Video summary
George TheTinMen argues that men's mental health needs are often overlooked or misunderstood, citing extreme examples like Ned Brockman running 1600 kilometers for charity and Russell Cook traversing Africa as valid coping mechanisms rather than evidence of toxic masculinity. He contends that these actions provide meaning, mastery, and a sense of contribution to many men who lack other outlets for distress. The podcast highlights the severe funding disparity in the sector, noting that Movember is one of the largest charities globally with significant resources, while grassroots organizations like Mankind rely on zero government funding and often require founders to work second jobs or live without salary. George criticizes how funds raised by major entities are frequently distributed through a "feminist framework" focused primarily on violence against women, leaving male victims—who constitute one in three abuse cases in the UK with virtually no refuge—without support. He asserts that framing men as victims of domestic violence under the banner of "violence against women" is politically convenient but practically erases their specific needs and denies them access to shelters or research funding. A significant point of contention arises regarding Movember's advocacy strategies, particularly its alignment with organizations ending violence against women while neglecting male abuse survivors. George questions why a men's health charity would donate money to initiatives that exclude men from the narrative entirely, suggesting this creates an "entry price" for legitimacy rather than addressing systemic issues like bullying and childhood trauma which he views as root causes of later violent behavior or mental health struggles. He contrasts the high-profile but often criticized figures in the manosphere with positive role models who are ignored by mainstream advocacy, such as Chris Bumstead, Jordan Peterson, and David Goggins. While acknowledging that some aspects of these influencers' content may be extreme, George argues they offer valuable lessons on emotional resilience and action-oriented problem-solving, whereas traditional therapy models often fail to resonate with men seeking solutions rather than just being heard. He believes the current advocacy landscape suffers from a vacuum of positive male role models, which has inadvertently allowed figures like Andrew Tate to fill that space by speaking positively about masculinity, even if their methods are controversial. The discussion also delves into specific systemic failures and policy gaps affecting boys and men, including high rates of suicide, poor educational outcomes for males, and the lack of a federal office for men's health compared to numerous offices dedicated to women's issues. George expresses frustration with political gestures like "White Guys For Harris," viewing them as performative rather than substantive solutions that address the alienation many young men feel from politics and society. He emphasizes that effective intervention requires looking at early childhood development, supporting parents to avoid intergenerational cycles of violence (such as spanking), and addressing bullying in schools where 97% of bullied boys develop violent fantasies later in life. Don Dutton's perspective is cited regarding the need for massive investment in child welfare during the first two years of life to prevent future societal costs like prison populations, rather than focusing solely on deprogramming adult men after they have already caused harm or suffered trauma. Ultimately, George calls for a unified approach where major organizations and grassroots advocates collaborate without political posturing that alienates potential allies. He sets clear "red lines" for his own advocacy: refusing to treat domestic violence exclusively through a gendered lens that ignores male victims, rejecting the distribution of funds under frameworks he views as exclusionary, and demanding open support for a Minister for Men or equivalent federal role. The podcast concludes with an invitation for constructive dialogue between different factions in the men's movement, aiming to bridge the gap between those who have resources like Movember and independent advocates working on the front lines. George stresses that true progress requires acknowledging the lived experiences of struggling men rather than mocking their attempts at achievement or forcing them into narratives they do not identify with, ultimately hoping for a future where suicide rates drop, education improves, and meaningful political action is taken to support boys and men across all demographics.
Read the full video transcript
men's mental toughness is just toxic
masculinity rebranded writer Jill Stark
says a cult hero Ned brockman's grueling
1600 kilm charity run has Aussie's
talking but not everybody sees it in a
positive light what do you think about
this I mean it's just one more absurd
headline adding to the the many many
things that we can blame for blame toxic
masculinity for which is absurd I mean
for me it's part of like a bigger
problem where men's mental health needs
are often sort of different to Wom
and like some of the crazy things men do
such as run, 1600 uh kilometers and
raising millions of pounds are just
outside the view the view of people like
Jill who think such a thing is toxic and
not actually an amazing achievement for
anyone uh despite the fact that they're
raising tons of money for charity as
well yeah so a man he run, 1600
kilometers raised maybe one and a half
million Australian dollars for the
homeless which is like I don't know what
more you could possibly want that's
still toxic masculinity somehow and uh
it just isn't and uh yeah I mean one of
the many absurd we could have a whole
podcast just going through these
headlines and just one of the many
things that just washes over you but
thankfully some things are just a little
bit too stupid to be offensive and that
sort of qualifies very much so into that
category what do you make of the current
world of advocacy for
men honestly it seems to be quite
splitting a little bit I feel like as it
becomes as any movement becomes sort of
larger reaches a critical Mass which is
a lovely thing it sort of it seems to be
fragmenting into different view sets
which we can't really afford to do and I
guess the elephant in the room is
certain large organizations that are
becoming in my opinion too entwined in
politics and losing sight of their own
mission statement which is the first
second and third priority is to help men
and ultimately save men's lives that's
my priority and some unfortunately we're
in an area of advocacy that is just
innately and popular right now it's
uncomfortable and it requires you know
making some sacrifices and doing some
things that are not going to get a huge
amount of credit but are necessary
nonetheless it's interesting to think
about when a movement is too big to be
small but too small to be big it's still
kind of revolutionary but has sufficient
size to Warrant Splinter factions and uh
different sort of approaches well it's
well I'm I'm really interested in things
like the diffusion of innovation where
basically maps how a movement becomes
viral and as I'm sure you know you need
about 133% of adoption by the the public
for it to go viral and then it meet hits
that mass Market success so you have
that bell curve of the diffusion of
innovation and I I've always wondered
where are we on that bell curve how when
are we going to reach that Tipping Point
of 12% where the mass the mass Market
the early and late majority as it's
called they're like actually this is
something that I can now get on board
with the risk is now at acceptable level
and I'm like we're we're getting there
and I mean I really want to get there
together I really feel like we need to
work as a single unit here and we need
to keep communicating and we need to
sort of have the sameed shared
objectives so yeah I mean that's where I
want to get to and perhaps that'll be
the end product of this podcast who are
the market leaders in this the market
leaders I mean the money the money is
owned by member which is the elephant in
the room uh member people think member
is just a meme and it is a meme November
is like the whole idea of men growing a
mustache for uh for November it started
in Australia maybe 20 years ago but it's
far more than that no now is one of the
largest most powerful NOS in the world I
think it's one of the top 50 it's
absolutely the most the largest richest
most powerful Men's Health and male
suicide charity on the planet and they
are the ones that have the money to be
honest they're the ones that through
which the money is given they don't do
work directly themselves they take money
from different donors that growing their
mustaches fundr runs bake sales Etc and
they'll distribute it to other people
sort researchers and groups and various
other things so that's how it structured
and to be honest that that comes with
risks in its own right
too how so well I feel like any any
organization that has a huge amount of
money and power and influence and others
that don't you got to remember the The
Men's Health and male suicide sector the
men's sector is deeply impoverished like
I know people that are doing
groundbreaking research and yet they're
working second jobs they're sitting dogs
I know I know a guy called jod who's
trying to open the first men's abuse
shelter in UK and he is s sat right now
at his kitchen table just answering his
own phone just answering the phone to
men he's taken a thousand calls this
year he's not not been paid a single
penny he's taken no salary and he is
just answering the phone to anyone
who'll call him and there's so many
childes I get nothing I I got to mention
mankind who are an amazing charity they
own the only shelters in England for
male male abuse victims zero pounds from
the government nationally that is0
pounds so there is a massive lack of
money and funding in the men's sector
and because it's all going to people
like movember and it's it's frustrating
because everyone talks to me about no
one cares about men no one cares about
men and I do they do care about men
because there's so much money raised for
November lots of people doing amazing
work in November right now but the money
just doesn't seem to be getting spent in
the right way in my opinion and uh
that's the problem it's not a lack of
effort and not a lack of ambition or
generosity or compassion from the public
it's it's just not being used in the
right way what you make yeah what do you
make of member's
efforts well I mean I want to qualif
everything I say right now m is a
massive organization massive I think
they've done about 1,00 projects they're
in about 20 countries including mainly
the UK Canada uh Australia and America
uh they do amazing work they do amazing
work especially in things like prostate
