What Does Trump’s Win Mean for YOU? Inflation, Debt, Immigration, Bitcoin, Abortion & AI
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The podcast opens with a discussion on interpreting Donald Trump's election victory, which he won both in the popular vote and the Electoral College after securing key swing states like Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, North Carolina, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, New Hampshire, Maine, and Vermont. The hosts characterize this outcome as "the revenge of the working class," driven by a deep sense of disenfranchisement among Americans who felt ignored or silenced regarding issues like inflation, censorship, and economic reality despite official claims of prosperity. A central theme is that while Trump's rhetoric can be polarizing—described vividly as sounding like fingernails on a chalkboard—the electorate desires authenticity over polished political figures. The hosts emphasize the importance of distinguishing between emotional reactions to events and objective data, urging listeners to establish clear metrics or "KPIs" such as real wage growth, debt control, and inflation rates rather than relying solely on feelings or fear-based narratives that can create echo chambers. A significant portion of the conversation focuses on economic policy, specifically addressing Ray Dalio's theory of long-term debt cycles and the critical need to tame national debt before it leads to currency devaluation and loss of reserve status. The hosts express strong support for Elon Musk's proposed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), viewing him as uniquely qualified due to his entrepreneurial background in optimizing operations, though they acknowledge political realities may limit immediate cuts like a $2 trillion reduction. They argue that the government should not directly generate revenue but rather create an environment where businesses thrive, and success must be measured by whether the middle class can save money for retirement without gambling on volatile stock markets. This leads to a discussion of Bitcoin's potential role as a stable store of value akin to gold, offering financial security against inflation for those who cannot afford complex investment strategies or are tired of market volatility. The dialogue also tackles social and geopolitical issues, including immigration, abortion rights, and international conflicts like the wars in Ukraine and Israel-Palestine. The hosts note that while Trump has made bold promises regarding ending these conflicts within his first 30 days as president-elect, success will depend on navigating complex diplomatic landscapes without alienating allies or provoking further violence from foreign actors like Iran. On domestic social issues, they highlight the stark demographic shifts in voting patterns, particularly among white women versus Black voters and Hispanic males versus females, suggesting that different groups are experiencing vastly different realities rather than simply holding opposing political views. Regarding abortion, Trump's refusal to support a national ban aligns with his broader strategy of focusing on economic metrics over ideological purity, allowing states more autonomy while avoiding the polarization seen in previous administrations. Throughout the episode, there is an underlying tension between emotional responses and first-principles thinking, illustrated by examples ranging from Pomeranian dogs barking at each other to historical parallels involving JFK's assassination fears surrounding Trump's presidency. The hosts advocate for "steel-manning" opposing arguments—articulating them as strongly as possible before refuting—to avoid blind spots caused by tribalism or fear. They conclude that democracy will not end but requires active engagement with diverse perspectives and a commitment to measurable outcomes like human thriving and economic growth. Ultimately, the conversation frames the next four years as a test of whether new leadership can deliver tangible improvements for ordinary citizens through fiscal responsibility, regulatory reform, and transparent governance supported by emerging technologies like AI and blockchain.
Read the full video transcript
A lot of people wondering what a Trump
victory means, especially given that he
won the popular vote and the electoral
vote, and we are going to talk about it
today. Immigration, debt, inflation,
Bitcoin, abortion, and AI. Let's get
into it. Drew, welcome.
I'm excited to be here.
Are you?
I am.
I'm not sure if I get that from your
face right now, Drew.
I'm going to be honest.
You know, it is what it is. I just I
feel like it's nice to know. I like the
anxiety
when you think about nice to know nice
to know what? Where the country is?
Nice to know that it's over. The The
votes are counted. Trump won.
I I can I Now I can reframe my mind and
I can live my life. But this
Yeah, this is one of the important
things, something that you and I talked
about in a previous episode is run the
thought experiment. So that it was easy
enough, I think, for all of us to say,
"Okay, wait a second. Right now I don't
know. There's a ton of uncertainty." But
run the thought experiment. If they got
elected, then where does my emotion go
after that?
That way you understand at a visceral
level what the stuff really matters to
you. And so I think the way that people
need to interpret this is this really is
a referendum on the government and the
way that we've been running it for the
last 4 years, where people feel like,
"Hey, wait a second. You're telling me
that the job numbers are great. You're
telling me that the economy is great,
but when I go into the grocery store, it
doesn't feel great. You're telling me to
sit down and shut up. You're censoring
my information. You're saying that these
points of view can't even be heard." And
I think a lot of people really felt
disenfranchised by that. I think we have
a banger clip to this effect.
I'm interpreting the results tonight
as the revenge of just a regular old
working-class American, the anonymous
American. They're not garbage.
They're not Nazis. They're just regular
people who get up and go to work every
day and are trying to make a better life
for their kids, and they feel like
they have been told to just shut up.
The revenge of the working class.
Yeah, that's how it felt to me.
I like that a lot. I think that's really
a great way to characterize this.
There's this whole notion of the country
is ultimately run by elites and I think
in many ways that is true. What we're
witnessing though is the breakdown where
there's finally an avenue in new media
for people to talk about this, to be
able to point to it, to say this is
exactly what's happening, for people to
be able to walk into a grocery store and
film it and say, "This is absolutely
insane. This is outrageous." For a song
like uh Rich Men North of Richmond, for
that to pop off and go hyper viral,
there are ways for these voices that
traditionally would never be able to get
onto a major network to say their piece,
they're able to go out and make known
the way that they are thinking and
feeling in this moment. And when you
give people words to put to the thing
that they're going through, or you give
them a meme to capture how they feel,
now you've really got something. And
Elon tweeted out this morning, "You're
the media now." And I think that
understanding what that means,
understanding guys that all of us are
now able to say the things that we're
thinking and feeling, and that becomes
fodder for other people to organize
their own thoughts. That ultimately is
what gets me excited is I want people to
have a way to think through these
problems, to not be beholden to their
emotions, to step outside of that and
say, "Okay, hold on a second. Where am I
trying to get to?" I want to be able to
walk into a grocery store and buy
things. I want to be able to take care
of my family. I want to have a thriving
middle class. And so that idea of the
revenge of the working class really
resonates with me because ultimately
when you have a thriving middle class,
when the economy is growing, when people
feel like, "My kids' lives are going to
be better than mine,"
you're in really good shape. That feels
like if I had to really sum up what this
moment is, it's, "Hey,
I have been promised that if I do all of
these things, go to school, get a good
education, keep my head down, be a hard
worker, that my kids' lives are going to
be better than mine." And that just
isn't coming true largely because
whether the elites are sinister or not,
um there is
a sense that I know better than you. So,
this is what I lovingly refer to as the
dumb voter problem.
