Waymo, Texas Culture, Airline Lounges, OpenAI & Uber Eats - Rory Sutherland
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Rory Sutherland and his guest explore how scale transforms perceived flaws into artistic successes, using Texas culture as a primary example. They discuss Bies, a massive gas station that leverages its sheer size to turn what might be considered "ghastly" at a small scale—such as the aggressive "Don't Mess with Texas" slogan originally created by the Texas Department of Transportation in the 1970s or appalling marching bands—into magnificent experiences. The conversation highlights how Americans excel at taking something atrocious and making it big enough to become art, noting that Bies functions like a Costcoized building where pumps double as parking spaces under shade. This theme extends to driving behavior; Sutherland argues that driverless Waymo vehicles remove the social calculus of road interactions because passengers cannot see out or be seen, leading to rude behaviors from other drivers who feel no fear of retribution or guilt for inconveniencing others. The discussion shifts to innovation strategies and consumer psychology through the concept of "reverse benchmarking." Sutherland explains that instead of copying competitors directly, companies should identify areas their rivals overlook—such as poor coffee at a top restaurant—and excel in those specific niches to create differentiation. He illustrates this with an example where a high-end restaurant introduced craft beer pairings after realizing wine-focused menus alienated non-wine drinkers. This principle applies broadly, from the IKEA effect where effort increases perceived value, to the adoption of vaping and zero-alcohol beers which succeed due to placebo effects and marketing rather than medicalization or actual intoxication. Sutherland also critiques how status markers have evolved; while yachts signal wealth but imply time poverty, blimps or airships would suggest both money and leisure, a prediction that aligns with Jeffrey Miller's theory on social media changing the currency of status from possessions to experiences like travel photography. Further examining retail and hospitality environments, Sutherland advocates for investing in communal areas over individual rooms, citing Moxy hotels as an example where ground-floor amenities create a sense of belonging unlike traditional chains that make guests feel homeless upon checkout. He contrasts this with extreme examples like the former East German police station hotel in Berlin, which offered authentic but traumatic experiences compared to standard Marriott expectations. The dialogue also touches on property dynamics and neighborhood economics, suggesting strategies like buying the cheapest house on an expensive street or finding negatives others dislike (like a pub) that become positives over time. Sutherland notes how car electrification will eventually reduce noise pollution concerns near busy roads, altering long-term real estate values in ways currently undervalued by buyers who ignore school districts if they have no children. The conversation concludes with reflections on human behavior and perception hacking, particularly regarding advertising imagery. Sutherland argues that using anthropomorphic animals like Bies' beaver is a brilliant cheat to avoid the problematic "user imagery" issues of showing specific demographics in car ads, which can alienate potential buyers due to class or age associations. He connects this to evolutionary psychology, noting humans are hardwired to spot faces and eyes even on clouds or products. Finally, they discuss how choice limitation is beneficial; while all-inclusive resorts reduce decision fatigue for burnt-out parents, Sutherland prefers car rentals during holidays because the freedom allows for serendipitous discoveries that rigid itineraries prevent. The episode ends with a humorous note on the absurdity of wealth markers, such as Clive Whitmore's daughter complaining about her father's name appearing in large letters across underwear elastic bands at romantic moments, underscoring how social signaling often relies on arbitrary or ironic displays rather than pure utility.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome back. Good to see you.
>> It's a pleasure. What a joy. And And
here in Austin, too.
>> You're in Austin. Uh Bies. You went to
Bies. Tell me.
>> Absolutely. I actually brought you a
present.
>> Oh, I thought uh you know, it wouldn't
be fair if I didn't bring you some local
specialtities.
>> And of course, some uh some some beef
jerky as well. Jalapeno honey, which I
thought would be good. But the BIES
thing is particularly good because they
have a brand partnership with the uh TX
dot, the Texas Department of
Transportation.
>> Okay. So, they licensed the don't mess
with Texas advertising slogan.
>> Okay. Now, this may surprise you. The
don't mess with Texas. The rights to it
actually belong to the Texas Department
of Transportation cuz it was an
anti-littering campaign.
>> You're kidding. No.
>> How old is this?
>> It dates back criy to the I think the
70s or or at least the very early 80s. I
think the 1970s. Okay. And it's a kind
of famous advertising case study because
how do you tell Texans not to litter?
Okay. Now, in other parts of the world,
you know, simple kind of blandishments
or appeals to their sort of, you know,
you know, higher order concerns might
work, but this is a uniquely text and
message lowkey aggression unspoken.
There's a kinetic interaction. Yeah.
Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. And actually,
funnily enough, when they presented it,
one of the people said, "I find this a
bit abrupt. Could we not make it, please
don't mess." But of course, that doesn't
work, does it?
>> No. Unfortunately,
>> rather rather beautifully bies, which
for the benefit of non-exan
um audiences is it's one of those things
which I think is proof that one of the
great things Americans do is it proves
that you can take something that at a
small scale is atrocious and if you make
it big enough, it's a work of art. And
Bies has done this with the gas station
by making it so enormous. You take it
from something, you know, compar
ghastly. Marching bands would be another
case. You know, if you go and watch the
Texas A&M marching bands, marching bands
are appalling at a small scale. I think
they're
>> until there's 100 people or more.
>> But if there are 500 people doing it, it
suddenly becomes magnificent.
>> Yeah. Well, I think the the interesting
thing about Bies, for the people that
haven't been, again, it's 100 pumps,
maybe 200 pumps, something like that.
And then the biggest Costcoized
building behind that sells everything
from life rafts to barbecues to jerky to
>> deer corn particularly. I think they
seem to go very big on deer corn which
is not something I think I don't know
whether it's a hunting thing. I mean
whether it's just that you want to
attract deer to your I suspect that's
unlikely. I suspect it's a hunting thing
that like a trap or whatever. It's a
kind of way in which you sort of create
a trail of deer corn and then they
wander into your sights or something.
>> Bookie is one of the in fact the only
fuel station gas station that I've ever
been to that has so many pumps that even
if you're not filling up for gas, you
just pull up outside of one of the
pumps.
>> Well, I had an ethical dilemma as a Brit
because my wife said, "Look, all these
other cars next to the pumps are
actually empty. The people have just
left their car by the pump and they've
gone into shop
>> cuz it's under the shade." Now, you
wouldn't do that in M&S simply foods
back home. You know, you fill up, then
you pull into one of the parking spaces
and get out of the way. But you're
right, there's so many pumps that the
pump doubles as a parking space.
>> Yeah. It's also the only way that
because that's covered over, right?
You're in the shade and so it just means
that you don't get to be too hot.
>> They also have about 50 electric car
chargers as well. They they've gone big.
>> Speaking of which, have you been in a
Whimo yet?
>> Uh, no, because I tried to register.
Now, it's it's an Uber partnership in
Austin.
>> It is. If you get an Uber, they'll
>> But when I asked asked for when I asked
for it, they said you're on a trial or
something that I'm on some sort of
>> maybe it's because you're British.
>> It could be. It could be some weird
thing. Um, but interestingly, I'm I'm
still trying to get a Whimo. I had a
friend who took one in San Francisco.
Actually, took about 10 because he
became addicted to taking Whimos.
>> And his judgment, I don't know whether
you agree with this,
>> he's pretty comfortable in a driverless
car just being driven around town. He
said out on the open highway if we hit
60 I'd get a bit nervous but he said at
kind of town speeds he was he was pretty
content.
>> I think the fastest that I'll have been
will have been 35 mph. It's just a
little But I I do have a theory. I'm
going to give you this one. So
>> I noticed when I was ordering Whimos on
the app, it would say it's 10 minutes
away or 5 minutes away and it would
almost always be between 50% and 100%
more time than it said it was to get to
me. It wasn't getting lost. It wasn't it
wasn't accidentally going somewhere and
then when I got in my journey was also
taking way longer. What I've realized is
there's only two reasons I think that
humans behave on the road in regards to
other drivers. One is fear of
retribution and the other is the guilt
of inconveniencing another person. But
with a Whimo, both of those are taken
out of the picture because the back
windows are so blacked out that you can
barely see if there's anyone in. There's
never anybody in the front seat. And
what retributive? They're not going to
tailgate you and beep their horn. You
know, in America, road rage is a mortal
endeavor given that everybody's armed.
So
basically, every time a Whimo is at a
junction, it gets no one lets it out. No
one behaves courteously to it. Everybody
knows if they pull in front pass
pedestrians. I do it all the time when
I'm walking. If I see a Whimo in front,
I'm like, it's a little close. I'm like,
it's going to slow down. I mean there's
an economist Douglas McWills in the UK
and he and I occasionally talk about
this because we're both car enthusiasts
about the extent to which motoring
uh actually teaches social skills,
social calculus.
>> So one of one of the little bits of
social calculus a good driver would
probably perform is that your readiness
to let someone in from a side junction
uh would be dependent on how fast you're
going already. If you're stuck in
traffic, okay, the calculus is, well, no
skin off my nose. If I let this person
in, I lose 5 ft of road or whatever, you
know, by being generous. Consequently,
we engage in those small acts of kind of
altruism as motorists. We're also hugely
sensitive to when you perform a favor,
whether the person thanks you. So, one
of the great inventions which I think
originated in Japan is the idea of
flashing your hazard lights to say thank
you if someone lets you in.
>> I've never had that in America.
>> I've seen it once or twice here. It's
less common, but it's spreading. It's
one of those strange things. It's it's a
kind of I truck drivers kind of
propagated it in the UK, but I mean I
was remember talking to Robert Trivers
who's kind of like, you know, the kind
of Diane of evolutionary.
>> Triv is a [ __ ] legend. Oh my god.
>> He he was talking about in Jamaica where
you know your entire emotional reaction
if you perform an act of generosity is
nothing to do with the cost of the act
of generosity. It's whether it's
acknowledged.
>> Right?
>> So if you actually let someone through
in East Kent in London nobody does it
but in East Kent I noticed that if you
pull in to allow someone to come through
a you know a narrow it's usually
alongside a row of parked cars
>> and you don't at least give them a
little wave. It's
>> that's bad form. bad form. It's really
really not done. Um and but also we
learn this kind of calculus of okay, how
much does it benefit them versus how
much does it cost me? And there's a kind
of nonzero sum
>> domesticating effect being on the road.
>> So I I think that's probably true.
>> I wonder if that's contributing to some
of the extended adolescence delayed
development thing we're seeing among Gen
Z.
>> They don't drive. the fewer and fewer
people
>> if you're not careful can be quite
psychopathic.
>> Mhm. There's that guy in London, right,
that catches people that do that illegal
U-turn.
>> What's his name? Isn't he Australian?
>> Exactly. He's actually I think he's
Zimbabwean. White Zimbabwean originally.
>> Oh god, that's a terrifying combination.
It's not promising. I don't want to get
on the wrong side of the white Zimbabwe.
Interesting on the the road thing.
>> Cycling Mikey, he's called. Yeah. uh in
the US. So if you in the UK, if you are
in front of the car that is in the lane
that you're trying to get into and the
car that's in the lane you're trying to
get into isn't moving quicker than you,
you're either moving at the same pace or
around about the same pace,
>> it is almost maybe 90% of the time the
car that's in the lane you're trying to
get into should pull back, give you a
little flash, and alert you to go in.
Right? If you're more than about half a
car length in front of them, they can
see your your indicator, you do that. In
the US, people treat their lanes like
it's their territory. They're so [ __ ]
>> Texans, interestingly, despite their
reputation for individualism. Texan
drivers seem to be quite generous. I
mean, apparently Massachusetts is the
worst place. But you're right about the
whole thing of lane possessiveness. Um,
that it's more extreme here than it is
over in the UK. But your point, by the
way, is quite worrying because it occurs
to me that we're breeding a generation
of young urban people who can't drive
and therefore that sort of domesticating
uh influence is is lost. If you just sit
around in public transport, you lose
that social calculus. And it occurred to
me
>> that when I say they can't drive, they
may have passed their test and they may
have a driving license, but there's a
problem because
>> very different to being able to drive.
Well, if you live in London, two
problems, okay? One, you don't drive
very often. All right? Secondly, driving
in London's horrible anyway. It's not
really enjoyable. But the third problem
is something had to be driving is only
really enjoyable when you do it
frequently. So, you'll know this
experience. Okay, you pick up a higher
car, you're in an unfamiliar country.
The higher car is unfamiliar. You're not
quite sure where the indicator thing is.
Um the the the country may have sort of
weird norms like four-way stops that
you're unfamiliar with. For the first 24
hours of driving, you don't enjoy it.
You know, you're fumbling around. It's
it's system what is it? It's system two,
not system one, to use a carnival
phrase. It's only with frequency that
driving becomes system one. So now I've
been in Texas for 5 days. I'll pretty
much pick up the car outside the hotel
and I'll drift off pretty contentedly.
The first, you know, the first 5 hours
of driving were a little bit fraught.
And it suddenly occurred to me that a
lot of people, if you live in a city and
you don't drive frequently and you only
rent cars,
>> you don't know what it is to enjoy
driving.
>> Yeah. You're always in that alien sort
of
>> alien kind of initial zone where it's,
you know, it's kind of um you haven't
got over the hump.
>> Mhm.
