Video summary
Dr. Anna Machin argues that current cultural narratives regarding fatherhood are largely fictional myths built on anecdotes rather than academic research, often damaging to men and their families. A primary myth she seeks to dismantle is the belief that mothers possess an innate "instinct" for parenting while fathers must learn from scratch; evolutionary anthropology reveals that human males are biologically primed to parent just as women are. Machin explains a critical evolutionary trade-off: because human babies have brains six times larger than expected for our body size, they cannot be born fully developed due to the constraints of bipedalism and narrow pelvises. Consequently, humans birth helpless infants requiring extended care, making male parental investment (MPI) an essential adaptation rather than redundancy. Approximately 500,000 years ago, when kin networks were insufficient for survival rates plummeted, evolution selected for men who stayed with their partners to ensure paternity certainty and the survival of offspring, leading to a unique form of monogamy in humans compared to other primates where only about 5% have investing fathers. The biological changes associated with becoming a father are profound yet often overlooked by society. Machin highlights that testosterone levels drop significantly—by up to one-third—in new fathers and do not return to pre-birth levels as long as they remain in contact with their children, facilitating emotional bonding rather than aggression. Neuroimaging studies show that the male brain undergoes structural changes identical to those seen in mothers: increased gray matter in areas responsible for empathy, risk detection (amygdala), executive function, and social cognition. While women's brains light up primarily in ancient limbic structures related to nurturing, fathers' neocortices activate more strongly, reflecting their role as "grandchildren optimizing machines" who scaffold a child's entry into the wider world beyond the family unit. This distinct evolutionary niche positions fathers not merely as helpers but as critical figures whose absence would have caused human extinction in our ancestral past. Culturally and developmentally, Machin identifies specific roles that differentiate maternal from paternal contributions, particularly regarding challenge and socialization. Fathers are uniquely equipped to prepare children for the complexities of life outside the family through "rough-and-tumble play," which builds resilience, reciprocity, and risk assessment skills in a time-efficient manner. This dynamic is crucial for adolescent mental health; research indicates that strong father-child relationships significantly reduce depression and anxiety in young adults, with girls potentially benefiting even more from having their voices validated by an involved male figure who supports them against patriarchal norms of silence. However, modern society often fails to recognize these needs due to a "zero-sum" mindset where supporting men is viewed as detracting from resources for women or children. Machin challenges the notion that single-parent households automatically suffer without fathers, noting that many cultures utilize social father figures like grandfathers or uncles effectively, and argues that even in Western contexts, any significant male mentor can fulfill these developmental roles if biological absence occurs due to economic necessity. Despite the clear scientific evidence of their importance, Machin faces pushback from segments of feminism and media culture that depict fathers as "surplus" figures or useless caricatures like Homer Simpson. She attributes this stigma partly to a lack of empathy for men's struggles with postnatal depression—a condition often dismissed because they did not experience childbirth pain—and the societal pressure on men to be both primary breadwinners and perfect, hands-on caregivers simultaneously without permission to show vulnerability. Governments remain reluctant to implement policies like equal paternity leave seen in Northern Europe due to short-term fiscal concerns, ignoring long-term savings from improved child outcomes and reduced gender pay gaps. Machin concludes that the solution lies not in choosing between men or women but in recognizing fatherhood as an equal journey requiring structural support, better antenatal training for fathers, and a cultural shift where empathy is extended equally to all parents regardless of their biological role.
Read the full video transcript
Why do we need to change the narrative
around fathers?
We need to change the narrative about
fathers partly because the one we have
at the moment is a complete fiction,
which is kind of made up from many myths
and stories we've been told in our
culture over the years. About the role
of fathers, about their importance to
their children, about how they become
fathers, how they learn the knowledge to
become fathers. And actually, all of
this is based upon absolutely zero
academic research. Absolutely no
observational research at all. It's just
stories that we've told each other,
anecdotes. And because of that, the
myths we've built up around fathers are
just that, they're myths. They're not
actually true, and they are very
damaging to fathers. They're damaging to
men. And they're also damaging to their
families. Um so, the work that I do, and
those of my colleagues around the world,
we do it because we actually want the
facts to be out there. We want the
stories we tell about fathers to
actually be accurate.
Which myths do you wish that you could
put into the ground and fully bury about
dads?
Uh the first one I'd bury is that
fathers men are not instinctive parents.
So, we have this story, and I hear it a
lot still from the dads that I study
when before they have children, which is
that
like mom is an instinctive parent, she's
somehow like magically able to do this,
whereas dads have to learn. And because
of that, they tend to see what mom does
as a gold standard of parenting, and
whatever they do as a secondary, bit of
a failure. And actually, it's not true,
and we'll probably go into that a little
bit later, but we've we've discovered
that men are as biologically primed to
parent as women are, which as an
evolutionary anthropologist makes
perfect sense to me. But that's probably
one of the biggest ones, because it
really undermines a man's confidence.
That he feels that actually, if he just
goes with what his gut is telling him,
he will be okay. He really A lot of them
lack a lot of confidence, and they do
very much belittle themselves in
relation, for example, to what mom is
doing.
Yeah, it's
there is a demonization of fatherhood,
and I want to get into this later as
well, but I wonder how much of it
is a cope in response to single parent
households and us trying to not make
children who grow up in single parent
households feel like they're falling
behind, because if we minimize the
impact that fathers have on children's
rearing, then the people who do grow up
with just mom don't feel like they're
missing out as on as much. And this is a
trend that we see, you know,
it's the tyranny of the minority is
somehow sometimes how it's categorized,
but yeah, it's so so fascinating. One of
the other things, William Costello,
who's one of David Buss's students out
here, told me a story that you taught
him about how fathers saved the human
race from extinction because babies'
heads got too big.
Yeah.
Okay, so what happened? So, our brains
are six times bigger than they should be
for an animal of our of our size of our
body weight, and we're also bipedal. So,
we had this massive
problem with our anatomy about 1.8
million years ago to start with, where
our hips had narrowed cuz our we'd gone
bipedal, so the birth canal got
narrower.
But, we had this big increase in the
size of our brains, for example,
compared to chimps.
And we got to this point about 1.8
million years ago where the head
would no longer fit through the pelvis
at full term.
So, we started having to birth our
babies very preterm, basically. We
should be pregnant for much much longer
than we are. Uh and that meant you have
this helpless baby, and mom wasn't able
to do that entirely on her own. Um
particularly if she had like toddlers
and everybody else around her.
Initially, women helped each other with
kin,
and that was fine for about just over a
million years. And And about half a
million years ago, our brains took a
massive leap again and suddenly just
relying on your sisters, your
grandmother, your mom, whoever it might
be, wasn't enough.
And actually the race our our species
was threatened with extinction because
these babies were not surviving.
And so what happened? Whoops. What
happened next was that the the next
genetically related person had to step
in. Now that was dad. Now this was a big
thing for mammals for a mammal because
only 5% of mammals actually have
investing fathers. So we're really rare
and we're actually ape that does it. So
this was a big big evolutionary step for
mammals to take for dad to stick around.
But if dad hadn't stuck around,
the species I would argue would have
died out because there were all these
babies and none of them were surviving
and none of those genes were carrying on
down the generations. So we would have
hit a really difficult demographic
problem.
