The Life-Changing Power Of Changing Your Perspective - Derek Sivers
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this discussion, Derek Sivers introduces his core philosophy from his book *Useful Not True*, arguing that beliefs should be adopted based on their utility rather than their objective truth. He illustrates this with examples like believing men and women are identical to counteract personal bias or treating marketing as an act of consideration despite it not always being factually accurate. Sivers contrasts "functionally true but literally false" concepts, such as the idea that porcupines can throw quills (which helps avoid injury), against "literally true but functionally false" ideas like free will existing, which he suggests often leads to nihilism if accepted without nuance. He emphasizes that while facts are absolute and unchangeable—like squares having four sides or gravity pulling objects down—the vast majority of life consists of perspectives that can be reframed for better outcomes. The conversation delves into the importance of reframing situations by detaching from instinctual reactions to find smarter strategies, citing Tim Ferriss's technique of reading critical reviews rather than praise and hiring journalists to challenge ideas as examples of deliberate thinking over intuition. Sivers shares a personal anecdote about visiting the woman he hit in a car accident years ago; after being told she would never walk again due to his crash, he discovered misinformation had caused her guilt for 18 years until they realized both were holding onto an incorrect narrative. This story underscores how humans confuse their subjective perspectives with objective reality and highlights that facts can be true while the perspective surrounding them is not, a distinction crucial for avoiding emotional traps where high emotionality often signals contested opinions rather than absolute truths. Sivers critiques "judging the box" instead of contents, using Woody Allen's work as an example where great films might be discarded due to private allegations against the director. He advocates for maintaining an eclectic worldview by diversifying one's thoughts like a financial portfolio, suggesting that people should actively seek out worldviews different from their own—such as those in Russia or Iran—to prevent collapse when facing adversity. This approach challenges tribalism and credentialism, arguing that experts are allowed mistakes within an "accuracy budget" and that individuals should not discard entire bodies of work based on a single flaw. He also touches upon the concept of social relativity, comparing how different frames of reference affect perception in physics to how cultural backgrounds shape psychological perspectives, urging listeners to inhabit diverse mindsets rather than retreating into echo chambers. The dialogue further explores the tension between authenticity and action, referencing Kurt Vonnegut's quote that "you are what you pretend to be." Sivers argues against prioritizing intentions or feelings over observable actions, noting that judging oneself by output rather than internal struggle prevents impostor syndrome in high-performers who often feel inadequate despite their results. He discusses the danger of social consistency bias, where people stop evolving publicly even if they change privately due to fear of judgment from peers, as seen when diet movement leaders faced backlash for adding fruit back into their diets. By adopting a mindset that choices are only "for you and now," individuals can iterate on decisions without needing immediate perfection or justification, allowing them to pivot strategies like bodyweight training in response to physical limitations while preparing for future challenges. Ultimately, the podcast concludes with reflections on minimalism as preparation for adversity and the value of stories over facts in human retention, acknowledging that narratives provide emotional weight even if they aren't strictly true. Sivers encourages listeners to visit his website at sivers.com rather than Amazon due to platform frustrations and invites global connections via email. The overarching message is a call to embrace imperfection, reject rigid identity politics, and focus on actionable outputs while remaining open to updating beliefs as new information arises. By treating philosophies as tools in an orchestra rather than absolute truths, individuals can navigate life's complexities with flexibility, using reframing to turn potential liabilities into assets for personal growth and strategic success.
Read the full video transcript
what do you mean when you talk about
useful not true oh diving right
in um for
years I write
things that are sharing my point of view
on something I share a point of view I
find useful and I state it as a fact I
say for
example uh men and women are the
same and I choose that belief for
example uh to counterbalance my tendency
to think of men and women as more
different than they actually are so I
would deliberately choose a belief that
helps counteract my Tendencies right in
the same way that somebody who has a
tendency to be late to things might
leave start leaving what seems
unreasonably early which helps them get
there on time right so there are many
beliefs in life that I choose as a
countermeasure but when I express this
belief publicly there was often somebody
saying but that's not true men and women
are different I say I know it's not true
true is not the point what the hell is
true
anyway I'm choosing this belief because
it's useful to me not because it's
true and this subject came up a few
times even when I was writing a book
about business I would say something
like marketing is just another way of
being considerate and there would always
be somebody to say hm well that's not
always true and say I know it's not true
but this is a nicer way of thinking of
marketing instead of thinking like how
can I annoy people and spam them if you
think of marketing as whatever you're
doing to be considerate to help people
remember you to help people find you uh
it's a better way of thinking about it I
find it more useful to think that way
so I realized there was a theme
underneath my previous four books which
is that I choose beliefs because they're
useful not because they're necessarily
true I love this idea so you uh I think
George Mack good friend of mine uh
phenomenal writer got a copy of your
book before maybe it even been announced
or maybe early on and uh we'd been
talking about something which is
literally true but fun Al false for two
years two and a half years uh or
functionally true but literally false
and I was like oh Derek's got it like
he's nailed it this is the exact thing
that we've been talking about for ages
so I was super excited to be able to
have this conversation because it's kind
of a pet project of mine too um the best
examples that I've got something which
is uh functionally true but literally
false porcupines can throw their quills
no they can't they're not darts players
they can't throw their quills but if you
treat a porcupine as if it can throw its
quills you're less likely to go away
from it um walking under a ladder is bad
luck no it's not I I I I am yet to see
any evidence that people who have walked
under a ladder result in worse luck over
the next however many decades of their
life but if you evade walking under
ladders you are less likely to have
paint cans and plant pots and humans
dropped on your head uh pigs are morally
dirty creatures and that means that you
should never touch them or eat
them not true as far as I'm aware the
moral status of pigs is equivalent to
that of cows and chickens and everything
else but their flesh does carry a higher
pathogen load on average so if you avoid
eating it adaptively that's protective
to you especially if you were perhaps
let's say in the Middle East in a place
which is quite warm and doesn't have
great sanitary conditions and it's the
Middle Ages uh and the reverse something
which would be uh literally true but
functionally false much harder to find
at least in my opinion uh would be free
will doesn't exist so a deterministic
view of the world uh one which may laws
of physics and a bit of philosophy kind
of seems to say to people smarter than
me that this might be the case uh but
when you actually try and functionally
use that or usefully use that in your
life uh it kind of of results in a lot
of people becoming nihilistic or
fatalistic or apathetic or just a bit
sad or something uh and I guess another
one uh so like always treating the gun
like it's loaded is is another sort of
twist on this beautiful example uh so
yes this is a a topic that uh me and you
and a couple of my friends have been
pointing at from different directions
and I'm very glad that someone's finally
come along and put it into a single
piece of work thanks and then the hard
part for me was to make it catchy I
decided with this book I was aiming to
be catchy because I wanted the little
examples to stick in your head for years
afterwards
so my first drafts I was trying to dump
everything I knew about this subject um
because I didn't know a lot about the
subject beforehand I went and
read many books about pragmatism and
skepticism and nihilism
and then read uh every book I could
about
um uh what do you call that the the
study of Religion theology uh I read the
Bible cover to cover read every single
page and uh read books about Islam and
Judaism tried to read two books about
Hinduism I still don't get it um and uh
and only and and what you see in this
little tiny 100 page book that you can
read in 90 minutes or less uh is me
trying to take everything I learned
about this subject and compressing it
into short memorable little fables I
read it on a flight from Austin to
Nashville which for the people that have
taken it is not a long flight and and I
was taking notes so yeah uh very parab I
love memes I think that uh um Steven
pressfield's books uh both of them are
fantastic that format's great Oliver
burkman's most recent one is very
similar to yours I think that was
zeroing in on a a new
very concentrated uh type of so like
purified version of of writing and I'm
I'm here for it so kind of taking the
the thesis of the book overall there's
five sections I'm really excited to go
through and I want to go through some of
my favorite stories and and chapters and
lessons and stuff like that but a lot of
what we're talking about today is a kind
of reframing in one form or another yeah
why is reframing important
reframing is everything reframing is not
just a good way to feel better about
things out of your control but
reframing helps concrete
strategy uh even just whether in
business or just life and what you
choose to do with your life and how you
choose to approach anything
reframing is it's what it's all about
man I think reframing is what helps you
look at any
situation and understand that you've got
a
default instinctual
reflective reaction to
anything but that's not the only way to
see
it and it helps so much to detach from
your first
reaction and call it what it is it's
just my first reaction it's not the only
way to see
this and to do good old-fashioned
brainstorming techniques to say okay
what are some other ways to look at this
and not stop after the first two or
three but push
yourself
into going to the edges and thinking of
some radically different ways to look at
this
um and what you come out with is either
a smarter
strategy or a unique Insight uh a
different approach that most people
don't take and hadn't thought of because
it doesn't come naturally it's not very
intuitive um all of these I think all of
the best stuff for me in life has
happened from these moments where I
think harder and think past my first
reaction to
something and find a a new approach
to a business or new approach to where
I'm living in the world or a new
approach
to Parenting or whatnot uh everything to
me all the best stuff in life has come
from the deliberate process of conscious
reframing what would you say to the
people who go well that's all well and
good you positive mental attitude and
such but it's wishful thinking you know
that the the thing is the thing and this
sort of version of trying to
recapitulate it into some other uh
perspective that doesn't fundamentally
change the thing what's your what's your
thoughts
there I'm trying to think of more
day-to-day examples actually I'm going
to think of one from a friend that just
came to me this morning uh Tim Ferris
long
ago said that when he's trying to figure
out a book to read on a certain subject
he wants to find a good book book on any
given subject he'll go to Amazon and
look at the well-rated books but he said
the I look at other people's reviews but
he said I don't look at the good reviews
what I do is I find the top rated
critical review he said because I don't
want to hear praise for the book he said
I want to hear criticism against the
book and I went oh that's a nice
technique look at the top rated critical
review as they have them sorted into
praise and critical um and another one
from Tim that came to mind is
when brainstorming a book he said I will
hire a
journalist to to push back he said
journalists and lawyers are the the two
that I've found are the best at pushing
back on an idea and challenging an idea
