Video summary
Dr. Scott Eilers argues that depression often manifests less as sadness and more as anhedonia, a clinical state defined by the loss of joy due to a malfunctioning dopamine reward system in the brain. He distinguishes between normal emotional responses to life events—such as grieving a loved one—and chronic Major Depressive Disorder or Persistent Depressive Disorder (formerly dysthymia), where individuals feel hollow and numb without any apparent external cause. A critical aspect he highlights is "false depression," which occurs when lifestyle factors like isolation, poor sleep, and lack of physical activity create an environment devoid of reward opportunities, leading to a cycle where the individual stops trying because they no longer experience satisfaction from their efforts. This condition creates a discrepancy between effort and outcome, or leverage loss, making it difficult for even high-functioning individuals with successful careers and families to feel internally fulfilled despite outward appearances of success. To combat this state of emotional numbness, Dr. Eilers proposes five specific strategies: investments, checking the lock, stacking, loopholes, and apathyception. He advises against chasing momentary joy or "peak experiences" as a cure, noting that such approaches often fail to break through raised thresholds for pleasure. Instead, he suggests combining achievement with leisure—such as exercising before socializing—to create a potent mix of accomplishment and enjoyment. Additionally, identifying small "loopholes," like specific foods or activities that still elicit positive feelings despite severe depression, can help maintain momentum. He also introduces the concept of treating apathy not as an emotion to be felt but as a glitch in the system; individuals are encouraged to act on their values regardless of whether they feel rewarded at the moment, effectively choosing to ignore the lack of immediate emotional payoff until it returns. The discussion emphasizes that mental health is deeply rooted in biological and physical maintenance rather than just psychological insight or cognitive reframing. Dr. Eilers advocates for a "bio-psycho-social" order of operations where physical health—sleep, nutrition, movement, and substance use—is the foundation upon which brain function rests; without these resources, the brain enters a low-power mode incapable of processing emotions effectively. He uses the analogy of an internal road system to explain that external inputs cannot reach the individual if their body is not maintained properly. Furthermore, he warns against over-reliance on self-awareness and intelligence as solutions, citing the Yerkes-Dodson law which suggests that too much stress or awareness can become counterproductive. High IQs, for instance, may accelerate learning negative patterns from social rejection, leading to rapid internalization of trauma without sufficient time to adjust one's perspective. Ultimately, Dr. Eilers concludes that managing severe depression requires a fundamental overhaul of one's lifestyle rather than minor tweaks, acknowledging the severity and potential psychosis associated with deep depressive episodes. He shares his own 41-year case study as evidence that these strategies are replicable for others facing similar challenges. While he admits to being somewhat "tough love" in his approach compared to traditional therapy models, he believes this is necessary because depression functions like a chronic medical condition such as diabetes; one must actively manage it through specific actions rather than hoping symptoms will resolve on their own. By accepting the reality of the illness and committing to rigorous self-care that maintains the brain's ability to function, individuals can regain agency over their lives even when they feel disconnected from reality or unable to experience joy in the moment.
Read the full video transcript
How would you describe to somebody who's
never felt it what depression feels
like?
It's tricky because it can feel like a
lot of different things. It depends on
the person, but for a lot of people,
depression is not as much the sadness
and the despair as it's often portrayed
as. And it often is more of a numbness
or an emptiness. So, one of the core
symptoms of depression that nearly
everyone experiences to some degree is
what's called anhidonia. The literal
translation of anhidonia is the loss of
joy. So the reward system in your brain,
right, your dopamine pathway that causes
you to experience emotions like
enjoyment when you're doing something
fun or achievement after you accomplish
something. It basically stops
functioning. It can it can be a
diminished functioning or it can be a
completely absent functioning. And what
that feels like on a day-to-day basis is
you can go out and do the things you
would normally do that would normally
make you feel some certain way and the
emotional reaction that you would expect
to experience upon completion of those
tasks or activities is either
significantly dulled from what you
usually experience or it is just not
there at all. It's very much I I hear a
lot of people describe it as as if there
were a black hole inside of them where
their emotions or their reactions should
be. And obviously for many people when
you start feeling this way, that's where
the lack of motivation that we see with
depression comes from. It's not that
these people actually stop caring about
their lives or the people in them or
their jobs or whatever. It's that you
don't feel anything when you do it. And
you know, we're we're reward-based
mammals, right? And so if we don't feel
anything when we do things that are hard
or challenging that require effort, the
natural reaction is to stop doing them.
And that's where you see that's where
you see the person who, you know, can't
get out of bed, can't take care of their
home, can't take care of their hygiene,
it it's it's that there's no there's no
reward in it. It's like, you know, if
you were going to work and your boss
pulls you aside and says, "Hey, just so
you know, we're out of money. We can't
pay you anymore. I don't know when we're
going to be able to pay you again, but
we still want you to come in and do all
your stuff. You're just not going to get
paid for it for a while. That wouldn't
be a really compelling proposition to
most people, right? And that's kind of
what it feels like to be told you still
have to like stay alive and do stuff
when you're severely depressed is I'm
working for no paycheck.
What's the What's the difference between
feeling sad and actually being
depressed?
mainly the intensity, the duration, and
the causality, right? So, this I really
do think we need to rework some of our
clinical terms because depression, you
know, when a psychologist like me says
depression, we're talking about a
chronic mental health condition, right?
But depression is also an emotion and it
is emotion that all human beings
experience under certain circumstances.
So, somebody you love dies, you lose a
job, your house burns down. These are
extreme examples. I don't know they
don't have to be that extreme but we all
face challenges in life that cause us to
feel sad or depressed and that doesn't
mean you have depression. Where we draw
the line is that a person who
experiences a clinical or a chronic
depression. They're going to feel like
that. They might feel like someone they
love died for example for no apparent
reason. Like nothing happened, nothing
changed. I just wake up one day and I
feel like I'm grieving. I feel like
something horrible has happened. I feel
like my life has no meaning. But I
cannot rationally explain to you, here's
what happened to make me feel that way.
Here's what changed. Here's why I didn't
feel that way a week ago and now I do
today. And for most people,
depression isn't technically a
diagnosis, right? Mood disorders are a
category of diagnosis. Uh there's no
such thing as as depression just, you
know, as a as a like a Zcode. When most
people when they say they're depressed,
they're referring to major depressive
disorder. Major depressive disorder is
an episodic mood disorder when a person
experiences depression in episodes and
they also experience non-depressed
periods. So they kind of go back and
forth between these two states sometimes
with no rhyme or reason. And so when a
person is getting into these deep dark
places of depression, and this sounds a
little subjective, I know, but when
there's nothing happening in their life
that would reasonably seem to make them
feel that way, that is when we would
start to say maybe this person has a
chronic mood disorder.
Why is it intermittent? Is is there a
category of depression that's just
always on that that doesn't come off?
There is. It's called persistent
depressive disorder. used to be called
dysyic disorder up until 2013 and we
changed it because no one knew what the
heck the term dysyic meant. We're not
always the masters of terminology in
mental health.
Persistent depressive disorder is
usually categorized as like a low to
moderate level of depression, but it
really it's not episodic. It doesn't
really have ups and downs. It's almost
just more like the person's personality.
Um I think of like I I don't know this
person. I have no idea if this person's
diagnosed with anything. But the person
that always comes to mind when I think
of dysmic disorder is uh or or PDD is
Bill Bellichic, the former coach of the
New England Patriots. You know, his team
could win by 50 points and put up record
numbers and he'd show up to the press
conference just really not looking
happy. He seemed like he was never
really enjoying himself, right? That's
again, I'm not trying to diagnose him,
but that's kind of the image in my mind
when I think of persistent depressive
disorder.
