Why You've Been Lied to About Where to Put Your Time, Energy, & Focus | Seth Godin on Impact Theory
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this episode of Impact Theory, Seth Godin introduces his new book centered on the transformative power of practice and generosity over mere output or hustle. He argues that society has been brainwashed into an industrial mindset where we are trained to seek status and compliance rather than genuine contribution, a system he compares to spending trillions annually to condition children for consumption. To counter this, Godin advocates for "streaks"—consistent daily actions regardless of mood or motivation—where the practice itself becomes the output because it is all that can be controlled. He illustrates this with his own workshop where participants wrote every day for 100 days without missing a single session, proving that consistency builds reputation and leads to remarkable outcomes like record deals, rather than waiting for inspiration or external validation. A central theme of Godin's philosophy is the shift from an inward-focused mindset to one of generosity, exemplified by his interpretation of the Turkish custom of putting bread on the hook: creating work not necessarily for immediate reward but with a selfless intent that others can take and benefit from. He shares a personal anecdote about fly-fishing in Wyoming where he intentionally refused to catch fish, realizing that focusing solely on the outcome (the bite) would ruin his practice; instead, by merely casting without attachment to results, he became more effective. This approach challenges the transactional nature of modern education and work, urging creators to stop asking "will this be on the test?" and start engaging in work simply because it makes things better for people they care about, even if that means being uncomfortable or putting themselves "on the hook." Godin addresses practical concerns regarding commerce and sustainability by advising against quitting one's day job immediately but instead starting a side hustle to build trust and reputation over time. He uses the example of artist Abby Ryan, who painted an oil painting daily for years before her sales increased significantly as her unique style developed, demonstrating that becoming "peculiar"—private property in oneself—is essential rather than trying to be invisible like a standard Uber driver. Furthermore, he discusses how passion is often a choice made after committing to the work; by choosing to love what you do and changing your behavior first, you reshape your self-narrative from an impostor into someone who rhymes with themselves. He emphasizes that good taste comes from understanding genre and seeing patterns in one's audience long before they realize it, citing Diane von Fürstenberg’s success as a result of learned sensitivity rather than luck. The conversation also delves deeply into handling feedback and avoiding the trap of becoming a "hack." Godin distinguishes between useful criticism that helps you improve and noise from those who are not your target audience or whose fear manifests as anger. He recounts his own early struggles in publishing, where he learned to read rejection letters for clues about what editors wanted rather than taking them personally, eventually realizing that successful agents were often underpaid because they lacked data-driven spreadsheets while others chased metrics like bestseller lists which create infinite holes. He references Miles Davis’s decline into bitterness after becoming a rock star as a cautionary tale of losing one's artistic soul to the demands of fame and money, suggesting that true artists must be willing to alienate parts of their audience to stay authentic rather than playing safe covers just for sales. Ultimately, Godin frames life as living on a tightrope where safety is boring but risk offers the chance to sing, dance, or connect meaningfully. He encourages readers to stop trying to fill infinite holes with fame and wealth metrics that never satisfy and instead focus on contributing something better for ten other people each day. By adopting this practice of making things better without waiting for permission from gatekeepers like Oprah or editors, individuals can build a legacy that outlasts them. Godin concludes by highlighting his organization Akimbo as a B Corp dedicated to public interest alongside profit, inviting listeners to find their own unique path through consistent action and practical empathy rather than relying on innate talent or magical thinking about success.
Read the full video transcript
Everybody, welcome to another episode of
Impact Theory. I am here with the legend
Seth Godin. Seth, welcome to the show.
Well, thanks for having me. The last
interview still sits with me. You worked
so hard, you prepped so deep. It was
really fun. Awesome, man. Well, I'm
honored by that and I am very excited to
talk about the new book today. I went
just as hard on this one and I think
that this book is incredibly important
for anybody that wants to do something
profound with their life and when I
first was researching you for the last
episode, I came across an idea that is
just It's something I repeat to myself.
It's something I bring up to people all
the time and it feels like it's a
central theme of this book, which is
show me your bad writing. So, for
anybody who says, you know, I I can't
write or I'm a bad writer, whatever,
that question's so profound.
Is that what you see as a central idea
behind practice or is it something else?
Well, the practice involves several
things all woven together. One of them
is definitely show me your bad video,
show me your bad public speaking, show
me your bad counseling, show me your bad
therapy, show me your bad uh
engineering designs. Because we've been
trained to get attached to the outcome.
And there's this belief that the effort,
the process, the
practice doesn't matter.
And if the outcome isn't going to be
great, don't even bother.
But the only way to get to great
outcomes is to show up with this
practice and get better.
So, that's one of the key things. The
second one is that we can get out of our
own head by
stopping this mindset of hustling people
to get more than our fair share of
attention and instead approach it with
generosity. Because
the purpose of shipping the work is not
so you can come out ahead. The purpose
of shipping the work is to make things
better.
So, we will definitely get to the
principle of generosity, which shows up
a lot in the book, but there was another
concept that shows up a lot as well that
I think is important for framing the
book, why you wrote it, and what the
ultimate outcome will be. And this is
the idea of being brainwashed. How
exactly have we been brainwashed?
Well, so let's say I
uh
had a secret committee and I came to the
government of the United States or any
place in the West in 1850 and said,
"Here's what I want to do. I want to
spend over a trillion dollars a year in
time and money. I want every single
child from the age of five to spend six
to eight hours a day with me for 10 to
15 years in a row. And then I want to
build into the culture a mindset of
consumption and compliance. Okay?" Like,
no one would go for that plan. And
that's exactly what we did. And when you
and I spoke previously, we talked about
the mindset of education versus
learning. But, the brainwashing runs
really deep because the industrial
system needs us to be acquiring,
status-seeking
uh
cogs in their system because the
factories are so efficient, they just
keep making more stuff.
