How Your Brain Gets Tricked By Clever Marketing - Rory Sutherland (4K)
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Rory Sutherland opens his discussion with a critique of how human psychology and status-seeking drive irrational market behaviors, particularly in real estate and dating. He argues that these markets are fundamentally different from commodity markets like iron ore because they rely on flawed heuristics; for instance, property buyers calculate their maximum borrowing capacity first rather than assessing need, creating an artificial price spiral driven by tax advantages. Similarly, online platforms impose rigid filters—such as requiring a degree or using static photos in dating apps—that act as poor proxies for true talent or relationship potential. Sutherland illustrates that these "choice architectures" eliminate vast pools of capable individuals who fail initial sorting criteria but might have excelled under different conditions, noting that the most enduring value often comes from attributes like humor and wit which cannot be captured by standard metrics. The conversation shifts to the dangers of top-down problem solving versus bottom-up inquiry, using historical examples to demonstrate how progress is rarely achieved through rigid adherence to ideology or pre-rationalized theories. Sutherland cites David Ogilvy as a prime example of late-life success despite lacking traditional credentials like university degrees, highlighting that breakthrough innovations often emerge from "post-rational" discovery rather than strict hypothesis testing. He points out the reverse-engineering nature of major discoveries such as Viagra and graphene, where researchers found applications for compounds initially developed or observed without a specific disease target in mind. This approach contrasts sharply with modern corporate structures that waste engineering talent on templated PowerPoint decks instead of fostering creativity through "hit-and-run" research methods. Sutherland also addresses the political polarization prevalent in both American and British contexts, arguing against the simplistic narrative that social progress is exclusively driven by one side or another. He references historical facts such as the Conservative government passing women's suffrage laws and the Church of England supporting gay rights to show that history is more complex than partisan labels suggest. Furthermore, he critiques the tendency in the UK to import American cultural narratives like "white privilege" without considering local demographic realities, sharing an anecdote about his great-aunt Beatrice Blackwood’s horror at segregationist America in 1923. He emphasizes that effective problem-solving requires acknowledging tribal biases and recognizing that ordinary people often hold more diverse political views than politicians allow them to express through the binary of left or right. Throughout the interview, Sutherland advocates for "trim tab" thinking—identifying small interventions with disproportionate effects—and encourages embracing messiness in decision-making processes. He suggests that if everyone applied identical criteria when hiring, dating, or buying homes, market efficiency would plummet; instead, a diversity of prejudices and starting points creates better outcomes. Practical examples include designing products like air fryers for the mass market rather than niche enthusiasts, creating user-friendly interfaces with large buttons that benefit both disabled users and those carrying groceries, and using humor to defuse tension during police investigations into serious crimes like the Yorkshire Ripper case. Ultimately, he concludes that creativity thrives when we accept uncertainty, avoid premature optimization of new technologies, and recognize that the opposite of a good idea is not necessarily wrong but could be another equally valid solution in complex systems.
Read the full video transcript
I heard a quote from you our mutual
friend George Mack uh sent me a quote
that said a rich man is anyone who earns
more than his wife's sister's husband
yeah that actually isn't me I wish it
were me because I would have retired on
the basis of that quote happily I think
uh it's what's the what's the chap
called a brilliant American humorist
called The Sage of Baltimore the
Americans will know um no idea he a
fantastic comic writer and I've briefly
forgotten his name right but it is
interesting how um interesting now I was
having ation yesterday with someone at a
an addiction clinic in Switzerland which
I can't name I wasn't there as a patient
just in case you I was there a very very
interested Outsider and he said that you
know comparison is the enemy of
happiness that you know one of the
things that seems to be a curse for all
humankind and you've obviously read I
you probably interviewed the author of
the status game have you st yeah yeah
which is a fascinating book because it's
this kind of terrifying invisible force
that drives us
and we're in denial about it and in some
ways the game only works because we
pretend we're not playing the game you
see what I mean and that comes down to
other other phrases about status seeking
which is I think the famous one of
Aristotle and assis where he said that
if there were no women all the money in
the world would be worthless I think
he's probably overstating that I mean
you know they presumably Pleasures to be
derived from sort of jet skiing and i'
I'd like to have one of those Yachts not
for the yacht but just for I know it's
not called parking you know it's called
moing okay but the actual business of
sailing around on one of those Yachts
wouldn't appeal to me at all but docking
the [ __ ] thing that must be an
absolute Joy do you ever watch that guy
called super yacht captain on YouTube no
now what they do when they dock those
things is they actually send up a drone
so they've got an aerial view of the
ship right and then they use the bow
thrusters and the stern thrusters to
actually maneuver the thing in W I mean
you get that now on um cars right you
know the fanciest Range Rover gives you
what appears to be an overhead sh it
actually I I've got the electric car and
they tend to come fantastic car
absolutely delighted with it yeah right
have you are you going to upgrade to
something similar something Poss the
macki GT next time because then I'll
I'll be well into a midlife crisis and
so I'll need a car with stripes on it uh
interesting that you said earlier on I
just attributed misattributed a quote to
you there's something called
churchillian Drift did I teach you about
this before which is where quotes
there's also a famous thing which is
called somebody's law which is that the
quote is never attributed to the
original person who said it right it
also applies to scientific laws so if
you take baze theorem it wasn't actually
Baye it was someone about 50 years
earlier who's a blind mathematician at
Cambridge in fact I can't remember his
name appropriate enough we can all
remember baz's name but we can't
remember the person who actually came up
with it and so quite often it's the
second
person uh the person who popularizes or
makes famous who actually gets the law
or the discovery credited to them not
the person who is the original
Discoverer well it's a stickiness game
right it's all about who manages to
capture the meme best me and George were
talking about this yesterday allel M
right the sage of Baltimore there you go
there we go you know that Americans did
you Tak it's only only taken five
theic's kicking in he's one of those
people who um probably is you know there
are certain people who are you know much
more famous in America than they are in
brit undeservedly so because he was
extraordinary yeah what have you learned
about the choice AR ecture of online
dating sites and how it relates to
property websites well this is this is
kind of interesting because one of the
reasons one of the reasons I like
working in advertising and marketing is
I think the correct way to solve
problems and to understand what's going
on is really bottom up not top down by
which I mean
um actually open-minded inquiry and
observation of all kinds of things okay
tends then over time patterns start to
emerge and I think the better way what
we try and do in politics in particular
is we start with a theory we then impose
the theory on reality we trumpet the
areas or the scale at which that theory
succeeds and we sweep under the carpet
those areas where the theory basically
fails okay so if you take something like
okay uh if you take something like the
efficient market hypothesis it probably
has an application in a few fields and
those are well celebrated and measured
by economists it's a complete nonsense
to apply um the same rules of a market
to say the property Market or the dating
Market as you do to the market for a
commodity like iron ore or something of
that kind okay they're fundamentally
different in particular if you look at
the property Market there's a problem
because when people go and buy most
things you know uh if you went out to
buy car I've got to ask about your car
I'm a big macki Enthusiast have you gone
electric or in Texas does that get you
vilified it will it would get me killed
not in Austin though uh yeah Austin suff
Austin okay it's sufficiently
Progressive I think I'll get Camaro a
Camaro for my first car in America uh
FYI there's no license equivalency
between the US and the UK which means
that I need to retake my theory test 18
years after I took it in American which
is weirdly difficult it's going to be
it's all the road signs are different
what does this particular thing mean all
of my knowledge about roundabouts is
totally [ __ ] useless obviously my car
which is obviously American has an
interesting American feature which is
you can set the cruise control to
effectively go at the speed limit plus
or minus X miles hour so it's using this
satav it uses a mixture I think of
satnav and actually Optical Character
recogition reading the road sign which
does raise the question that people in
residential areas are going to put up
fake 7 m hour signs along their Street
so that electric cars all automatically
slow to a crawl how hilarious but um so
I imagine you you noticed that wonderful
thing where people as I predicted were
hacking autonomous taxis in San
Francisco you put a cone on the on the
hood as they'd call it and the thing was
basically immobilized in a state of
complete confusion and I predicted that
I'm proud to say five years ago I said
people will hack self-driving cars and
they'll discover that all you got to do
is put a pattern of weighted balloons on
the road and the things will go
absolutely Dali and sure enough someone
discovered that okay dating sites so
dating sites okay so let's look at
something here which is so to go back to
my original point the market for
property is highly problematic because
what most people do when they buy uh
they look for property to buy is they
work out how much Deposit they have they
then work out how much they can borrow
they add those two together and they
start looking for houses around that
price okay so the basic heris question
they're asking is how much can I afford
and then they start
looking now if you notice we don't buy
anything else like that we don't buy
cars that way okay if you went and said
okay how much money can I raise as a
deposit how much can I borrow people be
driving around in Bugattis and you know
Bugatti Veyrons and Bentleys all over
the place we don't do that with cars we
kind of take a balance on how much
property how much car do I actually need
how much do I care about cars Etc but
because we have this euristic that
effectively property is the only tax
free big bet you can make in your life
okay with huge tax advantages in terms
of the capital gains everybody maxes out
now unsurprisingly people who sell
property have noticed this fact and
consequently property prices go up and
up and up because everybody's
effectively so as interest rates go down
it doesn't make anybody richer it just
means that they set their Target price
for the property they're prepared to buy
even higher than before sellers of
property aren't complete idiots so they
basically put their price up to get
whatever they can get and so
consequently you end up with an absurd
spiral okay so the property Market is
fundamentally unlike say the market for
as I said whether it's iron ore or
indeed whether it's you know uh high
quality energy drink yeah there it is
doing some implausible product placement
um now it struck me also that there's a
fundamental problem in three things
which actually is the same in all three
cases and it's the market for graduate
recruits the market for first in other
words employees for first
jobs the market for property and the
market for dating okay which is that two
problems when you recruit someone
straight out of University or you
recruit anybody for a job in which they
have no experience at all okay you don't
know anything about them realistically
but you need a proxy so the proxy seems
to have become you know Russell group
University 21 or above and everybody
uses that as the first stage filter for
their search and everything that doesn't
meet those criteria or everybody who
doesn't meet that those criteria
effectively disappears out of the
marketplace despite the fact that they
may be possessed of unbelievable talents
they just either had a good time at
University or a part of that very large
part of the population who are very very
clever but don't feel motivated doing
academic hyp pathetical things okay you
know if you think about it I know people
people who are good at chess are
probably quite bright in some respect
but you can't say someone who's bad at
chess is thick right you know my
brother's an astrophysicist he's [ __ ] at
chess right okay um uh you know I mean
they they do actually record games that
sort of Einstein and Oppenheimer played
in The Manhattan Project and they're
kind of okay chess players but they're
nothing amazing right so you know there
are quite a lot of things that are one
way proxy necessary but not sufficient
in other words exactly necessary but not
or sufficient you know but but actually
not necessary so actually you know now
what's happened here as a consequence is
that we're automatically just discarding
now let's take dating as a parallel
there what's your first filter okay the
HR person's first filter is two one and
above you know and then they interview
them but but the first filter is that
two one and above they've got to have a
degree in fact increasingly I noticed my
daughter's generation are doing master's
degrees because even if you got a first
class degree from a Russell un Russell
group University it's that positional
good thing where you create hyper
competition and it's really a kind of
peacock's tale signaling effect okay so
what you're really proving is not
ability or human capital it's just
commitment to the area in which you're
invested okay now in dating sites it
strikes me that what you have I I got
married long before there were online
websites and as a contemporary of Mind
said who also got married before there
was online dating he said I feel like I
caught the last helicopter out of Saigon
you know genuinely I wouldn't know where
to get started an online dating but
what's the first Criterion you use
accept or reject now I'm assuming here
you're a guy I don't quite know it works
slightly differently I think for women
because obviously the demand is
completely asymmetric okay but it's a
still picture of them and some words of
text all
right now how good just as 2 one or
above is not actually a brilliant proxy
for how valuable an employee this person
will be it's all you've got okay I don't
think a still photograph and a few words
of text uh in any way proxy for who you
might Forge a long-term relationship
with okay because what you're doing is
you're making a series of decisions
you're going you're working your way
down the decision tree to use the
language of choice architecture and
because every decision you make you're
happy with you think therefore that a
series of seemingly rational decisions
will reach an optimal
outcome but actually Ian for example
there are people who are extremely
attractive actresses who wouldn't make
it as a model because their
attractiveness is to do with motion
humor wit pres you know all those things
which matter more in a relationship than
how you look in a static photograph you
know I me I'm showing my age here but
Cameron Diaz probably wouldn't have made
it as a Vogue model okay but or Jennifer
Anison I don't know okay but what I mean
what I'm saying is what makes them
attractive is a whole mix of things like
humor deportment movement you know
subtle things which cannot be captured
at all in that initial filtration phase
same goes for employment what makes a
good employee cannot really be very well
captured by that initial filtration
phase same goes with property okay which
is what do people do when they look for
property they go okay uh first of all
how much can I afford and they start
looking at that point point then they
ask the second question which is where
is it and how many
bedrooms now all I'm saying okay is that
it seems rational while we're going
through that process it seems perfectly
sensible because each stage we're
filtering what we don't see the dog that
doesn't bark in the night is what we're
rejecting that might be great okay now
here's where the problem really gets
acute okay everybody's going through
this decision tree starting at the same
place and working looking through in the
