When Behaviour Escalates Fast: 7 Strategies for the First 60 Seconds
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The video addresses how educators and caregivers can effectively manage situations where a child's behavior escalates rapidly, emphasizing that intervention is most successful when initiated within the first sixty seconds before a meltdown occurs. The core principle underlying these strategies is that dysregulated children are responding to feelings of unsafety and threat rather than simply being difficult; therefore, adults must prioritize providing safety signals over attempting to exert control. When an adult reacts with shouting or aggressive movements, it reinforces the child's fear response, activating their primitive brain systems and making regulation nearly impossible. Consequently, the goal is to de-escalate by creating a sense of security that allows the child's higher-order thinking brain to come back online, rather than trying to force compliance during a state of high arousal.
To achieve this safety, the presenter outlines several practical techniques starting with physical positioning and communication styles. One key strategy involves adopting a forty-five-degree angle when facing a child instead of standing directly head-on, which reduces perceived threat levels similar to how people feel more comfortable sitting side-by-side in a car rather than across from each other at a table. Additionally, adults should ensure they do not block the child's exit route, as having an escape path visible further enhances feelings of safety. Another powerful verbal tool is "offering the obvious," where the adult acknowledges what the child clearly wants or needs—such as wanting to leave or stop a task—even if those requests cannot be immediately granted. This simple act validates the child's experience and releases the pressure they feel from trying desperately to communicate their distress through behavioral outbursts.
Further strategies include making a "strategic retreat" by taking a literal physical step back, which signals to the child that they are not being attacked and gives them necessary space to regulate, while also helping the adult maintain their own calm. The presenter also advises replacing the word "but" with "and" in sentences to avoid erasing previous empathetic statements; for instance, saying "I know you are upset, and I want to help you feel safer" maintains connection better than "I know you are upset, but you need to calm down." Furthermore, adults should employ a "one-down" approach by proactively reducing demands on the child as soon as early warning signs like clenched fists or irritability appear, rather than waiting for a crisis to occur. This proactive reduction of pressure prevents failure and protects the relationship, ensuring the child can still complete some work without reaching a breaking point.
Finally, the video introduces methods to manage stress accumulation through "preemptive pauses" and "commentary pauses." By inserting thirty seconds of genuine calm between activities with no demands or expectations, adults prevent the buildup of stress that often leads to sudden behavioral explosions, particularly for neurodivergent children who struggle with transitions. During these pauses, or even while performing actions like stepping back, the adult should narrate their movements in a slow, low voice to make the environment predictable and less frightening for a hyper-vigilant child. By combining these seven quick wins—adjusting body language, validating feelings, reducing demands, and creating predictable spaces—adults can effectively contain escalating situations, foster trust, and guide children back to a state of regulation before they lose control entirely.
Read the full video transcript
So we are thinking today about seven
quick wins for when behavior escalates
fast. This was a topic that has been
requested. What do we do in those
moments when we have children who are
struggling? When they are approaching
that point of meltdown, it feels like
things are getting out of control and we
want to be able to bring the situation
back to a point where thinking speaking
brains are online, nothing's being
thrown around, no one's being bitten,
and there's minimal shouting. This is
our aim. Now, the key thing to recognize
first of all is that we need to try and
get in there as early as possible. So,
what we want ideally is to be
recognizing the early warning signs
rather than waiting. This isn't about
once the paints have been thrown across
the room, what do we do? This is about
trying to prevent getting to the point
where the paints are being thrown across
the room. So, there's about a minute
here. Sometimes when behavior is
escalating fast, where you've got your
golden moment where things are
escalating, things are beginning to feel
like we're losing control. The child is
is really really struggling now and
we're trying to intervene just before
things tip over the edge. So, of the
seven strategies today, some of them are
about prevention, trying to stop us get
to that point and some of them are about
that kind of early intervention just as
things are beginning to bubble over.
We're trying to kind of contain things.
