Washington Central Unified Union School District - Special Informational Mtg Aug 10, 2026 [WCUUSD]
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The primary purpose of the Washington Central Unified Union School District's informational meeting was to address logistical concerns and clarify details regarding an upcoming vote on Article 14 amendments, which pertains to school closure procedures. The district leadership assured attendees that this gathering is not intended to deny information but rather to answer specific questions about how the voting process will unfold tomorrow night, including ballot counting at East Montclair and the subsequent posting of results via email through Infinite Campus. A key point clarified during the session was that while a citizen petition has been submitted requesting an amendment to Article 14 regarding school closures for future academic years, this vote does not constitute a board-initiated plan or a guarantee that any schools will close; rather, it establishes a legal mechanism and deadline by which such a decision could potentially be made if the community chooses to pursue closure.
Significant discussion focused on the nature of the petition itself and how state law supersedes previous local agreements regarding school consolidation. The board explained that while their Articles of Agreement previously required district-wide votes for closures, this specific amendment was driven by a citizen-initiated petition rather than an internal board decision. Consequently, if approved, the new process would require both a majority vote from the union district board and approval from voters in the respective towns before any school building could be closed or instruction ceased after June 30th, 2027. The administration emphasized that this amendment changes the procedure for future decisions but does not compel action; it simply sets forth the steps required if a closure is eventually deemed necessary based on budgetary realities and student needs assessed during upcoming fiscal cycles.
The meeting also touched upon the collaborative approach to budgeting, noting that while data from state targets like December 1st will influence final numbers, preliminary planning has already begun with input from principals across all elementary schools in the district. Board members acknowledged the deep emotional impact on Worcester and Callous communities who feel defensive about protecting their local institutions after years of debate under Act 46. Several speakers expressed regret over the divisiveness caused by this process, urging the board to consider holistic options beyond immediate closure if a vote passes, while also recognizing that they are legally bound to follow state statutes even when it contradicts earlier community sentiments or promises made in previous agreements.
In conclusion, the district reiterated its commitment to serving all students within a unified budget framework and stated that no concrete plans for school consolidation exist at this time beyond what is outlined in the amendment's procedural language. The board members expressed hope that voters will participate tomorrow night so they can move forward with clarity once results are tallied, acknowledging that any future steps regarding resource allocation or facility usage depend entirely on those upcoming numbers and decisions. Despite the tension surrounding the issue of potential school closures for Worcester and Callous residents, the administration maintained that their role is to facilitate a lawful process while working collaboratively with community leaders to ensure student needs remain central to all discussions about district resources and operations.
Read the full video transcript
[music]
So, it is 5 o'clock and um not sure
clock behind me. I was looking at my
computer. So, welcome. Uh this is the uh
official that was on our warning the
uhformational meeting that is about our
vote tomorrow. I do want to just assure
you all that what we are here for is to
answer the logistical and the uh
questions that are about the vote
tomorrow. It isn't that we are trying to
deny anything. It is just that that is
what this meeting has been worn. And so
so many have the ballot, many have seen
the ballot of what the um vote is. I
believe many of you have seen the uh
fact sheet that we tried to put out. We
completely understand that there's
confusion and that uh what it means for
uh for people once this vote occurs is
what creates a lot of anxiety and a lot
of extra questions and that um we do not
have um you know I don't have the
ability to guess what's going to happen
after the vote or even how the vote will
go. We will communicate as mo as soon as
we have those numbers and we will move
forward with plans based upon that. So
that uh are there questions that people
would like to ask?
>> Logistical question will the votes be
counted tomorrow night as opposed to the
day?
>> Yes. So, one of the things that the
question our district clerk did resign
July 1st as part of um the role the
statute allows that the chair which is
me to be elected or appoint authorized
as a district clerk designign and so
I've gone through training with Rosie
Leair uh I have we have done test
ballots and so I will be meeting them at
East Montyard tomorrow we will be doing
the ballots tomorrow
Good question.
>> And will the results be posted anywhere
tomorrow night?
