Video summary
Dr. Rick Hanson explores the Buddhist perspective on life's inherent unsatisfactoriness, arguing that while everything ends, this is not a problem if one is not attached to outcomes; rather, it reflects the endless arising and expansion of the universe itself. He cites physicist Professor Mueller from UC Berkeley to illustrate how time functions as a dimension of an expanding bubble, suggesting we are always in creation at the leading edge of "now." This physical reality challenges our fear of change, which Hanson identifies as a major source of pain because people often struggle with letting go before it happens. Drawing on teachings like those of Ajahn Chah and Jack Kornfield, he posits that happiness is directly proportional to how much we let go: if you let go completely, you become completely happy. However, our biology and modern culture make this difficult; humans evolved from ancestors who were possessive rather than chill because they passed on genes associated with grasping for resources like food and mates in a hunter-gatherer context where ownership was limited to what one could carry. The difficulty of letting go extends beyond physical objects to thought patterns, identity, and views. Hanson explains that humans are unique among primates due to "mental time travel," the ability to simulate pasts and futures which reinforces a sense of self but often traps us in rumination loops seeking anticipatory rewards or validation for our narratives. He uses the Zen story of an overflowing cup to illustrate how we get so involved with our own mental content that there is no room left for new experiences, leading to suffering when reality contradicts our views on politics, sports, or self-worth. To counter this, Hanson advocates for cultivating a "don't know mind," which acts as a solvent for congealed rumination by refusing to collapse uncertainty into fixed answers. This practice allows individuals to receive the next moment without expectations, dissolving the resistance that arises when we plant stakes in specific positions about how things should be or what happened in the past. Hanson emphasizes that true letting go requires fully feeling and releasing trapped emotional memories rather than avoiding them through doomed quests for redemption or absolution. He shares personal anecdotes of facing fears directly—such as confronting a monster under his bed at age ten or diving into "devouring faces" during psychedelic experiences in Joshua Tree—to illustrate the heroic nature of entering pain to achieve integration. This approach transforms mundane victories, like overcoming social anxiety by giving talks without applause or accepting rejection gracefully, into opportunities for growth that are often overlooked because they lack external fanfare. By expanding one's window of tolerance through repeated exposure to dreaded feelings and realizing survival is possible regardless of the outcome, individuals can move from a state of rigid defense to fluid adaptability, akin to Bruce Lee’s philosophy, allowing them to stand their ground without being consumed by ego or fear. Finally, the discussion turns toward authenticity in an era dominated by phoniness, consumerism, and digital manipulation where people often try to "speedrun" relatability as a growth hack. Hanson references Martin Buber's concepts of *I-Thou* (genuine connection) versus *I-It* (superficial interaction), urging listeners to recognize when they are being treated as objects or conversely, treating others that way due to roles and agendas. He encourages people to reverse-engineer authentic connections by focusing on what is genuinely true within themselves rather than polishing an act for the world, thereby reducing preoccupation with controlling others' minds about them. This shift fosters a sense of safety and regulation in relationships, allowing individuals to appreciate realness over pretense even as they navigate complex social dynamics or professional settings. Ultimately, Hanson calls for large-scale compassion coalitions to address systemic issues like climate change and poverty, suggesting that the same courage required for personal letting go is essential for building collective alliances motivated by a response to suffering.
Read the full video transcript
In Buddhism, there's this um view in
early Buddhism especially that life is,
you know, very unsatisfactory because
everything keeps ending. Well, wait a
second. First of all, if you're not
attached to what's happening, the fact
that it's endlessly changing is not
itself a problem. And meanwhile, there's
the endless arising. And so, there's
some physics about that. Why is there
time at all? And uh one of the leading
theories comes from this professor uh
Mueller M u L E R at UC Berkeley that
the big bang universe is a
four-dimensional space-time universe.
Space is expanding. There's evidence for
that. And we don't notice it because
it's so big. We're continually being
stretched just a tiny tiny wee bit. But
time is the other dimension of the
expanding bubble of the Big Bang
universe. So maybe the next moment is
simply what's occurring as the temporal
expansion of the universe proceeds. So
we are always in creation at the leading
edge of now in the temporal expansion of
the big bang universe. Whoa. And so
things are ending because there's the
endless expanding into the next moment.
And isn't that the coolest way to kind
of relate to what up? It's so funny that
you decided to start your siloquy uh uh
with that because I wanted to talk about
change. I wanted to talk about letting
go today. And um there's a
I think a lot of people like the idea of
being someone who can deal with change
well. And I think a lot of people
probably are. You know, if they were to
look at their past, they actually
probably did deal with change well when
the change happened. But
maybe not so well in advance of it
occurring. Fear of change is uh a real
source of pain for a lot of people. And
it's interesting that you know, you're
right, the perfect cocktail is going to
be drained at some point. you know, the
dinner is going to finish, the friends
are going to move to a different
country, the parents are going to pass
away, the career is going to end, the
passions are going to become less
enthusing than they were in the past.
And with that
needs two things. You need to be
prepared to let go. And I think the
techniques of letting go, what that
means, whether it's letting go of
something that you still aren't 100%
certain about, a relationship, a
friendship, a career, uh or something
that's completely ended. This is, you
know, a person who's passed. This is a
situation which no longer exists. Uh
that's one side. And then the other side
is okay, how do we step into the future
more hopefully? So I think uh lots of
fertile ground for us to get into here.
It's nice that we we came in and our our
astral minds had yet had been linked
before we even started talking.
>> That's fantastic. I had no idea that
would be our topic and um Oh, so much to
say about it. Right off the top, I'm
just reflecting on this uh kind of
statement from Ajan Cha. Ajan's an
honorific like minister or rabbi.
Anyway, in uh Thailand, no longer alive,
major teacher in the lineage of western
Buddhism. Um Jack Kornfield, Sharon
Saltzburg, Joseph Goldstein, so forth.
Really a wonderful teacher. Lived in
rural settings and was really down to
earth. He said, "If you let go a little,
you'll have a lot of happiness." Pardon
me. If you let go a little, you'll have
a little happiness. If you let go a lot,
you'll have a lot of happiness. And if
you let go completely, you will be
completely happy.
That's a kind of a good frame here,
right? It was pretty cool.
>> Yeah. Very, very cool. Um well, I'll say
another little thing about it, which is,
you know, I'm a longtime therapist and
um understandably people are dealing
with with fear, fear of change, let's
say, and feeling unsupported. And uh in
Buddhist meditative practice that gets
mature, sometimes people are so aware of
the endless ending of the moment that it
is terrifying. And it's very important
whether it's in everyday life or in deep
meditative practice to feel buttressed
and supported and buoied and lived by
the ongoingness of all rightness. That
is actually true to the extent it's
true. amidst the crud and crap, there's
so much that's already okay
continuously. And bringing that,
foregrounding that into awareness with a
brain that tends to tune out what it
habituates to is really important,
right? We notice the things that are bad
or that are ending. We don't notice what
is continually booing us and living us.
You know, our own bodies, our friends,
the goodness in our own heart, the
things in the world that are supportive.
And anyway, just bringing attention to
those parts of the truth amidst other
parts that are concerning that we need
to do something about. Bringing
attention to those parts of the truth is
as a regular practice and developing the
habit of that is really useful.
>> Why is it so hard to let go? Why is that
not our set point, our natural state?
>> Well, just think about our ancestors
going back, you know, right? humans,
hominids, monkeys, squirrel-like,
ratlike creatures in Jurassic Park. Uh
the creatures that maybe by genetic
design were really super chill.
Chump, they got eaten. They were like,
"I'm letting go, man. Yeah, you can have
my banana. Yeah, you can have my
girlfriend." Like, they did not pass on
their jeans. The ones that were cranky
and possessive and grasping, my
precious, you know, they passed on their
genes and we're their great great great
great grandchildren on top of the food
chain right now. Right. So that's I
think part of it. Gosh, we have a
culture. You've really spoken well about
this that is very acquisitive.
Again, huntergather times in our biology
is to not be able to possess very much
because you can only own quote unquote
what you carry with you. And in many
native cultures, there's no sense of
ownership particularly. It's the group,
the band, or it's you don't really own
it. Mother nature gave it to you for a
little time, right? So, there's that. Uh
so our modern culture that's very much
about ownership and property and
accumulating wealth and and in a sense
the properties of status including in
our very status seeeking culture your
reputational property the amount of
likes you get or followers
more and you know people write about the
molecule more and dopamine and it's more
complicated than that of course but
that's a good part of it. So I think
that's another reason why it's hard for
people to let go. M it's the weird thing
is it's not only letting go of things
that exist. It's even letting go of
thought patterns. You know, we have this
sort of obsessive ruminative thinking,
these welltrodden paths that we go
through. Oh, and now I'm here and I'll
think this thing and then I'll think
that and oh, that really got to me and
D. Like how many times do you want to
replay the same insult that that person
threw your way at the water cooler 2
months ago? Oh, if I and then this weird
fantasy comes in. If only if they I
would have said this and then they would
have said that, but I would have said
this thing and then that would have
happened. And yeah, we are oddly even
possessive over our own thoughts, even
the ones that are mean to us.
>> Wow, there's so many. That's so cool.
Uh, I'm tuning into the way that when we
ruminate, you know, we feel
identified with. That's another
extremely difficult thing to let go of
is identity. And yet, in some ways, it's
one of the most useful things to let go
of because then you can let in.
