You Will NEVER EAT Sugar Again After WATCHING THIS! | Dr. David Perlmutter
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this episode of Health Theory, Dr. David Perlmutter outlines a paradigm shift in understanding brain health and disease prevention, moving away from genetic determinism toward lifestyle-driven solutions. He argues that conditions like Alzheimer's are not solely genetic but are heavily influenced by modifiable factors such as diet and exercise. A critical point he raises is the failure of current pharmaceutical approaches; recent studies published in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicate that existing Alzheimer's drugs, primarily cholinesterase inhibitors, do not work to stop cognitive decline and may actually accelerate it. Furthermore, Dr. Perlmutter challenges the medical establishment's focus on beta-amyloid plaques as the primary cause of dementia, citing research from Harvard suggesting these plaques are a defensive response by the brain to infections like herpes simplex or chlamydia rather than the root problem itself. He emphasizes that Pfizer has already halted its pursuit of amyloid-targeting drugs, signaling a necessary change in strategy toward addressing inflammation and underlying causes. Central to Dr. Perlmutter's argument is the vital role of aerobic exercise in manipulating gene expression to produce Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF). While resistance training is beneficial, he asserts that aerobic activity at an intensity corresponding to 180 minus one's age for twenty minutes a day is essential for stimulating neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity. He debunks the old myth that brain growth stops after adolescence, explaining how BDNF facilitates the creation of new neurons in the hippocampus and strengthens connections between existing cells. This biological mechanism allows individuals to reverse cognitive decline by repopulating memory centers with healthy cells, a process compromised by high sugar intake, stress-induced cortisol levels, and lack of sleep. Consequently, he advocates for optimizing health metrics beyond standard "normal ranges," suggesting that optimal hemoglobin A1C levels should fall between 5.0 and 5.4 to avoid the U-shaped curve risks associated with both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. The discussion extends deeply into the gut-brain axis, where Dr. Perlmutter details how a healthy microbiome is fundamental to preventing systemic inflammation that drives chronic diseases like Alzheimer's, diabetes, autism, and Parkinson's disease. He shares a compelling case study of an autistic child whose symptoms dramatically improved after receiving fecal microbial transplants (FMT) from a screened donor, noting the procedure's high efficacy compared to standard antibiotic treatments for C. diff infections. Dr. Perlmutter explains that gut permeability issues allow lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a bacterial endotoxin, to enter the bloodstream and trigger inflammation throughout the body. He also highlights how food acts as information sent directly to our genome; specifically, plant-derived RNA in exosomes can alter gene expression within gut bacteria, influencing their metabolic output and location. This underscores his view that eating primitively—consuming whole foods rich in fiber rather than processed items or artificial sweeteners—is crucial for maintaining a robust microbiome capable of regulating immune responses. Dr. Perlmutter also critiques the widespread vilification of cholesterol and statins, arguing that these drugs can increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes by up to 71% in women and 46% in men, thereby quadrupling one's risk for Alzheimer's since Type 2 diabetes is a major precursor. He posits that cholesterol is essential for brain function, serving as an antioxidant and a building block for vitamin D synthesis from sunlight exposure. Instead of lowering total or LDL cholesterol indiscriminately, he recommends measuring oxidized LDL levels to assess true cardiovascular risk, noting that inflammation causes arterial damage where cholesterol appears merely as a healing agent. The overarching theme connecting these diverse topics is the concept of "connection"—to one's genome, microbiome, family, and nature—as the most powerful lever for health. Through his upcoming book *BrainWash*, he aims to reset public understanding by exposing how media manipulation influences lifestyle choices toward detrimental ends, urging individuals to reclaim control over their biology through informed decisions that align with evolutionary needs rather than modern environmental stressors.
Read the full video transcript
In today's episode of Health Theory with
Dr. David Perlmutter, we discuss how to
reverse the damage your lifestyle is
causing your gut, the four metrics you
must know to call yourself healthy, the
real cause of Alzheimer's, and the
secrets to effective aerobic exercise.
Everybody, welcome to Health Theory.
Today's guest is Dr. David Perlmutter.
He's a board-certified neurologist and
the four-time New York Times
best-selling author of Grain Brain,
Brain Maker, and several others. He
witnessed his first brain surgery at the
age of 13 and went on to publish his
first paper and give his first lecture
on the brain at just 19. Since then, his
innovative approach to medicine has made
him one of the most sought-after minds
on the planet in the fields of nutrition
and brain health. He's won countless
honors and awards and has been
interviewed by everyone from Oprah and
Dr. Oz to 20/20 and Larry King Live. And
as somebody who's existed on the cutting
edge basically your entire career, what
I want to know is what is the cutting
edge now? What are you thinking about
this maybe a little bit controversial
that you're exploring that you think is
going to have a big impact? We said 5
years ago, maybe you should stop stop
eating gluten and cut back on your carbs
and eat more, dare I say, fat.
And boy, did people's feathers get
ruffled with that. So,
I found that it felt good to be
disruptive and challenge the status quo.
Ronald Reagan said that status quo is a
Latin term for the mess we're in. And I
think that what I foresee
is that we are going to see a virtual
explosion in the ability to harness big
data and moving forward manipulate that
data using artificial intelligence to
really be far more specific about making
recommendations for Tom. What do you
need based upon who you are? What does
your genome look like? What does your
microbiome look like? what are your
lifestyle choices today, where do you
live geographically, what's available to
you, and therefore be very specific
individually
in terms of what your needs are. What's
really important, I think,
is we are now seeing, unexpectedly,
the ability to leverage personalized
medicine biometrics
to the larger audience. You know, which
it kind of gets back to the idea of
looking at the few to extrapolate to the
many. I mean, that's how drug trials
work, for example. We know that at most
3% of people are ever sampled and
utilized data-wise to make
recommendations for the remaining 97% in
terms of a drug.
