Video summary
The "Market Maker" podcast recently shifted its format to provide quick analyses of major market deals before diving deeper into the details, covering various headlines such as SpaceX's earnings and AstraZeneca merger talks before focusing on Sainsbury's sale of Argos for £120 million. This transaction involves a newly formed private equity firm called Swift Partners, led by former Morrison's executives Richard Penny Cook and Trevor Strain with backing from True Capital investors. Although the exit price is significantly lower than the original acquisition cost of £1.4 billion in 2016, market reactions have been positive because the deal allows Sainsbury's CEO Simon Roberts to refocus entirely on its core grocery business by shedding non-core assets that carried high lease liabilities and contributed little profit despite flat sales growth around £4bn revenue.
Argos will continue operating independently under Swift Partners' management without any immediate store closures, marking a significant moment for the retailer which once boasted peak catalog circulation of 20 million copies per year but has struggled against Amazon due to low margins and a lack of brand loyalty. The sale represents part of broader globalization trends affecting those who grew up in the '90s, with Richard Penny Cook sharing nostalgic memories of circling items in Argos catalogs as a nine-year-old amidst pages filled with white goods and clothes drying racks. Rather than adopting a "doom and gloom" narrative often found in headlines about the UK high street, the reality suggests that workers are preserving their jobs or potentially thriving under new strategic direction, while Sainsbury's stands to see its earnings per share increase by eliminating interest payments on lease liabilities for an asset that was barely generating profit.
Ultimately, this corporate spin-off invites viewers and investors to look beyond sensational headlines to understand the complex structures behind such deals, questioning whether Swift Partners' new retail expertise can revive Argos or if it remains strategically peripheral to Sainsbury's future. The podcast concludes by encouraging audience engagement on critical questions regarding the viability of Argos under its new leadership versus concerns that Sainsbury's may have made a mistake in spinning off this specific asset, highlighting how strategic decisions often require looking past surface-level financial figures and emotional nostalgia for long-term business health.
Read the full video transcript
Hello and welcome back to the Market
Maker podcast. But before we begin, just
a quick heads up. We're going to go back
to a format we've tried before. A lot of
people said they liked it and it's going
to be a quick take on a few of the big
deals that have happened and then we're
going to go into a deep dive. So, just
for a bit of flavor, we've had SpaceX
earnings shares sunk after they revealed
huge AI spending plans. Then there was a
really big one. I know that, Stephen. I
was peppering you on WhatsApp uh last
week. Astroenica holding talks of
Bristol Myers Squib over a $400 billion
tie-up and I just, you know, they're
such big names, such staple names and
such a big number. Thought quick word on
that. Um and then actually I met up
earlier in the week for a coffee with a
guy who used to be a prop trader 20
years ago. Uh he's now very senior at
the Hong Kong Exchange based in London.
and he was telling me just how busy his
team in Hong Kong have been with all of
the gang buster kind of listings that
are coming to market at the moment. And
one I did see was one we've had an
episode on before which was Shien who's
coming back or attempting at least to
the IPO market. Uh then we're also going
to comment on Snap, another another one
we've touched on before. Um a bit of an
update there and then a deep dive. So
quick touch on some headlines. The deep
dive sainsburries has agreed the sale of
Argus to PE partnership swift partners
and we're going to look at the strategic
rationale take a tour through what's
been a pretty turbulent corporate
history of Argus. I'm a huge fan and in
fact Stephen
last week I bought something from Argus.
First quiz of the day what do you think
I bought? It's a very very good
question. Well, I know. And last week
you were in New York, so I'm going to go
like an adapter.
>> Some kind of travel adapter.
>> Uh, no. I'll give you one more guess.
Not It's not New York. It's not travel
related.
>> You got to give me You've got to give me
a hint, though, because just mean, as
we'll find out, the amount of things
that Argos sells is pretty
>> It cost me 20.
>> It's a interesting one.
>> Very interesting. I'm going to say like
a little juicer. One of those little
juicers. Do you know that's a pretty
good It's a pretty good train.
>> Okay, [laughter] let me grab it. Give me
one second. Let me grab it.
[clears throat]
>> All right. Okay,
>> here we go.
>> Look at this puppy. Can I don't know if
you'll be able to see it. My camera.
>> Yeah, very nice. That is really nice.
>> That's the Casio AW9H
9VF. Of course, 1980s classic.
>> Analog and digital readout. I mean, you
don't get That's 20 pounds well spent
right there, my friend.
>> There is absolutely nothing smart about
that watch, and I love it. [laughter]
>> Um,
>> oh, I can't wait to talk about Argos.
