Video summary
Superconducting quantum processors operate in an environment far colder than deep space, requiring temperatures near absolute zero to function correctly. This extreme cold is essential because superconductivity itself is a low-temperature phenomenon that only occurs in specific materials when cooled to around 4 Kelvin, or approximately minus 269 degrees Celsius. At these temperatures, quantum phenomena become stable enough for computation, but even the slightest intrusion of heat from room temperature photons can cause decoherence, effectively destroying the delicate quantum states needed for processing. To achieve and maintain these conditions, scientists use a cascade of refrigeration technologies rather than a single system, culminating in dilution refrigerators that continuously reach the millikelvin scale by exploiting the unique phase separation properties of helium-3 and helium-4 isotopes.
The physical infrastructure supporting these processors involves intricate engineering to shield the chips from thermal and electromagnetic radiation, often described as preventing "lightning strikes" from stray photons. IBM is developing a modular cryogenic platform that addresses the challenge of scaling quantum systems beyond the capacity of a single large refrigerator. Instead of building one massive monolithic unit, which would be inflexible and inefficient, the new design utilizes customizable chambers that resemble bank vaults with doors on all sides. These modules can be connected via bridge shields under vacuum, allowing multiple cryostats to be linked together in rows and columns. This approach creates a scalable architecture where individual units can be added or serviced without dismantling the entire system, similar to connecting server racks in a data center.
Building this modular ecosystem required overcoming significant practical challenges, including tight manufacturing tolerances and the need for robust industrial-grade reliability. The team faced issues such as imperfect gaps in shielding that allowed light leaks or protruding parts causing electrical shorts, which were solved through iterative prototyping and creative fixes like using copper tape to seal irregularities. A key strategic shift involved moving away from simply integrating processors into off-the-shelf refrigerators toward a holistic design where the cryogenic system is optimized specifically for quantum computing needs. By controlling the design in-house and integrating components from various specialized vendors, IBM can adapt quickly to rapid technological changes and ensure that the cooling infrastructure evolves alongside advancements in quantum chips and control electronics.
Looking ahead, the trajectory of this technology focuses on increasing efficiency and density to support fault-tolerant quantum computers capable of solving real-world problems like drug discovery and molecular modeling. While current systems are a first step, future developments aim to reduce overall power consumption by packing more qubits into each module and improving the efficiency of the cooling stack itself. The ultimate vision involves expanding the number of modular units significantly within a few years, enabling quantum computers with multiple logical qubits that can outperform classical supercomputers in specific tasks. This evolution marks a transition from laboratory experiments to industrial-scale deployment, where the entire ecosystem—from the dilution refrigerators to the control electronics—is designed to work together seamlessly to build the quantum future.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome to season 2 of the Coherence
Times, where we bring coherence to the
entangled world of quantum computing.
I'm your host, Ryan Mandelbaum. Every
other week, I'll bring you stories about
how scientists, developers, and
businesses are making quantum computing
a reality. We'll explore new research
and development, highlight the latest
advances in the field, and see how users
are trying to extend quantum to
real-world problems.
Superconducting quantum processors are
incredibly sensitive. They need to be
protected from outside interference and
cooled to temperatures near absolute
zero, while still being connected to a
bunch of control electronics. So, as
they continue to scale, the systems that
support them have to scale, too. That's
why IBM is developing modular cryogenic
platforms designed to connect, operate,
and scale quantum computing systems.
These will be required for the future of
fault-tolerant quantum computing, where
modular processors will work together to
run larger quantum circuits. So, [music]
I've invited two guests to help me
understand the importance of cryogenics
for quantum and how IBM is preparing
quantum hardware for this sort of
scaling. First, I'm joined by Matt
Hollister, IBM Quantum's head of
cryogenic systems engineering. Matt has
helped to shape the infrastructure that
supports increasingly [music] large and
capable quantum computing systems,
including our new modular platform.
[music]
Also with us today is Ali Lindler, a
cryogenic assembly engineer who works on
the design, integration, [music] and
operation of IBM Quantum's cryogenic
systems. Matt and Ali, thanks for
joining [music] me.
All right. So, uh Matt, let's start with
the basics. For our listeners who maybe
don't know that much about
superconducting quantum computers or
about cryogenics, uh why don't you tell
us about why these processors need to be
held at such cold temperatures?
>> Okay. So, uh superconductivity is
inherently a low-temperature phenomena.
It uh occurs in a number of different
materials, some of which are elemental
metals, some compounds. There are some
exotic materials that display
superconducting properties at relatively
high temperatures. There's a class of
materials called high-temperature
superconductors, but even there it's
high temperature in this context is
still cryogenic.