same order that's what online Choice
architecture does now if you look at how
people chose houses or for that matter
girlfriends or boyfriends back in the
pre- internet age there was a lot of
noise in the system you know I mean the
conventional British way and the you
know the New York way is you go out with
people and first of all find out how
much they earn as far as I can see okay
I mean dating in New York always strikes
me as like a weird Jane Austin kind of
transactional field okay but in Britain
basically you went to a rugby club and
got pissed with your friend's sister
okay and then you discovered you really
liked each other now that's messy I'm
not suggesting it's optimal there's a
lot of choice you're missing out but
everybody effectively found a house
found a partner in a different way the
choice architecture was different the
starting point was different the initial
filter in many cases people found a
house because they walked past an estate
agent window they drove down a lane and
saw a for sale side M MH and in many
cases they didn't start searching with
800,000 and down right and it was messy
so people had houses had lots of
opportunities to appeal to people and
partners had lots of different strengths
which they could deploy depending on the
circumstances in which the meeting took
place because I mean guys aren't that
shallow men are a bit shallow but there
are hell of a lot of Personality
features okay now if everybody chooses
according to the same criteria it's a
much less efficient market clearing
mechanism than if everybody's a bit
messy so let's assume that you had you
know I I mentioned this earlier because
I was talking to a kind of recruitment
firm I said let's imagine where you had
a world where weirdly everybody's HR uh
director was like oddly prejudiced okay
but they're all prejudiced in completely
different ways you know one person was
obsessed with hiring Oxbridge graduates
another person was obsessed with hiring
Jamaicans uh a third person was obsessed
with hiring scousers okay over time
multiple differing prejudices or what
you might call diversity of opportunity
rather than equality of opportunity
would provide a more efficient market
for talent than the one we have now
which is regimented and identical and it
seems to me there's a conflict here
which is in recruitment the needs to
look fair means you have to apply the
same criteria to everybody which means
as that kind of consistency of selection
spreads out across the whole of Industry
okay it actually means that there's a
ludicrous undersupply of certain people
who meet those initial criteria while
the 50% 80% of people who don't meet
those initial sortation criteria
effectively go to waste yeah it's like
there must hell of a of girls who are
single because they just don't look that
great in the Still's photo right now
there's this further thing which is now
i' got to be really careful because my
wife's going to watch this okay but
actually you don't want a wife or a
house which appeals to everybody right
right if you you know if you marry a
supermodel right basically they're going
to run off with your tennis coach and
take your house right what what you want
is someone who's disproportionately
attractive to you yeah all right that's
the sort of game theoretic approach of
house hunting so my my approach to house
hunting I'll stay out of dating because
my wife might be watching this okay is
to some extent a form of and I've often
said that estate agencies would be a lot
better if they actually were forced to
list the downsides of a property as well
as the upsides because the shrewd way to
choose a house is not to say what's my
perfect house it's to say what do other
people hate that I don't mind yes okay
so an example in my case would be next
to a railway line absolute bonus you
know I Love Trains right they stop at
midnight they don't keep you awake I'd
never go to bed before midnight anyway
I'd actually pay extra to have trains
going past my house okay equally my
children have left school so the school
catchment area can be you know
crackheads academy doesn't bother me
right
okay my kids are 22
right and the other the third one which
would be a massive bonus to me I
couldn't believe my parents-in-law once
didn't buy a beautiful Georgian house
wait for the reason because it was next
to a pub right I think sorry I'm totally
confused here that's a the best Garden
in the world right it's not sissing
Hurst it's a beer garden right because
it's a garden and it's got beer now I
actually knew some people who Liv next
to a pub and they had such a good
relationship with the landlord they
could actually order over the fence so
if they had a barbecue they could just
go you know four points of the
usual now to a lot of people being next
to a pub is an absolute nightmare you
know flight path okay if you're if
you're completely deaf go and buy a
place in the heathow flight path because
it's not going to bother you but it's
going to bother everybody else so the
other thing about this very regimented
mode of choice is that it prevents you
from gaming the system yes now to be
honest what makes someone initially
attractive at first glance and what
makes relationship
enduring okay are not the same thing
they're not the same criteria therefore
using what you might call First Glimpse
criteria in a house in an employee uh in
a potential partner okay in if you're if
you're seriously after a long-term
relationship which after all you are
with a house and you are with an
employee you may or may not be when
you're on an online dating site that
varies okay the first Glimpse criteria
are to toally unreliable as a guide to
long-term
enjoyment so this my wife's going to
kill me for this okay the kind of person
you want to marry right isn't something
that everybody wants it's something the
value of which you only discover on
repeated familiar on on long-term
familiarity so you want what you want is
an air fryer girlfriend or a Japanese
toilet girlfriend okay right not a
Corvette girlfriend do you see what I
mean right you want something which
actually you know the value of fully
because over long-term exposure they're
actually technically called in economics
they're called experienced goods and
what's interesting about an experience
good is that it's something the value of
which only becomes apparent with use
okay sorry this is terrible using that
economic term to refer to relationships
it's not the worst thing people have
said about relationships on the internet
this okay you're probably right yeah
yeah yeah yeah but that is that is
fundamentally interesting that what the
internet has done that the two things
are is that in many cases the it yields
up as the first filtration point is not
a very good proxy to begin with but
secondly and this is I think the worst
problem if everybody is using the same
first stage filter because everybody's
on Tinder or whatever it may be
okay then effectively it's going to
create a totally inefficient market
clearing mechanism because demand
disproportionately goes towards those
people who happen to be those initial
those initial proxy criteria yeah now
that strikes me fundamentally as a
problem in all three of those markets in
other news this episode is brought to
you by element element is a tasty
electrolyte drink mix with everything
that you need and nothing that you don't
it's a healthy alternative to sugary
electrolyte drinks and it is the best
way that I have started my morning every
single day for over three years now it
contains a science-backed electrolyte
ratio of sodium potassium and magnesium
with no sugar no coloring no artificial
ingredients or any other junk your
adenosine system that caffeine acts on
isn't active for the first 90 minutes of
the day but your adrenal system is and
salt acts on your adrenal system so if
you want to be more awake want to
regulate your appetite curb cravings and
have better brain health this is the way
to start your day head to drink LM
nt.com slod wisdom to get a free sample
pack of all eight flavors with your
first box plus there is a no BS no
questions asked refund policy so you can
buy it 100% risk-free that's drink LM
nt.com
slash modern wisdom did you read Seth
Stevens dz's book everybody lies so he
was an ex data scientist at Google and
then he did another book called don't
trust your gut oh no I haven't read that
so the second one don't trust your gut
looks at this specific problem it looks
at what is the issue by the way nicotine
plus that is like just the supercharged
yeah I know yeah beautiful what flavors
that uh this one's I think Cherry I
think oh very good with my cataract I
can't bloody read this sorry sorry this
is this is going to be the first ever
guest Chris has had where half of our
conversation is about medical problems
sorry that's totally fine um yeah in his
second book he looks at um people who
basically haven't been priced into the
market uh when it comes to dating uh and
um by the way who single makes no sense
does it if you actually go around the
world and meet people who are single and
meet people who are in relationship
Highly Educated women Highly Educated
women one of the most over represented
single groups you got women who can
contribute a ton of money to a household
Etc I'm married to Highly Educated women
they pain
[ __ ] my God my God the arguments
never mind okay but no no but also
because historically effectively this
may change okay so women are more
reluctant to marry down in education
level than men are correct interesting
probably because men are shallower and
they just go well you know 21y old
barista that can't spell her own name
yeah it's your atrophy wife as I call
them you know very th second wife yes
exactly my god um but you know you
notice that the people you they have
that very weird breed of people who are
sort of very rich and very very thin you
know right um but but you know so I mean
Chris Rock did a whole routine on this
didn't he which was what was it men
can't go backwards sexually women can't
go back in lifestyle was I think the
Chris Rock routine one thing that I
think deserves study um which is
interesting is a huge generation of um
the most successful comedians are also
amateur or you amateur effectively
evolutionary thinkers aren't they yeah
so if you look at javes absolutely
fascinated by kind of darwinian
evolution and so on um absolutely true
of say Andrew Schulz true of Jimmy Carr
um Jimmy Carr actually wrote that
co-wrote that book with Lucy Greaves the
naked jape which is a absolutely
fascinating kind of Investigation into
the The evolutionary origins of
comedy and actually there are few more
than that I mean you know I think you
can see it in Dave Chappelle you can see
it in Chris Rock a lot of that stuff
there's a huge influence and there seems
to be a significant correlation between
interest in kind of evolutionary
psychology and um comedy well ultimately
it tells us why we are the way we are
right and that is one of the insights to
say the thing that everybody knows but
no one has named or no one dare say yeah
is one of the greatest forms of that you
can find there was something else I
remember but also I suppose it's all
about um I mean I suppose you know
recontextualization so comedians are
going to be very very open to different
ways of looking at the world because it
is to some extent The Source you know
that contextual flip is at the root of
quite a lot misdirection exactly um but
it is fascinating because like music we
have this debate what is the
evolutionary function and one of the
things that strikes me as odd is that we
don't look at comedy
uh as a source of inspiration for wider
problem solving so I did an interview
with Jimmy Carr at um adweek which was a
kind of advertising Festival which by
the way is as you must have found um I
mean people like him for example the
what you might call Brain to mouth speed
is extraordinary isn't it terrifying
there's that great phrase in television
which is called brain to mouth and you
know Jonathan Ross or whatever people
like that are very very good as
interviewers because they can basically
form a thought and speak it more or less
in
parallel and I I found that really
interesting in terms of you know talking
to Jimmy Carr because it's rather like
you know you fancy yourself a bit there
was a wonderful thing I saw actually on
I think it was the a299 in East Kent
which was one you know you know they
sort of hotted up citrons which are like
the hot hatch with enormous kind of um
unne necessarily large tail pipes and a
ludicrously large woofer that takes over
the whole of the um the boot and um one
of those on the a299 decided to take on
a McLaren F1 okay and I have to say it
was comical to watch the guy actually
you know acquitted himself in the first
sort of five seconds reasonably well but
I felt a bit like that you know talking
to Jimmy Carr because you know you work
in a business you were the Citron with
the big I was the Citron with the
unfeasibly large tail pipes okay and and
similarly I've always been in awe of
Andrew Schultz for the the crowd work
just has just has a speed which is just
terrifying yeah yeah m i so someone
asked me the other day um who are the
easiest people to speak to and who are
the most difficult people to speak to on
the show and I definitely find that
comedians are the ones that I need to be
the most switched on for Mark Mark
Norman in particular Mark is so it's
such a game of it's not a game of uh of
tennis it's a game of ping pong dinging
binging it's that it's that kind of pace
and you're right he rides the crest of
now it's oddly a Sam har Harian sort of
type thing he's just living in the
Perpetual present and just deploying
thoughts as they come to him and the
lack of filter and the Precision of his
speech just allows him to just things
just fall out of him and there's always
this weird debate about creativity which
is it kind of comes in two forms one of
which is what you might call sheer inate
Genius and the other one is hyper
accelerated rationality which is just in
the same time that the other person is
getting from A to B you're already at F
yeah but I mean what interests me also
is if you look at political
movements given the fact that psychology
is often quite oblique the way to solve
a problem this is this is what really
really bothers me about politics at the
moment which is in fact it's what my
next book is about if I can give a
taster which is the question is do you
want to win arguments or do you want to
solve
problems because the most of thinking
you adopt if you want to solve a
problem is much more open-minded much
less dogmatic okay it's much more
oblique and creative than the mode you
would adopt if you want to win an
argument and what we've done is we've
selected for our leadership for our
politicians in some cases for our
business people and we've educated for
and we've promoted for the ability to
win
arguments
okay and actually
winning an argument and solving a
problem are two completely different
skill sets I'd argue so there's what
always fascinates me about Andrew
schulz's okay if Andrew Schulz said you
know 5% of what he says on stage in a
corporate environment or at Yale okay
you know if if if you consider you know
Rob Rob Henderson's experience at Yale
okay you know they practically have the
place shut down for def fumigation okay
and contaminated Z deont and yet his
audiences are completely mixed in every
sense I mean if you want a really if you
want a really really diverse group of
people genuinely representative and
diverse and Andrew Schulz audience is
pretty much as good as it gets and he
solves the problem which is interesting
okay not by pretending say race or
gender don't exist okay but by
highlighting the distinctions and then
taking the piss out of them yeah okay
now from an oblique kind of creative
point of view you have to ask the
question is that actually a better way
of solving the problem than
for example the extreme dogmatism of say
the politically correct movement I don't
like using the word woke particularly
okay now you know is part of the
solution that you know in other words do
you actually make people pretend not to
notice ethnic differences and as a
consequence become incredibly anxious in
the presence of any of those differences
okay or do you actually acknowledge them
make light of them because but both of
them are trying to tune down the
seriousness both of them try to say okay
the one of them Works yes precisely and
here's a question I want I want to do
some empirical testing on this okay you
do occasionally at comedy clubs you do
occasionally get a pissed guy who
heckles and everybody gets really angry
okay but do you get violence ever
outside comedy clubs outside well inside
or outside I once I've seen one video in
the last few years where a Heckler has
tried to start on a a comedian but
unbelievably rare it's unbelievably rare
especially given that you're pointing
out people and saying stuff about them
or their wife or their relationship or
their Chastity or whatever I mean I
recommended I couldn't make it to Andrew
Schulz at the Royal Albert Hall but I
recommended people went for the limited
visibility seats not only because they
were cheaper but because given his crowd
work the blast radius the brilliant
thing is I could hide behind a pillar
and it's very unlikely I'd be singled
out as like the whitest guy he'd ever
seen or whatever it might have been yeah
yeah yeah and so you know what's
interesting is there comedy audiences
are really fascinating just in terms of
their demographic constituency it's
teaching people a sort of a degree of uh