And yet now, with this ability to crunch
this data and move forward, I think
we're going to really understand the
larger, the bigger strokes that, uh, you
know, frankly, we know that not
everybody today, and certainly moving
forward, is going to be available to,
uh,
participate in specific personalized
medicine, but I think we're going to
learn what really has traction with
respect to the broad strokes. Mhm. And
what do you think people should be
tracking now? Like, what's a meaningful
Should I be wearing an Oura Ring or a
constant glucose monitor? Like, what are
What are the data points now that that
you collect or that you recommend that
people collect?
Well, it's a good question because, you
know, as you well know, there are so
there's such incredible availability
right now to look at changes in your
microbiome on almost a daily basis, for
example. Uh, certainly your genome is a
great place to start. That doesn't
change, or does it? Uh, we In reality,
we know that our day-to-day lifestyle
choices
are hugely influential
on the expression of your, uh, life code
that we thought was really locked up in
a glass case, and we now recognize
absolutely, uh, is not. So, I think
that, uh, to start with, we should all
understand our genomes.
Whether it's 23andMe or any other uh,
service that's out there, it's not just
getting your genome sequence, but then
manipulating that data to understand
what your current needs are before you
even begin tracking as you move forward.
How do we manipulate it? I've actually
never heard somebody say that before.
online sites that are available to
upload your 23andMe data. You just drag
the file and drop it into various sites.
Dr. Ben Lynch, author of a book called
Dirty Genes, has a terrific site. And
from that, you learn not just what your
genome says, but more importantly, what
does it mean?
I learned some things about myself that
I never knew that did change
my lifestyle choices to some small
degree. One thing I learned is that
I, Tom, am a poor methylator. What does
it mean? It means that I have not the
most favorable genes in a pathway called
MTHFR,
along with about 20 to 22% of Americans.
People need to know that.
When
What's the impact of that? Like if you
were not to address it, the outcome
would be
one of the most common things that we
see with people who are poor methylators
is,
for example, that my homocysteine level
can go up. And why is that an issue?
Well, homocysteine
is a powerful risk factor for
Alzheimer's.
So, it really takes us away from the
notion of Alzheimer's being a genetic
issue, either you have the Alzheimer's
gene or you don't, to Alzheimer's being
related to modifiable lifestyle factors.
Now, other things that are important I
think people should be following.
Their homocysteine level, as mentioned,
vitamin D level. I think knowing
your fasting glucose level on a pretty
regular basis, whether you have an
onboard glucometer or not. I think to
me,
I I find that to be a little bit of an
overkill. I think you can get a good
sense if you measure your blood sugar
maybe once or twice a week with a finger
stick. I think you should know your
ketone levels. Your hemoglobin A1C or
so-called average blood sugar I think is
hugely important.
you think's a good number there?
Well, I've learned in the few years that
I've been at this that um
you know, I'm the kind of guy and I I I
think you probably are too
uh
who says well, some is good, more is
better. But in terms of medicine it's
not always the case that a lower insulin
level, a lower hemoglobin A1C or lower
blood sugar is necessarily better for
you. I mean, I 5 years ago popularized
the idea that
we really have to get our insulin levels
low
because it would be A, an indication
that we were eating less carbs, having
less blood sugar elevations,
and B, it would ultimately help restrict
our risk for developing insulin
resistance.
Mhm.
Uh and now we see publications that at
the very lowest ranges of insulin, there
is actually at least in women an
increased risk risk, a profoundly
increased risk of becoming demented.
Uh and Is it the same risk? So, they see
it on the low end, do they see that same
risk then on the high end? Well, the the
risk on the low end and again, this is
just in women, but that's very important
since you know, two out of every three
Alzheimer's patients is uh are women.
Uh but it's important that at the lowest
range the risk was increased about 2.38
X. At the high range it was increased
about 1.7 X. So, they're actually worse
off if they're too low.
Really, really low.
Interesting. How would you depress your
insulin that low?
Well, I think this gets to the point of
uh gene expression. I think people have
certain what we call polymorphisms of
genes that might not code for adequate,
uh, insulin activity. Uh, so a plus
being, of course, on an extremely
low-sugar, low-carbohydrate diet. So, it
gets to, again, back to, dare I say, the
sweet spot. It's a terrible misnomer, I
think, uh, as it relates to blood sugar
and and our diets. We shouldn't
opt for the sweet spot, but, uh,
you know, it it's it's relevant for us
to understand in the context of this
discussion
that as we get together and talk about
this,
2018,
we have no treatment, uh, for
Alzheimer's. None. Nothing works.
Nothing reduces the, uh, the rate at
which people decline. And
to me, it's very compelling that last
month the Journal of the American
Medical Association put out a study
by a Dr. Richard Kennedy,
uh, which was actually a a meta-analysis
of some of the the top 10 best uh,
evaluations of the efficacy of so-called
Alzheimer's drugs. Though there is no
drug that works, yet Alzheimer's drugs,
uh,
you know, are selling at the rate of
close to a billion dollars in our
country annually. We've known that they
don't work, but what was published last
month was really quite compelling by the
Journal of the American Medical
Association. Not only do the drugs not
work,
but they speed the cognitive decline of
patients who are taking them. What are
they attacking? What's the the notion
behind the drug? Must be something that
it what lowers and what it attacks or
None of the drugs are involved in in
dealing with beta amyloid. Uh, the first
class of drugs representing the lion's
share, about 76%,
are what are called cholinesterase
inhibitors. And these are drugs like
Aricept or donepezil that inhibit an
enzyme that degrades a neurotransmitter
called acetylcholine because it was
noted decades ago that the Alzheimer's
brain is a brain that is low in
acetylcholine. And a very simplistic
approach would be, "Hey, we can bump up
acetylcholine. That'll be a good thing
and it'll help people." Well, it never
has shown any efficacy and yet
it received FDA approval, another story
for another time. But now it's not just
that it doesn't work, but it's hastening
cognitive decline in the very people who
can't afford that. And you think of the
families who have dad or mom or husband
or wife on these drugs and they're
actually making people worse. It's like
giving somebody a treatment for their
diabetes that is raising their blood
sugar. And you bring up the idea of
getting rid of plaque.
