Video summary
In this Ask Me Anything episode, Dr. Andrew Huberman clarifies the critical distinction between clinical obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and common neurotic tendencies or specific behavioral fixations often colloquially labeled as "being OCD." He explains that true OCD is characterized by compulsive behaviors that fail to reduce anxiety regarding obsessions; instead, they exacerbate it. In contrast, individuals who are particular about cleanliness, exercise routines, or perfectionism can achieve lasting relief and comfort through these actions without suffering from a disorder. Huberman emphasizes that while the "30-day abstinence" protocol discussed with Dr. Anna Lembke is effective for resetting dopamine pathways regarding substances like alcohol or drugs, it does not apply to intrusive thoughts in the same way. Abstaining from food is unhealthy, and one cannot simply stop thinking about abstract concepts without a specific strategy tailored to the nature of the thought itself. Huberman defines thoughts as internal perceptions that combine data from the past, present, and future, distinguishing them from external sensations or immediate behaviors. He identifies two primary categories for intrusive thoughts requiring different interventions: those that are merely repetitive but not disturbing, such as an annoying song stuck in one's head, and those that are deeply troubling due to their emotional content, often resembling trauma. For the first category—thoughts on a loop without significant distress—the recommended strategy is to anchor attention to external stimuli or engage in focused activities like mindful meditation. Drawing on research from Dr. Wendy Suzuki at NYU and his own lab's studies, he notes that improving focus through short daily practices helps wane these background loops over time by directing cognitive resources elsewhere rather than trying to suppress the thoughts directly. When intrusive thoughts are disturbing because they involve trauma or upsetting narratives, Huberman argues for a counterintuitive approach: getting very close to the source of the distress. He cites Dr. Paul Conti's definition of trauma as an event that fundamentally alters nervous system function adaptively and suggests that extinguishing such intrusive thoughts requires detailed engagement with them rather than avoidance. The most effective method described is extensive journaling, where individuals script out every detail of the disturbing thought using complete sentences to impose structure on fragmentary mental chatter. This process transforms a hijacking emotional story into an old, boring narrative by depleting its emotional load through exposure and articulation, similar to how one might address a superstition like "knocking on wood" by writing down worst-case scenarios until the fear diminishes. To fully support this recovery from intrusive thoughts and trauma, Huberman highlights the physiological necessity of high-quality sleep rich in rapid eye movement (REM) cycles. REM sleep is essential for removing emotional loads associated with traumatic experiences and processing disturbing memories effectively. He directs listeners to free resources available on his website regarding mastering sleep protocols to ensure they obtain sufficient restorative sleep alongside their cognitive exercises. Ultimately, he advises that if thoughts are truly intrusive due to clinical OCD, individuals should seek a psychiatrist; however, for those dealing with repetitive or trauma-based narratives, the combination of focused attention training and structured writing serves as an effective form of self-administered therapy. The episode concludes by reiterating that these science-based tools aim to improve mental health and performance while supporting ongoing research funded through his premium channel partnership with the Tiny Foundation.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast,
where we discuss science and
science-based tools for everyday life.
I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor
of neurobiology and ophthalmology at
Stanford School of Medicine. Today is an
Ask Me Anything episode or AMA. This is
part of our premium subscriber channel.
Our premium subscriber channel was
started in order to provide support for
the standard Huberman Lab Podcast, which
comes out every Monday and is available
at zero cost to everybody on all
standard feeds, YouTube, Apple, Spotify
and elsewhere. We also started the
premium channel as a way to generate
support for exciting research being done
at Stanford and elsewhere. Research on
human beings that leads to important
discoveries that assist mental health,
physical health and performance. I'm
also pleased to inform you that for
every dollar the Huberman Lab premium
channel generates for research studies,
the Tiny Foundation has agreed to match
that amount. So now we are able to
double the total amount of funding given
to studies of mental health, physical
health and human performance. If you'd
like to subscribe to the Huberman Lab
Podcast premium channel, please go to
hubermanlab.com/premium.
It is $10 a month to subscribe or you
can pay $100 all at once to get an
entire 12-month subscription for a year.
We also have a lifetime subscription
model that is a one-time payment and
again you can find that option at
hubermanlab.com/premium.
For those of you that are already
subscribers to the premium channel,
please go to hubermanlab.com/premium
and download the premium subscription
feed. And for those of you that are not
Huberman Lab Podcast premium
subscribers, you can still hear the
first 20 minutes of today's episode and
determine whether or not becoming a
premium subscriber is for you. And now
without further ado, I will answer your
questions and as always I will strive to
be as thorough as possible, as clear as
possible and as concise as possible. Our
first question is about abstaining from
thoughts and in answering this question
we're going to skirt right up against a
topic that I've covered before on the
podcast, which is obsessive-compulsive
disorder, which is a very serious
disorder. I mean, it can have a range of
severity, but people with true OCD
suffer a lot from obsessions.