But, um, let's, uh, yeah, should we
start before I begin though, you did
mention I was in New York and the only
thing I'm gonna say is I got stopped in
New York. I was sat outside the hotel
and I was waiting for an Uber and two
two guys came up to me and said, "Uh,
are you Ant on the Market Maker
podcast?" And I've said this before, I'm
always a bit like, should I say yes,
should I say no? But they were in a
shirt and she knows I thought I'm in a
safe place. [laughter] And they said,
"Yeah, we're we're on our summer
internship in investment banking. Shout
out and kudos to you, Stephen." They
said you were guiding them through their
interview process and it was absolute
gold for them. So, shout out to those
guys. And also Miles Goas who is someone
who reached out to me on LinkedIn and he
heard an episode I did ages ago with a
lady called Chloe Shepard who's a repo
trader here in London. And now he's
going to be joining her desk for a
12-month internship. Uh he's the first
in his family to go to university. He
said he wouldn't have been able to
figure any of this stuff out if it
wasn't for the show. So, look, it's been
amazing and I love the comments, the
questions that people leaving on the
show have been picking up. So, whether
they're questioning our analysis,
sharing your insights, uh we love it.
So, please do engage. Uh we love to
learn, too, and we love to get your
thoughts and share it with a friend or a
colleague cuz it's the only way we're
going to really grow the show. We'd both
really appreciate it. So yeah, without
further ado though, let's let's crack
on.
>> Yeah, absolutely. And that's amazing. By
the way, and by the way, if anyone stops
me in the streets, I don't care if
you're wearing a shirt and chinos. You
can wear what you want. I'll still say
that I'm on the market maker. I don't
know what you're on about.
>> I did get most glamorous place I've been
stopped so far is Kiddaminster.
Yeah. So look,
>> shout out shout out to Kiddaminster.
Shout out to Kiddaminster. Massive. I
hear you. [laughter]
>> All right. headlines. So, um, SpaceX
earnings, this is our little headline
section. So, tell me, I've got a
headline here that says SpaceX earnings
a mixed bag. And you must be all over
this stuff. Yeah. I mean, the the reason
why I always find it interesting is
probably like a lot of people, uh, it
was my brother who was yapping in my ear
on the IPO launch and and kept telling
me 200, 210, 220, and I haven't heard
from my brother in a few weeks. Uh so
it's gone a little bit quiet because the
shares you know they are down around 30%
decline the share price post the IPO
hype everything that I was reading on
just the top level because this isn't
the deep dive section was interestingly
their revenue beat by a considerable
margin 7.81 81 billion up 92% yearonear.
However, when we were looking at as we
do with all AI orientated stocks, it was
the AI spending that really spooked the
market. So, yeah, quick take from you
then. With with Elon's strategy,
I guess there's two things. One is uh
his appetite to persevere with the AI.
We we did the deep dive when they listed
and everything you were saying was
really it's all hinging on the AI story
even though they have a Starink
profitable side of their business. So is
that still true? Now we get the first
look under the bonnet here of this
company in the public domain and then
two
what does this mean for investors who
are holding Tesla and and the overall
ambition of X and Elon?
Yeah, it's, you know, I think it was
quite a good earnings call, right? It
was, it was a beat on a lot of different
areas. Revenue, their net loss was only
541 million, beating estimates of a 2.21
billion net loss. Again, I think I
mentioned it last week, and definitely
check out the AI business model deep
dive if you haven't done already.
Once you're on this travelator, once
you're on the AI spend travelator, you
got to keep on playing. falling off is
not really an option, especially if
you've bet the farm. And when I say bet
the farm, I mean a $2 trillion potential
market cap story on the AI buildout. You
got to keep playing. There's no way that
Elon and SpaceX can stop being bullish
about this stuff. And then obviously
there's the Tesla story. Bring in Tesla
at some point. I think it's probably
going to happen. And then the whole
robotics story comes on board. You've
got it starts to all make sense in this
extremely sci-fi company. So yes, share
price was down, but that's kind of
expected because big AI capex is
prompting
uh slight bearishness, but you know, I
think it's a pretty good quarter.
>> Well, we're up and running, right?
>> Let's go. All right. Uh second headline
I'm going to talk about Astroenica and
Bristol Myers Squib. So this is a
British pharmaceutical company
Astroenica that you and many people
would have heard of and Bristol Myers
Squib similar size slightly smaller US
pharmaceutical company
opening talks to merge into a $400
billion bayamoth taking advantage of
things like economies of scale. maybe
slightly defensive because both parties
have a bit of a patent cliff. So when a
lot of their blockbuster drugs go off
patent. So maybe together they are
stronger. But what I love to read about
is the analyst view, right? And the
portfolio managers that actually invest
in this stuff. So Marcus Mans, portfolio
manager at Union Investment, the deal
makes neither strategic nor financial
sense.
Lucas Louu, portfolio manager at ATG
Healthcare. I'm not a big fan of mega
mergers. It kills innovation and agility
and would be growth dilutive for
Astroenica in the near term. And then
this is my favorite one. I want you to
comment on this one.
It was a quote from an unnamed source
that says, "This is the equivalent of
the World Cup uh forprofit fund raise in
terms of its strategic misstep and
terrible communication." So, what's
going on here? This sounds like an
absolute dog's dinner. Yeah. And I was
just having a quick type to see how many
people did Astroenica directly employ in
the UK cuz these this is a UK and a US
company, right? So Astro in my mind is
up there with like the BPs of the world
when it comes to it being identifiably
British in that sense. I don't know the
makeup of it completely in its investor
base. That's probably not strictly true.
But would that would this just not get
off the ground just purely off the basis
of that as well? Would that not be a
massive stumbling block?
