What are the Lessons from 25 Years of Reporting on the Post-9/11 Wars? (Future Security Forum 2026)
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The panel explores how the September 11 attacks fundamentally transformed the landscape of national security journalism, shifting it from a focus on public health and environment to the complex realm of counterterrorism. For reporters like Joby Warrick and Steve Coll, the event was a career-defining moment that forced an immediate pivot toward understanding the origins of al-Qaeda and the rise of the Taliban. This shift brought profound changes to daily operations, including the necessity for rigorous safety protocols, armored vehicles, and specialized training that were previously considered unnecessary luxuries. The environment became significantly more dangerous, with incidents like car bomb attacks on embedded teams illustrating how quickly situations could turn lethal, leading to a culture where every decision regarding travel and source access was weighed against severe personal risk.
Beyond the immediate physical dangers, the panel highlights a critical evolution in the perceived neutrality of Western journalists. Azadeh Movani notes that following 9/11, American reporters were no longer viewed as neutral observers but as symbolic extensions of U.S. military power, often facing hostility or being refused access to sources. This sentiment has intensified over time, particularly after events like October 7th and subsequent conflicts in the Middle East, creating a climate where gaining trust is increasingly difficult. The discussion also addresses the rise of disinformation and deepfakes, which complicate the verification process, alongside the economic devastation seen in places like Iran, where journalists now navigate societies grappling with collapse, trauma, and deep-seated resentment toward foreign intervention.
The conversation further examines the structural changes within newsrooms that have altered how stories are told and who tells them. As major outlets reduced their overseas bureaus and stopped sending staff to conflict zones, a reliance on freelancers grew, inadvertently encouraging risky behavior among those seeking exclusive scoops without institutional support. This era also saw a significant shift toward employing local journalists from the regions being covered, moving away from the "fortress" mentality of keeping Western reporters isolated in safe compounds. The panelists advocate for a more integrated approach where local voices lead the narrative, emphasizing that long-term immersion, language learning, and building genuine networks are essential for safety and depth. Ultimately, the consensus is that while the risks have escalated and the media landscape has become more fragmented, the core mission of understanding human experience in war remains vital, requiring reporters to be vigilant, adaptable, and deeply connected to the communities they serve.
Read the full video transcript
Our
next panel is uh what are the lessons
from 25 years of reporting um in the
post 911 wars and our moderator is uh
Kimberly Dozier and you will introduce
our panel. Thanks so much for all your
patience today.
>> Thank you so much and um thank you to
Peter New America and ASU for holding
this conversation. and it's been really
thoughtful listening back from the green
room. Um, we're going to dig into how
911 affected us in reporting 9/11 and
everything that happened afterwards. Um,
we have at the far end Elliot Arian,
journalist and author, also Marine Corps
and CIA special operations veteran. Dad
was a Marine. Got to mention Marines.
Um, Steve Cole, Pulitzer Prizewinning
author and journalist. uh former dean of
the Columbia Journalism School and the
former president and CEO of New America
and author of more books than I have
time to list here. Um Azade Moveni,
associate professor of journalism at
NYU, um ASU's future of war fellow in
2018 and author of guest house for young
widows. And also she just got back from
u her frequent trips to Iran. So, we
will be drilling into that. Um, and Joby
Warick, Pulitzer Prizewinning author and
national security reporter for the
Washington Post. And the new book that
is for sale just outside is The Jackal,
The Rise and Fall of Carlos, the World's
First Super Terrorist. And I'm Kim Doer,
CNN global affairs analyst. And uh I
have uh run into some of you all in the
field, at least Joby um back here also.
And I warned them I would give them a
lightning round question to begin.
How did 911 and what followed change
your reporting
>> Joby? Oh,
>> okay. Well, didn't start in alphabetical
order, but thank you for doing this.