>> No, I love driving. I've heard you say
that.
>> So, what have you, Given that you've
lived in Texas for a few years, what
what have you gone for? I've got to ask
about this.
>> Uh 6.2 L V8 Camaro.
>> Fantastic. Okay, that's brilliant. Yeah,
you you've assimilated. Correct. I've
gone totally [ __ ] feral, I think,
rather than assimilating.
>> Uh, it's beautiful. It's really fun,
dude. It was
>> 40 grand, 45 grand USD.
>> Oh, don't I know? It's insane. Don't for
a 22 model. It was beautiful. It was
everything that I wanted. It's got
wireless Apple CarPlay. It's got cooled
seats that you can uh press the remote
start and it'll turn the engine on and
begin air conditioning the car before
you get in, including cooling the seats
down, which in 105° weather is actually
>> literally it's [ __ ] lifeanging. Yeah,
exactly. And I was like,
>> and this is 35 grand GBP, 30 less than
that maybe.
>> I mean, they they pay for cars in
dollars less than we pay for them in
sterling generally.
>> It's crazy. So, uh yeah, I love it. I
love it. It's it's
>> Yeah, I hope actually This is one area
where Trump's tariff negotiations. I'd
quite like to volunteer for the Trump
team negotiating with the UK trade
people on the grounds, you know,
compulsory and zero duty on Mac trucks.
>> Well, exchange. You can have our Land
Rovers, you can have our Rolls-Royces,
you can have our Mini Coopers, and we'll
>> You want a Corvette?
>> Yeah. Well, you would upgrade your
Mustang Mache.
>> Yeah. No, no.
>> Have you still got it?
>> I've still got it. Love it. Actually,
I'm debating. There's an interesting
question about whether the new Cadillac
L will be introduced which is electric
um and is arguably perhaps uh what would
I say? Well, you know, it's an
extraordinary I I like luxury cars.
Okay, so this is this is slightly
embarrassing. I used to have a German
boss and I used to really really rile
him by saying things like Lincoln Town
Car, best car in the world. Okay, cuz
when you got off an 8-hour flight in New
York, that's what you want to sit in,
isn't it? To be driven into New York.
And I think Europeans are absolutely
unhealthily obsessed with cornering on
the grounds that you don't do it right.
Acceleration is really valuable. You
don't throw your passengers around
corners at extreme speed. I don't, you
know, I don't drive as if I'm on the
[ __ ] Nuremberg ring, okay? I drive in
a way that maximizes sort of I like a
little bit of speed and maneuverability,
but I I don't want all this y about
hurling things around hairpins. So, a
really good American car. This is not a
fashionable opinion, I might add, in
Britain, but my love of American cars is
unabated. Yeah.
>> Good. How would you improve airport
experiences? I've spent a lot of time in
airports recently.
>> So, I mean, one of the interesting ones
is they're too big. I mean, the you
know, the the shopping center component,
which was novel when it first started,
has now become obligatory, and you
basically have to walk through the
Houston Galleria before you can catch
your plane. Um and um London City
Airport. You've probably used that, have
you?
>> No, I've never been.
>> I've never Okay, it's
what this is. This is what's so funny.
Okay, so there's an idea I'm playing
with in marketing generally and in
innovation, which I call reverse
benchmarking. Okay, so the idea is what
most companies do is they benchmark
themselves against their competition.
Now, the great writer on this is a guy
called Roger L. Martin who's my own
personal he's Canadian my own personal
business guru extensive writer he was
dean of the Rottman school in Toronto
and he wrote a piece called benchmarking
is for losers okay that all you do is
you you diminish your margins by making
yourself in direct competition with your
other competitors
so you don't benefit uh your uh your
profits or your shareholders and also
you don't benefit your customers okay
and And the reason you don't benefit
your customers is because they're then
deprived of choice and and
differentiation. And you don't benefit
the overall category because the
category loses value because it's more
homogeneous. Okay. And my argument is
and I got this inspiration from that
great book, you've probably had him on,
will have you ever had him on?
>> No.
>> Okay. Unreasonable hospitality.
Fantastic book about a guy who ran 11
Madison Park. He's a major sort of food
innovator in all kinds of ways.
I think he's married to the woman who
invented cereal milk, which I think is
one of the most brilliant inventions,
which is, you know, the milk you get at
the bottom of cocoa pops would be the
British, which is tastier than anything
else you've ever drunk. And she had the
inspired idea of just flavoring milk
with breakfast cereal and selling it as
a drink, which I think is just genius.
Okay. Now, his brilliant thing was he's
number 50. I've told this story a lot,
so apologies to people who heard this
before. He's number 50 uh restaurant in
the world in the San Pelgrren restaurant
awards. It's a three star Michel
restaurant New York. That's 2011. He
wants to get to number one. Pretty, you
know, remote ambition. It's not going to
be easy. But one of the things he did
was what I call reverse benchmarking. He
took his team to the number one
restaurant in the world and they started
doing what we all do, which is how are
we doing compared to them? They do this
really well. Let's copy it, etc. And at
the end of the whole experience, Gdara
just goes to seem, I'm not interested in
any of that stuff. They're already doing
that. Well, if we merely copy them, no
one will notice. What I want to know,
given that you've just been to the best
restaurant in the world, according to
San Pelgrino, um, is what what was a bit
disappointing,
cuz we're going to double down on that.
All right.
And the the approach was they finally
came up with two things that were a bit
disappointing which was one the coffee
was nothing special. I mean I found
American coffee quality unbelievably
high variance and they just said it was
fine. The coffee wasn't disgusting. It
was just there was nothing particularly
interesting about it. And of course
because he taken a few people to the
kitchen along a few of them wanted to
drink beer. And the beer drinkers were
treated a bit like secondass citizens
compared to the wine drinkers who are
given all manner of [ __ ] with a you
know sleier and a load of conversation
about the terois you know and so he goes
back to his own restaurant and he
appoints one of his guys who's a coffee
obsessive the coffee sleier and another
guy I think from the kitchens who is
obsessed with American craft beers or
all craft beers he makes him the beer
smell now imagine you're in this
restaurant now most of the people in the
restaurant aren't going to ask for beer
here, but 10 or 20% of them will. Okay?
And and they're expecting, yeah, we got
Sam Adams on draft or we've got this in
bottles. And instead, they get a beer
menu from the beer simlier with
suggested beer pairings. You know, the
citrus IPA goes really, really well with
the cod or whatever it might be. Now,
those people, you've blown their minds.
Okay? It's not a question of, "Hey, that
was a bit better than I expected." So
this reverse benchmarking is find out
something that your competitors have
completely overlooked,
do it really, really well and I would
argue as a marketer and then actually
turn it into a feature, you know,
spotlight it. And you could you could
almost take this and make it into a I'm
not going to say it's everything, but
it's a generalized theory of innovation,
which is, you know, what Steve Jobs did
was take a field where everybody was
focused on the tech and the capability
of the machine
to the complete exclusion of any
aesthetic or usability consideration.
>> You made it beautiful.
>> And what he does is go, okay, now what
what I'm not saying is you can be [ __ ]
at the technology so long as you make it
lovely. No, you merely have to be kind
of, you know, what you might call top
desile in what you do somewhere else.
But then you go off and you find the
area which everybody else has ignored.
And I I look at things like I'm a big
fan of the Moxy hotel chain. I often
talk about that. And what that is is
double down on the ground floor. You
know, make the ground
>> we work on the ground floor. Don't feel
weird when you've checked out.
>> And that that's one of the marvelous
benefits you discover through
experience. uh you know that actually
after I've checked out of a moxy I every
other hotel makes me feel homeless but
the moxy you you know you okay take your
shopping trolley and your plastic bags
and go and push them through the streets
until your flight leaves whereas in the
moxy you just hang out for another 5
hours and get on with some [ __ ] and
order their coffee and you don't feel
remotely unwelcome in other news this
episode is brought to you by Momentous
if your sleep's not dialed taking ages
to not off waking up at random times and
feeling groggy in the morning. Moments
sleep packs.
How did I miss both of those? Are here
to help? They're not your typical knock
you out supplement overloaded with
melatonin. Just the most evidence-based
ingredients at perfect doses to help you
fall asleep more quickly, stay asleep
throughout the night, and wake up
feeling more rested and revitalized in
the morning. Which is why I take these
things every single night, and why I
trust Momentous with my life, or at
least with my sleep, because they make
the highest quality supplements on the
planet. what you read on the label, it's
what's in the product and absolutely
nothing else. And if you're still
unsure, they've got a 30-day money back
guarantee. So, you can buy it completely
risk-f free, use it, and if you do not
like it for any reason, they will give
you your money back. Plus, they ship
internationally. Right now, you can get
35% off your first subscription and that
30-day money back guarantee by going to
the link in the description below or
heading to livemus.com/modernwisdom
using the code modernwisdom at checkout.
That's l i v e m o m n o us.com/modern
wisdom and modern wisdom a checkout. So
what would you do to airports? Right.
That's a really interesting question. Um
uh what interests me about London City
Airport is the fact that there's a
natural benchmarking tendency which is
that when I was a kid the rich kids had
been to you know they might have been to
actually wouldn't have been Dubai back
then would have been char but they've
been to Skipol or they've been to Changi
in Singapore they it's amazing their
shops you know it's like because back
then we hadn't seen a shopping center
before and it was really novel you know
I bought Walkman you know it was
fantastic right And then suddenly all
airports became like that. Okay. And
suddenly people went, if you've been to
London City, it's incredible. You go in
and 6 minutes later you're at the gate.
There hardly any shops. It's brilliant.
Okay.
>> So there is a really really interesting
idea. I mean there is scope, lots of
scope for really interesting innovation.
>> Um I think it's a lot easier. Also, it's
worth noting it's a lot easier if you
want to premiumize an experience. It's a
lot easier to in innovate on the ground
than it is in the air. Now there is a
fantastic thing which a friend of mine
called Jeremy Stone tells me about which
is at Washington Dallas where they still
have these vehicles which I think were
designed by Ero Sarinan the Finnish kind
of inventor where your lounge drives to
the plane.
Okay. So you get in something that looks
like a room where you're all sit sitted
down and you know you've got a few
little tables and you're comfortable and
then the actual lounge is on wheels and
drives to the plane.
>> Wow. Now, it's a really really
interesting innovation because there's a
Soviet era innovation thing called Tris,
uh, which is it it's the Russian fora
technique for creative innovation or
something. And they have a whole list of
kind of principles, one of which is make
the thing that stays still move and make
the thing that moves stay still.
>> It's just something in kind of
mechanical and engineering innovation
which is a different way of looking at
things. And so what's interesting about
that of course is you the planes don't
need then to go to a gate. So the
constraint first of all you probably
save a lot of fuel because the plane
doesn't have to spend so much time
taxiing. The plane can be parked pretty
much next to the runway.
>> Can have a much smaller number of gates
or whatever it is.
>> And you and it means that every time you
expand your airport, you just buy a few
more vehicles. You don't have to go into
a $1 billion.
>> Well, you treat you treat your airport
more like a car park in a building,
>> right? How can we slot these different
maneuvering Lego pieces together so that
they can [ __ ] off in a straight line
toward where the plane is?
>> Here's a weird one. So, one thing would
be nothing to do with airports
themselves, but it occurred to me the
other day. I was thinking I was trying
to do a bit of reverse benchmarking. No
hotels offer you a monitor,
>> okay?
>> You might have a 4K You might have a 4K,
you know, 85 in TV, but in order to plug
your laptop into it, you'd have to rip
the thing off the wall. Okay. It's weird
to me that no hotels offer a dual screen
experience. And it's weird to me that
car hire companies, if you wanted to, if
you wanted to employ all of America's
young people in the summer, see see if
you agree with me. If you could pay a
car hire company, very simple thing. You
pay a hundred bucks, okay? And it's big
money, okay? We will meet you at the
arrivals gate and with your keys and we
will walk you to your car. Oh yeah,
that's good. Like a concurge
>> because Yeah, because that's the wor a
car hire is terrifying. If you if you're
familiar with the airport, it's fine.
Okay, but if you're going
>> Where's the AIS? Oh, no. That's the
Enterprise.
>> We We've moved off site, so there's a
shuttle bus.
>> There's a huge queue that I need to get
through.
>> Yeah, I haven't pre-registered my
driver's ID. All of this stuff hasn't
been submitted. Here's a QR code. Here's
a single piece of ID that says I'm the
person with the QR code. Here's a
one-time password that's texted to the
phone that two factor authenticates the
fact I'm here. Hello, sir. Have you ever
been through uh Dubai airport or or the
Middle East and been met by one of those
conc?
>> Sibaya, I think it's No, I haven't got
that right. That's wrong. There's a word
for it which is an Arabic word for
hospitality or welcome.
>> So, you get off, you walk off the plane.
>> There might be a book by someone in the
12th century. So, don't don't ignore
that bit. Okay. Uh you walk off the
plane and someone meets you there. It's
the same as being picked up by a driver
>> at the arrivals gate exit, but it
happens as you get off the plane at the
gate and then they say, "Oh, Mr.
Williamson, here let me take your bags.
