Video summary
Dave Smith argues that mainstream corporate media in Western countries functions essentially as state propaganda designed to cover for powerful interests and spin narratives favorable to them, a role he believes has remained consistent over decades despite recent events. He contends that while lying is not new, the current era is distinguished by how profoundly stupid this propaganda has become due to an inability to adjust to facts on the ground. Smith cites the viral video of Tony Henchcliffe performing at a Nazi rally in Madison Square Garden as a prime example; whereas traditional outlets like CNN reported only isolated clips suggesting bigotry, independent media showed the full context where Henchcliffe was clearly joking, exposing mainstream lies instantly. Consequently, he notes that even corporate networks have been forced to admit they are no longer "mainstream," now relying on content from figures like Joe Rogan and Smith himself for accurate analysis rather than their own reporting. The conversation highlights a significant shift in public trust, with 69% of Americans expressing little or no confidence in the media landscape. Smith attributes this crisis to institutions that have consistently lied about major issues such as wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Russia Gate, often justifying pre-existing plans for regime change through fabricated claims like weapons of mass destruction or imminent genocide. He compares the legitimacy loss of these corrupt entities to the Soviet Union's collapse, arguing they no longer serve their intended role as champions of the people but rather act as enemies who have lost the right to exist. This erosion of trust has driven audiences toward independent platforms where unedited, three-hour conversations allow for genuine debate on complex topics like Ukraine or Israel-Palestine conflicts, which are impossible in scripted news segments that rely on talking points and shutdown tactics against opponents labeled bigots. Social media fragmentation following Elon Musk's acquisition of X (formerly Twitter) has further polarized the information ecosystem, with many journalists fleeing to platforms like Blue Sky while others remain censored or silenced for misgendering individuals. Smith critiques this siloed environment as detrimental, noting that it exacerbates echo chambers and prevents cross-pollination of ideas necessary for a healthy society. He draws parallels between political maneuvering in the media world and historical banking scandals, such as Woodrow Wilson's presidency being funded by big bankers to establish the Federal Reserve Act, suggesting that elite influence over politics is an accepted but dangerous norm regardless of which side holds power. The departure from centralized platforms does not solve the underlying issue of censorship dynamics; instead, it merely shifts where these conflicts play out without resolving the fundamental lack of honest discourse in established institutions. Looking toward future political developments, Smith discusses the Libertarian Party's role and the necessity of drastic government spending cuts to address corruption defined by a massive organization extracting wealth through force rather than voluntary exchange. He reflects on Donald Trump's unique position entering his second term with control over Congress and the Supreme Court, having won the popular vote after being severely burned in 2016 when he lacked experience or plans against entrenched interests like Project 2025 suggests. Smith believes that while it is easier to criticize than to build change, the current cultural shift away from extreme left-wing activism regarding issues like Gaza might provide a window of opportunity for Trump to implement policies such as deporting illegal immigrants without facing the same level of resistance seen previously. Ultimately, he warns against complacency in independent media spaces and emphasizes that true liberty requires standing up to tyranny rather than retreating into comfortable but ineffective echo chambers.
Read the full video transcript
busy few weeks for you yeah it has been
I'm tired yeah what do you make of the
media's performance this year what's
your assessment of
them um man it's like I the answer is
obvious but I'm trying to find the words
to to really I mean it's it's not you
know I I view the the corporate media
apparatus in not just the United States
of America but in in most Western
countries as essentially state Pro
propaganda they might as well be State
media there's essentially no difference
their their job is to cover for powerful
people and to spin the narrative that
those powerful people wish for the plebs
to believe so I think that's always been
true like that's not there's nothing
drastically different in in this last
year as opposed to you know 50 years ago
or something like that and if you look
at the way you know the media lied the
United States into Vietnam or something
like that or you know this is always
what they've been in the business of
doing what's striking to me about the
last year is how profoundly stupid the
propaganda has become and kind of their
inability to adjust to the new facts on
the ground so you know something like
just just for one example that which I
guess I care about because he's a good
friend of mine but so Tony henchcliffe
when he speaks at the at the Nazi rally
in Madison Square
Garden if you are at all plugged into
like social media or this world of
Internet shows that we're a part of you
just kind of know this this video has
gone viral I mean there's you know you
the video of Tony doing his insult comic
routine is you'll see one clip on
Twitter that's got 3 million another has
7 million another has 600,000 another
has that now CN then at the same time is
getting like 200,000 views on their
their daytime show and this show is
telling you that a speaker made a
comment at a trump rally but everyone
who's seen that is also seeing the
actual thing like they can literally see
that you're lying to me so like you got
to step it up here guys you got to
adjust and they just didn't adjust they
and and the lies it's not it's not that
they're lying that's nothing new but the
lies like Joe Biden is sharp as attack
and Camala Harris is a phenomenon of joy
and you know like they were just so
blatant that it you know it's like well
of course nobody's going to be fooled by
this or next to nobody so I think the
best thing that's come of of this
election and the Fallout since is that
even the corporate media has finally had
to admit that they're not the mainstream
anymore and that to me has been really
fascinating watching them they're like
well I guess the real action is over
here with Joe Rogan and with all these
internet shows and not with us which
which has been true for a while you
could just look at the numbers it's it
has been true but to see them finally
have to Grapple with that has that has
been glorious the best clicks that the
mainstream media now get are commenting
on what Independent Media is doing yeah
and and and for good reason man like you
know there there's been a lot of uh um
discussion about this lately and you
know I had uh um Sam Harris called me
out uh you you've been making friends
him and Chris Cuomo you've been making
friends yes yes that's right yes my dear
friends Chris Cuomo and Sam Harris and
you know what he said was that you know
he was like listen you know Joe Rogan
has some comedian Dave Smith on to break
down the history of Ukraine or the
Israeli Palestinian conflict or
something like that and I'm sorry but
that's not that what are we looking at
this guy like he's the next Henry
Kissinger or something like that and to
be clear I get his point like he's not
entirely wrong sure it is kind of
ridiculous that we don't have serious
credible institutions and we don't you
know like okay there's a fair point to
that but if you're just being honest and
not as Sam Harris is trying to
rationalize away why
he's not wrong for getting all of the
major stories wrong over the last few