Lots of interesting things there. First
off,
if it wasn't for the width of women's
hips, how long do you think they would
gestate for?
We don't really know, but it's probably
getting to maybe
pushing towards elephantine levels. So
it'll nearly probably
Yeah.
If not slightly longer because you've
got a big brain to grow in there and
that takes a lot of energy and it takes
a lot of time.
Mhm. So there is a So but if
It's it's it's not quite an arms race,
but it is a an evolutionary trade-off
between how much mom needs to walk and
uh how long the child needs to gestate
for.
Yes. Yes. And the way we dealt with that
and the way we dealt with this
demographic nightmare is we birthed our
babies earlier and earlier and earlier.
And that's why when you look at a chimp
baby, it's like bounding around the
trees after a week.
And you look at a human baby and oh my
god, you've got years before it's going
to be doing that.
Just a puddle for the next 2 years.
Yeah, exactly. If any you know, if
anyone's looked after a newborn baby,
you know how unbelievably helpless they
are and that was the trade-off. But that
meant that in the classic classic
statement, it then started to take a
village to raise a child because you
suddenly have this kid
who was helpless but was growing this
enormous brain that was going to need
loads and loads of support.
And MPI, male parental investment, just
to like really really drive this home,
how rare this is. 95% of all mammal
species have zero male parental
investment and none of the other ape
family do. Like we we are we are the
outlier.
Yeah.
And the reason for that and and that's
why we then go on to this argument of
how important fathers are. Because if
fathers hadn't been important and if
they weren't still important, they just
wouldn't have evolved. They just would
not have evolved because evolution
it hates what we call redundancy. So
what it what it doesn't do is it doesn't
invent
or cause to evolve two roles which are
identical or near each other unless
they're really needed. So it wouldn't
have caused a human father to evolve
unless he was absolutely critical for
the survival of the species. It just
doesn't work like that.
So it you know.
Go go back 750,000 years ago.
What would the typical father have done?
The typical father 750,000 years ago
would have probably acted very much like
a chimp father
and would probably have probably
sided several children with several
different females because reproductive
success, in terms of evolution, the only
thing that's important is reproductive
success. How many kids are you having?
Are they surviving? Are they themselves
reproducing? Okay. So before we had
investing fathers, before dad had to do
that, he would have been spreading his
seed because that would have increased
the likelihood of reproductive success.
But we got to this tipping point where
he was doing that and oh my god, none of
them were surviving.
Okay? So actually your reproductive
success is pretty much zero.
And so evolution will have selected for
those men who stuck around and actually
started investing. But the But the
problem is you get to the point where a
man you could say, "Well, he could just
carry on, you know, siring several
children with several different women."
But the problem you have is that first
of all,
he wants paternity certainty. So, if
he's doing that, that means all the
other That means the women who he is
mating with are also mating with other
men.
And then you've got this conundrum of,
"Oh my god, I I'm now possibly investing
in someone else's child and I don't
really want to do that." So, the way I
deal with this is I do a thing called
mate guarding, which a lot of primates
who do couple up do. And I'm going to
stick by the female side. But if you
stick by the female side, you're not
mating with anyone else. And you slowly
move into this thing where we have for a
greater or lesser period of time what we
call parental monogamy. And that the
father sticks with the woman,
only mates with that woman, and helps to
raise the children because that's the
only way his genes are going to survive.
So, I got sent something by Mac and
Murphy earlier on. And this is
This is really interesting. So, this is
a pushback against
alpha Tate alpha male sort of
hyper Andrew Tate approach as being
what's classed as reproductive success.
And the tweet from him says, "I've
always been skeptical of sexual partner
count as a measure of male reproductive
success. In our species, concealed
ovulation and contraception make it
rather unlikely that a man will produce
children through anything other than
long-term committed relationships." And
it got me thinking about how this is
reflected ancestrally as well. That, you
know, spreading your seed around, even
the most alpha of alpha males,
it doesn't track using wolves or chimp
tribes or
silverback gorillas as the model for us
because the children come out in a very
different sort of way. And as you
identified, and anyone that's read The
Ape That Understood the Universe knows,
humans are grandchildren optimizing
machines.
Mhm.
That's the thing that needs to happen.
Once you get to the stage of
grandchildren, sweet like I hands are
off the wheel, so to speak.
But yeah, I think it's a really nice
reframe.
And it also maybe
explains, I don't know how long 500,000
years is
evolutionarily, pretty long time. But
I think a lot of men
feel in them a a little conflict that
you know, they want dad, but they want
Chad in their own lives. They want to
kind of And there is a battle that I see
amongst my friends, I'm 35 and
I'm seeing these
former degenerates
start to calm down a little bit. And but
they still have this sort of vestige of
what they used to be, but they have this
desire for what they want to become. And
I almost see perhaps the 750,000 year
ago version of them battling with the
250,000
year old version of them. And
I do think, you know, it's
who's going to give men
sympathy for oh, poor poor party boys
like starting to settle down like you
you know, the adult infant, the juvenile
that it really needs to grow up. I'm
like, yo, I'm
I'm on board. Like I'm
I've been around enough of these These
are my friends. But
I do think that it's interesting to see
the knobs and the the dials start to get
tweaked a little bit. You know, we talk
a lot about the the change for women
they've hit
uncharitably hit the wall or
largely just I realized that this is now
the time for me to settle down. But no
one really ever talks about the
equivalent with men. And I do think that
I see it in my friends like I
I need to grow up. I need to stop being
such an adult infant.
Yeah, absolutely. And and and in fact, I
do have a colleague in
in Finland who does study male baby
lust. And it's something that again, we
don't we don't talk about. We talk about
ticking clocks for women and the fact
that they get this sudden insatiable
desire to have children. But men have
it, too. And it's partly because of as
you go as you age, your testosterone
naturally declines anyway.
Um and so test what testosterone is
really, really good at in high volumes
is helping you find a mate.
It's really good at focusing your
attention on that scene. It's really
good at giving you all those features
which women find attractive. It makes
you very driven about finding a mate.
But as you age actually it declines. And
it's a natural um decline and you start
to focus more upon having a family. The
other great thing about it, which is the
fascinating thing about testosterone, is
when you do become a father for the
first time, it drops significantly, like
really significantly, up to a third.
And it will never return to the
pre-birth level as long as you remain in
contact with your child. So testosterone
is a very powerful hormone, but I think
it's until very recently we didn't
realize how important it was in shaping
fatherhood, shaping human fatherhood.
Yeah, so there's an interesting parallel
I think going on here that
what was needed ancestrally was uh
resources and protection, primarily I'm
going to guess from a father, right?
Like if you're spending 20 hours a day
with an infant in your arms, it's hard
to go picking berries or taking down a
wildebeest. Similarly, you are
physically more frail and the child is
unbelievably frail, therefore you need
someone to play uh the bodyguard
hypothesis, I think your uh ex-boss uh
told me on this podcast, Robin Dunbar.
So
I think that there is um
an equivalent change that's happened
culturally
uh socioeconomically in the modern world
which almost reverses this. So
women finally have access uh financially
uh and educationally to not be dependent
on their partners. And
emotionally there is a push to almost
reprogram some of the maternal instincts
and some of the pair-bonding instincts
that women have. You know, there was a a
famous article in the New New Times last
year by Chelsea Conaboy that said
maternal instinct is a myth that men
created to keep women down.
