Video summary
The podcast features a discussion between Alex O'Connor and Chris Will-X regarding an emerging phenomenon often termed a "Christian Revival," characterized not by widespread conversions but by a shift toward what is described as "cultural Christianity." This trend involves prominent secular thinkers, such as Richard Dawkins and Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who publicly express sympathy for Christian ethics or architecture while explicitly rejecting the theological truth claims of the faith. Chris Will-X contrasts this with traditional Christianity, which requires belief in historical facts like the resurrection to be considered valid by St. Paul's standards. He argues that many modern adherents love the "tree" (the religion) but reject its "fruit" (radical compassion and forgiveness), preferring instead a Stoic-like utilitarianism or right-wing conservatism that utilizes Christian aesthetics without theological commitment. This movement is partly framed as a reaction to New Atheism, which Chris suggests created a spiritual vacuum by dismissing religious impulses as unnecessary evolutionary artifacts rather than intrinsic human needs for the sacred. A significant portion of the conversation explores why this specific type of revival has gained traction among right-wing conservatives and disaffected individuals who feel alienated by progressive culture wars involving woke ideology, Islamism, or secular humanism. Chris notes that figures like Douglas Murray and Tom Holland contribute to this trend by equating Western Civilization with Judeo-Christian values, despite the historical contradictions between modern liberal ethics and biblical texts regarding slavery and gender roles. The dialogue highlights a strategic choice made by some intellectuals: they view Christianity as a more flexible "low tea" religion compared to Islam's "high tea," where scripture is treated as immutable divine word. In contrast, Christians can engage in textual criticism of the Gospels without abandoning their faith because the Bible was written by men and contains disputed manuscripts, whereas the Quran is viewed by Muslims as the eternal Word of God. This flexibility allows cultural Christians to adopt traditional values like gender roles or family structures while ignoring specific biblical commands they find objectionable. The discussion also addresses recent high-profile conversions that challenge the narrative of a purely superficial revival, specifically citing Ayaan Hirsi Ali's conversion story shared in her article for Unheard. Chris recounts how she initially framed her shift as choosing to believe factual claims about Jesus due to their moral resonance and community support rather than intellectual proof, noting that Dawkins mocked this approach by asking if one could simply choose to believe the virgin birth or resurrection. However, Ali's eventual affirmation of these core doctrines suggests a deeper engagement with Christianity beyond mere cultural appropriation. The hosts debate whether Jordan Peterson is the primary mover behind this revival; while acknowledging his influence on biblical interest among younger men, Chris attributes more weight to Tom Holland and other right-wing commentators who are actively reshaping the discourse around Western identity. Finally, Alex O'Connor questions the tangible impact of this intellectual shift on actual church attendance or census data, noting that Christianity continues to decline in both the UK and US while Islam grows through higher birth rates rather than conversion alone. He points out that media coverage often focuses on immediate events like elections or social movements (e.g., the sexual revolution debates involving Mary Harrington-Freyer) while ignoring long-term demographic trends such as falling birth rates, which he describes as a lagging indicator of existential risk similar to South Korea's population collapse. The conversation concludes with skepticism about whether this "revival" represents a genuine theological resurgence or merely an online echo chamber effect where terminally internet-savvy individuals perceive a movement that may not yet exist in the broader public consciousness, leaving open the possibility that future historians will study these demographic and cultural shifts rather than seeing them as immediate political realities.
Read the full video transcript
three two one what you laugh it's really
funny the way he's like the only person
g face on it's not like someone else
doing it's not someone else going 3 two
one right right it's like you just you
sort of like right you stay like deep
into the soul three two one well you
don't have a soul so easy for me to do
it yeah so I'm told anyway Alex OK Conor
welcome to the show Chris will X how are
you I'm good man I'm good are we seeing
a Christian Revival at the moment what's
going on gosh I love this this is
something I've adopted too the sort of
just straight in with the question you
know none of this none of this Gallivan
thing around how are you how's your day
been tell us about yourself you've been
in Austin for a week I don't need to
know how you are yeah I mean the these
these Fair people don't know how I am
but they also don't care so you've
struck a sort of Perfect Balance
there I I'm writing an article about
this at the moment which should be out
by the time this episode's out who knows
not not I not this reviewer but um I'm
opening with this quote from the Gospel
of Thomas the apocryphal Gospel of
Thomas one of those ancient gospels that
didn't make it into the New Testament
and yet is filled with these wonderful
and bizarre stories about Jesus and at
one point in this apocryphal gospel he
condemns some of his followers he says
you've become like the Jews who either
love the tree and hate the fruit or love
the fruit and hate the tree some similar
imagery in the canonical gospels of like
by their fruits you shall know them you
know a good fruit doesn't produce bad uh
a good tree doesn't produce bad fruits
but interestingly here you know people
get this criticism all the time like you
claim to be a Christian um but you don't
really act in accordance with it you're
like nominally a Christian but you know
you're not displaying the sort of
radical compassion of Jesus or something
like that it's a very common crit
criticism that you're not acting in in
accordance with your
beliefs but we've we've been seeing this
strange reverse phenomenon emerging
where you've got people who like the
fruits
but don't even believe in the existence
of the tree so usually the criticism is
like look you love the tree but you
you're not producing the right fruits
but in this case you've got an emerging
class of thinkers who are unwilling to
say that they believe in the actual
truth of Christianity and yet are at
least Christian adjacent or sympathetic
to Christianity or kind of a bit
depressed about the fact that everyone
isn't Christian anymore this is your
Douglas Murray's Constantin kissen um
Jordan Peterson to to some degree
Andrew huberman um I suppose but then he
does say he actually believes in God
right okay these maybe he likes the tree
but the fruit is yeah yeah I mean I
don't know if I mean I don't listen to
much hubman but maybe his fruit is is is
is is fine is very Christian I I don't
really know um but but in in the case of
these thinkers the reason they're
interesting is because people talk about
them all the time in this Christian
Revival phenomenon I've got a friend
Justin Bry who just wrote a book called
The surprising Rebirth of belief in God
why new atheism grew old and secular
thinkers are considering Christian it
again or something like that and it's
very hopeful um but I think a bit too
optimistic because the case studies it
points to are the people that I've just
mentioned people like this um Tom
Holland the historian who um well as as
I as I write in this article Tom Holland
not the actor but in a sense an actor
because he sort of likes to pretend that
Christianity is true even though it's
not the interesting thing about these
guys is that they won't say that it's
true they're unwilling to say that it's
true and they call themselves cultural
Christians Richard Dawkins you know Arch
archetypal
atheist also I mean recently called
himself a cultural Christian he's been
doing it for years but it got a lot of
attention recently when it did it on on
on LBC and it's kind of interesting you
know so so you're going to spend your
entire career just lambasting this
religious tradition and undercutting the
truth value of it and then getting
depressed when the cathedrals are empty
and being turned into mosques which is
what's happening in England like you may
have sort of shot yourself in the in the
foot a little bit but it's there's
nothing inconsistent strictly speaking
with saying that you like going to even
song but you don't think any of it's
true so what we're seeing is an
emergence of people who are more
sympathetic to the Christian ideal or
what they perceive as the Christian
ideal um which is a whole another kind
of worms but without actually believing
in the truth of it I mean most believing
Christians will say if you do not
believe historically that a man called
Jesus died on a cross and rose from the
dead then your faith is futile and your
still in your sins as St Paul put it to
the Corinthians um
famously so these people sort of can't
be counted among a Christian Revival but
I think Christians have a lot to
celebrate that at least now the culture
is shifting from a sort of new atheism
Christianity is evil and terrible and
wrong to yeah might be wrong we'll sort
of brush that bit under the under the
carpet but try to display the The
Virtuous ethics of Christianity although
in my case they're not actually
advocating for a Christian ethic they're
advocating for a sort of right-wing
traditional conservatism which is not
same thing just to tie a bow on your
previous analogy when you talk about
tree and when you talk about fruit what
are you referring to the tree is the
belief in God the the sort of Christian
religion as it were and the fruit is the
fruit of that belief so if you're to be
a good Christian you believe that Jesus
rose from the dead and because of that
you believe in a sort of radical
philosophy of forgiveness and compassion
and charity and asceticism and you live
that life out to the best that you can
in the knowledge that there will be
inevitable failure that you can then
apologize for um so a lot of people will
say I'm a Christian but they do none of
that they don't go to church they don't
pray they don't act like a Christian
they don't show any charity or
compassion to the to their brother or
sister so what do they do or whatever
else um they well they could be selfish
and and of course everybody is selfish
to some degree but a Christian likes to
regularly remind themselves of that and
apologize for it and repent of it and
make efforts to try to avoid it but a
lot of people you know like if someone
barges past me on the
street then I will always just think it
is it is possible that person you know
their wife's going into labor and and
yeah it's like they say don't attribute
to malice what can be attributed to
stupidity like also what can be
attributed to you somebody having some
kind of excuse or or justification um
something that you would understand it's
like have I not ever barged past someone
called the fundamental ATT tion era sure
yeah that this this is why I love you
Chris you always have a have a have a
label to to perfectly stick on all of
these Concepts it's wonderful
um yeah I mean I I if I experience that
and think to myself well I'm going to be
charitable here because you know but for
the grace of God there go I I think well
that's a very Christian sentiment Alex
you know um and if if you if you met
someone who's a Christian and you said
what do you like about Christianity and
they said oh I just love this figure of
Jesus who would just go around forgiving
people and even when people deserve
punishment let him without sin cast the
first stone that's the most incredible
like that I mean it is just the most
based part of the entire gospels man
that's just unbelievable unfortunately
it's not in the earliest manuscripts of
John so it's probably added on at a
later point and Jesus probably never
actually said that um not that that
really matters in my view um but then if
somebody said that they liked that and
then you know somebody like accidentally
spills a drink over them and they get up
and just like deck them you'd be like
well hold on a second I thought you were
sort of embodying this Christian ethos
and they'll sort of talk the talk but
won't walk the walk and so in that case
I think they love the tree but hate the
fruits um that might not be the correct
interpretation of Jesus is saying in the
Gospel of Thomas there but I think it's
a worthwhile analogy to to sort of
abstract and and us in the context that
I'm I'm putting forward here also it
makes a good opener for for an article
so I'm going to do it anyway why is this
happening what has occurred recently
that's caused Christianity cultural
Christianity this sort of Revival of it
utilitarian Christianity if you want to
call it that which I quite like as a
term yeah there there are a few things
um for this you know functional
utilitarian practical Christianity that
isn't an affirmative set of Truth claims
but rather a sort of protective cloak to
be worn it's more like stoicism it's a
cultural thing yeah the cultural
Christian I mean think of Richard
Dawkins loves going to even song likes a
cathedral thinks that God doesn't exist
and that the Christian stories are
ludicrous fantasies this is your
cultural Christian why are they
beginning to reemerge in droves for a
few reasons first new atheism either
creates or describes this vacuum of of
you know spiritual
ungrounded um you don't need any of this
religion stuff I know that it's
obviously evolved in the human psyche
for some
reason and every single Human Society we
find doesn't matter where we look they
all have some kind of sense of the
numinous some kind of distinction
between the profane numinous the sort of
uh you could say the Transcendent the
something that sort of sits above and
beyond a little bit sort of mystical a
little bit sort of out there you know
when you ask somebody if they're
religious and they say no I'm not
religious but I'm spiritual and you're
like what the hell does that mean and
they're like I just sort of believe in I
believe in like something well I believe
in I believe in this microphone you know
I believe it exists what do you but
they're sort of getting at this this
sort of ethereal other this something
right and every society wherever we look
you know society's developed this
feeling and that there's clearly
something intrinsic to human nature that
drives us towards this religious impulse
but the new atheists come along as the
old atheist did before them uh but the
new atheist did it more more fervently
in saying no not only is this untrue not
only in the sort of you know where
Sigman Freud says that your belief in
God is I don't know the result of some
kind of childhood repression trauma
whatever um okay like but he's still
going to think that it's an intrinsic
part of the human psyche right new
atheist come along and say well I also
think it's false but you also don't need
it you know you don't need this
Celestial dictator telling you what to
do oh you only do right and wrong
because you're scared of upsetting the
the big man in the sky well that's a
terrible source for ethics and and
everyone goes yeah you know damn right
yeah yeah I believe and it's sort of
like a rally and cry like it was really
some of these speeches especially in the
case of Christopher Hitchens you know
they they sort of make you want to stand
up and give a give a round of applause I
mean it's just amazing right and part of
it is appealing to this this human
um this sort of like Humanity this
common Humanity oh like are you not good
enough yourself to to sort of stand up
and and live a good life and all of this
kind of stuff and everyone's like yeah
yeah
absolutely but we've seen the fruits of
this as people begin to sort of throw
off religion and societies begin to
throw off religion what people have
perceived happening is the creation of a
spiritual vacuum and if it is the case
that human beings are naturally
religious they have a an Impulse towards
the the most fundamental thing I think
we have an Impulse towards is the idea
of the Sacred the idea of something
which is separate and Untouchable that
that shouldn't be mixed with the profane
that shouldn't be um that that usually
has a sort of attached to it a set of
Dogma uh about rules what you're allowed
to do with it what you're not and and
those rules aren't entirely justified by
reason alone it's sort of considered to
be self-evident just this this separate
thing that we treat as as totally sacred
so that's that's your God right and the
idea is that if you remove the god
something else has to fulfill that uh
that place something has to fill it in
and so the the right-wing conservatives
will say that environmentalism veganism
um gender ideology all of this kind of
stuff has become a new religion and
although it's maybe a bit of a lazy
phrasing you know what they mean you
know exactly the kind of thing that
they're talking about right and um the
left will criticize you know nationalism
as filling that role um you know
populism and populist leaders people get
religious about Donald Trump which they
do it's it's amazing um to to sort of
see the the power and influence that
that that man has it's it's almost
spiritual you know um so to cut a long
story short or
to append a long story with a conclusion
I should say
um I think what's happening is a bunch
of right-wing thinkers are seeing what
is fulfilling the vacuum that new
atheism created woke ISM
islamism um few other things which it's
it's there's someone in particular that
I should mention but and they're saying
I don't like this and they're realizing
that the kind of secular humanism that's
promised by the new atheists just kind
of isn't cutting the Mustard Seed as I
like to say it's um it's not doing it
you know so I recently was in New York
and I watched Richard Dawkins and aan
hery Ali have a discussion aan hery Ali
was supposed to be at the meeting in
Washington DC in 2007 that created the
