Video summary
The video features a conversation between Julia C. Patrick and Jeffrey Wilcox regarding the urgent need to shift from traditional strategic planning to what they term "success planning." They argue that standard six-hour retreats, often held at country clubs, are insufficient for addressing the complex challenges facing modern nonprofits, particularly given demographic shifts like an aging leadership population. Instead of merely setting goals for the next three years, organizations must define what success actually looks like and understand the driving forces behind it, such as policy advocacy and community equity, rather than just focusing on functional tasks or fundraising metrics. This approach requires moving from a mindset of preserving the status quo to one of creating tangible impact and building financial sustainability through financing and stakeholder relationships.
A core component of this new methodology is the role of interim leadership, which is frequently misunderstood as simply filling a temporary vacancy like a substitute teacher. Jeffrey explains that true transitional leaders are there to build capacity and facilitate transformational change, not just to maintain operations until a permanent hire is found. This process involves forming a transition team that includes diverse stakeholders, such as board members, donors, and staff, to establish a "shared truth" about the organization's reality before making any strategic moves. By asking tough questions without the fear of losing their own jobs, interim leaders can challenge outdated structures and encourage organizations to pivot toward a new chapter of service, effectively building a runway for future leaders rather than acting as the jet itself.
The conversation concludes by emphasizing that this shift requires a fundamental change in how boards and staff view planning as an ongoing organizational process rather than a one-time project with a fixed end date. Success is achieved not by completing a document at the end of a retreat, but by continuously refining strategies based on data and community feedback through listening sessions and internal navigation tools. Ultimately, the goal is to foster an evolutionary mindset where organizations can navigate choppy waters with a compass of shared values, ensuring they remain relevant and effective in serving their communities despite external pressures and internal limitations.
Read the full video transcript
Hey, welcome back everybody. It's
another episode of the nonprofit show.
One of my all-time faves, Jeffrey
Wilcox, has graced us with his presence.
My friend, where are you coming to us
from today?
>> Costa Mesa, California.
>> Wow. So, you're there giving a speech um
that just when you told me about what
the topic was, I want to jump on a plane
and come watch it. I mean, really
interesting stuff that you do. Um, and
you're such a great thought leader. But
today, we got to back the bus up and
talk about strategic planning, transform
transformative planning. I can't even
say it. A new way to look at things. I'm
really excited, Jeffrey, to get you on
board with this. What an interesting
conversation.
>> Thank you.
>> Yeah, really, really interesting. Hey,
you know, we get to have these
interesting conversations because we
have amazing partners and they include
Bloomerang American Nonprofit Academy,
Staffing Boutique, JMT Consulting, of
course, our friends at Third Sector
Company, your part-time controller, and
Martis, the newest member of our
sponsorship family. I'm Julia C.
Patrick, CEO of the American Nonprofit
Academy. And as I mentioned, Jeffreyel
R. Wilcox, not a lot of pressure, huh,
my friend? Um, as I'm like, what are my
faves? What are the thought leaders? But
I I'm always captivated by the things
that you say, the things that you spark.
Even just in the green room today, you
said something that just like blew my
mind wide open. So, let's start with
what the third sector is and then what
is the third sector company do because
this is a really interesting topic.
Well, thanks Julia and third sector
actually as a name comes from the
British Commonwealth. There is the
private sector, the public sector and
the third sector. So the idea of the
name really is a worldwide sense that
there is another segment of society that
is trying to make society better and is
absolutely intrinsic to a society's
infrastructure. That's the name. Now
here's what we do. For the past 25
years, we have helped organizations
build a bridge between their prideful
past and through interim leadership and
through succession planning and through
training create a hopeful future. And
I'll tell you that looks different for
every organization. But I built this
company, Julia, because there was such a
lack of succession planning going on in
nonprofits that we had to create some
ways for for well-meaning people to
build a bridge between what they were
founded to do, what they're currently
doing, and what they need to do. And
that is a science that is a business,
and that's a a core of professionals to
steward people to higher ground in their
service to others. Well, it's really
interesting to me and and Jeffrey, we
talk about this a lot privately, you and
I, and and I've talked about this
privately with your team members, and
that is when I think about like the top
10 issues for the nonprofit sector. Um,
one of them is this change in leadership
due to demographics, an aging leadership
society. And we have all of these folks
founders, CEOs, seuite members that are
retiring out and paralyzing
organizations if they haven't planned
for this. So this concept of the interim
leadership to me is one of the biggest
opportunities and misses at the same
time because if you don't understand
this and you haven't witnessed it in
your community,
you're going to be like, "What? what
what does this mean? What do they do?
