Video summary
In this episode of the Huberman Lab Podcast, Professor Andrew Huberman interviews Matt Abrahams from Stanford Graduate School of Business to explore science-based tools for improving communication in both public and private settings. They address the evolutionary roots of stage fright, explaining that fear often stems from a deep-seated sensitivity to status risk rather than just performance anxiety. The conversation emphasizes that effective communication requires balancing what is said with how it is delivered; while content must be logical and meaningful, delivery factors like confidence, body language, and vocal timbre are equally critical for connection. Abrahams argues against the common practice of memorizing speeches or leading presentations by listing credentials, noting that these tactics burden cognitive load and delay engagement. Instead, he advocates for "Costco credibility," where trust is built through immediate relevance and value rather than titles, suggesting speakers should start with action-oriented hooks similar to opening scenes in an action movie. A significant portion of the discussion focuses on authenticity and overcoming internal judgment during interactions. Abrahams defines authentic communication as coming from a place of understanding one's own values and beliefs before articulating them, which prevents the speaker from constantly monitoring their performance or worrying about audience perception. To combat this self-judgment, he introduces an improvisation exercise where speakers must describe objects incorrectly for fifteen seconds to disrupt habitual evaluation patterns. This practice helps individuals suspend judgment in favor of flow, a skill that is particularly useful when speaking spontaneously. The dialogue also touches on the nature of legacy communication, citing iconic speeches by Steve Jobs and Martin Luther King Jr., which succeeded due to their poetic structure, timing with societal needs, and emotional resonance, contrasting these with modern information environments where signal-to-noise ratios are often lower for non-traumatic events. The interview provides practical strategies for managing anxiety and refining delivery techniques without relying on rote memorization. Abrahams suggests creating a personalized "anxiety management plan" that addresses both physiological symptoms, such as cooling the body to reduce blushing or using tongue twisters to warm up vocal cords, and psychological sources like negative future outcomes by shifting focus to present-oriented goals. He also details specific methods for eliminating filler words through breathing techniques known as "landing phrases," where a speaker intentionally inhales at the end of every sentence to create natural pauses. Furthermore, he advises on handling interruptions politely using paraphrasing to reclaim control without being rude and suggests that speakers should prepare by building their own slides rather than copying them, ensuring they have fully processed the material's narrative arc before presenting it. Finally, Abrahams addresses interpersonal dynamics, including how to win arguments without damaging relationships and how to communicate effectively with neurodivergent individuals or those who are introverted. He proposes a method for resolving conflicts by quantifying personal passion levels on a scale of one to ten, which helps partners understand that not all issues carry equal weight for everyone involved. The conversation concludes with advice on asking for raises by framing requests from the listener's perspective and preparing thoroughly through role-play rather than memorization. Throughout the episode, both hosts emphasize that while there is no single "right" way to communicate due to neurodiversity, playing to one's strengths while exploring new boundaries—such as testing unconventional presentation hooks like visual stories or music—is essential for growth. The overarching message is that communication skills can be learned and honed through deliberate practice, introspection, and a willingness to adapt strategies to fit the specific context of each interaction.
Read the full video transcript
Do you ever recommend people memorize
speeches? Never. The reason memorizing
is so bad is it burdens your cognitive
load. You've created the right way to
say it and you're constantly comparing
what you wanted to say to what you're
actually saying. So, having a road map,
having a structure, having some
familiarity with some ideas are
important. If there's certain words that
you really want to get across or certain
data, have a note card, read it. I'd
rather you do that than put the
cognitive burden on yourself of
memorizing. Several people asked about
how best to communicate with people who
are not very good at communicating. I
would encourage people to lead with
questions. Draw the other person out.
Often, if you can get them talking about
something that's important to them or
connected to what you want, then you can
engage in that conversation. So, again,
it's pre-work. It's thinking about
what's of value. Lead with questions and
then as soon as the person responds,
give them space to tell more. My
mother-in-law had a black belt in small
talk. She was amazing. She was from the
Midwest. Every time she'd fly out to
visit, she'd come off the plane with
three new best friends. And her secret,
and you mentioned this earlier, were
three words, tell me more. Once somebody
answers a question, give them that space
to say more and that really draws them
out and gives you some ideas of what's
important to them so you can latch on
and talk about it more. So, lead with
questions, give space for more
communication. That's how you draw
somebody who might be reticent or not
comfortable speaking.
Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast,
where we discuss science and
science-based tools [music] for everyday
life.
I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor
of neurobiology and ophthalmology at
Stanford School of Medicine. My guest
today is Matt Abrahams from Stanford
Graduate School of Business. Matt is an
expert in speaking and communication on
stage, online, in person, and in all
circumstances. During today's episode,
we discuss how to become a better
communicator. Everything from protocols
that work to eliminate ums, how to deal
with on stage fright, how to practice
speaking more clearly, and equally
important, how to remember important
facts and synthesize information that
you learn from others.
Humans are extremely visual and we are
extremely verbal and what we hear sticks
with us and how things are said matters
tremendously, too. We all register
people's levels of confidence or anxiety
when they speak and that determines what
we remember and what we forget and also
what we remember and forget about them.
During today's episode, Matt explains
tools that have been proven to work that
you can practice alone or that you can
use in real time to improve your
communication skills. He also explains
what it really means to communicate
authentically. We hear about
authenticity all the time, but Matt
makes clear exactly what that is, how to
tap into it, and how to deliver
information in your own unique voice. He
also offers great tools for when things
go wrong and how to recover from those
situations with grace. Matt Abrahams is
considered one of the foremost experts
in communication and I'm sure that
everyone, women, men, young and old will
benefit from what he teaches today.
Before we begin, I'd like to emphasize
that this podcast is separate from my
teaching and research roles at Stanford.
It is, however, part of my desire and
effort to bring zero cost to consumer
information about science and
science-related tools to the general
public. In keeping with that theme,
today's episode does include sponsors.
And now for my discussion with Matt
Abrahams. Matt Abrahams, welcome.
Thanks, Andrew. I'm thrilled to be here.
Teach us how to communicate better. But
please do it in the context of not just
public speaking, but one-on-one
interactions, spontaneous interactions,
as well as planned interactions.
Basically, I'm asking you to solve a
number of problems that people have, but
I think we often hear that one of the
major fears people have is public
speaking. Yeah. But I think it's highly
contextual. Like when we think public
speaking, we think like being forced out
on a stage to talk about a topic we
don't know or something, but what do you
think that fear of public speaking is
really about? Is it the fear of being
ashamed, of saying something stupid, of
like dissolving into a puddle of our own
tears on stage? What is it? Because some
sense it's kind of illogical.
Well, those of us who study this believe
it actually has an evolutionary basis.
That when our species was hanging around
in groups of about 150 people, your
relative status meant everything. And
I'm not talking about who has the fancy
car or who gets the most likes on social
media. It's who got access to resources,
food, shelter, reproduction. And if you
did something that put your status at
risk, that could be really bad news for
you. So, those of us who study this
believe it's ingrained in who we are to
be very sensitive to anything that puts
our status at risk. And that can be
being up in front of a big crowd or
talking to my boss about an important
issue. All of those put us at risk. We
often hear that
what is being said is perhaps not as
important as how it's being said, the
timbre of one's voice, the eye contact,
the body language, etc. Whenever I hear
that, I often think like it's kind of a
skewed perspective. It's got to be the
the sum total of it all, right? Yeah,
absolutely. I mean, what you say is
really important. If it doesn't make
sense, if it's not logical, if it's
confusing, that puts you in a bad light.
But similarly, how you say it, if you're
confident, if you're upright, if you use
a strong voice, that matters, too. So,
those of us who do what I do are really
intent in helping people not only craft
messages that are meaningful, but to
deliver them in a way that can actually
be connected, authentic, and and
engaging. Both are important.
So, when I think about online
communications and in-person
communications where somebody is on a
stage and they're
selected to get talk about it something
and the expectation is that they're
going to engage us.
I like to think of this concept that a
friend told me about of, you know, that
the
first thing we want to know as a as an
audience member is, you know, has this
person earned the right to have my time?
So, typically, people will talk about
their, you know, their titles and their
experience and
and so how much of the the fear of
public speaking do you think comes from
people's
need to
kind of explain or justify that they've
like earned the right to actually take
your time and and and talk to you? You
cuz you hear a lot of filling of of
credentials and things like that.
Let me just sort of counter that with
the possibility that came to me, which
is that people don't want to hear that
at all. They just want to hear what
somebody has to say. Right. And I I tend
to agree with that. I coach my my
students, the the the folks I work with
in the corporate world, that what's
really important is connection. So, if
you can show that you have some value to
bring by getting people engaged with
your topic and showing that there is
relevance and salience for them, that's
all that really matters. Your
credibility, while it informs what you
say, doesn't need to be the first thing
you say. I'm on a personal mission to
stop presentations and meetings from
starting with people just giving their
credentials, telling the titles of what
they're saying. Get us hooked. I tell
people it's like an action movie. How
does every action movie you've ever seen
start? With action. Do something that
engages the audience. I'm not saying
crash a car and jump out of a plane, but
make a provocative statement, ask a
question, give some interesting
statistics. Show what you're saying
means for the people and then you're
enabled to engage them in a dialogue and
that's where connection happens. So,
credentialing is important, but it
doesn't happen right away. You
demonstrate your credibility. I I teach
my students that there're two types of
credibility. There's your career and
college credibility, something you'd see
in your LinkedIn profile, your resume,
and then what I call Costco credibility.
You know, when you go to Costco, they
give you free samples. You try it, you
like it. Show people through the
questions you ask, through the
engagement you have, through the
relevance you bring, that's how you
build credibility. I totally agree and
this raises that issue not only of
credibility, but of authenticity. We
hear so much about authenticity,
authenticity and I've been thinking a
lot about that recently. What is this
authenticity thing? Uh you know, in
terms of people being able to tap into
it um or maybe that runs counter to
authenticity. Like you're not supposed
to tap into anything, you're supposed to
just be you. Yeah. So, I I think it
comes down to really understanding
what's important to you and what you
stand for and coming from that place.
So, what does that mean? That means when
you're talking about anything on a big
stage or in a one-on-one interaction,
understanding where the value is for you
and then articulating that in as clear a
way as possible. So, just
be
true to your beliefs, but you have to
first understand and take the time to
think about what those are. Many of us
are nervous or so worried about getting
through all our material, we don't focus
on coming from a firm, clear, connected
place. So, it really has to do with
introspection first and then you convert
that into something that's meaningful
for the audience. That's what I think
authenticity is. Yeah, I feel like part
of this authenticity thing that we're
exploring also has to do with
the person delivering the information
that they're doing it in a way where
they are not constantly monitoring
what the audience thinks of them.
This seems to be like central to
effective communication. That monitoring
for one's performance Right. and other
people's perception of them, trying to
get a running score of how well they're
doing is really runs counter to
effective communication.
>> Absolutely, 100%. It is the the more we
are in our heads judging and evaluating,
the more difficult it is to be present
and connected to somebody. I do this
activity in my class on the first day
that that really shows how in our heads
we can get. I borrowed this from
improvisation. I have my students stand
up and for 15 seconds, they just point
at different objects in the room and the
only rule is to call it something that
it is not. So, you point at the ceiling
and you call it a car. You point at the
floor and you call it a calculator.
And for 15 seconds this is very
challenging. I had a student once who's
pointing at a chair. Nothing's coming
out of his mouth. And I go up I say,
"What's going on?" He said, "I'm not
being wrong enough."
I gave no rubric, no no requirements. I
said, "Tell me more." He said, "Well, I
was going to call the chair a cat, but a
cat has four legs and a chair has four
legs. I'm not being wrong enough.
Sometimes a cat sits on a chair. I'm not
being wrong enough."
We are all on this continuum he's on
judging and evaluating. He's clearly
several standard deviations away from
most of us, but we all carry around this
judgment in our head and what it does is
it locks us internally and not allows us
to be external. So, you're absolutely
right. And when I'm focused on judging
what I'm saying,
I'm using precious cognitive bandwidth
that I could be spending on making sure
you clearly understand my message. This
is why memorizing what you're trying to
say works against you because that
precious cognitive bandwidth trying to
get it right gets in the way of actually
doing it. So, we need to train ourselves
to understand that the magic of
communication happens in the moment and
not what's happening in your head
before.
What a great exercise. Uh do you
recommend people do that on their own if
they're As long as they're not driving.
>> [laughter]
>> And you know who's really good at it?
>> a red light. That's a green light.
Exactly. Um
it's a wonderful Children are fantastic
at this because they don't have the
inhibitions that that that we do. But
anything that gets you to disrupt the
judgment and evaluation that you do can
be really helpful. Mhm. So, if just a
simple game like that, other improv
activities as well. It just gets you to
see here's what I'm doing. This is my
pattern, my habit. It it identifies the
heuristics that we carry around that
actually get in the way of our
communication.
Oh, that's so cool. I sometimes like to
play the game that I played when I was a
kid where you look at clouds and you try
and see what they look like.
And it's so much fun. And it's a very
childlike game. Right. But it forces you
to see
clouds differently. Um the contours
Yeah. uh become certain things. And then
um it's interesting that almost always
if you do this with somebody else, it's
kind of fun to do. Um it gives way to
narration where it looks like one cloud
is eating another cloud. You start
creating this narrative.
>> Yes. Right? And um I did this recently
with someone and it was it was a lot of
fun. Yeah. And it And then at some point
you're like, "Wow, that really looks
like" and then you know, whatever it was
that
we happened to see. What I think enables
that and what allows you to have that
fun is that you're suspending judgment
for a little bit and you're just letting
things flow freely. And it is in doing
that that you begin to build a
confidence in what happens in the
moment. A lot of my work recently has
been on spontaneous speaking, speaking
in the moment. And you can actually
prepare to be spontaneous. If you think
of an athlete, they do a lot of drills
and a lot of repetit- repetitive
motions.
So, when they're in the game, they can
respond appropriately. You can do the
same thing with your speaking, but part
of it is that mindset you have to take.
Get out of your own way. See what
happens in the moment and that frees you
up to do what needs to be done when
you're in that interaction.
I'd like to take a quick break and
acknowledge our sponsor, Eight Sleep.
Eight Sleep makes smart mattress covers
with cooling, heating, and sleep
tracking capacity. One of the best ways
to ensure you get a great night's sleep
is to make sure that the temperature of
your sleeping environment is correct.
And that's because in order to fall
asleep and stay deeply asleep, your body
temperature actually has to drop by
about 1 to 3°. And in order to wake up
feeling refreshed and energized, your
body temperature actually has to
increase by about 1 to 3°. Eight Sleep
automatically regulates the temperature
of your bed throughout the night
according to your unique needs. I've
been sleeping on an Eight Sleep mattress
cover for nearly 5 years now and it has
completely transformed and improved the
quality of my sleep. The latest Eight
Sleep model is the Pod 5. This is what
I'm now sleeping on and I absolutely
love it. It has so many incredible
features. For instance, the Pod 5 has a
feature called Autopilot, which is an AI
engine that learns your sleep patterns
and then adjusts the temperature of your
sleeping environment across different
sleep stages. It'll even elevate your
head if you're snoring and it makes
other shifts to optimize your sleep. If
you'd like to try Eight Sleep, go to
eightsleep.com/huberman
to get up to $700 off the Pod 5 Ultra.
This is Eight Sleep's biggest sale of
the year. It goes from now until
December 1st, 2025. Eight Sleep ships to
many countries worldwide including
Mexico and the UAE. Again, that's
eightsleep.com/huberman
to save up to $700 now through December
1st, 2025. Today's episode is also
brought to us by BetterHelp. BetterHelp
offers professional therapy with a
licensed therapist carried out entirely
online.
Now, I've been doing weekly therapy for
well over 30 years and I've found it to
be an extremely important component to
my overall health.
There are essentially three things that
great therapy provides. First, it
provides good rapport with somebody that
you can trust and discuss issues with.
Second of all, it provides support in
the form of emotional support or
directed guidance. And third, expert
therapy provides useful insights.