And what I'm trying to reflect back on
people is
you can pick yourself, and you can show
up and ship work that makes things
better, that you are proud of, and you
don't need anyone's permission.
Now, this is a a period of pretty
profound disruption, and I'm curious to
Was that part of why you wrote this book
now, or was this book long sort of in
development before all of this hit?
Yeah, I've been working directly on this
book for 3 years. So,
it has been, I think, a moment of
disruption in our culture for at least
20. The internet um did some amazing
things, and many of us who were there at
the beginning forgot to focus on the
things that weren't going to be so
amazing.
And one the things it did was it gave
everybody a microphone.
And that's a good thing because voices
previously unheard were not heard
before, and now they are. It helped
focus a long overdue lens on racial
injustice, for example. But the other
problem was that it created these
chambers of noise where
you got ahead and the media companies
got ahead by dividing us, by creating
breaking news that isn't breaking, that
isn't news, by calling people friends
who aren't friends and buttons likes
that aren't likes. And so
we can't discount how hard the media
worked against all of our peace of mind
and well-being for the last 15 or 20
years.
And it took a toll, and we're feeling
that toll in politics, but we're also
feeling that toll deep in our soul.
So, a few years ago I set out to make a
workshop for creatives, and it was a
full year. Like I can usually make a
workshop in a few weeks cuz it's based
on years of my life, but this was a year
of really digging deep to understand how
do you even teach somebody to be a
professional creative, to ship important
work?
And then
we we ran the workshop for uh 500
people. It changed lives deeply. And as
I was watching people engage with that
work,
I said I have no choice, even though
it's so much effort, I have to make a
book.
So, what is it about all of that that is
so profoundly changing for people? Is
there like a key insight or a key idea
that unlocks something for somebody?
It's streaks.
It seems really trivial. It's streaks.
That inside the creator's workshop,
people wrote every day for 100 days
without missing a day. And the writing
isn't the point. None few of these
people are professional writers. Uh one
person who was in the workshop just got
a major record deal from a famous record
label. Because he did his lyrics, he did
his music, he shared it, and the average
person gave and got 500 pieces of
feedback a month.
And I would ask people who aren't part
of something like that, "When was the
last time you gave and got 500 pieces of
useful feedback?" We're not supposed to
do that at work. We're not supposed to
do that with friends. Where are we
supposed to do that? And it turns out if
you can make a circle of five people,
you can do it with each other. That this
practice says,
"I don't have to be in the mood. It's my
work. And I don't have to be motivated,
and I don't have to have the muse talk
to me. I simply do this work. I chop the
wood, I carry the water, and then maybe
it resonates with people, or if it
doesn't, I learn something and I do it
again."
There's a quote from the book that I
wrote down that I want to read verbatim,
which um speaks to exactly what you're
talking about now, which is "The
practice is not the means to the output.
The practice is the output, because the
practice is all we can control."
That That to me is one of the the most
profound takeaways from the book, to be
sure. And then in terms of that streaks,
being consistent, putting in the work,
doing the stuff over and over
is exactly what I've seen in my own
life. So, one of the ideas that I'm
always trying to get across to people is
don't worry about, you know, whether
you're a born this, that, or the other.
It's understanding that the human animal
is the ultimate adaptation machine. That
as a species, we've literally picked the
strategy of improvement of being able to
learn something. So, instead of coming
out fully baked, we come out with the
ability to be baked, as it were, you
know, as you go down the path of
something.
What I want to know, and what you cover
so interestingly in the book, is how do
you move from blindly doing something to
doing something with intention?
So, intention,
design thinking, intentional action.
If it's It's
go for it. It's for you.
If it's work, it's ultimately for other
people.
It's ultimately to cause a change to
happen. If you're not causing a change,
then I'm not sure why you're taking up
our time.
But if you seek to make a change in the
world, you have to ask three simple
questions.
Who's it for? Who specifically am I
seeking to change? Who specifically am I
building this for? What's it for?
Can I say what this does? And what
change am I seeking to make, which is
related to the what's it for? If I can't
say it, then I'm just ranting, right?
But if I can be very clear, it's for
people who believe this. It's for people
who want this. It's for people who are
aligned with this. And after you engage
with my work, you will feel differently
or you will act differently. That is the
work of the creator. And
we don't want to say any of those things
because it puts us on the hook.
And being on the hook feels
uncomfortable. And so we wiggle away.
But I think being on the hook is the
best place to be.
Let's talk more about that. In the book,
you give an example I'd actually never
heard before of this old Turkish custom
of putting a loaf of bread on the hook,
which then led me to look up the
etymology of the phrase on the hook and
did it come from that? And I thought
that whole idea was so interesting.
One, if you can walk us through that
Turkish idea of putting a loaf of bread
on the hook, which I think ties into
your notion of generosity and and how
that plays into artistry, um
let's start there rather than asking
eight questions at once.
Um
so I guess it's still true. I haven't
been to Turkey in a few years. If you go
to a local bakery and you can afford it,
you buy two loaves of bread instead of
one.
And you say to the person behind the
counter, put that one on the hook.
And then somebody who's hungry stops by
the bakery and says, "You got anything
on the hook?"
And they take a loaf of bread. Buy one,
give one.
And it's just
in the sense that, you know, bread is
the staff of life. It doesn't cost that
much to to pay it forward. But that got
me thinking about the phrase on the
hook, cuz we usually associate it with
fish. And fish don't like being on the
hook. And it's not a generous act for a
fish to be on the hook. It's selfless,
but I'm not sure that the fish then goes
on to live another day. So, I like this
idea of putting your work on the hook.
And saying, "Here, I made this. Here, I
Here, this. And it might not be for you,
but I made this." And that approach to
it
lets me shift my gears from please judge
me, please pay me, please reward me to,
"Oh, I had the ability to weave
something together, and I did. Here."