cancer and Men's Health they they've
done some really great work recently
where they're talking about men who Di
young in the UK so they found that I
think 15 men Die Young every hour in the
UK so in the end of this podcast that's
15 men who have died young most of those
most of those deaths are avoidable if we
can increase the sort of the health
literacy amongst men and sort of do more
work for men's
health and no one can argue with that
that's really really important my issue
with
movember was in within their mental
health area and and certain things in
terms of um prioriti in sort of parts I
mean it's hard to dance around the
subject but but basically my main issue
is their recent advocacy around violence
against women and you got to remember
violence against men is a massive deal
that no one's taken seriously one in
three victims of abuse in the UK is a
man and that is me being conservative in
America it's one in two if you look at
the CDC data it's one in two and like
people might say that's not true but go
check it for yourself the research I'm
happy to present you so much research I
can literally give you hundreds of
papers to prove that but it at least one
in three and there is virtually no
refuge for men and virtually no refuge
for um in America or the UK and I think
in America there's maybe two shelters
for men in the UK there's a few more but
really nothing and member recently and
this is where a point of contention I
have with them they've been sort of
allying themselves with organizations
that are trying to end violence against
women and even giving money over to
violence against
women and that to me is not right that
to me intuitively is not right that does
not make sense especially what I know
about how impoverished and how desperate
uh men men shelters and people like jod
my friend are for for money I need to
qualify another thing is that when I
criticize violence against women that
does not mean I Am pro violence against
women no one is pro [ __ ] violence
against women the naming of violence
against women is extremely effective
because it's named after a really
important sentiment violence against
women like who doesn't want to end that
I want to end violence against women
just as much as anyone does the issue
that I have are a certain amount
policies around against women that
basically gender it gendered violence
meaning that men and boys are taken out
the picture and the funding the the
policy the shelter is given exclusively
more or less to women and girls and
those that one and three victims of men
which in the UK represents about 750,000
men every year there's nowhere for them
to go there's no there's really no help
what is the abuse that you're talking
about what what what constitutes abuse
or gender violence what is that I mean
this is why some stats say one in three
some stats say one in two in Australia
it's one in four victims is a man it
really depends on what do you consider
violence does that include emotional
psychological abuse or financial abuse
or abuse by proxy are we specifically
talking about physical abuse in America
if you're talking specifically about
violence physical violence by a partner
there are actually more male victims of
physical violence by partner according
to the uh sent for CDC and that's just a
shocking stat but that is also true and
like that report that survey comes out
every few years and I dread the years
where there are more victims more male
victims because I'm like it's going to
be so [ __ ] unpopular your point being
that you would have to talk about it
you're going to report on the actual
stats and you can't say something that
would be more popular publicly because
you have to say the thing which is
unpopular publicly well let's just say I
prefer it when it's one and three
because it just it just takes the edge
off a little bit when it's more when
there's a greater disparity of
men I what would you say what would you
say the people who go uh that there's a
an imbalance in abuse especially
gendered violence because men are more
effective men are stronger therefore the
severity of the violence in One
Direction over the other is going to be
much worse i' say that's sometimes true
sometimes not the latest data for the
office for National statistics which is
the sort of the government's data body
in the UK finds the exact opposite finds
that men are more often injured so male
victims are more often injured by female
Partners in the opposite way around so
that intuitively sounds right and I
would totally understand people that
would say that and it often is right but
not always I mean this is the issue I
find of the discussion of violence
against women is that it so often
becomes centered around the very very
extreme like mostly homicides like
people who are killed by partners and
that is mostly women absolutely but that
is also a small part of the problem that
is like you know tiny tiny percentage I
interviewed Don dton recently he he
summarized it well he said um we measure
domestic homicide per million couples
but we measure domestic violence per 100
couples so you can sort of see the
disparity out it's a much different
scale and that's not to say domestic
homicide isn't important and that's not
to say that men aren also killed by
their Partners I think it's about one in
four victims of domestic homicide is a
man and if you look at male male victims
so including children like it's even
closer it's really close to to 50/50
because there's a massive
um disproportionate a number of boys
killed Often by parents so if you bring
in the boys then it's very similar I
think in Australia I think it's about 36
males and 44 females killed in domestic
violence rather than intimate partner
violence and it's so frustrating because
people say well women are just killing
their Partners from self-defense and I'm
I'm not talking about women and men I'm
talking about children and if you
consider the majority of males killed by
their partners by family members are
boys I'm like who who is defending
themselves from a child it doesn't make
sense and I mean I would just I guess
I'd underscore it by saying every every
victim needs to be spoken about I don't
doesn't matter if it's 1% doesn't matter
it doesn't matter if it's one single
person I would say they're just as
important as anyone else what's the
issue of a men's health charity like
movember getting behind a movement that
tries to reduce violence against
women nothing but movember is a Men's
Health charity and there was lots of
work by no means enough but lots more
work being done to end violence against
women violence against men isn't even a
thing violence against and quite
literally isn't a thing like if you're a
male victim of abuse in the UK you are
literally classified as a victim of
violence against
women literally like the government
released a document not long ago two
years ago and the title of this document
was supporting male victims of violence
against
women and I'm like so you're a man being
abused by a woman and you're somehow a
victim of violence against women so
we've arrived at this crazy sort of
backward Su assault of sort of mental
gymnastics where a male victim is now
victim of violence against women give me
give me the Steelman case for why it's
framed like that and then give me the
more concerning potential reason for why
it's framed like that one of my more tin
hat reasons behind why we don't care
about men I asked Erin pitty this who
was the founder of the first Domestic
Violence Shelter anywhere in the world
which was in chisik in London and I I
she was thrown out of her own charity
because she wanted to help male victims
and uh she she wanted to talk about
interactive violence we're both Partners
were abusing each other and which is
half of all domestic violence is is that
I asked her why are we doing this why
don't we help men why why is not why is
there not more support and Shea said one
word money Shea said money like they
don't want to share the money
like if you look at Sandra Hy who who
was the CEO of Refuge K which is the
largest domestic violence charity in the
world like she's she's on record saying
if we were to say men are as likely to
be abused as women we would have to
share the money and they don't want to
do that so there but this is's going in
the other direction you're talking about
an organization like member which
already has lots of money probably I
would guess receives like 90 out of
every hundred pound given to men in one
form or maybe even more
um I don't understand why this reverse
trick is being played in that regard if
the women's Charities already have more
than they need why is a men's charity
donating money to it they seem to stick
to a more Antiquated model of men's
health that is more around you know like
blood pressure and obesity and like the
physical side of men's health whereas I
can I want to look more broadly I'm more
interested in the systemic societal
causes of men's health that hurt men so
that's that's where the Divide is like I
would say like for instance a man who's
raped in prison is a men's health issue
father losing his child in family court
is a men's health issue a husband abused
by his wife is a men's health issue a
boy being bullied is a a men's issue
like Men's Health isn't just about
prostates and you know bmis and all that
and those are important but we have a
different definition of mental health
that's where the Divide is I I think
Men's Health is out there and member
seems to think Men's Health is in here
and they they just don't consider it um
they consider what what I can understand
they consider violence against women a
men's health issue which doesn't make a
huge amount of sense to me but from
their perspective they want to help
treat Violent Men to stop them from
abusing women which is a noble cause but
again you're just looking at one side of
the problem like you can't solve any
equation with one side you've got to up
both sides that both Partners need help
like I said half of all violent
relationships both partners are doing it
they're both put participating in a
cycle of violence that spirals out of
control you know an argument become
yelling and yelling will become shoving
and shoving someone gets slapped and
then slapping it becomes punching and it
gets worse and worse and worse so it's
certainly important to help men be less
violent through certain treatments but
that again that's only one half of that
cycle so yeah they they want to reduce
Violence by men against women by seeing
it as a men's health issue and I guess
doing certain iies to encourage what
they consider healthy
masculinity which is a rather nebulous
term in its own so violence against
women is a men's health issue and
violence against men is a violence
against women
issue yeah yeah I mean that's it's they
they certainly don't consider violence
against men a men's health issue but
violence against women is a men's health