Um and I think what this has created is
that
an assumption women don't need men
financially, women don't need men
emotionally, so women don't need men
parentally either.
That's the stage that we are, at least
in some corners of uneducated popular
culture getting to.
Yeah.
Uh and that certainly is that men are
dispensable. I would never forget
reading something about the Y chromosome
and the Y chromosome has does have very
little of any use on it in terms of
genes.
And so this argument that one day it'll
die out and actually we won't need any
men. And what that really misses is
actually fathers aren't really there for
mothers. Fathers are there for their
children.
So whether or not as a woman
you feel that you need that that that
partner in your life
and I will get into the single parent
thing in a minute. What is very clear
from the data that we've collected and
colleagues around the world in the last
15 years is that your children do need
you.
So actually it's not about as a woman
I've got my own money, I can protect
myself, you know, da da da da da da.
It's actually but your kid needs the
input from that father because actually
what fathers bring to their children is
very different from what mothers do. And
when I started 15 years ago the mantra
was fathers had no role in child
development because mothers were the
environment of raising that child
mostly. She was the major input into
that child's life and therefore you
didn't need dad around really. And we
have found again, not surprising from an
evolutionary point of view that fathers
actually have a very separate, unique,
and important input into their
children's development. And if you don't
have that, then first of all it has to
be found from somewhere else.
So actually the argument from feminists
or women or whatever it should be
shouldn't be I don't need this man. The
question should be yes, but does your
child need this man?
Because actually that's what he's there
for.
Um so maybe you don't want a partner in
your life. Okay, fine. Co-parent.
You know? Okay. You can live separately.
This is fine. You don't have to be
romantically involved. You don't have to
have any financial aid. You don't need
to ask him for any protection.
But what about the kid?
Just fundamentally, what about the kid?
And I think that's that's the argument.
quite surplus to requirements
now,
I think. Um you know, we had this
as you identified uh
bit of uncertainty around fathers, I
think. Uh I had this really
um very formative conversation in a
group
a couple of months ago uh just before we
uh I found out that I was going to have
a chat with you. And it was so timely
cuz I'm thinking about this and the role
of dads and so on and so forth. And um
it was a mastermind filled with
a couple of billionaires and a bunch of
millionaires. So, these people
monetarily, in terms of resources, are
very very successful.
And they said, "Look, let's just do a
round table. We've all eaten dinner. Uh
does anybody have any challenges that
they're facing uh personally or
professionally? Throw them out into the
group." And I think there was one round
one uh sweep that went round. And on the
second one, this guy said, "My wife is 6
months pregnant 7 months pregnant. Uh
all that she's talking about is the
baby, and I don't feel anything. And I
feel ashamed at the fact that I'm not
like when's this cascade of hormones
going to come? Is it going to come when
the baby arrives? What if it doesn't?
What if I'm not meant to be a dad? You
know, I want kids, and I can't wait to
have kids, but I I don't feel anything,
and I'm scared I'm scared of telling her
maybe she's going to think I'm less of a
man. I'm not going to be a good father.
Maybe she's going to want to leave me."
Um it's there was just
like pouring out of this guy
uh
self-doubt
and and and concern and shame and guilt
and terror.
Uh and I
it really it really touched me. You
know, this guy opened up and sat right
across with another guy equally
successful with three kids. Uh and he
said, "Same for me. Same for me. Just
hold on. It will come. It's going to
take longer. Um but in the the point
being, you know, when we're talking
about men and dads feeling surplus to
requirements, there is a
the it's a very vicious sort of
double-ended sword that's happening here
where
culture is maybe feeding an increasing
narrative that women can survive without
dads and dads are surplus to requirement
and we don't want to make the
single-parent household people feel
uncomfortable. And what that does is it
slots almost perfectly into these fears
that fathers innately have. So, you have
this almost sort of um
extrinsic and intrinsic
narrative being woven together that
certainly to the guy that was sat next
to me,
it it played right into the fears that
he already had, and it didn't make him
feel like he was any more secure.
Yeah, absolutely. And that's why
in a way I do the work I do and I
publish the work I do in a in a in a
helpful format. So, that's why I wrote
my book, and that's why we have to get
this information out there about dads
because what he was feeling is
completely and utterly normal. I can
think of only maybe
three or four men that I've studied who
haven't had that concern, and I've
studied many, many men in this process.
And
and the other guy at the table was
right. It will come. But we don't tell
men that. You know, we hear this thing
of, "Oh, the baby will come out and
you'll feel amazing and you'll feel
elated and it'll be amazing and you'll
immediately love them."
Probably not. And actually, quite a lot
of women don't feel that either. Let you
into a little secret. But um but it's
because and we can explain that. We can
explain that. Mom, when she's pregnant,
is there's raging hormones everywhere.
When she gives birth, she's got a
massive flood of hormones which help her
give birth actually, but as a side
effect are amazing bonding hormones. So,
we've got oxytocin, we've got dopamine,
we've got beta-endorphin in there,
accelerating the bond she's going to
build with that baby. And that's done
partly because babies are tough and you
don't want her to leave it on a
hillside. So, okay, let's give her some
really good, you know, chemicals, side
effects, and she will Dads can only
build their bond because they don't go
through that physiological process, they
don't breastfeed, for example, they have
to build their bond through interaction.
Okay? So, for example, the drop in
testosterone doesn't occur until the
baby is born.
So, that's first of all a big tough
thing. So, you're not getting this drop
in testosterone, which makes you more
motivated to care for the baby with and
also releases more of an effect from
your bonding hormones. High testosterone
blocks the effects of bonding hormones.
Okay? So, if you drop the you get much
more of an effect of oxytocin and
dopamine and things like that. So, he's
not getting that head start during
pregnancy, he has to wait for the baby
to be born, then you get this baby who's
born, if your partner is breastfeeding,
then basically in those first few weeks
there's very little way in.
Because she's breastfeeding, the baby's
either asleep or it's crying or whatever
it might be, and it's very latched onto
mom.
And that's a really tough period. I've
had dads who very much that has driven
them to postnatal depression.
Okay? So, it's a very serious
depression as well.
Oh my god, yeah. The rate is about 10%.
And it's and it's it's genuinely
postnatal depression. And again, that's
something we need to talk about and
highlight for men. So,
what I always say to men is I explain to
them physiologically what's happening.
I say to them you'll build your bond
through interaction. In those first
weeks, baby's not doing anything, so
that's really hard. If you can find a
way in.
So, maybe your thing is baby massage
before bed, maybe your thing is giving
it a bath, maybe your thing is reading a
story even if it doesn't understand you,
it still works. Um find your thing, and
it's your thing, nobody else's thing,
okay? And try and do it every day. But
until your baby starts to interact with
you, until they start smiling and
babbling and laughing and looking
pleased to see you, and then at 6 months
they start playing with you, and then
you can do rough and tumble play and all
these wonderful things. Until that time,
it's going to be tough.
But it will come.
And but we don't tell dads that. So they
they sit there thinking
either baby doesn't like me
or oh my god, I'm not feeling anything
for this baby or
and or, you know, mom's really good at
this. Why am I so awful at this?