years the the truth is that look convers
like shows like this and shows like Joe
Rogan's show and shows like a whole
bunch of these these internet shows
there's just what's going on is is just
levels more intelligent and thoughtful
and interesting than anything that's
happening at CNN or ABC news or any it's
like it is the dumbest I mean I just was
listening um to uh I don't know if you
saw this but there's a clip one of the I
can't remember her name but she's one of
the CNN ladies and um she's uh she's
she's being interviewed about what went
wrong in this election and I'm listening
to it and it's just like the dumbest
take like there's not one thoughtful
moment there's not one thing where you
go oh okay that and and I'm somebody
personally who's like I really enjoy
reading like brilliant left Wingers
brilliant right Wingers you know
Libertarians different all types of
different views if you're thoughtful and
interesting I think there's something
that can be gained from their work I you
know I am certainly not a left-winger
but I think gome Chomsky is like like
must read stuff like you're missing the
game if you haven't read gome Chomsky
you I promise you you will benefit from
Reading him and like so I'm just saying
if you're just objectively looking at
this I'm sorry Tucker Carlson and Glenn
Greenwald sitting down and having a
discussion is is just light ears more
intelligent and thoughtful than anything
that you'll ever catch out of any of
these corporate media outlets and so
like for them to all look around like
well this is ridiculous that we're
relying on on Joe Rogan and Dave Smith
like yeah okay it is but it's also for a
reason well look it's the best that
we've got you're right the the fact that
the mainstream media is totally bereft
of any honesty or useful or interesting
Insight uh is not good and yeah is it a
damning indictment of our media
landscape that we have to turn to you
and Rogan for like accurate analysis and
and insight or at least something which
is original or at least something which
is said because you believe it as
opposed to because it's what you think
is socially acceptable or will tow the
party line or will get the outcome that
you want that's not to say that people
don't have their own everybody is pushed
by biases that they're conscious and
unconscious of but yeah damning
indictment indeed and yet who do you
propose that we speak to it's the same
conversation I have this all the time
around masculinity people will happily
Point their finger at a number of uh
role models that are often held up for
men uh and say we don't like them I'm
like okay who' you suggest instead and
there's no one so it's like right okay
identifying a problem without proposing
a solution seems uh unuseful and yes uh
should we be turning to uh Dave Smith
and Joe Rogan to be like the [ __ ]
harbingers of Truth in 2024 I alas here
we are
yeah well that's that's exactly right
you know and if uh if if the
institutions had done a better job none
of this would exist I mean if you think
about this the Head Start that they had
on all of us not to mention the fact
that these are I mean even listen you
know like I Joe Rogan has some money in
the bank but he doesn't have anything
like the resources that CNN has doesn't
have a multi-billion dollar operation
you know what I mean Joe Rogan's like a
a few guys that's his whole operation
and so the it should say something that
he's not only caught them but has lapped
them several times over and you know
that's that's kind of unfortunately
where we are and I I get your point on
the masculinity issue I think it's like
the perfect uh comparison where okay you
you may not like Andrew Tate or someone
like that but I don't know for these
young for for a a 20-year-old young man
who's had nothing his entire life except
has probably grown up without a father
was probably thrown on you know Ridin or
Aderall or something like that when he
was a kid every every teacher has been a
woman every uh um you know college
professor or any influence in his life
has had nothing to say except that
masculinity is toxic and that somehow if
you want to get up and run around like
from from the first grade if you want to
get up and run around that's worse than
someone who wants to sit and listen and
like I'll tell you as some I have a a
son and a daughter and it is I mean I
when my daughter was I remember when she
was like a year and a half old and she
would sit on my lap and she would stare
into my eyes and we'd play like patty
cake and she'd like touch my face
because it's so sweet and my son from
the time he was a year and a half old
like if you tried to put him on your lap
he was diving off head first you know to
go Sprint into the wall and then fall
down and then you know either either
start crying crack up laughing or
whichever one it's going to be but so
it's like Oh Yeah from the very
beginning we're instilling in these kids
that masculinity is bad and femininity
is good so of course they're going to
look for somebody who could be a so
again to your point it's like okay so if
you don't like this guy will then
provide something you know that usually
right and this is true throughout
history is that usually when I wouldn't
say usually always when far right when
when far right or far-left radical
groups actually take over or get a
strong foothold it's because the
establishment has failed on every level
and you could you picked the historical
example that's always the case and if
the establishment is doing a great job
listen if we had peace and prosperity
and you know what I mean like a healthy
Society there's no way you would see the
the far left and the far right gaining
as much traction as they are today why
do you think it is that it's all either
the Bernie Sanders Wing or the
right-wing populist Wing that has any
traction amongst voters cuz the
establishment has failed is it people
unhappy with the current situation so
throwing out the current order and
trying to move as far away from what
they see as moderate or reasonable or
right now as is possible is that the
sort of thesis here I mean I think so I
think I think that's a a large part of
it for sure and I think that you know
certainly with like young kids on on the
left um they're embracing socialism
because they view that as the opposite
of what we have right now and as far as
like the kind of right-wing populist uh
movement I don't even think you know
it's been fairly incoherent in terms of
theory it's not really clear and and I
think we're going to see a lot more of
that emerg now it's already kind of
started to with like v ramaswami um and
his kind of push against
big government right-wing populism and
more for like well no that's actually
not the best theory guys let's not go in
that direction but I think the the truth
is that Donald Trump's drain the swamp
message is really what resonated with
voters that it's really like we know
this whole thing is corrupt and we
oppose that and that's enough to unify a
lot of people that was enough to get me
to vote for Donald Trump and I don't
like a lot of things about Donald Trump
but I'm I'm pretty unified in looking at
Kamala Arison going I'm against that
yeah 69% of Americans have absolutely no
or very little trust in the corporate
media 31% of Americans are [ __ ] as
you cited not long ago uh what do you
think happens moving forward with uh
sort of Trust in Media are the are the
media going to learn anything from this
do you think that they're going to Pivot
or change well I mean I don't think so
and I I don't see how they can and I'm
not like the best at predicting the
future I've gotten things wrong uh in
that regard but even just looking at
like the post-mortems over the last few
weeks none of them even the ones like
there's kind of a split between within
the corporate media between the real
loons who are like no it was sexism and
racism and that's all that we're going
to say about this you know and then
there's like the ones who are I guess I
only have one foot off the cliff who are
like well maybe you know there are
