“Why America Is Screwed…” Michael Knowles on Ben Shapiro, Hookup Culture, and Toxic Wokeism
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this interview, Michael Knowles critiques Ben Shapiro's intellectual depth and career trajectory while recounting his own unconventional publishing history with a book titled *Reasons to Vote for Democrats* that contained no words other than an epigraph from Thucydides and extensive blank chapters. Knowles explains how he self-published the "blank" volume, which became a number one Amazon bestseller before Simon & Schuster attempted to buy it; Shapiro allegedly facilitated this deal by providing his agent but was reportedly upset about the book's success until publishers realized they could not make fun of him for receiving money for nothing. Knowles later wrote *Speechless*, a serious work on free speech that challenged conservative absolutism, arguing that all societies require standards and norms rather than unbridled expression, noting that he outsold other number one New York Times bestsellers in his first week despite the mainstream media ignoring him. Knowles shifts to personal history and social commentary by detailing his relationship with his wife, whom he met in high school before being pressured by liberal culture to separate for college—a decision he later regretted as part of a destructive "hookup culture." He contrasts modern dating apps and career-first mindsets with traditional marriage, citing advice from his grandfather that emphasized patience, shared experience, and frequent absence due to military deployment. Knowles argues that human beings are social creatures who grow together rather than apart, warning that delaying marriage until one's thirties or forties makes it difficult for individuals to find a perfect match because their habits and worldviews have already solidified. He advocates for young men to date with the intent of marriage immediately and avoid premarital sex, viewing modern contraception as having severed the natural link between procreation and sexual ethics, leading to demographic decline in Western nations. The conversation turns to gender roles within marriage, where Knowles asserts that while he does not naturally desire to rule over women, his role as head of household is a necessary duty imposed by fallen circumstances rather than an inherent preference for dominance. He warns against husbands passively deferring to their wives on all decisions out of fear or apathy, noting that this dynamic breeds resentment and entitlement within the family unit. Knowles also addresses language policing, specifically regarding terms like "gay" used as a descriptor for certain political views he opposes; while critics claim such usage is aggressive or offensive, Knowles defends it as plain speech necessary to pierce through layers of euphemism and ideological censorship that distort reality. He references George Orwell's advocacy for simple Saxon words over Latinate ones, arguing that accepting redefined terms like "she" for biological men accepts the premise of transgender ideology before a debate can even occur. Throughout the discussion, Knowles touches on fringe topics such as his skepticism regarding extraterrestrial life and conspiracy theories about royal succession involving Prince Joseph Welf of Liechtenstein, which he dismisses in favor of believing demons are real. He also promotes Mayflower cigars, claiming that moderate cigar smoking has no statistically significant correlation with mortality based on specific studies, though he acknowledges the smell is a point of contention with his wife who prefers him to smoke outside. The interview concludes with Knowles expressing frustration over how fear of offending hypothetical third parties allows political elites to control dialogue, urging listeners to speak clearly and truthfully rather than adhering to linguistic prisons constructed by left-wing censorship regimes that constantly redefine basic words like "illegal alien" or "undocumented immigrant."
Read the full video transcript
the country is literally dying we are
all just afraid of offending some
hypothetical third party that doesn't
really exist and I think that is how the
left controls the whole dialogue people
are attracted to truth I don't think men
want to rule over women I don't want to
rule over women I have to do that that's
my role what do you think are some of
your most extreme opinions there are
certainly things I believe that I I
wouldn't be allowed to even say on
YouTube it would shut down the
whole the excellent Michael noes thank
you for using the proper pronunciation
of that title oh Mr Shapiro he does not
pronounce it correctly how does he they
say he says something with a couple
extra letters and I it sounds almost ex
I don't know excellent is the excellent
Michael nles and since we're on the
topic of Ben Shapiro I was wondering if
maybe we could just start this off by
you reacting to this little clip we have
right here okay just letting us know
your thoughts okay free association
Michael
nolles
uh I was going to say good Catholic is
not as good as but he's you
know mediocre
Catholic and mediocre person I mean I
think we can agree on on that I mean NS
is is a discredit to the company and
he's actually but it's not my free
association I really shouldn't be
sounding off go ahead go ahead he's just
awful I mean the fact is that that
nolles has somehow been able to make a
career out of being a complete empty
vessel and it's it's incredible to me
and all the stuff where he's not an
empty vessel whenever he talks about it
I mean my goodness have you heard him
going go on for like an hour about
aquinus it's it's really just just it's
it's pretty terrifying so okay so I like
by the way I like hear how Ben says I'm
an empty vessel and then I just
pontificate for hours about St Thomas
aquinus the greatest Theologian ever to
walk the earth uh you know where it
comes from though especially the EMP
empty vessel phrase where does it come
from Mr Shapiro my friend of many years
uh he wrote a lot of books when he was a
young man he started writing his first
book I think he was in the womb then I
come along this about the year 2017 and
I published a book called a masterpiece
actually called reasons to vote for
Democrats a comprehensive
guide and it it didn't have any words in
it and that book at the time since then
Ben has sold a lot of books I think at
the time my book without any words may
have sold more than all of Ben's books
that he put a lot of time and effort and
words into he was not happy about that
but then there was one other this is
something that really got got bad 2016
the election Hillary Clinton was
supposed to win Ben is Mr Data Ben is Mr
facts all of the polls said Hillary
Clinton was going to win now I'm a
little bit more when it comes to
politics a little bit more about
intuition and I said I don't I don't
know if I believe that the Wicked Witch
of the West is actually going to be
elected president and Trump he's kind of
a weird guy he's big celebrity though
for 40 years I don't know and Ben said
okay okay nolles I'll give you four to
one odds four to one on a $100 bit
that Trump is going to lose I said okay
I don't know if I'd take even odds but
four to one I'll take sure okay
Ben and I now have a check framed in my
office at home crumpled up cuz he
crumpled it and threw it in my head but
it's now framed $400 and he said in the
memo it was for ignoring data I think
that was the beginning the origin story
of Ben's U frustration so I'm curious
when you made this book yeah there's
there's no words in it it's just just
blank pages how much did you make on a
book like that is that technically now a
New York Times bestseller well it it is
certainly a bestseller uh it is not in
New York Times Beth why is it they
wouldn't acknowledge it they would not
acknowledge it now they the the book
when I say bestseller I mean a number
one Amazon bestseller and there are a
lot of books who that claim to be that
sure because they'll say well you know
in the category of uh Norwegian fantasy
troll fiction you know I'm the number
one but this was the number one Amazon
bestseller in all of books for days and
what was in the book so the book I can't
say it had zero words okay it had a very
limited number it opened up with an
epigraph from thiddies the ancient Greek
historian and the epigraph said this is
not an effort to win the Applause of the
moment but a contribution for all time
because my book was not just for the
2016 cycle it it remains true every
election cycle and then it had about 10
chapters or so on economics on civil
rights
on immigration on foreign policy of all
the reasons to vote for
Democrats now those chapters were
completely blank they did not have any
words in it but but then at the end of
the book I had a very very extensive
bibliography I cited all of my sources
modern medieval ancient and uh I think
that the book was very persuasive to
answer your question about the money I
made a lot of money on that book I made
I I I sold I sold hundreds of thousands
of copies of this for I I don't even
know what the number is at this point I
don't think it's a million yet but it's
it might be getting up there sure I
self-published it so it cost me nothing
to oh my gosh and I it wasn't like a
stunt meaning I I actually just did it
to irritate my friends and relatives I
didn't expect to make a ton of money and
then I see the thing starts ticking up I
was having a cigar with uh Jeremy the
god king boring over here and we're
refreshing Amazon and it's you know
number 20,000 that's pretty good number
20,000 on all
then it's number 5,000 then it's number
500 then it's number 20 or something so
Fox News called me asked me to go on the
morning show the next day I said okay I
wake up for the morning show this is La
time and it's number six I do the
morning show I go back to sleep 400 a.m.
or I wake up it's number one and it
stays at number one forever so here's
where the real money kicked in uh I I
get a request from Simon and Schuster to
purchase the rights to my
no way to my nothing and so I sort of
thought well do they know that they
could just kind of do it I what protects
someone else from taking your idea doing
the exact same thing copying me a little
different well they could do it for
Republicans they could do it I know
maybe I should have played both sides
could have doubled my mind I wasn't
mercenary does that exist on the other
side yeah there were a bunch of copycats
who all tried to do it but they didn't
the libs man the essence of it yeah they
they also just ar your first
marage it's got to be really high
quality it's hard to make nothing high
quality but the cover needs to look like
a real cover the epigraph has to be a
good epigraph it has to you know it has
to be a little subtle to and the libs
they did all these you know it was like
10 reasons why I hate that dumb idiot
Donald Trump or what I said that's not
even the joke man you're not getting it
you know and uh so it was number one
yeah Simon and Cher tries to buy it I
talk to Jeremy I say hey man Simon and
shuster's offering me like I I think it
was like 25 Grand to buy the rights plus
then royalties I said um I didn't have a
lot of money I'm a young guy I said this
is great right and Jeremy says no you
can't take it so what do you mean I
can't take it he goes 25 Grand is not
funny said no it's funny to me man it's
pretty good he goes no it's got to be at
least six figures you need at least a
six figureure Advance on your fake book
for it to be funny said then I get a
request from another publisher St
Martin's
then Ben though he was upset about how
great the book was doing he uh then
because of his masochism decided to give
me his book agent to help negotiate the
deal so he said okay NOS I'll set you up
with this this agent you can negotiate a
contract between for nothing I tell the
agent it's got to be six figures he said
okay all right they negotiated all the
way up we get the deal but the
Publishers didn't they just didn't get
the joke so they said okay well Michael
the one thing you can't do is make fun
of us for giving you a bunch of money
for nothing I said why'd you give me the
money then the whole reason to do this
is that's how you get more media and
it'll be funny they won't do it so the
SES start to decline they say we got to
turn this around I said okay put me back
on Fox so I go back on Fox we had
already done the shtick about the book
so they asked me it's just something
about I think it was Trump's policy in
Syria maybe and I complimented
Trump in those days fox fox and friends
had a big audience but there was only
one audience member who counted and that
was the man sitting in 1600 Pennsylvania
who happen to be watching that morning
and so I go off the show I go take a
little nap at the office
and I wake up as my phone explodes
because Trump had tweeted out uh reasons
to vote for
Democrats by Michael J noes a great book
for your reading
enjoyment goes right back up to number
one and and then the New York Times
won't acknowledge it okay fine I'm
offered another book contract I say well
what what do you mean another book what
would what have I ever done that would
give you the impression I can write a
book with words people were offering me
a book contract so I finally take one
years later yeah I write this book and I
and I realized this had to be a pretty
good book because otherwise the headline
would say no should stick to what he
knows you know and it would have been a
disaster so I really put a lot into this
book uh and the book hit number one on
the Publishers Weekly list which is tied
to actual Book Sales sold uh 18,000
copies first week or something um
I I outsold the number one New York
Times bestselling book by like 40% that
week nowhere on the list even with my
book with words nowhere on the list
would the lying fake News New York Times
put me on their list what was what was
the second book that was called
speechless so the first book that great
name thank you I was a little just a
little nod yeah sure so the first book
had no words the second book was
entirely about language
and the SEC I actually didn't know how
the second book was going to sell
because it was not just a usual
right-wing pmic I think had it been a
usual right-wing pmic you know how to
own the libs and so can you uh it would
have sold reliably very well but this
one was a little different because it
was a book about Free
Speech but at the time all the
conservatives were defending free speech
in this grandios absolutist kind of way
and my book actually disagreed with that
and my book said no know Free Speech
absolutism that's a liberal idea that's
not a very conservative idea actually
all societies have a have a right to
standards and Norms I don't think you
should just be able to go scream
whatever you want in the street even if
it's offensive or obscene or fraudulent
or whatever uh the question is
not a battle between censorship and Free
Speech the debate is actually between
two competing sets of Standards so the
question is not um how much should we be
allowed to say the question is what are
we going to say because free speech in
the abstract doesn't mean anything to
people who have nothing to say although
before we go into that AI might be the
most important new computer technology
ever kind of like the beard trimmer Jack
that you should be using that you're not
using at least I can grow you're not
using it though anyway it's storming
