Video summary
On the twenty-fifth anniversary of September 11th, Richard Gage, founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, presents his investigation into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. As an architect, he expresses profound shock at the building's symmetric, free-fall collapse in under seven seconds, a phenomenon that defies standard explanations involving debris impact and fire alone. Gage argues that the simultaneous failure of all structural columns and the melting of steel and concrete cannot be attributed to thermal effects from fires, citing witness accounts of explosions and forensic evidence such as molten iron microspheres and nanoothermite found in the dust as proof of controlled demolition using explosives and incendiaries. He emphasizes that these findings are supported by a petition signed by over 3,600 architects and engineers who demand a new investigation, while also noting that debunked theories regarding dust composition or directed energy weapons do not align with the overwhelming evidence pointing to deliberate destruction.
The discussion extends beyond the physical mechanics of the collapse to address the broader context of false flag operations designed to manipulate public opinion for regime change and resource theft. Gage draws parallels between 9/11 and other global events, including the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as conflicts in Gaza and the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a pattern where leaders like George Bush and Tony Blair acted with a lack of comprehension regarding the human cost of their decisions. He characterizes certain groups within this narrative as a "Zionist cult" or "satanic messianic cult" that allegedly plans humanity's destruction while hiding behind honest Jewish people, urging viewers to recognize these sociopaths who lack empathy and believe the public is too stupid to question official narratives. Despite the cynicism surrounding powerful figures, he maintains an optimistic view of the internet's ability to spread truth and holds that karma will eventually catch up with those responsible for such atrocities.
Ultimately, Gage stresses the critical importance of sharing this information to awaken the public and hold perpetrators accountable, encouraging everyone to avoid burying their conscience or sticking their heads in the sand. He clarifies that questioning the physics of 9/11 is not anti-Semitic because it relies on objective facts rather than prejudice, criticizing the use of such labels to dismiss legitimate inquiries. The video concludes with a call to action for viewers to like and subscribe to support this rare content, to listen to podcast evidence from an upcoming conference in New York featuring experts and figures like Roger Waters, and to love truth rather than hype. By disseminating these findings, he hopes to foster a society that is aware of the realities behind official stories and capable of demanding justice for the victims of these engineered disasters.
Read the full video transcript
Hello friends. So we have a pretty uh
important day coming up. It's if I'm
correct, it's the 25th anniversary of
911.
And this is a day that didn't just
affect us in in terms of the magnitude
of the event and all the social and
security controls that uh were put in
place afterwards. But also for those of
us that could kind of see through this
pretty much from the beginning, it's,
you know, it's
it's been a tough thing to deal with to
think that there's this amount of
deception
uh in the world and that for the
majority out there, they wouldn't even
know, you know, what's gone on other
than the official narrative. So, I'm
absolutely delighted today to be joined
by Richard Gage from the San Francisco
Bay area.
Uh, Richard Gage, AIA, member of the
American Institute of Architects and
founder and former CEO of Architects and
Engineers
for 911
911 truth. He now leads the charge for a
new World Trade Center investigation
along with his courageous wife Gail at
richard gage 911.org.
I'm just going to play my intro and then
we'll get into it. [music]
[music]
>> [music]
[music]
>> Richard, how are you doing, sir?
>> It's great. Hi, Chris. Great to be here
with you.
>> Well, it's been a long time coming, sir.
I think because
um you know I've been on to this like I
said I think about 2005
I saw that building seven collapse video
and for me Richard that was a smoking
gun that everything else you could try
to justify in your mind that maybe I'm
I'm wrong about this or I'm getting a
bit conspirit but when you saw that
building come down and I'm going to I'll
I'll play the video in in in a while.
Like you'd have to be a fool to think
that that was from a you know relatively
insignificant fire. Um and I knew that
you've been heavily involved all along.
Uh and uh yeah, and I'll just say on a
personal note, I had dinner twice on top
of the World Trade Center windows on the
world back in 1991, I believe it was. I
think I just served in the Northern
Ireland conflict in the the Royal
Marines and my buddy and I treated
oursel to a trip to New York which was
just
beyond small town boy. That was kind of
like a big big thing and and our host
said, "Hey guys, do you want to you know
have dinner on top of the World Trade
Center?" And it was I think it will
always be the greatest meal and setting
that I ever had.
And then years later to be watching
that,
you know, that come down. It was um
yeah, I guess it was a sight to behold
for everybody, but you know,
specifically uh having sat up there
myself. So I guess my first question,
Richard, is like why did you get
involved?
I was angry in 2006. I heard David Ray
Griffin on the radio who's written now
14 books on this subject of 911 and what
really happened there. And boy, I I it
hit me like a ton of bricks. I had never
heard any alternative theory as to how
these towers had come down. And here
this this guy was saying there were
witnesses of explosions like like 118 of
them. And I'm
there's a third tower that came down.
What? I'm an architect. I wouldn't know
if there's a third tower that came down.
But uh sure enough, there was. And uh
we'll I'll show that to you. And we've
got um
I mean I I I wanted to go into
Afghanistan and Iraq and get those
bastards who did this to us. I was, you
know, a flag waving Reagan Republican
and uh this just turned my world upside
down. I had to find out if it was true.
So I did some research, additional
research after watching David Ray
Griffin on the live stream that night.
And I was uh I everything they were
saying, it seemed like it was backed up.