How come she's got a bond? How come she
knows what's going on and I don't know
what's going on? So they build this
massive massive pressure and actually we
just need to tell them. We just need to
say this is normal. And the fact that
you were talking at a a man's group,
that's brilliant. You know,
we have in the past set up
n- antenatal groups just for men.
And they are amazingly powerful because
Antenatal groups?
Yes. So so prenatal groups. Before the
baby is born. So in the UK, you know,
you go to those and you go with your
partner and mom's there and very little
is focused on dad and dads tend to not
voice their fears in those environments
because they are they're there as like
the supporter and the rock and then they
have thought they're not going to say
anything.
Well, look at how much mom's going
through. She is the one that's going
through everything.
And they're all it's all about
supporting mom. What can you do to
support mom? Um but actually, if you do
a man's group
and particularly if you bring in men
like happened on your evening where
there's a dad there who goes, "It's
okay."
They open up amazingly and they will
tell you all their fears and all their
and then having some experienced dads
there is really powerful because they
will turn around and go, "That happened
to me, but I can assure you it's all
fine."
And they can ask all the silly questions
that they think are silly and they're
not going to ask in front of a load of
women and also most antenatal teachers
are women and it's just a really
powerful thing to do. But we have to
prepare these fathers. You're like
saying to them, "You do all this
preparation for mom." And you read all
these books and they say how to support
mom and how to do this. And that's
really important. I get that.
But there's very little out there that
actually says, "And what about dad?"
Because he is actually going through a
profound
emotional, biological, physiological
change as well.
It's just not quite as obvious
because there's not a big bump, you
know? But actually, his brain is
changing just as much as hers. We know
that now from scans. You know, we can
see the change in a man's brain when he
becomes a father.
But we just need to share the knowledge,
I think. And that's why it's very
important to me to do a lot of talks, to
do a lot of podcasts, to write The Life
of Dad because I want to And that's
written for fathers because I wanted
them to have a book that wasn't about
supporting mom, that wasn't about what's
happening to mom, that was about what's
happening to them.
Because I think that's really important.
What?
You've mentioned about this adjustment
in androgens, so testosterone drops. It
It actually drops a little, I think,
when you get into a committed
relationship, and then it drops a little
bit more.
and then it strup Yeah, exactly. And
then it dramatically
Yeah. Yeah. Dramatic drop.
What?
What's going on with
gray matter? What's happening to our
brains?
Okay. So, what we see in the brains is
we see two key changes in the brain,
which we see and they're identical in
women. And we see First of all, we see
changes in the very core of the brain,
um particularly in the limbic area of
the brain, the amygdala,
uh and the hypothalamus, which are
related to risk detection,
which is understandable. So, as a
parent, you need to be very good at risk
detection. You need to look out for
those for those risks to your baby.
Second really big ones are in the outer
areas of the brain. So, we see the areas
related to empathy increase in size,
which again is obvious. You need to be
very good at reading your child's
emotional needs, what their emotional
state is, what they're going to need,
and particularly when all you've got is
somebody screaming at you, you need to
be very good at that.
The other thing is all those really good
parenting skills like attention and
planning and problem-solving and
organizing. So, those areas of the brain
are associated with that. Some of them
related to executive function. They also
increase in size.
So, you see all these areas becoming
primed so that you are as good at this
as you possibly can be. And we see that
happening in men and in women.
I wonder if
uh the hardcore productivity pilled
corner of the internet gets a hold of
this conversation and finds out that
their executive function can be
increased by having kids, they might
start having children.
Suddenly everyone's having children,
yeah.
Having children is a productivity hack.
No, they'll say, "Look, look think about
how much I'm going to be able to
parallel process. My my Google
calendar's going to be completely put
together. Um
Yeah, you'll just be knackered, but
anyway.
Yeah, true. Yeah, the the sleep offset
may may derogate that. Talk to me about
um this
risk detection
Mhm.
stuff and fear stuff because there's
these videos on the internet. It's um uh
dads What is it? It's like dads doing
unbelievable things. The child's
about on the corner of the couch and
falls off and this father gets like some
Odell Beckham Jr. reverse crow grip
thing or like they pluck some pluck some
before a random tractor accident occurs
or whatever, you know, like So there's
there's this increase in that, but does
this mean that parents, specifically
dads, but also mothers,
is their baseline anxiety
is that raised? Does this bleed across
into the rest of their life, too? Do
they have a sense of fear, anxiety,
stress, whatever occurring as well?
We do tend to It's partly It's a quite a
complex multifactorial thing. You do see
an increase increase in cortisol in
young parents, obviously.
Um it is a very stressful thing to do,
not only with the lack of sleep, but
also with the sheer amount of learning
you need to do and the fact that yes,
you have to you have to have this
heightened risk detection. We do find
that men, and it's probably to do with
the drop in testosterone, definitely
become more emotional
in situations which they feel relate to
them. So I always get my dad saying, "Oh
my god, I now can't watch charity
appeals on the telly, you know, without
crying."
And it's partly because you've got a
drop in testosterone.
but it's it's it's emotional in a a sad
direction. It's not like they get more
aggressive emotional.
No. No, they tend not to, actually.
That's probably because there's a drop
in testosterone. So we don't see in some
male other animals who don't tend to do
the caring side, but tend to do, for
example, defense of the nest.
We will see more aggressive behavior.
That tends to be caused by the increase
in a hormone called vasopressin, which
actually isn't
terribly important in humans. Men Men
have kind of replaced that with
oxytocin. Um so, we don't tend to see
increases in aggression, but we do tend
to see increases in in stress response,
and we see increases in, yeah,
vigilance, basically. Just sheer
vigilance for what's going on.
Yeah, that's very interesting. Okay, so
let's roll the clock forward. This
imaginary father and his imaginary sleep
deprivation has got to maybe 3 to 6
months in, and the baby's a little bit
less of a puddle on the floor. I've
heard this story of, you know, it's very
important for the child to lie on the
father's chest, skin-to-skin contact.
How much of this is bro science, and how
much of this is legit?
Absolutely legit.
If
there's one thing I will tell a father
after birth is put that baby on your
chest.
Um but still here, even though we've
spent years trying to um educate the
medical establishment, we still find
that fathers aren't offered it as
routine, which is ludicrous.
Um and we still have to say to them, you
have to be assertive enough to ask for
it and say, "Please give me the baby. I
want to put the baby on my chest." The
reason for that is ba- human babies are
sensory beings, like a lot of little
baby mammals.
They do everything. Their senses are
very heightened. One of the senses
that's not heightened is vision.
But they are amazing at smelling.
They're amazing at at feeling and touch.
So, if you put them on your chest as a
father, what happens is they first of
all, they smell you, and they start to
smell who you are, cuz they can't really
see you. Secondly, a wonderful thing
called biobehavioral synchrony happens.
So, when you put a baby on your chest,
they their physiology starts to go into
time with your physiology. So, they'll
come to the same temperature as you.
Their heart rate will come to the same
heart rate as you. Their Their blood
pressure will come to the same blood
pressure as you. Okay? Also, touch is
the key release of bonding hormones.
It you know, oxytocin, dopamine,
beta-endorphin, if you want to release
those, the best thing you can do is use
touch.