And most of us want to be generous. And
it Getting out of our own way is so
important.
So, I want to push on that a little bit.
I think there's something really
profound in that for the person who's
experiencing, quote unquote, writer's
block, who doesn't have the bad writing,
for them to begin to shift out of the
inward-focused to this concept that you
have of generosity. The story you tell
in the book, and I don't know if you I
can't remember if you intentionally told
this for this reason, but when you went
fly-fishing for the first time, you
didn't want to hook, which I thought was
utterly fascinating. And so, you
practiced all of the things around
fly-fishing, but you intentionally did
not want to catch a fish. What what was
it in that moment that made that act
still useful?
Okay, so let's assert for a moment that
fly-fishing is not generous to the fish.
And that um
the other people I was with were
throwing the fish back.
So, we weren't trying to feed our
families. We were out there on this
river in Wyoming seeking
to commune with nature and to engage in
a process of practice, being mindful
about what we were doing.
And I just knew instinctively that if
there was a hook on that fly, I was
going to be using the all of my powers
of telekinesis to will the fish to bite
my hook. That I would be measuring the
quality and goodness of my work
based on whether a
a primordial being
decided to bite the hook. And I said,
that's going to take me totally out of
my head. I don't want to have the fish
be part of my day. That's not why I'm
here.
And
it turned out within a few minutes and
for several hours after that, I was
casting better than almost anybody in
the crew
because I was simply casting. I was
merely casting. I wasn't connected to
the outcome.
And
so there's a paradox here cuz on one
hand, we only do the work to make things
happen. We only do the work with this
generous mindset, but we must do the
work with a practice
that ignores the guarantee that it's
going to work. And back to your
brainwashing thing from a few minutes
ago,
if you've ever said to a teacher or to
yourself, will this be on the test?
You have revealed education. Will this
be on the test says the following,
I will pay attention and learn this for
a little while if you promise that you
will give me an A.
That's the exchange.
That's not how you learned how to ride a
bike. That's not how you learned how to
do anything that actually matters to
you. You did those other things cuz you
could and then you enjoyed the benefits
thereafter, not in some transaction.
And so the practice says,
I seek to make things better for people
I care about, but the only way I'm going
to do that is by
not imagining them looking over my
shoulder at every turn, but instead to
engage with this work.
Now, so as you get into the idea of
generosity and you start focusing on um
creating real art that changes people
and it has this almost interactive
focus,
I know a lot of people then slip into
well, then how do I even charge for
this? So, how do you begin to integrate
this into a
real life where people have to feed
their families and at some point you do
need a fish, whether it's a literal fish
or not, on the hook? How do people
reconcile those two ideas?
Yeah, so commerce has to show up in our
western culture. And I guess I would
start with this. Please don't quit your
day job today.
Just cuz you heard us talking. Uh
you can begin with your side hustle. You
can begin with your practice cuz it
might take a while for it to get to the
point where you have created something
so peculiar and particular and unique
and remarkable that people will eagerly
pay for it. And if you need to paint
your masterpiece in the next hour, I
don't know how to help you.
So, that's the first place I start. That
you may have to be a cog in the system
for a little while longer as you develop
trust, as you develop a reputation, as
you develop the permission to talk to
your followers. So, um you know, we've
been talking about art art, so we'll
start with that. Abby Ryan. Abby Ryan
decided, I don't know, 10 or 15 years
ago to paint an oil painting every day.
And
when you say that out loud, you realize
that's a pretty unusual thing to do.
And then she started videoing her work
as she did it and she started teaching
people generously how to do it. And over
time,
as she got better and her reputation
improved, her eBay sales went from oh,
this painting was $100 to this painting
is $800.
But if you're making $800 every day
making an oil painting in an hour and a
half. That's a gig, right? And then it
was featured in Oprah magazine, and then
people are buying it not because they
saw Abby painting it, but because she's
actually really good at it. Okay? But it
all began with this germ of an idea,
which is I can connect people to my
practice.
But let's just go totally in a different
direction. Let's say you're a real
estate broker.
Most real estate brokers are freaking
out correctly
because Zillow makes it clear we don't
need them.
Right? That you can look at every single
house for sale in Vermont anytime you
want from your the safety of your
COVID-free living room.
So, why are they getting paid 6% of
$800,000?
This is a problem.
Except for some real estate agents who
know every single person in town, who
uh coach the Little League team, run
this organization, have people have
meetings in their office all the time,
have a point of view, and only sell
and buy in a very particular place,
whether it's for a community or based on
geography.
That person is worth more than they
charge
because that person is bringing a level
of humanity that is not in the playbook.
They cannot easily be replaced.
And so one of the things I mention in
the book is the origins of the word
peculiar.
And peculiar comes from the Latin for
cattle.
And it means private property. You own
the cattle. Peculiar means you are in
and of yourself.
All the systems in our life push us not
to do that. You're an Uber driver? Well,
you better be invisible. All their rules
are you can't be a particular peculiar
Uber driver, you have to be the standard
one.
So, my advice is don't be an Uber
driver.
Figure out what you can do instead where
you actually
benefit by being you.
You have a quote in the book and I'm
forgetting now who it came from, but it
was like genius is the person who can be
most truly who they are. And I found
that really interesting and it got into
this concept which you talk a lot about
in the book and I'd love to get your
real-time explanation of uh
the alternate title to the book before
you ended up settling on that one was
like be yourself or the power
What was it? Trust yourself.
Trust yourself. So, what what is this?
You end up separating the word self in
the book. Um so, you put your and self.
Why what's the distinction? What's the
power of the self? What what was that
whole idea? Um
Trust yourself. When you're talking to
yourself, who is talking and who is
listening?
Right? This is a fascinating thing that
we don't examine very often. Someone's
talking and someone's listening and it's
still you.