The devices and the materials that are
generally used in superconducting
quantum devices are more of the very
low-temperature variety.
So, we're talking about
phenomena that only really appear when
you're operating down in the the sort of
4 Kelvin temperature range,
which is at around minus 269° C, which
is 269°
Out with the superconducting quantum
devices specifically, quantum phenomena
in general is something that's
inherently quite unstable.
So, to maintain the quantum phenomena
that we're actually using in these
computing devices, it helps to operate
at very low temperatures in order to
reduce the phenomena of noise coming in
from the environment.
Any heat that enters these devices is
enough to destroy the
the quantum phenomena that we're
actually relying on in the processes.
That's something though which is true
beyond superconducting quantum
computing. So, even non-superconducting
devices will often benefit from
operation at cryogenic temperatures,
although maybe not quite such deep cryo
as as we generally work with.
>> -269° C is that sort of 4 Kelvin
range. This is very cold. Can you give
me a sense of how cold this really is?
>> The typical temperature that people
refer to is deep space, which is sort of
slightly below that temperature.
It's kind of hard to put it into a
physical context in terms of what we
would experience in in everyday life.
Um so that is a very difficult one to
answer.
However, the the 4 Kelvin temperature
where a lot of these phenomena start to
turn on, that actually is the
temperature of liquid helium.
So this is not something that you could
have carried around in a
constant or something
because it is so cold it evaporate very
very easily. Um people are probably used
to seeing liquid nitrogen as a cryogenic
fluid as the sort of the the typical
incident demonstrations of people
plunging items into into nitrogen and
freezing them and causing them to
shatter. That is in terms of the
temperature scale, that's about 20 times
warmer than than the 4 Kelvin
temperatures that we're talking about
for helium.
>> I want to just make sure that the sort
of listeners understand there's like two
temperatures that we're kind of talking
about here, right? We need to first get
to the temperature that things are
superconducting at all, which is already
a very cool temperature. But then we get
to sort of this quantum you know, we
have to push it even cooler to the sort
of millikelvin scale essentially so that
not only do we have access to these
quantum phenomena, the
superconductivity, but also access to
actually be able to control it without
all of the noise that might ruin the
quantum computation, right?
>> Yeah, that's that's actually a good way
to think of it Ryan.
In reality, the refrigeration systems
that we tend to use are all really
multiple refrigerators working in in in
unison. And you can't go from room
temperature to these very cold
near absolute zero temperatures in a
single refrigeration system. So the
actual technology we use really is a
cascade of several refrigeration
technologies to access these very deep
cryo temperatures.
>> So before we get into the construction
of the actual hardware, maybe we can
talk a bit more about like what it is
that we're trying to protect against in
this quantum realm, Ali. Like can you
tell us about what it's like to be a
quantum processor at these cold
temperatures?
>> Yeah. Um so to be a quantum processor in
the very bottom of your system, you
think about an OVC initially. So it's a
dark space that your cascading cryostat
sits inside.
Um the processor is primarily trying to
be shielded from things like um
thermal radiation and electromagnetic
radiation. Um
So the ways that we kind of do this are
we shield around the processor because
electromagnetic and thermal radiation
can actually act like light and it can
kind of bend around crevices um inside
of the computer. And if there's
something like a room temperature photon
that could kind of travel from room
temperature um all the way down to the
cold stage where your processor sits. Um
there was a colleague that actually
described it to me like a lightning
strike on your payload, which I felt was
pretty neat. And it's very amazing that
something um as something as simple as a
photon could strike that payload and
cause a decoherence of sorts um given
that the pulses that are that go inside
of the computer are um so much smaller
than room temperature photons.
>> I see. So if
So even if we have this chip held at
this negative you know, 273° C
basically near absolute zero
Kelvin
a room temperature photon sneaking in it
it really can do some
damage to your computation at the very
least.
>> That's why we're very precise in how we
machine things like shields and stuff
like that to try and keep those photons
out.
>> So let's work together to understand
what these things are and how they
actually work. I think Matt you got us
started. Can you tell me about this like
cooling in successive stages? What what
is this and why does it work the way
that it does?
>> So, the the story here really starts in
the early 1900s.
Um
around that time there was a lot of
interest in driving to lower and lower
temperatures. Uh and there really was a
race of sorts amongst a number of
scientists in Europe and North America
to uh liquefy uh gases at progressively
lower temperatures.
So, things really start to get
interesting in about 1908 when helium
was first liquefied by uh by Onnes
working uh working in Europe. And this
was the first time that that that sort
of low temperature boundary, the sort of
4 Kelvin boundary, had really been been
reached because every other uh liquefied
gas uh exists at much higher temperature
than that.