You know, there's this whole dynamic
obviously of releasing and receiving. We
can't, you know, the old a true story,
you know, proverb, you may know it, I'll
say it quickly. um a great scholar of
Buddhism in Japan and the history of
Japan went to go see a great Zen master
for a conversation and they sat down and
they had tea and it was very elegant and
the Zen master was preparing it. You can
imagine the movie of this. And uh they
began chatting and the uh um the the the
scholar asked the teacher a little
question. The teacher started to talk
and then the scholar would jump in and
propound and expound for a while and
then the pause. They'd ask another
question. The Zen master would start to
talk a little bit. Then the scholar
would say so many things. And ah
meanwhile this master was preparing tea,
preparing tea. And so he started pouring
it into the cup. Beautiful cup, lacquer
table, thousand-year-old mug, something.
Starts pouring it in. Tea starts to
rise. And the scholar's watching the
slow rising of the tea in the cup gets
closer and closer to the lip. And then
he's just thinking, "What?" And this
master keeps pouring.
Well, the tea starts flowing over on
this beautiful table. And the scholar
says, "Wait, wait, wait. You can't you
can't put any more into a cup that's
already full.
Z master puts down the cup and says
exactly.
So we tend to get so involved with our
stuff right in our own minds. That's
part of it. And then another part I'm
just reflecting on you and me as people
um who and to put it kind of bluntly are
paid to be right
to be or paid to know in a way we get
valued and paid in praise not just in
money and so forth. Uh and so then what
do we do with our uh attachment to view?
One of the three major things that
Buddha talked about people get attached
to is their view. The other is sense,
pleasure and identity. view. Um, how do
you deal with that? You form a view. You
think it's right. I'm the same way. And
yet
that attachment to our view about
politics or sports or people we're with
or even our self. We have a lot of view
about our self.
>> We get attached to it. How do we let go
of these views including our righteous
case? I'm very aware of that myself
about this or that. How do how do you
work with that?
I think I have a little bit of a get out
of jail free card, at least publicly.
Um, because no one typically is coming
to me as the expert. I'm mercifully sort
of made a career out of being the most
stupid person in every conversation that
I've had. So,
>> brilliant strategy
>> it is. So, there's something called
jester's privilege, which is kind of
what all of the comedians have at the
moment. um you know from medieval times
the gest of being able to say the thing
to call out to the cortisans and maybe
even to the king or the queen themselves
to be able to say the unspeakable thing
and they had a particular privilege.
Now, I imagine that uh if you push it
too far, the jester's privilege it it
turns out that there's only so many
times that you can do that or there's a
limit to it, too. Um, and they may need
a new jester who takes his privilege
slightly less uh seriously. But
there is uh holding opinions lightly and
sort of being prepared to change your
mind um at least for me publicly uh is
is not that hard.
>> I don't find it too hard. Um largely
again because curiosity is quite a nice
salve to this. It's a really lovely
antidote. If you're curious about stuff,
you just want to find out. You want to
know as opposed to I suppose it's the
difference between uh proilitizing or or
giving some sort of a sermon and
interviewing or asking questions. Um
because on one side I just want to know
and on the other side I want to tell.
And for the most part, uh I'm pretty
good at wanting to know. And the telling
thing is is cool, but slightly less so
for me. However,
>> uh when it comes to my own sense of
self,
>> the level of attachment I have to how I
know me, about what I am, uh even in its
positive and negative aspect, you know,
we're attached to the negative stories
that we tell ourselves about things
because it's a safety blanket. Oh, no. I
I that's I don't do I don't do that. I
don't I don't dance. I don't I don't
public speak. I don't you know I I I I'm
not built for big crowds or whatever it
might be.
>> I'm not a racist.
[Laughter]
>> Rick, you've betrayed yourself. You've
betrayed yourself in the first sentence.
Um
it's it's very that is an area I think
you that identity. How do I see myself?
That is something that's very very
difficult to let go of.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
It's really interesting uh
looking back. It's I think it's useful
to note turning points in your life, key
moments that were good. Maybe somebody
opened a door for you or or you realized
something in particular yourself. And a
key moment for me was in the middle of
my 20s. I realized in terms of thoughts
about identity that growing up I had
been a nerd but not a wimp.
I don't know if that translates to
British lang.
>> Oh no, I understand. I understand
entirely. Yeah. Someone interested in
quirky intellectual pursuits but not
someone who was a coward.
>> That's exactly right. I was president
president of the dork club, you know,
kind of a very I was very young going
through school and uh introverted and
kind of shy and my parents didn't really
help me with social skills. So that led
to a lot of feelings of being an
outsider but and I thought of myself as
a wimp. I felt cowardly. I felt
inadequate as a male uh you know in
terms of male identity, in terms of
physicality and all the rest of that. Uh
and yet uh I had this kind of moment
where it's almost like you know your
life passes before your eyes where
episode after episode after episode
retrospectively in you know some major
episodes I realized no way I you know I
I fought back. I stood up for myself. I
was assertive and I I was a nerd but not
a wimp. Anyway, that was a shift of
identity and I think that's helpful for
people to reflect on times when things
were a big shift for you so you could
appreciate that and and learn from them.
>> It's interesting. I think a problem
people have letting go can often feel
like giving up.
>> Correct.
>> And this is
>> this is very painful
>> to feel, oh, this is me admitting defeat
here.
>> Yeah,
>> it's funny. Um, I guess I'm in story
mode a little bit. Hope it's okay. I'm
um a little sleepdeprived because of all
the things I've been doing lately.
Anyway, so you're reminding me. So, I
have a dear friend. I I'll spare his
name. Uh, many years ago, we were
talking and he was very attached to a
particular woman. He was pursuing her.
He was chasing her. She was kind of
interested, but she wasn't that into
him. He's really suffering, you know,
going into it. And by the way, for the
record, men talk about their
relationships, too. You know, guys do
this as well. So, I remember we had we
were walking out and we had gone to a
restaurant and we were walking home and
we were half drunk, not fully drunk, but
half drunk. He he was probably more than
half drunk, going on and on and on. And
I said to him, I said to him at some
point, "Well, well, man, maybe you just
need to surrender here."
and he turned to me angrily said I don't
do surrender
and I'm like whoa and he was kind of
reflective on that but I don't do
surrender and then a little later he
threw up all over my feet but you know
that was part of it all
>> well your stomach has just surrendered
your dinner all over the pavement
>> I know but he did he he had enough
insight we were both involved in kind of
a personal growth world at the time and
um back in my 20s actually and he uh you
know he came to realize what I was
talking about but You're exactly right.
It was part of his male identity and as
and as a person uh hyper self-reliant
libertarian kind of person. I don't do
surrender. But yeah, we have to
surrender.
Yeah, I think the uh chasing of a
partner or the getting over of a breakup
um I think is a probably pretty fertile
ground to use as an example for this uh
emotionally charged uh sense of
accomplishment or defeat. um uh
attachment to selfworth. What does this
say about me?
>> Yeah.
>> What does it what does it mean about my
place?
You know, it's a
>> probably a good a good sandbox to to
keep going here. So, it feels to me like
um
>> rumination,
what are we getting out of rumination?
Like, why is the brain so tuned to
ruminate in that way?
Well, wanting to stay in this beautiful
sandbox. Um, well, it is really
interesting because our closest genetic
relatives, chimpanzees say, and bonobos,
they don't ruminate. Uh, it's possible
that the citations, you know, big
brains, we don't quite know what's going
on there, but they don't certainly
chimps don't ruminate because they don't
do metal time travel. They don't have
the neurological basis for it in their
cortex to systematically envision a
future. You know, if I do X, will she
like me? If I do Y, will she like me?
You know, they don't do a effective
forecasting on the one hand. Nor do they
reflect a lot on the past. Why did I do
that? How could I have done that better
next time? Why did they treat me that
way? Yuck, yuck, yuck. They just don't
do that. And one of the great advantages
in human cortical evolution as the brain
tripled in its size over the last
several million years was the
development of the neural substrates for
mental time travel and uh the ruminator
in which we simulate different potential
futures and we generate little mini
movies about the past. So on the one
hand, when you think about trying to
survive in stone age times, it's really
useful to be able to systematically
learn lessons from your past or
systematically
uh anticipate or project different
futures. So on the one hand, we have
this incredible thing. What a great
piece of hardware. And it's really
saturated as well with the sense of
self, which again seems much more
elaborated and developed in humans
compared again to our closest primate
relatives. Um, and so on the one hand,
thank you, mother nature, we're blessed
by this. On the other hand, it's really
easy to get lost in it. And what I
notice about it is that um there's a lot
of anticipatory reward embedded in the
ruminator. Uh if we just solve the
problem that we're anxious about, there
will be a reward. Or if we just revisit
the past and work it through, there will
be some realization around it or some
release around it where we will get the
reward of establishing that yeah, I was
right all along and they are [ __ ]
for do having done that to me. And we're
there's a kind of a subtle I think of it
as like the inner ad agency in which uh
these reward systems that are quite
agent a an ancient are exaggerating how
good it will be to have figured this out
finally after looping around the
ruminator track several dozen times. And
no, cuz once you loop around the track a
few dozen times for one, it's painful to
loop the track. And even if you do
eventually kind of sort of resolve
something, like how great did that feel?