Insights that can allow you to make
changes to and improve your life. Not
just your emotional life and your
relationship life, but also your
professional life. With BetterHelp, they
make it very easy to find an expert
therapist that can help provide the
benefits that come from effective
therapy. Also, because BetterHelp is
done entirely online, it's very time
efficient. There's no driving to a
therapist's office, looking for parking,
etc. If you'd like to try BetterHelp, go
to betterhelp.com/huberman
to get 10% off your first month. Again,
that's betterhelp.com/huberman.
When I do
public lectures like we do or when we do
live events,
sometimes um do some crowd work
where I'll just cold call for I usually
ask for a body part and I'm always
afraid of like, "What body part
[laughter] is he going to say?" I'm
afraid cold call for
>> I try and weave it to some real
neuroscience or health related fact. And
it's always a lot of fun, but I I do it
as a way to break up the um the cadence.
Uh-huh. Sometimes I think the difficulty
in public speaking comes from the fact
that as we go out there, we we've done
some preparation.
>> Right. And maybe maybe we've memorized
it. I I typically don't. But we have
some sense of what we're going to say,
beginning, middle, end, etc.
>> Right. Uh what's on the slides. But that
the the cadence can become so regular
Yeah. that we lose people.
Yeah. And breaking up that cadence can
be helpful, I think. Um and when I step
back from public speaking experiences
both as a the speaker, but also as an
audience member,
I feel like there's a almost a song-like
nature to a a talk. Right. Where it has
an opener and then it has a
you know, a quicker pace and then it
repeats itself and it's got some
melodies and rhythms and I like to think
that really effective podcasting Yeah.
not to make ourselves conscious of
of what we're doing here has some of the
same.
Yeah, I want to tell you a story that
relates to that, but I I at some point
I'm going to shout out the word earlobe
and I want to hear how you respond to
that cuz I I just I I'm amazed that you
get up and ask people to call out body
parts.
Uh I did some work uh when I was
researching my recent book where I
interviewed the gentleman who's in
charge of all LEGO manuals. Uh I don't
know if you've ever built LEGO or not.
>> Oh, yeah. As a kid, yeah. Their manuals
have no words.
And I was I've always been fascinated by
it. In my class, I will do a lesson
where I will bring in a LEGO manual and
an IKEA manual, which is they're
antithetical. And I have my students
just discuss communication as using
these as two representations of ways to
get information across. The gentleman
who runs that group shared with me that
LEGO manual designers see the manual as
a story, as a narrative. All you're
doing is putting pieces together. But
what they found is if you put all the
same steps in the same order. You could
you could each step could be the same
number of moves with the same number of
pieces. People have a very different
experience than if you give some moves
that have a lot of hard detailed work,
some that are simpler, some that are
faster. So, that rhythm you're talking
about builds that motivation, builds
that sense of accomplishment. They're
looking to bring emotion into the act of
building LEGO models. Wow.
>> Isn't that interesting? And and that
just emphasizes what you were talking
about. Is it the Scandinavians that It's
out of Denmark, yeah. Oh, okay. My
stepmom will be very pleased that we're
talking about LEGO. She's Danish. Yeah,
yeah, yeah. Um
amazing. Yeah, isn't that fascinating?
And if you can do it with a manual that
has no words, that's just have to you
putting bricks together, think about
what you could do in your communication
one-on-one or one-to-many. What you're
talking about, the rhythm, the patterns,
the pattern disruption, all of that can
lead to that engagement.
I think about the way that we learn
things
as kids like um the ABCs.
[clears throat]
Yeah. Not just a string of letters, but
it has prosody, right? There's
inflections and Right.
A B C D. Everyone knows that, right? As
opposed to just A B C D. Kids don't
learn that way.
>> Absolutely. And putting things to music,
putting things visually are lots of ways
to help you remember.
These days we hear a lot about the fact
that
people want short-form content.
>> Yes. And yet people I can attest listen
to long-form podcasts and are still
doing that.
>> Yeah. So, I have a theory that's not
based on any data that I've seen that
people need a lot of um updating of
visual information nowadays. Yeah. You
know, they're they're scrolling
Instagram, they're scrolling TikTok,
they're they're updating I don't like
this YouTube video, switching to another
one very fast.
But with audio, long-form continuous um
presence of the same voices or voice
works. It's very soothing and we get
into a groove with that. And I actually
played this game. I um decided to just
listen to the audio coming through on
Instagram reels and just flipped them.
I wanted to And And by the fifth one it
was incredibly jarring. It's really
disruptive. It's like, "Who are these
voices and I know these voices." But the
visuals are very easy to track.
>> Interesting. Yeah.
>> And so I think that it's correct that we
can really update and we like the
novelty of of new visual information.
But that audio content needs to spool
out over long periods of time or else it
actually is is quite aversive to us.
Yeah, I heard somebody once say that the
difference of all the senses
our auditory sense requires us to slow
down more than anything else to to
actually pay attention. And I think
there's something about that slowing
down that makes us more engaged with
audio. Uh and and I think you're right.
I mean, when you
my teaching has I'm curious if your
teaching has had to change. As I teach
younger generations of students, I have
to change things up so much more
frequently. Somebody who took my class
15 years ago would be oh my goodness,
what are you doing? But in a in a 2-hour
class, I change things up like seven
times. So we go from a mini lecture to
watching a video to partnering with
somebody just to keep the students
engaged because that's where they're at.
They they need that
switching to help engage. I teach
medical students neural development and
a few other things. Yeah. And I use
slides heavily there. But what I've
realized over the years is that if
there's too much information on a slide,
Yeah. they're not going to hear anything
I say. And then if you switch a slide,
Yeah. people as somebody who studied
vision, this makes perfect sense. People
will orient towards the new visual
information and they won't hear what
you're saying in the transition.
>> Yeah.
The other thing that I'm really obsessed
by because I got my start teaching
online
on Instagram by doing drawings of
different aspects of the nervous system
and talking about them is that there's
this sweet spot when you're going to
teach something with a visual, I've
realized. That for instance, if I were
to draw um
an area of the brain or a brain circuit
accurately with a lot of detailed
information, it's too much. Right. It
they there's less learning in that case
as opposed to sparser representation of
the key elements.
But if I go to ball and stick model and
just triangles and and circles, it
doesn't work as well. So there's this
sweet spot where there's just enough
detail
but not too much where people can hear
what you're saying, see the labels, see
the stuff in it and it gets imprinted in
their brain. And when you look back
historically, I'm obsessed with the
history of medicine and the history of
teaching medicine,
when you look at the diagrams that were
really that have really propagated
through time in the field of medicine,
they're extremely sparse.
They accurately represent just a few
elements of say the immune system and
they're not the little bubble diagrams
like, "I'm a macrophage. I'm a glial
cell." Like uh-uh. They like those
little cartoons don't work Right.
>> in at least in the long run. Nor does
showing all the detail that's there. And
he's like, "Whoa, that's that's just
like drinking from a fire hose." And so
the really good teachers and anatomists
were able to just give
the appropriate dose of information
and not any more. Kind of like a great
chef would just have like not over spice
something. And it And it's not easy. No.
Um is And And you sort of have to be the
teacher and the student at the same time
to be able to do this. Well, I think
you're hitting on what's a essential
element of any effective communication,
which is really understanding your
audience and their needs. You know, so
many of us define success in
communication is just getting the
information out. I'm successful because
what I had in mind is now out. I've made
that mistake many times.
>> Yeah, right. It's It's more about what
do I need to say so that my audience
understands it better. It's not about
what I want, it's about what you need.
So I have to do reconnaissance,
reflection, and research to really think
about how best to craft my message, be
it a drawing or an important point I'm
trying to make through my words. You
really have to think about your audience
and most people don't. Most people are
just so worried about getting the
content out, they don't think about how
it lands. Success is if your audience
takes what you've said and and they're
able to do something with it and
understand it. You know, the F word of
all communication is fidelity. It's
about accuracy and clarity of
transmitting ideas. And if you're not in
sync with what your audience needs, then
you're in trouble. Most of us create one
message and just deliver it to multiple
audiences and think we've been
successful because we got it out. That's
the wrong way to think about it. So if
you're willing, could we just take a
couple of minutes and explore some of
the tools and practices and then go back
to some of the theory and then back in
the tools and practices. Um
I love this
exercise you said of like I'll point to
the mug and I'll just Yeah, shuffle
around.
>> to judge myself and I'll say bulldog
[clears throat] cuz that just is kind of
like where you know, I'm like Bart
Simpson doing the Rorschach test.
Butterfinger butter like bulldog bulldog
bulldog. But um
what is that exercise good for and when
could and should somebody apply it on
their own or with other people? That's
an exercise that I use for for two
reasons. I use it to show that we have a
tremendous amount of judgment that we
make when we communicate. Because if you
ask somebody, "Why is it so hard to call
something something?" It's it's not.
They'll say, "Well, that's not what I'm
used to or I want it to be better than
than something else I was thinking." The
other thing that I use it for is to help
elucidate how we heuristically think in
these challenging situations. So
invariably when I do this in my class,
I'll say, "Were you using any tools to
help you figure out what to say?" And
people say, "Yeah, I went in the
category of colors." Or in your case,
the category of species of of dog.
These are heuristics. Our brain is
trying to help us. And heuristics are
very important. If we didn't have them,
we wouldn't be able to make decisions.
But sometimes a heuristic locks you into
a way of thinking. So let's imagine you
and I come out of a meeting and you turn
to me and you say, "Hey Matt, how do you
think that meeting went?" I immediately
say, "Andrew wants feedback." And I can
itemize all the things that went wrong
or all the things we could have done
better. But had I been really listening,
not locked into that heuristic of
feedback, I might have noticed that you
were looking down. You were speaking
more slowly and softly than usual. Maybe
what you wanted in that moment was not
feedback, but what you wanted was
support cuz you knew the meeting went
bad. So if I lock into a heuristic too
soon and not understand that I locked
into that heuristic, I might take our
communication in a direction that isn't
productive or could be harmful. The
situation I just described you actually
happened to me with a colleague and I
itemized all the things that we did
wrong. It took me 6 months to repair
that relationship because he didn't want
to hear what went wrong. He knew. He
wanted me to give some support in that
moment. So that exercise is to help us
understand that we do a lot of judging
that we don't need to do and that we
have these heuristics or patterns that
we get into that don't allow us to be
present and respond to what's needed.
Could you define heuristic? I I believe
I know what it means, but So it sounds
like you mentioned heuristic and pattern
and as kind of synonymous, but
maybe just define it for people.
>> So to me, a heuristic is a tool that we
use often unconsciously to help us
reduce the uncertainty in a particular
situation. So for example, imagine I'm
in the grocery store and I'm trying to
pick out
the best tomato sauce or the best
ketchup. I might use a heuristic of
which is the cheapest. How many
offerings from one brand are there? That
must be the best brand to buy. So these
are mental shortcuts that we use to help
us in uncertain situations.
I'm recalling a story where when I was a
junior professor, meaning before I had
tenure, my first graduate student who's
now phenomenal professor in her own lab
at the University of at the University
of Utah, excuse me. Um
We were in my office and we were talking
about something related to her first
manuscript and I went on this long
description of what we would need to do
with the analysis and this and that. And
she sat very quietly and then she said
to me,
"Could you be more specific?" And I
thought, "Oh my goodness, I just spoke
for like 5 minutes." And I think what
she's asking is, "What in the world are
you saying?" Which is probably what she
was asking. She's probably going to
chuckle when she hears this. Right.
And she had this amazing way of asking
questions like that. Mhm. She would say,
for instance, Um
uh tell me more. Yeah. Or
what exactly do you want me to do
for these experiments in the next couple
of weeks? Right.
>> And then she'd usually tell me a better
idea as all great graduate students do.
Right. Um but
I feel like that's a bit of this. It's
It's that I was coming to it from the
perspective of um kind of a fluency of
of uh
this sort of expectation that we both
were on the same page and we weren't.
>> Right.
>> Not because I was the professor and she
was the student. Actually, she was
closer to the data than I was because
she collected the data.
>> Right.
>> But um that's the sort of interaction
that one-on-one you can catch and you
can course correct. Right.
>> But in public speaking,
often times people just get off stage
and they either realize it went poorly
or they get the feedback that it went
poorly. My post doc advisor once said,
"If you get questions after a talk, it
means you did well." Yeah, absolutely.
>> don't, it means they just want to get
rid of you and have you go off stage."
Right.
>> So now when I get questions after a
talk, I'm like, "Okay, excellent." Like
that means you [clears throat] engaged
people, they have questions. Um so take
note of that. If people have questions,
it's very likely you you you bull's-eyed
it. Absolutely. And
you're highlighting that if we get into
our heads, we're we're not able to
assess what's going on in the moment. A
lot of communication is responding. And
so I need to be present enough to see
how my audience is responding. Are they
looking confused? Do they look upset?
Then I can adjust and adapt. So, we have
to be in that moment enough to be
present so we can respond. And the
preparation work we do in advance helps
us be better prepared. Now, I would
argue that in the example you just gave
with your former graduate student, part
of the issue that I think she might have
been having is when you relate the
information, it was just a list or
litany of things. And our brains aren't
very good at remembering lists. I mean,
I I always will joke with my students,
when you go to the grocery store, how
many items do you need to buy before you
have to write something down? For me,
it's three. I just can't remember much
in lists.
If you provide a structure to the
information, it makes it much easier. It
increases processing ability. So, a
structure is nothing more than a logical
connection of ideas. Everybody listening
has seen structure. If you've ever
watched a television ad, most ads are in
the structure of problem, solution,
benefit. There's some issue or challenge
in the world, the product or service
makes it better, and you benefit in some
way.
That's a structure. There's a logical
connection. It's like a story. It's a
beginning, middle, and an end. And our
brains are wired for that. We we
understand story better than just a
random list of things. I'll joke with my
students, bullets kill. Don't put a lot
of bullet points on a slide because
you're not helping yourself. So, in that
interaction you had with your graduate
student, I wonder if she would have
understood it better had you structured
the information in a way that's logical.
A great structure for that might have
been three questions. What, so what, now
what?
Here's what I Here's what I want you to
do. Here's why it's important. Here's
the next steps to help you accomplish
it. All of a sudden, it becomes easier
for me to digest and understand. So,
structure is critical to helping get
messages across.
Yeah, across those first five years of
having my lab, I learned that the best
way to interact with students and
postdocs, the most effective way,
was to have them stand at the white
board in my office
and write things down as we talked about
a project.
And the things they would write down,
we would eventually cross some things
out, maybe make some edits, but those
were the as we call the do outs that
they were going to take to the next
phase of experiments.
By putting them in control of what the
critical information was,
>> Right. they could also stop me and say,
like, what would happen here? So, that's
a very dynamic interaction. It's not a
typical lecture-type interaction. But,
I've found that that works really well
in other types of situations, too. Yeah.
Where the person can take notes, can ask
questions about things that were
unclear,
but
where I
get a strong sense of what their
takeaway was, and also where I fell
short or perhaps, in rare cases,
succeeded in communicating what I'm
trying to communicate.
>> Right. Uh I love that you are taking the
time to have those interactions where
there's that you get feedback in real
time. And there are things you can build
into more formal or bigger types of
communication situations. I can take
polls. I can have people partner or pair
with each other and share some
information back. There
virtual tools allow you to to do lots of
things. People can give you reactions as
you're as you're communicating. There
are ways to get feedback in real time
that allow you to adjust and adapt. But,
one, you have to build in those
opportunities in the structure, and two,
you have to be present enough to pay
attention to what's going on.
Do you recommend people tape themselves
giving lectures and then review those
videos? Absolutely. I I make all of my
students as part of the work that they
do, they have anytime they do a public
presentation, it could be a panel
simulation, a meeting simulation, a
speech, they digitally record themselves
and they have to watch it three times.
Once with sound only, no video. Once
with video only, no sound. And then once
both together. And anybody who does this
will notice different things, both
positive and negative.
I tell everybody it's like going to the
dentist. Nobody likes going, but
everybody's really glad they've been
because you you see so much and you
learn and
I I know many great communication
teachers. The best teacher is watching
yourself communicate. I assume you have
watched yourself. Have you learned
things when you watch what you see?
Yeah, I
I
I will listen to podcasts with guests,
and I do listen to solos to try and see
where I can improve. Right. Uh I have
one or two people who
I seek feedback from, Mhm. and I
have always done my best to implement
that feedback.