You know, and so I'm fascinated by this
topic of leadership in this really odd
time, right? Because this is a
demographic issue. This isn't a choice.
This is just strictly an aging
population and and moving through how we
we lead our our third sector, if you
will. So, part and parcel to this is
planning and understanding the future.
Um but when we think about interim
leadership and planning and strategic
planning, you have some different
thoughts on this. Help us understand
what modern strategic planning might
look like.
>> Well, Julie, if we think about the
environment we're in right now, I hope
most people would agree the strategic
plans that were written immediately
before COVID practically became
absolutely impossible to try and pursue.
And as we've come off COVID, as we've
looked at um some of the things that
have happened in policymaking at all
levels around the country right now and
how nonprofits are impacted by public
funding, public opinion, and public
policy, the idea that a strategic plan
can be a Saturday afternoon at a country
club with a large lunch, a couple of
breaks, and by three o'clock this smoke
goes up and we've figured out what we're
going to do for the next three years is
pretty naive.
>> Yeah. And yet, my friend, I can tell you
I am still being contacted by boards who
are like, "Can you come lead a six-hour
retreat to figure out what we're going
to do for six years?" It's like, really?
>> And so, you know, the thing we've
learned through intram management is
that organizations that contemplate
about what's next have to be very
thoughtful about what h how do we begin
with the end in mind? because we want to
hire leaders that will be able to
steward us to where we want to go. And
if we haven't figured that out, the
chances are we're not going to hire the
right leader to get us there.
>> Part of interim leadership, which I
think is something that is absolutely
misunderstood, is our role is even
though interim leaders are hired to fill
vacancies, our role is to lower
executive attrition. Because it's not
just that executives are aging. We also
are in an environment today where the
career path of an executive is much
shorter than it used to be at any age.
>> Yeah.
>> So, we've got to create environments
where people want to go to work, where
people want to be of service, and they
want to stay.
>> Right. You know, you mentioned something
in the green room that I thought was
fascinating. Um, and you'd actually
written this in a in an email to me
about why don't organizations
define what success looks like.
>> So often we just we are like more
focused on task management. You know,
how do we get through the day? How do we
get through the month? How do we get
through the year? You know, a really
limited viewpoint as opposed to what is
success. And I that kind of shook me to
the core because I witnessed to you in
the in the green room. I see that with
myself, you know, stepping back and
saying, "What is my success versus what
are my tasks?" Wow.
Hair on fire moment, Jeffrey, because
those are two very different things.
>> They are. And and we have trained our
interims to help um light a match. Um so
a lot of hair goes on fire in
organizations across the country. And
and and quite frankly, Julia, the first
thing we have to do is we have to change
the narrative.
>> Strategic planning is is an antiquated
term.
>> What we really are talking about now is
success planning. How does an
organization begin to think about what
is success or how they're going to
pursue success? And I have to tell you
and I'll briefly say there are five
significant differences that we teach
our intrams between strategic planning
and success planning. Here they are if
you want me to rattle them off.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I need to I need to know
this.
>> So number one, we have to move from
understanding the functions of our
organization to the forces of our
success. And what that means is we stop
arranging our strategic plans based on
the functions of a nonprofit corporation
and we look at the driving forces that
will either lead us to or from success.