I have so when I'm thinking of a new
book to write I don't want somebody to
just tell me this is a great idea I want
somebody to push back and say this is
maybe a bad idea to be writing about and
finding counter ideas to that so both of
those uh just you know the morning an
hour before we hit record I was looking
for a book on Amazon and remembering
Tim's technique of finding the critical
reviews and thought see these are two
very ex good examples
of approaches that would not come
instinctually but come after deeper
thought and pushing harder to find a a
way of reframing what you're really
doing here am I looking for
encouragement or am I looking for
discour
enagement so that I can push through so
there anyway that's just one tiny
example um
but more examples come up all the time
in uh something I'd like to talk about
in a minute that's not in the book I'm
just curious to hear your thoughts about
is when we choose to think of something
from scratch to kind of break it down to
say okay wait hold on what's the real
point of what I'm doing here forget the
norms and what most people do uh what's
the essence of what I'm trying to go for
here and reframing can be a really good
way to strip away the ceremony and the
habits and the instincts and the norms
and ask yourself what you're really
doing and what's the real point the
reason that I like reframing
is largely in life things aren't what
they are things are what we think they
are yeah and we confuse the two we get
confused we think that we have this
precise accurate
unbiased transparent perfectly recorded
view of yeah of things that are
happening have happened to us um and we
see so well the fallibility in other
people the the way that they convince
themselves or are manipulated by others
or swayed by their past experience uh
meanwhile we assume that the way that we
see the world upon First Impressions we
have this sort of mass solipsism Mass
individual solipsism more sort of ego
like narcissist I that's for other
people but me me my my first impressions
about the world they're always correct
uh my favorite I think example of this
can you retell your car accident story
yeah that was um yeah the past we tend
to think of the past like it's a
Concrete thing like you just
said uh when I was 17 I was in in a car
crash uh in my neighborhood in Hinsdale
Illinois um I blew off a yield sign
crashed into an oncoming car and just in
the confusion in days afterwards
somebody told me later that the woman in
the oncoming car that I hit that uh I
broke her spine and she will never walk
again but this was about a month before
I went off to University in Boston and
so it's like I kind of left Hinsdale
Illinois and didn't go back but I
carried this burden with me that every
now and then I just think man that is so
[ __ ] up like there's some woman
somewhere that will never walk again
because I blew off that yield
sign oh I just like just carried this
burden with me you know you put it out
of your head sometimes and it comes back
sometimes and after 16 years or in my
mid-30s I was back in Hinsdale Illinois
and I thought I'm going to go find that
woman that I hit so I went like found
her name and the oldfashioned White
Pages phone book and I just showed up at
her door and knocked on the door and she
answered and I said hi uh my name is
Derek I'm the one that when I was a
teenager I hit your car and and I like
started crying it was like all this like
pent up burden years of regret just like
came out I started crying on her
doorstep and she's like oh sweetie
sweetie don't worry don't worry here
come in and she walked me into her
living room walked and it took me a
second to put this together because I
was you know upset I went wait
what and she explained that yes she
broke a vertebrae in that crash but
she's been walking just fine uh and so
it was misinformation that somebody told
me that she'll never walk again and um
she said you know I was I was a lot
heavier then I was a compulsive eater
and she said that's why I hit you is I
was eating and not paying attention to
the road I was eating while driving and
she said that accident really um turned
me around because I realized what a
compulsive eater I was that I actually
you know hit some poor innocent teenager
because I was eating and I said wait you
didn't hit me I hit you cuz I blew off
the yel CH she said no sweetie I hit you
cuz I was eating I said and she goes
wait all these years you thought that
you hit me and then she started crying
and she goes so stupid these stories and
and uh yeah was just this moment where
we realized like we had both been
holding on to this story of what
happened and both feeling guilty about
it for 18 years so what do you take away
from that what's the
lesson every story anybody tells you
about their past here's what
happened my ex jumped me with no warning
uh this person wronged me this person
said they were going to do something and
then ran away with the money and didn't
do what they said they were going to do
uh all these stories we carry with us of
people who have wronged us and people
who are just bad and evil uh it's a
great reminder that there's always
another
perspective there's always another
version of that story and the one that
you've been carry around or the one that
somebody else tells you is probably not
the only version of that story and uh
then you can even zoom out and think
about um all the history that we learn
in school and the tales of what happened
in World War II and all of these things
have many different perspectives I never
watched 500 Days of Summer but I think
you convinced me that I maybe should go
back and watch it for the people who
haven't seen it what's the what's the
thesis of that movie is a cute Romance
movie from uh maybe 15 years ago and uh
the point is that the whole movie is
basically a guy saying yeah this
girl we were we were in love we were
together we'd been together for a few
months everything was great I found the
love of my life and then just one day
out of the blue she just dumped me for
no
reason
and he spends most of the movie
being feeling sorry for himself self and
down in the dumps and why does this true
love not why did she dump me out of the
blue and it's not until his little
sister near the end of the movie says
you know next time you look back I think
you should look again and then what I
love is the movie does something
wonderful is it replays for you those
same scenes it showed you earlier in the
movie but now the camera lingers just a
little bit longer and you see that like
when earlier we saw him like we saw her
look up and smile at him now the camera
stays a little longer and you realize it
was one of these
Smiles that like lasts for one second
and then completely drops when he's not
looking and you see them holding hands
you see them like this moment where they
hold hands but now the camera lingers a
little longer and you see that he
reaches out to hold her hand and then
she kind of pulls away and now you
realize through the art of film editing
that she never she was never into
him but our mind does the same thing as
movies our mind picks single moments and
finds tiny little moments where somebody
that was otherwise nice did something
bad or somebody that was otherwise bad
did something nice and focuses in on the
moments that we want to extract to tell
the story that we want to tell ourselves
or others and we start ignoring all the
other
moments and
so this is true also with any
perspective anybody tells you about the
world I love this idea
that the facts might be true but the
perspective is not somebody can
say uh here's one I just heard
yesterday the the new Medicaid budget at
the government is going to cost American
taxpayers
$380
billion look how wasteful that
is and that might be a true fact that
it's going to cost $380 billion the fact
that they're ignoring is that the
current plan costs $490
billion and so they're choosing a
perspective that wasteful by by
selecting only this one specific fact
and ignoring the other facts and we all
do this in life when
you say you encounter a mean person or
somebody being mean yeah let's even that
I just said a mean person as if that's a
character trait but no it might just be
a person who was being unkind in that
moment that you
encounter and especially let's say if
you're traveling you're on a holiday to
uh Romania a place you've never been
before and the first person you
encounter
is uh unkind to you say people in
Romania are
mean and people here are bad and we make
these perspectives
like the economy is going to hell or AI
is stealing everyone's jobs you do this
by selecting tiny little facts and using
that to support an entire
perspective and what I love realizing
and this is the
whole long answer to your question about
the movie 500 Days of Summer and him
focusing in on the little moments where
she smiled at him and the little moments
where they held hands he's using those
select moments to say she loved me and
we use these select moments to say
things are getting worse because look at
this
fact but you only choose that
perspective when you ignore all the
other facts so you have to realize that
there's a big difference between facts
and perspective that the facts can be
true but their perspective is never true
because I sorry we didn't mention maybe
we should have said at the beginning my
definition of true is like absolutely
necessarily objectively empirically true
any creature or machine could observe it
and agree and only in that case would I
call something
true because whatever you consider true
is closed no further questioning it's a
fact and that's that so I think it's
important to be careful with that word
true and Define it as narrowly as
possible because everything that's true
is not up for
negotiation there's no other way to see
it squares have four sides that's that
um everything else there can be
different ways of looking at it so it's
nice to remind
yourself what few things are actually
true and that everything else is up for
reframing I think going into November
this is probably quite an important uh
thing to remind everybody of um you've
got this lovely idea about uh
perspectives feel real that one person's
undeniable fact is another person's
incorrect opinion essentially and uh I I
love the reality of that people share
perspectives not facts nobody bonds over
facts I I looked at a study recently you
basically get about three times as much
retention after uh 24 hours from telling
somebody a story than telling somebody a
fact about the same story so you know
humans grew up in an environment that
wasn't rich in facts but was pretty rich
in stories perhaps unsurprisingly were
adapted to be able to hold on to the
stories so these
perspectives especially if it's got a
compelling narrative behind it feels
real it feels more real than the fact
that we might actually be underlying
that or might even be contradicting it
because the story the the the way that
you are brought into this the framing of
the landscape of this discussion is so
much more compelling and uh yeah the
fact that one person's undeniable fact
is another person's incorrect opinion I
think is
um it just shows how it's the blind men
touching the elephant thing right yeah
yeah well the way that I structure the
book
is the way that I would do it in
conversation with somebody too is to
first point out other people's faults
because it's so
easy to look at those people those
stupid people that think that their
politician is the good one those stupid
people that think that they uh whatever
social values stance is the correct
one uh what idiots look at them like
spouting it as if it's the only way when
I think that's stupid uh that's so much
easier to see other people being wrong
and we can point at their faults and
even somebody who tells you a soab story
about a breakup they had uh with
somebody that wronged them it's easier
to look at that friend and say you know
that might not be the only way of
looking at this maybe you were in the
wrong um it's easier to do that and it
is so hard to then turn that back at
yourself and say wait a minute maybe all
of my social values and political
opinions are really
stupid maybe all of my perspectives on
things that happened in the
past are just me making myself the hero
of a fictional story um or this the the
noble victim um
maybe everything every opinion I hold as
fact is just not true it's just one way
of seeing it and even though I've been
completely focused on this
subject for the last couple years
writing this book I still would catch
myself in these moments like I live in
Wellington New Zealand which is like a
it's like an okay little city in
Wellington uh and I catch myself saying
things like well is a bad place to do
such and
such and I catch myself going whoa wait
a second I'm stating that like a
fact that's not a fact that's not
true that's just one way of looking at
it whoa how else could I look at it and
the important thing is maybe the where
we need to go with this point
next is when you have a variety of
opinions that you could adopt you have
to just notice in yourself
which way of looking at it works for you
whether that makes you take smarter
actions or whether that just helps you
feel at peace with things that are out
of your
control none of these perspectives are
necessarily right or wrong the real
judge is your own actions what does it