>> Yeah, it's one of those strange ones. It
hits the headlines because there was a
leak or because there were, you know,
certain sources that meant that it was
front page of the FT, but is this thing
ever going to get off the ground? The
investors hate it. I think a
Astroenica's shares were down 9% on
Monday, last Monday. And yeah, it's not
going to get through antitrust unless
it's a acquiring Bristol Myers Squib.
Astroenica is one of the very few or
dwindling sets of jewels in the London
Stock Exchange's crown, right? So, yeah,
this isn't going anywhere. Question for
you. This sounds like when it's this
these two big companies and everyone's
saying this isn't going to happen. This
feels like maybe there were businesses
utilizing advisers to explore a few
options. this came up as one of the
options and then someone's gone to
someone has a relationship with the
financial media the FT run sources
it it feels like a a good outcome for
someone like Financial Times and
exclusive like this would you pull rank
as the banking team like let's say
someone at Astra or Bristol you know who
your financial advisers are let's say
pick two there one one is Lazard and the
other is Goldman's would you if you were
in that team and you were the senior go
right everyone line up
who spoke [laughter]
>> surely
>> yeah someone said something that they
shouldn't have done and this was quite
exploratory stage
>> yeah I think you I think you paint the
absolutely correct picture that so many
of these meetings happen or so many of
these discussions happen a little bit of
spitballing hey what if you guys got
together here you know some pretty
interesting synergies let's spend a bit
of time modeling this out and we'll come
and present it to you say the bankers
and then who knows maybe it's a long
lunch maybe it's a few drinks on a
Friday afternoon remember this news came
out on Monday so maybe [laughter]
maybe there was something going on over
the weekend that uh tongues got a little
bit loose and yeah there would probably
be a a cause for concern let's just say
but anyway I don't think it's going
anywhere what probably will go somewhere
heading on to headline three and I want
to get your take having just chat matter
to the guy at the Hong Kong Stock
Exchange, Shien. There's been so much
spoken about Shien, not least by us. I
remember a few years ago, Shien was
valued at almost $100 billion in the
private markets. So, is it going to IPO?
Where's it going to IPO? How much is it
going to IPO for?
Uh yeah, I guess it's
does it go locally or does it go to the
New York Stock Exchange which it has
attempted in the past 3 years ago.
Obviously lots of issues with a Chinese
entity over regulation, ESG surrounding
living wages, forced labor.
So does it just make more sense, I
guess, to just list on the Hong Kong
exchange? I guess the the appetite or
I'd imagine it's less friction and also
the the engine room is running on that
exchange at the moment. There are deals
to be done and you are missing out if
you're not part of that local action. So
there's probably a lot of impetus and a
lot of kind of uh renewed energy I guess
in that particular region. Um not sure
about the US scenario. We kind of we've
had this big pickup
but given SpaceX as well there's
anthropic coming is now optimal feels a
bit suboptimal to me from that from that
degree.
>> Yeah. I mean this is a company that's
not doing very well either and that's
and it's definitely worth mentioning. I
don't know whether Timu's taken its
lunch, but in the draft IPO Perspectus
last month, it swung sheen swung into a
99 million quarterly loss due to slowing
sales in the US. Remember, there was
that import duty exemption on small
packages. So for years and years, you
could send a small package from a
different country to the US and you
wouldn't get any import duty cuz it was
small. Donald Trump closed that loophole
and it kind of screwed Shien's business
model because it was small packages and
it was low value packages. So is this is
certainly not a great time in terms of
the story for Shien to IPO. Therefore,
it's not going to be at the hundred
billion. It's going to be more like 30
to40 billion valuation. But as you say,
is the story a little bit more durable,
a little bit more robust in the eastern
markets? Possibly. And that's why they,
you know, I'm not sure the it would it
would get through the LSE or or the New
York Stock Exchange from a from an ESG
perspective before you even go into the
is there a demand base for it. All
right, final one of this quick take
before the deep dive is a snap. And I
remember when we talked about Snap a few
months ago, you were highlighting how
there's some really interesting parts of
the business. There's an interesting
governance setup. But I guess from this
perspective to start with, we're right
in the midst or coming to the end of I
mean we're recording this on Thursday on
the 5th of August and the US stock
market record highs, baby. So
[clears throat] at the moment we're just
going gang busters. Earning season I
think we're 90% or the odd through. And
once again general take is things are
humming along despite everything in the
world that's going on. So, what were the
financial metrics that we've seen out of
Snap that we could take away?