every industry and literally billions of
dollars are being invested so you got to
buckle up the problem though is that AI
requires a bunch of speed and processing
power so how can you compete without
cost spiraling out of control that's why
it's time to upgrade to the next
generation of the cloud or Cloud
infrastructure or our sponsor oci oci is
a single platform for your
infrastructure database application
development and AI needs oci has four to
eight times the bandwidth of other
clouds offers one consistent price
instead of variable Regional pricing
which nobody is interested in and of
course Nobody Does it quite like Oracle
so now you could train your AI models at
twice the speed and at less than half
the cost of other clouds so if you want
to do more and spend less like uber 8
by8 and data bricks mosaic take a free
test drive of oci at oracle.com sisted
once again oracle.com
IED guys it's completely free to try it
out I highly recommend it oracle.com
thank you so much Oracle and back to the
podcast what led you to this point today
did you always have an interest in these
sort of beliefs yeah was always
interested in politics and show business
for my entire life that's what I wanted
to go and I was an actor I'm also the
only human being ever in the history of
theater who got over the acting bug I
was cured I uh actually have lots of
moral qualms about acting too maybe
we'll get into that later but uh I
always like show business and I always
like politics from the time I could
remember uh and then I was always
relatively conservative I've had this
haircut since I was six years old you
know I started smoking cigars when I was
15 oh by the way I have I brought you
guys for my company Mayflower cigars W I
brought you uh these are some of the
rarest items on the market right now why
is that I sold out of these cigars I had
a 4mon supply when we launched this
company Mayflower we sold out in one day
30,000 cigars these cigars took a year
to get the blend and the brand perfect I
worked with the best Factory in estle
Nicaragua which is the best cigar
capital in the world right now as far as
I'm concerned
and there's two cigars here this is the
dawn that's your breakfast have it with
coffee smoke this is the dusk that's
your evening smoke you have a full day
right there you got to figure out you're
on your own for lunch how much how much
can you smoke of a cigar in one day do
are you like a multiple cigar per day
type guy I can be I try to keep it to
about one just not even for the health
you know I actually think cigars are on
the whole uh relatively good for you uh
the FDA has not uh looked at that
statement though there have been a
couple studies on this that that have
shown that fewer than four cigars per
day have no statistically significant
correlation with mortality cigars yeah
and there was one actually done by one
of the cancer societies a major study
that showed that the cigar now there's a
difference between cigarettes and
premium cigars but for premium cigar
smokers the uh premium cigar smokers who
smoked in moderation actually lived
slightly longer than the non- premium
cigar smokers is it a social thing could
it be that people who smoke cigars maybe
do so in a group setting so I think part
of it is it it's social so you're more
likely to have good conversations with
guys and you know relax a little some of
it you you could have a cigar alone I'll
Have a Cigar at night with a book and a
and a
drink that's the only way I really get
to relax right I got kids running around
I'm working here all day traveling if
you sit and relax I think stress is a
real killer you know and and that's one
of the few ways a man is not going to go
to the spa usually and get a face mask
and cucumbers on his eyes so that that's
one way to do it so it's the sort of
thing where yes you get a tiny little
bit of a nicotine buzz but just like you
you know you get a little jolt from the
coffee but it's also just about Focus
focusing on these flavors and in the
same way you would with a scotch same
way you would with a good meal and it's
just I I think if you can take your mind
off your work and your responsibilities
for 40 minutes a day but there are other
certain Outlets that you could achieve
that with
right have you noticed any detriments to
to smoking cigars anything bad in your
life no maybe like you went on a date
with a girl and she was like ah you know
it smells a little bit so my wife who is
a a saint walking around the earth she's
right about almost
everything she hates the cigars she
hates them and I told her I said look
I'll defer to you on a lot of
things but there are very few things
that I've Loved longer than I've Loved
You cigars are one of them because I
kissed my wife for the first time at age
16 but I smoked my first cigar at 15 it
was your first love it was it was my
first I'm curious what does she hate
most about you smoking cigars just the
smell she she encourages me to go have
my nightly cigar go sit outside to relax
she likes you cigar maybe when you're
calm down yeah she likes to kick me out
of the house I think your wife is right
I can't stand the smell of it like I've
seen some of these cigar lounges and you
walk down the street and it stinks like
you're 20t away and you smell the thing
and you get there it's just it looks
like a weird place inside it's always
really tiny and there's like I dudes in
there all like just it's kind of weird
you like that I love it I love it here's
another reason I love so you know I'm a
married guy if I go to a bar what do I
get out of that I could if I go to a
regular bar there's going to be girls
around now I don't think I'm going to be
tempted to go you know pick up a girl at
a bar but even the the appearance of
impropriety I don't need that I don't
need some woman walking up someone takes
a picture and it looks bad and I don't
need any of that what do I well you know
what I want to do when I go to a bar I
want to sit with a bunch of fat old
dudes and I want to talk about politics
and religion and philosophy and I want I
want there to be a woman repellent all
around the bar and for the bars that I
go to there is and that would be a big
cloud of smoke that you're describing
now is that more so because of you or
because your wife would prefer you not
to go to a bar with a lot of women
around drink she's not worried that you
know I'm going to go be a Don Giovani
but it's it's more for me I just don't
need the appearance of impropriety I
mean I think there's there's real wisdom
first of all in avoiding the near
occasion of sin so I think you would
probably have to tort me to get me to
ever cheat on my wife but I don't need
the occasion of sin to be near to me and
uh then furthermore I don't need uh the
sin of Scandal you know I don't I don't
want there to be the appearance I was
talking to a friend of mine who was set
up one time he's a uh celebrity May one
might have heard of him uh and he was
taking pictures with people sometimes
you know they come up let's have a
picture and so this woman sis we take a
picture and he has his hand on her
shoulder or something and right before
the picture's taken she grabs it pulls
it down and so he's like hey get get out
of here they got the picture and then
all of a sudden you know it's you're in
essentially a blackmail kind of a
situation I don't need any of that okay
I don't I just want to sit also even
let's say you have a more innocent
conversation with a chick at a
bar I don't want to sound like I'm a
sexist or something but
what I don't know I don't I don't need
to what you GNA say what are youna say
topics lend themselves more toward the
conversation among women certain topics
lend themselves more to the conversation
among men and certain things guys are
not going to talk about or they're not
going to talk in a certain way if
they're in mixed company okay well let
let's get on to that but but real quick
while you're on the topic of like that
photo thing where the guy the girl
grabbed his hand I have seen this meme
of Ben your very own Ben Shapiro he does
a hand Le itation have you seen that
every single time he takes a photo ke
Reeves I think
his hand like six in off of her shoulder
and he's always like smiling the exact
same people love the Keo wanto because
they're like look how respectful he is
he's not even touching the other person
yeah I to me that's a little too far you
think that's too far I think it's a
little too far a safety precaution right
it it's a safety precaution it it is a
safety I just sort of think I I fear
that if I were to do that that would be
seeding to the Liberals and the me too
movement way too much ground I think
it's okay if someone asks you for a
picture they like you you can be chummy
and put your hand you make sure they
don't pull your hand in anyad could
happen with a guy too hypothetically
there's nothing stopping a guy from
grabbing his your hand and putting it
down and taking the photo luckily my
hands aren't that long or my arms aren't
that long but yes no it could H exactly
it could happen to and I just sort of
think if I live my life in a way that
has Integrity if I do my best to do that
and I am the person who I present myself
to be as much as I possibly can be uh
then people just aren't going to believe
it that that sort of a trick just is not
going to work and so I think that's the
the better way to focus on it but who
knows you know if we if all of us end up
getting me toed at some point then
Shapiro and Keanu are going to have the
last laugh when it comes to you know do
I have to is everyone out to get me all
the time do I sort of think there are
two kinds of fear there's surval fear
and there's fear of the Lord right fear
of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom
and survi fear is
cowardice so we don't ever want the
survi fear this is what I think I go to
these schools and I give speeches and
sometimes people make death
threats sometimes more than others and
we take security precautions very
seriously around here but I'm not going
to live my life in constant fear that
some wacko is going to pop me off it
could happen Okay well that's life you
know and uh I I I'll I'll prepare in
case that happens I'm I'm be more
inclined to prepare my soul than to
constantly be worried you know and
checking every corner of of the day uh
you
know at a certain point then they win
don't they if you're constantly in fear
of these things then they've already won
but you know what before we go into that
these days a lot of people are beginning
to learn about the benefits of fasting
like weight loss better gut health
mental Clarity and increased physical
performance as someone who's tried this
myself the whole not eating thing is not
for everyone it's a bit intimidating and
that's why your sponsor prolon was
created prolon is a revolutionary
plant-based nutrition program that
nourishes the body while making cells
believe their fast it's been researched
and developed for decades at the
University of Southern California's
Longevity Institute and backed by
Leading us medical centers prolon helps
promote healthy blood sugar support
cardiovascular health and reduce
abdominal fat you basically get the
benefits of doing a fast while still
consuming food and all this starts with
prolon 5-day program which includes
snacks soups and beverages all designed
to keep your body in a fasting State
when I received the 5-day fast box from
prolon I was surprised how well laid out
the program is they make it incredibly
simple to show you exactly what you need
to eat to stay on track I absolutely
loved the and the nut bar was my
favorite it was actually incredibly
tasty and even just doing this for one
day made my body feel much better
overall try out prolon right now because
they're offering you guys 10% off their
5-day nutrition program just go to
prolong
life.com that's prolong
life.com or click the link in the
description to get 10% off your 5-day
nutrition program thank you so much
prolon for sponsoring this episode and
back to the podcast so you were doing
something similar with Ben where you
would go to colleges and do debates what
were some of the craziest experiences
that you've seen I had one last night
actually I was at Vanderbilt Here Local
speech go in nice packed Auditorium
everyone looks good get I start to give
my speech and outp these
pro-transglutaminase
and I said hold hold on wait who are you
and I said we the transgender people and
I said well it's it's always the
protrans crowd they are by far the
craziest protesters i' ever the most
violent the most uh likely to threaten
to kill you and everyone you know and I
mean it's not even close there's no
other issue abortion immigration
colonialism nothing touches the trans
issue and so I said okay
well why why are you protesting me and
it was because of a speech I gave at
CPAC the big conservative conference
back in February or March where I said
that for the good of society and
especially for the good of uh the
confused people who Fallen pray to this
confusion transgenderism must be
eradicated from public life entirely the
whole Preposterous ideology at every
level that was that those are the exact
words because I've seen them written in
print a lot now I was accused of calling
for
genocide I said hold on how do you get
that Rolling Stone accused me of that
Huffington Post accused me of that other
Outlet Daily Beast I think
and I said I called for the eradication
of an ideology from public life I didn't
call for killing people where' you get
that I said in fact I prefaced my
statement with for the good especially
of these people who identify as
transgender we we got to get rid of this
crazy idea and uh So eventually all of
those lialis Outlets had to change their
headlines I think eradicate is probably
a heavy word to use so I I think I think
eradicate I usually think pests or I
think something in house like ants you
have an ant calling you eradicate the
ants maybe maybe eradicate was too
strong of a word but you were talking
about an ideology and people thought you
were talking about a population I mean
you hear about eradicate poverty does
that mean you're going to kill all the
poor people you're going to eradicate
Nazism does that mean you're going to
Nuke Germany I don't think so uh
eradicate comes from radics the Latin
word radics means root you got pull it
out by the root which is precisely what
I was saying I don't believe that it's a
good idea to uh merely say all we need
to stop transing the eight-year-olds we
need to wait until they turn nine you
know eight is too young but 18 or
whatever that's fine
no either a man can become a woman or he
can't and if a man can become a woman
and vice versa then we should trans the
kids if if you can really be born in the
wrong body then for sure we should we
should encourage gender affirming care
or whatever else they call it but if you
can't and we know that you can we know
that a man can't really be a woman in
vice versa then we shouldn't tolerate it
for anyone it's not going to help
anybody in fact the largest data set on
this ever published just came out of the
UK not long ago and it showed that
contrary to popular propaganda the
transgender transition does not
alleviate any of the conditions of
gender dysphoria uh they looked at
anxiety suicidality depression uh they
all remain the same post hormonal and
postsurgical transition and in one case
in the case of anxiety got worse so I
just looked at that in a sober way and I
said oh this ideology which is fairly
novel uh poses a false view of human