do for you how will you act if you adopt
this perspective how will you act if you
adopt that perspective let's just say if
you decide that there are no good jobs
out there that there's uh nobody's
making any money nobody has any money
and there's no good
work okay if you choose to adopt that
perspectives what action does that
create in you if that makes you just sit
on your couch eating chips and watching
TV and giving up maybe that's not
working for you maybe you should try
another perspective maybe for some
people that idea that nobody's got any
money there are no good jobs out there
for somebody that perspective makes them
go yeah so I'm going to start my own
thing I'm GNA do this like I'm gonna
fight against all the odds you know I've
got my back against the ropes I'm like
the boxer in the 18th round or whatever
who's going to come back at this thing
fighting it all depends on how you
respond to that perspective that you're
going to choose and then choose the
perspective based on how it's making you
respond so given that the fact almost
nothing people say is true what is the
relationship between that and rules that
we have in
society I don't know you tell me what
you taught me the most interesting one
of the most interesting things that I've
learned especially again going into
November when the founding fathers of
the United States of America were
drafting the Constitution it was assumed
that this new country would have three
six or 12 presidents when someone
proposed having only one president most
delegates were against it since they had
just left a kingdom and wanted nothing
like a king the issue was debated for
weeks before finally agreeing by a 7 to3
vote to have just one president it's a
reminder that the way things are is
arbitrary and not the only way seven to
three vote resulted in the in like the
most powerful most influential country
with the most humans on the planet the
fundamentally being changed that's so
that's so what I didn't know that the
constitution had assumed that there
would be this sort of I don't know like
Council of presidents yeah would have
been a very different situation huh
wildly um thanks for that reminder yeah
that actually came from AJ Jacobs his
new newest book is called I think living
constitutionally or something like that
he's the one that revealed that fact for
me so thanks AJ Jacobs um rules yeah
thanks for that reminder it
um once you realize how
arbitrary the world is you can also see
rules through this
lens even just day-to-day rules a
business saying you can't do this uh no
you must go to this booth first and get
your number and then you must wait in
line and this is how this system works
uh there's so many examples uh
where hopefully we all have examples
from our own life where you bypassed the
rules and thrived because of it that you
you can understand why they're there in
the same way I thought it was beautiful
the way that you started this
conversation with the examples of the
ladder uh and the pork that there are
okay we can understand there are reasons
why people came up with these rules it
makes the system work better if
everybody follows the
rules but if you understand that that's
just most of the time that there are
some
situations where it just makes sense for
everything considered and nobody's going
to be harmed by not following this rule
in this moment classic example is uh a
red stoplight in the middle of nowhere
at 3: in the morning where you can just
clearly see that there's nobody coming
in any
direction it doesn't make logical sense
to sit there and wait for a whole minute
for the light to turn green you
understand why it's there but come on
it's 3 in the morning there's nobody
here um except the
aliens uh and um there's some rules like
that where yeah I've I've thrived in
life by breaking some of these rules
and isn't there a um
I don't usually do exact quotes but
something like uh reasonable men and the
world depends on some people being
unreasonable oh I'm not familiar I'm not
familiar with that but it sounds a lot
like uh the people that I like to hang
around with the the
unreasonableness ress depends on the the
occasional person being unreasonable
because you realize that rules are not
etched in stone they're ever changing
and they're adapting and that if
everybody only ever follows the rules
then nothing ever progresses sometimes
you need somebody to break the rules or
point out that that rule
is
immoral and let's look at say like Rosa
Parks or uh slavery rules or apartheid
rules uh that were good thing that
somebody started breaking those rules
and pointed out that those rules are no
longer um we should no longer follow
those yeah
it's very useful to have a set of rules
that are unwaveringly followed because
it gives most people a
largely uh Pitfall avoiding rubric for
how they can go about life right like
you you might not expedite success but
you'll kind of avoid catastrophe for the
most right perfect example I was at the
uh uh uii Gallery in uh Florence a
couple of weeks ago and there is a large
line for the bathroom uh for the ladies
and there was no disabled people around
but there as a disabled stall that was
being unused by both men and women so
one of the women skipped out of the
queue went down went into the disabled
thing and I thought well there is a rule
that disabled people should be the
people to use the disabled toilet but if
there's no disabled people around and if
the queue for the ladies is so long that
it's holding up other people who might
actually be old or something or needs to
get to the bathroom more quickly than
you do then that seems kind of almost
like The Virtuous thing to do I guess
The Virtuous thing would have been to
have got one of the older women and put
them in the disabled toilet but that's
kind of a little bit weird so um you
know what I mean so it's it's agency
it's it's it's playing playing with the
rules when it's safe to do so so knowing
the ones that are meant to be bent and
sometimes the ones that are meant to be
ignored and broken entirely uh and then
also sticking to them too but I I think
the you know the reason that we have
this it's a coordination uh problem it's
trying to get Society to work it
wouldn't do for us to say to it the
reason that rules are there is so that
you don't need to from first principles
work out what you're supposed to do each
time it's not a freefor all Royal Rumble
to see who gets the bathroom stall first
you have person that arrives first
stands first and then second stands
second and then third and so on and so
forth uh but yeah that I I saw that
happen only a couple of weeks ago and I
immediately thought of this sort of idea
of rule followers and Rule Benders in
the same scenario yeah one of my
favorite things about writing a book is
when you
discover new insights in the writing so
it's not just sitting down to tell you
what I already know it's me sitting down
to dive into this subject for you know
12 hours a day for 2 years and in doing
that I came up with this Insight I went
rules themselves are useful not true
that rules except you know the rules are
not like a law of gravity it's they're
not laws of nature they are useful
guidelines to keep Society Running well
they're useful and it really helps you
to see it from the system's point of
view to see like you just did why is
this rule useful this rule is useful
because if somebody comes up in a
wheelchair and needs the bathroom they
shouldn't have to wait in this long
queue with everybody else but if you
look around nobody's in a wheelchair and
if you're going to be quick then we if
we understand the the purpose of that
rule and nobody is harmed by us breaking
that rule then it can actually be both
logical and even moral
to ignore that rule right now not
harming the system not harming
anybody yeah okay so if we've convinced
uh most people that what other people
say almost nothing of what other people
say is true how do we take them to the
next step which is that their thoughts
their own thoughts are also not
true well first just realize that you
are them that you that you are them to
somebody else that from everybody else's
point of view you are the the odd one um
my two favorite little examples of this
are an old joke of
a man is traveling through the
countryside and comes to a river he
can't figure out how to cross there's a
woman on the other side of the river and
he says excuse me Madam how do I get to
the other side of the river and she goes
you are on the other side of the river
I was like well from her point of
view and uh and another one is an
American woman goes to Scotland for her
first time and she's just be in a bar
full of people and she's talking to
these guys and she goes I just love your
all accent and they go we don't have an
accent you do it's like oh right all of
us have an
accent we all think that our the way we
speak is the normal one and it's the
other people that have an accent but no
I am speaking with an American accent
right now uh it's a nice reminder so
yeah you are the other to everyone else
so you are them so all of the rules that
you've just happily taken on board to
identify how illogical and irrational
and flawed and biased everybody else is
needs to be turned around and point it
at yourself
yeah uh
yeah then we can get into if do you want
to get into that stuff about the the
split brain patience and how we lie to
ourselves that would be
great this was a
mindblower so we
all believe our
brain but our brain makes
up things
confabulation uh and this was r revealed
very clearly in tests with split brain
patients people who have had some kind
of problem with their brain so that the
left and right hemispheres that are
connected through uh a pretty
surprisingly narrow uh connection in the
middle um if there's a problem uh brain
surgeons can uh disconnect that middle
uh sorry I forget the the Latin official
term the thing that connects your left
and right half to your brain and
surprisingly once that's severed the
people can live surprisingly normal
lives and they're just like you and me
except they psychologists use them for
studies to see okay well hey you're one
of the rare people on Earth whose right
and left hemispheres of your brain are
not communicating with each other
directly can I ask you a question and so
they would show a message to one eye
saying uh please get up and close the
door and the person would get up and
close the door and then they'd show a
question to the other eyes saying why
did you close the door and the person
would say oh I just sorry it just seemed
like we needed more privacy in
here and they would put a message into
headphones in just their right ear
saying uh you know please walk around
the room to the other one why did you
walk around the room oh I just needed to
stretch my legs what's amazing is these
people weren't lying they completely
like all of us believed that that is why
they did what they did their brain told
them this is why you did it because the
brain never says I don't know anything
you ask it why it will come up with a
reason but this is hard to prove for
most of us but in this very controlled
situation of left and right hemispheres
it was revealed that this is something
that all of us do all the time anytime
you've ever told yourself why you did
something
it's very likely not the real reason you
might have just been making that
up and when you when you then now
replay your choices in life your choice
of career spouse
meal
everything uh why did you do this you
realize the
only wise answer is I don't know I have
no idea why I do
anything and so you stop asking why and
you just look at your actions you say
well this is what I did why I don't know
why would I know I don't know my own
brain my brain lies to me I I will never
know the real reasons why I did
something who knows what subliminal
subconscious motivations drove me to do
that the reason we call them
subconscious is because they're not
conscious there's no way of knowing them
otherwise they'd be conscious so I don't
know and then you
realize anybody else telling you why
they did something also doesn't know but
they think they know so we can just
ignore the reasons that anybody gives us
ignore the reasons in oursel and just
judge things only through their
actions well I suppose that we need
to we need to at least be able to
believe that we know why we did the
things that we did because if we didn't
we would sound to all of the humans
around around us like a mental patient
we'd sound like somebody who needed to
be sectioned so there's a a theory
around Consciousness I think one of the
reasons that it's potentially put
forward is that social groups are very
important to humans it's one of the
reasons that our brains grew so quickly
so that we can deal with larger group
and tribe sizes as that grows I need to
know Derek but I also need to know Tim
and I need to know the strength of their
friendship I need to know that Tim did
that thing and Derek got angry but that
was a few weeks ago and it seems like
they're a little bit better and
basically in order for me to be able to
model what you're thinking I need to be
able to think so theory of mind is it
allows us to project how you and
everybody else may get on together now
one of the problems is that if we saw
our motivations and our actions and the
beliefs that we have about the world not
being facts just being these kind of
