Video summary
Naval Ravikant begins his discussion with a fundamental insight regarding human nature: while individuals have the capacity to change themselves, they cannot directly alter other people. He argues that any attempt to force someone else to change is ineffective and often alienating; instead, one can only modify their own reaction to others' behaviors. Drawing parallels from educational methodologies like the Dale Carnegie School of Public Speaking and the Michelle Thomas approach to language learning, Naval illustrates how removing fear and criticism fosters growth. In public speaking, audiences are encouraged to offer genuine compliments rather than critiques to build confidence, while in language acquisition, passive observation allows learners to absorb without feeling threatened by direct testing or grading. This principle extends to relationships, where the most effective way to encourage positive behavior is through sincere praise for praiseworthy actions rather than criticism of unwanted behaviors. The conversation shifts to defining true love and relationship compatibility, distinguishing between superficial connections based on "resume items" like shared hobbies, educational backgrounds, or careers versus deep spiritual unity. Naval suggests that relying on concrete metrics often leads to poor decisions because real love is an ineffable sense of wholeness achieved when two consciousnesses connect. He references the concept of a "God-shaped hole," noting that humans are driven by a desire for connection and unity across various fields, from science and art to mysticism. Consequently, he advises against settling for partners based on potential or growth trajectories alone; instead, one should choose someone they genuinely enjoy being around who brings a sense of completeness, as material definitions often mask the true spiritual bond required for lasting love. When faced with difficult life choices regarding relationships, careers, and locations, Naval emphasizes that modern society's abundance of options can lead to paralysis if one cannot decide quickly. He offers three specific heuristics for decision-making: first, if you are uncertain about a choice or opportunity, the answer is no by default; second, when faced with two equally viable options, choose the path that causes more pain in the short term, as this often leads to greater long-term peace and avoids future regret. He credits Kapil Gupta for the third heuristic: selecting the option that leaves you most equanimous mentally over time. These early-life decisions are critical because they constrain opportunities regarding one's social circle, dating pool, job prospects, and even environmental quality like air and water, making them far more significant than later adjustments in life. Finally, Naval addresses the importance of values versus checklist items when selecting a partner and raising children, noting that behavioral genetics play a larger role in temperament than society often acknowledges. He warns against trying to fix an unhappy partner or expecting one person to make another happy down the road; instead, happiness is best achieved by pairing with someone who is already content. The emotional pain of loss aversion—the fear of starting over or separating from friends and family—often keeps people in suboptimal situations, but Naval encourages embracing failure as part of a "zero to one" journey. Successful individuals are those willing to iterate on their choices within closed timeframes, accepting that they may need to climb down the mountain and start again until they find a path where work feels like play and life offers significant leverage.
Read the full video transcript
What's that uh insight of yours? Uh we
think we can't change ourselves, but we
can. We think we can change other
people, but we can't. Exactly. I think
to add to that, you can't change other
people. You can change your reaction to
them. You can change yourself, but other
people only change through trauma or
their own insight on their own schedule
and never in a way that you like. Yeah.
Alanderon says that uh people do
sometimes change, but rarely in
relationships and never when they're
told to. Absolutely. Yeah. The fastest
way to kind of alienate somebody is to
tell them to change. In fact, uh the
Dale Carnegie School of Public speaking,
you know, the way that operates is uh
they get you up there and they realize
that the number one problem with public
speaking is uh that uh people are very
self-conscious. And so uh people who are
practicing in the Dale Carnegie School
of Public Speaking, I don't know, I
never went through it. I heard this
secondhand, so I could be wrong, but I
like the story where they get up and
they start speaking and the people in
the audience are only allowed to
compliment them, genuine compliments,
not fake compliments, on things that
they did well, but you're not allowed to
criticize them on things that they did
poorly and eventually they kind of get
through it and they develop the
self-confidence. The same way uh there's
like the Michelle Thomas School of
Language Learning and on that one, what
they do is you listen to a teacher
talking to a student. They're not
teaching you. You're not expected to
remember or memorize anything. You just
listen to a student stumbling over the
language. It's a better way to learn
because you yourself don't feel
flustered. You're being tested, graded.
Oh, so you're not in your own head as
much. Correct. You're not in your own
head and you're just you might even be
laughing at the student or you might be
agreeing with the teacher or vice versa
or sympathizing with the student. But
because you are a passive observer, you
can be more objective about it and you
aren't threatened or fearful and you can
learn better. And coming back to the
original point of you can't change
people. If you do want to change
someone's behavior, I I think the only
effective way to do it is to compliment
them when they do something you want.
Not to positive. Yeah. Exactly. Not to
insult them or be negative or critical
when they do something you don't want.