So that kind of that first 60 seconds
before everything goes a little bit
that's what we're thinking about today.
Um and the reason on that last slide
I'll just keep
we're just going forwards in the slides
now. The reason why I say this like once
you get to eight or nine out of 10 in
terms of dysregulation um your options
are limited. This is a kind of a basic
brain thing. Essentially, we are wanting
to be in a scenario where we are
accessing our kind of preffrontal cortex
and our lovely thinking, speaking,
problem solving brain, the stuff that
allows us to manage day-to-day, make
good decisions, regulate, all those
things. But as we move into this kind of
danger threat state where behavior is
going a little bit w and this is when
our amygdala is kicking in and we're no
longer kind of using reasoning. We're no
longer able to do kind of complex
thinking, speaking, interacting. And so
it's really really challenging to to get
things back under control because we're
in a very sort of basic brain state
where we're essentially got a sort of
trauma or fear response that fightlight
freeze type response is really kicking
in. So we really want to get in a little
bit earlier than that if we can. So the
kind of underlying principle for the
whole session today is this that
disregulated children need safety
signals not control attempts. Why do I
say this? Because when we are faced with
a child who seems out of control, where
their behavior is escalating, where
we're seeing that volcano at risk of
erupting or indeed erupting, we as the
adult tend to go into the mode of taking
control. Now, it's important that
children who are struggling know that
there are adults around them who who
have control, who are calm, who've got
this all together, but they need that to
feel in a safe way, not like you've
become the threat that you're barreling
in there and you're taking charge in
like a big loud way because that can add
to that feeling of threat. And we'll
discuss that a little bit more as we go
through. But we just need to see this
these these behavior challenges uh are
often essentially a response to feeling
unsafe, a response to threat. I'm
disregulated. I don't feel safe anymore.
What I need is to feel safe again. When
you come in and you try and control me,
whether you do that by shouting or
through your movements or whatever it
might be, that adds to the feeling of
unsafety, which adds to the
dysregulation. And suddenly we're not
seven out of 10 anymore. We're 10 out of
10. the volcano has exploded. So, they
need safety signals from you, not
control attempts. And we'll have a look
at what that looks like.
Okay. So, strategy number one, we have
seven today. Seven. Uh, and we will work
through them. Um, so number one is the
45 degree angle. So, this is about how
we actually position ourselves. Body
language. Thinking about how we feel
physically to the child makes a really
big difference here. So what's most
combative is kind of face to face like
Spanish Inquisition style. You're facing
the child headon and that increases that
feeling of threat. Whereas if we move
ourselves kind of just around a little
bit um then we change that threat level.
So think about the kinds of situations
when you've ended up having really
difficult conversations with a friend,
say when you feel more able to open up.
Often you might be sat side by side in a
car or walking along side by side
together. or you might have gone for a
drink and you might sort of sit around
the the corner of a table. Very rarely
do we choose to kind of be facing each
other directly. That can feel quite
threatening. So this kind of 45 degree
angle feels much less threatening. This
is just a general thing, by the way, not
just when behavior is escalating. This
is also how you would make someone feel
more comfortable if you were
interviewing them. For example, we'll
often do the Spanish Inquisition. We're
one side of a big desk, they're the
other side. But imagine how differently
that interview would feel if you were
walking alongside or you had chairs that
were side by side without that barrier
and without that that head-on. So that
45° angle makes you feel less
threatening. But little children as
well, it can be good if you make
yourself feel smaller. So bringing
yourself down um can also help if you're
looming over them and directly facing
them. You can see why that might feel a
bit scary. And if they're already in a
bit of a scared place, that can be
challenging.