Four Horsemen of new atheism Hitchens
Dawkins Daniel dennet and Sam Harris and
it becomes this huge cultural Moment The
Four Horsemen they still talked about
today as a group she was supposed to be
there she was a a incredibly successful
new atheist writer speaker debater and
earlier this year or last year she
announces in an unheard article that
she's a Christian
now wow a like incredible just just like
absolute like headline news in this in
this Niche yeah it well this is the this
is the thing it's sort of like how
predictable was it well you know she'd
been hanging out with the Jordan
Peterson and stuff and she's sort of
quite I think she's got her footing in
the sort of right-wing cultural space
and so it's kind of not surprising if
you knew that this kind of Christian
Revival thing was was happening anyway
um but her entire article for unheard I
mean it mentioned like Vladimir Putin
and it talks about wokeism and China and
it talked about islamism and it it
mentioned Richard Dawkins more than it
mentioned Jesus it's the story why I'm
now a Christian I think the article was
called and it it had nothing theological
no spiritual experience no no
philosophical argument just you know I'm
not happy with the way that that our
culture is going you know I'm suspicious
of the the rise of wokeism and islamism
in China and Russia and Christianity is
sort of a best defense against that so a
lot of people criticized it and said
well what do you mean you're a Christian
Richard Dawkins response to her was in
his article was to say seriously I am a
Christian you're no more Christian than
I am which is really interesting because
a lot of people look at Richard Dawkins
and say he's basically a Christian and a
lot of people look at aan and said she's
basically an atheist so they're both
sort of making the same criticism in in
the opposite direction so they got
together in New York and I was there and
I watched it
and to everyone's surprise I think I and
did actually affirm belief in the truth
claims of Christianity so she's not just
fruit she's tree as well it seems that
that's now the case but the interesting
thing is when Dawkins because Dawkins
was ready to show up to this discussion
and say and tell her why she's not
really a Christian like because of the
tree the LA tree you know I know you
like the the the stories and all of this
kind of stuff but like you're not really
a Christian and it was it was actually
at the beginning aanne told her story of
conversion where she really opened up
about depression suicidality just utter
despair being not strong enough to
commit suicide but not wanting to stay
alive anymore and then she tries praying
you know some some therapist after
hundreds that she'd seen tells her that
she's got like a spiritual poverty and
she should try praying and it works
right and eventually she gets sort of
lifted out and she's got this her her
sort of her the thrill of life is back
you know and everyone's applauding
because they're so happy for her they
they cheered at that you know and it was
almost comic the way that Dawkins
listens to the story and goes well
that's very moving aan but but do you
think that Jesus was bornn of virgin you
know but interestingly basically said if
I'm not mistaking her she said that she
chooses to believe these things she
chooses to believe that Jesus is born of
a virgin that he rose from the dead
which seems kind of weird and a bit
obscene how can you just choose to
believe something and a lot of people
will say well I can't I can't choose to
believe something you can't choose to
believe that Australia doesn't exist it
doesn't work like that but interestingly
I began to notice that if somebody
becomes convinced that Christianity is
true like through philosophical
argumentation historical argument for
the resurrection of Jesus okay
Christianity must be true and then you
hear all these moral claims that it
makes about family values gender roles
stuff and you think well I don't know
about all of that but I'm I mean I've
just become so convinced that
Christianity is true that like it must
just be that this is the moral way and I
I I choose to just believe that right no
one really bats an eyelid they might
think it's it's wrong to do that but
they don't think it's like illogical
they don't think it's like a an a sort
of an illegal chess move as pet
reversing the stack and going in the
other direction is something where
people go hang on second yeah so soan
obviously just like deeply resonates
with the Christian Story the Christian
ethic the Christian Community she said
that when she was going around
criticizing and mocking religion for
years and years and years um islamists
would send her death threats Christians
would send her a letter saying that
they're praying for her you know and and
she thought that was the difference
between those those two religions um so
it's a really interesting story from her
something's obviously deeply resonated
so she says well whatever that is that's
that's realer than real that's the most
important thing in my life and so yeah I
choose to believe the factual stuff as
well and that seems like a much more
like intuitively it seems more
illegitimate to go that way but you know
I think people do it in the other
direction all the time in other news
this episode is brought to you by eight
sleep I have been using my eight Sleep
mattress for years and I cannot imagine
living without it during the summer I
find it difficult to sleep because I'm a
warm boy and eight sleep is the ultimate
fix I don't need to worry about how low
I can crank the air conditioning because
my mattress is literally temperature
controlled and now eight sleep have
launched their newest generation pod the
Pod 4 ultra pod 4 ultra can cool each
side of the bed individually up to 20°
below room temperature keeping you and
your partner cool and for those who
snore heavily it can detect your snoring
and automatically lift your head a few
degrees to improve air flow and stop it
eight sleep is clinically proven to give
you up to 1 hour more of quality sleep
every night best of all they ship to the
United States Canada the United Kingdom
Europe and Australia right now you can
get
$350 off the Pod for Ultra by going to
the link in the show notes below or
heading to 8sleep.com
wisdom using the code modern wisdom a
checkout that's EIG ghts sleep.com
wisdom and modern wisdom a checkout is
it possible
to choose to believe in
God not like naively not like well try
it try it for yourself you don't believe
in God or do you maybe you're an
agnostic I don't know what you what you
what you think about this stuff Chris
you're probably sort of what agnostic
atheist or yeah agnostic so just try it
out like believe in God for for a second
good it
go I don't know what that would mean
right exactly it's sort of like what
like how do you even begin to like no
you can't do that but what you can do is
It's Complicated by the fact that I
don't believe in free will but you know
shelving that for a moment like okay so
like assuming that there is some like
libertarian Free Will and you can like
have authorship over your actions and
choose when to raise your hand and stuff
um you can choose to do things which
will which will
knowingly affect your beliefs it seems a
bit disingenuous and maybe it is but
like if you only read Christian
literature only spoke to Christian
guests and did so without going into the
conversation with an attitude of I'm
going to sort of criticize and object
but like I'm just going to listen and
learn if you did that for like three
years and only hang out with Christians
and went to church every day Christian
worship music you'd probably become a
Christian like it probably would happen
you did it with vegans yeah I mean but
but that's actually another good example
is that if you if everyone know is a
vegan everyone you know is a vegan and
you only listen to like vegan speakers
and they're always talking about how
immoral everybody else's and all this
kind like you're going to become a vegan
chances are you know so you can choose
to surround yourself in a community and
with certain literature that will at
least sort of open you up I suppose so
you can choose to do that interestingly
as an atheist like aan was or Dawkins uh
even though you are there in opposition
you are actually surrounding yourself a
lot of the time with people who talk
about religion who think about religion
who think about the Transcendent and God
and ideology and dogma and stuff like
that that's right and so a lot of people
criticize me for being soft on
Christianity um I I accept the charge I
am um because I quite like Christianity
you know i' call myself one of these
cultural Christians if I could make a
bit more sense of the concept like I get
what they're driving at they're like
look I I like the the message of
Christianity I like it's it's ethos I
like it ethic I like this figure of
Jesus and I can see societal benefit for
people believing in in God in religion
and having a unifying moral and all this
kind of stuff like yeah sure that's
that's great and maybe that is a result
of me spending too much time with
Christians it's possible you know um you
lived with some for a while that's right
yeah yeah I lived with with Christians
and a lot of my my closest smartest
friends I talked about philosophy and
and definitely theology with the their
Christians um and it's it's great it's
it's incredibly edifying have a have a
wonderful time but it it's you know I
try to spend time with with with
different people from different
backgrounds with different ideas all the
time
um but but yeah I mean you can you can
choose to sort of adopt your
surroundings and the thing is that is
disingenuous in the sense that you're
you're essentially just aesthetically
deciding which will view you want to
like put
on um sort of irrelevant is the the
truth claims that it makes but I totally
understand it especially if you're
someone like Ian if you're someone who I
mean imagine what it's like to actually
suicidal for months for years to to to
literally have hit rock bottom and have
nowhere else to go and suddenly you
discover this thing you discover this
thing which after years and years of
struggle with the with the with the
deepest and darkest struggle that a
person can go through you get this sort
of hand you can grab hold of and it just
lifts you out of this brings you back to
life you know and then just as you're
sort of there and thinking oh my
goodness this is I've been waiting for
you tears streaming down your face you
got Richard Dawkins going like yes but
do you actually believe in the Virgin
birth why do you keep bringing that bit
up because it shows a difference in what
people care about the cultural
Christians care about the the the ethic
and the society and what it does for
people it's sort of a sociological
project whereas for um I would
say theological Christians but also like
atheist critics it's more about the
truth claims of a religious worldview so
a lot of people you know if you look at
the comments on this discussion that
they had a lot of people will be like oh
so I am just done a Jordan Peterson
basically she's just sort of sort of
done this wishy-washy well the truth
kind of doesn't really matter by the way
this approach of like it doesn't really
matter you know did Jesus rise from the
dead you know I don't really know what I
really care about is just like how it
feels man that's the kind of like
attitude that would get you condemned as
a heretic in the early church you know
like oh you don't affirm the belief in
the resurrection of Jesus you
know it it would be bad so the reason I
bring it up is because there two
different approaches one is one is very
left brained one is very right brained
you know honestly like like the it's
sort of what about the the the facts the
science you know and the other side is
sort of what about the narrative and the
sort of feeling in the ethic and the
poetry and that's the left brain and the
right brain battling it out right in
front of you yeah has Christianity gone
soft we've spoken about how sort of the
atheist side coming in is assessing
religion specifically Christianity with
perhaps less of a fine tooth comb in
order for Christians to say with open
arms we permit you person who does not
have an active belief in God yeah in the
resurrection of Jesus in many of the
things that are important M to Faith and
you just said that would have been
heretical is this are both sides nerfing
the uh bar that they need to get over
one in order to believe and the other in
order to accept maybe um there's also
the difference between like the
Christian religion as practiced in the
history of the Christian church with a
particular emphasis on like modern
Christian Europe and how it behaved um
there's that kind of Christianity and
there's a kind of Christianity which is
like emulating the figure of Jesus which
is I think the important thing so for
example um has Christianity gone soft
well consider the Christianity of the
Crusades versus the Christianity the
sort of lukewarm halfth people don't
believe like less than like 1% of the
the population are going to church of
England churches you know like yeah
that's definitely gone soft but arguably
the kind of either military or strong
armed Christianity that emerges in the
history of the Christian church is
itself an inappropriate hardening of the
Christian message the figure of Jesus
Christian relativity like what what is
base Christianity and and religion is
always famously just used used to um
buttress political aims and functionally
how can we uh have this ideology this
Dogma to be able to drive us forward
perhaps if we wanted to invade some
other country yeah or like how can we
motivate people to believe that we're on
the right side here I mean famously
Adolf Hitler that people debate all of
the time whether he was a Christian who
knows I mean he was a Roman Catholic but
he and he never renounced it but like
you know he wasn't acting very Christian
let's say but he did have the belt
buckle of every Nazi Soldier have God
mitun God With Us written on the written
on the belt buckles um atheists weren't
allowed to join the SS didn't want them
um didn't think they could be trusted I
suppose um Hitler says explicitly in my
camp that in standing guard against the
Jew I'm doing the handiwork of the Lord
so he's using this religious terminology
and a lot of people like to point out to
me like I'll hear Christians say yeah
but he was actually an atheist I mean he
was just pretending to be a Christian
surely and I'm like well why would
pretending to be a
Christian make it easier for him to be a
fascist you know what I mean it it's
it's sort of a bit of a confusing thing
um yeah because people use religion in
in this way and so there's there's the
question of like well you know was Adolf
Hitler a Christian right well maybe he
would maybe if you ask him let's say you
know we discovered some some text or
some bit of the table talk that that we
didn't otherwise know about and and and
and he says yes I'm I still very much
believe in God and Believe I'm Doing
Christ's work there's a sense in which
you could could say ah see he was a
Christian that's what the atheist might
say but the Christian would say I don't
care what he claimed to be being a
Christian is doing the work of the Lord
being a Christian is is is enacting the
will of the father right so
interestingly maybe without fruit maybe
you don't even need to believe in God
per se to be a Christian you just sort
of need to do the will of the father
it's hard to know what what counts as
being a Christian um
but I think sort of the two approaches
that clash in this aan Dawkins you know
um Rumble is the difference between the
approach that says the thing that
matters is that you live the right kind
of life and have the right kind of
ethics and the other side which says the
thing that matters is that you get the
right theology that you have the right
truth claims um to me that seems a lot
less human it seems a lot less
um in in accord with the way that Jesus
spoke and behaved and acted I mean he's
not going around like settling
theological disputes really you know
he's responding to theological disputes
and and people are trying to test him
theologically but he always responds to
them with a sort of vague classiness
that sort of transcends the dispute it
almost makes nonsense the the the
disputes um
so yeah I I don't know okay has
Christianity gone soft like yes
politically like clearly it doesn't it
just doesn't have the political power
anymore um a lot of ninal Christians
don't really believe in what they're
saying they sort of go to church because
they feel like they have to but don't
actually have the same kind of passion
that you'd like to see in a in a in a
sort of firmly spiritually convicted
Christian population sort of doesn't
exist at least in Britain I don't know
about America it's probably much more
enthusiastic here but in Britain the
interesting thing about America I spent
uh Easter Sunday at Austin Ridge Bible
Church uh this is the first American
Service that I've been to the only of
the time that I've been to a service
recently was at ripping Cathedral on
Christmas Eve uh ripping Cathedral
Christmas
Eve 245 year old woman with a c-shaped
spine playing the organ uh everybody
singing hymns brief talk in between uh
very sort of um
cobwebby classic sort of British
Christmas thing I go to Easter Sunday
Austin Ridge Bible Church I pulled up
behind a 150 Grand Corvette superar that
had God now as the number on the back
that was the first thing I went in the
lady that was the warm-up act for the
main person that was giving the the
sermon for the day uh started using
religious language and I was like oh God
we you know straight into it and she
said um guys please uh we must remember
to have patience and
forgiveness uh and we must give Grace
when turning right out of the car park
onto bave Road and I thought oh wow okay
this is an interesting use of sort of
semi
Christian language here to direct
traffic and then
the opening act was a six-piece rock
band complete with 20 person back in
choir yeah uh fireworks uh a full LED
wall that would have made my nightclub
career look poultry with the lyrics up
behind so that everybody could sing
along even me who didn't know the words
uh lead singer very charismatic playing
the guitar dude on the drums black guy
playing saxophone set of glasses on uh