issue and it just it it just reminds me
of like this strange political dancing
where they're basic in my opinion
they're just afraid
they're afraid I understand why look
look I had this conversation with
Richard Reeves which you got to see and
I I I get this sense that anybody who is
trying to run a public facing legitimate
not like you or me
illegitimate uh you know outside of
wedlock uh communicators um anybody
that's trying to do forward- facing
stuff in Washington DC in Sydney
Australia or in London England and is
trying to have these conversations they
need to do the pay this Penance they
need to sort of Kiss the Ring of of the
existing gendered mental health gender
Health gendered violence gendered
marital
issues cliches and stereotypes and and
and caricatures and the way that this
stuff runs um because it is still too
big to be small too small to be big it
is not yet sufficiently big or widely
adopted that you can talk about the
problems of boys and men without first
saying we know the problems of girls and
women are a big deal as well and this is
like a a structural
operational policy political nod yeah we
know we know we know look we all of the
support or the support that we give to
men uh can't be done you can't uh call
us castigators for being uncaring
misogynists that are anti-feminist look
we gave money to vog and in in in that
regard I think well maybe that's a weird
kind of Entry price that you need to pay
but something tells me in your opinion
that you don't need to do this I me it's
mostly [ __ ] in my opinion to call it
what it is like I mean go look and talk
about your Richard Reeves podcast that
is self-evident now you both spent 20
minutes talking about that the first 20
minutes of a podcast about men you spent
talking about women and I was like that
makes the point like how many people
dropped out as a result probably quite a
few and it's not good enough like you're
only undermining yourself long term it
reminds me of people that say oh I'm not
a racist but well I'm don't [ __ ] say
it then don't say don't need to say that
like the proof is self-evident like no
one could ever accuse Richard Reeves of
being a misogynist and someone that
would should not should not be bargain
withed can't be bargain withed and you
shouldn't like I just feel all does
penance paying and apologies and this
long Lany of small print that has to
seemingly come with every single piece
of Welling advocacy men and boys you're
just Burning Bridges with people like me
that are not doing that and refuse to do
that
and it's not I don't think it works long
term I think you weaken your point I
feel like you're setting a precedent
that we don't want to follow and we
won't be following um what's the biggest
elephant in the room around men's issues
at the moment oh that the clear
interwining of politics once money is
put into large organizations like I've
been very infused by the by Richard for
example $20 million from Linda Gates uh
movember about to open up a $100 million
member institute there's money to be
spent and with money becomes
expectations and politics so I can
understand there were political
expectations uh I'm sure they're sat
around tables women's organizations
being told what they can and can't say
what they can and can't argue about I I
have no doubt people at movember care
actually I know they do care because
people have contacted me from within
movember to say we do care but we can't
doing the thing because we're playing
this political dance and that is just
not good enough for member to seemingly
be scared of just sharing the truth of
male victims of abuse in this example to
be afraid or browbeaten by who knows
unknown feminist organizations it
seems not and also our own government
are afraid of these organizations and
they're on record and saying that is not
good enough I'm sat here with nothing I
don't have that hund million I don't
have their large legal teams to defend
me uh I have I'm just sat I have a
laptop and I'm doing the hard work I'm
the one that's actually taking risks
those like me and to hear these large
organizations suggest that they're
afraid well you know we would love to do
what you do George but you know we just
can't of course you can you the one
person that can do it you are you're not
a small organization remember you're one
of the biggest you are the biggest Men's
Health Organization on the planet like
if not you then who is it going to be
and you don't see it from women's
organizations like and more power to
them they're constantly pushing the
boundaries they're constantly asking for
more they're constantly making more and
more things women's health issues as
they right as they should they don't tow
the line in the same way they're not
brow beating and they're not afraid and
that's that's admirable and I would just
I would just remind them of your
obligation to men that you are obligated
to help men that is your first second or
third priority and that is really it
like I'm sorry if that's uncomfortable
I'm sorry if saying that in a meeting is
going to get you into trouble I'm sorry
if you know it's hard I'm sorry if you
lose money but unfortunately your job is
to save men's lives and I'm sorry but
that is unpopular the things that
causing Mor suicide are are often
unpopular to talk about and if you can't
talk about them then this isn't for you
like give what are the what are the
unpopular things causing male
suicide well Martin Seager has
attributed 20% of male suicides in the
UK to family breakdown and child custy
battles so a child being lost in a
family court and a relationship
breakdown that's 20% of suicides that's
what I mean that is a men's health issue
in my opinion of course it is and it's
if we could fix family courts and if we
could help support men after divorces we
could potentially reduce suicide male
suicide by up to 20% at that again
domestic violence I said it has a
massive detrimental impact on men's
health 11% of suicides sorry 11% of men
being abused will consider suicide and
like I said 750,000 men being abused in
the UK every single year what's 11% of
that you do the maths in America is 50
million men in their lifetime being
abused 11% of that are potentially at
risk of suicide and these are the men
that are just being betrayed left behind
because powerful political Men's Health
Advocates are just too afraid to say the
simple truth that domestic violence is
not gendered there are a significant
amount of male victims of abuse and that
abuse has a massive detrimental impact
on their mental health does lead to
suicide and they are not being helped
like I'm really struggling to make sense
of it myself well you had a you you got
to have a chat with Zach uh and maybe
some more people I don't know what what
did you learn when you had a a chat with
member and the reason I ask
is I must have done between 30 and 50
episodes on this podcast talking about
mental health relating to men in one
form or another whether it's
loneliness sexual Dynamics mating Market
socioeconomic status education
employment training uh inell going deep
into the world's like leading researches
on the incel movement all sorts of stuff
everything everything from top to bottom
left to right and um
I have asked myself the question why am
I not a massive like card carrying
movember guy like I should be I should
be the I should be the poster boy
for always talking about I love the work
that they're doing they're doing this
they're doing that they're doing the
other you know I should be like balls
deep behind them uh literally saying
saying that I love the work that they do
and for some reason I'm not so I'm
interested in what you learned when you
got to speak to the people running
member and what
what assumptions maybe were uh certified
and and what questions were unanswered
and answered and so on if you're going
to hand over I think they handed over
maybe three million Australian dollars
to violence against women I'm like well
then presumably going to give at least
that to violence against men and as far
as I can tell they're not there just
doesn't seem any plans to open any
shelters for men or do any programs for
men or to help violent women be less
violence I I just want to know what are
you doing they're just basically making
things either men's health or not men's
health because one is politically
convenient and one isn't and that the
the stuff that is politically convenient
seems to be more things around eating
habits physical fitness diet
interventions prostate cancer which are
important which are important but Men's
Health isn't just in here Men's Health
is out there and like they're just
holding on to an Antiquated model of
men's health well I don't know you say
that they've got lots of money flowing
in maybe they don't have enough money to
be able to afford to raise shelters or
give your mate jod some cash so that he
can man his one person thousand call
phone line no I mean certainly lots of
money flowing in but a lot less flowing
out it seems like uh UK charity
commission is basically a space where
you can actually look at the accounts of
all the Charities which is excellent and
it's quite clear you can look at
member's accounts and you can see they
have at least 35 million pounds in cash
perhaps up to 50 million it's difficult
because 50 million assets 35 million in
cash at least
and that's not right they're not that's
not their money first of all that's
money they were given to help men in the
ways I've described and it's just sat in
a bank account like £35 million or more
sat in a bank account not being spent
accumulating interest it seems for their
own benefit that is not right especially
like I said I know people that are
desperate for just a tiny tiny
percentage I'm here running like
crowdfunders like rattling a tin can for
money to help my friends to help support
male victims abuse remember sat back on
a big mountain of cash million I I
cannot explain how much I could do with
just .1% of that amount of cash I could
do huge things and yeah they say it in
their own they in their own accounts
they say it's they are risk of
reputational damage if people find out
how much cash they are sat on and it is
a lot it's 35 million pound why do you
think that would be the case cuz it's
not like people can be drawing massive
salaries or else everyone will be up in
arms I don't know where that money
goes I have no idea all I know is they
have a lot of cash I know that they're
trustees there are seven Trustees of
November November Europe which is
basically the UK armor of member and not
one of those trustees is based in the UK
not one of those trustees is even living
in Europe they're all based in North
America and Australia so I guess the
difficult questions at November going to
be asked I'm now asking and I will
continue to ask is why are you sitting
on so much cash when the men's health or
uh industry is struggling so much and