This was also intimately just uh
connected with the discovery of
superconductivity itself. Um
it turns out that uh mercury
superconducts in that temperature range.
Uh so, being able to achieve that 4
Kelvin temperature limit also allowed
for the discovery of the superconducting
phenomenon in the first place using
using elemental mercury. Following from
that, there were further experiments
that sort of pushed the low temperature
limit down to about 1 Kelvin. And that's
still a temperature that you can achieve
using regular off-the-shelf uh helium 4,
which is the common isotope of helium.
And at about that time, there was some
discussion of is it possible to sort of
achieve even lower temperatures? It
turns out you can't just by using simple
liquefied gases.
Um but in the early 1900s, around uh the
mid-1920s, there was a new class of
refrigeration technology was invented
which
uh relied on um ordering and disordering
of magnetic uh domains in uh
uh salt materials. And that allowed a a
push down a little lower in temperature.
And that That the first time that it was
really possible to access these
millikelvin temperature regimes. The
problem with that technology is that
it's inherently discontinuous. So, it's
great, but you can't operate something
for a long period, uh which makes it
challenging to do um any sort of
computational process or similar where
you where you really want to maintain
that temperature for very long periods.
Um so, it wasn't until uh helium-3,
which is a the rarer, lighter isotope of
helium was first uh identified in 1939,
that it really became possible to
achieve these millikelvin temperatures
continuously. The base technology that
we use is a type of refrigerator called
a dilution refrigerator.
Uh and that relies on a mixture of the
two heat the two primary helium
isotopes, helium-3 and helium-4. But, it
what it does allow you to do is reach
these millikelvin temperatures in a
continuous process. Uh so, that was a
real breakthrough in in the early to
mid-1960s, where you were suddenly for
the first time were you able to achieve
these millikelvin temperatures
continuously. Now, fast forward a little
way,
uh the dilution refrigerator technology
has been used for a lot of different
applications in fundamental physics. Uh
a lot of them connected to
both studying superconductivity,
um but also the development of
superconducting devices such as the
quantum processes that that we use in
that we use in our our quantum computing
systems. The way that the refrigeration
process actually works, um
turns out that if you cool a mixture of
the two helium isotopes to sufficiently
low temperature,
uh because of the different quantum
mechanical properties of the two
molecules the two atoms,
um they actually spontaneously uh form
uh
separate phases. Uh so, a little bit
like oil separating from water.
Um but an important difference is that
unlike oil and water separation, you
don't get a complete separation of the
two helium isotopes.
What you actually have is one phase
which is essentially pure helium 3.
But then the other phase is mostly
helium 4 with a very small amount of
helium 3 dissolved in it.
Uh and it turns out that if you
encourage helium 3 to move across that
phase boundary, it produces a cooling
effect. And that's what the dilution
refrigerator technology is reliant on.
Now, as I'd mentioned a moment ago,
these systems really are several cooling
stages cascaded together.
Uh the dilution refrigerator part really
only operates below
a temperature of around about 1 Kelvin.
So, you have to provide some sort of
cooling
between room temperature and that sort
of liquid helium temperature range
at a sort of the midpoints of the
refrigeration system.
Traditionally, this had been provided
just with a bath of liquid helium.
Um but an important innovation
in the late 1990s into the early 2000s
um
made use of a mechanical refrigeration
technology or should say several types
of mechanical refrigeration technology
that allowed you to reach temperatures
around 4 Kelvin without needing that
bath of liquid helium.
So, really the refrigeration technology
that we use now as our workhorse is
is a 4 Kelvin refrigerator which is
pre-cooling that dilution refrigerator
to reach down into the millikelvin
regime.
>> Got it. And that makes sense cuz it does
a couple things, right? Obviously, the
most important is it reduces you can't
have these lightning bolts
photons that I described shooting in
there. So, we cool in successive stages.
I know there's thermal stresses, things
like that. And then I actually wanted to
bring back something from the previous
season that I thought really described
the evaporative cooling here really
well, which is it's almost like you're
have like the sweating, right? That
you're It's literally like a little
evaporative process of taking heat from
one helium isotope, the helium 3, into
the other helium isotope, the helium 4.
>> Yeah, it's exactly analogous to what
evaporation process.
>> And then Ali, can you tell me about the
I I I don't think the reader listeners
will be able to hear this, but Ali's
sitting in a lab with all of these
refrigerators right now. And I I think
it's really amazing and I want to
actually hear from you like walk us
through what it looks like, um what it
sounds like, and maybe how these fridges
are actually built, right? I mean,
they're gorgeous chandeliers. Can you
get us through a bit of the construction
piece?