There was a third tower. It did look
like controlled demolition. They didn't
talk to us about it at the American
Institute of Architects. I'm one of
90,000 members of the American Institute
of Architects. So, we didn't get even
one bulletin on this, the third worst
structural failure in modern history
after the Twin Towers. So, yeah, I'm I I
I I
put together a PowerPoint. I'd never
done a PowerPoint.
I had never really spoken in public, but
I brought it to my
firm, the architecture firm that I
worked for at the time, 14 architects
and engineers. They kind of thought I
was nuts uh before I I brought it to
him, but I bought them pizza. And they
said, "You guys got to come in and
look." And they did. And every one of
their hands went up. Oh my god, you're
right. These are controlled demolitions.
Once people see the evidence,
then they get it. And then it's up to
them about what to do. And many of them
do something and a lot of them do
nothing unfortunately. But they all
agree that we're talking about a mass
deception here that we've all been had
the wool pulled over our eyes. And yes,
I got very angry. These are buildings.
I'm an architect. I'm not going to stand
by and
let this deception go on and not do
anything about it. invade two countries
in which a million two million people
have been killed. uh this affecting
regime change in Afghanistan and Iraq
and
uh this and stealing the resources of
those countries
and deploying a surveillance state on
our own people here through the Patriot
Act, the Military Commissions Act, the
National Defense Authorization Act of
2012 in which any of us can be arrested
without a right to a lawyer, a trial, a
jury that this is Not I I'm not letting
this go down. That was 20 years ago.
I've been full-time and and and speaking
now in uh 24 countries and a thousand
presentations
and I'm not going to stop until we get
our country back. I don't know how
that's going to happen, but it's a slow
crawl. But we're making a big effort,
Chris, uh with this year in New York and
uh big conference uh 40 speakers. I'm
looking forward to sharing that
information with you. But that's how far
we've come.
>> Yeah, absolutely. And let's not forget,
you know,
it's um
extremely admirable. You mentioned the
deaths in in the Middle East, but also I
think it's the first time a lot of us
realized that what our military is being
used for and how many of our boys and
girls never came back.
So many joined up because of this event.
It was, you know, a
huge catalyst for people joining the
military. And I know several people that
lost limbs um that died died over there.
And you know, we say we I mean America
and the UK, we say we love our veterans.
Um I I think we just owe it to them to
to find the truth on on this issue.
>> Yeah. And many of them are finding the
truth, too. And it's not popular. It's
not easy to tell people who don't want
to hear this, like me 20 years ago. I
didn't want to hear this, but I
I felt like I was sliding down a very
slippery mud slope, and I I couldn't
stop. I I had to know if it was true or
not. And and by God, uh I've learned a
lot about things other than 911 since
then. uh other false flag operations
where you do set up a war trigger system
to manipulate your own people and into
supporting a war with the help of the
media uh to to affect uh the the uh the
regime change and the stealing of
resources. So
uh no, it's it's not going to happen
anymore. I've now convinced 3,600
architects and engineers to sign on to
the petition demanding a new
investigation
into the destruction of all three of
these World Trade Center skyscrapers.
And um they are all uh on the petition
at our website richardgage911.org.
and we have con convinced many of them
to to go be interviewed and we've
created documentaries. 9/11 explosive
evidence experts speak out was our first
one and we're now creating a series of
12 episodes. Uh first six are done. They
were on building seven and now now we're
going into the Twin Towers. It's a deep
dive with the lawyers committee for 911
inquiry and I teaming up together to
bring these
experts to present their testimony to a
grand jury in the grand jury boardroom
and it's a great setting. It's called
911 crime scene to courtroom. Uh
bringing the hard evidence of 911 to
court and that is available at uh the
website uh here also Richard Gage 911
but also 911c2c.org
and many of them will be speaking at our
conference coming up in New York this
week. 40 speakers all together, family
members, first responders,
uh researchers,
social media influencers,
researchers on false flag events, which
is going to be what we're talking about
on Sunday with the Oklahoma City
bombing, Gaza, COVID, the sinking of the
US, Liberty, all other false flag
events. uh that not all of them. There's
there's way too many to cover. Um but
that's uh that's pretty exciting to have
for instance Roger Waters from Pink
Floyd teaming up with uh Matt Campbell,
the brother of murdered victim jeal.
Um they he though Matt and will be
there, Roger Waters will be there. Brett
Weinstein will be there and uh Jimmy
Door. Um this is all happening next
week. And so I wanted to play you a cute
little uh introduction to that
conference uh with um
uh that that was made with Larry
Silverstein, the developer of World
Trade Center 7, who later within 6 weeks
before 9/11 bought the rest of the
towers and um put massive terrorist
insurance on them. and he missed his his
uh his his appointment with Destiny up
on the windows of the world where he was
every day but he had a dermatology
appointment on the day of 911 the
morning so uh he got lucky and so we
call him lucky Larry but uh can I play
that for you Chris?
>> Yeah let's let's do it Richard.
All right. Uh because this is really
really special. Um uh
Ken
Lucas Kaffenburgger uh created this
little piece for us uh with AI and it is
priceless.
>> Uh Mr. Silverstein,
>> what is it?
>> You might want to see this. There's a
conference happening.
>> A conference? Why the heck do I care?
>> You said you wanted notified of anything
about 9/11 after you saw that video, so
I figured you'd want to know.
>> Oh, brother. Here we go again.
>> It's called Turning the Tide. It says
here, "Four days of presentations,
discussions, networking, and action,
marking the 25th anniversary of 9/11.