It's been noted since the
naming of Alzheimer's disease after Dr.
Alois Alzheimer who first described the
pathology of what this looked like in
the brain of a woman dying of that
disease that now bears his name.
And the plaques were noted then and
since that time scientists and
clinicians alike have really focused on
the plaque as being the thing we've got
to get rid of.
And it turns out that
researchers like Dr. Rudolph Tanzi at
Harvard have made it very clear that the
plaque is the response to the problem,
not the cause of the problem. The plaque
is what we call an antimicrobial
peptide. And it's the brain's way of
responding to perhaps infectious agents
like herpes simplex virus or chlamydia
infection. So, you know, it is said that
the enemy of my enemy is my friend. We
need to embrace beta amyloid as being
there for in a very important reason.
When we rid the brain of beta amyloid as
has been tried in clinical study after
clinical trial
patients decline much more quickly.
Uh that might underlie why Pfizer in
February of this year said no more.
We're just not going to pursue the
notion of an Alzheimer's drug anymore.
We've got to leave the beta-amyloid
alone.
Uh there was a move a couple of years
ago for the FDA to approve
uh brain scans that would measure the
amount of beta-amyloid load in a patient
as a way of being diagnostic. Do you
have Alzheimer's or are you on the way
to that?
And they didn't prove it because they
realized that people can have a head
full of beta-amyloid and be cognitively
perfectly intact. Whereas others with
very little beta-amyloid actually would
demonstrate the clinical manifestations
of Alzheimer's disease. Um so looking at
uh you said that okay Pfizer's pulled
out, they're no longer making um
Alzheimer's drugs, but the one thing
that is recognized to help is exercise.
Um we know that exercise has a sort of
what I'll call a real-time effect on
blood sugar. Um and you're the first
person that I've heard anyway talk about
the knock-on effect of um insulin doing
more than just shuttling blood sugar out
of your cells. What are the the factors
you think that are at play here? And
what are the behaviors that we should
take to make sure that we stave off
dementia as long as humanly possible?
What a concept. What a concept that
this disease affecting 5.4 million
Americans, 40 million people globally,
costing us a trillion dollars, higher
than the market values of Apple or
Google,
uh predicted to triple by the year 2050,
that our lifestyle choices
can be leveraged to reduce our risk that
will affect 50% of people age 85 or
older, the flip of a coin.
So in in in that uh through that lens,
let's go back to where we were, the the
value of exercise.
And I'd say uh your points about insulin
sensitivity are well taken. Very
important keeping blood sugar down, uh
enhancing the sensitivity of the insulin
receptor. I want to come back to that
because I think um
I'm seeing a big elephant in the room
that we need to talk about. And that is
that physical exercise
changes your gene expression. You are
able to change the expression of this
previously thought to be immutable life
code for the better and lead to the
expression of what we call a tro- a
trophic hormone or growth hormone for
the brain, BDNF.
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor.
Uh there are many things you could do to
amp up BDNF. You can use uh
uh turmeric in your cooking, take a DHA
supplement, uh even uh CBD has been
demonstrated recently to increase uh
BDNF. But, the most important thing you
need to buy
uh to improve your BDNF is a new pair of
running shoes because aerobic exercise
is able to manipulate the expression of
this BDNF. Why specifically aerobic?
Well, to a lesser degree uh resistance
exercise as well. But, I'm simply
telling people 20 minutes a day, 5 days
a week, hopefully more.
At a heart rate value of 180 minus your
age as a target, of course consult your
health care uh practitioner.
But, what a powerful way to reduce your
risk for dementia. How can I connect
those dots and make that statement to
you as we sit here?
Well, the Journal of the American
Medical Association has wonderfully
correlated baseline BDNF levels with
future risk for dementia. You want to
have more of this chemical that does two
important things.
It increases the growth of new brain
cells in your brain's memory center,
which is a powerful target for
Alzheimer's, Okay. and it also increases
the connection of brain cells one to the
other, a process called uh
neuroplasticity,
that we can
actually allow our brains to take
advantage of the experiences that we
then choose to pursue to build a better
brain. And that is Is the BDNF a
building block of that or
No, it is not.
Is it a signaling molecule?
molecule. I mean, our brain cells want
to connect to each other. And our
lifestyle choices that are highly
stressful, that are deprived of
restorative sleep, that are higher in
sugar in terms of diet,
that are overall stressful,
uh increase cortisol, for example, that
inhibits the growth of new brain cells,
actually compromises
uh our brain cell population in the very
areas that we need them most, like the
memory center, the hippocampus. So, we
can We can reverse that. We can tip the
scales in our favor and say, "I'm not
going to continue losing brain cells.
I'm actually going to repopulate
my memory center with new brain cells."