certain things we could have done better
maybe the transing the kids thing was a
little bit too far or something like
that but even with those guys that just
none of them and in in some ways it's
just because they're so strongly
incentivized not to admit this even to
themselves but none of them can really
have an honest postmortem none of them
can really go like oh I guess what
happened is that we just consistently
lie through through our teeth and we've
gotten every single issue wrong every
single one of them on the side of power
like there's not one of all of the the
issues you know if if you were to just
say in the 21st century what has the
corporate media gotten completely wrong
and you could list off like these
humongous that you know like from the
war in Iraq to the financial recession
you know um Co and you know Russia gate
and all this stuff isn't it convenient
that they always get it wrong on the
side of the CIA it's so bizarre you know
and none of them can admit that and none
of them can admit that oh we were lying
when we said this is a great economy
actually we've totally gutted this
economy and and rigged it against any
honest workingclass person and I mean
like you know it's like that was one of
the major ones that was just
unbelievable to watch them pretend this
is a really great economy and when it's
it's terrible for working people is the
one of the worst economies the worst I
think in my lifetime and so again it's
just you look at them okay they have no
ability to actually grapple with what
got them here and why they've lost all
their credibility and then on top of
that you know and and this was a thing
that I think a lot of people got wrong
because I I even saw a lot of people who
I kind of agree with in respect saying
that Camala Harris made a huge mistake
by not going on Joe Rogan's podcast when
she was invited on but I think you've
got it all wrong if you're looking at it
like that that that was a wise move on
Camala Harris part that there's no way
that would have gone good for her
there's no way it wouldn't have been a
disaster for her because Camala Harris
is not built to be able to speak openly
and unguarded for three hours her whole
thing is she's got to say talking points
because otherwise you might find out
that she has nothing she does she's not
interested in any policy she doesn't
have a deep thought on a single issue
and so they've constru there's a new
game in town now and what it's an
amazing president that's been said over
this last election where now you have to
if you want to be president of the
United States you have to go and sit for
an unedited threeh hourong in-depth
conversation and Trump had to do a bunch
of them and it's just simply the the
case that what the corporate media does
what the progressive establishment
Democrats do isn't built for that like
it it it just can't be done there there
is nobody if you're let's say if you're
on the side of um transing the kids or
whatever you don't do well in a long
form conversation you rely on shutting
down your opponent by calling them a
bigot and then having censorship and
having the power and having the control
you're you can't because there's just no
defending it it's not like there there's
not one single person out there who's a
good defender of it it doesn't exist
yeah the you may not have noticed this
the other day was transgender day of
remembrance uh not to be confused with
trans day of visibility which is in
March or trans day of action which is in
June uh last week was the last day of
transgender awareness week uh
transparent day was earlier this month
as well uh California legislature has
declared August to be trans History
Month uh pronouns day pronouns day is in
October also in October is gender fluid
visibility week uh non-binary people's
day and non-binary Awareness Week both
in July October designated as
lgbtq History Month which was initially
lesbian and gay history month and of
course lgbtq pride month formerly gay
and lesbian pride month is in June so I
assume that you've been celebrating
appropriately yes I I uh I don't eat
until sundown on all of those days
whatever whatever it is you're supposed
to do I I can't believe you have all
those memorized
Chris look I they're on my calendar I
that's I'm being a good contributing
member of society but yeah this um this
idea of sort of the media landscape and
and it's changing uh it really did feel
like you there was a couple of breakr
moments when Independent Media went
mainstream so the CNN horse Dormer thing
with Joe uh the the onew punch of the
nword video as well shortly after that
uh and then uh a lot of the stuff around
covid labik hypothesis vaccine
skepticism stuff like that uh and then
it kind of you know it came back down a
little bit I think that sort of
independent Crossing over into the
mainstream we saw uh Mr huberman have
his little uh eruption earlier this year
uh and then the election has just thrust
it so much I think into the Public's
iist because so many people are invested
in the outcome of the election so many
clicks and so many eyeballs are bothered
by it and it just Garners all of that
attention so yeah you know it really
wouldn't surprise me if within the next
four years we get to the stage where
there's more than 50% of the population
maybe not more than 50
I I I I often
overestimate how not normal the normies
are and I fa flatten my face a
significant portion of people say we
don't want MSNBC or CNN to host the
presidential debate we want it to happen
on a piece of Independent Media we want
[ __ ] Rogan and Glenn to do it or
Douglas Murray and [ __ ] Chena I don't
know like you know what I mean like we
want that uh and it I feel like we're on
a
trajectory where that doesn't seem as
ridiculous as it might have done only 5
years ago yeah well in a way what seems
ridiculous now would be to have it on
one of the networks I mean it just
doesn't make any sense and I you know I
I know so many like um yeah I I was
going to say blue check journalists but
that's not a thing anymore but if you
remember back in the day on on Old
Twitter that used to be a thing when it
was the journalist with the blue check
and that's how you knew they were like
an official journalist but I remember
all of them for years just like
deriding uh Twitter and and podcast and
it'd be like ah Twitter isn't real life
and oh the podcast Bros are upset does
that even really matter and I remember
always looking at this and being like
guys it's it's as much real life as the
New York Times is real life why isn't in
any it's a show what we're doing right
now is a show there's two people there's
cameras there's a microphone who cares
whe whether it's on the Internet or it's
on FX or something like that it's like
the what matters is how many people are
watching and there's just way more
there's just no listen if Elon Musk and
Joe Rogan decided they wanted to host
the next Presidential uh
debates we all know that that would get
not more views than if Jake Tapper were
to host it but like by orders of
magnitude more viewers on it so why it's
just the more you look at it on paper
you're just kind of like oh yeah it
would make no sense to go in that
direction and all the sense in the world
to go in this direction and all things
being equal that's probably what you're
going to
get just to try and play a bit of
Devil's Advocate for sort of the other
the other direction is there because for
all that I love and am a part uh and
will happily contribute to the
degeneracy of uh The Independent Media
space uh there is a bit of me that
thinks well I never went through formal
media training I'm not held to any
particular uh standards uh fairness
unbiasness all the rest of the stuff
even if the media has totally
disregarded those etc etc etc
um is there a place or is there a way a
case to be made of how we could Salvage
that other side of Defense the more sort
of corporate Legacy Media thing because
I I again I would benefit massively if
everyone just [ __ ] discarded them and
came over to our side but the is a bit
of me that thinks well you know they