nature it says that your body has
nothing to do with who you really are
and uh so it's harming everyone it's
harming society and it's harming the
individuals who believe in it uh so we
got to get rid of it and in in America
we had never enshrined transgenderism in
our law until about 8 years ago and then
some you know feisty radicals on the
Supreme Court decided to start doing
that some legislators in North Carolina
but uh it's been bad for everyone so
let's just get rid of it so what
happened with the protesters so the
protesters shrieked and yelled and I
made my point and then they just
shrieked profanity at me because they
don't have a there there's no argument
you know I don't I don't think I'm
overstating the case here I don't mean
to sound condescending or anything there
is no protrans argument I've never heard
a single persuasive argument I I doubt
either of you could even think of one
that you've heard that was in any way
persuasive and so
uh they left you know some voluntarily
some the police you know were helping to
get out if they were getting a little
little more violent um and then we went
on with the speech and I talked about
the history of colonialism which
probably disappointed them actually so
is your view that that would be body
dysmorphia where you believe you're born
in the wrong body and transitioning
wouldn't help that solution that instead
it should be treated how else if if
let's just say I'm I'm in a male body
but ment I think I'm female how would
you go about treating you're not in a
male body you are in part your body yes
so the human being is body and soul
hylomorphic being combined right so what
these people believe is that uh it's a
it's a view once called Gnostic dualism
the idea that the the soul the
metaphysical self is opposed to matter
to the body and that matter is bad and
metaphysics is good and uh it this
heresy has cropped up a number of times
in history and it's always been put down
thankfully because it would destroy
civilization so what would I tell a
person who's confused I'd tell him the
truth that's what I would do what would
you tell an anorexic an anorexia comes
to you she's 89 lbs she says I'm so fat
I just got to put down the sandwich
would you say well you know to be
charitable and to help to affirm your
what you know yourself to be deep down
yeah fatty put down the sandwich no you
wouldn't you say no you're you're deeply
diluted and and uh you're at at risk of
a lot of health problems and even death
and so no you're you just have a defect
of your perception and we're going to
we're not going to indulge that we're
going to correct that and that might be
hard for you you might never get over
that temptation to uh starve yourself
but we're we're not going to help you do
it yeah so your answer would be in that
case therapy of going through maybe
self-acceptance or answer would
acknowledging therapy is one way you
could do that though that's a little bit
dangerous now because there are so many
quack therapists who will affirm these
delusions uh I guess I would just
broadly say I would tell people the
truth and you get the truth a lot of
different places you know you get the
truth from talking to your friends you
get the truth from talking to your
family you get the truth from talking to
a psychotherapist you get the truth from
talking to a priest you get the truth
from talking to your guidance counselor
I don't but uh what we have now is a
regime that insists to all of those
people that if they do not tell a lie
they will be
punished the PE parents the teachers the
psychotherapists they'll lose their
accreditation they'll lose their license
and uh so I I would not only encourage
the culture to change I would I would
also change the law back to what it had
always been what do you think the harm
is to society in indulging in that
because my belief tends to be if it
doesn't affect me and it makes someone
happy I don't really care if someone
wants to wear a suit every day doesn't
impact me whatsoever they want to wear a
dress every day day or dress you know
one gener it doesn't affect me so it's
not really something that you know I'm
all for whatever makes people happy how
do you believe that is a detriment to
society well Society is not just about
you right Society is about all of us
that's so even your premise which is
that uh uh leave me alone you do what
you want to do I do what I want to do we
have nothing to do with each other that
is the negation of society right but the
uh furthermore the premises are off
because you say well if it makes someone
happy it doesn't make them happy
happiness is not merely a subjective
question that the anorexic might think
that starving herself makes her happy
she'll tell you that but it doesn't it's
it do that is not conducive to human
flourishing so uh that would be the
first issue the second issue then is the
real harm felt by other people I don't
know when big Husky Hank walks into your
little girl's bathroom you know that's a
problem that's that damages her it's
scandalous it's traumatic and it can
lead to sexual assault and it has this
is what got Glen yunan elected in
Virginia the ladden county schools had a
a transgender bathroom policy and so
some very confused young man went into a
girl's bathroom and ried a girl and what
happened what did the school do they
covered it up why because it was
politically dangerous to touch the trans
issue so what did they do they sent the
kid to another school and what did he do
he did it again and what did they do
they covered it up again so you know for
the victims of of those people who were
In Harm's Way because of trans bathro
policies directly
that would be a harm to society the
girls who train their whole lives to win
Scholarships in in women's sports we're
doing a movie about this now lady
Ballers and then they lose their
scholarships and they lose their medals
they just lose even the glory of the
game because some husky dude who's
sexually confused T takes their trophy
because men are physically stronger than
women that's a direct harm I mean that
can be a real Financial harm even to
those girls so there are all sorts of
problems that come along with it but at
a deeper level even Beyond these
material issues
living in lies is never going to allow
your Society to flourish the further
removed your Society is from reality the
the uh worse off it's going to be the
libertarian view that you've just
articulated which is well leave me alone
you do you I do me no one really
believes that you might not care about
politics but politics cares about you
you might not care about Society Society
cares about you we are not free floating
atoms in outer space man is a political
creature we are born not primarily with
rights and entitlement but primarily
with Duty and obligations uh you know
you didn't choose your life you didn't
choose how you came into the world
you're not going to choose hopefully how
you leave the world and and so we need
to recognize that we do all live
together we have to figure out how to
live together and we can live together
either in accordance with truth that we
can all perceive using our reason and
objective reality or we can live
According to some kooky Narrative of
lies that we're constantly rewriting
where no one ever knows what everyone
accepts and where where the ground is
basically quicksand so if you think the
people that believe the opposite of what
you believe are really suffering do you
think that saying something like they
subscribe to a kooky Narrative of Lies
is something that's going to like flip a
switch in their head and think oh okay
maybe Michael's right and I can change
my ideology or do you think that it puts
them into a position defending their ego
or their idea of who they are that maybe
it wouldn't be productive to defend in
the first place cuz I think like if
you're really trying to convince the
other side coming at from an angle of
being like I understand your plight I
understand the way that you suffer and I
understand your argument entirely and I
respect you for having said opinions
right but I have my own and these are
what they are rather than from a more
aggressive angle because I see these
kind of
like these debate like aggressive
undertones which I see on everybody
right the left and the right 100% but I
do Wonder to bring people into the
center in some capacity right it is
better I feel like to not be super
aggressive and say that the other
person's agenda and narrative is just
like you know ideologically inferior
like like to a to a supreme degree right
especially something that so many people
subscribe to yeah I don't think so I you
know it depends on the context so you're
saying in these debate scenarios
sometimes people get aggressive yeah
that's a debate you know a debate is not
when you're sitting with a loved one
trying to persuade them of something a
debate is when you and an opponent are
standing on stage you both have fixed
views you will not convince the other
person that's not your job you're not
allowed to convince the other person you
know they are there to defend their view
you are there to defend the other view
you are trying to persuade the audience
and so the way to persuade the audience
the people kind of in the middle I think
is through Clarity and I think always
Clarity is Charity but especially during
a time of debate now if I were speaking
to a um trans identifying person as I
have many times I would speak very
differently there I'm not having a
public debate there I'm trying to figure
out okay what has led you to this error
so I can go in and correct that error
for different people it's going to be
different things for some people it
might be they fell down a a tumbler
rabbit hole on the internet I talked to
one trans D transitioner who who did
that for someone else it might be a a
childhood problem or sexual trauma that
they had that's often the case uh for
some it might be an undiagnosed uh
medical condition like autism I talked
to a girl who nearly transitioned at
because her doctors told her that she
was you know or other doctors had told
her that she was the opposite sex and
then fortunately her doctor and her
family and her priest said no that's not
how reality works and they found out she
had undiagnosed autism and now she feels
a lot better so it depends on who you're
talking to but even calling it
necessarily like an error is kind of
attacking somebody's belief of who they
are their identity and I think like no
it's attacking their belief of who they
are their identity right saying that
like your entire identity is an error
because to them it's their identity that
they are in error about their identity
that's true but it's not attacking their
true identity it's not attacking them I
guess that's the distinct but to them
that is them but they're wrong yeah and
you can't convince someone they're wrong
by telling them they're right right of
course not but I'm just saying to call
something an error when someone what
should we call it a situation maybe I
don't know I what kind of situation I
guess it could be like attacking
someone's religion where like that's
what they believe that's I think that if
anything it's going to ramp up their
side of the argument it's going to make
them angry and defending their position
even more I don't think it's going to
Spur actual change if I felt that there
something really wrong or bigoted or
mean-spirited or something about my
statement that men and women are
different which everyone everywhere has
belied for all of history until five
minutes ago uh then I might soft pedal
it so I have nothing but love and
charity for them um and part of that
charity is telling them honestly what I
think I mean you just mentioned that
it's sort of like attacking someone's
religion it's not sort of it's exactly
like attacking someone's religion they
have a belief about human nature how man
relates to the world to himself how the
body relates to the soul that is
fundamentally wrong in fact where I will
give the protrans gender people a little
bit of credit is they have an advantage
over the modern liberal materialists the
modern liberal materialists who say you
know you're just your body you're a bag
of chemicals love is fake everything in
your head is just an an illusion caused
by firing synapses and uh you're when
you die you turn to warm food and take a
dirt nap right that's that's the modern
materialist view the the protrans people
say no I'm not just my body they go too
far they say I'm not my body at all but
they they recognize at least that there
is a metaphysical
component sometimes they fall into error
and into um liberal materialism again
where they'll say my true transgender
identity is on a brain scan I have the
brain of a woman but the body of a man
but of course your brain is part of your
body so they don't really understand
that what they're trying to talk about
is the mind what they're trying to talk
about is the soul they can say my body
including my brain could be entirely
male but I am at a deeper level female
and that's actually closer to the the
truth of the matter which is they're
saying I have a soul and they do have a
soul but then the question is what is
the relation of the soul to the body can
the Soul and the body really be in
opposition or and by Soul they use the
term gender identity
or is your soul the substantial form of
your body which is the matter and does
your sex and your gender identity derive
from the soul or from matter and the
fact is the great thinkers who have ever
walked the Earth have actually discussed
these questions there there is an answer
to these things but because our
education system is so extraordinarily
weak now very few people have ever read
maybe have even heard of someone like
atomas aquinus or an Aristotle or Plato
you know they don't read these things
anymore and uh so they're left totally
Al confused on the questions but there
is an answer and I I think that is a lot
more comforting you know there's a great
tapestry called the the biotapestry that
depicts the Battle of Hastings
1066 one of the most famous scenes from
it is this guy with a funny hat holding
a stick beating his soldiers who were
who are running at him and it says here
Bishop Odo holding a stick Comforts the
boys so comforts
Bishop Odo was not able to fight in the
battle the bishop but he had a stick and
when his retreating men were coming at
him he hit them with the stick and say
go back into the battle go back and
fight and the biotapestry one of the
most famous pieces of Western Art says
he was comforting them because to
comfort is to give strength and I think
the way you give strength is by telling
people the truth and putting them on a
path that will that will be conducive to
their flourishing in
happiness that's the traditional view
the traditional view in our civilization
is the truth sets you free and lies will
will deceive you and lead to death the
way the modern Libs talk about it is
that they want you to believe that lies
will set you free oh just let them live
in their lies who cares it doesn't harm
you doesn't hurt your bottom line just
it makes them happy that the truth can
be so harsh and cruel and actually harm
people it's a total inversion of reality
although you know what before we go into
that you guys might have noticed that
lately we've been putting a lot of money
back into the podcast we've been
traveling to guests we've been upgrading
our equipment but the thing is if you
want to get into content creation
yourself it doesn't have to be this