So, I'm arguing that the verbal,
fearful, compliant,
sometimes scared voice is the frontal
cortex, the part of our brain that isn't
particularly good at creativity.
And then the one that's listening, the
one that's getting shut down, the one
that claims it wants to be authentic is
that other one, that one that's willing
to push us forward. And what I am saying
is we are a dance of both.
To trust yourself does not mean that you
just do whatever you feel like and are
guaranteed it's going to work. It
probably won't.
What it means is
you need to listen to that voice more
often.
And if you can develop a practice that
lets that voice show up in a way that it
can,
your work, your life gets better and you
can start today. If you want to be a
runner, you don't do a lot of planning.
You don't get Runner's World magazine
and change your sneakers and sign up for
this and sign up for that. If you want
to be a runner, you go running.
It doesn't matter how far and you do it
again tomorrow. And if you do it for 30
days in a row, you're a runner.
And if you keep doing it, you'll get
better.
That is the practice. The practice says,
I'm committing to this method and
I'm going to have streaks, whatever form
they take, and one day I'll get better
at this and when I do, I'll be able to
serve the people I hope to change.
One of the coolest things in the book, I
think this is so profound, is this idea
that if you want to change your story,
if you want to change your own
self-narrative, if you want to begin to
shape your identity, you change your
behaviors first and not the other way
around.
Um, why is that? How'd you come to that?
That's pretty counterintuitive.
It's true and um
there's a lot of brain science that goes
to this. It has to do with where our
narrative even comes from.
We what we do is we see the world around
us and then we make up a story about it.
Not the other way around. That uh Dan
Dennett, the great philosophy uh
professor at Tufts, has proven that
dreams happen in the moment we wake up.
That all night, there's electrical
activity in our brain,
but it's not till we wake up that we try
to make sense of it. That's interesting.
I've never heard that before. Yeah, it's
pretty cool and it makes perfect sense.
How they proved it was tricky, but it
makes perfect sense to me because the
storytelling part is our conscious
brain.
And if you are somebody who always goes
out of their way to open doors for other
people and help them, then you will
start telling yourself a story that
that's the kind of behavior you admire.
Not the other way around.
And so, just choosing a behavior, if you
want to be a writer, write. If you want
to be a runner, run. That will change
how you think of you and your work.
You talk about passion as a choice.
How is that true? And if it is, then how
do we go about making the right choice?
Right. So, this is
um
a little bit controversial cuz a lot of
people want to find their passion.
They say, "How do I find my calling?"
And
I point out to them that there are
plumbers who think they found their
calling, and there are plumbers who wish
they could sing opera. And there are
opera singers who think they found their
calling, and there are other opera
singers who think it's just a grind. It
turns out it has nothing to do with the
profession.
It has to do with our narrative about
the profession. So, to your previous
point,
doing the work changes our story about
the work.
And I think it's so much more reliable
and so much easier to love what you do
than it is to do what you love.
Making the choice to love what you do
means that whatever you're doing, you
can be in love.
And
you know, I'm super lucky. I don't have
to dig ditches for a living or work in a
toxic waste dump. I'm really grateful
for that.
Um but there are also plenty of people
who, if you said, "You have to write a
blog post for free every day 7,500 times
in a row," would say,
"That's horrible."
For me, I love that. And that was just a
choice. I decided that I would love
doing that.
Okay, so we're in that moment. We're
Gary Goldman. We know what we're trying
to do, which you talk a lot about in the
book. I think that's really important.
How do we get better? Like how how do we
march down that path?
In my experience, the best creators have
learned how to see.
They've not learned how to see by using
one of those uh digital "Please stay on
the phone after this call and rank our
service" kind of survey.
They learn how to see cuz they
understand genre, because they develop
good taste.
Good taste is knowing what your audience
wants 10 minutes before they do.
So, uh Diane von Fürstenberg burst onto
the scene with her wrap dress in the
1970s, revolutionized a a corner of
women's fashion. How did she know? And
I've talked to her about this. She's
completely nonverbal. She's unable to
explain how she knew. She has nothing.
But she knew cuz she learned how to see.
Cuz she exposed herself enough. She
developed pattern matching ability.
And domain knowledge is so important.
Genre is so important. It's not generic.
It's genre. What does this remind us of?
What does it rhyme with? When I touch
the emotion you're seeking, what other
emotions are right next to it? We
develop these things. Some people are
really lucky get a lucky early, and some
people takes 10 20 years to develop this
sensibility. The first year I was a book
packager, I sold my first book the first
day to Warner Books.
Chip Conley and I, 5,000 bucks, we split
the money.
And then Chip went back to doing his
gig, which was hotels, and I said, "I'm
going to be a book packager. If I can
sell a book a week, I'll be fine."
And I got 800 rejection letters in a
row.
800 times over the next 12 months,
someone in the book industry cared
enough to buy a stamp, send me a letter
saying, "This is a bad idea. Go away."
800 times.
And I didn't keep making the same
mistake. I kept making new mistakes. And
in that industry, it was socially
acceptable to send people a proposal,
and it was totally understandable that
they would write back.
And then something clicked into place,
and I learned to see.
And within 2 years after that, I'd sold
20 books, and over the course of 10
years I did 120 books. And I could tell
about half the time I was right. About
half the time if I said, "This one's a
big one," it was a big one. Can you walk
us through that process? Uh I know your
story well enough to know like when you
were trying to get better at writing,
you were looking at James Bond. We
talked about this in in our first
interview. That process to me is
incredibly important. How were you
asking yourself new questions? Like how
how did you make sure you were making
new mistakes, not repeating it? And how
were you making sure that you were
getting incrementally closer to so that
you were analyzing, okay, I did this, I
got this result and
Right. This is a great question.
The first books were How to Hypnotize
Your Friends and Get Them to Act Like
Chickens
and The Fortune Cookie Construction Set.