These are intrusive thoughts and
compulsions,
which are the behaviors typically
associated with those thoughts. I think
it's really important that we define OCD
really clearly so that we can make sure
that we're talking about intrusive
thoughts and the desire to abstain from
thoughts versus OCD and where there
might be some overlap there. The
functional definition of OCD
that really pertains to the disorder,
obsessive-compulsive disorder,
OCD as opposed to, you know, we call
people neurotic or we say you have OCD
or I'm so OCD about this or OCD about
that. That's become kind of common use
of the of the acronym OCD. But true OCD
is a situation in which the engaging in
a particular compulsive behavior
does not serve to reduce
the intensity or the frequency of the
obsessions. In fact, it makes it worse.
Okay, so um the typical thing that we
hear these days is, "Oh, you're so OCD."
Or he's so OCD or she's so OCD or I'm so
OCD.
Now, if someone is OCD in that sense,
okay, so not the the clinical disorder,
but OCD in the sense that, you know,
they're they're really clean. They're
really fastidious. They need everything
perfect. However, that person can
achieve some level of calm and comfort
that's fairly long-lasting if
everything's clean and perfect, well,
then that's not obsessive-compulsive
disorder. This is really important to
understand as we venture into answering
the question about intrusive thoughts
and the desire to abstain from certain
thoughts.
A person with true OCD
will keep cleaning and cleaning or
washing their hands or or arranging
things at perfect right angles, but the
more they do it, the more their anxiety
goes up.
A person who has more typical, um, gosh,
we don't really even have a language for
this nowadays, unfortunately, but the
sort of person that's extremely
particular, they need things a certain
way, and they're very driven to resolve
things and do things to make sure that
things are done in a certain way
or handled in a certain way.
Well, if that person can experience
relief from engaging in, let's say,
exercise or from cleaning, right? You'd
say, "You're so OCD about exercise."
Well, but if exercising for an hour or
even 2 hours in the morning makes
somebody really calm the rest of the day
and they don't need to exercise, well,
then they're not necessarily true OCD.
They don't necessarily have a disorder
related to exercise. However, if they're
exercising for 2 hours in the morning
and then they find they can't
concentrate on other things and their
desire to exercise just increases and
increases and becomes intrusive for
them, disrupting their quality of life
throughout the day,
well, then that's falling under the
umbrella of what we would call a true
disorder. Okay? So, we want to highlight
that because the question is about a
desire to abstain from thoughts, and the
question is, "In your discussion with
Dr. Anna Lembke," and I should just
mention, Dr. Anna Lembke is the director
of our dual diagnosis addiction clinic
at Stanford University School of
Medicine. She's the author of this
incredible book Dopamine Nation that I
think everybody should read. I do
believe everyone should read that book.
So important for the addict and
non-addict alike because it deals with
basically the state of our life
nowadays. We're living in this
dopamine-rich world where we can quickly
become dopamine depleted, which is
terrible, leads to depression in
addition to things like addiction in
some folks, etc. Anna was a guest on the
podcast. You can find her episode at
hubermanlab.com. Just put Anna. I think
she's the only guest we've had thus far
whose, um, name is Anna, so it'll just
pop up there. The entire website is
searchable, but if you want to listen to
that episode or watch that episode,
you can access it at hubermanlab.com.
The question in your discussion with Dr.
Anna Lembke, you were talking about
abstaining from people's drug of choice
for 30 days to reset the dopamine reward
pathway. And indeed, that is the
prescriptive that Dr. Anna Lembke gives
for most all addictions and for people
that are suffering from milder even
severe depression related to dopamine
seeking behaviors,
social media, video games,
sex, food, etc. However, of course, in
the instance of food or in some other
addictions, you can't abstain for 30
days, right? That would be terrible to
abstain from food for 30 days. I'm sure
people have done it, um but it is not
healthy to do. Certain things like
alcohol and drugs, people can abstain
for 30 days in efforts to never go back
to them again. There are cases of severe
alcohol or opiate dependence where
people can't go cold turkey or they risk
dying. So, there they need to really
work with a a physician, but the 30-day
reset
of the dopamine system is something
that's very real and that pertains to
most people. That is, it's going to be
very effective for most people
struggling with either behavioral, what
are sometimes called process addictions,
or other types of addictions including
substance abuse issues.