>> Um so, in terms of walking into the data
center, you kind of walk in and you hear
these pulse tubes. So, these pulse tubes
sit on top of
your cryostats. Um
so, you kind of just walk in, you see a
lot of cabinets. Um we have different
cabinets for telemetry. Um we have
cabinets for gas handling. So, telemetry
kind of puts our systems onto network to
where clients can access and use them.
Um we have cabinets for our room
temperature electronics. So, we have
cabinets
that go um that give communication from
your telemetry to your RTE.
Um we also have cabinets, like I said,
that are for the gas handling system.
So, the way that you can operate and
maintain a cryostat is through this
cabinet that's known as the GHS. Um So,
what this has is essentially a bunch of
turbos. Um it has a bunch of pumps. Um
it has a PLC interface to where you can
access valves, pumps, your turbos, um
everything else.
Um and that
GHS has a line, two lines actually. Um
you have a still line and a condensing
line that run kind of over the ceiling
and they kind of go um and attach to the
chandelier itself. So, that chandelier
hangs in our data center. Um it looks
like a cylindrical can, which is your
outer vacuum can. Um and the chandelier
sits inside.
>> Okay, so we have this this chandelier,
we have this fridge, this cooling
system. And now, Matt, I know that the
we need it to be bigger than just one,
right? One of these chandeliers, maybe
they call the chip that's got like 100
to 200 cubits or so. Um but I think one
thing that's really amazing is this
discovery of this modularity that we can
start to do. Can you tell me a bit about
that? Like how what Why do we need to
build modular quantum computers and why
we need to How do we build a modular
fridge?
>> So, the the real motivation for going to
a modular architecture is we we know we
have to build systems with higher cubic
counts than we're able to do at the
moment.
Um so, depending on who you ask, there's
numbers of anywhere between a few
thousand up to a few million
uh individual cubits uh in a useful
quantum computer.
Um
to fit that into
uh a single cryostat is is very
challenging. Um the while it's possible
to build large cryostats, and and here
we're talking much larger than the
systems that we've historically used up
until this point for our deployed
quantum systems.
Um
it doesn't make a lot of sense to try to
build a single big system to support uh
computers at the scale of what we're
talking. It's also very inflexible to
take that sort of approach because you
you have to design for a particular size
system, and if we decided we want to
make the system 50% larger,
there's a lot of inefficiency in then
having to re-engineer everything from
from square one in order to accommodate
that. So, our approach for these very
large future systems is really to adopt
modularity at all levels of the stack.
The
technology processes associated with the
production of the quantum chip, of the
electronics, as well as the
infrastructure such as the cryogenics,
naturally lends itself to a to a
particular maximum size, and that does
not necessarily match to to where one
would want to be if you were to build
try to build this to the monolithic
system. So, really at all levels,
everything in
uh our scaling plans point towards
making the system modular.
Um
in the cryogenics space, uh in least
from the point of view of systems
operating at millikelvin temperatures,
that's not something that's really been
done before.
Uh certainly people have experimented
with uh with large
monolithic cryostats in this sort of
temperature range, usually for a
specific application such as a specific
one-off experiment. Uh but this field
where we're talking about wanting to
build many copies of our systems
to to to couple them together to make
this this expandable modular system,
this actually is quite a unique and new
uh technology space that we're operating
in.
>> And Ali, how do you actually make a
fridge modular?
>> Yeah, so we have in the lab right now,
um the way that we make these guys
modular is we have uh chambers. So,
these chambers are kind of customizable
to however you want to orient um
whatever system or position that you're
wanting to create. So, the way that they
work is they almost look like a bank
vault to where they have doors on four
sides, um and then you can take off
doors or add as you please or as you
continue to build more modular systems,
um putting more cryostats inside.
So, one cryostat per one chamber.
Um
You look inside, if you were to open the
doors with it fully assembled, you would
actually just see a very um shiny MLI
blanket and shields.
So, MLI actually protects um your
processor. Uh reflects a lot of that
initial infrared and electromagnetic
radiation and things like that coming
inside.
Um but these modular systems actually
have panels. So, for the shields, you
have front panels to where if you wanted
to do a servicing of sorts, or you
wanted to access the wiring inside of
the fridge, you can actually just take
the front panels off simply and have
access to your processor. You have
access to your wiring. Um you have
access to essentially everything. Um
which is much different than your
standard cryostat to kind of where it
hangs in a frame and it's a cylindrical
can. And if you wanted to, you know,
access the system, um you'd have to take
the OVC cans off and you'd have to take
all the cans off to kind of access. Um
But the way that it's truly modular is
that we have the ability to have as many
chambers um that we need for system or
how many qubits that we want or that
we're looking for.
