Video summary
The video introduces an interactive simulation designed to demystify the complex physics and biology behind brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and electroencephalography (EEG). Using a virtual dashboard that resembles a fighter jet cockpit, viewers can manipulate various parameters to observe how different factors affect neural signals. The core analogy presented is that reading thoughts from outside the skull is akin to trying to hear a whisper inside a soundproof vault while standing next to a loud jackhammer. This highlights the immense engineering challenge engineers face daily: extracting faint electrical signals generated by millions of neurons while battling the insulating properties of the human skull, dead skin layers, and overwhelming environmental noise.
The simulation demonstrates how the orientation of pyramidal neurons allows their individual electrical charges to summate into a detectable macro field, but it also reveals that active thinking actually produces a chaotic, low-amplitude signal compared to the synchronized, high-amplitude waves seen during deep sleep. To capture these signals effectively, the video contrasts wet clinical electrodes with dry consumer headsets. Wet electrodes require scrubbing the scalp and applying conductive gel to bridge microscopic air gaps, significantly lowering electrical resistance and filtering out noise like 60-hertz power line interference. In contrast, dry electrodes suffer from high impedance, making them susceptible to environmental electromagnetic bleed and motion artifacts caused by muscle activity, such as clenching a jaw or shifting weight in a chair.
Ultimately, the simulation concludes that achieving perfect signal fidelity requires invasive methods, specifically stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) implants placed directly into the cerebral cortex. By bypassing the skull and skin, these implants eliminate spatial blurring and allow access to high-gamma frequencies, which are essential for decoding precise motor intent with zero latency. This trade-off illustrates the unforgiving engineering compromise inherent in neurotechnology: balancing the pristine quality of invasive signals against the daily friction and safety risks of non-invasive wearables. The video leaves viewers contemplating a future where such technology becomes safe and mainstream, raising profound questions about the boundary between organic human thought and digital feedback when the interface becomes perfect.
Read the full video transcript
Okay, we'll be reviewing this new
application.
You can try it yourself on
bionykills.com/electrodes.
It's covering different electrode
interface modalities.
In this particular simulation, you can
control the
cognitive state
from deep sleep relaxed to active.
Can simulate the
EMG noise.
And choose different types of
electrodes.
And we'll go for this
overview by Notebook LM. Well, it's
actually
doing a demo for the application and
what it can do.
>> Imagine
uh trying to eavesdrop on a whisper,
right? But this whisper is happening
inside a completely soundproof bank
vault.
>> Oh, wow.
>> And you are standing outside the vault
just trying to listen in. But also,
you're standing right next to an active,
incredibly loud jackhammer.
>> That is a that's quite the acoustic
nightmare.
>> Right, it's an absolute nightmare. But
that is basically what engineers are
dealing with every single day when they
attempt to, you know, read human
thoughts from the outside of the skull.
>> Exactly, it's a huge problem.
>> exactly what we're going into today. So,
welcome to this deep dive. You aren't
just listening to us talk through a
stack of dry research papers today.
>> Definitely not.
>> No, today we are acting as your personal
technical guides.
Because right now, you are looking at a
live, highly interactive
neuroengineering dashboard right there
on your screen.
>> Yeah, the
uh the Bionyk Chaos laboratory
interface. Bionic Chaos, I mean, what
you have in front of you is a real-time
biophysical simulation of an EEG system.
>> system, right?
>> Exactly. We are looking at a fully
functional brain-computer interface
simulator. And by the end of this deep
dive, as we, you know, walk you through
this dashboard, you are going to
understand the actual physics and the
biology of how different sensors and
placements, and even the subject's state
of mind dramatically alter those
electrical signals we extract from the
human brain.
>> So, let's get you oriented because at
first glance, I mean, this dashboard
looks like the cockpit of a fighter jet.
>> It's a lot. There is a lot going on.
>> There's so much going on.
>> Mhm.
>> So, let's just start by directing your
eyes over the left side of your screen.
You've got this top-down kind of
wireframe model of a human head.
>> Right.
>> And it's covered in this crazy web of
glowing dots.
>> Yeah. So, those glowing nodes, they
actually map out the international 10-20
system, which in clinical neurology and
neuroscience, I mean, this is the
absolute gold standard for where you
place electrodes on a human scalp.
>> Okay, because I'm looking at the labels
on these nodes and they have names like
FES and O1.