cobbled together lawyers attorney
justification for why we did a thing
that's kind of pulled out of nowhere
that would sound to a lot of the people
around us very unpredictable we would
sound like an unreliable Ally to a lot
of people because what what was the
reason that Derek went and lit that fire
over there I don't know I asked him and
he came back and he just sort of said
like woo I don't know I was just a
little you know he said exactly what it
was which is this totally unsatisfying
answer that isn't drawn into a single
coherent narrative about someone that
isn't wrapped into their personality and
all the rest of it so I think it's
important to see the fact that we don't
have full transparency about our
motivations the fact that we don't
understand why we do the things that we
do fully and that we never can as an
Adaptive mechanism we can feel um uh
resentment or or frustration at the fact
that we don't have this level of
self-insight that we think might be
useful but it's actually not that useful
to have it like that because it wouldn't
be adaptive for the way that we need to
show up for everybody else if every time
anybody asked us why we did a thing we
just said I don't know or gave some like
you know ridiculous explanation about it
that wouldn't that would make them very
uncomfortable because that's not the way
that humans are supposed to be we need
to be able to be predictable consistent
uh animals moving forward and I think
that yeah uh not getting too frustrated
at the fact that we don't have it and
realizing where it comes from or at
least my bro signs theory about why I
think it might come from um I think it's
at least a good place to start
you did just say Bro Science did you
correct okay it's the highest form of
science I that um well for what it's
worth you're catching me off guard I
haven't I hadn't heard this idea that we
need to have reasons
why and I'm not fully convinced that I
it's been over a year since I've asked
anybody why anything and it's been over
a year or two since I've told anybody
why anything
um just to linger on that that sounds
like an
unbelievable uh lifestyle right turn to
make I don't know I think maybe I was
already a very skeptical person I
haven't yet read uh Michelle is it
Montaine or Mont the French uh
philosopher that uh kind of wrote These
Diaries um but apparently I've read a
book about him but I haven't read the
original Source yet of his Diaries but
essays that's it he he coined the term
essay Essa the French word for to try
and so Michelle Mont Mon's essays um
very
apparently would very often end with a
little uh but what do I I know like he
would kind of stay his point of view and
here's how I see it and this is what I
think and therefore this and that and at
the very end but what do I know who
knows maybe it's all wrong I think I've
been operating in that mindset for
years of hey I'll say a thing now I'll
say that this is why uh I'm I've decided
to do what I'm doing or go where I'm
going but what do I know know maybe it's
wrong I don't know maybe there's some
other reason that I said no to this or
some other reason I said yes to this
that I'm unaware of I don't know uh I
think I've already been in that mindset
for years uh and
um yeah so I I it's been years since
I've bothered to ask anybody why
anything I think it is very possible to
just judge people by their their actions
it seems like you're still
functioning yeah for now
yeah yeah what do you mean when you talk
about the more emotional the belief the
less likely it's true
oh that's an interesting
one
uh all right well we have to just rewind
one second to remind anybody still
listening
that that definition of true that when I
say true it really means absolutely
necessary necessarily objectively observ
empirically 100% true the idea that that
an alien from outer space and an octopus
underwater could both observe this thing
and
agree that's what I call
true uh things of the Mind are never
true because there can be another way of
looking at it if it's a thing of the
mind even that's moral statements like
uh it's bad to kill uh there is another
way of looking at that there are some
situations where it can be good to kill
like there are way too many bunnies here
in New Zealand that shouldn't be here
every Easter the kids and otago uh go
out to kill as many bunnies as they can
you're kidding me no serious because
it's like completely overrun if you just
drive through the countryside of otago
um in the southern uh South Island of
New Zealand uh there's just thousands of
bunnies that are not native to this
environment and so they have no
Predators kind of like the uh cane toads
in Australia that whoever brought that
first one or maybe two in should not
have done that because now there's just
an overrun of cane toads in Australia
it's uh pythons in the Everglades and
axis deer in Maui as well all doing the
same thing so there are some situations
where it is good to kill so
any
moral uh or value statement basically
anything of the mind we can't say it's
necessarily objectively absolutely true
because there could be another way of
looking at it so you have to realize
that all those things in the mind are
just one perspective and that other
perspectives
exist so when
you notice that somebody's getting very
emotional about their point of view uh
it seems to imply that there's something
else going on that this is
triggering some other underlying
emotions or there it has some extra
meaning to them uh that their value
system that they they strongly
believe uh even if somebody has to say I
believe the reason they have to say I
believe is because they're communicating
what's inside their mind to you you
don't you don't say uh I believe I am
holding glasses in my hand right now you
just say well that's just a fact I'm
holding glasses in my hand right now
that's not a belief we don't have to say
I believe because it's just a fact uh
which means that there's also for the
things that are truly just a fact
there's no need to get all emotional
about it there you go that's a fact and
that's that there's no no emotional
persuasion uh it's just there it is and
so it seems to me to be an
indicator that the more emotional
somebody is getting about something the
more this ties into their sense of self
identity um how they present to the
world how they think things should be uh
it's usually just things of the mind and
of the emotion that are not just
objective facts so yeah the more
emotional somebody gets about something
the less likely it seems to be true high
emotionality is like putting the caveat
I believe before then making that
statement about whatever it is well put
there is a um I think there's an
equivalent another Bro Science rule
which is uh any field which has got the
word science in it is not a science that
it's it's not called chemistry science
or physics science or biology
science um but it is called social
science um so yeah uh this odd sense
that the more emotional somebody is
getting about
something it it tends to be things that
can be contested and the reason that the
emotion is there is to act as a um
additional form of evidence on the side
of the person that's trying to convince
you of their point of view but if it was
true especially something which was
absolutely self-evidently objectively
outside of space and time true well how
much more evidence does this need yeah
no one's fighting like that for Gravity
right right
fighting
yeah yeah by the way thanks for
remembering the um outside of space and
time uh I'd never heard it put like that
but you're right I forgot that my
definition of true includes for everyone
everywhere always yes and if it's not
true for everyone everywhere always then
it's not necessarily true well we can't
true for you for now you open up uh
talking about what time is it now as a
question there's a great book by Carlo
relli it's called the order of time it's
real small thing not as small as yours
yours is particularly small uh it's the
audio book is read by Benedict
Cumberbatch Doctor Strange from the
Marvel uh Series so it's awesome it's
really Sherlock Holmes to me correct
really cool cool little listen and in it
he talks about light cones so
um asking what is happening right now is
a pointless question actually
technically a pointless question even
between me and you if I say what is
happening right now there is a short
brief window that it takes for the
electrical current to go from here at
the speed of light whiz through my modem
and then down to you and then comes back
to me and all the rest of it uh but
especially when you start talking about
slightly bigger distances he actually
draws what's called a light cone which
is the now of now it moves like this it
doesn't move out it's not flat like that
it takes time to build out and um as you
were talking earlier on there's a couple
of physics references that have come up
uh talking about perspectives and you
were saying accent for instance so what
is normal to one person is abnormal to
someone else and it made me think about
kind of social relativity so moving at
relativistic speeds to everybody inside
of the spaceship that's moving at 99.9%
the speed of light they're just walking
around and going about their business as
they normally would but to somebody
looking from outside of the spaceship at
the way that they're moving they're
moving incredibly strangely well why
because their frame of reference and
your frame of reference are two superbly
different things and it's always fun to
see something uh from sort of the social
world or the psychological World get
reflected even if it's uh pulling on the
tethers a little bit uh tenuously um in
a different field so yeah I was thinking
about social relativity there before as
well I love that
it we live in a
very subjective social psychological
world that there are some of us maybe
that are working in Laboratories right
now that are living in a world of just
uh empirical science but most of us
aren't but yet we act like we are we act
like our perspectives and how we see the
world is
true I liked the idea of judging the
contents not the box when it comes to uh
things that are useful but not true I
spoke to Eric Weinstein a couple of
weeks ago and he has this uh this
concept of an accuracy budget and his
accuracy budget is basically that people
that are playing with ideas in public
should be allowed to get things wrong uh
not all the time that would make for a
pretty poor uh expert but um an accuracy
budget means that it makes you less
scared about playing with ideas and
pushing the edges of things for fear of
one misstep coloring all of your body of
work well you see he wasn't right on
such and such the meteorological
the Vietnamese weather tomorrow or
whatever it was or you know he Mis he
misquoted that guy that explained about
how men that are unreasonable move the
world forward that means that his entire
body of work can't be trusted uh and I I
think that he's true there's an
odd an odd sense that people should only
ever speak about that area of absolute
expertise that there is not very much
that can be contributed to by people
outside of some
like odd formal training plus
apprenticeship plus time spent within an
area uh in an age where credentialism is
actually kind of quite highly criticized
so these two things are existing in in
uh time and space at the same time uh
but yes uh experts only and this idea of
an accuracy budget I think is similar to
your idea of judging the contents not
the
Box yeah this was one of the original
inspirations
for writing the useful not true book is
how I saw um what do we call it cancel
culture where somebody who's made 20
years of great
movies uh I I'll pick Woody Allen for
example Woody Allen has made some
objectively empirically observably great
movies it's just a fact outside of space
and time for everyone everywhere always
Woody Ellen has made some great
movies
uh
maybe uh what Woody Allen's uh is it son
or daughter I don't remember I think
there there are allegations against
Woody Allen that Woody Allen has uh
there's a a chance that Woody Allen has
done something bad in his private life
um let's say probably
true um
but then people use that to
say uh remove all his movies ban them
from the store they must never be shown
nobody should be able to see these
movies anymore I will never certainly
never watch these movies ever
again because of those
allegations okay so that's an extreme
example but sometimes it even comes to
little examples where like somebody can
write a really useful book about
psychology
uh and if you read this book and if you
applied what it said to your life you
would live a better life by your own
standards you would benefit from reading
this book oh but I heard that author on
a podcast and he has a social view I
disagree with therefore [ __ ] that book
I'm never reading that
book I can see how it's useful for
people to
discard somebody because if you say that
600 page book I know it might benefit me
but I don't like something that author
said therefore I'm not going to read it
well lucky lucky you one last thing to
do in life now you can just stay in
happy proud ignorance that I'm not even
going to look at that book because I
don't like something that that person
said uh that to me is judging the Box
not the contents you're taking this um
package of a person an author or a
public figure a media uh figure and