Mhm.
Every political party has to deal with
the dumb voter. And so, do I believe
that I know better than them? Or do I
believe that we need to let all voices
be heard? And I think the vote is that.
There are people who still believe I
should get to control what you think,
what you see, what you say. And then
there are other people that say, "Nah,
you just got to let people speak and let
the chips fall where they may."
Where do we go from here? What what's
next?
All right. So, now this is getting
elected, as crazy as the election was,
getting elected is the easy part. Now,
actually doing good policy that has
positive outcomes is going to be
difficult. And
all kinds of people who were excited to
see Trump get elected are now going to
be like, "Hey, tick-tock, [ __ ]
Like, where where are my prices coming
down? Is this actually working?" Um is
he going to lean into the crazier parts
of his rhetoric or is he going to
navigate like a moderate? So, now it's
going to be rubber meets the road. He
has said so many times, even as
president-elect,
"I'm going to be able to shut down the
war in Ukraine." All right. Time to put
up or shut up, right? And so, here's
where I think we're going to see this is
not going to be as easy as any
politician wants you to believe when
they're campaigning. So, please, boys
and girls, do not forget that. Like, you
got a lot of promises made, but now we
want to actually make good. If we cannot
make the middle class thrive, we are
going to be back here in four years
wildly divided. This really has to be a
very clear metric. What are we going to
do to ensure that wages are beginning to
rise for the middle class, that people
are feeling better about their lives?
Because when they project out, they say
life is going to be better for me a
year, five years, 10 years from now than
it is today. Life is going to be better
for my kids than it is for me. So, that
my kids when they're 20 are going to be
better off than I was when I was 20.
Now, if you can get the country to feel
that based on grounded things in the
real world, the price of gas, the price
of bread,
um job opportunities, am I getting
promoted, what are the educational
opportunities, how are we doing, where
are we faring as a nation on KPIs that
matter,
things are going to be great and 4 years
from now we're going to feel good and
everybody's going to be
um in a positive frame of mind. But, it
has to be measurable things. And now it
can't be campaign promises, it has to be
things that are delivered on. And I
think he's going to struggle. I think
the American system is designed for it
to be hard to push things through. So,
we're about to find out whether he and
this group of people that he's
surrounded themselves with can build
coalitions. And that to me is a huge
question mark on Donald Trump. He
certainly was not able to do that well
first presidency. He's extraordinarily
good at triggering people and dividing
them. And so, that to me is the big
question mark. Now, I'm a big believer
in gridlock, so I'm not
worried about that so much. Um I think
it should be hard to get things through
uh so that only a select few things get
through.
But, that's going to be the real
question. Can we turn things around for
the middle class, for working people in
the country?
Honestly, he has a a path ahead of him.
He already won the Senate, he got the
Senate, and it looks like he's going to
get the house. So, he'll have complete
control of the government. Not meaning
that he can strip away constitutions or
take away amendment rights. But, if
there is a valid bill that needs to be
passed, it should be no problem. If he
did want to fund a war or remove funding
from a war, it shouldn't be a problem.
So, let's see if he actually brings RFK
and Elon and Tulsi and Vivek and all
these other people together and really
put them in place to do something,
because he doesn't have the resistance
that typical people do when they get
into office. Biden the last 2 years has
been fighting the uphill battle. We all
remember the classic Obama gridlock, so
at least from now until 2026, it's all
on Trump. If he does what he says he's
going to do, if his plans are executed
efficiently, he shouldn't have that
resistance from the government. So, at
this point it's a wait and see.
Yeah, and now that sequence of words I
wouldn't blame anybody for saying I have
legitimate fears about that. And so I
was saying before the election, the only
thing I don't want is a judiciary,
house, senate, and president all in
alignment with one party. And so the
fact that we've ended up there, I mean
certainly I read as again the revenge of
the working class. It's people speaking
very clearly about this is not working
for them. Young men have been just
isolated beyond belief.
Uh and so
as somebody who I'm wildly apolitical, I
just want results. I'm like, okay,
there's like that's a message that's
loud and clear. And let's make sure that
we don't get lost in data that can be
spun. And we also, cuz you do need that.
You need the data. You need measurable
things you can speak to. But you also
need to go talk to people about like
what is the experience on the ground?
Where you at? And given the world of
social media, this becomes easier than
ever to get a pretty broad swath uh a
sentiment that covers a pretty broad
swath of people. Um but I think that's
going to be very important that we be
careful that having that kind of grease
shoot can create problems.
Let's take the emotion away from it.
Let's take the feelings away from it. He
won the popular vote, any one key
battleground states. He got Wisconsin,
PA, Georgia, North Carolina. Like these
are usually the states that it takes
3:00 a.m. two recounts. We don't know
when these votes are coming in. He was
just picking them up one by one by one.
And it as of right now, he's going to
sweep the swing states. That's unheard
of. And just to what the what the clip
we just referenced, this was the first
time in 20 years that a Republican won
the popular vote. So they just say you
know, that person's not smart enough or
these are dumb voters. Like this is a
clear indicator that this isn't he
strategically beat them. He just had one
good win and one good run. No, this is
the country clearly saying, both on the
popular vote numbers and on the
Electoral College numbers, there's no
hesitation, there's no doubting. They
didn't want Kamala, they wanted Trump.
Now, I want to say, when Trump speaks,
it's a bit like fingernails on a
chalkboard for me.
But, I take this vote as a commentary on
I don't want a slick politician. I don't
want somebody who
every line feels rehearsed. I want
somebody that can sit down with Joe
Rogan for 3 hours, shoot the [ __ ] say
what they think, and not feel like, and
this was the thing that freaked me out
about the Democratic run at all of this.
And I won't even say Kamala Harris,
Kamala Harris always felt like a
figurehead to a blob that I didn't know
who they were, I didn't know what they
wanted, and
I think a lot of people feel that. They
feel like I want a candidate that he
might be a little loose cannon, but at
least I know what he thinks. He's not
afraid to go into the lion's den. He's
not afraid to to have hard
conversations. He's not afraid to pop
off the top of his head. He is like
He is like the world's worst freestyle
rapper. Like, he will say whatever he
thinks.