In terms of why is it episodic? I mean,
that's one of our million-dollar,
really, we should say billion-dollar
questions at this point, given how the
pharmaceutical industry is, but that's
one of the burning questions in mental
health. And and one of the sad truths
about mental health that I talk about a
lot is we don't know as much as we try
to act like we know. We don't know on an
individual person-toperson basis exactly
why any specific individual becomes
depressed or has a mood disorder. There
certainly seems to be a brain chemistry
component to it. So when our
neurotransmitters, the chemicals in our
brains that cause our neurons to
interact with one another, things like
dopamine and serotonin, when the
functioning of those neurotransmitters
shift, our emotional experience in this
world shifts, even if nothing in this
world has shifted outwardly to cause
that. So there certainly seems to be a
chemical component to it. I personally
believe and this is not a super popular
opinion in my field. I believe that
there is a strong lifestyle component to
it and I believe that many people who
experience mood disorders I don't
necessarily know if this is what starts
it but they end up you know because of
this anhidonia because of loss of
appetite low motivation insomnia things
like that they end up chronically living
in a way in which their life isn't
realistically going to produce a lot of
opportunity to feel good and so
sometimes they have these prolonged
depressive episodes. I I don't mean this
to sound judgmental, but I call them I
call it false depression. Not because
it's fake or because the person is
acting or anything like that, but
because this person is probably capable
of feeling better, but they've been, you
know, perhaps resigned to living in this
certain way because for a while this
this feeling of reward was not
accessible to them no matter what they
did. So, they stopped trying and now
they live a life devoid of reward
opportunity.
For a lot of people, there seems to be a
social component to it, right?
Isolation, disconnection from others is
a huge piece of it. But ultimately, our
current appraisal of mood disorders is
that they're very multiffactorial. It's
not like this one thing happens and
you're guaranteed to have a mood
disorder. And that the causes can be
very different from one person to the
next, which of course tremendously
complicates treatment on the therapy
side of things. What else don't we know
about mental health disorders? What are
what are the big, you know, like the um
they used to have that deck of playing
cards that were the FBI's most wanted
terrorists. What What are the uh as yet
unanswered but really should be when it
comes to mental illness and depression
from a medical lens?
Oh my goodness, there are hundreds of
possible answers to that question.
Number one on the top of my list is why
are we so bad at treating it? And I'm
sure that the answer to that question
probably goes back to the question you
asked before, which is what is it? It's
hard to treat something if you don't
completely understand what it is. But if
you look at outcome literature for
individual psychotherapy and
psychotropic medication, which are the
1A and 1B of treating virtually every
mental health condition, most effective
medications, most effective like best
possible conditions, right? This is
assuming your therapist is on their
agame. They know you have a good
relationship with them. You're on the
right medications, the right doses, best
possible conditions. We're talking 50
60% of people get better. So close to
What is get better?
Experience some relief from symptoms.
So, not even like not Yeah. Yeah. I
mean, it's a low bar is what I'm saying.
That's not like
get to asymptomatic. That's like makes
progress. I mean,
yeah. Improves. Maybe goes from, you
know, severe to moderate on a PHQ9 or a
GAD 7. Those are depression and anxiety
screeners. So, this is a low bar. We're
not talking Yeah. cured and
asymptomatic. We're talking like, do you
notice a difference in your life? Do you
feel marginally better? Even maybe half,
maybe slightly over. And so we have this
huge swath of the treatment seeking
population that is getting little to no
relief. And we don't necessarily know
why that is. I have a lot of
frustrations towards my own field about
that how that is handled because people
people who have tried maybe two or three
therapists two or three different
medications and and have gotten you know
unsuccessful outcomes let's say in all
of these conditions they are often given
the label treatment resistant and I
understand what we're trying to
accomplish with that label we're trying
to say this person seems like they need
something more or something different
than kind of our boilerplate approach
here. I really don't like the term
though because I feel that it places
some of the blame for the poor outcome
on the person seeking treatment. So to
me it's like there's this underlying
assumption we're doing everything right
so if you're not getting better it must
be a you problem. And frankly I don't
think we have enough information to say
that. I it the quality of care you'll
get from a therapist varies dramatically
from one person to the next. It is not
as standardized a field as I would like
for it to be. Our lure exams for example
and this is true for both psychologists
and M's level therapists. The lure exams
are basically like trivial pursuit
mental health edition. It's like who
invented this treatment and when? No one
cares.
At no point I've been I've been
practicing for 15 years. At no point
have I had a therapy client be like,
"Well, when was that treatment invented?
Was that in 1976 or 1975? Because if you
don't know, I'm not going to listen to
you." No one cares. We train people on
the wrong things and then we're shocked
when we aren't getting great treatment
outcomes. It feels a little bit unfair
to say treatment resistant when between
50 and 40% of all people are treatment
resistant. It just sounds like the
treatment is solution resistant.
Mhm. That's exactly what I think. I
think we have and and I'm not just
trying to push the buck pass the buck on
to other people. I'm trying to be a part
of this mission. I think we have a lot
of work to do to understand what people
actually need when they come to therapy
when they're struggling with various
conditions because even even let's just
take depression as an example. The
difference between a person who
experiences mild depression and a person
who experiences severe depression is
night and day. It's like comparing level
one and level three autism, right? So
level one autism is like a person who
maybe just has some some social quirks
and makes some gaffs in social
situations and maybe gets a little bit
obsessed about the things they're into.
Level three is like typically more
profoundly disabled like I cannot
communicate without use of a device and
may never be able to live independently.
Depression has a similar spectrum. So
does anxiety for that matter. And so
someone with level one depression, they
may just need someone to talk to every
now and then. They may not need a
lifestyle overhaul. They may not need,
you know, XYZ set of strategies. They
need an outlet. They need a safe place.
They need to just talk through their
feelings and talk through some of the
stuff they're going through. And that's
probably all they need is literally any
competent therapist and they'll get
better. Severe depression is a different
beast entirely. It is disabling. Like we
don't we don't often think about mood
and anxiety disorders as as being in the
same category of things like, you know,
autism or schizophrenia. But at these
severe tiers which they can reach, they
are disabilities or at least they can
be. They can they can prevent you from
working. They can prevent you from going
to school. They can prevent you from
having relationships, taking care of
yourself. And I think we do not do a
very good job of delineating these
severity levels and and we just kind of
put someone with a therapist to say,
"Okay, you have depression. This person
treats depression." And if you have
severe depression and you go to therapy
and the person just kind of chitchats
with you for an hour, you're not going
to get better from that. That's not
going to do anything for you under most
circumstances.
There's a lot of work to be done here. I
like many therapists, this is a spoiler
alert, but it's probably not a super
well-hidden thing. Most of us get into
this field because we have a personal
stake in it. is either us either like we
think we're screwed up and we're trying
to figure out what the heck is wrong
with us and hoping that we can also help
some other people along that journey or
in some cases it's maybe like you know I
had a close friend or a family member
whatever it's not a career that people
usually just go into out of pure
academic interest it's certainly not a
career people go into for the money um
and when I kind of saw behind the
curtain of what professional mental
health was my first reaction basically
was like this is it you know this is
what we think,
oh, this is captaining the ship.
Yeah, it was not what I was expecting to
see and it my first thought was this is
not enough. This isn't going to do it.
Do mental health illnesses have
biomarkers? Like is there anything
happening neurologically? Can we can we
look? because I think there's, you know,
an additional
an additional type of discomfort to
anybody who's dealing with any sort of
mental malady because it doesn't present
externally except for in your behavior.
You know, if you've
snapped an Achilles or broken an arm,
people go, "Oh, there's a thing. There's
a real impediment to your ability to
move forward in the world, and I I
should treat you as such." But there's
the
am I maybe I'm making it up. Why can't I
just sort myself? You know, no one ever
says, "Why can't why can't I just fe he
heal my own broken arm?" That's not the
sort of thing that we think. You know,
we get frustrated at the process, but we
understand that it's something that
needs fixing and other people behave
accordingly as well. But the reverse
isn't true. So, I guess, yeah, I'm
interested in the biomarkers,
neurological side of what's going on
with depression.