intellectual humbleness uh being able to
cast off the the tension that you have
when watching something occur by
laughing so I've noticed this I'm
preparing for my first live tour which
is happening around the UK and Island in
a couple of weeks time and as a part of
this I did a ton of work in progress
shows and we could feel I could see in
the room and feel in the room tension
arising as I'm talking about whatever
the thing is that I'm talking about this
section about confidence or this section
about regret or this section about
whatever and there was bits where you
needed a laugh almost kind of like how a
dog shakes its coat when it's wet and
one needs to cast it off yeah so here
here's an interesting analogy okay in
terms of being right versus solving the
problem okay now if you want to win
arguments or if you want to win the
respect of a peer group who holds the
particular set of political views what
tends to happen is you get into a virtue
spiral I think that's what it's called
in the book Purity spiral Purity thank
you Purity spiral you become
absolutist and then because conflict is
inherently interesting an argument is
inherently interesting so if we hear
outside some people having an amicable
conversation we won't even bother to get
up if we hear a fight starting to break
up or two people shouting at each other
we'll have our noses pressed to the
window to see what's happening and
journalists and news papers and media
know this so they focus on those areas
where there is the greatest polarization
which means you're focusing on the part
of the problem which is most difficult
to solve so the example I give because
I'm going to move away from politics
because when you mention politics
everything suddenly drives people to
this polarization I I try I aspire to be
the most left-wing person on the out
right okay which is which is which is I
find the conversation of the outright
inherently interesting but I try not to
become part of it and I occasionally you
know I write for The Spectator but I I'm
occasionally write about the virtues of
Henry George or the insights of KL Marx
just to shake the whole thing up bloody
interesting guy marks by the way okay
right I mean the I think I think the
actual the um uh the the way I put it is
the diagnosis is fascinating and the
prescription is terrible correct okay
correct um
now okay the the perfect Exemplar of
where this problem goes wrong and this
is very difficult if you work in
advertising and marketing because quite
often you're not criticizing the
intentionality or the aspiration of the
person you're merely saying that the way
you're going about this isn't working
very well okay so yes uh you know nearly
all the aspirations of say the diversity
and inclusion movement are those which
we should all generally support and I
don't want to ever get into that kind of
weird you know weird thing where you
start getting angry about trigger
warnings because if you give it about 10
minutes thought you realize that trigger
warnings although they're a bit funny
and it's a bit weird when Netflix says
may contain nicotine use okay which you
know never put anybody off going to the
cinema in 1946 you know imagine if you
had to do that Casablanca warning
nicotine use it's a bit weird okay but
it's a great idea okay some people may
be deeply upset by certain forms of
content and you should at least give
them the opportunity to kind of opt out
or to avoid it I don't you know yeah
okay we we can debate what is triggering
but nonetheless it's broadly speaking an
intelligent principle I think now so the
example I'll choose won't be from
politics because politics automatically
leads people to become tribal and
therefore they have to take a side okay
and the example I think is perfect is
cycling Mikey do you cycling Mikey is a
YouTuber okay and he goes around he
stands at a place in London called
Gandalf corner and if he sees a car
ducking around the wrong side of a keep
left Island he just stands in front of
it and refuses to let them move takes a
photo reports him to the police he's
he's um uh he's got guy Richie um I
think he got did he get guy Richie
banned because he photographed him using
a mobile phone while stationary waiting
for a set of traffic lights and he sends
his film footage to the police he puts
it up on YouTube okay
now I basically support what he's trying
to do okay because I think cycling
safety is incredibly important and these
people are doing bad things okay we've
all done it let's be honest okay we've
all used the mobile phone uh when
driving we've just been lucky enough to
get away with it and I wish I'd never
done it okay where cycl Mike is less
effective however is his mode of
delivery which is so combative and so
effectively polarizing okay that it
actually becomes
counterproductive now where he you know
he he he's he's well-intentioned which
is he wishes to increase cyclist safety
no no one's disagreeing with that okay
where he's less effective is in
disabusing people of The wellestablished
Stereotype that all africanas are
bastards um because he does things which
are inherently first of all he's a
little bit unfair because when he
catches when cyclists misbehave one you
can't report them to the police because
they don't have a license plate secondly
he claims that if you stand in front of
a cyclist or a motorcycle they might
fall off so he can't actually stop
motorcyclists and cyclists performing
egregious and illegal acts so he
concentrates entirely on the motorist
but then he basically goes stand in
front of them on the road and then
effectively does things which I mean we
don't really have a massive culture of
vigilantism in this country reporting
other people to the police is something
we're pretty reluctant to do you know
it's not a hellmark of a nice culture
when people are blagging you know
basically you know lagging to the screws
as it used to be called in prisoner of
Cell Block H right okay it's something
you just don't do but secondly I'm there
as a marketing guy going look I support
what you're trying to do but you've been
driven into this extreme
position where your Purity spiral is so
extreme that actually it's
counterproductive Y and so you you know
you're very very good at at feeling
confident in your own opinions but
actually your ability to bring now if
you notice in advertising it's very rare
that you're nasty to users of your
competing product okay you don't get
Ford ads going if you drive a voxel
you're a [ __ ] yes okay because genuinely
people want to win over people who are
either under ided or in a rival camp and
it's not a good idea and you won't see
much advertising that does that to
patronize them or to effectively become
incredibly sanctimonious as he does I
mean extraordinarily
sanctimonious and I think it's I think
it's a kind of example of a pattern you
see where people's desire to be entirely
on the right drives them to practice
counterproductive behaviors because I
mean
uh there's you know for example I think
as a marketing guy I can't help watching
this guy thing and say if you're
actually very nice to those people and
you handed them a leaflet which you
produced yourself you know just warning
them of cyclist safety I think it would
probably quite effective yeah I mean I
was actually I went on a speed awareness
course I don't know if you ever had that
I've had to do it once I had the
pleasure I turned up thinking this is
total ass but I'm doing it to avoid the
points it was pretty worthwhile in the
end at the end of it I went away going
okay I have rethought quite a bit of my
driving pattern as a consequence of what
I learned reeducation now if you turn so
there's this huge problem okay which is
that everything now I think Douglas
Murray says this which I thought was
interesting it was actually had a dinner
which he said his the real reason he
gets angry about the culture wars which
I think is the right reason to be angry
about them is not because somebody's
wrong and somebody's right and goodness
says what it's the extraordinary
opportunity cost that while we are
arguing about these things that are very
difficult to decide and which
automatically polarize people there
areund problems we could solve okay
which would actually appeal to everybody
yeah as he says while The Barbarians are
at the gates we'll be debating about
what gender they are well this is an
interesting one because I'd also argue
let's take cyclists and motorists okay
every it's in everybody's interests to
effectively Foster hostility between
these two groups even though of course
quite a lot of people straddle both
groups outside London it's quite rare to
be a cyclist who doesn't also own a car
okay not not not totally rare but most
people outside London most households
have access to a car in some shape or
form and my there is that imagine what
you could have done if instead of
fostering cyclist motorist hostility by
focusing on the areas where uh there's
the most Discord and the most
disagreement imagine if you both said
okay there two things that mo one thing
that motorists hate and cyclists hate
even more potholes right now bind them
together over bind them together and say
look potholes are really annoying to car
owners cuz you got get your tires
replaced which by the way is
environmentally bad as well [ __ ]
moral Terror to a total Terror to a
cyclist particularly if you're one of
those narrow tired you know titanium
rich thingy Mobs with yikra and
everything else and um so it's it's kind
of interesting which is the point is
that the opportunity cost of this focus
on problems that divide you know
problems where the solution acutely
divides
people is has a huge creative
opportunity cost because the thing to do
if you have two people who disagree
about something is to change the
question okay obviously we're not
getting anywhere here so let's just
solve something else there's a there's a
quote from Scott Alexander which is
really great it says if you're
interested in being on the right side of
disputes you will refute your opponent's
arguments but if you're interested in
producing truth you will fix your
opponent's Arguments for them to win you
must fight not only the creature you
encounter you must fight the most
horrible thing that can be constructed
from its corpse well well let me I'll
I'll I'll come back to you with a quote
which is Thomas Soul um as I said I'm
the most left-wing person on the alt
right I'm I'm I'm a very big admirer of
of quite a lot of the people Soul
included Thomas Soul's phenomenal
absolutely phenomenal guy activism is a
way for useless people to feel important
even if the consequences of their
activism are counterproductive for those
they claim to be helping and damaging to
the fabric of society as a whole okay
now one of the weirdest things about
this movement okay and one of the most
tiring things about being politically
correct as a Brit is weirdly you have to
pretend you're
American because okay if you think about
it okay there are loads of problems you
can solve at the local level this place
here okay sort out the [ __ ] signage
right and first of all you come into a
place to find it and it's like the St
Valentine's Day Massacre you know you
come into this weird news okay where the
only thing you can imagine happening
there you know it looks as if you know
the interior Decor has been done by Pete
docky right and then you got the signage
and the numbering is completely batshit
insane and you can only read the the
actual number of each door if the Sun is
at a particular angle okay so there all
these things we can do to solve problems
locally at a smaller level but if you
want to feel self-important you
concentrate on the problems at the top
you know things like effectively
politics I mean if you look at actually
even things at the level of kind of um
probably not London actually but if you
look at I don't know why do we never get
any coverage of say the mayor of
Manchester or the mayor of the West
Midlands we got a loot of coverage of
Scottish politics right okay because why
because there's a massive divisive issue
there which gets people worked up which
is Scottish
independence where by the way we're
asking the wrong question anyway the
question should be what kind of
Independence do we want not do we have
Independence or don't we completely
lacking in Nuance anyway okay you never
get any coverage no coverage now bear in
mind the population of Scotland is
smaller than the population of Yorkshire
okay most people don't realize that they
think because it's kind of large
geographic area there are about 15 or 20
million people living in Scot abandoned
it's it's very small population because
all the really talented ones move to
Wales in the 19th century um sorry
that's just my that's just my own
ancestry sorry you know in in search of
people who weren't permanently angry
about nothing in particular and so my
great-grandfather moved from kth s to
the South Welsh valleys because it was
kind to In fairness Cardiff was like the
Dubai of the of late 19th century
Cardiff was like the Dubai of the late
19th Cur first place in the world where
a million pound contract was signed was
in cardiv docs it was coal so it was
effectively the largest coal exporting
port in the world wow and by the way not
your shitty German coal proper quality
coal right here's a question here's a
question for you why is it that when we
look at the uh exports of national
identities from the UK and Ireland to
the rest of the world uh England English
people we have a a position although we
get referred to as being British y uh
Northern Irish people kind of do
Southern Irish people absolutely
definitely do even Scottish people do oh
Scottish marketing is brilliant I mean
as as as a nation brand it's absolutely
potent as hell yeah why does no one what
what's happened to Wales why has Wales
not managed to establish itself on the
global geopolitical branding there's an
interesting debate about this one one
Welsh commentator I'm not don't shoot
the messenger here suggest that Welsh
people who move somewhere else very
rapidly kind of lose their welness and
assimilate anywhere that's his argument
so if you look at the contribution of
Welsh Americans okay now you've never
heard you've never heard that hyphen
before have you okay Irish American
Scottish American yeah absolutely You'
never heard of Welsh American includes
like Thomas Jefferson okay it includes
arguably Elvis about 50% of country
singers Tammy winnette real surname Pew
okay right if you actually Hillary
Clinton funnily enough um is I think
half Welsh okay so you have this but but
there is app I mean if if you ask people
who are American about their Welsh
ancestry they may dimly know uh that
they have some Welsh ancestry it barely
extends to knowing where it is whereas
if they got Scottish or Irish ancestry
it informs every [ __ ] cell of their
being even if they're like a 16th Irish
they start wearing green things yeah and
you know
to the slight annoyance by the way of
real Irish people I might add okay to be
honest okay and quite a few people who
are very proud of their Irish heritage
are actually descended from northern
Irish Protestants what's sometimes
called in the United States Scots Irish
but they don't even know that okay so
you know I think Henry Ford there's a
huge Irish American contingent of people
who are effectively um uh from Northern
Ireland um but again that distinction
isn't really
made uh there is an argument that it was
at the time of the American Civil War
where people tended to take sides on
that basis I'm not quite sure um but
generally that doesn't that hasn't
pervaded until the you know 2023 but the
Welsh have done a bad job there's
actually a group called Global Welsh
which I belong to which looks at this
question of kind of I mean the greatest
Welsh American by the way was a guy
called Russell camel Humphries who was
number two to Al Capone okay I'm not
making this okay so this guy who was um
by the way he was known by the by the
various feds and people out for him as
the nicest man in the mob okay and big
Welsh from I think he was from Caro
which is in kind of the middle you know
kind of mid whales tiny little bit his
parents were okay and he was entirely
Welsh and uh read sorry M did I say
Russell Murray Murray the camel humph
and um or Murray the hump he was known
as which is either to do with Humphries
or to do with the fact that he wore
camel coat but I think I think um he um
effectively he he he would occasionally
kill people but he'd only negot he'd
always negotiate first and I think one
of the senior feds who are supposed to
arrest him uh actually refused to turn
up to arrest him because he liked him
personally okay and didn't want to be
part of the arrest and he was also uh
violently against cursing by the way
okay soive organized crime killer but
not a swear killer but not a swear no no
he didn't didn't like any of that any of
that but but research him because it's
really really it's comically funny the
idea of a Welsh guy in the mob I looked
at a study recently that showed an
inverse correlation between marriage
length and cost of engagement ring and
wedding combined that the more that is
spent on the engagement ring and the
more that is spent on almost in pure
economic terms you'd expect it to be the
other way around because the sunk cost
of wedding should skin in the game
should ensure the duration of the w
equally what are you trying to prove yes
yes okay yeah what what have you learned
you must have some insights about
engagement rings and their Heritage and
their history I mean what is what is
interesting is that um uh there is a