>> I knew the anniversary wasn't going to
be easy, but this
>> it's from September 10th through the
13th right here in New York. It seems
like a collection of experts that don't
believe the official story all in one
place.
>> A bunch of crackpot tinfoil hat people.
Who cares what they have to say anyway,
right?
>> It doesn't seem like it. They've got
some pretty important speakers.
>> Oh, yeah. Like who?
>> Jimmy Door, Dennis Cusinich, James
Corbett, Brett Weinstein, and that's not
even half of them. Oh,
>> there's first responders, government
whistleblowers, families of the victims.
>> Ah, come on. authors, filmmakers.
>> I think even the uh timeline junkie guy
who made that video you hate.
>> What? This is insane. At least they
don't have like a iconic rockstar
speaking or something.
>> Well, Roger Waters from Pink Floyd will
be there as well.
This is not good. Debbie,
>> would you like me to buy some tickets on
their website? Maybe you could talk to
them and clear some things up.
>> Oh, no. I can't. Uh I I have a
dermatologist appointment to get to that
[music] I can't miss. Oh, so um your
dermatologist appointment lasts 4 days.
>> What's with all the questions, Debbie?
You're starting to sound like them.
[music]
>> Yeah, you guys got to get uh tickets to
this if you're anywhere near New York or
can get there September 10th. Uh we've
got um
uh an incredible lineup of of of
speakers here. One of them is myself.
I'll be going in deep into the
World Trade Center 7 evidence and the
Twin Towers and and the report. I'll be
part of a series of speakers talking
about the report that Senator John Ron
Johnson has inspired us. He's he came
last year and spoke to the 911 truth
movement and boy uh that was in
incredibly inspiring. He's the as the
chair of the Senate sub permanent
subcommittee on investigations. He he
says he he can do for 911 what he's
doing for COVID and that is have a set
of hearings. So he he suggested we put
all our best evidence in and we've done
that. It's about a thousand pages long.
We'll be presenting it on
uh on Saturday night and that uh is
going to be a very special new
presentation with new evidence that uh
I've never given out before. Um, I'll be
um joined by uh Ted Walter and Mick
Harrison and Alan Merrill and Pierce
Robinson in that project and James Lee
uh will be there along with many others
that I mentioned in those false flag
operations. He'll be talking about
Charlie Kirk, another false flag uh
deception on the part of uh our
wonderful deep state. He'll be
discussing that as will Chris Martinson
uh going into the uh the deep
ramifications of 911 and and looking at
it analytically too. Karen Quicowski
will be there as an intelligence
whistleblower um from the Pentagon.
Powerful stuff. Uh Brett Weinstein uh a
a deep thinker that talks about the the
questions that are raised as a result of
the evidence that we're presenting. uh
how do they affect our our society and
us personally? What do we do with this
information? How do we process it? You
know, the the mass deception on a on a
world scale with the media, the arms
industry, the oil industry, the banking
industry, all profiting enormously and
managing and executing the crime of the
century. James Corbett from the Corbett
Report will be there. um and Brett uh
and Roger Waters as I mentioned uh Jimmy
Door uh comedy um bringing some levity
to a very serious situation but he's
been so incisive and so dedicated about
911. Dennis Cassinich will be presenting
a keynote address on Friday night and
powerful
uh stand that he takes on 911 as a
former congressman. Mary Holland from
the children's health defense will be
discussing the parallels between 911 and
COVID. Nick Bryant, the author of the
Franklin scandal, exposing pedophilia in
uh con Congress. He's been researching
Epstein for 10 years before we knew who
he was. And he'll be exposing that on
False Flag Day on Sunday. Also, as will
Marilyn Nast looking at the deception of
anthrax following immediately after 911.
And then Phil Turney, the one of the
survivors of the US Liberty, he'll be
talking about that in a very serious
way. Uh on false flag day, we have
family members like Bob Mane, father of
Bobby Mlane, who was murdered in the
North Tower, and he'll he's been this is
a 25y year effort of getting to justice
for not only his son, but uh all of the
family members. Eric Lawyer, the founder
of firefighters for 911 Truth, will be
hosting a panel of first responders and
firefighters like Chris Joya, who will
be there talking about his experiences.
uh working the pile and being uh a fire
chief and former fire commissioner of a
nearby New York town. All this will be
MCEd by Jason Burmis, the creator of
Loose Change 911, one of them, and uh
Matavasetti, an anesthesiologist and
engineer. Uh these guys are incredible
MC's for the 911 truth movement. having
to handle characters such as Willie
Rodriguez, the last man out of the
towers, who will be talking about his
experience of saving people.
Firefighters, credit their lives to this
janitor in the in the towers and he
heard explosions below him uh as he was
in the basement. So deep down in the
basement, explosions before the plane
even hit the tower, which he then heard
up above him 7 seconds later, which was
corroborated by the seismic evidence
that we may have time to show. Then we
have Barbara Haner from the lawyers
committee for 911 inquiry. And boy,
she's uh going to be a powerful uh
speaker talking about the the the
efforts that have been made legally in
the court system by the lawyers
committee. Uh Neils Herro will be there.
He'll be talking about the uh eight
international scientists and the study
that he led looking at the dust samples.
Seven independently collected samples.
They find nanoothermite in all of them.