How great was that benefit compared to
the cost of running around the ruminator
track? And then the other thing, uh, so
you're you're asking kind of why we do
it. And and part of the why is because
it it also tends to um reinforce and
reify the sense of self the me you know
both the witness of the little mini
movies of future and past and that's the
sort of I the subject subjective point
of view and then there's the character
me in those movies what they did to me
that me or what they what could happen
for that me in the future. So there's a
lot of that that's very rewarding.
People get in that um especially if you
feel belleaguered in your sense of self
if you feel attacked or a lot of the
content of rumination is negative. It's
around resentment or hurt or guilt. And
um it kind of shores us up weirdly as a
self to do that. But it's
>> how do you mean shows us up as a self?
Can you dig into that a little bit for
me?
>> Yeah. uh it is sort of it's useful to
observe what's implicit, what's the
ground distinct from figure. So the
figure quote unquote what I mean is the
story, the event like let's go back um
something happened in a restaurant maybe
with a person you were interested in
romantically. So there you had this
conversation didn't go quite well. You
felt misunderstood. You reacted a little
bit. They seemed to overreact maybe you
were missing something. So that's that's
the figure that's the content.
>> But what's the frame in which you're
ruminating about that content? In that
frame there's there's there tends to be
uh an implicit background strong sense
of self including the sematic sense of
self
which again because it's in the frame we
don't tend to notice it. It's the sky.
We notice the cloud, the figure, you
know, the content, but the sky is what's
really important
>> because also neurologically we are
reinforcing the frame by going through
it again and again and again.
>> Why is reinforcing the frame in relation
to the self a bad idea?
>> Great question. I think sometimes it's
good if you're reinforcing a frame of a
sense of your own innate goodness
and that you're a nerd but not a wimp.
Uh that's good. But from you know from a
wisdom standpoint uh this is yeah from a
if to the extent we get attached to self
and um identified with it that tends to
lead fairly quickly into forms of
craving like self wants things or it
tends to lead quickly into a pretty
developed sense of you know me myself
and I that uh others are not treating
well. We tend to take we tend to take
things more personally. That's a good
way to summarize that. So self is a we
want to use the sense of self but we
don't want to be used by it. That's a
deep topic.
>> I'm interested to learn more about that.
I think this uh relationship between
taking things personally because I I I
don't understand really
how you can ruminate without taking
things personally. They they seem to be
intrinsically linked.
>> That's exactly right. And that's part of
the problem. So when you ruminate, so so
why what are the problems with
rumination? Um one, it it's effectively
unpleasant.
It's not an enjoyable experience to be
in the ruminator. A B whatever you're
ruminating on which tends to be
emotionally negative and uh things like
resentments or you know deep guilt um
feelings of hurt uh that gets reinforced
neurons that wire that fire together
wire together in the rinators. You're
reinforcing it. you're reinforcing
reactivity and you're sensitizing your
brain to to reactivity because little
bits of cortisol are released. You know,
they go into your brain and sensitize
the alarm bell, the amydala there and
and make it more reactive to stress. So,
you're it's not good to do laps around
the rumination track. Also,
functionally, uh rumination often has
the function of keeping at bay softer,
more vulnerable feelings. you know,
while we're rehashing that argument in
the restaurant with this, let's say, a
woman we were pursuing. Um, you know,
and we're kind of right about it and
we're going through the movie and we're
having the repetitive thoughts about it,
our case, and then we're thinking about
how other people would think about it
and why haven't they thought about it
the right way and been a better friend
to me about it. While we're doing all
that,
what's underneath it all that's being
avoided as an experience? softer
feelings of hurt, despair, feeling like
a failure, feeling defeated. What you're
saying, projecting that sense of defeat
into the future. I will always be
defeated. I will never find love. Those
those deeper, even younger, going all
the way back to, oh, I never got a good
girlfriend when I was in high school.
You know, going all all the way back.
Rumination functions as a defense often
against deeper experiences which we need
to open to to get a complete release and
move on to the next good thing. And
that's not good either.
Rumination feels
stiff, tight, this sort of obsessive.
It's it's it's very you're right. It's
it's got structure to it. It's not free
flowing. Um, and it seems to me like
going back to your homminids chimps,
when did we get the ruminator uh room
installed into all of our brains? It
feels like rumination is kind of a
survival mechanism gone rogue.
Feels like it's a a useful tool. The
effective forecasting, what do I what
should I have learned from that thing
that just happened? What's the lesson to
take away? Well, well, that thing was
emotionally salient to me. That thing
was really, that thing made me feel
something. I should pay attention to it.
Maybe I should think about Maybe I
should think about it a lot. I should
mine this well deep. There must be
insights and gems and and and and
treasure deep down in there. Um, so
yeah, it seems to me that rumination is
hijacking the brain's desire to do
problem solving
whilst
usually probably not solving a problem.
>> Yeah. I love the fact that you um deep
in practice tuned into the feeling in
your body of ruminating, you know, as
you put it, tight, contracted,
right? And you know and even there can
be a kind of depending on our
temperament a certain aggressiveness and
attack mode in the rumination. Other
people maybe by temperament are more
fearful in their nature and they would
be more like withdrawal mode. Um others
might be more centered in a kind of
anxious insecure attachment style in
which there's a beseechingness. I'm
speaking to the frame of the rumination,
the the backstory in which the plot is
unfolding of what we're talking about.
So yeah, you're you're very alert to
that in the bodily sense. And and I I
agree that what we're seeking and the
brain is seeking in the rumination is
some kind of result except the way it's
going about it is preventing a result.
We don't get to clarity. We don't get to
okay, I sorted it out. you know
effective problem solving uh you you
work it through okay
I know exactly I I have felt this fully
I have clarified the facts I have
clarified my values here I know what my
plan is going forward I know what the
lesson is going forward and I'm released
I'm free rumination we're bound
traditional metaphor is a dog chained to
a stick you know it can orbit the stick
but it doesn't get released It's not
free. It's not truly autonomous. We're
captured by our ruminations.
>> They seem so beguiling, right? They're
seductive. We get caught up in them and
we're we're captured by them. That's not
good. So, yeah, think productively about
things and feel the feelings along the
way. Um, I'll I'll say for me that uh
there are a couple keys that can be
really helpful. So when you find
yourself starting to ruminate about
something, be aware of it. And what you
can do is to continue to reflect on
whatever that was or let that movie
play, but go wide.
Try to get a sense of your whole body,
your whole mind. Because when we
ruminate, we're locked onto that
particular tile in the mosaic of
consciousness. Other stuff's happening,
but we're we're we're sucked in to that
part. And so it's it's good to kind of
go wide because when you go wider, you
don't suffer so much and you take more
into account. And what that does
technically, rumination typically
involves a lot of activity in the
midline cortex, including the rearward
portions, the default mode. Um, and so
when we go wide, that tends to engage
networks on the sides of the brain,
especially right hemisphere for
right-handed people because that's
gestalt processing, holistic processing,
and that tends to quiet activity in
midline cortices. Wow. So go wide and
including go wide to all the many things
that were involved in that conversation
at dinner that didn't go well. you know
this
where she was coming from, where you
were coming from, the other people, the
stuff that was happening big picture.
Going wide really helps. And then also,
especially as you can try to feel below
the surface, what's really going on here
that's being kept at bay by the hamster
wheel of ruminating
>> what's underneath the surface? And then
third, try to come to a conclusion.
What's the takeaway? You know, what's
the takeaway? What's the wisdom from
here? How are you going to operate from
now on? you know, what have you
realized? So those three things, going
wide, feeling below the surface, and
going after the takeaway, then that
makes rumination productive, and you're
using this incredible neurological
hardware
>> for its best purposes,
>> not being trapped by it.
>> Yeah. Why is repetition and compulsion
weirdly comfortable in a way?
>> What? You know what I mean? It's like
putting on a an old leather pair of
shoes. You know, exactly how they
squeak. They've sort of molded around
that weird big toe you've got from when
you kicked a football wrong in, you
know, ate your
so funny. Well, another story. Sorry. I
was talking I was hanging out with a
friend who was talking to a buddy and
let's see. Uh my friend was saying, "Oh
man, I've had my head up my ass lately
talking about mistakes he's been making
and so forth." and his buddy replied on
the volley just really quickly, "Yeah,
but it's great to be home again."
Right? There's Freud called it the
repetition compulsion. Familiarity.
We're drawn to familiarity because it's
it's safer. You know, again, from a
evolutionary standpoint, the known is
safe. Even if it's the known bad thing,
the devil, you know, right? That's
known. and u was not yet known. That's
where threats could lurk back in the
stone age or Jurassic Park. And so um I
think that's one part of it. Certainly I
think in the background as well uh it's
sort of there's this reassuring
continuity of selfing
even though the content you being when
the content is familiar the frame in
which the content is known or
experienced is familiar as well and that
I think that gives us a a comfort
>> um then of course biology some people
are you know a little more tilted toward
OCD or compulsion or you know other
people and then there's another element
which is really interesting. I hope it's
okay that I'm just kind of going through
a lot of stuff fast but well you're
familiar with the big five theory of
personality factors. Great. So acronym
ocean ocean
uh the first one is openness and people
vary on a range both by genetics and
then acquired
tendencies and how open they are and
people who tend to be more toward the
rigid end of the range they will be uh
trotting more familiar paths in their
own mind stream again and again and
again. So I think that's part of it too.