saying well that person is not perfect
therefore everything inside their box is
bad that whole container is now bad and
what did you say disreputable um uh I'm
going to discard everything in time that
entire
container I think that's doing a huge
disservice to
yourself for
one it's just
stupid and by stupid my definition of
stupid is avoiding
[Music]
thinking stupid isn't an inherent trait
it's something that you do you are being
stupid when you avoid
thinking and to take an entire container
of a
person and just decide that that entire
everything inside that container is bad
is being stupid it's avoiding
thinking that the individual ideas
inside that
container might be worth adopting but we
tend to get this like identity politics
kind of
um deciding that I am a person who is
against uh this social I am against
abuse and therefore if somebody's uh
accused this person of abuse I need to
show that I am against
abuse by showing that I will never again
look the direction of that person that
was accused of abuse and it's
understandable and it's maybe even even
righteous and maybe even
admirable but it's doing a disservice to
yourself
to refuse to think further or think
about the complexities or just pick the
individual
ideas from somebody's body of work
without needing that to be an
endorsement of the total package you are
at a massive disadvantage if the only
people that you can learn from a people
that you usually agree
with well put huge disadvantage you know
this is the main problem with uh
tribalism for anybody that is into
personal growth
you you are going to struggle to find
anybody that is sufficiently
pure uh that they have met all of the
criteria for you if you're very
sensitive with this to be able to accept
them on board uh so I actually wrote
something on the plane uh that was
inspired by uh uh what you were talking
about um I went through a retreat in
California last year during it I met a
business owner whose YouTube content I
used to watch a long time ago when I
asked him why he stopped making videos
he said I started feeling like I had to
live up to in private the things which I
was saying in public and I've come to
think about this all the time I've also
come to realize that there's two sides
to fake it until you make it one is
positing an ideal or better version of
yourself which you are motivated to live
up to due to the need for social
consistency but this stake in the ground
acts as much like a tether as it does a
Finish Line If you commit yourself to a
worldview or life philosophy what
happens if you stop agreeing with it
sure you might want to change but
everyone around you has grown accustomed
to the previous version of you whether
it's Lifestyle Changes like your dietary
approach or training methodology
worldview changes like religious belief
or political affiliation or personality
changes like commitments to personal
growth going sober or changing friend
groups social consistency bias is a
double-edged sword a while ago some of
the leading influences in the ex paleo
diet movement then the carnivore diet
movement started to add fruit into their
food the aptly called meat and fruit
diet caused uproar not because of the
evidence that the diet is based on but
because new proponents had ardently
stated a different belief in the past
and the change caused people around them
to feel uncomfortable this is the danger
the social incentives align for you to
not change in public even if you grow
out of your beliefs in private stupid
people see someone changing their mind
as an indication of unsophistication
because they don't understand that
updating your worldview when you grow is
a sign of intelligence not fickleness
and that an unwavering commitment to a
narrow worldview is not cleverness but a
substitute for it which unfortunately
means that changing your mind in public
often results in you being attacked by
large numbers of mostly stupid people
and the more public you are about it the
harder it is to reverse and this is what
I thought you quoted in your book we are
what we pretend to be so we must be
careful about what we pretend to be Kurt
vonet
yes that Kurt vonet I'm misremembered
that Kurt vaget quote for many years uh
and I just remembered it as um you are
whatever you pretend to be and when I
found the original quote I went I like
my version
better because by the way Chris I got to
say I love what you just read there that
was one wonderful thank you that was
really wonderful it's you beautifully
said what I was trying to say way more
words though that would have taken up
six pages of your book your your book's
like 90 Pages not so hey listeners the
uh if you haven't read useful not true
yet the
average chapter length is 21
sentences that was a lot I did the work
you know the old quote like forgive me
for the long letter if I had more time I
would have written a shorter one I I
took the time I did the work I made it
as short as it could be um it is a lean
Bean it's stage ready for the Mr Olympia
competition yeah yeah so um the my
previous book called How To
Live was a deliberate exercise in
contradicting myself every chapter
contradicted every other chapter uh each
chap there were 27 chapters and each one
was completely convinced that it had the
answer on how you should live your life
and therefore every chapter disagreed
with every other chapter and it was such
a fun format because of the thing that
you just read it was a way of saying uh
I am not picking just one thing and
saying this is the answer I am stating
up front that I believe in opposites I
believe in contradiction for a few
reasons uh but the most visual one where
I should say audible one is an orchestra
the book ends with an image of an
orchestra seating chart with 27
different types of instruments to match
for the 27 chapters and the idea is if
you are a composer or a
conductor nobody would say hey composer
what is the best instrument you'd say
well for when for what it's there is no
correct answer uh you use instruments
for their purposes you bring in the
clarinet when you want the clarinet and
you bring in the trumpets for that
effect and you hit the tonies for that
effect and sometimes you combine them
sometimes you have the cello and the OBO
playing at the same time and what you
like is the combination so of course you
know this is the modern wisdom podcast
you know where I'm going with this the
this is what
philosophies are to us
philosophies are not an argument about
which is the correct way to see the
world that's like asking the composer
what is the best
instrument philosophies are tools that
we
use for purposes and at different times
in our life you know music is time uh
you bring them in at different times you
use stoicism sometimes not always you
use skepticism sometimes maybe you have
like stoicism and skepticism combined
like an like an OBO and a cello at the
same time and you and you use them and
then maybe you put them to bed before
you go to sleep at night and you flip to
a different philosophy that helps you
sleep at night and a different
philosophy helps you get up in the
morning and a different philosophy helps
you succeed in business and a different
philosophy helps you focus on your
family that there is no one right answer
these are tools that we use and same
thing with worldviews I mean the
conservatives versus the Liberals well
it's a either one is the right answer
they have their different purposes and
you can approach all of these as an and
not an or you also you know just to
really drill at home you are so on the
back foot if you only learn from people
that you always agree with and also if I
know one of your perspectives and from
it I can accurately predict everything
else that you believe you're probably
not a serious thinker because you
shouldn't be taking your entire
worldview wholesale you shouldn't be
putting it on like a onesie right it
should be an incredibly eclectic New
Orleans you've got this crazy feather
bow and this hat and a cane and a pair
of high heels you know that's what we
all are we're all idiosyncratic we've
all got very sort of unique life
experiences that have brought us to this
point and it shouldn't be I mean there
are some people that whose worldviews
and beliefs will fall slap bang into the
middle of the normal distribution of
normal but that's not it's far fewer
people actually than it should be it
should be a very flat sort of Hill that
everything is going over so getting wait
wait Chris I want to take
this astray here for a minute feel free
where where are you living now Austin
Texas okay thought so where did you grow
up new uh Stockton on teas in the
northeast of the UK Northeast I didn't
okay well uh very different mindsets in
these two places slightly yeah did you
live other places in between Newcastle
Northeast uh small summers in Thailand
in Bali and ABA stuff like that little
bits okay did you spend enough time in
Thailand and Bali to kind of get to know
the worldview or did you kind of just
stay vacation vacationy okay um do you
have investments into stocks or ETFs yes
okay so you've
heard that the big idea with investing
is to not put all your eggs in one
basket but you should have a diversified
portfolio right so you should have some
of investments in tech stocks maybe and
some in Commodities and some in
international real estate uh the big
idea being that if any one sector of the
world economy goes up or crashes that
you won't be too hurt because you've got
a broad Diversified Investment Portfolio
right you've heard
this I mean the S&P 500 that's all I do
I'm Morgan howel pilled so yes I I guess
I've I've uh uh tried to spread risk as
much as possible so I started thinking
about this in terms of what you were
just saying our thought
portfolio that we should have a well
Diversified thought portfolio yes that
ideally thought patterns that are
uncorrelated so I can have a certain way
of looking something at something that
is uncorrelated with another way of
looking something and have them both so
that if one of those worldviews
collapses that the other one can see up
uh and vice versa so I actually nerded
out on this thinking well I grew up in
America and yes I've been living outside
America for 15 years and that's helped a
bit but I still at my core tend to think
in a pretty American Way um let's say
maybe specifically California American
way so which ways of seeing the world
are most
uncorrelated with the California point
of view what's the most uh Diversified
away from that part of my portfolio and
I was thinking well what places has
America labeled as enemies uh Russia
Iran Venezuela it's like okay well then
maybe the reason that these places got
labeled as enemies is because they had
conflicting worldviews shouldn't that be
a good sign to me that uh these are
places with a very different worldview
that clashes with the one I grew up in
and I
am really enjoying getting to know World
Views that are as different from the one
as I grew up with as possible one of my
favorite moments of last year in
2023 uh was the the two days I spent in
the company of a really sweet emirati
man in United Arab Emirates whose
grandfather built the first building in
Dubai um and hearing his worldview and
his family history going back 1800 years
he knows his family history 1,800 years
in the past because they keep good
records and we were talking about his
family's paths over the last 18800 years
and then flying directly from Dubai to
Israel where I spent a week last
September just a few weeks before the
October 7th Gaza attacks I spent a week
in Israel talking to uh a bunch of
people in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv and I
just
love getting to know these worldviews
that are as different from mine as
possible and
ideally
fully uh adopting them or at least uh
inhabiting them so that I can step into
those shoes and think in that way and
use it in my Diversified thought
portfolio so when it comes to my
thinking on any given subject I can
adopt the way of thinking of my friend
Muhammad who's who knows his family
history 1800 years back or I can step
into the mindset of the uh Evangelical
man I met in Jerusalem with eight kids
or I can step into the mindset of my
friend from Nairobi Kenya that sees the
world in a very different way and and
now that's really like my main pursuit
in life is to really try to learn learn
deeply learn and and adopt very
different worldviews that I can keep all
together it
shows how much of a competitive
Advantage you have from depersonalizing
yourself from learning things that it's
not an alternate point of view is not
some sort of attack on you and your
point of view it's just it's a different
way of seeing the world isn't that
interesting oh isn't it so interesting
isn't that amazing who hold on explain
to me how do you see this wait Having
Eight Kids is easy wait hold on explain
this uh by the way he had a great
explanation he said he said yeah man he
said Having Eight Kids he said you know
what's having you know what's hard
having one kid he said man I just spent
the day with a friend who has only one
kid he said that guy doesn't get any
rest his kid needs him for everything he
said in my house like I've got eight
kids he said their own I Outsource the
entertainment of the children to the
children said they don't need me at all
uh he said man having one kid is Hard
Eight kids that's easy well I'm I'm an