Let me take you through a special bit of
immigration. Here's a a ar a rivals
lounge that you can get into. Please
give me all of your documents. I'll go
and speak to the people for you. This is
and it's airond conditioned and lovely
and there's water and a cool towel that
smells of cucumber and they look after
your immigration experience in I've only
ever done this once and it wasn't me
that was paying.
>> It would be nice as well if I mean
because actually the airport experience
if if you do it if you go through it
frequently does get weirdly stressful
and annoying precisely in a weird way
because it's repetitive and there's that
paranoia that you're only one lost bit
of paper away from complete we we were
debating this. Why is it that airports
are so stressful? Now, there are a load
of things. Why is it that the uh the
boarding pass is completely unlike the
dimensions of your passport? Shouldn't
it have kind of 3M sticky post-it note
glue on the back?
>> Well, imagine if every imagine if every
um passport around the world just had a
small number of magnets on each corner
and you could have a tiny bit of printed
on the printed paper, a tiny bit of
magnet. It snaps onto the back the same
way that your um iPhone has the Mag Safe
thing on the back and all that you need
to do is hand the person, hey, here's
passport and boarding pass. Cuz that's
the thing, you know, you don't ever know
when you're going through TSA at the
front. Sometimes they seem to want your
passport. Sometimes they seem to want
your boarding pass and I can never
[ __ ] tell before I get there.
>> There's, by the way, a very interesting
hack there. I mean the various hacks,
one of which is and I can do a bit of
product placement here for the hotel
Emma in San Antonio which is absolutely
fantastic by the way. Um is I do
actually carry an open bag because the
trouble the trouble with having
everything zipped up as I said the
spectator is that every time you want to
retrieve something it's like making love
to a goth. You know they're just too
many zips. Okay, right? You know you
know you know what I mean? It's it's
kind of you know this te Oh god I left
that thing. Oh, which of these 17
compartments is it in? And I think a lot
of a lot of baggage design has gone in
the wrong direction, which is multiple
sealed compartments. But you actually
need one thing where you just go, I'll
chuck it in there.
>> I have a friend who uses a workman's
bag, like a carry that you would have
drills in.
>> You you unfold.
>> No, no, no. Imagine that, but cut the
top half off and make the handles
longer. So, it's basically a tray.
>> Clever.
>> Yeah. And it would have, you know, this
is where the hammer goes. This is where
the drill goes and you can see
everything from above and he just picks
his bits out and puts them back in.
>> So, London City Airport, which I
recommend you because I think you can
fly to Newcastle from there. I'm not
quite sure.
>> It has some pretty good strengths in
that they have the new scanners so you
don't need to take your laptop out of
the bag. Now, it's amazing how
irritating that is. It shouldn't be,
okay, but you know, the kind of
rigmmoral you've got to go through
deciding what goes into your check
luggage, what goes into your hand
luggage is really, really tedious. M
>> um so there are technologies which are
starting to improve things undoubtedly
um cuz I I mean it is kind of weird uh
why that's so unpleasant but I suppose I
suppose what it is is there's something
about going back to school about an
airport which is you're at the mercy of
various
>> being dictated to you got to wait in
cues you can't you can't do the thing
you want another element
>> a slightly weird one I would think which
is oh you great privileges in you're in
group one uh which means you get to wait
in an unair air conditioned air bridge
for 11 minutes
>> standing there like a pratt before we'll
let you onto the plane
>> whereas I imagine the people in the
later groups can just breeze straight on
I don't know what's going on
>> sometime so I think it's an interesting
one at least in America uh something
I've noticed I live 12 minutes maybe 15
minutes from Austin airport the reason
that it gets stressful to me is that
there's an inverse curve of tolerance
that you have because you start to take
the piss more and more. You assume that
with experience, you're able to navigate
the airport more quickly, but it's
mostly out of your control. Yes, maybe
you've got all of your stuff in the
right places. You've packed the night
before. You've already pre-ordered the
Uber. You know when it's going to come.
You know that if you order Uber Black XL
that it actually arrives a little bit
quicker or they can take a different
road because of the HPV people or
whatever the [ __ ] But then when you get
there, if TSA is slammed or if you, you
know, you forgot that it's the beginning
of spring break or something else that's
going on, you're still going to be
screwed. So for me, the problem is as
you get more experienced at it, you try
to take the piss more, but your
experience isn't able to impact how
quickly you can really go through the
airport experience.
>> So you know this, you know this weird
thing that you know the biggest car
company in the world doesn't own any
cars. That's Uber. you know, the biggest
lodgings company in the world doesn't
own any property. That's Airbnb.
>> And I always wondered whether you I'll
piggy back on Ryionaire, which for
American listeners is a bit like Spirit
Air, okay? Uh in the US, it's a very
ultra lowcost carrier. Okay? And this is
how you do it. You basically produce,
you have a luxury airline, which was
totally benile in the air, but then
that's only an hour and a half anyway in
Europe. Okay? So, you'd buy a country
house near Stanstead airport and it
would cost you £600 return to go to,
let's say, Madrid, okay? And you'd turn
up at the country house, park your car,
there'd be a party going on like
something out of Eyes Wide Shut or you
know the beach party in the the Wolf of
Wall Street, you know, there'd be fine
wines and Belgian chocolates and then
you'd be driven to your Ryan airplane.
Okay, cost of flight £17.95.
Okay. And then you be kind of met at the
other end.
>> So in other words, in other words, you
take a totally benile experience in the
air, but you absolutely make the ground
experience fant
>> in parenthesis of something that's
wonderful.
>> So there's I mean there's emphatically
scope for creating a kind of parallel
network of uh air routes which are small
airport to small airport simply because
you know Austin probably is a is a lot
easier than say Houston or Dallas.
Although Dallas Dallas gets very high
scores from users.
>> Um great.
>> It actually Dallas DFW employed its own
behavioral scientist, someone called
Courtney Moore. I don't know if she's
still there, but she had some very very
interesting ideas. So how do you stop
people feeling compelled to queue before
the gate has opened? And one of her
ideas was you made the gate ambiguous
until it you were ready to board.
>> So you don't know where you're supposed
to. basically say, you know, your flight
to London from DFW is boarding from gate
47 or 48. So you go, well, there's no
point of me standing in a queue cuz I
might choose the wrong gate and I'll
look like a pratt, so I'll go and sit in
the coffee shop instead.
>> That's clever.
>> And then only when the gate opens does
it become obvious which gate is actually
your gate.
>> It's interesting with gates because you
can be more and less lucky based on
where the gate's located and what the
close uh retail spots are around it. If
you're in between the DKNY and the Louis
Vuitton shop, you think, "What the [ __ ]
I wanted to be next to the Starbucks."
Heathro Terminal 5. Everybody thinks
Pamon good. If you're going through
Heathro Terminal 5, you need to go to
Predtoon. It's a British staple, even
though I don't think it's British. It's
not meant to be.
>> I think
>> it's it's built in Britain, but Ptoon is
hardly a [ __ ]
>> You might be right. It might be owned by
McDonald's, actually.
>> I think it is. Okay.
>> Um, but if you if you're looking at the
main Prets at the far side, you've come
in from the back. If you take a left all
the way down toward the lower numbers
away from the business class lounge
behind you really hacked this
>> keep all keep going all the way all the
way all the way down to the end. Take a
left. Keep going. Keep going. Keep
going. There is a much smaller prep
that's there that still has everything
but it's down and on the side and
there's never any queue. You've got a
little walk in. You go past the WHNS.
Have a little look at any of the box.
But it is a
>> There used to be a brilliant EasyJet
hack which was that there was a pillar
at the end of the checkin desk. I don't
think it works anymore at Gatwick. And
the pillar led people to believe that
there was only one gate there, but there
were actually two, but the queue was the
same length. Okay. So, it was actually
uh because because nobody could see the
extra little check-in desk.
>> Effectively, the queue moved twice as
fast.
>> Um I think they've changed it now so
everybody cues in one line, but there
used to be a rather brilliant I mean,
there are little hacks you can find. So,
an interesting Okay, here's an
interesting theory for airports. Okay.
which is that generally people who fly
infrequently aren't that bothered by
streamlining the whole process whereas
George Clooney and up in the air if
you're a totally frequent flyer you get
almost unhealthily obsessed with
streamlining the process
>> and one clever thing you can do as an
airport it probably wouldn't work at the
scale of something like Heath Row is you
could build in secret shortcuts which
were known to your uh the tube has them.
I mean, the London Underground. So,
there are places where it signposts the
exit is over there. But the Kanye know
that if you turn right down a, you know,
down a funny little tunnel, you cut 150
yards off your walk.
>> But it wouldn't do to advertise it
because it couldn't handle the traffic.
>> Advertise it. You simply allow them to
be Easter eggs.
>> Okay. So, let me give you, let me give
you an Easter egg, which is going to
ruin this for everybody that's
listening. Uh, Amsterdam Skipple
Airport. If you go to their
>> That's a really annoying airport, by the
way, because they should have made it
two terminals. Really? Yeah.
>> Okay. So, what they've done is they've
endlessly expanded that airport, you
know, and
>> D E F G
>> and if you're if you're from gate
whatever is C48, I mean, frankly, you
could have walked home, you know.
>> Um, so most of the a lot of people have
layovers in Amsterdam. It's a real hub.
It's well well positioned. Uh, problem
is
>> it's kind of a bit of a [ __ ] on to find
somewhere to relax. It's really
difficult. And the way that they've done
this, kind of the same way that those
benches have been designed in New York
City to mean that homeless people can't
lie on them because they're precisely
the inverse of the shape that a human
spine is supposed to make. Some weird
medieval torture device that's
masquerading as a [ __ ] piece of art
next to the street.
>> Um, but gate D2 in Amsterdam Skipol
airport is the only one that I've found
that doesn't have armrests in between
the seats. So, it's a low bench that's
padded and there's no armrests in
between it. D2 Skipple. Is that right?
>> D2 Skipple. And you can lie down, put
the put the thing on, you can lie flat
on this. I've spent many of time at
>> there's a gate in London City, which is
most people stay in the main kind of
holding pen, but if you walk towards
gate three or something, there's a
little cafe and a seating area next to
it, which most people don't know about.
So that's that that's
>> whoever whoever staffing the [ __ ]
Yeah. Whoever's staffing the Easter egg
predon and is near gate D2 in Amsterdam
Shipple is going to be [ __ ] A quick
aside, if you're anything like me,
packing for a weekend trip somehow takes
longer than the trip itself, which is
why I've partnered with Nomatic, because
this backpack is the best, most
beautiful, most life-changing piece of
luggage that I've ever found. It's got a
compartment for everything. No more
playing suitcase Tetris or rolling your
clothes like you're some sort of burrito
chef. You planned a beautiful trip. Do
not let a disorganized bag ruin the
vibe. Look, if you're still on the fence
about their product, they come with a
lifetime guarantee. So, this is
literally the final backpack that you'll
ever need to buy. And you can return or
exchange any product within 30 days for
any reason. So, you can buy your new
bag, try it for a month. If you don't
like it, give your money back. And they
ship internationally. Right now, you can
get a 20% discount. See everything I use
and recommend by going to the link in
the description below or heading to
nomadic.com/modernwisdom.
That's nomatic.com/modern
wisdom. Talk to me about uh takeaway
food. We you linked me in with some guy
that makes crazy Indian takeaway food.
>> Oh yes. It's Nostalgia Foods and um
Narish Sara. Yeah. Who's a food
scientist at Berkeley who uh like most
Indian immigrants and indeed British
immigrants to the United States.
Definitely
>> wily disappointed.
>> Well, not always. There are there are
very good Indian restaurants in in the
US, but they're few. Okay. I mean
certainly in proportion. I mean of
course there wasn't much of an Indian
population and of course your spicy food
is partly taken care of with things like
Texmex etc. M okay but anybody who's
either British or or Indian or Pakistani
Bengali etc uh would feel a bit deprived
and so he's found this technology where
you basically you can ship chefs over
from hydrobad
uh they then prepare biryani which you
then preserve using NASA food preserving
technology
>> and I've tried it and I've shared it
with other people and it's astounding.
>> Was it was it the parathas that you were
talking about?
>> Oh that's a different one. That's a
thing called a frozen paratha, which you
probably could get here. Um uh uh and
that's that's an extraordinary thing cuz
you just weirdly you don't thaw them.
Take them straight out of the freezer,
bang them with a bit of oil in a frying
pan. Uh about 1 minute each side and
it's fantastic. Yeah. I I can't believe
I the email thread that I was put in was
somebody somebody at berkeley.edu edu
telling me that my industrial-sized
order of NASA freeze-dried [ __ ]
Indian food had been I was like what how
have these five different
things contributed to result in me
eating Indian food but rank
>> he makes he also makes haleem which is
one of my favorite things of all time by
the way if you've never had item
>> it's it's usually I think lamb and I
think wheat grass which is kind of
soaked overnight in some shape so it's
like the only way you can describe is
like a very meaty porridge and then you
and pimp it. If you ever go to Saloo in
Kennon Street in London, they they then
bring you a little tray which has little
bits of chili, little bits of ginger,
little bits of something else, maybe
saffron, and then you pimp the top of it
by sprinkling these things
>> over like you make your own pizza.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And then it sits probably
sits on top of rice or or Yeah.