>> Yeah. Um I mean, I'm not going to share
what some of the the things were because
some of it some of it was subtle, but
but um
and I never would have observed in
myself and then turned out to be very
useful. I mean, what When I think of
effective communication on stage or in a
podcast or in any form, really, I feel
like it's really about getting outside
the self-judgment. Right. And at the
same time, you have to be connected to
your audience. I mean,
and this is especially difficult on
podcasts where it's a solo podcast. I'm
talking to a camera, but I just imagine
it's a an audience like a classroom.
That's right. And yet, hands aren't
going up, at least not then. They go up
when we post it and you see the comments
and
critiques from time to time as well. And
And those are very useful. I mean,
coming from the landscape of teaching in
the classroom, large lectures, small
lectures, and doing peer-reviewed
science, you get a very thick skin. Yes.
And yet, nothing quite prepares you for
being public-facing. And now,
everybody's public-facing unless they
block their comments section. I mean,
most everybody out there, the the you
know, the mom posting the cake she made
for her kids and uh the kid posting the
the birthday party photo. They're
Everybody's public-facing now. Right.
And so, I think it gives people a
thicker skin, but it I think for a lot
of people it can be um it can be
damaging for them. I like though that
you are taking the time to reflect and
seek feedback. I often say the only way
you get better at communication is three
things, repetition, reflection, and
feedback. You got to practice. Nobody
has ever thought their way to better
communication. You have to do it. You
have to reflect. You know, that
definition of insanity, doing the same
thing over and over again expecting
different results. That's how many
people communicate. Every night before I
go to bed, I spend 1 minute writing down
what went well and what didn't go well
in my communication that day. And every
Sunday, I spend 5 minutes going back
over the previous week and I make a plan
for the following week. I am not saying
I'm a great communicator, but I
certainly believe I'm a better
communicator because I've been doing
that practice for years. You do that
every week? Every day. Every day. Every
day. I have a journal. I write down one
or two things that I thought went well
and one or two things I did thought
didn't go well. And then I pick one on
the Sunday, I review them. And it it has
helped me. And then the final step in
that is feedback. You have to have
trusted others who can give you honest
feedback. But, yeah, that reflection
practice I've been doing for a long
time. How long? Probably
I think it was after my kids were So,
probably at least 15, 16 years. Awesome.
Well, this is why you're a Stanford
professor. This is one of the great
pleasures of being at Stanford. I mean,
we're not at Stanford at this moment,
but I have to say, I mean, there are
other great universities on the planet,
but I love it because
>> [laughter]
>> everybody who's on the faculty there and
the students. I mean, the the students
are really the the phenoms of the place.
Let's let's be honest, but
is so committed to their craft. Yeah.
Also true elsewhere, but since
Stanford's the experience I know, it's
it's just so awesome. You teach
communication and you're taking notes on
your own communication every day and
reviewing at the end of the week.
Correct. Fantastic. Um
Yeah, I think feedback is great. I think
that um being a selective filter for
feedback Mhm. Yes. is great. I I do like
to listen to other lectures. I listen to
a lot of Yeah. lectures that perhaps
other people would find boring based on
content or delivery. Um
and I learn a lot from
people's styles. Yeah. Um you know, it's
also interesting to pull from
the communication styles of people in
really distant genres.
Um I won't mention some of these, but um
you know, if you look at different
fields of entertainment and
communication, some people use more
physicality. Some people are are more
rigid. Um I think there's a lot to be
learned from exploring these other
landscapes. I 100% agree. I'm very
fortunate that the podcast I host, I get
to interview some of the world's best
communicators, and it is such a treat to
not only engage them in thinking through
their craft,
but seeing them do it and observing the
different ways people do things. I And
it doesn't have to be somebody who's
famous or or has a whole bunch of
notoriety. One of my son's kindergarten
teachers taught me so much about how to
stay calm under pressure, how to monitor
and manage and facilitate interaction.
We just have to pay attention to it and
be open to it. Not so that we copy, but
so that we get ideas and we see how
people do things. The way you break down
complex biological processes, I find
amazing in terms of the accessibility
that you bring to it. That's a skill
that somebody who is programming, you
know, some programmer somewhere could
use to explain to their end users how
this works. We need to borrow and
understand what people do.
We get caught up in our own way of doing
it. And And watching others, I think is
is a best way to do it.
Long ago, I realized that when there's a
certain amount of energy in the body,
what we call autonomic arousal,
sympathetic tone, whatever, you know,
people say fight or flight. But, when
there's a lot of energy in the body,
which is often the case when we're going
to give a talk or we're in a novel
situation, doesn't have to be on stage,
that allowing oneself to physically
move, to walk, to pace, to gesticulate,
helps dispel some of that energy um and
makes it a lot easier to deliver the
information than were one to just sit
really still and try and, you know,
funnel all that through the words mouth.
Right? When we're calm you know, and
relaxed we can sit back and just move
our mouth and our eyes a little bit and
our head a little bit. So, I've seen
that some of the best public speakers
know when to pace,
know when to stand rigid, and
it may be rehearsed, I don't know, but
they're they're not um
running against their natural tendency
in those moments.
Um and like there's a there's one
neuroscientist, he's actually been a
guest on this podcast before. I won't
embarrass him by saying who it is. And
he has so much mental vigor and energy.
And the first time I saw him give a talk
was actually at Harvard Medical School
for the 50th anniversary of a
foundation. And he got up there and he
grabbed the microphone and he gave the
talk like this. And I thought to myself,
he's going to eat the microphone.
He's going to eat the microphone. And he
gave the most spectacular talk. And he
was funneling all his energy into that
microphone. Right. And I realized this
guy isn't moving at all, but I I thought
it was totally reasonable at some point
he was just going to take a huge chunk
out of the thing. And And of course he
didn't. I thought wow, he brought us all
to that one location. Now, clearly he's
a very experienced and skilled
communicator.
But he's also an expert in that topic.
And this is the thing that I always
would remind my students and postdocs
who had some understandable stage
fright. Which is
there's no way that you aren't among at
least the top three people
in the room in terms of the knowledge of
what you're talking about. Yes. Right?
Like
probably
have the most knowledge. But maybe
someone else is an expert there, which
can be a little scary. But at least
you're then you're kind of their peer.
So, to remind oneself that in most
situations where we're public speaking,
you're among the top experts in that.
You spent the most time with the
material at least compared to the
audience. Well, and I would add to that
that often when we're in those
situations, the audience actually wants
to learn from us. They're there because
they want to take value from us. They're
not there to critique and judge and
evaluate. Although that can happen.
People don't like watching people fail
and flail. We we want to get some value.
And if you remind yourself that I have
value to bring
and the audience wants that value, that
can reduce some of the temperature of
that. With regard to movement, I think
movement is great. You just don't want
it to be distracting. So, there's some
rules or ideas around movement. So, move
when appropriate during transitions. You
know, stand-up comedians have have a
rule that they try to follow is you
never want to walk during the punchline.
You want to land the punchline. All of
us when we communicate, we have
punchlines. We have things that that
really we want to have land. Stand still
during that. But as you're doing the
setup, move. So, decide when you start,
come in, move forward. So, movement can
can help you with that anxiety, but it
also can help your audience understand
what's what's important and what's not
important. So, if I'm transitioning from
one point to the next and I physically
move or I turn my body at the table if
I'm seated, that signals information to
you that's helpful for you to know.
We're moving from one place to the next.
So, use this need to move in a
purposeful way. I didn't realize that
comedians don't deliver the punchline
while moving, but now that makes perfect
sense. Right, cuz you're distracting
your audience.
Even Chris Rock who moves a lot will
sometimes stop during the punchline.
We've known for a long time that there
are things that we can do to improve our
sleep. And that includes things that we
can take. Things like magnesium
threonate, theanine, chamomile extract,
and glycine. Along with lesser-known
things like saffron and valerian root.
These are all clinically supported
ingredients that can help you fall
asleep, stay asleep, and wake up feeling
more refreshed. I'm excited to share
that our long-time sponsor AG1 just
created a new product called AGZ. A
nightly drink designed to help you get
better sleep and have you wake up
feeling super refreshed. Over the past
few years, I've worked with the team at
AG1 to help create this new AGZ formula.
It has the best sleep supporting
compounds in exactly the right ratios in
one easy-to-drink mix. This removes all
the complexity of trying to forage the
vast landscape of supplements focused on
sleep and figuring out the right dosages
and which ones to take for you. AGZ is
to my knowledge the most comprehensive
sleep supplement on the market. I take
it 30 to 60 minutes before sleep. It's
delicious, by the way. And it
dramatically increases both the quality
and the depth of my sleep. I know that
both from my subjective experience of my
sleep and because I track my sleep. I'm
excited for everyone to try this new AGZ
formulation and to enjoy the benefits of
better sleep. AGZ is available in
chocolate, chocolate mint, and mixed
berry flavors. And as I mentioned
before, they're all extremely delicious.
My favorite of the three has to be I
think chocolate mint, but I really like
them all. If you'd like to try AGZ, go
to drinkagz.com/huberman
to get a special offer. Again, that's
drinkagz.com/huberman.
Today's episode is also brought to us by
Juve. Juve makes medical-grade red light
therapy devices. Now, if there's one
thing that I've consistently emphasized
on this podcast, it is the incredible
impact that light can have on our
biology. Now, in addition to sunlight,
red light and near-infrared light
sources have been shown to have positive
effects on improving numerous aspects of
cellular and organ health, including
faster muscle recovery, improved skin
health and wound healing, improvements
in acne, reduced pain and inflammation,
even mitochondrial function, and
improving vision itself. What sets Juve
lights apart and why they're my
preferred red light therapy device is
that they use clinically proven
wavelengths, meaning specific
wavelengths of red light and
near-infrared light in combination to
trigger the optimal cellular
adaptations. Personally, I use the Juve
full-body panel about three to four
times a week. And I use the Juve
handheld light both at home and when I
travel. Right now, Juve is having their
biggest sale of the year. From now
through December 1st, 2025, you can save
up to $1,000 on select Juve devices
during their Black Friday sale. Just go
to juve.com/huberman.
That's j o o v v.com/huberman.
Some exclusions apply.
I wonder if you've observed in the
classroom that
social media and other
newer forms of content are changing
people's expectation of how engaging
something should be. Because the on-ramp
to social media is a very fast one. I've
never observed anything that brings
people to focus so quickly unless it's
um seeing something really disturbing,
which nobody wants to see. But you know,
if you if you suddenly see two cars
crashing, you're completely focused on
that. You're not going to go back to
what you were doing. Right. But setting
aside
bad events, traumatic events,
social media has an incredibly smooth
and fast on-ramp to a focal point, which
has got you in the box. Yeah. Yeah, a
book doesn't typically do that for
people. Right. Uh so, what's happening
now um
in terms of what you observe with
people's expect audiences' expectation
of how engaging something needs to be?
>> Yeah, so I I see this play out in a
couple ways. One, when you when you
think about a multi-generational
workforce or a place where
multi-generations are together. You
know, people of our vintage, although
I'm older than you are, uh
expect relationships and communication
to unfold in a certain way. And I think
younger generations expect things to be
quicker and more transactional.
And when we come together, that can
breed misunderstanding and sometimes
conflict. So, I I see it play out there
and I find it really interesting. And I
try to coach the the students I have
that they have to be appreciative of the
ways in which people connect in the ways
in which people expect information to
come in.
You know, if if you're just going to
keep texting me things and I actually
want you to pick up the phone so I can
hear it in your own voice, that's going
to cause some some issues. So, we have
to appreciate that others have different
ways of taking in information.
I find that many of the younger students
that I communicate with, it's hard for
them to do some of the initial work that
we have to do in relationship building,
trust building. Uh it just because they
expect things are used to things
happening really fast. And a lot of
communication, a lot of connection at
least at first takes time.
So, it's helping people appreciate the
time spent up front can lead to the
exciting and in-depth connection that
comes later. So, it is it is changing
for sure.
I was trying to think before our
conversation what would be the
the one piece of advice
to give people so that they are um
more at ease with communicating in novel
environments, on stage or off stage. And
what popped to mind for me was
um be friendly with people. I'm
naturally pretty friendly. Like if I'm
getting a coffee, I'll be like, how's
your day going? Or like I I will ask
that and I'm genuinely curious. How's
your day going? Now, it's rare that
somebody says like today sucks.
Occasionally they do. Um
uh usually they say, oh, it's pretty
good. Like how are you doing? But in an
Uber for instance, I often find myself
in conversation with people. Like
conversation is pretty fluid for me. I
realize for other people it's not.
>> Right. People won't believe this, but
I'm actually very introverted. I spend a
lot of time by myself, but I like people
and I'm reasonably friendly and they're
friendly with me. So, I I think being
friendly helps
you get good at communication. Yeah. Uh
wouldn't you say? Yeah, absolutely. I
mean, my answer to that question would
be curiosity. I lead with curiosity. Ask
questions, observe things, point them
out. You know, a lot of people hate
small talk because they don't know how
to do it. But if if you lead with
curiosity, if you ask a question and you
observe, that's where I think we can can
one make it move forward in a way that's
more fluid and more comfortable for
people. And quite frankly, people are
most at ease talking about themselves.
And so, if you can get people talking
about something that's important to
them. And then, you know, there's a
whole science behind conversation. And
uh people who study conversation look at
turn-taking. Cuz if you think about it,
conversation is just taking turns. There
are turns that are supportive where you
say something and I support what you
say. So, you might say, "Hey Matt, I
just got back from Maui." And I could
say, "Oh, that's great. Uh where'd you
stay? What did you do?" Or I could say,
which is the other type of turn, which
is switching. I could say, "Oh, I just
got back from Costa Rica." And a good
conversation does both.
So being curious and then managing the
switching and supporting turns allow for
that conversation not only to develop,
but it allows you to get closer and more
intimate if you will. That is closer in
terms of trust building in the
relationship you have.
Yeah, almost always in Los Angeles uh
I ask my Uber driver where they're from
Mhm. because often times it seems that
they have accents and I can't place the
accent Right. and almost always I learn
about a great restaurant based on Yeah.
their their
their ethnicity, right?
>> I found what I think is the best
Armenian restaurant in Los Angeles as a
consequence of a great Uber ride. So
yeah, leading with curiosity. I I don't
say where's the best
restaurant.
Right. I I think it inevitably leads to
food, it seems. Dogs are food.
I'm curious about linearity versus
non-linearities in storytelling. Yeah.
You know, some people
have a style where
they can spin a lot of plates
simultaneously. Mhm. I imagine it. You
know, they they can start one thread,
maybe open up a couple other threads.
Some people have a very linear style.
Some people won't reference things they
said earlier. Some people will
constantly reference things they said
earlier. I suppose it
depends. But in general, if one is
trying to communicate information
what's best from the standpoint of of
people learning the information? So
as a teacher, as somebody who's trying
to convey information that's important
to people, I believe a linear approach
that clearly lays out the foundations
and builds is probably best to help
people really understand. Often in
educating you're layering, you're
scaffolding, and that leads to a linear
approach. That said
the more
spurious
approach, the the approach that has lots
of different avenues can be much more
engaging.
And can also be successful. And it
really doesn't have to be either or. I
think you can have a high-level linear
view
that you're taking your audience on that
journey, but at different points you can
branch off and and share some
interesting information.
You know, I see being a good speaker as
like being a good tour guide. And I
actually was a tour guide at one point
in my life. A good tour guide does a
really nice job of setting expectations
of where you're going. Most people won't
go on a tour if they don't know where
they're going. If I showed up and said,
"I'm your tour guide, let's go." You
might say, "Yeah, I don't know where
we're going." But if I say, "Hey, we're
going to do this and this and we're not
going to do that." Then you can relax
and feel comfortable and come with me.
And I let you know at each point where
we're moving to the next place.
But along the way, we can meander, we
can wander, we can go check out some
things and come back. So as long as
people have directionality
and everything fits as a a larger
narrative, I think you can play with
either of these. But when it comes to
strict education, I think we've got good
evidence that a linear approach that
scaffolds is really what's most helpful.
Do you think that if people want to get
better at communication, they should
practice being a tour guide? I think
adopting that that that mindset that
hey, taking you through my material, I'm
like a tour guide. How would a tour
guide explain this? They would introduce
at the beginning, set expectations.