only child and it does feel a little bit
like you constructed an entire Factory
just to produce one version of a product
and then shut it down so uh yeah yeah
from an efficiency standpoint it can be
it can be dialed back but here's another
you know wait sorry Chris did you just
come up with that right now on the spot
the factory yeah that was really good
that was you should remember that
um so one other thing that's kind of
interesting you know from a meta
perspective stepping outside of yourself
is to ask another question which would
be uh first
off let's find out about this person's
perspective secondly wow that
perspective is really different to mine
that's that's very interesting but
thirdly and probably most insightfully
why am I having the response that I am
having to this worldview that's being
proposed to me what is it about what I'm
hearing from this person that's
different to the way that I see the
world that's causing this thing to
happen and why am I why am I threatened
by it am I afraid of it do I not want to
be wrong am I holding on to a worldview
that I actually don't fully truly
believe in and I'm worried that this
might tempt me away in some form or
another so I think asking yourself why
you have the reaction that you do when
you're faced with
um contents that are different not boxes
that are the same uh I think is uh uh
really useful opportunity for
growth I love
that getting practical moving forward
into how people can actually reframe and
find better
perspectives how do you advise people to
do that oh
um well the how is quite basic the how
is to just put aside the time to think
whether that's talking with a friend
or just laying in a hammock staring at
the sky thinking of different points of
view or in my case I like to journal I
spend most of my waking hours with my
fingers on Keys typing whether I'm
typing emails or I'm typing code or I'm
writing a book
or very
often I just flip over to my diary
whether it's my daily diary or I have a
thoughts Journal like on certain
subjects like if I keep coming back to
certain subjects like I don't know China
I've got a a separate document that's my
thoughts on China so that every time I'm
like H having some more thoughts about
China I just flip open that document and
I start typing my current thoughts that
I have which might just be a sentence or
it might be like I've got
some unresolved stuff in there that I
need to work out but either
way the question that I
that helps to keep asking yourself is
what's another way to look at this
so especially if it's a disempowering
belief let's say if you have a certain
belief that's really working well for
you that makes you very happy that makes
you very productive or uh Successful by
your own
definition maybe you don't need to
challenge that one so much working don't
mess with it it's working it's fine but
I'm sure we all have a number of
perspectives and beliefs and thought
habits
habits that we'd be good to challenge um
we'd benefit
from doing the good old-fashion
brainstorming technique of asking
yourself okay well what's another way of
looking at it well now I've got three
that I've written down here let me come
up with five more even if it seems like
I can't let me just push harder even if
it becomes silly ones um I'm sure that
imagine a poet long ago who who uh was
used to uh paying people to read his
poems and and was feeling very upset by
he was spending so much money paying
people to read his poems and a certain
point he had the radical crazy idea of
like wait a minute what if people paid
me to read my poems oh my God what a
weird idea
um and now the poet has made a good
living because people like paying money
to read his poems uh all of us have a
version of this of something that can be
inverted and taken to a weird
extreme that you never would have
considered
uh that only comes from that
brainstorming process of pushing past
the first few obvious answers pushing
past the next few ones that took a
little effort and then going far into
the ones that you only get to if you
really spend the time to think harder
and push a little more
extreme you say that to change you need
to reach past what comes naturally and
I've had this in my head for a little
while that
um kind of like type one and type two
thinking we have type one and type two
reactions as well so uh type one being
automatic this is your habitual way that
you go about things type two is more
effortful it's deliberate you need to
kind of get in there and and Tinker with
it and be very very sort of conscious
and focused and then the goal over time
is that the type two becomes the type
one that through deliberate practice you
can then anybody that's ever got better
at anything knows this playing an
instrument or or or driving a car or
playing pickle ball or doing whatever um
but I also think about this sort of in
terms of uh reactions which I guess is
still the same but it's a much quicker
version of that if you get yourself into
the habit of not reacting quite so
quickly that the type two reaction is
the one that gives you that space to
breathe and actually type two reacting
gives type two thinking the opportunity
to step in and actually go through it so
I think that the skill that people need
to learn a lot of the time isn't just
type one and type two thinking but it's
type one and type two reactions because
that then sort of unlocks the next level
but yeah reaching past what comes
naturally that's how you uh suggest that
people look at changing their
perspective yeah yeah you're right
reaction reactions as well which might
come
from
communication
meaning uh say if somebody texts you a
question hey Chris uh need an answer
what do you think about
this you might have to get in the habit
of saying let me think about that I'll
get back to you in the next few days
even though it's a text which we think
of as
urgent it's communicating that you're
not just going to give you a quick
impulsive response to this just because
somebody's
texting and making that a habit
um insisting on a little more time as a
habit uh say reading the terms and
conditions of something before agreeing
to it so you you know maybe not every
little app that you download but uh what
about not jumping to a conclusion when
you ask yourself why you did a thing
well there you're jumping to now that's
the more advanced stuff
the for your then even for your own
thoughts yes
to to challenge yourself to not just
jump to that
conclusion but to give yourself a little
longer ideally if you make a habit of
journaling so you're used to I'm sorry I
say journaling but you know again it
could be it could mean you call a friend
maybe you've got a best friend that you
talk about everything with and every
time you're confused with a decision you
just call up your friend and you say hey
hey what are your thoughts on this I've
got a question for you what how am I
thinking about this wrong you know it
doesn't have to be journaling that works
for me but whatever works for you
talking with friends staring at the sky
uh you know putting a rubber duck on top
of your computer monitor and asking the
rubber duck um whatever works for you
[ __ ] ask I mean uh the new llm AI tools
are Wonder for this if you open um
claw. or chat pt.com and you say what
are some other ways of thinking of this
it's a it's a great way to get started
on this process uh because it's used to
coming up with different ways of looking
at things uh it can be a great tool for
that my favorite uh different
perspective or reframing is your example
of the different perspective of a silver
medalist versus a bronze medalist can
you just explain what that is what
they're thinking while that stood on the
podium yeah I didn't come up with this I
don't remember where I heard it but the
idea is that
the gold medalist is happy yes but the
silver medalist is the most unhappy
because the silver medalist can't help
but think oh if I was milliseconds
faster I could have been the gold
medalist whereas the bronze medalist is
sitting there happy cuz it's like whoa I
just made it if I was milliseconds
slower I would have got nothing at all
but look at me I'm standing on the
podium in front of the the whole
Olympics I did it I'm the I'm one of the
I'm a whatever bronze medalist I'm a I'm
a finalist I did it I I won an Olympic
medal the fact that it's bronze whatever
that's great I made it uh whereas the
Civil silver medalist has the toughest
spot I really love that because it shows
just I I think
so much of our experience is mediated by
the thoughts that we have about it
and there's this sort of I think there
is for people that are thoughtful or a
bit introspective or they ruminate a lot
they can kind of look at um people who
don't as much and there's a degree of
jealousy or at least I I I used to have
this a lot and I think in my less
gracious moments I still sort of do you
know it's it's this weird kind of
narcissism where you think oh you know
the depth of my Consciousness is just
causes me to suffer man and you go well
if you were that smart you'd figure it
out like it's the nval thing if you're
so smart why aren't you happy um but you
know looking at that scenario there uh
look at how close I was to winning I'm
so despondent look at how close I was to
not getting a medal I'm so happy uh like
the person that's feeling worse got a
quicker time objectively they performed
better uh compared with the person who
is stud so grateful that they just
slipped in and managed to get themselves
on the podium and uh yeah I think
about quite a lot um trying
to George Mac often talks about the
midwit meme and he says there's no way
that you can be the guy on the right
which is the guy that's the sage the
super smart guy all you can ever become
is the guy on the left so my entire life
now is me trying to be the simple guy on
the left not the smart guy on the right
do you know the meme I'm talking about
the mid Sor okay so imagine you've got
an IQ Distribution bve on the left hand
side you have a guy that looks like it's
a meme he looks like a neanderthal he's
got a heavy brow kind of like me and uh
he he's sort of he always comes up with
a simple answer on the right you have a
sage that looks a little bit like a Jedi
with a hood up uh and he obviously comes
up with the most ascended answer and
then the middle at the top of the IQ Bal
curve is the midwit and the midwit is
this sort of raging screaming lib type
person and the joke is that the guy in
the left and the guy in the right always
come up with the same answer and the guy
in the middle is the one that over
complicates everything so if it was for
gaining muscle the guy on the left would
say lift weights eat protein the guy on
the right would say lift weights eat
protein and the guy in the middle would
say I must ensure that my predigested
enzymes are consumed within 30 minutes
of performing an anerobic scientifically
back you know overthinking it lift
weight protein uh
and almost all of the time I think uh
when we get too confused is we're trying
to be the guy in the right as opposed to
dude I'm stood on the podium that's
amazing the guy on the left would think
wow I'm stood on a Podium the guy in the
middle would think if only I'd optimized
my sleep a little bit better and the red
light glasses at night and melatone in
release with cortisol and blah blah oh
my God I'm stood on a Podium uh right
it's and if you you were Naval gazing
enough to to realize this about yourself
as I imagine almost anybody that listens
this far into a podcast called modern
wisdom uh is then you can realize which
perspective helps you feel better or act
better and just decide to adopt it that
this is the way I'm going to choose to
look at things uh so this comes up a lot
with for me with um money
that Morgan
howel
and Mark Manson were in a conversation
that I heard
where they were saying on Mark's podcast
I think that um they saying you know
it's just human nature we can't help but
constantly try to strive for more we
just you know you can't help it you have
1 million you want 10 million you have
10 million you want 50 million you have
50 you want 100 you can't help it and I
was just thinking yeah you can
because you just realize that that's a
recipe for disaster and so you choose to
not do that how easily have you found
being able to put aside the desire for
more more
more uh one 100% completely I have no
desire for more more more I think of it
like a fraction and let's remember a
fraction is anything with a you know
what you a numerator and a divisor
denominator uh that uh it's funny when
somebody says something like you know
it's just a there's just a fraction of
people it's like well a fraction can be
over one you know it's a it doesn't
fraction doesn't mean small fraction but
you have the number on top which is what
you have and then you have the number on
bottom which is what you
need and
I've never really had a care for that
top number
past you know the first few years where
I just had to have something in that top
number I put some amount of money in
that top number and I've put all of my
attention on the denominator about what
it's divided by so I've always just
reduced and reduced and reduced my needs
even like going to Great Lengths to
see how little I can live on and
challenging myself to um I'll just give
a real concrete example that's going on
right now in my life I'm building my
