Video summary
Louis Theroux addresses the significant challenge of discussing issues facing men without being unfairly categorized under the broad and often distorted umbrella term, "manosphere," which he argues has crept out to include extreme elements like those found in the manosphere itself. He notes that while feminism is a vast bucket encompassing diverse figures ranging from maternal feminists like Louise Perry—who campaigns against rough sex killings—to super-liberal progressives, the online equivalent for men lacks such nuance and often lumps together vastly different ideologies under one label. Theroux emphasizes his goal to create a balanced approach helping both genders understand each other, yet he finds it increasingly difficult to speak openly about male issues like declining coupling or mental health without being lumped into audiences with shared demographics but divergent motives and treatments for the same problems. The documentary explores how legitimate concerns regarding men's self-improvement are frequently smeared by a moral panic surrounding extremist content online, creating an ideological no-man's-land where Theroux finds himself "spit-roasted" from both sides: accused of being too blue-pilled or misogynistic by the manosphere and legacy media respectively. He highlights that terms like "manosphere" have become highly inexact, often conflating evidence-based self-help figures such as Andrew Huberman, Scott Galloway, Richard Reeves, Jordan Peterson, and Arthur Brooks with far-right extremists like Nick Fuentes, Myron from Fresh and Fit, Justin Waller, Sneako, and even controversial figures associated with conspiracy mindsets. Theroux argues that this conflation ignores the massive gulf between those advocating for self-reliance, physical health, and practical life skills versus those promoting a narrow, paranoid understanding of gender relations and success. A central argument in the discussion is the necessity to address male-specific crises—such as high rates of suicide, drug addiction, violent crime, and incarceration—without first requiring an ideological "land acknowledgement" or prioritizing other groups' issues. Theroux points out that previous patriarchal role models have vacated due to fatherless homes and a shifting socioeconomic landscape where women now often outearn and outeducate men up to age 30, leaving young boys without clear blueprints for belonging and fulfillment. He contends that while the internet offers access to diverse information, including helpful content from creators like Huberman on sleep or caffeine intake, it also pipelines vulnerable youth toward extreme ideologies, making navigation increasingly complex for fathers trying to provide good role models in an uncertain world. Theroux further illustrates how specific insults used against him and others, such as being labeled a "looksmaxer," feel absurd given their lack of relevance to the actual content or intent behind male self-improvement discussions. He critiques the conspiracy mindset prevalent within certain corners of online communities that view men's attempts at rebuilding themselves outside approved therapeutic channels as inherently contaminated. The film aims to clarify these distinctions, showing viewers the extreme end of a spectrum rather than presenting all advocates for men's issues as part of a shadowy room or unified movement. Ultimately, Theroux seeks to separate genuine self-repair efforts from extremist propaganda while acknowledging that both worlds exist simultaneously and are often unfairly merged in public discourse. The conversation concludes with an emphasis on the importance of avoiding conflation between healthy male advocacy and harmful extremism, noting that terms like "manosphere" have lost their granular accuracy by encompassing everything from gym culture to far-right politics. Theroux expresses frustration at being accused of things he hasn't done or believes in, such as lookingmaxxing, which underscores the absurdity of how language has been weaponized against men seeking improvement. He maintains that while there is a valid push for more open dialogue about male struggles and solutions, this must not be undermined by using legitimate concerns to smear all efforts at self-improvement. The documentary thus serves as an attempt to thread the needle between addressing real societal shifts affecting men without validating or amplifying the most dangerous elements of online masculinity movements.
Read the full video transcript
The thing that's
weird for me or that's a little bit of a
challenge for me is that it's difficult
to speak to issues that men face
without being lumped into this very
broad term that sort of concept creeped
out to include manosphere. I mean, you
know, feminism includes maternal
feminists, someone like a Louise Perry
who campaigned against rough sex
killings and is very pro-family and sort
of the most anti-natalist super liberal
super progressive woman. Like you know,
feminism is a very big broad bucket term
that includes everything and I think
that manosphere is basically meninism
was just too weird of a term. So,
manosphere is sort of the online
equivalent of what feminism is. And
shared audiences
don't really indicate shared motives.
But I can say as somebody that I think I
do good work. I think I do I I I try to
create a a balanced approach for helping
men and women to understand each other
and improve their lives.
But it's a
it's a difficult needle to thread to
just talk to men
at all. And um you know, you use a a
small clip I think of Scott Galloway at
one point in in the documentary.
