Video summary
In this episode of *The Tom Bilyeu Show*, host Tom Bilyeu addresses President Trump's recent executive action declaring all Biden-era documents, including pardons and memorandums, null and void. While acknowledging the frustration such a move might cause for those released under previous administrations, Bilyeu reframes the issue by comparing unchecked corruption to gangrene; he argues that while removing specific bad actors is necessary, the true disease infecting American politics is "lawfare." He draws parallels between his own legal battles and Trump's current stance, noting how both have faced what they perceive as unjustified persecution through novel rulings. Bilyeu expresses a strong desire for an era defined by honor and integrity, criticizing the political climate where opponents are relentlessly pursued legally rather than addressing substantive issues. The discussion shifts to the nature of modern American politics, which Bilyeu describes as having become existential due to extreme polarization. He observes that both major parties have rejected compromise; Democrats view Trump supporters as fascists while Republicans dismiss calls for de-escalation by labeling them snowflakes. This mental battle has made elections a matter of life and death for many voters, leading to efforts to rig outcomes rather than accept results. Bilyeu suggests that this environment prevents great leaders like Nelson Mandela or George Washington from emerging today because the political atmosphere is too toxic for compromise. He notes his own difficulty in finding allies within either party who would advocate for stopping mutual legal attacks, highlighting how few people are willing to bridge these divides without being dismissed by their respective sides. Bilyeu then delves into a philosophical reflection on why society reacts so strongly to negative stimuli and the role of populism in current times. He posits that humans function somewhat like automata programmed with specific ideas, meaning significant societal shifts only occur through abject suffering or overwhelming optimism brought about by prosperity. In this context, he identifies Trump as a populist leader who understands how to fan existing flames of anger into an inferno, contrasting him with himself. Bilyeu admits he will never be popular in the same way figures like Nick Fuentes are because his North Star is self-respect derived from adhering to personal values rather than pandering to public rage or reducing moral complexity. He acknowledges that while some may feel these populist sentiments authentically, others might simply be products of their time reacting to a fractured landscape. Finally, the conversation takes an abstract turn toward AI and evolutionary theory as metaphors for societal development. Bilyeu suggests that if we are not in a simulation, reality functions exactly like one: stable yet dynamic systems require boundaries to prevent chaos while allowing novelty to emerge from individual actions within those rules. He uses historical examples such as asteroid impacts wiping out dinosaurs or bottlenecks reducing humanity to thousands of survivors before re-expansion to illustrate how life persists through catastrophic events followed by evolution. Ultimately, he concludes that the problem of evil exists because this dynamic system grants us capacity for both good and bad; however, AI offers a potential path forward where individuals operate within bounded rules yet create unique lives, fostering coherence without becoming an undifferentiated mass. He ends on a note of gratitude to his listeners who validate his efforts despite feeling like he is sometimes screaming into the wind.
Read the full video transcript
Good morning everybody. Welcome to
another Tom Bilyeu show live. I love
doing these. Trump has declared all
Biden auto pen actions null and void.
>> President Biden was swinging his auto
pen around, signing everything. And
breaking news now, Trump just officially
terminated every document, pardon,
executive order, proclamation, or
memorandum signed by the auto pen under
Joe Biden. This is a quote, "Any and all
documents, proclamations, executive
orders, memorandums, or contracts signed
by order of the new infamous and
unauthorized auto pen within the
administration of Joseph R. Biden Jr.
are hereby null, void, and of no further
force or effect. Anyone receiving
pardons, commutations, or any other
legal documents so signed, please be
advised that said document has been
fully and wholly terminated and is of no
legal effect. Thank you for your
attention to this matter." You know how
mad I would be if I had to if I got out
of jail and Trump was like, "Psych." And
then I had to go back.
>> Bro.
>> For sure.
>> And you just let a whole narco dude get
off and you're about to auto pen me. I
would be so pissed.
>> Yeah.
>> I'm running at that point.
>> So, yeah. God.
>> Here's my thing with this. Uh as soon as
I read this, I thought of gangrene.
>> When somebody has gangrene, you have to
amputate. And so, you might lose your
arm, your leg, whatever, but you can't
let the gangrene spread. Now, the
gangrene in this scenario is not the
auto pen. It is not that um people in
government have done something bad. They
most certainly have, and there will be
plenty of crimes to find if you want to
go after it. The gangrene is lawfare.