>> Yeah.
>> But, I'd imagine mapping the human head
is just notoriously difficult.
>> Well, incredibly difficult.
>> Because you've got a toddler's head, an
adult's head, entirely different bone
structures. I mean, you can't just hand
a doctor a tape measure and say, "Hey,
put the sensor exactly 3 in above the
left ear."
>> Right, because that 3 in means something
completely different depending on the
actual patient.
>> Exactly.
>> Which is why the system doesn't use
absolute measurements at all.
The
the 10 and 20 in the name actually refer
to percentages.
>> Oh, percentages, okay.
>> Yeah, the whole grid is based on
proportional distances between fixed
anatomical landmarks on the skull. So,
for instance, a technician will take a
tape measure and find the total distance
from the
>> Which is the bridge of the nose, right?
>> Right, the bridge of the nose. And they
measure all the way back to the inion,
which is that little bony bump at the
very base of the back of your skull.
>> Okay, I see. So, if you place a sensor
at exactly like 10% or 20% of that
specific patient's total measurement,
the grid just dynamically scales.
>> It stretches to fit the map perfectly,
yes.
>> That's brilliant. It's like a dynamic
GPS grid.
That means FES is always going to sit
dead center over the frontal lobe and O1
is always going to anchor right over the
occipital lobe in the back.
>> Precisely.
>> Whether the patient is, you know, a
massive NFL linebacker or a premature
infant in the ICU.
>> Exactly. It creates this universal
coordinate system. So, if a researcher
in Tokyo publishes a paper saying, "Hey,
we detected a specific anomaly at
electrode Fes." A surgeon in Toronto
knows the precise square centimeter of
the cerebral cortex they're talking
about.
>> Wow. Okay, that makes perfect sense.
>> But, to understand what that anomaly
actually looks like, let's pull your
attention over to the right side of the
canvas now. You should see an
oscilloscope.
>> Yeah, I see it. It's the the black box
with all the green traces jumping
around. Looks a bit like a hospital
heart monitor, but I mean the lines are
way more erratic, really jagged.
>> Yeah, they are. And what you are
witnessing on that oscilloscope is not
just abstract data. Those specific
voltage fluctuations are the
synchronized electrical firing of
literally millions of pyramidal neurons
in the cerebral cortex.
>> Wait. Rendering in real time?
>> Rendering in real time, right in front
of you.
>> Okay, pyramidal neurons.
So, these are the specific brain cells
actually doing the heavy lifting of our
conscious thought.
>> Yeah, they are the primary excitatory
neurons in the cortex and they're named
that because their cell bodies literally
look like tiny pyramids.
>> Okay, that's a cool visual.
>> But, you know, their shape isn't
actually the most important part for our
dashboard here. It's their orientation.
>> Their orientation?
>> Yeah, evolution basically arranged these
particular neurons so they are lined up
completely perpendicular to the surface
of the brain. So, they point straight up
toward the skull, kind of like trees
growing in a forest.
>> Wait, does the orientation actually
matter for the electrical signal? Like
if they were just a tangled random web
of cells, wouldn't they still produce
electricity?
>> They would, absolutely, but we would
never ever be able to read it from the
outside.
>> Why not?
>> Well, think about it. If the neurons
were facing all random directions,
firing off their microscopic electrical
charges, those highly localized
electromagnetic fields would just cancel
each other out.
>> Oh, because they're opposing each other.
>> Right, they'd cancel out before they
ever even left the tissue. But because
millions of these pyramidal trees are
all standing parallel to one another,
pointing the exact same way, their tiny
individual charges physically summate.
>> Meaning they add up.
>> Exactly. They stack together into a
macro field that is just large enough to
push through the layers of tissue and
bone so that our surface sensors can
catch it.
>> That is just wild. It's kind of like um
like a massive stadium full of people
holding a flashlight.
>> Okay. Yeah.
>> If they're all just pointing their
flashlights at each other in completely
random directions, from far away, it's
just this diffuse blurry glow.
But if everyone points their flashlights
straight up into the night sky at the
exact same second,
>> then from a satellite in space, you see
one giant unified beam of light.
>> Exactly.
>> That is a fantastic way to visualize it.
And the rhythm of those flashes, like
the frequency and amplitude of that
unified beam, tells us an incredible
amount about the cognitive state of the
brain in that specific moment.