degree where what you're practicing
there is a form of commitment device in
other words it's an unrecoverable sunk
cost which is upfront expense being
proof of long-term commitment and I've
made that point that some advertising
works that way okay in other words you
wouldn't spend a fortune advertising
this car if it were a waste of time for
me to test drive it okay so once you
spent the money on Advertising it's gone
therefore the only possible value of the
of advertising is that it leads to a
sale therefore if you are advertising a
new product heavily you are confident
rightly or wrongly but it doesn't matter
you yourself who know the product better
than the buyer does is confident in
terms of its long-term appeal and um
desirability when test driven
and so you know some part of advertising
undoubtedly Works through sheer costly
expenditure sheer costly signaling
wasn't you you guys did a study where
heavyweight paper was the most effective
thing to increase Charity donations uh
that's right yes now you will never ever
get any what's so interesting about some
of this research is it uncovers things
which people feel but don't even think
or say so there's this quote probably
wrongly attributed to David ogelby that
he said the trouble with market research
is that people don't think what they
feel they don't say what they think and
they don't do what they say now no
everybody would say that a charity
donation uh should be sent out on the
cheapest paper possible because you
should minimize your marketing cost what
we found is that when you put slightly
more expensive paper in the donation
envelope it was for Christian a week
actually uh slightly more people give
but people give much more large
donations so the volume of donations
over 50 or1 was significantly increased
now that's unconscious it's probably you
know if this thing's flimsy and there
may be a certain degree of reciprocation
in that which is they've sent me a bit
of nice bit of paper I owe them 50 Quid
I mean there you know we how it works by
the way why it works you could come up
with four or five different possible
explanations but um those kind of things
are really fascinating because they are
they belong to that field of activity
which you can only prove through testing
market research won't tell you the
answer pure Theory won't tell you the
answer you have to test I'm a very
prejudiced man but given my background
as a nightlife club promoter uh living
and breathing flyers and paper for a
very long time did you do that nightclub
game where you created artificially long
cues of course I did course you of
course I did let me let me let me give
you this one first so one of the few
prejudices that I have in my life is
against single-sided Flyers single-sided
Flyers are around about 90% as expensive
to do double-sided Flyers because almost
all Flyers are double-sided my second
biggest Prejudice are against
double-sided fliers with the same thing
printed on both sides you have two sides
of a piece of paper that basically says
I can't even be bothered here what
should we put on the back I just put the
same thing command C command V send it I
don't care then after that just tiny
tiny little things that you can do we
found that if you go there's something
called um uh spot UV which is the kind
of gloss that you put over the top of a
piece of paper that gives it a smooth
finish if you go uncoated which isn't
that much more again and if you go a
little bit heavier GSM you get this
almost sort of organic furry feel to it
it's like every um innocent smoothie
label right you know it kind of feels a
bit more kind of raw and organic and and
and natural we see what we're talking
about here is This brilliant thing okay
which is it's very simple if you want to
solve problems okay which is stop trying
to think like Newton and come up with
universal universally applicable context
free laws okay that's been done okay
it's called physics okay we've done that
instead you got to think like Darwin
okay
now we mentioned earlier this this
difference between effectively
evolutionary thinking which I think um
the evolution is a study of how things
change not how things are okay that's a
fundamental difference what do you mean
well Evolution come the most Bale
description of evolution but which is
also incredibly insightful is things are
the way they are because they got that
way okay which sounds like AB absurdity
but when you when you actually think a
little bit more deeply then it forces
you to ask the question well how do they
get that way okay and where else could
we go from here you know what are the
tools at our disposable to to get from
here to somewhere better okay now one of
the things I think that is an obstacle
to problem solving I think the reason
that comedians are often evolutionary
thinkers Ricky Javas being an obvious
case but John C another one okay
absolutely fascinated by um you know
evolutionary thought is because it's a
gate it's a gateway to complexity it's a
gateway to thinking in terms of complex
systems and complex systems changing
over time and and it's an Escape From
the idea that there must be universal
laws I've got a friend called Jag Bala
known on the web as hanging noodles who
always argues that we monotheistic
cultures like Christianity have a
disadvantage in our thinking because
unlike Hindus um we're prone to what he
calls mono theism we need one Theory to
explain everything okay and he points
out that actually in Hinduism you you
know don't have that problem because
we're used to the fact that there's you
know the elephant and the I mean I think
I think he said his mother praised on an
altar which has an elephant a monkey and
Jesus on it right and there's no there's
no inherent contradiction to that now
actually that's what I'm quite hopeful
about having a Hindu prime minister
because I think if we unleashed his uh
lack of monotheism and freed him from
political Dogma uh he could be
creatively really quite interesting but
that complexity thing is really
interesting because one of the things
that you you need to lose in order to
understand complex systems is an idea of
what you might call discussing things
that make you look important one person
call it the higher twaddle and that's to
that's you know I noticed this with a
former Chief Executive you know if he
was interviewed instead of talking about
advertising and you know he'd always
talk about like the fed and Janet Yellen
you know and likely interest rate Rises
okay right and that's kind of an that's
a self-important thing to talk about
weirdly people in Britain and instead of
solving British problems somehow weirdly
adopt American it's a signaling thing
and it's a signaling thing which is I
care about these things at and I'm I'm
so important that I'm only going to
debate them at the very highest level
okay and so I mean there are all these
people people going right tring to
defund the police in the United States I
going I'm a Brit right first of all my
responsibility for what I think is a
terrible criminal justice system of the
United States my responsibility for that
ended in 1776 okay I don't think it's
great but it's not my problem okay
secondly I wanted to start some Brits
demonstrations going around going disarm
the
police because it's it's what's so
interesting is if you're American this
defund the police is debatable but the
idea that the police shouldn't carry
guns is probably to them so bizar that
they think you're insane okay other
things in the United States four weeks
of paid vacation okay I've never met
anybody in Britain so right-wing that
they think we should have less holiday
time nobody zero nobody's ever said we
another two 2% on GDP growth if we just
got rid of people's holiday doesn't
happen never exists okay if we cut
maternity leave down two and a half
weeks no those things actually once you
have them they're air fryers they're
Japanese toilets once you have them
there's no going back everyone's an
evangelist grandfather once you once
once once you've got there you never go
back yeah okay and I'm kind of going
well look you know first of all you you
have to now if you look at what Darwin
did to have what is probably one of the
five biggest insights to to be honest I
mean I'm going to stand up for Alfred
Russell Wallace not least because I was
born in lumad which is the same Village
that he was born in tiny Welsh village
um and my my ambition is to be I think
I've probably already succeeded is the
the second best evolutionary thinker
born in L badok I think that's a kind of
attainable sensible ambition okay um but
uh I'm really worried that someone will
crop up you know you know Imperial
College London of fledgling evolutionary
psychologist from Lum exactly
yeah and um so was very sweet cuz I
spoke at the Royal Institution and I
made the prediction that I was probably
only the second person from ladok ever
to have spoken at the Royal Institution
and sure enough I think Alfred Russell
Wallace spoke there in sort of 1860
whatever it was he survived into the
20th century actually um but but if you
look at what Darwin did and what Russell
Wallace did okay they didn't get they
didn't get involved in self-aggrandizing
theory first they went around
interesting funny little places and they
looked at the beaks of of finishes okay
now I think if you want to solve
political problems actually this is why
I love working and advertising okay
because you can get down into the weeds
of microscopic things like what's the
effect of choice architecture on
property selection or indeed dating
websites you can actually we have a kind
of Mantra in our Behavioral Science
practice which is dare to be trivial
because our argument is in a complex
system quite often the things that make
a difference may be surprisingly small
they kind of butterfly effects and your
job is to look for the point of
intervention in the system where the
smallest change has the biggest effect
Buck Mr Fuller called it trim tab okay
on his gravestone it says call me trim
tab and the trim tab I don't I'm I'm not
an engineer but it's the bit on the end
of a Rudder I think on a ship or
plane which only moves slightly but it's
the greatest point of Leverage in terms
of turning that ship it's like an extra
Rudder on the end of a Rudder or
something okay and my point is that
we have and I had an argument with
someone who was the I think he was the
political correspondent of the ft and I
said when John Major you a lot of your
listeners be too young to remember this
but um uh I'm always conscious of this I
I I found myself doing things like now
explaining what a fax machine was and
things like that but when he invented
the cones hotline he was widely
ridiculed for that okay so he invented
this thing which was a a phone number
where you could report cones that were
blocking off the road where no Road
Works were being performed and you could
also say you know you could also get
advanced warning of where Cones were
going to be now at the time he came up
with that he was the Prime Minister okay
and this was regarded as the most
comical and absurd thing you could
possibly imagine like every one was
being tyrannized by roving bands of
cones the other hand he was solving a
problem which you like potholes which
annoys a great number of people all the
time okay and it was non-controversial
but it was considered Absolut beneath
his dignity well my only argument is
that probably the way you solve big
problems is by tinkering around with a
lot of small things and then sometimes
the big problems just weirdly go away
okay I think that tackling problems
head-on is usually counterproductive but
the argumentation tendency that people
want to win an argument rather than
solving a problem first of all causes
this tribal polarization which means
that people very rapidly then start
saying I won't actually argue for what
good I'll argue for whatever path of
action most annoys my opposing tribe
correct yeah it's it's not what's most
effective it's what signals that I am a
acolyte yes I'm a devoted unquestioning
acolyte of this particular let me give
you this I've come up with this idea of
the unreliable Ally so if I know one of
your views and from it I can accurately
predict everything else that you believe
you're probably not a serious thinker
because you've put your entire world
ideology on as a onesie inally Dominick
cummings's great Insight was he said
that effectively the language of left or
right is a is a tribal convenience for
people who are into Political
cosplay correct it's it's rather like
you know okay most people are kind of
interested in politics in the way that
I'm interested in Star Wars which is
I'll watch it if it happens to be on but
I'm not going to go to a convention and
dress as Darth Vader okay and politics
is full of the kind of people who dress
up as Darth Vader and you know get
unbeliev involved in insane details of
you know how the Federation is actually
the governance of the Federation or
something okay most people aren't like
that the other Insight of dominant
comings was he said most people in
reality are both more left-wing and more
right-wing than politicians fully
understand so Ordinary People in a way
are serer and more diverse politically
than the people who've been forced to
take sides yeah they get reduced down to
a dashboard though right and that isn't
able to fully capture you know one vote
from somebody doesn't fully encapsulate
just how far right and how far left you
are because on balance you aggregated
that you are a bit left so you voted
labor or you are a bit right so you
voted conservative this I do so avoiding
that identitarian thing I mean you know
I I write for The Spectator partly
because the weird thing is it would have
been complet actually no that's not fair
okay actually that's not fair I was
going to say that in the 1970s it would
have been the opposite where the
right-wing press got much more annoyed
about you writing something left-wing
than vice versa actually that's probably
not fair of the British very interesting
by the way way which is if you're
American okay there's quite a simple
narrative which you can reasonably
believe which is that most progress
socially not necessarily economically
but most social progress happens under a
democratic regime okay so you go back to
say votes for women that was my cousin
woodro who is De bizarrely he's like my
fourth cousin twice Ro his mom was
English from a Scottish family okay
um just just to even things out my my
other traced American relative is in
prison in Washington state for
kidnapping and attempted murder so
swings the roundabouts right yeah um but
um uh the the interesting thing there is
that you know most of those kind of uh
forward movements the Civil Rights
Movement Etc happened under in a
democratic regime okay and so it's very
easy if you take the American narrative
on board which is basically they're
these well-intentioned Democrat people
who do nice things and then Republicans
tend to be nasty
okay I don't think that Maps very neatly
onto the UK okay so if you look at the
UK uh votes for women was actually a
conservative government uh the NHS was
set up undoubtedly by labor government
atly but actually on the recommendations
of Beverage who is a liberal okay um I
think um same-sex marriage was
conservative government I think the
legalization of by the way if you go
back the Guardians supported the south
in the American Civil War okay The
Spectator a right-wing publication was
about the only publication in the UK to
support the uh Union against the
Confederacy The Spectator in the 1960s
okay was known as the buggers bugle for
its campaigning for the legalization of
homosexuality okay and another force
that was absolutely decisive in that
campaign was bizarrely the Church of
England so there's well not that
bizarrely I suppose if you consider that
homosexuals in CIA Church positions
perhaps okay no no no no no at the time
no no there were quite a few trust me
okay but but I mean actually there was
an Archbishop of Canterbury at some
point in the 60s who kind of needed
protection because of his position on
that matter if you want to if you want
to see a really Advanced group in terms
of being ahead of the curve on anything
it's the Quakers I mean if you're an
empiricist everybody would become a you
know what we really need is a Quaker
Revival okay but the thing is you can't
have a demonstration can you as a Quaker
what do we want sh okay it doesn't
really work but but my point is that
actually if you look at it if you look
at the British social
progress I mean you know the
anti-slavery campaigners some of them
were Tory okay Shaftsbury was it's
actually British progress is much much
less easy to uh kind of stereotype than
in the United
States and so you know you actually look
at the you you look at the history of
different Publications and their
opinions on different things the idea
actually which my kids seemed to absorb
which was everything was horrible until
leftwing people came along and made it
better
yeah this this force of History thing is
kind of a bit borne out I have to say in
the U you know it's complicated
obviously it's a bit you know you could
say well there is some empirical
evidence for that in the United States
although you had a Democratic party
which was completely weird for you know
while the South was overwhelmingly
Democrat you had that kind of weird
Unholy Alliance thing going on but it's
not really safe and this business of
taking American concerns because they're
the most important because it's America
okay and getting wildly excited about
them in the UK even though our problems
are different okay so I'll give you just