The question continues, you said you
were going to ask Anna how to abstain if
your drug of choice is a thought or
narrative as opposed to a substance or a
behavior.
The question continues, as far as I can
tell, your discussion with Anna moved on
before you asked her the question.
Would you be able to discuss strategies
for abstaining from addictive thoughts
and narratives? Okay, so let's talk
about intrusive thoughts and let's start
off by asking ourselves, what is a
thought? Okay, in the realm of
neurobiology, we have sensations, which
are the uh processes by which our
neurons, nerve cells, convert light,
photons, sound waves,
touch, mechanical pressure,
etc. into electrical signals and
chemical signals that head into our
nervous system including our brain, and
then our brain at least we think makes
sense of them
and help us navigate the world that
we're in. Okay, so the sensation part is
a pure transformation of mechanical
information or
in some cases chemical information like
smell. Chemicals literally, volatile
chemicals floating around in the world
are brought into your nose and your
neurons in your olfactory bulb convert
those into electrical and chemical
signals that your brain can understand.
Perceptions
are your idea of what those signals out
in the world are.
Either because you're paying attention
to them or for some other reason you
decide that a stop sign in front of you
is red and that um the sign behind it is
white and that the sky is blue or
cloudy. Those are perceptions. Okay? So
we have sensations and perceptions.
Then we have emotions which are these
things that include the mind and body
that um are related to neuromodulators
like dopamine, serotonin, etc. Although
those chemicals do other things as well.
And then of course we have behaviors,
actions, everything from me moving my
pen on a piece of paper to walking,
running, etc.
Thoughts are a fifth category of neural
functioning that we really need to
define but that doesn't have as strict a
definition as sensations, perceptions,
or feeling, or action. But thoughts are
real, right? We all know this. Thoughts
are real. And one way that we can define
thoughts is that thoughts are
perceptions that
include data from the past present or
future. Okay? Or combinations of past
and present or present and future or
future and past. Okay? I'm not trying to
give an overly complicated definition
here, but if we are going to answer for
question about how to abstain from
thoughts in a really direct and
actionable way, we really need to
address what are thoughts. So, thoughts
are perceptions that are generated
internally, right? We don't need any
external sensation in order to have a
thought. We can close our eyes, we could
be in sensory isolation for that matter.
We can be floating with no gravity and
we can have a thought.
Thoughts tend to run
pretty much automatically in the
background all the time. Some people
refer to this as chatter in the back of
our minds in a very unstructured way.
And then if we force our thoughts to be
structured
because we decide they need to be or if
something in our environment captures
our perception,
then our thoughts tend to be structured.
Let me give you an example. If I'm just
walking around,
if there were a way in which we could
broadcast my thoughts onto a screen, I
hope we wouldn't do that, but those
thoughts would be a mixture of
semi-complete sentences and gibberish.
However, if somebody stops me and says,
"Hi. Um good to see you. What are you
doing today?" and I start answering,
well, then my thoughts are suddenly
being driven by an external stimulus,
their question, and some internal ideas,
memory of who I am and what I'm doing
that day, so past and present and so on.
And so thoughts become structured.
So, when we have a question about how to
abstain from thoughts, we need to be
additionally specific and really
pinpoint that what we're trying to do is
to abstain from thoughts we don't want,
presumably, either because they are too
repetitive and distracting or because
what's contained in those thoughts is
disturbing.
Okay.
This is important because it gives us
two answers to the questions that are
highly divergent.
One answer to the question of how to
abstain from intrusive thoughts, you
know, thoughts that we're addicted to,
is if those thoughts are merely on loop
all the time and we You stop them, but
the thoughts themselves aren't
particularly disturbing. So, think about
a song you can't get out of your head,
or you keep recounting some event, but
the event itself isn't very disturbing.
It's just intrusive because it's there.
Well, in that case, the data really
point to trying to anchor your thoughts
to some external stimulus. So, getting
into action,
getting into activities that really draw
your attention away from that thought.
Now, you may still hear it scrolling in
the background, so you might be sitting
in class still hearing that loop of
thoughts in the background. That's
something that over time ought to wane,
it ought to disappear,
if we try and bring more and more
attention
to whatever it is that's in our
environment, whatever it is that we
happen to
be learning or
doing physically, et cetera.
Things like mindful meditation, doing a
10 or even just 5-minute a day practice
of sitting with eyes closed or lying
down with eyes closed and really
focusing on one's breath, focusing one's
attention on the sometimes it's called
the third eye center, but in science
we'd say the just the region right
behind the forehead, you're directing
your attention there, has been shown to
increase focus for singular topics,
and can improve memory and do a bunch of
other things as well. Those are data
from Dr. Wendy Suzuki's lab at New York
University. She was a guest on the
podcast as well. My laboratory has run
studies on mindful meditation as well.
