Video summary
The discussion centers on the theological tension between human ability to believe and the necessity of God's intervention for salvation, particularly when examining Old Testament examples versus New Testament doctrine. One participant argues that while people in the Old Testament could temporarily believe or trust in God based on external signs like prophets, miracles, and sacrificial rituals, they lacked an internal, regenerated heart capable of sustaining that faith permanently. This perspective relies heavily on passages such as Deuteronomy 29:4, which states that God had not given them a heart to know, eyes to see, or ears to hear up until that point. Consequently, the argument posits that any belief exhibited by Old Testament figures was fragile and dependent entirely on external circumstances; without continuous divine intervention through signs or threats of judgment, individuals could easily walk away from their faith due to their inherently wicked nature described in Genesis.
A key hypothetical scenario is introduced to test this theory: if a person on the Day of Atonement genuinely believed by faith that their sins were atoned for and then died shortly thereafter without any further external miracles or internal regeneration, would they be saved? The participants agree that under the Old Covenant system, such a person would indeed be saved because their faith was directed toward God's completed work in the sacrifice, not their own merit. However, this raises the question of how such faith could exist in a heart described as "desperately wicked." The dialogue suggests that while God certainly used external means—such as raising up judges, sending angels, or performing miracles—to keep people seeking Him, there is no scriptural evidence that He performed an internal work to change their hearts prior to the New Covenant. This creates a distinction where Old Testament believers could start trusting God but lacked the spiritual capacity to endure temptation and remain faithful over time without constant external prompting.
The conversation further explores the nature of faith itself, distinguishing between mere intellectual assent or temporary trust and true saving faith that endures. Using the analogy of trusting a chair to sit upon, one participant explains that true faith involves entrusting oneself to God without making extra precautions to save oneself, whereas relying on external threats or personal effort is not genuine faith. The participants acknowledge that while some Old Testament figures like Abraham and Moses maintained their faith despite failures, others fell away due to arrogance or a lack of love for God, acting more out of religious obligation than heartfelt trust. Ultimately, the consensus leans toward the view that while humans can initiate a temporary belief based on knowledge and external evidence, the ability to sustain that belief until salvation is ultimately a work of God's grace, a truth fully realized in the New Testament through the indwelling Holy Spirit and the promise of a new heart.
Read the full video transcript
address that. My main question is in
regards to I saw you did videos in
regards to the different
>> letters in in tulip. So from a
historical perspective I am I I'm not
familiar with um Calvin or anything like
that. Um the the only time when I came
across the whole concept was going on a
podcast for the first time and I needed
to research it. But I do believe in each
one of the letters cuz I believe it
reflects what scripture says. The thing
specifically that I was always confused
about is that you're pretty much
rejecting of total depravity from the
perspective of people can be believing
but they don't stay believing.
Therefore, it doesn't have that
inability that um total depravity is
speaking about. But from my perspective,
I believe that well, at least from the
the reformed um teachers that I listen
to, John Piper,
um James White, it was always from the
perspective of ultimate salvation. Does
a person have the ability to believe in
a way that would lead them to salvation?
And from me um reading through the
scripture, my perspective is that they
don't. Um,
>> so
go ahead.
>> Salvation is based upon us believing and
trusting ourselves to what God has done.
>> Correct?
>> So in in the New Testament or after the
cross or or Christ, all he's doing is
fulfilling every part of the atonement.
He plays a part of the high priest,
right? He plays a part of the the
sacrificial offering
>> and the scapegoat, the sin bearer. plays
all all all three all three roles. The
reason why I bring that up is because
people in the old testament were saved
also.
>> Mhm.
>> Uh they could never be reconciled to the
father because the mechanism that would
reconcile them was Jesus actual
ascension after his death, burial,
resurrection and then his ascension.
So they are s there waiting on him. But
as they die, they die in right standing.
How they get there? What what put them
there? They believed. Now did something
was there something internal making them
believe or something external?
>> See there's a there's a problem that
those who believe that um you cannot
believe on your own.
Well in the Old Testament we do have
people believing on their own. Now it's
not quite on their own because what do
they have in the Old Testament? They had
priests and they had prophets and they
had signs from God and they might even
heck from time to time see an angel or
the angel of the Lord but and there's a
text that's given uh Deuteronomy
294
Moses says yet to this day the Lord has
not given you who's you
a heart to know nor to see nor ears to
hear.
>> Is this Deuteronomy?
>> Yeah. Deuteronomy 29:4. So, who would
who would that include? Well, it would
have to include Moses. It would have to
it would have to include Joshua.