>> Which means we finally get to the really
fun part of this dashboard. We know
where the signals are coming from now,
so let's actually manipulate them.
>> Let's do it.
>> Okay, look down at the bottom right
corner of the UI, everyone. You'll see a
control panel labeled the neural
dynamics engine.
We are going to change what our digital
subject is currently experiencing.
Let's shift the simulation into deep
sleep.
>> Okay, keep your eyes on the green lines
on the oscilloscope.
And engaged.
>> Whoa.
Look at that shift. The traces on the
screen just completely, fundamentally
altered. The jagged spikes just smoothed
out into these massive, slow, rhythmic
waves rolling across the entire grid.
>> Yeah, it's a dramatic change.
>> like deep ocean swells, like really tall
hills and very wide valleys.
>> You are looking at delta waves. They
operate at a very low frequency,
typically between like 1 and 4 hertz.
>> Meaning that wave only cycles 1 to 4
times per second, right?
>> Exactly. And biologically, this is the
absolute hallmark of stage three deep
restorative dreamless sleep.
What is happening in the cortex right
now is that the brain has largely
disconnected from processing external
sensory input.
>> So the neurons just aren't reacting to
sights or sounds in the room.
>> Right. They are basically offline from
the outside world. And because they
aren't busy calculating or reacting to
anything, millions of neurons just fall
into this shared rhythm dictated by
deeper brain structures. They're resting
together, then firing together, then
resting together.
>> Oh, I see.
>> It's an intense, completely unified
synchronization, which is why the
physical wave on your screen is so tall
and powerful.
>> Okay. Well, let's see what happens when
we disturb that peaceful rest. I'm going
to use the engine here to wake our
subject up instantly, and we are going
to assign them a complex multi-step
calculus problem.
>> this should be good.
>> So watch those big slow ocean waves
right now, and switch.
>> There it goes. The signal transforms
immediately.
>> Okay, wait. Hold on a second. The guy
just woke up and started doing intense
calculus. And the signal just flatlined
into tiny static.
>> Yep.
>> Did the simulation just crash? Because
it looks completely broken.
I mean, when the subject was asleep, the
waves were huge and powerful. Now that
the subject is awake, hyper-focused, and
doing heavy cognitive lifting, the big
waves are just gone, replaced by this
chaotic low amplitude buzz.
>> It is a bit shocking to see at first.
>> I feel like this is backwards. Shouldn't
a brain doing complex math produce a
much larger, more powerful signal than a
brain doing absolutely nothing?
>> It seems totally counterintuitive, I
know. But you have to go back to your
stadium analogy. When the brain is in
deep sleep, it's like the entire stadium
of neurons is doing the wave together.
Everyone stands up and sits down at the
exact same moment.
>> Right. And that mass synchronization
creates a giant visible signal from
space.
>> Exactly. But, what happens when you wake
the subject up and ask them to solve
calculus?
>> Well, I guess the stadium stops doing
the wave, cuz, you know, people have to
actually get to work.
>> Precisely. The visual cortex starts
rapidly decoding the numbers on the
paper. The prefrontal cortex starts
holding all those variables in working
memory. The parietal lobe starts
processing the spatial relationship of
the complex equation.
>> Now, I see where this is going.
>> The unified stadium basically fractures
into thousands of highly specialized
groups, all firing incredibly fast,
producing what we call beta and gamma
waves.
>> But, they're all firing at completely
different rhythms now.
>> Right. And because these different
cortical networks are now totally out of
sync with one another, their electrical
fields are no longer stacking perfectly.
>> Gotcha.
>> In fact, on a macro level, they start
canceling each other out. That is called
desynchronization. So, that chaotic,
tiny, noisy trace on your oscilloscope
right now.
>> Yeah.
>> That isn't a broken signal at all. That
is the beautiful, messy visual
representation of active human thought.
>> That is amazing. Okay, so that actually
brings us to a massive engineering wall,
though. If an active thinking brain
produces a signal that is microscopic,
totally chaotic, and actively
desynchronizing itself, how do we ever
capture it reliably enough to control a
machine?
>> It's the million-dollar question.
>> Because, frankly, if the signal is this
tiny, why isn't the whole world wearing
brain-reading hats right now to, I don't
know, type on our phones?
>> Well, because reading these
microvolt-level signals from outside the
head is just a physics nightmare, and
the primary culprit for that is
evolutionary biology.
>> skull.