they've split tested a lot of how media
works for a long time they have the
money behind them it just seems like
they're pointing in the wrong direction
and if we could just adjust the
direction a bit uh maybe we could have
two really fantastic worlds that that
presented the public with information I
I'm not against that in theory but I I
do think that institutions in
general you there's a line you can cross
of being so corrupt and so evil that you
essentially lose the right to exist you
lose your legitimacy and so I think you
know if in in 1990 someone was arguing
that you know we just need to point the
Soviet Union in the right direction and
then you know what I mean because it's
important it's important to have these
these big institutions or something like
that I think you would go like well no
they've lost their right to exist and I
I think the corporate media is well
beyond that point and by and by the way
I don't like uh from my perspective I
I'm not flippantly making that
comparison I think it's a well-earned
comparison I mean the the corporate
media has lied the American people into
war after war after War over the last 25
years that is I mean millions of
innocent people have been slaughtered
over these conflicts which were they
weren't mistakes or things they got
wrong they were blatant lies and some
people in the corporate media may have
just been paring these lies and not
known that these were lies but all all
you got to look at right to understand
because I love talking about this but
all you got to look at is you go uh
fourstar General Wesley Clark who's on
tape on Democracy Now saying that in
2001 he saw the plans that were not only
to go topple uh the government of Iraq
but also Libya and Syria and I think um
I forget the other I think Lebanon was
in there and there's a whole list of
countries ending in
that we were going to go topple all of
these governments and then years later
well two years later when we went into
to the war in Iraq they said oh it's
weapons of mass destruction and he was
in bed with uh with Osama Bin Laden and
then when we went to toel Gaddafi they
said he's about to go genocidal against
his own people and then when we went to
topal Assad they said oh he's going
genocidal against his own people and
there they make up the lies to justify
the plan that was already the plan from
well before any of this this nonsense
was going on and as a result of those
Wars if you add them all up it's in the
millions of innocent people trillions of
dollars wasted the whole region
destabilized like if that's not enough
to say yeah you've lost your legitimacy
You've Lost Your Right to exist
especially when your role was supposedly
to inform the public and the role
because again this is why I make the
comparison to the Soviet Union in theory
your role was to help the working class
your role was to be the champion of the
people and you've been the greatest
enemy of the people well then I'm sorry
there's no writing that ship the the
correct answer is to abolish that
institution well they're committing such
sepu I think that people are losing
faith in them you like think about the
last five years or so uh I I find myself
being very sort of non-c conspiratorial
very like hopeful about institutions I
still think universities got a strong
place to play etc etc etc and for me
right Canary in the coal mine who's got
[ __ ] lungs of Steel to withstand this
stuff I'm like yeah they suck like they
absolutely suck and uh I I just it's
been face plant after face plant after
face plant and um yeah when it crosses
over I've got this rule uh the parental
clout gauge so uh a story hasn't reached
real mainstream significance when it's
on the front page of the New York Times
when it's trending on Twitter it's when
your dad messages you about it on
Facebook Messenger like that's when it's
really broken through uh like he sent me
a message not long ago saying I see your
friend Mr Rogan is in the news again I'm
like holy [ __ ] like this is really
really broken through another one a
couple of 18 months ago uh that Andrew
Tate spelled t AIT t uh that Andrew
Tate's a nasty piece of work isn't he
I'm like [ __ ] wow Tate you really you
really reached global domination because
you've managed to get my dad in the
northeast of England um but yeah and I I
would I would get the sense that even he
is like yeah this doesn't really feel
right that much anymore uh so yeah I
maybe they're not going to learn and I
don't know maybe suback and the Free
Press and and live streams and all the
rest of it maybe that's going to be the
next sort of media landscape but I feel
like there's a lot of stepping up to be
done there in terms of sort of the
volume uh another point that I'm sure
you've heard talked about before I'd
love to get your take on uh
the boring stories that get covered you
know there is still a place for like
meteorological insights and and surveys
on like really really boring stuff that
the Press kind of still has a hold over
and you hopefully they're not [ __ ]
about with what's happening with the
weather or whatever but maybe they are
uh but with that like you know who's
going to come in who's going to fill
that hole who's going to fill that
vacuum um so yeah there's a lot of uh a
lot of changes to be made another uh
trend that we've been seeing recently is
exit this uh departure of journalists
and users from X what do you think of
this and the move to Blue Sky and sort
of the social media landscape and how
that's going to get partitioned yeah
well I mean I think there's this um
which I think you know if you if you
think back to uh like around 2016
2017 when there you know when when
whenever it was that like the uh you
remember the the Ben Shapiro and Jordan
Peterson and like the the kind of like
owning college kids video first destroys
yes you know it used to be like the um
that Snoop uh dog song would come on in
their classes and they'd be smoking um
but back and and one of the things that
I actually think for the time I think it
was really necessary and kind of a a
great thing I I think you got to move
out of that realm of just owning 20y
olds at a certain point but like uh but
there was something about it where you
would just see it was like a window for
the rest of us who weren't at at
universities to be like wow there has
been this tremendous uh atrophy where no
one no one's pushing back on any of
these ideas and so they haven't
strengthened them and then the first
time they're confronted with someone
pushing back on it like they literally
have nothing they have nothing I like
you know it it would be as simple as
like some 19-year-old would be like you
know I was born a man but I identify as
a woman and like Ben Shapiro would be
like how come you're not a Trey and they
like you know like oh my God he owned
her or him or whatever and there's just
this this Dynamic where there's there's
been a a tremendous weakening and that
you know it's it's just like it's like
anything else it's like if you haven't
been to the gym in years and you're and
you're weak and your muscles have have
all gone through atrophy well the only
answer is you got to start lifting heavy
things again you got to pick up heavy
stuff and put it back down and that's
the way you'll recover and get stronger
and so that's kind of like where we have
to go going forward no matter who um uh
no matter what side we're talking about
um I'm sorry remind me of your question
I kind of uh uh spaced on that where I
had exit going to Blue Sky I'm sorry so
anyway so just with all these people
leaving it just it seems like that to me
again it's like yeah after Elon Musk
came in and bought Twitter and kind of
was like no this isn't going to be a
controlled environment you've seen that
the a lot of these people they rely on
that they rely on the fact that their
their opposition is going to be censored
or kicked off and they can't actually
compete in the marketplace of ideas and
so if those people want to remove
themselves from the conversation fine
but it's that's not going to change the
dynamic I don't think I mean that's not