>> What about Jacob?
It have to include him. So,
>> um, how would it cuz this is Moses
giving them the message, right? He's
telling them what they're going to do.
>> He's giving them a warning. Do not do
this cuz if you do this, this is what's
going to befall you. So Moses is the one
that speaks to God and believes and
knows and he's given them the message.
So I wouldn't include Moses in the
actual warning.
>> You get what I mean? As the message
bearer
>> so yet to this day, the Lord has not
given you a heart.
>> Given you Yeah. giving you cuz it's like
addressing. He hasn't given you and a
heart to see cuz there they That's what
I look at it. So I don't include Moses
in the general conviction affair cuz
he's the one giving the message.
>> Okay. So the the word is lhem which is
all inclusive to you all. Now
>> let's say it doesn't include Moses. It
includes everybody else.
>> Yeah.
>> And so a heart has not been given to
them. Now we know what he's speaking
about because this comes up again in
Isaiah when he is touching their heart.
He's hardening their heart. Mhm.
>> So he and and and he will not give him a
heart to to believe, eyes to see, and
ears to hear. Same thing that we're
seeing here yet to this day. So up till
up till now, up to this point, God
hadn't done so. So who does that
include? A lot of people, faithful
people who had faith but didn't have an
inner workings of the Holy Spirit
regenerating their heart. So man needs
help either externally or internally.
The problem that we have externally is
that so many people you can start off
believing and then and then walk away
which is the case of Israel.
>> Go ahead.
>> That's the thing from Deuteronomy,
right?
>> When I'm because the warning
specifically states that they're going
to turn away.
Right? So here's the warning. Do these
things and this will happen. And then
there's a second part of it. Sorry if I
don't like remember it specifically. No,
you're fine.
>> Which is from like a storyboard
perspective. This is how I remember it.
>> So remember,
>> remember what they have to do. They have
to love the Lord their God with all
their heart in Deuteronomy. And that
>> the commandments that were given
>> Well, hold on. You got to keep this in
your heart
>> in Deuteronomy 6. Deuteronomy 10, he
tells them, "Circumcise your heart and
sift your neck no longer. Get yourself
right. Fix your heart." So he's telling
them to do so. All the while
periodically through this, you've got
people that believe consistently. No. So
they can make it they they can make up
their mind to believe something. I
really believe this. This is true.
Something inwardly though will allow
them to move away from that. You cuz you
can walk away from what you know is
true. You can know, hey, this is the
best job, but that job's got more fun
over there. Or this woman or this man is
better, but I walk away cuz I like what
I see over here. But I know this is I
know he going to mess me up. I know
she's I we we do that all the time. We
walk away from what we know is right or
what what's better. You pick a scenario.
So no difference in the children of
Israel. They can walk away from what
they know or they trust is true. So
which we see that happening with them.
They believe something to be true and
they can entrust themselves to it, but
they also have the ability to stop
entrusting themselves to it at that
point in time because there's nothing
inward. To this day, the Lord has not
given you a heart to know, nor eyes to
see, nor ears to hear. The same wording
that we see in Isaiah um 96 or I'm
sorry, 69 and 10. The same wording. And
he says, "Otherwise, if you did have a
heart to see and eyes to believe, I mean
eyes to see, heart to uh to know and
ears to hear, you would turn and
believe." And this is kind of an ongoing
thing which we see happens to the
Gentiles
>> and all believers in the New Testament.
And then God has said he's going to do
the same thing for the Jews, Israel,
when the fullness of the Gentiles comes
in. So when that's when that's taking
place, then he's going to open their
eyes and their hearts and their ears,
and they will believe. Also, up to this
point though, he has not. Now, he's not
saying that he's hardened them in
Deuteronomy 29:4 is not saying that God
has hardened them. He hadn't hardened
them. He just hadn't given them eyes to
see, ears to hear, and a heart to know.
So how did everyone else see, hear and
know? That was them. What kept them
seeing, hearing, and knowing? It would
be different events. Maybe something
catastrophic.
Maybe some uh waring nation. Maybe the
angel of the Lord shows up, an angel
shows up, a prophet shows up, signs and
wonders show up. Because remember, we've
got a prophet or a man of God leading
them all the way up till Samuel.
And then here comes Saul. And then here
comes David. This this ultimate
rebellion. By the way, we also have it,
you know, periodically in in Judges
where they would um um follow the Lord
for a minute. God is cool with him, but
then they would stop being cool with God
and they would sin and then God would
raise up an outside force to cause them
to turn back to him. they would ra he'd
raise up uh someone to come against them
and they would cry out and then he'd
bring up a judge and they would they
would they would be delivered. So the
cycle so even in the cycle of judges we
see them trusting God but it was just
temporarily they couldn't keep seeking.