a very simple example of this which is
you know if you talk about white
privilege okay and I I'm to some extent
the beneficiary inarguably of exactly
that but the only Point i' make is that
when I was one of the reasons I'm white
okay apart from the obvious ones one of
the reasons I'm right is I was born in
the UK in
1965 when I think someone will correct
me on this the population of the UK was
97% white okay in
1965 so you know the odds that I'm going
to be white it's not like it's not it's
not a situation like the United States
where you've had generations of people
effectively unfairly disadvantaged okay
the people who are disadvantaged hadn't
arrived at the point when I was being
born to the to the most part
okay now as a consequence simply
transplanting
American history and American
preoccupations and American narratives
and imposing them on Australia the UK
France okay doesn't really work and yet
these people do it because they want to
identify themselves with the highest
profile um uh you know biggest debates
do knowour so they can take sides and
that's completely inimical to you know
we got we got other things to be guilty
of if we're Brits let's be honest okay
it's very interesting actually I had a
great aunt who's an anthrop olist called
beatric
Blackwood who spent her her life kind of
connected to the pit Rivers Museum and
her diary is survive and sometime in
about 1923 she went to Memphis I think
might have been I think it was Memphis
okay I thought interesting to see you
know how how does you know fairly you
know obviously she an anthropologist
fairly conventional English woman of
1923 upper middle class family how does
she react to going to the American South
in the 1920s and I thought her reaction
gosh this is really you know tiny bit
you know it's a bit dodgy you know it's
a bit off you know she was AB horrified
I mean there's there's just these pages
of her raging against the fact that she
wasn't even allowed to visit a black
household because they wouldn't allow
her in because if word got out that a
white woman had been in their house
there'd be trouble okay
now yeah we got we got loads of flaws
over here which we can solve and we can
look at but I don't think there's a
wonderful case from your part of the
world isn't there which is a battle
where the pubs refused to deny access to
colored servicemen when when they were
bed somewhere in the Northeast isn't it
not sure are you a monkey hanger are you
or technically a smoggy oh you're a
smoggy as it's referred to the American
audience at this point is completely
Middle where ICI a huge big industrial
plant that spews out all manner of
smokers but I mean you know different
countries you know the situation in
Canada is fundamentally different from
the situation elsewhere and the idea
that you have to solve problems by
basically looking to the United States
and then just importing wholesale
whatever happens to be the fashionable
topic dour over there seems to be crazy
and if I were in the US I'd be competing
anyway for four weeks paid vacation
which would benefit everybody yeah that
seems to be the F the Vanguard of social
change should be paid vacation and a bit
more maternity leave the only person who
suggested that was Bernie Saunders and
everybody thought he was some sort of
communist well I'm not sure if it was
just because of that that they thought
he was a communist but there may be
other reasons as well one of my favorite
stories that I've learned over the last
couple of years about David Ogie that
I've never got a chance to talk to you
about was when Fortune published an
article and titled it is David Ogie a
genius question mark I asked my lawyer
to sue the editor for the question
mark um is there any truth in that
gosh funny enough he's an interesting
case in point because he's a university
Dropout okay so he didn't have a degree
he was when he started the agency he was
former Chef failed tobacco farmer I
think during the war he'd been in MI6
somewhere in Washington as well he was
kind of Ian Fleming character in many
way actually um you know he he and Ian
Fleming by the way was also successful
in a sense relatively late in life um
and by the way we need more of these
stories because you know you can re you
know it's never too late Colonel Sanders
you know sorry was 65 when he founded k
enty Fried Chicken as then was okay um
and David OG was a kind of Colonel
Saunders of advertising he was
relatively late and he had the advantage
of surviving for a long time there are
people within Ogie who think that his
brother Francis who tragically died
young and was based in the UK rather
than the US was as much the brains
behind the operation as David was but I
I met him once fortunately and I knew
his wife quite well his widow now um
and yeah I think
he had some advantages okay so he was
doing advertising at first for Fairly
aspirational products at a time of Great
American angila so he was advertising
Guinness Rolls-Royce um scheps um the
English tourist board for example which
allowed him to do a particular style of
kind of Urbane aspirational advertising
at a time when most American advertising
was quite crash crash yeah it was to an
educated audience that could work out
the inference I mean famously that r R
advertisement at 60 MPH appeared only
twice and it was in the Wall Street
Journal I think what was that at 60 MPH
the loudest sound in this new
Rolls-Royce is the ticking of the
electric clock what is it that makes the
Rolls-Royce the best car in the world
there really is no magic about it it is
simply patient attention to detail says
an eminent Rolls-Royce engineer I even
memorized the subhead but it's um he was
very um the the one thing everybody can
learn from him is uh
writing and he is closest I think as a
Pros writer if you read his books one of
his books is terrible weirdly which I
think it's called blood brains and beer
it's his autobiography the rest of the
books are excellent um I think
everybody's allowed one bad book uh but
um uh it's a wonderful Pro style very
similar to con and do in that it's very
very simple and easy to read with every
sort of 57th word being a slightly more
complicated or slightly more High futin
word just to remind the reader that the
writer isn't an idiot yeah and I think
it's it's actually a great approach to
communication which is that little
signaling of in the Rolls-Royce
advertisement if you are too diffident
to drive a Rolls-Royce you could drive
the Bentley yeah she says you have a
Bentley with a less kind of grandiose
radiator Grill
effectively and you know and so he was
it was actually it's a probably actually
you know other people who are big fans
of that kind of proel Kingsley Amis was
a big admirer of Conan doy and it's a
particular way of writing which is
incredibly easy to read but at the same
time really intelligent and quite Urbane
what I really what I really loved about
at least my research that I have managed
to do a David Ogie is uh his approach to
engendering which you guys have
obviously continued now uh engendering
this there are no wrong answers
creativity kind of culture which I think
is really great well it's a huge I mean
I was saying to some clients the other
day we actually we make it easy for
ourselves in one way which is it's one
of very few corporate this is why I'm
very interested in the comedy world I'm
very interested in other forms of
anomalous economic activity if you like
where you're actually paid to be
weird and you you don't realize how rare
and precious it is until you move into
until you encounter management
Consultants okay where the whole thing
is kind of templated formulaic they
recruit engineering graduates which by
the way is a terrible waste of
engineering talent I want Engineers
going and making bloody things I want
them bloody well producing PowerPoint
decks at sort of200 an hour what a waste
you know you know those people could be
producing I don't know space Rockets or
something but instead they're going and
producing these effing PowerPoint decks
for management consulting firms and the
the value of actually having so most
organizations first of all regard logic
as a good proxy for um in other words
the course of action that has the best
argument attached must be the best
course of action and what's unusual
advertising and comedy and a few other
things music obviously I guess um is
that we don't buy that that we don't buy
the idea that whatever has a good
argument attached to it must be right
because there's probably a better idea
which comes from Left Field which you
won't arrive at through pre-
rationalization you can only
post-rational eyesee it now that
distinction by the way is quite
interesting um I won't go into the whole
thing about Charles Russell purse
brilliant American philos of the 19th
century and um I won't go into the stuff
about um uh you know the whole thing of
abductive inference being a different
form of mental process but if you look
at actually quite a lot of
pharmaceutical progress okay it actually
happens backwards okay it's not we have
this disease we need to cure it oh look
let's do these things here's a cure
those processes generally lead to fairly
well actually not that reliable you know
tolerable incremental progress over a
very long period now let's not discount
that because over a period of 80 years
we do get better at
things the real breakthrough things
happen backwards okay which is Viagra
penicillin yeah in other words um it's
almost a cure for which there is no
known disease rather than a disease for
which there's no what can we use this
for it's giving people erections uh well
what happened was it was intended as an
angina remedy Viagra and there are two
stories about it one of which is that
the nurses noticed that when the guys
came in for their kind of people on the
trial when they came in for their kind
of checkup they were sitting in a really
weird way okay and the the other story
I've heard is that at the end of the
trial they were told well okay um we're
we're obviously processing the trial
results which were pretty inconclusive
as far as angina went so could you hand
back any unused pills you have to which
the response in every previous trial
have been yeah sure here they are and in
this trial went
no there's also a fascinating story
which is that a German pharmaceutical
company got there first noticed the side
effect and immediately rejected the drug
okay because they failed to see the
opportunity to in other words as an an
any angina cure that caused people to go
around in a priapic state of tence was
obviously no good as an angina
medication and they failed to see beyond
it which is that now I'll tell you two
other stories of this I was talking to
some other people one of the great
things about being a vice chairman is
you can just go and talk to to be honest
okay most discussion and decision-making
argumentation is top down most progress
is bottom up or horizontal okay so we
organize organizations in the absolute
worst way for problem solving which is
what you know what you need is people
who know quite a bit about three
different things to solve a problem
because more and more Modern Problems
aren't problems within a specialism
they're problems that involve the
combination of two specialisms so anyway
here's an interesting one which is is a
drugs company I was speaking to giving a
talk to and to be honest I think I learn
as when I give these talks companies
often I learn as much from them as they
do from me but they pay me so fine okay
um this is a case where they were
looking at drugs to treat um autoimmune
diseases such as rheumatiod
arthritis and what happened was that
some of the drugs they tested were
apping right because they actually had
the opposite effect they boosted the
immune system and of course if you've
got disease where your immune system is
attacking your own body it's the worst
thing you want to do so they put these
on the shelf and go okay you know rule
that out and then someone a a little
while later goes
ding if you're trying to practice
immunotherapy for cancer a drug that
strengthens the immune system that's not
a bug that's a feature okay and
similarly that happened with Night Nurse
which is one of my favorite marketing
story is where they were looking when
they created Night Nurse and this was
long before there was something called
day nurse okay they were looking to
produce a a flu remedy and they produced
a very successful to be honest it was
treating actually treating the symptoms
rather than the cause okay but they
produced this flu treatment so not a
remedy but a treatment uh which was
brilliant but the downside was it sent
you to sleep so you couldn't drive or
operate heavy machinery um I'm don't
regularly operate heavy machinery but
it's a bit I love that warning yeah I
love that warning too yeah oh [ __ ] I was
about to do some heavy Excavating you
ruined
has been taken been completely it's
rather like that video message which is
you mustn't show this video on an oil
rig do you remember that at the
beginning of VHS videos it said this is
not licensed for the display on oil rigs
and you imagine those people 500 miles
out of the North Sea going oh [ __ ] press
the pause we about to watch speed to
just about to watch Speed 2 and that's
ruined it for us you know any moment now
someone's going to turn up from the
copyright licensing Authority and BP are
going to be in trouble and um but anyway
um the the fascinating thing is that
what happened is they said okay so it's
no good it sends people to sleep and
then a little guy I've always heard the
story as a little guy kind of from the
marketing department said actually if
you position it as a nighttime flu
remedy okay the fact that it sends you
to sleep is a bonus it's not a problem
so night nurse was born by basically
reframing and this is what I said about
highspeed 2 I said High Speed 2 is a
terrible answer really um in the sense
that it goes at the wrong speed along
the wrong route um lots of things are
terrible about you know the whole thing
was misconceived but it was the first
thing that was wrong about high spe 2
was the question they asked and they
asked an engineering question which is
how do you transport X people over y
miles uh you know at a time of Zed T
okay right and so they set down those
kind of mathematical parameters now a
marketing person would have asked a
different question which is a much more
interesting open-ended question which
has far more scope for expanding the
solution space to allow for Creative
Solutions and the question a marketer
would have asked is how do you make the
train service between Manchester and
London so good and so enjoyable people
feel stupid
driving now speed obviously okay speed
may be part of that convenience Comfort
enjoyability connectivity catering okay
um variation of seating so you know I
mean you remember strangers on a train
there Hitchcock films where they used to
have the observation car at the back of
the train [ __ ] me every time you watch
this is a train in the 1950s you go oh
God I wish they had trains like that now
they even had a smoking thing at the
back didn't they now I did have a crazy
idea which is if you spent the money
okay this is hypothetical but this is
why comedy is so important it's much
more easy to start silly and re it back
than it is to start boring and re it
forwards as it were and I said just a
hypothetical exercise if you spent if
you kept the tracks the same and you
spent all the money on both buying and
recreating the world's greatest steam
locomotives right and you ran the trains
from Manchester like your train at 9:15
will be pulled by the Union Pacific Big
Boy okay or the malard right or a
replica of the malard now it would be
slower okay I'm assuming the Wi-Fi could
be quite good you wouldn't go into full
you know kind of you know 19th century
or you know mid 20th century Nostalgia
but every single tourist to London would
go to Manchester just to ride on the
effing train right if you had a replica
of the bloody um Harry Potter train okay
you'd actually get people coming to
London so they could travel to
Manchester yeah if you think that's by
the way comical I've got a friend who's
the warden of an Oxford College uh a
former boss of mine um and the tourist
visitors to Oxford colleges basically
have completely bif there are colleges
which nobody visits and there are
colleges which are swarming with
tourists the entire discriminator
between those two is whether the college
features in a Harry Potter film wow so
new College Oxford has a tree apparently
which is featured in one of the films
and that has tourists swarming in next
door you can have a fantastic College
architecturally magnificent didn't
feature in Harry Potter you know
basically it's um pointless it's you
know it's what you call those things
that blow through the place tumble weed
tumble weed yeah yeah what's your
thoughts on the abandonment of this
billion dollar train thing there's
something recently that's been
you can still solve it you go and hand
the job to I've said this you go and
hand1 million pounds to Johnny IES I and
his mate Mark new Mark new Australian
designer already has form here because
he designed the Quantas business class
seat which in my opinion is the best
actually never mind business class it's
the best airline seat ever conceived by
the wit of
man um and you say you give them the
brief okay we've got this stupid Railway
going along this stupid route how do you
make it just absolutely amazing I mean
joh Ives back in the UK right I'm sure
100 million are get him out of bed okay
and you just go okay you're in charge of