expensive with her sponsor streamyard
for those that aren't aware streamyard
is a live streaming platform that allows
you to create high quality content with
just the click of a button all you need
is a camera and an internet connection
and then you could stream directly from
your browser and what makes it even
better is that you could stream across
multiple platforms at the exact same
time from Facebook to LinkedIn to Tik
Tok to YouTube and more and trust me
guys if you're trying to blow up you
have to be on every single platform when
we got on Instagram reals and Tik Tok it
did huge number for us so I highly
recommend it and streamyard makes it
incredibly easy how Graham with just the
click of a button plus streamyard is the
best way to start creating content
without having to spend any money
because they actually offer a free
package for our listeners linked down
below that's right the cost is
absolutely nothing to get started
meaning it's going to cost you the low
price of zero and we absolutely
recommend it the link is down below
thank you so much and now let's get back
to the episode so you wrote an entire
book on language what do you think is
more important in debate and
conversation in just like transmitting
information to someone else the words
that you're putting out with the intent
that you that you assign to these words
or the way that it's received from the
other person receiving information well
one hopes in in good communication one
hopes that the two overlap and the way
they overlap is uh if we have a shared
view of reality this is one of the
reasons that the transgender issue is so
dangerous to society is because it it
rips at one of the most basic aspects of
of our shared perception of reality the
distinction between men sure but let's
just say you don't have a shared reality
with someone else so what's what's what
would be more important well if you
don't have any shared reality then words
don't do anything because so then how
would you bridge that Gap through
through persuasive and clear language so
the the what words are is words are
symbols that refer to some objective
reality outside of us right ideally this
is how we're communicating right now
we're not communicating because I'm in
your head and you're in my head we're
communicating because we're using
different symbols and we basically agree
on what those symbols refer
to uh language breaks down when the
relationship between the symbol and the
symbolized between the the signifier and
the signified are ruptured which is
increasingly happening people don't know
the meaning of the word woman that's why
Matt Walsh has a big hit movie is
because one of the most basic words in
language is now controversial uh so what
we see from this then is that the the
progressives in a way have a point when
they say language man you know it can
kind of it changes meaning over time you
know it's it's what leis Carroll writes
about Humpty Dumpty in Allison
Wonderland Humpty Dumpty says when I use
a word it means whatever I say it means
nothing more and nothing less and Alice
says well can a word really means so
many things and Humpty Dumpty says
that's not the
question uh the question is which is to
be master who is controlling things
who's controlling the perception of
reality this is why the libs are so so
frequently using language manip
manipulation to change the political
order both from controlling the the
Public Square through big Tech these
days uh but but then also by changing
the very meaning of words marriage woman
uh patriotism what you know any of these
FS so it's very important for the
conservative I think or for any normal
person who wants to get back to a shared
reality to use to use words in their
proper meaning in a very precise way
even and especially if it's a little bit
provocative because sometimes you've got
to be provocative to wake people out of
a trance and so when I use a precise
word like eradicate I'm doing so very
intentionally and that is going to make
headlines and that is going to lead
left-wing Outlets to lie about me and
that is going to lead left-wing
activists and terrorists to threaten my
life when they read the lying headlines
from the left-wing articles but I think
you actually kind of have to do that
because the only alternative to that is
to buy into
the manipulated me mouth language of the
left to use vague usism a word like
situation that will do nothing other
than seed to them the ground so I want
to get your take on this because we try
to be as in the middle as we can we
really don't pick a side you know if you
stand in the middle of the road you will
be hit by
a here's what I want your opinion on y
uh we very much want to be a platform
that gives everybody a way to speak
their truth both on the right and on the
left however we found overall that we
make a very diligent effort to reach out
to people on the left and ask them to
come on and they don't want to come on
and they don't it's very very very
difficult for us we really want Andrew
Yang Bernie Sanders and AOC if we could
get those three on not to argue not to
debate but purely just to hear them out
and learn and it's very difficult we had
a couple of people on the left on our
show before we had
fantastic is amazing I don't think never
Destin's incredible the daily wire needs
to cab with Destiny in some capacity I
think I was supposed to do something
with him Absol do it and the scheduling
told I think he's you were on whatever
right was on that or he was ones or
something like that Destiny and I were
supposed to do something and it
scheduling got sure postponed but we
should do it yeah because I I like that
he's willing to talk to conservatives
I've invited conservatives on my show a
bunch
and the irony is there are some clips of
me that have gone viral you know owning
a lib with fact and logic and you know
having one of these intense debates it's
really not my style though I'll do it
when I do it I think I do it maybe a
couple times a year but I'm much more
interested in long form conversations I
I'll do a two and a half hour show with
a pro-abortion activist I did one uh
about a year ago there were some zingers
in there but I I actually do want to
figure out what they think where it
comes from how to correct that eror
Destiny would be great he articulates
everything he has so much dep to his
arguments as well yes but most of them
most of the libs I find don't want to do
it and the thing is if they're not
coming on my show I am I say with no
false modesty and true humility I am
like the nicest guy on the right I am
the most willing to Grant premises and
Seed ground and try to see it from their
perspective if they're not going to come
on my show they're not going to come on
any shows they're not going to come on
Ben's show they're not going to come on
this show no matter how much you try to
be down the middle uh and I think part
of the reason for that is one they don't
have very good arguments but two they
have cultural hegemony so they have all
of the um institutions of influence
which means that they don't need to
sharpen their arguments and to they have
no reason to make the arguments because
they've got all the
power you brought up relationships and
marriage a couple of times now I think
you said somewhere that you met your
wife when you were like four years old
right we were in the womb
no where how did you meet your wife at
four years old it's controversial I we
were at least in sixth grade Home Room
okay uh in middle school but we may have
met in fifth grade district Orchestra
because I was the you know 52nd chair of
second violin and she was 53rd or
something but we don't really remember
it I this was a long time ago sure and
uh so then in the eth grade she had a
crush on me I was dating the lead of the
eighth grade musical it was you know a
real celebrity romance and then I had a
crush on her in ninth grade she was
stating a much older man wait did you
break up with the the celebrity
Orchestra person or whatever like the
number one we we we broke up Happ you
know it was a real Torrid love affair I
don't know we one of us didn't hold the
other's hand or something you know it
there's got to be more than that a few
weeks of passion yeah it was just a few
week long relationship it was I don't I
mean in Middle School a few weeks is
like you're married for 10 years you
know I mean that's pretty long and then
but then 9th grade my wife was dating
this much older upper classman in high
school oh I was Furious but then they
broke up and then we started dating in
high school who made the first move I
guess I did yes I do you remember what
you said I do actually I remember she
had broken up with her uh boyfriend and
I instantly said oh we should go watch a
movie that was it it was just instantly
you so you were kind of waiting for them
to I was waiting I was keeping my my
eyes out were you were you friends with
her at the time kind of like yeah yeah
yeah we were friends I mean we were like
we weren't I'm somewhat skeptical of men
and women being friends just platonic
friends generally but we were yeah we
you kept your foot in the door a little
bit why you're skeptical maybe of that
is why yeah you the
exct okay I see you ever met a girl you
tried to date when did you realize that
this girl you were dating in what sixth
grader whatever you said it was or nth
grade 11th grade we started dating okay
okay was was going to be the one pretty
pretty quickly I
I realized it my wife and I split for
college we're very sort of we regret
this now but at the time you got to put
yourself in Liberal New York it's
amazing how backwards everything was
everyone in our lives said you have to
split for college you have to it's crazy
you can't marry your high school
sweetheart that's not that's what
country bumpkins did 50 years you can't
do that you got to split for college
you've got to go date a million people
you got to go you know live the hookup
culture
and so we go to we were in colleges that
were pretty far away from each other and
so we did break up for college and
then rather quickly I realized oh that's
this isn't good you know but whatever I
was single for three four years and uh
then by so you're single all throughout
College yeah so didn't even work being
split up with her anyways did you guys
communicate in between or did no I
wasn't single like I was dating other
women I wasn't single I was sitting okay
and she just went out and had fun so you
were not dating anyone else so you guys
BR I was you guys trying to make me I'm
just double checking no you want to get
the timeline correct sequence of events
this is I guess you know all well that
ends well in that I I know for certain
that my wife is like the one of the
greatest women ever to walk the earth
you know um and certainly you know at
present the greatest woman walking the
Earth because I I did I dated a lot of
girls in college and I thought why am I
doing this like what's the point I know
I have to I was told I have to break up
with my high school girlfriend and we
have to date these other women and we
have to but it's all just bunk man you
know it's totally crazy it turns out
that what people had been doing for all
of history is usually better than what a
bunch of modern radical reformers are
doing now and the evidence of this is my
friends who really bought into that
especially my female friends one can
have a few I guess is uh they say put
your career first don't pay any
attention to relationships don't get
married young don't have kids young
don't do this
don't they're all miserable and it's I
feel bad for them I'm not saying this to
make fun of them in any way they got
duped I got duped a little bit too but
they got duped and they were told this
by the entire culture and you know then
they wake up one day and they say wait
you know brunch isn't as fun anymore or
you know actually my my puppy is not
satisfying aing that I have and actually
I'd like to be with a person and you
know I asked my my grandparents who were
married for 69 years before my
grandfather died and uh at their 60th
anniversary I said hey Grandpa what's
the key to a good marriage
and he was a Navy Captain he said oh
three things buddy uh
patience shared experience 54 months of
pregnancy that's shared experience and
frequent absence because he you know he
would deploy and go away for nine months
at a
time the shared experience is a big one
you can't there's no substitute for that
you know I have known my wife and her
family for the majority of my life my
wife and I went on our first date more
than half my life
ago that's crazy and I'm a young man you
know I mean that is a that is a crazy
thing and so people don't really have
that anymore and I'm not saying you
can't have a great marriage with someone
you meet but it's it's just harder it's
harder to do that and I hear all the
time people write into the show young
men and especially young women who say I
just got lied to dating is just so hard
okay but you don't think that there's
any Merit to going on multiple different
dates with a bunch of different people
and collecting all these data points
about things that you like and things
you don't like and then once you have
this rubric finding someone that kind of
fits all of those things I do think that
there is Merit in knowing what you know
and liking what you like and finding
that someone else so this gets to
another uh disagreement about human
nature which
is some people say you need to go figure
out who you are and then you need to
find that person who will you know match
perfectly with you the other view of
human nature is that we grow together or
we grow apart
so I think it's very hard if someone you
know is single until they're 40 and they
date a million girls and they you know
have their career and they do whatever
they want it's going to be very hard to
find someone who fits perfectly into
that you've got a life you've built a
kind of life you're more set in your
ways you've cultivated habits that are
going to be harder to break the longer
you do them the older you are if you and
a and a person grow from a young age
together look there's a risk you might
grow apart there's a risk you might have
some big blow up and disagreement I
guess that's that's always a risk with
any relationship but more likely you're
going to grow together you know you're
my wife's views are going to influence
my views my My Views are going to
influence my wife's our behavior is
certainly going to influence each
other's behavior and so that view you're
describing it's the most popular view by
far of of everybody but I I think it it
mistakes how human nature really works
liberalism lowercase L liberalism you
know I'm not even just string about
modern crazies but this whole idea of
modernity views man primarily as an
individual and we just we do our own
thing and leave me alone and don't you
know don't yuck my yum and don't don't
bug me to oversimplify it the
enlightenment liberals were wrong
Aristotle was right man is a political
creature or a social creature we don't
make any sense outside of our social
environment and the basis of that the
fundamental political and social unit is
marriage as the family because we're a
coupling creature as well and and uh so
if you can couple with a good person and
you know you don't pick a bad one at a
at a young age you're going to grow up
together and and you're going to be
different people as a result of that
than you would have been had you gone
separately so what event happened in
your relationship with your now wife
