Video summary
The speaker recounts his personal experience with red light cameras in his county over a decade ago, describing them as ineffective scams designed primarily to generate revenue rather than improve safety. As a firefighter who frequently witnesses accidents caused by drivers slamming on their brakes or rushing through intersections, he argues that the panic induced by these cameras creates just as much danger as running a red light itself. He notes that even his own county eventually removed the system after only one year of operation, likely due to public complaints and pressure from concerned citizens who realized the financial benefits went largely to third-party companies while offering no tangible safety improvements for the community.
The video then shifts focus to Flock cameras, which are currently widespread across many regions including parts of Orlando and Tampa, often flagged by navigation systems as annoying distractions during road trips. The speaker expresses strong concerns about these devices due to their invasive nature, noting that unlike personal security measures such as home doorbell cameras where individuals retain control over data access, government-operated Flock networks track citizens without consent or oversight. He highlights a disturbing incident in Central Florida where law enforcement officers were caught misusing the system for stalking purposes, resulting in firings and potential legal consequences, which underscores the lack of proper safeguards against abuse when such surveillance tools are centralized under AI-driven platforms that monitor license plates, bumper stickers, and facial features indiscriminately.
A key argument presented is the false equivalence between existing privacy risks like cell phone tracking or smart tire pressure sensors versus the unique threat posed by Flock cameras; while individuals can choose to leave their phones at home or use open-source alternatives for personal devices, citizens have no real choice but to pass through government-installed camera networks on public roads. The speaker emphasizes that ignoring these issues because other privacy concerns already exist is a dangerous mindset that allows freedoms to erode further without resistance. He encourages viewers to research Flock cameras themselves and join the growing chorus of opposition, demonstrating how collective action successfully removed red light cameras in his area and can similarly dismantle or reform intrusive surveillance systems elsewhere through persistent advocacy and informed public discourse.
Read the full video transcript
Let me tell you a story.
I don't know how many years ago,
probably over 10 years ago. I'm at the
age where I think something was 3 years
ago and then someone goes, "No, that was
15 years ago."
But probably over a decade ago, the
county I live in,
uh, it got red light traffic cameras.
Those things are horrible. They're just
a scam. Uh,
and I can't believe the counties have
them. Luckily, after a year,
my county got rid of them. We only had
them for the one year.
I don't know what happened. I don't know
if people complained or if just the
right people complained, but we were
able to get rid of them. And they just
they don't work, okay? I mean, they work
at giving people tickets, but do they
make things safer? That's That's
something you can argue. Now, I'm a
firefighter for those of you who don't
know,
and I see lots of accidents. And there
are lots of accidents of people trying
to run red lights.
Uh, sometimes by accident, sometimes
people just trying to make the light.
But also, I see a lot of people in
accidents slamming on their brakes to
avoid going through red lights. This
happens a lot at fire stations, funny
enough. So, lots of our fire stations
will have a flashing yellow light out in
front of the station,
and then we have a little button we can
click, or actually, we used to click a
button. Now, that the truck
automatically triggers it when our
lights are on.
Um, and it will make that light cycle to
red. And it goes from a flashing yellow
at the bottom to a solid yellow and then
to a red.
It is quite often
people slam on their brakes for those.
And I I remember when I, you know,
before I was a firefighter, driving by a
fire station that I went by regularly
and doing the same thing. I don't know
if it's just in our minds where they're
used to not stopping at that light. And
then all of a sudden, it's changing to
yellow or if it's just because it's
going from a flashing yellow to a solid
yellow.
But people slam on the brakes all the
time. And accidents happen a lot, and
even more so, people almost get into
accidents. The first person slams on the
brakes, the next person kind of slams on
the brakes, and so forth. It's like,
lots of times we're leaving this fire
station, it's like, "Oh, no, there's
going to be an accident right here."
Slamming on your brakes to
not go through a red light is almost as
dangerous as going through a red light.
>> [clears throat]
>> But my point here is
my county did get rid of it.
When I'm driving on road trips, my Mazda
I bought used, the last person paid
extra money to have the navigation
system in there. It's a 2016, so it's 10
years old, so the maps are a little
outdated, but when I am in certain towns
like certain parts of Orlando or Tampa,
it will tell me when there's a traffic
light camera. It will go traffic camera
light camera ahead. It's actually quite
annoying. Like I'm glad that it didn't
like those maps aren't from when my
county have it cuz it would be really
annoying if it was constantly saying it
when I'm driving around, especially if
there aren't traffic light cameras. But
when I'm on trips, I really appreciate
that. And I always think when I hear
that why do the people in this county
allow this? Cuz it clearly this is this
is these are uh private companies
and I'm sure that these politicians are
getting kickbacks cuz there's there's no
other reason to have them. It's it's
collecting money
uh and going to a third party. I'm sure
the county or city or whatever gets some
of the money, obviously, but it's not
making things safer and it's just
annoying.