Um so, the systems actually have bridge
shields. So, the way that you can kind
of connect these systems together is by
both connecting them under vacuum. So,
both um sides of the chamber have either
an O-ring groove or they have an O-ring
receiving surface
to where you can almost um
winch or push them together and apart.
Um And then from there, you have bridge
shields that allow for um
essentially a connection for your
processors to be run through and in
between. Um the shields actually have a
small gap in between, so the shields
from one cryostat to the next do not
actually touch. Um but they are coated
in a dark material that allows for light
tightness and having the tunnel, so to
say, or bridge um to be able to connect
multiple payloads together in multiple
uh cryostats, which is thus making it uh
modular.
>> So, I like to imagine this because I
have limited mental capacity. I imagine
kitchen refrigerators. And I imagine you
have a big one, and then you get
increasingly small, and you have a very
small kitchen refrigerator in the
middle. And that one can miraculously
cool your lunch to
basically absolute zero. Um so, are you
essentially saying that and if it's
better to imagine that you were going
from top to bottom, and so the innermost
one is both in the middle and also at
the lowest of all these refrigerators.
The freezer's on the bottom, like many
for one for kitchen freezers you buy.
And so, essentially there's like tunnels
that can get connect in these little you
can imagine like a whole rows and
columns of these stacked or maybe just
rows and aisles of these refrigerators
in the way you might imagine a
superconducting or a supercomputing
center with lots of racks. And so,
basically you're saying that there's
like tunnels between those innermost
refrigerators that we have to do a lot
of hard stuff in order to get them all
connected.
>> Yes. Uh well, I wouldn't say hard stuff.
Um I would say you have your cryostats
assembled, um and it's actually the
modularity of it makes it
not too difficult to actually put
multiple systems together uh with the
bridge shields. So, a good way to kind
of think about it is, like you said, you
have the freezer like as the smallest
and the most cold. Um but you have that
bridge you have a bridge for each
thermal um shield stage. So, you have a
bridge at your still, your 4K, and your
50K. And same for the modular cryostat
for the system that sits right next to
it and next to it and next to it. So,
they kind of continue on in a line, um
and then you have indoors or end caps on
both ends, and you can cap off or close
your shields on your ends. Um
And if you ever wanted to change that,
you could just simply, like a
refrigerator, open the door um and make
your changes and connect them all
together.
>> Amazing. It's like going to the quantum
grocery store and
>> [clears throat]
>> break the fridge.
>> It really is like
a beautiful piece of engineering. It I
mean, it's it's incredible.
>> Uh and I know that this is not easy. I
think when I talk about it in these
analogies, it doesn't sound as hard as
it as it is. So, I maybe want to talk to
Matt about the like the project plan
that actually got us here. How do you go
about sort of
going from building what is Maybe people
don't understand that dilution
refrigeration has actually been around
for so long that we almost think of it
as like borderline off-the-shelf
technology to now what we're doing is
building this big modular crazy fridge
designed just for modular quantum
computing. So, I'd love to hear a bit
about that, Matt.
>> Yeah, it's
it's possibly a sort of oscillation in
the way the technology has developed. Um
so, uh as we discussed before, the um
dilution refrigeration was first
demonstrated in the 1960s.
Um but for a very, very long time, these
refrigerators only existed in university
labs essentially for for fundamental
research.
Uh part of the issue there was that
there wasn't a a major commercial
application for the systems. A lot of
people would build and operate uh their
own their own fridges, and there was a
lot of a lot of sort of esoteric
knowledge uh that only existed in these
uh in in these university labs.
Um
quantum computing, I think, was the
first major technology driver that
actually brought the fridges out of the
lab and more into the hands of
companies that have the impetus to
develop a a lot more robust
and more industrial type products.
And as you say, a lot of that was driven
by companies like IBM that were pushing
to develop the the superconducting and
other quantum computing technologies.
Where we are now and traditionally what
we've done with our systems today is
that we've taken a relative these small
off-the-shelf cryostat, which is the
sort of classic cylindrical chandelier
that that appears in any number of
published photographs.
And fridges of that sort of scale are
capable of, depending on the exact
architecture, they're capable of
supporting anywhere up to low thousands
of qubits. IBM itself has demonstrated
over 1,000 qubits operational in one of
those stand-alone fridges.
The issue then though is to go larger,
you have to have a way by which you can
couple multiple fridges together. So we
we have separately developed the
capability to connect the individual
quantum processors together.