And I'll give you a couple of examples
of that. Yeah,
>> success plans are are more about not
we're going to have partners. It's
talking about what's our role in the
community's ecosystem. It is one force
is our ability to advocate for policy
because we are so heavily publicly
funded that we have to understand
appropriately as a 501c3 how we can push
the limit because those dollars are so
dependent on what we do. We're moving
from functionality to the forces of
success. But wait, there's more.
You move a plan that is somewhat
aspirational like we need to raise more
money to achievement. We need to lift
15,000 people out of poverty and we're
going to do that not by ourselves but by
being a community leader and getting it
done. It's moving from being a an
infrastructure to an impact
organization. How do we create impact?
From fundraising to financing and from
engaging people to building equity. It's
it's the driving forces. It's the
achievements we want to see. It's how
we're going to create impact in the
lives of the community and the
community. Moving from fundraising to
financing and having built equity with
all the stakeholders in a community,
that is a success plan. Have none of
those things, I can guarantee you, you
have no success.
>> Okay. So, again, second hair on fire
moment of the day. And I don't have a
lot of high a lot of hair to give up.
Uh,
I'm shocked by
your comments because I feel Jeffrey,
this is a heavy lift for a board who's
thinking, you know, they probably served
on other boards. They've probably done
that country club Saturday. You know,
they think that it's going to just this
is what we do. Those five points, any
one of those five points, um, is is
going to kind of blow some minds, right?
It's a new way of thinking about it. And
we're talking about organizational
planning and we're talking about
refocusing how we think about things. Is
this reasonable to think that an interim
can bring this about or is it because
it's a new person you can bring it
about? Do you know what I mean? Like
sometimes if you have the same people at
the table, it's really hard to get
everybody to think in a new way. or is
the magic part of this is that you've
got a new voice and so people are
hearing things differently.
>> Part of the magic is the questions you
ask reasonable and smart people not what
you try and tell them.
>> Okay. Strategic planning today in my and
now we're going to call success planning
consultation is based on are on are we
asking the right questions in the right
way to the right people.
>> And as consultants in planning if we're
not asking the right questions to the
right people in the right way we're not
going to get the answers that we want
>> right
>> all of this requires buyin. It's a buyin
to say we live in a dynamic environment.
We are trying to u navigate choppy
water. How do we do that together? And I
will also tell you it it it asks the
questions of maybe we need to
restructure so that these ideas aren't h
something that's held in a retreat.
These are ideas that mobilize the way in
which we think and operate.
So when I hear you say that, I feel like
a lot of times the the the preuncterary
strategic plan versus the success plan,
you meet, you think, you write the stuff
down and then you kind of measure
yourself at the end of the year or four
Q4 and there's nothing you can do.
You've either been successful or you
failed versus what I hear you saying is
like it seems like this is a continual
discussion. You're refining it. You're
you're addressing it. You're not just
beginning of the year, end of the year.
Is that is that fair to say?
>> That is very fair to say. And I will go
out on a limb to say my lived experience
in this is many nonprofits think of
planning as a project. When the plan is
done, the project is over. And it really
is it really is an organizational
process
>> because how in the world can you
navigate a ship without a compass in
your hand, right? And goodness knows the
magnetic forces that drive that compass
may not be the same ones as you get out
of the middle of the sea to you know
drive that metaphor to a to a point. But
the fact is
what we need to do is talk about not
what we not only what we've achieved but
what we've learned. organizations that
are saying we're a learning organization
to take on complex problems in society
are constantly saying okay what is our
experience teaching us and then we don't
sit on that.
>> Right. Right.
It's an interesting thing because um
[snorts]
it sounds to me like you started off
with the board because the board is
working with the interim leader, interim
decisions,
you know, final placement,
but you have a team that you're leading
whether it's five people or 500 that
also have to be re-educated, right? Or
re resparked in a new way. Is is that
fair to say?
>> It's totally fair to say. And when
organizations are open to looking at
transitional management, let's get a rid
of the I word. Interim goes back to an
era when we were in first grade and we
thought about a substitute teacher
walking in the room. Intra leadership
today is someone who is coming into
organizations to help provide
transformational management to good
people who want to see good things
happen in their community.