I am interested in it, too. And
unfortunately, there's not a lot right
now. For depression, we don't really
have anything consistent we can point to
as a biioarker. For some conditions like
ADHD, for example, there is some
preliminary evidence that at least
structurally there are differences in
brain maturity and brain development. So
most people who have ADHD seem to have
delayed development of the prefrontal
cortex, for example, and it lags one to
three years behind their chronological
age. That being said, because that's a
very early finding, insurance is not
approving MRIs as a test for ADHD in
most cases. So even for the relatively
few conditions where we do potentially
have biomarkers, we aren't really able
to look at them unless the person is
really wealthy and wants to pay out of
pocket for a medical procedure. And the
people who are trained to assess those
biomarkers aren't necessarily mental
health professionals. like I as a
psychologist I you would not want me
giving you an MRI. I would probably kill
you. It would not go well. I don't know
how to do that. And so it's it's sort of
like a one hand is not talking to the
other thing. But what you said before
about
I know it's a little bit cliche to say
it this way, but like these are
invisible illnesses, right? Because of
the lack of biomarkers, because of the
lack of the general lack of physical
manifestations. Sometimes you can look
at a person and be like, I think that
person is probably depressed, but that's
not always the case. There's an entire
subset of the depressed population, and
I think this probably exists for most
mental health conditions that are
considered high functioning. So there
are people, you know, just like there's
people with high functioning autism,
right? There are people with high
functioning depression and high
functioning depression does not mean
mild depression. This is very important
to know. There are people with
high-powered jobs, spouses, families,
homes, cars, and they look fine. In
fact, some of them even look better than
most. Some of them are some of them are
people who are in exceptionally good
shape, take wonderful care of
themselves, have immaculately maintained
homes, and they are severely depressed.
They feel hollow, empty, and numb
inside. And
this is kind of a weird way of thinking
it, but I think you'll I think you'll
appreciate this. I often think of
depression in particular as a disorder
of leverage. And so if you think of if
you think of leverage in life as being
like the difference between what you do
and what you get, right? A person who
has a lot of leverage in life can
accomplish things and feel good from
those accomplishments. They can go out
socially and make friends and feel
connected and loved and valued. They can
get a promotion at work and feel
competent and skilled. They can spend
the money they get from that promotion
and feel joy and excitement because
they're on a vacation or a concert or
whatever. With depression, we lose our
leverage. There becomes this discrepancy
between what we put in and what we get
out. But everyone who looks at our lives
from the outside looking in, they don't
know what's inside our heads, right? So
they judge our output and they see he is
doing these things therefore he must
feel good enough to do these things and
there's this whole group of people these
high functioning depressed people that
are being very very missed in society
and in treatment um prior to opening my
practice I used to work at a hospital
and so my colleagues were you know
surgeons oncologists etc. Um, and many
of them were deeply struggling with
their mental health and and no one would
have ever known from the out. I only
knew cuz they told me. I didn't even
know. I didn't even look at these people
as a psychologist and think, "Oh, I see,
you know, there's some subtle little
tail I see that tells me this person is
not doing as well as they're letting
on." I don't even know. That's how good
people are at hiding those things
because a lot of us don't have a safe
place where we can let that out. Also,
there's a lot of shame around,
you know, having a life that from the
outside seems to be going great, but
from the inside doesn't feel all that
good. You know, ostensibly there's
nothing wrong. No one's died. I'm not
bankrupt. My wife hasn't left me. And I
just don't feel that fired up about life
or, you know, joy isn't coming to me
except for when I really, really work
and go out and seek it and sort of pick
it up off the ground. Uh it's
interesting around the the sort of high
functioning
part. I wonder whether
we should be sort of more scrutinous of
people that are real high performers
because you think well any normal person
would have taken so much pleasure and
joy from their successes by this point
that they would have given up. But for
some reason you have this black hole
inside of you. And that's not to say
that everybody who's a super high
performer has this, but that it is just
a really obvious, you know, equation of
drive that, hey, if you're the sort of
person who keeps on pushing long after
the success level that most people would
consider to be reasonable or worthy of
praise or worthy of relaxing a little
bit, if you keep going, well, what's
driving you? Or perhaps it's that your
leverage you're having to get for every
hundred units you get in you only feel
10 of them or something like that as
opposed to with somebody else who for
every hundred units that they got they
would feel 100.
Yep. That's exactly it Chris and and
you're absolutely right that there are
people who just love their jobs and love
their careers. And it's not that
everybody who is at the top of their
field or who works more than 40 hours a
week is secretly depressed. But I think
more of the people that meet those
criteria
are severely depressed than people would
think. Because when you get this
anhidonia, when you get this numbness
inside, very broadly speaking, there's
two pathways you can take when that
happens. You can say, "I don't really
feel anything when I do things,
therefore I should stop doing things."
Or you might take the approach of I
don't really feel good no matter what I
do. Therefore, there is no point in me
organizing my life around joy and
leisure and fun. So, if everything feels
the same, I may as well work as hard as
possible, do as much good as I can for
other people, make as much money as
possible, maybe not even for me because
I don't feel anything when I spend it,
but maybe for my friends or my family or
my kids or whatever. Because if being at
work and being on an awesome family
vacation emotionally pretty much feel
like the same experience to me, I might
as well do the one that produces
something, right?
Yeah. I've got an essay um that I want
to read to you that I wrote a couple of
weeks ago. Sure.
And uh I I was thinking about the uh
Victor Frankle quote that was
I guess gets used an awful lot. When a
man can't find a deep sense of meaning,
they distract themselves with pleasure.
And what he's arguing is that a lack of
meaning causes people to seek temporary
relief uh in superficial pursuits rather
than to sort of address the underlying
existential void. And I think that
perhaps for many people, maybe even for
most people, this is a big issue. But I
think that there's another group who
suffer with the opposite problem which I
called Frankle's inverse law which is
when a man can't find a deep sense of
pleasure they distract themselves with
meaning. So if ease and grace and
joyfulness don't come easily to you, one
solution is just to ignore momentto
moment happiness entirely and just
always pursue hard things that people
sort of become a world champion at
willing the marshmallow test and you
convince yourself that delayed
gratification in perpetuity is noble
because you struggle to ever feel
grateful in the moment. So you sort of
prioritize meaning over happiness
because happiness doesn't come easily to
you. And obviously delayed gratification
in the extreme just results in no
gratification. And yeah, I think some
people are sort of hyper respponders to
working hard will give you good rewards.
You know, the sort of just grit your
teeth and and and keep going. Uh and
they go on to become workaholics and
insecure overachievers. And from the
outside, it looks like you've sort of
transcended the shallow need for
pleasure. But in reality, it's just cope
to avoid facing the fact that you
struggle to feel joy. So instead, you
sort of perpetually promise yourself
that happiness might finally come
tomorrow. Like like running toward the
horizon, sort of something that never
arrives. Uh congratulations. You've
managed to subjugate your joy as a
tribute to your work. And I think uh we
quite easily confuse we mistake humilous
and sort of fun lacking seriousness with
being sophisticated and caring about
your pursuit. Um Theorough's got this
quote where he says the price of
anything is the amount of life that you
exchange for it. And by this logic I
think a lot of us are paying into a bank
account that we ne never withdraw from.
So yeah, this this odd sort of inversion
of that when people can't find a deep
sense of pleasure, they distract
themselves with meaning that feels like
kind of the curse of the high
functioner.
Yeah, I think we might be talking about
the same group of people here. And it's
something it's tricky because, you know,
this goes back to mood disorders and and
their episodic nature. And and it
depends a little bit on are we talking
about a person who always feels this way
or are we talking about a person who has
some eb and flow in their mood? Because
some of this in my opinion can actually
be a healthy coping tool for anhidonia.
Because if you experience episodic
depression and you have periods of life
where you can't feel joy, but then you
do have periods where at least to a
degree it returns, then you can at some
point withdraw from that bank account
that you're constantly paying into. You
just can't withdraw from it at will. The
bank just kind of tells you when it's
open and you just sort of have to accept
that, right? And something I learned
just through repetitive trial and error
in my own life is the way something
feels while you are doing it is not
necessarily the way it's going to feel
later. And and that relationship can
move in either direction which is really
important to understand. I think all of
us understand that things that feel good
when we do them can feel bad later. you
think about like a drunken night out
with friends or something like that
might feel really good while you're
doing it but you don't necessarily feel
great the next day or a relationship
that you were in and it ends and now all
the happy memories you had with that
person are now sad memories because
you're grieving. So I think we all
understand that directionality but it is
important to note that it can go the
other way as well. And if you're in a
depressive episode and you're
experiencing a state of anhidonia and so
you don't enjoy anything that you're
doing, you might be able to withdraw
from those experiences later. The the
story that always comes to mind when I
think of this concept is when I was 17.