But you still have to get signals from
each quantum processor out to room
temperature. So that's where a lot of
the chandelier hardware that you see
really, that's all wiring to control the
processor and read out signals.
So that becomes the the driver really of
how dense you can make these systems.
And it turns out that a a good size
module, at least for our
readout architecture, is slightly larger
than
the the sort of commercial off-the-shelf
fridges that we've been using.
Up until now, these systems actually we
still we still use. So we're really
developing the next technology here. And
versus making some single large system.
Um
we we had experiments a little bit with
making larger systems um in the early
2020s, we had a a project called
Goldeneye,
uh which aims to build a a large
monolithic refrigeration platform.
Um and while that project was um it was
largely successful uh and spurred of
development in the uh in industry to to
to make larger fridges. Ultimately, we
uh determined that that system um the
the building block was really too big.
Uh there was some ability to do
modularity, but but really the
individual the individual block was too
large.
Uh so, following the Goldeneye project,
we then started to explore some other
options for smaller, higher-density
modular
uh cryostat configurations.
Uh and that um morphed into what became
known as the Union project, which is the
the modular cryogenic system that we're
we're in the process of of developing uh
in our lab. Um uh really what Union
represents is a
uh a building block which is suitable
for installation in uh
data centers. So, it it's about the size
of a large server rack. Um but it has
the ability to be coupled in such a way
that you're also able to make these
these connections at the level of the
quantum processor, so that you can
string one processor to the next to the
next to make these ever-larger systems.
>> So, it is going to kind of be like a
supermarket of quantum processors, if
you imagine the freezer aisle.
>> I I I I prefer to think of it as a
server rack, but yes.
>> [laughter]
>> A server rack of quantum processors. I
love Anyway. So, Ali, this is a hard
project, I assume. And I would love to
hear about some of the challenges like
when you first were
brought into this project and had to see
what we were doing and how we're moving
from these single fridges and monolithic
fridges into this
you know, server rack of fridges. What
what were what were some of the first
challenges that
>> you saw?
>> Yeah. Um so, we kind of started I joined
pretty much when this project um the
parts started actually forming and
started coming to IBM.
Um so, starting out it was initially a
lot of site preparation. So, making sure
um even little things like thinking
about how are we going to take um
this cryostat and put it inside of this
modular chamber. Like we we need the
infrastructure to be able to do things
like this. So, it was a matter of
getting the infrastructure here on site
to be able to do that. Um and then going
from actually receiving the first ever
um
there's a lot of good people and a lot
I've had a lot of help here in
Poughkeepsie um and in Yorktown as well.
Um it's really been a team effort in
terms of getting everything here and
then from getting everything here to
reviewing documentation and kind of
figuring out exactly what goes together
and how. And not only reviewing
documentation to see the assembly
process, kind of going through the
motions yourself
and kind of seeing like hey, maybe we
would like to do this this way instead
of another way. Um
I think um
a decent example you're not only kind of
taking new parts and
building them onto a cryostat, you're
also having to um deploy, set up, and
maintain
an actual physical cryostat that IBM is
more used to. Um in a in a certain way,
the cryostats are are similar in terms
of configuration. Um the modular
cryostat has different plate shapes. Um
but it's a similar process. Um but it
was it was a lot of trial and error. Um
and there were sometimes where I kind of
had to take
what I have learned in terms of thinking
about all of these processes and things
that can affect the fridge, things that
can affect the processor. Um I kind of
had to take those into consideration and
kind of practically apply them to what I
was doing here. And there were times
where I would get stuck and having
brilliant and smart people, uh great
leaders like Matt, who I could feel
like, "Hey Matt, um I would like to have
your opinion on this." And kind of
working with the designers, working with
the people that kind of move this
project forward, and getting the parts
here, and actually giving that final
push to have a fully functioning system.
Um
And having, you know, having to
troubleshoot things sometimes because
you can have one thing on paper, but it
can get here, um and it can be something
entirely different, and you have to kind
of take the
science um fundamentals that you know
and kind of practically apply them to
build a system that is functional.
>> Can you give me an example of that, like
the zip ties and dental floss for this
project?
>> So, not I wouldn't say dental floss
here, not yet.
Uh
I would think a good example would be
the shields. So, kind of how I touched
on, you know, infrared, um
electromagnetic, you know, light
tightness in shields.
Um there were sometimes where, you know,
tolerances aren't always perfect, and
vendors, you know, don't always send you
the perfect um board through hole or put
the perfect pin down in the perfect
spot. So, there were some instances kind
of where um you would kind of put the
shields on and you'd have a problem of
hey, there's a gap here and it's not
light tight.