So, The Fortune Cookie Construction Set
was the only book at the time where you
could look up a recipe for fortune
cookies. Cuz fortune cookies don't have
the recipes in American cookbooks and
they didn't have the recipe in Chinese
cookbooks.
And so, the first page was the recipe
for fortune cookies and the next uh
100 pages were little perforated
fortunes that you could tear out and put
into the fortune like Henny Youngman
fortunes, this fortune, that fortune. No
one wanted to publish that.
And the other one was one of the first
uh not first, one of the only books
anyone had ever pitched on hypnotism,
How Did You Stage Hypnotism at Home and
How to Hypnotize Your Friends to Get
Them to Act Like Chickens. No one wanted
to publish that, either.
And I just kept kind of with one thing
after another that was either clever and
I was proud of myself for being clever
or
because I had an MBA,
I had spreadsheets to prove that people
would actually buy the book.
And then what came to me,
no one explained it to me, but what I
figured out was
the people in the book industry who
tended to go to famous colleges were
dramatically underpaid. Really
underpaid.
And they weren't in it to sell a lot of
books cuz they didn't know how many
books they were selling. It took a year
and a half after a book was bought,
purchased, for them to know how many
copies it was had sold. And by then they
weren't even interested. They'd moved
on. So no one in the industry had a
spreadsheet, cared about spreadsheets,
or was keeping track of spreadsheets.
And no one in the industry wanted to
reward me for being clever.
So what I realized was
book people bought books that they were
proud of
and they bought books that they wanted
to talk to their colleagues about.
And if I made books like that
they would publish them happily.
Particularly if I was the kind of person
they wanted to buy books from.
Not that I was well-liked in a Willy
Loman sense, but that I was a
professional who was in it for the right
reasons, not somebody who was trying to
hustle an advance so I could make
another clever book.
And
that led to a real shift on my part of
who's it for, what's it for, what change
am I seeking to make? Cuz what I realize
is first it has to be good enough in
{quotation marks} to appeal to the
gatekeeper.
But I wasn't actually doing all this
effort just to make them happy. I wanted
to make the readers change. I wanted to
reach readers. But I had to do a bank
shot. First I had to get it through the
editor and then I had a chance to get to
the reader. And that's one reason why my
blog has been around so long cuz my blog
was disintermediated. My blog meant I
didn't have to please an editor. I could
just write for my reader.
And that's a huge shift in our culture,
but also means you don't get anointed by
an editor the way you used to and get a
guaranteed audience. Typical failed book
in New York now, New York publishing
um has gone from 20,000 copies is what a
decent failed book would do to 200.
Because 20,000 used to be we'd fill up
all the Barnes & Noble's, we fill up all
the local bookstores. It was all 20,000.
Now, it's well, Amazon doesn't reorder
and we only shipped them 10.
I want to talk about imposter syndrome
and the reason that I'm bringing it up
now is as you were going through that I
thought, "Oof, there's there's really
something here about is it just that
Seth Godin is inordinately good at that
analysis or is it that the practice
itself of doing something over and over
and over is going to yield a result?"
And for the person whose self-narrative
is, "I'm not as good as Seth Godin."
They're of course going to get into that
imposter syndrome and you've already
addressed that, "Hey, you probably
really aren't good enough at this yet."
You talk in the book about so many
things being a process that you think
you're sort of either born with or
you're not.
I'm working on this concept I call the
physics of being human that there are
just certain things that the brain does
whether you want them to or not, they're
universal to all of us and one of them
that I was thinking about yesterday
while researching you is this idea that
we we analyze and you analyze by
default. And so journaling is powerful
because whether you want your brain to
or not, it is going to analyze what
you're writing, what you're doing.
Practicing being a plumber, you're going
to analyze. Submitting all the book
proposals, you're going to analyze.
Is there a way for us to sharpen our
skill of
being able to
see that gap, to recognize, "Oh, what's
really going on here is the you know,
the guy with the Harvard MBA or
whatever, he's underpaid and he's doing
this for a whole different reason."
I don't think most people verbalize as
much as I do.
And
that's fine. That's some of the most
successful people I know
don't verbalize
in almost every field. So I'm looking to
see if I can show you Yes, here it is.
So this book was a turning point for me.
So, I'll give you the background of this
book.
Um
CliffNotes used to be a very big deal.
CliffNotes used to be the single biggest
profit center at a lot of bookstores.
And the guys from CliffNotes, because it
was reliable, you had 100 titles, they
sold and sold and sold.
Uh and the margins were good. And the
guys at CliffNotes in Publishers Weekly
published the list of their top 30
sellers to help bookstores know which
ones to stock.
But it also told me which ones to
compete with them on, because they
revealed their short head. And I said,
"Well, who wants a CliffNotes? Who wants
a CliffNotes is some kid who doesn't
want to read a 30-page CliffNotes. They
want to read a four-page CliffNotes. So,
why don't I just take 35 of the best
selling CliffNotes and put them in all
in one book?"
So, for the price of two CliffNotes, you
get all the CliffNotes.
And I need a credential, so I got
college students to write them all, A
students from Tufts University.
And this is a brilliant idea. I can
prove spreadsheets back and forth that
this is a brilliant idea.
And it wasn't going to sell, cuz I still
was floundering about trying to figure
out what people wanted.
And I met this guy named John Boswell.
And John Boswell wrote uh OJ Legal OJ's
Legal Pad, and he created French for
Cats, and he'd done million sellers one
after another.
A real nice to me, profane guy. And I
went to see him on a mutual
introduction, and he ripped my proposal
apart. And said, "I will help you with
this, but we're going to split the book.
We're going to split it." I'm like,
"Fine. I got nothing. Go for it."
And he said, "The first thing you're
doing is you're laser printing your
proposals." I said, "Yeah, it cost a
dollar a page. I got to walk down there
and print it out on the laser printer."