So my my worst years depression wise
were like
early adolescence to early adulthood.
Like 13 to 23 was that was my rock
bottom. I'm kind of thankful I got it
out of the way early, but 16 and 17 in
particular were very, very dark times
for me. And I think on some level, my
parents recognized that. They had no
idea what to do. We're small town
people. They don't they're not mental
health savvy. I don't blame them for
that. But my dad knew I was really into
like fish and water and stuff. And so he
planned um when I was 17, he planned a
trip, just the two of us, a scuba diving
trip to the Florida Keys, which was like
the apex. Like that was the coolest
thing I could imagine at the time. So, I
remember, you know, we fly out there.
We're we're out in the water and we we
we take this boat out, you know, three
miles out to the reef or whatever. Get
in the water and I'm I'm not even in I
mean, I'm in the water, but like my head
is still above I'm just treading water,
right? And I remember looking down and
just seeing all these bright colors.
Like, there was just fish all around.
And I remember thinking, that's cool. I
didn't know there was like I thought I
was at least going to have to get
underwater before I saw the fish. I had
this conscious recognition almost almost
like this outside looking in of like
this is a really awesome experience and
I remember thinking it should feel that
way too and it was almost like it was
almost like this slow motion thing where
I could I could feel the awareness of
the moment get not that emotions
literally happen in your heart they
happen in your lyic system but whatever
that's what we say I could feel that
that it just died before it reached my
emotions and I was consciously aware
fair that this was a neat thing that was
happening, but I felt nothing from it.
And I felt that way the whole day. It
was like this three or 4 day trip. We
did all this cool stuff. I even took
pictures, which was really unusual for
me back then. Like I knew it was
special, but I didn't feel like it was
special. But the funny thing is, I still
have those pictures. When I look back on
those pictures now, I feel joy about
having been on the trip even though I
did not. It's not like a nostalgic. It's
not like I'm feeling what I felt back
then because I did not feel joy on this
trip. I was also nocturnal on this trip.
So, the schedule was really hard to to
work around because I was dealing with
severe insomnia. So, we couldn't do half
the stuff we wanted to do. But, that was
an important life lesson for me. And
this is important to remember when
you're depressed and when you're
experiencing is just because you don't
enjoy it while you're doing it doesn't
mean it is a waste. Because that that's
what I hear people say, especially like
these high functioning people, you know,
like they have they have the resources
to go on the family trip or whatever or
go to the cool concert, but they don't
because they don't care because they're
like, "Why bother? Why spend money? Why
spend time if I won't enjoy it?" You may
be able to draw from that well later on
when you're in a different mood state.
We aren't locked in to only experiencing
the emotions that we experienced at the
time when we reminisce. And so in my
opinion, it is still worth doing those
things to hopefully be able to draw from
them later when you're in a better
place, which I know is a big assumption,
but it is possible.
Yeah. It the sort of circular
uh white flag waving that you have when
you think, well, I don't feel good in
the moment, so it's pointless doing
anything in the moment, and this is
going to last forever. And even if it
doesn't, I'm going to look back on this
and I'm going to remember that I
actually ruined the trip for myself. And
that photo that I took was me not
feeling good. And think, yeah, in in in
some ways, but tragedy plus time equals
comedy is about the closest thing that
psychologyy's got to an equation, I
think. Um, how else would you recommend
people cope when they're in a period
where sadness is more readily available
and happiness is more limited?
I have five go-tos for anhidonia and for
emptiness. And one is the one I just
described. So, I call that investments,
which is basically still do the things.
Know that you're not going to feel great
while you do them. Don't expect to feel
great while you do them so that you're
not disappointed when that good feeling
isn't there, but don't catastrophize it
and say because I didn't feel good while
it happened, I will never feel good or
like you said, I ruined the trip. Not
necessarily. You you banked something
that you may be able to draw from later.
So, investments is one. The second is
what I call checking the lock. So, this
is all kind of based on the metaphor
that anhidonia is like an emotional
prison, right? It's like someone's
locked you into this sensory deprivation
prison.
If you stop doing things that bring you
joy because for a prolonged period of
time you are unable to experience joy.
You will not inherently realize when you
have left that state because you won't
just wake up some morning and feel joy
because you woke up because that's not
an inherently enjoyable experience. So
if nothing you do in a day has the
potential to create joy, you might end
up in a period of anidonia, a period of
depression for years or even decades in
some cases when you were capable of
feeling something. And the reason you
didn't experience joy isn't because you
were unable to, but because you stopped
doing the things that would produce it.
So, I encourage people, even if it's
something small, do one thing every day
that at least theoretically could
produce joy. Otherwise, you won't know
when this comes back and you'll just
assume it's not there. There's no marker
there. There's you're not going to wake
up and just like angels are singing to
you saying, "It's over. You're better."
You won't know unless you do something
that prompts it. Another strategy is
something I call stacking. So sometimes
we all have a threshold for joy, right?
And there are there's little things that
happen every day that are technically
good things, but they don't cross our
threshold and so we feel nothing. An
example would be stopping at a stop sign
successfully. Like you're driving and
you don't crash. That's kind of the
default assumed thing and but it is
technically a good thing, right? But you
probably don't get a dopamine hit every
time you successfully break your
vehicle. Um, and so sometimes what
happens with anhidonia is it's not that
our ability to feel joy is actually
literally gone. It's that this threshold
has been raised quite a bit. And so it's
going to take a lot more to get you to
clear it. And a mistake people often
make is just stacking joy on joy on joy
and just trying to be like, "Okay, I'll,
you know, watch the game with my buddies
with some drinks and just do a bunch of
pleasurable stuff all at once." But what
I have found is more more effective is
stacking multiple I'm going to say
enjoyable emotions rather than just all
joy or all pleasure. I have found
achievement plus pleasure is a really
really potent combination. This is
another one I stumbled across completely
by accident but I'll give you the short
backstory here.
Around age 18 I started going to the gym
even though I had no motivate. I
basically got peer pressured into it and
I was like yeah whatever I'll go. I
didn't I wasn't super excited about it
at first, but as I as I got into it, it
was like, okay, I start to see some
value in this. And there was this one
day I specifically remember after I had
started learning about kind of nutrition
and rest and stuff like that and learned
about protein synthesis. And I'm like,
okay, so my muscles are going while I'm
eating food. That's kind of cool. And I
had gone to the gym with one of my
friends that morning. And then that
evening, I was hanging out with another
friend, playing a video game, eating
pizza, stuff like that. And I remember
like I'm playing the game with one hand,
like eating my pizza with the other
hand. And I remember thinking in that
moment, I'm getting stronger right now.
I'm sitting here playing a video game
and eating pizza and my fitness level is
rising because I'm resting and consuming
protein. And I remember in that moment I
had this burst of joy that I had not
felt in years. And I have found that
that combination in particular is
relatively reproducible for me when I
because when you do something that
produces a feeling of more like
achievement or accomplishment that often
tends to be more of a slow burn, right?
It's not it doesn't always feel amazing
right away, but you kind of stay feeling
good about it all day long like from the
gym or, you know, mowing the lawn or
whatever. Every time you look out your
window, you're like, "Yeah, that's a
nice looking lawn." It's sort of this
it's sort of like proteins and fats
versus carbohydrates, right? It's that
slow burn. So, I found that if I try to
stack the early part of my day with more
like achievements and accomplishments
and then later in the day try to hit the
joy while the achievement and
accomplishment still present sort of in
my mental ecosystem, that stack often
gets me across this threshold that I
don't typically seem to be able to cross
with just joy and pleasure and leisure
alone.
Third is what I call loopholes.
Anhidonia is not always total. And so
what happens sometimes is you lose your
ability to experience joy from the
majority of experiences within a
category but maybe not all of them.
There might be one or two things in an
individual category that still work. So
if you take food for example, people
often experience so it's called physical
anhidonia. Basically, your sensory
inputs are kind of numb. And so, it's
sort of like I don't know if you lost
your if you ever got co and lost your
sense of taste. I did and I am one of
the people that loses my sense of taste
and eating just became this monotonous
chore because nothing tasted like
anything and I hated to eat food.