that kind of sold it to you that she's
the one well we got back together
because I I realized that the modern
hookup culture I I won't call it swipe
culture because dating apps weren't
around yet but that the modern just like
date a million girls and don't you
know don't don't treat romance or love
or anything as as significant was it was
deeply unsatisfying and pointless and
just a huge waste of time don't you
think there's Merit to that as well it's
like the the motivation is Created from
desperation so when you were away and
you felt like you lacked that love with
your wife that that was empty in your
life you're like oh my gosh I need this
back and then that had like fortified it
and created some strength that wasn't it
can be it's like the Zeal of a convert
you know I was an atheist for 10 years
I'm uh fairly fervent in my religious
views and my my faith in part that's
because I was an atheist now does that
mean that I'm more fervent than I would
have been had I just stayed in the faith
I don't know I know plenty of people who
were uh you know cradle Catholics who
who
are much more um Sanctified and edified
than I am uh so I I I don't know but
that that effect can be the case and
yeah it could be that three years of
girls at whatever College you went to
send you screaming back to your high
school sweetheart arms outstretched sure
but think of just all the wasted time I
had this realization in college I said
man if I had spent every moment that I
spent chasing
girls reading I would be the smartest
person at this entire University you
know like what did it get me there's no
point and so much of our modern view of
sex is pointless including marriage now
because marriage can be dissolved with
no fault divorce even marriage is just
kind of pointless you do it as long as
you sort of feel it's personally
beneficial and then you just split up
and oh you had some kids well that's
okay better that the parents are happy
than that the kid you know that the
parents bicker and you know stay
together so then we'll go on and we'll
just have a new marriage and that'll
break up though because we take our vows
and we say we're going to be together
till death does its part but no one
really believes that and so you know
it's just kind of whatever it's just me
me me but a man wrapped up in himself
makes a small package indeed and it just
seems so pointless I mean a lot of the
criticism of the um LGBT
movement from from uh you know
heterosexuals I think is um a little
high-handed and misplaced because that
the problems run so much deeper than
that you know um what it all boils down
to I think is a sterile sexual ethic the
idea that sex can be just totally
divorced from procreation this is a view
that never existed at all in really in
human history until uh modern birth
control technology and the radicalism of
the middle of the 20th century and now
we think that the primary purpose of sex
is just to you know be titilated for a
little while and uh you know we we
consider babies to be a sexually
transmitted disease and and if you know
something goes wrong with your
contraception well at least that that's
why we need to have abortion to kill the
baby so you don't need to think about it
and it it's just to totally wrong when
you when you separate means from ends
when you separate actions from their
natural consequences then things are
going to go haywire and the consequence
that we're facing now is the country is
literally dying you know we have a a
below replacement birth rate and we have
for 50 years and that's that's been true
around the West only one country has
even started to turn it around that's
Hungary through a great deal of effort
so you know even if you think I sound
like an old fuddy dudy or something and
you know people should go out and swipe
right uh there are actual political
civilizational effects xianping and
China in South Korea they're talking
about this they're doing everything they
can to turn it around because otherwise
your country literally dies so what is
your advice to young men who are dating
today I don't want to sound exactly like
Ben I can't because Ben talk so much
faster than I do uh date for marriage
certainly um and don't make all the
mistakes that all of us have made and
what are those mistakes don't don't um
have sex before marriage don't do uh
don't don't view marriage it's just some
kind of relationship you know I I hate I
hate that word relationship
it's so devoid of any romance or Aeros
or love at all you know do you hear now
people even heterosexuals will introduce
their boyfriend or their girlfriend they
say this is my partner this is my like
you have an accounting firm together you
know what's so funny I've said that with
Jack I'm like oh this my partner but I'm
think like business partner and people
look at us be no no no business business
partner business we're also lovers but
you know that's a separate we do that
after the show yeah that would be that
would be some of the advice and U so
what do you call it then it's not a
relationship Do It Let's Fall In Love
that's what Cole Porter was singing not
you know let's do it let's swipe right
and have a relationship you got to do
that and then you got to get married and
then you have a have to have a ton of
kids that's the other thing you only
have two I only have two you know listen
we got started a little late but we're
working I'm I if I can fill up the Trad
wagon by you know age uh 38 or something
how many kids I my ideal number look I
would be open to as many as we could
possibly have but my ideal
number six would be good six it's a
little tough six kids tough if you
especially if you have C-section or
anything it's a little trickier to
expensive it's expensive sort of I don't
know man I left California so I already
saved a ton of money but how do you how
do you make sure you have the time to
spend with each child individually and
give them the time that they need and
want from their father well I don't know
that you you know again I guess we're
getting to this kind of distinction
between the view that we're primarily
individuals and the view that we're
primarily social I don't know that I
need to play with my kids individually
all the time I do you know a little bit
here and there but we're also together
as a family a lot so that that's one way
to do it what do you think are some of
your most extreme or Fringe opinions and
are there any opinions that you hold
that you feel too uncomfortable to share
publicly oh many yes really no no not
that many I mean the thing is there's a
there's a writer by the name of Leo
Strauss and this guy Leo Strauss a u
very smart Jewish philosopher who wrote
a book called persecution in the art of
writing who said that um basically in
any age if you get a little too close to
the truth you will be persecuted by the
regime for it so you have to find clever
ways of conveying the truth and one way
would be through esoteric writing and he
makes a persuasive case that for some
philosophers they write in a way that is
exoteric to be understood plainly from
the text and esoteric as well and this
is part of a great conversation with
philosophers so uh anyway I think people
who have any Politically Incorrect
opinions probably need to engage in a
little esoteric speech every now and
again but I don't think my views are
particularly extreme and I'm not just
being glib or cute about it I think
among
conservatives even I have pretty
moderate views it's just
that moderation these days I guess is in
the eye of the beholder I think
moderation is a good thing I think
moderation is a virtue uh but I don't
think for instance that uh claiming that
a man is not a woman you know I don't
think that's extreme I don't think
claiming that a baby is a baby is
Extreme I don't think claiming that God
exists is Extreme I don't think claiming
that
uh the family is a real thing uh and a
basic unit of society is Extreme I guess
the libs would say that that is Extreme
but you know I can't I can't help that
is there anything too extreme that you
would feel uncomfortable talking about
on camera well I certainly wouldn't
bring it up there's a c cameras all over
there I don't know if you guys saw
they're off they're not recording I'm
trying to think what why sort of edgy or
maybe if there is something you could
just say yes there are a few things that
I do believe that would just be too
triggering to talk about it's pointless
well there are certainly things I
believe that I I wouldn't be allowed to
even say on YouTube it would shut down
the whole maybe I already said some of
them it would shut down the whole if
stream how about this what if we bleep
it and then you just get a reaction but
we're not going to acknowledge what it
is I'll give you an example of it okay
that do you want us to bleep it just no
no you can keep this well we'll see
maybe for our own sake we might bleep
this is the example and I I really
promise you I'm not I'm not just being
cute and glib about this here's here's
an opinion I have okay when the
parliament voted to oust James II the
king of England last Catholic Monarch
and to invite the Protestant Interlopers
from Orange William and Mary in that was
an unjust Act of parliamentary Supremacy
that created a major problem and sent
England on its path of degradation and
uh there was a Jacoby Rising there were
a number of them the most famous of
which was led by Bonnie Prince Charlie
uh from France into Scotland and it was
a blood bath and he got lost and you
know he totally was destroyed and then
he went back and lived his life in
obscurity and sadness and then Through
the Ages there have been various
Pretenders to the throne presently it
would be France the arch Duke of Bavaria
who is childless and a homosexual
apparently so then it would pass to his
brother Maximillion then down to his
daughter Sophia and then finally down to
a young man about our age Prince Joseph
wiel of lion
uh who will uh be the claimant to the um
Throne of England that's a view that I
only somewhat ironically hold
uh that's an extreme view I guess now
most people would listening to that will
just their eyes will glaz over they say
what the hell what are you talking about
who cares about but that's the kind of
political disagreement that I'm most
interested in I thought maybe you were
going to bring up aliens
the aliens give me a break give me I
heard you're a big believer here we go
here this is this is do they exist and
have you seen proof that they exist I
think I think maybe maybe the present
royal families are actually the aliens
who took over uh the aliens are not real
they're not real and I have friends and
loved ones and colleagues who believe
that they are but they're not they're
fake how do you know they're fake but
what about the the piece that was
recovered which piece was that that
little the little tiny Guy the one from
Mexico I think it was discovered in Mex
that one that guy is real I love you
know this is what I love these guys man
they so there's a congressional
committee to
investigate ET which is it just tells
you everything about the Congress right
and they said no but there's evidence
now so cool what's the evidence and
there was like well you know my cousin's
brother's third uncle's neighbor who
once saw a movie about the C CIA man he
said he saw a weird light in the sky
like well okay I don't know that's not
very persuasive and then the best
evidence they had is this a little like
papier-mâché project from a fifth grade
student in Mexico I said here he is
we've got ET but ET is not real uh but
demons are real I guess maybe that's a
controversial opinion that I have so
we've spoke with someone who was high up
in a certain organization who told us
off the Record now now but this is a
firsthand experience they've seen this
firsthand well now it's third hand from
I guess so okay but they have told us
off the Record that they've seen
unidentified spacecraft in air that they
cannot explain that has been covered up
they that they see these these objects
come down and will whiz off and they're
in the the best technology ever in the
world and these things are outpacing by
a hundred times and they'll report it
they'll do but it disappears yeah I I am
inclined to believe that I mean that
could be a SC op to sometimes we do that
our government pretends to discover
things to scare our enemies and so we we
might be doing that again or it might be
enemy technology or it might be just a
failure of perception in Radars but yeah
people probably see things but the
little green men do not exist so you
don't believe in anywhere in our
universe that is infinite that there
can't be life well the universe probably
isn't infinite it's probably finite but
it's very big uh but no I don't I don't
suspect that we'll find life anywhere
else in the universe no that's not I
don't I wouldn't you know if if we find
some little cell somewhere I I wouldn't
that wouldn't totally rock my world but
yeah I don't think we'll find life
anywhere basically I think that the
chance of us being the only living
organisms in the entire universe seem
pretty small when you really think about
it what are the chance why because I
feel like calculate the chances I don't
well then how do you talk about the CH I
just think that the fact that we're here
means there's a good chance that someone
else is elsewhere now why do you think
that why do you think that our EX ex
istence here implies the existence of
other people somewhere else because I
don't believe that our existence is an
accident I do I don't think it's an
accident either so I don't think it
would be an accident that there would be
something else somewhere you're saying
you don't think we're
special I think that we could be unique
but I don't think that us being alive is
something that is unique necessarily to
us I feel like life has to exist we're
here yes you're you saying that so
you're you're stating that belief but
I'm I'm just asking what
about our life here seems to you to
imply the existence of any life anywhere
else it the answer will involve
something about what you believe about
i' say maybe by chance it it feels like
if the chance of us here you think we
got here by chance I do there you well
that's really what it comes down to uh I
don't I don't really believe in chance
you know I believe in Providence um but
I don't really believe in just I don't
think that this whole world that we live
in and our life and everything I don't
think it's just like a big dumb accident
and and a farce and a joke I think it's
intentional and so I think that we are
special and I think that we are created
by a creator that being the case there
is nothing about our special existence
that would imply the existence of some
other kind of life form elsewhere I even
compare human beings to animals on Earth
what separates human beings is that we
have a rational Soul right so we have
intellect and will a a cow does not have
intellect what about octopus and octopus
is a weirdo and might be an alien but
does not have a rational Soul they
always overstate it to they say you know
octopus has the intelligence of a
seven-year-old think I don't know what
kind of dumb seven-year-olds your dog do
but looks like a Big Blob to me that
like got out of a a container just like
a mouse can too but but anyway maybe
they're smarter than mice but they're
not that smart and uh the reason we know
this is we would not put an octopus on
trial for killing somebody would we an
octopus sneaks into your home at night
strangles you with all his little
tentacles would you would you say arrest