H yeah, I'm
I'm intrigued about why
not only with rumination but with sort
of planning for the future.
We're so prepared to keep ourselves
trapped inside of something that we
don't enjoy. We've been here before.
>> We've we've we've been across this
terrain and we know that it's filled
with upturned
tacks and we keep stepping on them and
all of them are painful and you go,
"Yeah, I know. But it feels it feels
familiar. And I wonder whether I wonder
whether there's a relationship here
between
the fear of a lack of control
that uncertainty
>> Oh, very nice. Yeah.
>> Uncertainty is so
abhorent to us to our brain
>> not knowing that we would rather
fantasize a catastrophe
than deal with uncertainty.
That's super brilliant. And do you think
that's particularly common in people who
um have a career or a life history in
which they've been rewarded a lot for
being in control and having control and
directing things and in particular
certainly I think for people who have
been rewarded for being right for
performing um
there is a a particular sort of free
flowingness that you have around the
friends that ah I don't know what I'm
going to do tomorrow. ah you know I
don't have the thing and in some ways
their outcomes in life
can be a little bit more uh high
variance you might say diplomatically um
because they don't plan for the future
in the same sort of a way and they don't
necessarily foresee all of the potential
pitfalls and their um they don't have
the the structure that at least in the
modern world for most people bears a lot
of fruit, right? Being able to know what
tomorrow looks like, iterating on
habits, compounding interest of saving
money and knowing when you're going away
and knowing what time you need to wake
up in order to be able to make it to
work on time so you don't get fired. You
know, all of these things are really,
really important. So you say okay the
more control I have
>> the better my life gets the
>> including about many of the things you
talk about you know your own
optimization your own physical fitness
your own workout routines your vitamin
intake and all the rest of that yeah you
know for me a lot more around the mind
you know the more control I have over my
own consciousness you know the better it
goes right so yeah we those of us who
uh yeah I think also just to go into it.
There was a lot about my childhood that
was was fine and I just felt a whoa
I got dropped in to a stream in which
there wasn't that much control. They
were bigger than I was, right? They had
more power. They were doing all these
things. They were upset about this and
that. they like h um and so yeah then
internally for me what a refuge was to
develop a growing sense of autonomy
where I did have control and I would
increasingly create little domains in
which I was in charge including what I
was thinking about or paying attention
to. So maybe in part if people have a
turbulent um disregulated
you know childhood or youth then they're
going to be more particularly
appreciative in healthy ways even that
can then hijack us in not so healthy
ways uh to you know have to be in
control have to be have to know.
>> Yeah. And I I think it's just a it's
such an ironic tragedy that we would
rather fantasize a catastrophe way worse
than anything that could reasonably
happen in the real world. I guess we're
sort of going into forecasting as
opposed to ruminating here. But
>> uh
>> that's a kind of ruminating where you're
caught up in imagining a future and
Right.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Yeah. And uh yeah, it just I I had this
I read this sentence which it's kind of
funny. I'm such an addict to um memes or
apherisms that I'll happily take
something that didn't mean what the
author meant and then repurpose it into
my own. It's kind of like when I first
read uh Harry Potter when I was a kid
and I'd never I'd never heard the name
Hermione read out loud. I'd only ever
seen it written down. So I went four and
a half books of Harry Potter convinced
that it was Herion and then they
released the movie and they called her
Hermione and I sort of rejected their
interpretation of the author's like a
word that you know a name that's
relatively common or whatever but that
I'd never heard and I was like no no no
this is the way that this is the way
that I do it right this is the this is
the way that that that I'm going to see
it and uh it's kind of the same it's
kind of the same with this that we have
our we have our perspective on things
this is this is the way that this thing
is going to be. And uh for me, I saw
this sentence written and uh it was this
this author talking about thinking in
superp positions.
Uh you know, you have this Schroingers
there's a degree of uncertainty. We
don't know whether the cat is dead or
alive. And then he was talking about how
most people abhore the uncertainty so
much that they need to collapse the
superp position down into an answer. And
this is what we do when we fantasize
catastrophe. We are collapsing the
superp position of uncertainty. So yeah,
the idea of thinking in superp positions
I think is a is a nice it's also
>> I love that.
>> Yeah, thinking in superp positions is
>> Oh, I'm going to take that away.
>> Feel free. It's it's bastardized from
someone that didn't mean it to mean what
I meant it to mean.
>> Oh, I I'll be quoting you. You know,
respect your sources.
>> Let's go. It's like the human centipede
of plagiarism.
So this is so cool. So in the sandbox of
relationships, let's say, and hurts
about that unfulfilled longings, you
know, the normal range. Um, how can not
knowing be helpful?
>> Long pause here.
>> Don't know mind. Yeah, don't know mind.
Beginner's mind. Don't know mind. um
receiving the next moment as it arises,
not knowing. Uh I I had a friend uh very
deep in practice, longtime teacher say
to me quite a while ago. I sort of was
asking him um so what what do you what
what's your core practice these days?
That's a really useful question I think
for people that engage in practice like
what's the primary focus for you? He
said living with absolutely no
expectations.
And to really track what absolutely no
means, that's really something because
the brain is an expectation generator.
It wants to know. It freaks when it
doesn't know. You know about people in
these uh century deprivation tanks who
would start to hallucinate because the
brain needs content. It wants content.
Uh is quite a deep thing to just not
know. So I I think back on people that
I've been in wrangles with, let's say,
of one kind or another who, let's say,
have truly mistreated me or I have
myself felt sad and remorseful about
something I did, a mistake I made or
there's some tangle or I I can't believe
they did that. I did not see that
coming. I have found it really helpful
to when I can just say, "Okay, all that
and don't know." What's it feel like to
don't know? don't know, not without
labels, don't know the meaning, the
implication, just don't know. Suddenly,
it feels freer and looser. It's kind of
not knowing is like a kind of solvent
that dissolves the congealed crud of
rumination.
[Music]
>> Being comfortable with that,
>> to be that uncertainty,
>> to cultivate don't know mind. I mean,
that's a major practice in some
traditions, cultivate don't know mind.
And I think it's for me it's really fun
because I'm a kind of scruffy autonomous
type person, you know, and uh I don't
want my brain to control me.
I don't want the programming.
>> I want I want autonomy even for myself.
>> That's right. I want to be the ghost in
the machine. I don't want the machine to
control me. I'm living in the machine,
my inner being, whatever. And so I like
disrupting. It's disruptive to not know
>> maybe so. Or another way of putting it
putting it is maybe so don't know maybe
so and I just wonder how uh for you for
example if if we apply this to
relationship issues
um don't know don't know what the future
will be don't know what the past has
meant you know just so much I don't know
to me that feels like unpacking in
>> it's very expansive
>> yeah it feels that way
>> yeah it's very open. It's um
the resistance can really only be
generated once you've planted a stake in
the ground somewhere. Once you've made a
position, right?
>> And then you've dug this thing in. This
is this is what I think was right. This
is what I think happened. This is what I
think will occur. And then everything
begins to exist in relation to that, you
know, and that's where the resistance
comes from because there's something to
resist against, you know, like the dog
running around the pole. Um, but if you
don't, it's you it's total free flowing.
Yeah, exactly.
That's really nice.
Do you do you write poetry by any
chance?
>> I've actually started I did it for the
first time uh a couple of months ago. I
really enjoyed it.
That was just an intuitive sense of how
your
mind stream unfolds.
>> Yeah. I uh I've been hanging around with
musicians a lot more uh over the last
few months and I always had this sense I
maybe everybody has this that they
assume that their particular uh mode of
communicating or their particular art
form is the one that sort of maximally
allows for you know effective
communication. And I knew that I knew
that music was able to say things that
words can't because there is sort of
emotion and there is tension and release
and there is swelling and there is
harmony and there is rhythm and there is
all of this stuff. But I don't think I'd
ever considered fully that lyrics can
say something
>> that pros can't. that words, you know,
that in absence of words, you're
actually able to say more than if you
need to be more explicit. That
>> vagaries can be sort of more educating
and insightful
>> than precision can
>> and um yeah, that
>> that I guess if you're not musically
minded, which I'm not, um the closest
approximation that you can get to doing
that is poetry.
That's really lovely. Yeah. I I uh don't
think Well, I wrote a paper in college
that was an epic poem. That was the
closest I ever got to ever write doing
poetry and I'm not sure it was any good.
Uh yeah, the the best poetry is like
what we're talking about. It stops your
mind.
You know, like humor is the same way.
the jester. I'm thinking of Lear's fool,
King Lear's fool, right? The jester who
has privilege that they
you have that moment where your mind
stops and in that space is possibility,
right? And the best poetry does that for
us.
>> What about letting go of emotionally
charged memories? you know, stuff that
has happened a good while ago and yet
when we're at our when we're sleepd
deprived, when we're feeling scared,
when we're a little bit more vulnerable
or we're a bit more agitated or
whatever, um this is the sort of thing
that keeps coming back up. How do you
come to think about letting go of
emotionally charged memories from the
past?
>> Yeah. Well, I that's been personally
important to me and it's also
professionally kind of squirrely in my
wheelhouse. And so short version for me
here would be
we we
can't let go until we let in fully.