>> Yeah, it's bonkers. I mean, you're
you're absolutely right. The earning
season's been quite remarkable. And
Snap, we discussed it on a on a podcast
a few weeks ago, and we can link to it
in this episode. It's one of those
companies I always look at and think,
gosh, they've got so many monthly active
users. I think 800 million. They're a
brand name. They should be competing
with the likes of Meta, put their market
caps down at I think it was sub 10 10
billion, right? [laughter]
And that's because they've got this
bizarre governance structure which means
that they can never really sell and Evan
Spiegel and the other co-founder can
never really relinquish control. But
anyway, Snap's latest earnings were a
success. The stock price jumped over
10%. Uh it was a revenue beat at $1.6 $6
billion for the quarter, 19% growth over
a consensus of 1.5 billion. It increased
its advertising revenue by 9% and it
increased its average revenue per user,
which is something we discussed a few
weeks ago, by 13%. Narrowing its net
loss. So what's kind of interesting is
when we're looking for signals in the
market of slowdowns and speedups, right?
in terms of economic growth, in terms of
confidence, in terms of the health of
the market or the health of corporations
and businesses, advertising is one of
the places that we look to straight away
because if I'm a little bit negative or
a little bit bearish or a little bit
concerned about the future of my
business, one of the
purportedly discretionary parts of my
cost base is advertising spend. And Snap
is not. If I'm a marketeteer and I'm
looking at my advertising spend, I'm
going to go, "All right, I'll keep the
meta stuff. That's that's almost the
non-negotiable. I might keep the
LinkedIn stuff if that's my my target
market." Snap is a little bit
discretionary. So the fact that these
guys are up 19% quarteron quarter that
is pretty positive in terms of the story
for the health of the economy in
general. So what it it doesn't mean that
much for Snap. I mean it's a good thing
for its investors up 10%. But I think it
tells a a more instructive story for for
the economy as a whole.
>> Yeah. And just talking about the economy
as a whole, when you're thinking about
people spending money, businesses
spending money, you know, the
oil price has dropped sharply. Uh, you
know, we were down, we dropped 11% in a
two-day slump. I mean, who knows where
we'll be by the time this show airs,
which is literal days, but in the oil
market, obviously in the Middle East,
that's a long time, but it's looking
like the straight of Hamus is going to
reopen. Oil prices have dropped. CPI was
already down in the prior print. The Fed
aren't going to hike as aggressive as we
might have originally thought. So from
from a climate perspective, you know, is
there a little bit more continuity than
we thought just a few weeks months ago
when we're right at the height of this
kind of dual force or risk of the
emergent uh oil price shock from what's
happening in the humus with the AI
bubble or not scenario. Maybe the
corporate earnings have just smoothed
that out, you know, a little bit of
confidence.
>> Yeah. And look, the markets moved so
quickly, and this is why I've always
slightly preferred corporate finance and
investment banking. I think on the
podcast that we did last week, we were
talking about the massive fall in the
South Korean uh stock exchange, the the
Cosby, the index, uh, and then it
entered bull market territory like a day
later. I'm so confused. [laughter]
>> I'm feeling great now. Yeah. Basically,
whatever you do, don't open your day
trading account. Just just
>> look, just sit, keep calm, and carry on.
That's that's the age old, you know,
phrase that holds true in investing.
>> Absolutely.
>> All right. Well, look, let's move on
then and let's talk a little bit about
this headline where Sainsbury has sold
off Argus to a newly formed Swift
Partners. I couldn't believe the numbers
when I saw your notes of Swift partners
paying, am I right?£120 million
and Saints Reese has paid 1.4 billion.
Am I reading that right or is that a
typo? No, that's absolutely right. It's
staggering that this thing and we're
going to get on to our kind of mutual
love of Argos. I'll give you a couple of
stories as well maybe. Uh this thing
that employs 14,000 staff. It's got 466
doors. It is worth
£120 million.
How is Again, it's one of these things
that you just have to take a step back
and just go, huh, wait a second. Going
to go back to the cursor being worth $60
billion, right? [laughter]
this thing that is such a staple for so
many Brits and maybe quite importantly
so many Brits of a certain age.
We'll see from hopefully the comments
that this thing is being sold off
basically for spare change as a non
central strategic asset of the massive
supermarket chain Sainsburries.
So, so just paint me a picture then. So,
what's happened in the past? How have we
arrived where we're at? What's the
structure of it? And then how is it
being received?
>> Yeah. Well, I tell you what, I'm going
to I'm going to say something before I
begin and before I give you the headline
terms. Do you know I used to work at
Argos?
>> Oh, so were you back or front of house?
>> Back of house.
>> Oh, okay. So, anyone that knows Argos,
what it used to be, and it's still the
same actually, uh, you used to go into
this store and you'd have a very, very
small area with lots of little terminals
and the Argos cataloges, physical
cataloges, and you' thumb through the
catalog for the thing that you wanted.
You'd find the code, the numerical code.
You'd fill it out with a little pen on a
tiny sheet of paper. You take those
codes represent the things that you want
to buy to the checkout. The checkout
would go beep beep and you would pay
your money. Then you'd have a number, a
little bit like if you're queuing up for
a fast food, you'd have your number and
in the background in the kind of
warehouse behind the checkouts, you have
all of these little minions for which I
was one going away scurrying around
trying to pick up these items that
corresponded to these codes. And then a
few minutes later, these items would be
delivered. And there you go. That is
Argos. And I was I was part of the
machine.
>> When you were describing the pen and
filling out the numbers and then the
ticket on the screen, it gives me such a
warm feeling. It's almost like u
nostalgia and it was almost like you're
winning something even though you're
buying something.
>> Love it.