Andonia is kind of the same way. Like
your food kind of loses its flavor and
that's why a lot of people lose their
appetite when they're depressed because
it just becomes this thankless job again
for whatever reason. I'm sure there's
some nostalgia reason to it. I have
found that no matter how depressed I am,
cheeseburgers from a charcoal grill
breaks through for me. I don't know why
that is. I don't remember how I figured
that out. That doesn't matter how bad it
is. That is the one food where my body
is still like, "Yep, this is this is
pretty good." So, yes, when I'm
depressed, I eat a lot of cheeseburgers.
And that's okay because that's part of
what gets me through. You might also
experience the loopholes with like
socially, you know, maybe normally you
have this large, you have a lot of
different people you enjoy interacting
with. Maybe when you're really
depressed, you find there's really only
one person you want to be around. Maybe
it's your partner, your best friend,
your mom, your kid, whoever. You find
you still get joy from this. Maybe
there's one hobby or one very specific
way you play out that hobby that still
breaks through. So when when we're you
when we're looking for loopholes, our
world's going to shrink a lot. we're
going to end up repeating a very very
small range of behaviors over and over
and over again because they're the only
things that make us feel anything. But
if that's what it takes to get you
through, then sometimes that's what you
have to do. And the final one is
actually kind of what we talked about
earlier. It's very similar what you
described in your essay. It's what I
call apathyception.
And I I've heard he didn't use this
word, but I've heard Alex Hormosi, who I
know you have on here from time to time,
he's described something very similar,
which is basically the idea of like, do
I have to feel something when I do
things? And can I continue to do the
things that I know I should do, whether
that's because they're in alignment with
my values or because there's still
things that kind of raise my my floor
and prevent me from getting to a really,
you know, like suicidal or disabled
place. Can I keep doing them even if I
feel nothing? And it's harder to be
sure, but it's not impossible.
I I have to put myself in a mindset
sometimes of like reward is optional.
It's great when I feel reward for what I
do, but sometimes I won't because that
appears to be just a thing that my brain
does. Sometimes I I basically think of
it as like a glitch in my system.
Sometimes this thing doesn't happen. And
the worst thing I can do if this thing
doesn't happen is to stop doing the
thing that produces it. So I can choose,
it's a mindset in my opinion. I can
choose to not care about the fact that I
don't really care about this right now.
I can out apathy my own apathy because
who says I have to who says I have to
care? Why is that a rule? Do I have to
care? Can I do something if I don't care
about it? Yes. It sucks, but I can.
And it works.
That was a longwinded answer, wasn't it?
No, dude. That's I mean that's brilliant
and obviously very hard one between
personal experience and professional
research as well.
I imagine that a lot of people maybe try
to just sort of chase joy very
aggressively. Uh a ton of peak
experiences one after another. Is that a
solution? Just big injections of
excitement?
No. Having thoroughly experimented with
that coping strategy for an entire
decade, I can confirm that it in fact
does not work at all.
Dang it.
That
but that is I mean I think that is the
natural response, right? Especially if
you had like a pre-epressed period of
time when you enjoyed life and then and
generally enjoyed life anyway, right?
And then something shifts and you're
like I am not feeling the way I used to
feel. This this equation seems to have
been upended somehow and now everything
kind of feels like a slog. it feels like
a grind and it feels like the work and
the non-enjoyment is outweighing the
enjoyment. I think it is a very natural
response to say, "Well, then let me just
kind of increase the volume of the joy.
Let me spend more time on these things
or make them more prevalent in my life."
And it's just never going to produce, in
my opinion, anything beyond the moment.
I don't think we can get out of
depression by chasing momentary joy and
pleasure. no matter how strong or how
compelling it may be. And my metaphor
for this is basically there's two
approaches to life. You can either try
to do things that feel good or you can
try to do things that make it feel good
to be you. And th those sound almost the
same, but they are very very different.
If I'm trying to do things that feel
good, I am essentially externalizing
everything. I'm saying I am dependent on
external inputs to give me a reason to
live and a reason to keep going. And
anytime my ability to access those
inputs gets disrupted, I'm pretty much
guaranteed to feel awful.
I have gotten so much more value out of
spending time and energy on things that
make it feel better to be me on just a
normal average day than on things that
feel good when I do them. And these are
the very basic unglamorous parts of
life, right? This is this is your
physical health. This is sleep hygiene.
This is nutrition. This is moving your
body. This is having a healthy
relationship with substances, which
usually, in my opinion, is going to mean
like minimal or none. Um, this is paying
attention to how you talk to yourself
all day long because you're going to
hear your own voice more than you hear
the voice of every other human being
combined. And so the relationship you
have with yourself is tremendously
important. You are your body and your
mind are the gatekeepers for everything
out there, right? Every external input
has to come through you before it does
anything, before it means anything to
you. You're the road it has to travel
on. And if the road is broken and
nothing can get in, it doesn't matter
what you have in life. And that's again,
I'm talking about people I don't know
here, which is a dangerous thing to do.
But that's usually my conceptualization
or my theory. When you see, you know,
celebrities, famous people, talented
people, rich people struggle
tremendously with mental health and
addiction, in some cases even succumb to
suicide.
That's usually what I tend to think
probably happened. It's not that they
didn't have the things. They clearly had
the things. But did the things get all
the way to their heart? Did the things
matter to them? Were they able to feel
the things? And I I would assume
probably not or that would have gone
differently. The skill with which we
take care of ourselves
is the maintenance of that road into
you.
And if that road is blocked, if that
road is not well-maintained, it really
doesn't matter what is out here because
you can't touch it, you can't access it,
and it won't make you feel anything.
Yeah. Yeah, it's interesting the
difference between sort of what do you
do physically to prepare the system to
make sure that the road is uh as well
maintained as possible. I think a lot of
the time when we talk about well how do
we improve selft talk how are we more
self-compassionate how can we be kinder
and more patient when we have
shortcomings um a lot of that is kind of
top down rather than bottom up bottom up
being did you sleep enough did you train
enough did you eat enough did you see
some sunlight today did you speak to a
friend etc
how do you think about the other way how
much of a role does that have uh I don't
know I I I become increasingly skeptical
about being able to think your way out
of feeling problems
Um, I don't know.
I think they're both tremendously
important. I I would even argue they're
probably equally valuable in the net
overall outcome. But I do believe in an
order of operations here. And the order
of operations I subscribe to is
biocschosocial
because physical health is brain health.
Your brain literally lives inside of
your body. Your body is your brain's
home. And you're not going to be able to
have a physically healthy brain if you
don't take at least decent care of your
body. And this this actually kind of
goes back to something we were talking
about earlier, these poor treatment
outcomes, right? The the biological
component of mental health in my
experience is often skipped over by
professionals and we go straight to the
psychological and the social. We go
straight to the thoughts, the feelings,
the relationships.
And it this is this is a weird thing
that always comes up for me, but when
you see the commercials for like um like
erectile dysfunction medications and
they always say make sure your heart is
healthy enough for sex, right?
Before you try to produce joy or
connection, make sure your brain is
healthy enough to feel that. Because if
you're getting 3 hours of sleep a night,
snacking all day long, and then like
binge eating one meal at night, abusing
caffeine and alcohol, and you're
sedentary,
no, you're not going to feel great. Your
brain is not able to feel great. It is
literally not healthy enough to do the
things you want it to do. And no amount
of changing how you think or how you
talk to yourself or whether you're
assertive or have boundaries with other
people is going to change the fact that
your brain is lacking the resources it
needs to do its job. It works on a on a
system very similar to a power grid,
right? You've probably heard you've
probably heard that term. We only use
10% of our brains, right? Do you know
how that's it's kind of true, but it's a
halftruth? Okay. So, the implication
there is like that there's this secret
90% of your brain that's, you know,
never gets used and could be unlocked to
give you superpowers or something. That
would be stupid. Like, we are not that
poorly designed. Our brains are
unbelievably efficient. The the accurate
statement would be you only use about
10% of your brain at any given time.
your brain is, if you ever look at an
fMRI for example, you'll see like when
they say this part of the brain lit up
when this person like looked at the Mona
Lisa or did their taxes or whatever,
what they're showing is which part of
the brain was receiving blood, oxygen,
and caloric energy. So your brain is
constantly redirecting resources to
different parts of itself depending on
what it thinks you need for what you're
trying to do. But it's also important to
remember your brain is an organ. And
like every other organ in your body, its
primary concern for you is survival. And
so if you don't have enough resources,
your brain needs rest, blood, ox. So
obviously rest comes from sleep. Blood
and oxygen come mostly from movement,
right? Physical fitness. It needs
caloric energy which comes from food. If
it is lacking in any of those things,
it's going to go into a low power mode,
similar to your phone or your tablet.