That study was done out here at uh U-
UCLA in collaboration with researchers
at University of Pittsburgh,
led by a Dr. Erickson, demonstrating two
groups of people, 100 people in each
group. One group stretched for a period
of a year. The other group was involved
in aerobics. They found that those who
stretched had lower levels of BDNF,
declining memory function, and shrinkage
on very sophisticated brain scans in
terms of their hippocampus size,
which is the Let's pause there cuz I I
want to walk through this and make sure
that I understand. The
Yeah. This is incredible and potentially
very useful, but I want to make sure
that I understand the sequence of
events. Right. Okay, so first of all,
does BDNF trigger the regrowth of brain
cells across the brain or just the
hippocampus?
Good point. We used to say the brain
doesn't grow new brain cells, end of
story, right? I mean,
you're probably too young to know that,
but
when I was was school, we were told that
uh
your brain grow maxes out at about age
18 and every beer you drink after that
it's 40,000 brain cells or whatever the
magic number was. For whatever reason, I
don't remember that, but um
how incredible that uh
in your 90s, you were still growing new
brain cells. You have this gift of
regrowth of neurogenesis. It's a choice
you can make. You can make it today
after watching this podcast by dragging
those sneakers out and uh if only going
to the mailbox is as far as you can go,
then have at it. Tomorrow, you'll do
that twice. And the sequence is you're
doing the exercise, the exercise is
creating BDNF, BDNF is then triggering
hippocampal cell growth
Hippocampal, yes. But beyond that,
another area too called the
subventricular layer of the what's
called the ependyma in
um the layer of cells that underlies
those fluid-filled compartments that you
see when you look at a brain scan. But
for our purposes,
the uh synaptoplasticity
and the neuroplasticity, the connection
of brain cells happens throughout the
brain. Um we also depend on a process
called synaptic pruning. What does that
mean?
Uh it means that also for brain
function, we have to have the ability uh
as we are in our uh childhood and
adolescence to cut back on the number of
connections that we have uh in order to
kind of refine the the computer to make
it work at its optimal level. So, Which
it's doing, I'm assuming, based on
repetition. What you do the most is
going to get the most connections, it's
going to get the most the highest degree
of insulation. Exactly. All of that.
Neurons that fire together will wire
together. And those that don't will
atrophy, will fall off the the tree. And
so you're saying that um that process,
the firing together and wiring together,
is um one repetition, two, you get the
BDNF if you're exercising that washes
the brain in some way, signals to them,
hey, to in some way that makes them more
active, more likely to connect. So, what
is the advantage then, the um
evolutionarily
coded or selected advantage
that exercising people
should have higher levels of BDNF and
ultimately, let's just say, be more uh
able to survive and cognitively uh
superior
in evolutionary terms. All right.
And I guess it's the people who were
healthy enough to hunt and gather and to
lead,
uh you know, the expeditions in our
Paleolithic times.
Uh so, these individuals, and I've never
thought this before, I just was
uh having a bit of a free association
while we were talking. These are our
ancestors and uh evolutionarily they
were selected because they were
leading the group.
So, uh
uh
we can play upon that now that we
understand that. It's interesting. Do
you think that there's any relation
between movement and memory because of
the if you're moving and you're hunting
or whatever, you need spatial relations,
you need to understand sort of where you
are. So, I ask all these questions
because one, like, even when people talk
about exercise, I never do cardio. I
hate cardio, it's painful.
But, I lift all the time. But, if you're
telling me that that's actually not as
powerful,
then I'll start doing cardio. Um so, I
guess understanding like the the nuance
level so that I know how to act is
ultimately the the driving force behind
my questions. Um
so, I think I understand BDNF,
which is fascinating in in the last 10
minutes, my understanding of why that
matters is skyrocketed. I want to go
back to um the HA1C levels.
Uh I want to pin you down for a number
and I'll tell you why. So, on staff, we
have a vegan and I once watched him cane
an entire package of blackberries. And
as he was doing it, I could feel my
blood sugar rising. And [clears throat]
I was like, there's no way this kid's
going to die. Like he is he's too good
at his job for me to let him die. So,
I'm like, you have to go get your levels
checked. And he did, and they they fall
within in what I would consider normal
ranges. So, I want to know if I'm
delusional on that, if there's just as
that much genetic variability, cuz that
would have spiked I know because I take
my blood sugar levels quite frequently,
that would have spiked me to over 140.
Sure, it may have pushed me closer to
like 120 to have You can't imagine how
many blackberries he ate. Um but his his
H um A1C level was 5.1.
And he eats like that all the time.
Well, three things come to mind. First,
I I want it not to be missed that our
time together may have compelled you to
engage in aerobic exercise. That
that's great. I mean, that is huge. And
uh
you know, what compelled me was the
science, the data,
my personal risk for Alzheimer's having
lost my father to that disease, and then
just understanding how pervasive and
preventable the situation is. But uh if
if you've changed your exercise routine
based upon our time together, then I'm
grateful that I came out here. That's
great. Next point.
Uh the ideal uh being in the normal
range. I You brought up that uh term,
and I I I just really recoil at the
notion of a normal range. It's normal
won't really uh by definition is
average. It's, you know, whatever the
number is a thousand samples, and then
one standard deviation on either side,
the normal range. And that doesn't work
uh in terms of my messaging. I want
optimal. So,
a normal range of vitamin D between 30
and 100. So, a patient will say, "Well,
my level's in the normal range, doc. I'm
at 31." Uh there's a term for that. It's
means it it is that sucks. Not that I
use it that often, but it really does.
We need optimal. Well, then you know, I
good enough normal range is not where we
are. We want tip-top. And so as it
relates to hemoglobin A1c
tempering my next commentary with the
notion of the U-shaped curve
I would say a range would be between
let's say
5 to maybe about 5.3 5.4. Now
to get to your third point of your
friend who's eating a lot of berries
first of all,
it's a lot of sugar. It's a lot of fruit
sugar called fructose, which has almost
no effect on insulin as you know.
