Was Jesus Actually The Serpent In The Garden Of Eden? - Alex O’Connor
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The discussion centers on a significant reinterpretation of the Genesis creation narrative found in an ancient Gnostic text known as *Testimony of Truth*, which dates to approximately the 2nd or 3rd century AD and was discovered in the Nag Hammadi library. Unlike traditional Christian readings that identify the serpent with Satan, this early gospel presents a radically different perspective where the serpent is not a malevolent figure but rather an agent bringing truth to Adam and Eve. The text notes that when Genesis was originally written, neither the concept of "Satan" nor the specific identification of the snake as the devil existed; it simply describes the creature as being more *arum*—a Hebrew word translated in the King James Version as subtle or crafty, but also found throughout Proverbs to mean sensible and prudent. In this Gnostic framework, the creator god depicted in Genesis is characterized not as a benevolent deity but as an incompetent or evil figure known as the Demiurge, who lies by threatening Adam and Eve with death if they eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. The serpent intervenes to correct this deception, revealing that eating the fruit will indeed make humans like God in knowledge without causing physical death. Consequently, the act of disobedience is reframed as an act of wisdom; by consuming the forbidden fruit, Adam and Eve gain true spiritual insight rather than succumbing to a fatal curse. This narrative suggests that they were correctly banished from Eden not because they sinned, but because their newfound knowledge made them incompatible with the jealous creator god who did not wish for humanity to become like him. The theological implications of this text rely heavily on the Gnostic distinction between the material world and spiritual reality. In this worldview, the physical universe created by the Demiurge is flawed or inferior, while true salvation comes through *gnosis*, or secret knowledge, rather than adherence to behavioral laws. This aligns with other early Christian writings like the Gospel of Thomas, which emphasizes that entry into the Kingdom of God depends on discovering the correct interpretation of Jesus's words rather than mere actions. The canonical Gospels themselves hint at this duality by recording instances where Jesus taught in parables to obscure meaning from crowds while explaining deeper truths privately to his disciples, suggesting a tradition of secret teachings distinct from public instruction. Ultimately, *Testimony of Truth* upends standard Christian theology by identifying the serpent directly with Jesus Christ and portraying him as the bringer of liberating wisdom against an oppressive creator god. This interpretation posits that death entered the world not through divine punishment for sin, but because humanity gained knowledge without simultaneously accessing the Tree of Life, which would have granted eternal existence within a flawed material realm. By guarding the gates with flaming swords after expelling Adam and Eve, the Demiurge effectively cut off access to immortality once mortality had been introduced into human nature. The text concludes that this ancient gospel was condemned by later orthodox authorities precisely because it challenged the foundational narrative of original sin and redefined the serpent's role from a tempter to a savior figure delivering humanity from ignorance.
Read the full video transcript
There's a there's a great Gnostic gospel
called the testimony of truth which is
discovered in the Nakamadi library. So
that's buried in like 400 AD. So it's
it's probably like 2 or 3rd century AD.
Um
and the testimony of truth retells the
story of Genesis.
But interestingly if you read Genesis
and I mean like the actual account of
Genesis um
so so who are the characters in the sort
of Garden of Eden story? Adam, Eve, Eve,
snake,
snake. Who's the snake?
Devil,
right? Why do you think that?
Which it's just sort of traditionally
the snake is the devil. But the text
never says that.
The text never identifies the serpent
with the devil.
Interesting.
The concept of the devil, Satan, the
accuser
didn't exist at the time of writing of
Genesis. Right.
This is like one of those things about
did the fruit of the loom logo ever have
a cornucopia in it.
Yeah. Yeah. A Mandela effect. Except
this time
like
Yeah. the original Mandela effect.
Yeah, I I I suppose so. Like like go,
you know, go and read the text. It's
just the serpent. And we're introduced
to the serpent. We're told
it's Genesis 3. It opens now. The
serpent was more crafty than any of the
beasts that the Lord has created. And
and so Adam and Eve are told um you can
eat of any fruit of the of the garden,
but do not eat of the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil. For in the
day that you eat thereof, you shall
surely die. Surely die. Because the
Hebrew it sort of says die twice. It's
like you will die die die die die die
die die die die die die die die die die
die die die die die you will die a death
um
and so the serpent comes in this crafty
serpent crafty is an an important word
there um the King James translates it as
as subtle the word is arum um so this
the snake was more subtle or crafty or
shrewd than the other beasts and it
comes to Eve and says did God say that
if you eat of the tree of the knowledge
of good and evil you'll die and he goes
yeah and he goes you're not you're not
going to die God just knows that if you
eat of that tree you'll become like him
knowing good and evil and he doesn't
want that. So Eve looks at the fruit,
sees that it's good for eating, takes a
bite, gives them some to Adam, and what
happens? Do they die?
No. What happens? Well, God tells us in
the Bible in the Genesis account, God
says, "Now the man has become like us,
knowing good and evil. He must not be
allowed to reach out his hand and eat
from the tree of life." And so he's
banished from the Garden of Eden.
What's the tree of life?
Tree of Well, who knows? The tree of
life and and inherit eternal life. So
presumably in the way that eating from
the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil gives you the knowledge of good and
evil. If you eat from the tree of life,
you get eternal life. And God says they
must not be allowed to do that.
They should have just gone for the tree
of life first, which wasn't.
Yeah. Yeah. Well, so there are lots of
theological interpretations here because
interestingly, God doesn't say at the
beginning,
you must not eat the tree of life. He
just says you must not eat the tree of
knowledge, good and evil. So arguably
like
if they'd gantcharted this correctly
and they'd worked out
tree of life. Yeah. Live forever.