And I am
not surprised in the slightest that
because he was gone after, he is now
going after other people. Hurt people
hurt people.
Uh but boy, do I wish that we had
somebody in office that understood, that
could stand and give the following
speech. There's no one in American
history who has had the opposition go
after him legally harder than me. And I
believe that all of this was
unjustified. I believe you guys created
novel rulings specifically to go after
me. You had people like Letitia James
that ran to get elected by saying I'm
going after Donald Trump. Not I know
what he did, but that I will go find a
thing that he did to go after him.
Nobody has been persecuted like I've
been persecuted. And I'm telling you
right now that it stops here. And we
have to usher in an era of honor,
integrity,
uh virtue, and let's bring some of these
things back. Clearly is not capable of
that. But Jesus, do I want that to be
the message? Because the gangrene is
lawfare. The thing that needs to be
amputated is lawfare. Now, if you can
start anew and say, "Okay, listen. That
that past [ __ ] is the past [ __ ] And I
would talk endlessly about the fact that
the people actually running the
government during Biden's time referred
to themselves uh as the Politburo, which
is specifically a communist
group that runs the government. So, I'm
like, "Dude, that one to me, we all know
that I have my
I don't think it's weird, but I'm sure
many people map it as a weird aversion
to communism socialism.
Uh so, by all means discount the
veracity that I feel it, but
like that's crazy to me. And I still
wouldn't be going after them legally.
Now, you draw a line in the sand and you
say, "Don't keep [ __ ] around because
if you do something now, we're going to
come after you because we can't like let
this stuff stand." And so, now it's like
cool. Moving forward, everybody
understands that abide by the rules,
abide by the law. This is a new era.
We're not playing that game anymore.
What ends up happening? The thing that
people ought to be absolutely terrified
by is this will make elections truly
existential. Because now Trump is in a
position where if
a Republican does not win the
presidency, they're going to go after
him again. They're already talking about
to troops, hey guys, just so you know,
the statute of limitations is 5 years
for following unlawful orders, and
that's going to be long after literally
a quote, that will be long after Trump
has left office. So, what they're trying
to communicate is the troops should be
ignoring Trump because they will be
prosecuted after. It's like that one
enrages me. because of what it does to
the entire nation. And yeah, that that
is just stupid and people are locked in
this
mental battle where they are making
elections existential, which will make
people want to do everything they can to
rig an election. So, it's like, oh my
god, so dumb.
Um
My daughter is in high school now, and I
now hate high school. And I feel like I
have never had so many back in my day
like stories and kids don't do this and
you young folk in the hippity like I'm
I'm becoming that person and I never
thought I'd be that person.
>> We are all always that person.
>> Yeah, so I I hear what you're saying,
but you sound like a decent person
walking up to the DNC. Like, hey guys,
let's be friends. And they're like,
what? No, he's a fascist. And you go to
RNC like, hey guys, let's stop suing
everybody. What? You're you're
a snowflake, get out of here. Like, you
know what I mean? I feel like are are
you just yelling into the wind at this
cuz I I get what you're saying. And it
sounds good.
>> Yeah, yeah.
>> And I'm looking like, okay, maybe I'm
looking at Trump's cabinet like, no, he
won't say he won't say he won't say he
won't maybe RFK would say it. And then I
look at the DNC like, no, he won't say
he won't say he maybe Pete Buttigieg
might say like, I'm I'm looking at the
eighth person in line of the that might
say this thing and that's a might. So,
it's it's one of those things now where
it's like I I is this just we're just
going to have to let them burn
themselves on the oven and then we'll
we'll get to see the results. I wrote a
line about this in the upcoming deep
dive, which is um Nelson Mandela would
never come to power today.
Uh George Washington would never come to
power today.
So, I think uh even though I do believe
that the great man of history theory is
real, that great men really are required
to pull us in a direction, who we
consider great changes era to era. This
is a populist moment. So, I'm never
going to be popular the way that Nick
Fuentes is popular because I'm not
willing to reduce the number of crayons
that far.
Uh and my North Star is self-respect.
And I have a set of values, and when I
adhere to those values, I respect
myself. When I deviate from those
values, I lose respect for myself, and I
hate the way that feels so much that I
will only do the things that make me
respect myself, no matter what that
means financially, etc. I'm never going
to be popular in a moment like this
where I have to pander. I have to give
people back what they want. Now, some
people may just authentically be there,
and they're just they're a product of
their time. They feel those things, and
so they're not necessarily pandering.
