm saying really bad things
can happen and if you work through them
together, you actually can evolve to a
much deeper level together. But it
requires a lot of work.
>> Where does somebody start beyond buying
the book Safe by Jessica Bal? Uh where
does where does somebody start
practically with moving through this?
Um well I actually provide your audience
with the wheel of attachment which is
new to this book and new to the
attachment space but starting to
understand
um what your earliest relationship
dynamics were like how you felt in your
earliest relationship dynamics starting
to get a sense of those things because
those are what we're repeating later on.
So um I think that's where we start. Of
course, I'm a psychotherapist and that's
that's what I'm going to say. But our
earliest relationships, how we felt safe
in our home, who we felt safe with, who
we didn't feel safe with, what did our
bodies feel around these people, what
kind of dynamics did we have with our
siblings? Getting in touch with all of
those things, and who in my life now
does that feel similar with, how am I
repeating these patterns? What core
wounds are continuing
to show up in my life? And how much
charge do these wounds have? Do I feel
them in my body? Where do they live and
how big are they?
>> Heck yeah. Jessica Balm, ladies and
gentlemen. Jessica, I appreciate the
heck out of you. Two slamming books in a
row that I think are very timely. Where
should people go to keep up to date with
everything you're doing?
>> Um well, you're supposed to get a link
with like free gifts for your audience
specifically. So, I have to make sure
they get that. But it's a guide to the
wheel and then um a video of me and my
mentor who's 82 who has provided me so
much safety talking about insecurity to
security. Um I'm on social media. Um but
you can just put Jessica Bal. I feel bad
for anybody else named my name because
if you just put my name into Google, it
just like I show up everywhere. So
>> the number one Jessica Bum. I have a
highly anti-Semitic British MP um who
also shares my name and I sometimes I
sometimes wonder if he he sees me
trending online and gets pissed off
because I'm speaking to like Ben Shapiro
or someone Jewish and uh and every so
often I log on and find out that he's
got into conflict with Israel. So uh I
may be I may be um assassinated at some
point because somebody has gotten the
wrong Chris Williamson killed, but we'll
wait and see. Um,
>> everybody knows you though and yeah,
you're just out there doing your thing
and I think it's just so awesome to see
and I'm excited for you.
>> Well, I appreciate you very much. It's
been a long time since your first one
and uh I'm so glad to see that you're
continuing to flourish.
>> Thank you.
>> Congratulations. You made it to the end
of an episode. Your brain has not been
completely destroyed by the internet
just yet. Here's another one [music]
that you should watch.
Come on.