Uh it doesn't often rhyme, but at least
you can figure out how does his mind
work.
And I remember last time, I saw the
whole thing where he was like, you know,
is there going to be a way I don't think
he said inject bleach. But, let's just
say for a second that he literally said,
"Is there a way to inject bleach into
your vein and get this to work?" That's
somebody who's trying to get down to
first principles, okay? I'm not saying
Trump is a super genius, but I am saying
that's how these things work. Like, if
you're trying to find a solution,
whether you're so I I've done this as
writers groups, you come in and you say,
all right, dirty pitch, bad idea,
whatever, and you just don't judge me
right now. Let me just get the ideas
out.
Yeah.
Um and so, he doesn't have that polish
that people like from a politician, but
you can see he's actually trying to
figure out like, "Okay, wait. How does
this connect to this? Is there going to
be a way to do that?" And when you have
somebody running through those
hypotheses, as long as they're not on
stage like rolling up their sleeve with
a vial of bleach being like, "Well,
let's find out." Or worse, rolling up
somebody else's sleeve.
Um,
I think people want that. They want the
just sort of naked he's just a dude.
He's a dude with the gold toilets.
But he talks like a guy. But this is
this is I want people to interpret this.
He Dude, he's a billionaire who could
not be more detached from everybody else
in terms of how he lives his life.
I can't relate, okay? And I'm filthy
rich. But the way that he talks, you
feel like, "Oh, I'm actually talking to
him. He actually runs the country." And
there's I think profound unease that
people have with the other alternative,
which is totally buttoned up. But is
there like if I peel away your flesh,
like what's underneath? You know what I
mean? And I think people are freaked out
by that.
I think you nailed it after the Rogan
interview calling him like that uncle on
Thanksgiving that like I don't see you
stole from you.
Yeah. Yes.
I was trying to give you credit, Tom.
well, I try never to take credit for
something that's not mine. But yeah, the
funny uncle that you think is a little
unhinged, but
It's like yeah, like ah, he's cool. All
right, I'll see him in a couple months.
Like he has gold toilets. He lives in a
penthouse overlooking the Hudson. Like
he is literally on an island. He's he's
away from everybody. But yet he's more
relatable to people in the middle in the
middle of America. It's amazing.
Bringing it back down to like grounded.
I know there's a lot of headlines.
There's a lot of news. There's a lot of
emotions. I think Van Jones is crying on
CNN again.
really?
He always cries.
What I'm really trying to get to is like
what does this actually mean? I know my
Bitcoin is up. I'm excited for my crypto
bros out there. I know Aiden Ross is
excited after me winning that bet.
out as well. Aiden Ross got shouted out
by um
uh oh god UFC Dana White.
Oh Dana White, nice.
So I I know a couple people are really
happy but
50% of the country isn't happy. 50% of
the country is worried about their
reproductive rights. They're worried
about if they're going to get raided.
They're worried about if they're going
to be out on the street. There's a lot
of legitimate fears. So let's just
ground it for a second.
Hold on.
Yeah.
There's a lot of legitimate fears or
there's a lot of fears? That I think
Let's dig into that.
Yeah, that's the real question. I think
right now everybody has to write down. I
would highly encourage you guys to write
down. What is the North Star? What are
you aiming at? Like for me it's very
easy.
If Trump doesn't get inflation under
control, if he does not get the debt
under control, if he doesn't go in and
make the government more efficient, if
he doesn't actually let RFK and a team
of people go in and make America healthy
again,
it's it's nothing but a sea of red flags
for me.
If he comes in and he starts attacking
political opponents, red flag. So there
are things that you can mark and say,
"Okay, wait a second. Are these things
happening? Yes or no?" And if they are
happening, then now all of a sudden all
those fears were legitimate.
But the whole idea of a preemptive
strike is a mistake. Going in and
assuming that this guy is going to act
like Hitler when he's already been
president for 4 years. He actually he
says crazy rhetoric but he governs like
a moderate. So I don't believe that we
have reason to think that
it's all going to break loose and it's
going to get crazy. So write down the
things that are the metrics by which you
are going to judge success and failure.
And then if you see things moving in the
wrong direction, now it's like, "Okay,
that fear is valid and you can start to
lean into it." But when people just let
it be this amorphous blob of I have a
bad feeling and you said a bad thing and
my friends are reacting, people can get
themselves caught up in a stream of
emotion that causes them to be
completely blind to what's actually
happening. And I'll give you an example.
The thing that I worry about for people
that are in the never Trump category is
my two Pomeranians.
Now, when we had one Pomeranian, it
would bark, you would show it there's no
problem, it would calm back down.
When we decided we were going to get a
second Pomeranian, I was like to my
wife, "Hey, just so you know, what's
going to happen is the first one's going
to bark, the second one is then going to
bark, and the first one's going to be
like, 'Oh my god, there must really be a
problem.'"
But wait, the first one was the one that
was like, "Is there a problem?" Then the
second one chimed in, which convinced
the first one, who no one would have
barked in the first place had the first
one not spoken up, to now think there's
really a problem. This is what people
mean when they say echo chamber. So, you
get in there and you're just in this
loop of like, "Is there a problem? There
might be a problem. There is a problem
cuz you just said something." And now it
goes back and forth, back and forth. If
you have a document that says these are
the things that I'm actually worried
about, and then it's like, "Okay, if
we're moving towards that, now you can
keep it about the facts, you can keep it
about the data." This is how you don't
blind yourself in a company where it's
like, "There's a KPI associated with all
of the big things we're trying to
achieve, and we either are or are not
moving towards them." If people can
anchor themselves like that, we'll
navigate this time well. If they can't,
it's just pure emotion, it's going to be
a nightmare.
100% well said. What do you think is
next for the economy? Um I mean, we
talked about the five different forces
that are playing on it.
Yeah, so I think Ray Dalio is just
absolutely correct. And if you want to
understand what's going on with society,
you need to understand the big debt
cycle. And so, if you look at the last
500 years, the rise and fall of these
different empires is hyper predictable.
You can map it out on a graph. And when
you simplify the graphs, it's absurd how
they just repeat and repeat and repeat.