They'd make sure that you understand why
we're moving from one place to the next.
And when you're done, they really want
you to take something away of value. I
mean, most tour tours end up in the gift
shop, right? Your gift to your audience
is something they can take away and do
something with. So I think using that
analogy, seeing what your job is through
those that lens can be really helpful.
I'm remembering back to grade school
where we were asked to bring an object
that was really important to us and then
>> kids would get up in front of the
classroom and
>> Yeah. And of course it what a what a
beautiful exercise for kids to Yeah.
partake in because of course they know
more about that object than anybody.
But I remember seeing or hearing
different um styles. Yeah. Some people
get in there and they'll be like, "This
is my whatever." Yeah. Like transformer
and they're really out there with their
"This is my uh you know, my goldfish." I
had some goldfish. Um
and then occasionally
not so occasionally you get this kid
that would say, "Well, this is my pen."
And then and then you're like and you're
like to speak up and then and and
they're just not comfortable
>> Right. sharing their Right. they're
clearly
intimate knowledge about this object and
why it's important. They I mean, you
could just tell like they're they're
closed up. Right.
>> And so you tell them to speak louder and
then they'd speak louder, but I think
that's a lot of people. Right.
>> They're just not comfortable
projecting their thoughts out into the
room. Right. What is the
quote unquote solution or or how do we
make space for these people? I'm I'm not
saying this for like politically correct
reasons, but I wholeheartedly believe
that these people harbor tons of useful
knowledge.
Maybe they want to get that knowledge
out, but maybe that's just not the
medium for them. Maybe they write or
maybe they just
don't want to share their favorite
object. Yeah. So I'm I'm sure you
encounter people like this, but by
virtue of the fact that they're going
into a particular job or or line of work
that they they're told they have to get
good at speaking to a whole room.
Yeah, and I think that's unfortunate
when people say you must be better at
this. There are lots of ways to
communicate and everybody should find a
vehicle in a way that's helpful for
them. There are some roles that require
certain types of communication and if
that isn't something you're comfortable
with, maybe you look at a different
role, but I believe we can all learn our
communicate and develop our
communication skills.
I've spent much of my career helping
people feel more comfortable and
confident speaking in front of others,
working on anxiety that goes around it.
Helping people to see that there are
lots of ways to communicate. Maybe I
don't have to hold this object up and
make it about me and my object. Maybe I
tell a story about the object or I tell
a story about how I came to have the
object. So it's less about me and it's
more about the story. If we can get
people to distance themselves sometimes
from the the fear itself and get others
engaged, it can work really well. I
coached a very senior leader at a at a
very big company everybody's familiar
with and he was really really nervous.
And as he got promoted, he had larger
and larger audiences. And what he would
do, what we worked on doing is in
essence distracting the audience right
at the beginning. He would start by
saying, "Let's watch this 30-second
video." And then when the video was
over, he became a facilitator of what
just happened. So what did you think?
What does this mean? And he was much
more comfortable facilitating
interaction than actually being the
center of attention. So there are a lot
of things we can do that that accomplish
the goal of communicating the
information that's not about the
spotlight being on me communicating it.
And I want to share one example of or
take the the story about the kids doing
show and tell. I used to do that in my
undergraduate classes But I would I had
a wrinkle on it. I'd have people bring
in an object and they'd have to share
it. I had them use that what so what now
what structure. And then I had them tell
about an object that they thought about
bringing in, but they didn't. So then
they had to say what that object was and
why they chose not to bring it in. And
that was far more illuminating about the
person and we talk about authenticity.
People just emoted in a way that they
didn't when they had this thing that
I've I've made sure to think about this
and it's going to make me look good and
I've I've architected my conversation
about this one object. But when they
talked about the other object, their
passion came out, their conversational
nature came out. It was really
illuminating to do that. My graduate
advisor told me that she'd much rather
give a talk to an entire room full of
people or an empty room than one person.
Yeah. It's hard to do it for one person.
Yeah. I think she's unique in that
sense. I think most people are terrified
of giving a talk to a room full of
people.
I still don't know why Right. but that's
not because it's easy for me. I just I'm
just I wonder what it is. I mean, you
said there's this evolutionary basis
>> I think it's that. I think the the
consequences seem more real when you're
in front of more people.
For me personally, the the the group
size that's most anxiety provoking is
between like 10 or 12. Once you get
above 12, 20, 100, 1,000 people, it
becomes to me more anonymous.
But it's that 10 to 12 range that's most
difficult. So in terms of how how you
can best practice, I do you know,
vocalizing it is the most important
part.
>> Say it out loud.
>> Say it out loud. You know, I'm amazingly
eloquent in my mind. I'm not always as
lucky when I open up my mouth. So you
have to actually say it out loud. We
make so many assumptions in our mind,
connect dots that when we actually speak
it, we realize they don't do that.
Recording yourself obviously and
listening,
getting trusted others.
You just have to get it out. And this
isn't just for a big public speaking. I
mean, this is in a high-stakes
interpersonal communication. Maybe I
want to ask my boss for a raise. Maybe I
have to give some feedback to a
colleague that's not great.
I have to practice this stuff and I have
to think about not only what am I going
to say, but I also have to anticipate
the responses and maybe role-play some
of that as well. You know, athletes do
lots of drills. So when they're in the
game, they can play it well. We need to
do the same thing. It it amazes me when
I work with with senior leaders of
companies and they'll say, "Oh, I
practiced the presentation once or twice
and I'm ready to go." And I think think
about a stand-up comedian. How many
times they practice their routine over
and over again? How can in just one or
two times flipping through the slides
you have that content? So getting it
out, practicing it, getting the reps,
absolutely important. One person, 10
people, nobody, it needs to be
practiced. We do think we know
how to say something until reality hits
us square in the face. Yeah. It's almost
like if we read a word many many times
and we think we know how to pronounce it
>> and then at some point we're required to
pronounce it or we pronounce it
incorrectly and then we realize we've
been It's actually pronouncing it in our
head incorrectly for a very, very long
time.
>> You and I talked prior and I I shared
with you I've done martial arts for a
long time. And when you learn a new
move, you learn it in the air and you
can become a really great You can do
that move really well, but then when you
meet another person and have to practice
that move, that's where reality sets in.
And that's that's exactly what you're
talking about. You have to You have to
experience it in reality, in the real
world, and then you see where you're
really at.
Yeah, I'm not a martial artist, but
years ago
like
spent a little time in a boxing gym and
I have to tell you shadow boxing is not
the same as getting hit and the heavy
bag doesn't hit back. I mean, it has
some, you know, physical weight to it
that's different than shadow boxing, but
it's a whole other experience. Exactly.
Like anything. It's that feedback. Yeah,
I've been um really intrigued by the uh
famous choreographer Twyla Tharp. She's
now in her 80s. She's incredible.
Said and written incredible things about
choreography and
um she said that she has this practice
where she'll um sort of develop a dance
routine, then go through it in her head,
then because she was a dancer, she can
try it and then she has people
do it and then imagine it and then they
iterate thousands and thousands and
thousands of times before they actually
even perform it once in front of a small
audience and and not publicly. So, it's
it's an incredible thing that we would
expect ourselves to be able to like get
up and communicate information really
well without having done that. One new
world that I think is really interesting
with regard to this rehearsal is there's
there's some VR tools now that you can
actually don and practice the
presentation and you can see a simulated
audience. And you And some of these
tools you can actually program the
audience's responses. You can say
they're favorable or they're ignoring
you. So, you can desensitize yourself.
And I think that's a really interesting
vehicle for people, especially people
who are phobic, to desensitize, to to
get in the in the goggles and practice
the presentation. And some of them you
can actually, if you have slides, you
can upload the slides and you can
practice referring to them. So, I I
think it's not only in reality, but in
virtual reality we can practice and
prepare, too.
Do you think that if somebody wants to
get more fluid at uh presenting
information that they could uh
find a a friend who would select an
object in the room for them at random
and then they'd have to give a
brief improv talk about it or something
like that, just to get comfortable
taking on topics with some level of
fluidity? Yeah, I think improvisation is
is a wonderful way to get better at
communicating. Because improv isn't
about being funny. Improv is about being
in the moment and responding to what's
needed. And so, yeah, doing anything
like that. You don't even need a friend.
You can just look at an object and start
talking about it. Describe it. Share a
story about it. All of that could be So,
you could flip open a book and pick a
word and then just talk about what that
word means. Those are some of those
agility drills that can help you be
better when you're put on the spot. And
And it builds a confidence, too. It's
like, I can do that. If I can do this
when I pick a random word, I can do this
when somebody asks me a question that I
know a lot about the topic on. So, it's
a way of building confidence and helping
with that in the moment processing.
I feel like people over the age of 15
are not
terribly comfortable
embracing these theater-like games
because it seems childlike. But it's
actually that childlike level of
curiosity and communication that you're
seeking when you
to be an effective communicator. Yeah, a
class I co-teach at Stanford through
their continuing studies program is
called Improvisationally Speaking. I
partner with a gentleman named Adam
Tobin, who's an excellent improviser,
and together I bring the communication
piece. And it's a way of giving people
baby steps and permission to do some of
these improv games because we directly
link a particular improv activity to a
specific communication need. And when
people see that, they open up. Uh at
Stanford's Graduate School of Business,
there are several courses that bring in
improvisational
ideas into very serious things that How
How to be a manager and adapt to
management skills through improv. How to
demonstrate your status and power
through some of the things that that
improv teaches. So, taking improv or at
least understanding some of those
principles certainly can help.
When I think about the truly archival
important information on the internet,
very few things break through. I
sometimes play this game. I think like
What is like true legacy content on the
internet? And one of the things that
breaks through is Steve Jobs'
2015, I think it was,
commencement speech at Stanford.
The I Have a Dream speech, obviously
Martin Luther King, JFK said some
some pretty important things.
Those were written speeches.
And they're reading from a script.
And they include story in many cases.
So,
it fits and yet
the Jobs speech, which I've listened to
many times,
um
he's reading from a piece of paper. So,
it runs counter to a lot of what we're
talking about and yet it's extremely
effective communication. Why do you
think those examples, let's just say
JFK, Martin Luther King, Steve Jobs, I
should probably include a few others,
but those are the ones that come to
mind. Why do you think those are at
least among the most effective
um
incidents of
great communication that linger in
people's mind?
Well, there's several factors. One, I
think is that they're incredibly well
written. They are they are poetic. They
are aspirational. They use rhetorical
flourishes that that make them
memorable. Repetition, alliteration,
things like that.
They also are in a context in a time
when those messages were really
important and needed. And though they
echo, they connect at a level of what's
going on in the zeitgeist of the moment.
JFK's moonshot speech, Martin Luther
King's civil rights speech,
Steve Jobs, I would argue what was going
on in the economy and the environment at
that time, that message really
resonated. So, I think it's a match of
context and timing. It's a match of
really important ideas presented in a
really important way with specific
retorical flourishes that really make
them memorable. And And
I think also the the character that
those people brought to it also makes a
difference as well. I think other people
could say those words and not have the
same impact.
I'm having a hard time coming up with
a memory from the last 5 to 10 years
of really important public communication
moments.
I can remember certain things happening
that were televised and online,
um but those were more
things that happened.
I think we're getting noisier.
No, I think I know we're getting
noisier. There are more messages out
there.
Uh even in the the case of Steve Jobs,
which was the most recent in the example
you gave, things weren't as noisy. It
wasn't as crowded, right? And so, I
think it's hard to hear those phrases or
those speeches in these environments
where there's so much noise going on.
Certainly when we observe traumatic
events, Yes. those are flashbulb
memories. I remember the shuttle
disaster, certainly 9/11. I think the
most salient recent one would be the
assassination assassination, excuse me,
of Charlie Kirk.
Um you know, everyone knew about that.
It was And it was
And it was on video. Right. Right.
That's so it's such a different thing
for people to see a grainy video versus
a high-definition video, Right. um
which is what we see now.
Um So, that in some sense,
you know, it creates this different
threshold for what what's memorable.
Right. And And those are all tragic
events.
JFK's assassination, you know, we it's
this grainy video and and sort of shot
at a distance and very few things get in
the in the domain of
of not tragic, not traumatic,
uh get big signal to noise that really
lasts long.
I think that's true and I think people
that we don't have the the people aren't
referring to the same channels. So,
people are getting the information
differently as well. And And that's also
dividing our attention. So, we're not
seeing these things really bubble up.
But I do think it's also a commentary on
where we're at as a society as well. I
think it would be lovely if we heard
more and more positive
speeches that resonate with people that
we're citing and quoting years from now.
Yeah, I think about this a lot. Um you
know, I think about
um the non-bad events that
that get big signal to noise.
And there
I can't None come to mind right now.
Forgive me, folks, if I'm missing some
recent thing where some puppy did a
super cute thing, but there's so many
millions of those videos that I think
we've become saturated. It's like the uh
uh information equivalent of highly
processed food. Like our senses have
been dulled. I think there's some truth
in that. And And I also think we're
we're
moving away from traditional oration as
the way it used to be done. Right? There
just aren't forms for that.
Uh you can watch some TED Talks. There
there I mean, some amazing TED Talks out
there and other talks of that caliber.
Um but I don't know that any have risen
to the level that you're referring to.
Yeah, I think Brené Brown's talk TED
Talk on vulnerability is one of the ones
that I think is really legacy. Most
people younger than 18 probably haven't
heard it, but anyway, we'll we'll put a
link to it. And then there are a bunch
of other really great TED Talks as well.
You have an amazing TED Talk. I saw one
a talk online with 24 million views is
not a trivial number of views. That's
And it was an hour-long conversation
about effective communication. So
clearly people care about effective
communication.
Um
do you think that
people being good at one-on-one
conversation makes them better at
on-stage conversation or do you think
these are two completely different
skills? I get this question a lot. I
think I think there's a Venn diagram.
There are people who are able to connect
one-on-one in a way that's hard to do on
a stage. A lot of it has to do with what
academics call immediacy. I'm present
with you. I'm focused. We're we're
engaged in that way and that doesn't
necessarily translate on a big stage or
in a meeting.
But some of the skills do translate.
It's having structure, having focus in
terms of a goal for what you're saying,
being able to start in a way that's
compelling. So it's a Venn diagram and
there are people who can command a
presence on a stage and you put them in
front of one person and they don't know
how to to respond. So in terms of
messaging, I think there's a lot of
overlap. In terms of presence, I think
it really varies a lot and that but I
believe everybody can learn to be better
at communication. I wouldn't do what I
do if I didn't believe that. So if you
are good interpersonally but not so good
in front of a large group, use the
skills you have, find a path to hone and
develop the skills in a different
environment. And similarly, if you're
good on a big stage, let's take what you
do there and find avenues to help you
interpersonal. But they're they're not
always the same and there are some
people who are good at both.
I'm excited to share that Mateena, the
yerba mate drink I helped create, is now
available at Whole Foods stores
nationwide. Longtime listeners of this
podcast know that yerba mate is my
preferred caffeine source. It provides
smooth energy without giving you the
jitters and it has a lot of other
potential benefits including helping to
regulate your blood sugar, improving
digestion, mild appetite suppression and
much more. Mateena is my absolute
favorite of all the yerba mate brands
out there and I've tried them all. Given
my love for Mateena, I decided to become
a part owner in the business and I
helped them create their new line of
products which are all entirely zero
sugar. These zero sugar cold brew
Mateena flavors are fantastic. I drink
at least three cans of them every single
day. You'll often see them on the table
during my podcast recordings. I
absolutely love the product and I'm
proud to now have it sold at Whole
Foods. So check out Mateena at Whole
Foods stores nationwide. It's cold
brewed with the absolute best
ingredients. It has zero sugar and it
tastes amazing. And if you don't have a
Whole Foods near you, you can also buy
it online at drinkmateena.com.
These days we hear quite often about
neurotypical and neuroatypical.
And I do think there's a distinct
difference in the conversational style,
the amount of prosody.