going to change which shows have big
audiences which accounts have big
audiences and if if they want to go
there you know I've saw what was it one
of the the pollsters who got this
elction C all wrong was like I'm leaving
and going to Blue Sky it's like what to
to go get things wrong by yourself
okay have have fun you
know yeah it's it's weird man because
you if you just say the headline uh
richest man in the world buys social
media website and then endorses
candidate and pushes him to 200 million
people like just that headline is like
[ __ ] like that I don't know that that
that sounds like a lot but on the flip
side of it
so many people on the left were happy
with the finger being pressed on the
scale when it was going in the other
direction and the question now is well
okay is the sense that people have of
Twitter becoming very right leaning and
the suppression of people on the left
and all the rest of it is that it or is
this just a move back to balance and
what you're doing is it's like going
from cold water to lukewarm water that
feels really hot because you were just
so used to having this situation before
and it's like well I don't know the the
people that were getting suppressed or
having their accounts deleted for
misgendering people or misnaming people
or all of that stuff restrictions all of
the stuff that came out they they stuck
about for the most part yeah it was gab
and Truth social but everybody kind of
still played in the pool and and it does
feel a little bit like well I don't know
if as soon as uh a loss occurs
everyone's like Cartman like screw you
guys I'm going home to Blue Sky or
wherever else uh I don't know but I the
fra uring and the fragmenting and this
sort of um siloing of different groups
in different social medias I wonder what
that does because it's going to make
your own Echo chamber and your own bias
even worse the algorithm already does
that your followers already do that uh
you don't even have the offset now of
outrage uh stuff that comes in apart
from I guess maybe things from other
platforms put across onto yours but then
when you see the replies of that
everybody agrees with me so I wonder
whether
the uh myopia on both sides is going to
increase more given that people are
going to cross-pollinate uh the
misunderstanding that everybody has of
everybody else's views also going to
increase more because you never get to
see a reasonable take you never have a
discussion that brings that that uh
volume down although maybe you weren't
having that before in any case I don't
know no I mean it's a I agree with all
of what you're saying and you know just
to the to the first part there you know
I sure I I could see looking at on paper
and going hey the richest man in the
world bought this plat form he throws
his his capital and his influence behind
a political candidate and I could
understand people having an aversion to
that but the truth is that that is just
the way of politics whether you like
that or not I mean over well over a
hundred years so what was it 1912 when
wooder Wilson R for president um he was
funded by the big bankers and then he
got in there and sign the Federal
Reserve Act into law it's like the most
blatant example of like the they're
going to give you money to win this race
and then you're going to get in there
and give them control over the nation's
credit Supply which still is the
craziest freaking thing in the world
that is just kind of accepted now as
that's just how Modern Nation States
operate I guess but that private banking
interests get to print out of thin air
money they get to create money and then
lend it to the big banks at next to no
interest so that they can take that
money and lend it out at interest to the
American people or the the British
people or whatever government we all
have central banks um it's like the the
most blatant scam in the world and and
this goes on all the time and so if Elon
Musk was doing that so that Donald Trump
could pass policy X that would give Elon
Musk billions more dollars I would
certainly be opposed to that it's a
little bit different if he's just doing
it because he believes in the candidate
and by the way I mean you know if you're
talking about giving Donald Trump a
whole bunch of money in order to get a
policy that you want I think Mariam
Maiden would be the one to look at not
Elon Musk and obviously uh George now
Alex Soros or do the same thing for for
Democrats so yeah I mean that's the game
um For Better or For Worse but and
mostly for worse but to your point I
really do like in in deep in my soul I
totally feel the same way as you and I
feel like everybody should be on these
platforms together cuz we got to share a
country so we might as well all be
having this argument together the thing
of it is is that it's not like we were
having that that that wasn't the dynamic
but if anybody from say the I mean look
I you know I debated Chris Cuomo I'd
debate anybody else from the corporate
media if they want to do if they want to
come engage in this conversation in a
good faith manner okay let's do it and
it's not just me I know I speak for you
when I say that and lots of other people
that we'd be like more than happy to
have so if they want to do it that's
fine
but also in any type of relationship
like there has to be standards and just
unifying for the sake of unifying is
never a positive in human intersocial
you know relationships and like it it's
uh if if your wife was like if you hit
me I'm leaving you and you hit her like
that's a reasonable standard for her to
have and like be like no sorry you have
to not do that in order for us to be
together and so
my thing is kind of like
after like all the years of censorship
and all of the years of like covid
tyranny and all of this other stuff it's
like okay hey if you want to come be a
part of this conversation where I'm
arguing that you got all of that wrong
and it was evil what you did then fine
come prove me wrong but if you don't
want to do that and you'd rather leave
fine but the standard is going to be
that neither side gets censored at least
that's how I'd like to see it I've never
been and I don't know anybody anyone who
was like a Critic of the covid insanity
who was saying that the people pushing
lockdowns should be censored or that the
people who were pushing the vaccine
should be censored all of them were
saying let's have this debate so I do
see an asymmetry here where there's one
side that's quite happy to have the
debate and the other side that relies on
censorship so if that side now has lost
the ability to censor and their response
to that is like well I'm leaving like
the husband the husband being like well
if I can't hit you then I'm leaving well
like well okay then well then okay the
door's right there you know I don't know
what to say yeah this uh MSNBC story
with lake and Riley have you been
tracking this I I saw that Rogan tweeted
out the uh the headline of it but I have
not read the uh the article B basically
that the the fact that this person was a
illegal immigrant it's he was an
immigrant in the headline of the story
uh all of the pressure and all of the
attention is placed on how he never
stood a chance and how unfair it was
that he was prosecuted and persecuted in
the manner that he was a person who
killed somebody else not only somebody
else but an American citizen not only
killed somebody else who was American
citizen but did it as an illegal
immigrant and all of this stuff has just
been buried Buried buried uh New York
Times with that fro Loops fact check
thing about RFK it's like the difference
between the American version and the
Canadian version It's not that different
except for the red for and the yellow 3
and the BHT lining inside of the bag and
uh this [ __ ] uh The View with this
Dragon believer thing about Rogan so for
all of
my Whimsical British sentimentality
about you know Dave maybe they're not
too far gone maybe we can't I'm like
guys I'm I [ __ ] this is I can't
burden I can't bear this burden anymore
I cannot shoulder this weight uh just