So, what's next for the economy is if
you cannot get the debt under control,
literally nothing else matters. And I
don't know how to say that more
directly. If we do not get the debt
under control, this country is on a
one-way path to destruction. We will
lose our ability to have the reserve
currency, that will become something
else, almost certainly born out of
BRICS, but we will lose that privilege.
And as we lose that privilege, we will
not be able to pay it for the things
that right now we can just make money up
out of thin air. We can um essentially
socialize the costs for our own spending
across all of the people that hold debt,
including foreign nations. And so, it's
an extremely privileged position. The
problem is every single reserve currency
throughout history has lost that
privilege because of what we're doing
right now. And if you look at the graph,
the amount of debt that we have
skyrockets into the sky, and it overlays
almost perfectly with the amount of
money printing that we're doing.
And if we don't tame that beast, we're
in trouble. So, this is why I think this
is why for sure I'm excited about Elon
Musk coming in, and the whole idea of
the Department of Government Efficiency
is you even though
it will be very disruptive to anybody in
the government that gets let go, you
must, for the health of the entire
organism that is the United States, you
must get the debt under control. You
must get an efficient return on your
capital.
And this is why mapping out what you
actually want to see happen becomes
critical. So, as we reduce expenses in
the government, are we actually
increasing GDP as one example? Because
the hypothesis goes that as you free
talent from the government where it is
only able to spend other people's money,
and it's not actually able to directly
generate revenue, there are
complications there about good uh
government regulations, light
regulations create the environment in
which companies can thrive, but I want
to remind everybody it's still you need
companies to thrive. So, the way that
the government sets things up is
incredibly important and it matters a
lot, but they don't directly generate
revenue. They simply create the soil in
which the economy of the the business
generators in the world are able to
thrive.
So, as we back off expenses there and
done well and Elon's thrown out ideas
that I think are really they have
potential. They're just ideas right now.
Um
as they do that, are we actually making
things better for the middle class? And
the more that we can simplify it and
look at very simple things like are real
wages going up? This is where you have
to understand the difference between
nominal and real, which gets me into a
whole thing that people make this stuff
sound more complicated than it is, which
is exactly how people get bamboozled.
Anyway,
that's going to be important. What's the
metric? I will simplify it as
uh
can the middle class save?
Okay, that's very important. This is
where we get into Bitcoin. Can the
average person save their way to
security or must they gamble their way
to security in the stock market, which
is what they're being forced to do right
now? This is not anti-stock market. I
love it the most. Got a ton of money in
the stock market. Yay! I love the way
that the capital markets work. It's
unbelievable. However, it should be
optional and right now it is not
optional. Right now in America, if you
want to retire, you have to gamble. It's
insane.
It's insane.
So, if they don't take huge strides into
reigning the debt in, we're we're really
in trouble.
Inflation, obviously hugely important.
And even if we're only at 2.5 instead of
2%,
that's already bad. And by the because
if you run the math on that, it's what
25% over. It's not some small amount,
even though when you go two 2.5, it's a
really big deal. It's 25% over. Uh so,
be thoughtful about that. And I should
say I should never do math publicly, cuz
I'm terrible. So, if it isn't exactly
25%, you guys will forgive me.
Um that's going to be really important,
getting that down. And making sure that
the things that people interact with,
cost of energy, cost of food, cost of
education, that stuff is huge. Return on
a home prices, good lord. Um what are
just the normal basket of goods that
people interact with? Stop manipulating
the CPI.
Okay? Stop manipulating the CPI, which
is more sinister than people realize.
Check out my boy Eric Weinstein for a
breakdown on that. Uh manipulating the
CPI is legitimately evil. They need to
stop doing it, so that people can see
what inflation really is. And then, if
we can get that in line, start freeing
up some of the talent from the
government, get them back out into the
public sector, lighten regulations on
the public on the um companies, so the
companies can grow and thrive, that they
can get bigger and do better things.
Um
those are going to be the key. There are
some
international policy stuff that I think
is going to matter a lot, but I'll I'll
put a period on this part.
You You took the baton, cuz that's
exactly where I was going next.
He did talk about ending the Ukraine war
in his first 30 days, like while he was
still president-elect. He did talk about
how I feel like his Israel-Palestine
take, that he was going to bring peace
to the Middle East, wasn't necessarily
committal.
Um I know that he is team Israel. Um
and that's a whole 'nother can of worms
I do not want to open.
Uh so, do you think that he will see we
will get out of these wars, or at least
be less war friendly than we have been
recently?
I think we'll be less war friendly, but
I will be very curious to see what he's
able to move. So, this is where now I
put my tinfoil hat back on and go,
"Remember, everybody, Trump has to
survive 4 years." So, I have a very bad
feeling that we have not seen the last
attempt on President Trump's life. Um
that that I hate a lot. I hate that that
is a true statement. Um
Now, we'll see.
Hopefully, the temperature settles down
because he won the popular vote.
Hopefully, that just sort of dissipates
a lot of this energy. Um but when you've
got Iran trying to kill President Trump,
now you're in a position where you've
got foreign actors that want to see your
president taken down. Um if you read Oh
man, I forget the exact title of the
book right now, but JFK and the
Unspeakable, I think, which is all about
what got JFK assassinated. Uh I worry
that Trump is stepping on similar things
as he goes up against the uh
military-industrial complex. So, that
scares me a little bit. Uh but we'll
see. So, I think he's going to have a
harder time ending the Ukrainian war uh
than he thinks, but hey, he made a bold
claim, and now we get to see whether
he's able to pull it off or not. Lord
knows, I hope he can. Just
like he said, I want people to stop
dying.
Uh when it comes to Israel-Palestine,
that is I'll be very curious to see how
he plays that as he made such tremendous
progress with the Abraham Accords uh
before he went out of office. Will he be
able to get that going again? I don't
know. Uh but if he can,
it'll be very interesting.
Yeah, there's a lot of black bad blood
there, so his work is cut out for him.
Internally or externally?
In mid- in the Middle East, like
Oh oh, bad blood between the two sides.
Yeah. Yeah, so yeah.
the two sides cuz now it's spread to
Yemen, it spread to Jordan, it spread to
Syria. Like it's it's no longer just
this country versus this At least it was
a Gaza conflict a couple years ago a
couple months ago.
Yeah.