Dreamhouse uh I bought a piece of land
in 2020 when I moved back to New Zealand
and uh I've been thinking for a couple
years about what would be my ideal
home and in just a few months it should
be there uh it's a 4x8 meter prefab
cabin with no kitchen and no bathroom
that is my ideal home uh because I've
just constantly
pushed myself to see how little I can
live on and and sometimes the answer you
know you find what things you truly do
want or need or what would I truly be
unhappy without and then you notice
which things you're so happy to not
need and uh so to me I've never pushed
for more more and more I've always been
pushing for less less less cuz I'm just
focused on that bottom number of that
fraction how scalable do you think it is
that other people can do that too and
how much do you think is
a like uh a particularly naturally
strong powerlifter that's stronger than
most guys in the gym the first time he
picks the barbell up how much of that do
you think is a quirk of the
idiosyncrasies of of your particular
psychology no I think anybody can think
this way I of course am a product of my
past and and for many years uh from the
age of 18 until No god let's go back
further okay come on this is modern
wisdom podcast to me the appeal of
stoicism was the core idea of toughen
yourself before I ever heard of stoic I
didn't hear about the word stoicism till
I was
41 that's the first time I I heard
stoicism but I had been living according
to that approach to life since I was a
teenager
because I wanted to be a successful
musician and I knew that this is
something that millions of people want
but only one out of a million is going
to get and damn it I'm going to be the
one to get it so I wanted to toughen
myself to be able to withstand any
adversity withstand any uh circumstances
out of my control uh this was my
Approach constantly was to toughen
myself which later I read a book about
stoicism I went whoa this is the way
I've been living since I was a teenager
but it was because I wanted to be a
successful musician
and then when I was 18 I joined a circus
they were looking for a musician so from
the age of 18 to 29 I was in this circus
where everybody in the circus was living
basically hand to mouth even my boss had
a uh a habit of never buying a car for
more than $1,000 he would only get the
cheapest car he could ever find uh and
run it into the ground and then buy
another car for $1,000 and run run it
into the ground uh and I was surrounded
by jugglers face painters magicians
musicians these were my peers nobody had
any money so when I saved up
$10,000 my friends were like whoa dude
you are set for life when I got when I
started CD Baby and I got like $100,000
I'm like whoa now I basically can retire
so this idea that um if it's all who you
surround yourself with you know the they
say that you are the average of The Five
People You spend the most time with I
disagree with that I think it's about
who are you trying to
emulate and I knew and know some rich
people that are miserable cuz I see that
they're on this constant drive to get
more and more and more and it just took
one look at them to see like that's a
path of
misery I'm going to keep challenging
myself as I've stoically started doing
already as a teenager challenge myself
to see how how tough can I be how strong
can I be how resilient can I be how
capable of weathering any change can I
be the less I'm dependent on the tougher
I am the more I'm able to withstand
whatever the world throws at me so this
is is clearly the right path to go on so
maybe I'm just a product of my
upbringing but it seems clear to me the
better path well the best part of a
decade spent in a circus playing music
is a perhaps a non-typical uh uh
upbringing for many people to draw their
Philosophy from but yeah I mean this is
a conversation I've had so much on the
show over the last few years especially
as my you know since the last time that
we spoke of change in my life um
although was kind of on the way I guess
when we first sat down to speak and
um working out what it means to to
um have more than you need and to then
you're left with this really bizarre
decision where you
start you have to choose whether or not
you're going to sacrifice your quality
of life in order to achieve more success
because you already have more success
than you need so
you're now making a judgment to let go
of a thing that almost everybody almost
universally says is their number one
priority you know I just want to be
happy or I just want to not do things I
don't want to do or whatever uh and then
you when you start to dig about where
does this motivation come from like what
is it that I'm doing what am I motivated
to do and why am I doing it is it
success is it money is it scarcity is it
fear of falling off is it a desire for
validation is it a need to be recognized
by people that I think are impressive
you know it's
just the whole way down and um yeah it's
it's admirable to to you know see what
you did with CD Baby to even the way I
I've always admired I seem to remember
hearing a story God forever ago maybe
even before I started the podcast about
the way that you
coded and host your website is that
still the same
now probably I mean it's like capsule
for the future that'll kind of never
never die it's the most future proofed
way that you could come up with it is
that is that right uh that's one way of
looking at it that's uh the let's just
say my minimalism runs deep and
iode oh deep into I mean almost more
into code than other aspects of my life
I hand code every line myself I don't
use any anything that ever generates any
code for me I only every character
myself
Shopify oh God no I mean I mean sorry I
mean so sorry look quick aside Toby who
started Shopify is the one that taught
me Ruby on Rails I paid him a 100 bucks
he taught me Ruby on Rails and he said
hey I'm starting this e-commerce company
I said ah sorry man I can't help um that
was Shopify anyway so sorry that was I I
so admire what Toby's done um but I'm
saying I don't use anything that
generates code every
character I type myself I type every
Open Bracket every HTML tag I don't even
use markdown that converts it into HTML
I want to type those things myself
because I want the friction of that so
that there is no line of code that
doesn't absolutely need to be there and
it and I would not be typing it by hand
if it didn't need to be there and I want
that because I don't want to create
digital pollution because you know we we
all agree that if somebody walked down
the street throwing trash on the road
everywhere they walked you'd say hey
Jerk you can't do that that's pollution
but yet why do we do this
digitally
somebody
has 140 character tweet which really
could be done in uh what is that 280
bytes but yet to see that 280 bytes you
have to download like a 15 million byte
message through Twitter
which is just this digital pollution
shoved down the wire at us to get this
tiny little thing and I just I feel that
pollution everywhere and I just object
and so in my own code I uh
ruthlessly get rid of every
single character that doesn't need to be
there
um I don't know that's sorry I know I I
probably just sound insane we're talking
about this hey I remember I I don't know
the first time I heard you might have
been you and Tim talking about it uh I
that's something I've recalled for you
know best part of a decade now in one
form or another so it stuck with me so
it's a you know anything that's a lesson
that's that impactful I think is worth
doing but I just have to before I let
this go I just have to say it's I
understand that it's just aesthetic in
the same way that somebody lays out
their living room or their bedroom in a
way that makes them
go yeah that's the way I like it I like
these red curtains and this blue sofa
and this furry carpet or whatever it is
that people like to do with their living
spaces my website and my code is kind of
my living space this is the way that I
reach out to the world from this island
in the Pacific Ocean that I live on um
this is my connection with the whole
world and I want to feel proud of that
connection I want to feel that it
reflects my self identity so I'm not
saying other people should do what I
done but yeah my code is
extremely paired down as essential as
can be and like I I look at it and it
makes me
go yeah I did I like that this makes me
happy I am proud of this I have some I
have a similar kind of setup uh audio
visually with the show as well so I I
know what what it is to have that craft
when it comes to uh adopting what works
for you now this is something else that
I've been playing with a little bit
recently which is cool that you zeroed
in on something similar as well um
realizing that your choices are only for
you and only for now stops you from
having to justify them to the
world and it removes the pressure of
them potentially being a little bit
imprecise because you can just cause
correct in
future you don't have to justify it to
other people which means that you only
have to do it for you and it's not going
to be forever it's just for the next
period maybe even it's just a starting
block maybe it'll change tomorrow which
allows you to be imperfect with your
decision making and those two things I
think really for me when I think about
um I I have a bias uh when it comes to
decision- making that it needs to be
perfect the first time uh and it needs
to be very very right if it comes to uh
hiring or firing uh a member of Staff if
it comes to making a decision around
around branding especially if it's new
if it's something I've done before I can
just kind of keep on going and iterating
but that first step especially if it
feels like a new piece of territory uh I
often um get caught up thinking that
this is something which is going to be
like this forever I'm like no it's not
you don't even train the same way that
you did a year ago or five years ago or
10 years ago you don't eat the same diet
you don't sleep in the same bed you
don't even believe the same things about
sleep about what you're supposed to do
before sleep so so um yeah realizing
that your choices are only for you and
only for now I think is it makes me go
ah right okay let's just move forward
let's put our best foot forward and and
we can adjust from that yeah H we just
put two ideas back to
back when I talked
about my self-introduction to stoicism I
said all I was really trying to do was
toughen
myself it's very future focused even my
minimalism the whole core idea
underlying all of it is I'm expecting
the future to be really tough to be
really bad I'm expecting things I'm
expecting
adversity and so I want to prepare now
so that when huge adversity
comes it doesn't bow me over because
I've stealing yourself ready for it yeah
and
that's very future focused so it's dude
okay so speaking of
uh physical and lifting things uh I have
been for 12 years doing classic barbell
exercise um right next to me right the
king where I'm talking right here
there's a squat wreck just you know a
meter to my left of my left hand here uh
that's where I keep my squat rack my
barbell so as I'm working I a couple
times a day would you know put the heavy
bar on my back and do five sets of five
or even just like one set of five just
to stand up and and get a little break
and I've always wondered like H I would
like to live
nomadically I would like to be able to
instantly be at home anywhere I go this
squat wreck H this is going to be a bit
of a problem it's a burden uh I was like
well you know I've got some money saved
up maybe I'll just say that wherever I'm
going to spend a few months I'll just
buy a squat rck as as soon as I arrive
um or just try to stay somewhere right
near a gym that I like that's open at
all hours and I was I was always kind of
fitting this into my worldview like hm
okay well this thing has
become uh a dependency of mine
and
then 6 weeks ago as I was hiking in the
forest suddenly my left knee went ah
what the hell and it turns out I've had
a meniscal tear in the ligaments in my
left knee and I can't squat right now uh
haven't been able to for six weeks um
even just to you know squat naturally
and just to squat down to the ground and
stand back up just hurds like hell so
I've started seeing a physical therapist
that got me doing body weight uh stuff
and I found this book that he
recommended called convict conditioning
and the do you know it no oh okay but
it's written by God spent like 18 years
oh yeah very memorable name Wonderful
Name spent 18 years in prison uh
coaching uh convicts on how they can
keep fit just in their jail cell and uh
it's amazing body weight exercise and
the guy that wrote it he does onehanded
push-ups I sorry no no not just push-ups
handstands uh so the it's like the
ultimate you know the finish line of
going through this book is you could
learn to do a hand stand on one hand and
then do this you know 10 times same
thing with one leg spots all these
things and you just realize like oh man
body weight exercises can be hard as
hell here I thought I was strong cuz I
could squat 12 kilograms but oh man this
[ __ ] is tough and so as soon as I
checked out this book and I got into it
I went oh this works for my future if I
really get good at this stuff I can do
this anywhere I can do this in a tiny
hotel room in Pakistan I can do this
while on the road in Argentina um oh my
God this would be a great thing to get