And so very often when we go back to
things, it's because there is some
non-experienced experience that has been
trapped in the neural nets of memory
that needs to be released. And so the
revisiting of that material sometimes in
the frame of a kind of doomed quest like
if only I could do this or that I'd get
the finally the blood from the stone
that I've been
>> seeking. Yeah. That's right. Or
redemption, absolution, etc. Exactly. Um
so we we tend to go back to it, you
know, again and again and again.
And so therefore to truly let go, we
have to really open and then resource
ourselves so we can feel it most fully.
But what typically happens when you feel
it most fully is it moves through you.
You have to be a little careful with the
white hot core of trauma. So what I'm
saying here is not necessarily true for
that because there are certain
experiences that once they do get into
emotional memory they are not going to
go um what's around them can change over
time. The context the understanding the
sense of self related to that terrible
trauma let's say um you know can shift
uh and you can become more regulated
about not being so hijacked by that by
that memory. But I think realistically
for people, sometimes you can get a
complete release, but just sometimes we
have to live with it. And then how do we
live with it? Well, that's a whole
topic. Um, which I think a lot involves
letting ourselves turn a corner from it
after we've really worked it through.
You know, every time we recall that
episode, we feel like crap. So, we
deliberately help ourselves to turn a
corner so we don't keep revisiting that
episode. That's that's a piece of truth.
But I think so that's it's hard one
wisdom you know um version of this
another story. So I was a kind of
fearful kid and lying there in bed very
active imagination. Uh
as an adult I was prepping for the
psychology license in in America where
they they grill you on things and you
have to know about the roar shock the
ink plots. And so I took a roarshock uh
to prep for the license exam. I'll
reveal something that I hope will not
come back to haunt me which is so I did
the roar shock with someone who knew me
well as a grad student grinding away
parent of young kids getting a lot of
stuff done late 30s at the time and then
she came to me with the results she said
are you feeling okay Rick
well I'm busy I'm doing my dissertation
I'm trying to get licensed I got two
young kids and I'm the sole provider of
my family but yeah I'm feeling okay she
said well there are some kind of
psychotic features here.
And I was like, "What?" And she said,
"Well, this is why because when you
looked at the ink blot, you would give
like six different possible images and
you could elaborate a lot of why you saw
it and all the rest." And that sometimes
happens with people who are crazy, you
know, and and I said, "Huh, I'm not."
She said, "It also happens with people
of a very rich imagination and are kind
of creative and have a lot of access. So
at that point I'd done a lot of
psychedelics, a lot of inner work, you
know, and I'm a performance kind of guy.
I'm like, hey, how much can I see? I'm
going to see a lot of things. I want to
get a high score, right?
So my point is I have a good
imagination. So there I was, 10 years
old in bed, scared to death because I
was convinced there was a monster under
my bed and I could hear little sounds
and I was alone and and I finally did
one of the the most the bravest things
I've ever done. I kind of screwed up my
courage. I said, "Okay, I'm sick of
this. If you're under there, eat my
face." You know, and I tucked my head,
you know, I leaned over the bed to what
was underneath it, knowing it could eat
my face. And no, just a bunch of dust
bunnies under there. But I had to enter
into it. You had to be I had to be brave
enough, you know, to go into it. And uh
I think that's what we have to do
sometimes to get a full release from
some of our deep material
>> to face it. And I I imagine that the uh
experiences that you had in psychedelics
probably reinforced that as well.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Exactly right. I had some of
this is quite intimate to to myself.
I'll kind of leave it alone a little
bit, but I I had a lot of um early
experiences in psychedelics in which I'd
look at a Oh, I don't mind talking about
it actually. I'd look at a kind of a
screen like a ceiling, a white ceiling,
and very quickly there would be these
demonic devouring faces, bloody teeth,
just
like whoa. I didn't like that, you know,
and that was fairly recurring. And I
mean um and then a year or two or three
of that h passed with probably half a
doz maybe 5 to 10 uh trips during that
time closer to 10. Finally I was in the
desert in California, a place I actually
love, Joshua Tree National Park. U
highly recommended if you make it to
California and I was staring at a bush
with thorns. you know, a desert, there's
a lot of thorny bushes. And every thorn
was a devouring face coming at me. And
at that point,
I just had had enough of it. And I said,
"Okay." And I
dove into the face. dove into the
devouring faces, demonic devouring, kind
of feminine, witchy, you know, bloody,
sharp teeth, jagged.
And then in that moment uh
I got a release and realized that that
what that was were these disowned pushed
down in a way parts of myself that were
witchy kind of the opposite of my
masculineized logical spocklike top down
leading with intellect mo
like the wild witchy and nice. I was
very nice. I'm a nice boy. And this was
this disowned part of me. I could feel
the shivery in my body right now as I
talk about it. And it was it was
disowned set away. And I had and I there
was an integration of it in that moment.
Um and uh ever after I've never had a
nightmare since. Wow.
I've had dreams that were a little
uncomfortable like someone's trying to
get me.
So yeah, that's another that these are
extreme examples
>> that are have a heroic not to praise
myself but just to say to other people
it's noble to step into the pain or to
like
go for it into it. It's noble. It's
heroic to do this
>> to feel it fully. I love the idea of um
ordinary victories, sort of mundane
successes like that. I've been thinking
about these more and more recently that
there's a lot of things that we overcome
that are
so kind of
normal and unceremonious
and unimpressive
and inward and and idiosyncratic as
well. Like they're so there's such a
part of us that even trying to unpack
and explain which you've very
successfully managed to do there. but
stuff that's even less grand than that.
But you win. You win over this sort of
little part of yourself. And I think
that, you know, we're talking about
letting go, about dealing with change
well, about being brave in the face of
uncertainty. These are these are things
that nobody is going to really pat you
on the back for. Like, oh, you dealt
with the inbuilt uncertainty of living
in a universe that you don't have full
control over. Congratulations. It's well
done. Like everybody has to do that. You
just did it. But this time you did it
with more grace.
>> This time you did it with more
equinimity. This time you did it more
quickly, more deafly. You did it more
peacefully. You did it without
castigating yourself. You did it without
staying up all night ruminating. And uh
yeah, winning mundane victories, boring
successes, I think is a a a and no, we
should we should congratulate ourselves
even more for those because the big
successes everyone else going to
congratulate you for. Oh, the new book
was so fantastic. Oh, that podcast
episode did Oh, congratulations on the
wedding. It was so beautiful. You looked
at how well your kids doing in school.
Like, yeah. You know, like the things
the things that are kind of
>> obvious slightly more normal successes
all the way up to the Nobel Prize and
you got the most recent title, all the
rest of the stuff, whatever. Job, job
promotion. Um yeah, cultivating uh
reducing down the bar of what
constitutes worthy of praise and
success, even if it's just inwardly or
maybe outwardly as well, like hey, I did
this thing today. I had this great I
I'll invert you and I'll do story time.
So, I had this really uh lovely rancher
and wrangler, a guy called Dry Creek
Dwayne on the show uh about last year.
He is a older fellow from Wyoming. Um,
seven kids, old school guy, big beard,
permanently got a cigar in his mouth,
cowboy hat, old school. Old school as
[ __ ] you know, big man, raw mangled
hands from ranching and wrangling and
getting picking at at horseshoes and
stuff for an entire career.
And uh he has spent a long time dealing
with I think quite a sort of classic
that generation anger from from the sort
of masculine uh discontent. Uh and he's
found himself at a really sort of
beautiful place of peace. Uh and he
considers himself sort of the anti-g
grind set bro person. He's very much
maybe the answer to your problem is to
grab a cigar and sit on the back porch
and read a novel and and think about it
a bit. You know, he's not you. Here's
the notion template that you should use
and the five-step process that will
allow you to track time block the
calendar for the next. He's none of
that. And um he was explaining this day
where there'd been a particularly
difficult horse and he was trying to um
break, domesticate, train this this
particular animal. And he had got up
kind of on the wrong side of the bed
that day. He wasn't feeling it. Uh but
he had to go to work and this is what he
does. So apparently he went and he saw
so him not in his best state. horse not
in their best state either. And he went
and he said he sat down and he just
looked at the horse. The horse was in
its stable. He sat down on this stall
and he lit up a cigar.
He said, "I smoked the first cigar."
And then I lit up a second cigar. I
smoked the second cigar and I potted
around a little bit and then I came back
and my wife asked, "So honey, how was
your day?" He said, "Well, I didn't
break anything and that's a success." I
just thought that was so wonderful to be
able to drop down. Yeah. Everybody loves
this idea of grand victories, right?
We've got this I think you've you've
referred to it as your one wild and
precious life, right?
>> Mary Oliver's quote. Yeah.
>> Um
which is beautiful. And inbuilt in that
is this kind of pressure. I need to make
the most of my day. I need to I need
this this needs to be done now because
if I do this now then I can do something
else next after now and then tomorrow
now can also I can like it's almost kind
of like a denial of death
>> in a way. It's like if only I could fit
more life into my life it would be like
I push death further away from me. Um,
and
inherent in that in a meritocracy, in a
capitalist world, in a world where
people are growth-minded and they want
to achieve a lot and I want to get
things done. I want to make Yeah, I'm
going to fit lots in.