I don't think it ever was just
Israel-Palestine.
and I just hear Dave Smith correcting me
in my back of my mind, so you know. We
we like to over-index on October 7th as
being the first domino when there were a
couple other dominos before that that
tipped that one over.
A couple.
There I mean, this is now going back
thousands of years, but um honestly, I
don't think any of that matters, and I
will say the thought experiment in terms
of actually being able to get to the
other side of this, I think it's a
thought experiment that no one will run,
and and what I'm about to say is sort of
in that naive camp, but it's always
important to me to anchor myself in how
the human mind works. So, if you look at
all of that is simply you came into
existence right now,
Mhm.
and you're a flesh-based AI, and the
matrix is real, and all you all that
historical context is simply to generate
the emotion that you need to move
through the world,
um I think people would be able to think
through this a lot better, because
here's what I want people to understand
about emotions.
Humans are a very complicated animal,
and
you you will never be able to perceive
the world the way that it actually is,
and so the only way to navigate that
world is to have an emotional reaction
based on the context you're in so that
you can take very rapid action.
Otherwise, you would constantly be
paralyzed by indecision, because the
world is too complicated It It is quite
literally impossible for you to take in
all the data of the world that the world
is presenting you. It's It's not
possible. And so, the only way that
we're able to move is through emotions.
The problem is emotions are taking
incredible amounts of data and
condensing them down to this incredibly
small throughput to get you to take
action. And so, people believe that
their emotions represent an objective
view of the world, and it simply isn't
true. There's a really great Thomas Soul
quote about this that I'm going to
paraphrase. The problem isn't that
Johnny doesn't know how to think. The
problem is that Johnny doesn't know what
thinking is. He confuses feeling for
thinking.
That's all of us. All of us think, oh, I
feel a thing, and therefore, this is
accurate, and this is true, and I'm just
going to march forward, and this is why
I always encourage people to have KPIs
so that you don't get blinded by, oh,
this feels right, and so I'm I'm to keep
doing this. So, what you're seeing in
the Middle East is nobody's able to let
go of anything. It's like a gang war.
It's well, you killed my brother and all
I can think about is that and so I'm
going to kill your brother and your
father and it's just this ever
escalating thing. So, I really think
that again, just to stay on I actually
believe this is true even though I know
how horribly naive this is once rubber
meets the road because people are in the
grips of their emotions.
But, the only way is to switch the
emotion that they're in the grips of.
What we have to do in the Middle East is
get people to focus on I want my child's
life to be better than mine is and I
believe that's possible. And once you
get people to believe that in the here
and now and I trust me, I get it the
martyrdom and the belief that actually
dying for a cause is is a part of this
equation.
But, nonetheless, it doesn't change. If
you can get people to believe that I can
make my child's life better here on
Earth, now all of a sudden that will
realign all of their behaviors and that
I think is why the Abraham Accords were
successful in the beginning was you just
got everybody focused on economics. And
if there's a real economic opportunity
here and we really could make this a
better place to be and that life on
Earth could itself be
amazing and this is why I think Dave
Smith is so right when he says, "Look,
as long as they feel like they live in
an open-air prison,
it doesn't matter what Israel's take is
on it. They're
that doesn't feel good and they don't
believe that their children's lives will
be better than theirs. So,
then it it really does become about
those you did this to me and so I'm
going to do that back to you.
We've been on X all night retweeting
sending like memes and things like that
back and forth. But, there are there is
a a little bit of a sentiment on there
that this might be the end of democracy.
So, what do you say to those people?
Okay, so I think that even Elon was
probably overstating it. I have fears
about people shipping people in to
change the demographics of a given area.
However, if you can actually make
people's lives better through better
policy, then they suddenly don't need or
necessarily even want the handouts. So,
I don't think this is going to be the
end of democracy. I don't believe that
that was true whether Kamala Harris won
or Donald Trump won. This is really
about identifying what are the problems
that we have. How do we recognize none
of us see the whole picture? And this is
the thing that scares me. I know we have
a a clip from Oprah as just one example
of people who believe this. But, going
back to what I was saying about
emotions, people are in the grips of an
emotional read on a situation. They
trust that emotion to mean that they are
correct. They don't distrust themselves,
which I think is one of the most
important things anybody can do. Um my
election message to everybody before the
election was, "Look, no matter who wins,
I'm sending you all love. I want good
things for you. And PS, by the way, even
though I have a take, I don't have a
monopoly on truth. Nobody does. And so,
anybody that's making those kind of
bombastic statements,
I hope they mean them sincerely, right?
Cuz you want to say what you believe.
I'm never going to be afraid to say what
I believe. But, I want everybody to
always understand me in the larger
context of I simply want to give you a
string of logic that you can follow from
my base assumptions, my value system to
the outcome that I want. Okay? I'm
traveling from the things I believe that
are true about the world
to the things that I want to be true and
believe ought to be true about the
world. And then saying, "I'm going to
look at these KPIs on the way to see if
we actually get there." And I know the
North Star of where I'm trying to end
up, and I can articulate everything
through the process from my values to
what I believe to be true to where I'm
trying to get to to the KPIs that I'm
going to judge to whether or not we're
actually making progress. Okay? I'm just
trying to give people that line. Now, if
you look at everybody is trying to give
you that line, you're suddenly going to
notice that a lot of people their line
is just pure emotion. There is no
ability to articulate the um values that
they have. They might be able to
articulate their beliefs, but they don't
recognize that their beliefs aren't
true. None of our beliefs are {quote}
{unquote} true. We don't even understand
ground level physics yet. So, this isn't
ground level truth that people are
giving you when they say that they have
a belief. It's just what they've chosen,
often blindly with no sense of it being
a choice, what they've chosen to
believe, followed by they don't know
what their actual value system is. So,
they they're just giving you a string of
emotion and their outcome is either what
they want, what they're hoping for, and
hope is not a strategy, or what they are
fearing. Okay? And fear does not mean
that it is true.
So, I want always and forever, my
whatever I put out into the world, no
matter how aggressively I put it out
into the world, I want people to
interpret it as that. I'm just going
from beliefs, values, a string of KPIs,
and then this is the outcome I'm trying
to get to, and so we know whether we're
going there or not. And then you guys
need to internalize that, triangulate on
truth using a bunch of other people, not
just any one person, using a bunch of
people who are giving you their unique
individual frame of reference, and then
you go, "Okay, that's interesting. I
think they're wrong on 98% but 2% of
that's interesting. That really helps me
get a better sense of this." And the
analogy that I will always use is when
you were trying to figure out how to
navigate life well,
that path is an object inside of a
hidden black bag. And what you have to
do is you have to grope around on this
thing to figure out exactly what it is.