I don't want to say affect because
I have some close friends who are
neuroatypical and they tell me and I
believe them that they have every bit as
much emotion underneath their voice as
somebody who's like you know really um
you know sharing that emotion in in
these inflections of voice and and their
bodily movements. Do you think that we
need to adjust our kind of concept of
what effective communication is based on
this what seems to be an expansion of at
least the understanding of neurotypical
neuroatypical? Yeah, I I I certainly
don't mean to conflate neurodiversity
and introversion and extroversion. But
the question you're asking to me is I I
hear it as a similar way. Is is there
one right way to communicate or one
better way and people who don't
communicate that way are they at a
disadvantage? Uh I think there are
expectations for what effective
communication is but I think it is a we
can expand it in and there is value for
people
regardless of if it's neurodiversity or
introversion for example. Extroversion
tends to get rewarded just because you
get you hear it. You see it. But the I I
think there are things that we can learn
from people who are neurodiverse that
can help to really
connect and and be better communicators.
So too in the way that folks who are
highly introverted communicate can help.
There is certainly no one right way to
communicate. There are better ways and
worse ways and regardless of where you
are in terms of introversion,
extroversion, neurodiversity, you can
communicate effectively. Play to your
strengths. There are things that
introverts do that are amazing that
really help move communication forward.
People with certain types of
neurodiversity in terms of the
creativity or the level of detail with
which they communicate can be really
helpful. We just have to find those
advantages and and lean into them to
help.
I find that when it comes to podcast
guests, Yeah.
if somebody wrote a book at some point,
they tend to be pretty comfortable
podcasting.
Independent of whether they've been on a
lot of podcasts before.
Which raises the question is
the practice of writing out one's
thoughts
by hand or typing them out
an effective way to prepare to speak or
just get better at speaking generally.
And I do understand that eventually you
got to you know if you want to get
better at push-ups, you got to do
push-ups. If you want to get speaking,
you have to speak.
But do you think writing and
transferring ideas onto paper helps
people become better communicators?
Short answer is yes but I think it's a
two-part process. The first part is the
thought process that goes into what
you're going to write. Having written
some books, I know you're you're writing
a book, you you think differently about
your content. You have to think about
the audience. You have to think about
how do these pieces fit together?
There's there's a scaffolding that's
needed. So it's the thought process that
helps.
But then the actual putting pen to
paper, fingers on keyboards, when you
have to make word choice, when you have
to think about the syntax, the grammar,
you are more intimately involved with
your content than you are when you're
just thinking about the ideas. So so I
think at both levels, it's helping you
hone your message. I'm a very nervous
writer. I'm not a very nervous speaker.
I I am very nervous about what I write.
But I'm a better editor than I am writer
and that editing process really trains
your brain to be ready to respond to
questions, to focus information. And so
I think each of those steps, the
ideation, the actual crafting and then
the editing, prepare you to communicate
better. And all of us can use different
parts of this You don't have to write a
book to be able to use those skills to
speak better.
I used to prepare my scientific talks by
building the slides. Mhm. Yeah.
>> And I required that there be nothing
else going on in the room because in my
head I'm thinking about what I'm going
to say as I build the slide. So the
building of the slides oneself, Yeah.
including sometimes the illustrations
etc., was an important part of preparing
the talk. Right.
I find that if I can just cut and paste
figures, it's much worse. Yeah, I call
it a Franken deck. People like
accumulate different slides and slam
them all together like Frankenstein was
an amalgamation. There's no story there.
There's no thought process that ties it
all together. So the slide was the
manifestation of your thought process.
And that's why I think it was so useful
to you.
Can I share a story? Sure. You're the
guest but I I really want your thoughts
on this.
We have a colleague at Stanford. I His
name escapes me. Forgive me. But years
ago we were
um we were Pew fellows which was this
group where you Yeah. You know
congratulations.
>> Thank you. I I still don't know how it
happened for me but it happened.
Anyway, we had to give our talks the
fourth year. And
you know talk about being in a room full
of people where you're like whoa. There
was some serious It's people from all
around the the the country and you know
and it's not just neuroscience and so
you know you're humbled to be there. I
don't care how good you are.
Many people in the room are going to be
better than you.
There's this one guy. He's now a faculty
member at Stanford and for his talk he
got up there
and he said rather than show you a bunch
of data, I'm going to play you a movie
and a song.
And he put up this video of these oil
droplets bumping into one another.
And the sound or the song corresponded
to the oil droplets bumping into one
another.
And my first thought was this guy's
crazy. Like he's legitimately crazy
or he just kind of doesn't care.
And this is pretty cool.
Um
but then he went on to give a talk about
how he was using sound in order to
develop novel molecules. He went on to
win a MacArthur genius award. He's built
$1 microscopes and centrifuges that
they're using in Africa to diagnose
diseases in areas that have very little
funding. He's one of those. Yes. Yeah.
And I remember thinking
like wow. Like this guy is incredible.
Yeah. Just spectacular levels of
uh [snorts]
communication ability.
Yeah, I think he actually is a genius.
You know the these genius awards is kind
of a funny name, right?
And and I realized
>> I never got one. What's that? I I never
got one. I never got one. And I think
some people that get them are geniuses
and I think some are not frankly, you
know. And and um
but that talk was really
it wasn't just humbling. It was really
eye-opening for me because it made me
realize that if somebody
has
true command of the material and they
believe in their own unique vision
enough
that you really can use something as uh
what seems as vague as a bunch of oil
droplets bumping into one I mean it was
pretty but it looked like a lava lamp
frankly and some music. But it was the
perfect bring around because it it was
such high signal to noise.
Hats off to him. He's amazing.
If people try to do that
and it doesn't work,
Yeah. it fails spectacularly.
If it works, it succeeds spectacularly.
So do you think you know
there's something to you know,
whether or not we should stay
conventional or we should try hooks like
that. I never once thought I should do
something like that when giving a talk.
But it was I mean you can probably tell
by the way I'm relaying the story. It
still sits in my body as one of the more
fantastic experiences in my entire
academic career. So I was like that was
incredible and I'll never forget it. I I
think what that particular talk did is
it violated expectations and in so doing
it made it stand out.
Should people test boundaries and push
things in communication? I think they
should. But I think we need to be a
little
thoughtful about that and perhaps AB
test them, run them by some other
people, say I'm thinking of doing this,
what do you think? And make sure that
the risk you're taking is calculated. I
have this conversation all the time with
my students and and the people I coach
around humor. Now I'm not saying telling
a joke is similar to your experience,
but it involves risk and if it works,
humor is an amazing way to connect. But
if it fails, it's a great way to
disconnect. So you have to think it
through, you have to understand the
costs and the benefits and I think test
it out on a few people and then see what
happens.
It sounds like this person
did uh not only violated expectations,
but they were able to give you a
visceral experience of what it was that
they were studying. So it wasn't just a
concept which many of these you and I
both attend lots of academic talks. I
mean it can get very theoretical, very
conceptual, but made it very tangible
and because of that that was helpful to
the goal that they were trying to
achieve. So I often challenge people,
how could you communicate this
information in a way
that really gets people engaged and
involved? Could you do something on a
whiteboard? Could you use an analogy? Is
there a story you could tell or a
question you can ask rather than just
detailing the information? So do
something that violates an expectation
but is in line with and supports the
goal that you have.
Do you think that some introspection
about who one is is helpful?
You know, like I couldn't give that talk
even if I had half the knowledge. I
couldn't give that talk. Like I can give
the talk that I give.
Um
and sometimes I wonder whether
even if a talk is very dry,
it works because the person is dry.
Or somebody has more theatrical, it
works because the person is theatrical
outside of the talk.
This kind of brings us back to
authenticity. Sometimes I wonder if
people
just need to figure out who they are and
how
they process information in the world
and just try and share that. The same
way that a musician would
share their
song or um
an artist would share their visual art
or um or some other form of art because
that's the filter that they experience
the world through. I mean I I think a
lot of times we we want to hear things
because we want to access these other
portals that we can't get to.
I think understanding what works for you
and where your strengths are is
absolutely important, but at the same
time you don't know where some of those
strengths are if you don't try other
things. And that's why I coming back to
this notion of improv as a one example,
you don't know until you do it where
your comfort levels are and where those
boundaries are and you might learn that
there's some things you can do really
well that would help you be a better
communicator. So absolutely
investigating what works for you and
leveraging that is important, but also
expand a little bit to see where you can
grow.
I think the work you do, the work I try
to do in terms of podcasting and writing
and teaching, we're trying to expose
people to more information that they
could then adapt and adopt so that they
can perhaps expand the way they
communicate, they research, whatever it
is. So I think you do have to absolutely
play to your strengths, but you have to
explore what those strengths might be as
well. I'd hate for everybody just to do
only what they're good at.
Can we talk about uh damage control?
>> [laughter]
>> Yes. You know, I I do think having
coached uh students and postdocs through
public speaking and having seen one
complete meltdown. I I
This person's now professor. He's doing
incredible work. He's you know, he's
went on to get a job and everything, but
during a practice talk in front in front
of a small number of people, it was like
total meltdown. Total meltdown, no
recovery. Just we had to just delay and
do it another time. Despite
>> So he he literally just stopped talking
and walked off the stage.
>> He froze and and he apologized and then
we said, no, it's fine. I'm in a small
venue and then we tried to you know,
encourage him along and and maybe he
hadn't slept well. He had a lot going
on. But it ended with him sitting on the
side of the stage asking everyone to
please leave. Oh, okay.
>> It was So it was heavy. You know, it was
heavy and it was very important for us
to all get back in the room again and
and he did that and then he went on the
job market and he got a position and
he's tenure faculty member someplace
now. So
he recovered himself as you know, we all
have bad days, but I think hearing that
some people are probably like, oh my
goodness. Right. Um
what to do if one does forget what
they're trying to say on stage or Right.
um just choke. Yeah. You know, I I
recommend if people are nervous that
they actually have some outlet for that
movement as I talked about before.
Pacing or even bouncing one's knee
behind the podium very effective at
dispelling energy and getting one to
relax. It I just think it's
use it's been a useful tool for me and
and I think for others I've suggested to
do as well. But
how bad do you think it is if somebody
suddenly stops on stage and just says,
sorry, I lost my train of thought and
goes back to it. Do you think it
humanizes them or do you think that it
actually is deadly for the message?
Like with my students I have to say it
depends. It depends on the circumstance
that you're in. I do believe that
audiences are more forgiving. What I
advise the people I teach and coach to
do in those moments is instead of
saying, oh, I forgot what I want to say,
why not say, I get sometimes so
passionate about what I say I get a
little ahead of myself.
Which is likely true and use that as a
as a reason to reset.
Let me share with you what I advise
people to do to avoid blanking out and
then what to do if you do blank out.
First and foremost avoid memorizing.
Memorizing invites blanking out. So
let's not memorize. Let's have a clear
structure, a road map, but we don't know
every word that we're going to say.
The fear of blanking out leads and
increases the likelihood of blanking
out.
So
let's not worry about blanking out as
much as we do. How do we do that? We
rationalize. I ask everybody to think
about what is the likelihood in this
upcoming communication, whatever it is,
one-on-one, big presentation, that
you'll blank out. Most people say maybe
20%. Well, that means 80% of the time
you're not going to blank out. I'm not a
betting person. I'd take those odds.
So realizing it's not as likely to
happen, that's step one. Step two, ask
yourself if it were to happen, what's
the worst thing that would happen for
me? Well, it would be incredibly
embarrassing, it would be awkward and it
might have some short-term implications.
But who in their life hasn't been
embarrassed, been in situations that are
awkward and had short-term implications?
So when you put it in that context, all
of a sudden blanking out isn't as likely
as you think and it's not as bad as you
think. That reduces the stress you have
about doing it which reduces the
likelihood. So by not memorizing and
rationalizing, you can actually reduce
the likelihood of blanking out. Now
let's say the worst happens, you blank
out. You you don't know what to say.
First and best thing to do is just what
you do if you lose your phone or lose
your keys, retrace your steps. Repeat
what you just said. Most of us can
remember what we just said
and then that gets us back on track. If
that doesn't work, the final rip cord I
think you can pull is to distract your
audience. What does that mean? Ask a
question. This will happen to me.
There'll be I teach the same class a
lot. Sometimes I can't remember, did I
say this this time? I just need a moment
to think. I'll just pause and I'll ask
my students a question.
They don't they think that's logical.
Anybody can come up with a question. If
you ever hear me, anybody listening, if
you ever hear me say, I want to pause
for a moment and think have you think
about how what we've just discussed can
be applied to your life. That means I
have forgotten what I want to say next.
In my mind I'm what the heck do I say
next?
Most of the people in my audience are
like, how would I apply that in my life?
That's great. It gives me that fraction
of a second, gives me that sense of
control. Most of us can leverage a
question to buy us that time. So let's
not say, oh my goodness, I've forgotten,
it's the worst thing ever.
I get passionate. Sometimes I can't I
get ahead of myself. Give me a moment.
Or just ask a question. It's similar to
I advise people who are nervous speakers
never to say, oh, excuse me, I'm so
nervous. A lot of people try to
pre-apologize for their nervousness and
all they do is prime us to pay attention
to everything they do that's nervous. So
let's not call attention to the mistakes
we make. Let's just do what we can to
get through them and that's going to
help.
Great advice that I'm sure will help a
lot of people. I hope so. The most
spectacular example of a recovery I've
ever seen was actually a job talk at
Stanford. Yeah. I don't know if I should
include this person's name. He's now a
professor at uh UNC Chapel Hill, but he
could have been a faculty member at
Stanford because
>> [laughter]
>> of I think the data, but also what
happened was
he spilled water into his laptop during
the talk. You know, they have a podium
where everyone's given water in case you
get thirsty. Keep the water below,
folks, and he he spilled it. But the way
he handled it was so cool.
>> What he do? It spilled.
He didn't say anything. He took the
bottle, put the cap back on, put it
underneath,
reached underneath. There was no towel.
He said, could somebody perhaps get me a
paper towel or a towel? They brought him
a towel.
He
sopped up whatever moisture was on his
laptop.
He said nothing the entire time. This is
Mark Ziolkowski. He's a total badass.
And then he went back and finished his
talk.
>> Yeah. It was like
Yeah, it was Composed under pressure.
That was awesome. You know, contingency
planning is a really important part of
all communication. It's thinking about
what what could happen that would lead
this conversation or communication in
one direction or the other, positive or
negative. How would I respond? It makes
sense, you know, when you plan a trip, a
vacation, you you think about what
happens if the flight's delayed, what
happens if the room isn't ready. We
should do that in our communication as
well. Not to script it out, but just to
be ready. So, I think everybody
listening now, what would you do if your
technology didn't work in that moment?
Think about it. And then when it
happens, you you've got that recovery
plan. And that you just build that
confidence. Perhaps he had thought about
what happens if I can't use my tech.
And that's what helped him be calm.
Incidentally, he works on pain. Okay.
>> [laughter]
>> I don't know what that's worth.
But it was just an awesome display of of
calm under pressure. Or something under
pressure. I I think it it was the fact
that he just kept things moving forward.
And stood in silence. The the ability to
stand in silence in front of people
demonstrates confidence in so many ways.
And so the fact that he was able to take
care of business in silence, I think
added to that.
I feel like
when people get nervous, their um voice
gets up into their heads. Yeah. They
start going up on their tiptoes and they
start asphyxiating themselves by
speaking much higher than their natural
tone of voice is. Yeah. Um so, sometimes
I
re encourage people to Um
slow down. Yeah. And try and drop their
voice down Right. further into their
throat and chest a little bit.
Right. Um It can be artificial. Like
there's one very salient example of a
former CEO Yeah. uh
who perhaps didn't have the voice that
they spoke with. Um but um
but assuming it's still your voice,
Yeah.
Right. Oh, absolutely. Uh you taught me
when you were a guest on my show uh a
lot about breath and how breath can
impact not only your confidence and the
anxiety you feel, but how doing breath
breath work can really help you still
your your whole body and allow your
natural voice to come out because when
we get anxious, we breathe shallow. Less
air is being pushed out, it's being
pushed out faster. Our voice starts
sounding like this. And sometimes this
is actually really it appropriate. If
I'm really excited about something, I
should sound like this. But I want it
under my control. So, breath work and
having an authentic natural voice is
really important.