There is glucose in there and ultimately
he will to some degree
glycate. He'll bind his blood sugar to
protein in the case of hemoglobin A1c
hemoglobin. And ultimately will increase
that activity and it'll be measurable.
But you say he does it all the time.
He's eating whole fruit with fiber
to help offset the blood sugar spike. So
I think you have to look at many things
in terms of looking at an N of one
what did his A1c turn out to be based
upon what you've observed? There are a
lot of variables here. We don't know his
what his microbiome looks like for
example. I think a vegan diet can be a
very salubrious approach. However, with
certain caveats. You're not going to
have great sources of vitamin D, B12,
fat. You know, a lot of vegans don't get
enough dietary fat. And it's a huge huge
issue.
Yeah, it's interesting. When I heard
this story, I was like, "Whoa!" that you
you did a fecal matter transplant
with a child that was suffering from
pronounced autism.
I
while I have certainly heard the
through-line of hey C-sections lead to a
microbiome that's wildly disrupted,
which increases the potential of
somebody
developing autism. I certainly had never
heard of using a fecal matter transplant
to reduce some of the symptoms of that.
Um one, walk us through that story,
which I think is utterly fascinating.
And two, I'd love to hear what the
pushback is on that, where you think
fecal matter transplants are in terms of
efficacy, in terms of safety. Um and
I'll say that knowing that or you should
know that I'm sitting here waiting for
the answer because my wife has struggled
profoundly with um antibiotic induced
microbiome disruption. And if I thought
that that was going to work, I would do
it immediately, but I'm worried about
the safety.
Well, let's address the safety first. Uh
I think with a properly screened donor
uh that it is negligible. I mean, it is
the treatment of choice
uh being carried out at uh more than uh
100 hospitals in America today
for an another disruption of the bowel
flora called Clostridium difficile or C.
diff. Uh the standard of care treatment
using antibiotics is has an efficacy of
approximately 28%.
FMT
fecal microbial transplant has an
efficacy uh without recurrence north of
96%. Whoa.
Think about it. I mean, the the the
reason that people get C. diff in the
first place is from uh antibiotic
exposure frequently. Other drugs can do
it as well. And they're treating that,
the mainstream [clears throat]
approach is to treat it with further
antibiotics. You talk about fighting
fire with fire. But FMT now has really
become a national uh
uh well-accepted approach to treating uh
C. diff. So, I wouldn't be concerned in
the least with respect to uh safety of
that procedure, provided the donor is
screened. So, a woman arrived in my
office with her uh child, and um
I observed him uh that he couldn't make
eye contact, and he He
repetitive motion, you know, very
characteristic autistic child. And I
asked her, "How did you come to see me
today?" And I think as I recall she was
from um
Mississippi.
And she she said, "You know, I need to
tell you the story how it all happened."
She was in the parking lot
of a grocery store.
And she couldn't get her child out of
the car.
And next to her was parked uh a
gentleman in a truck. And he apparently
apologized to her and said uh
that he didn't mean to get uh in get
involved in this, but maybe you ought to
take him down to Florida to see me of
all, you know, and uh and she asked him
why and apparently I'd helped somebody
in his family.
So, she comes to see me with her son.
And it was right then
that I was deeply immersed in the
literature that was revealing that these
kids have a profound disruption of their
gut bacteria. I mean, it's almost like
an autism fingerprint. And this was many
years several years ago that we see very
powerful correlations between these uh
patterns of gut bacteria and the
manifestation of autism. That we see
children who are born by C-section, you
alluded to that earlier, have an
increased risk of autism. And that
C-sections disrupt their microbiome. One
researcher, clinician uh actually uh Dr.
Feingold uh actually was treating uh
autistic children using vancomycin to
help re an antibiotic to reestablish
some balance and was getting good
results.
So, I said uh let's at least start with
some probiotic enemas. I instructed her
how to give her child uh probiotics
from the health food store, putting them
in an enema, and administering them. He
improved. He uh
doesn't sound like a big deal, but he
was able to tie his shoes for the first
time in his life. And he was able to
spend the night out at a friend's house.
I mean I mean those are major landmarks.
They don't seem like much, but they
were.
As we continued to work with him, he
plateaued. Uh maintained his
improvements, but it was not continuing
to get where she wanted. And I said,
"Well, we ought to consider fecal
microbial transplant." What is that?
Identifying a healthy donor,
taking the fecal material, and
transplanting it into your son's colon.
She identified a healthy 12-year-old
girl.
And I got on the phone with her.
And I said, "I know it sounds really
strange,
and it's way out there, but we just need
to do this." And she said, "If it'll
help him,
I'm in." Wow. And she did, and he began
FMTs. His mother did them at home.
And um
I was getting ready to give a talk in
Germany.
His mother sent me a link to a video of
this kid
presenting um
presenting a
book report at school
on Benjamin Franklin.
And it I I got like that getting ready
to give my lecture like I'm getting
right now. It took the the wind out of
my sails. I just couldn't believe it.
And he's now in regular school at the in
the top 10% of his class. He was always
bright. But he had this inflammation the
way it was
cognitive performance. You know, it's
like listening to a
FM radio station in a lightning storm.
It was always there.
So, um you know, that was one of the
things that we did that was certainly
disruptive and eccentric.
Um since then, the University of Arizona
did an interventional trial on 20
autistic children demonstrated
profound improvement in these kids,
where nothing has helped them, ever.