Um so yeah we we want to remove that
that threat response. We want to send
the safety signal and and then this
point about the exit route as well. Um
if you are in the way of where the child
might escape that again is going to
increase their feeling of uh threat that
lack of safety. If you're stood between
them and the door you might just move
yourself a little bit. Um, this just
makes the the, you know, again, we're
trying to remove that that feeling of
threat and increase that feeling of
safety. You're not trying to block their
exit. You want them to feel safe. Of
course, you know, all of these ideas
that I'm sharing, there will be times
when you say, I'm going to overrule that
because on this instance, you know, I
don't think the child is safe. Actually,
I'm trying to contain them. This is what
our safeguarding procedures suggest. But
this is just general practice
recognizing that a child will feel quite
confronted if we're direct and if they
can't see their way out of the
situation. Um then that threat level
continues to rise by moving ourselves
just a little bit, angling ourselves
differently, things begin to feel
different for the child.
Okay. Number two is offer the obvious.
This one feels a little bit strange at
first, but bear with me. So, in this
instance, what we're actually going to
do is just tell the child what they
want, even if we're not actually able to
give it to them yet. So, this might look
like this. Um, you want to leave right
now or you don't want to do this work or
you want me to stop talking or you want
everyone to go away. You're not telling
them that you can make these things
happen. You're just acknowledging what
it is that you believe they want. Later
on with one of the other strategies,
we'll think about how we might add an
and sentence to this. But for right now,
we're just going to acknowledge what it
is we think that the child wants. Now,
this might seem like a strange thing to
do because it's like, "Yeah, okay,
Pooky, whatever. We're not fixing
anything here. We're just telling them
what they already know." But the problem
is they know what they want, but they
think that you don't know what they
want. And until you kind of confirm that
with them, they need to tell you because
they're feeling threatened, scared,
worried, whatever, they need to
communicate with you. So their anger,
their frustration needs to be heard. So
if they don't think you've understood,
they're just going to try harder to tell
you. And right now, that telling you
might be through throwing, kicking,
hitting, shouting, whatever it might be.
Um, as they're fighting to to help you
to understand. And and this can mean
that it escalates and escalates until we
get to the point of meltdown. And this
is really common. It's like
communication breakdown. They're trying
desperately to tell you what is going on
for them. But they think that we've not
understood. But if we do understand and
we just name it, we say you want
everyone to go away right now. The
pressure for them to explain themselves
is released. And that's not the end of
it. We need to think about what happens
next. But at least they feel heard. So
they know that you've understood and
that gives us space to move on to the
next thing. So just stating what it is
that we think is going on for them is
tip number two. And it does seem
strange. I do get that this seems like a
very old thing to do and it can feel
very unnatural. What I would suggest is
that you try it um and you see what
happens. Try to keep these sentences
fairly simple particularly with younger
children. So all of these strategies we
can adapt a little bit for different
ages, but like if it's a really young
child, we'll be keeping our sentences,
you know, three, four um words long. You
know, you you wanted the pen or you want
to leave. But with older children, we
might begin to uh make it a bit more
complicated. We might start introducing
feeling words. For example, if we're
kind of upper primary or we've got into
secondary, we might be saying, "You're
feeling very frustrated because Jimmer
took your pencils," or whatever it might
be. So, we can begin to name it um a
little bit more, make it more complex as
they get bigger. But simplicity is often
your friend here. When we have a child
who is feeling overwhelmed in any way,
then their brain is not at its kind of
most free to explore thinking and
problem solving. And so we want to keep
it simple for their brain if we can.
Okay. Number three is the strategic
retreat. So this is about the fact that
when a child um is having their behavior
beginning to escalate, quite often we
want to step in and take control. We
might be thinking, "Look at me. Look at
me. I'm trying to communicate with you
here or move in to try to take control
of the situation." But remember what
we've been saying before about children
needing to feel safer and less
threatened. And how we can make them
feel less threatened is actually to take
a step away. Now, we're not talking
about abandoning them, completely moving
away from them. It's just literally a
step away. This does two things. So,
one, as I already said, it's going to
reduce the feeling of threat for the
child. a bit like when we we uh changed
uh our body language and the the angle
we were facing. When we take a step
away, it says, "I'm not coming in for
the attack here. Essentially, it's okay.