Um so, skin-to-skin contact after birth,
skin-to-skin contact at any point during
the baby's life is really, really
critical for fathers. So, it's something
that's routinely given to women
but not to men. And actually, in a way,
arguably, it's more critical for men
because moms got that little bit of head
start with her bonding hormones having
gone through childbirth. Um but, it's
really critical as the first interaction
between a father and child, I think.
Robin taught me about the
release of bonding hormones when
finger over skin movement is kept at 2
cm per second or less.
Yeah, there's a particular Yeah, no,
that's true. There's a particular
rhythm, and it's why we find some touch
or some stroking irritating.
And some stroking really lovely.
And I suppose you you know, you might
have we you know, you you have a partner
who strokes you, and sometimes you're
like, "No, that's really And it's
usually because it's at the wrong
frequency.
We have these special, special hairs and
special nerve cells in our skin, and
it's just a very particular stroke rate
that works.
apparently, that was if you run that
back, and you look at the primatology
side of it, it's a pace at which it
would be quick enough to be able to find
and groom fur.
But, if it was any quicker than that,
you're not going through and actually
being able to pick out whatever the the
things are. Okay, so
we've spoken about kind of some of the
challenges that both dads and moms face.
What is the difference in the roles that
moms and dads are supposed to play?
Like, why why are they here when it
comes to the raising of children?
Okay. So, we have to this this is where
it can all get horribly political, and I
can be misquoted horribly.
Um and picked up by both sides of the
argument.
From an evolutionary point of view, as I
mentioned earlier, evolution hates
redundancy, so it will not cause two
roles, like parenting roles to be
exactly identical if they're not if
that's not required.
Um so what's happened in human evolution
is that there are some things that both
parents do.
So both parents are care, both parents
are highly empathetic. If you look at
the brain activity in the brains of
mothers and fathers when they're
interacting with their children, we see
equal we see synchrony in empathetic
areas of the brain, we see synchrony in,
you know, the caretaking areas of the
brain.
But beyond that, there are some really
distinct differences and they seem to
relate partly to the evolutionary age
of the two roles
and partly to the fact that mom's role
is quite biologically constrained.
Um partly by childbirth, partly by
breastfeeding, particularly in the early
stages where dad's role is much more
flexible. So what we have found is that
if we look at peak activations in the
brain when we're looking at interactions
with mom, dad, and baby.
The peak activations in the maternal
brain are in the core of the brain. So
the limbic area of the brain, the
unconscious brain, very very very
ancient, as old as time.
Um and that's where nurturing is and
attachment is and risk detection is. So
there's really fundamental
caring things. So, you know, you look at
the tiniest little vole or mouse and
it's got the same thing happening in its
brain.
Dad's, obviously that bit lights up, but
the peak in activation is actually in
the neocortex, the the newest bit of the
brain, which is understandable cuz it's
an evolutionary quite young fatherhood.
And there we see a lot of uh activation
in the social cognition areas of the
brain. So that's at the front of the
brain
um and that's to do with being able to
sort of maneuver your way through the
complexities of social life.
Um and there is lots of different things
involved in that, so it might be social
communication.
It might be things like empathy. It
might be things like what we call
sharing, caring, and helping. Um but it
can also be things like resilience,
mental resilience.
Um and so dad's role
I've kind of reduced it in a a simple
catchphrase, but dad's role is to
scaffold the child's entry into the
world beyond the family.
So
what dad is there to do is once all that
very initial nurturing has happened and
the baby's starting to to grow and maybe
mom has another baby, is to take that
child
uh and this is what would have happened
500,000 years ago. Take that toddler
and start to prepare them to go beyond
the family. So the first thing they
might do is go to preschool. And we know
from research that the attachment a
father builds with their child, the
sensitivity of their parenting to that
child is the biggest predictor in how
well that child transitions into
preschool.
So how good are they? How how good are
they at sharing, caring, and helping?
How good is their social communication?
How good is their emotional inhibition
and regulation? Those are all driven
mostly by the relationship that child
has with their father.
Because it seems to be that dad is the
key to this. And what's really
interesting is as an anthropologist I
study fathering around the world. So
obviously
how a culture views fathers does vary.
Um and we have certain views in the West
and those aren't necessarily the views
shared around the world.
But what we do see is regardless of
whatever culture you're in
every dad is doing that social
scaffolding. When you reduce everything
away, that's what he's doing. So it
might be, you know, I studied a a group
in Kenya called the Kipsigis who are tea
planters, quite a patriarchal community,
very male-driven.
But dad will take will first of all as
soon as the child is able, he will take
the child into fields to teach them how
to use the crop. But the most important
thing he does is he takes them to the
market.
And he teaches them how to build the
social network that's going to enable
that kid to negotiate and sell the tea.
So he will do that. Even in the West we
do that. You know, dad might be might
you know, get the really good um work
experience gig because he's built a
really good network on the golf course
or at the country club or wherever it
might be. And so dads are very
involved in making sure their kid has
the network, has the social skill, has
the resilience
to actually survive in our world. And
part of that resilience is things like
taking appropriate risk, helping you
know, helping them deal with challenge,
helping them deal with failure.
Um and we see that from very early age.
That's what rough and tumble play does
partly. And so dad is there to make sure
this kid has the skills to survive
outside the family. And that seems to be
the key role of fathers.
What is the role of challenge? That
seems to be one of the key differences
that you found between mom and dad.
Yeah, the role of challenge is because
you know, we live in a really difficult
world.
And
you as a as a child and as an adolescent
have to learn to deal with that
challenge, navigate that challenge, get
over it, deal with failure, dust
yourself down, get yourself back up,
maybe find a different way around it or
whatever it might be. And so you and you
need to you need to be given those
challenges
in a way as a child which is
challenging but not too much.
And that and that's difficult.
Um you know, some some parents shy away
from that completely and it's the whole
cotton wool ball thing.
Others might go a little bit too far. Um
but it's really important your child
confronts challenge and it seems to be
the dad is the key one in doing that.
And it starts because of rough and
tumble play. So rough and tumble play
starts at around
six to nine months. It's when you see
fathers and most fathers do this and
most people recognize it. You know, it's
when you
you know, um it's quite robustious. It's
quite physical. There'll be wrestling,
there'll be tickling, there'll be
running around, there'll be jumping off
stuff, there'll be throwing each other
around the room.
And it's really critical to child
development. Um when dads say to me,
"What's the one thing I can do with my
child
to build our bonds, to help my child?"
I'll say, "Play with them."
It is the most critical thing. And this
whole fun parent thing kind of annoys me
a little bit because actually, when dads
do it, they're not I mean, it is fun,
but they're not doing it cuz they're fun
parent. They're doing it because it
actually, developmentally, is critical
to the child. Because the child starts
to learn about reciprocity in social
relationships. Play has to be fun for
both people.
Otherwise, it's, you know, it just ends.
So, there's a give and take of play.
It's understanding, you know, am I
actually pushing the other person too
much that they're not enjoying this
anymore? So, empathy is involved. It's
about physical challenge. Oh my god,
this is quite difficult, but I can
surmount it. It's about risk. How can I
assess risk? Actually, flinging myself
off of the top of this climbing frame it
might be too much.
So, and it actually starts to build the
child's ability to see all those things.
And that just goes on throughout life.
So, we know looking at adolescence
that the biggest factor in a child's
mental health when we look at the
parental input is actually the
relationship they have with their dad.
Dad is like the superhero of mental
resilience in adolescence.
and girls?