Uh in collaboration with researchers
from Harvard, validating the notion of
fecal microbial transplant as a
treatment for autism. We know that we
can measure the permeability of the gut
by looking at levels of something called
LPS, lipopolysaccharide. It's a
chemical that enshrouds the gut, many of
the gut bacteria. If the gut lining is
leaky
for whatever reason, typically because
of disruption of the gut microbiome,
then we can measure that LPS in the
bloodstream, where it doesn't belong.
We see dramatic elevations of this LPS,
meaning inflammation and uh breakdown of
the gut lining in Alzheimer's, autism,
major depression, and even Lou Gehrig's
disease.
My point is that we focus on the brain
when
there's a heck of a lot going on in the
gut that we're just beginning to
unravel. The beginning of our time
together, you challenged me. You said,
"Well, what does the future look like?"
And really, as we understand this
relationship between the gut and the
brain,
we've got we've we've moved to a new
stadium.
And there are new rules written.
Because as a neurologist, I have had
traditionally very few tools in the
toolbox. It was very much an audios,
diagnose and audios situation. It
doesn't really help anybody to go to the
neurologist's office and he or she comes
up with a very exotic name, or something
not as exotic, like Alzheimer's,
uh is a a word
that has incredible um gravitas in a
negative way when family members hear
that. And we have no treatment,
and yet it's preventable.
And um
it's like John Kennedy said in his
inauguration, that the time to fix the
roof is when the sun is shining. And you
know, that really has been you know, a
fundamental aphorism for me that to
prevent these situations for which we
have no treatment is the call to action.
And uh there's no doubt uh that to a
significant degree this epidemic is
preventable. And that's the message that
we want to shout out because um
we are um inculcated with the mentality
that we should live our lives however we
choose and come what may, there'll be a
treatment, right? Eat crap and we'll
give you a diabetes pill to get your A1C
below 7. Well, what kind of goal is
that? Uh but the reality is
treating your diabetes to lower your
blood sugar has uh other downstream
effects that may not be good. Lowering
your cholesterol level with a statin
drug may not be the best thing to do.
And you're
on that. I've heard you talk about that,
statins effect on um insulin receptors.
Um which was what put it on my radar
that there potentially other issues or
other things that insulin is doing cuz I
always just thought of it as the, you
know, taking the blood sugar out and
putting it in the cell. Well, let me see
if I can connect those two, the notion
of diabetes and and statin drugs, for
example. And why I'm really um so di-
seemingly dialed in on diabetes because
if you become a type 2 diabetic, which
is by and large a choice, you have
quadrupled your risk for Alzheimer's.
Did I say a disease for which there is
no treatment?
Yeah.
So, that's why you don't want to become
a type 2 diabetic. Mhm.
In the Journal of the American Medical
Association
in uh 2012
was the publication of a study called
the Women's uh Women's Health Initiative
study.
Uh and it involved 150,000
women
and demonstrated that those women taking
a statin drug
had an increased risk of developing type
2 diabetes by 71%.
Whoa. In men, according to a more recent
study, 2015, journal is diabetologia,
their risk is increased about 46%.
Taking a statin drug that's ostensibly
the good thing to do for your heart is
actually associated with a significant
increased risk
for another situation, for which guess
what? We've got another pill for you.
So, now you're on your statin and we're
going to add in your diabetes pills. Uh
so, this is diabetes that did I say
quadruples your risk for Alzheimer's, a
disease for which there is no treatment.
We connect these dots and this is the
information that people need to know
before they capriciously acquiesce to
taking that drug because my doctor said
my cholesterol level is too high.
And truthfully, I mean, I think we all
well understand that it is a um
a pathway of this cholesterol number
gets me to write that prescription for
this patient. And I'll explain that
well, high cholesterol is going to give
you a massive heart attack. Well, that
isn't true
that at least 50% of myocardial
infarctions in America today occur in
people with normal, so-called normal
cholesterol levels. Beyond that,
we have this idea of what is called the
statin brain, where taking a statin drug
is associated with cognitive issues,
memory issues. Uh and this is called out
on the the the bottle of medicine that
this drug can affect memory. Why so?
Well,
your brain loves cholesterol. It's a
very important fat as a lining of your
brain cells. It acts as a brain
antioxidant.
And equally important is the notion that
we talked about vitamin D and how
critically important that is in your
entire body, that there are more than
900 receptors in your body for vitamin
D. That's how pervasive its actions are.
And most of those are in the brain.
Where does it come from, vitamin D? Oh,
comes from the sun. The sunlight shining
on your naked body changes a chemical
into vitamin D. What is the chemical?
It's cholesterol.
I actually did not know that.
Well, cholesterol is from which we make
vitamin D, as it is from which we make
testosterone and progesterone and
estrogen and cortisol. So, this
vilification of cholesterol is very much
off base.
But you got to give somebody credit. It
sure paved the way for the notion that
it's bad and that if you eat eggs, your
children will be born naked or some
horrible thing will happen and that we
should lower cholesterol to incredibly
low levels. The lower, the better.
So, the notion of the U-shaped curve has
yet to find its way to that level of
pharmacology
understanding that we need our
cholesterol. We love our cholesterol.
The issue
that relates to risk for coronary artery
disease is unrelated to cholesterol.
Cholesterol shows up
when the coronary arteries are inflamed.
It shows up to heal the coronary
arteries. It's why when a person dies of
heart attack and you section their
coronary arteries and you look at under
the microscope, you'll see cholesterol
is there. It's trying to heal this
inflammation. It's like blaming the
firemen because they're on scene,
blaming the firemen because they're
there at the fire. Doesn't work that
way.
It has a lot to do with um
not the number of LDL, its value, but
whether it's been damaged or not,
oxidized or not, or bound to sugar.