So, what you're really trying to do is
learn how to focus better on one thing,
and by focusing on that one thing, you
focus off these repetitive thoughts.
Now, I have a feeling that this question
was asked and that many people upvoted
this question because the issue isn't
just thoughts that are intrusive because
they're there and on repeat, but because
the thoughts themselves
are actually
troubling.
This could be recounting a trauma,
someone harmed you, you observed
something that was disturbing,
um you felt wronged, um you felt someone
else was wronged, um you can't seem to
get your mind off of something and your
emotions tend to follow and so it's
uncomfortable. I have a feeling this is
the the root of the question.
In that case, the approach is very
different. What we know from essentially
all of the quality scientific and
clinical studies
is that those sorts of intrusive
thoughts are very much like a trauma.
Now, we have to be clear in defining
what trauma is. I'll use the definition
that Dr. Paul Conti, another incredible
guest that was on our podcast,
a psychiatrist, Stanford, Harvard
trained I think one of the world's
foremost leaders on the issue of trauma
and psychiatry and psychology generally.
He defines trauma as an event or
something that fundamentally changes the
way that your nervous system works such
that you function less adaptively going
forward from that event. Okay, so not
every bad occurrence in your life is a
trauma.
That's good news. The bad news is many
people have traumas and traumas change
the way that our nervous system works so
that we don't function as well as we
could. So in that sense,
intrusive thoughts that are disturbing
are in many ways traumas and are
reinforcing that trauma. Now, we know
that almost counterintuitively,
in order to deal with trauma, you have
to get very close to that trauma. You
don't have to re-expose and I would hope
you would not re-expose yourself to the
very same trauma, but we know that one
of the best ways to deal with traumas is
to get very clear about the narrative
around those traumas. Now, this can be
done with a therapist
ideally,
but not everyone has access to therapy
or can afford therapy.
There's a range of quality of therapists
for that matter. So, we're always
referring to the desire for people to
great therapy with really great
meaning excellently trained people.
But it turns out that if you want to
extinguish an intrusive thought, one of
the best ways to do that is to journal
about that particular thought
extensively. So, rather than the earlier
strategy for intrusive thoughts where
they're just on loop and intrusive
because they're on loop and present,
but their content isn't disturbing. When
a thought is disturbing and intrusive,
we know that it's very useful to script
out as much detail about that particular
thought and the things around it as
possible. Obviously, you want to do this
in a way that
is fairly structured, so you ideally
would use complete sentences. So, the
reason for doing that is that thoughts,
as I mentioned earlier, can often be
fragmentary, so they they pop up in our
mind almost
we seemingly spontaneously. They're
they're inhibiting our ability to focus
or be present to work or family or other
things or sleep.
Writing things down in a lot of detail
does seem to have this quality of both
reducing the emotional load of whatever
it is that that thought is about,
as well as diminishing the frequency of
those intrusive thoughts over time.
So, this is far and away different than
the strategy I mentioned for the other
types of intrusive thoughts. And really,
it's far and away different from the
30-day abstinence approach that Dr. Anna
Lembke was talking about for substance
or behavioral addictions. Now, of
course, this process of abstaining from
thoughts or
removing the addictive nature of certain
thoughts
can definitely take some time. So, a
good example there would be
superstitions. You know, I'll come clean
here, and I've talked about this before
on a few podcasts, that when I was in
college, I developed a sort of
knock-on-wood superstition. Um anytime
I'd say something that I didn't want to
happen or did want to happen, I'd say
knock on wood, and I'd knock on wood.
And then I started um suppressing the
behavior, mostly because it was a little
embarrassing. And then I started just
telling myself in my head knock on wood,
knock on wood, knock on wood. And it was
clearly a little bit of an OCD type
thing. But again, OCD in air quotes
here. Um I think it qualified as OCD in
the sense that the more I did it, the
more I wanted to do it. So, I needed to
go cold turkey on the thinking, but how
can you go cold turkey on a thought? You
couldn't. What I was told to do and what
worked very well for me was to just
write down the worst possible outcome
that I was concerned about. So, to
really get close to the nature or the
underlying basis of that intrusive
thought. And I raise this because a lot
of times the intrusive thought is not,
"Okay, I'm thinking about a car
accident." or "I'm thinking about a
breakup." or "I'm thinking about an exam
that I have."
That can be intrusive, but a lot of
times it's some kind of um
nebulous, abstract set of words or ideas
or images around something that happened
that we saw or heard or experienced.