they come up they do an ENC call they
leave another lady comes on introduces
stuff and then a guy comes out and with
a mic and you know there's sort of
background music that swells when it's
important and kind of stays quiet when
it's not and then he leaves and then the
band comes back on and they do maybe one
or two more songs and then everyone goes
outside and Starbucks coffee and stuff
and then they asked for your money they
didn't ask for my money actually they
were Rich enough yeah um not once was
the word religion used not once nobody
in that room thought of themselves as
religious yeah they have a direct
relationship with Jesus and with god oh
sure it's all about it's just jesuses
like super super Jesus stuff uh and that
I was like what is that what's
Christianity when you kind of rip much
of the ideology side out of it I don't
even know is that what is that missing
what is it that they've done what have
they taken out of what I would be more
familiar with from what I would have
learned in school in so far as they're
doing that they're probably getting
something right which is that
Christianity is not
so much a set of Truth claims a religion
as we'd use the term today as it is a
relationship with a person Christianity
is a relationship with Jesus that's what
it is um so I mean the word religion is
is famously very difficult to Define uh
and also kind of doesn't exist as a
concept until relatively recently in
like religious study and comparative
religion
because you know like you you find
religious communities from a thousand
years ago and religion isn't this like
thing that they do they don't have like
work family religion you know like get
myot it doesn't it doesn't like box off
like that it just is permeates it's it's
the air that you breathe and and the
water that you swim in it sort of
doesn't really make any sense I mean
like it's like a a fish trying to Define
water which it I'm sure the fish can do
but it only wants you take it out of the
water and sort of show it what it was
swimming in before but it wouldn't
consider itself to be swimming in water
you know um I I think Emanuel K had this
image of a of a of a bird or Dove like
flying through the sky and sort of
thinking like feeling the the wind
resistance and thinking gosh if only I
could get rid of this wind I could fly
so much faster get rid of the air and
that's kind of what what like people are
doing with religion you know if only I
could if only I could get rid of this
this resistance but you sort of throwing
out the baby with the holy water
um so they're probably getting that
right I'm not sure about the whole mega
church situation um having said that
I've never been to one and pretty cool I
know people comy I've had you know a
friend of mine recently told me that he
went to one of these like mega church um
experiences in in England actually and
was just sort of overcome with emotion
tears streaming down his face
uncontrollably like like sort of
unbelievable experience and I thought
wow that I mean that's that's amazing
but then I've I also have a a friend who
we recently sort of accidentally
stumbled upon like a sort of traditional
I think it was a Catholic service
there's four guys singing some Coral
songs and we were holding candles it was
a concert they said free concert and we
went in and they gave us candles after
going through the metal detectors you
know um they gave us these candles and
we sat there and there was this there
were these four guys singing this this
sort of Latin Christian music and my
friend had used to be a sort
of um
like a like a real American style
Christian uh Christian you know and
said like wow I've never experienced
anything like that that was amaz like
just that was really amazing and I
thought gosh it's just because you it's
not what you're used to you know the
person who's who's used to that will be
amazed by the mega church the person
who's used to the mega church oh my
goodness this mega church stuff is
ridiculous but it's sort of yeah I think
it's got eating one meal for the
entirety of your life and then going oh
my God because what it shows you is that
like you you can separate out you know
this idea of being a Christian or
worshiping God from all of the the
trimmings that you think necessarily go
with it you know standing in this like
drafty old building with a bunch of
elderly people going we believe in one
God the father and like doing the nyine
Creed and like and going up and getting
in queue for communion and the sort of
the the the trembling priest like
putting a bit of bread on your on your
on your mouth and you think gosh this is
this is a bit lame um and it is
so then you go to like a mega church and
you think oh goodness right like you can
isolate the Christian bit put it in a
new context and Suddenly It's amazing
again maybe Christianity isn't so bad
after all so it's got a lot of utility
for that reason um but yeah I mean my my
understanding of what the mass should be
of what church should be is a meal um
you know Jesus last supper you know
breaks the Bread drinks the wine says do
this in memory of me it's it's the
Passover meal well it's the Passover
meal in uh in the in Matthew Mark and
Luke in John's gospel Jesus dies uh
before the Passover meal uh maybe the
other way around well because John's
trying to say that Jesus is the Passover
Lamb who's being slaughtered and so
there's a kind of biblical contradiction
there as whether Jesus dies before the
Passover or after the Passover um that's
kind of a side point um so I think that
like what the mass is supposed to be
Jesus says you know I mean the whole
reason the mass exists the Eucharist is
the
in the sort of the the the Zenith of the
mass it's where you eat the bread and
drink the wine because that's what Jesus
did before he died and he said do this
in memory of me but it was a meal it was
a it was a feast and I have a feeling
that in early Christian communities the
mass was a uh was a meal but then they
stopped doing that because it became too
much about the meal people used to just
show up to like eat married but then why
not you know why not because you know it
should
be yeah probably
um but so I I I don't think there should
be like hard and fast rules exactly on
how to do it but I am a little bit
suspicious of the whole I don't know you
know people have made this criticism of
mega churches and I don't like the money
I don't like the sort of Fame the
celebrity the fact that you used the
term warm-up act in a in a church
environment just seems wholly
inappropriate um but like the criticism
that's often it's often made that it's
too like um it tries to get you sort of
in a state of vulnerability by using
like musical tricks and stuff I've seen
some some people tweet this it's a
social media thing that that crops up
every now and again people say oh I used
to think that I I really like loved God
and I was like really into like worship
but turns out I actually just liked you
know music oh turns out I actually was
just like really into drums it's kind of
a joke because they're like oh it it was
just the
music but
like yeah like hold on just just take a
step back and ask the same question
again well why does that music Move you
in that way you know sure Coldplay can
do it too but then arguably Cold Play
are sort of approximating the same kind
of spiritual openness that that people
are trying to achieve at church the only
difference is that when they do it at
church they then use that state to to
sell you God rather than sell you
merchandise you know we'll get back to
talking to Alex in one minute but first
I need to tell you about momentus trust
really is
everything yep when it comes to
supplements a lot of Brands may say that
they're top quality yeah uh but few can
prove it that's why I partnered with
momentus they make the highest quality
supplements of anyone on the planet two
fundamental parts of recovery are Sleep
Quality and proper hormone levels which
is why I trust M's sleep packs and their
tonat allei plus their entire range is
NSF and inform Sports certified meaning
that even Olympic athletes can use it
that is how highly it is tested what you
read on the label is exactly what's in
the product and absolutely nothing else
best of all there is a 30-day money back
guarantee so if you are uncertain about
either of these products you can buy it
completely risk-free if you do not like
it for any reason they will give you
your money back and they ship
internationally you can get a 20%
discount sitewide by going to the link
in the show notes below or heading to
liv.com slod wisdom using the code
modern wisdom a checkout that's l i v m
o m n t us.com slod wisdom and the code
modern wisdom a
checkout well what about when you walk
into you've been to the Vatican oh yeah
right what about you walk in there you
walk through the doors it's the best
front end of a funnel I've ever been
into well look the Vatican is a is a
look if you if you go to St Peter's
Basilica wait you've been um I mean it
is just like breathtakingly huge um the
the the sort of the scale of the thing
is is enough to sort of make you like
and and it's actually so big that you
kind of your eyes aren't like you know
parallaxing properly so it's kind of
difficult to even tell how big it is um
until for anyone who's ever been there
there's writing big gold band that goes
all the way around and there's writing
and I there with the priest and I
haven't verified this but he told me
that each of those letters was 2 m tall
yeah I heard that on the two other and I
I genuinely I was like I don't I don't
believe you I literally I'm looking at
it right now I'm staring at
it I don't believe you I just don't and
the the the statues on the top level are
built bigger than the ones on the bottom
so that they look the same size this
it's a strange illusion I kind of wish
they hadn't done that because it would
give you a better idea of Des but anyway
okay yeah amazing or inspiring but at
the same time it's designed pretty
poorly um from the outside I mean you've
got Michelangelo's dome which is like at
the back of the Basilica which you can't
see from the front which is just poor
design uh because of the fact that
you've got like three different
architects who all had different ideas
of what to do and were planning things
separately and they all just sort of got
shoved together and so you get this this
great big Frontier but imagine if you
could see that Dome from the front it
would be spellbinding um also the fact
that the St Peters was built um off the
back of sale of indulgences
so the Catholic church say give us money
and we'll shorten the time that you
spend in purgatory and you get to heaven
quicker and they use that money to find
the building of the church so it's a
little difficult to be you know
theologically inspired when you start to
realize what kind of building you're
walking into and the kind of history
that that surrounds it God now yeah I
mean but but then there is still but
then it's exactly the same thing as the
the God now thing is the Mega chur where
there's I mean like if you start
thinking about it you think well this
isn't right this is bad you know you
might go into a mega church and say well
this is terrible CU they're just trying
to make money and then you know you go
into St Peters basilic and you think
well this was raised on the sale of
indulgences but there's still something
amazing about it there's still something
that that inspires or and that's the
that's the important bit um I think so
so so yeah so I mean that's I mean it's
amazing an amazing place to be um but
like every human attempt to approxim
make the a of God will will necessarily
be be beholden to our failures as
immoral creatures talk to me about the
political dimension of this Christian
Revival yeah it's just a bunch of right-
wiers getting upset about Islam and
wokeism basically in my view um I mean
Douglas Murray you know goes to church
on Christmas and sort of likes to be I
mean Justin Bry talks about Douglas
Murray as one of his examples of people
who's sort of very like Christian
friendly you know like sort of
cultural Christian type I don't know how
true that is I I I haven't sort of kept
up with
Douglas's like writing on this stuff but
say it were true it's like why is that
is it because Douglas has sat in a
church prayed deeply you know for an
inward sign of like the the sort of True
Religion of the universe or is he just
upset with the way his country is going
I think it's more likely the latter um
Constantin kissen recently called
himself a cultural Christian um in in
like a video and it was the same kind of
thing like it's not a theological thing
you know they'll say I'm an atheist but
I'm a cultural Christian Russell bran
got baptized Russell BR got baptized but
again this is this is slightly different
because he says he actually believes it
right actually I don't know I mean I
haven't I again I haven't kept up with
Russell Brand I don't I don't listen to
him but I I presumably he'll actually
believe in the resurrection of Jesus and
stuff to have been actually
baptized um so I think that where
somebody has actually sort of developed
a Christianity and a truth claim I
believe Jesus rose from the dead I don't
think that's just is that a Christian
Revival yeah I mean sure that would be
an actual Christian Revival but I don't
think the way the thing that people are
pointing to and saying but look at this
upswing I don't think that's happening
as much I I don't know I don't know what
the stats are on like baptisms and stuff
but it wouldn't surprise me you know if
there's a non-zero number of people who
start to look at the fruits sure and it
is possible to her Al it and kind of go
back up to the tree yeah you think well
yeah it's going to it's going to work
both ways yeah in a way
like if you can't see the tree you can
just sort of like start picking up the
fruit and following the trail and it
will sort of lead you to discover the
tree for some people for sure and again
you're around the people you're going to
mass you're going to service these are
your new friends they're talking about
it all the time I got to read this I've
got a study someone gifted me a study
Bible know what this is so there's two
there I wasn't sure what your position
on this was whether you think that it's
a up
in utilitarian functional
Christianity as opposition to certain
movements that a number of people have
got a problem with or just
conservatism uh wrapped in uh religious
uh talking so is it does it exist as a
Revival of conservatism with a new bow
put on it or in opposition to push back
against uh other things that people
concerned about that was why I think
it's the conservatives who are pushing
out uh who are pushing against this
stuff right like so new atheism what's
new about new atheism the sort of
political Dimension you know it it's
it's as much like a movement a
sociological movement like I say more so
than it is a theological one um it's
much more it's the reason that new
atheism found its way onto like the
national press it's on Fox News you know
people
debating and now in the way that now
it's like you you know um I I don't know
what it is in America like like you know
gender studies in schools or whatever it
used to be like evolution in schools
that's what you turn on the TV in fact
like imagine that you know like you
would turn on the TV and you'd find your
tuckle Carlson and people like just
going on and on and on about like
Evolution and God and religion and
Christianity I mean it's it's amazing it
did it was doing exactly what like the
you know the woke social justice stuff
is is doing now in that in that space um
so that was sort of the the like the new
atheism thing sort of was was was this
cultural phenomenon talking about
politics you know um it it did the
theology stuff a little bit as well but
but you know it was it was social
movement and so okay what kind of social
movement was it well broadly speaking it
was leftwing it's an interesting subset
of like YouTube atheists who went on to
be like anti- sjw reactionary types but
broadly speaking The Atheist community
that that sprung up Christopher Hitchens
the Socialist um Richard Dawkins
very leftwing more recently sort of
gender critical and you know suspicious
of Islam all that kind of stuff which
puts him more on the on the on the right
same thing with Sam Harris but these
guys are like traditionally left-wing
people right and it's all
very you know Christian nationalism is
suppressing gay rights and gay marriage
and abortion and all of this kind of
stuff and contraceptives and divorce
laws and all of that right so new
atheism is is quite
leftwing
so whatever like space it creates
culturally the people who are going to
sort of say we don't like this we don't
like what's happening we want to react
against that are going to be
conservatives um so like in other words
it's like it's both I think it's it is
in many ways a reaction against this
vacuum but the people who are reacting
against that vacuum are going to be
probably more or less conservatives they
used to
call uh the Church of England was was
known as the Tory party at prayer what
they called them the fact that the fact
that nobody is now going to church of
England churches means it feels like a a
sort of waste of a good label and I
think like the cultural Christianity
movement could be called that you know
the the Tory party at pray not the Tory
party because the Tory party is probably
about to cease to exist in England have
you seen this I think right now as we're
speaking Yeah it's got to be about like
you know half past or quarter two yeah
be like right
now
um there's a seven party debate
happening on the BBC Nigel farage is
currently stood at the podium like
probably shouting
at a bunch of other people um and it's
amazing like reform UK are two points
behind the conservatives at the last
poll I checked um I remember hearing
that well look I mean we're in we're in
store for either another sort of 1997
like super labor success or or the
actual um sort of it's like a it's it's
an existential moment as Andrew Mah has
put it for for the for the for the
conservative party it's sort of amazing
to see so maybe not the Tory party at
prayer but the English rights
conservative people you know at at
prayer even if they don't know quite who
they're praying to isn't it interesting
though you know one of the things I
noticed since moving over to America is
that there is no equivalent of the