Typically, I think it would come with
rice. Absolutely magnificent thing. It's
wonderful. And he makes haleem. He makes
biryani. Um and and hydrai biryani is
considered the kind of gold standard in
India.
>> Okay. um what's happened with changes in
people's ordering preferences given that
so much of this is now done over screen.
You look at McDonald's, you look at even
I I would be very interested to know the
difference between a touch.
>> Okay, this has a really interesting I
don't normally talk about AI because
everybody else does. But one thing that
strikes me as interesting about AI is
when you change the context and the
choice architecture within which people
choose. So it's a screen rather than
face to face. Okay, they make different
choices.
If you want my frank opinion, I think
the whole property market is broken
because everybody searches for property
in the same way. Okay. Uh now one way in
which you can innovate very reliably is
it's quite hard to change a million
people's behavior. Okay? Because people
are driven by habit and they you know
they've already got a I mean they've
already got a solution to the problem a
lot of the time. Yours may be better,
but they're, you know, I mean, literally
when mobile phones were invented, we
forget this because your generation
think nobody had mobile phones. They
invented the mobile phone, everybody
bought a mobile phone. It was about 20
something years before it reached kind
of, you know, mainstream adoption. Now,
part of that was price, part of that was
technology. A lot of it was people
saying things like, "Why would I want to
make a phone call on the street?" I mean
I literally because they didn't really
envisage the value that a mobile phone
brought you until they owned one. Okay.
And there's also the whole social proof
thing that in the early days of owning a
mobile phone you were a bit of a wanker.
Okay. So translation for Americans jerk.
Okay.
Now
uh what's got interesting there is that
behavior is slow to change. Okay. But if
you change the context or the or the
interface which people use to make a
decision,
everybody's behavior changes.
And so in McDonald's, one of the things
they found, I think people tend to order
a bit more when they order on a screen.
I think I've heard anecdotally that the
number of particularly males who order a
meal with two burgers in it has gone up
a lot because you felt awkward doing
that face to face even with a complete
stranger who you are never going to meet
again in your life. You just felt a bit
awkward, okay, doing it. Whereas when
when you're ordering on a screen, they
don't even know how many of you there
are, okay, because it's a screen.
>> Obviously, upselling may or cross-elling
may become easier. You know, there's a
limit in a spoken conversation. So it
does strike me as interesting with AI
which is
>> if which is possible. You know there's
this new device I think Johnny Ives been
involved in
>> I wanted to talk about that
>> which is a thing which you wear around
your neck and it uses the processing
power of your mobile phone but it
basically talks to you.
>> Okay. I think you'll also need a
matching eye piece.
>> I think that the glasses pieces
would be quite good. I think wouldn't
>> I could see you. That stinks of you.
Absolutely stinks of you.
the digital monle. Yes. the digital
ponet for uh yeah or or lunette you know
those things on a handle which you but
um uh they um uh if you change the way
in which so if if suddenly instead of
going to a screen I'm going I need to
renew I need to rent a car I you know I'
I'd like you to show me details of this
I need to choose a toaster and that
changes from being screenbased to say
conversational and iterative
then everything changes okay Well,
there's a okay there's a possible way in
which AI will make me completely
redundant which is not in the way that
most people anticipate which is
advertising generally is a business
trying to reach consumers.
Okay. The natural
direction of travel of an AI empowered
world would surely be the other way
round where consumers appoint agents to
find them things to buy.
So actually once you have unlimited what
you might call search there are no
search costs you know okay right for the
consumer effectively in the sense that
the searching is being done by an AI uh
agent
then
effectively what you're doing is the
consumer is appointing an advertising
agency to find them stuff rather than
the company appointing an advertising
agency to find them customers.
And I can't see, you know, um, now I'm
sure there, you know, I'm sure, you
know, I don't think I'm going to starve
to death, but it does strike me that
that would seem a pretty natural
direction of travel. And, for example,
things like the, you know, the real
estate industry now. Okay. Now, that
that sort of works with fairly crude
search, but it's not I I think it's very
very simplistic, which is where do you
want to buy a house? How much do you
want to spend? Do you want a flat? Do
you want a house? Do you want to buy? Do
you want to rent? Okay,
that's actually it seems perfectly
satisfying to the person going through
that process, but I don't think it's a
very any more than dating apps are a
great way of finding a lifetime partner
necessarily.
>> Okay. Uh, you know, the process of
dating probably should be highly
iterative, which is that you use what
you find in the marketplace to refine
your preferences.
>> Yeah. You train it over time. You do it
with your YouTube algorithm. Even
Spotify. Spotify suggests new bands and
songs to me. Like this really know. I
wouldn't have even picked that and it
knows. And that going back to your air
fryer girlfriend, not a Corvette
girlfriend idea. Experience good. Look,
just trust. Trust that I know your
preferences.
>> There are things where the experience is
better than the promise. There are
things where I mean the classic case
where I always think the experience and
the promise are absolutely loggerheads
in consumerism is camping equipment. So
you buy a tent or a sleeping bag and the
thing that really impresses you is how
small it is when it's in the bag. Okay?
And then you use that sleeping bag, you
take it out of its bag and it turns into
something, you know, basically the size
of the Hindenburg, right? Okay. You
think that is magnificent. How do they
manage to get that sleeping bag into
that tiny bag? And then it's raining and
it's 8:00 the next day and you've got to
get the sleeping bag back in the bag
wet. Okay. Wet. And it's a living
[ __ ] nightmare. So you could say
there are air flyer girlfriends and
there are sleeping bag girlfriends.
Okay. There girlfriend is wow this is
much better than I you know it's much
more than it said on the tin and the
sleeping van girlfriend is god it looks
so great but I mean that about all kinds
of things are like that which is you
know the conflict between the promise
and you know and you know undoubtedly
advertising I think sometimes
overpromises and underdelivers and then
there are experiences where you
underpromise and overd deliver
>> um
>> interesting with the way that dopamine
works with that stuff right that
overpromising on the front end is good
for getting people through the door and
I imagine that you can launch businesses
very hard with that but how do you get
repeat purchase and how do you get good
customer satisfaction with that actually
I wish very interesting question
actually I wish there were there are a
few things this is the whole question of
how search works and it's it really
comes into the field of sort of decision
science and choice architecture
okay so at the moment you tend to at
ratings for restaurants. And I've always
wanted in hotels. And one thing I've
always wanted Trip Adviser to offer is a
list of uh the most polarizing hotels,
okay? Because really interesting hotels
are going to be slightly divisive. Okay?
The moxy would be divisive actually.
>> You know, if you turned up,
>> if you're a family of four,
>> if you're a family of four, you [ __ ]
there's no kids club.
>> But anything that's really good for some
people is probably going to be deficient
on some other measure. You know, I mean,
the most extreme I've always given this
example, the hotel I stayed in in East
Berlin, uh, where it was, it was a
former East German police station. The
the rooms had been cells. Okay. You
actually slept on a large platform above
your own shower because there wasn't
room in the cell to have a whole bed and
separate shower. There was one
television in the room. It was black and
white. Wasn't even a flat screen, one
channel. And it showed still does show
to this day the big Labowski on
continuous loop. Now if you'd turned up
expecting the Marriott, okay, it would
have been literally traum traumatizing.
Okay. On the other hand, if you wanted
something that was authentically Berlin
>> experience holiday
>> and I ought to make the point, okay, um
I ought to make the point that in the
middle of the hotel, it was a bit like
the moxy in that thing in that we invest
in the communal areas, not in the rooms.
Okay. There was a barista and a coffee
shop. You sure it wasn't a panopticon in
the middle of that
>> or everybody's room being looked at?
>> I'm I'm pretty sure you're right. It
should have been a panopticon. You
shouldn't
>> That would have been real authentic.
>> In the middle in a kind of courtyard was
literally a a coffee shop where I had
probably the best flat white I've had in
my life.
>> When are we going to get a Hindenburg?
We spoke about this last night.
>> The derigible.
>> Yeah. What's Talk to me about
everybody's desire to have a derigible.
Well, I've always wondered, by the way,
I didn't fully answer the first question
about star ratings, but I've always
wondered, you mentioned repeat purchase.
Nearly all businesses overinvest in
acquisition and underinvest in in in um
customer retention, right? And the
reason is I I'll tell you the companies
I don't think do that. I think
family-owned companies tend not to
because they've got kind of reputational
skin in the game and they've got
longerterm time horizons and they're
actually building a brand. Okay. I think
companies that are owned by like private
equity, companies that have short-term
time horizons are obsessed with
quantification. And it's always easier
to quantify and measure acquisition of
customers than it is to to actually
measure retention of customers because
retention of customers is harder to
measure, but it's also slow. Okay? If
you do something, but I would argue, and
this is when I this is where I was going
to go, the only really obviously it
doesn't work for one-off purchases like
marriage. Okay. Right. It wouldn't work
for Okay. But repeat purchase, you know,
Amazon should have a kind of repeat
purchase ometer. Obviously, again, not
on things you'd only buy once in your
life.
>> But actually, it's a pretty significant
measure.
>> It's not just how many people bought
this thing. It's how many people that
bought this thing before rebought.
>> So, to tediously go back to air fryers,
okay, very simple question. If your air
fryer broke, would you go and buy
another one the next day? Yes, probably
you would. Okay. Now that's not true of
yogurt makers. Okay.
>> And so they consumers would benefit
enormously. Now interestingly there are
some libertarian economists who believe
in this that it would be perfectly
acceptable for the government to collect
information on certain things and to
share it with consumers to make them
better informed. So one interesting
thing would be people who enter this
category. So you might have you know
yogurt maker. I'm being a bit unfair to
yogurt makers. I'm sure they're people
who love them for I can never be
bothered. The second
>> churn our own butter as well. Why don't
we do that?
>> Exactly. Let's pretend we're 17th
century peasants. Yeah. I don't really
get that. Um but it would be useful for
the government. You know, electric cars
interestingly
generally have a very high repeat rate
within the category that you know it's
it most people who actually go electric
don't revert.
>> Question on that. I wonder how many of
those situations are due to the fact
that when you've planted your flag in
the ground and your next door neighbor's
gone, "Oh, Rory, that's a oh, that's an
interesting. Who's that? It's a Mac E.
It's an electric one. Oh, well, you it's
the future, you know, it's
four years later when the car needs to
be renewed." And you go, "Yeah, I got I
got the 6.2 L V8 [ __ ] Camaro." You
go, "But what about the whole you said
about the and it's you have to eat your
own prize."
>> Part of its consistency bias, by the
way, part of its regret minimization.
Part of it maybe sunk cost which is it
took me three months of effort to become
really good at owning an electric car
such that I could turn up more or less
anywhere charge the thing not look like
an idiot having invested that cost okay
I'm more likely to actually reap the
rewards which is in a sense you know in
dating market that's why women have to
play hard to get
>> okay which is the cost of acquisition
probably translates into into loyalty
and consistency
>> absolutely yeah I mean You don't want to
give somebody the job as they're at the
interview at the first time that you see
them. It's usually not a good indicator.
>> Currently, places like Goldman Sachs not
only will subject you to about six
interviews, okay? Probably three of
which are entirely gratuitous, but they
don't even offer you a job. They wait
for you to rig an ass.
>> No way.
>> Somebody literally told me this test of
agent. Literally, they said, "It's
really weird because I had six
interviews and they all went really well
and I haven't heard back." And somebody
said, "You won't hear back.
They want you to ring up and actually
pester them. Um now that it was
certainly one New York in New York
investment bank that literally would do
that. They go I'm not going to actually
offer the guy a job. You know we we've
done six interviews but um
>> it's on him now. We did six interviews.
It's now on him.
>> There are products by the way which is
almost certainly good to add a degree of
friction because if there's a degree of
difficulty I mean I have this
>> the IKEA effect
>> I have. Yeah. you the effort you put
into the acquisition of something
contributes to the perceived value of
the thing.
>> Yeah. This is your bit about uh the
difference between cheap strawberries
and pick your own strawberries.
>> Yeah. Yeah. That fundamentally they mean
something different. One of them is I
put effort into the creation of value
here and therefore that the low price is
destigmatized. Whereas if you made IKEA
really really easy furniture to buy, I
think they had to offer a delivery when
they moved to the US, didn't they?
because they were met with complete
incomprehension or something. Uh because
Americans had a high expectation of
service.
But fundamentally uh pick your IKEA is
pick your own strawberries. It's I've
put some effort into the creation and
and uh accumulation of this items.
Therefore, the low price is partly a
reflection of my own effort rather than
just low product quality to begin with.
>> Yeah, there's double effort as well. For
the people that have never been to an
IKEA, first try and find the nearest
IKEA to you. is a real experience.
Halfway around there's great quality
meatballs, but it's a
>> there is a big one near Austin, isn't
there? I seem to remember.
>> It's not far. It's just in round.
>> I remember driving past it. Yeah,
>> it's just in round.
>> It's not quite as big as the
Gigafactory, but it's pretty vast.
>> Yeah. Um, you walk around this big maze
for ages. So, not only did you have to
build the thing yourself, look at the
instructions, have an argument with your
wife about how it was going to work.