>> Yeah. Uh so profoundly I must say so I
was in 2001 despite my youthful looks I
was a mid-career uh national security
I'm sorry investigative reporter at the
Washington Post working on public health
issues uh meat safety you know
environmental issues 911 happens and my
career turns on a dime because for at
least a brief period of time everybody
in the newsroom is doing something
related to to counterterrorism terrorism
in um Steve Co being one of our our
editors at the time and I was suddenly
immersed in in questions about whether
al-Qaeda could create a dirty bomb or
make a biological weapon and and it was
some the most fascinating work I've done
in my life. I've never looked back. have
been working in the national security
space ever since and witnessed pretty
dramatic changes in how we do our job,
what we write about. Um, the environment
that we're working in, it's certainly
become much more challenging for many
reasons now. But it's it's it's a
incredibly stimulating challenging field
and and uh myself has experienced it it
it yields a lot of good stories and
books. So happy to be part of that.
>> Does it do?
>> Uh, thank you Kim and thank you to New
America. Thank you to Peter. Um it's so
good to be back and to always have had
such wonderful support. Um 911 and and
how it changed um our reporting. Uh I
was in Tehran actually um for Time
magazine and um two things I remember. I
remember um there was some clips of it
on um social media recently. Uh there
was uh a vigil in Tehran two nights
afterwards for the victims and it was
really quite incredible because
spontaneously all of these families uh
young people poured into uh the squares
of of the downtown all holding candles.
Um, and it was extraordinary to see this
moment where this, you know, I guess we
saw the the dawn of the idea of the
clash of our civilizations and why do
they hate us? But in the heartland of
where um there was supposed to be or
perceived to be hatred for the United
States, there was actually um there was
actually an outpouring of of sympathy
and solidarity which really made the
Iranian government very nervous. Um so
to answer your question um I was I was a
correspondent in the region but based in
based in Iran and you know as it became
apparent that the US was going to uh was
going to invade um I think for many
years um sort of militarily Iran had not
imagined that the US would show up on
any of its borders and suddenly uh that
was unfolding very quickly. Um there was
the bond conference and there was um of
course the we spoke this morning about
the spillover of some of the alada
operatives into Iran. Uh so for me it
was a moment where you know suddenly
there was uh a military
um sort of implication for the United
States and Iran in a way that had never
been before. And so as a reporter it
became very sensitive to work uh for an
American publication.
um the the stakes for Iran visav what
the United States was going to do in the
region um were suddenly um you know
enormous
Steve
>> uh well I mean it changed my life and
hasn't quite let go of me because I by
accident I was at the Washington Post I
was uh managing editor on 911 itself but
earlier I had been a correspondent
assigned to South Asia randomly and
Afghanistan was one of the countries
that I covered and Pakistan and I spent
a lot of time covering the antecedants
of the rise of al-Qaeda and then in the
'9s did some reporting about the first
World Trade Center bombing and with a
group of people tracked down Osama bin
Laden and Sudan and so when 9/11
happened out it still felt like shock
out of the blue but very quickly I
thought that there was um that I should
go back and write about the origins of
the attack through Afghanistan's
experience and the CIA covert action in
the 80s all the way through the rise of
the Taliban and the chase for Bin Laden
before 911. So I did that. That book
came out and it found an audience and so
I have written two other books, one of
which I just finished that I wouldn't
have otherwise. So I've spent
essentially 25 years in and out of
covering the wars that followed 911,
particularly in Afghanistan. Thank you,
Elliot. Were you at one of your other
jobs when 911?