For boys and actually, for girls, it's
even more powerful.
And we think that it's only really been
studied
in the West, though there's been a few
studies in China.
Um we think that's because in a
patriarchal world, if you have a dad
who spends time with you,
who inputs into your life, who values
your opinions, first of all, it's
amazing for your self-esteem.
Uh and it's saying, you know, you are
valuable, what you say is valuable, and
I'm going to support you in saying it.
And in a patriarchal world, that's quite
a powerful message to give a girl. That
it's okay for you to voice who you are.
And I am here and I'm going to support
you in that. Um so, actually, it can be
a bigger impact on girls than on boys.
So, that's just getting up into
adolescence. Just to round out that sort
of conversation about play,
what does play do for the father or for
the bond with the father beyond the
child in isolation? I know risk, I know
reciprocity, I know empathy.
Yeah. Okay, so it's one of the key ways
that fathers build their bond is through
play because as I've said, you have to
interact with your child.
Um and one of the key ways you can do it
is through rough and tumble play because
because it's
fast and it's breathless and it's
exercise and it's touch and sometimes
there's a little bit of pain, it
releases a lot of oxytocin and
particularly beta-endorphin which is
your body's painkiller and is released
during exercise.
And those are really powerful bonding
chemicals. And because it's so fast and
so in a way time efficient, it does it
in this soup top way.
So you could give your baby a massage
and that would be lovely and they get
some beta-endorphin, they get some
oxytocin. But if you rough and tumble
play with them, it's much much more of
an impact, it much higher levels of
those chemicals. So it's actually a
really good way of building a tight bond
pretty quickly with a child. What's
really really interesting is rough and
tumble play is mainly a Western
phenomenon.
We do see it in other cultures,
but it's rarer and that is because most
fathers in Western cultures don't have
much time with their children.
They are time poor because of the
culture we have and they're the primary
breadwinner. And therefore this is
developed to enable them to very quickly
bond with their children in this time
efficient way.
high ROI uh
strategy for bonding.
Yeah. Yeah. Whereas if we go and look at
let's go and look at the Aka, okay, who
are in the Congo, they are the most
hands-on fathers in the world. They
spend at least about 55 to 60% of their
day in actual physical contact with
their children.
They don't really do it, but they are
with their children all day. They're
carrying them, they're singing to them,
they're telling them stories, they're
going on the on the net hunt with them.
They don't need to do it in the same
way.
And so they don't.
I know that it's going to be hard to
make the comparison because of the
difference in culture and so on.
Is there something different about the
upbringing, the risk tolerance, the
empathy either in childhood,
adolescence, or adulthood of the
children who are given this more
protracted lower intensity bond with dad
uh from the Aka as opposed to the high
peak high high ROI thing. I'm wondering
if there's something that the rough and
tumble play gives or doesn't give that a
flatter longer equivalent of play per
day does.
No, we don't really see any difference
actually in terms of bonding, in terms
of attachment, in terms of adjustment of
children. Um the only difference
actually between something like the Aka
and maybe some
Western fathers is the degree to which
they will allow their children to
confront risk. So, little Aka baby,
little Aka toddlers walking around with
knives.
You know, it's it's a hunter-gatherer
society. They don't quite have the same
uh I don't know, lack of tolerance for
for severe risk and actually children
learning skills early on. So, actually
that's really the only difference you
see with them is that they're there, you
know, lighting fires and carrying knives
and doing all these things at a very
young age, which probably most of us
would kind of balk at, but they seem to
be fine.
Roll the clock forward then. Let's get
into adolescence and the particularly
useful role of dads when we get there.
Yeah. So, adolescence is a key time um
and it's a time when we see a lot of
rewiring of the adolescent brain. So,
when you go through puberty, there's a
lot of de-wiring, re-wiring.
And it's a difficult time for children.
It's a particularly difficult time
mental health-wise because we're
starting to see
a change in the focus of attachment from
parents to peers.
And that means that actually your
ability to navigate the social world at
that point is really, really critical.
And we see a lot of the mental health
issues that young people have manifest
themselves within the social sphere. So,
things like social anxiety, for example.
Things like body issues. They tend to be
within the social sphere caused partly
by the
society in which the child lives. And
because of that, it seems to be that
because dad is the one that has the
skills to scaffold the child and also
the person who has been like the key
resilience builder in the child. That
continues into adolescence. But what's
really interesting is dad doesn't really
have to do anything amazing. So you
don't have to spend hours with your
adolescent or you don't have to
you know
spend lots and lots of money. Actually,
what seems to work with adolescents is
just feeling that you as a father value
their company.
And you as a father, as a busy person,
have taken the time to spend time with
them maybe doing a hobby they like. Or
it can be something as mundane as
washing the car, walking the dog, making
Sunday lunch. Just something where the
dad has said, "I'm going to spend this
time with you."
And what's really interesting is is how
children view
whether or not their parents value them
differs between moms and dads. So
children think their mom values them if
their mom remembers their favorite
breakfast cereal.
Or you know, makes sure their sports kit
is packed or all that kind of thing.
They value their dads because
they value they feel their dad values
them because he spends time with them.
And that might be because you know,
dad's time is seen as this very
concertinaed thing. Um so it's about
doing those things with the child. It's
about having a secure attachment to the
child. And secure attachment starts as
soon as birth begins. But if you can
maintain that secure attachment all the
way through to adolescence, it's really
really powerful. And we know that what
you do with your kid as an adolescent as
a father carries them well into young
adulthood. So there've been studies
showing that dads who have good secure
attachments, who spend time with their
children, first of all those kids have
much high self-esteem. They're much less
likely to have things like depression or
anxiety. They're much less likely to
report loneliness. But as a as a young
adult, for a start their mental health
is better. But also for example, just
dealing with things like stressful
things in their daily life, they are
much more capable of dealing with those
things.
So, what I'm thinking
Yeah.
I've got it in my head about trying to
fold into the discussion
of
teen girl depression,
60% of 12- to 16-year-old US females say
that they have regular or persistent
feelings of hopelessness,
etc., etc., etc.
I'm trying to
work out or deduct the base rate from
that of fatherless homes. I'm trying to
work out, you know, whether Jonathan
Haidt is correct at
folding this at the feet of smartphones
and hijack of female comparison during
the time that they switch from parent to
peer association.
And how much of it is a little bit more
fundamental than that, and it's absentee
fathers. That could be absentee fathers
due to it being single-parent
households. That could be due to the
increase in living costs and the fact
that dad needs to work more, which means
that they're not as involved. That could
be
if Jonathan is adamant that it needs to
be to do with technology, it could be to
do with the distraction or the increase
in distractibility of dad from screens,
which means that he's not spending as
much time with kids. But, yeah, looking
at the
pathologies and challenges that young
men and young women are facing as they
get into adolescence and then young
adulthood,
can you draw lines between
fatherless homes or a lack of male
parental input into
raising kids up?
Do you know what? You've mentioned so
many different factors there, and they
will all be important because it's a
multifactorial problem. I want to make
two points. The first is that we need to
be very careful about what we mean when
we talk about a father.
Okay? In the West, we associate the word
father with biological father, and so we
talk about father absence.
Because the biological father is not in
the home or not in the life of the
child.
If you look in other cultures in the
world,
that obsession with biological
fatherhood is a little bit strange.