why are none of your trustees based in
this country why are n How could a
trustee who's not even living in this
country claim to know how best to spend
men or money for British men that's a
good question you used a term earlier on
which I'm seeing uh increasingly thrown
around which is healthy
masculinity healthy masculinity being
what I think seems to be the answer to
toxic masculinity or at least an
attempted sort of uh retconning of of
what that is I've heard that there is
potentially some footage from guests
who've been on this podcast being
featured in an upcoming anti- manosphere
campaign by movember do you think this
is where they should be focusing their
attention no I mean member seem to be
declaring war on the manosphere I don't
know what the manosphere is I'm I'm sure
I'm seen as part of it I'm sure you're
seen as some sort of president of the
Manis and like the frustrating thing is
like I hate the Manis I hate the red p
like I'm more than happy to point and
make fun of people like Andrew Tate and
I will bang that drum forever but I
don't think it needs to be talked about
in the same in the way that they want to
talk about it I don't think it needs to
be a war against the manosphere like I
feel the manosphere is just burning I
feel like it's gone in many ways what is
Andre T doing these days he just seems
to have descended into madness like the
people that were once sort of um s of uh
symbolic of the manosphere like where
are they it's gone it's over let's move
on let's actually you know actually help
men let's spend our money setting a
better example for boys so they don't
have to go to these sort of Nefarious
figures I feel like just fighting the
manosphere you're just fighting ghosts
you just what are you fighting Shadow
Boxing Shadow Boxing an imaginary
opponent yeah I always think an angry
gorilla fighting mist is how I describe
it does member want to challenge what it
is to be a
man yeah this is what I mean there are
certain things like member very keen to
encourage all of us to challenge
stereotypes of what about it is to be a
man which I am on board with but they
don't seem to want to challenge
themselves their own gender stereotypes
I.E that men are violent and women are
victims like violence against women in
my opinion that is a stereotype in its
own right so that ought to be challenged
this gender Narrative of domestic
violence is a stereotype that needs to
be challenged too so it's not good
enough to make to demand that we
challenge our stereotypes if you're not
going to challenge your own so yes I
just think it's absurd amount of time
they seem to be spending fighting a
man's
I don't know who's even part of it I
don't know what it is and like there's
better things to be spending your money
on it stinks to me as you know somebody
who's at the cold face of Internet
culture and I think that you're right as
well I think that whatever the
manosphere was or is uh is largely on a
decline I mean you're selling your stock
like [ __ ] these nfts you're just pumping
them you can't can't wait to get rid of
them because they're declining by the
day I don't think that whatever it was
but it it stinks massively of um people
in the mainstream media finally hearing
a term that is catchy and does catch on
uh and go this this is a big deal and
you go no it was a big deal in 2021 it
was a big deal but the internet moves
quickly but there's you know the
conceptual inertia of these big [ __ ] off
lumbering behemoths that take forever to
actually catch up to anything and this
isn't me saying that that's how it is
about M but I'm starting to see the
manosphere be talked about more online
toxic masculinity sort of Contin I mean
that's still I'd definitely put a little
bit of cash into that stock if I could
that's certainly something that seems to
be continuing to uh to drive drive the
stock price up but like it just doesn't
seem to me to be on the money about
exactly where the conversation around
men is happening online and then when
you say you
know challenging stereotypes I I would
be absolutely fascinated to hear what
the world sort of thinks of a stereotype
like Chris Bumstead so Chris is just
retired as six-time Mr Olympia classic
physique Champion he's cried on stage
during his acceptance speech I think at
least 50% of the time if not four out of
six of the times fully broke down crying
when he did his leaving speech regularly
tells stories about how he goes to
therapy regularly tells stories about
how he breaks down in his girlfriend's
arms before he does this thing not one
person is calling him uh soft or weak or
vulnerable or you like a a puss boy uh
and on the flip side nobody would also
call him toxically masculine but my my
concern is that when you take this sort
of rough Hune anybody on the internet
talking about stuff that is
proen uh in a manner that doesn't
Concord with our cliches of what people
on the internet think masculinity is
which is Chris Bumstead big big hulking
guy must be toxically masculine he needs
to like there's no place for him to fit
and for me I would love like make him
Minister for men he's just retired from
bodybuilding I'd love to have Chris
bumpstead as Minister for men every he
got 25 million men mostly that follow
him on uh Instagram Because by the way
if you get big muscles it's not girls
that care it's guys that care and he
would make a phenomenal role model he
encourages me to be a braver more open
more vulnerable emotionally attuned man
that's what and that but the problem
with it is it doesn't fit into an easy
narrative right because he doesn't look
the way that he presents he presents in
the way of like a sort of wuss guy
that's never actually done any like a
super sort of agreeable dude but has
made all of the achievements of somebody
the type of masculine and it's not easy
enough for people to grasp I don't think
um but yeah I just I don't know the
challenging stereotypes thing is is
challenging them challenging them in the
most sort of low resolution way possible
and I just want it to be better I want
there to be better male role models out
there well I I would add Jordan Peterson
to that I mean he's he's so often
mischaracterized like he's he's
absolutely on the The Hit List for
movember as again like some sort of
high-profile manosphere Elite I have no
idea but I'm like he is so in touch of
I've seen him crying so many times like
he is so in touch of his emotions yeah
some things he says we may not like and
it's easy to quote some out of context
but he has done a net good for men Boys
in my opinion and maybe they haven't he
hasn't done a way that member likes or
other people like but people want to
watch him like PE men and boys are voted
of their feet and including for people
like you Chris like you started from
nothing you started from your dining
room table with a webcam and you got to
where you are because people voted for
you by watching your content same for me
but to obviously a lesser extent and I'm
like we are people to be learned from
and so is Jordan Peterson so is Chris
Chris Bumstead and
like I feel like that's why we need to
together like I would love to talk to
member and be like I don't agree with
the direction you're going in I think I
have valuable lessons to H um to lend
you I think Chris would pick up the
phone i' love to speak to you if anybody
any organization is really worried about
radicalization and men being pushed
toward bad influences the first thing
they need to do is correctly patent
match who is and who isn't a bad actor
because if they're not careful they'll
just push creators Like Me Away by
positioning themselves in opposition to
me yeah like you're making an enemy of
an ally you can't see somebody like
anybody that looks through the back
catalog of this podcast and doesn't see
somebody that cares about men's issues
like you're high you're high you you
can't you just simply are unable to
interpret content accurately and this
doesn't matter whether it's movember or
a feminist organization or anything like
I'm not anti [ __ ] anything I'm just
Pro men's issues and I yeah being told
that men are supposed to talk more but
then also being told to shut up when
they say things that you find
inconvenient I don't know feels like
being politically gastl at a a national
scale just not even that like going back
to the start of this podcast you were
talking about the man who ran like
thousand kilometers and and to raise
money for homeless people and was mocked
for it it's like the whole meme of like
men will you know fix uh steam engine
rather than go to therapy or men will
reenact the holy R I love those I
[ __ ] love those m men will dig a
massive hole in a beach to avoid going
but maybe they are therapy maybe those
things are actually therapy to men maybe
going to the gym is therapy maybe taking
the dog for a walk is therapy maybe
reenacting uh Battle of the Bulge is
therapy for men like maybe these are
actual therapies and like who who's to
say they aren't like therapy doesn't
have to be sat being sat down talking to
a sort of a psychologist like therapy
can be anything and like you don't we
shouldn't be mocking these men that dud
these amazing things like we should be
sort of seeing them as Pioneers in many
ways did you see uh did you see Russ
Cook that guy that ran the length of
Africa no but that sounds fascinating
his uh hardest geiza on Instagram and I
think he ran it was a either in a full
year or maybe even over a year and he
ran basically a marathon every day uh
and he's the first person in history to
have gone from basically Cape Town to
whatever the [ __ ] at the top chinia
turkey some [ __ ] whatever's the very
very top and uh he it took him a year to
do that there's videos there's some
really really Raw videos of him one day
he must have drank from uh a classically
unclean drinking source and he had
vomiting and diarrhea while he's running
and he's just not stopping and he just
keeps on going I can absolutely see a
headline that says this is the denial of
emotions this is feeding into the sort
of toxic must always be strong narrative
it's like no men want to be strong they
don't they don't want to feel the
compulsion to needs to be strong all the
time but they want to be strong and the
difference between telling men it's okay
to talk about your emotions it's okay to
not be strong and competent all the time
and you can't be those things because if
you are being those things you're not
choosing to be them is denying from men
one of the greatest sources of meaning
that they have in their life one of the
greatest sources of meaning is doing a
thing that's difficult and getting
[ __ ] better at it it's exactly why I
like men would rather produce 850
episodes of a podcast then go to therapy
but then actually go to therapy during
the last year of the podcast
so it it always it always takes me back
to Elon Musk when he first bought
Twitter um he got rid of all the middle
management and 90% of the coding team