Even before that, when you were in the
selection period, you had to go through
we are here to get kitchen stuff. Well,
we've got to walk through the bedrooms
and we need to walk through the lounge.
We got to go through the lighting
department. Oh, we're at the kitchen.
Okay, that piece of art over there is
quite No, we're on kitchen. Yeah, it is
an ADHD sufferers nightmare.
>> You could actually sort of sell IKEA
blinkers, couldn't you? Which is sort
of, you know,
>> to focus you in
>> effectively. Yes.
>> But well, you could get a you could do
the concurge service again. Sir, I'm
going to take you directly to to the
kitchen. Exactly.
>> It's like being
>> put a sack over your head.
>> Being [ __ ] abducted. Exactly.
>> But I'll lead you straight to the
kitchen section.
>> We'll get back to talking in just a
minute. But first, some things are built
for summer. Sunburns, hot girl walks,
your ex posting their Euro road trip,
and now lemonade and salt.
Huh? Element just dropped their brand
new lemonade salt flavor, and it's
everything that you want on a hot day.
Tart, salty, and stupidly refreshing.
It's like a grown-up lemonade stand in a
stick with actual function behind the
flavor. Because let's be real, if you're
sweating through workouts, sauna
sessions, or just walking to your car in
July, then you are losing more than just
water. Element replaces the electrolytes
that your body actually needs. Sodium,
potassium, and magnesium with no sugar,
no junk, and no nonsense. I've been
drinking it every single day for years.
And in the Texas heat, this lemonade
flavor in a cold glass of water is
unbelievably good. Best of all, they've
got a no questions asked refund policy
with an unlimited duration. So, you can
buy it and try it for as long as you
want. And if you don't like it for any
reason, they'll give you your money
back. You don't even need to return the
box. That's how confident they are that
you'll love it. Plus, they offer free
shipping in the US. Right now, you can
get a free sample pack of Element's most
popular flavors with your first purchase
by going to the link in the description
below or heading to
drinklnt.com/modernwisdom.
That's drinklnt.com/modernwisdism.
When are we going to get a Hindenburg?
When are we going to get one?
>> Yeah. Oh. Oh, yeah. You're absolutely
right. Blimps.
>> Yeah. So we had this conversation that
actually helicopters are not only
dangerous but actually they're a poor
status marker because they suggest
you're time poor. And so the theory was
that the air yacht which by the way did
exist. You can see it on YouTube there
was a after World War II there was a
company that turned something like
Boeing Stratafortresses into flying
luxury yachts which I think could land
on water. So actually wouldn't have been
the Strata Fortress, it must have been
some sort of sea plane. Okay. And um
there's actually a tragic thing of a
family who set out to fly around the
world and were actually killed by people
somewhere in the Middle East because
they landed somewhere in the middle of
some tribal conflict. Um but the the
airship um would be extraordinarily high
status as a mode of transport because it
suggested you had money but you also had
spare time and of course you could have
a degree of luxury which is difficult in
all but the largest aircraft. M I mean
I've always wondered about it which is
why is it that yachts are high status
but RVs are low status relatively cuz I
think American RVs did you ever watch
Matt's RV reviews on YouTube?
>> I did. Yeah.
>> Matt Foxworthy absolute genius in my
opinion.
>> Um and actually by the way interesting
detail about salesmanship. Three things
we like about this motor home. Three
things we don't like. Actually that's
it. It would give
>> that's your one star five star reviews
again. Right. actually the admission the
admission of what you might call
disarming cander uh is actually a good
element of salesmanship because it
actually contributes towards trust
>> that the too good to be true heristic
kicks in and people actually get a bit
unnerved and one way of doing it of
course is just to say it is expensive
but it's worth it okay but some
acknowledgement of a downside
um can be actually particularly I think
Robert Chaldini's close to the point of
sale can be very convincing
Uh Jay Leno on Jay Leno's Garage talks
about the fact that he won't buy a
Ferrari because the whole thing is mired
in all sorts of weirdness. Okay. But he
was very impressed cuz when he was
buying a McLaren, he said, "I'm quite
interested in the ceramic brake discs or
whatever it is." And the guy said, "Are
you planning to track the car?" No. He
said, "I'll mostly be." He said, "Don't
need it. Let me save you $20,000
straight off the bat." You know, because
um if you're driving around LA, they
take ages to warm up. You'll end up
hitting the car in front. Now, that's a
brilliant way of establishing trust, of
downselling someone slightly. Um, who
else? Alex Hozi is very, very good at
this.
>> I mean, that guy is an absolute genius
in my opinion.
>> Yeah, he's one of the best funnel
hackers in the world. Yeah,
>> absolutely brilliant. I mean, it's
fascinating to watch. Um, you know, I
feel like, you know, um, but, um, but
the but the airship because I always
thought when you think about RVs, okay,
um, 99% of the world's interesting
things are actually found on land,
aren't they? really. Okay. And so there
are also problems with the very big
yachts which is you can't go into small
harpers.
>> So you end up next to an even bigger
yacht feeling that you failed in life,
you know, at the Monaco Grand Prix. And
I've always thought that actually
having, you know, if I if I was
supremely rich, having a really really
luxury land yacht would be a great
thing.
>> Didn't we think about the fact that a
hot air balloon is even more high status
than a blimp? Because at least with the
blimp, you have a tiny little turbine at
the back that can direct you roughly.
>> Hot air balloon says, "I've got money.
It have to be a luxury hot air balloon.
I've got money. Um, I've got lots of
time to spare and I don't really care
where I've
>> go." Yeah,
>> I'm so rich that I'll make it good
wherever I go. I mean that that's very
much the weird finding on airlines which
is that when you have a flight that's
canled and people have to travel uh the
ne on the next day. The general finding
of airlines is that the people in the
middle of the plane are really angry
about it. Okay. The people at the you
know some of the economy travelers
they're like students. Okay. You give
them a free night in a four-star hotel.
They're going off to Asia for you know
five weeks anyway. Okay. This is a
bonus. They're delighted. Okay. They you
know they get a night in a hotel. It's
all a bit of a novelty. The people at
the front of the plane just go, "Yeah,
that's fine. I'll just go back into the
Seavoy and I'll book an extra night."
And then they're not bothered either.
The people in the middle are going
absolutely
>> premium economy are [ __ ]
>> I I mean the whole question, by the way,
of you know, one of the most interesting
things, you know, we're both fans of
evolutionary psychology.
And one of the great predictions made in
evolutionary psychology
uh was made by Jeffrey Miller in his
book spent and the mating mind. Have you
had him on?
>> I multiple times.
>> Multiple times. Okay. This is a case of
someone actually getting a bang on the
money. He predicted that social media
would fundamentally change not the human
urge to display status but what the
currencies were. So he predicted that
travel would become much more valuable
as a status marker because you can now
photograph yourself in front of Machu
Picchu. Okay. And basically, you know,
while all your friends are at work in
the rain, okay. And that the nature of
the things that would actually enable
you to display status through digital
means would and cars would be probably
diminished or you know household
possessions
>> except to the extent that you can
photograph them would be kind of
diminished
and that prediction has been pretty much
borne out and what your I mean what's
interesting there is that you know a
very interesting question would be
status of a job Okay, there was no
debate, okay, that it was better if you
had to work in London, okay, it was
better to earn 100x than 50x. Okay,
if the choice becomes to today's young,
you can live in Lisbon or Fort Ventura
or for that matter, you know, in the
middle of the New Mexico desert. You can
live there for 50 or you can live in
London for a 100. It's not altogether a
slam dunk to decide who's got the better
job. You know, when you were both
competing for identical resources and
that the only variable in employment was
how much you got paid, how long you
worked, how much you got paid, that that
that was employment economics for, you
know, hundreds of years. Basically, it
was it was assumed that place was a
given, that when you worked was a given,
and so the only variables were
effectively uh you know, how long you
worked, how much you got paid,
>> maybe commute,
>> and yeah, I guess I guess I mean there
would be people who' choose jobs because
the commute was easier. Um, famously
there was one London bank that moved
next to a railway station and they found
they could never get rid of their older
staff because it was they'd all moved to
the country, bought an F-off house and
they just rumbled in on the train and
walked walked 100 yards to the office
and they were those guys weren't going
anywhere.
>> Um, but suddenly you have this technical
employment market where as well as free
time, there's free where and there's
free when. So if you can work where you
like when you like and a colleague of
mine Brian Featherstone Hall said also
if you can work with whom you like all
of those things are now negotiable value
counters alongside the money.
And so you know it's it's a really
interesting debate. If you're an
employer and you want to you want
particularly talented people but you
haven't got the immense budget which
enables you to compete with JP Morgan or
something
>> well offering lifestyle benefits or
locations where near affordable housing
>> strikes me as a pretty smart place to
go.
>> What would you do to improve food
delivery apps? This in the US there's
even more than there are in the UK. So
many different
>> We have we have Deliveroo which you
don't have do you? We have Just Eats,
which you don't have.
>> No. And Just Just Eats kind of feels a
little bit sort of internet in 2005
to me up against something like an Uber
Eatats.
>> Um I mean, Deliveroo, interestingly, is
I mean, they'll probably move into
delivery of not just food as well, which
is interesting. I mean, what what
ultimately happens there
>> uh is fascinating.
Um what what's so you use Door Dash
presumably Uber Eats? I use Uber Eats
but one thing
>> they do this slightly annoying thing
that I always find which is oh yeah okay
your meal comes to $35 you that's a bit
expensive but hell they're delivering it
what the hell and then they go pay us
another $5 we won't urinate on your food
that's another $7 and by the time you go
out I'm finished.
>> Have you ever done this? So if you go
into
>> Hit me with it. If you go into the Uber
app, just normal Uber app here, and then
it's got this suggestions thing in the
middle. Now, everybody below your two
most recent places that you've been and
whatever it is that you're going to type
in about where you need to go. Everybody
forgets that. If you go to suggestions
and you look here, car hire,
>> bikes, stuff for teens, and then if you
go down, get anything delivered. Food,
grocery, alcohol, convenience, health,
personal care, baby, gourmet, pet
supplies, flowers, retail, electronics,
you can Oh, get anything done. a courier
or a store pickup. So if you've left
your watch in a gym,
>> you can send the [ __ ] Uber guy to go
and get it for you or you can get your
uh pharmacy delivery. You can get them
to get pretty much anything.
>> What they're interestingly suffering
from is the interesting thing which is
kind of the Starbucks PR dilemma. Okay,
>> which is PRET is mentally known for food
in the UK and they want to sell more
coffee and Starbucks is known for coffee
and they want to sell more food. And
what's what they're doing there with
with Uber, which is quite clever, is
they're obviously predominantly
associated with one particular
application. Okay. And people have got
into the habit of getting food delivered
because they had food delivered before.
You just booked it by telephone. You
know, it was a pizza in 1989 or
whatever. That was Domino's whole stock
in trade. And so actually getting people
to broaden their repertoire within it's
quite a common marketing dilemma which
is it's almost it's almost a marketing
equivalent of the innovators dilemma.
You get known for one very good thing.
>> Now Starbucks I think possibly you know
I think Howard Schultz was conscious of
this. They were so desperate to sell
food because they saw it as incremental
value. You see? Okay. And so, you know,
in other words, it, you know, the coffee
stuff was one thing, but the food they
more or less saw was incremental profit
that you then start diluting your coffee
credentials if you're not careful.
>> Yep.
>> And, you know, it's it's interesting
with, you know, for example, PRE, um, I
think, you know, has experimented with
various subscription services and so on
and so forth. Um, uh, you know, to get
people to up the coffee consumption.
>> Well, like a loyalty card. But what
Uber's doing there is it's quite because
they do trains in the UK obviously you
don't you know so you you literally you
can book you can book any train on Uber.
No way.
>> And coaches and I think um uh a few
other things.
>> [ __ ] me I haven't been back to the UK
for long enough. Wow. That's cool.
>> And so but but I mean the where's your
uh what's the problem you have with the
because I I find that I' I've used Uber
Eatats and apart from that slightly
weird thing of continually demanding
extra money for uh for you know
>> I'm a I'm a fan of Uber Eatats. I think
the the main issue I've got at the
moment when it comes to the intersection
of food and digital is I'm still often
overwhelmed and confused when it comes
to choosing, especially in a city that
I'm not familiar with.
>> Yeah.
>> And I don't quite know what the metric
is that I want. So
distance from where I am, especially if
I'm going to go somewhere, you you land
in Manhattan, you're on the Upper East
Side, you think, I I want to go for some
food this evening. And maybe you don't
even have that specific. your MS can't
decide whatever you go [ __ ] like okay so
I need to kind of reverse engineer what
I think it is that she wants and she
says she doesn't want anything but I
need to if I get this wrong I'll know
and if I get this right it's acceptable
>> claims to be lactose and gluten
intolerant which makes things even more
tedious
>> right okay so I'm looking on Google Maps
and I go okay well I'll I'll order by
first off I need to filter by open now
that seems pretty important given that
I'm trying to go now
>> but after that it's just this it's
really difficult to okay well this one's
4.5 stars, but it's only got 100
reviews. This one's a fourst star, but
it's got 2,000 reviews. And you It's
>> You're probably a Brit, so you'd like to
order the food by degrees of spiciness
in some cases. Would you?