Yeah. Joe, it's actually a really
interesting like what would happen if
Adam and Eve eat from the tree of life
first and then Well, arguably
see this is the sort of insight
that you need a productivity bro to
bring to the theological
seriously though it's it's a great
question I I think that the tree of life
gives you eternal life and the idea is
that Adam and Eve have eternal life in
the garden of Eden when they're created
they're just going to live forever in
the garden of Eden
they've already got eternal life so
eating from the tree of life
and that's been subtracted from them now
that they know good and evil you're not
allowed to know good and evilly and also
have eternal life. So then they're
banished and then they're mortal. So the
the Christian interpretation of the
story is like well they didn't die
literally but they they died in the
sense that mortality entered into the
world. You know they died a sort of
spiritual death. They became
but their immortality was taken from
them. Yeah. Exactly.
The fact that you're not going to die
now doesn't matter. You are at some
point.
Yeah. It's like there's something about
knowing good and evil as a human that
means that you are going to die.
probably because
if you sin, the price of sin is death.
And if you don't know good and evil,
then you can't sin because you can't
knowingly do evil. But if you know good
and evil, then because we're humans and
we're naturally flawed, we're always
going to sin and therefore we we need
death. So death enters the world. But
here's the thing, right? That's one
interpretation. Um but it is a bit of a
weird story. Like who is this serpent?
Why is the serpent even in the garden in
the first place? you know, like like
what what's the serpent doing there in
this perfect Eden? You know, um who who
created this this this serpent? You
know, why can't they just eat from the
tree of life afterwards? Why does
because God doesn't it's not like they
they literally just can't eat from the
tree of life. God banishes from them
from the garden and then guards the
gates of Eden with a cherubam with a
flaming sword. These stories are
extraordinary, man. It's worth it's
worth revisiting them. Um, so this
ancient gospel, testimony of truth,
identifies the serpent. It tells you who
it thinks the serpent is. It doesn't
identify it with the devil. Identifies
it with Jesus Christ.
What does that mean?
That Jesus is the serpent.
Because a great deal of the Gnostic
tradition believes that the creator of
the material world is an either evil or
incompetent or lesser kind of god
figure, the demi urge.
So the material world is created by this
evil or incompetent god. Um there are
lots of different reasons to explain why
that happened, but it's like not not the
father that Jesus refers to. Jesus being
like the true God comes down and when
when Jesus says, you know, my father in
heaven, he's not talking about the
creator of the material universe because
that's an evil demiurge. He's talking
about the real sort of spiritual God. So
the material stuff is bad and the
spiritual stuff is good. Um there's so
much to it, man. There's so much to it.
But but but so so the idea is that the
God of the Garden of Eden, this Gnostic
gospel, the testimony of truth says like
what god is this? What god is this that
sort of lies to Adam and Eve? says that
they're going to die. Doesn't is a
jealous God, a self- admittedly jealous
God. Doesn't want them to become like
him. Now, why not become like gods? You
know, he doesn't want it. He's jealous.
And then the serpent comes in and and
tells him the truth. Says like, "Look,
you you you're these like material
creatures created by this god, but
there's this like spiritual wisdom.
There's this knowledge of good and evil
that he doesn't want you to have because
he's this evil god. Like, but I'm going
to I'm going to give it to you. I'm I'm
telling you the truth here."
Um, and so this this gospel thinks that
Jesus is bringing wisdom there.
Interestingly, that word arum, the
Hebrew word that means shrewd or crafty
or subtle
um also is translated the same word
throughout the whole of Proverbs as
sensible
or prudent. So there is a reading of
Genesis that says now the serpent was
more sensible than any of the other
beasts that God has created. And he he's
the one that comes to Eve and says, "Oh,
like God said you were going to die if
you No, no, you're not going to die.
You're just going to be like him." And
he's right. So this ancient Gnostic
gospel condemns this creator god of
Genesis identifies the serpent with
Jesus uh and says that Adam and Eve did
the right thing by eating of the tree of
the knowledge of good and evil. So
there's one way that the Gnostic gospels
totally upend the traditional
understanding of Christianity and you
can see why it's therefore condemned.
So that's that's fascinating. And also
this whole belief in the in the demiurge
and the different and the different also
to be clear the word gnostic a lot of
scholars reject it because gnostics
didn't call themselves gnostics.
What is gnostic?
Gnostic comes from the Greek word nosis
for knowledge because a lot of these
texts are unified by the fact that
you're you're saved through knowledge.
It's not you're not saved through the
things that you do the way you behave.
It's like you got to have the right kind
of knowledge. You got whoever has the
gospel of Thomas says you know whoever
discovers the correct interpretation of
these words you know shall enter the
kingdom of God. It's about like getting
you made them more [ __ ] literal.
It's like getting the but you can't you
can't and in fact in the canonical
gospels um like the gospel of Mark you
can read it like there's this report
that when Jesus was with the big crowds
he spoke in parables so that they
wouldn't they wouldn't understand
properly but when he got back to the
disciples he explained everything
properly. There's this idea even in the
canonical gospels that there's like a
public teaching of Jesus and a secret
knowledge of Jesus. And so the gospel of
Thomas opens these are the secret
teachings
of the living God. So this is the stuff
that he said backstage
which Ditimus Thomas Judas wrote down
the gospel the the apostle Thomas wrote
down. Um whether Thomas actually wrote
them probably not.
Thank you very much for tuning in. If
you enjoyed that clip with Alex you will
love the full length 2 and 1 half hour
podcast which you can watch right here.
Go on, give it a