What 25 years in central banking teach you – In Conversation with Boris Vujčić
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Boris Vujčić reflects on his twenty-five years in central banking, a career that began with witnessing hyperinflation in Croatia during the 1990s and culminated in leading the country into the Euro area before joining the European Central Bank as Vice President. His early experience seeing inflation rates reach 1,000% profoundly shaped his understanding of economic stability, revealing how high inflation devastates households, particularly those with low savings, and forces companies to engage in financial engineering rather than focusing on their core businesses. This personal observation instilled in him an unwavering conviction that maintaining price stability is the only viable path forward, a lesson reinforced by research showing that populations who have suffered from high inflation develop a lasting aversion to it. Consequently, he emphasizes the importance of anchoring inflation expectations and improving financial literacy among the general public, arguing that when people better understand central bank policies, they can form more accurate expectations, which in turn helps policymakers achieve their macroeconomic goals more effectively.
Transitioning from the Croatian Central Bank to the European level presented significant adjustments, primarily regarding the scope and international nature of the institution he now leads. While his core responsibility for stability remained consistent, the shift required him to focus exclusively on the Euro area rather than a single nation, dealing with much broader issues and stronger international linkages. Vujčić notes that while he was not entirely surprised by the quality of people at the ECB, he was positively impressed by their dedication to their work. His past experience has proven invaluable in his current role as he recognizes that many economic challenges repeat themselves over decades; having seen similar crises unfold previously, he feels more prepared to handle new events, even though the specific nature of future shocks may differ. This continuity allows him to apply lessons learned from navigating the financial crisis, the sovereign debt crisis, and geopolitical conflicts like the war in Ukraine to current and emerging threats facing the European economy.
Looking ahead, Vujčić identifies several critical challenges that Europe must address to maintain its competitiveness and productivity, with the primary focus being the completion of the single market for financial services. He argues that the fragmentation of European markets prevents banks from scaling up sufficiently to compete globally against giants in the US and Asia, particularly in trading and post-trading sectors where size matters immensely. To overcome this, he advocates for a comprehensive package of reforms that creates a genuine banking union and capital markets union, ensuring that all stakeholders benefit rather than pursuing isolated measures that have failed in the past. Simultaneously, he highlights emerging risks such as geopolitical instability, unsustainable fiscal positions in some member states, and the rapid valuation increases in equity markets driven by artificial intelligence, which could lead to significant repricing if not monitored closely.
Despite concerns that strong regulation might hinder competitiveness, Vujčić firmly believes that regulatory simplification is possible without compromising safety or reducing capital requirements that have proven essential for absorbing shocks. He maintains that the core issue affecting European banks' ability to compete is market fragmentation rather than the volume of regulations themselves, and he is committed to simplifying the thousands of pages of existing rules while preserving the robust architecture that has kept the Eurozone stable since the debt crisis. Furthermore, he stresses the need to adapt to new technologies like stable coins, digital currencies, tokenization, and artificial intelligence, ensuring these innovations enhance rather than endanger financial stability. Ultimately, his vision for the future involves a unified European approach where integrated markets allow institutions to grow, thereby supporting every citizen in Europe through higher productivity and greater resilience against global uncertainties.
Read the full video transcript
I saw the inflation rate of 1,000%.
Uh so I saw what it does to the to the
households to people. Actually I wanted
to
uh study uh to become a film director.
Uh financial stability is something
which is usually not uh to to what
people are not very attentive when
everything is okay. But uh once it's
gone, it's everybody's problem and
everybody pays lots of attention.
He spent more than two decades at the
heart of central banking, helped lead
Croatia into the Euro area and now is at
the European Central Bank [music] as
vice president. I'm talking about Boris
Buch, our guest in today's episode of
Euro Matters, a podcast by the European
Central Bank. My name is Stefania Seola.
Boris, welcome to the podcast.
>> Pleasure to be here, Stephania.
>> After two decades at the helm of the
Croatian Central Bank, you moved now to
and sit on the European Central Bank
executive board. What has been the
biggest adjustment?