It's battery saving mode because it
doesn't have enough juice and things are
going to run slower. The screen's going
to get dimmer. It's not going to be able
to do all the things it's capable of
doing. The least of your brain's concern
is making you feel happy. Your brain is
actually pretty indifferent to your
happiness. That's like the absolute
topofthe line. If I have nothing better
to do, sure. But if there's any other
more basic unmet need, that's going to
get prioritized first. And so, we've got
a lot of people who are, and I'm not
trying to be mean or judgmental. I don't
think we do a good enough job of
explaining this is our job in mental
health, and I don't think we're doing it
well. But we got a lot of people who
aren't checking these boxes and then
aren't understanding why it doesn't feel
good to be alive. It's like your your
brain doesn't have what it needs. It's
not charged. And so I I wouldn't say I I
think of it very much like an algebra
equation, right? Like one part of that
equation is not more important than the
other part of the equation, but if you
do them out of order, you will get the
wrong answer. And I firmly believe that
the order of operations is biological,
psychological, and social in that order.
And I think when you try to do them out
of order, you get stuck.
It's the difference between being
depressed and living a life that is
worthy of depression. Like, okay, I this
is not the sort of thing that would make
anybody feel happy. It's an easy
question, right? A hard question is how
do you make somebody happier? An easy
question is how do you make a happy
person more depressed? You go, well, I'd
cut them off from their friends. I
wouldn't let them see any sunlight. They
wouldn't move their body. They wouldn't
eat or drink particularly well. They'd
have no sense of purpose. They disrupted
sleep pattern. you go. Okay. So, if
that's how you make a happy person
miserable, we have to at least assume
that the foundation. So, if you're going
straight to an SNRI or or treatment
resistant, I I need to the psychotherapy
thing. It's like, well, I mean, it seems
to me like the foundation should be
laid. And that's not to say that there
isn't a use for those things on top, but
surely that should be the primary focus.
You would think so. I mean, what you
just described is actually a really
useful tool. It's that inversion
thinking, right? Like if you don't know,
if you can't figure out what you should
be doing to feel better, well, what
would you do if you wanted to ruin your
own life? Like if you wanted to make
things as bad as possible, and I
literally do this activity with people,
make all make the bullet point list of
if I wanted to have the the wor the most
depressing, anxietyprovoking, miserable
life possible, what would I do? And I'll
have people make all their bullet points
or whatever. And then I'll say, "Okay,
what do you think would happen if you
did the opposite of everything on this
list?" And that's usually like, "Oh,
I've never tried that." Our brains just
don't seem our brains are better at
identifying problems than solutions. But
when we use that inversion thinking
technique to to to answer that question,
it gives you the next step. The next
step is built in. It's just, well, then
do the opposite of those things and
you'll probably get the opposite
results.
It seems like you're suggesting that um
numbness isn't neutrality. It's more
sort of a shield born out of unprocessed
trauma. How's how so?
Well, there's a there's a different I
actually just made a short about this,
but
yeah, the the numbness that comes with
depression or anhidonia, it's not the
same feeling as like a nondescript day.
So, we all have those days, right, that
are just very generic days. Days where
nothing special, good or bad, really
happens. Days when you don't have any
strong emotional reactions to anything.
days that you're probably gonna forget
ever like you will not remember five
seconds of this day a week from now. We
all have those days. That's not
depression. That's not anhidonia. Those
would be more neutrality. This is the
absence of something that is supposed to
be there. This is the absence of the
ability to experience those things even
in the presence of stimuli that should
create them. And that's again sometimes
where the line is between pathology or a
mental health diagnosis and just like
just life is not great for me right now.
Because I think we do all have even
longer periods of life where things are
just kind of blah, kind of mundane and
we don't necessarily wake up happy or
excited or thrilled but that doesn't
mean you're depressed either. You just
might be in kind of a rut, right?
Yes. Yeah. It's I think one of the main
challenges that people will face here is
kind of feeling at war with your own
mind.
Like hang on a second, you're supposed
to be here serving me, making my life
better, improving my day-to-day
existence, and I am my own worst enemy
here. Especially if you've got the
additional shame of ostensibly nothing's
wrong. I'm not on the verge of
bankruptcy. I didn't just lose my job.
My mom didn't die. you know. Okay.
So, you are exclusively the architect of
your own prison here. Not only are you
the prisoner, but you're also the prison
guard who's holding the keys. But
actually, you're kind of not holding the
keys cuz it's not as if you meant to put
yourself in here. And it's also not as
if you know how to get yourself out. So,
yeah, there's this I don't know, a sense
of cosmic unfairness. Like, why do I
need to work so hard?
Yeah.
To be happy. Everybody else like they
just [ __ ] it just comes to them for
free. You tell me I'm going to leave the
gym with a coffee in my hand, playing my
favorite song, talking to my friends,
and the sun's shining and the birds are
tweeting. It's like, why? Why? Why? Why?
That just feels unfair.
Well, it looks that way. It's important
to remember, we were talking about high
functioning depression earlier. Some of
the people who you look at and you
think, man, it's easy for him. Why can't
I just be like that guy? Some of them
are not the guy you think they are. Some
of them on the inside feel exactly the
same way you do. That being said, I'm
not saying that's everybody, right? I
really do believe there are healthy,
welladjusted people out there who
inherently enjoy life unless something
aversive is happening to them. I don't
meet a lot of those people, but I do
believe that they exist.
It is unfair and that's not something I
shy away from. Having a chronic mental
illness is an unfair thing to be saddled
with. There's I don't have I don't have
an explanation for that that's going to
make you feel better about it. I I don't
have a a pep talk I can give you where
like oh here's why it's okay here's why
it's cool because I struggle with those
same thoughts too to be honest with you
but what I have decided is it simply
exists right if if this is just
something that is true of me I basically
am back to I have two options I can
pretend that it is not true of me I can
live the way I perceive other people
living which is that they don't have to
be on their agame all the time about how
they live their life and how they think
and what their relationships are and
they can take this kind of lazy fair
approach to life and still be happy and
I'm just going to live like them and
just hope that works out. Spoiler alert,
it won't. Or I can say, "Okay, I I was
born with a chronic condition. That
means I have to live my life a little
bit differently." And I often quote I'm
using it differently, but I often quote
Dave Ramsey on this. So, I know with
finances, he says, "If you want to live
like nobody else, you have to live like
nobody else." Right? Meaning if you want
to have a degree of financial security
more than what most people have, you
can't spend like them. You have to have
different habits and different
relationships with money. If you want to
have a level of mental health and just
emotional stability and contentment from
life that is more than what other the
people around you have, you can't you
can't just copy their template. You're
going to have to do something
differently, probably a lot of things
differently. And that is unfair. And if
you want that outcome, it's still what
you have to do.
Mental if you have a chronic mental
health condition, then managing your
mental health should not be a side quest
in your life. And that's what most
people do. They they they put other
stuff at the forefront and they say,
"I'll take care of my mental health when
I can, when I have time." Which we're
busy adults. There's not a lot of that,
right? Those are things that are in
short supply.
You wouldn't necessar if I like live
streamed 24 hours of my life. I don't
know that it would look dramatically
different than most people's, but I put
my mental health needs at the forefront.
That's the framework around which I
build other things because that's the
weakest link in my chain. If something
is going to take me down, it's going to
be my mental health. I know that that is
my Achilles heel and so I have to plan
for that. Now, as far as, you know, our
lack of control over the brain, again, I
know this is very frustrating. And I
know that because you have conscious
thoughts in the brain, you feel like you
should just have full autonomy or agency
over it, right? But what's important to
remember here, the part of your when you
think about your brain and you think
about like your thoughts, your
narrative, your decisions, you got to
remember that's a very small fraction of
the brain that everything you're talking
about there is the prefrontal cortex.