and there's this famous selfie of him
and like 20 Asian dudes behind him and
it's him basically saying I'm going to
run this entire company with these
people if you want to work harder than
you ever have in your entire life on the
most difficult and important problems in
coding come work for me and he got
castigated because it was this is going
back to Industrial Revolution era
pushing people to work beyond their
limits are we not we not got past this
what about mental health Mondays and
what about holistic Tuesdays and what
about you know smoothie Wednesdays and
stuff like that this is pushing people
to go too hard and it's like you maybe
true and maybe even true on average for
most people but there is a huge subset
of people for whom you put that kind of
a challenge in front of them or you tell
them to run 1600 kilometers for homeless
people or you tell them to run the
entire length of Africa and they go yes
like do you think that Russ Cook ran
daily for over a
year because of toxic masculinity or do
you think he did it because it gave him
an
innate feeling of meaning and
contribution and and Conquer and Mastery
that denying that is literally denying
him denying his nature and we all know
how dangerous that can be in the modern
world of the lgbtqia plus community so
you know his him living out his truth
was him running every single day because
that's where he took his meaning from
yeah I mean I I have a friend called Sam
who walked the length for of New Zealand
to raise money for boys who are he's a
survivor of sexual abuse himself and he
wants to raise money for uh male
survivors of abuse and he walked across
the whole of New Zealand took him I
think maybe 70 days that's that is could
not be less toxic that so admirable and
I just this idea of seems that men like
to value achievement they like to do
something they like to be productive a
lot of women i' I've written a lot about
this and a lot of women contacted me and
being like I I want this too like I I
don't like this therapeutic model of um
the psychological model of therapy like
I want to do these things I want to make
the steam engine I want to sort of re
reenact the Holy Roman Empire but we
seem to want to realify these things
where men want to do and Achieve great
things like in the way Elon said like I
mean put him in Mana feere as well same
for Goggins perhaps to a greater degree
and sometimes these people can be
enforcing like an unhealthy archetype of
masculinity but then sometimes they can
just be lifting men up like I've I've
seen the videos from within movember and
they have been leaked to me I'm afraid
and I remember the first clip I saw was
Andrew Tate and I do not like Andrew
Tate let me be clear but the bit the bit
he said and it's not perfectly quoted
but he said something like you don't
achieve anything by talking about it you
achieve it through action and I was just
I was like waiting for the offensive bit
and that was it you picked you pied the
most the most acceptable Andrew take
quote that there's some horrible things
he said and I'm like you've picked
something that's actually good and I was
just like I can't believe that seing as
controversial and what you're saying is
really important and true for a lot of
people like men want action men want
change men want Solutions it goes back
to sort of um the classic Trope of like
uh women want to be heard and men want
their uh solution their problems solved
like a lot of time when a woman comes to
your problem they don't want a solution
they just want to be heard but sometimes
men just want a solution they don't want
to be heard they want an answer and
that's when you get into sort of the men
out from Mars women from Venus thing
where a man's giving a solution where
his wife is not to be heard and his
wife's not giving a solution because
shees just talking or or listening and I
don't know I guess at the bottom of it
there's a fundamental difference in
generally speaking how men and women
present distress and how men and women
want to be helped and sometimes men more
often want a solution or they want to
achieve something F purpose you know
this is a a Richard reism to say that a
lot of the time men are told that their
biggest problem is that they're just too
masculine that if they were a little bit
more like women if they talked about
their problems if they were less
concerned with conquer and Mastery and
progress that they would be fine and you
go well if I was to deny women what they
want what their predisposition on
average is that would be that would be
like catastro like that is probably not
far off patriarchy right like you you
denying the other sex's right to live
out their
innate uh inbuilt desires and like what
is they want to do especially if it's
not oh like running 1600 kilometers is
toxic masculinity like who's that
hurting shy of the tarmac who's that
hurting who's David Goggins like yes
okay is David perhap would David benefit
from like a century or so a little bit
of talk therapy to get in touch with his
emotions yeah maybe but he lives a a
very important Niche I think which is
someone who doesn't ever stop okay what
is it like if you don't have any quit
any man that looks at Goggins and goes I
can be that in its entirety that's not
how men how infantilizing to think that
that's the way that men look at that
person as opposed to go hey when I'm
going through a tough time I'm going to
call on my inner Goggins and when I'm
going through an emotional time I'm
going to call on my inner seab bum I'm
not going to call on my inner seab buum
and like get in touch with my emotions
if I'm going through a really really
rough workout or something like that
like it's all I'm going to use the
different tools that I have for the job
and uh yeah there what was that Peterson
quote about something about being cruel
you got to learn to be cruel or you have
to you you're weak if you're not able to
be cruel or something that's on The Hit
List as well I'm afraid yeah that's one
of the the blacklisted often it was it's
completely out of context that's often
quoted but when you're talking about
Goggins Etc it reminds me of like some
the words of my mom and she'd always say
everything in
moderation and like if no one sat there
just watching Goggins like their eyes
like this for like several hours a day
and if you did I'm sure that would be
unhealthy you're watching a bit of
Goggins you're watching a bit of Jordan
Peterson you're watching a bit of Chris
Williamson maybe you're watching a bit
of me like you're having everything in
moderation nothing on its own is good
and I wouldn't suggest just watching
goggin who do the powers that be in
men's advocacy put forward as positive
role models
I don't I don't honestly I do not know I
do not like this is a question we we had
maybe a year ago who are who are the
positive masculine role models for men
and I don't know we didn't have an
answer there I have answers but I'm not
sure who they're supposed to be like I
think they I think these this this
certain type of advocacy really
struggles to present a male role model a
healthy male role model especially one
that is masculine and I'm still waiting
for them to present one like have you
seen one like who who are we stuck up to
if not all these manosphere
men it's uh the vacuum of any role
models has left the Gap that has been
precisely filled by people that those
those supposedly providing us with Role
Models say aren't Role Models right like
it's the the issues that you have are
laid at the feet of the vacuum um you
know I think very much the rise of the
manosphere and whatever version that is
like the djn internet version of the
manosphere the proper one uh I think
that that largely was laid at the feet
of Jordan abandoning his conversation
about boys and men you know he moved on
to other things he moved on to talking
about political issues and and religion
and and faith and stuff like that and
he'd opened up a market there evidently
was a market he'd inspired a lot of
people to have these sorts of
conversations and it showed proof of
concept that you can be very popular by
doing it but he didn't continue
servicing the market so there was demand
and no Supply which sucked in a lot of
other people well I think I think Jordan
probably gave up on that because he got
so much backlash like he clearly cares a
lot about men and boys and he he must
have been sick about being vilified for
it the same for like Warren Farrell like
he could have been a really great role
model and Champion for men and boys no
one really knows who he is but he's a
wonderful man very thoughtful and
sensitive A Lot Like Jordan and he was
just I guess castigated and I I know
like I I can understand what Jordan
would give up I often feel like giving
up
too and um you're right that there is a
massive lack of positive male role
models especially when you think about
how many boys haven't got fathers at
home and how few men there are in
classrooms and how bad the role models
are on TV especially like sitcoms and
people like Andrew Tate capitalized upon
that he' just stepped into that vacuum
because he does speak positively about
masculinity whether you like it or not
he does speak positively about men and
boys and they just naturally gravitated
towards it I I always like to think that
who could have predicted well it's I
always like to think that his his
meteoric success I think he was the
fastest growing influencer in history
that massive success is exactly
proportionate to our failure that's how
badly we've done that's how big our
failure has been so if we need to stop
pointing the finger at boys calling them
toxic misogynistic or oppressive and
start pointing the finger at ourselves
for not helping them not talking to them
only ever talking about them never
talking to them that's the real big
problem like we always talk about boys
we always talk about men we never talk
to them like I actually spent last
Friday on the streets London just
interviewing random men and I'll tell
you what every single man I spoke to was
[ __ ] in his own unique horrible way
like losing his children addicted to
alcohol his parents are dying like he's
like every single man was going through
something horrific and yet the archetype
of men as privileged just didn't does
not line up with my lived experiences
and I get DMS every day from these men
like really really struggling often with
the issues out we talked about earlier
and they're not being helped and they're
not even being seen and they're actually
being mocked a lot of the
time and those are the men that
gravitate towards people like Andrew
Tate because we are not doing a good
enough job in my opinion and so like I
said like instead of us fighting that
the man is fear like this ghost let's
start actually questioning are we doing
a good enough job can we do better and
can we bring these men and boys back cuz
I think we can I think you already have