Christian right in the UK or there
wasn't right you know that you know what
I mean Bible belty like you know it's
for God it's country it's patriotism and
the constellation of beliefs kind of
right themselves I mean what what
religion by what religion is our prime
minister you know and and also like if
you are like K St
Christian I literally don't know I have
no idea and if he was I wouldn't know
what kind of Christian he was and also I
don't care and nor does any of his party
and nor do any of the the population you
know
like genuinely it's so it's so strange I
think our prime minister is a Hindu as
far as I'm aware um but I'm not sure how
like religious he is in in that but can
you
imagine like it being a serious part of
the conversation in Britain your
American listeners might not be fully
aware of just how absolutely ludicrous
it would
to be sort of on the campaign Trail and
somebody asking you know what's your
favorite Bible verse you know and and
when like Donald Trump can't think of a
Bible verse you know what is it he said
when he was asked for his favorite Bible
verse he goes oh there are just there
are just too many there are just so many
I love it all I love them all um that
that can that's a bit of a scandal it's
like the leader of the Republican Party
do you know like in the UK it just it
just doesn't so not Salient and and so
maybe I think what people sort of
noticing is that the the right in
America is quite it's quite strong got a
presence do you think that do you think
that this could be a potential angle for
a future British political party to tap
into I don't think they can tap into
Christianity at least not yet I I don't
think it's it's nearly strong enough but
I think a lot of people in the UK are
getting desperate because their country
is going down the pan uh there is no
such thing as a sort of small SE
conservative party because the the Tory
party two left wing for the right
Wingers and two right wing for the left
Wingers that's why they're ceasing to
exist they've sort of Fallen between two
two pews um
and and they're gonna they're going to
possibly you know have to have to hang
up the Hat
um so I think people in the UK are quite
sort of especially right Wingers in the
UK are quite desperate so like we don't
have a we don't have a a movement we
don't have a home we don't have a party
that we can vote for like we don't we
don't have a way to get ourselves
represented in Parliament so what are we
going to do and there sort of trying out
different things and one of these things
is like well what if we all just become
Christians again you know maybe that
will do something but it means that if
you if you pay ption on like Twitter to
the kinds of account CU it's not just
the the thought leaders but also like
you begin to notice in in the comments
you know there's more PE there's just
more people there are more people who
are who are fervent there's more people
with little uh display pictures of like
a a crusader you know with the with the
with the with the Sword and the and the
helmet on and stuff and and you realize
that if there is sort of a Christian
Revival happening it might be a Revival
of the sort of strong armed um like
we're not going to take this kind of
Christianity rather than the meek and
Mild I've heard you talk about the
difference between strong armed
Christianity and meek and Mild
Christianity is the reason for the get
that in go on uh is the reason for the
strong armed Christianity that this
revival is coming in opposition to a
bunch of things that seem quite
aggressive that seem quite militant
whether it be rising threat from China
Russia Islam gender ideology wokeism
whatever
yeah um I
mean I think a lot of people are for
those who are I'm not I shouldn't you
know this is all hypothesizing and I
can't say that whether most people who
are sort of considering Christianity
again are doing so for theological or
political reasons but of the people who
are doing it for political reasons
arguably you know the politics comes
first that their their primary concern
is having a sort of a strong ideological
um and this is the culture this are the
people who will say I don't believe in
God but I sort of like the Christianity
stuff like what do you like in
Christianity well for many of them they
say it gives them a it gives them this
this sort of protective layer against
these ideologies that they don't like or
the vacuum of no ideology how does it
give them a protective L well that's the
question to ask right like and and I'm
kind of the wrong person to ask there
because I'm I'm not sort of part of this
crew but if you did ask them I mean I
know it's a little bit vague and and a
little bit difficult to pin down but it
to to any extent that it does offer a
protective layer against ideologies you
don't like it has to be a bit more
strong armed it has to be defend it has
to put up a shield right and so it it
really depends on who you ask right but
but let's just hypothesize for a moment
what is it that you get from utilitarian
Christianity in opposition to secular
liberalism what does it provide you that
you can't arrive at
without the Christianity bit content
secular you know secularism doesn't have
content secularism is just like a a sort
of rule a political rule that says that
you're not allowed to like let
religion
um have any sort of any particular
religion have any hand in like political
Affairs you just got to sort of have a
hands-off approach to religion right it
doesn't actually provide anything it's
not a world view Christianity is a is a
world viw it allows you to say there are
things that are right and wrong wrong
right so in in like a like a secular
liberal government you might say you
have this opinion you have this opinion
and because we're a secular liberal
Society even though I think you're wrong
I think you should be in Parliament I
think you should become the Prime
Minister if that's what the people want
all of this kind of stuff where if you
have an ideology that just says no there
are right things in wrong things and our
country is one that believes in these
right things and if you believe the
wrong thing like no you know you're not
going to become the Prime Minister
you're not going to like so I think it
it sort of provides you this ability to
safeguard your worldview in other news
news this episode is brought to you by
Mando Mando whole body deodorant will
have you smelling great it's powerful
enough for the toughest body odor but
gentle enough to use everywhere on your
body you've probably heard that some
deodorants have some dodgy chemicals in
that you probably don't want to be
putting on your skin every single day
Mando is aluminium free baking soda free
crueltyfree and Dy free so you can smell
fresh from head to toe without rubbing
any sketchy chemicals into your skin if
you're looking for a great place to
start their starter pack is an absolute
steel and it comes with a solid Stick
deodorant cream tube deodorant and two
free products of your choice deodorant
is a personal preference and if you're
unsure about whether or not you're going
to like it you can buy Mando and use it
for 60 days and if you do not like it
for any reason they'll give you your
money back also they ship
internationally and offer free us
shipping on orders over $25 you can get
up to 40% off Mando's starter pack by
going to the link in the show notes
below or heading to
shop.com and using the code modern
wisdom a checkout that's shop m n o.com
and modern wisdom a checkout so there's
more structure it's sort of butress in
this way but what is it about
Christianity which is particularly
useful up against a woke Chinese Russian
assault well that's that's to me is
still a bit of a mystery it tells me
that we're not in so far as people are
specifically when they're talking about
political issues like like China and
Russia I would ask that same question I
think the only answer you can give is
that it's somehow tied to a uh
a sort of a political
um yeah like a
political
uh sort of what's the word here like
like what's what's the word what am I
looking for I don't know
like I don't know like a forceful
restatement of your political
commitments you know um and and and the
fact that that's tied to Christianity is
is a bit of a mystery to me I don't
really know is it that it's something
that seems more steeped in ancient
Western values so that's that's the
other thing is is that it's like it's
it's Western but this to me seems quite
contingent this is why I'm I'm
separating out like Christianity as what
Jesus teaches and what Christianity is
and Christianity which is like like I
said earlier spe with a specific
emphasis on on the history of you know
Western Europe
um people think
that Western Civilization is a result of
Christianity that's in fact yeah I think
that's what's going on here so you get
Tom Holland the historian who has
popularized this idea in his book
Dominion that all of Western
Civilization is essentially Christian
without realizing it so you know we've
taken what were once non-obvious
controversial ethical contingent
statements you know things that a lot of
people thought were true a lot of people
thought we're false we're quite radical
quite controversial and they've so
successfully embedded themselves into
our culture because of the rise of
Christianity that we now describe them
as self-evident truths you know it's
just self-evident that every person has
worth that you know slavery is wrong all
of this kind of stuff it's just
self-evident and so we don't need
Christianity to teach us that anymore
because it's self-evident and Tom
Holland thesis is is something like well
what we don't realize is that it's
actually come from Christianity even
though you now don't realize it so if
you cut off the Christianity you cut off
the basis for this entire Western ethic
in the first place so people who care
about Western
ethics people who care about um well
preserving the west and preserving the
Western
ethic might buy into this Tom Holland
thesis and say oh okay so I really care
about Western ethics and Western ethics
is Christian therefore if I care about
Western ethics I should care about
Christianity and upholding Christianity
who cares about upholding the West at
the moment the political right so
particularly in Europe you have this
right-wing Christian sort of um you know
friendship
merer what about its usefulness as a
prophylactic against wokeism yeah it's
kind of the same thing right because
it's still it's still like I mean what's
woke culture trying to do is trying to
sort of undermine Western Civilization
you know the history of Western Europe
trying to sort of rewrite the books he's
trying to say that a lot of uh a lot of
the West is is evil and patriarchal and
white and racist and all of this kind of
stuff this is this is what like people
dislike in the So-Cal woke movement if
you ask someone like Douglas Murray you
know what what what's the big trouble
with Woks what don't you like about them
what will he tell you he'll say they're
undermining Western Civilization so it's
still this sort of let's save Western
Civilization approach and I think that
this has come at the same time as the
popularization of the CIS that Western
Civilization is Christian therefore to
save the West we save Christian like an
equation
yeah yeah
sure well how do you mean like an
equation like you sort of add them
together
yeah that's how an equation usually
works yeah yeah like as in they're
treating them as the same correct yes
that you can if it is or the enemy of my
enemy is my friend right like yeah it's
it's um I don't know it's a bit like I'm
trying to think of an of an example here
of like where else people just sort of
go a bit they sort of they they cozy up
to an
ideology because it it's sort
of I know it helps and I don't mean that
to be sort of cynical cuz we're not
always conscious that we're doing this
but we we become attracted to this
ideology become attracted to this
religious tradition and think oh yeah
like I I like Western civilization and
the people who are talking about this
Christianity thing they seem to care
about it they seem to recognize that you
know there's a lot of importance in
western civilization and so they
suddenly find themselves becoming more
attracted to it but but but it's it's
important to stress that
like I don't think this thesis is
correct I mean I'm not I'm not sure you
know I I I still haven't actually read
through Dominion by Tom Holland I really
need to to do that with the amount that
I talk about that's why I'm always very
careful to to talk about his thesis um
but like I think Western Civilization
you know what's it defined by free
speech freedom of religion um capitalist
economy um you know like basically all
of these things which I mean you can say
that nominal Christians have like
established these historically but if
you actually flip open from the
scripture there's no way that that you
can describe this as Christian or
judeo-christian especially with the
judeo part when it comes to like the
abolition of slavery I'm told that this
is oh it's essentially Christian
Movement the abolition of slavery like
as if as if the Bible which explicitly
condones and teaches you how to take
slaves how to uh be them as inheritable
property to your children um you know if
you if
you march up to a city to attack it and
you see a beautiful woman
I'm not misquoting if it says if you see
a beautiful woman uh among them this is
in Deuteronomy I think 20 I think it's
like Deuteronomy 21 but I might be wrong
about that then you can take her as your
wife and if you want to do that then you
take her home this bizarre ritual you
shave her head trim her fingernails give
her exactly 30 days to mourn her parents
who you might have just killed and then
you can take her as your wife okay so
now we're told that despite all this
sort of
scriptural
um endorsement and instruction that well
the Abolitionist Movement was
essentially Christian oh and the women's
rights movement is all Christian it's
all Christian ethics secretly cropping
up I'm like okay so maybe it's the case
maybe that God was always against
slavery and always sort of proom and
social justice and all this kind of
stuff it just took us literally
thousands of years to work it out and
this just so happened to coincide with
the enlightenment it's possible or maybe
actually no
maybe this isn't a Christian
message and and like when I when I ask
specifically how is this Abolitionist
Movement or whatever how is it Christian
it's like well Christianity teaches the
worth of the individual the emphasis on
um sympathizing with the victim this is
the big thing it's like the idea that
Jesus comes down everyone's expecting
the Messiah to be this great military
leader who's going to you know liberate
uh the Jews from Roman occupation and
instead you get this man who is like
poor athetic and is crucified I mean
we're so used to the crucifixion
narrative that we forget how
embarrassing it is and shocking it is
for your
Messiah to die a slave's death I mean
it's it's an extraordinary story it's
what makes it such an attractive one and
so we're told well you know this this
idea of you know
um Sympathy for the victim is is like
uniquely Christian and that's where we
get like the care that comes in social
justice social justice movements are all
about like caring about the victim like
yeah okay
but the Bible does explicitly tell you
you're allowed to own other human beings
as private property so how do you square
that one so in other words Tom Holland
might be right that like the sort of
nominally Christian Western ethic has
like built up well or the nominally
Christian sort of system and religiosity
has built up this Western Society but it
can't actually be like scriptural in my
view I mean I might just be wrong about
this but but so it's a little bit
confusing to me that's why I find it
difficult to answer the question like
you know why are right-wingers attracted
to Christianity well are they are they
attracted to Christianity as in are they
attracted to the message of the Gospel
or are they attracted to what the sort
of Christian church and Christian
religion has historically been able to
politically provide you know I wonder
how much is that it provides a more
stable and sophisticated sounding by
virtue of how long it's been around push
back against something that in
comparison is flimsy
contemporary uh Less steeped in
Nostalgia and and um less stable in that
way like if you were to create a thing
that would act in opposition to Super
Progressive very new very contemporary
very quickly changing uh you would
choose the most Lindy story that you can
what's the one that's been around for as
long as possible and you know we can
kind of we get that bit we don't need to
really worry about shaving the head and
cutting the fingernails and we don't
really need to worry about the slaves
and passing them down to your children
and stuff like that and I suppose that
with Christianity because it is as Sam
Harris said it's a relatively low te
religion uh they're quite prepared it
seems to me like they take less offense
at
people um playing fast and loose y with
the literal interpretation it's h it's
okay that he admitted that thing I get
the sense that the Islamic faith would
not be so okay with you peace mealing
your way through their particular
Doctrine yeah it's what I was about to
about to say or bring up well I mean
because you're quite I said it first I'm
not sure I think Sam Harris said it
first right [ __ ] okay so I'm the middle
of the human centipede between Sam and
you yeah I suppose so yeah why not yeah
you can put it in those terms if you
like and another reason I love speaking
with you Chris um I think yeah as as I
like to put it Islam is more High te and
Christianity is more like high tea if
you know what I mean like tea why is
there not an Islamic Revival
because um well no sorry there is is is
this is the other thing I this is what I
was about to bring up actually was was
the fact that like okay a bunch of like
you know our political establishment the
Civil Service have just been totally
taken over by this woke culture man um
and everyone's a bit like come on
seriously like really um you know on on
the the anniversary of dday we've got
Pride flags flying over Regent Street
like instead of the British flag I think
that's true might not be true but you
get the point of making people are like