continual nothing learned nothing
[ __ ] learned at all and um you know
what it feels like it feels it feels
boomy it feels like someone who just
does not have their finger on the pulse
of what is going on and that's where I'm
like are you this [ __ ] dull this this
uninformed about everything CU your only
job is to be informed yeah and uh
apparently so which makes me think that
it has to be a complicity it has to be
uh something Ree of cowardice or
coordination or or uh compliance as
opposed to ignorance I'm like you you
can't be this stupid well and also I
mean I think a lot of it is just being
stuck in your ways you know that old
saying you can't teach an old dog new
tricks like there's a lot of wisdom to
that I don't know about you like I feel
it the older I get I mean I remember
being like 20 and it's almost like
everything is a possibility you don't
even know who you're going to become as
a person but the older you get get
you're kind of like yeah I know I know
who I am and we're not changing that at
this point like sorry we're far we're
far past that I mean I could Tinker
around the edges a little bit but you
know and I mean the New York Times what
was that I could I saw someone actually
I first saw it because someone posted
like just a screenshot of the text and I
read it and then I was like I got to go
pull up this article there's no way
there's just no way that this was
actually the go but he got that wrong
like they literally say he got that
wrong and then the next sentence is how
he got it right it's just unb but I
think so many of these guys it's just
like this is what they've been doing
forever and there's this is what I was
saying before it's it's really it's
stunning but the inability to Grapple
with this new situation and that the
facts on the ground have changed and you
are just going to pretend that it's the
same old world and and particularly when
when the the disparity in audience is so
large you know like it's it's like
you're not even winning you're still
doing this thing and you're not even
winning yeah like let's say let's say
you do a show and it gets like two
million you know views an episode and I
do a show and it gets like 2,000 views
an episode and you're going to lie about
me you're going to say Hey you know Dave
believes all these things that I don't
really believe well okay morality of
that aside that's a fairly effective
strategy because a lot of people are
just going to hear from you and they're
not going to hear when I respond to you
but if I've got 2 million and you've got
2,000 and your strategy is to lie about
me well well that's a really stupid
strategy because so many more people are
going to hear the truth and the the few
who hear you are going to know that
you're lying and so it's just like that
it's it's it's right in front of you
where you're like what do you think are
are you still act and and you know I I
remember in my lifetime when that was
the case when they had a monopoly on
information and they could just lie
about people if they wanted to remove
them they could just tell you this guy's
a racist don't don't listen to him
anymore I mean look the uh Rogan enwood
video uh was my favorite example of that
because what the media tries to do and
this is one of my least favorite sort of
parts of the internet is to take uh an
indiscretion uh which may be an error or
may be actually uh something that they
commissioned to do that they meant to
say uh and say first off this is what
they meant to say so there's no such
thing as misspeaking uh secondly after
that they say this is not one small
isolated perspective or error this is
indicative of an entire ideology this is
the tip of the iceberg and below it is
just bigotry and sewage and transphobia
and racism and white supremacy and
whatever whatever slime they want to
throw at you but the difference with the
Rogan position was the media was saying
this is the tip of the iceberg um
Millions hundreds of millions of people
were saying I've seen the whole Iceberg
I've watched 500 a, multip thousands of
hours of this guy and I I don't think
that you're right and that the ability
to take a
single uh indiscretion error Vector from
somebody who is speaking a lot like
inevitably there's going to be errors
that come out uh and saying not only did
they mean to say it but and this is
indic it proves that they're the
transphobe bigot xenophobe racist
whatever that we always knew that they
were it's like it's such a tired [ __ ]
Playbook and it really balls me and on
top of that it makes me concerned it
makes me tread more carefully because I
think oh God like what if what if this
minor misspeak what if the way that I
put this particular sentence together is
constructed incorrectly and then
construed in a manner that somebody else
can you I'm like this is not it's not
[ __ ] cool no 100% man and and just
like so to your point about having seen
the entire Iceberg I think that's so
spoton and particularly with something
like uh The Joe Rogan Experience where
the guy has you know I feel like because
I've done Joe's podcast so many times at
this point I feel like his I think his
listeners have that relationship with me
because it's just when you go there it's
it's a you know you talk for three hours
and people really it's not like doing a
a Nightly News show where you come on
and there's this energy of like I'm
performing the news now you know hello
everybody and welcome to the Nightly
News at ABC and our top story you know
it's it's not like that it's not
scripted it's a conversation you people
are going to hear the things that I want
to rant about that I want to talk about
you're also going to see me in a
situation where where Joe just throws
something at me that I I wasn't
expecting and you'll see how my mind
works and how I think about things how I
take in new information and all and you
sat there for three hours and really got
to know and I've done the show like a
bunch of times but Joe's done every
single one of them like the fans who are
fans of Joe Rogan they listen to him for
9 hours a week in their like they know
him you know I I get people all the time
cuz because we're good friends and
they'll be like oh what's Joe Rogan like
and you're like you know what Joe
Rogan's like what do you that's what Joe
Rogan's like by the way for anybody I've
how much time you've spent with him but
that's what he's like he's like exactly
what you know he's exactly the same
there's no act being put on and so when
people millions and millions and
millions of people who have consumed
like hundreds and hundreds of hours of
his cont you're going to say like oh we
got to cancel this guy like you might as
well be telling me I got to cancel my
wife or something like that like what no
I knew all all the stuff you're talking
about I already knew and I knew
everything else about it too so it's
just not going to happen like this just
is not it's not possible for you to like
get in between that very authentic
relationship that he has with his his
audience I think what else that does and
it can be whichever uh media form you
like you know even substack to some
degree the sort of frictionless that
people are able to publish regular blogs
on whether it's personal Reflections or
stuff from science uh the uh you know
daily Vlogs I love the fact that a lot
of uh Vlog editing now seems to be
moving down from the whole limic hijack
thing Sam suck and his like 45 minute
chest and back workout video which is
essentially unedited right there's no
fluff there's no there's no nothing
there's no curation um I think what all
of this does is it throws into very
harsh light
the much more curated much more
perverted molested world of the person
who Joe Rogan's a dragon believer and
you're like [ __ ] what dude like
you're so
either malignant or out of touch those
are the only two uh options and both of
those mean that I shouldn't listen to
you yeah and this this has always been
one of the worst things about you know
which you kind of touched on just now
but one of the worst things about
political correctness or like wokeism as