>> The human skull. I I from a biological
standpoint, the skull is an absolute
marvel. It is this dense, calcium-rich
armor perfectly designed to protect our
most vital organ from blunt force
trauma.
>> Right, it keeps us alive.
>> But from an electrical engineering
perspective, calcium phosphate is a
highly effective electrical insulator.
It completely scatters, absorbs, and
blocks the weak electrical fields
generated by the brain.
>> So, you have these microscopic
whispering neurons trying to shout their
complex math problems through a literal
brick wall of bone. And on top of that,
dead skin.
>> A very thick brick wall.
>> To get the clean signal you are
currently seeing on the oscilloscope, we
clearly have to optimize the point of
contact. So, direct your eyes to the
panel on the screen labeled placement
and invasiveness. Right now, the
simulation is running the medical
clinical standard, which is wet silver
silver chloride electrodes.
>> Yeah, and the operative word there being
wet. If you have ever had a clinical EEG
in a hospital setting, you are deeply
familiar with this really messy reality.
>> Oh, yeah.
>> A technician literally takes an abrasive
paste and physically scrubs your scalp
to strip away the stratum corneum, which
is the outermost layer of dead skin
cells and oils.
>> Which uh
sounds terrible. Just aggressively
scrubbing the scalp.
>> Yeah.
>> But I assume dead skin is also a
terrible conductor of electricity.
>> It is highly resistive, yes. So, once
the skin is scrubbed raw and red, they
apply a highly conductive electrolytic
gel right between the silver electrode
and your scalp.
>> I always think of this like building a
custom computer.
>> Oh, really? How so?
>> Well, if you are putting a metal heat
sink onto a really hot computer chip to
cool it down,
you don't just slap the dry metal
directly onto the dry chip.
>> Right.
>> Even if they look perfectly flat to the
human eye, there are microscopic
imperfections, right? Like tiny air gaps
between the metals. And air is an
insulator, it traps the heat. So, you
have to squeeze thermal paste between
them to fill those microscopic gaps and
and a perfect bridge.
>> That is
>> That wet electrogel is basically doing
the exact same thing, but for
electricity instead of heat.
It chemically bridges the microscopic
air gaps caused by hair and skin
texture.
>> The thermal paste analogy is incredibly
spot-on. By chemically bridging those
gaps, you drop the skin impedance, the
actual electrical resistance, down to
about 5 kΩ.
>> Which is very low. And if you glance
over the telemetry dash on the UI, the
result just speaks for itself. The
signal is gorgeous.
>> It really is.
>> You get this beautifully clean high
signal-to-noise ratio. The brain waves
are distinct, the background static is
almost zero.
>> Yeah, it's the clinical gold standard
for a reason. But here is the major
problem.
Bringing this back to the real world of
consumer brain-computer interfaces,
the wet gel presents an absolutely
insurmountable friction point.
>> Right. Because let's be honest, I am not
going to aggressively scrub my scalp
with abrasive paste and slather chemical
conductive gel into my hair every single
evening just because I wanted like play
a virtual reality game or turn off my
smart lights with my mind. Nobody is
doing that.
>> Nobody. The daily friction is just way
too high, which is why the entire
neurotech industry has basically spent
the last decade aggressively pursuing
dry consumer headsets. You know, devices
you can just slip on like a pair of
headphones.
>> Well, let's test that out right now. I'm
going to guide you back to the interface
panel. Keep your eyes locked on the
oscilloscope as I switch our hardware
from the wet clinical standard to the
dry modality.
>> This represents modern consumer tech
using dry pin-like electrodes that just
kind of comb through the hair to rest
directly on the scalp.
>> Okay, ready? 3 2 1 switch.
>> And there goes the signal. What you are
seeing on the dashboard right now is the
catastrophic reality of dry electrodes.
Without that wet electrolytic gel
bridging the microscopic air gaps we
talked about, the electrical resistance
just shoots through the roof.
>> impedance on our telemetry dash just
spiked from a highly conductive 5
kiloohms all the way past 250 kiloohms.
>> It's a massive jump.
>> The green lines just shrank to a
whisper. The raw neural signals fighting
so much resistance it's barely even
registering on the screen anymore.
>> And when your primary brain signal is
that incredibly weak, something else
really problematic happens. You open the
door to environmental bleed.
>> What does that mean?