And by putting a lot of clear structure
to what the thought is exactly
and to putting some thought and
structure onto paper about
what that pattern of not healthy
thinking relates to,
people often achieve tremendous relief
in a fairly short amount of time.
Sometimes just in one session of writing
it down, sometimes they need to write it
down multiple times. What you're
essentially trying to do with a
intrusive thought or a trauma of any
kind is you're trying to turn a
disturbing story, that is a story that
evokes a lot of emotion, and
captures, it kind of hijacks your
nervous system,
into what is essentially a known, but
repetitive and kind of old boring story
where the emotional load has been
depleted. And there are, of course, I
have to highlight the fact that getting
sufficient rapid eye movement sleep, we
also know is very important for removing
the emotional load of traumatic
experiences and intrusive thoughts. So,
you really want to strive to get the
best possible sleep you can that
includes sufficient rapid eye movement
sleep.
And we have multiple zero cost resources
for that at hubermanlab.com. We have the
episode on master your sleep, we have
the episode on perfect your sleep, we
have the toolkit for sleep, all of which
are time-stamped and all of which can be
accessed completely zero cost to try and
get your sleep um as good as possible
including lots of rapid eye movement
sleep. So, in order to
remove intrusive and addictive thoughts,
ask yourself, is this OCD of the classic
sense? If it is, you should see a
psychiatrist. They won't necessarily
prescribe medication, but there are
tools for true OCD that that are very
effective in many cases.
And we did the episode on OCD which I
invite you to to listen to as well.
You want to ask yourself, are the
thoughts disturbing or merely intrusive
and repetitive? If they're merely
intrusive and repetitive, well, then
learning to focus your attention on
other things and getting better at
focusing on single things through an
exercise like mindful mindfulness
meditation can really help and indeed
the
perhaps the best use of mindfulness
meditation
is to improve your level of focus. It
does have other benefits as well, but
that's going to be the major one that
one will experience even with these very
short five or 10-minute a day
meditations. Great data on that from the
scientific literature.
And then, if those intrusive thoughts
are not only intrusive, but they're also
disturbing, in that case, you really
want to put as much structure
and thought, believe it or not, into
what those thoughts are really about,
write them out on paper in complete
sentences, and maybe do that multiple
times until the underlying emotions
related to those thoughts really start
to diminish. And by doing that, you're
essentially doing your own form of
trauma therapy, for lack of a better way
to put it. And again, the data really
point to the fact that getting close to
the specific details around those
intrusive thoughts is going to be the
best way to extinguish them. Thank you
for joining for the beginning of this
Ask Me Anything episode. To hear the
full episode and to hear future episodes
of these Ask Me Anything sessions, plus
to receive transcripts of them and
transcripts of the Huberman Lab podcast
standard channel and premium tools not
released anywhere else, please go to
hubermanlab.com/premium.
Just to remind you why we launched the
Huberman Lab podcast premium channel,
it's really twofold. First of all, it's
to raise support for the standard
Huberman Lab podcast channel, which of
course will still be continued to be
released every Monday in full length. We
are not going to change the format or
anything about the standard Huberman Lab
podcast
and to fund research. In particular,
research done on human beings, so not
animal models, but on human beings,
which I think we all agree as a species
that we are most interested in, and we
are going to specifically fund research
that is aimed toward developing further
protocols for mental health, physical
health, and performance. And those
protocols will be distributed through
all channels, not just the premium
channel, but through all channels,
Huberman Lab podcast and other media
channels. So, the idea here is to give
you information to your burning
questions in depth and allow you the
opportunity to support the kind of
research that provides those kinds of
answers in the first place. Now, an
especially exciting feature of the
premium channel is that the Tiny
Foundation has generously offered to do
a dollar-for-dollar match on all funds
raised for research through the premium
channel.
So, this is a terrific way that they're
going to amplify whatever funds come in
through the premium channel to further
support research for science and
science-related tools for mental health,
physical health, and performance. If
you'd like to sign up for the Huberman
Lab premium channel, again, there's a
cost of $10 per month or you can pay
$100 up front for the entire year. That
will give you access to all the AMAs.
You can ask questions and get answers to
your questions, and you'll of course get
answers to all the questions that other
people ask as well. There will also be
some premium content such as transcripts
of the AMAs and various transcripts and
protocols of Huberman Lab podcast
episodes not found elsewhere. And again,
you'll be supporting research for mental
health, physical health, and
performance. You can sign up for the
premium channel by going to
hubermanlab.com/premium.
Again, that's hubermanlab.com/premium.
And as always, thank you for your
interest in science.