>> That I mean, I I do. It's certainly a a
criteria I look at. Yeah. It's just I I
struggle and especially if I'm somewhere
new and I'm on Uber. Okay. I can either
order Sweet Green or Carver Flower Child
for the millionth time
>> or I can try and get something that's at
least remotely
like localized to wherever it is. This
is going to be a unique experience, but
also I've got such potential buyers
regret here that I think, God, this is
my only sustenance for the evening. I've
had to wait 50 minutes for it to get to
me and I'm going to hate it.
>> I agree. Yeah. By the way, by the way, I
think all these people will start start
to have to start offering Mojaro
portions soon.
>> Okay. uh you know because actually if
you look at the effects of what are they
GLP1s
on people's calorific consumption it
seems to affect all sorts of impulsive
behaviors actually seems to have an
effect on sort of gambling addiction and
and and we never anticipated
>> um but if you look at Walmart had a lot
of good data on this because they
obviously have pharmacists but they also
have their loyalty card data so they can
see the effect that it has on what
people buy. uh what you might
purchasing. I I I saw talk from the
chief economist at Visa about 2 days ago
and purchased now some of this is people
eating out more and shopping a bit less
but purchasing which was on a constant
upward trend purchasing of food from the
grocery aisle which was on a constant
upward trend seems to have flatlined.
Now, what's interesting about that is
that's with probably 8 to 10% of the US
population on some sort of GLP1
um treatment.
Now, if it causes flatlining with 8%,
what the hell happens when it's 25?
>> Mhm. Mhm.
>> Um so, now I don't think the prognosis
is all bad. I think that people on those
things will actually have small which
maybe maybe maybe this is you know the
direction of of capitalism I would argue
or the desirable direction of consumer
capitalism of which I'm something of a
fan is actually less but better
>> you knowity
rather than having a chocolate bar this
you know that's the size of a small
field you have you know you in other
words you treat yourself to smaller
quantities of things that are of a
higher quality and you become more
mindful about your enjoyment of them.
Did you see that speech at the end of
the White Lotus where the lady from you
haven't watched it? Okay. She gives a
speech which is you know effectively
we're the most privileged 1% of people
in the history of the world. We have a
duty to enjoy ourselves. It's a
>> it's a wonderful argument.
>> Wonderful argument.
>> And it was it was interesting because
she wasn't an altogether sympathetic
character. It's probably fair to say.
Although um the whole family were
actually more interesting in many ways
uh than anybody else. Um it was I don't
know why they were chosen as being from
North Carolina. I think she there's a
whole lot of American nuance in there
that he went to Duke and she went to UNC
or something, you know, or Okay. There's
a whole lot of weird sort of stuff in
there which as a Brit I couldn't
entirely disentangle. Um but um
uh
there's a there's a there is actually a
degree of validity to that which is that
you know if if you're in a privileged
position, it's actually slightly rude to
your ancestors. It's disrespectful to
your ancestors in a sense and to other
people less fortunate than you to go
around not enjoying the things that you
have some active form. There's a meme
that's floating around on the internet
at the moment and it's a guy stood in
front of this sort of cosmic backdrop
and it's millions and millions of small
silhouettes of people and it's my entire
ancestral lineage watching me lift
weights instead of talk to a girl for
the 3,000th time.
>> Perfect.
>> Yeah.
>> Before we continue, if you haven't been
feeling as sharp or energized as you'd
like, getting your blood work done is
the best place to start. Which is why I
partnered with Function because they run
lab tests twice a year that monitor over
100 biomarkers. They've got a team of
expert physicians that take the data,
put it in a simple dashboard, and give
you actionable insights and
recommendations to improve your health
and lifespan. They track everything from
your heart health to your hormone
levels, your thyroid function and
nutrient deficiencies. They even screen
for 50 types of cancer at stage one,
which is five times more data than you
get from an annual physical. Getting
your blood work drawn and analyzed like
this would usually cost thousands, but
with function it is only $500. And right
now, the first thousand people can get
an additional $100 off, meaning it's
only 400 bucks to get the exact same
blood panel that I use. Just go to the
link in the description below or head to
functionhealth.com/modernwisdism.
That's functionhealth.com/modernwisdom.
I mean, that that's an interesting one
as well, isn't it? which is the uh I
mean one of the other things the
economist revealed is the amazing number
of single person households
>> uh you know in other words people not in
a relationship
um
>> I think the most common living
arrangement for a man under 35 is still
at home with his parents over 18 and
under 35 the most common living
arrangement is still with parents
>> and that I I you're going to
unfortunately bring me on to one of my
other hobby horses which is the need for
um uh land value tax uh to make property
more affordable and basically to get
these oldsters out of houses which are
bigger than they need.
>> Um because family formation has become
impossible. Okay. Now this is one of
those cases which I often talk about
which I think we need to be permanently
alert to where something comes along as
an option and becomes an obligation.
>> Explain that for me.
>> Okay. So Nim Talib taught me all this
stuff. a huge difference between an
option and an obligation which is I
personally I hate drinks parties right I
like dinner parties I hate drinks
parties
>> last night last night for me was what 1
2 3 4 5 6 that's close to my upper bound
I think when you get to seven uh 7 to 8
that's starting to get a little much for
me but
>> back at home in Monmouth there's a man
called Wilson plant who was an
extraordinary man I mean he you know he
sat in the pub sort of presiding in the
pub and someone would have a discussion
and you get a bit intellectual and go,
"Well, how do you know DH Lawrence
thought that?" And he'd reply, "Because
he told me so." See, he knew everybody.
Nancy Mittford. I mean, he was just one
of those people who in his 20s and 30s,
he'd just be been in sort of London
society. And he had a rule for a pub
conversation which is between the graces
and the muses. Now, I think I've got
this right. There are three graces and
there are nine muses. And his argument
is that once a pub table, you know, once
a pub table gets below three, it's time
to go home. Okay? Once it gets above
nine, you should split off and form
another 10.
>> I am in agreement.
>> I I think I think it's And by the way, I
don't mind drinks parties in the garden.
Uh because you can wander off.
>> Well, that's little clusters.
>> But if if if particularly when you're 59
inside, you can't hear a [ __ ] word
anybody's saying. Anyway, so back to
your land value.
>> That's my options and obligations thing.
Okay. So, interestingly, the only good
thing about a drinks party is you go,
"Yeah, yeah, that's fine. Saturday
night." And if you don't feel like
going, you don't have to go. Whereas a
dinner party, if they've actually
prepared food and they're they're going
to be eight of you and they don't, you
know, they want to match up the genders
or whatever it is anybody does. I don't
know if anybody does that anymore. Okay,
but you have to go basically you have to
have a really good reason not to go. So
that's an obligation whereas the drinks
party is an option. Okay,
and you the ultimate option is six of us
are going to the pub this evening. If
you feel like it, come along. That
that's an option. Okay. Whereas um Dave
Stag party is a [ __ ] obligation.
Right. Okay. Now Nim taught me this
distinction which obviously understands
perfectly from finance. You know it's a
massively important distinction whether
you own an option on something or
whether you have actually an obligation.
Now what happens quite a lot I think and
we need to be really alert to it is
something comes along. Now a classic
example of this would be parking apps.
Okay. Now, the parking app comes along
and you still have machines. You still
have meters that take coins. Uh you
still have a pay and display machine as
we call it in the UK. Okay. But if you
want to, you can pay by app. And you go,
"Oh, that's fantastic. I really like
that. That's great because I don't
always carry a lot of coins with me.
This makes it really convenient.
Absolutely fantastic." And you go,
"Isn't this good? The world's getting
better." And then the people who operate
car parks notice that they that it's a
lot cheaper if they just get rid of the
pen display machines. Mhm.
>> Okay. And also they probably lose a bit
of money from fraud or theft
maintenance,
>> maintenance and all that stuff.
>> And then suddenly you're stuck with only
the parking app.
>> Uh if you're 70 or 80 years old, this
sort of [ __ ] is starting to turn the
world into a nightmare. The extent to
which you're expected to have a
smartphone and have the eyesight to use
it uh and master a pace of change which
is actually to some extent imposed on
us. It's not chosen by us. That's
becoming and by the way you're talking
about airports. Okay. Uh there is there
is nothing at an airport between
disabled request a wheelchair and walk.
Okay. There's no halfway house for
someone who's a bit elderly but doesn't
actually want to be wheeled through. And
I you know I think I think you know
given the fact that wealth is more and
more concentrated again among the old
nowadays the extent to which a lot of
modern built infrastructure is extremely
disrespectful to people who are just a
bit elderly in other words they're not
fully registered disabled but they are
constrained I think is is monstrous.
>> Anyway another example of what starts as
an obligation and as an option and
becomes an obligation is actually the
two income household. Okay. So there was
a period obviously women entered the
workplace married women particularly
entered the workplace a little bit
during World War II. I think it was I
mean 10 to 15% of of women were actually
working in war work. That changed
things. But for a long time it was do we
want to actually both go out to work and
have a pretty blinged up you know fancy
ass lifestyle option or would we prefer
that one or either you know it doesn't
have to be man or woman or will we
prefer if one person stays at home and
one person goes out to work. Now for
that blissful period it was still
possible to maintain a household with
children on one salary.
The two-income household was great news
for property owners. It was great news
for the government because you had twice
as many people you could tax. What it
meant for the typical family, now I'm
not making any value judgment about
this. I'm just simply saying what's
true, is you lost 40 hours of
discretionary time each week without
necessarily enjoying a market
improvement in your um discretionary
income. Because all that happened was
that house prices basically went up to
mop up the spare income that was made
possible by two people in a in a
relationship working and therefore the
gains went to land owners, land
landlords or or indeed you know your our
parents' generation to some extent
rather than to the people actually doing
the work.
>> We were all exit liquidity for everybody
else. What do you make of Gary
Stevenson's ascendancy and that sort of
messaging that's happening in the UK?
Well, first f frivolous point which is
uh if you want to help with wealth
redistribution, Gary, go out and spend
some [ __ ] money, right? I mean, he
was earning like two or three million
pounds a year and only owning earning
one pair of shoes, okay? And his mates
from school were working in JD Sports
and I did help I couldn't help thinking
reading the book, Gary, Gary, just go
down to G JD Sports and just buy a few
pairs of shoes, help out your mates,
okay? Uh you know, get a hot tub, you
know. you know, but his fundamental
insight unbelievably stingy. Do you not
think you do that book?
>> I haven't read it. I've seen him talk.
>> But jeez, Gary, just go and you know,
enjoy it for cry out loud. Okay. Think
you get that weird thing actually in
banking, which is so much of your
enjoyment stuff back then was covered by
an entertainment budget. Okay. That you
got really really resentful about
spending your own money. You see, you
see what I mean? Most of us the money
comes in 80% of it walks straight out
again because we piss it up the wall you
know you know you know I haven't got an
air fryer for the second bedroom you
know but there are people who kind of
you know if you're in that very
corporate world where more or less all
your fun is taken care of by some
expense account you actually find you
spending your money disproportionately
painful. He's absolutely right in his
insight that um money is becoming
unhealthily concentrated um in that two
things I would say. He's absolutely
right that economics uses these single
representative agent models which don't
capture inequality.
Okay. Um I would argue personally Gary
that you need to read up a bit about
georgism which I think the great ideas
of Henry George and the land value tax
would actually take care of a lot of
that. uh in my view if you tax land
ownership because property ownership is
effectively
you are buying the right to impose taxes
on the on the younger generation. So
what you what you I mean when people
invested in gold okay it doesn't do
anybody else any harm because I I can
make do without any gold. Okay I'm not
massively into bling not hugely into
jewelry. Okay we can all get by without
gold. Unless there's a bloody um uh a
Dutch tulip boom, okay, I'll just switch
to gladioli.
Okay, but I can't substitute for
property at some level. If your employer
demands you work in a major city, okay,
and land and commutable land is scarce
other than the blimp of course where you
could just live tethered above Barkley
Square 400 ft up. Okay, other than your
blimp solution, there's no escaping the
depradations of rent seeking land
owners. And what has happened is that
we've in a way we've sanctified wealth
and being pretty mean on income.
>> Okay? So we've taxed away income
discrepancies pretty energetically,
but they aren't that big. Okay? I mean
what I mean by that is if you look at
income inequality even before tax never
mind corrected after tax
you know there the number of people who
earn like you know 20 times median
income okay is they exist but there are
very few of them and they pay an
enormous amount of income tax I mean
huge amounts of income tax in other
words that's someone who's probably like
a high-end lawyer in a partnership in
you know a London magic circle law firm
now there are a lot of people I'd rather
the money went to than people in law
firms. But nonetheless, those people pay
a lot of tax, whatever you think about
it. Okay. By contrast, wealth inequality
is monumental. I mean, there are people
who if they walked into a football
stadium, the every single person on
average in that stadium would now be a
multi-millionaire simply because Bill
Gates walked in. Okay? There aren't
inequalities like that of that kind of
extreme form in in actual earned income.
And yet we have this incredibly
aggressive system of redistributing
earned wealth. And yet we treat wealth
that's actually resident in asset values
and things as completely sacrosan.