He's like, "No, no, no, no, no." And he
calls his secretary in and has her
retype my proposal using carbon paper on
that onion skin paper.
I'm like, "What's that about?" He said,
"Cuz authors have typewriters."
And he didn't have words to explain why
you needed to act like an author when
you weren't being it. Blah, blah, blah.
So, I decoded
some of what he had learned, right? And
then I learned that I watched him
interact with the editors who we were
trying to sell it to, and he was mean to
them.
One after another.
And I tried to decode this cuz many of
the most successful agents in New York
at the time were mean
to their clients.
But I realized again, it's all a club,
and it's a club people want to be a
member of. And they only have a few
tools to use to get them to be members
of certain clubs. And if this club is
seen as
difficult to get into, the whole Groucho
Marx thing, they will try harder to get
into it. And like so, all And I never
did the whole mean thing, but I got the
joke immediately about He didn't know
have words for what he was doing, even
though he was a really successful book
guy. He just knew what had worked. How
did he know? Cuz he went through the
process I went through. He showed up,
and he showed up, and he showed up. And
we look
you know, I I was talking about this
just the other day. Um
go look on uh
the streaming services, and you can
listen to one of Joni Mitchell's first
demos.
She does a cover of House of the Rising
Sun.
And when I saw it show up on my browser
the other day, I was really excited.
It's not good.
And if she hadn't made it, she wouldn't
have made all the other ones.
So, that's what you got to do. We show
up, we cut the wood, and we chop the
water, or cut off the water, and
whatever. You get the idea.
Chop the wood, carry the water.
Uh you mentioned Joni Mitchell in the
book. It is a really interesting moment
and I'm curious how you think about
this. So, one of the things that I worry
about as people go down this path of,
"Okay, hey, Seth told me that I'm going
to have impostor syndrome. I'm not I'm
probably not good enough yet, but I need
to become peculiar. I need to be myself,
really lean into that. Don't worry about
alienating those people." And then you
tell this wonderful story about Joni
Mitchell. And Joni Mitchell realizes
that she's going over people's heads,
but instead of being like, "Oh my god,
if I feel terrible about that." and sort
of dummying it down, which is a very
famous Jay-Z lyric about how he dubbed
it down for his audience and doubled his
dollars, um, she goes even more highbrow
and now we obviously remember her, you
know, decades later.
Is there a danger in leaning into that
where you may not actually
Yeah.
you may be being arrogant instead of
being accurate. Yes. Okay, so, the first
thing I want to put a pin in that's
super important. I do not believe in
authenticity. I do not think you have
any right to do whatever you feel like
and whatever pops into your head as the
version of you that you think is the
authentic one is not correct.
The audience does not want an authentic
you.
You do not want an authentic anybody
when you hire anything. When you go to a
concert, right? If you go to a Jay-Z
concert and he's in a bad mood, you
don't want him to be in a bad mood. You
want him to be the best version of
Jay-Z. That's what you paid for.
Consistency. Consistency is part of
being peculiar.
Consistently generous, consistently
showing up, rhyming with yourself in a
way that you're proud of,
but no, not authentic. You're not
entitled. So, with that said,
the Joni Mitchell story has a key piece
of nuance in it. Joni Mitchell, like
most successful musicians, as I
mentioned with the Doobie Brothers, was
becoming a hack.
She was a legend. She could Every record
that she was doing was breaking every
uh, uh sales record there was. She could
have done it for 50 more years. She
could have been the Rolling Stones. That
was the path she was on. But, to do
that, you need to play covers of
yourself.
You need to make sure it sounds like a
Joni Mitchell album.
What Joni Mitchell did, Bob Dylan did
the same thing. She intentionally
alienated her audience. She
intentionally made them go away. She
made Don Juan's reckless daughter
breaking the hearts of her record label
because she didn't want to be Joni
Mitchell with a capital J and a capital
M.
She knew that her smallest viable
audience was smaller than the audience
she had.
Get rid of the people who don't get the
joke. Make the music that you want to be
proud of. Back to art, away from being a
hack. There's nothing wrong with being a
hack because the fact is Rolling Stones
made a billion dollars being a hack.
But, Joni Mitchell said, "I only want my
people who want to go on this journey
enrolled where I am going."
And the happy medium there is the is
Grateful Dead. Grateful Dead sold 500
million dollars worth of tickets, but
the promise was
you don't know what you're going to get
when you come.
And the promise was there going to be
parts of this that are boring. And we're
going to explore the edges. That's what
we do.
And so, you can earn that right to show
up and say, "I know I'm doing that or
I'm doing this." So, when Permission
Marketing became a New York Times
best-seller, I had a big choice to make
cuz I'd been in the book world for a
long time and now I was finally an
author.
And that book sold. So, I could have
done the Permission Marketing Handbook
because that book would have been easy
to sell to an editor. Or, I could have
started Mailchimp because that business
would have been really good. And then I
would have been the email marketing guy
cuz that was my background. I'd earned
the right to show up and say this.
And I intentionally did not do that.
Because I wanted the feeling you get
when you launch a book like Survival Is
Not Enough. And then it comes with the
feeling of what happens when it only
sells 13,000 copies.
Right? That's part of the deal if that's
the journey you want to go on.
You quote Joni Mitchell in the book and
she says, I'm paraphrasing, but
they're going to crucify you if you stay
the same. They're going to crucify you
if you change. Staying the same is
boring, change is interesting, so I'd
rather be crucified for changing. And I
thought, "Whoa, that's actually really
powerful."
Yeah. And it's different groups are
doing the crucifying. Right? If you stay
the same, the real joyous fans are
thrilled. They want you to play covers.
It's the other people, the the fancy
opinion-leading people, that are going
to say you're not relevant anymore.