The majority of your brain is not
involved in conscious processing at all.
most of it is doing behind the scenes
work and in that way it does function
like any other organ. So yeah, it's
frustrating to not just be able to like
choose to be happy right this very
second or flick a switch in your brain
and go to sleep right when you want to.
But you don't have that level of agency
over anything else in your body either.
You have to for everything in your body,
you have to coax it into doing what you
want. You can't just command it. If you
wanted to slow down your heart rate
right now, you could do it, right? You
could do it by slowing your breathing,
maybe doing a meditation practice, maybe
doing some progressive muscle
relaxation. There are things you could
do that would create that outcome, but
there's not a thing you can do in your
brain where you're just like, heart,
slow down, right? You you have to you
have to do some kind of middleman
activities that make that organ do the
thing you want it to do. You can't
consciously control your digestion, but
there are practices we can engage in
throughout the day that improve our
digestion, right? That's how the brain
is. You can't just brute force it into
doing what you want it to do. And in
fact, if you try to do that, you
actually usually get farther away from
your intended outcome. But if you
understand how it works and if you
understand a how brains work in general
and b as a person with xyz mental
illness, here's how mine is different
from the average and here are the
additional steps I have to do to get the
desired outcome. Well, then your choices
are do them and usually get that outcome
or don't do them and be miserable all
the time. And I'm not trying to I'm not
trying to be trit or put the blame on
people, but at some point we do have to
make a decision and say, "I accept that
I have a chronic health condition and
I'm going to do what I can do to manage
it." It's functionally no different than
if you say, "I have diabetes.
I can either take my insulin or not take
my insulin. I can either follow my
nutritional plan or not follow my
nutritional plan." But the consequences
for not doing the things I need to do to
manage my chronic illness that isn't
necessarily my fault that I have. The
consequences are high and that's
ultimately where my agency is is I can
manage it or not.
Yeah. It's
a kind type of tough love I guess to
say.
That's why I strive I appreciate that
because that's what I'm going for.
Sometimes I worry I go at least by
therapist standards I think I drift a
little more into the tough side of
things than a lot of therapists would.
So I appreciate that. Look, you're
trying to motivate people to take some
action. And I think exactly one of the
challenges of modern psychotherapy and
one of the reasons that stuff like ACT
and CBT is having a a good resurgence at
the moment is that it actually gives you
something to do about it. We're going to
do something as opposed to it just being
this
rum temptation of rumination sort of
cyclical talking about the same thing.
and it's hard and I see you and that's
difficult and oh yeah that must be and
you go dude I mean that is huge lots of
people don't have anybody in their life
that says yeah man that sucks that was
tough that was really hard that you went
through that thing but after a while
there's okay and what are we going to do
about it right and if you can do
something about it whilst you've got
somebody that's saying yeah that's tough
and that must have been really really
hard if you can have that at the same
time I imagine that the progress is is
even quicker
exactly and I and I do think it's it
helps to know that the person saying
this isn't just some academic, not
there's anything wrong with scientists
obviously, but I'm not just saying, "Hey
guys, I've read the research and the
research says this is what we should be
doing. Um, in fact, some of the things I
say aren't always completely congruent
with the research." But I my life is a
41-year case study. It's a 41-year case
study of chronic depression. And I can
tell you that at least for me, here are
the things I tried early on that
produced very, very poor outcomes. here
are the and made my life miserable. And
then here's the things I've been doing
lately that have made me less miserable.
And my theory is that this is a a
replicatable outcome. And and that I
don't know that I am so unique that this
only works for me and nobody else. And
and that's essentially my core
hypothesis is that my results are
generalizable by sharing the case study
that is my life with people. And usually
if I if I do come off snarky or mean,
it's because I'm thinking of me because
sometimes I'm a little irritated.
Yeah, this isn't directed at someone
else. It's directed at myself.
I'm actually talking This is just me
talking to my younger self. And if you
get caught in the crossfire, I'm sorry
because I'm still a little frustrated
with him for some of the things that he
did.
Yeah.
But I also understand I mean I I do know
what it is to be in that dark place. And
at my lowest, something a lot of people
don't know is that up to 40% of people
who experience severe depression
experience psychosis with it. We think
we hear psychosis, we think
schizophrenia or or psychotic disorders.
Severe depression has a high frequency
of psychosis.
What is psychosis?
Psychosis means in some way, shape, or
form, you're disconnected from reality
to the extent that you're experiencing
hallucinations, delusions,
derealization, depersonalization, things
like that. For me, it was more the
latter two. So, I alternated between
thinking either maybe I don't really
exist or maybe the world doesn't really
exist. And this is the timing of this
was terrible, too, because early
adolescence is when The Matrix and The
Truman Show both came out. The vocals
did not help.
Not good for the depersonalization and
derealization because then I'm like,
"What if it's true?" Um, so that was
terrible timing, frankly. I I resent
them for that. No, I'm just kidding.
Those are great. Um, but yeah, I mean, I
like literally I didn't even know if I
was real. I just walked around like this
this might all be fake. this might all
not even matter. I remember I would for
a long I had about a month sophomore
year of high school where I was
basically mute. I didn't talk to
anybody. I just walked around with my
headphones on all day long listening
this like this one minute instrumental
chanting song on repeat for like I mean
it was a really it's funny now
looking back at it I'm like that is
fairly disturbing that that happened but
that I mean that's how bad this stuff
can get. And so, yeah, when I tell
people like you're going to have to work
really hard if you want this to not ruin
your life forever, that's that's because
I know how bad it can get. Like, if if
you take a person like that, like me at
my lowest, there's not going to be one
or two little tweaks that you make where
it's like, "Oh, this is fine now. This
is going to require an overhaul. This is
going to require dramatic change,
dramatic modification because you are up
against something big. And we don't
defeat big challenges. We don't defeat
massive enemies or demons with like
let's just make one or two little tweaks
here. Like no, it's going to be
everything. is going to be a fundamental
overhaul of how you live, how you think,
and how you interact with the world and
the people in it because you want to
have a fundamentally different outcome
than the one you've been experiencing.
And there's going to be a proportional
relationship between the amount of
change you make in what you are doing
and the amount of change you get in your
outcome.
Has being a psychologist ever made your
own mental health harder to manage? Is
there such a thing as too much
self-awareness? Yes, actually. Oh, I'm
so glad you brought that up. I I do
think there is such a thing as too much
self-awareness. I mean, it's like almost
everything in life, I think, exists on a
bell curve. And we we tend to cons we
tend to confuse bell curves with linear
relationships because we start from the
bottom and work we work our way up and
we see progress. Um, this is there's
going to be a slight tangent, but then I
I promise I will actually answer that
question. There there's a fascinating
concept in psychology called the Jüks
Dodson law. The Jüks Dodson this is from
industrial organizational psychology.
It's like psychology of the workplace.
The Jüks Dodson law is a graphic
delineation of the relationship between
stress and productivity.
And most of us tend to perceive that as
a linear relationship. If you
conceptualize stress as like how much do
I care about this thing? How much do I
remind myself how important this is and
all the good things that'll happen if I
do it and all the bad things that
that'll happen if I don't? That's
stress, right? And productivity is, you
know, how well do I do? Do I do this
thing on time? Do I do it well? Do I do
it frequently? We tend to think that
that's a linear relationship because at
some point in all of our lives, we
probably had a thing we didn't care
about very much and we didn't do a good
job of it and then someone said, "Hey,
you should care about that thing more."
And we cared about it more and we did
better. And we're like, "Aha, I figured
out the secret of life." But there's a
point where caring becomes
counterproductive. There's a point it's
a it's an inverse curve. So there's a
point where stress becomes
counterproductive. And you could think
of that really simply as like a job
interview. So think about it's a massive
continuum. You think about three data
points, low, medium, and high stress. If
you go to a job interview and you don't
really care about the you're like, I
don't really want this job. I'm kind of
just doing this as a formality. I
probably wouldn't accept it even if they
offered it to me. You probably won't
come across great in that interview. You
might come across as a little detached,
a little arrogant. You're probably not
going to wow them because you don't care
enough. And so there's this sweet spot
in the middle, right, where it's like, I
think this job would be really good. I
would like doing it. It would pay well.