I'm fed up Fed Up of all of this
nonsense and
so you just said like you know you need
something that's that's old tried and
tested you know and can stand up against
this and so you get a bunch of like
particularly I think disaffected young
men who you know the like Islam is very
attractive to them attracted to them
because it because it says well look you
don't believe in all this crap do you
you don't believe in that you believe in
you believe in certain kinds of values
you believe that you should stand up for
yourself you believe in gender roles you
believe in this right yeah I do actually
it's like well this is Islam can give
you this and it can justify it and it
can give you the the strength and the
community behind you to assert those
values and not have to worry about being
some kind of like Outcast or condemned
or whatever no because like we we all
believe the same thing as you and we're
growing and we're popular and nobody
wants to criticize us because we stand
up for ourselves you know okay yeah sign
me up for that whereas the Christians
are still very much
like sort of yeah like like you say that
they well they have the message of
turning the other cheek yeah this is the
Jesus figure so and their belief as well
is that you will be judged
eventually not necessarily right now
yeah it's it is a different sort of
message of of of Salvation I mean
Christianity has the sacrifice of Jesus
for your sins and and Islam doesn't have
that Islam doesn't believe that that
Jesus died on the cross
again because we forget how radical it
is that killing a prophet like God
wouldn't allow that to happen so the
idea of Jesus dying on the cross is a is
a is a total anathema to the to the
Islamic understanding of who God is and
because again Islam is much more sort of
like proud and sad up for yourself kind
of thing having having this this
embarrassing slave death for their
Prophet like it doesn't run so Jesus
doesn't die on the on the cross in in
Islam um whereas in Christianity yeah he
dies on the cross and he sort of pays
your sin and all this kind of stuff it's
a much more like I'm going to sort of
throw myself on Christ you know woe to
me and my sin um and so and that's more
attractive to some and less attractive
to others but it it it sort of means I
think that also is why you get more like
Christian churches who are sort of like
oh we're totally open and we're like Pro
pride and we've got a transgender
priests and all of this kind of stuff
when you don't see that happening in
Islam at least not as much to the same
degree a lot of people like I'm not I'm
just not quite working out why that has
resulted in churches Christian churches
or Christian belief that permits people
to be more
peac well that's actually I think a
slightly separate thing which is which
is important to to spell out a lot of
people say simply that Islam
is like you know uh half a millennium
younger than
Christianity right because it sort of it
crops up later than Christianity and
therefore Christianity you know has its
sort of Enlightenment Revival
Reformation 500 years ago and Islam is
like 5 six 700 years behind so it just
hasn't got there yet right and and like
a lot of people do this line I don't
think it's right because it sort of
treats Islam as a religion like it's
sort of still a baby or something and
and that it's like it's like not
connected to the world in some way that
it that it's like oh give it 500 years
and for some reason it will just happen
in the same amount of time as it
like maybe but I I don't think that's
true I think it's it's got more to do
with the way that the scripture and and
the and the and the prophets are treated
like in Islam the Quran is the word of
God which has sort of existed for all
time um and you know the Quran you you
you hold in in in your hands the Musa
the the copy um the written copy is is a
copy of a message which is eternal right
which is which the final word of God is
Quran means recitation so it's just you
know Muhammad receives and Muhammad is
illiterate he can't read he can't write
and and God um sort of speaks to him in
in a cave and says you know says write
or recite or something like to that
effect and Muhammad is sort of like well
I'm I'm a literate I I can't I can't do
it and he just commands him to do it
anyway and Muhammad is is is so sort of
freaked out by this that I think
According to some reports he considers
suicide he goes to like throw himself
off a cliff and then he goes home to his
first wife who is the first person to
encourage him that he's actually heard
the word of God and that you know he
should submit to it so she's known as
like the first Muslim she's the first
person to sort of you know recognize the
message and and accept its truth um so
this word of God comes to
Muhammad and is at some point at a later
Point like written down recorded and
there are there are various copies
floating around and then califf uthman
he decides to to put together a sort of
an official codex and this is where we
get our our Quran that we hold in our
hands but the actual message itself is
eternal and comes directly from God in
Christianity unless you're speaking to
like a Biblical fundamentalist who are
quite a relatively new and and quite
American phenomenon um they don't treat
scripture in the same way scripture is
written by men particularly the gospels
I mean the letters of Paul are letters
written by a man to a bunch of churches
to settle sort of theological and
practical disputes this isn't like the
word of God in the sense that this isn't
like the the exact words that of that
that you're reading in the Bible are the
words that came out of the prophet's
mouth that God you know put into the
it's not the same thing in
Christianity in Islam the word becomes a
book in Christianity the word becomes
flesh and dwells Among Us that's the the
opening of The Gospel of John you know
um in the beginning was the word and the
Word was with God and the Word was God
and then later on and the word became
flesh and dwelt among us so you have the
word of God being Jes Jesus in Islam the
word of God is the
Quran and so a lot of people think the
Quran in Islam is what the Bible is in
Christianity I think that the Quran and
Islam is what Jesus is in
Christianity and the gospels are more
like the Hadith literature in Islam
which is sort of these reports of of the
sayings and doings of Muhammad which
some are better attested than others you
know there's sort of dispute over which
ones are sound which ones aren't but no
one disputes the
Quran but the some of the Hadith you
could say well this one maybe didn't
happen this one did happen we know we're
not really sure um but no one disputes
the Quran in the same way in
Christianity with the gospels yeah maybe
they said this maybe they said that
maybe that's a later interpetation maybe
that was wrong maybe blah blah blah but
no one disputes
Jesus you couldn't you couldn't have
Jesus sat in front of you and argue with
him about what's what's true in
Christianity right and so this is
why in
Islam well in Christianity if you want
to say look I know the Bible says all
that stuff about women speaking in
churches but actually you know Paul
probably didn't write that letter and he
probably didn't mean this and that
particular verse moves around our early
manuscripts and maybe he didn't really
say that I mean that like whatever and
so you end up with this sort of yeah
okay fine play in the system would Jesus
be okay with it yeah it feels like Jesus
might be okay with it kind of thing and
so there's a bit more room to maneuver
you can't do that with Quran you can't
say oh well maybe that verse isn't true
maybe that was a mistake maybe that was
you know a later interpetation because
the Quran is the word of God what's an
interpolation oh like a later Edition so
something so something that's added
uh later into the text so like earlier I
mentioned the stoning of the adulterous
woman which is my probably well it's one
of my favorite stories in the in the
gospels um where Jesus says he who is
without sin cast the first stone it's a
religious test because you've got this
Jesus peaceful figure and as a woman
who's committed adultery and the law is
quite clear that the woman should be
stoned and Jesus is just like writing in
the sand and the Pharisees are like okay
come on then Jesus what are you going to
do here it clearly says that she should
be stoned that's what the law says he's
like writing in the sand he's kind of
ignoring them and they say Jesus you
know what should we do here you know the
law is quite clear we need to Stone this
woman and they're testing him what's he
going to do and he says sure yeah okay
go ahead but he who's without sin casts
first stone oh man it's brilliant it's
awesome it's like ethical genius it sort
of undercuts at the same time as not
contradicting the the truth of the law
or the Justice you know it's this it's
This brilliant moment but unfortunately
it's not in our earliest manuscript and
so most scholars believe that it's it's
a later interpretation in other news
this episode is brought to you by Factor
if you're too busy this summer to cook
but still want to ensure that you're
eating well factor is the solution
Factor's fresh never frozen meals a
dietitian approved and ready to eat in
Just 2 minutes so no matter how busy you
are you will always have time to enjoy
nutritious great tasting meals with 35
different meals and more than 60 add-ons
to choose from every week you will
always have new flavors to explore their
meals feature premium ingredients like
filet min on shrimp and black and salmon
without having to do any shopping
prepping cooking or cleaning up if
you're the sort of person who wants to
eat well but always struggles to find
time factor is basically an ultimate
life hack you always have a meal which
is well balanced high in protein
dietician approved and ready to go just
sat in the fridge you can get 50% off
your first box plus 20% off your next
month by going to the link in the show
notes below or heading to factor
meals.com
mw50 using the code MW 50 a checkout
that's factor meals.com
mw50 and mw50 a checkout plus Gnostic
Gospels which is like the DVD extras
sort of the behind the scenes Vlog the
director's cut yeah yeah it is the
extended edition the nostic gospels are
a fascinating uh Corpus of texts
which we've only very recently in the
grand scheme of things been able to
ReDiscover and read for ourselves we
knew of the existence of a bunch of
gospels that weren't in the New
Testament um because early church
fathers were writing about them um we
knew about the existence of a Gospel of
Judas a Gospel of Thomas fascinating you
know but we didn't have the texts until
in
1945 uh some guys digging in the desert
and accidentally crashes into this big
jar at least this is one of the like the
stories are disputed
um and just like opens this jar at first
doesn't want to open it because he's
scared there's like a demon in it uh but
turns out it's got a bunch of ancient
manuscripts which he takes home and
keeps by the fire where is it in nomadi
near nomadi in Egypt so Egypt is has the
perfect climate for the preservation of
of
Papyrus
so it's we're not entirely sure but it
seems that like these tchs were
buried in this cave in the desert and
that could be uh because athanasius
comes up with the Christian canonical
New Testament as these are the four
gospels all of the other ones you know
we're not we're not we're not going to
read They're not part of our tradition
so they end up getting sort of destroyed
so they get they get sort of buried in
in the ground to either protect them
because they don't want to be destroyed
or just to bury them to sort of get rid
of them um it's also possible that it
was a a burial site some people have
suggested that like it's it was uh some
significant figure with a lot of you
know a lot of texts to his name when he
was buried he was buried with these
texts and so that's why some people
think that the story of the discoveries
true because it was actually a grave
robbing some people have thought maybe
it was just a simple grave robbing but
the person who then discovers these
texts doesn't want to admit that he's
robbing a grave have these been carbon
dated have they been verified
authenticated y so there's been there's
been a lot of work done on this um we
you can you can date the actual Papyrus
but you can also I mean the
extraordinary thing about these gospels
is so I think so the Gospel of Judas for
example which is not found in that
collection it's not found in the nomadi
collections it's it's found at a
at a later point and fascinatingly when
people began to realize what it is
there's this huge scramble because it's
worth a lot of money right and people
are like trying to smuggle it people are
trying to uh because because you can't
just sort of take really expensive
ancient manuscripts across the border
you know countries want to keep them for
themselves they want them for their
museums they want them for their
researchers uh but the people who find
them want to sell them so this Gospel of
Judas is discovered and it finds its way
all over the place it actually spends
something like 15 years in a safety
deposit box in Long Island in New York
which like almost destroys it because
you go from like humidity the perfect
climate of of Egypt to like New York
city so it was just like absolutely
ludicrous it's finally National
Geographic who buy the Gospel of Judas
they sent a bunch of Scholars I think
including Bart Man to go and like verify
it and they give them a bit of the text
but they can't give them too much
because they can't just let them read it
because they haven't bought it yet but
they need to give them enough to like
verify the text right so there's carbon
dating and all this kind of stuff but
also I mean we can we can so we carbon
date the the Papyrus and we know that it
sort of dates you know I I don't know
what the exact numbers are but between
like 80 ad and like 400 ad it's like
give will take like a few hundred years
but we also know that
um that uh irus writes in against
heresies about the Gospel of Judas so we
know that it existed and we know that
this is dated to around that time and
we're like this must be the Gospel of
Judas but because erus writes about it
in like 180 ad we know that the top end
for how late it can be
there are lots of different ways to get
to
triangulate exactly right so you can
date a Tex by you know carbon dating the
Papyrus um also it's been referred
referred to we can do it textually like
what are its textual dependence what
what does it have knowledge of you know
does it have knowledge of the the so a
lot of people date the gospel of Mark
after 70 AD because it mentions the the
the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple
so the Temple's destroyed by the Romans
in 70 AD and Mark's gospel mentions this
and so the secular storian looks at that
and goes
well that means it was written
afterwards the Christian might look at
it and say well Jesus talked Jesus
predicted the destruction of the temple
because he was Jesus it was a miracle he
knew it was going to happen so it could
be earlier you know so so there's
there's sort of theological dispute as
well interestingly there was one gospel
um the gospel of Jesus's wife which was
discovered relatively recently and was
was particularly famous because it was
this tiny it was a
fragment and it talked about Jesus's
wife and it mentions Mary Magdalene so
the presumption is that it's it's
describing Mary Magdalene as Jesus's
wife which has been a sort of theory Da
Vinci codes thing going on for a while
and we have this Ancient Ancient Papyrus
and at first Scholars are sort of like
they think this might be this think this
might be real they carbon date the
Papyrus and it it's it matches perfectly
yeah like this is this is like dat this
is an early ancient text um then some
like red flags start being raised and
the the sort of final nail in the coffin
this is a forgery we we know now this is
like a complete forgery and one of the
ways to prove this is that it quotes um
another gospel in Aramaic I think it it
might it might quote the Gospel of
Thomas actually but it it quotes this
Aramaic translation so so it's it's it's
got like this this text that's been
translated into a different language but
there's a there's a translation error in
in the Papyrus on this fragment there's
an error in the translation
and there's one other place where the
exact same translation error occurs
which is a typo on a website that
translates this gospel into Aramaic so
it looks like the guy who's forged this
this this bit of Papyrus has used an
Aramaic translation of an old gospel
from a website to then like on Old
Papyrus genuinely old Papyrus and then
written out and also like the the
formatting of the of the text like where
the line breaks are all of that kind of
stuff is the same as on this website
which like the the chances of that are
just like astonishingly small especially
with the typo and so we're like oh okay
yeah that's a a shame that's a forgery
what is interesting in the Gnostic
Gospels how does it contribute or what
are the big reveals well for a start it
tells us what
um what what Christian Traditions were
being opposed at the time of the
formation of the New Testament Cannon so
you know we're very familiar with
stories of the New Testament with
stories of the resurrection and this
kind of stuff there are Gnostic Gospels
which tell us all kinds of different
things so we know that there are
communities who believe things and when
we get to grips we can read for the
first time what early Christian
communities believed that eventually got
sort of condemned as heretical but now
from their own maths because we we knew
that there are heretical sects that
believe all kinds of different things
but we've only ever heard about them
through the writing of their opposition
so irenaeus is against heresies is this
huge volume that writes about why all of
these heretical beliefs are wrong so you
know it tells us what people believe but
we're hearing it through a Critic now we
can read it through you know from the
from the horse's mouth as it were and so
it's all kinds of stuff in there some of
them are older some of them are newer
some of them are obvious sort of fakes
some of them are a bit more like sort of
interesting the Gospel of Thomas might
be the most famous um CU it's possibly
quite old I mean Scholars have dated it