>> I would say I mean, yeah, 911 didn't
change my reporting because I wasn't a
reporter. I was a senior in college and
um although I'd written some really
compelling papers. Um
but uh yeah, some people ask me like,
yeah, how how did it change? I don't
think it changed. I actually think it
made me like I can't imagine I can't
unbraid who I am today from who I would
have been if 911 hadn't happened and I'd
gone to war. And then I think you know
the my career writing that followed my
wartime experience has been very much
sort of defined by trying to understand
um war which I think kind of throws open
the aperture of human experience. I mean
you see the absolute worst that people
are capable of you know the highest
levels of depravity but you also in in
war can see the absolute best. um and as
a participant in war I saw you know
heroism you know and and valor that
stays with me still and so now when as a
as a writer whether I'm you know any war
that I'm covering I just got back from
Ukraine yesterday uh it's often whether
I like it or not filtered through that
lens of having been a participant in war
>> I just will chime in with my own
experience I had been um a foreign
policy reporter based in London and
watched 9/11 on a view screen from the
radio CB BS radio studios um was on the
phone with my mother waking her up and
telling her to turn on the TV when the
second plane hit the second tower and
that's when we all really knew it was
terrorism. But um
trying to get into Afghanistan
while it was
um in full invasion mode and
parsing trying to parse whether it was
safe enough to get smuggled into Paktika
province by people I didn't know and
then deciding hm might I be more
valuable to them as a symbol than for my
reporting and I decided not to go in
that way. Um, turned out to be a a good
call from some of the stuff that
happened to reporters afterwards. Um,
and then ultimately ending up covering
the Iraq war uh for three years until in
2006 uh me and my team were uh embedded
with an army um unit and the al-Qaeda of
Iraq cell in the city knew we were
coming to that neighborhood and so they
left um a car bomb in place uh and they
waited until we drove past it. They knew
we were getting out of our vehicles. So
they waited until we were out of our
vehicles near the car bomb and they
command detonated it through us through
the whole foot patrol. So um that uh you
know all the physiootherapy I still go
through to keep my legs working. Um, and
I keep in touch with um the families of
my camera crew because they were lost.
And the the people the the woman who did
the most healing between me and the
families of the crew because um you know
there's tough time there survivors go in
a lot of anger. I was still there. My
friends were gone. Um it was the widow
of the army captain who was killed who
brought us all back together. Um so
lessons like that. Yes. absolutely
life-changing and it'll never quite let
go. But I want to get into also the
changes in getting to the story. It used
to be whether it was trying to get to
Kosovo before the Serbs started bombing
and the worst thing you faced was um a
bunch of Serb paramilitaries
um at the checkpoint trying to get over
the border or um it was really driving
driving and car accidents. That was the
the crazy crazy drivers in many parts of
the world. Uh we had one driver um in
Belgrade who used to take uh blind
curves at very fast speed and we asked
him, you know, there might be someone
coming. Why do you do that? He's like,
it's in God's hands. Anyway, uh we soon
switched out that driver. Anyway, um,
how did your safety calculations of
getting to the story change in the years
following 9/11?
I mean, the decades. Well, I think Danny
Pearl's abduction and murder was a big
wakeup call for a lot of correspondents
who had kind of had an easy 1990s and
gotten used to being um treated with, if
not respect, at least kept safe by the
people you uh uh
encountered in a conflict zone because
they needed you to get their message
out. And as communications technology
changed and uh insurgents and other
combatants could get their own messages
out then you became useful in the way
that you sort of speculated about when
you were thinking about going into
Baktika. And um I think I felt having
worked in Pakistan a lot that I could
very easily have made the mistake that
Danny made in going to that meeting. And
I think it was humbling and just also a
recognition. There had been abductions
in Kashmir of journalists before in the
90s. But by and large my experience of
those conflicts that I covered was that
you could go anywhere with anyone as
long as you were smart you know vetted
the people you were going to travel with
and people would be remarkably
courageous in protecting you if they
made a commitment to you as a personal
matter. So um that that stopped. So then
your methodology like when I was
supporting colleagues in Iraq as the
managing editor um the amount of uh
resource that we had to invest in
protection equipment in deciding whether
the home the base we had had to be moved
the you know we were barely qualified
for some of these judgments had to hire
consultants. None of that had been part
of the first half of my career in the
field. I I remember at CBS in Baghdad,
we the budget including all because of
all the security was something like a
million dollars a month because we had
to it started as a because insurance
required it. You had to get flat jackets
etc and armored vehicles and then it
became like the only way to do business
and I know that we were the smallest of
the three bureaus in terms of our
staffing etc. So everybody was pouring
much more money into that. And I
remember the first time I went in years
before
um 911. Uh I had some XSAS guy trying to
talk me into um hostile environment
training and medical training and I
tried to get the London bureau chief
interested and he was like, "Yeah, nah."