So, in some societies, the biological
father doesn't really factor at all,
particularly in matriarchal societies.
Uh in many societies, they have what's
known as a social father, and that can
be a grandfather, an uncle, an elder
brother, lots of people. So, in South
Africa, for example, it's quite normal
within the black communities for the
grandfather to raise the children
because the father has to go away to
work.
And that's perfectly normal, and the
grandfather has a special name for
father.
Um in some societies, kids have whole
teams of fathers who all do something
different.
And that might be the biological father
and loads of social fathers, who knows?
So, I think we need to be very careful
about talking about absentee fathers,
because actually, if you look at many
children who are in single-parent
households with a mother,
if you ask them who are the significant
men in your life, they will come up with
some.
And we assume there is no father figure
in their life, but that father figure
doesn't have to be the dad. It could be
the grandparent. It could be a teacher.
It could be a coach. It could be a
brother. It could be your mom's best
friend.
Um it doesn't have to be the biological
father. It has to be someone who is
willing to and might even not even
consciously know what they are doing.
But they are feeding into that child's
development. So, first of all, I would
make that point. Um that we are very
biased in the West towards biological
fathers, and we needn't be.
Um secondly, it's very multifactorial.
Um certainly, I think I think
part of the reason I support fathers in
relation to more equality in the home
with things like paternity leave and
things like that is because they are
important to children.
And they are important to child
development. And we find that children
who have more input from their father do
tend to be more resilient. And they do
tend to be have more successful
outcomes, particularly girls.
So, you know, that is a factor, having
that that father figure in your life.
And that's why we do try and fight here
in the UK for more rights for fathers.
Um
but then again, I agree, social media is
an issue. And I talk about that in a
very different area of my life, talking
about the mismatch between uh the speed
of evolution of the human brain and the
speed of our ability to innovate. So, we
have a very very ancient brain that
can't cope with the way we've innovated
the iPhone, for example.
We are not made to operate within that
environment, and it's a major it
handicaps our brain's ability.
Uh we don't get all those lovely
positive bonding hormones. We don't
we are seeing something that quite often
is lying to us, and we're not terribly
good at spotting what's lying to us if
it's not right in front of us. So,
theory of mind, we are not very good at
theory of mind at a distance.
So, social media certainly has a role, I
think.
But it's not
the only role, and it really does depend
upon the child. So, there's a real
interplay between the child's
personality
and social media.
So, you will get a child you could get
it one child who was on social media 8
hours a day and would be completely
unaffected by it. And then you'll get
another child who is more vulnerable.
It's really really complicated. But I
think the reason why I try and unpick
the fatherhood bit of it is because
kids have evolved to have these two
roles in their lives.
And the science shows us that the dads
are primed to do this role. The science
shows us that the fathers are important
developmentally to their children. We
know that where fathers have secure
attachments to their children, the
children have better outcomes. And we
know that that's good for society.
So, the reason why I fight for
fatherhood and more equality in the home
uh is because of that, and because it is
good for children. It's good for
fathers, it's good for families, and
it's good for society. It's good for
women. If you can get fathers if you can
get equal paternity leave for fathers
with maternity leave, women can go back
to work sooner.
They have less of a career penalty.
They're then sharing what we call the
career penalty with the fathers.
The gender pay gap reduces. You know, so
it's kind of for those of us who
campaign and do the research of fathers,
it's kind of a bit of a no-brainer, but
um convincing governments is another
issue.
Yeah, why is it the case, given that
there
mothers want the best outcomes for their
children?
Mhm.
Mothers also want the best outcomes
presumably for themselves.
Mhm.
These are facilitated
through
making men more integrated, through
making them more necessary into the
raising of children.
Mhm.
Is it just short-sightedness and a lack
of insight into your work that's causing
a kind of anti-dads
surplus of requirements male narrative
at the moment culturally, do you think?
There are several things. Our media
culture hasn't changed enough. So, we
still It's getting better. We still We
have less representations of the
completely useless dad
um or the surplus dad in adverts on
telly and sitcoms, but it's still there.
It's a very ingrained
uh belief.
Homer Simpson, Peter Griffin.
Oh, you know, and if you've ever watched
Peppa Pig, I mean, I love Peppa Pig, but
Daddy Pig is just the worst
representation of fatherhood you've ever
seen. Um he's completely useless. Um uh
and that's funny. Um so, there's that.
There's
there is and I am
feminist to my very core. Unfortunately,
there is an element of feminism that
doesn't want men to be involved.
And they want the primacy of the woman
to be kept as a parent.
Um and they feel that men are moving
into what is a female space. Now, if you
look at the evolutionary story and you
look at the science, that's obviously
completely ludicrous,
but it's a belief.
And I have had quite
I've had backlashes from fellow women
because of the work I do.
Because I should be studying mothers
as a woman.
Um so, there is that backlash.
Governments just don't want to invest in
it, you know? It's we've had the system
we've had for such a long time. It
doesn't matter. I can hit them over the
head with my research and my book till
I'm blue in the face. And we have all
been doing it. Recently in the UK, we've
had a massive consultation on paternity
leave. We all trooped up to Parliament.
We all presented everything, which has
been, you know, it's highly, highly
convincing. We could show you the child
outcomes. We could show you how much the
cuz ultimately it's all about money. We
could show you how much the government
will ultimately save. But first of all,
they're not going to save that money for
like three decades. So this current
government I'm not interested cuz I will
be well retired by then.
Um, and
they've just come out at the end and
changed practically nothing.
There was a real reluctance
to do it. You know, um, even though
we've got perfect examples from northern
Europe where it works very, very well.
Yeah, it's
it's a shame. It's a shame. I've been
having a lot of conversations. I had a
lot of conversations about dating for a
long time and now I'm having a lot about
the role of men and masculinity and what
it means to be a man and so on and so
forth. And um, yeah, it's
unfortunate that
any gains for men are seen as a
a loss for women. You know, there's a
zero sumness to a lot of the
conversations. And um, yeah, what else?
What what have people said you're this
self-confessed
feminist with her bonafides out front
uh,
writing a book about men and dads and
saying that we need to give them more
budget and more attention and more care
and more sympathy and more resources.
What's the pushback been like upon you?
The pushback is
the pushback is I quite often get the
response
quite an angry response. So I I every
now and then I get called in to do radio
phone-ins. And quite often I will get
somebody on the phone saying to me,
"These men, you know, haven't given
birth. They haven't been through the
pain of it. They I particularly if
you're talking about postnatal
depression actually. They should all
just pull themselves together. So that's
a classic. Um that there are limited
resources and all those resources should
go to women. Um and I can kind of see
that argument here with the NHS, but
what really gets me is the lack of
empathy because
empathy doesn't cost anything.
It's limitless.
But we have to pay the zero-sum game
with empathy as well. So if we give any
empathy to men,
then women get less. No, actually,
that's not what happens. We're just
empathizing with both of them.
Why is it that it's seen as a loss that
you're supporting a man? You can
actually support both. It's amazing, but
you can. So you very much get that
attitude that you take you give to one,
you're taking away from the other.
Um and
I find that sto- I find it astonishing
and I I you know, when people say
particularly the pull themselves
together thing to me, I said, you know,
I do say to them, "Would you ever say
that to a woman who is struggling?"