How do you check that? You have your
doctor check a glycated LDL or oxidized
LDL. And maybe your doctor is going to
go, "Well, I'm not sure I've heard of
that or that our lab will do will do
that." In which case you need to move
on.
Cuz that's what is very clearly
correlated to risk for coronary artery
disease, the oxidized level of LDL,
which is directly related to blood
sugar. We're back where we started.
Yeah, which I don't think in this
interview we've really put our finger on
the what I'm sure most people know, but
I think it is worth saying, what are the
lifestyle choices that are causing this
cascade of essentially inflammation?
Mostly food.
And that should be empowering, meaning
you can break the cycle.
So, inflammation is what Alzheimer's is.
Alzheimer's, coronary artery disease,
Parkinson's diseases,
autism, diabetes, cancer, these are
inflammatory diseases.
The brain in the Alzheimer's patient is
virtually on fire with inflammation. The
word comes from the Latin inflammare,
meaning fire and inflamed.
So, our lifestyle choices by having
higher levels of blood sugar
bind to our proteins called glycation.
That's what A1C measures. When we bind
sugar, because it's always elevated to
our proteins, that challenges our immune
system and the immune system says,
"Something's going on here." And that
increases the production of these
chemicals called the cytokines that
mediate inflammation. There's a very
interesting study
that was published in the journal
Neurology back in 2014. And this is a
study that looked at a group of
individuals and a couple of several
decades ago
and did a simple blood test measuring
inflammatory markers.
It followed these individuals for 24
years.
And it found that those individuals who
24 years ago had the highest level of
inflammation in terms of their blood
markers had a dramatic decrease in the
size of their brains and at the time
they came back to get reevaluated had
poorer memory function.
We know that there are is a very
powerful correlation between markers of
inflammation in the blood and
Alzheimer's disease. So, it's very clear
that we've got to do everything we can
to reduce inflammation and that brings
us back to the gut. Because the lining
of the gut
that one cell
lining that separates stuff in the gut
from the rest of your body is the
gatekeeper basically for inflammation in
your body. Whenever we threaten the gut
lining and that chemical LPS and other
things gets in and challenges our immune
system, we amp up inflammation and that
sets the stage for every bad chronic
disease that you don't want to get.
And when the World Health Organization
is now telling us that chronic
inflammatory degenerative conditions are
the number one cause of death on planet
Earth,
we've got to pay attention to that
metric [snorts] because
it's something over which we have
control based upon our lifestyle choices
like the foods we eat. We want to eat
much more primitively, much more locally
and and as such reduce inflammation.
You wrote an article when you were 16 or
a letter to the editor in the paper, I
guess is a more accurate way of saying
it. I don't know if you remember this,
but came across it in my research and it
basically said speaking of, you know,
Western lifestyle,
it basically said, Uh,
we're all sort of running this
experiment and we're each contributing
to um seeing whose lungs can evolve to
handle pollution and I don't think that
spending a Sunday at the beach or going
on a week trip to the mountains is going
to be enough and basically intimating
that our current lifestyle is so far
removed from what we've evolved to
handle that
there's a just a fundamental problem.
And
before we started rolling you and I were
talking about um
the your notion of brainwash, the new
book that you're working on and I just
want to hear a little bit about that
about you know, what are some of the
things that are happening um from a
lifestyle perspective at a broader um
level than what we've just been talking
about, you know, just what we eat, but
what we're engaging with um you know,
negativity and how that influences the
brain and you know, the way that the
media's presented and the kinds of
influences that they're having. Like
what are you finding as you look more
deeply at that?
I think that uh there is a lot of uh
traction of the the paleo ideology, but
at its core the notion of paleo is one
that says, "Let's get back to sending
the right signals to our genome." Which
is
hasn't changed in let's say 70,000 years
fundamentally.
Uh and it get gets back to our original
conversation we started today about how
our lifestyle choices are interpreted by
our genome.
How our food beyond the macronutrient
content is actually information sending
up-to-date signals as to our environment
to our genome so that our genome can
then in kind respond uh to maintain our
health by responding to the signals to
that it receives. Our evolution cannot
keep up with the environment to which we
are exposed. And the environment to
which we choose to expose ourselves.
So, the idea that
we can change that
by going back and trying to think about
what it was that our ancestors
lifestyles must have been like and
therefore cause our genome to express
genes for longevity,
reduction of inflammation and
stabilization of immunity. Is I think
really very very important.
So, I think that you know this is really
becoming an area of great interest
for a lot of people. It's you know
instead of trying to patch up these
problems, I think the idea of letting
our genes keep us healthy
is really um
it's it's it's kindness. It's really
about about reconnecting to that
incredibly beautiful gift that we've
received from all who have come before
us. And it's very instructive to
recognize
that the genes of our gut bacteria are
influencing our genome expression. That
those little critters that live within
us are moment to moment changing our
gene expression. There's a very
interesting piece of this puzzle that
was just solved for me last month in a
journal Cell Host and Microbe. The
researcher's name is Yun Teng, T E N G
from University of Louisville.
And he gave us information about
the idea that plant cells contain RNA.
We know that. Who didn't know that?
And that
they are able when we digest plant cells
that
microsomes that then are extruded from
plant cells called exosomes that contain
plant RNA work their way into our gut
bacteria and change the expression of
the genetic material of our gut
bacteria. So, food is running the show.
Plant food is changing the expression of
our bacteria
gene uh genome. That leads to three
important things as it relates to our
gut bacteria. It changes their rates of
multiplication.
It changes the metabolic products that
they produce like vitamins and
neurotransmitters.
And it changes their location in the
gut. Hopefully, closer to the gut lining
so they can help us keep that intact.