the design of the train Interiors you're
in charge of the catering the
connectivity your brief open brief make
this journey so amazing that people want
to go on the train for the sake of the
train not for the sake of the journey
that's the brief it's the brief that
Cunard effectively had okay so when jet
jet aircraft were invented okay um the
blue ribboned which was that competition
for how fast you could cross the
Atlantic became to be honest a bit of an
academic exercise because if you could
get there in under a day by plane even
if you had to refuel in Gander it didn't
really matter whether the Q the Queen
Mary was faster than the bloody United
States or the Normandy anymore okay so
card basically had to go okay we've got
to stop thinking of these ships as a
source of a form of transportation they
got to be a destination in themselves
and consequently they kind of invented
the cruise ship industry sort of and I I
don't give them 100% credit but that
idea of so cruise ships when you think
about it you border cruise ship you go
around in a circle and you come back I
mean you do visits and places for a
journey yeah yeah you know but actually
the cruise ship is as much of a
destination as the destination is and
you can do that with high speeded too
yeah what would you do train twister is
my suggestion solution to train
overcrowding is to turn close proximity
to other people from an annoyance to a
source of entertainment okay a lot of
intimacy concerns there yeah there
probably I did think of the legalities
but you know your next station is head
corn left hand yellow
come
on you you probably have to have gender
segregated T carries that's a concern it
depends if you're going to Brighton or
not that might be a bonus um you've also
got the the issue I suppose I've seen a
lot of the people that travel up and
down this country is getting older yeah
and I'm not sure whether you'd have to
have at each different stop some sort of
paramedic perhaps or or a physio that
could give R down by the way that is
part of the appeal of the cruise ship
industry to the elderly in the United
States which is you got a doctor on
board
right you've got three weeks where your
medical care is basically taken care of
if you tumble tumble down the the water
slide not irrelevant and by the way if
you're a cruise ship doctor you're a
[ __ ] good doctor because you got to
be able to cope with everything right
you can't specialize if someone's on
board and you're sort of you know 200
miles from Land you can't say I'm
terribly sorry it's not my specialism I
need perforated eardrum to a half exact
exactly yeah I bet you got to be a [ __ ]
hot generalist what would you do to
improve business last flights
interesting uh yeah I've got an idea for
that for short Hall which is really
mischievous you know how they always say
that the the biggest car company in the
world Uber doesn't own any cars and the
biggest uh you know accommodation
company in the world Airbnb doesn't own
any houses I've got this idea to start
an airline that doesn't own any planes
okay and this is I did think of having a
vaping Airline I did wonder about that
or you can just Vape on board you just
Vape on board not that you like a vaping
tax a vaping search charge yeah and and
you'd have two you know you'd have two
classes you know 20 milligrams at the
front 10 Mig at the back fantastic but I
did wonder about that but actually my
idea was you buy a country house near
stanstead okay and every time you fly
okay you park your car at this country
house okay you're checking your luggage
and the country house is it is like the
party in The Wolf of Wall Street okay
right it's like Eyes Wide Shut okay it's
Absolute Total opulence okay and then
when you're ready to fly you're driven
in you know Dr Evil's car which of
course is an S-Class Mercedes with the
windows blacked out isn't it you know
okay which is kind of like you know it's
kind of like you know Dr Evil's natural
conveyance of choice okay you're driven
to the plane and you walk onto a ryion
air flight okay and the ryion air flight
cost you 37 quid and it cost 250 quid to
use the lb you're a nightclub promoter
right yeah yeah we could go into
business doing this ready to go so the
whole idea is okay the bid on the plane
is only an hour it doesn't really matter
if it's Ryan Air and all okay you know
you could do a thing where you book the
middle seat out okay so you got a bit of
space but basically you use Ryan Air and
the whole aim is you make the airport
experience amazing where you're
literally fered to the plane then the
plane bit you don't try and compete
because there's a limit what you can do
at 30,000 ft to make it amazing yes or
certainly a limit to what's illegal that
would make it what's legal that would
make it amazing it's quite there are
lots of illegal things I'm sure you
could do make moreing that would make it
amazing but we'll we'll kind of you know
we'll we we'll draw a veil over that
should we say yeah what so we were
talking earlier on about kind of this uh
culture of creativity that you guys have
managed to Foster and kind of perpetuate
as well I know that you've spoken to
Rick rubben yes yeah that was fantastic
yeah you think a lot about creativity
for yourself by the way Rick asked me a
question which I'm going to ask you he
said why haven't you moved to the United
States and you have moved to the United
States
now you've moved to Austin which I think
is very ever yeah because I think Austin
is actually an interesting game which is
Americans are choosing it because they
want to live within a cool a cool
culture rather than the cash culture
okay in a sense the status game in
Austin is slightly different you've read
that Paul Graham essay each City
Whispers something different to you
lovely yeah I I haven't but I will yeah
he's he's an interesting guy you know
you go to Miami Miami Whispers to you
you are as important as the watch on
your wrist or the shoes that you wear or
the car that you drive yeah right uh La
Whispers to you you are as important as
as your role in the entertainment
industry people that you know and the
people who know you know in La there's a
club which is only for people who don't
work in the entertainment industry right
because any other club they join they're
automatically at the bottom you can you
can own some business you know literally
a billion dollar business and you can
own it but in La if you go to the same
Club as the celebs you're basically
treated night film second class so they
they have a kind of separate club for
people who aren't in the film industry
fascinating
and La you're right it Whispers London's
very complicated because it's the bloody
Center of everything from government to
advertising to business to I can't
remember what he says London London
Whispers to you uh but yeah so the the
Rick Austin also has the great advantage
of being a democratic City and a
Republican state I people say that blue
dot red ocean thing I see no one that's
liberal everybody that's there is in
some degree based or conservative I
sorry really I that's what I see man I
mean I assume that you know I assumed it
was my my idea of Heaven which is kind
of it's short range left wing and long
range right wi which is so I can go out
and I can buy really good coffee made by
people with interesting body art but
then in the afternoon I can drive into
the desert and fire machine guns at oil
drums both they actually true yeah you
can that's Austin in a nutsh tank that
is that is a Austin in a nutshell but
definitely one of the things that's
interest absolutely adore Texas so I
I've been I've been having the the old
dig at you know I said I got nothing
against the United States cousin Woodrow
was president of the [ __ ] place but
um uh I have to say that uh Texas I find
absolutely love now I'm a Brit I'm a
white guy Etc actually it seems to me I
got a Texan colleague who says all
Texans get on pretty well because
they're all Texans okay they have an
identity which transcends other things
okay now Austin you say that actually
you find oddly that you don't find that
kind of blue dot well I don't know man
it's just I don't know how much of it my
visit there but I love I love Houston I
love Dallas I don't know how much of
it's a selection effect because the
people that I'm around are going to be
people who have maybe achieved a degree
of Financial Freedom that's cause them
to lean more right or whatever but
there's definitely uh and low taxes
correct there's definitely a freedom to
and a freedom from culture so there is a
freedom to do the things that I want
there is a freedom from any of the
[ __ ] interventions of the people from
Washington etc etc but going back to the
creativity thing for the people who want
to try and get a uh they want to
artificially inseminate their creativity
muscle yes what are some of the things
that you advise the guys that you work
with in the companies you work with to
do to engender a creative culture study
biology not just sort of physics and
maths in other words study complex
things um I have a kind of weird Theory
which might form a chapter in my next
book which is in a weird kind of way
cops are better scientists than
scientists are okay now let me explain
okay if so one of the things I recommend
is read a lot of true life crime okay
study that kind of stuff by the way
there's a fantastic Andrew Schulz uh
routine on this on his wife's propensity
to watch um films about serial killers
the female obsession with serial killers
is never going to make sense to me but
do you have because I have it as well so
it's great because my wife and I both I
think she likes it because there's a lot
of psychology and I like it someone gets
killed but I'm only joking Bond over
your love True Crime there is a really
interesting thing about reading about um
uh true life crime which is it's one
case where you get an extraordinary
amount of detailed study into the life
if you've read those you know books
about say Peter Sutcliffe and his family
you get an extraordinary amount of
detail into a family which in many cases
is completely ordinary except for the
obviously the outlier that somebody
kills somebody or a lot of people so
that you know you do get that weird
thing which is a very deep study not
into a major historical figure except in
the worst possible
sense um but um no that it is
interesting but
what it is about detective work is
you're kind of working okay there's a
Conan dial P actually fun enough one of
the I think one of the sources of my
creativity was obsessively reading
Sherlock Holmes short stories as a
fairly young kid okay my Behavioral
Science thing was probably weirdly
reading ESOP who uh is really the first
behavioral scientist even though he
lived in the sixth Century BC you know
Jesus was also a pretty good behavioral
scientist if you look at it you know the
parable of the lost is basically loss
aversion okay you have really
interesting things like you know the
parable of the vineyard is you know
perceived Equity you know actually
there's a there's a hell of a lot of
Behavioral Science in Jesus um seriously
so that's that's my third book you know
there's that book Jane Austin was a game
theorist okay there's a fantastic book
my my my book's gonna be my third book's
gonna be Jesus was a behavioral
Economist right I wonder how that one's
going to go yeah yeah I don't know how
that's going to go down but um but
actually what what C do talks about
through the mouthpiece of Sherlock
Holmes is this business of reasoning
backwards and he said that everybody
knows how to reason forwards this has
happened so this is going to happen next
and it's the natural mode of thinking
reasoning backwards is not actually that
difficult to do but most people don't do
it and that is if you think about a
detective uh a work of detection it's
this thing has happened now we have to
find out what were the pre-existing
conditions that led to this outcome and
in advertising Forward Thinking
creativity it's we want to get to the
this place in the words of Roger L
Martin a very brilliant business Guru
what would have to be true for this to
come
about I think that's the question by the
way a lot of political movements don't
ask they they have a hypothesized ideal
future okay and they don't subtly ask
the question okay what needs to happen
between now and in other words play the
hand your dealt we happen to be here we
want to get there let's not just ignore
where we are and immediately effectively
fantasize into existence a perfectly
neat uh Society because change doesn't
work like that you have to start where
you are you have to play the hand your
Del it's very very easy to say why did
it take them so long to you know uh give
votes for women etc etc but actually if
you look at the reality of it these
things take time and also persuasion is
slower than legislation but it's
persuasion that actually makes things
work have you got the so I'll just make
that distinction with in regard to drink
driving okay the breathalyzer you know
penalty points license banss for driving
for American Americans we don't have a
distinct between driving under the
influence and driving while intoxicated
if you're basically intoxicated you lose
your license
okay it the legislation sort of worked
but a lot of people in my parents
generation thought it was a bit naughty
to get caught over the limit my parents
didn't drive drunk I just want to
absolve them of that but some of their
contemporaries did and my parents
wouldn't stop someone leaving the house
if they had too much to drink they'd
encourag them to stay but they wouldn't
like grab their car keys now when
something makes it way its way from
being imposed to being adopted what you
see in my children's generation is they
would wrestle one of their friends to
the ground before they got into a car
over the limit so America is so
different to this I know so different
the attitude of Americans to people that
drink Drive is like you'll be at some
bar or something so oh we're going to go
to such and such a place do you want to
come I oh right okay brilliant presuming
that there's an Uber waiting outside and
someone gets into the four50 go I've
just watched you sink Three Margaritas
over the last hour and no one no one
really bats an I I saw this amazing
video I'll find it in LA is like that as
well la la yeah yeah I mean Uber has
probably reduced this to some degree but
the extent to which people used to drive
around La intox my brother-in-law who
lived there for quite a few years just
couldn't get his head rounded at all
yeah there was a a great video of when
they first introduced the uh you can't
drink and drive drink and drive not
drink then drive you can't drink and
drive and they're talking to these guys
and and girls from the deep south in
America and they're all in you know beat
up Chevy trucks or whatever and they're
interviewing them through the window and
this dude sat there and there's another
one with a woman who sat there child on
passenger seat without seat belt on beer
between legs saying I don't know what
this country is coming to that a guy
can't finish his hard day at work and
you know have beer when he's on his way
home you know this country is being run
by Communists these godamn commies
trying to take our beers away from us
and I'm like you're drinking and driving
literally dring and driving
extraordinary thing I think in New
Orleans or certainly in Louisiana I
think is it isn't it where you can
actually have drive-thru margarita
stands phenomenal so you literally put a
margarita in your cup holder nothing in
America is beyond being drive-thru the
bank no
CVS [ __ ] Margaritas everything is
driveth through that that by the way um
I never answered Rick rubin's question
why I never moved to the United States
and there are two reasons one of which
is I'd probably make a million dollars
but then I'd start shopping at Whole
Foods and I'd be back to where I
started right okay so the one thing I
can't get my head [ __ ] individual
malthusian trap that you've got yourself
into we had this La guy who came over
and he was La creative guy wonderful guy
and he was in raptures about waitrose
now this won't be funny to American
audience apologies okay but he said the
food is such good quality and such
reasonable prices okay and you suddenly
realize he grown up on Whole Foods or
Bristol Farms all those LA and it's
completely bipolar American Grocery
retail you know German grocery retail is
all about price really y okay American
Grocery retail British grocery retail is
really all about brand actually quite
interesting and then you have American
Grocery retail which is just like you
have a choice between two absurd
extremes you know it's like having first
class and in room only you know it's
kind of weird I think what happens with
British supermarkets is that they are
woven into the class structure as well
yeah right you know little our system
isn't all bad you know let me explain
this okay one thing which I think is
problematic about the British class
system but is also quite nice okay is
you do reach escape velocity relatively
soon okay if you prove yourself
reasonably successful materially okay so
okay this is a total stereotype okay but
if you're a brid you you're going to do
this right okay you're going to come
back to the Britain with some money
which I hope you've made in the Colones
okay right slowly and you're going to
buy the old rectory in Minion Hampton a
flat in London you'll have a Range Rover
a labrador um a wife called Polly and
two children at private school
membership to
Soho basically that point you could stop
okay because anything more than that is