it's some Scholars radically date it to
like really early like 0 ad which is
around the time that the canonical
gospels were being written um some date
it later but it's still very early it's
like second century ad so so pretty
early um and about half of it I think
contain quotes it's just a list of
sayings of Jesus it's a socalled sayings
gospel so no narrative no crucifixion no
Resurrection none of that just a list of
sayings from Jesus and about half of
them I think are also in the synoptic
gospels half of them aren't and they say
really weird Mystic things like if you
bring out what is within you then what
is within you shall save you but if you
do not bring out that which is within
you then you know what you keep inside
you will destroy you or something like
that which is like a bit sort of
esoteric and and weird and you sort of
have to Grapple with it and figure out
what he's what he's going to going to be
called and there's another one in there
that where and again these are just
sayings like out of nowhere it says
something like whoever comes to know the
father and the mother he shall be called
the son of a
prostitute and then just moves on to the
next one you're about to ask me what
that means I don't know no one knows
like it's so strange and the most famous
part of the Gospel of Thomas is the
ending the very last quote Simon Peter
goes to Jesus and says what about Mary
Magdalene you know she should leave us
because women are not uh worthy of of of
life meaning like you know eternal life
Christian communion you know women
aren't worthy of this so Mary Magdalene
should leave us now you would expect
Jesus here to
say no no Peter women are perfectly you
know capable of inheriting eternal life
no he says I will draw her close to me
to make her a man so that she can enter
the kingdom of God for all women who
make themselves into men will enter the
kingdom of
God the Gospel of Thomas that's where it
ends
that sounds pretty woke yeah it's like
the sort of earliest sort of trans um
trans account and of Mary magdalin in
particular God knows if you'll pardon
the phrasing what that means um I've
heard all kinds of different theories um
a lot of the Gnostic Gospels seem to
emphasize Unity bringing together making
two one and a lot of time this is framed
in terms of gender so the male and the
female are to sort of unite um and so
like there's sort of this argument that
that's sort of what what's being gotten
at here but it's weird that Jesus like
specifies women being made into men
there's one Gnostic Gospel which I mean
remember that in the Genesis story Eve
is Created from the rib of Adam she's
taken out of Adam it's like a separation
so some of these Gnostic texts sort of
long for the
reunification um saying that you know
that was a terrible thing when when Adam
and Eve were separated seems to have
this like platonic influence if you
heard the old sort of um that old like
Greek Fable of the of the original
creature being this like forearmed
four-legged two-headed creature and this
this is like the form of the human and
then they end up getting cut in half and
like you know spread across the Earth
and so you know people will then spend
their lives searching to be reunify very
romantic story right and and there might
be some influence there in some of these
Gnostic texts where you've got the sort
of separation and and desire for
reunification interesting that the
biological way that humans develop is
actually that every human begins female
is that right I don't know much about
embryology I I have heard things to this
effect but which why men have got
nipples yeah yeah yeah yeah they start
sort of developing nipples yeah no you
yeah you're right I haven't man a long
time since I've thought about that I
mean that that is fascinating isn't it I
mean it's funny as well because correct
they just got it the wrong way around
yeah this this is a thing is is like a
lot of people you know I I recently did
this debate with Des Souza and he asked
me and we were talking about whether the
Bible was true and he said did the
universe have a beginning I said I don't
know like sure maybe I I I think it
probably did he said said well how did
the Bible know
that okay at best a 50-50 guess I I I
like okay whatever but the point that I
was making is that like people will
reinterpret things either way I think
that if the universe was infinite
there's a way of interpreting Genesis to
fit with that but also what I was going
to say is that like had we discovered in
embryology that all embryos start male
and then become female the female is
sort of drawn out of that people would
go ah see look at the story of Adam and
Eve that's what it was getting at like
we you know we knew
yeah exactly right and and I think
people sort of do that all the time
there's there's a great Gnostic Gospel
called the testimony of truth which is
discovered in the nakadi library so
that's buried in like 400 ad so it's
it's probably like second or third
Century ad
um and the testimony of truth retells
the story of
Genesis but interestingly if you read
Genesis and I mean like the actual
account of Genesis
um so so
who are the characters in the sort of
Garden of Eden story Adam Eve Eve snake
snake who's the snake devil right why do
you think
that which it's just sort of
traditionally the snake is the devil but
the text never says that the text never
identifies the serpent with the devil
interesting the concept of the devil
Satan the accuser didn't exist at the
time of writing of Genesis right this is
like one of those things about did the
Fruit of the Loom logo ever have a
cornicopia in it yeah Amanda effect
except this time like yeah the original
Mandela effect yeah I I suppose so like
like go you know go and read the text
it's just the serpent and we're
introduced to the serpent we're
told it's Genesis 3 it opens now the
serpent was more crafty than any of the
beasts that the Lord has created and and
so Adam and Eve are told um you can eat
of any fruit of the of the garden but do
not eat of the tree of the knowledge of
Good and Evil for in the day that you
eat thereof you shall surely die surely
die because the Hebrew it sort of says
Die Twice It's like you will die die you
will die a death
um and so the serpent comes in this
crafty serpent crafty is an an important
word there um the King James translates
it as as subtle the word is arum um so
the the snake was more subtle or crafty
or shrewd than the other beasts and it
comes to even says did God say that if
you eat of the tree the knowledge good
and evil you'll die and he goes yeah and
he goes you you're not you're not going
to die God just knows that if you if
that tree you'll become like him knowing
good and evil and he doesn't want that
so Eve looks at the fruit sees that it's
good for eating takes a bite gives some
to Adam and what happens do they
die no what happens well God tells us in
the Bible in the Genesis count God says
now the man has become like us knowing
good and evil he must not be allowed to
reach out his hand and eat from the Tree
of Life and so he's banished from the
Garden of Eden What's the Tree of Life
tree of well who knows the tree of life
and and inherit eternal life so so so
presumably in the way that eating from
the Tree of the knowledge of Good and
Evil gives you the knowledge of Good and
Evil if you eat from the Tree of Life
you get eternal life and God says they
must not be allowed to do that it should
have just gone for the Tree of Life
first which wasn't yeah well so there
are lots of theological interpretations
here because interestingly God doesn't
say at the beginning you must not eat
the tree of life he just says You must
not eat the tree of knowledge good and
evil so arguably like if they Gant
charted this correctly and they'd worked
out Tree of Life live forever yeah you
know it's actually really interesting
but like what would happen if Adam and
Eve eat from the Tree of Life first and
then well arguably see this is the sort
of insight yeah that you need a
productivity bro to bring to the
theological Ser though it's a great
question I I think that the tree of life
gives you eternal life and the idea is
that Adam and Eve have eternal life in
the Garden of Eden when they're created
they're just going to live forever in
the Garden of Eden they've already got
eternal life so eating from the and
that's been subtracted from them now
that they know good and evil you're not
allowed to know good and evil and also
etal life so then they're banished and
then they're mortal so the the Christian
interpretation of the story is like well
they didn't die literally but they they
died in the sense that mortality entered
into the world you know they died a sort
of spiritual death they became but their
immortality was taken from them yeah ex
the fact that you're not going to die
now doesn't matter you are at some point
yeah it's like there's something about
knowing good and evil as a human that
means that you are going to die probably
because if you sin the price of sin is
death and
if you don't know good and evil then you
can't sin because you can't knowingly do
evil but if you know good and evil then
because we're humans and we're naturally
flawed we're always going to sin and
therefore we we need death so death
enters the world but here's the thing
right that's one interpretation um but
it is a bit of a weird story like who is
this serpent why is the serpent even in
the garden in the first place you know
like like what's the serpent doing there
in this perfect Eden you know um who who
created this this this serpent you why
can't they just from the Tree of Life
afterwards why does because God doesn't
it's not like they they literally just
can't eat from the Tree of Life God
banishes from them from the garden and
then guards the gates of Eden with a
cherubin with a flaming sword these
stories are extraordinary man it's worth
it's worth revisiting them um so this
ancient gospel testimony of
truth identifies the serpent it tells
you who it thinks the serpent is it
doesn't identify it with the devil
identifies it with Jesus
Christ what does I mean like Jesus is
the
serpent because a great deal of the
Gnostic tradition believes that the
creator of the material world is an
either evil or incompetent or lesser
kind of God figure the Demi
urge so the material world is created by
this evil or incompetent
god um there are lots of different
reasons to explain why that happened but
it's like not not the father that Jesus
refers to Jesus being like the true God
comes down and when when Jesus says you
know my Father in Heaven he's not
talking about the creator of the
material Universe because that's an evil
Demi urge he's talking about the real
sort of spiritual God so the material
stuff is bad and the spiritual stuff is
good um there's so much to it man
there's so much to it but but so so the
idea is that the god of the Garden of
Eden this Gnostic Gospel the testimony
of truth says like what God is this what
God is this that sort of lies to Adam
and Eve says that they're going to die
does is jealous a self- admittedly
jealous God doesn't want them to become
like him now why not become like Gods
you know he doesn't want it he's jealous
and then the serpent comes in and and
tells them the truth says like look you
you you're these like material creatures
created by this God but there's this
like spiritual wisdom there's this
knowledge of Good and Evil that he
doesn't want you to have because he's
this evil God like but I'm going to I'm
going to give it to you I'm telling you
the truth here um and so this this
gospel thinks that Jesus is bringing
wisdom there interestingly that word
arum the Hebrew word that means shrew
or crafty or
subtle um also is translated the same
word throughout the whole of Proverbs as
sensible or prudent so there is a
reading of Genesis that says now the
serpent was more sensible than any of
the other beasts that God has created
and he he's the one that comes Eve and
says oh like God said you were going to
die if you no no you're not going to die
you're just going to be like him and
he's right so this ancient Gnostic
Gospel condemns this Creator God of
Genesis identifies the serpent with
Jesus uh and says that Adam and Eve did
the right thing by eating of the tree of
the knowledge of Good and Evil so
there's one way that the Gnostic Gospels
totally upend the traditional
understanding of Christianity and you
can see why it's therefore condemned so
that's that's fascinating and also this
whole belief in the in the Demi urge and
the different and the different also to
be clear the word Gnostic a lot of
Scholars reject it because gnostics
didn't call themselves gnostics what is
Gnostic Gnostic comes from the Greek
word nosis for knowledge because a lot
of these texts are
unified by the fact that you're you're
saved through knowledge it's not you're
not saved through the things that you do
the way you behave it's like you got to
have the right kind of knowledge you got
Whoever has the Gospel of Thomas says
you know whoever discovers the correct
interpretation of these words you know
shall enter the kingdom of God it's
about like getting you made them more
[ __ ] literal it's like getting the
but you can't you can't and in fact in
the canonical gospels um the gospel of
Mark you can read it like there's this
report that when Jesus was with with the
big crowds he spok in Parables so that
they wouldn't they wouldn't understand
properly but when he got back to the
disciples he explained everything
properly there's this idea even in the
canonical gospels that there's like a
public teaching of Jesus and a secret
knowledge of Jesus and so the Gospel of
Thomas opens these are the secret
teachings of the Living God so this is
the stuff that he said backstage which
did him as Thomas Judas wrote down the
gospel the the Apostle Thomas wrote down
um whether Thomas actually wrote them
probably not uh but given the fact that
the secret knowledge given the fact that
the Bible was uh an editorial decision
what goes in what stays in yeah there's
interations that edits are made there's
uh contradiction in terms of this says
this thing here and doesn't say that
thing there and also well we there's
sort of play in the system that kind of
probably didn't say that so we can
probably kind of get rid of that
yeah where does the authority come from
of that
Corpus and why has the gospels not
completely upended the entire world of
Christianity given that the editorial
decision is now so plainly evident that
it was just laid at the feet of flawed
humans like the rest of us well
because I mean so so the the the way
that these texts are determined are
through a mixture of things so like
Apostolic succession is important uh as
in the the sort of the message needs to
be legitimately attributed a bit like
how the had of Islam are attributed like
if if you read a Hadith um it will have
this entire sort of second bit which
tells you the line of succession from
Muhammad to the person who heard it and
this person heard it from this person
and this person heard it from this
person because the important thing is
like is like knowing that it comes from
the right source and so the the four
gospels that we have I believe to be
written by either eyewitnesses
traditionally eyewitnesses or like
traveling companions to eyewitnesses to
the life and Ministry of Jesus um so
like Matthew the Apostle um Luke the the
traveling companion of uh the Apostle
Paul um John traditionally associated
with the Beloved disciple of Jesus so so
these are sort of like they're believed
to be written as close to eyewitness as
you can get um also the theological
content is
important uh like I tweeted out a thread
about the Gospel of Thomas a couple of
quotes and people misunderstood what I
was doing they thought I was somehow
trying to like endorse it or something I
was just like wow look at this really
weird gospel cuz I just done a podcast
episode on it so I quoted some of the
more bizarre elements to the Gospel of
Thomas and Michael NS retweeted it and
said reading this is is is just it just
makes it so obvious why these texts were
condemned in the first place and he's
kind of right like the stuff about like
turning women into men and and like the
son of a prostitute and all this kind of
stuff it's just like kind of weird and
and and doesn't seem to sort of fit in
with what people would have like
remembered and known about Jesus at the
time and so they're sort of condemned on
theological grounds as well like I don't
I don't think that these texts I
couldn't say that they more closely
approximate Jesus's message it's so
clear that they just they just
completely
contradict what the understanding of
Jesus was at the time of the formation
of the cannon and so they're sort of
expelled for that reason too but and
you're like oh but now that we can read
them you know shouldn't that just
totally upend everything for a lot of
Christians it's actually done the exact
opposite like I say like the Michael NES
thing a lot of Christians are now
reading these texts and going oh oh yeah
I can to yeah oh thank goodness I can
totally because if if we discovered the
Gospel of Thomas and it was like this
really close text that had like a sort
of plausible close ethic that was a bit
different or something that just denied
the Virgin birth but sort of nothing
else it'd be really Troublesome like oh
goodness but because it's like so wacky
and so out there Christians are like oh
thank goodness you can get rid of it all
because now it's OB now it's totally
obvious why it was condemned in the
first place obvious yeah the Gospel of
Judas is a fascinating one I re people
can read this right the Gospel of Thomas
you can read it in like 20 minutes the
Gospel of Judas is much harder to read
because it's just like really really
strange but the beginning it's kind of
like Eerie it's got that D Vinci Code
interest the disciples are praying um
they sort of yeah Jesus sort of comes
upon them praying and laughs at them and
they say Lord why why you why you
laughing at me you know
like and and and he says well I'm not
laughing at you like but by doing that
you praise your God like your God as if
it's a different God and then he pulls
Judas aside and says like do you know
where I've come from and Judas goes yeah
I know where you've come from you've
come from the realm of barbalo and I'm
not fit to utter the name of the word of
the one who sent you like this some like
