What is the role of the US–PNG Relationship in an increasingly complex Pacific? - Ambassador Amet
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The relationship between the United States and Papua New Guinea has evolved significantly from a fifty-year diplomatic tradition into a comprehensive strategic partnership, marked by recent milestones such as a defense cooperation agreement signed in 2023 and a mutual defense treaty with Australia in 2025. This elevated status serves as an umbrella for a wide range of developmental aspirations, encompassing infrastructure assistance to build the nation's defense capacity, health initiatives, education programs, maritime security, and internal law and justice systems. While the United States has maintained long-standing investments in major resource sectors like gold, copper, and liquefied natural gas, this new framework formalizes a holistic approach that addresses both national security needs and broader developmental goals, distinguishing it from previous agreements that were more limited in scope.
In addressing the growing militarization of the Pacific region, particularly following China's test launch of a submarine-launched ballistic missile, Papua New Guinea advocates for a balanced approach that respects its sovereignty while engaging with all major global powers. The nation's position is not to choose between competing alliances but to request that all partners, including the United States, Australia, Japan, and others, refrain from activities that contribute to conflict or threaten regional stability. Prime Minister Marape has emphasized that as small island states, Papua New Guinea faces unique vulnerabilities regarding climate resilience, cultural preservation, and maritime resources, urging external powers to respect territorial waters and avoid nuclear tests or military exercises that could negatively impact these critical areas.
Ambassador Amet highlights that the core sentiment of Papua New Guinea's foreign policy is to partner with all nations in pursuit of development and security without being forced to align exclusively with any single bloc. While the country acknowledges and respects the technological advancements and defense capabilities of its partners, it insists that these activities must not compromise the sovereignty or safety of the region. This stance reflects a desire to maintain an open environment where developmental aspirations can be met through cooperation from diverse sources, ensuring that the Pacific remains a zone of peace rather than a theater for great power competition.
The discussion concludes with Ambassador Amet recommending Clive Hamilton's book, *Silent Invasion*, which examines the influence of the Chinese Communist Party on Australia's political, economic, and academic spheres. He notes the book as an eye-opening resource that sheds light on regional dynamics and suggests there may be a sequel addressing the global impact of such influence. This reading reinforces the broader context of the interview, where understanding the shifting geopolitical landscape is essential for navigating the complex relationships between the United States, China, and Pacific island nations in the coming years.
Read the full video transcript
What is the role of the US Papua New
Guinea relationship in an increasingly
complex Pacific region? Today I'm joined
by Papua New Guinea's Ambassador to the
US, Sir Arnold Amet. I'm Katherine Pack,
Deputy Director and Senior Fellow with
the Australia Chair, and this is Pacific
Policy Pulse.
Thank you, Ambassador, for joining us
here today.
>> So, Ambassador, you've been Papua New
Guinea's Ambassador to the US for just
over a year. And in that time, there
have been some really major
developments, not least of which is
Papua New Guinea's first mutual defense
treaty with Australia. Amidst all of
this activity, what is the current state
of US-Papua New Guinea relations, and
what does that partnership look like in
the broader context of Papua New
Guinea's outlook?
>> Yeah, good question. Um, actually the
the defense pact with Australia was last
year in '25,
following our defense cooperation
agreement with the US,
actually in '23. And so, that's elevated
our bilateral relationship with America
significantly, from just being a
diplomatic relationship going back 50
years, to now a very strategic
partnership with
uh the Americans, and then of course
followed by the Australians, who have
been traditional partners for a long
time, and uh others in the region. So,
it has elevated our strategic
partnership with uh
uh the US. And whilst the
uh description is defense cooperation
agreement, it's uh an umbrella for
developmental partnership, very
strategic, and it articulates a whole
range of uh
um national developmental aspirations on
the part of PNG.
Uh the Americans of course have
investment in Papua New Guinea over
many, many years in some of our major
resource developments like gold and
copper with Newmont and LNG with
ExxonMobil. Uh and so whilst uh the a
part of this agreement with the
uh
US is defense uh
that that is a long way down the track
in developing um
some
infrastructure
assistance to our defense force capacity
uh for national security and so the
large range of
uh
areas uh
uh holistic developmental, health,
education
um
maritime security,
internal law and justice and so and so
it's really elevated significantly
uh in writing uh in very specific terms
our partnership with the US that hadn't
been there apart from a number of uh
specific um
uh agreements before.
>> As we think about broader security in
the Pacific
China on 6 July [clears throat]
launched a submarine-launched ballistic
missile SLBM into the Pacific. Papua New
Guinea's Prime Minister, Prime Minister
Marape said we ask all major powers to
refrain from using Pacific waters for
missile testing, military weapons trials
or any activity that contributes to
conflict or militarization. How does
Papua New Guinea view this growing
militarization of the Pacific and what
role should partners like the US,
Australia, New Zealand play in ensuring
the region remains stable and secure?
>> Yeah, I think what you've just said uh
just now that uh
our
uh geopolitical global partners
um
uh uh
development partners, um
uh the Europeans, the NATO alliances,
the Japanese, the Koreans, the um
uh the Chinese, Americans.
Uh our preference, and I think that's
the essence uh and sentiment of what the
Prime Minister was saying, we'd prefer
to partner with all of you in our
developmental aspirations, our security,
and maritime uh
security, and we would ask and uh and
prefer you to respect our sovereignty,
so that we did not have to align with
any of you in particular. Uh we respect
your
uh developments of your defense uh
technology,
but we would ask that you uh respect our
territorial waters and
uh the vulnerabilities of our region.
Uh we're small island states. Uh issues
of um climate uh
resilience, uh our the culture, our
maritime resources, the fishing and so
on that uh
uh this kind of tests, the nuclear
tests, uh do not have the potential of
affecting. And so um
uh and uh we do not get embroiled in
uh in that, we would respect your
um
developmental
uh
activities,
but we would uh ask that you respect our
sovereignty in these respects as well.
I think that's the Papua New Guinea's
position. Uh it's not uh
uh saying to one or the other um
and uh but that uh we would respect uh
your
uh technological advancement uh
uh exercises, but please uh respect our
the sovereignty in our region.
>> Mhm.
>> Well, and lastly, what book are you
reading these days?
>> I've just actually finished
um
an interesting book by Clive Hamilton,
an Australian think tank academic
um called um
Silent Invasion.
Uh
the influence of the communist uh
the Chinese Communist Party into
Australia in the political, in
economical, in academia. An interesting,
eye-opening for
uh us in the region.
And of course uh
the potential for that in many of our
countries globally. I think there's a
sequel to that
uh of a global impact that as we know
um the
Chinese influence
regionally as well as throughout the
world presently.
Uh very interesting. Yes.
>> I haven't read that one yet. I'll have
to check it out.
Well, thank you so much, Ambassador, for
joining us on Pacific Policy Pulse.
>> It's been a pleasure, Catherine. Thank
you.
>> Thank you.
>> [music]