>> And I for heaven's sakes I hope there
are some people who say keeping doing
what we've always done is kind of a
stupid thing for us to do in today's
environment. How can we find someone to
help us break the cycle
>> so that we can get on a new course with
a new leader to be successful? And that
requires someone who's been trained and
is willing to ask tough questions.
>> Yeah. is willing to say, you know what,
is it time to merge with another
organization in the community before
hiring another executive because the
funding for this organization is going
to paralyze your ability where if you
could leverage it with another
organization, you probably could help
far more. Now, what are you in this for?
Preservation or or real change in a
community?
>> Yeah. And it takes an intram to ask
those kinds of questions with a certain
type of tough love
that that we are all stewards of
mission. And in standing up to that
duty, sometimes steward of mission means
we have to make some tough calls so the
mission does not become paralyzed.
That's what an interim does. Mhm.
>> Well, and I think that the beauty of
this, Jeffrey, like one of the added
benefits is that [snorts] it's the
interim doesn't bring their ego to some
of these questions because they're not
they know that this is not going to be a
permanent job. They they're not
answering that question like, "Oh my
gosh, will I lose my job or will I you
know, who's going to be getting my
salary?" Right? I mean, it's it's if you
think about it, asking those tough
questions is a lot easier for that
interim person to be to be presenting
them. A lot of times they've never even
been thought about. Right.
>> That's right. And and the planning piece
that we're talking about today
is the result of some earned trust.
An interim has to get some buy in to
we're on a journey to figure out what's
the best next step for our organization.
And that doesn't say like we'll have a
retreat and and do a plan like I've just
outlined to you today.
>> It is we now understand we have to get
first of all a sense of what's our
shared reality. What's our data? What's
our truth?
>> In the old days we called that a needs
assessment. what I call it today is
truthtelling
[laughter]
>> because that's what it is.
>> Yeah.
>> So, so the question is how do we work
with the board of directors? How do we
work with diverse people to say this is
apparently our truth?
>> And it may be painful because it
collides with your perception.
>> Yeah.
>> So this planning process I'm talking
about is an endpoint. It is not a
starting point. The starting point is
what is our shared truth? Yeah.
>> Our second standing point then is what
do we do with this shared truth? And
hopefully among the choices will be
we're going to have to plan differently.
But other choices may be we're also
going to have to operate differently.
We're going to have to have we're going
to have to define governance
differently.
>> Right.
>> Wow. Now there's a pain point.
>> Yeah. or we're going to have to um
reorganize ourselves from silos and
actually think about ourselves
differently in how we serve the
community. But until you have a basis of
shared truth, this idea of planning has
no basis other than someone from the
outside came in and says they have, you
know, drank the water from the promised
land and we should all start drinking.
That doesn't work,
>> right? Okay. So,
I'm thinking about this so often in my
career as, you know, leading uh serving
on boards and leading in boards. Um,
these are discussions that the board
has, but listening to you this morning,
I'm really thinking that it almost seems
like this needs to start with the
organization because they're going to
have the knowledge to to understand what
some of the actual challenges are and
opportunities. Is that fair to say? or
do we we we start with the board and we
just go through these processes and then
it we we push it out and report out to
our teams. I mean where does this go
because it's ultimately going to be the
responsibility of the staff to lead this
through.
>> So you raise a very good point and it
begins again with buying. Number one,
when we work with boards about uh about
working with an interim and what we
teach in our academy is interim
leadership or what we'll call
transitional leadership should use some
profound processes. You do not want to
walk in and just adopt the structure
that's there.
>> Okay,
>> we have something called a transition
team. And a transition team is getting
representatives of the key stakeholder
groups of the organization including the
board
to come together and say how do we want
to work together for this organization
to move from what it was to what it can
be. And what happens is the the interim
executive director is doing very little
reporting to the board.
What's coming on is it's the voices from
the transition team from within that are
coming and saying we've really talked
about this from our unique vantage
points which has included the board
which has included some committee
members upcoming board members maybe
some major donors but it's a transition
team that has really thoughtfully looked
at an organization and came forward and
said these are some of our
recommendations for the board to
consider. It's a different ballgame when
it's coming from within than someone
from the outside, which would be a
consultant, which interrs,
>> right?