Dungeons and Dragons type like stuff you
know it's like this fascinating and this
because the Gospel of Judas is very
Gnostic the realm of barbell is like
this higher realm that Jesus has been
sent from to save us from the sort of
material creation and when Jesus says
you're worshiping your God he's talking
about the evil Demi urge because they're
sort of accidentally worshiping the the
wrong God you know it's I thought
Christianity just had one God yeah well
it does but it seems like it kind of
didn't always but but they wouldn't have
called the gnostics wouldn't have
referred to this and again gnostics too
broad of a term people who believed in
the demoic Creator wouldn't call that
demoic Creator like God they call it
like the material creator of the
universe or something God is why God
create the universe huh if that was the
case why didn't God actual God create
the universe there are again there are
lot lots of different ideas and uh it
sort of depends which text you read but
um some people believe that there's like
there are like these sort of lower
deities who sort of try to recreate the
spiritual realm to govern over and it's
sort of a subpar version that's what the
material world is um some people think
that the the Demi Ur is like evil and so
creates the material world to like you
know I don't know like trap people and
make them suffer or whatever some people
think that it's the result of
incompetence um the simulation
hypothesis for theology yeah basically
but the you know the god of the and by
the way like like I
probably botching a lot of what I'm
saying here I I've I've been learning a
lot about this recently by by speaking
to people on my podcast um and you know
reading these checks and reading some of
the the literature around them and
hopefully if I have watched anything too
badly people in the comments will be be
quick to sure I hope I hope that's the
case but I I I really I want to
emphasize that you know like this is
this is very difficult to pin down and
I'm I'm I'm no expert but at least what
I hope is getting across is that this is
like fascinating I mean it is just
incredible because even if it is all
obviously just like stupid and
ridiculous and the Gospel of Judas is
written written way later and obviously
is false it's all just fascinating that
this text exists and was circulating and
was and was circulating with enough
prominence that it was you know uh taken
seriously by early church authorities
enough to officially condemn them
because they were sort of having enough
influence it's fascinating one of the
things that we haven't spoken about with
this Christian Revival has been a death
of meaning in the modern world I think
so far the way that you've spoken about
it is sort of functionally like what
does it do what can it give people uh as
legitimacy and their push back against
encroaching secular liberalism and
authoritarianism and the East and and
woke and all the rest of
it how much is this revival a response
to a death of meaning in the modern
world yeah so that's the other thing
which I should have mentioned earlier
because take aan her Ali yeah in her
unheard article she talks about China
and Russia and islamism and whatnot she
does also mention nihilism but if
you not me like it's you know it's
because you rang me yeah four or five
years ago while I was in the gym and one
of the first things that you said was
try nihilism yeah what do you mean I'm
trying
nihilism as a life philosophy yeah yeah
yeah could try on forze man how's that
going
like it's all right I guess yeah very
nihilism sort of is like uh you don't
really try on nihilism so much as you
take off all the clothes and and you're
not wearing anything for a while it's
it's it's quite a quite a strange
phenomenon and and yeah I don't know I I
don't remember saying that to you I
don't remember where I was in my life or
how tongue and cheek I was being but you
know it's worth it's worth really were
very vegan at the time which may have
been going hand in hand it's worth
really like taking it seriously though
like what does it mean to live these
philosophies what it's not something to
just mess around with it's not like oh I
like this Christianity stuff like yeah
sure what does it mean to actually be a
Christian it's not something that you
can just like sort sort of if you really
want to be a Christian you can't just be
like oh yeah cool I'm sort of on that
team yeah yeah whatever no it's like you
have to you have sort of radically
change the way you look at the world you
have to turn the other cheek do you do
you have to do that why can't I just do
it the same way as I do with James
clear's Atomic habits James clear's
Atomic habits has got four steps to
embedding a habit I often miss the
fourth one oh sure yeah it's it's okay
if you miss it like you don't okay I
maybe I misspoke you don't have to do it
but you have to sort of try to do it you
have to uh be motivated to do it you
have to give up so much of
of of the way you approach the world you
have to adopt a radical forgiveness you
have to like you you you you sacrifice
your ability to you know if somebody
mistreats you at a bar or whatever to be
like that guy's a dick no you can't
think that that's not a very Christian
thought you know you've got to you've
got to be forgiven unless they're trying
to teach gender ideology in schools yeah
but but this is the thing like what's
the Christian response to that well
Jesus had sort of there were times where
Jesus was angry like famously flips the
tables at the the temple um because
they've sort of turned the temple into a
market and they're selling things and he
thinks this is inappropriate so you know
he he displays anger but generally
speaking when it comes to theological
disputes he'll he'll he'll know what's
correct he'll tell you what's correct
but he won't do it
in he won't do it in a particularly
vicious way except like I mean the one
thing he really hated was religious
Hypocrites um so a lot of his
his most stinging critiques were for the
Pharisees who sort of claimed to be
these religious authorities but we're
like acting pretty poorly how prophetic
Yeah well yeah this is like you know
everybody yeah that that's that seems
that seems to be every the idea that
sort of everyone hates a hypocrite
that's the that's the thing that Jesus
and Jesus did have you know seeming like
vital for for a lot of these people
called them like a brood of vipers and
and and this kind of stuff so you know
Jesus does do that every now and again
but if you've got like you know teachers
teaching gender ideology even if the
Christian thinks this isn't very
Christlike this isn't this isn't
through I think the sort of approach of
anger and and and I don't know
condemnation let's say of the
person uh may or may not be Christian
depending on on how it's done but but
when you said a second ago yeah I know
you were sort of joking like unless it's
this but but that that's that's part of
it you point out that like oh well
here's a place where everyone makes an
exception well part of the the struggle
of being a Christian is trying to retain
that that element
of that essence of forgiveness
and compassion and charity even at the
times that are most trying I think um CS
Lewis said you know I forgive the
unforgivable in others because God has
forgiven the unforgivable in me you
know does this show how unra and
illogical humans are that we've tried to
make arguments and reasoning neat and
tidy and mathematical but becoming wise
appears to be so hard on your own even
with the assist of the scientific
Enlightenment and computers that you
still need to personify these lessons
that you need to couch wisdom and living
a wise life inside of a broader
narrative which has religion and has a
guy from 2000 years ago is it a case
that people are saying we've tried it
the modern way we've tried to live a
life that is determined by I can I know
the weather tomorrow in Venezuela uh I
can Uber Eats things to my house and
look at how [ __ ] miserable I am yeah
we need to find something that's older
something that's more tried and tested
and is working on a different pathway I
don't think it's necessarily older
especially because there was a time when
this message was new and it was still
just as radical for people um but yes
the fact that it's
narrative the fact that it's
storytelling um
and moral principle rather than like
scientific truth claims the the the the
gospels don't make scientific truth
claims
they tell a story they they give an
account of a man's life and his moral
teachings
um I I think you know it's often
condemned as this like retreat of
rationality but like I think it's it's
it's just to do the brain thing again
it's just the sort of the
reemergence um of the right
brain um this way of looking at the
world that's that that sort of
legitimizes poetry and art and
music that are sort of irreducible to
argument and syllogism uh that in other
context people people think it would be
inappropriate to try to understand music
just by looking at music theory I mean
music theory is very useful and
important but like the way to understand
music is to actually listen to the
listen to the song you know and for a
lot of religious people they're
beginning to realize that this this
microscope approach of trying to sort of
analyze the religion for its truth
claims misses something of like living
like stepping back and then living life
of course if it does make truth claims
and those truth claims are wrong that's
a problem obviously it's a problem but I
think people are are beginning to become
more forgiving of that because they're
beginning to recognize the value of
narrative well we spoke about this the
last time we talked I'm really
fascinated with this idea of things
which are uh literally true but
functionally false and functionally true
but literally false or just useful
instead of functionally true um and it
it it seems that this is Contin to ramp
up look I I feel better when I have
faith I feel better when I'm a Christian
like religion is the ultimate split test
split tested and split tested and split
tested into Oblivion uh working on an
existing pathway that every human
civilization has had in one form or
another and we have come up with a way
that is pretty good at dealing with the
uncertainty of the future and the fact
that you're flaw and the fact that
you're going to die and difficult things
are going to
happen and unfortunately
Netflix and a bit of like some Ryan
holiday books who don't cut the mustard
yeah and in so far as they in so far as
they
do um so Jordan Peterson has described
God as the ultimate fictional
character uh and he does so kind of
tongue and cheek and I think what he's
kind getting out there is the the idea
that like good
fiction approximates truth in a
roundabout way like like a good a good
work of fiction tells you something true
it just doesn't through the through the
use of fiction like did you know did the
Grinch steal Christmas no not not really
but there's sort of a you know an
important message symbolic so called
moral of the story right um and the
archetypal example of this is the
Christian scriptural Cannon these are
the stories that have best approximated
whatever truth is trying to be gotten at
and done it in the most effective and
um
and uh sort of surviving mhm manner um
so yeah I mean it's obviously it's
obviously doing doing doing something
but yeah like like people want their
stories to be true the the the
difficulty is that
like the specific truth claims of
Christianity like Jesus rising from the
dead for
example you like we we can't say like
that didn't happen in in the in the sort
of scientific sense of like I mean we're
doing like historic uh science I mean
you can just say Well it breaks the laws
of physics and they never break but you
don't know that like it could it could
have happened logically speaking you
know it doesn't break any laws of logic
for for man to rise from the dead if if
like we discovered the bones of Jesus
that would be another matter I mean
you'd be able to say well the truth
claims aren't really important to me I
care about the narrative and all but
you'd be like yeah but we have the bones
of Jesus we know that he remained dead
he did not R from the dead didn't Ascend
into heaven like Christianity has got to
be undermined there whereas if it's a
case of like there's this extraordinary
claim which we can't like prove is false
that Jesus rose from the dead but like I
in some way probably don't think it's
true but you can't prove that it's false
it it sort of leaves that room for
people to be attracted to the narrative
and the poetry and the meaning and sort
of say well this is a really
unbelievable claim to me but like I'm
just sort of happy to just to just say
yeah sure why not Jesus rose from the
dead Okay I I choose to believe it asan
her Ali did what I was going to say
about her with the nihilism question is
that
like when she approaches the the
discussion with Richard Dawkins we're
not talking about Russia and wokeism
anymore a little bit you know it comes
up but she's talking about her own
depression she's talking about her own
own sort of feelings of nihilism and
despair and suicidality and that's what
Christianity afforded and like a way to
to get out of for her um so for her it
was it was very much seemingly from what
I understand of her position a response
to this personal nihilism as well I
wonder if I kind of had it in my head
about that debate and the applauds that
people had for her when she said and I
found faith and Faith dragged me out of
my yeah problems
I wonder whether the reason and even to
me I can I can feel it inside of myself
when you hear a story like that from
somebody who has been at a very low
place and has been brought out by a
thing that they believe in uh and then
this guy sat opposite them starts
wagging his finger about this sort of
weird picity but do do you actually
think that Jesus was born from a virgin
and you know and I wonder whether the
Applause I presume that that didn't get
Applause I'm going to guess that Richard
Dawkin trying to come in litigiously
well it was sort of it was a split it
was a split audience in that like
Dawkins and I I I might be
misremembering I need to watch this back
but you know at points he would just
sort of say he said like I am I'm sorry
but this is bigger than you know Comfort
than your personal feelings of what
brings you comfort it's quite quite
harsh but then you're there to have that
conversation and there were a few points
where he basically goes look I care
about what's true I don't you know I
don't care about the narrative and the
beauty and the I care about what's true
and people yeah okay I just wonder I
just wonder whether um you know
the
ambient meaningless depressive anxiety
induced cultural milu that many people
feel in the modern world I wonder
whether that makes them predisposed to
see aan as well good for you look at how
great this is for you I'm so happy for
you that this thing has happened and who
the who's this white guy who's this old
foty doing guy coming in shaking his
finger at you and and pooing on your
parade it'sit it's a bit like the the
sort of the father-in-law at the wedding
coming along and being and and like a
beautiful day you found the person to
love your life and he goes yeah well you
know he doesn't doesn't make that much
does he you know he could could have a
better job yeah it's not I'm not saying
you're you're wrong yeah okay you fine
yeah you're all right mate all right
fine you're true yeah correct well done
you you you've sort of scored your point
on the truth value but you've like
totally ruined the whole the whole day
you know um and that's how I think a lot
of people would feel about that
conversation but look I totally
obviously understand I mean the way that
I'm speaking now I understand why people
make this criticism you can probably
understand too why people are like I'm
soft on Christianity because it seems
like I'm like rally endorsing this
approach I'm not endorsing it I'm just I
I'm trying to explain what I see going
on and what I see going on is an
abandonment of care for like
propositional truth claims and an
embracing of of unifying narrative that
that sort of gives direction to people's
lives and people are more ATT atted to
that I'm still like the reason why I
wouldn't be able to just call myself a
Christian is because I don't believe
that it's true like I I think I'd have
to believe in the truth claims ah but
that's because you are holding yourself
to a particular standard due to the fact
that you've spent the last decade
immersed in it you are also friends with
people who do have a very high bar that
they hold their own faith to I think if
I was to somehow be able to get in and
twiddle with the barometer or the
thermostat with which you would have to
pass in order for you to say Well I'm
cult Christian I believe in forgiveness
I you go to church you've been to church
like you H they're cool you know rock
bands they're awesome pyate Technics
love that God Corvettes great um all of
those things I think you would quite
easily be able to I'm sure that there's
tons and tons of Christian values you
think this is great and maybe if I had a
way to identify that uh during times
when my life is difficult I would be
able to think huh rather than having to
axiomatically why is that people come up
with you need to have your values do you
know your values big personal
development thing you have values and
then you have principles like what is it
that I believe in and then operationally
how do I actually act within each of
these if that's not someone just
recreating their own religion on the
back end of some personal development
book I don't know what is you wouldn't
need to do that you don't need to come
up come up with it from first principles
because you have your operating manual
that's there it doesn't matter about
believing in a thing the problem that
you have as far as I can see is that
your criteria your uh level of uh
certainty and the depth of of certainty
as well that level of conviction is
greater than it is for some people who
are able to bate out their belief in the
tree versus the tastiness and usefulness
of the fruit yeah and there's going to
be a lot more hurdles in the way of like
to believe in the resurrection of Jesus
I don't just have to suddenly become
convinced that there's a strong
historical case for it because I know
that there is I just know that there are