great at because it's future focused
so we we so we just put these two ideas
back to back that you can make decisions
now that will make a better future for
yourself and that like maybe like you
said like trying to not mess up when
hiring somebody um might be a really
good way to think about it say like yeah
when hiring somebody that's almost like
a mini version of getting married that's
this is a big damn decision you should
not be choosing the just for now version
of getting married a you seem all right
today sure let's get married um it is a
future decision but yeah then there are
there are other things that really are
just for now and the tough part about
being human I guess is trying to figure
out which situation this
is just revisiting that uh molested
version of Kurt vet's quote that you
came up with dude could you use another
adjective please you molested Kurt vonet
no uh you are what you pretend to be
yeah what does that mean to
you if you pretend to be kind you are
being
kind if you
pretend to be a good
parent say um my real world situation is
there were times when my kid was little
that he'd say like Dad play
horse and like my
authentic response was like I don't want
to get down on the ground and crawl
around but it just took a second of
thinking wait a minute this matters to
him this is all about our connection and
our bond I want want to give him a great
childhood I will get down on my hands
and knees and be a horse right now and I
get down on my hands and knees and I
pretend that I'm into it and you know
what I get into it and in zoomed out I
pretend to be a good dad for him I do
the actions he needs me to do or wants
me to do and by pretending to be a good
dad I become a good
dad
and this this matters with bravery uh
being social I'm
inherently uh
antisocial uh introvert whatever you
want to call it and when I have to go
into a social situation with a bunch of
people in a room going talking like my
first thought is oh [ __ ] me but I'm like
you know what I know how it's like okay
I've read some books on social
skills I consciously know what I should
be doing here we go and so I can just
pretend for one hour
to be social and I can walk into that
room and I can walk up to people and say
hi I'm D you know what are you do where
you from no really no way you come from
there wow cool tell me now why did you
do that uh H see I just asked somebody
why um but uh I can pretend to be social
for 1
hour and then leave exhausted but by
pretending to be social I was being
social so I really like this idea of you
are whatever you pretend to to be so
therefore you don't have
to be that in your core and your
self-identity you can just turn it on
and just pretend to be that and that's
enough because by pretending to be that
you are being
that yeah I
think the more that I judge myself on
the actions that I take as opposed to
the intentions that I had or the
thoughts that I had around the thing
the better I feel and I understand why
I'm playing with this idea that's not
even quarter baked it's not even been
rolled up into dough ready to be put
into the oven yet but I've got this this
sort of belief
that people who are more action focused
or type a uh or overw
workers uh people will Give a Little Bit
of Sympathy to them but really they know
that the downstream benefits that those
type A type people have uh are
significantly better better the outcomes
they're going to get in life on average
tend to be significantly better by most
objective standards than the person that
has a type B problem right the person
that can't be gotten up off the couch
that struggles to hold a job that turns
up late that does all the rest of it is
because of the outcomes that they try
they tend to get in life more worthy or
seen as more worthy of sympathy than the
person who is overly anxious and turns
up half an hour before and has this
calendar that's packed back to back and
always overworks themselves and does all
of the rest of it um but I kind of get
the sense that the judging yourself on
your action the actions that you took
not the thoughts that you had uh you are
what you pretend to be is a a nice way
for the type a person to take back a
little bit of that control and to sort
of own it because they're the sort of
person I think who is likely to have
taken action and then overthought
themselves out of feeling like they were
good and worthy for praise for having
done that thing the type B person would
actually and this is the reason that we
say to people you know your intentions
your intentions matter an awful lot you
know I know that you didn't get the X Y
or Zed done but you really meant to do
well uh that feels like a compassionate
thing to do because it raises up the
person who needs more encouragement to
go and do a thing but we don't talk
about the person that is really really
hardcore going after doing the thing and
still doesn't feel good enough despite
the fact that they did it so you going
to the party having the conversations
I'm not a social person God this is
going to be tough and then you you know
put on the the performance once you've
done it uh and then you go back home and
you go oh well you know there's me
another non- introvert or another non-
extrovert out for the night I that
didn't go very well but if you actually
look what was the thing that I did to
everybody else by every observable
measurable objective
standard I did the social thing I just
did it I just did in front of me so I
need to judge myself more on the actions
that I took not on the thoughts that I
had around the actions that I took I
love this subject I hope you do dive
into it more and if you do call me I
will I promise I will let's I all let's
rever this reverse this where we have a
conversation where I nerd out with you
about your subject um because
authenticity is
overrated I don't really know know how
everybody defines authenticity but to me
it seems to be this idea
of doing what you actually feel like
doing
correct uh being true to yourself being
true to your emotions which you can
imagine where I'm going to go with that
it's just [ __ ] you don't know your
own emotions or why you're having a
thought and being true to a thought that
your brain is lying to yourself and
telling you that you're having this and
now you're going to act in accordance
with that subconscious [ __ ] that and
that you being authentic and who knows
where you even got this self identity in
the first place it's because your third
grade teacher told you that this is what
kind of person you are so now at the age
of 33 you're trying to be uh true to
that thing because your teacher said it
to you when you formed your
self-identity based on that it's such
[ __ ] that I think we should just
toss all of it
away in fact I think it's
very
Christian to care what our intentions
are I think it was like
Christianity
that brought this idea of what matters
is what's in your
heart and I think we can put that aside
for a minute and just
say forget what's in your heart forget
your intentions forget what you're
thinking judge yourself only by your
actual
actions because all that other stuff is
just [ __ ] maybe I'm just too
skeptical I don't believe any
my head is telling me and I don't think
you should either so just put it all
aside CU it's all [ __ ] and only look
at your actions but
maybe that's why I've also never had
impostor
syndrome I've had so many conversations
with friends about impostor syndrome and
I just don't get it I've never felt it I
don't understand why they do I don't
understand the thought
process that lead leads to somebody
feeling impostor syndrome to me it's
just like well you just show up and you
do the thing you were just an object in
everybody else's world you are not the
subject you're just the object every to
everybody else they are the subject you
are the object you were just the object
that came and did the
thing that gave the
presentation that turned in the report
that
whatever nobody cares how you feel about
yourself and it doesn't matter so how
can you feel like an imposter you showed
up and you did the
thing um but I think it's probably
related to what you're talking about
I've got to give you another one so this
is two from the same
newsletter uh output is all that matters
value doesn't come from the effort you
put in I'm sorry it doesn't it doesn't
come from struggle or your sweat or your
tears it doesn't come from your
experiences doesn't come from how many
hours you worked at or how many years
you took to learn to do it those things
may help you to put a price tag on what
you need to compensate you but that's
not the same thing at all you can dig
holes and fill them in all day long but
all that effort isn't going to result in
anything valuable it comes purely and
only from the demand anyone else has for
it which is often just something very
subjective and irrational which you have
no control over someone dying in a
desert values that bottle of water far
more than the Mona Lisa and that was a
and Sans uh basically saying that I
think it's an important redress uh that
you're talking about here for the type
of people that listen to this show type
A anxious overachievers the sort of
neurotic overthinking ruminating type
person that's really trying to optimize
their life and uh so much of the time
you're judging yourself on the thoughts
you had you're judging yourself on how
you felt about the thing that you did uh
you're giving too much Credence to your
thoughts and if you actually were to
just look at look at all of the stuff
that you've done all of these things you
you spinning five plates at once and not
none of them falling and maybe one got a
little crack in it but you kept
everything going and uh yeah I think
thinking about output focusing on output
rather than input focusing on what did I
get done as opposed to how did I feel
about it as opposed to how much time did
it take me either long or short I got
the thing done that was mattered and uh
yeah I think Andy grobes says there are
so many people working so hard and
achieving so little
and uh I I always think about that when
I whine about having a a hard day or or
I look at a day ahead that's going to be
difficult or whatever and I'm like look
there just a list of things that need to
get done how you get there is totally up
to you and the experience you have of
getting there is even more so up to you
because it's the story that you tell
yourself useful not
true one of the fun ideas in it was to
after disproving something as not true
not necessarily true to then still see
how it's
useful so MH the stuff that you just
said all that matters is the output it
doesn't matter your intention it doesn't
matter your background it doesn't matter
the hours okay that's true but
uh it can be or let's just say yeah that
other stuff isn't necessarily true but
it can be useful for the sake of
communication to give people a story
stories are useful even though they're
not true you can tell a great story of
how much effort you put into this or you
can tell a great story of like oh this
poet this this poet is a an old
80-year-old woman that's been through so
much hardship in her life she survived
this and that and this war and this
thing and out of it came this poem now
you read this poem it's like whoa okay
I'm going to read this poem with so much
more attention
and uh giving it so much more value than
I would if somebody said oh one of my
third graders in my in my class wrote
this poem here read it you might read it
go yeah yeah yeah okay cute all right
whatever um but we give more weight to
things that we've been told a story
about that how much effort or wisdom or
suffering went into this thing we now as
social and psychological creatures value
this thing
more
so both can be both can be true both can
be false both can be useful it can be
useful for you to think all that matters
is the output [ __ ] [ __ ] my thoughts [ __ ]
my background [ __ ] my effort just do the
output that can be a useful belief for
you to have when creating it but now
when communicating it you might need to
reverse that well again it's for now and
it doesn't need to be justified to
anyone oo
touche Derek civas ladies and gentlemen
Derek it's been four long years since we
got to catch up I really love this new
book I think the uh the format that
you've put it in is fantastic where
should people go they're going to want
to keep up to date with all of the
things that you're doing you know me
just my website I don't really do social
media even that book won't be on Amazon
for a year [ __ ] Amazon oh God [ __ ]
everybody nothing for Amazon uh go to my
website go to c.com s i v
rs.com is my store where you can get my
book now and go to my website the best
thing okay so you know my my only ask is
that I really like when people email me
it's one of my favorite hours of the day
is the hour I spend in my email inbox
connecting with people from the world so
anybody that listened to this go send me
an email go to my website si. RS my
email address is right there uh it says
contact go click that say hello ask me
anything I actually really like
connecting with people from around the
world thank yeah Derek I appreciate you
thank you thanks Chris if you enjoyed
that episode you will love a selection
of the best clips from the podcast over
the last couple of months and it's
available right here go on give them a
watch