Well, the job is pretty much the same as
one that I had before. I'm as you said
25 years in the central banking at the
management level. But uh on one hand I
was more previously focused on Croatia
although of course also as a member of
the governing council on the European uh
affairs and the Euro area goals but I
had also much more focus uh nationally
and also on my own bank which is much
smaller than the ECB. So on one hand the
uh focus has changed now it's
exclusively Euro area and uh on the
other hand the scope has changed because
it's much bigger institution and the u
international linkages and uh issues
that are discussed are much broader than
was the case before. So there's the main
changes
>> and any big surprise when you arrived
here and you thought ah this as a I
don't know governing council member I
hadn't seen and now I see it. Well, I
would say it's a surprise. Uh, as you
said, the the job I know, I know the
ECB. I knew the ECB before, but now I
know better ECB. And from what I got uh
over the last 3 months that I'm here
[laughter] is uh that there are there
are very good people. uh the quality of
people uh has I wouldn't say surprised
me but uh to some extent I'm positively
surprised that uh there are so many good
people that are very much dedicated to
what they are doing and that's a that's
a nice thing
>> good to know and um when you were at the
creation central banks let's go back a
bit in time you really uh shepherd the
bank into many milestones and uh
including not joining the euro
uh apart from joining the euro which
probably is one of the biggest
achievements which other achievements
really you are very proud of
>> well as you said they've been there for
a very long time so many things have
happened
>> uh on one hand I think it was a great
achievement to keep the price stability
and in the case of small open economy
always exchange rate stability
>> uh over this more than uh quarter of
decade going through all kinds of
challenges like the great financial
crisis euros debt crisis uh then the
covid the Russian aggression in Ukraine
and finally now I'm in the euro zone
when next shock happens but all these
shocks I was uh running the the the
central bank which was out of the euro
zone and we managed to do that uh all uh
very successfully and that's I think a
good achievement the other on the other
hand there were many challenges es in
terms of the financial stability
>> because as a supervisor I went through
also all kinds of challenges uh from the
crisis of the small and mediumsiz banks
at the beginning of 2000s
uh through the failure of the systemic
bank uh
bank being brought down by a rock trader
like a bearings case uh and then
resolving that issue. Yeah, you had
quite some uh interesting moments.
[laughter]
>> It was it was not boring for sure.
>> Um and Croatia joined in 2023 the euro
and this is a bit less than 10 years
since the US session. So relatively
short period of time. So from this
experience, your experience, what would
you say could be useful for other
countries on a similar path?
>> I would say adopting the euro is not
just changing the currency. It's uh
everything that precedes that. Uh
meaning uh having a strong institutions,
good policies
and making sure that uh you're in a
shape when you're joining of
withstanding shocks once you're inside
and being resilient within the Euro
zone. Euro zone helps you with that. But
there are other policies that also have
to go hand in hand once you join in the
Euro zone and before you join the Euro
zone. So I think that's that's important
thing to have in mind. Of course the
benefits of joining are obvious. Uh and
I would say I cannot think of the
country which would not benefit in some
way of joining the the Euro zone
European
uh ones.
>> Oh very good. And from a personal point
of view, any of those lessons that you
think is already shaping a bit uh your
role currently even going forward, what
do you think your past experience really
is going to do to you as vice president
of the European Central Bank?
>> I think that experience helps a lot.
Once you see uh things, you know how to
deal with them.
uh it doesn't mean that you don't get
surprised by the new events because
things change and the types of the
challenges that we will have in the
future might not be exactly the same
ones
>> uh that I had through my career but many
things are similar many many things tend
to repeat itself so once you saw them
you know 20 years later you know how
they look like and most of the times It
helps a lot.
>> And talking about stuff you've seen,
you've you've lived through a period of
very high inflation in the '9s and how's
that experience shaped you and also your
um attitudes towards inflation and what
it does to people's lives?
>> Yeah, that was I think important that I
really saw the high inflation. I saw the
inflation rate of 1,000%.
Uh so I saw what it does to the to the
households to people particularly those
who are poor with uh low savings also
and also saw what it does to the
companies which then uh start to
basically financial engineer rather than
do their core businesses.
>> Uh many households uh do very poorly in
the times of a very high inflation and
the whole economy suffers. So that's uh
something that uh I've seen and I've
seen the dynamics of the inflation how
it grows from relatively low levels to
very higher levels and that's also an
experience that definitely stays with me
and that uh
helps me I think to uh uh
have deep conviction that we have to
fulfill our goal of uh keeping the
inflation at our medium-term target
because
other options are definitely not good.