Well, after 9/11 it became required for
everybody partly because of the break in
insurance that you got. Um, but just as
a quick followup, how about as a
managing editor
sending a a freelancer in? How did that
change?
>> Well, mercifully, we had the resources
that we wouldn't have to do that if it
was a conflict zombie, very rare, but we
had lots of people who were not
employees in a W2 sense who we were
responsible for, translators, drivers,
the whole Baghdad operation. And you
know there was a time when we had a
kidnap consultant. I had to go to dayong
trainings because I was the person in
management who was going to fly to
Baghdad if somebody got kidnapped and I
was going to set up an operation center
there. And you know the advice we got
was all very [clears throat] chilling.
Um
um but we were we were lucky but just
lucky. And we had very um experienced
sensible correspondents. We trusted the
correspondents on the ground to make uh
the calls. We communicated
um you know very uh actively, but we
didn't try to run every intersection
with a 5,000 mi screwdriver because we
know that's how you make mistakes. And
so we empowered the correspondents,
supported them with the security that
they felt they needed, inspected it very
actively, and and we had some good luck.
But um I wouldn't want to do that again.
And after four or five years of doing
it, it was um you know, you you really
felt like my colleague Phil Bennett, who
really did most of this as the foreign
editor, he said to me one time, you
know, every night I leave this office, I
light a candle. And that's what it felt
like.
>> Azade, what kind of calculations did you
go through, especially as a as a woman
moving in what became a conflict zone?
Well, back then we didn't really have
any um you know, even when they started
making us go to hostile environment
training, there really wasn't any kind
of gender specific uh advice for that.
Um I think it's you know, for many years
we just, you know,
didn't, you know, factor in what a what
a woman could potentially experience
into the kind of emerging security
trainings that we were that we were
undergoing. And honestly, to this day, I
still don't know if there's very much of
that. Um, but we're in a whole different
world where there's, you know, almost
um, you know, if if you're a freelancer,
you maybe don't go anymore. And if you,
um, are supported by an organization,
then you have, you know, sometimes you
might even have like a whole kind of
paramilitary [clears throat]
crew traveling with you right behind
you. Um what what I really recall um as
a stark difference that did feel like it
had sort of implications for our
personal safety was feeling as though I
or as working for an American
publication
uh magazine as an American reporter we
and I think western at this point it it
began to change. We were not viewed as
neutral. Um, you know, I remember in the
early days of Iraq, um, the Iraq war,
you know, I was on like checkpoint widow
duty, as I, you know, came to think of
it. Um, you know, these people, these
young men, these fathers would be killed
at checkpoints by the army, not
intentionally, often because they were
getting things wrong. Um, and so you
would go to the the homes of of the
widows and talk to them and say, "Is
this much compensation enough for you?
How do you feel?" And you know the first
American that had that the family had
ever seen had killed the family member
and then the next Americans that they
had seen were coming to like ask them
how they felt about that. Um so you know
from Iraq and and places that were
starting to experience a lot of violence
because of an American military presence
in in Afghanistan. this was the same um
you know this this creeping sense that
um you [clears throat] know your your
your symbolic presence was for the
people that you were trying to talk to
whose trust you were trying to gain um
was mediated for them by this inability
or I I don't mean to speak for others
but you know there was a sense that uh
we were implicated that we were part of
uh a force or a power in the world that
was doing this to their country or to
their community and sometimes, you know,
people just wouldn't speak to you or
they would be very rude to you. Um, and
[snorts] then I think as as the wars
evolved and as we got to the period
where the Iraq insurgency turned into
the Arab Spring and then turned into
ISIS, um, then it got to the point where
as a reporter, you could, you know,
there were certain stories where you
could scarcely get anyone to speak to
you at all.