>> So, we will, you know, the the limit, so
to speak, and I'll turn to Jen and
Alicia in a minute, uh, is just who
controls the ability to post on the
website. We will be sending out um
emails to this to the board. We will be
sending emails out through the Infinite
Campus. And I'm wondering if we would
have the ability uh to get it posted on
the website as well.
>> I can certainly talk to Sashley about
being able to do that for us.
>> Other logistical questions or other
questions? Yes. And if you would come up
to the mic that might if you don't mind.
My name is Marilyn Martin and I live in
Worcester and I have a question about
article 14 amendments.
I have a question about how this was put
onto the ballot and how it was
um
done. I don't think it's following the
articles of agreement.
So our understanding is um and it's
complicated when you look at all of
those articles they have all those
little asterisks all those little
>> Yes. And so then when you have to go
down to the different statute of what it
looks at the statute that applies to
that article in terms of amendments said
that 5% of registered voters could put
forth a petition for an amendment and
that was what was presented to us as a
board.
>> I get that part. But under article 14
there's different it doesn't agree with
what you just said.
So, so general and Chris correct me if
I'm wrong, but you generally legislate,
you know, you know, state law
supersedes, you know, a contract like
this.
>> And so it's, you know, it's it's state
law that lays out the process for, you
know, how many signatures are needed to
put, you know, to require the that a
board, whether a select board or a
school board, put an art item to the
voters if, you know, if it's received
the signatures.
>> All right. Thank you.
Other questions?
Yes.
>> Do those ballots have to be co-mingled
or they are you don't know what town is
what voted?
>> They will be co-mingled.
Other questions?
>> Yes,
>> I have another one.
>> And if you want to use a loud voice, you
could
>> I think for the people on Zoom.
>> Oh, okay. Okay.
>> Yeah. Come closer to the Zoom uh to the
owl. I'm sorry.
>> Under the fact sheet, it said that the
board has no current plan. Well, under
um
[sighs]
under the school closing closure,
they put uh article C now. And it's and
at the it's the uh I'm sorry, I'm
frustrated.
>> No, no, no. Take your time.
>> The C part of the B. Yeah, the C the C
part is what the um people wanted
changed
and on the fact sheet it says there's no
plan current plan but in this it it has
a plan. The last sentence is a plan when
the school will close.
>> So the way that that you I can see why
you would read that that way. What that
is saying is during that school year if
there was a vote for closure that's what
it would look like. That would be the
procedure. I can honestly say to you at
this point there is nothing on our
agendas bringing that forward. What
happens is we all know when there's
budget talks that you know that becomes
potentially an option and as part of an
option it's it's an option. There are
other discussions that will occur. So
this doesn't say what's going to happen.
It depends what what the board decides
to do.
>> Correct.
>> Okay.
>> Correct. That is always what it will not
go to the towns unless the board has
voted to approve it.
>> Questions? You look like you're thinking
of something there, Karen.
I was actually wondering how many people
are online.
>> Yes, that's what I was wondering.
>> Yes. And um but that includes the owl
myself.
>> Yes. So the there are Thank you. 13
>> and any questions from people online as
well?
Um,
>> Linda Gray from Callus, I thought you
would present some information.
>> The um,
>> are you only answering questions?
>> So, the only information I mean, yeah,
we could present about the ballot, which
is the um, and the fact sheet. So, the
um, sorry, got distracted. So, and I
apologize. I had thought that there was
a number of of information that was out
there. So we do know that there was an
amendment request a petition for the
amendment to come forward and that is to
change article 4 and the change would be
about the closure of the school building
that it's the amendment puts forth that
in the academic year and what it is
using it's using the language from the
original article. So that's why it's
referencing year 2122
and after through 2627
that the new union school district shall
not close any school building or cease
using the building to provide direct
instruction in at least one grade pre
kindergarten through grade 12 unless
first approved by both the majority of
the union district board and the voters
residing in the town in which the school
is located. And then the second part of
that which you were also referencing was
that academic year 2728 and after that
in academic year 2027 and 2028 and after
the new union school the district board
shall not close any school building or
cease using the building to provide
direct instruction in at least one grade
pre kindergarten through grade 12 unless
first approved by both a majority of the
union district board and the voters of
the New Union District. The vote to
close a school for the 2728 school year
may occur prior to the beginning of that
year with the closure effective after
June 30th, 2027.