We know that mankind could seek God in
the in the Old Testament but according
to Romans they couldn't keep seeking or
be seeking they the part of the ongoing
seeking. So, you can seek God, you can
believe, you can trust, but not long.
Just like Luke 8 um tells us, there were
those that believed, but believe
temporarily. Well, the person that
believed temporarily didn't have the
Holy Spirit in them, didn't have a
regenerated heart, but they were they
but it still and that didn't preclude
them from having the ability to believe
or to trust.
>> Right? So my my um question from that
would be because even in the New
Testament when God is given the when Jes
God go God Jesus right when Jesus is
given the like the parables right and
there is parts where said believing for
a while right so the idea of a person
hearing the news believing and then it
being taken away it being choked out it
not finding good soil that is evident in
the New Testament but specifically for
what I'm saying is that when it comes to
total depravity specifically, unless I
am missing it, but from my
understanding, they're speaking about
the nature of man, does man have a
nature that would lead them to salvation
without the interference of God?
>> Oh, now if we look at it that way, that
that there has to be some sort of help
by God. Um, yes, there has to be
something done by God. But let me ask
you a question.
>> What do you think about this? Now, this
is all hypothetical, but we're just
we're we're we're playing that we think
this actually had not could have
happened, but did it happen? So, let's
pretend we are you and I are there on
the day of atonement.
>> Mhm.
>> And we've been talking to Percy, our
buddy.
Percy, you've been living wrong. You've
been living bad. We want you to go ahead
and get yourself right with God.
Percy, you know what? You're right.
You're right. I am I'm I'm I've been
having all these issues and so now I'm
going to
um commit myself to following after
Yahweh.
>> So, here we are. We're we're together on
the day of atonement. He has Percy has
humbled his soul, afflicted his soul.
He's fasted and he really believes in
the power of what God is doing on that
day. The high priest comes out,
everything's good. God has God has
accepted the offering.
Percy is in right standing, right?
>> I don't know.
>> Well, assuming that he did every
assuming that Py believed.
>> Yeah, he did everything that was
required.
>> Like what was require? Are you talking
about pre or post Jesus? Cuz
>> No, the day of atonement. No. On the day
of atonement.
>> The final day.
>> On the day. No, no, no. on the day of
atonement under the law.
>> Oh, under the law.
>> Under the law, he did everything that
was that's what that was that was
required. He did everything.
>> He showed up. He has humbled his soul,
afflicted his soul.
>> Mhm.
>> Okay. And the offering was accepted. So,
all of his sins were professed on the
head of the scapegoat. The blood was
shed to pay for his sins. So, now he's
atoned for. The priest goes in and make
intercession for him and everyone else.
and he's done his part where his soul is
bowed down and he realized I need this
and he believes that God he believes
that God has accepted the offering
because the priest says hey we're I'm
alive so everything's good right so on
that day is Percy I'm sorry Clavus is
Clavus atoned for on that day if he if
if Percy to die that day would his sin
be atoned for
>> yeah if he believed by by faith and that
seems like a roundabout But that's
what's the Bible said like if he hold if
he believed by faith then he would be
saved because
>> Exactly. So according to the Bible works
>> he wouldn't he wouldn't be saved.
>> According to the Bible though on that
day Clavis is atoned for.
>> Mhm.
>> Do you think anybody did that and then
died a week or two weeks or a month
later?
>> Yeah, sure.
>> Okay. I believe so.
>> And in the meantime, God didn't do
anything extra for that person. There
was there was no prophet to come around
to convict him or anything. He just
died. Maybe he was old.
>> So what was the work that the Lord did
in him? Nothing.
>> The work that they did in him.
>> Yeah. What was the work that the Lord
did?
>> Remember, you know, the the key the key
point about that, you know, because Paul
mentioned it as well. Why the Jews
during that time failed? because they
pursued it as if it was by works.
>> Yeah.
>> Right.
>> So the the the the caveat that I
mentioned is that it has to be you would
have to do it as if by faith and we know
well from my belief.
>> Did all Jews do that as though it's it's
it's it's a it's accomplished by works.
Did all Jews? So it's just a general
statement but Paul is highlighting of
the ones that failed right the ones that
failed were that are the ones that did
it as if it was
>> by
>> but some but some had but some exercised
faith right
>> so if and that's the scenario that I'm
giving right
>> if it is done as if it was by faith
right according to the scriptural
definition of faith right this is the
cuz I Um it's it's hard for me to read
the the King James, right? Is the
assurance, right?