So bringing it to now, um I hear from
various folks in the CT world, they're
seeing some of the similar resentments
build up first after the violent
aftermath um post um the horrible
attacks of October 7th. Um but then
the combined USIsrael attacks on Iran
and the continuing Iran war. um a lot of
resentment building up. A lot of what's
filling Arab and Gulf TV screens are
scenes from what's happening on the
ground that Americans aren't seeing. So
Elliot, are you seeing any parallels
to the the the time before 9/11 and now?
>> I mean, I think antipathy to the United
States has existed in that part of the
world for a very long time. So I don't
feel like this is a distinct ratcheting
up uh you know necessarily. Um so uh I
think that the you know the US and one
of the things that I think has been lost
in these 25 years you maybe you've seen
a little bit of this conversation now
vis 911 is um
you know is I think we take for granted
the fact that nothing has happened in 25
years. If you had told any American on
like September 12th or September 13th
that we would go 25 years without any
terrorist attack close to the scope of
what happened on 911, I don't think most
people would have believed you. And we
seem to have just sort of forgotten
that. Um and so I think that there is
you know an importance to remain
vigilant and not to and not to believe
that um that another similar attack
couldn't occur and completely reset the
table of what the US looks like in the
world and you know and then how all of
us would be having to uh tell stories
from that part of the world. But I've,
you know, I've never, you know, I, one
of the significant differences for me,
like covering the war in Ukraine versus
covering these Middle Eastern wars is,
you know, you you go around Ukraine, you
know, I was there about, I've gone there
for 10 years, but I was there right
after the invasion. People were happy to
see you and they're glad to see you.
Yes. Like, let me show you, let me talk
to you. You know, we are sort of aligned
in telling this story. Um, I've never
felt that way in the Middle East. And I
don't think that's because of, you know,
October 7th or recent events. Um, I
think, you know, the the most vulnerable
I ever felt, uh, was certainly, you
know, not as a Marine or a special
operator, you know, on patrol in Iraq
in, you know, 2004 and 2005. It's been
as as a journalist. I say, you know,
being in a war zone as a service member
is kind of like, you know, driving
through, you know, the worst
neighborhood in South Central. Um, but
you're like a member of the Bloods or
the Crips, you know, so if something
happens, you're okay. driving through as
a as a journalist is like, you know,
you're you're some guy in like a
Mercedes-Benz saying, "Excuse me, do you
know which way to the freeway?" Um, it's
like a significantly different different
level of risk. And I've always been um,
you know, been very aware of that.
>> Joby, are you seeing any parallels?
>> Um,
I actually I think I think Elliot's
right. I think if anything, it's things
have gotten much worse. I mean, we would
typically parachute into places and you
could count on the fact that people
would still speak to you that your
security concerns were things that you
could manage maybe without without an
entourage. It's kind of safer to be
below the radar screen and you got your
your fixer and your translator and you
kind of control the places where you're
going to meet your sources. you don't to
go to places where it's it's it's
probably going to be a little more
dangerous and and more challenging since
Daniel for um Daniel Pearl, but also
since you know we've had Andrew Ty uh
was a was a freelancer working for us
who got kidnapped in in Syria and later
we discovered he was killed uh and and
James Foley and and so many others. So,
so we're so much more mindful and even
with those preparations, it almost seems
daunting in a way that it had not before
that if you go to one of those places,
you try to go into Syria or or into Gaza
that will people speak to you at all and
will you have permission to go to places
uh because of of security controls. So
it just the challenge of trying to get
to that other side to understand what
the other side is thinking and feeling
and what those grievances are is a far
greater challenge than I think it was 25
years ago in my impression.