that octopus he's really smart he knew
what he was doing no he's just a dumb
octopus well my understanding is that
octopus would be way smarter but they
don't live that long so that they
because their lifespans are pretty short
they're not able to advance in the same
way that we would so if they lived 80 to
100 years old yeah they might can have
entire octopus civilization maybe they
might have they do down they could have
pet crabs and stuff like that if they
lived to 80 years old which they don't
but look I don't know what they do down
in the water this is the other crazy
we're investigating outer space which is
empty we should be investigating the
oceans which we know basically nothing
about where probably a bunch of aliens
live down there you know but like
octopuses but we don't you know we're
not going to put any of these even an
80-year-old octopus we're not going to
put them on trial and it's cuz we have a
rational W will and a soul and so we
can conceive of abstract Concepts and we
can think about things like justice and
we can perceive objective reality and
reason about it no other being can do
that on Earth uh it's even relates to
the way that our Wills work right we
have two Wills you want like you you
want the 10th cup of coffee but you
don't want the 10th cup of coffee
because it'll make you jittery but you
want it CU it'll taste good and give you
a little more caffeine high and so how
do you explain that you have a a
disagreement about your Wills well one
is the higher will it's rational it's
reasonable and the one is the lower will
it's the appetite the the animals have
the latter but they don't have the
former and the rational will is
understood as mediating between the
lower will and the Divine will the you
know God's will perfect will the
objective truth and reality so if that's
the view of things that you're going
into with which is how I view things
then I just don't see any reason to
believe that you know ET is out there
somewhere certainly that there's no
rational ET out there I don't even know
I don't even know what that would mean
for our own understanding of ourselves
you know because if you believe what I
just said then you believe that man is
made in the image and likeness of God so
what's ET is he made in the image and
likeness of I don't know some like
lesser demon or something I don't I
don't know what like is he does he look
just like us see my question when it
comes to religion is that there are so
many different religions out there and
every religion believes that they are
right and so in virtue of that not
necessary I I tend to think that how do
you know which one is the correct one if
there are so many out there well there
are a lot of different theories of
physics right and and they contradict
one another so how do you know which one
is right there are a lot of different
theories of evolution and if you're
inclined to uh you know be really
gung-ho about Evolution well which one
do you think is right is it Darwin is it
Lamar is it some newer strand of either
of those you you use your reason and you
you separate fact from fiction and you
take you believe the more persuasive
arguments and you throw out the less
persuasive arguments and that's what you
do with religion when when it comes to
theology theology is Faith seeking
understanding so it's applying logic and
the rigors of reason to religious claims
and and religion is just simply a habit
of virtue that inclines the will to give
to God what he deserve so we talk about
multiple religions but there's really
only one religion and we're all just
trying to figure out what it is but do
you believe that other sex of that
religion are incorrect or I don't
believe in sex before marriage if that's
what uh yeah I I mean I I'm I'm Catholic
yeah I think that's true I think that's
the true Faith so in as much as a
religion contradicts that I think that
religion is wrong of course but that's
you know that's just Aristotle's
non-contradiction principle right you
can't simultaneously believe things that
are in opposition I think even the most
atheistic person would say that certain
religions seem more plausible than other
religions you know
um what would be a good example of this
with offending uh wide swath of the
audience most people out there would say
that uh Christianity is more plausible
than
Scientology right why well because
Scientology makes all these crazy claims
about machines and Technology okay like
space aliens right okay like kind of
actually the claims you're are you guys
scientologists you are I had a feeling a
bad example then uh so we would say that
okay well if Christianity is more
persuasive than Scientology then okay
You' you've just dismissed one of the
religions well how about the other ones
do you think it's more persuasive than
Islam I do I think that the historical
claims of and and the theological claims
of Christianity are are more persuasive
than Islam okay we got rid of that one
how about Judaism I you know have great
respect for my Jewish friends and my
Muslim friends and even scientologists
some of them uh but Judaism says Jesus
is not who he says he is Christianity
says Jesus is who he says he is well I
don't know what is it then one
investigates the this question and I've
arrived to the conclusion that he is who
he says he is okay so there goes that
religion how about Buddhism well all the
Buddhists I know are just like liberal
women in Northern Westchester who wear
tight pants and you know meditate during
this so they're not right about anything
I I can easily dismiss that religion how
about Hinduism I some of my best friends
are Hindus uh but that's a a
non-theistic religion uh so that's
pretty easy one to to uh reject off the
bat because it contradicts um uh plenty
of logic and conclusions I've already
come to about uh the nature of being and
who created everything uh okay well I
think we've just handily gotten rid of
all the other religions right now you
might say well there's a lot of
different sects of Christianity that's
true I just think that the historical
claims and the theological claims of of
the church uh go back to Antiquity
they're well attested to over 2,000
years and so that's how I landed on that
one your mileage may vary maybe you come
to a different one but at the very least
we we've landed roughly in the
neighborhood of one another here we
don't just have to throw up our hands
and say well you know Johnny says this
and Jack says that so who the hell knows
everyone can believe whatever they want
let's not try to arrive at any why did
you become
religious oh I was persuaded of it you
know I was an atheist for 10 years but
uh that view just is not tenable what
about it well it doesn't explain
anything why do you need things
explained because I'm a rational person
with the bra curious explain certain
things I feel like like just by chance
is an explanation right how does the
chance come about how does anything come
about it just that's the nature of I
feel like just chance one could discuss
chance and probability and I don't know
stochastic systems or whatever but that
you can only do that within the context
of a created world right you can only do
that um within the context of I'm a
human being with a brain I think with
faculties of reason on planet Earth
within a universe and so at a certain
point you have to ask well how did all
of that come about and there are plenty
of ways to do it you can ask how
anything is in motion an object is in
motion uh when some other object put it
puts it in motion well what happens when
you go all the way back down the line
you need to have an unmoved mover how
how are how do effects come about I
smack you across the face I would never
do such a thing because I'm a lover not
a fighter but then you would have a
little red mark on your face that's an
effect and the cause was my slap well
why did I slap you I don't know because
I drank too much coffee this morning
well that was the cause and the effect
was my irritability well where did the
coffee come from you go all the way back
down the line of causes there has to be
an uncaused cause doesn't there uh
perfectability the fact that some things
are better than other things the fact
that we would all agree even if you're
like a nice happy skeptical person we
all agree that it's better to help a
little old lady cross the street than it
is to kick a newborn baby in the head
right I think we would all agree with
that okay well if some things are better
than other things then there has to be a
maximally great thing traditionally
called a summum bonum well who is that
maximally great thing that would that
would be God there many other arguments
too I mean that's just a handful off the
top of my head but the those
observations necessarily entail coming
to the conclusion that atheism is just
like Reddit tier 2006 bunk what prompted
that though there's got to be an event
that happened that made you think that
pushed you in that direction I met smart
people I guess I mean this really
started my freshman year of college and
I I diss my college sometimes cuz it's
kind you know super liberal and gone
completely off the rails but there are a
lot of intelligent people at it a lot of
them were atheists no question about it
I noticed the very smartest people were
religious and they presented me with
arguments you know we're just having
little debates and things CH they were
challenging my thinking and I didn't
have an answer for the arguments that
they were
making and so if you have any kind of
humility at all then you you have to say
huh you know you never do it in the
moment you never say yeah you're totally
right man I can see the debate in the
moment you say you're totally wrong
you're a big jerk whatever but then you
go home and if you have any humility
whatsoever you think about it you say
huh yeah I guess that guy was right I
guess I did lose that debate and then
once you do that for long enough you you
come to the uh the correct conclusions
hopefully was your wife on board with
the decision to go in a certain way for
Religion she was freaked out by it she
was freaked out cuz look we grew up in a
big agnostic liberal New York play
everyone was functionally an atheist
anyway whatever their nominal really you
know some people were nominally Jews
some people were nominally Catholics but
you know basically everyone was a
practical atheist a liberal really I
mean they just they believed what you
articulated at the beginning which is
you do you leave it alone we can't
really know anything I don't know
whatever you know and and I don't mean
to diss it I don't mean to be dismissive
in any way that's that is the Zeitgeist
man that is the culture we're living in
but uh as a result of that when I came
around and I said hey you're gonna this
might freak you out but
uh I think God exists
it's so fun it's so funny this is the
thing that virtually everyone believed
for all of human history but now if you
say it's kind of like it's a little
radical
and I said look I'm going to go to mass
this weekend I'm going to go to church
you don't have to come but I don't I'm
just G to go because I think I should
she said Okay and she kind of you know
she went with me just to kind of she was
freaked out man she became less freaked
out over time obviously you know we were
married in the church and everything but
but uh can be very jarring I mean it's
very this is why I keep coming back to
liberalism because I don't I don't mean
it in in the own the libs way I mean it
in the like recognize the air that
you're moving in way we live in in a
liberal age where all the premises of
liberalism we're just what we believe we
don't even think about it and it's not
our fault we don't you know you don't
wake up every day and write a five-page
report on whether you're going to have
waffles or pancakes for breakfast you
just do things you know we we we are
animals of prejudice and we just kind of
go about our habits right but when you
start to pull at that thread and this is
why to bring us all the way back full
circle this is why the trans issue keeps
coming up because the trans issue is
just it's so absurd everybody knows a
man and a dress is not really a woman
but it's also The Logical conclusion of
liberalism it's also The Logical
conclusion of radical self- sovereignty
it's also the radical conclusion of I'm
going to make my own reality I'm going
to have my own truth and so once you
pull at that thread you can't you can't
stop pulling the whole thing starts to
unravel so you say okay yeah we
shouldn't trans the kids we shouldn't
really trans anybody actually men and
women are different which means that
marriage is what it used to mean not
what people say it means now which means
that feminism is kind of bunked too
which means that liberalism is kind of
bunked which means we're actually not
radical individuals we're not just we
don't make ourselves we don't oh my
goodness gracious the last 500 years has
been a total serious of error what if
your wife did not want to convert with
you what if she says I disagree with you
you could have your religion
I don't see the things the same way I
can't do that would that be a deal
breaker for you no I wouldn't be it
wouldn't be a deal breaker at first
because uh I'm I'm what uh the late
conservative writer William F Buckley
called an epistemological optimist
meaning it's a very unfortunate and
pretentious phrase but it means that I
think we can know things and I'm
confident in the rational faculties of
my loved ones not just my wife but but
you know people like my good friends too
and so I'm confident that if something
is true and that I think it's true and I
I'm relatively persuasive person I think
uh that I'll be able to persuade them of
that or maybe it's not true maybe I'm
mistake I make mistakes sometimes a rare
occasion and if it's not true I'm
confident in their rational faculties
and solid you know character that
they'll be able to persuade me some
people really worry about this when they
talk about values alignment and true
especially if the if the person that
you're dating
is you know not the brightest not the
most humble not the most open to things
you want to make sure that you agree on
basic stuff
but I think that people are persuadable
and I think people do have reason and
they're they're amenable even if you're
really far down the rabbit hole people
are attracted to Truth at a certain
point and to Beauty into goodness and
you know eventually you want those
things so I I'm not afraid of it I don't
I don't treat dating or friendship like
you know you've got to check boxes on a
on a checklist so okay you scored 75 all
right we can get married you got to see
I don't think so you're a human being do
you do you get along do you love the
person all right then you'll you'll grow
together let's talk about maintaining a
marriage how long have you been married
at this point five five and a half years
five and years we just had our fiveyear
anniversary in Memphis Tennessee the
most romantic city in
America no I don't know she recommended
I said we can go to the Caribbean we'll
do whatever you want M I want to go to
Memphis what's in
Memphis well what's it's it's more about
how do you get to Memphis she didn't
want to get on an airplane for a day or
two and so she we had to do someplace we
could drive to and there aren't that
many places to drive if you're in
Nashville go to Chattanooga that's not
that's not that romantic go to
Louisville I don't know drink some
Bourbon and hit a baseball and so