This is an incendiary. should not be
found in any of the World Trade Center
dust. And so he has a whole theory of
how these towers were taken down. Uh so
he'll be discussing that. John Cole has
written a uh made a whole movie uh about
false flag day. That's what we're going
to be calling 911 from now on. False
flag day. And that's what his film is
about. He's an a civil engineer who's
written done many films about the
evidence, the forensic evidence at uh
available to us on 911. Bill Manning was
the editor-inchief of Fire Engineering
Magazine and he is the uh he's been he's
been speaking out for 24 years now
starting with the
the the
his shocking uh reaction to the
destruction of evidence. He says,
"Crucial evidence it could answer many
questions is on the slowboat to China,
showing an astounding ignorance of
government officials to the value of a
thorough scientific investigation.
The EV the destruction of evidence must
stop, but it didn't." So he exposes that
and he's really on it now uh with a
13,000word
document to uh article to the fire
engineering magazine and Rick Bicki who
arrested these curious individuals
uh in the van that had a mural on it
with the twin towers about to be
attacked hit by an airliner.
So surrounding citizens called the
police on just because this image was
down on the street on the day of 9/11
and it's like that's not right. So he
arrested them and he's going to be
talking about that experience and
experiences also in and around the
towers that morning. Richard Grove is a
historian, forensic historian who'll be
talking about the financial crimes of
911. Xander Arena from the architects
and engineers for 911 truth. the
organization I founded 20 20 years ago.
Um he'll be talking about the new
efforts that they're going to be making
and the petition that's going to be
working yet again. So we we have social
um [clears throat]
uh uh scientist uh Rich Ellifitz, PhD.
He'll be talking about how the the the
the world as as a society is has denied
this information collectively and how
they're waking up to it and what some of
the implications of that awakening are.
And personally, the psychologist Robert
Griffin takes on that uh effort uh for
each of us psychologically. He appeared
in 911 explosive evidence experts speak
out with six other psychologists by the
way who really go into why this
information is so difficult to
re wrestle with, to digest, to
understand the implications of. And then
there's a whole panel led by Carol
Brulee and others uh of early on
first
uh early on activists before they were
architects and engineers to help them
give them evidence. Uh they were citing
all of the evidence they had against the
backdrop of the fervor of the pitch to
go to war in Afghanistan and Iraq. And
it was not easy for them in those early
days. And so 25 years later, this is
25th anniversary of 911, we are
encouraging them
uh well uh they are encouraging everyone
to uh we are encouraged by them uh and
that incredible uh effort that they made
so early on against that backdrop. uh
the maker of that Lucky Larry uh film we
just saw. He's making another one now
and he's making a whole series of
cartoons around uh the perpetrators of
911. Lucas Kaffenburgger, he'll be
speaking and showing his series as well.
Pretty exciting. And then activists like
Sandra and Jean Laritana who are leading
uh the way down near building 7 with
handing out leaflets about the
conference on 911 and encouraging people
to come up and see the rest of the
conference. And Ted Walter of course
will be presenting uh uh the the project
uh the pro project for 911 truth and
accountability report that I referred to
earlier. So, don't miss any of that. And
guys, you can watch this for free. Um,
you This is the theater. It's a historic
theater. You can't miss it. Um, it'll be
re re live streamed on the redacted
platform of Clayton and Natalie Morris.
So, we're encouraging everybody to to
watch wherever you are. Drop what you're
doing. see this incredible sets of
presentations
uh on 911 truth uh and donate uh for
sure. And the tickets themselves um are
uh $150 for the whole event and then uh
in in individual days you can get
tickets for students as low as $20 with
ID. And uh if you want to rub shoulders
and a classy brunch and with uh Brett
Weinstein, Jimmy Door, and meet Roger
Waters of Pink Floyd, come to the
brunch. And with as a VIP ticket holder,
you get front of the line uh service and
front seats as well. $911.
That's a donation. It costs twice as
much to put on this event as the tickets
are sold for. So we have some very
generous donors who have helped us and
we need you to help us too. And so
consider that donation as you watch for
free from home too.
The fir the international premiere of
the responders movie is also happening
on Friday. John Kirby's movie with those
who are speaking the truth. Not just um
those who are afraid to speak the truth,
but talking about explosions, fireballs,
uh uh uh incredible explosions going off
uh here and there that the official
narrative denies and and offiscates. Uh
so this is a is an amazing opportunity
for all of us to come together 25 years
later virtually or in person if you can.
What do you think Chris?
>> Yeah absolutely. Can we go back to the
full screen Richard? Is that okay?
Because I
>> Yep. There we are.
>> Yeah. We've got another uh chancer that
we've got to mention.
Uh, friends at home, if you see me
looking across, I'm not ignoring my
guest. I'm showing you stuff on the on
the other screen. I'm a oneman band. One
day, I'll be as big as Joe Rogan and
I'll have I'll have a Jamie to get this
stuff up for me. But at the moment, I
I've just got a cat and she's pretty
useless. But no, let's give uh Howard
Lutnick a shout, shall we?
because um Howard, surprise surprise,
became
um what polit he's in um Trump's
cabinet, isn't it? We call it a cabinet
in the UK. I don't know what you call
your government.
>> Yeah.
>> Um but he's actually uh the 41st United
States Secretary of Commerce.
Um
and on that day after he his uh office
counter Fitzgerald
lost 658
employees
including his brother
and surprise surprise Howard wasn't in
the office on that day. [laughter]
So, um I think you start to see a a link
here, Richard.
>> You have a dermatology appointment, too.
[laughter]
>> Yes.