And we can't help it. It's obviously in
our nature to criticize. And I do it as
well. But it just reminds me that like
when somebody does something
praiseworthy, don't forget to praise
them. Like definitely go out of your way
and and it'll be genuine. It has to be
genuine. It can't be a fake thing. uh
this is not, you know, one of those uh
just dropping compliments type thing
eventually that people will see through
that. They want authenticity, but just
don't forget to praise people when they
do something praiseworthy and you'll get
more of that behavior. There was a a
really famous thread on Reddit about
five questions to ask yourself if you're
uncertain about your relationship. One
of the questions was, "Are you truly in
love with your partner or just their
potential or the idea of them?" And
that's the, you know, they show such
great promise. they they look at their
look at their ability for for for change
and growth. They they they they're on
the right path. The partner matching
thing is so hard. Uh you know, when
people come and ask me like, "Oh, should
I be with this person?" I'm like, "Well,
if you're asking me, the answer is
clearly no, right? Because you wouldn't
have to ask if you were with the right
person." Or when you ask someone like
why they're uh in a relationship with
somebody and they start reading out his
or her resume, right? That's also a bad
sign. What do you mean? Oh, it's like,
oh, we have so much in common. We like
to golf together. It's like, it's not a
basis for a relationship. Or, oh, you
know, she's a ballerina or, you know, he
went to Harvard or what have you. These
are resume items. That's not who the
person actually is. What's a better
answer? I just love being with this
person. I just trust them. I, you know,
I I enjoy being around them. I I I love
how capable he is. I love how kind kind
she is. You know, I love her spirit. I
love his energy.
uh the more the the more materially and
concretely definable the reasons are
you're together, the worse they are. The
ineffable is actually where the sort of
true love lies because real love is a
form of unity. It's a form of
connection. It's connecting spirits. Oh,
you too. My consciousness meets your
consciousness. It's a the the the
underlying drive uh in love, in art, in
uh science, in uh mysticism is the
desire for unity. It's a desire for
connection. As you know, Bourhees uh
famously wrote, "In every human there's
a sense that something infinite has been
lost." You know, there's a God-shaped
hole in you you're trying to fill. And
so, we're always trying to find that
connection. Love is trying to find it in
one other person and saying, "Okay,
you're male, I'm female, or whatever."
And you know, whatever your
predilictions are, and now now we
connect, now we form a hole. Uh a
connected hole. Or in mysticism it's
like it's all about okay sit down
meditate and you'll feel the hole. In
science it's like oh uh you know atoms
bouncing is mechanics but that generates
heat. So thermodynamics and motion or
kinetics are one combined theory that's
a whole. Electricity and magnetism are
one thing that's that's the whole
creates that sense of awe. Uh in art
it's like I feel an emotion I create a
piece of art around it and then you see
that painting or you see the cistine
chapel or you read the poem and you feel
that emotion. So again, it's it's
creating unity. It's creating
connection. Uh and I think everybody
craves that. And so when you really love
somebody, it's because you you feel a
sense of wholeness by being around them.
Uh and that sense of wholeness probably
doesn't have anything to do with what
school they went to, you know, or what
career they're in. Just sort of tying
that into the life is short, stop
[ __ ] about. Uh if you're faced with a
difficult choice and you cannot decide,
the answer is no. And the reason is
modern society is full of options. Yeah.
Knowing this rationally sounds sounds
great, but having the courage to commit
to it in reality, I think is a different
task. And cutting your losses quickly in
the big three, relationships, jobs, and
locations is hard. What would you say to
someone who may cerebrally be able to
agree with you and say, "I understand."
My cousin said this about me. He said
that uh he said what I really he says
what I've really noticed about you is
your ability to walk away from
situations that are just not great
enough for you or not good enough for
you. And I think that is a
characteristic that I have. I will not
accept second best outcomes in my life.
Um ultimately you will end up wherever
is acceptable to you. You will get out
of life whatever is acceptable to you.
Um, and there are certain things to me
that are very very important where I
will not settle for second best. But
then there are a lot of other things I
just don't care about because if I spend
all my time caring about those things, I
don't have the energy for the few things
that matter. And uh, so in decision-m I
have a few heristics for myself. Other
people can use their own, but mine are
if you can't decide, the answer is no.
If you're offered an opportunity, if you
have a new thing that you're saying yes
or no to that is a change from where
you're starting, the answer is by
default always no. Secondly, uh if you
have two decisions, if you have A or B
and both seem like very equal, take the
path that's more painful in the short
term, the one that's going to be painful
immediately because your brain is always
trying to avoid pain. So any pain that
is imminent, it is going to treat as
much larger than it actually is. This is
kind of like a decision-making
equivalent of Talib surgeon. Uh tell
surgeon where you want the surgeon that
doesn't look as good because he's more
likely to be a good surgeon. Yeah, it's
similar in that appearances are
deceiving because you're avoiding
conflict. You're avoiding pain. So take
the path is more painful in the short
term because your brain is creating this
illusion that the short-term pain is
greater than the long-term pain because
long-term Yeah. You you commit your
future self to all kinds of long-term
pain. Mñana exactly mñana. So take the
more short-term painful one. And then
finally the last one which I would
credit Kapal Gupta with uh is that you
want to take take the choice that will
leave you more equinimous in the long
term. By quantamus he means like more at
peace more mental peace in the long
term. So whatever clears your mind more
and will have you having less self-t
talk in the future if you can model that
out that is probably the better route to
go. And then I would focus decision-
making down on the three things that
really matter because everything else is
downstream of these these three
decisions. Especially these are early
life decisions. Later in life, you have
different things to optimize for. But
early in life, you're trying to figure
out who you're with, what you're doing,
and where you live. And I think on all
three of those, you want to think you
want to think pretty hard about it. And
people do some of these unconsciously.