Um Richard Reeves as well from the
American Institute of Boys and Men is
sort of tangential to him or Arthur
Brooks. Like is Arthur Brooks and Scott
Galloway are they really the the [ __ ]
cutting edge of of misogynistic content
online? And then I see someone like a
Scott Galloway
talk about guys should be strong or or
they should go to the gym or young
people should go out and have
experiences and and make mistakes and
you know, he's concerned about the
decline of alcohol. He thinks that
people should be going out and getting
drunk when they're young and whatever.
Um
I think it's difficult or I found it
increasingly difficult to be able to
speak to the issues of men and boys and
what's happening with gender relations
and and sex and declining coupling and
all that stuff, it's been becoming
increasingly difficult for me to do that
without being
yeah, lumped in with
audiences that may cross over, but
ideologies that don't really have all
that much in common. And um it's made it
it's it's it's been a really interesting
challenge because obviously people are
pointing at lots of the same issues, uh
but the uh diagnosis and then treatment
plan uh diverge an awful lot. So, yeah,
it's it was very interesting watching
the documentary. I I hear that. And I'm
really curious to know, Chris, cuz you
mentioned earlier that you felt you'd
had a bit of
uh flak
for for something or other. Uh Are you
able to share anything about that?
Yeah, I mean I mean it's more general
flak. It's kind of
uh
rain rather than a atomic warheads, but
um
yeah, there's disagreements
around
typically it's that I'm too blue-pilled,
that I don't see I know the truth about
how men and women are supposed to
relate, but I'm not prepared to be
sufficiently militant or
harsh in my presentation of it.
>> I thought you meant that you'd had flak
from the legacy media. Oh, I've also got
that. I've also got that.
>> for being too manosphere adjacent.
>> Oh, that's correct. So, yeah, the
manosphere think I'm a blue-pilled cuck
and the Guardian think that I'm a
misogynist right-winger. So, I get I get
kind of ideologically spit-roasted from
either side. I've got sort of one in the
front and one in the back. Um but yeah,
the start of this year was
tons and tons. Manosphere influencer
Chris Williamson talks about this blah
blah blah blah blah blah. And I hm
That's interesting because the term
manosphere has now been inflated to
encompass
so much that it basically
it doesn't really mean anything. If if I
am the same as
if me, Richard Reeves, Scott Galloway
are the same as Nick Fuentes and Myron
and Justin and Andrew and Sneako,
well
I mean it
it doesn't seem to be a particularly
granular or accurate presentation and I
don't think that they would agree that
they agree with much of the stuff that I
say. If you were to put it to
sort of lay it at their feet.
Agreed. I mean it's the term is highly
inexact and and and actually you're
right. And I've been on Theo Von and
I've been on Joe Rogan and
I I like those guys and and and I know
those have been characterized as
manosphere.
>> Manosphere, Jordan Peterson would be the
same, Andrew Huberman would be the same.
And in fact, as you say, there's a huge
gulf
there's a huge spectrum within the the
so-called manosphere community.
We debated it a lot in the process of
making the film. I was I said many times
like I'm not about to make a film where
it's like look at these guys they like
to have big muscles and they want to
make a lot of money, you know, hustle
bro culture and whatnot. That's not I
don't find that interesting. I don't
find it particularly it might not be my
lane, but I actually I like working out.
You know what I mean? And I and I and I
feel like self-reliance can be
can be super important.
And and it's healthy to have a kind of
mixed diet of of kind of media intake
and
so my thing was like oh
and we do try and clarify in the
documentary like this is the extreme end
of a certain world and they are a
self-identified
community the ones we look at.
Um
they they very much see themselves, you
know, Sneako,
Justin Waller, Myron from Fresh and Fit,
they all they all they're all they are
all quite tight, those three.
Uh
somewhat adjacent to uh for Nick
Fuentes, in fact, and certainly Andrew
Tate is tight with them. It's a certain
So, there is I I think the more we can
avoid a conflation of
you know, everyone who happens to have a
male audience or everyone who advocates
for some sort of sense of like there's
certain things that are helpful for men
who tend to find helpful and it's good
for their mental health, you know, as
opposed to oh, the world's
run by a shadowy room of, you know, like
these kind of cons- it's very There's a
There's a conspiracy mindset in the
world that I was looking at. There's a
It's a It is quite a specific uh
rather paranoid, I would say um
narrow a kind of narrow uh understanding
of how the world works, a narrow
understanding of what men and women are,
narrow sense of what achievement and
success look like. Mhm. Uh and and that
was that was very much the precinct that
I wanted the film to take place in.