So, that was a very intriguing
couple of dots to connect. Therefore,
our food is uh changing our gene
expression and
we should think about that. You know, we
say when a woman is pregnant, she has to
be careful because now she's eating for
two. Mhm. Well, well, Tom, you're eating
for a hundred trillion right now. This
morning before we came here,
I was having breakfast at the hotel. And
at the the the woman next to me, um one
woman was uh
had uh skin milk in her coffee cuz we
don't want dietary fat.
And to which she put several uh
pink packets of sweetener, which the
research shows is profoundly damaging to
the microbiome, associated with a
profound increased risk of obesity in a
French study of tens of thousands of It
was 70,000 women. And also dramatically
increases your risk for avoiding sugar
in the first place, type two diabetes.
Her brain has been hijacked by media
that would let us believe that this is
the right choice. But, that media
doesn't have her health uh at the core
of their interest. Uh what that media
has uh it is their end up bottom line,
right? And she is simply a pawn
uh on that chessboard being manipulated.
That is the focus of this new work
called uh brain brainwash. We're trying
to wash people's brain and push the
reset button and really call out all the
ways that day-to-day
uh our lifestyle choices are being
manipulated. Uh
you know, learning that uh all of our
online uh
yeah, areas that we explore are being
leveraged to create advertising that's
appealing to us. That's not telling you
something that your audience isn't
certainly aware of. But it has health
consequences. It's not just that you
happen to buy, you know, the latest pair
of glasses or a shirt. It has to do with
your health like this woman this morning
choosing this artificial sweetener. And
I will say that we had a premise for the
book about calling out how our brains
are influenced and beyond that, how
reconnecting with nature, how dietary
changes, how meditation, how various
things can help undo what's been done,
how we can harness this notion of
neuroplasticity,
and we talked about earlier, uh by
having higher levels of BDNF to then
allow the good pathways to stick,
allowing us to connect back to the
prefrontal cortex and act in a more
empathetic way, in a more compassionate
way, in a way that recognizes that
our decisions today are going to affect
what happens tomorrow.
Um the notion that we can do that uh is
is a heck of a gift that we need to
raise awareness of, especially these
days when impulsivity and narcissism
seems to be, you know, the way things
are done today. And we've
certainly got to pay attention to what
what will tomorrow bring? How will our
actions today affect ourselves tomorrow
and affect the world tomorrow?
So, um
the Dalai Lama said that if you want to
be happy,
practice compassion.
And if you want others to be happy,
practice compassion.
So, in a very real sense,
what we choose to do
rewires our brain and changes our
thinking.
What I'm saying is that we presuppose
that our thoughts determine our actions.
But in a very real sense, our actions
determine our thoughts.
Yeah, what I was thinking.
That is absolutely fascinating and the
perfect place to
um get to my last question, but before I
ask that, where can these guys find you
online? And And I
more than ever I want to stalk you. I've
spent the last couple days just living
in your world.
And there's some amazing stuff there.
So, where can people find more about
you? Uh I'm uh drperlmutter.com,
oddly enough, is my website,
drperlmutter.com.
And I have Facebook, which is uh David
Perlmutter, MD. Uh David Perlmutter is
Twitter and Instagram. I have a
newsletter that goes out every week on
drperlmutter.com.
Amazing.
Oh, I have a YouTube channel, The
Empowering Neurologist.
Yes, there's a lot of amazing content
there.
Cool. My last question, what is the one
change that people could make that would
have the biggest positive impact on
their health?
Uh it's a
it's a very difficult question to answer
cuz there's so many levels of things we
talked about.
I would say um
embrace
uh the recognition that connection
is the most uh powerful notion that that
can we can leverage for
health and for our future. Connection to
other people? I'm going to leave it
open. Connection to our genome,
connection to our microbiome, connection
to our families, connection to our
neighbors, connection to those who live
in other countries, and connection to
the planet.
I love that.
Amazing answer.
Dr. Perlmutter, thank you so much for
coming on. That was absolutely
extraordinary.
Guys,
he is shaping my thinking, I think, more
than anybody else right now. I I cannot
encourage you enough to go in. He's
making connections other people aren't
making. He's talking about things that
are um certainly going to rile some
people up, but I think are backed by um
cutting-edge science, to be sure, but
certainly he always speaks from a place
of what's coming out in the studies.
It's absolutely extraordinary. Um I I
just have really been blown away with
his ability to go into the hard science,
talking at a cellular level, and then
also, like his last answer about
connection and the way that for him that
really is taking everything into
consideration and not just um connecting
to other people, but also connecting to
the things you can find out about
yourself, bringing us back to the
beginning of the interview where he was
talking about understanding your data
and understanding really who you are at
at a much deeper level than I think most
people really understand themselves.
And I think it's utterly fascinating
that the man that's given us so many
books on dietary impact on the brain is
now showing us um a broader perspective
on what's impacting our brain in the
ways that we can really begin to shape
our lives, to shape our genetics, which
I think is such an interesting idea. Um
it it it's absolutely breathtaking, and
I will for sure put my stamp on every
second that you spend in his world um
learning from him is a second well
spent. That um the highest compliment
that I can pay somebody in his field is
to say that I really believe it will
help you live a longer, happier, and
healthier life. Um so, dive in. You will
not regret it. All right, if you haven't
already, be sure to subscribe. And until
next time, my friends, be legendary.
Take care.
[applause]
Dr. Perlmutter, thank you again so much.
Thank you guys so much for watching and
being a part of this community. If you
haven't already, be sure to subscribe.
You're going to get weekly videos on
building a growth mindset, cultivating
grit, and unlocking your full potential.