So, um I'm guessing it would be helpful
to put this podcast out before your
conference if that's possible.
>> Yeah, great. Very important. I mean, I
was planning on doing it on the actual
anniversary, but um the more people that
can be exposed to this, I I I think the
better.
>> Yeah.
>> So, did you want to talk a bit um
about the actual physical,
architectural, structural sort of
evidence? Just I'm I'm talking for
newcomers because a lot of my crowd were
really sort of familiar.
um
with this. But uh I guess for newbies
coming to this and let's be honest, you
know what? A third of the population
weren't even born when this event
happened.
>> Yeah, it's true. Um and you know what?
Um, no matter how many of you are
familiar with the evidence, there are
people you know that are not familiar
with the evidence that are counting on
you and your courage to take a stand
and drip on them, if you will. So, I'm
encouraging everybody to share this
information and Chris's other incredible
podcasts uh with people that don't know.
And that's why we start at the beginning
with building seven because most people
don't know about the third worst
structural failure in modern history. As
I mentioned, most architects don't know.
So, I'm showing you not only to remind
you that building 7 was easily the
tallest building in most of our states,
just dwarfed next to the Twin Towers, so
that you can share this information with
others who need to know. You're not the
end of the line. You're the beginning of
it. You're the ones who people are
depending on and people you know who
know other people.
We've got to change uh our the system in
our country. And and and to to me it was
911 that like I said it hit me like a
head over the two with a 2x4. So this
building was impacted a little bit by
some of the damage and damaged by some
of the debris from the north tower that
came on it. But it's standing fine. In
fact, NIST, the National Institute of
Standards and Technology, who was tasked
by Congress to explain these collapses
to the American people, said this was
not a significant factor in the
building's collapse. So, some of you
haven't seen this and everybody needs to
see it. And note that the East Penthouse
in the upper left has come down in an
isolated event. And then about six
seconds later, this happens. What What
are we looking at? Straight down.
uniformly,
symmetrically into its own footprint in
under 7 seconds at freef fall
acceleration.
Now, that doesn't happen
because of this. What we found was that
uncontrolled building fires caused an
extraordinary event. The collapse of Wal
Trade Center 7 was primarily due to
fire.
>> What? Well, let's look at those fires.
These are the worst fires that we have
in in the in the building. They're few.
They're relatively small and they're
scattered throughout the building and
they're burned out on the floor that
NIST says the initiation of collapse
happened on.
So
the over an hour before the building
comes down and the building their
initiation of collapse theory requires
that the fires burning on that floor.
Well, we've never ever lost any steel
frame fire protected structure
ever due to fire.
It's not happened. This is
unprecedented. Not before, not after 911
when we have all these
fully engulfed skyscrapers. More than
half a dozen of them never come down.
They're fireproof. What can do it? Well,
we can easily see on the left an a
series of known control demolitions. On
the right, building 7. Is there any
similarity? Is there enough similarity
to warrant an investigation into the
possible use of explosives, especially
since fire, the official cause of this
building's collapse, has never brought
one of these skyscrapers down. So, we
have evidence that we need to look at,
right? And we don't have time to go into
all of it because of uh we're but but we
have a five-hour presentation on this
subject full of evidence beginning with
is there a sudden onset of destruction
>> and what you're seeing are high shots.
>> Let's take a look.
>> Now here we're going to show you a
videotape of the collapse itself.
Describe that.
>> Now we're going to videotape the
collapse of this building.
It's amazing.
>> Amazing. Incredible picture word. For
the third time today, it it's
reminiscent of those pictures we've all
seen too much on television before when
a building was deliberately destroyed by
wellplaced dynamite to knock it down.
>> What? Deliberately destroyed by
wellplaced dynamite to knock it down.
That's incredible. Dan's never repeated
those words.
Since 911, we never seen building 7
except for two occasions on mainstream
media. It should have been the most
studied structural failure ever. After
all, it has feature number two. It comes
straight down. Let's look from West
Street. Yeah, pretty straight down.
Pretty symmetrical. Chris, how do we do
that? We have to take out all the core
columns within a fraction of a second of
each other followed about a second later
by the perimeter columns and then repeat
that on every floor synchronistically
timed. That's how the building comes
down so smooth without hesitation.
These are these fires going to have that
level of precision.
Not going to happen. Building that is
damaged on one side is going to fall to
that side and that's just intuitive.
That's what we would expect. And this
says there was damage due to fires in
the northeast corner. That's the way it
should have fallen, right? And then how
fast? Well, as fast as a bowling ball
falling out of the sky, gaining velocity
every second. The definition of
acceleration.
That how does a bowling ball fall that
fast? Because it has no resistance under
it. This building had 40,000 tons of
structural steel under it. Three to five
times stronger than it needed to be to
hold that building up. Where did it all
go? That means not one of those 80
columns gave any resistance. Did these
fires take them out all at once?
Well, what did? Well, we have witnesses
that heard explosions. That can do it,
right? That's what controlled
demolitions do. So,
uh, we have lots of witnesses. This says
there are none. Well, here's here's one.
>> We were watching the building actually
because it was on fire. The, uh, the
bottom floors of the building were on
fire. And, uh, you know, we heard this
this sound that sounded like a clap of
thunder. turned around. We were shocked
to see that the building was uh uh well,
it looked like there was um a shock wave
uh ripping through the building and the
windows all uh busted out and you know,
it was horrifying. Then uh you know,
about a second later, the bottom floor
caves out and uh the building followed
after that and um we saw the building
crash down all the way to the ground. Um
you know, you were in shock and then the
the worst part
>> we were in shock. Yeah, I bet you were
in shock. Um there are dozens of
witnesses. I I'm not going to play them
all to you because but the many many
many witnesses of explosions. In fact,
here's an explosion that's just
completely denied uh by N.