Again, none of this says that the
closure would occur. It is lining out
what the deadline would be around if
such a closure. So then as part of the
fact sheet because we kept hearing from
our community questions about does this
change how we consolidate? Does it
change how we would uh move forward that
with a closure? And what our fact sheet
was explaining was that this doesn't
expl touch consolidation at all. That
continues to be an administrative
decision around where the placement of
our grades are. It doesn't change um it
doesn't make that suddenly a petition
could come forward to request a closure.
That isn't part of the agreement, isn't
part of the article and it doesn't um
and it still is registered voters who
will be voting on it.
>> Would you repeat what you just said that
it doesn't something about a petition
that you described? So, so just as you
know I have had some people ask me well
can't um the community of voters also
put forward a petition similar to how
this request for a vote was couldn't
they put that forward to request closure
and that is not part of the article that
cannot happen it's not a legal process
for this
>> okay so I keep going back to
the why Why
have you bought into this petition if
there's no plan to close callous or go?
Why if that's not what I'm hearing in
the in the hallways?
>> So, this was and um other board members
can feel free to chime in. This was a
community petition that was brought to
the board. It was not a board petition
to put forward to amend the articles.
And so that we haven't put together a
plan um that hasn't been uh like a
step-by-step plan. First, we'll do this
and then we'll do that. As a board, that
has not been what our plan is or what
our discussions have been. This was a
petition that legally was brought
forward to us and our our um role in
that petition was to approve the date of
the election. That was our only role in
that. And it's basically citizen
initiated petition. Um and it that that
process is open to any citizens. Um
there there are some limits in terms of
what petition can actually ask um to be
done as as long as it's within the the
scope of what a community petition can
ask to be done. Uh then it's it's
something that we pass through and and
the towns would vote on and and but they
can't demand that we close a school.
Although you someone could petition and
we could say that's not within your
realm of power as a community. Um but
they could certainly do that. Um so and
you know petitions it's kind of like
having in other states which we don't
have in Vermont is um citizen initiated
uh moves to amend the constitution of
the particular state. We don't have that
here but a lot of other states do. Um
this is similar to that only not in a
constitutional realm. is based on these
articles.
>> James first.
>> You're welcome.
>> What's the next step if it's approved?
>> That that is a great question. I can
honestly say to you, we don't know the
next steps other than we will have to
meet and figure out where we're going.
We know that we have a budgeting cycle
that's coming up. We know that there's
been different numbers that have been
said. It it will be a time where we have
to figure out how do we reconnect and
understand our budget process in a way
that helps all of us to come to that
understanding of what is it that we need
to do the instruction for our students
and where does that where are those
impacts of numbers declining as well as
the changes in the state.
Um so if petition passes it does not
compel an action. It what it does it
sets forth a process. Um if an action is
like if the board decides to try and
close the school um it sets forth a
process for doing that doesn't compel
the board to do that um or direct the
board to do that. It's just setting up
the mechanism of how it would happen.
Much the way this past year um the
mechanism when the board voted to um the
initial process was of voting to close
uh Dodie and Callus and then sending
that to the towns to decide whether or
not they want to close their school. Uh
it was a process questions not a
substantive this is what you will do.
The board doesn't have to do anything if
it passes really just setting up a
process for a potential closures.
So you
>> what you said. So if this passes
>> and the board comes up with some kind of
a plan, maybe it's to close each one
period.
>> Does that mean we all get to vote on it?
>> Right.
>> If that's what passes. Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> That is cool. Yeah,
>> I feel like it's been said I'm going to
say it a different way. I totally come
across a little direct according to most
people.
>> What did you say?
>> I come across a little direct
>> according to most people, but I'm just
going to try to say like this amendment
that we would be right the the ballot
says to approve or not approve.
Approving this amendment to article 14
would change how we can close schools.