it's called now is that it does like
when you set up this system where
there's like a there's like third rails
everywhere that you're not allowed to
touch and if you touch them you're
supposed to be ruined now and that is
supposed to Define everything about you
that is you know it's that might work
for really dumb people but for anybody
who's at all intellectually curious it's
like you you need people who get things
wrong sometimes and some of the most
interesting thinkers who I've always
loved reading you know they get certain
things very wrong but that same person
might get something else right in a way
that you're like wow I never thought
about it like that before there's a lot
of uh figures like this who are kind of
like you know very provocative thinkers
who might say four things and one of
them you you kind of agree with the
second one you think is dead wrong the
third one you think is wildly offensive
and the fourth one you think is
brilliant and you've never thought of
things in that way before you know and
like who wants to get rid of that person
those are the best people like those are
the ones who are really fun to like read
through and kind of you know stretch
your own brain by thinking about what
they're thinking about and what you
agree and what you don't agree and I
hate and not just hate but I like very
bitterly resent anyone who ever tries to
make me live my life that way who try to
make me be like well I'm a little bit
concerned about talking about this topic
cuz people might think I'm a bad person
and in
fact part of the reason why th those
types of people are so important is
because when when it really hits the fan
and there's like totalitarianism is on
the rise and everybody's falling in line
well who is going to be who's going to
have the personality type to stand up
and be like no I'm against all of this
it's it's not the the formist
conventional thinker you know it's the
people who are outside of the box and so
yeah Joe definitely has some views that
are outside of the box and he likes
getting into conspiracies and he likes
talking about like all this stuff but at
the same time that's I think to most
people who who listen at least that's
part of what makes it so fun and
interesting what you've mentioned uh
libertarianism a couple of times there
as a uh card carrying member what do you
make of
the what do you make of the play of the
libertarian party and that sort of
position uh at the moment because it
seems to me like the right is going down
and the left is going up so you've got
sort of this split but I assume to you
there is more down to be done and less
right that would be that would be useful
well yeah I mean I think that the the
way I look at it is that I think so I
mean I'm I'm a a Libertarian forget the
party I'm a Libertarian in terms of my
worldview because I I think that the um
the greatest struggle in the history of
humanity is between tyranny and Liberty
and I think that Liberty is the is the
key to a a moral and prosperous society
and that governments are agents of
aggression and that they bring uh they
bring nothing but destruction especially
when they're out of control and not
reigned in as most current governments
in the west are in terms of the party
there's you know Third Party politics in
the United States of America
is the the entire system is rigged
against third parties and so there's you
know the the prospects of like the
libertarian party out taking taking over
the Republican party or something like
that is not happening anytime soon I did
think that uh Angela McCardell who's the
chair of the party did a phenomenal job
this year in really kind of
reimagining the role of this third party
that is pro Liberty and was able to get
a a bunch of uh concessions maybe isn't
the right word but assurances from
Donald Trump before he won and hopefully
he comes through on at least some of
those but I think that I think that what
you know I what the country needs is
liberty and what and what the world
needs his Liberty but particularly you
know in the United States of America
which is what I know the most about I
mean even in Donald Trump's you know
like uh this drain the swamp clean out
Washington of corruption well I think
the Libertarians have a lot to add here
in in an understanding that the the
essence of the corruption in Washington
DC is that the government is so big
that's really why it is so corrupt like
definitionally that's why when you have
a government that's spending I think
we're going to top7 trillion do this
year is the biggest most powerful Oran
organization in the history of the world
and they they get their money through
the threat of force I mean this it's not
like it's a big company that just has a
product that everyone wants to buy they
get their money because they say you pay
us or we will throw you in jail and then
they print the money which robs your
value from you or they can borrow the
money which is just a promise to tax you
in the future well when you have that
you have an organization that is
extracting wealth from the American
people and then handing them out to
their political cronies and this is why
there's more millionaires in the suburbs
of Washington Washington DC than there
is anywhere else in the world that's the
corruption that's it right there and so
the only answer to this is drastic Cuts
in government spending which I will say
with like the Doge stuff I know it's not
like an official government department
but it does make me excited that that is
at least you know inserting that idea
into the consciousness of the American
people that like this is what draining
the swamp actually looks like yeah it
must be
terrifying if you're one of these uh
lots of skeletons in your closet middle
management [ __ ] government
bureaucrat people it must be like the
Spectre of an autistic guy and an Indian
guy bearing down upon you must be like
oh my [ __ ] God yeah and especially
like uh an autistic at an Indian genius
like they're not even just random guys
you're like oh man these guys are really
good at getting stuff done too
yeah I I think there's a lot of that and
I think look I think this really
explains why there was such a an
insanely hostile attitude toward Donald
Trump since 2016 and you know I know um
uh Joe's played on his podcast a bunch
of times but a bunch of people love to
look at like Donald Trump on The View
right before he had won the primar like
he wasn't that guy he wasn't a guy who
everyone had an allergy to and thought
was the next Hitler it wasn't until he
started saying drain the swamp and it
actually looked like he was going to win
and maybe even mean it and try to do it
that all of a sudden you you had this
hysteria come from DC and I think what
you just said explains it perfectly like
that he just terrified all of these
people who on some level know that
they're parasites and on some level know
that they do not perform a useful
service that they could voluntarily get
money for we saw Elon do this at Twitter
right he got rid of some absurd
percentage and it was just him and like
20 Asian guys uh sleeping under the desk
I remember that selfie when he first he
first started uh taking over yeah I uh
it'll be really interesting I've been
thinking a lot I had this conversation
with Shapiro a few months ago about
um what a lot of the Wright has done for
the last five years or so has been the
sort of rebellious voice of righteous
you know you you're able to push back
against overreach and political
correctness and victimhood ideology and
identity politics so on and so forth and
now that everything that you could want
has happened you have the much more
difficult task which is to actually
[ __ ] deliver change you have to
actually make something happen and you
can't just complain from the sidelines
about why is this not happening and so
on and so forth and that was a huge part
of the failure that Kamala had coming in
it's like are you a change candidate or
do you have legitimacy because you've
already been in office well if you go
after the record the record's [ __ ]