and I would I mean I would give you I
mean you don't need any more money but I
would give you a lot more support like I
would be like I'll be I'll be calling
you every single day if I was out
movember like Chris can I can what's the
secret Source you've got the secret
source for instance one of the things
that I rely on you for is uh stats you
know I'm not balls deep in the data I
don't know what the Cutting Edge uh most
recent CDC intimate partner violence
stuff is saying so I have to pick it up
from your Instagram or DM you and you
know like I I feel like if you had a if
you really wanted to make an impact you
would have a big email chain or some big
folder and Scott Galloway would have
access and I would have access and you
would have access and it would everybody
would be working collaboratively
together um and that's not to centralize
me in this I'm hardly like the Vanguard
of like fixing this problem my point
being that when I look at important and
successful social change campaigns they
work with the people who are already on
their side but the incentives align to
push people away if human tribalism is
so strong if you make someone feel like
an other they will position themselves
in opposition to you and I think you I
think you're seeing that an awful an
awful lot I relate so much to that I
feel othered so often I feel let down
left behind excluded like shut out of
the party so so often and it's so
difficult not I have to take breaks not
because I struggle like I'm not like
rning out energy but I generally feel
like alienated and I'm like I don't want
to to become resentful I don't want to
become bitter I need to step away for
like two weeks and I'm on a break right
now for
example but tell me this what does good
advocacy for men look like and what does
bad advocacy look like well I mean my my
particular brand of advocacy I I try not
to get two courts up in subjective
conversations about masculinity and
healthy masculinity and toxic
masculinity I just think masculinity is
it just is it's neither good nor bad it
just is my what I try to do my own
little part of the pie is just as you
said presenting data
in most reliable way possible so we can
have a conversation about men and women
in in a way in a on a foundation of
objective truth and unfortunately that
truth is often unpopular and difficult
to read and it annoys me when people say
I'm wrong about certain things Richard
Reeves for example said I'm on your
podcast uh that my the evidence I
present on gender parity of domestic
violence is is wrong completely wrong
and I'm like it's not though if you
think I'm wrong then you also accusing
the CDC of being wrong cuz that's all
I'm showing you I'm literally holding a
mirror up and if you don't like what's
reflected back that's just not my
problem that's it's called science so I
would encourage those people who think
I'm misleading people such as Richard
seems to I would why don't you send an
email to the CDC and accuse them of the
same thing and not just me but like the
the data for that particular claim is so
overwhelming we can no longer ignore it
I often like to quote Murray Strauss
because Murray Strauss essentially The
Godfather of family violence research
quite literally set up the field itself
founded it uh he designed the
instruments we still use today and he's
presented hundreds of papers over maybe
three or four decades that show gender
parity in partner violence between men
and women in terms of risk factors and
victimization and I'm like you can't
just ignore him he is the most
influential Family Violence researcher
who's ever lived and he's presented
hundreds of papers and I'm like that is
uncomfortable I'm sorry but what more do
you want me to show you like 400 papers
500 papers the biggest domestic violence
database in the world which has 1,700
papers finds the same the consensus
finds it's not
gendered it's by mostly bilateral and
then actually if you look at non-
bilateral violence it's usually women
doing it but it's certainly not gendered
and I'm so sick of being accused of
misleading people when I'm simply just
showing you the data that's all I'm
doing
what's the conflict tactics scale
conflict what is it we talked earlier
about how asking different questions and
different ways and give you different
results so like you said like one in
three victims of abuse uh in UK is male
but one in two in America is male and
one in four in Australia is male those
are all significant numbers but you get
different results depending on what you
ask so the CTS the conflict tactic scale
which was designed by m Strauss and that
is the most uh most widely used tool for
studying domestic violence is B
basically a way of asking people about
domestic violence so back in the old
days they would do surveys and they
would call people up like high crisk how
many times have uh have you had a
criminal sort of charge for domestic
violence or how many times has this
happened like framing talk of domestic
violence in a criminal
language but the convict tactics cell
doesn't do that because that people find
that that use of criminalized language
under represents the true form of
domestic violence but if you do the
conflict tactic scale which is just um
a series of questions that asks people
how do you deal with conflict in your
house uh and through more benign
questions about how do how do you handle
a dispute how do you handle an argument
what do you do if your wife or husband's
disagreeing of you then suddenly you're
you find much larger numbers if you take
away the whole criminal aspect of it and
just frame it in a more sort of benign
friendly way uh you get gender parity
first of all and you find that rates go
up by maybe 10 or 15 times so like I
said it really depends on how you ask
the question or how you you find
abuse uh and like similar a lot a lot of
um domestic vience stat is based on
criminal records for example like Canada
they find one or three victims of abuse
is man but they use criminal data and we
know men are less likely to file a case
of abuse and they're less likely to be
helped by police so they're
underrepresented there too so there's a
huge margin of error and I'm happy to
say that um but even that the lower the
lower estimates like one in four one in
three is still a sign significant amount
but yeah the conflict tactic scale is
basically a unique way of asking people
about domestic violence in a way that's
framed in like a a more relatable and
accessible manner outside of the
criminal language previously used that I
think it's a fairer measure of domestic
violence and partner violence and that's
where the controversy begins because
like I said it finds gender parity talk
to me about this issue around a minister
for men in the
UK Min the minister for men or our
Minister for men is a hypothetical
position that doesn't exist that a lot
of people are advocating for I I was
asking for this in 2019 and people
thought that was hilarious a minister
for men but it's becoming increasingly
popular it's been discussed in the
mainstream it was discussed a lot last
year uh I think there's a poll and and
just just under 50% of the British
public po supported a minister for men
so it's growing it's no longer a joke
now it's becoming more popular but a
minister for men would be a position
just like the minister for women that
looks into the various issues that I I
discuss so male victims of abuse sexual
violence boys being bullied male
homelessness male drug addiction of
course male suicide family courts for
example all these different different
things that are very
unpopular that but also extremely
important and a minister for men is a
position uh that would exist but doesn't
that would look into them like I mean
I'm one of the things I'm often saying
is that I am often surprised that I'm
sat in a seat that I do not think I'm
qualified to be here I don't think I
should be in this position at all really
the the person sat in the seat should be
the minister for men someone that's more
qualified being paid and supported like
some sort of politician or academic or
Professor not me but unfortunately I
seem to be the best you've got so a mil
for be doing my job
essentially um and talking about all the
things that all wants to talk about and
unafraid to do so and uh I would love to
see that happen I think it will happen
the next few years it's growing in
popularity and I think it and it
obviously mean for men and boys as well
let's be clear on that there's a lot of
issues around boys that need to be
spoken about like education and uh yeah
some sort I worry that uh given sort of
what happens every time that this
conversation breaks above the surface in
that way so to speak uh it's just
another person that annoys you or it's
another group that annoys you so I fear
that whoever becomes Minister for men
will do whatever it is sacrifice goat
blood over the pentagram of the beak
nose mask people and you know whatever
whatever they get indoctrinated into
that you don't like and
um I think you have such a gold standard
and you're very unwavering you know not
needing to sort of Kiss the Ring of
feminism every time you talk about the
problems of boys and men uh not wanting
to sugar coat the communication uh
because people have been so used to
having that happen to them and um it's
such you're like the David goggin of
masculinity do you know what I mean like
very unwavering in that regard and um I
wonder if anybody is ever going to be
sufficiently pure to meet your uh to
meet your standards yeah I mean I would
not want it to be sort of a symbolic
position and someone that's brow beaten
sort of a number of apologies I would
just want them to have courage and like
that's what I really want people to have
that courage to say what's unpopular and
just to be driven by the ultimate
ambition of stopping men from ending
their lives and that's that's the dance
we're all dancing now there are so many
people talking about male suicide
encouraging men to talk but so few
people talking about the things that men
are telling them like the experiences of
abuse experience of losing children
experience of addiction uh you know
family breakdown like family courts like
no one is talking about them like so
many men are talking about these things
that are causing distress and pushing
them towards suicide and then the same
people are telling men to talk and not
talking themselves about what men are
telling well it's no you need to talk
you need to talk but not like that yeah
not about those things don't bring that
up tell us tell us that you get sad
sometimes and that you wish that you
could talk to your friends more about it
well it reminds me of what happened to
our friends John Barry and Martin Seager
when they tried to set up the men's
section of the British psychological
Society so the BPS is like the sort of
the national group of psychologists in
the UK um and they have different
sections of research for minorities and