actually evidence that makes you
suspicious you're probably a drug dealer
you know if you got a private jet or
something like that will go he's
probably up to no good yes okay he's
probably a bit Shady he's not really
respectable and so there is that kind of
weird thing probably which is the the
royal family sumptuary laws which is you
know because we had a royal family who
actually in many ways their Pleasures
until recently were extraordin walking
around muddy fields in Wellington okay
yeah there's a c there's a culture of
sort of elite modesty in some ways in
the UK you know look at a Land Rover
Defender yeah it's it's a a every single
person I have a weird thought in the car
market which is once you produce the
Electric Land Rover Defender there can
be no more prestigious vehicle than that
in a weird way why because
it's it's hard to explain but the landro
defender is unbelievably beautiful by
the way the latest iteration of it is
fantastic if you made that electric and
therefore you know you've got a big
tough versatile vehicle big heavy thing
with a huge battery quite a lot of range
the performance is going to be fine
right because it's electric
okay and generally it doesn't matter
what the electric cars the performance
is going to be great okay why would if
you had the money why would you have any
other
vehicle okay and the only other vehicle
I can imagine by the way is um will a
proportional so I'm as a georgist I
believe that there should be a single
land value tax and I believe that an
awful lot of Technology exists so that
people can escape from the rent seeking
depredations of landlords and land
owners and that's one of the Great bunch
of places like Texas okay you've got it
a super abundance because Austin like
say Vegas or like say Phoenix okay they
were basically built after the car was
invented okay so living eight miles from
the center of Phoenix doesn't matter
because you can just drive in red to
have the automobile in Phoenix what I
love about do you ever do you ever go
there Phoenix Scotsdale Santa Fe is a
fantastic I'm going to Scotsdale in a
couple of weeks time for the first time
instead the hotel Valley Ho okay it's
kind of hotel where the Rat Pack would
have hung out it's really really cool
and fun okay but I absolutely love the
place now bear in mind okay as a Brit
okay the two most pointless cities in
the United States to visit in New York
and San Francisco because they're a crap
attempt to recreate a European city okay
whereas Brits love places like Austin or
Houston or LA or Chicago because they're
really different they allow you to have
a completely different life to the life
you'd have in London and I'm going to
make an accusation okay deep down
everybody wants to live in Suburbia okay
but in Britain living in Suburbia isn't
cool but if you live in LA you can go
and buy effectively a Suburban House you
know up in the kind of you know just off
what what's that place called um um uh
Wonderland you know the the valley thing
that goes up towards um uh uh the the
mhall drive yeah yeah you can basically
live in a glorious Suburban house and
because it's La it's totally cool okay
so that's one of those little games you
see if you move to Beckley Heath your
friends would start disowning you right
but if you move to to LA and buy a nice
Suburban House totally different yeah so
I was thinking about uh the Rebrand of
it's speaking about that sort of West
Coast phenomenon this Rebrand of Twitter
to X what's your assessment of it's a
very weird thing to do because I would
wait until he creates the everything app
before you Rebrand it yeah um that's
what seems strange to me bundle
neuralink and SpaceX bundle payment
vehicles I mean if he if he buil I'll
forgive him everything thing if he
builds in a Content payment mechanism to
Twitter how do you mean uh there is a
fundamental there are lots of holes in
the ecosystem the digital ecosystem
which haven't been plugged because
they're natural monopolies and therefore
um it's very difficult for them to reach
critical mass as Network Goods unless
they have Monopoly status now looking at
the Royal Mail which is the first real
Network good the penny post technically
not the Royal Mail okay the penny post
was extraordinary thing because there
had been one penny postal services in
London for about 150 years and this guy
Roland Hill with the mathematical help
of Charles Babbage IE the kind of
inventor of the computer and one of the
10 greatest mathematicians of his time
managed to do the maths to say actually
you can scale this up to a national and
subsequently an imperial level so
there's an imperial Penny Post in 1910
whatever you know Ma some Australia when
ra it didn't include Australia and New
Zealand you had to pay extra for them
but India but included India so when
ramanujan wrote to GH Hardy in Cambridge
he paid a penny for the L wow okay now
the mathematics there is to say that in
a network of of the postal kind of
network the G the efficiencies in trunk
routs in other words the cost per mile
when you're transporting uh 50,000
letters at a time the cost per mile is
so low that all the costs basically are
in collection sortation and then last
mile delivery so as a consequence the
distance is actually more or less
irrelevant to the cost of carriage and
therefore we can have a flat rate for
postage and it required babage to do the
maths to prove it worked even then it
lost money for the first few years
because people weren't in the habit of
writing to people 500 miles away because
they didn't know anybody okay apart from
else you know to Dev some time like if
you own the world's first fax machine
it's not really very useful yeah okay
and I think there are lots of things and
I think two of them are a locker system
for e-commerce delivery and what the
government should do is basically
license a monopoly for 10 years and say
okay if you offer an Open Access locker
system will give you 10 to 15 years of
schumpeterian rent from your your
Monopoly okay and by the way it has to
be open access so that local shops I can
ring up a local shop in seven Oaks okay
and say can you drop off a copy of this
book in my locker or in this Locker you
know sometime this evening after you
shut right not just not just e-commerce
but actually all forms of local Commerce
and indeed peer-to-peer sending if I
want to send something to my dad if
there's a locker in his village he's 93
I can basically pop it in my locker and
it be sent to his because then you
remove the last mile cost of delivery
which is causing environmental costs
it's causing Transportation congestion
and it's also it's not ultimately
scalable because as I spoke to someone
at PNG about the delivery the
subscription model for things like
razors they own Gillette right and they
said the problem with this model is it
works at a limited extent but if we
bought everything that way our home our
homes would turn into a delivery Hub you
know it your house becomes the logistics
Hub and every time you open the window
it's beep beep beep beep okay it just
doesn't make sense at at ultimate scale
it doesn't make what this got to do with
Twitter and X right okay so there's a
similar problem which is with micro
payments for now I've got a friend
called Dominick young who's in a company
called axate which is also looking at
this problem which is most people don't
want to subscribe to most content okay
pay to subscribe okay now there isn't a
single case there may be one case in
like Finland okay but that's it there is
there's barely a single case in the
world of a tabloid newspaper making a
success of the subscription model what
Twitter could do is launch a micro
payment system where I keep like 20 quid
of my um Twitter balance and every time
I want to read an article in well I do
subscribe to the New York Times but I
don't subscribe to the Wall Street
Journal and i' Bugg it if I'm going to
subscribe to the Ft right because the Ft
there are lots of articles in the Ft I'd
pay a pound to read but I'm not paying
35 quid a month or whatever I mean most
people claim the Ft I guess or at least
it's tax deductible okay but also the Ft
there's a there's a psychological thing
going on here which is that there are
certain things in the Ft which I would
love to read there's some Fant fantastic
journalist there what's the guy called
Gish something or other brilliant guy
okay um but equally if I pay 40 quid a
month for the whole of the Ft or
whatever it cost that's 500 quid a year
right okay well I feel that you know 70%
80% of that money is going to produce
articles on the prospects for Central
banking reform in Ecuador which are of
no interest to me at all right not sure
they that much interest to Ft readers
but but nonetheless okay I I don't want
to pay for the stuff I don't want and
it's a psychological thing even if the
net value to me of each of those
articles added together might add up
to20 I'm not paying for the whole thing
because I feel I'm paying for a lot of
value that I that other people are
getting but I'm not so if you centralize
the payment ability through
Twitter I keep my Twitter balance at 20
quid or 20 US Dollars and I go that ft
article looks a bit interesting I'll pay
50 cents to read that yeah now you can
really monetize high quality and the
same goes for video content by the way
the same could go to musical content
okay although spotify's made that work
fairly well but I think for high quality
journalism in particular but equally
tabloid journalism PE the people who buy
the sun buy it in the way you buy
chocolate or crisps or a packet of
cigarettes right an Impulse bar next to
the tail and you go oh I feel like a bit
of a treat I'll buy a copy of the super
sore away sun and it's XP and then you
take it with you those same people do
not want to just just there are people
who will only have pay as you go mobile
phones even if they would be better off
on a contract okay and I won't buy I
won't buy a train season ticket because
my argument is there are two days of the
week where I don't take the standard
Journey now I might actually save money
overall on the three Journeys I do take
but it pisses me off that I'm getting
proportionately worse value than the
people who travel in five days a week
but I'm still paying the same so that
feeling of pissed offness prevents me
from subscribing to a season ticket
prevents me from subscribing to a lot of
Publications where I would give them 10
quid a month if it was pay as you go so
would you if you had been El Al also by
the way if you if I subscribe to every
publication that you know I I think I
subscribe to the Atlantic I think I
subscribe to the New Yorker uh but let's
add okay wired New York Magazine let's
adders the new States okay I do
subscribe to the spec I right for the
spectators so that's obviously free
exactly and I subscribed to the times
and the telegraph I think
okay and then I read you're probably
accumulating what at least a grand a
year well well this is the point that I
I've basically reached Peak subscription
okay subscription saturation so in other
words there is a limit to the number of
direct debits people are prepared to
have yeah and therefore you cannot grow
the market for paid high quality content
or paid entertainment content tell you
what's an interesting business that I
found out about recently I think it's
called Rocket reach and this company
they go through maybe you link them to
your bank or something I don't really
know how it works
uh but they go through and they look at
all of the debits that you you that
you've got that are kind of lapsed or
pointless or [ __ ] something like that
and they get rid of them yeah so if
you've been by the way I'd also I would
also add legislation here which is it is
too difficult to cancel a recurring
credit card payment I was paying for
Club Penguin for my kids you know when I
was picking them up pissed from all bar
one you know at one o00 in the morning
okay I was still paying for Club bloody
penguin now I mean you know i' probably
had little sneaky visit to I didn't
don't worry um uh but
um I did not go on clubbing the only
time I went on Club Penguin as an adult
is my children when they were younger
would make me play the games to earn
points to decorate their Igloo fantastic
so they'd outsourc to me to get me to
play the dad go to work please virtually
yeah I wasn't doing anything else I
don't want to end up in the nonsense
wing of Wakefield prison okay um I
wasn't going on for any other purpose
okay right
[ __ ] hell look let's get back to X
for get back to X if you'd been Elon
would you have waited until you were
able to bundle everything underneath
right yeah because there's too much
equity in nobody everybody refers to it
as Twitter brackets X there's a hell of
a lot of equity in that it made perfect
sense as a name you had a tweet it's a
very very bizarre decision of elon's I
mean he you know undoubtedly you know I
mean the most bizarre feature of Elon
okay if I may say so which is if you
take comedic Viewpoint one of the great
things you do you take this sort of
Darwin mentality where you look at
little things and suddenly you discover
these absurdities everywhere and elon's
greatest absurdity okay is he's in favor
of driverless cars but mans space travel
now I don't want to be rude okay what he
means by man space travel is people who
have no obvious aeronautic ability
should be able to project themselves as
humans into space but cars which
obviously benefit from being driven by a
human have to drive around autonomously
now I don't want to be rude but isn't
that the wrong way around okay shouldn't
cars be driven by people and spacecraft
be autonomous I don't want to be you
know how much input do the humans in
spacecraft have now none my brother is
an astrophysicist if you want to get
astronomers and astrophysicists
absolutely um driven to a point of
apoplexy just mention man space travel
okay because they regard it as per per
dollar spent an extraordinarily bad way
of discuss discovering things about the
universe you should just be robots it
was described by one uh colleague of my
brothers as spending $300
million to find out how mice wank in
zero g okay you know the kind of
experiments you performed on man space
travel are kind of absurd compared to
something like you know Space Telescope
or or something of that kind you know
whereas if you look at what those probes
do that you know the nonhuman probes
it's just that that's just joyous
absolutely joyous however I do have a
colleague in the advertising industry
Trevor Bey whose lifetime dream has been
to go into space and I think he's done
this with Virgin I get it what is it now
250 Grand I think that that was it yeah
and he at all credit him he's not some
rich diletante guy who decided it' be
cool I mean he's probably quite rich but
he he's been an absolute lifetime space
obsessive uh literally since being a
child so it's a it's L good use of his I
can see why he does that each time that
we speak you have become an evangelist
for a new category of products I think
this is maybe your fifth or sixth time
on the show each time that we've spoken
I feel like the first time was the
Japanese toilet the second time air FR
was the air I I was the John the Baptist
of bloody air fryers I can tell you that
much right I mean seriously I went to
Phillips who at the time had a monopoly
of air on of air
fryers now this is an really interesting
point for anybody who's got a business
the thing to look at at a business is
not just the rate of growth okay you can
have extraordinary rates of growth which
consist of lots of people trying
something and deciding it's [ __ ] I mean
if you compare that thing what was that
Facebook thing threads right now if you
look at the actual data for the the
adoption of threads it was absolutely
you know exponential rates of insane
adoption if you go there it's basically
you know it's [ __ ] Wast absolute
Wasteland okay now the reason for that
is it may they very very easy to sign up
people had a look didn't like it you
can't actually leave threads because if
you want to leave threads you got to
delete your Instagram account which
understandably people don't want to do
so that's a kind of furline trap okay
now it looks impressive means nothing by
contrast there are things which grow
very very slowly at first it's a sigmoid
curve the data you need to look at to
give yourself reassurance if that data
is there is the repeat purchase rate or
the subsequent conversion to evangelism
yes now not many people had air frers
now I I had this even the reason I went
to Phillips and they didn't listen and I
said look s trust me you're sitting on
an effing gold mine here if you just
promote your effec they were the only
manufacturer of air fryers at the time
okay if you promote your air fryer and
you advertise it you can create kind of
mov were they not promoting it at all no
not at all didn't didn't advertise it at
all I have no clue I don't know what it
drove me nuts well it's now ninja right
ninja ninja ninja wasn't ninja wasn't
there t wasn't there now nin has become
the um the Tesla they have I've got a
I've got a 450 XL I've got a 450l double
is that a double no single single yeah
it's single but extra big and it goes to
450 so here's my I'm sure that you've
got done this already look at me
teaching the teaching the Messiah how to
use his own [ __ ] air fryer um from
frozen steak salt the [ __ ] out of it 12
minutes either side slap it on a plate
done perfectly every time I asked I want
I needed to eat more red meat in my diet
according to my dietitian uh so I asked
the only person I know who eats a very