Yeah, one thing you might find
interesting that's come out in the
literature since the last time we spoke
is that while the physiological side,
double inhale, long exhale still the
best way to calm down quickly, turns out
that all
exhale emphasized breathing slows the
heart down. Mm. Yeah. Just subtly, but
significantly enough that it helps you
calm down. So, if people can't remember
like what breath work to do,
physiological side, just emphasize an
exhale. Extend it, make it a little bit
more vigorous. If you need to be covert
about it, maybe just extend it a little
bit, maybe walk back to the podium or
away and do that long exhale. That seems
to really make a big difference because
you're offloading carbon dioxide, but
also there's this pathway through the
vagus nerve that literally slows your
heart rate down when you exhale.
It's pretty spectacular that we have
these mechanisms in us. Yeah.
>> it's fantastic and I and I give credit
to you every single lecture I give when
I talk about anxiety, I talk about what
you shared with me. It's all about the
exhale. And I will always say the rule
of thumb and then I'll joke, the rule of
lung is you want your exhale to always
be longer than your inhale to help you
calm down. And people have found that
liberating. So, I appreciate that you
shared that with me and know that others
are taking advantage of that.
You're welcome and it came from a place
of need that I came across those tools
uh because I think that we can prepare
prepare prepare, Yeah. but it's the
knowledge
that things happen in the moment that we
can't control.
That's right. I mean, that's the really
scary thing. That's right. And if you
think about it, most of our
communication is that it's spontaneous.
We don't know what's going to happen. I
mean, a lot of what you and I've been
talking about is planned communication.
It's the presentation, the pitch, the
meeting with agenda. But most of our
communication is spontaneous. We don't
know how it's going to unfold. You ask
me a question. I don't know what that
question is. I don't even know if I know
the answer. You ask me for feedback. I
make a mistake. I have to fix it. Most
of our communication is spontaneous. And
getting comfortable with that discomfort
of not knowing how this will transpire
is a big part of the mindset shift that
you have to have to do better in
spontaneous speaking.
Beta blockers, yes. Beta blockers, no.
So, I have a heart condition and I take
beta blockers regularly. And I see how
it slows down your thinking and your
body. I'm not a fan. I think cognitive
behavioral ways of managing anxiety much
better. Now, there are people I'm not a
medical doctor, obviously. Uh there are
some people for whom beta blockers might
work, but I I actively discourage people
if they're just wanting to take it to
manage anxiety. I think there's so many
other things we can do first before you
have to go there. But I my experience
has been it makes me fuzzy and I'm not
as quick.
Which makes sense because you're not
getting as much oxygenated blood to your
brain. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Getting a great
night's sleep the night before clearly
helps.
What do you do or recommend for people
that get a lousy night's sleep the night
before? Well, I wish I I would like to
ask you that question. I am an awful
sleeper. I am a really
>> that. Good. Well, let's let's fix that
today because I am a lousy sleeper. Uh
absolutely it is better to get a good
night's sleep than it is to stay up all
night cramming.
I tell everybody to train for
communication like you would train for a
sporting event. You need to eat well. I
call it communication hygiene. You need
to eat well, sleep well, exercise. Um it
is much better to stay on routine than
to deviate from your routine.
Uh there is some research around
caffeine consumption. Caffeine
consumption is actually really good when
you're ideating for creativity. When you
actually go to present, uh you shouldn't
deviate from whatever standard protocol
is for caffeine. You shouldn't all of a
sudden go cold turkey, but taking
additional caffeine because you didn't
sleep well the night before can just
agitate you during the presentation and
communication. So, uh getting a good
night's sleep is great. I am not the
best person to give advice on how to do
it.
Well, we could have a long discussion
about this. And [clears throat] I listen
to some of it
for afterwards. I would say the um
couple of things that have helped me
over the years traveling to give talks
both for the podcast and academic uh
stuff, etc. is
If you're going to stay in a hotel,
Yeah.
pull the plug on the alarm clock in the
hotel. Use your phone instead. Put on
airplane mode, use that one. Why?
Because I've woken up many times at 4:00
in the morning because someone prior to
me had set the alarm clock. That just
happened the other week with me. I
always unplug that. I actually cover all
the bright lights in the room. I put a
towel by the by the door crack. You want
to get I mean, an eye mask is ideal.
Right. Um
I try to
ask for a room away from the elevator
Yeah. cuz that'll keep you up all night.
Yes. Um those are just some of the like
zero cost things that are very helpful.
But the number one thing to recover
sleep that you didn't get
is this non-sleep deep rest aka yoga
nidra practice. Yoga nidra is the
thousands of year old uh practice of
doing long exhale breathing. Uh it's a
10-to-30-minute practice. I We can
provide some links to scripts for these
that are excellent. Uh where
you're slowing your heart rate down.
You're doing a body scan. But the goal
during yoga nidra is to stay awake with
your body relaxed. And it teaches you
how to fall asleep more easily. Mm. I
would argue based on experience that
yoga nidra and NSDR which is essentially
the same thing, but we've removed the
intentions and I just call it non-sleep
deep rest. These are zero cost scripts
out there. My voice, other people's
voice.
Also teaches you how to be very alert
and very relaxed in your body at the
same time. Which is a very valuable
skill for a lot of different venues,
including public speaking. Um so,
it will get you better at falling and
falling back asleep. So, I can send some
to
>> Awesome. I I I'm going to take partake
as soon as we're done. Yeah. And of
course, you're not drinking much
caffeine, right? You said you have you I
I do one cup of tea a day.
So, it can't be over consumption of
caffeine. No, it's my I I get in my head
and I think too much. Your forebrain's
working too much.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yoga nidra will help with
that. Cuz the essence of yoga nidra and
NSDR, forgive me, but is Mm. works so
well and it's zero cost. So, it's one of
these I'm not trying to pitch anything
you know, where you have to go pay for
something. I didn't develop it. It's
been around for a long time.
There's this
instruction in yoga nidra that's also in
these NSDRs where you teach yourself to
move your
brain from a state of thinking and doing
to just being and feeling.
To literally get out of thought. Right.
>> And to do that is very difficult unless
you give your brain enough to do. And
this is why NSDR instructs you to do
like a kind of focused body scan and
relaxation because if you just try and
not think, it doesn't work. Right. Um
You think about not thinking.
>> Yeah. There's also some really
interesting data on the vestibular
system in falling asleep. I'll share
this now. Just you can try it. I did
this last night. I woke up at once in
the middle of the night. Keep your eyes
closed.
If you have to get up and use the
restroom, do that first, but keep your
eyes closed and move your eyes slowly
from side to side. This is not um uh
EMDR, uh but move your from side to
side. Then move them up with your
eyelids still closed, down,
roll them left
or counterclockwise, roll them right
clockwise. And then try and
cross them a little bit, like stare at
the bridge of your nose and exhale. Now,
this might sound crazy. It sounds
completely wacky, right?
But what it does is it takes you your
vestibular system into a state, we know
this based on data,
that
mimics the state you're trying achieve,
which is that you need to forget about
your body's position.
Oh. You can't fall asleep if you're
thinking about your body position. In
fact, one of the prerequisites to
falling asleep is forgetting about that,
which is why there are now also data
showing that rocking back and forth
the reason it's effective at making
babies and adults fall asleep they have
beds that actually rock from side to
side is because you forget about your
body position when your whole body is in
motion. Huh. So, try this and I think
you'll find that it will greatly
facilitate falling or falling back
asleep. Absolutely. Tonight tonight I'm
putting in practice. This is this I get
I get free free consulting here. Thank
you.
>> Sure. Yeah, cuz I think that
decent night's sleep the night before is
great. Otherwise, do NSDR in the morning
or before a talk
if you can.
I think anything to bring your level of
autonomic arousal down if you're if
you're sleep deprived can help bring
more ease to the public speaking.
Something else that I really encourage
people to do to help is to have
conversation prior to whatever the big
communication is.
>> is huge. Right.
>> Yeah. To to connect with people, have
conversation. Whenever I do a keynote,
whenever I'm doing a big presentation, I
will always be talking to people.
Sometimes I have to go find them cuz I'm
behind stage and I got to wait to the
big introduction. I'll go find somebody
and just have a conversation. That focus
and present orientation that it brings
and just that act of speaking. I am so
amazed at, you know, anybody who does
any athletics or music, you know you
should warm up first, but people don't
warm up before they speak. They think
they can go from silence to brilliance
without it. Having a communication with
somebody as mundane as you want it can
really help. Do you use this technique?
It looked like it resonated with you.
>> Absolutely.
Because I've often and I still spend a
lot of time preparing for podcasts and
doing things in isolation. Right. And
I've noticed that if I do that for too
long and then I go to the corner cafe
that the conversation with the barista
feels like like what is going on here.
It really because you're in your head.
>> Yeah. Then it starts to feel like relief
and then your brain shifts to a
different state. A long time ago I
realized that having some form of
communication it en route to a talk or
something can be very helpful. I've
found and I'd be curious what you think
that um part of that is the speaking,
part of it is also the taking turns
piece. Because we're going to be
speaking it's generally just us
speaking, but that really
getting into a conversation where I
listen to what's coming back forces me
to also um practice withholding speech.
Yes.
>> Cuz I feel like a lot of bad talks are
when people are just kind of fire hosing
or they're adding little elements to the
sentences where they don't need them.
And it's it's just nervousness. It's
just nervousness.
>> Filling the space. Yeah.
>> So, there's some like you said you need
to warm up. Right. And and that that
turn taking, that switching it is
engaging for the brain. I would suggest
though that when you are up on a stage
giving a big presentation, leading a big
meeting, you can actually engage in
dialogue. It's not just calling on
people, but you can ask them. You can
say, "Imagine what it would be like if."
And now you're imagining it. We are in a
communicate You're you're responding
even though I'm not hearing it. I can
use an analogy or tell a story. We are
communicating taking turns in essence,
you're just not responding vocally to
me. So, a big challenge is to be
engaging and there there's several ways
to do it. There's physical engagement,
getting people doing something. There's
mental engagement, using analogies,
stories, questions. There's linguistic
engagement, taking people into the
future or the past by saying, "Picture
this or imagine how it used to be."
Those are ways of getting a dialogue
going even though the other person isn't
speaking back versus just me
broadcasting information.
I'd like to take a quick break and
acknowledge one of our sponsors,
Function. Last year I became a Function
member after searching for the most
comprehensive approach to lab testing.
Function provides over 100 advanced lab
tests that give you a key snapshot of
your entire bodily health. This snapshot
offers you with insights on your heart
health, hormone health, immune
functioning, nutrient levels, and much
more. They've also recently added tests
for toxins such as BPA exposure from
harmful plastics and tests for PFAS or
forever chemicals. Function not only
provides testing of over 100 biomarkers
key to your physical and mental health,
but it also analyzes these results and
provides insights from top doctors who
are expert in the relevant areas. For
example, in one of my first tests with
Function, I learned that I had elevated
levels of mercury in my blood. Function
not only helped me detect that, but
offered insights into how best to reduce
my mercury levels, which included
limiting my tuna consumption. I'd been
eating a lot of tuna, while also making
an effort to eat more leafy greens and
supplementing with NAC and
N-acetylcysteine, both of which can
support glutathione production and
detoxification. And I should say by
taking a second Function test that
approach worked. Comprehensive blood
testing is vitally important. There's so
many things related to your mental and
physical health that can only be
detected in a blood test. The problem is
blood testing has always been very
expensive and complicated. In contrast,
I've been super impressed by Function's
simplicity and at the level of cost. It
is very affordable. As a consequence, I
decided to join their scientific
advisory board and I'm thrilled that
they're sponsoring the podcast. If you'd
like to try Function, you can go to
functionhealth.com/huberman.
Function currently has a waitlist of
over 250,000 people, but they're
offering early access to Huberman
podcast listeners. Again, that's
functionhealth.com/huberman
to get early access to Function.
I'd love your thoughts on an experience
that I've had where
that I think many people have.
Um
where one of the most terrifying things
is when you are in a small room, maybe
10, 15, 20 people and they say, "We're
going to go around the table, introduce
yourself, who you are." Right. But I
want to go first because if I have to
hear people Right. go and then it's
coming around. I don't know why, but
some circuit must ramp up where as soon
as I start speaking I'm like hearing my
own voice and I don't have any problem
public speaking and people haven't
noticed, but there's something about
that anticipation Right.
>> without it being my turn to speak that
makes it such like really awkward. And
then I realized at some point if I just
focus off myself and just really listen
to what people are saying, when it comes
around you just say, "I'm Andrew." or
you're whoever and and then you share
the information that needs to be shared.
But if I'm anticipating having to speak,
it's like terrifying.
>> Yeah. It's that build up because it's
getting closer and closer and closer and
and the anxiety that you're feeling is
getting stronger and stronger. I I don't
like go around the room and introduce
yourself. If there's a need for people
to do that, I will always have people
partner up or get in groups of three and
then have somebody introduce somebody
else. It's just much easier.
I do exactly and I coach exactly what
you are what you do. I tell people
listen to everybody else and think to
yourself a question you would ask them
based on what they've said because that
causes you really to focus on what
they're saying. So, you're not getting
into your head and you're not really
living at the peak all the anxiety
feelings you're having. Now, to help
people introduce themselves, I have a
way I like to teach people to introduce
themselves. Don't start with your name.
Start with something you care about,
you're passionate about, something that
interests you and then say who you are.
For two reasons. There's actually a
third. First is you're going to stand
out cuz nobody does this. So, people are
actually going to remember you. Second,
if you start with something you're
passionate about, you care about, you
can use emotion and inflect your voice.
It's very hard to inflect your voice
when you say your name. And then
finally, if you're a non-native speaker
or you're speaking to non-native
speakers who might have an accent
hearing something in advance primes our
brain to say, "Oh, that's how that
person speaks." So, we'll actually pay
attention and understand their name
more. I don't know about you, but when
people with accents introduce themselves
to me, sometimes it's hard for me to
remember their name because my brain's
trying to get used to that's how they
speak. So, you're helping everybody. So,
when I introduce myself, I don't say I'm
Matt Abrahams. I say, "I'm somebody
who's passionate about communication. My
name's Matt Abrahams." and then I'll say
something else.
>> You'll do this at a party? Uh Well, it's
what it's a social set. So, I envision
what you were saying is more like a
meeting, not a party.
>> Got you. But even even at a party I I
might say I might talk about the the
environment first or connect myself to
the environment before I say my name.
Yeah, but I think leading with
something that you care about or
concerned about or something in the
environment before you say your name is
a much better way to introduce yourself.
It can't be too long, but it can really
help. Try it next time you introduce
yourself. Yeah.
Yeah, I know that's a it's an
interesting one. I I miss having a dog
because the dog could absorb a lot of
the awkwardness. Oh, yeah.
>> He was just so handsome. People had to
look at him. Yeah. Well, having having a
young child does the same thing.
>> Yeah. Like kids are are a wonderful
bridge to to all sorts of things.
>> can find those bridges in lots of
things. Yeah.
Now, dear close friend of mine I met
waiting in line I was at a conference,
you know these academic conferences. We
were at some buffet line and I didn't
know anybody. I was sent by my
department. And there's this guy
standing next to me. It was we were
standing too close where, you know, we
kind of had to talk. And I just look
around the room and I noticed that lots
of people were wearing different shades
of blue and I just said, "Did I miss the
the memo about wearing blue?" And he
looks around and he said, "Yeah, that's
weird." And we started a conversation
there. I didn't need a dog. I didn't
need a kid. I just made an observation
and that broke the ice enough for us to
talk and now we're good friends.
Whenever I travel to where he is, I
visit. Whenever he's out here, he
visits. So, we put a lot of pressure on
ourselves around this initiation of
communication and just being inquisitive
and commenting on something in the
environment can help. Can we do the
British wind up?
>> [laughter]
>> A lot of people won't know what that is.
The
There's this like
much older lady that lives in my
neighborhood and she has this little
tiny dog.
>> Yeah. And I figure if I just walk over
to her, she's going to like be a little
scared. Well, I she I see her often and
so I I did do a windup. I walked over to
her and I said, "Wait, is that the
dog that mauled that kid over in
Inglewood?" And she was like,
"You're pulling my leg." And then, you
know, we become friends, right? No, cuz
I'm not going to just walk up to her and
be like, "Hey, can you know, cuz it's
kind of like someone looming on you,
right? You know, it's like a little
scary, right?" Um so I I stole the wind
I guess they call it in Britain I think
they call it a windup, right? So I
wasn't trying to be funny. I just I
really like this lady and and her dog is
super cute and uh yeah.