And once you know the exact shape and
what the item is, then you can move well
through life. The problem is you're
wearing mittens and you can't see into
the bag. And so it's like, "Oh god." And
so you want seven or eight other people
to come in and do the same thing, feel
around, "Okay, I think it's this. I
think it's that." And then, once you
hear everybody's take and your own, you
can get a better sense of how to move.
But if this was all certain, then
everybody would win. It's the very fact
that it is by nature uncertain. And that
you need other smart, savvy, sincere
people to tell you what they think that
right path forward is. Don't take
anyone's word for it. Do not over index
on your own sense of this. Try to read
from a lot of people.
And that's why this clip from Oprah
makes me tense.
If we don't show up tomorrow,
it is entirely possible
that we will not have the opportunity to
ever cast a ballot again.
It's It's interesting cuz I was talking
to a friend of mine last night and she
was going through all the emotions.
And the one thing that I think we over
index on is at that rally that people
Oprah was talking to, they all showed up
and they all went to probably voted for
Kamala.
But that wasn't the swath of people that
they needed to talk to and I felt like
just similar to Hillary who didn't go to
Wisconsin, maybe it did bite Kamala in
the in the butt that she didn't go on
Joe Rogan. She didn't do any long form
podcast. Staying in that echo chamber
kind of reinforces your idea and gives
you that false sense of security.
Yeah, so there's a lot in that
statement. So first of all, um
what I really, really want people to
take away from this is that all right,
you're now still plugged into America.
You put out a hypothesis, Oprah, and
that it's unanswered. We don't know. It
It's not like I now know because Trump
won that we're not going to have a
problem with democracy. We may still. So
it's like, okay, cool. You put out a
hypothesis.
Mhm.
What though I need to see is what are
the What's the end state that you want?
Protected democracy. Please define
democracy because all the words that
were coming out of the Democratic camp
and this is why I associate them with
authoritarian rule. All of the things
that they're saying were very
undemocratic. It's like, bro, like you
should want this friction. You should
want to know what the other side thinks.
Two, what is your North Star that makes
you want to protect democracy? I'll
round it to human thriving. Okay, what
is a metric that I can look at for human
thriving? A middle class where they're
getting to enjoy the benefits of a
strong and growing economy, which
we can get into whether the economy is
actually growing or not at another time,
but that becomes very important. Okay,
now if
your key metric is people only say the
things that I think will lead to uh
democracy, which I fear from fear
emotion. I recognize that's why I don't
want anybody to just trust me
implicitly, but I fear they have a
distorted notion. They think some people
are too dumb to think for themselves. We
have to have control of the narrative. I
forget it was a Hillary Clinton said we
can't lose total control of the
narrative. I mean it's crazy. But that
reveals the way that they view the
world. That there there is a right way
to think through this, which I just
think is automatically false. There
there is only a bunch of ways to look at
this that will help you land on things
that have high predictive validity.
Uh and they want to control the
narrative. They want to make sure some
people are silenced. They want to make
sure that nobody's feelings are hurt,
etc. etc. And so these are not
KPIs that I think have ever throughout
human history proven to go anywhere
other than absolute horror, death,
mayhem, destruction. And so it's like
you have data points to know where these
hypotheses lead. Don't treat every
hypothesis like it's new. You want to go
has somebody done this before? Has
somebody already run this experiment?
So anyway, you're going to have to come
back in, re-engage with America. And now
if you're just leaning into this fear
and you don't have anything clearly
defined KPIs in terms of is this
happening or not happening. Um
you give people a nice simple narrative
that they can lean into emotionally. The
emotions will ratchet up and you'll
continue this divide between America,
which I really hope is not where we
spend the next four years.
Yeah, we need to wrap this up. I feel
like it happened. That's why I said at
the top, I'm just glad it's over now.
The election was clear and concise. Even
Mark Cuban
conceded.
He was great.
Yeah.
He was great. He and I I think a lot of
people have beef with how he comported
himself cuz they thought, "Oh man, he's
just a shill for the Democrats." I
looked at him and thought, "He is giving
the best argument, even if I interpret
Mark Cuban as a defense attorney who
believes that their client is guilty,
he's at least articulating the the best
argument for that side." And I think
that's really important. This is why I
think the idea of steel manning
someone's argument and really saying,
"Okay, robustly, I want to step into
your shoes. I want to understand why
you're afraid. I want to understand
where you're going." Um and really go to
bat for them. And And he may also have
just actually believed it. But it was
really good. He was very good at
articulating the best case to make for
Kamala Harris. Uh there were very few
voices. Him and Destiny I thought were
really really good at giving a
compelling side. And I don't want
anybody coming to a conclusion without
looking at the most like high-performing
people that disagree with them and say,
"What's their thought on this?" It's
going to sharpen your own thinking. But
the problem is people want to be right
instead of identifying the right answer.
And the easiest way to do that is to
lean into emotion to get people to clap
for you, even though history may judge
you as a villain. And I would much
rather be on the side of I'm actually
trying to get where I want to go. I
don't trust my emotions. I don't trust
your emotions. So, I want to follow that
string of logic to a defined end goal
through a bunch of KPIs. And I'll repeat
this literally until the end of time
because it is first principles thinking.
Um
but I I was very impressed with Cuban.
Including his like, "Hey, Trump won fair
and square. Great Great job. Godspeed."
I thought that was super honorable.
Yeah. High-class individual right there.
As we look at some of the exit polling,
there was some interesting mixes across
the demographics. I think we have a clip
from Joy Reid. Let's bring that up.
Yeah, this is interesting.
And I think we have to be blunt about
why.
Um black voters came through for Kamala
Harris. White women voters did not.
I think she nailed it cuz we made a big
fuss about Obama's speech at the rally
talking about black men need to show up
for Kamala. And according to this exit
polling, it shows that, you know, black
men did. But, to Joy Reid's point, the
white women that maybe would have went
to Biden in 2020, definitely went to
Trump in 2024.
Yeah, that's interesting. So, here's
here is something that I have an
emotional reaction to. Again, I always
distrust my emotions, but I really,
really am saddened by the fact that you
can so clearly see breaks along racial
lines. What that tells me is that they
are
um
having a very different experience.