>> Yeah. Here's one of the guys. He can
tell you I'm okay. All right. Here. Hold
on. You want to call You want to call
your mother or something?
>> No explosions.
>> That was in the vicinity of building 7
in the late morning of 911.
So, uh, we have experts that have
studied this f this, uh, NIST report and
produced models that said no way could
it have fallen. In fact, fire didn't
cause the collapse of this building,
says the University of Alaska's top
forensic structural engineer in the
country, Leroy Holy. Thermal expansion
did not result in the loss of support
for the beams and girders. The collapse
of this building was a local failure,
uh, global failure involving what? the
simultaneous failure of all the columns
in the building, not a progressive
collapse as claimed by NIST, completely
pulling the rug out. So, at the
conference, uh you can watch uh we'll go
into the evidence of molten steel and
iron, which is direct evidence of
destruction with incendiaries that can't
be achieved by fires whatsoever. Fires
don't get this hot. They don't melt
steel. They don't cause this corrosion.
They don't cause dripping molten metal.
So that's all evidence of of destruction
with uh
incendiaries and and that's evidence of
of unignited thermite in in the World
Trade Center dust. And yes, we have
evidence of ignited thermite as well.
And that's in the form of these red gray
chips found by Neils Herod who will be
speaking at the
uh at the at the conference. And so we
have all the key characteristic features
of control demolition. Fire doesn't
create any one of these, let alone all
10 of them. So we have 3,600
architects and engineers demanding a new
investigation. And they do appear in our
new series 911 crimes in the courtroom,
which your your audience is probably not
familiar with because it's not as hasn't
gotten out there as far. So, I'll just
play a twominut uh video uh uh an intro
[clears throat] introduction to this and
then we'll uh stop and talk about all
this evidence.
No matter how improbable
the conclusion may appear when you've
eliminated the impossible,
whatever remains, however improbable,
must be the truth.
We're bringing alive in the film the 60
exhibits of the 9/11 WTC evidence
contained [music] in the lawyers
committee's grand jury petition that
have already been submitted to the US
attorney in Manhattan to present to a
special criminal jury. This historic
investigation is ongoing [music]
and there's a role for you in it. Yes,
you can help us bring [music] the real
perpetrators to justice through this
film series. We're bringing together two
dozen experts in their field.
>> They ignored any scenario [music]
involving incendiaries. Demolition work.
You're going to set charges on each
floor.
>> In other words, [music] all of the
interior columns over eight stories came
down. Basically lost it once.
I could make out [music] what looked
like in a science fiction movie. Mol.
Okay.
>> Paused. said that'll be coming [music]
down around 5:00.
>> We'll be filming these evidence
presentations, not only for our filings
with the grand jury, also the
presentation to each of you.
>> We're inviting you [music] to serve as
virtual grand jury during each episode.
Six episodes have been done and six to
go. Uh because what we're going to do is
h get into the twin towers in the
following six episodes. And just let me
leave you with this. Uh why should we
look at the twin towers? Everybody knows
how they came down with plane impacts
and fires, right? Well, just look at the
upward outward arching streamers. The
geometry of fireworks freely flying
structural steel sections weighing four
and eight tons laterally ejected at 80
miles an hour landing up to 600 ft in
every direction trailed by thick white
smoke clouds. Wait a minute. Steel is
not flammable in office fire conditions.
What are these thick white smoke clouds?
Well, we can just look at thermite
ignition. We have molten iron, lots of
it, and thick white smoke clouds of
what? Aluminum oxide ash.
So, I'll leave that with you.
>> [snorts]
>> That is the only possible
explanation for these thick white smoke
clouds trailing these 4ton ton
structural steel sections
impaling themselves in skyscrapers all
around the World Trade Center.
So Richard, on that note, I know I've
done a lot of stuff on 911 over the
years and always the same point gets
brought up.
Um,
how can I say I'm just going to say this
without sugar coating it. Dr. Judy Wood
um directed energy weapon,
hence all the justification.
What why
is it
why or why not is that not being
factored into the um this equation? And
I'll just say now, I don't have a dog in
the fight because I'm not that smart.
So, you know, I thought I'd ask you.
>> Yeah. Thanks. Um, well, first of all,
the steel did not turn to dust. There's
been many agencies and companies who
have analyzed the dust. There is no
steel dust in the dust. It's not found.
So when people say what's all the dust,
all they need to do is look at the US
Geological Survey study of the dust and
others which find up to 30%
of that dust is pulverized concrete
powder. That's what the dust is and
that's what was hurting people so badly.
Very alkaline in your lungs uh for
instance. Um so we have the
pulverization of powder through
explosives which can do that and also we
I've shown you the evidence of extreme
heat which fire cannot account for uh
which also turns concrete to decomposed
hydration products sand gravel and
powder. So we know a that the steel
didn't turn to dust. We know that the
dust was concrete. We also know that the
the Judy Wood in particular uh suggests
that there were no explosions. Well,
we've got uh 200 witnesses of explosions
both in the Twin Towers and also of
building seven.