It changes the procedure. The first part
of it is still that the board and the
administration collaboratively need to
look at what our students need, what
would serve them best. And we as a board
would need to hear a recommendation that
that's what we need to do and we would
need to vote as a majority to close
schools and then it would go to the
entire district. And I think the thing
to keep in mind is our our budget is one
budget. So all of our money has to be
divided amongst all of our students
in the best way possible to serve their
needs. And this would be a tool to allow
us to look at how we can do that best to
serve our students. But it would still
be our electorate like so all of our
district voting members, they get to
vote ultimately on whether or not we
still close school buildings.
>> Correct.
>> Oh, sorry. Go ahead.
>> I there there's there's a question
that's sort of been at the peripheral of
a lot of these which is about you know
sort of what the board knows which is
about timeline. Um when when Ursula made
the made a comment about sort of we have
to figure out what our students need and
what we provide to them and what
a there are a lot of questions there
that don't [snorts] that sort of don't
really firm up until we get later in the
budget season and get certain certain
numbers. you things like what is our
like what what is our people pupil count
going to be where we start to where the
board starts to get a better
understanding of what kind of resources
are we working with that we think we can
get the taxpayers to support and so it's
really one of the reasons you're hearing
us say we don't know is because until we
have until we until the that information
firms up we don't really know what kind
of resources we're playing with and
until we don't know the resources we
you know, it's hard to say how we're
going to allocate.
>> Okay, Karen. And then
>> can you speak a little bit to the
budgeting process this year? What would
the change in administration
just as far as um what's the first
meeting where budgets are going to come
up and who will be
gathering that information that would
have typically come from our now
previous superintendent?
So I don't know it you know one that's
off the you know that isn't part of you
know ourformational meeting. However I
will have Jen and Alicia I can try to
answer that question. Help me out. We
[clears throat] we talk about budgeting
being a year round activity. We've tried
to um to set up a timeline that's
actually um advanced the it and made it
earlier to talk through. There's a sweet
spot though because as Zach was saying,
there's only so much information that we
have at our fingertips early enough. So,
we can start to look at our preliminary
enrollment numbers, our preliminary
programming needs, all of those things
as early as the next couple of weeks and
we don't have like the hard fast data to
move it forward concretely enough until
a little later in the process. So, we're
always trying to do that balancing
piece. I do know that we've tried to up
the um on the timeline the board
education piece around the budgeting
process so that as part of our public
engagement and the board's education
around it, they have that information
upfront as early as we can possibly
share it with them so that they can
begin the discernment process and really
understand what what the factors are.
But some of those numbers don't really
come until state targets like December
1st, December 31st, those sorts of
things. So for us, it's it's a work in
progress for a long time. It's why we
always have to do multiple drafts
because we're drafting based on the data
that we have at the time and we just
don't have it all from the from the
state. What would you add about I would
just say and practically speaking Jen
and I are serving in this role through
the end of August and and it's we've had
no conversations nor do either of us
plan on starting that process in August.
It would be the hope to hire a
superintendent and have them decide and
help lead that.
>> Could you introduce yourselves?
>> Yes. Alicia Lifford. I'm the principal
at East Montilier,
one of the acting superintendent through
August.
>> And I'm Jen Miller Arsenal. I'm the
director of curriculum instruction and
assessment. And Alicia and I are serving
as co-acting superintendent through the
month of August.
>> Ursula, did you want
>> I was going to address, and I know that
it's not part of the agenda
particularly, but it's probably on
people's minds as they're thinking about
this. Our budget processing was never
just the superintendent.
Our superintendent,
even our new one, will have the entire
leadership team that comes in and
advises, which includes all of the
principles of our elementary schools,
the principal of East or of U32. We're
sitting in the building right now. Um
are
Suzanne's position. I don't know her
title. I'm sorry, Suzanne. um a large
number of people over at central office
who educate, you know, our curriculum
director,
special ed, these are all people that
come in and talk about the needs of our
students that they know, right? The
principles are in their buildings, they
know the needs of their students. Um
they come together and they talk and
then they bring us their
recommendations. It's a collaborative
process that does go back and forth. And
I believe last year we started in
October with our education and that was
when we saw like if we were attempting
to offer all of the same services
the next year this is what it would
cost.