gay people and women of course and
Martin SE and John Barry wanted to set
up a men section in the BPS to look into
things like male suicide for example
like there could not be a bigger
priority in my opinion for the
psychological industry and reducing
suicide especially male
suicide that seems to be an
uncontroversial thing except it wasn't
there was a massive backlash when they
tried to set up the men's section to the
point where the BPS actually had a vote
they actually put it to their members to
vote and should be set a men's section
and then onethird of members voted
against it so onethird of BP members
voted against a section being set up for
the group most at risk the
suicide and it's like I just don't
understand that like could happen and
that's just a brand of advocacy I am not
on board with and that is just like a
red line I won't
cross what do
you what do you wish that member would
do more of or if you were to step into
Zach's shoes for a little while the guy
that runs I'm sure it's not just him
there's like a million people run
however um like but if you were to step
into all of the people that run member's
shoes what would you what would you do I
would be Distributing that money like
nobody's business there are people like
that desperate for that money that 35
million pounds just dishing out straight
away I would then appoint a significant
number of Trustees who are based in the
UK and are aware of British culture and
European culture and the idea that none
of their trustees are even here is no
good so give the money back spend the
money uh change the way it's governed
and then I more broadly in terms of the
philosophy I would be like you need to
be more courageous you cannot be brow
beaten behind the scenes by women's
organizations into dancing to their tune
that you are here to help men and boys
and that is the first second third
priority and anything that gets into
that in front of that you need to
confront with courage like me and like I
just I would just remind them of their
priorities like it the fact that they
they're talking about V is sort of like
the canary in of mind to me and it
sounds like this movember institute is
also um going to be Distributing their
money on feminist Frameworks which I
don't doesn't make sense that you're
here for men most men aren't feminists
most women aren't feminists like you're
not a political organization you should
be like you should be helping people
doing research and not and not just
playing this silly sort of political
nitpicking and semantic word play how
powerful are member how much do they
control
yeah really powerful like the most
powerful Men's Health and male suicide
charity on the planet and like they are
the ones that should be pushing back not
the ones that are just waving the flag
what the white flag of surrender be like
no I am sorry but men who are abused
that is a men's health issue and they
need to be protected by us we need to
stand up for them we need to actually do
at least as much for male victims abuse
as we are doing for women and not buy
into this political Narrative of
violence against women and gendered
violence which actually erases the very
men that they're obligated to help and
like how much do they how much are they
shaping The Narrative really I don't
know because as soon as you kind of as
soon as you tumble into degenerate
internet mode you kind of forget what
it's like to be a a person that watches
TV and does sort of the normal things uh
but I don't know how much the
conversation around boys and men is
curated or crafted by
movember me neither I think people don't
even realize they are an organization
people just think that's it's a meme and
like so many people have being like hang
on there's an organization called Mo I'm
like absolute yes there are um but
answer your question no I don't I don't
think they have much resonance I don't
think their messaging really has much
impact on men and boys like I hate to
like P it down to social media
engagement but if you look at their
social media accounts there's very
little going on there it doesn't seem to
be reverberating the same way that your
content is and to a less extent my
content is and I feel like they're just
talking to the void and because they got
so much money and because people are
afraid of saying what they really think
to member because they have so much
money they they're also getting like a
disproportionate sense of their own
entitlement they have a disproportionate
sense that they are leading the
conversation and they just are not
they're just not they have the money and
people like I said like I know people
that don't want to stand up to November
I've had loads of people contact me from
within movember and outside of November
what are they worried about because they
have the money they have all the money
like they have like I cannot describe to
you how little money there is in these
different areas I I I've been doing this
for five years I have not I mean I've
received some money just from kind
donors but very little I'm I've
hemorrhaged money absolutely how could
you would not believe how much money
I've lost running this account and
that's fine that's fine that is a
sacrifice I made un knowingly made and I
will continue to make for as long as
possible but there are people far far
worse than me people doing absolutely
seminal work into male suicide
especially that are literally got
nothing and the money they do have is
money that I helped raise through my
community and it's not my job so those
people do not want to stand up to member
because member have the money why are
people
like just not say what they think or not
do research they want to do because
they're afraid and that is just not good
science so I would say just having the
money in one place rather than
Distributing it more broadly is just a
recipe for disaster would you sit down
with someone from movember Zach or
somebody else maybe we could do it maybe
we could do it on the show if uh if
someone's interested maybe from from the
camp yeah yeah I'm I'm an open book I
recognize my limitations like I I where
were you most
wrong I think I have a lot of blind
spots in in the in the psychology like I
I try not to get into talking about
different psychological models I have
not got a PhD I have I'm a Bachelor of
Arts from a very middling
University uh so if we're going to talk
about Clinical Psychology like you win
you win every day of the week what I do
know is Communications that's where my
expertise are tone of voice
Communications how to present these
difficult issues in a way that makes
them palatable and resonant I would say
you have that skill too so I clearly
know how to get these messages out there
to make them sharable I've built a whole
career the reason why I can do this for
free is because I built a whole career
doing this we've in various different
scientific Fields because guess what
academics are not great communicators
and I've made a career out of that and
now I've turned my skill set to this
area of advocacy where it's desperately
needed so I have a proven track record
of making
Academia palatable an interesting
Dynamic sexy as sexy as as as it can be
and I I happy I'm happy to lift up other
academics I wonder if uh I wonder if
Richard you and someone from movember uh
I wonder if we could get that as a round
table CU I'd love to have that
conversation and it's easy again you
know even in this I can feel the
temptation to sort of tumble toward some
kind of them and us the powers that be
that have got the money and the young
upstarts that did it themselves doing
the thing I nothing would make me
happier than to genuinely impact the
conversation around boys and men to
actually make a a a real impact like
bullying childhood bullying to me uh I
got an invite to go to a very
prestigious um British school a lots of
people go and speak at these sorts of
places because it's great for media
because there is this sort of reverse
positive some brand thing that you get
where a person who's famous goes and
speaks it somewhere that's famous and
everybody gets to win or whatever and uh
the first thing that came to mind was
why do I need to go and speak to them I
can go I can go to a a primary school or
a secondary school in Stockon On's where
I grew up where I felt alone where I was
bullied throughout the entire time I was
at school and I can go and have a
conversation with those kids because I
actually know their experiences I don't
know the experiences of someone that's
paying 20 or 40 Grand a year to go and
get get their education to become a
future politician I don't know those
people but I know my people so that
bullying like I mean let's let's just
Linger on the bullying thing for a while
because I know it's something that
you've been working on a good bit well
bullying is a really important issue to
me like both you and I have experienced
the bullying and it it just destroys
your life totally destroys your life at
the earliest possible age and it's a
really good vessel through which to look
toxic masculinity or just problematizing
of men in two different
ways um one way is to see bullying for
example um well let's look at things
like violent fantasies for example
violent fantasies in my opinion are
massively correlated with experiences of
bullying there is a huge amount of
research that finds that boys who are
bullied especially the most bullied boys
almost all of them 97% of them will go
on to have violent fantasies uh later in
life so now you have a man who's having
a violent fantasy some people will see
that man is toxic a v a man having a
violent fantasy is seen as toxic needing
of Correction or needing of some sort of
healthy masculinity Workshop I don't see
that I see a bullied boy that's grown up
and a bullied boy develops violent
fantasies as a means of coping with
violence to come that's literally what
violent fantasy is It's A coping
mechanism because that boy is basically
fantasizing about violence so he can
deal with more violence so suddenly that
violent man is no longer sort of a a
toxic perpetrator but he's just a bul
boy that's growing up and he is
deserving of
sympathy and I just think in that case
men who have violent fantasies we need
to see them as victims in their own
right deserving of sympathy and support
not
condemnation and yeah bullying is one of
the one of the root causes of that I and
if you want to solve so-called toxic
masculinity in this case male um violent
fantasies then you need to look at
bullying you need to hold accountable
boys who sorry schools that allow
bullying which my opinion is
institutionalized abuse of children and
unless you're going to talk about
schools or what you're doing for
bullying you're going to you need to
support boys who are being bullied and
he needs to look at the the long-term
impacts especially in violent fantasies
those are the things you need to talk