>> Mhm.
>> The assurance and the conviction of
things that see and from scripture, from
my understanding, this is something that
the Lord gives us.
>> But hold on, hold on. It's not something
that we must up.
>> Hold on. Let's stay in the Old
Testament.
>> Hold on.
>> Right. So staying in the Old Testament,
that's the thing. Like staying in the
Old Testament
>> Mhm.
It's like it's it's hard to say that
we're going to stay in the Old Testament
because Paul is explaining pretty much
why some failed then. So it's like
revelation to clear up just like in
Hebrews it mentioned that
>> this why this why I'm giving this
example was something of times to come.
>> This is why I'm g that person
necessarily believe like because I did
this I'm going to be saved. What if
>> he's not believing in the Old Testament
he's not believing in what he he's done.
He's believing in what God has done. God
has God has given the offering and God
has accepted the offering. So he's
believing that all he's doing he's he's
believing in the Old Testament
on the day of atonement because the day
of atonement is ordered before
Deuteronomy 29. Now obviously all this
is pretty this is all at the same time
but still at that time God has not given
God has not done anything to their
heart. So there's nothing internally
that God is doing in the children of
Israel at that time. So if you believed
at that time, it wasn't because of
something internally that's happening to
you.
>> But that's what I'm saying in regards to
it. That's where I would um disagree.
Right.
>> What has God done internally?
>> That's what I would disagree with. So
the the premise that I put forth would
be the premise that um if you were able
to address that specifically then I
would say all right this is something I
would need to consider right because the
contrast that Paul did right if a person
was to do these steps as if it was by
works and not by faith right there is a
clear contrast and then
>> no okay hold on hold on in the old
testament their their atonement was
definitely by faith
No, but Paul mentioned that they failed
because in Romans that they did it as
>> Did all of them fail? Did all of the
Jews fail?
>> So there's a separation there, right?
Cuz if some didn't fail and some failed,
there's a separation.
>> Okay, but hold on. Did all the Jews
fail? Yes or no?
>> In my estimation, I don't believe that
all of them.
>> Okay, so there are some Jews that didn't
fail. those Jews that didn't fail
>> fail
>> going all the way back to the day of
atonement.
>> Yes.
>> Did they fail? I mean they they they
didn't fail because they believed in the
offering, right?
>> Yes. And it would have been done. So the
reason why they wouldn't fail one
moment.
>> All right. So they didn't fail and yet
God hadn't given them a regenerated
heart.
>> But that's the connecting that's the
connecting part that we're we're we're
talking about. Right? Similarly
with cuz from the the and it's one thing
that I realized when going through
Romans or just listening to Jesus speak
it's one gospel through line. It's the
same gospel that David believed in. It's
the same gospel that we believed in.
Right? And that's how they are forgiven
with that one sacrifice. So my mention
is that and this is the the the key part
that um you would need to address to
pretty much get through to what I'm
saying.
>> Okay?
>> There is a separation there, right? So
Paul in Romans outlined that
there are some that failed. So I agree
with you. It's like even though it
doesn't explicitly state that all the
Jews, even though Paul said it in a
general sense like they failed, I
believe that there are some people that
did it in right standing cuz there is
even mention of it with God when he said
that he kept for himself,
some that didn't bow the need to b. So
there was always a remnant that existed
in the group that was doing things
faithfully. they weren't all um cast
aside, right?
>> But Paul mentioning that there is one
side that did it as if it was by works.
We can agree that those that side
failed.
>> And then there is other side that did it
as if it was by faith. And there's
examples. You have Abraham. Um there's
some other examples. I can't remember it
off the top of my head. My saying is
that with the introduction of faith,
right, from what I've seen in the New
Testament as it speaks about faith,
faith is in something that mankind
generates on their own. It is something
done by the will of God. So if it's to
say that these people believed in the
atonement and were justified, right,
that justification, well, I won't go off
on a tangent, but maybe it's something
you can cover later on, right? If they
believed by faith
in that atonement, right, and they died,
I believe that they would have been
saved because they did it as if by
faith. Now, with the introduction of
faith, I don't believe that there can be
faith
without
God from what I read in the New
Testament. So, in order for you to say
that, you believe in that specific hold
faith without God.
>> Hold on. You said there cannot be faith
without God. Yes, that's my um
understanding of
>> So, this is why I I love this these
these sets of passages. Luke 8 12 and 13
and 14. They have faith without God.