Mhm.
At a minimum, they have very different
narratives about the experience that
they're having. They certainly have very
different assumptions about what's going
to take them to where they want to go.
And so, this is one of the things that
tells me we we just do not all see the
whole picture. And so, whether it's that
it really is just a wildly different
experience, and so we can't understand
why they would have such a different
take on this,
or that it's such a wildly different
narrative that we are not We may be
looking at the same thing, but we're not
seeing the same thing. I am distressed
that when you look at the black vote
combined, it 86% Democrat, 12%
Republican. That that is just a huge
difference. And if that were
uh anything that that breaks along
racial lines like that, I find very
um sad that it it is that kind of um
clear delineation. So,
the problem that I have with the way
that Joy Reid is taking this is that
"Hey, we were looking for you, white
women. You guys are to blame for this.
And now you're just leaning back into
making that view the the lens that she's
taking on this is a lens of race." Now,
until I saw this like I wasn't even
thinking about that, which means I was
blind to something. So, I
I am very fascinated by the way that you
really can see the difference Hispanics,
uh especially Hispanic males,
ended up voting
for Trump. Like, when you break out the
Hispanic vote into males versus females,
suddenly a pattern emerges that is very
interesting. And that whole narrative
that was being spun up that there were
going to be a lot of women that are
afraid to vote against their husbands.
Apparently not, cuz when you
Can we go to the next slide? Yeah.
It's like it was pretty different. Like,
men and women to a very large degree, in
fact, do we have
um
So, take out race. Do we have just how
did women vote versus how men voted?
That would be really fascinating.
All right. So, seeing the breakdown here
between men and women is also
fascinating. That is the exact inverse.
Men 44% for Harris, 54% for Trump. Women
54% for Harris and 44% for Trump.
Uh it's again going back to that idea of
we are having different experiences. And
so, understanding how to really step
inside the shoes of the other person and
see the world the way that they do is
super advantageous. I know that my wife
definitely is not seeing things the same
way that I am from an abortion
perspective. And I'm way more like I was
perfectly happy with Roe versus Wade.
Like, I that was not something even on
my radar. Uh a woman's right to choose
within, you know, reasonable confines,
I'll say, is I'm perfectly happy. Uh but
saw the issue around this election being
way more about freedom of speech, the
economy, and
my wife was just like not even concerned
about any of that, yeah, which is
really, really interesting. And so,
again, going back to that dynamic
friction, I was like, I'm not trying to
convince my wife, "Hey, hey, hey, all
that matters is the economy. This is
just that." I was like, "I'm glad that
you're giving me a different
perspective. I want you to think in the
way that you think. I want you to voice
be as loud with your voice as you can so
again the people can triangulate on what
is true.
Now I think this hints at something
that's probably well outside the scope
of today, but here's one thing I think
we need. There is a reason that religion
is resurging right now. There is a
reason that
um I think we have to anchor around
moral constraints. Now the question
becomes whose moral constraints? And so
my wife would tell you this is
outrageous. And the moral constraint
should be a person's bodily autonomy.
Cool. We just need moral constraints.
Once you flip a switch and say anything
goes, you're not going to end up
anywhere good. It's a really interesting
idea in filmmaking. I'll be interested
to see how angry people get with this
analogy, but in filmmaking they say that
the constraint makes the creativity. And
once you have a limitation, it actually
unlocks something cuz it's like okay, we
have to work within these confines. I
feel the same is true about moral um
restriction. Is you can actually
navigate the world better. Now I think
it is well worth debating what set of
morals lead to the most human
flourishing,
but I do think that if you don't I don't
think humans are innately good. I don't
think humans are innately bad. I think
that we can operate within a system. And
if that system yields the positive KPIs
that we want, great. Do that.
Um but when anything goes, anything
goes. And I think that people end up
snapping. So um when it comes to this,
abortion, what you're seeing is to get
the structure that we need. Right now
the dominant moral structure in America
falls into a Christian lens. And the
Christian lens has this pro-life stance.
And so you sort of get the the good with
the bad, right? Now pushing it back down
to the state level seems reasonable to
me
because boys and girls, at least I'm not
saying this is ideal. As somebody who
lives in California, the thought of
having to leave I absolutely hate, but
at least I know, hey, if this gets too
crazy, I can always move somewhere else
and still be in America. So, it is a a
very imperfect structure, but at least
it's there. And so, if somebody feels
strongly enough this is really
problematic.
They have the option to leave. I'm not
blind to some people just don't have the
finances to be able to pull it off,
but it is not a mission impossible.
Yeah, and it it it felt that way and
especially as that being their main
campaign point, you would assume that
they would have a larger share of the
women turnout. But,
when it comes to key demographics, I
guess it wasn't because
54 to 44% that is the win that they
wanted, but it wasn't enough. It didn't
just it didn't get her the 270, so
it would have been very different if
Trump had been beating the drum and
saying, I'm going for a national
abortion ban, but he's saying the exact
opposite.
Yeah.
I don't want a national abortion ban.
And even though they kept saying he's
going to do it, he's going to do it,
he's going to do it, enough people were
either persuaded by Trump's own words or
they didn't believe it was as big of an
issue. And so, I'm never surprised when
this is a hot button issue for people.
But, at the end of the day people have
to say, okay, this like even if you
don't like that change and I'll put
myself in that camp.
It doesn't mean that I don't think there
are way bigger fish to fry. And so,
the results speak for themselves in
terms of where the country is right now.
What you're seeing is the revenge of the
working class.
Yeah. All right, you ready for the
lightning round? Let's do it. All right,
were you surprised at the result of the
election?
Mildly.
Yeah, if you'd asked me a week ago, I
would have been very surprised by this
outcome, but there was something that
you could feel happening that, huh, the
energy does seem to be shifting. And I
was curious to see if there would be a
slip-up that would just break the other
way.
Uh but with
uh
Trump going for free speech, talking
endlessly about the economy, and the
people that he had on his super team,
Elon Musk, RFK, Tulsi Gabbard, Vivek,
like there was a real sense of like,
"Hey, we understand what we have to get
done. We're here to fight for the middle
class. We think we can get this done."
It just felt like the energy was pushing
that way. I I wanted a landslide one way
or the other, and this is about as close
as you're going to get to that. Um so,
as the numbers started pouring in, I
found myself surprisingly unshocked.