Or you'd have another issue of, you
know, vendor making a part and its
protrusion was more than you expected
and it's trying to short out to a
different stage. Um which that would
cause the cryostat. You would most
likely not be able to condense the
system or cool it down to its base
temperature.
Um so, things like that we kind of had
to, you know,
you talk to the designers, talk to Matt,
um talk to everybody and kind of see,
hey look,
I
let's have a conversation about this or
let's try and figure out a solution. So,
like for the shields, um copper tape is
a has been a great has been a very good
friend of mine um
in terms of filling those gaps. So,
they're not
in places where you can't necessarily
make up for them um on a prototype
system, um copper tape has been a great
resource. Um our Poughkeepsie model shop
has also been a wonderful source in
terms of
we want to modify or cut off this lip
here so it doesn't short out to a stage
adjacent. So, like the still stage uh
shorting out to the 4K or 4K shorting 50
um etc.
So, we've kind of had to take some
innovative ideas and try them out and,
you know, um
it's a prototype. So, there's been a lot
of learning involved, but there's been a
a lot of smart people on the project um
that have kind of worked through these
problems and tried to improve the system
as we go.
>> And then maybe Matt, from your point of
view looking at this at the project
level, I mean, were there any surprises,
like lessons learned or things that
while you were watching the team put
these things together, you maybe had to
make some pivoting or or do things
differently than you expected?
>> There probably were a few instances
where
uh we we had to adjust what we were
doing, but a lot of that was in response
to changes in other parts of the
technology.
Um
one of the goals for wanting to do to
bring the design of the the modular
system actually within IBM rather than
outsourcing it to a vendor
was that it allows us to execute much
faster
um because the the field is developing
very rapidly. Uh there's a lot of
developments that are happening in in
other parts of the system such as the
processor such as the readout wiring.
So having control of the design
uh ourselves and being able to respond
to the changes in other parts of the
system
uh really has allowed us to uh to to to
have a have a have a system which is
much more closely tailored to I think to
what we to what we would look for going
forward. Um that approach was relatively
new for uh IBM Quantum as an entity
because previously
uh with the use of the off-the-shelf
type cryostats,
uh you were really designing other
components to fit the fit the existing
cryostat. Whereas with this project,
we've we've taken a much more holistic
approach to the overall design
uh and the cryostat appro the cryostat
design really has been very closely in
conjunction with with other parts of the
system.
>> Maybe to follow up on that, um that kind
of brings me to that good point that
we're in this era right now where
quantum computing is not really a lab
thing anymore, right? Is you actual
clients and partners are using them to
do real things. And so with that being
said, how are you designing a dilution
refrigerator to kind of meet that needs,
right? to be this sort of commercial
exterior to the commercial product that
lives inside?
>> We've taken the approach of um
trying to to
uh maintain tight control over
technologies that are relatively
straightforward, but more specialized
parts such as the actual cooling system,
that we leave with the specialists.
So, the core cooling
uh system that we use in the uh in these
cryostats very much looks like the
commercial dilution refrigerators that
we've used in previous systems. But,
really what we're doing is breaking up
the different elements of the cryostat
design and optimizing each one
separately.
So, uh early on in this process, we we
went out to several dilution
refrigerator manufacturers with a fairly
broad technical specification,
uh which laid out the key features that
we needed in terms of the mechanical
footprint, in terms of the refrigeration
performance. Uh all of which was based
on what we understood of the rest of the
the hardware stack at the time.
Uh and then we're taking that piece from
this vendor and another piece from
another vendor and a vacuum chamber for
another vendor, and we're integrating
everything into a finished product.
Uh
in the same way that we we would take an
off-the-shelf cryogenics system and then
integrate our processor and our wiring
into that, we've we've kind of
uh expanded the scope of what we're
integrating in-house.
Um we have a lot of experience with uh
making these systems robust because, as
you said, this isn't something that
lives in the lab anymore.
Uh but, we
uh are aware of the criticality of
keeping these systems operating. So,
there's a lot of work has gone into and
and is still going into making these
previously lab-based systems into a much
more robust industrial type product Uh
that we can deploy either in our own
data centers or to customer sites.
>> So, I'm hiding this question at the end
of this episode and I don't know if I
prepared you all for this one, but I
know it's something that everybody
actually wonders and so I need to know
the answer to it and either of you are
welcome to answer it, which is that I
have I have brought my lunch, which is a
frozen a a frozen a hot a frozen burrito
or something and I would like to put it
into the the quantum dilution
refrigerator.