She says that there's no evidence of
thermite or nanoothermite. Well, we have
presented uh lots and lots of evidence
of ignited and unignited thermite in
found in the World Trade Center dust and
with the evidence of the molten iron
which we go into much greater detail in
our regular presentations.
Um, we know we have the evidence of
previously molten iron microsphheres
found by all the agencies and companies
in the World Trade Center dust, which is
evidence of thermite.
And so that's what they do find in the
dust, uh, molten iron microsphheres.
So, uh, that's why I'm not inclined to
talk about or or or agree with, uh, the
the conclusions or the theories of of
Judy Wood.
>> Is it possible? And I'm just, you know,
speaking as devil's advocate here. Could
it been not be a combination of of the
two?
>> Well, it it I'm not going to say what it
couldn't have been. I'm going to tell
you that the evidence that I've just
described brings us to irrefutable,
overwhelming evidence of thermite and
nanoothermite and explosives,
>> all of which is denied by the proponents
of the deed theory. So, you know, and
the evidence and and the conclusions
they come to are are not even supported
by their own evidence. So, I I I I have
reason to be suspect.
>> Yeah. Okay. Um
Yeah. I mean, I'm I'm
I'm curious to find out more about these
type of weapons simply because some of
the stuff with those Maui wildfires was
just bizarre,
>> you know, like cars with the engine
blocks melted and and it it
you know, I was in Nepal recently and
somebody said to me, Chris, why are they
why are they stopping doing the roofs of
the buildings green? They're all they're
doing them blue now. And I said, "Well,
I don't know about Nepal, but I know the
rest of the world is doing that because
apparently blue uh reflects these
so-called energy weapons or Jewish space
lasers as they've uh they've been uh
referred to. So, um,
I guess irrespective of all this,
everyone's going to ask you who who's
behind it. I think anyone that watches
my channel kind of knows who's behind
it, but what what what's your take,
Richard? Because, you know, and it
doesn't have to be a, you know, a sound
bite or a simple answer. You know, the
world's complex. Um, but when people
come up to you and they ask you that
question, what do what do you say to
them?
>> Well, I say, let's look at what happened
after 911,
uh, these false flag events are war
trigger systems. They're designed to
manipulate whole populations and in this
case the whole world into
going in a direction invading two
countries achieving the the goals of of
of the greater Israel and the project
for a new American century which called
for regional hegemony in the Middle East
which called for a vast increase in the
military budget. But they said in on
their website before uh they came into
power with the Bush administration this
group of neocons including Dick Cheney
uh they had written in the on on the
website absent a catalyzing and
catastrophic event [snorts] like a new
Pearl Harbor these goals are likely to
take a long time. They treat people
>> they treat pe like Larry
>> like they genuinely think people are
idiots, don't they? But I don't think
they factor the fact that people like
you and me and my wonderful viewers like
we see through this just it's so
easy like you know
>> except for another New Pearl Harbor.
It's like you're just writing the script
thinking that you've dumbed down the
masses with your MTV and your
Hollywood. Uh, sorry I'm being a bit
profane here, but you know, let's be
honest, millions of people lost their
lives. So, uh, you know, the odd cuss
word I think is irrelevant. Um, I just
think they honestly I think they come
from a position these these sociopaths
where they've done this for so long and
they've just relied on the fact that the
public are pretty dumb
and with this one
like I think they've got caught out in
the rain. Have you noticed Richard the
whole 911 thing it went a bit quiet
round about sort of five years ago
and then suddenly with the
>> came on.
>> Yeah. With the advance of Tik Tok and
Instagram and people really understand
and of course the medical nonsense that
we were all subjected to for like four
years or whatever it was. Um which is a
massive scam. I won't go into that. When
you understand the science be behind
health, you realize how much they're
they're laughing at the public
population who don't do anything for
their health but blame it on other
people and accept anything into their,
you know, their person that that comes
along. It's it's just all so weak. Um,
but I think off the back of that,
there's been like a resurgence of
interest in 911. And I think youngsters
now are like, "Hang on, if we don't like
get to grips with this, we're not even
going to like know our own future or
when the next false flag event is
happening. Um, we have had uh two since
9/11 major false flag operations such as
the invasion uh if you will of Gaza uh
by Hamas, excuse me, of by Hamas of
Israel. Uh it it's false from beginning
to end. I've done a presentation two
hours on the parallels between 911 and
Gaza. I've also done a presentation on
the parallels between 911 and COVID
which is on our website and I'm
encouraging people to to to wake up even
more. But like these young people you
just mentioned, 911 is I it is so easy
to understand. The evidence I just
showed you can be picked up by a fifth
grader. You don't have to be an
architect, an engineer, a rocket
scientist, or even an adult to figure
this stuff out. But you have to be
willing to look at the evidence and find
people also who are willing to look at
the evidence and then process it. That's
the hard part, right? Processing the
evidence. What does this mean for me?
What does it mean for my country? What
does it mean for society? What am I
going to do about it? How is this
falling on my shoulders? You know, for
me, I'm an architect. These are
buildings. I'm I'm gonna I'm gonna do
something about it. Regarding who's
responsible, you can also look at Kevin
Ryan, who wrote a book called Another 19
Suspects. It is uh really good and and
points to some people much closer to
home than uh far away uh Patsy,
hijacker, jihadis uh who probably
weren't even on the planes.
>> Yeah, absolutely. I'm I'm
very pleased to say I've had three of
your conference speakers on my podcast.