>> Your dry electrodes essentially
functioning as raw antennas now, and
they just start picking up whatever
stronger electromagnetic signals are
floating around the physical room.
>> Oh, because the human body is basically
just a giant bag of salt water, right?
We are essentially walking antennas.
>> Very much so.
>> So, if the sensor can't hear the brain
properly through the skull,
it starts listening to the environment
vibrating through us. Like, what
specifically? What are we picking up?
>> Look at the heavy thick oscillation that
just took over the trace on your screen.
In North America, the electrical power
grid runs at 60 hertz. Because the
impedance of the scalp is so terribly
high that ambient 60 hertz
electromagnetic noise, which is
literally emanating from the wiring
inside your walls, your desk lamp, your
computer monitor,
>> it's bleeding right into the sensor.
>> Exactly. The brain waves are completely
swamped by the electricity powering the
building itself.
>> You're trying to read a human mind, and
instead you're literally reading the
wall outlet.
>> It's a massive headache for engineers.
>> But wait, it actually gets worse than
just the room noise. Everyone, find the
button on your dashboard labeled
artifact. I'm going to trigger it right
now. This simulates our digital subject
doing something entirely mundane, like
just slightly shifting their weight in
their chair, or you know, just clenching
their jaw. Here we go.
>> And the screen just blew out.
>> Whoa. The green lines just shot into
these massive jagged cliffs way off the
top and bottom of the oscilloscope. The
brain waves data is completely
obliterated by these giant spikes. What
just happened?
>> You just triggered a motion artifact,
specifically an electromyographic or EMG
response.
>> Okay.
>> This highlights the absolute brutal
trade-off of non-invasive headsets. You
are locked in a constant battle for
signal fidelity, not just against the
environment, but against the subject's
own body.
>> How so?
>> When you clench your jaw or swallow or
even just blink your eyes, you are
contracting muscles. And muscles operate
using electrical potentials, just like
the brain does, but muscle fibers are
massive compared to neurons, and their
electrical charges operate in
millivolts, not the tiny microvolts of
the brain.
>> So, a jaw clench is basically a a
megaphone screaming right next to the
whispering neurons.
>> Exactly. The muscle electricity drowns
everything out. Plus, with dry
electrodes, any slight movement of the
subject's head creates tiny physical
shifts of the sensor against the dry
skin, which causes static electricity
spikes.
>> Uh that makes sense.
>> So, just imagine a consumer playing an
intense video game using a dry EEG
headset. They get stressed during a boss
fight, they grit their teeth, and
instantly the system goes completely
blind.
The game character freezes because the
computer can only see the jaw muscle.
>> Okay, this brings us to a really
critical logical roadblock then.
>> Mhm.
>> If non-invasive tech is this vulnerable,
I mean, the skull blocks it, the power
line swamp it, a simple jaw clench
completely blows it out,
how do we ever achieve perfect signal?
>> It's tough.
>> Because we've all seen the incredible
videos on the news, right? Of paralyzed
patients controlling robotic prosthetic
arms with their minds, and they're able
to slowly take a drink of water. They
clearly aren't doing that through static
and jaw clenches.
>> No, they certainly aren't. To achieve
that level of instantaneous
high-precision control over a complex
external machine, there's really only
one engineering solution left on the
table. We have to bypass the skull
completely.
>> to go under the bone.
>> We move from non-invasive wearables to
invasive neural implants.
>> Okay, I want you to watch the traces on
your screen one last time.
We are going to change the simulation
setting from the consumer dry modality
directly to an invasive SEEG implant.
That stands for
stereo-electroencephalography.
Get ready to see the absolute payload of
modern neuroengineering. Switching now.
>> It is genuinely like night and day,
isn't it?
>> It's stunning. The traces on the
oscilloscope are pristine. The 60-Hz hum
from the walls is entirely gone. The
artifact blowouts are gone. We are just
seeing incredibly clean, sharp, rapid
data.
>> The simulation just modeled the surgical
placement of microscopic electrodes
directly into the physical tissue of the
cerebral cortex.
By doing this, we've entirely bypassed
the insulating properties of the dead
skin, the scalp, and that thick bone.
>> And now your telemetry dash, the
impedances have dropped down to near
zero.
>> Yep.
>> We took down the brick wall. We aren't
standing outside the bank vault
listening to the whisper anymore. We
have stepped completely inside the
vault.
>> And because we are inside, something
else truly amazing happens. The spatial
blurring disappears.