>> Can I add one quick thing I think is
materials. I think one of the big
challenges too because I'm a little bit
of a different generation is that as
these news rooms had all receded in the
teens and were not sending people it
created this gap like a Ty like a Steven
Sult like I knew all like I was around
with all those guys and for them it was
this you know the prospect was
particularly in Syria is if you can get
to the story you as a freelancer could
be writing for the New Yorker or the
most esteemed organizations if you can
get there because they're not sending
anybody or the New York Times and so a
lot of these fols folks would pick up
and go and go get the story. And uh and
I think that created a lot of these
situations 10 years on where when
newsrooms had the resources, you know,
if you were a freelancer and you showed
up with a story, no one cared because
they already had their well-resourced
people getting the story. And that
caused people to run a lot of risks.
That that is how I started my career.
The first 10 years I was a freelancer
who would write for anybody and I was on
the front page of the Washington Post,
etc., etc., um because I was there. But
when I look back and realize I didn't
have health insurance, I shudder. Um,
and I have lectured uh freelancers now,
including when I managed some of them at
Military Times who didn't have health
insurance, and I'm like, "Dude, I need
all of your contact details for your
parents if you're on assignment for us
because I'm worried about you." And um,
I will let you go for, you know, another
month without healthcare. But here are
the links to the places that provide
journalists in war zones some semblance
of um emergency care. Anyone listening,
get journalist insurance um for going
overseas.
Uh, I want to ask about the new layer
and I know that um Elliot you've written
about this um in some of your novels how
disinformation and the rise of deep fake
videos also complicates our job um
together with this growing or return to
a lack of trust of anyone who's a quote
unquote American or Western journalist.
I say it's the it's generally the media
landscape and that um you know
information no longer has the exact same
premium that it once had. So you know
getting when there is no single story
having the story doesn't have the value
that it once did and everyone's having
to figure out how to navigate that.
>> So I wanted to ask if anyone had any
questions in the audience. Um Ambassador
Yasine
uh do we have a microphone to go to him
or do I just give him mine?
>> Oh you got it. Okay, ambassador right
there.
>> Thank you all for your service. I mean
it.
>> Thank you.
>> Um, so Iraq is a country that had no
journalism when you guys came in 2003
and uh things turned sour and so many
newspapers, New York Times, Washington
Post started to keeping their
journalists in their fortresses. I'm not
using this v this word unadvisedly and
sending Iraqis to do the reporting and
you'd see a notice of that. So at the
end of the article it see Iraqi
employees of the New York Times or the
Washington Post or the Wall Street
Journal contributed to this and were
keeping their names secret for their
surfy whatever whatever wording they
used. Eventually, as things settled
down, their names got mentioned at the
end,
and for certain of them, they'd moved to
the by line.
And I know that some of them actually
ended up in Neiman fellowships.
Is this exceptional?
Has this been widespread? Because
something like that in a country like
Iraq that was devoid of a journalistic
tradition is really transformative.
Well,
>> and I think it should be emphasized.
>> Um, I know in Afghanistan working with
US organizations launched so many
journalism careers and now I I I worry
about all of those journalists who
didn't get out. Um,
Steve, what was the practice for local
stringers? Because local stringers were
often my passport to get to the story or
understand the story. Well, I mentioned
before, I mean, we had Anthony Shadid,
who was the leading, you know, native
Arabic speaker um in our field, and he
didn't he he didn't live in a fortress.
He traveled on his own um a lot of the
time. But um the larger point is I I
think is correct. It's a big subject in
journalism as to how to incorporate
national journalists into the the kind
of supply chain of journalism. um that's
located in headquarters in the west and
I think a lot of uh younger journalists
have spoken up about changing the kind
of hierarchy of uh that was my
generation's inheritance. Um and uh
journalism has become globalized that
there's so much more connectivity.