What would happen and if it's not
possible, why is it not possible?
>> Um, I I think in principle it's
possible. One one place you might
struggle is I'm not sure how compatible
with high vacuum systems frozen burritos
are.
>> That's exactly what I was going to say.
I was I was a little bit nervous about
the vacuum more than I was the cooling.
>> [laughter]
>> So, like basically what would happen is
as you make it a vacuum, it would
explode, right? That's just what would
happen?
>> Uh, it would yeah, it would it would
give off a lot of gas, I think.
>> It would really ruin the
expensive investment that you've made.
>> think it might. I mean, I occasionally
you find people
find people keeping soda cans in
cryostats, but that's generally frowned
upon.
>> Ah, all right, good to know. Uh, and I
think that maybe I'll I'll I'll let's
just do the outlook then. I am
interested um, more than what the
refrigerator will do to my lunch is what
the refrigerator will sort of do to the
future of quantum computing overall. Um,
so maybe we start with Ali and just ask
um, what is um, where do you see where
does it go from here? I mean, what are
you excited about and what do you sort
of foresee as somebody working in this
space?
>> For me, um, I'm a little bit biased
towards the chemistry field. Um, I do
have a a little background in chemistry.
Um, it's my degree in. So,
I I look forward to I read a lot of
things that IBM has done um in
partnerships with different national
labs, um their different customers. I
think about specifically for me, um
being able to
model a molecule.
Um so, when I say model a molecule, like
you could take, let's say you had um
X molecule that you needed um to
formulate a drug molecule to defend
against um just things like that, things
that kind of benefit and help us in the
world overall. Um kind of seeing
quantum computers um almost perform
outperform classical entirely. Um And in
terms of the hardware, um I think it's
going to be really amazing to see um
right now looking at, you know, two
modular cells and thinking
in the next couple years, um that number
will multiply greatly. And thinking
about, you know, the workforce that IBM
will bring in, having a
computer with multiple logical qubits is
is something that is
incredible to think about. Um those are
things that, you know, I read about when
I was in school.
And seeing it kind of come to life while
I'm sitting here is is I mean, it's
incredible.
>> Awesome. And then maybe Matt, can you
tell me a bit about the trajectory in
terms of the cryogenics? Like, what are
we going to have to do in order to
realize the actual hardware that cools
these fault-tolerant systems?
>> I I think where where we are at the
moment really is only the first step
towards being able to scale to very
large systems.
Um we've we've demonstrated that the
fundamental architecture works. Uh
we'll continue to grow uh
the the availability and the size of
these systems in the near term.
Um
I think the major next challenge uh
partly is related to
the uh refrigeration in general, uh
because in terms of the overall power
consumption of the system, at least at
the moment, the cryogenics is is kind of
a large contributor to the overall power
consumption. Um and there's a lot of
interest in driving uh the the wall
power of the system down.
Um so that will
uh
that pushes to both increase the
efficiency of the the cooling, possibly
by adopting different technologies and
and pushing the development uh in the in
the private sector uh space towards more
efficient uh
components in the refrigeration stack,
uh but also uh
it drives us to increase the the density
of our systems.
Uh the more qubits that we can pack into
a single module also will reduce the
overall power consumption of the system.
Um
Out out with that, uh I think there may
be a fundamental sea change going
forward. Um what we what we're building
now is is sort of our our our best based
on the technology that we have.
Um but we're always looking for
developments uh both in fundamental
engineering, uh but also in
uh the the product space, the
availability of different technologies
from different vendors.
Uh so I think we'll be continuously
innovating uh as we push towards the
default tolerant systems that are that
are on our road map in the next 5 to 10
years.
>> Awesome. Well, cool. Thank you for
taking us into this the cool world of
cryogenics. Uh this was super fun for
me. I am uh I I was delighted that we
got to experience Ali's sort of in the
actual the in the actual space and bring
us into the world, even if we can't
really see it. Uh and Matt, thank you so
much for the history. I I appreciate
this one. This was super fun. So uh
yeah, thanks again, guys.
>> Uh thanks very much for having us on.
>> Thank you again.
That's it for this episode of the
Coherence Times. If you enjoyed the
conversation, please be sure to
subscribe wherever you get your
podcasts, comment in the comments
section, and share it with somebody
who's curious about quantum.
You can find us on Spotify, Apple
Podcasts, and YouTube via the IBM
Research channel. And for more episodes,
resources, and deep dives, please visit
us at ibm.com/think/podcasts.
I'm Ryan Mandelbaum. Thanks for tuning
in, and remember the quantum future
isn't just coming, we're building it
right now.