Um Willie Rodriguez, the last man to get
out of the towers alive. I've met Willie
twice now. Uh Jason Burmas, who was a
director, producer on one of the
greatest
uh turning point movies in my life,
which was Loose Change 911.
Um he's he's been on the show. He's a
super chat. And uh James Corbett, as you
mentioned, who came on my show after he
was kicked off YouTube. I'm I'm hoping
he's back on now because they've done
that weird thing, haven't they? Where
they they Yeah,
>> I think they realized they were losing a
lot of business to the other platforms.
So they
>> He is back on now. We just interviewed
our co-producer of the conference, Ted
Walter. an extraordinary uh interview by
the way by James with lots of supporting
great graphics on his part. Uh so be
sure to go to the corett.com
and see that.
>> But one chap I wanted to mention and I
got a huge amount from his research back
in the day was Christopher Bolin or
Bolan I don't apologies Chris if you're
watching. Um, and he said it as it is,
you know, he said, "We're looking at
dual passport holders all in their, you
know, their
>> well, dual citizens."
>> Yeah. Je dual dual citizens in their
I don't how you describe it. The Zionic
cult, [laughter]
Zionist cult. And by the Yeah, this is a
difficult one. I genuinely think they
hide behind honest, hardworking, kind
Jewish people, of which I'm sure you
know, and I certainly know. Um, and I
think they're playing
everybody. I think essentially
this is a,
you know, I don't know how you describe
it. Um, like a satanic messianic cult. I
think if they think they're bringing
around the destruction of humanity as we
know it, they're somehow going to, you
know, get in the hot seat. Um, so what
would you say to anyone that says
questioning 911 is anti-Semitic?
[laughter]
>> I would say the physics of 911 are not
anti-semitic.
>> Do you think that term's wearing out
now? Like I I call it antipathetic.
[laughter]
or um it's it's I just don't think it
works anymore. I I really think
everybody's being played
>> and when you're being played, you don't
do yourself any favors going along with
being being played based on some ancient
playbook or whatever that you know, I
think you you you do yourself a favor by
standing up and saying that building
seven didn't just fall down, did it? You
know, right? And if it didn't fall down
for your kids, it didn't fall down for
my kids either. and let's all grow a
pair and start calling this out for, you
know, for what it is. Um, and let's stop
this the, you know, these socio I call
them sociopaths cuz,
you know, sociopaths lack empathy
and that's what we totally what we see
in this sort of equation. Um, but um,
like I said, Rich, I think they've done
this for so long now, they they just
think people are stupid and they'll get
away with it. And I don't think they
realize, no, we've got like this thing
called the internet and people talk and
people are actually, you know, quite
savvy when it comes down to their basic
freedoms. Not not everybody, of course.
Um, I'm just, you know, I'm optimistic.
I'm optimistic. optimistic for the work
you're doing, all the wonderful people
we've mentioned.
I thought for a, you know, I think
people thought for a time there, this
might go away.
It won't, you know, it um
it won't. I mean, even George Bush, just
the smuggness,
>> what a smug guy. He I don't even think
he has the ability
to comprehend the millions of lives he's
responsible for along with Tony Blair
and you know Woler wits and and and
you know well just the whole cabinet. um
that I I don't even you know I'm not
like out for vengeance or anything like
that but I'm out for the truth Richard
you know the truth because they're all
just big players they'll you know their
karma their karma will come
>> um
but yeah
I think truth truth rules the day on
this one
>> it really does uh and we're getting
there one one piece at a
Absolutely.
>> One neuron at a time it feels like
sometimes.
>> So, is there anything you'd like to add
that we haven't covered before we uh we
say a f farewell and I shall hopefully
see you at some point in the future?
>> Yeah. I encourage everybody to get this
uh podcast about the conference uh and
and the evidence as as brief as it was
to everybody that you know, every
architect and engineer that you can find
uh the media. Don't sit on this
information. Don't let your conscience
um
be buried. It will cause you pain. have
a strong answer for your children when
they grow up and find themselves in a
deep state of full-on tyranny. Uh when
they ask you, "What what did you do to
stop it?" Uh have a good answer. Don't,
you know, don't don't stick your head in
the sand. Don't say, "Well, what can I
do? I'm just one person." Well, you have
a computer
and you can share this information.
That's what you can do.
Yeah, absolutely. You don't bring kids
into this world to let the likes of
Lucky Larry Silverstein decide their
future unless you're mental and then
maybe you've got a pass. So, [gasps]
yes, Richard, you've been amazing. Um, I
just want to take this opportunity to
thank all the wonderful people that
we've mentioned like Jason, Willie,
James, your good self, and and your
wife, obviously, Judy Word, even though
you know coming from a different place,
all people that that you know they they
they've had the balls to say something.
Um, so big thank you to all of them. Uh
friends, I'll put all of Richard's links
below this video. Uh so you can go on
Rich's website, you can find out details
of the conference. If I one thing I
haven't said during our chat is could
you like and subscribe
>> because as you probably guessed,
you don't really get these, you know,
you're not going to hear these kind of
chats on every channel. And um yeah,
that just leaves me to say, Richard,
thanks ever so much again. Stay on the
line. I'm just going to play this out.
Um, stay on the line so I can thank you
properly. And uh, that's it, folks.
Don't believe the hype.
Much love.
>> Truth [music]
with things that [singing]
are not real. And I [music] really want
us to be real with love. Love that last
[singing]
[music] mess.