You know, who you're with very often
it's like, well, we were in a
relationship. We stumbled along. It felt
okay. Hey, it had been enough time, so
we got married, right? Not great
reasons. Maybe not terrible reasons
either. I mean, people who overthink
these things sometimes don't get the
right answer. But maybe here, if you're
the kind of person that's not going to
settle for second best, you iterate. You
iterate on a closed time frame so you
don't run out the clock and then you
decide um on what you do. You try a
whole bunch of different things until
you find the one that feels like play to
you, looks like work to others. You
can't lose at it. um get some leverage,
try to find some practical application
of it and go into that. And then where
you live, uh where you live is really
important. I don't think people spend
enough time on that one. I think people
pick cities randomly based on where I
went to school or where my family
happened to be or where, uh my friend
was or I visited one weekend. I really
liked it. You really want to think it
through because where you live really
constrains and defines your
opportunities. Um it uh it it's going to
determine your friend circle. It's going
to determine your dating pool. It's
going to determine your job
opportunities. It's going to determine
the food and air and water quality that
you receive. Um, it's going to determine
your proximity to your family, which
might be important as you get older and
have kids. So, very, very, very
important decision. Weather, you know,
quality of life. How much do you stay
inside or outside? How long are you
going to live based on that? And I think
people choose that one probably more
poorly than they put a lot less thought
into that one than the other two
in some ways. Yeah. But also the You're
so right. How many people fall backward
into a relationship and before they know
it, we're living together, we got a
daughter, we got a kid, we were married
and you know, yeah. And then when you
have kids, because then that's half of
you and half of them running around,
you're never going to separate yourself
from that. So once you have a child with
somebody, then the most important thing
in the world to you is half that other
person, whether you like them or not.
Mhm. Yeah. Uh Jeffrey Miller had a tweet
a long time ago that I always think
about and he said every parenting book
in the world could be replaced with one
book on behavioral genetics that I'm a
big believer in genetics. Yes, I do
think a lot of behavior is downstream of
genetics and I think we underplay that.
We like to overplay nurture and
underplay nurture for or sorry underplay
nature for societal reasons. But nature
is a big deal. Um the temperament of the
person you marry is probably going to be
reflected in your child by default.
people. If you want a securely attached
kid, pick a securely attached partner.
Well, the secret to a happy relationship
is two happy people, right? So, I would
say if you want to be happy, then uh be
with a happy person. Don't think you're
going to be with someone who's unhappy
and then make them happy down the road.
Or if you're okay with them being
unhappy, but there are other things you
like about them, that's fine. But this
goes back to their unhappiness with
other things. And actually we we talked
a little bit about how people do connect
successfully, you know, on spirit and
and those things, but that's maybe a
little too abstract. If you want to get
a little more practical, it could be
based on values. And values are a set of
things you won't compromise on. Values
are the tough decisions of, oh, my
parent got sick. Do they move in with us
or do we put them in a in a nursing
home? Uh, you know, the ch do we give
the children money or do we not? uh you
know do we um do we move across the
country to be closer to our family or do
we stay put where we are uh you know do
we argue about politics do we care or do
we not right the values are way more
important than checklist items uh and uh
I think if people were to align much
more on their values they would have
much more successful relationships
the emotional pain of uh fearing change
I have this thing the job the location
the partner I'm going to enter or not
enter this thing. For the most part,
it's leaving. I think we have this sort
of loss aversion that that we really
feel evolve loss aversion. It's just
painful separating yourself in front of
your friends. It's embarrassing. And how
how would you advise people to uh get
past themselves with that loss aversion?
That fear of change. Oh my god, am I
going to Yeah, it's the hardest thing in
the world. Uh starting over. It's back
to the zero to one thing. It's uh it's
the mountain climbing thing. You're not
going to find your path to the top of
the mountain in the first go around.
Sometimes you go up there, you get
stuck, and you come back down. And the
difference between all the successful
people and the ones who are not is the
ones who are successful want it so badly
they're willing to go back and start
over again and again whether in their
career or in their relationships or in
anything else. In other news, this
episode is brought to you by Function.
Staying on top of your health requires
more than just an annual physical, which
is why I partnered with Function. They
run lab tests twice a year to track over
a 100 biomarkers and monitor for early
signs of thousands of diseases. They
even screen for 50 types of cancer at
stage one, which is five times more data
than you get from an annual physical.
You receive insights from a team of
expert physicians who provide a detailed
written clinician summary of all their
observations and then phone
consultations for any critical findings.
Getting these lab tests done would
usually cost thousands, but with
function it is only
$499. And right now, you can get the
exact same blood panels that I get and
bypass their weight list by going to the
link in the description below or heading
to
functionhealth.com/modernwisdom. That's
functionhealth.com/modernwisdom. Thank
you very much for tuning in. If you
enjoyed that clip with Naval, just a
mere taster. The fulllength episode is
available right here.
Go on.