>> They have facilitated internal
navigation tools. So, the board has a
compass to figure out where it wants to
go. The board has to, Julia approve the
process and then set back and let the
process work so the process can come to
them with the recommendations of where
we should go.
>> Yeah. Wow. I love that approach because
that to me is just brilliant. It it
speaks to what you said earlier that
you're looking for a solution and
leadership in transition that's going to
be more sustainable. And if you have all
that thought and you have that movement
behind those decisions, it's got to make
a huge difference. It does because let's
the difference between a transitional
leader and their successor is the
transitional leader is building the
runway for the successor to take off.
>> And when you have built this this
transitional mindset, this evolutionary
mindset, that's part of your legacy.
These people will continue working with
one another. they will want to pursue
that success that they have pictured
under transitional leadership.
>> It's a big thing for a lot of people
who've been in nonprofits for a long
time to realize you cannot as an interim
run the organization like you always
did. You are the runway. You are not the
jet.
>> Right? And I think that's fascinating
because um again it goes back to ego and
you know time served. If you've if
you've come into an organization at any
level and you've married yourself to it
and you believe in the mission and you
want to be a champion, um sometimes
making those changes is really hard
because you might have to admit you were
wrong or you don't have all the answers
that or that it's a new dawn, right?
It's kind of an interesting combination,
Jeffrey, of the ego and the person to
the whole of of what this organization
is trying to do.
>> The joy in transitional leadership is
the epiphany that you create in the
minds of other people.
>> And you know what? I I personally, this
is why I'm, you know, this I'm doing
exactly what I think I was cut out to
do. When I hear that your hair is on
fire, Julia, that's the biggest
compliment. It really is.
>> I I love working with organizations
that have done the same thing for so
many years.
>> They have wanted to do something
differently, but they've stood in their
own way of getting it done. And then the
beauty is
something happens and years later
they'll say, "I can't believe what a
pivot we took and I can't believe where
we are today." That is the ultimate
compliment in this work. Yeah, you know,
we don't have a lot of time left with
you and I want to talk about
this interim leader coming in being
strategic, being educated about what has
to happen, building trust, getting
people on board. The transitional team
is fascinating. It's not just the board,
but how [snorts] we're bringing the
community along.
I got to believe and I've asked you this
kind of before um but if you're from a
community where this has never been done
even interim leadership is a is a new
concept how hard is this and how much
time should we say we're going to invest
in this like how do interim leaders come
back out to everybody and say this isn't
a Saturday afternoon at a country club
this is going to be what three months,
six months, 12. I mean, how do we
articulate and frame that up? Because
this isn't a oneshot deal.
>> It's not. It is truly the word capacity
building in action here. You're building
the capacity of an organization to want
to thoughtfully evolve
>> and and that's where transitional
leadership can come in. So, so number
one,
an interim leader never introduces
themselves. They are introduced by the
leadership of the organization that they
have made a conscious effort and they've
made a conscious decision to have a
thoughtful evolutionary process in the
organization's ability to serve the
community. We teach our interims do not
introduce yourself to the community.
This is a stand taken by a not forprofit
that they are ready to have intentional
pivot in their service to others.
>> Wow. And that pivot is then going to
include about a 9 to 14month process
>> that's going to focus on the following
things. And we hope that one of the
things that is in that list is that
we're going to go through a thoughtful
planning process about what we want to
be, what we need to be, and what we can
be to influence the quality of life in
this community. And I can tell you
that's something an interim can't say.
But when the leadership comes forward
and say, "We're going to be very serious
about what we need to be for this
community and we're choosing how we're
going to do it," people listen.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And I think there's so much
fear in a transition time, right?
[snorts] Especially if you have a
beloved founder or a CEO that served
decades. I mean, it's such a for the
community, there's always that, well, I
don't know if they'll be able to get
somebody as good as, you know, she was
or he was. Right.