>> Do we currently have a U32 principal?
>> Yes. Yes. There is an interim. Elijah
Hawks is the interim.
>> Michael,
>> are you taking comments or just
questions?
>> Comments as well.
>> Okay. Um So I'm I'm includ
if you want. Um I'm a Worcester resident
E32 and Dodie parent and former board
member. Um
hi.
>> [laughter]
>> So, I've sat in many places on this
whole debate for years, and I just want
to say um that I know and believe that
everyone wants to do what's best for the
students of the entire district. And I
also know that Worcester and Callus
residents have felt on the defensive for
years now, trying to protect their
beloved schools. Um, and
you know, there's been a lot of
heartbreak over the years with this
debate. Um, if this is to p if this does
pass, I just urge you all administration
and board to
um to to think beyond
think beyond closure. And if closure
ends up being the answer, then to think
beyond closure of the two schools that
have been targeted for the past couple
years that the two communities that have
largely said they don't want their
schools closed. Um it can't be as simple
as the answer of like these two schools
have to close that is clearly there
[clears throat] are other options. So, I
just urge you to really take a holistic
look at what people have been um
fighting for for a couple years and
thank you for the work that you do. I do
miss you, but I don't
[laughter]
>> Yes. Yes.
>> I have another question. When you start
planning your budget, how many schools
you planning to plan for? the they will
be meeting with typically what the they
is the leadership team. So the
leadership team and the ad the
administration basically begins the
process by working with each school and
um and uh designating what their needs
are looking at what the so the planning
involves all now as we move toward it
becomes a conversation isn't if and you
all can help me because you've been part
of those direct conversations. My
understanding is it takes a look at if
we look at this grade level, what is it
that the needs are and then now does
that translate to the other parts? It's
a very good question because that was a
moving piece last year.
I'll add a little bit more. I think it
also doesn't happen in a vacuum. So um
the budgeting really should be a um tell
a story of the things that
programmatically are important and about
our students needs and how we will uh
meet them and support them to to achieve
the outcomes that we desire for them to
achieve. So we use the strategic plan
which is the district strategic plan
that was created by many people a few
years ago through 2030 and those core
beliefs and values to guide us and the
board also engages in conversation
around parameters so that when we're
doing some budget work we're also
working in tandem with the board around
establishing a draft budget that
fulfills the parameters that they have
set as a school board. So there is some
working together to to create a draft
budget that is doing the best possible
job um based on our knowledge and
experience to meet the needs of our
students in the community.
>> Other questions?
>> Anybody have a question
>> and admitting people? Yeah. And what I
can do um so yeah, so if there are any
questions online or comments
>> and everybody knows where to Oh, go
ahead Denise. This is just I'm
[clears throat] used to doing this
online and it's really hard to see the
board members from an online
perspective. So I'm sorry but I don't
know the lady sitting between you and
Ursula. This is Judy Buchanan who's our
newest board member.
>> We appointed her to the board
>> Wednesday. Last week also you would be a
new face.
>> From what town?
>> East. There was a vacancy since May.
>> Yes. Oh, so that doesn't have to be
voted on. Not till March.
>> March. When there's a vacancy that
occurs
>> mid
>> mid season before like in between the
vote
>> and the next vote,
>> we have 30 days. So statutoily, so by
law, we have 30 days to fill that
position. There are things we have to do
like letting the select board know. The
select board lets us know whether or not
any candidates who put their name
forward are legal voters, our 18, which
kind of go hand in hand, but there's
still two items on the list.
What's the other one? It's legal voters
and a resident of that. Yeah.
>> Which means they're a legal voter for
that.
>> What in
Berlin still has a a vacancy current and
so um you know we have been asking a
number of um people. So that one is also
>> Yes.
>> How are the meetings going to be handled
at the polling place?
>> There aren't any meetings. It's just you
just go and vote.
>> Oh, it did.