There's so many more reasons and ways
that national journalists can take the
by line, take the lead. No one needs to
protect them. they are leaders in their
own spaces. So, um I you know I see it
all the time uh as a practicing
journalist still and I presided over a
lot of discussions at Colombia that I
thought were inspiring. You know, people
are adapting and changing.
>> So, um can we have one more question?
This gentleman right here and if you
could introduce Oh. Oh, sorry. And Peter
has a question.
>> A quick one.
>> Just a second. Uh, yours first.
>> Thank you.
>> Um, as you were just in Tehran and
you're um Iranianame um the Iranians
often see the Iranian side, not the
American side. So, how did you you when
did you get back and what did you see
and and how did you deal with your
security issues?
>> Um, thank you. I got back perhaps two
weeks ago. Um, two and a half weeks ago.
I was there for about a month, but I go
regularly. Um although I hadn't been
since last summer, so I missed I think a
war and a massacre. A war and a half and
a massacre. Um I mean I go as a private
citizen. I'm aware we had discussions
earlier about hostage taking. Um you
know I I try and go as a private citizen
and I write kind of essaistic dispatches
and that has been tolerated from me. um
for some years. Uh and I and I realize
it may not always be. Um you know, I
think that going into Iran is is very
hard right now. I think some papers like
the Financial Times do a valiant job and
they have people on the ground and are
now indispensable to our understanding
of what's going on inside. Um it's it's
harder for the American press. Um what I
saw was a a society that's being
economically pulverized. you know, the
the extent to which people are um just
being crushed economically, pulverized
is the only word that I can really use
because the food inflation, the
electricity shut offs. I mean, it felt
like Lebanon for moments, it felt like
Syria for moments uh when I was there.
Um you know, there's massive shortages
of medications. I mean, I think it's a
country that is like on the brink
really. um you know, everyone in their
own way um really really suffering,
traumatized from the war. Some people,
you know, have had um you know, families
who were who've had a young person
killed in the massacre, the war. So,
we've had two successive big traumas and
and an economy that is really just at
the brink of collapse. Um
>> how do they feel towards Americans since
this is allegedly being done to free
them? [clears throat]
Uh well, I think initially there was um
like [clears throat] a a profound um
shock perhaps uh that the war was
expansive as it was and that it was
hitting because initially many people um
were very excited and happy. It must be
said that [clears throat] the regime was
decapitated. uh and there were the
people who had poured into the streets
and the people who were uh hoping that
this would shift something. Uh but then
they saw quickly that it was a war that
was uh [clears throat] that was
targeting Iran as a country, its
infrastructure, civilian targets. Uh and
so I think that turned and then there
was a real sort of wave of of
nationalist fear that our sovereignty,
our borders, our whole existence as a
country might be jeopardized. So, last
two minute lightning round. What advice
would you give a reporter who wants to
go out and cover one of these wars or
say a war in the Pacific today?
>> Uh, go live there. Take your time. Uh,
don't don't try to parachute in. Um,
build a network of places to publish and
then of places and and people to keep
you safe as you go about your business.
>> Anyone else? Health insurance. Health
[laughter] insurance. Yes, Elliot.
>> Yeah. I mean, I would I agree with Steve
and I'd also tell him just go, you know,
you just you just got to go and, you
know, and figure and don't be afraid to
figure it out as you're going and stay
safe.
>> Absolutely. [snorts]
Uh I'm with Steve. Go and stay a long
time. Learn the language. Learn some
language. um you know be able to
interact with the people that you're
writing about so that your perspective
is is a deeper one [clears throat]
>> 100%. I studied Arabic for two months
and then the Gamaya started blowing
things up in Cairo and Yaser Arafat
started coming to town for peace talks
and there went my Arabic lessons. So on
that note um thank you very much and we
go to the next panel. [applause]