>> That's right. It's like such an
interesting aspect that that kind of
loops everybody in.
>> That's right.
>> And causes another level of stress.
>> And that has to be um intentional.
Julia, I I mentioned that that one of
the things we teach in the interim
executives academy is that our
transitional leaders need to put
together a transition team. Another
thing that we highly advocate for is you
need to have community listening
sessions
>> and the leadership of the organization
there needs to be there to listen and
they also need to stand in front of the
folks who come to community listening
sessions and state what I just did.
We're in the process of really wanting
to become the next generation of of of
leadership for the community and we need
to listen to you in order to get there.
Anybody who thinks that in that interim
executive management is an internal
focused process is wrong.
>> Okay.
>> You we are we are leading
community-based organizations and as
interim leaders we have a responsibility
to make sure that we are building and
keeping intact and edifying that
community base.
It's interesting because, you know, that
whole thing about what you brought up
about the substitute teacher and what
you can get away with and how they're
just a temporary um that really flips
this notion of interim leadership on its
head.
>> It does. And that that notion has to be
flipped with the board the moment
they're thinking about an interim. If
you're look if you are looking for a a
substitute teacher, you're looking for
someone to bring in the paper and water
the plants until somebody comes along or
you're or you're hiring a housesitter,
>> you are doing such an injustice with
precious resources to take your
organization to its next chapter of
service. There's a difference between
hiring a next leader and standing up and
saying, "We're going to pursue a next
chapter." and interim leadership begs
that question.
>> Yeah. Fascinating. Well, if you're in
Southern California today and you're
watching this and you have the ability
to get in front of the genius that we
call Jeffrey Wilcox, um you need to do
that because
I never have enough time with you on the
nonprofit show. I always want to keep
the conversation going. Um, it's an
absolutely fascinating way to look at
how I believe at this point in time in
the history of our nation and
nonprofits, this is real. This is
happening. We have to be looking at
transformational change. Um, for so many
reasons. First and foremost, it's the
demographics. It's it's happening right
now. So, you can't just hope, you know,
that when change happens, you can deal
with it. You've got to get in front of
it. Um, check out Jeffrey R. Wilcox. He
is the president, chief learning curator
at third sector company. You can get
behind a lot of their thought leadership
on their website at third sector
company.com. They have a lot of uh
really interesting research that they've
conducted. It's not paywalled, so you
don't have to be a member of their, you
know, uh, client base. you can actually
get access to some of the really
interesting research um that talks about
interim leadership and what what's going
on. Um I think it's just truly Jeffrey
one of the biggest topics in our sector
that we must be talking about and um and
we're not I mean the nonprofit show is
but we need more folks out there talking
about this. um you know, we get to talk
about these things and we have no
pressure from our sponsors. We get to
choose what we're going to talk about
and and it that's really amazing not to
have editorial pressure from our
sponsors. Um and and that's something
that's incredibly incredibly value
valuable and I want to point that out.
Um, and those partners of ours include
Bloomerang American Nonprofit Academy,
Staffing Boutique, JMT Consulting, of
course, our friends over at Third Sector
Company, your part-time controller, and
Martis, um, the newest member of our
sponsorship family. Jeffrey, you always
give me so much to think about and then
I almost like want to think about it all
day and then come back to you at the end
of the day and ask for refining you my
refined questions because it's
fascinating stuff.
>> Thank you. Well, Julia, we're starting
our fall interim academy in October. Um
Okay. We've we've trained 850 nonprofit
people in 47 states. So, come and check
us out if you'd like to learn how to do
this. Yeah, it's uh I'm actually going
to be part of that cohort. Um I'm really
excited to to see what I can learn and
um what it looks like and what the
ecosystem looks like because it's just I
think riveting work. I really really do.
Um, everybody, we have a fascinating
cadre of people that we talk to and so
much of this ends with being in a
healthy mindset, you know, looking at
things in a different and new way as
we've talked with Jeffrey today. And so,
the way we end our show today is really
profound because we leave with a message
that says stay well so you can do well.
>> [music]