>> Yeah, I loved it. I still love it. And I
I tell you what, I didn't enjoy my job
though. Uh so I was working over
Christmas and I remember I had a really
really nasty boss and I'm sure that
people that have worked summer jobs uh
can empathize with this. and he kept
trying to trick me and kept trying to
kind of see whether I was passionate
about this job. So in the on the kind of
uh aisles and aisles of different
products that Argo sells,
if stock got below three of a particular
item, you're supposed to raise an alert.
That was a protocol. And I I tell you
what, my heart probably wasn't really in
the job and I just couldn't be bothered
to do it. So, so he would create
artificial scarcity and remove a couple
of the items and then tell me off for
not declaring it and I was fired soon
after. So, that was my Argos back of
house experienced.
There you go. You're just breaking
ground here. New insights shared into
the life and time.
>> Well, look, the career has taken off
since then, hopefully. So, anyway, this
is why this is why Argos is such an
interesting story. We could have picked
any story this week for the deep dive.
There's so much going on, but I wanted
to go close to home and I wanted to talk
about what maybe we would call the real
economy. So, the headline goes,
"Sainsburries, which bought Argos from
home retail 10 years ago for 1.4
billion, has sold off Argos to the newly
formed Swift Partners." So, this is a
newly formed company fronted by seasoned
UK retail executives.
And you think to yourself, gosh,
120 million, a 70 million quid payment
up front with the other 50 million being
deferred over the next 3 years. You
think, gosh, this has got to be a
shocking piece of news for Sainsbury's.
Share price has got to start plummeting.
What are these guys doing? What's Simon
Roberts, the CEO of Sainsbury's doing?
But markets loved it. Share price rose
5%. Uh which again subsequently kind of
flattened out. But it's one of those
things and we're going to dive deep into
sainsburries and Argos. It's one of
those things that although this is a
loss from a I bought it for a lot and
I'm selling it for not very much and
again there's different nuances there
that we can break down.
the simplicity of the strategy of
Sainsbury's CEO, Simon Roberts, who
basically said, "Look, we are going to
go back to what we do really well. We're
going to go back to being the country's
best grocery store supermarket." And
yes, we got a little bit distracted by
some of the
thought process around having lots of
different stuff all under one roof,
whether it's Habitat or Argos or to
their clothing company.
And now they're going, "Wait a second.
Actually, the business that we're
really, really good at and what we're
known for is doing really, really well.
It's growing moderately quickly and all
the other stuff is a bit of a
distraction. So even though we're only
getting 120 million for this thing, it's
off the books and we don't have to think
about it so much anymore.
It's interesting that it's interesting
because
I bought something for the toilet like
an air freshener uh diffuser from
Habitat. I buy two for my my children
for their pajamas and while I'm shopping
in Sainsbury's buying a Casio watch from
Argus. So [laughter] the old model seems
to work for the I must be a niche uh in
the in against the grain of the broader
crowd I guess. Yeah. And I mean Argos
has been doing pretty badly over the
last few years. It's had sales of about4
billion pounds which have been pretty
flat. its operating profit margin is
under 1%.
Bearing in mind that sainsburries
doesn't generate a particularly high
operating profit margin, but it's more
than 0.9%.
It's [laughter] it's not growing at all.
It's costly because there's lots of
outstanding lease liabilities. So Argos
has got lots of stores that have leases
and those leases are considered from an
accounting perspective to be debt. So
there's 280 odd million pounds of lease
obligations, lease liabilities currently
sitting on their balance sheet
associated with Argos. Sainsburries want
to get wants to get rid of that. So this
deal is not really adding any value to
the business from a underlying
profitability perspective. Yes, maybe
there's a little bit of convenience
factor for you, Ant, but it's not a
great business and therefore getting rid
of it even at the cost that they got rid
of it seems like a good thing to do.
Practically speaking, then what does
that actually mean? I'm assuming given
their pretty big footprint, Argus
employs a lot of people. I mean, you
don't see a lot of people physically,
but there's a lot of people behind the
scenes literally. So what does that look
like post deal?
>> Yes. Yeah. So it's it's not one of those
horrible headlines that
announces that another high street name
has gone under axing 20,000 jobs and you
feel extremely sorry for all the people
that were working at a place and and
suddenly are not. This Argos is going to
continue as a going concern. it the
staff will continue and in fact Swift
partners and we'll go on and talk about
these guys in a bit. Swift partners are
saying there's not going to be any store
closures and maybe there might be a few
additions. So this isn't a terrible news
story. It is just a classic case of a
spin-off of a not particularly
strategically important significant
part of a much larger group. And if you
think about it from a sainsbur's
perspective, like what really are the
synergies between, you know, a cucumber
and the products that Argos sells?
There's not a great deal from a supply
perspective, from an organizational or
operational perspective. So, it's
business as usual. Argos will continue
to exist
as standalone stores and within and
within Sainsburries. It just won't be
part of sainsburries.
when this was done in 2016 was it the
the initial deal? Who were the advisers
on on that at that point of time? Who
are the advisers and does the management
team see that as fault of the advisers
to say look this never was never going
to work in the first place or is there
acceptance of look this was just hasn't
worked for lots of different reasons and
then you re-engage with the same adviser
from a corporate scale perspective
because they already understand your
business and the asset and it's just
like following through with the the
continue analysis that you were doing
and then you just follow the process
that way or do you have clean slate
Right. Who's what's happening this time?