You said you wanted to do something
different because you wanted that
feeling you get. What is that feeling
you get when you do something that might
not work?
Um you know, the book ends with a quote
from Papa Wallenda of the Flying
Wallendas.
Uh which he may or may not have said,
but which is quoted in the movie
Rounders by my friend Brian Koppelman
and David Levien. And he says something
like uh
life is on the tightrope and the
tightrope is the only place to be.
And what it means to be on the tightrope
is that our job as humans is not to eat,
sleep, and die.
Our job as hum- humans is to sing or to
dance or to connect or to lead.
And all of those things have tightropes
associated with them. And it's in that
moment of it might not work
that we or at least me, that I become
alive. Because you
built something, you it's you organized
a surprise party, you put together the
pieces, and now in this moment, you're
about to learn something.
That is so different from taking the
truffles from the conveyor belt and
putting them in the box all day.
That's not what we were born to do, I
don't think.
So, we're living on the tightrope.
I want to
make the most of that. So, if we're
going to experience the danger, if we're
really going to put ourselves at risk,
um which has obviously huge potential
upside, but also has potential downside,
one of the things that seems to me to be
the core of where you're at at this
point in your life is that notion of
feedback that you brought up earlier.
Certainly the seems like the soul of the
AltMBA is the feedback.
One, how do we
receive that feedback? Cuz most people
are going to feel attacked. Most people,
you know, they put up the psychological
immune system and they reject that. Um
How do we deal with that?
Or some people do the opposite, and they
take it all in and they're crushed.
That's interesting. So, I've made these
things on my on my Glowforge. These are
uh writer's blocks.
And they take a long time to make,
um because you have to you like laser
each side. And this one says, "All
criticism is not the same."
That is the key to the whole deal.
I have not read an Amazon review of my
work in almost 10 years. Wow.
And the reason is simple, because I've
never met an author who said, "I read
all my one-star reviews and now I'm I'm
a better writer."
Never. Because what does a one-star
review mean? A one-star review means,
"This book wasn't for me."
All right. Well, you just told us about
you. You didn't tell us anything about
the book or me. You told us about you.
Okay, thank you for telling us, but I
don't need to read that in detail.
On the other hand, if Nikki
Papadopoulos,
the amazing editor at Penguin Putnam
says, at at at
Portfolio says, you need to change the
title,
I'm like,
I just paid you hundreds of thousands of
dollars so you would tell me to change
the title. Thank you very much. Cuz I
could have self-published this book all
by myself with no feedback from anybody
and no one would have told me to change
the title. This criticism is magic.
And so, you know,
at Akimbo what they have built is
institutions, workshops, the altMBA,
where the only feedback you're getting
is precious.
And they filtered out all other stuff.
And
you can build a system like that. You
can figure out how to make sure you're
listening to the right people. This is
why being an opening act for a rock
group is a really bad idea.
Because you're going to show up in front
of the wrong people who are going to
give you the wrong feedback. It makes
way more sense to figure out who's it
for
and bring it to them. It might take a
few extra steps, but the feedback you're
getting is the useful feedback.
Are there a few landmarks to knowing who
the people are that you should be
listening to to building that group?
Well, I think it's two parts. In the
case of me in the origin of my book
world, there are the people
who are going to pay you. And when those
people
give you feedback, you have to listen to
them or else they're not going to pay
you anymore.
But then there's this other thing, which
is
as we discussed earlier, people are
really bad at verbalizing where they're
coming from.
When you see someone who is angry,
look for the fear.
They're not they're probably not angry
at you. They are probably afraid of
something, afraid of what they'll tell
their spouse, afraid of what they'll
tell their boss, afraid of insufficiency
or afraid of death, and they are
expressing it to you by being angry
about something you did.
If you over index for that feedback, you
are going to make a mistake.
On the other hand, if you ignore all
feedback, then the people you seek to
serve will choose not to be served by
you.
And they will simply walk away.
And so that's why this is so nuanced and
so complicated, because what you've got
to figure out how to do is thread a
needle between being a hack
and having a hobby.
And there is a needle. There is a way to
do it.
But there are also people who were
contemporaries of his that didn't make a
living, that died in a gutter somewhere,
because they turned it too much into a
hobby.
And then there were other people who got
too famous, and I put Miles Davis in
that category, and went from being
magnificent artists to being bitter,
because they turned into a hack, and
then they wanted to go back to being an
artist, and they couldn't.
Why couldn't he? That's interesting. Cuz
he got hooked on playing for 80,000
people.
Right? I There I just watched a a great
documentary about him about a year ago,
and you can see the turning point, when
Bill Graham put him on stage, when he
realized that he liked being a rock
star.
But if you're a rock star, you don't
also get to make Kind of Blue.
You can't do both.
And so
he listened to a group of people who
told him what he would need to do to be
more of a rock star.
But deep down, he didn't really want to
be a rock star. He wanted to make his
art.
This is fascinating. Now, I'm super
curious, if you could go back in time,
and you get like 20 minutes with him, is
there an idea that you would try to
plant in his mind around self narrative
that would help him understand, like,
hey, you can actually reshape this so
that you can get closer to rhyming with
yourself? Um do you just go, "Hey, look,
this is the way it is and some people
get, you know, hooked on that and
there's no bringing them back." Because
there are so many people like they're
chasing money, they're chasing wealth,
they're chasing fame and
you know, Jim Carrey's famous quote, "I
wish everybody could be rich and famous
so that you see that it isn't actually
what you want it to be or it isn't the
answer."
I'm so curious, what would what, if
anything, would you say to him at that
moment?
Well, I think I have a slightly
different take, but it's specific. I
would just say thank you.
Um
to have sacrificed so much to be who he
was and to make the change he made for
people in the face of overt racial
oppression,
he had so much to prove to himself, to
other people. He was disregarded, he was
spat upon.