>> clearly need another dog. Um If one
thing has come from this interview, it's
that Andrew needs another dog.
>> Thanks to you, many many more things
[clears throat] have come from this
interview and far more utility as well.
But I mean, I don't suggest anyone
smoke, but I think um back in the day
this was the whole thing. People like
bumming a smoke, they'd uh take breaks.
I you know, I worked a job where I
You're right. did some packaging and
building of uh like scooters and wagons
at a toy store in downtown Palo Alto.
And uh on breaks you go into the alley
and like there were people working at
the bakery next door and you'd you'd
Right. strike up a conversation. I
didn't smoke, but you'd strike up a
conversation and then you'd get to know
somebody
>> Right. uh by name. Right. Uh but
nowadays people are often in their
phones. We use the phone as a pacifier
uh and as a way of of not having to
engage. Uh I I I have encouraged my two
kids uh to help them get out of this
cycle to to to show something that
you're looking at at the phone. Invite
somebody "Hey, this is pretty cool. What
do you think? Check out this meme." So
it's a use the phone as you're saying
that cigarettes used to serve as a way
to initiate conversation as long as it's
appropriate. And it's funny. I know
exactly the toy store you're talking
about because I know that bakery no
longer exists, but I used to go there
all the time.
>> They closed Prolific Oven?
>> Yeah, it's gone.
>> Oh. It's now a great restaurant, by the
way.
>> guess we can say cuz they they both It
was Palo Alto Toy and Sport World. It
was one of the oldest businesses. They
had a skateboard shop in the back. But
prior to working in the skateboard shop,
I worked I sold shoes and I uh used to
build wagons
>> Yeah. Radio Flyer wagons and and
tricycles and stuff.
>> to go there as a kid because you we not
only would get a toy, but we'd get to
have a treat, too. Oh, yeah.
Yeah, those were fun outings. Yeah, that
place was cool. It was a family-owned. I
Yeah, it's a
um All right. Well, now we're taking
people Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
>> if if in downtown Palo Alto
>> there, yeah. uh you can check it out. I
think the I think the sign is still
there. It might be.
>> Yeah. And and that that actually brings
up something useful. I mean, I had jobs
where Yeah. I was a
they didn't call it a barista then, but
I worked at a muffin shop around the
corner, which then got me that job. I
think from conversation across the
counter. I think
my niece worked a job selling frozen
yogurt before she went off to college
recently. So
get a job. Yeah. No, I think As a kid,
get a job where you interact with
people. Having a job uh where you're in
customer service as a kid is so
educational for so many reasons.
Communication being an important one.
You learn how to communicate with a lot
of different people. You learn how to be
in service of other people's needs in
that moment. I think it's it's
wonderful. I uh my first job and a job I
had a lot of during high school, I
worked at an athletic club folding
towels. And when people would come in, I
would give them the towel and we'd have
some small talk. It taught me to be very
comfortable. I had to announce I mean,
this sounds so silly, but I "The gym is
closing in 30 minutes." But as a high
school student, I had to say that with
100 people in the gym. That was
nerve-wracking, but that was part of my
desensitization.
So cool.
Yeah, I think that um
I I don't want to sound old because I I
am old. I'm 50 now. Uh but I feel good.
I feel good. I'm going to go another 50
years. That's the goal. Hopefully
healthy all along. But
I think being a camp counselor Oh, yeah.
is the perfect example of um
doing something you barely understand
how to do
and having to project confidence doing
it. I mean, they teach you a few things.
At least when I did it, but like
suddenly you're like in charge of all
these lives. I mean, you think about it,
it's pretty wild. But you know, by the
second session you're you're in a
groove. Like you're telling people what
to do, when to listen, letting them, you
know, do what they want when they want.
You
you can't use um
you know,
harsh forms of communication. You need
to be you know, you need to
But you need to keep them safe, so you
need to like use your voice
appropriately. Oh, yeah.
You know, raise it when it's necessary
if somebody's in danger, that kind of
thing. So doing that sort of thing I
think is how we learn how to
communicate.
>> Oh, absolutely. And and unfortunately,
some of those opportunities and jobs are
changing and we have to find other
vehicles to help people. I
when I left high-tech, I taught high
school for 2 years before I graduated to
to do what I'm doing now. And I learned
so much about communication teaching 14,
15-year-olds that I never learned
working in adults running organizations
like I did. So getting these
opportunities is precious.
Yet we don't have a lot of those
opportunities. One thing I think we can
all do with the younger generation and
even colleagues we have is role model
and talk through some of the things that
we're thinking about in terms of our
communication. So I with my children
will often say, "I have to have a
difficult conversation tomorrow with a
colleague or with a boss and I'm really
worried about this or I'm thinking about
saying it this way." We don't often get
meta about our communication and yet
there're learnings that we can pass
along. And you know,
you you saw it, I see it where where
we're both affiliated with our teaching.
I mean, people are brilliant and they're
really good communicators, but they
don't learn always that way. They had to
learn and they had to do it. And when
you start talking to people, which I
have the advantage of doing is asking
them, "How did you get to do that? What
do you do?"
There's so much richness in that. And I
think we just have to open up that
conversation, role model it, but also
talk about it with the younger people in
your life, the people you're trying to
uh
build up. And that'll really help.
Do you think by virtue of the pandemic
and the lockdowns and social media that
there is a swath of people right now who
um
really don't know how to engage the same
way that um people even younger than
them do. There So this isn't an ageist
thing. It's really that they missed out
on an opportunity uh to engage. There's
a What is it? The Gen Z stare? Is that a
real thing? I don't know about the Gen Z
stare, but I do think there there are
critical periods in development uh not
just in and I think we we that
generation of kids lost a critical
development. One of my sons was in high
school and high school is a is a great
place to learn about yourself and about
communication. And if you're doing it
through a screen, that's a very
different experience. Now, I think he's
a very good communicator, but they they
they
they missed on an opportunity. A lot of
how you learn is by testing and trying
things out. And if you lost a couple
years of that testing, puts you to
disadvantage. I know because of what I
do, we can build that back and learn it.
But there are there is a whole swath of
people who had to struggle in a way most
of us didn't.
My graduated advisor, who I really
admire very much she's passed away, but
I I've always admired her was once
described by somebody I think quite
aptly as quiet, but not shy.
And I realize it's a very powerful
phenotype. And I mention it because
some people listening to this
conversation might think, you know,
"I'm just not that chatty. Like I just
I'm Right. But they're not necessarily
shy. Like they're perfectly happy to be
in conversation and and be quiet until
there's something that they want to say.
And sometimes she wouldn't say anything
and sometimes she would say things and
indeed she was very very smart, but
she's also very at ease. So I came to
learn that there are people who are
quiet, but not shy. Yeah. And I think
that's a phenotype we don't often
acknowledge when we hear about
introverted, extroverted. My father was
exactly that way. My father uh
most intelligent person I've ever known.
He was very quiet, but he wasn't shy.
And if he had something to say, he would
say it and it would often be very
profound. And it it was the way he lived
in the world. And people people
appreciated it and and he leaned into
it. He had opportunities to speak and
would sit back. And I learned a lot from
him that sometimes the most effective
communication is to just listen and be
present. Uh so I I agree that there that
there are people who who have a lot of
value to add and they just might
be reticent
in the moment. And I don't think there's
anything wrong with that. We need lots
of we need diversity not only of ideas
and opinions, but diversity in the way
we communicate. We hold in this in our
culture this notion that the the
extroverted, confident person is the is
the right way to communicate. And that's
not always true. You can get into a lot
of trouble, especially extroverts who
who speak first and think second.
Especially nowadays where everything's
recorded.
>> Yeah. People will say stupid things that
they wish they hadn't said. I mean,
chairs of departments, fortunately not
at Stanford, but chairs of major
university departments have gotten
themselves fired by doing by being too
loose with their thumbs on what was
formerly called Twitter. I know at least
one prominent example. You just go like,
"What were you thinking?" Right. And
apparently
Yeah. they weren't filtering well
enough. Brilliant people. And and it
wasn't even something that like it was
clear they really believed. They just
said something really offensive and
really stupid. And
Yeah. at least at that time it was
sufficient for them to lose their
position. Yeah. I wasn't into anything
nefarious or bad. I was a good kid
growing up, but I can't imagine growing
up with everything being recorded. Yeah,
it's it's probably a tense time for a
lot of people, but people seem to be
vocalizing and sharing more as opposed
to less. Right. Although I I suppose
there's a sampling bias cuz we're not
hearing from the from the quiet ones
without social media accounts. I feel
like almost everyone has a social media
account now. What I do admire about all
of this social media is how
people who are younger than I am at
least are able to manage their presence
in so many different domains. I can
barely show up, you know, dressed
appropriately for a conversation.
They're able to manage their presence on
different platforms, some virtually,
some in person. And that's an art,
that's a skill to be able to to be able
to project yourself in different ways
and different venues. And and again, I'm
not saying be disingenuous or
inauthentic, but there's a skill there.
You know, I I coach a lot of senior
leaders who I would
I I'm trying to coach to really be
mindful of your presence, how you show
up, what it means. And I see in my
students who are generally in their mid
to late 20s who
this comes easy to them. This is just
something they know how to do. So, they
I'm not bashing social media ever, but I
do think that there's some skills that
come with it that that others could
benefit from. Maybe that's why the
younger generation is so much better at
it, cuz I see my peers from high school,
I see I see people 10 years, 20 years
older than I am that seem to have an
immense need to be seen on social media.
I mean, it's part of my job, which is
why I do it, but prior to that, I didn't
really have social media accounts or
didn't use them. But in any case,
there's no judgment for from me on that.
I just I agree, it's it's a lot of
cognitive load. It is, but they they're
able to switch in and out of those of
that in a way that that it's hard for me
and certainly hard for some of the
people I work with.
I'm curious about martial arts and
running, um but is in particular martial
arts, but do you think that
playing a sport or engaging in martial
arts can actually teach you how to be
more comfortable in your physical body
in a way that transfers to public
speaking, one-on-one communication,
small group communication, just
presence, posture, stance.
I enjoy the question, thank you. I don't
often talk about my martial arts. I've
I've been doing it over 40 years, and
it's it's a very much a part of who I
am. And I absolutely think what I've
learned in the martial arts have helped
me do better at what I do, and I think
what I do have has helped me be better
in the martial arts. There is a presence
and a connection that you need to have
to do martial arts well, especially when
you're working with somebody else.
Uh it gives a a kind of confidence
that I know I can handle myself in
certain in circumstances. I don't expect
to be attacked, but I know that in a
situation where things go sideways that
I can have some presence about myself,
and that confidence is invaluable in
everything I do.
And martial arts is really a form of
communication. I'm observing what my
opponent or the my training partner is
doing. I am trying to connect and
anticipate the next move, but not get
locked into it.
It it really trains your brain and your
body to be responsive and to be open.
You know, people focus a lot on the
martial, but the art side is really what
as I get older is what really attracts
me. Art is about expression, style,
connection. And that to me as I've
matured in my training has really become
this new wealth of knowledge. You know,
somebody say, "You've been studying the
same thing for 40 years." It's not the
same thing, it changes. It's multiple
levels and ways of uncovering. So, I
think it's great. I think everybody
should have some physical activity they
do that helps them in whatever
professional activity or their personal
lives. You can learn so much about
yourself and how to connect with others.
I think there's tremendous learning in
for lack of a better term, exercise,
yeah, but there's something unique about
martial arts or a sport. Not to say that
running isn't a sport, it can be, or
that resistance training isn't a sport,
it can be, but I think if people are
just exercising and only viewing it
through that lens
that um
they're not gleaning the full benefit. I
actually try and make my resistance
training sessions a sort of meditation.
Yeah. I don't allow myself to text
or in most cases
uh bring in too much other information.
I'll listen to music or a podcast. Yeah.
But I'm careful with that. I want to
focus on what I'm doing, and I think
it's great practice for cognitive
pursuits. My running is my meditation. I
I really when I run, I I might listen to
something, but I really meditate. I find
I'm very creative as a result of it, and
uh when I don't do it, I miss it. One
area that I like about the martial arts,
at least in the styles I've trained in
they vary in terms of their activity.
So, some of the stuff is completely
spontaneous. You're sparring, it's it's
spontaneous. There's some rules, but
you're sparring. And in the style I
train, there there are things called
katas or forms, where essentially a
prearranged dance of moves.
Long longer, everything is scripted. Uh
and then there in my style, we do these
things called self-defense techniques,
where you practice certain moves to get
out of
Each of those is training you a
different way of thinking and being,
just like there different ways of
thinking and being in communication.
Sometimes it's completely spontaneous,
sometimes I'm giving prepared remarks,
sometimes it's Q&A where I'm saying some
things I've prepared, but others I
haven't.
So, finding vehicles to help you train
in different ways,
uh cross-training, if you will, for your
communication can really help.
Fantastic. And I I really like this idea
that we need to consider the uh the
different styles of different audiences.
Yeah. Along those lines, I solicited for
questions
uh from the audience on social media,
and there's some terrific questions
here.
>> Great. Uh terrific because I know they
relate to questions that many other
people are sure to have as well. Uh
To kick it off
w-
somebody asked
Why do you think women apologize before
sharing their opinions? What should they
do instead? Do you observe this?
I see this often.
Apologizing is a way of trying to
connect.
Yet, I think it can backfire. So,
instead of saying, "I'm sorry," or "I
didn't do work," start with something
that you're confident in. And if you do
need to apologize because there's
something you didn't do or you need to
do, have that come later.
The way you start an interaction sets
the tone for the whole interaction. And
if I start by putting myself one down
because I apologize, "Oh, I did I'm not
prepared or I should have done this
differently," then our interaction is
going to be very different. So, start
with something that you're comfortable
with and confident in, and then if you
need to apologize, apologize later. It
really makes a big difference. I'm going
to layer in an additional question. I've
seen people give talks that begin with
"I didn't sleep that well last night or
I'm jet-lagged, so forgive me if I blank
blank and blank." Basically trying to
preload the talk with
um maybe a buffer so that if they make a
mistake, they're more protected. I It
drives me crazy, but maybe I'm just
crazy.
>> No, it bothers me, too. You know,
Andrew, my wife taught me a long time
ago I can't pre-apologize, and that's
what people are trying to do, right? So,
and all you do in those circumstances is
prime people to pay attention to
whatever it is you're doing. So, if I
say I didn't sleep well, then people are
going to be looking, "Oh, he's
stuttering over his words, he's
stumbling." You know,
you want people to focus on your
message. Don't pre-apologize. Just get
to what you're doing, and if something
comes up, you get to decide in the
moment, do I address it or do I just
keep going?
How to communicate well across cultures
and accents. You talked a little bit
about this earlier, but maybe we could
uh revisit that.
So, culture and context loom large in
all communication. Uh we have to think
And when I talk about culture, I'm not
just talking about country of origin.
Different organizations have different
cultures, different departments within
organizations have cultures. Different
generations have have different
cultures. So, we just have to be
sensitive to that. Uh our messages have
to play differently. So, whenever we
communicate, we have to think about who
we're communicating to and the context
and culture in which we're
communicating.
We live in a diverse society and a
diverse world, where we hear lots of
viewpoints, lots of people from
different places. Accents loom large. On
my show, Think Fast, Talk Smart, I've
interviewed a lot of people who are
experts in non-native speaking. And what
they all tell me is
the goal of a non-native speaker is not
to sound like a native speaker. It's
impossible, it can't be, you're not a
native speaker. Rather, focus on getting
your message across. Take the pressure
off of yourself. So, what does that
mean? That means I might make my point,
and then what I do is I repeat it with a
story or I give an example, I tell an
analogy. It's about getting the point
across, not about worrying about, am I
using exactly the right word in the
right syntax? And the reality is, I
don't know about you, but a lot of
native speakers of English they don't
speak English so well either themselves.
So, I think if it's all about getting
your point across and using repetition
and other tools to help.
How to deal with interrupting?
We have a colleague at Stanford, by the
way, that told me
if they interrupt, it's a sign of
interest
which helped the interactions. But the
question here is how should we handle
interruptions?
We still want to make the interrupter
feel heard in most cases, but sometimes
it can be distracting.