a lot of objections to that as well and
so now I've got to sort of overcome
those objections whereas for somebody
else it might not need to go that deep
for them to have that conviction uh sort
of developed within them
so I I think you know they say God meets
you where you're at right like it's it
would be it would be I mean so many
people spend so much time trying to to
do theology or philosophy and they they
they study intricate arguments of God's
existence some of them extraordinarily
complicated with like 50 different
premises and there's part of you which
wants to say well if that's what leads
you to God that itself seems like an
argument against God's existence like oh
yeah so you can come to know God but
only if you're smart enough and have
enough time to read through this 50
premise argument that finally can yeah
that'll do it for you that doesn't seem
like the way that things would be
designed but it but maybe it's the case
that for those who want to go digging in
that depth they'll find God there but
for those who don't they'll find God
somewhere else such as in you know he
does meet you where you're at the pretty
waterfall or in the the the the sort of
escape from the escape from nihilism so
yeah there's that idea that like you'll
where wherever you look you'll you'll
you'll end up finding God how much do
you think this Christian Revival is
Downstream from Jordan
Peterson
um is there a First mover of the
Christian
Revival hard to say I I don't know about
because Peterson's
religious convictions bonafides they're
so they're so they're so vague and so
non-committal
that I think it would be difficult to to
attribute a lot of it to him although
his like friendliness to Christianity
and the sort of biblical serious that he
does and he must I mean he must have
inspired so many people to to revisit
the the biblical stories especially
Exodus and Genesis Kan and Abel you know
everybody's heard of Kan Kan and Abel
now I wonder if that was the case you
know 5 10 years ago before Jordan
Peterson started talking about it in
every single podcast he ever does um so
that's cool but I don't know
if he sort of inspired this movement I
think in the UK Tom Holland has a lot to
do with it even if uh a lot of people
haven't read Tom Holland the people who
they listen to have um you know what I
mean so like the the actual sort of
Genesis of the thought might be in that
in that in that Dominion thesis that
seeps its way into into a lot of how
many times have we heard the term
judeo-christian values yeah it's it's a
strange it's a strange phenomenon I mean
what are judeo-christian values I mean
like flip open the Old Testament to
almost any page and tell me what you
find and tell me if you think that
Accords with what people would proudly
assert as judeo-christian values of
today they seem to they seem to
contradict each other who else is
perpetuating this wave of Christian
Revival um it depend depends what you
mean so the people I mentioned earlier
there sort of so the Constantin kiss
Douglas Murray's they're perpetuating it
in the sense that they'll I don't know
if Douglas Murray would use the term
cultural Christian but but say Richard
dorkin and Constantin kissen two guys
who will both say I don't believe it's
true but I'm a cultural Christian so
they they're just asserting the value of
like Christian architecture ethic
whatever whatever it is aesthetic um
which for me is of course the same thing
as ethic really um but then on the sort
of like belief front uh someone like aan
her Ali is is a big player because she's
a huge conversion story of someone who
actually now believes in God uh Russell
Brand maybe I'm I'm sure like even if
you don't listen to him he's famous
enough that the fact that he's converted
is like news um
I don't know have there been any other
sort of famous conversions recently that
I'm that I'm missing out they must have
because Al you can dispute whether this
Christian Revival thing is happening at
all and maybe it's just like a bunch of
wishful thinking maybe it's just a bunch
of of of people getting excited because
one or two people have converted to
Christianity again you know like like
who knows it would be interesting I
wonder when the next census comes out or
whatever GSS data if we're going to see
some mild Christian Christian light
thing coming about uh maybe you would be
able to see this in a maybe people won't
even identify as Christian but fewer
will identify as atheist or agnostic or
of no belief um the last sent showed for
the first time less than 50% of the
population called themselves Christian
where in England right so so the big
sort of every 10e census so when was
this do you know this
was um no I can't remember I think it
was 2021 maybe so right Rec yeah so like
so like recently like 2015 or something
yeah they do it yeah something like that
and so we'll have to wait for the next
one but but it's been steadly declining
you know Christianity has been going
down down down down down and so the
project if you look at any of the
statistics the projections are like what
the hell are you talking about Christian
Revival literally the church is being
absolutely decimated no one is showing
up for church tenants you know people
are calling themselves Christians it's
on the it's on the down low you know
Islam is growing atheism is growing you
know all of this kind of stuff
Christianity is completely depleted and
yet there's sort of people are just like
yeah but I can like feel it in the air
man like there's just something
happening and so like maybe at the next
census we'll see that the the rate of uh
the rate of decline slows down maybe it
reverses a bit maybe it holds still and
that itself would actually be quite
significant um I I I always think about
that how much is Just internet dgen Edge
Lord like terminally online people
thinking that their particular Corner
their reality sphere is well this
happening everywhere I remember before
the was what was the last general
election 2019 or it was the conservative
Landslide oh uh yeah sure maybe I don't
know I can't remember anyway I remember
uh stormy tweeted out in support of
Jeremy Corbin yeah that's right and I
remember thinking [ __ ] hell stormy I
mean that like and look at how many
retweets it's got that's stormy and then
Amber that won love Island tweeted out
as well and I thought oh my God like you
know this all of the polls are wrong
this is not going to happen not going to
happen not going to happen and then you
realize that the internet is not the
real world yeah it's the same thing with
brexit and the election of Donald Trump
I remember when Donald Trump got elected
um I must have been what 16 or something
and I just remember waking up and just
being like surely not surely not because
you just because everybody is and it's
the same thing with brexit like it was
like it's why people are like kind of
suspicious of polls now because like
everybody was predicting that this
wasn't going to happen because and and
you again you felt it in the air like
everyone you speak to literally everyone
you spoke to was like brexit is this
nonsense so ridiculous racist and then
it actually wins and you're like oh
right okay because yeah people have
their little Bubbles and I I wonder how
much of this like Christian Revival
thing is that I mean Christian rev like
s like seriously to to the extent that
like you know okay it's different in
America but in the UK If you just pulled
someone off on the street if you went to
a pub and say hey man have you been
feeling this this Christian Revival like
what the hell are you talking about I
mean if you ask them hey you know like
the rightwing Revival that's happening
in the UK they like yeah man it's crazy
see how reform UK has come out of
nowhere and just like started dominating
the polls you asking about Christian
Revival no the fact that it doesn't have
the cultural force it might be
exemplified in the fact that the sort of
new rightwing upand comom upand comom
reform UK who are doing everything they
can to try to take the traditional right
from you know who who now disaffected
with the conservative party and bring
them over to them they haven't tried to
use Christianity as a tool to do that
they haven't mentioned it again what's
even though something close to 50% of
the of England is claims to be Christian
you would think and and presumably the
50% who claim to be Christian are
probably more right leaning I don't know
that for sure but you know it's possible
if that's the case know why wouldn't
nidel farage be like yeah we're a
Christian party we believe in Christian
principles and Christian values realize
imediately got 48% of England yeah
because it doesn't work like that
because there isn't actually this like
upsurge and Christian conviction that's
happening in the country maybe we're
beginning to see the I think Justin
bry's idea is that we're beginning to
see it sort of in the ual space some of
the important thought leaders are
beginning to consider Christianity and
it's sort of in its in its infancy and
what's going to happen is those guys a
bit like the Tom Holland thing where
somebody changes their mind and then
enough people listen to them and it sort
of seeps down and then eventually we
might see something like the general
population becoming it's not happening
yet in my a good example of this I think
would be uh Mary eaat L Perry Mary
Harrington freyer India Nina power Helen
Lewis and in some parts to uh pushing
back against the sexual Revolution and
that was kind of I mean if you'd said
that 10 years ago you'd been like what
the [ __ ] do you mean yeah sexual
Revolution was bad for women what are
you talking about whereas now you start
to see this more and more in normal
press there is literally a thing called
being Perry pilled right um you know I
understand the case against the sexual
Revolution and I broadly agree with it
uh that was precisely the same thing
terminally online DJ
edgelord internet people [ __ ] posting
their way through Twitter and substack
to slowly actually get to huh I think
and I I it would not surprise me if in
10 years time that's the sort of thing
that our parents would bring up it's
like oh yeah yes I've been reading a
little bit an article in the times about
whatever whatever you go like that's the
same same as uh Birthright decline
George guy that we've been hanging out
with all week has got this great
question where he says what is currently
ignored by the media but will be studied
by historians brilliant yeah and I
suppose you would say birth rights birth
right decline I think impact of hormonal
birth control would be another one sure
uh I think uh embryo selection and the
uh sort of onslaught the coming I would
have said AI uh 2018 2017 but but now
it's yeah media's got a hold of it um
what would you say to that question just
trying to think about that I ignored by
the media but will be studied by
historians I don't know I think I think
bir birth rates is not a is not a it's
not a bad it's not a bad option
especially with how quickly that will
presumably like change demographics
um I
mean yeah like in the in the UK for
example a lot of people sort of
celebrate the the growth of Islam um and
there's this big debate where the debate
usually goes I but look how successful
we are and then say but that's not
because you're converting people that's
because you're having more kids you they
are also also converting people um but
they're also just having more kids and
so yeah like
people I would imagine that that will be
something that will be of sort of
Fascination as to why that happened is
so would you say the changing
demographics of the UK would be one yeah
sure but then that isn't the media I
mean not yeah well yeah I mean maybe not
like
a maybe maybe not like a ton but you
people people talk about it it comes up
usually in the sense of like alarmism
usually in the sense of like I mean I
saw a thing today on Twitter of somebody
sort of going around into VI like reform
UK candidates and and them just sort of
saying you know we we need to we need to
we need to take our country back and the
sort of the clever journalists being
like from who well you know the the the
the and it's that typical Street
interview style thing where they don't
know what they're saying and they sort
of say you know because we we'll be
we'll be in we'll be in the minority you
know soon you know whatever and the and
the journalist doesn't like doesn't deny
it or or whatever just sort of is it's
it's like a it's like there like people
are talking about it but sort of Gonzo
style journalism that side eyes thing
yeah but usually it's in the sense of
sort of like you know get a Lo of these
guys but you know it's it's there like
the presence of of the fact that people
think about that is like in the media
whereas like the birth rate thing like I
I think if I didn't know you I wouldn't
even like think of it as a I wouldn't
even like be aware of it as like a
concept right even as something to then
like condemn as alarmism or whatever
like you wouldn't even know it's a thing
Steven J Shaw the guy the original Dude
that I brought on a year ago as far as
I'm aware the best demographer in the
world at this uh just redid his numbers
for South Korea which went from 0.6 to
0.4 now he messaged me from Korea saying
yeah yeah sure the message was kind of
short when he he sends long messages
when it's a long message it's
interesting when it's a short message
it's sad and it was basically I think
the final sentence was they're done like
ker is completely done game over within
the next 100 years for every hundred
Koreans there will
be four great
grandchildren
wow yeah that's um
it's amazing isn't it I mean it's just
it's just fasc and and the fact that we
if we sort of have I mean the thing
about like this kind of stuff is it it's
like maths isn't it you can literally
demography is Ted this is how many kids
are being had you can't make any more
Oney olds is how many people there will
be right like we know it for a fact and
and you're right it sort of doesn't
doesn't really get a mention and I think
it's because the
media the news is is daily the news
talks about what's happening now today
right and this stuff isn't happening now
today it will one day people it's the
most unique until it does it's not going
to be talked about it's the most unique
type of risk it's not an existential
risk yeah it's not in the true permanent
unrecoverable collapse bust romian sense
of the word but uh it it is one of the
most unique kinds because it does not
Galvanize people to look up and see smog
in the sky or forests burning or fish
dead in the ocean it it doesn't
Galvanize people the same way it is a
lagging measure of a lead indicator and
just maths man and it's rever whatever
the opposite of an exponential like I
don't know I it's should be exponential
but down that one yeah it goes down it
goes down but it goes down increasing no
there got be what's the opposite of like
X lari
introvert people are screaming it into
their airpods a couple of mathematics
people are dude I want to say before we
before we finish up imponen it's an
imponen yeah an in rather than an ATI I
think that you're perfectly positioned
at the moment regardless of
how large the breakout of the Christian
Revival thing is regardless of how much
a threat of rising uh Islamic population
is in the UK and the US I think that
you're really interestingly positioned
I've said this you before but I think
you're really interestingly positioned
to uh blend uh a few different areas
that I don't think many people can so
I'm like genuinely genuinely excited to
see what happens next few years I think
that there's like just so much cool
stuff and I love your stuff I love
watching your videos so I'm really
really excited to see what you do thanks
man I'm a fan too as you know um yeah
it's exciting to see that potentially at
least you know the discussion of
Christianity is going to be like back on
the table again because I love looking
at Christianity studying Christianity
looking at the Bible and biblical
scholarship and all that kind of stuff
it's really fascinating but it's not
very like
you know it's I'm lucky I'm in a YouTube
Niche where people are interested in
those kinds of debates and stuff but
like it doesn't have a lot of political
relevance so if this does become a more
talked about you know thing or a
movement or or people are right that
there is some kind of Christian Revival
around the corner then then yeah
there'll be wow are you going to be the
theology consultant for Nigel farage's
new Reform Party is that what you're
suggesting I I am definitely not
suggesting that um but I think there'll
be a lot of interesting commentary to
make from the perspective of like well
how much of this is political and how
much of this is how much of this is
theological I don't know is Nigel a
Christian do he claim to be a Christian
wouldn't surprise me if he does but yeah
like we said earlier the fact that we
don't even know tells us everything we
need to americ Americans the UK right
spitting their Gatorade out Alex okano
ladies and gentlemen where should people
go keep up to date with all of the
things that you're doing um they should
go well they should go to church they
should go to the gym you know they
should go to the library oh they'll find
you in the gym all the time yeah and
they'll probably find me in church every
now and again as well I'm one of those
sort of Philip Len esque chur you're
like a cultural Fitness Enthusiast yeah
I'm a cultural Gym Bro I don't actually
believe in any of it but I you know I
sort of
I'm you know I drink a protein Chi
jimjon yeah I'm Jim adjacent I'm GNA I'm
going to start saying that that's going
in my again it's the Twitter bio every
single time it just grows and grows and
grows um if they want to find my content
um
then within reason is the name of my
podcast uh I've just done a couple of
episodes on the Gnostic Gospels and more
are coming uh with some fascinating
awesome interesting people um but yeah
I'm just Alex aonor everywhere else Alex
aon.com hell yeah appreciate you man
cool you too thank you very much for
tuning in I don't think about religion
all that much but when Alex talks about
it and the history and the different
gospels it's pretty cool I find it
pretty interesting you can watch my
conversation with the one and only Dr
Jordan B Peterson right here it's very
interesting so go on tap it