Memphis we it was great we went to
graceand went to Elvis's house and then
we where else did we go we went to this
hotel that has ducks and had a nice
dinner and it was really fabulous yeah
but so anyway that was five so I guess
we've been married like five Louisville
is one of the few places that we've been
yeah really to Louisville Papa John he
was all right yeah we collabed with him
Papa John like schn oh man that guy's
great yeah should collab with him I'd
love to I've never met they're looking
for collabs yeah that's great um but
okay question garlic sauce I could take
that like shot yeah it's very good this
is a question I love to ask most of our
guests if you think your wife does not
look great in a dress do you tell her
yes now it's it's rare my wife is a
hottie there's no doubt about it and
there was actually she's going to get
angry because I'm like telling Tales out
of school she was trying on two dresses
the for an event like a couple months
ago and so she tries one on it's just
like yo
girl let's clear the night you know
let's she's like M get out of here so I
just want your opinion on the dress you
know whatever she's like I want to try
another one on and she tried the other
one on it was was a pretty dress but it
was it didn't it didn't Garner that
reaction so I told her I was like yeah
that other that dress is fine that dress
is just like super hot you should keep
you should get like three of that dress
you know and so I'll do it but I would
never say I'd never say you know like he
you look fat and frumpy in a dress or
that doesn't seem like a good idea you
know why does your wife sound like Eric
Carman that's a good question many
people have asked that uh so I I because
she's a cartoon
uh third grader from Colorado actually
got I was doing that voice you know we
started dating my body I do what I want
you will respect my
authority I when we were I was 16 and my
much younger bride was 15 and a half and
I don't know I thought it I I would
pronounce her name Alisa like it's
Alyssa but I pronounce it Alisa this
like romantic Italian and I I don't know
why I would I would put on this Italian
accent and then I would have her do an
Italian accent she's not Italian she
speak Italian and she would go
um and then it so it started out was
like well you know I'm Alisa and then it
went it became a little more Mexican it
was like well you know I'm Alisa you
know hey Lisa and then it became a
little like Consuela almost like from
you know and then now I think it's fully
like Eric car it's fully Mexican
Eric listen here
ma so I also want to know in settling an
uncomfortable conversation with your
wife yeah do you treat these
conversations a little bit differently
than you would treat conversations with
let's say like a work colleague or a
peer or something like that yeah I don't
I don't sleep with most of my work
colleagues debate like yeah because we
were talking with it was Ben MAA right
and I think I asked him something like
how do you approach difficult
conversations or debates with your wife
and he just said she's right all of the
time oh that's so gay he def gay he
defers to her happy wife happy life is
what he says oh no oh that's he says
though he handles the business he
handles the business and the finances
big decision I want she will do
everything else but when it comes to the
business she doing that Ma I just got to
say he's a
saint if you met him you would love him
I'm sure I would I so I feel bad that I
but the the view that he was
articulating is so gay
and cockled it actually and so he it but
what if it works for him it does
it doesn't seems like he's pretty happy
married 25 years something like that
because of all the other great things in
his life I'm sure he's a great guy I
really don't mean to diss him but that
view is is like a feminist view it's
very sad be because the question you ask
how do you settle an
argument I take my wife's views into
consideration all the time in fact she
practically to to give your pal credit
practically she probably makes many if
not most of the decisions around the
house what are we going to do on the
weekend what are we going to have for
dinner what are we going to what are the
boys going to wear what are we going to
who are we going to see what are we you
know she where are we going for the
holidays a lot of the time but in our
household we do this a little of the
oldfashioned way I still view the
husband as the head of the household
which is an office that you know is not
exercised explicitly all the time but
sometimes it is if you really come to a
a final impass the husband is going to
decide that's my view because the
alternative is the wife is going to
decide and that doesn't seem right to me
that's not how any culture has ever
viewed it properly that's not how uh
Christendom you know has ever viewed it
that's it seems kind of weird to me is
your wife
you the idea is that there won't
necessarily be impasses if you're so
aligned and I think that's kind of where
Ben is probably with his wife where
there's never been an actual thing where
he's exercised you know his his his
power like that obviously he because he
gives it all to his wife but he so think
he's defer those decisions like you like
you mentioned about where we vacationing
where we going for dinner this and that
because he runs the business which is
here's yeah no but no that's this we
can't move on from this this is a big
problem he runs the business yeah I run
my business too but I run my household
too or I I'm I'm I'm at least the head
of my household my wife actually manages
it all of the time and my wife is my
wife and my wife is The Hand That Rocks
the Cradle is the hand that rules the
world and my wife is a living Saint you
know I mean she's all these things but
we're talking about in an argument when
there's a disagreement
and what you said is your pal says happy
wife happy life you you win always we do
what you want to do which means that
your wife is your husband now and I just
think that's crazy I don't think women
want that here's what I think here's
what I think and what I've noticed for
at least for myself and I'm not married
but engaged uh how strongly do you feel
on a certain thing uh and that's usually
what I kind of defer to where if she's
like I really need to go and get
Chipotle tonight and I'm like I don't
really care I don't want Chipotle but
feel that strongly absolutely will do
will do but if I feel really strongly
about like no I I can't get your pole
tonight you could get your P I'm going
to get this it's really like you know
who wants something more and if she
feels more strongly about one thing than
I do then it's her but if I feel more
strongly about one thing then she does
it's me and how how do you know that how
do you measure that no I really feel
more strongly no no I a discussion I
believe when she said this is like
really like there are certain things
that she said this is really important
to me that that you're here for this or
that you do this one thing this means a
lot and if I don't match that same level
of conviction I'm fine with it if we if
we get to a disagreement where I'm like
I'm really against it you're really for
it sometimes we'll sleep on it and just
talk about it and then sometimes we
could just say you know we'll agree to
disagree on this one thing I'm okay with
this we'll move on to the next one so
you'll say we agree to disagree but I'll
do what you want no no um I I think you
know not that all agree to do that but
that you know we could table this for
another time pushing it off so so what
if the question though becomes something
a little more important than Chipotle
which is uh you know where the kids go
to school and look that can totally
shape a person's I married my wife from
sixth grade you know uh and you have a
big disagreement on that you know she
wants to send the kid
to public school you want to send the
kid to some private school well that's
going to have big effects on your
family's finances that's going to have
big effects on your but I think these
are discussions to have before getting
married like these are discussions that
should be happening before having kids
what about the city you want to live in
you you want to take a job in St Louis
and she wants to stay with her sister in
San Diego well that was a discussion
that we had when we left California mov
to Vegas was was a big discussion and so
I took her opinion into consideration
she took mine uh I talked to Jack about
it I mean it was not just an overnight
like all right let's move you still you
still made the decision I think the will
to move um was stronger than her desire
to stay given our circumstances at the
time yeah that's good that's a great see
you do you do it the way that I do it
but here's thing if she says you know
what if you move to Vegas we're going to
break up that would that would put a
whole different spin on things what if
your wife said that because you weren't
married at the time righto you're
engaged so what if your wife said if you
don't do what I want we're getting
divorced I don't like ultimatums so for
me it would be the nature just talking
about an ultimatum you just brought up
an ultimatum I don't think that's an
ultimatum I think will break up if you
move I think that would be something
that she's entitled to that opinion and
that and you know not wanting to go
somewhere I'm not going to force anybody
to move where they don't want to move
what if she what she's your wife though
I think that that would probably be
deserving of of therapy and really
getting to the root cause of it and and
figuring out can there be a compromise
where maybe we say okay let's move here
but you're going to visit your family so
often so we're going to make time to go
back I feel like a lot of things can be
compromised in such a way where it's not
like all or nothing it's like I'll give
you a little bit you give me a little
bit it's a partnership in this I fear
this I I practically I largely agree
yeah but in principle I fear this this
perspective a little bit because it
turns everything every conversation with
your wife into a negotiation you're
always trying to get a little bit maybe
I'll have more of my say on this and I'm
going to give on here because then I'm
going to score some points I'm going to
bank them and then I'm going to be able
to get my way later on down the road and
I think Clarity is charity and I think
if if you drew claven gave me good
advice he said uh keys to marriage don't
sleep with other people throw out
feminism if if you say from the outset
look we're going to do this the
oldfashioned way and I love you and But
ultimately I'm G to have the final say
and if I got to move to St Louis we're
moving to St Louis the whole family and
I'm not going to hear peep about it uh I
think that's it it reduces anxiety
actually it reduces tension because you
you recognize that you have different
spheres of influence you recognize that
you have different roles in a marriage
you recognize that you have uh different
responsibilities in a marriage I think a
lot of the times men do not want to be
the decider I think this is actually the
secret of Genesis chapter 3 which is
sometimes cited by feminists as uh
patriarchal and you know knuckle
dragging whatever because it says um men
love your husbands men love your husband
that's what it says now that's the
rewrite says uh men love love your wives
and wives submit to your husbands oof
yikes and what so we see this throughout
scripture in Genesis chapter 3 we see uh
your the to the wife your desire will be
for your husband but he will rule over
you and rather than viewing this as a
little reward given to Adam for his
disobedience in the Garden of Eden I see
it as a little bit of a punishment or a
corrective at least cuz I don't think
men want to rule over women I I don't
want to rule over women you know what I
want to do I want to sit on the couch
and I want to sit in my boxers and eat
potato chips and strum a ukulele and
watch movies that's what I really if if
you told and smoke a cigar Mayflower
cigar that's what I would do I am called
by the circumstances of this Fallen
World to be the head of my household and
to uh make decisions and to work by the
sweat of my brow and I have to do that
that's my role but it's not my natural
inclination and so I think a lot of guys
they follow their worst instincts and
they just say no you know man wife does
whatever she wants and I'm just you know
I'm just I'm a schlub I'm I'm Ray Romano
in that sitcom I'm uh Kevin James and
that sitcom I'm both great guys but the
that ARA I'm Homer Simpson I'm just like
the big dumb schlubby husband and she
she makes all the decisions that's not
good you know that's not I don't think
that's going to lead to happiness that's
really interesting cuz I mean in my
relationships that I've had obviously
with women uh I feel like I just care so
much less about so many things than they
care about yes like to them just like
everything is the world but to me it's
just like yeah is very Carefree tell me
where to show up and when tell me what
to wear tell me you know how to do my
hair just whatever I just don't care you
know there are like maybe three things
that I care deeply about everything else
I'll defer to you I know the the issue
is though if you cultivate this uh Habit
of just like letting your wife do
whatever she wants even if you don't
really like it you just don't care
enough so you're like I don't like it
but whatever I'll go along it's not my
big deal I'll show up ultimately that's
going to build up a little bit of
resentment and it's going to build up on
your part it's going to build up some
entitlement on your wife's part and it's
and then when the rubber does meet the
road on a on a really difficult
decision you I think you're going to be
you're going to regret the your behavior
until that point when the rubber really
meets the road and she's not going to
move on the issue but you've never
exercised your role as the head of your
household and you've never even
expressed you have a desire for anything
you know you just show up uh you're
going to be at a at a very hard impass
and and it's not even about what the
decision's going to be you're in San
Diego or St Louis it it's going to be
how do you even make decisions what you
know it gets back to a fundamental
question what is the family what is the
marriage what is it that we're doing
together are we just I think this is
what leads to a lot of divorce are we
just we're just roommates just
negotiating something we're just women
are exactly like men and men are exactly
like women and we don't we relate to one
another in the same way I'd relate to my
butt or is this something special and
different with roles and duties I it's
the ladder so you on the whatever
podcast by the way uh yeah we're going
almost two hours here but that was like
what five hours that was 5 hours now you
guys you know you're a little more
succinct and clear in some of your views
than some of our friends who were on the
whatever podcast so maybe that was why I
went on to go on the whatever podcast
because I have an associate producer who
is a hip young cool Zoomer we call him
professor Jacob he's this cool he's like
12 years old and he said he like Mr
Nolls yeah you you got to go on the
whatever podcast I was like what's that
he like and he showed me and I said oh
I've seen these clips everywhere this
thing is great I was like there's no way
they'd want me to go on that show though
I don't I don't know he said no they