And the problem is until you actually
get to that point where you start
actually taxing. Now Texas does it
amusingly because you have quite heavy
land taxes. So, ironically, what's often
stereotyped, I think, unfairly as, you
know, the most conservative state in the
union, which in fact is not, okay, but,
you know, it's a highly conservative
state, you actually pay quite a lot of
tax on the value of the property you
own. So, the property taxes in Texas, I
think around 2.5% if you own it.
Now the great effect that has is that it
makes property less expensive because
you have to pay tax on it and it
prevents you using property as an
extractive store of wealth.
Okay.
And the extent to which I think you have
to argue that speculation in property
has been absolutely del has led to
enormous redistribution of wealth
effectively to the not necessarily very
deserving old at the expense of the
hardworking young is
I I I just find it impossible to
dispute. Okay, I'm 59 by the way. I did
okay. I surfed the wave. I didn't surf
it very well. I now own, you know, a
couple of flats. I don't own a house.
Nothing blingy. Okay. I now own a couple
of flats sort of outright. Um, but there
are people who bought a house in 1974
whose children, this is literally a case
I know of. Okay. So, there's a woman
living on her own in a five-
bedroomedroom house not far from where I
live, which is probably worth with the
garden 4.5 million. Okay. Or 3.2 or
something like that. She has no money to
spend. She has all this money tied up in
a totally liquid form of wealth.
>> So, you know, she's kind of going down
little and comparing the price of lemons
even though she owns a [ __ ] off, you
know, 3.5. Her children are kind of
worried about how they replace the shock
absorbers on their car. And then the
argument would be why should those
children go out and work really hard?
What I do to be absolutely honest is get
into debt, go off to Barbados, wait for
your mum to die,
>> me.
>> No, no, but that's but but nothing you
do working, let's say, as a school
teacher. So, there's this great book,
you must get her on called The
Inheritocracy.
>> Okay.
>> By a woman called Eliza.
Oh god, I'll remember it in a second.
>> You're becoming increasingly leftwing
here, Rory.
>> No, no, no, no, no, no. I'm left I'm
pretty right-wing in terms of people's
earnings because you have actually
earned them. So Henry George effectively
the way to understand Henry George is it
was an approach to life which actually
had a brief but extraordinary success uh
popular success in the United States.
The game of monopoly is based on it's
trying to interest people in George's
principles of extractive rent seeking.
Okay. And the basic principle of Henry
George is that it's it's now I I'm going
to qualify this. It's extremely free
market and capitalistic with regard to
the fruits of your labor. Okay? Anything
you do, any anything you build on your
land is yours to keep, but it's
effectively highly socialistic in terms
of land ownership and arguably ownership
of uh of limited resources. So a
georgist would also tax uh oil for
example
um uh you know anything that and the
argument is you didn't make those things
there would have been in the 19th
century they would have said this is
God's creation and you're only you know
you're actually you don't own it because
you didn't make it you don't have the
right to own this thing because you
didn't make it what you are is a
custodian of it and you pay commensurate
tax on the land you own okay whereas you
would in purest Georgia circles you have
no income tax at all. Okay, that
probably a bit extreme. Um, but it's
there it's sometimes called geoism and
it's um there's there's also a school of
thought which is kind of environmental
georgism which is you tax the
consumption or
you tax anything where you rivally
consume something of which more can't be
made.
>> Right. Yep.
>> Okay. And what happens in Texas, quite
interestingly, is all these Californians
apparently move to Texas and they go,
"God, the land here is really cheap.
Let's buy loads of it." And then six
months later, they get hit with a
massive tax bill for their land
ownership. And they go, "What the hell's
going on here? We bought this land cuz
it's cheap." And the Texans reply,
"That's why it's you pay 2.5% tax on
it."
>> Did you ever look at that issue with
fighter pilot seats that was designed
for average?
>> Yeah, that's a brilliant point. So
that's similar. That's analogous to Gary
Stevenson. Have you had Gary on, by the
way?
>> I haven't. He was supposed to come on in
London a couple of months ago, uh, when
we had last had you on.
>> I hope he's out shoe shopping instead.
I'm here advertising. Meet me halfway,
Gary. I'm trying to Well, there's an
interesting
>> If you want to redistribute wealth, it
does help if rich people occasionally go
out and buy something.
>> Yeah. There's an interesting there's an
interesting debate going on about
whether or not Gary Stevenson is
basically thinly veiled performance art
that you've got this the get up the the
same pair of joggers that all the rest
of the stuff it is I don't know it must
be difficult to have
>> I I think I think he's um okay
apart from his consumption patterns um I
think he's fundament so there are a few
things where the problem with all these
models is is that the assumptions of the
model that are nec necessary to simplify
the model eventually come back to bite
you and looking at average wealth as if
it's somehow representative of you know
that that a successful one that's
getting richer on average. The fact that
for
>> 30 [ __ ] years in the US and the UK we
presented rising property prices as a
good news story
>> is monstrous. I mean that was just the
most monstrous misrepresentation of
information. You don't say petrol's got
gasoline's gone up, but good news,
you've got a full tank of petrol, so
your car's not now more valuable, right?
>> Is it is it a case of kind of a luxury
belief that the sort of people who would
be writing and consuming those and
understanding those sorts of stories are
likely to already be people who own
property, so their lesson is not going
to be, holy [ __ ] it's going to be hard
to get on.
>> You're absolutely true. Uh even worse,
of course, every single MP in London uh
throughout the 70s, well ' 80s, '9s,
2000s was basically heavily invested in
the property market because they got a
massive perk. They got their mortgage
paid on a London home. So there wasn't a
single person there with a possible
exception of someone, you know, was Ken
Livingston ever an MP? I'm not sure he
was, but apart from a few very, very
principled leftists or possibly a couple
of georgists in the Conservative party.
It's a weird, by the way, it's a weird
sort of philosophy because it it's it's
both leftwing and right-wing and so it
has it at the same time.
>> Milton Friedman was a fan. So was um
uh god I always I always forget her name
married to Malcolm McLaren you the
fashion designer Vivian Westwood she was
also a geologist you get Richard Nixon
Winston Churchill it has its
>> adearance crosses the spectrum
>> but what what happened in the model was
that Adam Smith thought there were three
sources of wealth creation which was
land capital and um labor and future
generations of economists thought it's
too complicated having three things
because it makes the maths difficult so
we'll pretend that capital and land are
the same thing and they're not because
capital is potentially limitless and you
can create more of it. Land is
effectively a bottle an artificial
bottleneck. It's a it's a rentseeking
device.
>> I'm interested whether or not you've got
any insights around painkillers. Every
single time that I think about uh
a psychological effect of something that
people assume has got some sort of a
drop off rate. I I know that there's
some studies saying that more expensive
painkillers are interpreted as being
more effective. So even if
>> yes no no no no that's under I mean I
I'm the only person who complains you
can't buy expensive aspirin anymore
because my argument is I haven't got a
30p headache I've got a two pound50
headache you I mean by the way I think
there are a whole load of things where
in the human brain the X has to be
commensurate with the Y okay so the
reason if you're buying a house the
reason you have to have a posh estate
agent is because fundamentally if I'm
spending this amount of money I expect a
certain amount of money to be spent on
the act of persuasion and it may be
perfor highly performative but it's just
a kind of idea of what's proportionate
you know if you turned up to look at a
sort of four $5 million mansion outside
Austin and the guy just turns up and
goes here the keys go and have a look
yourself
you if something be it's a bit like the
fact in women's fashion that if you
spend if you spend $150 plus you've got
to get a rope handle bag right it's the
there's a commensurate amount of
[ __ ] s necessary to accompany any
activity in order for it to seem somehow
natural and right. Um, lovely finding by
the way from the visa chief economist
about the American South including
Texas. They look at what happens to
consumption patterns when people
suddenly get more disposable income.
Okay, typically gas prices fall.
Suddenly disposable income goes up right
across the board. Okay, what happens?
Two things that are really different.
Women's expenditure on clothing, massive
spike. men's expenditure on clothing
flatline. Okay. Because in the south, if
you got a pair of jeans and a shirt,
you're fully dressed. That's it. I think
that's fantastic. Um but
the the no I mean Gary's point by the
way about that thing which is that the
single representative agent model the
average model uh is is flawed because
actually one of the most interesting
philosophically okay the perfect place
to live is not somewhere where
everybody's a lot poorer than you.
Right? Because their consumption
patterns will then mean that there's
nothing for you to buy. So,
>> standard of coffee.
>> I always had this slightly socialistic
idea when I was watching Downtown Abbey.
Okay, if I'd been the Marquis of
Downtown, right, those people were
immensely well, they had been broke, but
he married the Canadian, didn't he? So,
they were kind of rich again. Uh there
was a whole period where nearly all
aristocrats had to marry Americans
because it coincided with a massive fall
in agricultural prices and and there's a
there was a kind of after World War I
there was kind of agriculture. Oh, I
don't that's Do you know what it was
partly? Uh, it was refrigerated
shipments of beef uh from Latin America
and grain from Canada.
>> So, suddenly the value of agricultural
goods in the UK fell off a cliff and so
the the aristocracy basically headed
west to try and pick up an airs. Um, but
what I always thought about those people
is they you obviously lived in a [ __ ]
house, you know, down to Abbey. Um and
but they ate food cooked by the same
woman every single night. And my theory
was that what I would have done her in
the market of Dantine is I would have
trebled the salaries of all my servants.
Okay. And I would have given them three
days off a week because then an
interesting Indian restaurant would have
opened in the nearby village and you
would have had somewhere else to eat.
Okay.
>> Oh wow. Do
>> you see what I mean? Yes.
>> You know and then there there'd be a car
dealership and there'd be a bit of other
stuff to cater to these richer people.
Then actually redistribution of wealth
in some ways is not altogether a bad
thing because you want everybody around
you to be a bit poorer than you. Have
you
>> you know let's be honest about it. You
want you want your neighbors to be a
tiny bit poorer than you so you can show
off a bit.
>> Turn up there's also [ __ ] [ __ ] off 6 by2
L
>> Camaro. Is there not is there not a rule
supposedly about you never want to own
the most expensive house in the
neighborhood?
>> There is an argument that says you buy
the cheapest house on the most expensive
street, not the most expensive house on
the cheapest street.
Um, I've also got various property rules
for how to game it, which is like find
out something that everybody else hates
that you don't mind next to a pub. Okay,
if you're thinking really long term,
you might think that with car
electrification, being next to a busy
road isn't the downside that it once
would have been.
>> It's going to get quieter up.
>> It's going to get a bit quieter and and
your worry about pollution might
diminish. But that's that's quite a long
game.
>> Yeah.
>> But, you know, don't worry about the
school district if you haven't got kids
or you're not planning to have kids. all
there are there and one of my complaints
about the property market is there
aren't mechanisms for you to look for
negatives because actually a negative I
don't care about is actually a positive
um but no in terms of drugs by the way
you're getting back to the placebo
effect on on drugs and do they have to
be expensive does the packaging matter
and you know there's a serious issue
here which is I don't think vaping would
have taken off if you medicalized it if
you demanded people went and got uh
vaporizers on prescription and they came
in sort of you know typical medicalized
packaging. I think the fact that it was
a bottomup trend with all the marketing
halaloo and pizzazz and packaging and
flavors and you know all the
extraordinary kind of uh you know the
distribution uh you know I think that
contributed to the successful adoption
of it. I think if you if you'd made it
medicalized I think you would have got
about a quarter of the rate of adoption.
Similarly, low alcohol beer
and low alcohol, no alcohol beer
fascinates the [ __ ] out of me. Partly
because I think it's placebo beer. I
think that when we drink and zero
alcohol beer, we still enjoy some of the
psych psychoactive effects of drinking
alcoholic beer by the power of
association. I would love to see a
behavioral observational uh experiment
go on to see what's the words per
minute, how many swear words does
somebody use, how much does their body
language loosen up having not ingested
any alcohol but drunk something which is
supposed to masquerade as it. There's a
bit of a theory that among regular
drinkers
that you drink alcohol to give you the
license to behave like a drunk person,
not that that it it it's kind of both.
Do you see what I mean? It's partly that
the alcohol loosens you up, but it's
partly that the fact that you are
drinking alcohol makes you feel you can
>> uh you can loosen up. M
>> um I've certainly experienced a weird
effect which quite a lot of people I've
spoken to have had the same effect which
is you go out for the evening typically
I take a train out of London back to
Otford as it happens and then drive home
from there and once or twice I've been
out and I've had two or three pints of
zero alcohol beer and I'm suddenly
driving home from the station I go [ __ ]
okay I'm over the limit no no no I
haven't had any alcohol at all
>> but I' I've had two or three of those
kind of weird panic moments where I go
because mentally Somehow I've been out
for two or three beers and yet obviously
as far as the breathalyzer is concerned
I'm sober as a judge.
>> Edward Slingland wrote a really
interesting book about the history of
alcohol. So two cool facts on it. One,
drinking alcohol makes you a better
lying detector. So your ability to
detect deception improves
>> that's where it comes from because I
heard that from somebody else
>> Edward Sling. Uh and the second thing is
that drinking reduces your ability to
deceive. So you have this really
wonderful effect.