I'm going to give you space. You're
safe." But also, crucially, this helps
us because when a child's behavior is
escalating, often we're mirroring that
ourselves. We're feeling that anxiety.
We're starting to feel that anger. We're
beginning to feel disregulated
ourselves. And when we physically take a
step away, that's sending messages to
our system as well, saying, "This is
okay. I'm calm. I'm in control." It can
help to have this as a little running
kind of script in your own head as well.
Like just telling yourself, "It's okay.
I've got this. I'm calm. I'm in
control." And even if it doesn't feel
completely true right now, we tell
ourselves this because this is what
we're hoping to aspire to. So, we're
going to take that step back. Even
though our instinct might be like, "Get
in there and fix this." For many many
children, much of the time, a step back
will be far more helpful. So, you're
going to notice the tension rising. You
might notice this in the child. You
might notice it in yourself. You're
often going to notice it in both. You're
going to resist that urge to move in.
You're going to take just literally one
step back and think about your voice.
So, we often talk about our voices here.
We're going to do our slow, low, low.
Remember, slow down the pace, lower the
volume, and lower the pitch. So, we've
got that lovely warm audible hug going
on. And then we're just going to wait
just for a few seconds um before we take
our next move, before we say the next
thing, do the next thing. Just give it a
little bit of space.
And so the key thing here when we crowd
the child, they're going to feel threat,
but when they've got just a little bit
of space, that's going to say safety to
them. So we just want to create that
little bit of space, which enables them
to feel a bit safer. They begin ever so
slowly to start to regulate again.
Okay. Okay, idea number four is
replacing but with and. Now remember a
little one moment ago we were talking
about stating what we believe the child
uh thinks or needs or wants. Um and this
is kind of the next part of that if you
like. Um so instead of saying um uh you
know you you you want to leave but right
now you can't. We're in the middle of
maths. We're going to think about saying
something different which will work
better for the child. Um, we very often
use the butt. Um, because usually what
the child wants isn't possible right now
for some reason. If what they wanted
like was possible and easy, probably
that would already be happening.
Probably the behavior wouldn't be
escalating. Um, but when we say but,
then the child feels completely
misunderstood. Whereas when we say and,
we're trying to keep that connection
open. Why? Because when when we say but,
it erases everything we've said before
it. So, we might have done the good work
of, you know, I know you're upset, but
then we say, but you need to calm down.
Then the child didn't hear, I know
you're upset. They they don't think that
you understand them because they think
that you think that they can just calm
down and so they feel completely unheard
and this this is not helpful. But if you
say, I know you're upset and I want to
help you feel safer. This is
acknowledging how they feel. This is
acknowledging what's happening for them
and thinking about what our next steps
might be together. I understand, but you
can't speak to me like that. This again
feels combative. Makes the child feel
that they're not understood. I
understand and I wonder what you need
right now. So, it's just a change from a
but followup to an and follow-up. It's a
again, it's one that doesn't always come
naturally, but comes very very
naturally. And is a little bit harder
and it's worth thinking through what
some of your common ones here might be,
but it really makes a big difference.
When we say but, everything before is
erased. As I said before, they think
that everything after it is the real
message. So, if we take that last
example, um rather than um understanding
that they're upset, I know you're upset,
but you need to calm down. All they hear
is you need to calm down. You can't
speak to me like that. Everyone else is
managing. That's the message that
they're hearing. So, we've undone the
hard work of recognizing what they're
saying.
Um and so, yeah, we're showing them that
we don't understand. But when we use our
and it means that both parts of the
sentence feel equally true. So again,
going back to our examples here, I know
you're upset. We believe this to be
true. And I want you to feel safer. Both
of these parts feel true to the child
now. I understand. And I wonder what you
need right now. That's hard. And we can
work out what's next together. So the
and really changes the feel of it for
the child. We haven't completely erased
um what was said first. We're seeing
them. We're hearing them. We're
recognizing the challenge. and we're
trying to support and find a way forward
together.