And and you bringing fresh fresh
eyeballs on it.
>> Yeah. There's a couple of ways to answer
that. The first is I'll I'll talk you
through the advisers. The second is was
it such a bad deal in the long run for
Sainsbur's? So the advisers back in 2016
for Sainsburries was UBS. And UBS is
their lead advisor. It's their it's
Sainsbury's corporate broker. Again,
when we teach banking, when we go into
banks and say, "Hey, this is what a bank
looks like," a lot of a lot of what we
say is, "All right, the goal of a bank
is to land, i.e. get a client for a
particular small part of banking. Maybe
that's payments, maybe that's security
services, maybe it's trade finance,
whatever it might be." and then use that
as a gateway into a much larger
longerterm relationship. And once you
are embedded within a company across
lots of different parts of your
business, then it stands to reason that
you are the first person that they will
call when you've got something strategic
and potentially a potentially quite
lucrative from a fee perspective. So UBS
have put in the hard yards over decades
with sainsburries and have got on this
deal. The other firm is Evercore. And
the reason why Evercore's on the ticket
is Roby Warshaw which was the firm that
Evercore actually bought the small
boutique advisory firm that Evercore
acquired. They helped Sainsbury's in
2021 for a kind of for a takeover
defense strategy. Remember when the
private equity firms were circling
around UK supermarkets following the
sale of Asda and Morrison's? There was a
threat that P would come swooping for
the big B sainsburries. So again, it's a
little bit of honoring of past
relationships.
And let's just have a very very quick
think about whether this was a really
really bad deal. So as I said, $1.4 4
billion. That was the acquisition price
in 2016. That's not strictly true. There
was a really complex series of
circumstances
when Home Retail spun this thing out and
it's to do with Home Base and selling
that on and it's to do with the
shareholders and getting them to agree
for the deal. Well, actually the actual
sainsbury's contribution for this 1.4 4
billion deal was actually only 1.1
billion. So that decreases it a little
bit. And during the course of their
holding between 2016 and 2026 or 2027
when the deal will probably go through,
they managed to spin off Argos's credit
card business for I think over £700
million. So when you actually tot it up,
it's not it doesn't look like such a
shocking deal. Yes, headwinds, industry,
internet, covid, whatever it might be,
but I wouldn't be firing my advisers
because they gave me some terrible
advice. This was a decent deal certainly
up until co up until 2020, 2021 and
you're shipping the credit card company
for 700 plus million. It's not too bad.
Good lesson there to always look beyond
the headline and understand the broader
context with then Swift partners. I've
not heard of them before. Probably no
one else has either. So who are they?
And you mentioned earlier that they've
got the idea of potentially expanding
the network of Argus. So
who are they? Who started it? What is
the money backing it? And and what is
their vision, so to speak?
Yeah, this is really really interesting.
What's so fascinating about the world
that we talk about and the and the world
that we exist in is there are players
across the whole spectrum of
size of check of investor base of type
of background of target company size and
you get all sorts of different things
that you think at the beginning of the
day I didn't know this thing but by the
end of the day I understand a little bit
more about Swift Partners and where
their money is coming from. So Swift
Partners, newly formed private equity
firm specifically for the deal for this
deal. So it's more of a kind of special
purpose vehicle created by a guy called
Richard Penny Cook who was a former
finance director for Morrison's from
2005 to 2013. He got his buddy Trevor
Strain on board who's also ex Morrison's
and they brought in an adult in the room
an ex-investment banker Matt Truman
[laughter]
who was uh a retail coverage banker at
Layman Brothers and then Latalie Namura
and JP Morgan. So these guys have come
together and said look we've got the
expertise we know retail we know
extremely well and we know how to turn
around retail as well. Where's the money
coming from? So, this is a a private
equity venture capital and consulting
group called True Capital. And I'd never
heard of True Capital, but I'm going to
give them their credit. Their website is
absolutely awesome.
It's like it is extraordinarily
welldesigned. I love their branding. So,
whoever did that work, fantastic. And if
you're a little bit of a bicycle cycling
nut, they invested in a company called
Zift.
So Zift uh is the uh you take off your
back wheel, you plug in, you put your
back wheel on a Zift and it connects to
the internet and connects to the
ecosystem and you can ride against other
people and it's very very cool. And this
was a $450 million round led by KKR but
supported by True Capital. So really
interesting firm focused mainly on the
retail side. They also invested in
Ribble which is another cycling clothing
brand. And I put a little photo of Sneak
Energy. Have you have you heard of Sneak
Energy? And I've not heard or seen sneak
energy, but I have seen in your notes
German Donna kebab. And you know what?
They opened a German Donna kebab in
Royal Tumbr, Wales. So in town where I
live. And do you know what? I'm I'm
definitely partial to a to a kebab.
>> Have you been to German Donna kebab?
>> No drinking is needed. So I went to the
German Donna kebab because I thought
this looks interesting. It looks like my
street. It was terrible. Like, oh no, it
was tiny portions, not tasty, not that
authentic kebab sort of experience and
it was expensive and it shut down.