>> Oh, so in venino veritas which is
effectively that both you're a better
lie detector and you're a worse liar. So
this is now if you think about it the
argument there might be that by
suppressing certain what you might call
highly literalist parts of the brain,
we actually gain powers of sort of
intuition over things like lying.
Um because the part of the brain that
processes language might you know this
is going Ian McGill. Have you had Ian
Mcgillist? Yeah. So Ian Mcgillist would
probably say the left brain tends to
have a very literalist interpretation of
language but it processes much language
but metaphor or analogies are processed
in the right part of the brain.
>> A little bit broader
>> and it's a bit broader. So one of the
things that might be absolutely true of
alcohol consumption is it makes you less
literal
which may explain why it you know
increases I mean there is that weird
view of alcohol that it's you know that
being a human is kind of tiring and this
gives you two or three hours of knowing
what it's like to be a bit of an animal
>> you know what I mean regress back to a
feral state you you will you know no
human is ever as happy as a cat that's
found a warm place to sleep there Maybe
they're making
>> four be as deep is about being like a
cat.
>> It's you effectively start just in you
know people seem to react hugely
differently in my experience. You know
some people become violent some people
you know but there is that element to
alcohol that it probably enables you to
enjoy the sheer physicality of being
because it quietens down those parts of
the brain which
>> without the awkwardness of thinking.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Uh interesting one related
to people being tired of being
themselves. Parents are all in on
all-inclusive travel again. Demand for
kid-friendly all-inclusive resorts is up
70%. Luxury tailored to parental
burnout.
So that's the all-inclusive, which is
basically you have um
uh part of that of course is choice
reduction, isn't it? that I mean
>> if you've got an Italian restaurant and
an Indian restaurant and a Chinese
restaurant and there's a buffet you
don't actually need to choose where
you're going every single night it's
self-contained
>> the whole thing is so I always wondered
about this which is one of the reasons I
always recommend I've got a few
recommendations for holidays from my 30
years experience one the only
generalization I'll make is that
holidays where I rent a car are better
than ones where I don't because you get
serendipity
okay now you can achieve that through
walking in a
But that business where you know I ended
up stopping on the outskirts of Florence
to recharge an electric car and then
because I had nothing to do for 20
minutes I wandered around the corner and
there was a kind of leisure center and
public swimming pool. Not the kind of
place you'd ever visit as a tourist in
Florence. And then I walked a bit
further and then my wife and I
discovered this fantastic cafe which was
just, you know, it was totally casual
cafe, but it was just glorious. And it's
one of those things you, you know,
pleasant surprise for pleasant
surprises. And the problem with having a
really planned holiday is that you don't
get any surprises.
>> In fact, you tend to get negative
surprises. Um, so that's why I'm a big
believer in car rental, uh, you know,
on, uh, on on holidays because you you
just stumble on things that nobody else
knows or a beach that nobody else goes
to and you just feel great about it. Um,
and also it means that if the hotel you
happen to book is absolute [ __ ] there's
almost certainly something pretty good
10 miles away and you can just get up in
the morning and go and escape. I mean,
I've never booked a hotel that's
absolutely [ __ ] but I booked hotels you
wouldn't want to stay in for too long.
But on the other hand, there's an
element, this is the contrary point,
which is one of the reasons I quite
often go on holiday to an island is
there's a limit to the number of things
you feel obliged to do.
>> You know, the curse of Tuskanyany, okay,
is that within about 90 miles there are,
you know, there's Sienna, there's Luca,
there's there's Florence. You go, you've
got to go over the mountains of the moon
to see the pier [ __ ] Francesca's. And
you go, [ __ ] hell. I just want to sit
by the pool and get quietly pissed, you
know. And so the great thing about
islands, you know, is that, you know,
they constrain the number of things you
feel obliged to do and the second time
you go back, you've already done the
things you were obliged to do. So you
don't get to do the things you wanted to
do.
>> So there is an element to things where
you know actually um choice choice
limitation presumably child care is
taken care of. One thing I I've I've
repeatedly said to the hotel industry,
by the way, um talking about when you
said child-friendly, all-inclusive,
uh and I said I actually said this to
Expedia in their headquarters, so I hope
they listen, okay? You've got to get rid
of that designation adults only. Okay?
Because I know what it means. It means
you don't allow kids. Okay? But I see
adults only hotel. I go, look,
>> perverts.
>> Perverts. Okay? I you know I go you know
I swingers you know I'm quite quite keen
on a quiet thing without too many noisy
kids but it doesn't make me think that
it makes me think I got to have spend my
whole week in a [ __ ] mask while a German
dentist urinates on me now I don't want
to do that you know call me oldfashioned
right and um so adults only is a
terrible designation I did a competition
on Twitter and loads literally 15 people
came up with better alternatives to
adults only
>> what was some of the one of them was
just grown-ups
You know, hotel for grown-ups was one
brilliant suggestion. Just grown-ups and
adults.
>> Because if you were to call it a mature
hotel.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Or you just, you know,
you just go, you know, quiet hotel or
you just say, oh, you know, over 16s
only would be fine.
>> Mhm.
>> But adults only. I'm going tell 59, you
know, I don't
>> awful demarcation. You're right. Uh
skims are now selling a bra with a
nipple piercing in.
>> Oh, that's not really. So the bra is
pierced but not the nipple.
>> No. So it's it's got sort of silhouette.
It's got the silhouette of a piercing.
So it looks like you've got a nipple
piercing but you don't.
>> I have to confess the tats and piercing
thing. I was born in 1965 on the Welsh
borders. Okay. I've never really got my
head around that [ __ ] I No, no, no. I
don't mind. I told my daughters they
could get tattoos if they wanted to so
long as they said dad.
>> Okay. That was the that was the only
thing to do. Yeah. Had a heart. A
massive heart. That was allowed. nothing
else of course. Um,
but that's it's quite clever. It's a
Trump loy nipple piercing. Now, the only
problem there is it is false promise,
isn't it? Because uh people who are
really into that piercing stuff
>> are going to be disappointed.
>> Are going to be suddenly disappointed.
>> Yeah. And people who would be turned off
by it are going to look at somebody who
doesn't have doesn't have a nipple
piercing.
>> So, it's not going to work. I mean, you
did hear that wonderful story, did you?
It's one of the funniest things I've
ever heard about the problems of the
rich, which is the great complaint of
Carolyn Klein's daughter. You never
heard this?
>> No. That um this is not a problem you
ever anticipated about coming from a
family where your your parents is rich
or famous, which is Kelvin Pine's
daughter. His great complaint was that
just at the peak moment of getting
romantic with a man, you are suddenly
confronted with your own father's name
in inch high letters.
Now, I've you know, my wife, okay, has
never has never had to pull down my
trousers to be confronted with Clive
Whitmore written across written across
the elastic band in huge letters. You
can imagine that's a bit of a turnoff,
isn't it? Um, you know, it's slightly
alarming.
>> It doesn't set the mood.
>> That's [ __ ] brilliant. Uh, ad
campaigns that have cuddly animals that
are anthropomorphic.
Yep. Here we go.
>> There we go. Bies for everybody who
hasn't been. It's the Texas Disneyland.
>> But you say that ad campaigns that
include a cuddly animal that talks to
you are more successful.
>> Fundamentally, I've always wondered
whether the theory is that um
the odd extreme, the extreme opposite of
that was for many many years in the UK,
BMW
advertising would never show people. The
most you allowed to show was the
silhouette of someone driving the car.
>> I remember thinking that. Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> Oily windscreen type thing. Yeah. And
and the whole and the argument is what's
your user imagery, right?
>> And the cuddly animal is a brilliant
brilliant cheat to that because user
imagery is problematic. Okay. In that
I'll give you an example. Okay. The
average person who buys a car from new,
let's say it's a, you know, Citroen. I'm
probably out of date. Yeah. Okay. Let's
say a small car from New Volkswagen
Golf. Okay. Average age of the person
buying those from new is in I think the
late 50s quite a you know that means um
that might be median age actually but
it's certainly in the late 50s by the
way do you know the car brand that has
the lowest average age profile of any
purchaser and you're never going to
guess well one of the lowest I I I need
to qualify that it's not the lowest you
know Rolls-Royce
>> really yeah
>> uh footballers rich young people
>> oh of course
>> you
So, interestingly,
interestingly, Rolls-Royce has quite a
young profile because if you make it
rich young, you're more likely to buy a
blinged up car as a rich young person
than you are as a rich old person,
aren't you? all well for obvious reasons
I suspect some of them reproductive um
and um uh but the user imagery is always
problematic because some of your users
probably don't necessarily like your so
obviously ads for small cars do not show
59y old men driving them or 65y old men
they show 27y old women which is a tiny
niche of purchases of new those cars new
it's quite it's quite a common purchase
of those cars secondhand but new very
very few. You know, you got to be
pretty, you know, you got to be pretty
rich at 20ome to buy a new car at all.
And um uh the so so you have this
problem with user injury. Now the you
know the typical BMW driver what's
aspirational to some people might be
repellent to others. Okay. So showing
people is problematic because you
immediately get into questions of class
and age and everything else. Now,
sometimes you can play that game
brilliantly, as with John Smith's Beer,
where you show, you know, an old bloke
in the pub with his dog, Tonto, you
know, which is obviously not intended to
be emblematic of the people who bought
the beer, but it's kind of emblematic of
people who, you know, in a sense were
beer connoisseurs, you know, that kind
of thing. But actually, animals are a
brilliant, brilliant escape from this
because most people were like that
Bkey's beaver. Okay.
>> Mhm. in a way that a a person even so in
some cases a celebrity spokesman, you
know, may not be liked by everybody. It
may be repellent to everybody, but
animals both attract attention for
evolutionary reasons. We we look at
things that are uh that have two eyes.
The whole thing in paridolia, you we see
faces and things.
>> Mhm.
>> Okay. We see faces in clouds and all
that sort of stuff. And that's because
we're evolved to be highly attuned to
spotting not only other human faces,
although that's obviously important, but
actually spotting anything with a face.
Okay. Um
and um
uh you get extraordinary biomimicry by
the way. I fantastic things where you
know if you have orchids that look like
the genitalia of insects, things like
that because
>> is this Sam Tatum stuff again?
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And it's it that's the
wonderful book the um evolutionary ideas
by
>> Yeah. You you looped me in with him four
years ago, something like that. For the
people on he has he came on for
revolutionary ideas. People that need
that love this imagine an intersection
between David Bus and Rory Sutherland
and you've got Sam Tatum. Uh yeah, that
that was fascinating. But no, it's uh
it's interesting to think about this
seems like
>> what you're doing what you're doing is
you're hacking perception. Yeah.
>> You know that it's what you might call
uh I never remember what it's called.
It's um there's there's a field of sort
of philosophy which is called
phenomenology.
>> Mhm. which is how humans actually
perceive the world. In other words, the
yawning gap between what is as is
measured by engineers and physicists and
what we feel. Now, the simplest example
of which they do in the United States, I
think it's fantastic. Okay. Uh is the
difference between the temperature and
the feels like temperature.
>> Mhm.
>> Okay. Because you can sometimes I wander
around Phoenix, Arizona. I I hate hot
humid weather, but I wander around
Phoenix, Arizona, you know, at 100
degrees. is I'm pretty happy. And so the
feels like temperature is much more
important to my sense of well-being and
what I wear and where I go than the
actual temperature.
>> The place that's got the most the the
highest variance of within a day
intraday variance for that is New York.
If you go to New York,
>> oh god, like March time.
>> You're rude about the London climate.
This really pisses me off that New
Yorkers are always dissing London. But
actually, it probably rains more in New
York than it does in London. I wouldn't
be surprised. But also, the city's
uninhabitable for about three months of
the year.
>> Well, look, if you leave the house on a
morning in March and you need a big
coat, a large coat with a hoodie
underneath and by midday you wish that
you put [ __ ] shorts on.
>> I know.
>> It's unacceptable. Rory Sutherland,
ladies and gentlemen,
>> an absolute joy. I love you to bits.
Thank you for being here.
>> What a pleasure. We haven't had any of
your We hadn't had any product
placement. We had We've done a good job
for Bies.
>> Yeah. Rory, come on. Do us a little ad.
Do a quick ad to camera for New Tonic.
Well, I was trying um I was trying to
start the uh interesting precedent where
guests on podcasts got to advertise
their own stuff cuz I thought they've
done all the traveling. You know, why is
it the host that
>> What do you want to What do you want to
advertise?
>> Uh why don't I say Busy's Bites in
Westerum, which I think is Kent's finest
Jamaican Italian cafe. There we go.
>> So, there we go. I'll I'll advertise
them. I always think they're wonderful.
>> Busies. This actually is extraordinarily
drink drinkable and it may well be you
know a component of it I'm sure is the
placebo but it does seem to be to be
actually efficacious. So there
>> that's what we wanted to hear. Seems to
be efficacious. Exactly what I needed.
>> Thank you very much for tuning in. If
you enjoyed that episode with Rory, the
fulllength conversation with Naval
Rabacant is just here, who's kind of
like a a skinnier, more Indian version
of Rory
from America kind of.
Yeah, Rory's okay with that. Anyway, you
should go and watch it. Press that.