They just really are that. And I'm
really not that. And so, to your point,
yes, I even considered not writing that
section cuz I was like, "Does this
really matter?" The reality is I am to
some extent screaming into the wind, and
thank you to every kind person that's
ever left a comment on YouTube that
says, "Tom, trust me. I'm listening.
People like me are listening." It means
the world to me, and if I thought there
were zero people, then I really wouldn't
do it. Um but nevertheless, I'm okay
with that because uh I'm only going to
say what I believe to be true. I'm only
going to say things that make me look
back and go, "Well, I at least tried
everything I could um to introduce these
ideas to more people."
So, yes, in a populist moment, you get
populist leaders that have far fewer
crayons, that understand the power of
anger, that understand simplify
messages, that want to
um not only capture the rage that you
already feel, but like really fan those
flames and make it a much bigger
inferno.
So, that that is what it is. I have a
very I have a super weird relationship
with humans and it goes something like
this. We are automata. So, we are swayed
by ideas, but we are automata that run
programming and because we run
programming, the only changes you can
make are changes that we're programmed
to accept. So, you can nudge people a
little bit, but for the most part, the
only thing that pulls people out of
these spirals is abject suffering. Just
brutality, war, death, mayhem, extended
poverty, or optimism brought on by
everything is going great. When I look
at that, I'm like, okay, maybe AI saves
us. It's possible. It's not likely given
people's reaction. I think that it will
the promise of AI will happen, but it
will be first we will suffer.
Uh and so, the bell that I think gets
rung first will be the suffering bell.
And history tells me there's virtually
no way to avoid that. You might be able
to elongate it, but ultimately the
trajectory only changes when you have
rapid, undeniable prosperity or massive
pain and suffering.
>> That saddens me though and I think
that's why I'm speechless now because
it's like
why do we have to learn that way? But I
guess that's this
>> This is where I say you're arguing with
God. So, whatever created us has saw saw
that to be fit that we're like that.
Now, having said that, if I can tell you
what I really think.
Okay.
Blind watchmaker.
Evolution.
>> Mhm.
>> But we're in a simulation.
And if we're not actually in a
simulation, it works exactly like a
simulation would work. Through every
ounce of time that I spend on Kaizen, I
realize
I'm trying to get the AI to run at the
individual level.
And it takes the least amount of compute
because you set up a bunch of rules and
then all of the novelty is born out of a
rule set existing at the individual
level and they have a certain amount
that they can change.
You have to bound it because if they
change too much they become an
undifferentiated blob and maybe the game
isn't fun, maybe it doesn't cohere. And
this is one of the reasons that people
wonder why is the universe so finely
tuned? It seems impossible if gravity
were just like bumped in slightly
different directions everything falls
apart. Once you program things in a
certain way
there's movement, there's change, it's
dynamic, it's interesting.
Um
and it's a closed ecosystem that
is stable. Like when you think about the
fact that life started on Earth somehow
some way
and took a really long time
but an asteroid hit the Earth that when
you see there are now AI videos that
will show you the scope of that [ __ ]
crater which is technically underwater
but like
it's insane. It is so big. And you
realized
oh, it didn't kill mammals.
Killed the dinosaurs and I think people
often think it wiped everything out.
This one little thing
stayed alive
and evolved and grew
and became us and then there's the
moment the Cape of Hope
where I don't I think it's a volcano or
something happened and humanity gets
knocked all the way back to like 3,000
people or something and then we
re-expand.
If I could create a game that had that
kind of like dynamic change and out Oh
my god, I'd be over the moon. So, it has
all these negative things.
But,
we've pushed the AI down to the
individual.
Like, the individual will lead a unique
life. They'll do It's bounded. It's
recognizable. They don't suddenly start
acting like an amoeba, but it's
it's unique. It's fascinating. It's
interesting. They cohere. They interact
with each other on like a known set of
rules that like sometimes sparks into
violence, but other times love, and they
have children. Oh my god. It is so
interesting. I get how we ended up here.
The problem of evil in philosophical
terms is a bitter pill to swallow.
That to make us
the interesting creature that we are,
that we have the capacity for both good
and evil,
but
we're pretty interesting. Thank you guys
so much for joining us. Means the world.
Love you all, and we'll see you next
week.