But my point here is
you know, if you've been keeping up on
things, everywhere you go, there are
these Flock cameras.
Um
and we could get rid of them if enough
people speak up because just like the
red light cameras. I And again, with the
Flock cameras, I'm sure that these
politicians, a lot of them, I'm not
saying all of them, but a lot of them
are probably getting something on the
side. Um
cuz cuz it's just an invasion of
privacy. They tout that oh, it's it they
usually the way they word it is it's
used is so many times in the solving of
crime. Well, just cuz it's used doesn't
mean it actually solves the crime. And
maybe And I'm sure it does help.
And I can do a whole video on on how
there's a whole bunch of cameras
everywhere and how my main issues with
these is one, that it's government-run
and the government shouldn't be watching
us all the time. Individuals still, you
know, stores and stuff, there are
cameras everywhere where
And
the Flock cameras just kind of avoid the
whole
needing to request that through proper
channels.
If a store wants to have cameras on
their property,
that's fine. And you know, if they want
to request that, that can help solve
crimes. We don't need to feed this all
into one system AI system that's
following it all. But I saw a post on
Facebook
uh of a friend of mine from high school,
someone I haven't seen in over 20 years.
But she posted something, you know,
talking about how bad the Flock cameras
are. And someone else commented on it,
"Oh, people complaining about these
Flock cameras, uh they're they're over
exaggerating. We all have cell phones in
our pockets, they're way more
intrusive."
Okay. First of all, let's say that's
true that that that that's that's how
you do it. Just because there's
something bad over here that people are
ignoring, doesn't mean we should also
ignore the bad thing over here, right?
So, if the cell phones are bad, that
doesn't mean that we should ignore the
Flock camera bad. But there is a huge
difference, right? I have no control
over the Flock camera besides going to
politicians and complaining. Where a
phone, I could say "I'm not going to
carry my phone." Okay? So, I could also,
if you have a phone that can be
unlocked, I can install and control all
the software on my phone, except for
maybe some some stuff that's embedded in
the chips. That that's hard to get
around.
Uh you can be like, "Oh, that's a
technical thing."
Uh maybe people aren't technical, but
you still have the choice at any point
not to bring your phone with you. Cuz
even shutting off your phone, or even
even if I clear out and I mistrust all
the software on my phone, you're still
pinging these towers, and the cell phone
provider probably knows who you are.
So, there's still a private privacy
concern there. But at any point, I can
make the decision, "I'm going to leave
this phone at home." Right? Or I'm not
going to install this app. And there's
there's
you know, again, leaving it at home or
not even having a cell phone. A lot of
people say it's not an option, but it is
an option cuz we all used to not have
cell phones back in the day.
You could do that. You could choose to
do that. It might be difficult for you,
but you could choose to do that. These
Flock cameras, I have no choice. The
only thing I could do is have a cell
phone with an application that tells me
where they are and gives me routes
around them. But sometimes you can't
even do that. I'm pretty sure I can't go
I can't leave my house and go more than
3 miles cuz where I live uh it's a bunch
of dead end streets. There's only like
two exits and I'm pretty sure there's
Flock cameras at both of them. So,
I I I can't leave my house without going
by a Flock camera.
Um
and I don't have a choice in that again
other than speaking up and complaining
and and informing other people about it.
But my cell phone, I could not have a
cell phone. I could have a burner cell
phone. I could leave my cell phone at
home. I take the steps uh as much as I
can to to make sure my software isn't
spying on me. But again, even if you
have all free and open source software
and you trust all your software, you
still have a device that's pinging a
server so they know within a couple of
miles where you are at all times. Um but
that's just there's no way around that.
Other than not having a cell phone. So,
saying, "Oh, there's this privacy
concern,
just ignore that because we already have
this privacy concern." No, no. Address
both of them. This one, get rid of it.
This one, get rid of it or modify it.
Th- there's always something that can be
done. But just to ignore it, yeah, that
person's part of the problem.
Uh and I know lots I I don't know lots
of people. Most people I talk to are
like, "Yeah, these Flock cameras are
bad." And a lot of people aren't going
to do anything about it other than maybe
complain and make some posts on
Facebook. But even doing that,
complaining and in in informing other
people. But I have had family members
who go, "Oh, I think these cameras are
great cuz I like watching these mystery
shows where they solve crimes and
watching them use all these cameras to
track down the criminals is so great."
And it's like, "Well, great. And you'll
give up our freedom so that you can
watch some interesting show." And again,
companies and businesses, you can't stop
people on their personal property from
having cameras.
Uh my issue is even if you have one on
your property, like these Ring
doorbells,
I any any type of device. I don't
understand why people use these services
that are monitoring, tracking them when
it's so simple to do things yourself.