>> Um can you bring it up so I can um have
it for later?
>> Okay, let me put on the screen
8 starting 12.
>> Those beside the road are those who have
heard the devil have heard. Then the
devil comes and takes away the word from
their heart so that they will not
believe and the word is is really to be
believing pistoantes and be saved. Those
on the rocky soil are those who when
they hear and receive the word look what
it says they receive with joy. These
have no firm root. They believe for a
while and in time of temptation fall
away. So here we've got an example of
someone who can believe temporarily and
fall away. We know that they are not
with God because their heart hadn't been
changed.
>> So, so, so he, so it's possible to
believe,
but what we see, especially now in this
dispensation, that you can't believe
continuously. There's got to be
something because of the kind of people
that we are, human beings, something's
going to cause you to stop along the way
to stop believing,
right? So
that's what that's what what's happening
now. God is going to regenerate our
heart. So when I believe my brand new
heart being touched with the word, I'm
going to hold on to it and forever. But
what about the Old Testament where they
did not have a regenerated heart? At the
very least, they didn't have one up to
the time of Deuteronomy 29:4.
God hadn't given them a heart like that.
So how did they believe? Well, there
needs to be something external to cause
them to not believe, but to keep
believing.
Something has to be in place to keep
them holding on to their their faith.
So, God will use exterior means or
external means, I'm sorry, external
means. And so in my little scenario, my
hypothetical, what if someone
believed on the day of atonement,
they're atoned for.
And whatever external means God is going
to use, it doesn't happen for this guy
because he dies before it happens.
Now, I know it's an odd scenario, but
it's possible that, and I'm pretty sure
there have been people on the Day of
Atonement who maybe a week later, a
month later, who knows, died. Still in
right standing, but they died. They were
old at the time.
So,
it's possible to keep it's possible to
believe temporarily. Now, the difference
between the old covenant and the new is
that there won't be a new sacrifice
given year after year after year. We've
only got one sacrifice in the new. But
under the old, we've got these multiple
offerings, these multiple sacrifices,
these multiple atonements. So, there's a
difference.
>> So, when I mess up, guess ahead.
>> I was Are um Are you using faith and
belief interchangeably? Am I getting
like the definitions wrong? Because
faith and same thing
>> it's it's so it's interchangeably.
>> Yes.
>> So the definition given in Hebrews I
believe it's 11 11:1 or 10:1 Hebrews 11
in regards to it's referring it. So
you're saying throughout scripture faith
and believe
>> they're interchangeable. Believe and
faith is it's the same it's the same
Greek word
>> could be interchangeably.
>> It's yeah it's the exact same Greek
word. Now it can be used as a verb or a
noun that makes it different. Like
belief can be the set of beliefs but I
got to believe in the set of beliefs. So
if I'm using the verb the verb for for
belief is the same as having faith.
So same word.
Okay. So if it's the very same thing,
right? So cuz I'm I'm thinking about it
this way, right? Throughout the Old
Testament,
all who we seen God use to fulfill his
his plan, right? His plan of salvation
are people that was just living in the
fallen world as it is and he comes to
them. And then through Abraham
specifically, he said that Abraham
believed and it was counted to him as
righteousness. In that very same passage
you say that interchanging faith and um
belief would be the same. But later on
when when it was being described
I think when it was going in regards to
the list of faith it they were using
examples of different people
believe it was in the same Hebrew like
after the definition it gives the list
of everyone that was using faith whether
bringing his son. So he believed, but
then it was through faith. That's that's
what that's what I was saying like this.
It was through this that this person did
this. It was through this that the
person when the war was going on and the
they snuck in and the lady hid them. I
don't remember the the specific names.
Say that it was through faith that she
did this. It was through faith and going
on and going on and going on. And I'm
looking at it as in belief is cuz having
belief is um I was always looking at it
from the perspective of knowledge and
then faith is the assurance that God
giving that God will come through.
>> Faith and always looking
interchangeably. How would you like put
it in that way where
>> it's always faith and belief are always
pred I mean it's always predicated upon
knowledge. You can't believe something
if you have no working knowledge of what
it is you believe in.
So, so I believe here's my example that
I always use. I believe in this chair. I
have faith in this chair. Same thing.
Meaning I'm tired. My feet hurt. My legs
hurt. I need a place to If only there
was a place or something that I can take
a load off and rest my legs and then get
some work done. Oh, look. There's a
chair. So, I believe in this chair. I
trust this chair. I have faith in this
chair. So much so that what do I do? I
sit down. Now, how do I know I really
have faith in this chair? I really trust
this chair. I really um have belief in
this chair. Is when I sit down, I don't
get a wide base and brace myself. I
don't grab a hold of the desk.