about going on about toxic masculinity
you're sort of it's it's too late it's
too late you need to get to the problem
a lot sooner than that well it's it's
nowhere near as sexy though right
because it's much easier to say this man
with his overly aggressive approach to
life is that they are the problem
there's something in them or if it's not
in them it's in the expectations around
them because at no point does that lay
at the feet of the person somebody else
who is to blame something that's not
systemic that's like sexy but something
which something which can be fixed which
is if only he was made to feel like he
needed to be less masculine everything
would be fine because you can't go back
and and un bully him you can't go back
to school and un bully you un bully me
that's not going to happen but yeah I've
got um a couple of different uh people
that I've had on the show with
evidence-based interventions for
bullying do Dr Tracy venor is the head
of anti-bullying in Canada uh and I've
got a couple of other episodes Tony vogs
as well um so I'm going to do a lot of
work on this next show hopefully I'm
going to get to go and speak in some
schools and stuff like that uh and and
pump money into those if I I mean you
asked me what would I do if I had M
money I'd just pump money into that I
would just be throwing money at those I
I did interview with Don Dutton recently
who is in my opinion now mauce trous has
passed away he is the leading expert in
the world on domestic violence I asked
him what would you do so I'll give you
his answer uh and he said I would spend
as much money as possible making a
child's life in the first two years of
life especially as comfortable as
possible I would be supporting parents
both mothers and fathers to make sure
that child is living a comfortable life
and he's like that would be expensive
but that will you'll you'll get that
that back long term that is a massive
investment that will pay off because
you've you've neutered a ton of
disregulated parasympathetic and
sympathetic balances yeah close down
half of Prisons perhaps um and then
second he's like I would not indulge in
this gendered violence model of
deprogramming violence men I would I
would I would look more at sort of
couples therapy where you're treating
both sides of the coin so I would do
that I would do more couple therapy and
I would definitely do a lot more to
support parents and children early in
life like I mean I talk a lot about
spanking children and how damaging that
is long term for example because it
basically teaches children that they can
solve uh problem um Behavior misbehavior
through violence like if you don't like
I saw I saw some I saw some research
that came out recently Rob Henderson
shared it about which you may have seen
as well uh pushing back against the
damaging nature of I think it was a meta
analysis uh saying that the physical
interventions for disciplining kids
isn't as damaging as previously thought
well there's a lot of evidence that it
doesn't work long term um but I mean I
would love to read that research because
I mean intuitively it makes it makes a
lot of sense that if you're a child is
very formative age if you're saying that
if you don't like Behavior you are able
to enact violence upon that person that
is essentially what partner abuses that
you don't like what your partner's doing
so you can hit them if you don't like
them that's basically what you're
teaching children that they misbehave I
can be violent towards them I often say
that and no doubt people are going to be
writing comments now well you don't have
children George you don't know what
you're talking about and guess what I
know I don't that's why I feel like we
should be doing more to support parents
so they don't have to resort to violence
and I mean I would love to read that
research I doesn't it's not research
I've read but I mean if I were to quote
Mari Strauss who's who is the expert he
said spanking children is the most
prevalent yet most ignored cause of
partner violence later in life so wow
it's it's hard it's your it's your uh
belief that there is a expectation
something unpleasant in an intimate
relationship parent child husband wife
uh something occurs and one of the
acceptable ways to deal with that is
with physical violence because that's
what happened to you when you were a kid
therefore that's what you can do as you
grow up in later life yeah well I mean
my my parents were probably the best to
reason and talk to me and negotiate and
I little did they know how unreasonable
you were well I I I Tred to be I try to
do that now if I disagree with someone
I'll sit them down I'll talk to them I
don't resort to violence I'm not a
violent person I think part of that's
because that's the model was shown
growing up that my parents weren't
violent towards me but if they had they
been violent towards me that would have
increased the chance that I would then
use that same model in people in my life
and guess the point I'm trying to make
is that instead of indulging spending so
much money on like Vogue strategies
which no one really knows what that is
we should be doing on things that we do
know what they are like spanking
children which is an objective thing
that we can all talk about I've never
seen spanking children mentioned in a
single domestic violence campaign and
yet at least according to ma stra it's
the most prevalent cause of domestic
violence so I'd be throwing money into
that as well to be honest un
bullying uh you're a man from the left
and a pro male Advocate what were your
thoughts on white guys for Harris as a
campaign I mean I don't what is what is
what is that that sounds you didn't see
white guys for Harris I I mean no but I
mean educate me okay so white guys for
Harris was a 30,000 person Zoom call
that happened uh
where as you can imagine I mean Scott
Galloway spoke briefly uh I think maybe
Reed Hoffman did as well I imagine that
Mark K was on there um it's a it was it
was interesting hearing a bunch of what
to me amounted to a pretty obvious
struggle session talking about how we
need to recognize our dot dot dot and we
must be aware of our dot dot dot and it
is it is apparent that we must etc etc
um I'm like hey if you're having this
conversation with potentially the future
president of the United States maybe you
should use this opportunity to try and
speak up for the group that you're
supposed to represent which is in the
title of the zoom call which you've
joined but it was very we understand
that we come from a position of blah
blah I just thought this is [ __ ] lame
like this sucks it no at no point at no
point does it present a hopeful or
positive
expectation for the people that you're
supposed to be resonating with it just
it just sounds like I'm going to have my
head it's the equivalent of being dunked
in the toilet over and over again yeah I
mean I I I'm not surprised that there's
these virtuous shows of like men
supporting Cala Harris but I think the
the bigger picture is a lot of men young
men especially on the left such as
myself feel totally totally alienated
from politics there's no one talking
about oh just got sorry no I've I've
just uh checked white dudes for Harris I
called it white guys shows how much of
an impact it had on me white dudes for
Harris is a group of Voters that
supports the 2024 presidential candidate
uh Ross Morales roetto and Mike Nellis
have been credited as the group's
organizers July 2024 fundraiser with
approximately
190,000 participants raised more than $4
million oh I mean I'm less interested in
what white men can do for Kamal Harris
and I'm more interested in what any
president can do for men as a group in
America like that's this that's the way
around I want to see it and I would like
to remind whoever that pres is that men
are more likely to die at every age boys
are behind at every stage of Education
men die more in 13 of the top 15 causes
of death and are behind women in health
outcomes across every single racial
economic and ethnic group so I'm more
interested in what can the president do
for men and there many more issues
besides that and I mean I don't care
about these virtuous signs of no
submission it seems and it's just like I
mean I think there's far more men that
are totally alienated from politics such
as myself and I just wish politicians
would write policy for them like
Minister for men or like any office for
Men's Health in America would be nice
like Men's Health in America is Dreadful
just as bad as is here and same deal
there's no there's no sort of um federal
office for men's health and there's
about eight for women and N for men so
I'm more interested in how do we help
men rather than how can men help Cala
Harris or whoever is going to get into
White House what do you think the future
of uh or the next couple of years for
men's advocacies got in store I mean
really I mean like I said I feel like
we're at Crossroads now and like I'm
here obviously to make some criticisms
to certain organizations but I'm also
here to listen like my inbox is open I
would like that question for that to be
a positive one where we can work
together where individuals like yourself
and and me and work with people in
politics Academia to put our best foot
forwards on this on on the same side
like to work
together and but there are just things I
will not do there are thing there are
red lines I will not cross and I will
not I will not treat domestic violence
through a v framework I will not
distribute funds underneath underneath a
feminist framework and I will not
support any organization that does not
openly support a minister for men those
are the red lines I have if you can
actually work with me within those lines
then I would absolutely love to help so
I would love to say in 5 years the
problems that we're talking about in
terms of Education being so poor Men's
Health being so bad perhaps most of all
suicide being epidemic like I would love
for that to be less bad that improved
improved because we've actually taken
meaningful political action and we've
actually um put our money where our
mouth is and work together to to feat
your Solutions so I mean I I want to
help solve these problems and I want to
work together I mean I'm only one side
of that I would like that too I would
like that too and in whatever way I can
help I uh I'll be trying to facilitate
George I appreciate you man where should
people go don't want to keep up to date
with all of the things that you're doing
well I mean I'm I'm expanding to my own
podcast now so I'm starting to interview
different people in the space on YouTube
so the Tin Men on YouTube uh but still
Instagram the Tin Men uh and I'm
expanding expanding out now but yeah the
Tin Men on Instagram is way you can find
me heck yeah I appreciate you man thank
you thank you thank you very much for
tuning in if you enjoyed that episode
there is something else you will
absolutely love right here go on give it
a tap