He's entitled to sell out all he wants.
And to someone today, what I would say,
regardless of your background,
regardless of where you came from, I
would say, "What do you want?
What do you What What is it that you're
seeking? Because if you're trying to
fill an infinite hole
and the filling part isn't making you
happy, I need to tell you about math and
math says infinite holes never get
filled.
And so, you know, every year when Forbes
publishes their billionaires list, they
ruin the day or the week or the month of
at least 100 people who have at least a
billion dollars cuz they're not ranked
as high
as they want to be. That's absurd.
That's absurd that you are keeping track
of that, that you care about that in any
way. That's an infinite hole. It's not
helping you get where you want to get.
Instead, maybe it makes sense to say,
"Where is your fuel? What is the work
you do where when you do it,
it makes you feel like you contributed
something. Stop
buying into metrics that were invented
by other people to help them get where
they want to go.
And, you know, a simple example is
people who buy their way onto the
bestseller list, right? That they're
spending 50 or 100,000 dollars to game a
system that every insider knows is not
very hard to game.
Why are you doing that? What do you get
in return? And how could you
stop keeping track of something that
shouldn't be kept track of and keep
track of something else instead?
That's up to all of us. Every one of us
gets to make that choice. Who are you
trying to please? If there's that person
that you're trying to please that is
always unpleasable, you found an
infinite hole. Stop trying to fill it
and go please somebody else.
Seth, you like if I had to I don't have
to conjure an image, I have an image of
you in my head of somebody who
tap dances in the most graceful,
beautiful way around all the sort of
mental traps that we all fall for.
And I'm saying this specifically, I've
never sort of put these things together.
Um so, forgive me, I'm just sort of
thinking out loud.
You have this
beautiful ability to be moved by people,
people maybe that you've never even met.
So, we talked about Leonard Nimoy the
first time and now Miles Davis.
Is it Do you open yourself up to that?
Are you just naturally impacted by
people? Do you seek the beauty in
things? Like that was such an
interesting framing around Miles Davis
and to see that it obviously hits you in
a pretty uh real way. Just curious, like
that seems like a beautiful place to
live for people that want to live there.
What have you done to sort of end up
there?
I always resist something being natural
or a talent
because I think it lets us off the hook
way too easy.
Um I do believe that people have
different emotional thermostats
and they're set
maybe by the way we're raised and the
traumas that we have or don't have.
Um but yeah, I do also think that people
are on various spectra about where they
are on that thermostat thing.
Uh in my case
I think the practical discussion is
what are you training in?
Like I can't bench press 10 lbs
because my shoulders don't work very
well from surgery, but even if I could
I could train to get to 20 or 30 or
whatever it is.
And so we don't walk up to somebody who
uh has a lot of muscles in various parts
of their body and say, "Were you born
that way?"
No, they trained to get that way.
And if you ask Patricia to play scales
she can play scales blindfolded because
she trained for years and years and
years. The fact that her father was a
jazz musician didn't give her any genes
in music, she just trained.
And so I've been training for a really
long time to answer the question
why did someone just do what they did?
How do I
get rid of some of the magic of the
world is just a giant magic trick and I
don't know how it works, right? Like I
know what freon gas does and I know how
a refrigerator functions. It's important
to me. I know that when you flip the
switch on the lights why the lights go
on. That's important to me.
And I needed to understand why that
person who turned down my book on spots
and stains turned it down and why the
person who tried to buy the book and
couldn't was really angry with me.
I needed to understand that the same way
I need to understand why the lights
work.
And often I'm completely wrong.
But I'm closer than if I hadn't asked
the question in the first place.
And so I think the training is
can we develop practical empathy? They
don't know what we know, they don't want
what we want, they don't need what we
need, and that's okay. What do they
know? What do they need? What happened
to them
that led them to believe that in this
moment they are being reasonable?
And if we can ask that question enough
times, not only I think does it help us
make change, it helps us
uh
live with the world as it is. Because we
can't change the whole world, but if we
understand it, at least we can decode it
and and figure out a way to make it
better.
It's amazing. One final question.
What do you hope, so knowing that you go
into the book asking how do I want to
change people, what what are you hoping
people take away from this concept of
the practice?
Two things. Uh
for all of us,
we need what you could contribute if you
contributed it it.
And for you, the reader,
uh I think it would be horrible if you
died with whatever you've got still
inside of you.
And it's not formed yet. You will form
it when you have a practice. When you
start believing in yourself, don't wait
to get picked. Oprah's not going to
call. But instead, adopt this practice
of making things better. Cuz 2020 is a
year we all want to forget.
But the only way forward is not going to
be cuz some space alien comes and fixes
everything. It's going to be because we
made something better for 10 other
people. If we all do that, it
multiplies, and then things get better.
I love that. Where can people find you?
Uh I'm at seths.blog,
and um I'm thrilled to announce that
Akimbo, the workshop organization I
started 5 years ago, is now a B Corp, uh
legally obligated to work in the public
interest as well as a for-profit, and it
is run and owned by uh two of my senior
people. So, I am part of it in that they
publish my workshops, but it's them uh
and it's now 20,000 plus people who are
learning together at akimbo.com. I have
a podcast, not like you, but a podcast
at akimbo.link.
And
I'm sort of hard to avoid. If you just
click around, you'll find me.
I love it.
Guys, this is in my opinion one of the
most profound authors for sure,
thinkers.
If you haven't already subscribed to
everything he does, I highly, highly
encourage it. And speaking of things you
should subscribe to, if you haven't
already, be sure to subscribe here. And
until next time, my friends, be
legendary. Take care.
Heroes are in enormously large supply.
You can say, what would Bill Gates do?
What would Elon Musk do? What would
Jacqueline Novogratz do? And you can
study their work enough that even from
afar without them knowing you exist.
Because they're your hero, you can start
to model it.