>> So you're convinced?
>> Absolutely. And then uh we mentioned
before when we talked this uh uh seminar
actually inauguration at which I was
yesterday of uh Michael Weber who has
spent his time looking at the uh
inflation expectations.
>> Mhm. And some of the research actually
shows that people who have went through
the high inflation
uh have different attitude towards
inflation. They dislike inflation more.
>> Mm.
>> Uh and this is even so [snorts] in
Germany where you see that in areas
where the inflation was higher in the
past. So generation ago,
>> yes,
>> you still have more dislike than in the
areas where it was not that
>> absolutely
>> that high. So the inflation experience
also shapes the attitude towards the
inflation later on.
>> And uh maybe um we refer to a speech you
had in Berlin and for our listeners,
we're going to put it in the show notes
so that people can refer to that. And
there you said how important it is to
understand the beliefs and the um
formation of expectations by households
by people normal people. And why is this
so important? Well, households are
majority of economic agents in the
economy and how they form their beliefs
if it and it does affect their behavior
is very important for the policy makers
to understand because we can then tailor
the policies better and we can have
better macroeconomic models, better
forecasts and better policies based on
that. And that's why we actually invest
so much in understanding how the
households form their expectations, what
their attitudes are. That's why the ECB
has launched its own consumer's
expectation survey in 2020
>> which is a very useful uh uh set of data
that we use in policym.
>> Yeah. uh in analysis and uh this has
proven to be important ingredient of
what we overall do.
>> Absolutely. And you also very often
mention how important it is financial
literacy and not just of those who are
in the financial environment of course
but everybody everybody being able to
have I don't know emergency funds think
about their future and how to put aside
enough money to cope with situations. So
what why for a central banker is this so
important?
>> Well, there are different reasons why
financial literacy is important. Uh one
is as you suggested it's very important
for the people themselves because they
can make better decisions
>> for their financial uh present and and
future.
>> Yeah.
uh for policy makers on the other hand
it's very important because people who
have better financial literacy better
understand what we are doing
>> and have better assessment of for
example inflation
>> better perception and better
expectations yes
>> about the future of the inflation for us
this is important because it enables
[clears throat] us to better anchor the
inflation expectations which is very
important for what we what we do on our
side It's also very important from
communication perspective to be able to
reach those who have lower financial
literacy
>> with simple messages with which we can
explain what we are doing and therefore
influence the way how they form their
expectations and their attitudes towards
what we do.
>> Absolutely. And going a bit forward,
going a bit ahead on your role, um which
challenges do you see Europe has to
tackle in the future? I think at the
moment uh as we uh often repeat uh the
key for Europe is to increase its
competitiveness, productivity
and uh main thing that it has to do at
the moment is to
uh push further with completing the job
which it has already been doing creating
a real single market also for financial
services,
banking union, service and investing
union,
capital markets and uh this is something
that we will have to do if we want to
keep the growth, productivity
uh competitiveness in today's world. uh
the way we should do it I think is we
should try to push uh many things in
parallel because we've been trying to do
one by one over the last uh 10 or so
years and it didn't really work. Uh I
think in the end we will have to have a
a package of things on which everybody
in Europe can agree. Uh because
everybody wins in the end. Yes. Although
sometimes you lose a little bit but if
it's a real package from which everybody
gains something then I'm sure we can we
can push it and that will allow the uh
scalability in the European market uh uh
so both for the companies and the
financial institutions banks who we
observe much more and which falls within
our uh uh responsibility uh to scale up
to to have higher productivity to become
more competitive
>> which eventually ultimately supports
every European in Europe not
>> absolutely absolutely
>> this is the final final [clears throat]
goal
>> that's the idea it brings benefits
benefits in the end to everyone exactly
in in in Europe
>> and uh let's zoom in on your role which
are your top priorities as vice
president of European Central Bank
>> first and foremost one is our main goal
that's the price stability that goes
without saying uh the other
is connected also with what we have been
just saying. I would like to be uh
during my mandate a part of this
solution of the European problem of not
having integrated uh financial markets
uh of uh solving the problem of the
fragmentation
by creating both a genuine banking union
and and the financial markets savings
and investment capital markets union
however you want to call it. uh and I'll
do whatever I can to to help uh that uh
uh uh happen. Uh apart from that of
course the the important thing is
financial stability.