very high volume of meat Michaela
Peterson who only eats meat yeah that's
a bit weird isn't it I mean I I have to
say
Okay I I
I my attitude to Jordan Peterson is a
bit the same as my attitude to Frankie
Bole which is in small doses I quite
like him but I think he's
overcommitted to a particular dogma and
I think what what he says and there are
very interesting sites to be derived
from him but I wonder that there's a
phrase that was used of Enoch Powell
this equally applies to people on the
left okay which is you're driven mad by
the remorselessness of your own logic
okay
and I don't think I don't think anybody
should see the world through exclusively
a lens of black and white left or right
okay I just don't think it's helpful
conducive to problem solving an example
on the left will be James O'Brien of
someone who's you know I call it James
O'Brien jesuitism
which is that you you're so obsessed
with the rightness of your cause that
you effectively construct an argument
from a fairly dubious assumption and
arrive at a place and therefore you go
QED my position on this is incontestable
okay and what what's less visible about
that is that the starting point or the
driving assumption or axium of your
argument isn't that great your argument
seems wonderfully convincing it's a bit
like dating sites okay every time I'm
make I've never been on a date just in
case my wife's M I don't want you you
know I don't I don't know what dating
side I go on in terms of you know fat
Welshman there's probably a niche there
isn't there I guess um but in any case
by the way you mentioned that asymmetry
that you said astoundingly that in your
entire time as a nightclub promoter and
as I assume because I can't tell as a
bloke a pretty good-looking guy who was
on love Island by the way which is
partly a wppp creation so we can take a
small amount of credit by the way for
your incredibly deserved uh ele ation
and fame but you you've only actually
been spontaneously approached by a woman
three time twice was it yeah yeah twice
twice that overcoming of approach
anxiety for women guys talk about how
hard it is to go up to women and that's
true that that is true but for a girl to
do it to a guy they need to swallow
something else which is that if they are
rejected they've had to overcome a a
social convention that is very very
embarrassing to have done to be reject
it's the same reason it's the reverse
reason actually of why uh women are
shamed for um not women ashamed of not
for not performing in bed in a different
way to man are but men get ashamed for
not always being hot to trot when the
wife is for some reason if you as a guy
the guy is always supposed to be that's
the Jimmy Carr joke isn't it that men
and women desire sex to the same extent
the difference is if a woman wants sex
it actually happens I think that's a
Jimmy I don't disagree go back to let's
let's round out this Evangel thing so we
had we had a Japanese toilet we had uh
the a see I do I do take my Darwinism
very literally which is don't don't have
a sense of proportion don't get worried
about being distracted okay I imagine on
the Beagle the guy you know and the guy
spent 10 years of his life [ __ ]
around with earthworms for God's sake
okay right Mustang Macky which may
become Mustang Macky
GT uh what was the other thing there was
something you got for your dad a a
telephone with massive buttons uh no
that that was a very interesting thing
which was that um the idea of Designing
for the disabled is actually a good
business policy even because you will
actually find yourself with a target
audience far larger than the one you
originally anticip who's got shoing it's
it's rather like actually you know
glutenfree okay the number of people who
are actually gluten intolerant to the
extent of having celiac disease is
pretty small but there are a hell of a
lot of people who are trying to avoid
gluten who will also buy a gluten-free
product and in the same way what the
example I always give is you know
disability legislation mandates
wheelchair ramps they're also handy if
you've got wheelie luggage they mandate
door handles rather than door knobs
because people who have bad arthritis
can't use a door knob but actually if
you're carrying two bugs of tea you can
open a door handle with your elbow
because when you're carrying two bags of
tea you effectively lost the use of your
hands and you know putting the shampoo
bottle that opens at the top and the
conditioner that opens at the bottom You
could argue that's just for people with
severe visual impairment but actually no
cuz I'm in the shower I've got severe
visual impairment itless have had your
fancy laser eye surgery which I can see
everything so presumably you can see
everything I can't see a [ __ ] thing I
tell what if you be what are you
evangelizing about at the moment um
that's very interesting um actually
electric cars interest me a lot because
what I mean one of the things that
interest me is that if you work in the
advertising industry it practices what
is makes it very very interesting is
that it's as I said its problem solving
methodology is slightly odd it's not the
standard scientific you know we must
have complete certainty P value less
than 0.05 before we proceed it's closer
to detective work which is you might act
on a hunch because the hunch or the
little bit of anecdotal information
doesn't give you a decisive answer but
it tells you uh what to investigate more
okay it tells you where to direct your
attention now if I had time I don't know
how much time I've got there are two
extraordinary stories here about how the
capture of Levi bellfield uh effectively
ghastly serial killer effectively
happened because a former girlfriend of
bellfields uh wrote to the police I
think or contact to them and said I had
this boyfriend once and there was a copy
of a magazine and all the blond women
had had their faces defaced with a brro
okay now there's no evidential value to
that you can't bang someone up for 20
years for defacing a copy of Vogue well
that probably wasn't Vogue not sure the
bellfield household kind of stretched to
harism queen or anything I you know but
whatever magazine it was right and you
can't arrest someone for that but you
should investigate okay similar thing
happened with the Yorkshire Ripper which
is uh effectively there was a very
shrewd cop and I can't remember his name
Yorkshire cop relatively Junior and the
Yorkshire police were obsessed with the
idea that he had a Newcastle accent do
you remember this yes because you had
that fake those fake tapes sent in which
the police the police wrongly believed
that there was information in the T
sundland technically oh they narrowed it
down to Shields yeah some [ __ ] pit
that what was extraordinary there was an
accent expert who placed him to within
five streets that was the unbelievable
thing about the accidents of the
Northeast they have that degree of G but
he wasn't the actual
perpetrator and one day this couple they
have to go and interview people who are
suspects largely because their car is
regularly cited in the red light
district of Leeds or Bradford okay and
or else they have some other reason to
raise suspicion okay and they routinely
have to go and interview these couples
and it's an awful thing to do because
first of all you've got to get the wife
out of the room so you can ask the
husband why he's always in the red light
district okay so you have to go oh my
throats like sandpaper make us a cup of
tea love but they started this couple of
cops just started with this kind of
break the ice riff which was right Madam
now's your chance to put your husband
away for good to get rid of your husband
for good and so they made light of the
fact that they were making inquiries
into the Yorkshire Ripper but by
starting with a joke they kind of
detoxified the whole exchange okay they
were saying don't worry you know he's
not you know you know you don't need to
panic it was a wonderful little joke you
know now has your chance to get rid of
your husband okay
and every single person they played that
joke on about 10% of them got angry and
90% of them laughed as you might expect
okay some people just don't have a sense
of humor um which is what's slightly
weird about woke comedy which is you
allow comedians to be policed by people
with absolutely no sense of humor
whatsoever which doesn't seem to make
much sense yes um but they just don't
have they don't have a sense of humor
when they interviewed Su Cliff that was
the only occasion where they told that
joke and they didn't either laugh or get
angry they just took it as a dead B kind
of statement of fact now then they
noticed okay he had a gap in his teeth
he was a lorry driver the pattern of
wear on his Footwear because you're a
long-distance Lorry driver match some
footprints that have been found near the
scene and they immediately went up to
the head of the inquiry and said we
should look at this guy and the guy said
does he have a Jordy accent know he's a
local man right forget it and they this
guy really bollocked them for being
suspicious I don't I don't want to see
anybody I don't want to see anybody
without a Jordy accent basically yeah Y
and um uh so now what's interesting
about that is it's as I said it's
reverse reasoning it's kind of okay and
also it involves to some extent a degree
of nose I think there's something in
this I'm not quite sure what but let's
explore it a bit further now you might
argue maybe that's how we should
actually pursue some pharmaceutical
research there's a company called helex
in Cambridge which effectively is aiming
to do pharmaceutical research backwards
which is find interestes in compounds
and see what they treat rather than
Define a narrow disease and find a way
to treat it now it's what you might call
post-rational science rather than pre-
rationalized science now a lot of
advertising Works through that way it
works backwards which is you come up
with some weird idea through some mental
process of inspiration that you're not
quite sure about and then you reverse
engineer the reasons why it might work
now a lot of people see that as cheating
just as the German you know German said
well you know we designed a a drug to
treat angina and it makes people penises
wct okay this is clearly a failure okay
well actually no it's the right answer
to a different question and it worries
me that we
discount we discount it so often when we
come up with an interesting answer to a
different question now the advertising
industry is probably relatively tolerant
of that you know you know you know I
always say look don't apologize for a
post rationalization if it's an answer
it's an answer okay how you got there
this isn't like a high school maths exam
where you have to show you're working
out okay and sometimes the the place you
get is by the way weird I always say
look in psychological issues in physics
the opposite of a good idea is wrong but
in Psychology the opposite of a good
idea might be another good idea okay
it's a bit like the difference between
you know if you like policing
conversation on the one hand and Andrew
Schultz on the other okay they're
complete opposites but they may actually
in a weird way be you know Solutions in
some kind of strange well and we you
know the psychology of humor is kind of
fascinating because it is kind of
harmless play I mean you know all
primates all mammals kind of engage in
kind of play fighting and we do it
verbally as well as physically you know
I'm not going to start wrestling with
you now that'll be completely weird okay
but we can engage in a bit of verbal
that's what banter is Banter yes and you
know and it's kind of like you know the
tone is that there's also a form that
abuse forms in friendship and Brit
British English is slightly more High
context than American English is in that
not that Americans don't do it but
British English is very much you say the
opposite understatement that in other
words tone of voice determines meaning
or context determines meaning more than
it does in American English uh that's
not me speaking that's an American by
the way it might be Jonathan
height and so that kind of verbal play
which is you know if we weren't friends
I wouldn't be able to be rude to you
like this you know which is kind of
again it's kind of reverse reasoning but
those kind of games exist all over the
place which means that actually the
opposite of something can can be just as
valuable as the thing itself if you like
and I you know I think it's important in
problem solving because I think it's an
additional string to your bow just as I
think that that solving problems
psychologically rather than
technologically is is an extra string to
your bow in terms of uh you know solving
uh difficult problems make the railway
enjoyable don't make the railway fast
Etc okay I think that's an extra that
expands the solution space and this
business of allowing people to imagine
and then work backwards which according
to um uh interestingly the scientific
method and and of course the method of
scientific funding would be unless
you've identified an absolutely clear
problem you're not allowed to do
anything
okay right you experiment now you get
some funding because you have
demonstrated the absolute Clarity of
your way ahead and the single point of
your destination okay now if you look at
someone like Andre gim who came up with
graphine you know now okay first of all
he discovered graphine with equipment
that you could have bought from Staples
on wh Smiths okay which is just taking
taking bits of pencil graphite and
endlessly pulling them apart with a bit
of
Cotate but he actually himself says I
don't like that kind of research I like
kind of what he calls hit and run
research where you just find an
interesting angle of inquiry and piss
around for a bit and see where it gets
you and then you discover the use
subsequently I think that's a good
strategy I think that's a strategy I
just wonder I just wonder about our
world where you have to win an argument
before you can act in other words you
need approval from complicated bodies of
people before you can do anything you've
got this thing about how all creatives
have to justify their ideas to
rationalist
to do it the other way Rory let's bring
this one home mate we've got lunch to
get to with and George every single time
you come on I absolutely love it thank
you for joining me what can people
expect the next couple of months well
we'll catch up again but can I also say
I mean nothing gives me more pleasure
than to see how this entire series is
just flourishing and absolutely
brilliant I think it's it's and and
there's a great quote from Jimmy Carr on
your interview where he says YouTube
became the biggest TV station in the
world and nobody noticed and I think by
the way you know we'd be wrong if we
didn't kind of end with a bit of a pin
and there's a wonderful article in the
Ft saying that you know YouTube is the
jewel in the crown of the internet uh
one of the things I recommend to
everybody by the way you said what am I
evangelizing for I'll tell you YouTube
premium oh okay subscribe to YouTube
premium and secondly watch YouTube on
your TV right yep I don't understand
okay my kids right they they want to
watch they want for [ __ ] sake right
okay everybody in your whole childhood
was how big is your Telly yeah okay
there's by the way a lovely joke about
that which is okay which is wonderful
thing which is only of value to Brits so
I really apologize so Kenneth Williams
mom was obviously pretty similar to
Kenneth Williams because they were
sitting backstage waiting for some
filming to finish on a carry-on film and
um uh someone said to uh their neighbor
which is one of the other relatives of
Charles Horry or something you know what
television have you got I've got a
14inch console to which Kenneth replied
Kenneth Williams mom replied 14 in that
would be enough to console anyone okay
so clearly there was a kind of family
tradition of absolute smut people are
watching it on their phone but we all
competed for how big your Telly was and
then I have these kids who are staring
at this sort of pathetic little letter
box watch it on your big watch YouTube
on your big Telly it's broadcast quality
nearly all of it it's 4K there's 250,000
hours of content where I think the title
starts with the words how to yeah okay
if you want to repair now what I think
has
happened is first of all we've had we've
had several YouTube Revolutions in that
well several things okay there is a
problem with certain Technologies which
is when they're new they're not quite
good enough so they hit the hype cycle
at the wrong Point yeah uh that was true
of video conferencing okay when it was
when it was when it was hyped it was a
bit [ __ ] and by the time it stopped
being [ __ ] it was too late to Hype it CU
you looked a bit like that guy in the
fast show when isn't electricity
brilliant you know premature problem
premature problem okay and I think that
happened a bit with YouTube you know it
was a bit sort of flaky it was all
filmed on crappy phone cameras you know
it was all a bit pixelated wobbly and
now actually it is the it is the only
part of the internet which has no
annoying if you have the YouTube premium
it has no annoying qualities to it at
all no and the algorithm is [ __ ] hot but
if I if I keep on following you around
the internet I'll consider that a a win
yeah Rory I love you to bits thank you
very much for likewise Mutual thank you
very much for tuning in if you enjoyed
that episode with Rory you will love my
fulllength conversation with Douglas
Murray that you can watch right here go
on give it a tap