I don't run some wire from the ceiling
down to my chair to hold it up. I just
trust the chair will sustain me. So when
I trust the chair can sustain me, you
know what I'll do? I begin to work. I
begin to do things. I can move around. I
can relax.
I can abide in this chair.
If I lose confidence or faith in this
chair, the chair starts to, you know,
move or whatever and it shifts. I get
up.
I used to believe. Nothing made me
believe in this chair. I just had I just
believe in the chair.
I can believe in the Lord.
What's going to keep me believing in the
Lord? I believe what the writers say
about the gospel that he died for my
sins. I need I believe that you and I
both know people who believe that Jesus
died for our sins. We We know folks who
believe that they are sinful people and
that Christ had to pay the debt. We know
folks that believe that but still aren't
saved. I can know something's true,
but I have not entrusted myself to what
I know is true. That's what faith is.
That's what true faith is. Versus the
people who Yeah, I know it is. I I
believe that.
We can't tell that they haven't fully
entrusted themselves to it. We I can't
know that. You can't know that.
So, here I am. I haven't fully entrusted
myself to this chair.
I have not. Looks like I have to you,
but you can't see that I'm holding on to
my desk.
You can't see that I got my feet wide
just in case this thing falls.
You can't see that I I I plucked up
underneath here an actual stone so if
this thing falls, it'll rest on it. I've
made every precaution to keep me. That's
not faith. There is no such thing as
faith where I'm doing the work to keep
myself. Did I just preach or something?
Someone should have caught what I just
said. That's not faith. If I'm if I'm
making extra precautions just in case
what God did fails
in the Old Testament, they simply
believe that's all they had to go off
of. God said it, the priest comes out
alive. All right, we good to go. All
right, cool. I believe that. Problem is
though, if I live another 8 months, I
might I'm probably going to sin a lot.
But if I live another eight hours and
die, I die in right standing. So how
would you differentiate from the people
doing it as if it was by works?
>> So these people who you mean the Old
Testament who did it by works?
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's the Old Testament
did it by works cuz everything hinges on
faith, right? That's what Paul said.
They failed because they he was
comparing us the Gentiles that didn't
follow all these rules yet we get to
commit. So, here's how you know. Here's
how you know that they didn't believe
that it was just kind of wrote. It was
just kind of robotic. It was just, yeah,
because we're Jews. Now, they got to see
the hand of God deliver them over and
over and over again. They were a little
too arrogant and confident, such as was
the case with u in the battle of Ai
where Achen, I'm going to take this
stuff and I'm I'm good. I'm a Jew. We're
going to be all right. They put more
focus in the fact that they were Jewish
and that God was the God of Israel. The
God of Israel was God.
And so God got God's got us. There's
nothing more for me. And and and by the
way, I don't want to do anything. So if
you really have faith in the Lord, which
means you would love him.
>> Mhm.
>> What would you do? The same thing that
you would do for your kids or your
spouse. I don't have to do anything for
my wife, but I do things for my wife.
Why? Because I love her.
>> Right.
>> Um and vice versa. So the Jews didn't
the Jews did not they didn't they didn't
regard God in their heart like was told
to them to do in Deuteronomy.
>> And and what you're saying is some of
them right because
>> it's some of them did some of them
didn't cuz that's what we agree on.
Right. Correct.
>> So cuz I don't want cuz I know I've
already taken up so many times. There's
two things I want to point out then I
then I'll go. Right.
What is the difference between sorry
mosquitoes are going crazy right? So
what is the difference between a person
that in that specific atonement
situation right because for me
uh I'm on the perspective that it is God
that gave them that assurance. It is not
something that came out of the human
heart which is from the mention in
Genesis before and after the flood. this
is what their their hearts are on
continuously. So from that heart for
them to come out that I'm going to
genuinely believe in God. Um I don't
believe that it's I believe that
assurance is granted to them by the
Lord. That is why they can um believe in
him. However, if it's the case where
it's of solely up to human A believe,
human B don't believe, what causes human
A to be different from human B? And
ultimately, would that person's
salvation hinge on their understanding,
their knowledge, or would it hinge on
God? So my perspective would be when
would God
um when would predestination take place?
Would it be God chosen before the
foundation of the world or in that
specific time it was those who would
believe versus those who wouldn't
believe apart from God?