It would be important to me. And I think
I'd be good at it. I think I could offer
a lot to this organization. That's that
midpoint, and that's where you're going
to do well. But then there's high
stress, right? this is a
once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. I need
to make sure I don't screw this up. Uh
this would be lifechanging if I got this
job. And most people don't do well under
it. It inverts back to it kind of looks
like you don't care because you're so
consumed with your own thoughts and your
own emotional distress that you don't
perform well. And that can be true with
almost anything. And I believe that can
be true with awareness. When we have
very very low self-awareness and we gain
some self-awareness, we're like, "Oh, I
know why I do that now. I figured out
why I have this unconscious pattern that
was kind of frustrating me and
frustrating the people around me. That's
great. Now that I realize what's
happening, I can take agency and I can
modify that pathway." Cool. But then
there definitely is a point and I have
experienced this personally where you
start second-guessing and overthinking
everything.
And for me it was it was about three
years into my career actually. I had a
supervisor. She was great, but she was
like super awareness focused and she
would always be like, "Why are you
saying that?" You know, we'd videotape
our sessions because when you're an
intern that's what you do and she'd
like, "Why'd you say this? Why'd you do
this? Why are you sitting that way?" And
I'd be like, "I don't know." And I
started to I started to just overthink
everything and and all day long I'd be
like, "Why am I doing this? Why did I
say that? Why am I crossing my arms
right now?" And I sucked at therapy
because I couldn't get out of my own
head. And so I believe there absolutely
is such a thing as too much awareness.
And I actually think a lot of people
their default bias is already in that
direction. Especially people with
anxiety in particular.
I'm going to think harder, work harder,
be more obsessive, ruminate more. I'm
going to find out or a chat pt and me
are going to develop an intimate
relationship.
Exactly. And it's too much of a good
thing. And I think that's true for most
things like like almost everything. The
Jüks Dodson law is one of my favorite
concepts because I actually think it's
basically a rule of life cuz almost
everything works that way. Think about
fitness. If you don't train, you will be
in poor health. If you train some
certain amount, your health will
improve. If you overtrain, your health
gets worse again. You get injured, you
get sick, you can't recover. It's too
much of a good thing. Almost everything
in life is actually this bell curve. And
we perceive it as linear because
initially it looks linear because you're
climbing that mountain and you're like,
the more I do this, the better things
get. So, I should just max this out. And
we sometimes don't realize like, oh, I
fell off a cliff because I did too much
of that thing. And it happens with
almost everything in life.
Is there a a link between intelligence
and depression?
Yes, there is. And it's that is a
fascinating one because when you look at
most of the risk factors for depression,
they're all the things you would expect.
You know, it's like poverty, chronic
illness, social isolation. It's all like
bad things, aversive situations, right?
And then there's there's two that you're
like, "What's up with that one?" And
they're high IQ and high EQ, right? High
awareness, high high understanding, high
empathy.
Of course, as with so many things, we
don't know exactly why that is. I think
it mostly comes down to two things. One
is high IQ can actually be a risk factor
for social isolation. Not even
necessarily. It's like you don't have
friends. But think of it this way. The
So on an IQ test, the 50th percentile is
100. An IQ of 100 is the is the mean.
It's the average, right? An IQ of 70 is
a person with a mild intellectual
disability. So the discrepancy between
an average IQ person and an
intellectually disabled person is 30
points.
If you took an average IQ kid and put
them in a school for intellectually
disabled people, they're not going to
have a great time, right? It's they're
going to have a hard time bonding and
relating to people. The class is going
to go too slow for them, etc., etc.,
etc. So, that's that's a 30 IQ point
discrepancy.
If you have an IQ of 130, that's a 30
point discrepancy between you and the
average person. And so inter I don't
mean this to sound arrogant, but it's
just it's just the statistics.
Interacting with an average person if
you have an IQ of 130 is going to feel
like you're talking to a disabled
person. And if that's like I know that
sounds mean, but it's it's true. And if
that's what most of the world feels like
to you, that's actually not great. Like
it it it's it seems like, oh, it' be so
awesome to be ridicul like genius level
smart. I know some of those people and
they actually usually have pretty hard
lives. They they don't relate well.
What's the mechanism there that you
think between intelligence and
depression? Social isolation is one of
them, an increased ability to sort of
pattern uh match internally, rumination,
I think that's a part of it, but I think
it goes a little bit beyond that. So
when we talk about IQ, we are literally
just talking about learning speed. How
many repetitions of a piece of
information do you require before your
brain says, "Okay, I got it. This is now
I understand this and I know it." It
doesn't inherently translate to improved
critical thinking abilities. It just
means you learn stuff quicker. So, if
you have a high IQ person who gets
bullied, for example, they're going to
whatever the bully says like, "Oh,
you're so ugly, you're so fat, you're so
stupid," but like whatever the rationale
is, they are going to need fewer
repetitions of that painful experience
before it becomes a rule in their own
brain, before they accept it as truth
and accept it as reality. An average
person, a person with an average IQ
might have to face nine instances of
social rejection, let's say. I made up
that number. That's not the actual
number before they start to ask the
question, is there something wrong with
me? Like is the frequency of this is
such that it makes me suspicious that
this is a me thing and not a them thing.
A high IQ person sees the pattern more
quickly and therefore potentially
internalizes the negativity more
quickly. So they might get rejected just
a couple times and be like, "What the
hell is wrong with me? Why does nobody
like me?" Because it doesn't take them
as long to get to that point. There's
also this is sort of a a middleman in
the relationship, but there's also this
is really what I'm about to say is
inherently very depressing just so you
know, but there also tends to be a
relationship between IQ and and just
general awareness of the state of the
world and reality testing. Like we learn
everything more quickly. So we learn a
little bit more quickly that, you know,
at least in my opinion, the world in
some ways is kind of a screwed up place.
And for a lot of people that awareness
is like a slow burn. you get you get
kind of spoonfed little bits and pieces
of like, you know, this is not this
super happy idyllic place all the time
and you get time to adjust to those
disturbing pieces of information as they
come in. If a high IQ person gets
bombarded with a lot of that stuff all
at once, it it can completely overwhelm
their coping ability at a very very
young age and put them into a very very
deep hole that they inherently want to
think their way out of. And it's kind of
like struggling when you fall into
quicksand or break the ice on a frozen
lake. Like that struggling trying to use
the mental processes to get out of your
mental despair actually tends to put you
further and further down that hole. So
yes, high IQ absolutely is a risk factor
and is correlated with a higher
prevalence of mood disorders like
depression and bipolar disorder. And
those are my personal theories as to
why.
Be careful what you wish for in terms of
choice.
Yeah. Yeah. It is very much a
double-edged sword situation. Yeah.
fishes. Dude, you're awesome. Uh I I
love your work. You are one of the uh
very small bucket of psychology guys on
the internet who aren't spouting total
horseshit. And uh you've got some skin
in the game as well. I I really
appreciate you. Where should people go?
They want to keep up to date with all of
the stuff you've got going on. There's a
few places you can find me. I have I
have a YouTube channel and everything I
post on YouTube, I also just take the
audio out of it and put that on a
podcast. It's available on every major
podcast platform. My YouTube channel is
literally just my name. It's nothing
special or fancy. So, it's just
drcotters. I also post shorts on
Instagram and Tik Tok. Um, I offer
personal coaching on my website,
drcottilers.com.
And for the relatively small number of
people listening that happen to live in
Iowa, I own a private practice here in
Iowa, Northstar Psychological Center.
It's not just me, it's a group practice.
Um, so if someone's in need of therapy,
your psychological testing, and happen
to live in Iowa, look us up.
Heck yeah. Scott, I appreciate you, man.
Until next time.
Thank you so much, Chris. Truly
appreciate it. It was a pleasure. Take
care.
Congratulations. You made it to the end
of the episode. And if you want more,
well, why don't you press right here?
Come on.