So why do you think it's okay to say
that to a man?
You know.
Um but it's it's it's very ingrained. I
think it's
I think they feel threatened. Um I think
they feel threatened by what it means
about their identity and it doesn't mean
anything about their identity.
But I think they think it does. It means
that we're taking some sort of
primacy away from them, I think maybe.
I had a uh
conversation I've had a few
conversations, but uh Dr. John Barry
from the Center for Male Psychology got
me thinking about something. So I'm
going to read you a little excerpt from
one of my newsletters recently. A common
question is, "Why don't men just do
better? Surely they can try harder in
school, employment, and health. Chop
chop, men. Hurry up and stop being so
useless." Well, no other group is told
that when they suffer with poor
performance or accolades in the real
world that they should just pull
themselves up by their bootstraps. We
don't tell any other group to talk about
their problems. In stead Instead, we
spend billions in taxpayer money and
private charity to set up committees,
departments, campaigns, and funds to
solve the problem. In simple terms, if a
woman has a problem, we ask what can we
do to fix society? If a man has a
problem, we ask what can men do to fix
themselves? And I think that this sort
of imbalance, specifically in certain
areas, this isn't everywhere, and there
are still areas in which the imbalance
runs in the other direction, but
especially around parenting, you know,
there is this
empathy gap, for sure.
Oh, yeah. No. Yeah.
Dr. John Barry calls it gamma bias, I
think is his technical term for it. And
um
yeah, it it sucks. You could have a guy
going through post-natal depression
being told, "Oh, you didn't go through
the pain of childbirth." Cuz yeah, also
I wasn't sure that I was going to be a
good dad. And and you now you're telling
me that I'm I'm not being sufficiently
supportive as well.
you know, I can remember one of the
one of the guys who I worked with who
was possibly one of the worst case of
post-natal depression I saw. And he was
he his wife the the birth was traumatic.
He was left standing in a room on his
own for
6 hours with the newborn baby. He'd been
shoved in the rain. The wife had been
taken off somewhere. Nobody's told him
anything. He didn't They didn't give him
anything to feed the baby. Baby was
screaming. He didn't know what he was
doing. So first of all, he thinks his
wife's dying. Nobody tells him whether
she's dying.
And he's left with this baby. Then they
get discharged from hospital, and
because he only gets 2 weeks paternity
leave,
that she's in hospital for 10 days. So
he's actually home with the baby and the
wife who's still very ill for 3 days.
Then he has to go back to work, leave
her on her own. So he's like, "Oh my
god." Feeling horribly guilty, terribly
stressed. "How is she going to be on her
own?" Gets home at night, tries to do
everything, stays up all night with the
baby, then goes back to work. Then
because, you know, now I have to earn
more money cuz I've got a child. Then
takes a promotion
um to a new job. So you've got the
pressure of trying to impress in the new
job, learning the new job, still got a
sick baby, sick mom at home with baby.
And surprise, surprise,
he gets post-natal depression.
Of course he does. He's got all these
different conflicting, you know, with
men are told now, you have to be the
hands-on father and you have to be the
perfect father and you have to be really
good at this and you've got all these
celebrity fathers with their papooses
and it's all amazing. And but you're
also still told, no, but you still have
to be the breadwinner and you have to be
the rock and you're not allowed to have
any emotions about this and you're not
allowed to have any fears.
Because this is about mom.
And so that is a massive pressure cooker
of stress.
And if you
and you know, then we add on top of that
maybe, you know, you might have had a
history of depression before or you
might have had a pre-history. Or let's
say your partner's depressed. If your
partner's depressed, you are much more
likely yourself to get postnatal
depression.
So it's just this massive, horrible
mixture
that is going to blow.
What would you do
if you were able to prescribe some
cultural, structural, personal,
psychological interventions or
suggestions for people either as a a
group or individually?
What do you wish that more people or uh
governments were doing?
I wish fundamentally
that everybody knew this about men. I
wish they knew the signs. I wish they
knew the story of fatherhood. I wish
they understood how important fathers
were. I wish they understood what
happened to a man. I wish they
understood
how many different things there are to
balance and how difficult it is to be
told you have to be this but you also
have to be this.
And you just have to slot into it, okay?
Just so just do it.
I wish that they knew that story and I
wish there were more groups. I wish when
we when parents did antenatal training
that there was more time spent just with
men
helping them
and seeing them actually that they need
as much support as mom does, but just in
a different way.
Okay? They just need a different sort of
support and they need a different
because they are fundamentally going
through, as much as I said before, as
much of an emotional physiological
change as mom is. It's just hidden.
That's all. It's just not as obvious.
And so I just wish we could share all
this information. I wish that, you know,
when people learned about what happens
to the mom, they learn about what
happens to dad.
And it's just seen as an equal journey.
And what's what's really sad is actually
for a lot of couples, it is an equal
journey. And actually moms find this
really hard when they go into hospital
and dad's shoved in a corner.
Or dad's not asked what he wants to do
or not asked to hold the baby or any of
these things. Or when the health visitor
comes around after birth, you know, and
the mom she'll spend the whole time
going, "How are you, mom?" And will
never ever at any point say, "How are
you, dad?"
"How are you doing? Is there anything
you are concerned about? Would you like
to talk about it?"
You know, cuz he's just the guy in the
corner, you know, making the tea. Um so
I just wish people understood that
fathers are true co-parents. And they're
true co-parents for a very important
reason. And if they weren't important,
they wouldn't be here. We just wouldn't
have them. We'd be like, you know, our
chimp cousins.
So, but it's
on next? What's what's Talk to me about
what's fascinating you now.
What's really fascinating me in the in
the field of fatherhood actually is and
it's partly slightly personal um is uh
fathers of of kids with special needs.
Because
moms themselves of kids with special
needs certainly struggle for support and
recognition, but for fathers there's
again even less recognition. And also
this role of
trying to build resilience and trying to
scaffold your child's entry into the
world beyond the family. That is a whole
bigger job when you have a child with
special needs. Um I have a daughter
who's recently been diagnosed with
autism.
And a big thing for us is, "Okay, how do
we prepare her to survive in the world?"
A world which isn't really adapted to
her needs.
And particularly my my husband
particularly going forward into
relationships and things like that.
That's something that's a real focus for
him. How can we give her the ability to
detect risk? How can we give her the
ability to to deal with challenge and to
deal with the social complexities which
as an autistic person is really hard.
So, that's a real key thing for me now.
It's a very un-researched area.
And so, I'd really like to, you know,
start looking at fathers who are in that
position, I think.
Had the perfect mother for it then. Had
the perfect mother to be able to go out
and do the first-hand research and be
able to come up with the strategies. Dr.
Anna Machin, ladies and gentlemen. And I
absolutely love your work. I think this
is very, very, very important and it's
fascinating. And any friend of Robin's
is a friend of mine as well. Where
should people go if they want to keep up
to date with your stuff on the internet?
You can follow me on Twitter. So, I'm
Dr. Anna Machin on Twitter. And you can
follow Well, you can go to my website,
which is annamachin.com. And it's all on
there.
Oh, yeah. And I appreciate you. Thank
you.
Thank you.
If you enjoyed that episode, then press
here for a selection of the best clips
from the podcast over the last few
weeks. And don't forget to subscribe.