>> Okay. So the I don't know what God would
have been doing to be working in a
person's life. meaning I don't know if
hey you're in this family and this
family are they're they're faithful
because if I've got a faithful mother
and a faithful father that's going to
help me out a lot if I've got a father
that makes sure that I am u walking
correctly because in those days you know
often times the the son would still be
in the house until marriage and even
sometimes even after that.
>> Yeah. So maybe that may maybe that's
something that God did. I'm not saying
that God doesn't do anything or didn't
do anything to keep them walking. He he
he definitely did. He would do things
externally, but he didn't do things as
far as we can tell. And there's no
scripture tells us that he did anything
internally. So maybe he gave me a good
father. Maybe he caused the crops to
grow well or maybe cause the crops to go
bad and I had to work extra hard and
certainly depend on him. Don't know. May
maybe an angel came. Maybe the prophet
there could be anything that God did
externally. But we don't have one
scripture that speaks about him doing
something internally.
So
>> Oh, I get what you're I get what you're
saying now in regards to that. But my my
thought of it would be how would you
reconcile that with the Lord saying that
and I'm just this is something I need to
improve and learn in the scripture.
When God mentioned before the flood that
he looked on the world and saw that the
the hearts of men is desperately wicked
and their thoughts
>> continually evil
>> and then afterwards right cuz this is
the thing afterwards the very same group
that he preserved to continue his works.
This a similar statement was made after
the flood as well in regards to that. So
my perspective would be how would you
reconcile human beings being in this
state and then from further revelation
in the New Testament we know that people
that aren't saved are being ens snared
by the devil being used to do his will
right how would that from that very
heart come a belief that would be
internally right that come a belief an
assurance in believing in that god to
keep them long enough until they pass
right because From from what I'm getting
from your perspective, it's that at some
point with how the human condition is,
they would stop believing. And I agree,
right? Because if you don't have that
good heart that the Lord promised as a
part of his plan, right? The
justification plus a good heart that
would allow you to to love the Lord,
right, and genuinely love the Lord and
continue with the Lord. How would that
person in that state, right? Cuz I'm
talking from Genesis, right, with how
God described man. And this is the very
same people that he saved, right? Um who
was Noah? Noah and his family. These are
the people that he said that what would
God use to make them keep this
internally? What would God how what
would make them keep believing?
>> No. Like where does this
belief and and and assurance in God
would come from out of a heart that is
desperately wicked and is just every
intent is
>> every intent
um every intention of the heart is doing
this. How would God that heart
>> without
>> God can here's what God can do. God can
make a believer out of you. God can sh
God can rescue you.
He can perform miracles or signs before
you. He can he can deliver you and
you're like, "Wow, yeah, this is
awesome. I trust you." After a while,
the the the thrill, as I say, the thrill
is gone. It it fades.
So, keep thinking about all the things.
Just think about everything that God did
in the Old Testament that he doesn't do
now.
>> Mhm. You ain't seen somebody part the
Red Sea or a lake or a creek. You
haven't heard God thunder from heaven.
You might have seen some thunder, but
you haven't heard him. You haven't been
led out of out of Egypt by a pillar of
fire and a pillar of clouds. You haven't
had a prophet come, a true prophet come
before you and lead you. You haven't had
judges show up. You haven't seen or
heard from the angel of the Lord or
angels. You haven't been thrown into
captivity and then be delivered by God.
So there are different things that God
would do that he's not doing today cuz
today we have the Holy Spirit that
resides in us. We have a regenerated
heart. Remember the promise was always
from God that I will do this to your
heart then. So he didn't he had done it
then. So think about all the things that
that he that he would have to do to make
people keep believing or to keep
fighting for these for these people
Israel. And part of us was to show that
how how disobedient the heart is, how
bad the heart is, how how uh unreliable
the heart is. And so what does he give
us? He gives us these the days of
atonement. He gives us these offerings.
Oh, so let's say in 6 8 weeks or 7 8
months I mess up. What do I do? I've I
can also give my own offering. I can
give my own sin offering. We don't have
that now, do we? So he
>> But that's the thing. The difference is
like my question will always be like why
does it work on some and doesn't work on
the others? Right.
>> Well, that that will never know. I I
couldn't begin to answer that. But
here's what I can tell. I I can tell you
though. So, they're in this community.
So, let's say you and I are in this
community and I'm not doing right. I'm
falling off.
Well, what what what do I have? I've got
you and others looking at me. And so
I've got I've got because I've violated
a law, an aspect of the law,
then I've got to I got to make amends
because you're telling me, heck, there's
even the threat of being killed by these
particular uh because of these
particular sins. So if I again as
sexually active as as we are today, we'd
all be dead then, right? So there is
this external threat. Sometimes God
doesn't have to do anything, just the
threat of it. People in prison don't do
a lot. Some Some do. When guys are in
prison and they do bad things in prison,
they do it because the guard's not
watching.