>> Mhm. Uh financial stability is something
which is usually not uh to to what
people are not very attentive when
everything is okay
>> because when [clears throat] everything
is okay it's
>> but uh once it's gone it's everybody's
problem and everybody pays a lots of
attention in order to ensure that uh it
stays with us and that it's been with us
now for since the euros and debt crisis
uh and it's been with us because we
change the way we do things. We change
the regulation. We change the
implementation of the regulation. We
change the the architecture of Euro zone
uh for better and that's why it is with
us. So we have to make sure that it
stays with us in the future and that it
changes to adopt the changes which
happen in the environment
let's say uh in the payment system with
stable coins with the digital currency
tokenization
in the AI
>> which creates new risks that we haven't
had before but also new opportunities so
we have to we have to make sure that all
that in a a helps financial stability
rather than endanger it.
>> Yes. And when we speak about your role,
one of your uh clear tasks is you are
the guardian of financial stability. And
in this role, what kind of risks do you
see the financial system is really
facing today and potentially going
forward? I know it's forecasting is very
difficult not for what you said, but
what do you see? Well, there are always
uh uh set of risks which are which are
uh more problematic than than other
ones. Today as the world has changed, we
always uh mention geopolitical risks
which are here which have not been to
that extent here few years ago but can
uh rapidly change the the the prices uh
the markets attitudes
uh and therefore endanger the the
financial stability. On the other hand,
you have the very high valuations in the
equity markets uh connected primarily
with the uh AI. Uh this is something
which we have also not seen uh or have
not seen for a long time. This kind of
price earnings, price to forward
earnings ratios. They might in the end
uh end up being justified.
>> Mhm.
>> But they might not. And the exposure is
large and increasing. So we have to be
very careful monitor that because with
such large exposure so many investments
going uh there it creates definitely
a risk for the repricing of the of the
equity markets. Then we have a fiscal
problems which
>> uh are nothing new. But uh we see again
that uh in some countries have uh
rising debts and unsustainable fiscal
positions in the long run. And we have
learned in the past know when something
is unsustainable it's unsustainable. And
uh better we address sooner we address
these problems the better it is. uh and
this is something that we have to also
monitor very close closely because it's
also possible to see the repricing in in
those markets which can be relatively
rapid
>> and then there are also uh uh private
credit uh markets uh connection between
the banks and NBFIs which are
which are increasing but u I would say
there we are not in a situation that we
worry too much. However, uh if there is
some severe scenario of stress in the
markets, they they can also become
amplifiers of the of the shock.
>> Yes. And one of the reasons why the
financial system in Europe in your area
has um withstand so many no difficult
moments is because we had strong
regulation and strong supervision
especially for banks. But recently many
say no this also might hinder
competitiveness.
Um what's your position in this uh
debate? I think that the competitiveness
uh of banks uh is not so much uh
function of the regulation. Uh
regulation
can be simplified and should be
simplified.
We have if you ask me too much
regulation
uh thousands of pages of regulation. I
don't think we need that. Uh I think we
can simplify and I think we will
simplify
uh we will simplify uh uh regulation
requirements towards the banks. Uh but
this is not the core issue of the
competitiveness. uh core issue of the
competitiveness is again going back to
what we discussed the fragmentation of
the markets in in in Europe and the fact
that the banks are not European but
national
>> they like scale to compete
u in the create markets I mean they're
very national there's not that much
competition but trading if you look at
the trading post trading that's where
the size matters
>> and is this uh because why US and for
example
Asia, China and so on have a better
starting points.
>> Exactly. Exactly. That's that's where
you have the really scale which allows
you to be more competitive when it comes
to the trading and and and post trading
and without you know scaling up having a
true European banks now big enough it's
difficult to to to compete with the with
the US uh on that front. So we have to
make sure that uh while we simplify
regulation which we need to do
uh we do not deregulate in a sense that
we reduce the capital requirements for
the banks uh which has served us very
well through the last uh shocks. Banks
were actually absorbers of the shocks
rather than the amplifiers as before.
Why? because they had enough capital,
enough liquidity. We have to keep it
there.