I hope that makes sense. It's a little
bit of a funny one, but just literally
think about replacing the word but with
the word and when you find yourself in
this situation and see what happens.
Okay, strategy number five is the one
down strategy. This is about reducing
demands. So, what we're looking to do
here is to see when um these issues are
just beginning to escalate, when we're
recognizing that a child is managing
just that little bit less well, and
we're going to start to reduce demands
on them. So, we're going to make things
one step easier. Um when a child is
beginning to feel dysregulated,
beginning to feel overwhelmed, then
every additional demand we put on them
is going to make it more likely that
they are unable to cope, that we're
going to see that behavior boom, uh
which is not what we're looking for. So,
we're going to um move things down a
notch in terms of demand. So, maybe this
girl here, she can normally write three
paragraphs. She's a good writer today.
As you can see, she is not feeling her
absolute best. She's got her head down
on the desk. We're seeing some of those
warning signs that things are not going
great for her. We might have seen clench
fists. She might have been a bit
irritable and snappy in her responses.
Maybe she's stopped talking. There's all
sorts of signs that we learn to look out
for in children as we get to know them.
Um, and so if we've caught this early
enough, then we might just take it one
step down. Instead of the three
paragraphs that we normally expect from
her, we're going to ask her to write
two. But if she's still struggling, or
if we think she's that bit more
disregulated, we might take it down
another level two down and just ask her
to write topic sentences only. Or if
we're even beyond that, maybe just tell
me your ideas verbally. We're not going
to expect any writing at all of her.
We're going to really reduce those
demands. You can apply this across any
um situation. Maybe, I don't know,
you're doing maths and instead of 20
problems, then uh you might go one down
and say, "Oh, we'll just do the odd
questions, not the even ones." Two down
might be just do the first five instead
of all 20. And three down might be it's
okay just to observe um for now, for
example. So, we can have a think about
what those levels might be for us. Um
the key here is to try and reduce the
demands before the child hits crisis,
not afterwards. partly because once
they've hit crisis kind of nothing
great's going to happen anyway. They're
not really in a position to continue
with any demands on them. We're just
yeah we're we're kind of fueling failure
here. But the other thing here is about
thinking about what behavior we're
rewarding. So if uh we are noticing
early warning signs but nothing's
actually kind of gone wrong yet and
we're saying, "Oh, she doesn't seem
quite quite like she's really really
managing right now. I think we need to
reduce the demands." And we do that in a
kind of calm and um very considered and
deliberate way. Um then then this is
this is rewarding uh like recognition of
early signs. They might even have let
you know. You might have a little uh
card that you share or something like
that. Some sort of non-verbal signal
that says I'm struggling a bit. Can we
reduce those demands? If we wait until
the point that things really escalate,
then it looks like we're responding um
by reducing demands once we see that
behavior that is challenging for us. And
that's not what we want to reward. Um
not because the child will then kind of
manipulate and go, "Oh, well actually I
always get to do less maths if I start
throwing things across the classroom."
But actually because internally,
subconsciously, they learn that when
they're not managing, the way to get
what they need is to have this kind of
escalation of behavior. And we can
create a bit of a a built-in kind of
cycle here of positive reinforcement of
challenging behavior. So, we really want
to to spot this early, reduce those
demands earlier on in that cycle when
we're just seeing those early warning
signs. Have a think if you've got
particular children that you've come
here today thinking about if there are
signs that you notice in them. Do you
see the clenched fists? Do you see their
breathing change? Does you know how
they're communicating with you uh begin
to change? They become less interactive.
There's all sorts of signs that you
might see. But what are the early
warning signs for this particular child?