they do they want you to come I said
let's go let's go now
there was a conflict of intentions here
because the point of going on that show
is to make fun of these poor ignorant
young women that's the whole point and
you make fun of them and then they look
stupid and then you get a great viral
clip and I just thought man that's kind
of mean I don't I don't not going to
California to go just make fun of these
young women because it's not their fault
most of them grew up in broken homes and
they don't know anything and they're
attending some stupid school that
doesn't teach them anything and they
don't know and they live in a swipe
culture and they're all being exploited
and used and on only fans and so I said
okay I'm going to do this show a little
differently I'm going to do the show on
their side so often you Brian who I like
the guy who runs the show often it was
not me and Brian against the girls often
it was me and the girls attacking
Bryan's point of were you switching up
your principles then no because the
girls are wrong I mean I pointed out
when they were wrong plenty of times too
but
Brian well he's probably
more correct than them on some like
basic things Brian said he didn't want
to get married so you don't want to get
married that's gay you know I don't I'm
making this accusation why do you keep
using that term I'm like that guy that's
a not very inclusive term you know that
it's very inclusive there are a lot of
gay guys gay so I'm including them why
can't you just say you disagree cuz I
well I disagree but specifically I
disagree because that view is gay right
but okay but the problem that I have
with calling something why are you gay
why are you gay you ugly well you ug
like I have a problem I feel like with
at least if I'm trying to understand
your motive like your desired outcome of
going on these shows and speaking the
truth or whatever your truth whatever
you want to call it I don't think it's
going to yield good benefit or desired
results if you say things are gay in a
derogatory way because it's not like
like someone maybe who's gay is going to
hear that and they're going be like oh
this guy he thinks all gay people are
bad or L I'm I'm I'm a an icon of the
gay community you know I don't I have
plenty of friends look I lived in New
York I lived in La I went to the gayest
University on what university Yale okay
so it's they say one in four maybe more
at Yale you know and uh I have I have a
disproportionate number of uh
homosexually identifying friends and
people with variously eccentric views
but uh you know I'm my view is that we
shouldn't recommend the uh uh LGBT
activism I think that's not a good thing
to right but it's not recommending that
it's just like I said if if your desired
result is to hopefully find a middle
ground where you can both agree on
something or my desired result is to
arrive at the truth that's my desired
result but don't you is for yourself or
to help other people arrive at the truth
for everybody but if you're trying to
help other people arrive at the truth
calling something gay in a bad way in
front of another gay person I don't I
think it's really good I think it's
really good to do because I think people
they recoil when you attack at like
recoil I don't think a lot of other
people a lot I think a lot of people
grew up on the
playground saying hey that shirt's
really gay hahhaa and then everybody
laughs I think everybody used this kind
of language until 5 minutes ago and in
no way is it mocking or you know uh
attacking any people who have kind of
eccentric sexual desires or anything
like that I think it's just kind of gay
you know even if it alien this whole
conversation but imagine it alienates
one or 2% of the audience is that worth
it in this case I'm using it in a very
specific way and intentionally much as I
would use the word eradicate at my CPAC
speech with regard to transgender
ideology so it's I'm using it attention
no no no that's what the Liberals
accused me of but that's because they
have difficulty understanding words uh
the reason I use the word eradicate
there is because I specifically was
referring to uprooting an entire
ideology root and branch and the reason
I use gay specifically in this case is
one because it's kind of funny and we've
all used it even though we all
politically correctly now pretend that
we don't we're all clutching our pearls
but uh the the other thing we all
pretend that the homosexuals are
offended by it they're not homosexuals
are outrageous people a lot of the time
and they're men a lot of the time and
they can they're tough guys uh you know
it's like Macho Macho Man in the in the
Village People the reason I'm using it
specifically here is because gay uh
refers to an entire view of the sexual
ethic a view of the sexual ethic that
views men and women as uh IND
discernible and uh substitutable for one
another and if you have the sexual ethic
that is ultimately sterile that does
that separates means from ends
and so I'm doing that very intentionally
using the esoteric way right I don't
think that's so esoteric I think it's
playing on uh the the proper meaning of
the word and it's showing people the the
issue from a perspective that has been
kept from them when you say when you
just say the word gay without any
context behind it people are not going
to put that meaning the way that you
meant it they're not going to do all the
background thinking of oh he means it
like this and if you extrap this use a
word that everyone used until 5 minutes
ago that now the politically correct
sensors won't let us use when I use that
word what I am saying is I will not
ascribe to your leftwing censorship
regime and you're right it might put
some people off it'll at least raise
their eyebrows even if they're not
offended I don't think many people are
actually offended by it but it'll raise
their eyebrows at least at first but the
consequence of that will be that it will
start to crack away at the leftwing
censorship regime which uses a cycle of
euphemisms to constantly change words
that we're allowed to use for anything I
would disagree I think it would cause a
lot of people to check out immediately
they would hear you saying something
like this and immediately think a it's
one of these guys anything he says my
speech has a lot of views on it anything
you say after that then you're going to
tune out or not take as seriously as
saying I disagree with the concept of
marriage because of this to me that
sounds a lot more eloquent and a lot
more sophisticated than saying oh
understanding which is I feel like the
number one thing that you you need to be
if you're trying to persuade other
people I guess my evidence to the
contrary is I I've given many long
lectures using very dry language on all
of these questions and you've never seen
any of them and none of those clips have
ever gone viral you have conversion rate
on not merely for attention it's so that
my your message point is heard by people
in a precise and and just way but then I
think it's also do you want your message
to be heard or do you want it to impact
the people in a positive way that you
would like to get your message across
because getting attention and just
saying crazy stuff will get crazy
attention I don't think I'm saying any
crazy stuff I think say very reasonable
true stuff but just taking to the
extreme and saying I'm going to say
something that'll get attention that
will do well on social media versus I'm
going to say something it's not going to
get as much attention but the people who
watch it will take my ideas into
consideration it'll make more of an
impact than saying something think I
think that my CPAC speech dominated the
national discourse for at least a week
after I gave it and it was wasn't
exclusively see back speech it was Matt
Walsh's what is a Woman movie it was the
work of turf radical feminists who have
you know there I'm not I'm really not
taking credit for all of this but I do
think that my speech at CPAC and the uh
positive way that it was received by the
American right and a lot of the American
middle and the screeching crazy reaction
that came from the left and the lies
that came from The Establishment media
helped to expand the window of discourse
and helped to move that issue more in
our Direction and it's like led to laws
that have been proscribing the
transgender ideology in public life so I
think it was very persuasive and it did
get people's attention it did I I
actually didn't intend for it to get
that much attention but it did and I
think that's a good thing and yes the
the libs are going to accuse me of all
sorts of things genocide or whatever but
it's ridiculous and reasonable people
know that's ridiculous just as when I
say that you know a guy uh saying that
my wife gets to run the whole show at
home and I don't have a say that's kind
of gay man I don't think that
homosexuals at home are saying that
awful terrible man he wants to throw me
off a roof like the Taliban no they're
saying okay he's using a word that we
don't use as much in the last five years
but a lot of people have used for a long
time and he's using it in a derogatory
way because he's criticizing an action
of a husband with his wife and he's
using it in a precise way because he's
saying that that view of sexual
relations Is essentially the same view
as the gay view which is that uh men and
women are
basically the same so I think it
operates on a lot of levels and the
proof of the pudding is in the tasting
I'm happy to give a really dry academic
lecture but that message is not going to
penetrate uh to some people it will I
give it in a you know I'm giving a
lecture on Dante this coming summer
can't wait to do it it's going to be
extremely academic very dry a lot of
people will consider it boring probably
the people in the room will look I tend
to believe that you could spice up your
message without alienating even one or
two% of your audience whatever that
maybe without using what do you mean by
alienate I think when you say the term
that's gay I think the people who would
be really receptive to you and want to
hear what you have to say might tune you
out at that point why because they think
that I disapprove of the sexual
Revolution I think that you would use
terms that maybe are not um it's just an
aggressive term it is I'd say when when
did it become an aggressive term it
doesn't matter how you're transmitting
it I'm just asking it became an
aggressive I'm saying that's not even a
part of this disc I'm saying matters how
it's received well all right but I got
to get an answer to this question you're
saying it's an aggressive term that's
very shocking for me to hear my whole
life that wasn't an aggressive term when
when did it become an aggressive term
probably in the last couple of years
exactly exactly so what are we going to
do are we going to accept the radical
redefinition of basic words by the left
and and just play along with their words
and what pretty soon I'm going to start
calling Bruce Jenner she or Caitlyn and
then I've accepted transgenderism
because here's the point when you use
the language framed by your ideological
adversaries you accept their whole
premise when you start talking about the
right to marriage equality rather than
the meaning of marriage you've already
there's no debate to be had you've
already accepted that two men can be can
marry one another just as a man and a
woman can marry one another you've
already accepted that you're just asking
who has the right to do it you've lost
the debate the moment that you call
Bruce Jenner Caitlyn that's a girl's
name or if you call Bruce Jenner she
especially you've accepted the premise
of transgenderism and you're right if I
call Bruce Jenner he people are going to
recoil at that I'm going to alienate 1%
of the Audience by saying that because
I'm not supposed to call him Bruce I'm
not supposed to call him him I guess
I'll I guess I'll alienate some radicals
but I will show the vast majority of the
audience the reality as I see it which I
think is so that's that's what I've been
trying to understand this whole time is
that if you're optimizing for impact you
think that your route would be more
impactful than maybe the other rout
you're giving me way too much credit you
you're you're make making me out to be
some uh big strategist calculator of
every piece of rhetoric I use it's not
that complex I just Endeavor to tell the
truth I Endeavor to speak the truth and
I Endeavor to speak the truth in really
plain terms I'm with George Orwell on
this politics in the English language we
should use simple terms we should use
Saxon words over latinate words when we
can we should use terms that are vivid
and I guess we now we call that
aggressive but George Orwell would say
it's plain it's it's clear it presents
to people reality because if we don't
use that if we just use the euphemisms
and the mey mouth politically correct
words then people are going to continue
to see a fantasy you know if if we talk
about an illegal alien then we know
that's the kind of person who has no
right to be in the country if we talk
about an undocumented future American
dreamer well that paints a picture for
you whether you're aware of it or not of
someone who has every absolutely every
right to be in the country probably more
than you do if we talk about she that
she the transom woman well she has every
right to go into that bathroom she's a
she if we say it's a he and he's a dude
and he's wearing a dress and he has no
that man has no right to go into the
bathroom the the clarity here in
language you might call it aggressive I
think it's the only option I'm not
saying that I personally find that
aggressive I'm saying in the way that
it's received and digested in the people
that are this this is the key you think
the language is just fine you think you
probably think I'm not labeling it EI
either way you just said you don't think
it's aggressive I preer i' probably be
more at least not aggressive or you
think it is aggressive I think it is
what the impact is probably no I'm
asking what you think man I think if
someone told me that no I wouldn't be
you know super sensitive to it and I
think basically everyone is like you and
I think that we're all just afraid of
offending some hypothetical third party
that doesn't really exist and I think
that is how the left controls the whole
dialogue because we're all normal guys
and everyone you talk to even if they
say you know I'm a gay guy or I'm a this
thing or I'm a that thing or whatever I
don't know what what language they're
supposed to use now but very few people
actually get offended by any of this
stuff it is the fear the hypothetical
fear of offending the other that keeps
us all trapped in this linguistic prison
living in a Web of Lies rather than just
speaking the truth clearly truth that we
can all basically perceive well Michael
thank you so much for coming on the ice
coffee hour thank you very much to the
Daily wire and thank you so much to the
production crew that set all of this up
this is incredible every single time we
come over here we we have a great time
we're going to wrap this up with one
final thing y we're going to do word
association I want to know the first
thing that comes to your mind when I say
Michael nolles sexy Matt Walsh not Ben
Shapiro
hm that's my answer yeah finally Brett
Cooper a marvelous wonderful bright
shining I future of this country was
that one word yeah no that was just one
emotion that girl she's great great
thank you so much Michael appreciate it