>> The spatial blurring?
>> Yeah. When an electrical signal travels
through the skull, the bone acts as a
diffuse medium. It smears the signal
out, making it incredibly difficult to
pinpoint exactly which tiny millimeter
of cortex generated the thought.
>> Oh, I see.
>> But with an invasive implant, that blur
is gone. We know precisely which
localized cluster of neurons is firing.
>> And if you look closely at these new
pristine traces, the actual frequency of
the wave is incredibly fast. We aren't
looking at those slow delta ocean swells
anymore. We are looking at high gamma
frequencies.
>> Right. High gamma activity oscillates
anywhere from 70 up to 150 Hz or even
more. And from a biophysicist
standpoint, high frequency waves have
very short wavelength. They don't travel
through dense physical barriers well at
all.
>> It's kind of like hearing a car pulling
up outside with the stereo blasting,
right? The high-pitched vocals get
completely blocked by the walls of your
house, but the long, slow, low-frequency
bass notes easily rattle right through
the glass.
>> That is the exact same physics
principle. The skull easily blocks the
high-pitched treble of the high gamma
waves, so we almost never see them with
surface headsets.
But once you surgically implant a sensor
inside the brain, high gamma is
everywhere.
>> And why is capturing high gamma the holy
grail for these engineers?
>> Because high gamma frequencies are the
fundamental neural code for precise
motor intent. If you want to move your
right index finger to push a button, a
highly localized rapid burst of high
gamma activity occurs in a very specific
millimeter of your motor cortex.
>> Oh, wow.
>> By surgically unlocking access to those
specific frequencies, a computer
algorithm can read your exact physical
intention in real time with zero lag,
and translate it perfectly to a robotic
finger.
>> And there it is. That is the grand
compromise as the core lesson of the
entire dashboard you're looking at
today. The choice of how we interface
with the human brain is always a massive
unforgiving engineering compromise.
>> It really is.
>> You constantly have to balance the
pristine zero latency signal quality of
a surgical implant against the daily
friction of a wet clinical cap, against
the absolute messiness of a consumer dry
headset, and against the severe medical
risks of opening up a healthy human
skull.
>> It is a delicate, extremely high-stakes
balancing act. And right now, every
researcher, neurologist, and consumer
tech company on Earth is fighting tooth
and nail to find the sweet spot on that
triangle.
>> Well, on that note, we are going to
formally conclude the guided tour
portion of this deep dive. I am
officially yielding the controls of the
Bionik EOS gas board back to you. I
highly encourage you to stay and enjoy
the sandbox. Click around.
>> Yeah, definitely play around with it.
>> Interact directly with that 10-20 head
map. Experiment with different electrode
materials. Maybe see what happens when
you mix wet electrodes with the deep
sleep state. Just watch how the
biophysics of the brain adapt in real
time. It really is mesmerizing once you
understand the mechanics behind the
screen.
>> It is. But, you know, before we
completely sign off, I want to leave you
with one final thought to ponder while
you play with the settings.
>> All right, what is it?
>> We just established that surgically
unlocking high gamma frequencies gives
us the fundamental neural code for
perfect, instantaneous machine control.
And right now, that technology is
rightfully used to help paralyzed
patients operate prosthetic limbs.
But, imagine a future where these
invasive implants become completely
frictionless, safe, and mainstream for
everyday consumers.
>> A world where anyone can just walk into
a clinic and get one.
>> Right. When the latency drops to
absolute zero and the signal between
your mind and a computer is completely
perfect and bidirectional, will we even
be able to tell the difference between
our own organic thoughts and the digital
feedback from the machine?
>> Oh, wow.
>> If you can just query a massive
artificial intelligence by simply
thinking a question
and the answer appears in your
consciousness instantly, whose thought
was that really?
When the interface is perfect, where
exactly does the human brain end and the
computer begin?
>> That is a very heavy, very real
question. But, it's exactly the kind of
muddy waters we end up in when we start
tweaking the dials on the human mind.
Keep an eye on that oscilloscope and
keep questioning what you see.
>> You can try it yourself on
brainwaves.com/electrodes.
There's also a description at the bottom
of the page.
And check uh
other simulations as well.
Like this epilepsy
discharges overview.
Or this uh sleep cycle simulator.
All these tools are available on
brainwaves.com. Go check them out and
provide your feedback.