>> It opened quite a big um unit shut down
within 6 months. So, I'm not sure about
these guys. Uh that was a bit of a fat
finger, I would say, with German Donic
kebab. I do not rate that company or its
food at all.
>> Okay, this is why people tune in to the
show. They want to get Ant's hot take on
basically running around going to Argus,
going to Arus shopping,
>> going with my kebab.
>> You're selling the dream. That's it.
I've made it.
>> But yeah, no, again, that sounds very
much straight from the private equity
playbook, right? you know, buy a brand,
squeeze it to make money, but also
decrease the quality of the product.
But, um, but yes, so they own Donna
Kebab and Sneak, which is a zero sugar
energy drink targeted to the gaming
community. So, if you want to stay up
all night gaming again, and I don't know
if you do that, uh, drink Sneak Energy's
cherry lemonade. Oh, Lo, limeade looks
absolutely disgusting. Well, hello,
anyone. I'm sure there's people
listening who have tried it or do drink
it. So, drop us a comment. Let us know.
Out of 10, what's your rating?
>> Shall we um shall we talk a little bit
about the history of Argos? That's why
basically cuz I've got a quiz that I
want to give you.
>> Okay. Yeah, let's go.
>> All right. So,
anyone of our vintage and maybe slightly
younger listen listeners won't even
comprehend what this thing is, but two
times a year in the summer and just
before Christmas, Argos used to release
the Argos catalog. And this was one of
the most exciting things for many
suburban youngsters. Comedian Bill
Bailey called it the laminated book of
dreams.
That's why he called the Argos catalog.
Um, and you know, it was very exciting
and you would go through the Argos
catalog and you look at the things that
you'd want, maybe circle them for your
Christmas wish list and things like
that. So my question to you, Ant, is at
peak circulation, how many Argos
cataloges were printed every year?
>> Am I allowed to know what year the peak
circulation was?
>> No, because I can't remember.
>> Okay. [laughter]
>> I'm going to go kind of late 90s.
>> Yeah. Yeah, it's going to be a long time
ago. So, pre- internet era when people
were magazine cataloged out to the max.
So, I'm going to say there's quite a
significant portion of the UK would have
been getting you would have been wanting
to get your hands on on this. So,
I'm going to say
12.5 million.
Tell you what, you're in the right
ballpark.
At peak circulation, 20 million Argos
cataloges are printed every year.
>> Yeah.
>> So, you're not a million miles away. And
over a bit, this is my favorite stat.
Over a billion Argos cataloges have been
have been printed in the history of
Argos.
>> It's a lot of trees, Steven.
>> That's a lot of trees. But again, it's
one of those things that it was such a
joyful experience, especially with our
consumerist hat on. And even now, you
explained the process of of picking up,
you know, a watch last week. To a lot of
people here in the UK, Argos is still an
extremely
viable,
useful, attractive business type and
customer experience because you can pick
something up the same day. You don't
have to wait until the next, you know,
the next day. even even next day
delivery sometimes isn't practical
enough if you need to go and get
something quickly. So, it's pretty well
liked by the consumer base. It just
can't really make money and that's the
problem, right? And that is the problem.
So, explain to me there like you're
saying it it can't really make money.
So, why not? What's the problem?
It's a really really interesting one and
again there is such a big difference and
whenever I'm talking about new business
formation with young people that are
thinking about entrepreneurship and
things like that there is such a big
difference between a really great idea
and a really really good business and
Argos for the consumer still is a really
good idea even in the world and by the
way it's been quite resilient in in the
face of the internet and Amazon. It was
growing during Amazon's main kind of
land and expand here into the UK. It was
still growing and it was still pretty
wellliked. It got bought in 2016 for 1.4
billion. That was not necessarily peak
Amazon, but it was certainly that wasn't
before internet shopping, right? So,
there's a number of factors that have
contributed to this thing flatlining.
We can talk about the problems within
the UK high street. We can certainly
talk about the sluggish economic growth
post post Brexit, post the year that
this thing was acquired by Sainsbur's.
So you can talk about slightly less
discretionary consumption. You can talk
about the the Amazon factor for sure,
especially with regards to consumer
staples. And one of the biggest problems
strategically from an Argos perspective
is I kind of have I kind of have a
little bit of loyalty towards Argos
because you know I've got that legacy
warm and fuzzy feeling about going to
the store and picking up my Christmas
present at the age of 9 or 10. But
because it doesn't really do anything
that is differentiated apart from its
interface with the customer, you don't
have to go to the aisles, you just pick
up the thing.
There's not really that much that's
keeping me going there if there is a
cheaper alternative because it doesn't
sell a lot of its own stuff. I'm not
really wedded to the Argos own brand dot
dot dot. It's just a intermediary that
is buying stuff, quite expensive stuff,
and selling it on for a relatively low
margin at a relatively low margin and
trying to compete against the economies
of scale of the likes of [snorts]
Amazon. So, it's again, it's slightly
stuck in that strategic no man's land
where it's not massive brand loyalty.