Yeah, I mean, you're right to say that
men's self-improvement often gets lumped
in with this stuff, but, you know, male
forms of self-repair are often treated
with suspicion.
It's as though sort of any attempt by
men to rebuild themselves outside of
approved
therapeutic and ideological channels is
is is contaminated in some way. If you
are That's a probably the best example I
can think of, and I'm sure that he's
been accused of it, Andrew Huberman, Dr.
Andrew Huberman of Stanford, is part of
the manosphere because what he talks
about like evidence-based ways to sleep
better or gain muscle or
how much caffeine you should have per
day or something. Um
it
it seems to be that there's sort of two
things happening at the same time.
One is a big push, of which I'm
like unapologetically a part of, that I
think that the issues of boys and men
need to be spoken about more. That I
don't think that we need to do this
ideological land acknowledgement throat
clearing before where we identify the
problems that all other groups are
facing before we can turn our attention
to men because we don't have to do the
same in reverse. We don't have to
acknowledge how many men take their own
lives or addicted to drugs or involved
in violent crime or go to jail or end up
home etc. etc. before we can then talk
about the problems of
girls and women. Uh but so
one thing is happening, which is
I think that there's been some
upending of
previous roots toward a sense of
belonging and fulfillment and status
that men
would have previously relied on. And I
think that that puts them in a kind of a
very uncertain world. Uh a lot of the
rules that they would have learned from
their parents' generations, certainly
their grandparents' generation, it's
been such a huge generational shift.
We've now grown up this generation's
grown up on the internet relying with
online content creators, a changing
socioeconomic landscape where women
outearn and outeducate men up to the age
of 30. Uh all of this, okay, so how am I
supposed to navigate this as a man? I
don't know. We've got the most
fatherless homes that we've ever seen.
So the previous patriarchs that would
have probably stepped into those shoes
and would have filled those sorts of
roles, they've now vacated. Okay, so who
do we turn to? Well, I've got the
internet and these things on there. Now,
again, all of that is I think important
to be addressed and that
young boys and men need to be given some
really great
role models, archetypes, game plans,
blueprints for how to do this. I'm sure
that you would even as a present father
it be like, I
the more good information that my boys
can access on the internet, the better.
That seems like a good very pro thing to
do.
And also at the same time,
there is a massive moral panic around
extremist vociferous content online that
is pipelining boys and men to believe in
these sorts of crazy things. And
it seems like
the
legitimate concerns about the second one
are used to sort of smear everything
from the first one.
That as soon as you start to talk about
male self-improvement, that the the the
term I mean again, it
the fact that I was accused of being a
looksmaxer, a term that's been around as
far as I can see for about 3 seconds.
Who told Who told Who accused you of
being a looksmaxer? Some news
some news article.
Looksmaxer Chris Williamson. I mean,
that feels a little bit like telling
somebody
It's It's a little bit of a a strange
sort of insult,
given that I haven't tried. So, you
know, I just sort of that I just woke up
like this looksmaxer thing.
Um
I It's It's just interesting these two
worlds exist at the same time, right?
One
>> I think that's really well put. I think
you broke it down beautifully.
In other news, you've probably heard me
talk about Element before, and that's
because I am
frankly
dependent on it.
And it's how I started my day every
single morning. This is the best tasting
hydration drink on the market. You might
say, "Why do I need to be more
hydrated?" Because proper hydration is
not just about drinking enough water,
it's having sufficient electrolytes to
allow your body to use those fluids.
Each grabbing a stick pack is a
science-backed electrolyte ratio of
sodium, potassium, and magnesium. It's
got no sugar, coloring, artificial
ingredients, or any other junk. This
plays a critical role in reducing muscle
cramps and fatigue while optimizing
brain health, regulating your appetite,
and curbing cravings. This orange flavor
in a cold glass of water is a sweet,
salty, orangey nectar and you will
genuinely feel a difference when you
take it versus when you don't, which is
why I keep going on about it. Best of
all, there's a no questions asked refund
policy with an unlimited duration. Buy
it, use it all, and if you don't like it
for any reason, they give you your money
back and you don't even have to return
the box. That's how confident they are
that you'll love it. Plus, they offer
free shipping in the US. Right now, you
can get a free sample pack of Element's
most popular flavors with your first
purchase by going to the link in the
description below at drinklmnt.com
/modernwisdom. That's drinklmnt.com
/
modernwisdom. Congratulations for making
it to the end of a clip. Your brain has
not been fried by TikTok.
Watch the full episode here.