>> I I think that may be an issue of
technical language in in the in election
in the law about election, it's you
know, it's referred to as a meeting,
whether it's a town meeting, you know,
format or, you know, you or vote by
ballot. And so like when you look at
things like warning elections um you
know petitioning for things to go on to
elections it's you know meeting is the
word that's used regardless of how the
vote happens.
>> Sorry I realize that's confusing but
that's it. There's a technical reason
legal reason why that happens.
>> Yeah.
>> I don't understand why the state statute
takes over all of this. Why do they have
the articles of agreement if we're not
following them? To be fair, our articles
of agreement cite the state statutes
that are relevant.
>> Well, I didn't say
>> the articles of agreement site the state
statutes that are relevant to elections
so that they were utilizing state law.
That is how those articles were written
and how they were voted on seven or
eight years ago.
>> So the model articles came from the
state. Um I think the agency of
education um and when they came to us we
were able to modify them in certain ways
and we did uh and so there certain voted
on modifications including the one that
um provided the the local town with
schools located with the vote to close
it because the original articles that
came from the state um had a
district-wide vote on closing schools.
Um I think we made other modifications
that are probably in articles um after
like 14 15 16 about consulting with the
community um and various things like
that. So um and those those proposed
modifications uh were sent to the voters
and voted upon you know 2019 I think and
became and became our operational
uh models.
So but the but the underlying model of
articles came from state
>> other questions online comments.
So we do hope that people will vote will
come out and vote. We will notify as
quickly as we can as soon as the vote is
counted and um
and then we will move forward.
>> Make a comment.
I was following Act 46 way back when it
all first started
and Callus and Worester agreed under
pressure and duress
to these articles of agreement
and now it feels like it was all just a
big lie
and I think a lot of callous and most of
people are feeling that way. So if this
passes, you have a lot of work to do to
heal those
to, you know, bring people together. Um,
I think people are open to conversation,
coming up with their other ideas and
it's unfortunate that this is happening
in this way cuz it's really been
divisive as you all know
and it's going to take a lot of healing
if ever.
That's just how I feel.
>> I agree with you, Denise. I I feel that
a promise was made like a lot of work
was put into those articles of agreement
and it was time a promise was made and
to have this petition move forward just
what was it six months after your guys
towns voted no.
>> I it just really hurts really deeply.
Yeah, it does. And we've heard that and
we understand that and um and we are we
are following what we are required by
law to follow. And please know that we
also as a board have understood what our
um commitment is to our communities and
we understand the task ahead. Um we
don't have a full plan as to what that
will look like. It just feels like it's
all nice and
>> Linda and then
sorry [clears throat]
>> I guess I can talk about it. I don't
have to go up.
>> I I'm
going to add to what Denise and Karen
said. This will be your legacy. They
will be talking about this for 50 years.
I know you've heard me say this, but I'd
like you to think about that because
we're still talking about Act 46. We're
still talking about how Montpielar
pulled out of U32 and that was 50 years
ago.
So
if you want divisiveness to be your
legacy,
you should think hard about that.
I I I don't want that to be my legacy.
I don't want to be the generation that
gave away the power of the small towns.
>> Well said.
Yes,
>> I agree. There's more going on here than
a school closure. Just a destruction of
two beautiful small towns. It breaks my
heart that this is happening this way
and I'm upset and I believe it.
Um
I and I I just want to say I know that
you guys are just following the
procedure and that this was a citizen
um petition put forward and we don't
have a choice in whether or not we vote
on this. Um but everything else does
stand after the vote happens. The
administration under board does have all
the responsibility in how this is
carried out. And you know, I've spoken
with friends and acquaintances in other
towns um other than Worcester and Palace
who've said yes, of course, if it was
our school, we would totally support
closure if it because that's what's best
for the students. And I challenge you if
it comes down to closure to um consider
those options before you consider the
two schools um that have been the focus
in the past couple years. Um but yes, I
just wanted to remind everyone this is
not a board initiative this current
vote. So
any other comments, questions
and we
last call online in person.
Our
meeting is a jerk. We didn't have corn.
Amen.
[music]
>> [music]