dog [ __ ] and if you're a change
candidate you need to throw your old
boss under the bus so you don't it was
very difficult it was a very difficult
position for her to play and you heard
this like what would you have done or
what would you wish that Biden had done
differently what would you have done
differently and she gives this like
Goring 45 minute roundabout of of of
nothing uh but yeah I I really am
interested if as it may be true the sort
of wokeness will be retracted not just
from the mocking it gets from the other
side but even from the left they like
look the [ __ ] first thing of being of
doing government is to get in power we
didn't manage to do that we need to
change Tac a little bit and um if that
means that there are fewer places for
you know commentariat on the right to
push back against for sort of the sort
of news stories that create those myth
of martydom flags that get planted in
the ground I wonder I wonder what
difference in the dynamic we're going to
see
uh over the next sort of four years
because that rebellious nature speaking
truth to power thing you don't really
get to do that you're you are power
you're [ __ ] in power make something
happen yeah no question I mean it's a um
it's very easy to criticize something
and it's much harder to build something
and particularly if you're talking about
um you know draining the swamp if you're
talking about uh cutting down on the
corruption in Washington DC you're
talking about taking on
the most powerful entrenched interests
in the history of the world who are very
prepared to fight for what they have
they're not going to give it up
voluntarily and they're not going to
give it up easily and you know you can
already see a lot of this happening
where you know say like Donald Trump
might say on the campaign Trail oh we're
going to deport all the illegal
immigrants and even he just uh reaffirm
the other day we'll use the military to
deport all of them you're like okay
that's very easy to say try implementing
that because you are going to get
resistance on every level and not just
on like you know like local law
enforcement in blue areas um but
activists the media every story of some
you know uh humanitarian catastrophe
that happens along the way is going to
be blown out of proportion some
mistreatment of some poor migrant that's
been evicted and separated from their
child Etc ET which inevitably will
happen if you were actually trying to
deport every single illegal immigrant
and so then whereas that might be great
campaign rhetoric then you have to make
a whole different calculation when you
get in there which is like okay how do
we actually accomplish this and and this
was really the failure of Donald Trump
in his first term is that he didn't have
any idea he had absolutely no plan I
mean like he may have had some ideas in
his head about how we'll do this but I
don't think he ever really understood
How Deep The Swamp was or what they
would come after him with it's like what
they and they did it to him right away
you know Donald Trump ran in 2016 on
let's have Dayton with Russia this was a
major theme in his 2016 campaign he was
like you know Vladimir Putin's in Syria
because he wants to hunt down ISIS
because okay we also want to get Isis I
don't care about overthrowing Bashar al-
Assad let's get along with Russia Let's
Make a Deal let's kill the terrorists
together and then let's get out of the
Middle East we don't need to be there at
all he's like okay all right that sounds
good that's a good campaign idea and and
that would be a great policy if you
could implement it but then you're
framed as being a Russian spy well what
are you going to do now and this is how
they what are you going to do now you're
going to go make a deal with Russia
because that would have just been proof
to the American people that you are in
fact a Russian spy wait a minute the
whole media is saying you're a a Russian
spy and now you want to make a deal with
Vladimir Putin so he couldn't do that so
he had to back off of that you know and
like there's just there's a lot of
things like that that are it's much
easier to be in my business than it is
to be in Donald Trump's business and and
in his business he actually has to
figure out how you can manipulate this
machine in a way that you can get things
done that's no easy task I'm certainly
not going to sit here and pretend that I
have all the answers of how to do that I
don't think the answer is giving Marco
Rubio the state department but that's
just me we'll see yeah yeah it's uh it's
funny to think about I re I found it
really fascinating that um even Trump
was kind of a bit surprised when he got
into office the first time and didn't
have anything prepared you who were the
staff that you're supposed to go through
what's the process that you're supposed
to do with this even if [ __ ] Hillary
had got in at least she's got EV like
you know the husband can be like hey you
know this is kind of the way that it
works um and then this was the whole I
guess Justified argument behind project
2025 which is hey last time he got in
and he had a blank piece of paper we're
just trying to kind of play a a game
plan even though I still don't know how
much a part of that he was or wasn't uh
but this time you know you've been in
this world for coming up on a decade
you've had on the ground experience last
time you had all of the evidence that
you've lost you have everything that you
need and if it doesn't get delivered
that will be uh big egg on face yeah for
sure and and especially this time coming
in after this guy has been so burned by
this system
in every way you can I mean with the
exception of Jack Kennedy no American
president has been more burned by the
system um and so you got that now he
also has not only a a much bigger
Victory than in 2016 but he actually won
the popular vote and there also has been
this incredible cultural shift where it
it seems to me that kind of the the
shock troops on the ground meaning the
people the kind of useful idiots the
young leftists who would protest Donald
Trump um the antifa and black block and
all those types there just doesn't seem
to be the same energy there like maybe
they're just tired I think they've been
distracted because they've been
protesting the war in Gaza for for the
last year and and I I think first of all
I think their right to protest that I
think it's an absolute outrage um but I
think it's just very tough to when
you've been protesting women and
children being slaughtered all year it's
very hard to turn around and now protest
Tony hinchcliff cracking jokes at
Madison Square Garden it's just kind of
you know it's it's hard to get that
energy going but because of that because
you know in 2016 if Donald Trump had
held a big event at Madison Square
Garden there' have been tens of
thousands of protesters outside there
was nothing uh according to the Secret
Service I think there was like a hundred
who were there no one showed up to
protest so don all what I'm saying is
that Donald Trump is uniquely set up
this time to be able to get these things
done so if he can't get him done now
that's that's a real shame I don't
know maybe maybe the future will be even
better but or even a better opportunity
but at least in my lifetime I've never
seen an opportunity like he has right
now control of the Congress control of
the Supreme Court winning the popular
vote not the same resistance behind you
let's let's drain some swamps pressure
is on Dave Smith ladies and gentlemen
Dave [ __ ] awesome man I really
appreciate you I appreciate your work
where should people go don't to keep up
to date with all the things that you do
oh uh part ofth problem.com is uh that's
what my my uh podcast is and all my
stuff is there and then I'm comic Dave
Smith on Twitter and uh yeah I'm all
over the place part of the problem is my
podcast that's all thanks so much for
having me Chris I really appreciate it
appreciate you too cheers man thank you
very much for tuning in if you enjoyed
that episode there is something else you
will absolutely love right here go on
give it a tap