>> Uh, there's a pressure to do lots of
things in that. And in some ways, that's
impressive, right? There are objective
differences between walking a 100 meters
in a day and walking 100 miles in a day.
there, you know, there there are
differences in the experience. But on
the flip side, if you can be the sort of
person like Dwayne for whom walking 100
meters is able to generate for you the
same level of content and well-being as
for someone else takes 100 miles, who's
got it better? Because Yeah. And I I
don't I just think it's a really nice
redress to
the more more more hungry ghost type
approach that people have for
achievement. And that's not to say if
you know you're looking at a poster
child for trying to make things happen
and agency and autonomy and all that
sort of stuff, but I certainly know that
when I play with things with grace and
ease and sort of more I don't grip
things so tightly. I'm less attached to
the outcomes of stuff that
it doesn't really matter because I'm
happy no matter what. It, you know, it
was an enjoyable experience because so
much of the unenjoyability of the thing
is the gripping of it.
>> And on top of that,
>> the outcomes, oddly enough, in some
weird circular way, the outcomes tend to
be better as well. Um, so yeah, I I I've
been thinking an awful lot about um this
another fork on this. I was talking to a
friend Alex. We did this huge 4-hour
long episode a couple of weeks ago and
uh people really liked it and there was
this bit in there that I really want to
work on. I'm going to try and write
about it over the next few months and
maybe do an essay on it. I think a lot
of people are quite ashamed about taking
pleasure in simple things. It sounds
lovely. It sounds like a lovely thing to
do. You know, just a a cup of coffee and
a a a fresh morning or whatever it might
be.
Um, but there's a little bit at least in
my mind of really this this is what
considers this is what constitutes like
impressiveness to you. How how pitiful,
how shameful, how how unimpressive is
life for you to only need what you
should be conquering mountains and and
and forging pioneering forward and doing
all of this stuff. It's that sort of
masculine drive for more this again very
sort of 21st century western I want it
want it want it I'm going to build it.
Um
and the more that I kind of see huh I
actually quite like simple things. I
actually don't need to be all that
impressive and in the same way as Dwayne
saying well I didn't make anything worse
today. I didn't break anything. And for
him to go to bed and consider that was a
good day. I think cultivating that same
thing, being able to get the pleasure
from 100 meters that you could from 100
miles, being able to feel a sense of
satisfaction in the boring and the
mundane successes in overcoming that
little part of yourself even just once
today that you did. I just think yeah,
that's a lovely uh a lovely redress to
the hungry ghost that sort of sits
inside of all of us.
Wow. Really? Wow. and you're
nudging me to reflect on the
relationship, the linkage between
identifying with a heroic narrative
that is your ego ideal that you're
identifying with. Everything has to be
big big lights. and the difficulty in
actually feeling
deep feelings of rejection, failure, and
defeat.
If we become more able to tolerate
experiences of in the sandbox, rejection
or more broadly defeat, failure, they
want, they scored on me. I will never
get justice here. They scored. I was
once walking down a hallway in high
school. I went to a large high school in
California, 2,700 people. And I was just
kind of spaced out. And as I walking
past all these kids, it, you know,
transition period, somebody punched me
hard in the stomach. I just walked on
by. And I was not a kid who fought a
lot. I didn't have active enemies.
Someone just clocked me for no reason. I
bam. And I'm like stunned. I turn
around. Couple seconds are going by. I
see a sea of moving heads going down the
hallway. I'll never score on that kid.
I'll never get justice for that boy, I'm
sure, who punched me. So, do we accept
that? But if we can accept
rejection and failure and defeat and not
being special,
then we get less hijacked by and we have
less ruminating about this heroic
narrative of the magnificence
that our that our life must be. and
anything short of which is not
acceptable.
>> How do you think about the role of humor
and sort of play with this? You know, I
get the sense that
>> the sort of people who listen to your
show with your son, which everyone needs
to go and check out. Being well is is
awesome. I just had a Dr. Scott is on,
the depression guy, um who I I learned
about from you guys. He's so good.
>> Um
I imagine lots of people listen to your
show. I certainly know lots of people
that listen to my show. They're serious
people. They're earnest, you know? They
like they want to get I want to do
stuff. I want to make my impact here and
I want to I really want things to
happen.
>> But there's a kind of brittle fragility
>> that comes along with seriousness as
well.
>> Yeah,
>> if that makes sense. And uh I wonder you
know in the little armory of things that
we have to play with you know this huh
I'm okay with uncertainty. That's one of
the lessons from today like sitting in
the thinking in superp positions right
I'm going to I'm going to allow these
worlds I I don't need to collapse this
down the don't know mind
>> maybe so that okay that's lovely that's
a a nice area here um
>> I wonder how you come to think about
sort of the role of uh absurdity uh
humor
Well, for myself, um
yeah, I I playfulness. So, I one detail
is that um research shows that little
juvenile rats who play with each other
have more neurotrphic factors in their
brain which promote new connections. So
play is actually a factor of learning
and so if you care about learning
broadly you know development healing
like what happens in therapy playfulness
is a real aid. People listen let's say
to you or to me and it's it's nice in
the moment and is there some interest in
an ROI uh not out of needing to have
this magnificent narrative of constant
growth in your life but just plain
common sense. Yeah, I'd like to have
some kind of lasting gain from listening
um let's say to you or to me. And so,
uh playfulness promotes that kind of
learning. And I think back on how many
therapy sessions I did with people that
were so somber, so inert and numb.
There's no playfulness and they didn't
get anything out of it. You know, while
they're nodding their heads, oh yeah,
doc, that's right. No lasting learning.
So, play really promotes lasting
learning on the one hand. On the other
hand, you're you're you know, you're
kind of raising the question about
certain ways of being that maybe in
particular cultures or gender socialized
types are
um devalued like earnestness.
You know, it's sort of embarrassing to
be really earnest and sincerely earnest,
not just in some problematically
ponderous or pompous earnestness, but a
a kind of vulnerable sincerity in which
there's a
>> wanting the best. Please, sir, may I
have another bowl?
>> Think of the risks.
>> There's no escape valve. The
>> There's no escape valve. There's no
there's no get out of jail free time.
Yeah, exactly. You are you're seen.
You're seen. There's no I didn't keep
half a foot out of this situation. This
is me opening up.
>> Yeah. You are pegged to this stake with
the risks that that are entailed.
>> This is what I wanted and this is really
what I wanted and I really wanted it and
I said it.
>> Yeah. And to me to go back to I love
what you said about really appreciating
small victories so forth to go back to
the nobility.
Um, and I kind of relate to that in a
early Buddhist frame of these are the
truths for noble beings. Not noble by
birth, but noble by effort. Uh, there's
a nobility in letting yourself feel
deeply or be revealed deeply. Like to go
back to that maybe conversation at
dinner that went bad to say, you know,
at the end of the day, I was there in
good faith.
Maybe I was unskillful. I said this or
that. There's lessons to learn for the
future. I was there in good faith. I was
there with with my whole heart uh deep
down and I was brave enough to be
earnest and sincere enough to kind of
lay it out like yeah take pride in that
healthy pride you know appreciate
yourself for that the the heroism the
nobility in that and the uncommonness
>> of that to me that's that's where real
bravery is that's really cool yeah I
love that uh I get the sense as well
that this is one of the reasons like
allowing yourself to be
puppeted by your own fear to not show
up. There's an equivalent in the world
of content creation which is audience
capture. So uh continuing to throw red
meat that is uh predictably going to be
liked by the audience but doesn't
necessarily resonate with you as a
person.
>> Uh it's actually you know the word
grifter. Have you you familiar with
that? Right. Okay. Um, so I asked, it's
a word that gets thrown around on the
internet a lot and for all manner of
different individuals and I genuinely
was interested. I said, "Hey, for the
people that use the word grifter, what
is the best working definition of what
that word means for you?" Because it's a
it's just kind of a slight it's a slur.
It's like calling
Yeah. It's just a very odd nebulous term
that that people tend to use for someone
that you think might not be fully
authentic. Like I mean, come on. like
let's get a bit more specific and and
somebody said um and I actually really
appreciated this and this is currently
my working definition uh somebody
promoting a product or staking a claim
that they wouldn't use or don't believe
themselves.
>> So it's here is what I'm doing out
front.
>> This is what I believe in private behind
and I was like huh that's okay I can
work with that. That's like a functional
definition I think for what people think
they mean when they say that word. And
uh my point is with the audience capture
thing, it's you not being you. It's you
uh trying to be manipulative in a way.
Uh it's this sort of meta you. It's
playing persona, not person. It's
projecting, etc.
>> And um that conversation at the
restaurant that was ungainainely or
didn't go the way that you wanted. um
the difference between you showing up
with vulnerable sincerity or just
straight up sincerity like this is me
and this is the position that I hold and
I said it all right could I have said it
w with a little bit more deafness yeah
probably and you know I could have
delivered it but I I tried like I g I
gave it a crack and that was actually
what I meant I said what I meant and
that you know I can take some lessons
from it the difference between that
>> and the lessons that you can take from
that situation
And a situation where you didn't say
what you meant and you were still
rejected
is the kind of the last bastion of well
>> I tried and you know [ __ ] I guess you
know you can kind of laugh it off.