But, I wouldn't bet on this. I had no
confidence in in my belief one way or
the other.
Nice. Bitcoin hit an all-time high high
at 74.4. How high do you think Bitcoin
goes under a Trump presidency?
That's a good question. I think,
honestly, if he starts fixing the
economy, I don't think it's going to
skyrocket. So, at least it like
myself, it is very complicated to figure
out why everybody's in this, but myself,
I look at that and I say, "Okay, this is
largely about financial freedom." I
believe people should be able to save
their way to security. Right now, that
isn't Bitcoin. I want to be very clear
about that. Right now, Bitcoin is still
in the gambling phase because it has
this massive volatility. But, I, if my
thesis is correct, what will end up
happening is Bitcoin will become boring
over time. And it will become boring
over time because it's effectively
replacing gold. It is a place where you
can store your wealth that if you save
in it, it will be worth roughly the same
down the road. Whereas, the US currency
is going to be inflated into just
absolute oblivion. So,
I'm very
optimistic that Bitcoin will continue to
grow as more people realize this is a
great place to store my wealth. But,
nobody just cramps their wealth into
gold right now. So, you put some in
there, but you want to have a balanced
portfolio because everybody wants some
upside. So, I I just want a place where,
again,
revenge of the working class. The guy
that's too tired to think about it when
they come home. A working mom who's
like, "Bro, I do not have time to figure
out the stock market. Like, I just want
to be able to say I'm going to sock away
10 or 15% of my money so that when I
retire, I can be taken care of and then
I'll have something to leave for my
kids." And they need something that's
stable. They need something where their
money's not locked up for 20 years, man.
That's crazy town. So,
that's what I want to see happen with
Bitcoin. I think that will naturally
drive the price up. I've got I'm largely
invested in Bitcoin. And so,
do I want to see it go up? Yes, but even
more than that, what I want to see is it
to become a really stable place where I
can save my money and it just doesn't
get inflated away. I can't stress that
enough. If you just save your money,
man, if you just save your money, you
should be able to do well.
And right now, you just you get
clobbered by inflation.
Do you think Elon cuts the two trillion
that he proposed out of the government
if he gets free reign?
No. Oh, free reign? If he gets free
reign, sure.
He's not going to get free reign.
and
Two trillion, probably not. Do I think
that he makes really substantive
inroads? Yes. Do I think that there is a
better person on planet Earth to do it?
Literally, absolutely not. There is
nobody because he's got the clout. He's
got the ability to point at his record
and be like,
"Bro, like look at what I've done. It's
insane." Any entrepreneur that's ever
built a company is looking at him jaw on
the floor like, "What is happening?"
Drew,
it's the craziest thing I've ever seen
in my life. No no entrepreneur unless
you're a total [ __ ] no entrepreneur
looks at that guy and is like,
"I can do that."
It's the most insane. So, anyway, I
think that he will be able to identify
$2 trillion worth of waste. Will he
actually be able to reduce it? Probably
not.
But I think he'll make very, very
meaningful inroads and get us on a good
path. And if it yields results to the
middle class, they'll vote it in again.
And then if we start getting eight years
of people who are fiscally responsible,
whether Democrat or Republican, I
couldn't care less. But if they are
fiscally responsible,
now you you start doing eight, 12 years
of very sensible reduction, getting
transparency in the budget. This is what
I want people to understand. Boys and
girls, when you're running a company, if
you dive into your numbers and you look
at every line of what credit card
expenses are, if you look at every line
in every department about where they're
spending their money and what the return
is on,
can I be crude for a second?
Absolutely.
Like There's a nice way to say it. I'll
say it the nice way.
Uh
Boo.
Okay, I'll I'll First I'll give you the
nice way and then you can get the kids
out of the room. So, uh it goes like
this. When you are running a company and
you start looking at all that, it's like
what um Warren Buffett said, when the
tide goes out, you see who's swimming
naked. Now I'll say it in my crude way.
When you're going line by line, it's
like little dick here, big dick there.
It's like you see who's doing who's
efficient with money and who's just
absolutely terrible. And there's nowhere
to hide. You got no clothes on, baby.
Like it is just all exposed. And if we
can get the government like that, where
we just see who's swanging that thing
and who's got the nubbings, like all of
a sudden you're like, all right, this is
just ridiculous. You can't spend money
here.
Uh I think then we will be in way better
shape. But there is just a culture of I
don't want to look at it. It's too
complicated. We want to bury all this
crazy stuff inside of a gigantic bill
that's 10,000 pages long. But now AI is
going to be like, bro, this is what the
bill says.
It'll be able to give you an instant
summary of that bill.
Uh and if we can have AI do the same
thing with this is where all the money's
going and it can slice and dice the data
60,000 different ways. If you ask it,
how much are we spending on screws? You
know, and it gives you like $4 trillion
and you're like, what? What's the most
common material that the screws are made
out of? Diamonds. Now you're like, "Ho,
ho, ho, ho, ho, ho. What the hell's
going on?" So, getting that level of
transparency, putting the budget on the
blockchain, so you know it's not being
manipulated, letting people go through
it. Same thing with algorithms on the
social media. Make it public. Let Let
people see what's going on. Like
community notes is completely public.
You can see exactly how it's created.
And so, that level of trust goes a very
long way. So, you get capped in
efficiency with transparent budgets on
the blockchain. It It could get very
very interesting.
We shall see. That's all I got.
see. All right, everybody. Thank you for
joining us. Welcome to the middle,
everybody. Are we going to get hit by
both sides or actually chart a way
forward? I'm telling you the center is a
destination. You've got to want to be
there. Have a little bit of distrust for
yourself. Want a lot of other smart
hands trying to figure out what this
object is that we call the right path
forward. All right, congratulations to
the middle class. I think this is a big
victory for everybody there. May your
lives get better in the next 4 years. Uh
my honor and love to everybody that
voted their conscience. No matter which
way you voted, I got love for you. All
right, everybody. Until next time, my
friends.
Make sure you subscribe, speaking of
things you should do. And until next
time, my friends, be legendary. Peace.
Take care.
If you liked this conversation, check
out this episode to learn more. This is
what I would hope would happen.
I would hope that you would consider
that there are these core foundational
ideas that make our country
the coolest country on the planet. Um in
so far as in the United States, you can
I think you can be