And so that you can proactively reduce
those demands. Now, one of the things
that people say when I suggest stuff
like this is, "Well, okay, but they're
not going to get their work done. You
know, we've got a lot of curriculum to
get through here. And I would just ask
you this. Curious cat says, "Would you
rather they complete one paragraph with
relationships intact or zero paragraphs
after a meltdown?" Sure, you wanted
three. But if we don't reduce those
demands, if we don't proactively manage
the situation, the likelihood is the
kids in the corridor or gone to the
head's office or whatever happens in
your school and no paragraphs are
written. Um, and not only that, but
actually the relationship begins to
break down, too. Whereas, if you've
recognized those early warning signs,
then hopefully they're still able to
produce something, one paragraph of
three maybe, and the relationship stays
intact because this showed them that you
saw them, you understood them, and you
responded. And so, it's actually
relationship building rather than
relationship breaking.
Okay, number six, the preemptive pause.
This just feels slightly ironic when I
like barrel through, barrel through,
barrel through. But the whole point of
these sessions is they're meant to be
like full on and lots of ideas and then
we'll do Q&A at the end. So the
preemptive pause. Okay. So this is about
having 30 seconds regularly that stops
the accumulation of stress. So
throughout the day we are moving between
different tasks all the time and every
time we transition particularly for our
neurode diverent children but kind of
for everyone a little bit of stress is
building up and we've all got our point
where we can't manage anymore. We've all
had days like this right where you've
gone from meeting to meeting to meeting
to meeting to meeting. Imagine like
those days when you have parents evening
and you've gone straight from school
into parents evening, meeting after
meeting after meeting and then in the
end you get to the point where it's
really hard. It's like that for our
children every day. um particularly
neurode divergent children because many
of them um are uh monotropic. Monotropic
is um have a really good capacity to
focus on one thing really well but it's
really difficult to do multiple things
and it can be really hard to move from
one thing to the next because we were
really focused in on it. Um and so when
we move from one activity to the next
that's actually really quite stressful.
So what we're suggesting here is a tiny
intervention where we just take a little
gap in between the activities. Instead
of going straight from one activity to
the next, there's just like 30 seconds
where nothing really happens. And then
we find that the stress is much less
likely to accumulate. So we don't
gradually work to that point of
meltdown. If you ever have kids that
you're working with where suddenly, you
know, it's kind of half past 2 in the
afternoon and you're just moving from
one activity to the next and something
really tiny sends this kid off the edge
and you're like, I don't understand. All
I asked them to do was to pick their pen
up and suddenly they've gone and you
don't understand. It's probably their
stress accumulation from many many
activities kind of building up. It's
like um if you ever played buckaroo, you
know, when you have to like balance the
things on the donkey's back and it's the
Yeah. the I don't know plastic bucket
that made the buckaroo jump, broke the
donkey's back, whatever the uh saying
is. Um and so what we're looking to do
instead is just to allow that moment of
calm between activities. Now, the thing
to remember here, these 30-cond pauses,
they have to be genuine pauses. Nothing
nothing happens in that pause. Like the
most that I've seen happen successfully
is a little bit of music piped through
or something. I've I've seen it work
really well where people have had like a
particular bit of music or some sort of
sensory thing that's kind of calming and
nice that happens in those pauses. A
chime I've seen work very well. Um which
signals the pause, but no demands, none,
no like even pick this up. Let's just
tidy up while we do this. That's not a
pause. That's a doing. We just want to
just do. And yeah, again, this one feels
a bit weird when you start doing it.
just stopping feels strange and you feel
like you haven't got time. But when we
start building in even just 30 seconds
between transitions where children can
just take a breath, where we can just
take a breath, we find that things are
much more regulated and we're much less
likely to have these escalations of
behavior. It can be something you can do
across a whole class, but equally it
might just be space that you create for
a particular child if they're really
struggling right now. But I find it
works really well um across whole bunch
of people if you need to. Um and again
it feels a bit weird at first but kids
often get quite used to it quite
quickly. Um and they will sometimes at
the beginning particularly like your
ADHDers will sometimes try and fill that
space with chat or movement or whatever
but they get used to it over time and
they begin to really use those pauses.