And And that's one of the points of my
channel to show people how to do that
and point out how simple it is. Um for
example, uh I have cameras on my
property that I have replaced with fully
free and open source software.
Um and I've done videos talking about
that. So, depending on the camera, some
cameras smell matter of copying a file
to an SD card,
putting it into the camera, and then
turning it on, and it will flash it with
open source free and open source um
firmware that you have complete control
over and you can trust.
And this is great because it works great
with really cheap cameras. So, I find
most times the cheap stuff that most
people are concerned about because it's
coming from China and other countries
that they're worried about spying on us,
you can buy them cheap, but they're the
ones that are usually the easiest to
modify to remove that stuff. Unlike
getting something from the Ring doorbell
or Google, where it's locked down and
there's not much you can do.
But,
my point is
main point is in this video is that we
do have some control and say it's it
even if we were to get to a point where
we have to get our freedoms back, it's
probably not going to be in my lifetime.
It's going to take a lot of work, but we
shouldn't just ignore it. We shouldn't
just go, "Oh, there's already something
bad. I should ignore this other thing
that's bad." Uh and if you're not
familiar with the Flock cameras, do some
YouTube searches.
Uh and and part of the issue also is the
way it's so easy for people to get into
them and view them and pull down that
information that they shouldn't have
access to. But, I mean, the companies
have access to it. Uh recently, one of
the people uh I'm friends with on
Facebook posted an article, I guess over
in Orlando, the or near Orlando, I don't
know if it was Orlando or near Orlando,
but Central Florida area, there's a
sheriff who
temporarily, at least, has shut down the
Flock camera program because
and this has happened a number of times
they caught one of their uh
their investigators, or somebody working
for the sheriff's department using it to
stalk people. That person was fired and
is possibly going to jail.
And they at least temporarily shut down
those cameras.
There are many, many issues with these
Flock cameras.
And it's just it's just
circumvents freedoms that we should
have. Uh and
letting people know
is part of the battle. So, I'm here
talking about it.
Again, for the example in my county, we
had those red light cameras for 1 year.
And I'm sure the county just didn't go
"Oh, we put them in for a year. Now
we're taking them out." cuz I'm sure the
county was making plenty of money off
the tickets and a lot of it going to a
third-party company.
Somebody, somewhere complained. And the
right people talked to the right people
or the right number of people
complained. You you do have control.
Sometimes it doesn't seem like it, but
you get enough people and we get rid of
these people who go, "Oh, it's a
non-issue." We get enough people who
say, "This is an issue." and they
complain,
well, then we can make changes. And
that's just an example of it. It's hard
sometimes, and it seems like it's
slow-moving, but you can do it. And
enough people, it seems like, are
complaining about these Flock cameras.
Uh most people just don't know about
them.
People who know about them, I think a
majority of people are against them.
Then you have the handful of
I'm just going to say it, idiots who
think that it's a good thing. So, let me
know what you think in the comments
below.
Do you Are you what I would consider an
idiot that think these are a good thing?
I'm all for tracking down crimes, but
there's no reason that police can't go
and go, "Oh, there's a camera on that
business over there. Let's go request
that or get a warrant like I should to
get that information."
Um you know, and sometimes things are
urgent. You can go to that business and
ask. I'm sure you can ask and not force
them, and they can give it over. Some If
if I had a camera on my property that
recorded something and a cop came and
said, "Hey,
can we we had a a crime happen over
here?
I could go in and go, "Hey, yep, here's
the 30 seconds you need or the minutes
you see." Not,
"Oh, here's everything." I have some
control of that. Or I could say no.
You know, I have that option. Go get a
warrant.
Um but there's plenty plenty of cameras
around. We don't need AI
dumping through and reading through and
looking at our faces, looking at our
bumper stickers, looking at our license
plates, and just tracking everywhere we
go. And again, I know that's not the
only thing it's tracking. Again, if you
have a cell phone, uh
they or not even a cell phone, right? Uh
our cars have tire gauges in them that
send out wireless signals that can be
tracked. And and I've
Again, I said 10 years ago, probably 20
years ago, I saw video on Hak5. Does
that channel still exist? I haven't
watched it in forever. Uh where they
interviewed a guy who made an open
source project with a little um a radio
uh software-defined radio dongle
and was able to monitor the tire
pressure sensors that send out, you
know, basically a serial number
regularly. And if you have enough
sensors, you can track where people go.
Supposedly, there are po- poles around
that are doing that. They're less
conspicuous than the Flock cameras. But
just cuz those exist doesn't mean we
shouldn't be concerned about Flock
cameras. Maybe we should be concerned
about both.
Anyway, thanks again for watching. Film
Riot Chris.com. I hope that you have a
great day.