>> People in the world, they do bad things
because the police are not watching.
There's no And there's no So there's no
threat for consequences. Sometimes I
don't need an angel or a prophet.
All I need is just a threat. The the
consequences. if I do this, I'll die.
So, I'm not going to do it. And people
are watching me. So, there's an external
um control that's there also. Now, why
would somebody still decide I'll go
ahead and do it anyway? I don't know. I
can't I can't tell you why some would
and some wouldn't. We do know that most
didn't though. We know that most people
didn't remain faithful.
>> So, and so because I I was an atheist
before, right? M
>> and the one thing that keeps me humble
whenever I go to speak to a person I
know that it was not of me the the day
in which my heart changed the previous
day I was the a god-hating person so it
wasn't something that I came to an
intellectual realization
>> right and the fact that I believed
something which in the eyes of the world
is ridiculous right
>> and it never leave there is an assurance
there is a a joy where I wake up every
day knowing that
the Lord loves me and in this love I've
been saved. Right? So, it's something
that
>> stays with me and I know, right? It
might just be personal experience, but I
know I didn't do anything special or cuz
I was like a not the agnostic type of
atheist. I was the slandering God type
of a atheist that just goes out of him
his way to like even try to destroy
other people's belief. And then from
just reading the scripture like going to
the scripture to try to prove my friend
wrong cuz he challenged me that how can
I say I don't believe in something I
don't know. I said I'm going to go into
the scripture. I'm going to know and
then I'm going to tell him I don't
believe. And from there um God changed
my heart. And this the thing too as well
for for example with Moses right Moses
messed up so he wasn't able to go over
into the promised land but through
scripture he didn't say that he didn't
believe if you get what I'm saying.
>> Mhm.
>> So Moses lived a full life from that
perspective because he went up he lived
and lived and lived and throughout that
time with him being God's
chosen right with God choosing him God
working with him. And if you look
throughout the scripture, it's not the
first time Moses messed up. Moses asked
God if he was their mother. I think I I
remember reading it and I was like,
Moses is playing a very dangerous game
cuz he was complaining to God as well
throughout some parts of the journey.
But throughout the scripture, it never
stated that he stopped
um believing. And like what is the
difference? Well, there's a huge
difference between Moses
>> regular man.
>> Well, there's a huge difference. God's
talking to Moses. Huge difference.
Listen. Say what you want to say.
>> Aaron Aaron
Aaron went God almost well, God almost
destroyed him. And Aaron was someone
that was very close in regards to
>> to Moses process, right?
>> But did God speak to But hold on. God
didn't speak to Aaron. God didn't speak
to Aaron face to face. But the times
that God did that Aaron did have with
God seemed to have helped him. He was
better off than others. Doesn't mean
that he wouldn't want to do wrong. I
mean, heck, you're saved. You want to do
wrong from time to time. So, yes,
>> but let's be honest. If God is talking
to me,
I'm going to do it. If God come and
says, "Corey, leave Dallas and go to
Wyoming." I'm I'm I'm walking there
right now. If God talks to me, if he
talk, you telling me that you won't move
on. Who in the Bible did God speak to
and move? They didn't move. They That's
what's gonna happen. Same thing with
Abraham. Same thing with Isaac. Jacob,
right? Jacob is a jerk. And God wrestles
with him. All right, you got me, Lord.
You got me. So, same thing with
Nebuchadnezzar.
If God shows up, the actual God shows up
and speaks to you, you're moving. So,
there's a difference between him. But
what about the regular person? So, I
can't tell you what's behind every
person's heartfelt decision. I don't
know. Couldn't tell you. So, but listen,
I I I got to go ahead and run. I got to
take a couple more questions before I
before I leave. Um
>> All right. Thank you so much um for your
time. I think I have I have an
understanding of where you're coming
from in in regards to it. My my like
parting statement would be that I
believe similarly to how God does it
now, right? Where he can save a wretch
like me that's been spending what 25 26
years just hating um on God and he just
changed my heart. I believe that the
same way in which it's from a heart
perspective where one person can see the
signs, see the miracles and harden their
heart and other person doesn't. I
believe it's the same method in which he
used now is the same method he was using
then. Right.
>> Only problem is
>> that's my perspective
>> and only only problem is I would say
this and you might be right. You just
got you just have to find a verse to
prove it. Amen.
>> All right. All right brother. You take
care.