There's there is a there is an ability
to do humor in that. But where is the
humor that you find that I compromised
myself to try and be somebody else
and that was rejected? There's there's a
an additional level of difficulty in
getting past it. And I think it's just a
nice justification for yeah showing up
sincerely, showing up earnestly. um uh
you know sort of playful seriousness I
think is huh why
>> I have this additional level of
protection for all of the fear that you
are going to have
>> by being seen and by this being me and
by a rejection of that not being a
rejection of a projection but a
rejection of a person and that person
happens to be myself
>> what you do gain in that is well
I at least I was myself at least this
weird character I tried to play, this
role that I tried to perform wasn't
rejected. Cuz to be honest, like that's
kind of more pitiful than the other way
around.
>> That's so true. Um
I'm thinking the ways in which
playfulness uh is a great aid to
aspiration without attachment.
And uh if we're incredibly
not just earnest, but if we're
self-righteous or uh pompous about our
pursuit of even a wholesome goal, that's
not so good. But to be playful about it,
I think about uh I made a play
using the word for a woman uh in my late
20s. Uh I was part of this whole
personal growth context kind of half a
cult. I won't name it now. And uh so
everybody was really deep in each
other's business, kind of all knowing
each other. And there was a woman in a
relationship with like the head dude. So
I was like a layer or two down from
Alpha and she was with Alpha Boy. And I
fully played went for it. I It was
public. It was known. I wrote these nice
little notes. I told him what I was
doing. Um and uh I went full out and I
didn't know if I would get it. I didn't.
and she was relatively kind and it was
okay. But at the end of the day, I felt
good about myself that I little Ricky
kind of the dork had still stuck my neck
out and you know made a play for a
particular woman and I feel great you
know I went for it right if I hadn't
gone for it I'd be thinking you wussy
you should have gone for it why not take
the risk and but what enabled it is
there was a playfulness about it was
like an improbable goal and I could be
playful about it which helped me be less
attached to the outcome.
>> My friend Charlie uh did a wonderful
video breakdown of Jordan Peterson's
most recent debate against 20 atheists.
It was on the Jubilee YouTube channel.
So, it's it's a a series called
Surrounded. Uh and it's it's doing huge
numbers. It's really cool. Kind of like
uh speed dating for debate, I guess, is
kind of the way that I would.
>> What a format. Yeah. We used to call
them a fishbowl. You're in the fishbowl
and you've got 10 or 20 people around
you. Okay.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Um and each person
comes in individually and you do a bit
and then they move on and so on and so
forth and um he does this comparison
between Jordan when he did that Kathy
Newman interview in 2019. So what you're
saying is that really famous one in
front of the purple background and and
this most recent one and Charlie is very
interested in charisma and he's talking
about likability being he's big into
playfulness and he's
>> very deep into selfwork and and
mindfulness too. So I think that sort of
percolates through and he has this he
just compares them side by side and I'd
never even thought of this uh because
the way that people change especially
over a long period of time it's been six
years nearly seven years since that
first debate came out and then there's
this new one
>> and if someone changes slowly slowly
slowly slowly you kind of you don't
really notice right it's like when did
you get fat it's like I don't know one
day one day at a time
>> um and he just makes a a really lovely
distinction between Jordan in that first
one uh where Kathy's sort of pointing
her finger at him and saying, "So, what
you're saying is this thing." And he
goes, "No, I'm not saying that at all."
I I think that's silly. I think that's
really I think that's I I do I think
that's really silly. And you just have
this it's keeping him regulated. It
feels more casual. It's much easier to
get on side. It's much more likable
approach. Um now he's standing his
ground, but he's standing his ground in
a sort of, you know, really fluid sort
of Bruce Lee kind of way. Um, and then
you look at the approach in this most
recent Jubilee debate and it's very
rigid. you know, it's it's um precisely
what do you mean by the term that you
just said is sort of definitional a lot
of the time. And uh you know, Jordan is
significantly
more uh he's been through the ringer, I
think, over the last few years, which
very well, I I imagine would cause any
normal sane person to come out the other
side and and and have their their armor
up. Uh and he's now deep into his
religion, and this is talking about
religion, so you know, maybe there's
some real
uh tacit differences between the first
debate and the second one, but I think
that the uh examples still holds, which
is the version of him that was able to
be Bruce Lee, playful, you know, uh he
looked like he was having a better time
>> during that debate. Uh and certainly, uh
I think came across in a a more sort of
likable manner. Um, and maybe there's
some topics that it's just hard to do
that on. And perhaps faith is is one of
those ones that people don't feel like
they can be as playful or equivocating
with. Um, but yeah, when you look those
two different worlds, you think like the
one that's h, you know, I think that's
silly. I I really do. I think and you
can see what's the sort of memory
everybody knows if even in the moment if
you're able to just drop into the the
the insult gets pinged across the table
at work or whatever it is and as opposed
to trying to clap back or as opposed to
trying to break the fourth wall and make
it really serious or as opposed to
taking it personally and allowing it to
ride up if you just giggle and go ah
that's silly. you're being silly and you
just whatever whatever little sort of
neutralizing retort comes I think I
don't know it when I think about the
sort of memory it would make for me uh
it in the moment you're able to begin to
sort of reframe the rumination trap that
you might get caught in later that day
when you start to think about how it
went it's like yeah I dealt with that
with grace that was like that was ease
and you know playfulness
I think people these days there's so
much phoniness in grift just like you
say and um I go back to my early days in
the whole human potential scene in LA in
the 1970s where you'd go to a party and
you'd think you're having a deep
conversation with someone about you know
the inner world and the psych the psyche
and you began to realize that they were
setting up a pitch to enroll you in
their workshop and you'd suddenly
realized that you had felt like you were
a thou to their eye. In Martin Booper's
construction of three kinds of
relationships, I thou, I it, and it it,
you felt like a thou to their eye. And
then you realize you were being seduced.
Uh,
>> you're going to have to you're going to
have to dig deeper into the the I and
the it and the
>> Okay, slowed that down. It's it's a very
cool model. One of the really useful
cool models. Martin Muber said
essentially there three kinds of
relationships. I am thou
where you're the I and to you they are a
thou. They are a being in their own
right. There could be a differential of
role that you could be a police officer
and you are now arresting a suspect and
putting them in jail but they are still
a thou to you in the context of your
roles. They are being you are not
exploiting them as a means to your own
answer. Then there's I it where the
other person is there. You might be
superficially polite. You don't care
about their inner world at all. They're
irrelevant. You just want to get the
answer to your customer service question
or you want to get over to fix your
plumbing. That's it. I it. And then it
it is bodies in space like in an
elevator passing each other. That's a
very cool framework and it raises a
question. Can you thou all beings? Can
you approach can you enter into uh
interactions with people even with your
roles as as a thou to your eye? And can
you be aware of the subtle movement into
iting them? And like you and I right
here, I feel like we're and I thou, you
know, we're doing our thing. You're
moving us along. I have a role. You have
a role. But we're like beings. I'm we're
not exploiting each other
narcissistically as extensions of
oursel.
>> Um and then there's something also to
realize. Do you feel like a thou to
their eye or do you gradually start to
feel like an it? when you're on the
receiving end of a grift, which is a
con, a con gri, a grifter is a con man
or a woman, whatever being, um
>> then you feel like you're being ited by
them. And in this world in which there
is so much um with media and consumerism
and the US, I'm sure the epicenter of a
lot of the the worst of this, LA
especially where I grew up, uh it's
about phoniness. It's about pretense.
you know uh if you have 300 best friends
you have no real friends for example and
so in that context including in which
now with uh AI it's so easy to to
manufacture fakes deep fakes included uh
I think increasingly there's a longing
in us for the realness that we evolved
in in our small bands it was real it was
really real you know eye to eye skin to
skin touch to touch life or death every
day real and so we long for the real.
And so we when we find the real,
when we when we feel that a person is,
as Carl Rogers put it, congruent, that
they're what's really true about them on
the inside is what they are aware of.
They are mindfully self-aware and is
what they're showing to the outside.
When those three circles line up that
are congruent, when we encounter that in
other people, that these days is the
coin of the realm
>> because it's rare.
>> It's a lovely point. Um, I've heard I
heard this term a couple of months ago.
Uh, somebody trying to speedrun
authenticity.
uh and it was in relation to um online
content creation and and basically you
know how do you growth hack
relatability? What what is that? And
that's you know like a meta grift,
right? It's a grift that appears to not
be a grift or whatever. What's what's
the what are the constituent parts of
being an I of creating an I thou
relationship and how do I reverse
engineer that to make an I it
relationship into an I thou
relationship? um which is which is
terrifying and funny, but uh you know I
I I I really agree. Um and that
increasingly is
especially with where my life's gone
over the last you four or five years. I
mean since we spoke nearly seven years
ago um
>> you kind of need your uh detection radar
needs to become ever more finely attuned
>> because as you ascend in whatever
notoriety or or the the the um
>> impressiveness or the skillfulness of
the of the people that you're hanging
around with.
you you need to be able to become ever
more attuned to smarter and smarter
tricks. Um, and fortunately, I think to
fly the flag for everybody should be a
club promoter for a couple of months at
one point in their life, uh, which is
still a campaign that I haven't managed
to get off the ground yet. But, uh, I
think being exposed to a very high
volume of people who are largely
unencumbered, maybe they've had a little
bit to drink, maybe they're out with
their friends, they're not really
thinking too much. You learn a lot about
human nature by watching people in cues.
Very strange. It's this odd liinal space
where they don't really have much to do.
And I spent, you know, I met a million
people in cues uh across my career
decade.