So these are just 30 seconds of no
demands at all. So it might be like
you've taken the register and just
before you then go into the activity,
you're just going to have 30 seconds of
just quiet and calm. Just 30 seconds
where no one has any expectations on
each other.
Okay? And then number seven can kind of
build on top of number six. Um the
commentary pause. So this is where we
are actually just going to narrate our
actions. Um so we can do this uh during
pauses. we're not making any
expectations on anyone or we can do it
when we're um alongside many of the
other um strategies. To be honest, this
is about allowing a child to know what
we're doing because one of the things
that increases that feeling of threat
and remember the whole thing today was
about increasing safety, reducing
threat. One of the things that reduces
the feeling of threat is uh things
feeling predictable. So being a child
where the world feels unpredictable
feels really unsafe and we wanted to
feel safer. So, we can just basically do
a little running narration of what we're
doing. We can do it in a nice calming
audible hug kind of voice. But, I'm just
going to move this chair. If we're doing
the one where we step back, I'm just
going to step back a bit to give you
some space. Going to sit down over here.
It's really simple, but what it's doing
is telling the child what is happening.
You are removing any unpredictability
when you do these things. Even just
taking that step back. this if this
child is kind of being hypervigilant,
hyper alert, really really scared right
now, you taking a step back suddenly
like what's going on? What's going on?
And their brain is kind of firing off
and thinking that it's a threat and
what's going to happen next. Whereas if
you just very calmly say, I'm just going
to take a step back to give you a little
bit of space while we take a breath.
That feels very very different for the
child. They know what's going on. You
have taken away the unpredictability.
So we're going to do this with a low
calm voice. Our slow low. We're going to
do it nice and slowly. um really matter
of fact and we're going to state facts,
not our feelings, and use very short
sentences because they're easier for the
child to comprehend. What we're not
going to do, we're not going to ask
permission. Is it okay if I take a step
back? That's more complicated for the
child. They need to see that you're in
control, but in a non-threatening way.
We don't need to explain why. Again,
that's too complicated for right now.
Just keep it really, really simple.
Don't make it a question. You're just
stating the fact. And don't use
emotional language. should just stating
the facts calmly, audible hug. Keep it
simple. Very, very simple.
Okay. 50,000 words later in about 20
minutes, uh the seven quick wins were.
And do have a think about which might
work for you and how. And do pop your
ideas in the chat. One thing I'd say
about this is uh when you have heard
ideas um it's really nice to think which
one will I try tomorrow and kind of
commit to that a little bit by popping
in the chat what you think will work or
any other ideas you got to share with
people. So we have the 45 degree angle
where instead of being face to face with
a child, we're going to reduce that
threat by moving ourselves around just a
little bit so we feel less threatening.
We might also lower our position so
we're not looming over them. We're going
to offer the obvious. We are going to
say what we think it is that they are
trying to communicate with us so that
they feel heard. You really want to
leave right now. We're going to
strategically retreat. We're going to
take that step back so we're not
crowding them because crowding feels
like threat, but space feels like
safety. We're going to replace the word
but with the word and because the word
but erases everything that came before
it. Whereas and shows I hear what's
going on for you and we can work on this
together. We're going to use the one
down strategy. Number five, this is
where we lower demands. When we begin to
see that a child is starting to
struggle, we reduce our demands on them
first by one level and then perhaps by
two or three if needed. We're going to
do the preemptive pause. So, in between
activities, we're going to stop stress
accumulating each time there's a
transition by allowing 30 seconds where
there are no demands on anyone. And
finally, we're going to do the
commentary pause where in these spaces,
we're just going to rate to the child
what we are doing to take away the
unpredictability so they know what we're
doing. And we're going to do it in our
nice calm voice.