Two ways. First, set expectations up
front. Setting boundaries can be
helpful. So, if I'm going into a
situation, I might say, "I want to spend
the first 5 minutes laying the
foundation to what I'm going to say, and
then
I'd love to take your questions." So, if
the person does interrupt, they're
violating an expectation that was set.
And that puts you in a better position
to maybe shut it down. You can say,
"Thank you, I hear you're really
anxious. I really want to get through
this material."
So, setting boundaries can help.
I believe one of the most useful
communication tools is paraphrasing.
Paraphrasing is where you take what
somebody has said, you synthesize it,
and you distill it down to something
important.
If somebody interrupts you, you can take
the floor back by paraphrasing what
they've said and moving back on. So, if
I'm talking about the financial
implications of something, and you come
in and give me your opinion, you
interrupt me, I can say, "Cost is really
important." And in fact, I just took it
back from you.
If you are somebody who wants to just
share your overwhelming knowledge, and
you you're one of those people who
bloviates
I can stop that by interrupting with a
paraphrase. I can say that point you
just made about X really important.
We're going to talk about that next on
the agenda. I think paraphrasing is the
most polite way to get control back, be
it from an interruptor or somebody who's
just talking too much. It can feel
uncomfortable to interrupt somebody with
a paraphrase, but if you're in front of
a room of people or a meeting, not doing
it is actually more rude to the other
people than it is being rude to the
person who spoke. So, paraphrasing I
think gets you out of those
circumstances.
Someone said, "How do I prepare for a
speech?" I I think there's a lot
>> [laughter]
>> There's a lot that goes into that, but
perhaps there's a shorter answer
um
that
you could give us a you know a a sort of
key Yes. uh key bins of preparation.
Absolutely. Let me give you top uh a few
top things. First and foremost, you have
to think about who is the audience I'm
speaking to. What's important and
relevant to them related to the topic I
want to speak on. All of us when we
communicate suffer from the curse of
knowledge and the curse of passion. We
know a lot about what we're saying and
we care a lot about it and because of
that we can make assumptions, start to
deep, etc. First, think about your
audience relative to your topic. That's
number one. Number two, come up with a
clear goal. Many of us take our audience
on a journey of our discovery of what we
want to say as we're saying it. We we
don't have a clear path. To me, a goal
has three parts: information, emotion,
and action. What do I want them to know,
how do I want them to feel, and what do
I want them to do?
Once you have an understanding of your
audience and your goal, then apply a
structure. Don't just list and itemize
information. Problem, solution, benefit,
past, present, future, what, so what,
now what? There are myriad structures.
If you do that, you will have content
that's meaningful to your audience and
increases the likelihood of fidelity of
the communication. Then you have to
practice. It's not enough to have a good
message, you have to practice the
delivery. If you do those things, you
will give better talks, you will have
better conversations, and better
meetings.
I was thinking about something a few
moments ago
for people that are afraid of public
speaking because they might choke or
dissolve into a puddle of their own
tears on stage or or freeze or whatever.
Um
do you think it's useful? I would think
it would be useful to try and think
about what you want to happen as opposed
to what you don't want to happen. That's
right. That's right. A lot of people
envision the worst and they self-create
that, right? It's a self-fulfilling
prophecy.
Imagine what the potential could be. Set
yourself for that positive expectation.
And it doesn't have to be this is going
to be the best communication ever. Just
be I'm going to add value. People are
going to learn something. People will
prevent The people won't make a mistake
that I'm advising them to avoid. Just
have a a positive outcome in mind and
that can really help. So,
thinking about what value is in it for
you and for your audience before you
communicate can really make a big
difference.
A few people asked questions uh that
relate to interpersonal relations that
you
maybe equipped to uh solve for them, but
like how should I win an argument
without losing somebody? I think that's
a Is that a different podcast? That
would be a whole different podcast.
Here's what I'll tell you though,
listening is important. A lot of our
arguments are over things that that
really don't exist. When I've been I've
done some mediation work in my life and
the number one thing I make people do
when I'm I bring two people who disagree
together is I make each listen to the
other and often the argument disappears.
People didn't realize that. And the
second bit of advice, I learned this
from two friends of mine. And my wife
and I deploy this a lot. When we are set
up to have a disagreement,
we each declare how important whatever
the issue is to us is. Because we
assume, you know, if I'm really
passionate about something, I assume
when we're arguing that you're equally
as passionate. But that's not always
true. But if I come at you with my full
passion and you're not as passionate,
I'm going to make you more passionate.
So, all of a sudden we're fighting. So,
if I want to go out to Chinese food, my
wife wants to go out to Mexican food, I
might say, "For me, Chinese food is an
eight because I really been craving it."
She says, "Mexican food for me is a
three today."
There's no fight. There's no argument.
But if she says it's an eight and I have
say it's an eight, then we have the
issue. So, understanding the
prioritization and really listening to
understand what's involved, you can
mitigate a lot of the conflict that
you're having.
Somebody asked, "How do I get rid of
filler words, um, like, etc.?"
I had a guest on my show. She's a
psycholinguist and she helped me realize
that filler words are not bad. Filler
words are actually helpful. They do
things for us. They They save the space.
So, if I'm not done talking and I don't
want others to interrupt, I say um and
uh. There's research in the child
development literature that says
when we speak to kids, before we say a
new term or give a new idea, we will
often preface it with a filler word, um
or uh. We signal what's coming next is
important and I think that's why it
drives us nuts when somebody says so
many filler words because we've been
trained as kids that something important
follows it and when all that follows it
is another um, we get frustrated. So,
the goal is not to eliminate these. The
goal is to make them not distracting. In
fact, playwrights and screenwriters will
actually add filler words to make it
sound human.
The best way I know to reduce filler
words, especially the ones that are most
annoying, and those are the ones that
sit in silence. So, I'm done speaking
um and then I start speaking again.
Those are the ones that really stand
out. is a breath technique. I learned
this from somebody who has been teaching
communication skills for a long, long
time. His name is Jerry Weisman and it's
called landing phrases.
When we speak, we need to be pushing air
out.
If I am inhaling, I can't speak. I
invite everybody listening and watching
to try to say um while inhaling.
You can't do it.
So, if I train myself at the end of my
sentences and phrases to land the
phrase, to be out of breath,
I have to inhale.
Not only can I not say um, I can't say
anything. I build in a pause. So, as you
speak, train yourself to land. And the
reason I call it landing a phrase, it's
like a gymnast who does all those flips
and twirls and then they stick the
landing. So, at the end of each of my
phrases, I'm completely out of breath.
I inhale and then I start speaking
again. You can reduce significantly the
filler words. Now, you have to practice
this and the way I teach everybody to
practice, look at your calendar or
schedule every day and once a day read
out loud everything on your schedule.
And at the end of each one, land the
phrase. So, I might say, "Going to lunch
with Andrew."
"Working out at the gym."
"Seeing my son for dinner." At the end
of each one of those phrases, I've
landed my my phrase. I'm out of breath.
I'm training myself how to do that.
You'll get rid of many of your filler
words.
Fantastic.
I'm going to try to do that.
You don't have many filler words.
I have to check some recordings of the
podcast. [laughter]
Someone wants to know how to tell a
story
without turning it into a sermon. Ah.
Like how to know when it's going on too
long. There are two ways to answer that
question. One is about time. How long
does it take? My mother has a wonderful
saying. She likes to say, "Tell the
time, don't build the clock." Many of us
are clock builders when we communicate.
We say much more than we need to. So, if
you have to tell a story, think about
what's the most critical few. In the
military, they talk about bottom line up
front. Get that bottom line up there.
So, don't say more than you need to.
The other part is you have to make the
story engaging and relevant to the
people you're talking to. A lot of
people have such a preamble to get to
the start.
A colleague of mine likes to talk about
parachuting in. Just jump right in and
then build the the rest of the story. A
lot of us Well, it was a rainy day and
then it was this and it was that and it
was that and you just get to the story
first. So, if you parachute in and you
remind yourself to be concise and clear,
you're going to tell more engaging and
better stories.
Several people asked
how to ask for a raise.
>> [laughter]
>> There are several characteristics I'd
like people to think about when you ask
for something that you want, especially
from a boss or an authority figure.
First, think about context.
Look at your boss's schedule before you
ask for a raise. Are you the fifth
meeting in a row before you go in? Maybe
it's better to go tomorrow when you're
early. So, context matters. People I
have a colleague who studied parole
decisions judges make and he found that
that decisions are different before
lunch and after lunch, even though the
cases are the same.
When you ask, you have to you have to
think about that. Second, when
positioning yourself,
think about from your boss's
perspective, what are the criteria they
would think about in terms of giving a
raise. Often we come and say, "Well,
I've done this and I've done this and
I've done this and this colleague got
that." Think about what value you have
brought to them. So, approach it from
their perspective. And think about how
you can position it so that you are
demonstrating your value again from
their perspective. And you should
practice. You should You should
role-play. Talk to other people, say,
"I'm thinking of saying this." Just so
the words come out instead of just
thinking in your head what you want to
say.
Several people asked about how best to
communicate with people who are not very
good at communicating.
That's a hard one. Uh
I would encourage people to lead with
questions. Draw the other person out.
Often, if you can get them talking about
something that's important to them or
connected to what you want, then you can
engage in that conversation. So, again,
it's pre-work. It's thinking about
what's of value. Lead with questions and
then as soon as the person responds,
give them space to tell more. My
mother-in-law had a black belt in small
talk. She was amazing. Uh she was from
the Midwest. Every time she'd fly out to
visit, she'd come off the plane with
three new best friends. And her secret,
and you mentioned this earlier, were
three words: tell me more. Once somebody
answers a question, give them that space
to say more and that really draws them
out and gives you some ideas of what's
important to them so you can latch on
and talk about it more. So, lead with
questions, give space for more
communication. That's how you draw
somebody who might be reticent or not
comfortable speaking.
Do you ever recommend people memorize
speeches? Never.
Uh there are times where I recommend
being very familiar with how you start.
Commencing is the part the point where
people are most nervous about speaking
is about 30 seconds before and about a
minute into what they're doing. So, you
can be very familiar but the reason
memorizing is so bad is it burdens your
cognitive load. You've created the right
way to say it and you're constantly
comparing what you wanted to say to what
you're actually saying. So, having a
road map, having a structure, having
some familiarity with some ideas are
important. If there's certain words that
you really want to get across or certain
data, have a note card, read it. I'd
rather you do that than put the
cognitive burden on yourself of
memorizing.
We talked a little bit about this
earlier but maybe we can just recap and
add anything that you want to the
question that's very common here which
is
how to reduce pre-talk anxiety. And it
could be public speaking or it could be
one-on-one communication.
We could talk a lot about this and when
you were on my show Andrew, we talked
about some of the biological things you
can do. When it comes to managing
anxiety, you have to manage both
symptoms and sources.
The symptoms are the things you
physiologically experience. You have
shared great advice on breathing etc.
I'll give one example. When I get really
nervous, I perspire and blush.
A great way to manage that is to cool
yourself down. The reason you're
perspiring and blushing is your heart
rate's going up, your body's tensing up.
It's like when you exercise. The palms
of your hand are thermoregulators for
your body. Anybody who's ever held warm
coffee or tea on a cold morning has felt
themselves warm up. I will always hold
something cold before I speak and it
helps cool me down. I blush and perspire
less.
So, there's things we can do to manage
physical symptoms. The breath work that
you talk about is really helpful. But we
also have to think about sources, the
things that initiate and exacerbate our
anxiety. I'll give one example. Many of
us are made nervous by the goal that we
have. I advocate for having a goal when
you communicate but sometimes that goal
makes us nervous. My students are afraid
they're not going to get a good grade.
The entrepreneurs I coach are afraid
they're not going to get funding. Uh the
people listening might be afraid their
boss isn't going to support their idea.
So, we're made nervous by a potential
negative future outcome. So, the way to
counteract that is to become present
oriented. Lots of ways to do that. You
can do deep breathing, you can walk
around the building, have a conversation
with somebody. I tell people do what
athletes do. Listen to a song or a
playlist that helps you get focused.
Start at 100 and count backwards by a
challenging numbers. Let's try 17s.
Really helps to focus and be present
oriented. My favorite way, and this is
going to sound really silly, I like to
say tongue twisters out loud.
You can't say a tongue twister right and
not be present oriented and it warms up
your voice. It's now a perfect to warm
up. So, before I ever do what any of my
podcast interviews or a big talk, I will
say a tongue twister out loud three
times fast and it gets me present and
warms me up. So, to manage anxiety, you
have to manage symptoms and some of the
things that initiate and exacerbate.
There are a whole bunch of those and if
you do it, you begin to create for
yourself an anxiety management plan
and you can invoke that plan and
actually just having that plan helps
reduce the anxiety you have. The very
first thing we do in my strategic
communication class is we have our
students create an anxiety management
plan and not only does it help them in
the course, I have students years later
say, "My grandmother passed away. I used
the anxiety management plan to help with
the eulogy or I'm doing a best man toast
and I'm using it."
Giving yourself tools to help manage
anxiety is at one of the biggest gifts
you can give to yourself.
Fantastic.
These are incredible
bits and frankly entire meals of advice
for people public communication and just
one-on-one communication and everything
in between is so important and people
really carry around a lot of fear and
anxiety about them but you've given us a
ton of practical tools and I know these
are time tested and there's data on many
of them and the real world data are
really what count the most.
>> Right.
So, I want to thank you for coming here
today to share them with us, also for
the books that you've written. We'll put
links to those in the show note captions
and
that you continue to get out there and
on here as a public educator. You know,
there are many, many people and books
talking about these topics but you
clearly thrown yourself into these as
like the guy who's really tackling them
for the greater good. So, I really
appreciate the breadth and specificity
of what you shared and I know everyone
else
will as well and I know that they're
going to apply them. So, my goal was to
do this outro without saying um once. I
guess I just said um.
You did it well. Thank you. Very fluent.
Come back again. I'd love to. Thank you.
Thank you for joining me for today's
discussion with Matt Abrahams. To learn
more about his work and to find links to
the various resources we discussed,
please see the show note caption. If
you're learning from and or enjoying
this podcast, please subscribe to our
YouTube channel. That's a terrific zero
cost way to support us. In addition,
please follow the podcast by clicking
the follow button on both Spotify and
Apple. And on both Spotify and Apple,
you can leave us up to a five star
review and you can now leave us comments
at both Spotify and Apple. Please also
check out the sponsors mentioned at the
beginning and throughout today's
episode. That's the best way to support
this podcast. If you have questions for
me or comments about the podcast or
guests or topics that you'd like me to
consider for the Huberman Lab podcast,
please put those in the comment section
on YouTube. I do read all the comments.
For those of you that haven't heard, I
have a new book coming out. It's my very
first book. It's entitled Protocols, an
Operating Manual for the Human Body.
This is a book that I've been working on
for more than five years and that's
based on more than 30 years of research
and experience and it covers protocols
for everything from sleep to exercise,
to stress control, protocols related to
focus and motivation and of course, I
provide the scientific substantiation
for the protocols that are included. The
book is now available by pre-sale at
protocolsbook.com.
There you can find links to various
vendors. You can pick the one that you
like best. Again, the book is called
Protocols, an Operating Manual for the
Human Body. And if you're not already
following me on social media, I am
Huberman Lab on all social media
platforms. So, that's Instagram, X,
Threads, Facebook and LinkedIn. And on
all those platforms, I discuss science
and science related tools, some of which
overlaps with the content of the
Huberman Lab podcast but much of which
is distinct from the information on the
Huberman Lab podcast. Again, it's
Huberman Lab on all social media
platforms. And if you haven't already
subscribed to our Neural Network
newsletter, the Neural Network
newsletter is a zero cost monthly
newsletter that includes podcast
summaries as well as what we call
protocols in the form of one to three
page PDFs that cover everything from how
to optimize your sleep, how to optimize
dopamine delivery, cold exposure. We
have a foundational fitness protocol
that covers cardiovascular training and
resistance training. All of that is
available completely zero cost. You
simply go to hubermanlab.com, go to the
menu tab in the top right corner, scroll
down to newsletter and enter your email.
And I should emphasize that we do not
share your email with anybody. Thank you
once again for joining me for today's
discussion with Matt Abrahams. And last
but certainly not least, thank you for
your interest [music]
in science.