>> That's super cool that you're that
you're naming that and and doing what
clips from that, you know, people in
cues as it were.
It was just that would have been great
if that was the case. But I was just
watching, you know, I'd be seeing you
100 to 500 18 to 24 year old 28-year-old
kids
>> talking and jostling for position and
guys would be in front of girls and
they'd be sort of how are we going to
talk to the behind us? Or they'd be some
people would be impatient. They'd be
thinking about how they're going to get
in. Some people would feel slighted
because they were waiting longer than
they wanted. Some people were really,
you know, whatever all the rest of the
stuff. And um yeah, as you continue to
sort of whatever ascend up through that,
the the games that people are able to
play in order to be able to access that
um become more deaf. And it's
strange to think about
the people that you like the most are
the ones that you you see them and you
think that they see you. It's like, huh?
Like here we are, two people. And it's
oddly really simple uh to actually get
to that stage. And yeah, the people that
I find myself hanging around with with,
you know, a lot of an increasing number
of options here in Austin, big scene of
stuff that's going on and and and
the people that I like to hang around
with are often not like the most
impressive ones. Not to say that my
friends aren't impressive, but uh it's
it's just people that I'm like, "Huh,
yeah, like here we are. You're seeing
me. I'm seeing you. There's not really
anything else that's going on here." And
that's like an adventure, right? and it
feels like a real adventure as opposed
to I don't know what like a you know
allegory of the cave shadows on the wall
type projection.
>> Yeah.
So much about that. Um I think it's okay
and it's necessary to select
skillfully what is genuinely true in you
to present to the world depending on
certain situations. So, for example, if
I'm in a presenting a talk to a bunch of
scientists or clinicians, I'll select
what's authentically real in me that's
appropriate to that setting. That's
really different from selecting what's
real in me when I'm hanging out with our
kids or adult kids. It's not the
totality of what's real inside me, but
it's genuinely what's inside of me. So,
I think on the one hand, it's there's a
there's a total place for that. Uh on
the other hand, I think that it's really
useful to be aware of um how we get kind
of identified with and captured by our
increasingly polished act
>> in the world and you know track that.
Um,
one thing that has helped me about all
that is to realize that it's in my best
interest to be less preoccupied with
myself and to be less focused on the uh
controlling or influencing what's
happening in the minds of others in
regard to me,
the more that I realize that it's really
good for me to kind of like relax that
and just accept the risk
of rejection and failure, right? To go
back to all that
>> in the sandbox. Then it gets a lot
easier to just like let go, you know,
and release uh and just not know who you
are.
>> Where do you come to think you bravery
and courage is sort of been a bit of a
theme today.
>> How how do you come to think about
cultivating that? someone who thinks
I feel like I'm being a little bit more
cowardly or I've been cowardly my entire
life more more so than I would like to
be. Um,
how do you come to think about where
courage, bravery, sincerity comes from?
>> Well, well, let's talk about
interpersonal courage.
So I've I've known a lot of people uh
men and women alike who are physically
brave or in business settings will you
know move into alpha roles and be strong
in those regards but interpersonally uh
they're scared and
interpersonal cowardice if you will and
so in that area I think when it's
helpful to realize oh I would like to be
more that way I would like to be more
willing to risk dreaded experiences of
defeat failure rejection, being laughed
at, you know, and and their my
exaggerated expectations of how horrible
that would be from my my childhood when
it was horrible or I saw it being
horrible for other people. Humiliation
in high school is a really big deal.
Most of the time these days in adults,
uh, like you say something dumb, they
give you a bad review, the river moves
on, 10 minutes later, nobody thinks
about it, it's gone, right? But we
anticipate it being horrible. So, uh,
you might say to yourself, "Wow, it
would be good for me to be more willing
to risk that dreaded experience, um, to
tolerate that." So, now you know what
you're doing. That helps right off the
top. That's executive function, top
down. Okay, I'm going to expand my
comfort zone for for what I'm willing to
tolerate, which means pushing back the
bars of my invisible cage and how free
I'm willing to be in life. That's really
helpful. And then um what I find is what
works again and again is to actually
take those risks and occasionally feel
what you dread.
Feel it. You know, you release it and
then you realize I'm still okay. It
moved through me. It doesn't defeat me.
I'm not consumed by it. I'm brave. I'm
noble. I'm heroic. Yay me.
I got through to the other side. And
then as you do that, suddenly now your
window of tolerance,
the bars of the cage continue to expand.
That's been a big thing. Um, and then I
think there's this other incredibly cool
man. I love how we talk about this
stuff, by the way. It's so much. It's un
it's unusually cool. So, I think
everyone ought to listen to Chris's
show. Awesome. toothpick and all.
Awesome. Okay. So,
um there's this whole thing in learning
broadly including personal growth
learning where you uh you generalize
from one domain to another. You cross
over. So, uh as an example, I got into
rock climbing early 20s as a I
experienced myself as kind of an unmanly
unathletic person because of my own
background. My dad was a cowboy like the
cowboy guy you talked about. He grew up
on a ranch, North Dakota, but he did he
was a manly man, but he never did sports
with me. Never threw a ball with me.
This was not how it was. Um, we were on
the ranch. We'd go horseback riding, but
we lived in suburbia, so, you know, he
didn't throw a ball. Anyway, rock
climbing. So, I would start doing
hardcore scary stuff that would boost my
sense of being an okay dude. in that way
and uh tons of women climb they get a
lot of value from it in their ways as
well. That said, what I would do then is
when I was with someone who was being
doineering, pompous in relationships,
some guy says, "No man, you got to do
this or that
or I was maybe scared about entering a
group." I would recall the emotional
memory like you did kind of early on in
the show here where you tuned into the
felt sense in your body of ruminating.
Well, I would tune into the felt sense
of climbing, pulling over an overhang,
being determined, problem solving, my
way up the crack, what it feels like.
And I would access that. I would tune
into that for a few seconds to mobilize
that inner sense
>> that was strong and brave and courageous
in that domain, right? I'd activate
those circuits of courage in that area
of rock climbing and then I'd be much
more prepared to deal with this really
kind of aggressive assertive [ __ ] and
that would be I don't know would you
ever try that do you cross domain thing?
Yeah, I mean the confidence that you get
from for instance the uh live shows that
I've been doing the last few years. I've
got another tour in around the US and
Canada toward the back end of this year.
Um it really does make if you've stood
in front of a few thousand people with
nothing except for a microphone and
patient eyes uh maybe impatient eyes
staring at you. Um
like what else is there, you know? is
one of one of the biggest one of the
biggest fears that that everybody's got
and you go, "Huh, like I did that thing
and it went not only was I okay, it kind
of went well. That's pretty good." Um,
and yeah, when you come across that,
it's like, "Okay, so really is this the
thing that you're worried about? You're
worried about this conversation. You're
worried about like you did that like can
you not remember what that felt like?"
>> Yeah, that's right.
>> Okay. Yeah, that was good. That was a
That was a thing.
>> Yeah.
>> Remember what that felt like. Not just
remember what it was. Then you're in
your head. You're just seeing the image
of it, but you're calling up the somatic
markers. The body. Yeah. What it felt
like.
>> Yeah.
>> Rick, you're great, dude. So are you.
>> I uh every time we get to speak, I love
I didn't know what we were even going to
talk about today. I had a bunch of stuff
in my head and then you started
siloquying. So um where should people
go? your courses, your online courses
are great. The podcast's great. You got
the
>> Thank you. Thank you.
>> send people in the right direction on
the internet.
>> Well, if uh so if people can find me,
just Google my name. And by the way, I
appreciate that. And I'm really startled
also that you're doing some kind of live
thing. I'd love to know more about that
and I would really direct people your
way certainly. Um, a thing I would
really just kind of talk about briefly
is this global compassion coalition that
I started with some friends and
colleagues a couple years ago that's
really growing. And the basic idea is if
we're going to actually continue the
progress that humanity has made over the
last 10, 100,000 years and especially if
we're going to tackle things like global
warming, poverty, children dying of
hunger, big stuff that is rooted in
ongoing systems that are unjust. We need
to grow larger and larger collectives,
collaborations, coalitions, alliances,
partnerships motivated by compassion,
which is a response to suffering that
wants to do something about it. So
that's the idea. Global compassion
coalition across many differences and
divisions, at least one thing in common.
Yeah, people are hurting needlessly and
we need to become big enough to be
strong enough to
push uh long overdue systemic change to
happen. So people can go to
globalcompassioncoalition.org.
It's free to join. It's a moral stance
and there's some nice benefits for
yourself along the way for being part of
this cause. Uh which I'm trying to
enroll Chris in.
>> Uh we need to we need to talk about
that. All right. Well, let I I already
want to talk to you again. I I'm I'm
already ready for the for the next one.
It's strange. I was saying before the
friends that I I like spending the most
time with are the ones that they feel
like they're there. And uh even across
the internet, there's not many people,
this is close to the highest praise that
I could give you. There's not many
people that are able to regulate my
nervous system virtually. Uh and and yet
there's something about your demeanor
that's able to do it. So, I hope that
we've managed to give people 90 minutes
of regulation today as well.
>> Lovely. Lovely. I'm with you.
>> Yeah, I appreciate you, man. Until next
time, Rick.
>> Yeah.
>> Congratulations. You made it to the end
of the episode. And if you want more,
well, why don't you press right here?
Come on.