I'm going to go I'm going to make a trip
because I really want to go to X store
because I really like Xto and I like
their clothes or I like their products
and I want to make a thing of it or I
just need convenience. So, I'm going to
go to the cheapest thing or I'm going to
go online. It's kind of neither here nor
there. And that's what I hope well we
can hope that's what the guys that have
bought this are going to try and figure
out where is that unique
point of difference that can keep this
thing alive. So So is is that what
happened here then? There was as we
explained earlier you got those
brand building under one roof of
sainsburries like TUI and Habitat and
all the other brands that come with it.
Is it you mentioned there Sainsbursbury
is looking to lean that product mix up
if you like or brand mix to do what they
do best. So is this like an asset that's
perhaps unloved and you've mentioned the
people behind this new entity this
private equity firm who are all from the
retail industry buckets of experience in
that one discipline. So, is this just
let's just not reinvent the wheel, but
let's just make make Argus great again,
[laughter]
giving it care and love sort of thing.
>> Yeah, absolutely. And it's it's always
it's always worth thinking if I'm the
CEO of a company, if I'm the CEO of
Sainsbur's,
what interactions are going to be taking
up my time during the course of an
average day or an average week and what
am I going to be going home thinking
about? And it is likely that the
majority of my interactions as a CEO of
Sainsbury's are going to be related to
the supermarket. it's 80 plus percent of
their revenue. I will be speaking to
major suppliers, big uh property owners
to negotiate lease terms, whatever it
might be. So, I'm going to be thinking
constantly about the core business. I'm
going to be speaking constantly about
the core business with my external
engagements and investors. Whenever I
speak to those guys, they're going to be
asking me about my strategy and whether
Arlos is core to the strategy. So the
fraction of my day I'm going to be
spending on Argos
is like 0.1%. Maybe 1% whatever the
number is. Now this is a 4 billion
revenue company that employs 14,000
people. It again it deserves possibly
someone's 100% of their time or a CEO's
100% of their time. And maybe
that will unleash a little bit of
creative thinking and a little bit of
imagination with regards to the strategy
and the marketing and the business
positioning as well. Has any of that
strategy been revealed from the side of
the the private equity firm yet or is it
all yet yet to become known?
>> I think it's yet to become known. I
don't think I've seen anything in
particular apart from the reassurance
that it's kind of business as usual. So,
look, we we'll wait and see. We'll wait
and see what happens. I'm fascinated. I
I want it to succeed.
>> I I thought I uh read a piece about um
Penny Cook talking about reintroducing
the catalog.
One of those cataloges.
>> No. And and don't don't don't tease me.
I'm going to what I'm going to do as a
present for you. I'm going to get the
printed catalog and I'm going to get you
I'm going to go into a store because you
know you and I live several hundred
miles away from each other.
>> So, I'm going to get a little box. I'm
going to put it together and I'm going
to get one of the little uh old little
sheets with the little squares on it
with one of the little cheap plastic
halfsiz pens
>> and I'll play you can circle five things
Stephen and uh we'll see how your
Christmas pans out.
>> That is fantastic. I did used to go
through the Argos catalog and circle
something that I wanted on every page.
And bearing in mind there was a lot of
pages of kind of white goods and and
clothes drying racks and things like
that. And I was probably about 9 years
old. Maybe that was the inner consumer
capitalist in me just desperate to break
out. Uh so yeah, part of globalization
in as as a ' 90s child. But uh
[laughter]
but so so what to to summarize then is
this first of all it feels like a bit of
another shock horror story on the UK
high street where actuality is you go
beneath it it's not quite that
sainsbury's not getting as bad a deal as
those numbers suggest those workers
preserving their jobs if anything
there's the potential to thrive under uh
new direction and new momentum so yeah
is anything else I'm missing there in
terms of like key takeaways of the
story?
>> No. Again, it's it's one of those things
you read the headline, you think, "Oh my
gosh, Sains has had a shocker and the
high streets had a shocker as well, and
this is all not very good." Bit of doom
and gloom. But again, the reality is
this is just a strategic corporate
spin-off, which we speak about all the
time. Sainsbury's got a little bit of a
haircut, but actually it's probably
going to be earnings per share accretive
because they don't have to pay interest
on the lease liabilities. They don't on
the on the leases and they don't they're
barely getting any profit from the thing
either. So the share price goes up. So
again, it is a really important
little bit of learning to die behind the
headline. We always talk about this and
just go all right what is really going
on? What actually is the structure of
this deal? Who is actually making you
know good decisions and who might be
making bad decisions? What's really
going on here? And then you can talk
about it with real clarity and a little
bit more depth.
All right. Well, as ever, thank you
Stephen for sharing uh your insights.
But look, we'd love to hear from
everyone else. I feel like um we're a
bit blinkered in our uh devoted love for
[laughter]
Arus. So, I'm sure not everyone's quite
in the same uh depth of passion as we
have. So, yeah, let us know what what
you think. Do you think Argus is going
to uh survive and in fact thrive in new
leadership or uh do you think Sainsbury
is perhaps uh are making the wrong
decision here to to spin off this asset?
Let us know. Love to get your thoughts.
>> Absolutely. Looking forward to
responding to the comments as well.
>> Thanks everyone. Take care. Thanks, H.