Submind YouTube summaries
Thumbnail for Was Identity Politics a Mistake? - Bernie Sanders

Was Identity Politics a Mistake? - Bernie Sanders

Watch on YouTube

Video summary

In this discussion, Bernie Sanders addresses the role of identity politics within the Democratic Party, arguing that while fighting for women's bodily autonomy and ending bigotry are enormously important, these social issues should not come at the expense of economic justice. He contends that it is possible to fight for both simultaneously; however, he asserts that Democrats have been strong on social identity issues but weak in standing up for the working class against billionaires. Sanders suggests that unless the party offers a sane approach to complex topics like immigration, crime, and trans activism, they will struggle to resonate with voters. He highlights a specific campaign ad featuring Kamala Harris focusing on transgender rights as an example of messaging that failed because it focused on issues affecting only 1% to 3% of the population rather than broader economic struggles. Sanders elaborates on what he views as a strategic "own goal" for Democrats, noting that their focus shifted away from tangible crises facing the majority while simultaneously demonizing minority groups. He points out that during his time in office and beyond, real problems such as massive income inequality, where 60% of people struggle to put food on the table, a climate crisis, poor educational outcomes with U.S. kids ranking 37th globally in math and science, and a failing healthcare system were ignored by mainstream Democratic politics. He contrasts this approach with Donald Trump's strategy, which he describes as demagogic: taking frustrations about housing costs or wages and redirecting them toward powerless minorities like undocumented immigrants or transgender individuals rather than addressing the root causes of economic distress. The conversation turns to immigration enforcement under President Trump, specifically criticizing the actions of ICE for what Sanders terms a move toward authoritarianism. He expresses strong disagreement with current tactics where agents in plain clothes pick up citizens off the street and deport them without due process, comparing these methods unfavorably to historical injustices against Native Americans and Black people. While he does not advocate abolishing ICE immediately, he insists that its operations must be sensible and comprehensive rather than draconian. He also touches on instances of vigilante behavior by individuals posing as government agents in places like New York subways, warning that such actions are frightening and undermine the rule of law established since Ronald Reagan's era. Ultimately, Sanders concludes that the Democratic Party has abandoned its working-class base by prioritizing identity politics over economic needs, leading to a situation where the working class naturally abandoned them after the election. He acknowledges some positive signs with figures like Andrew Yang in New York catching on to these realities but maintains that addressing real problems is essential for any political movement. The dialogue underscores his belief that true democracy involves solving shared crises through cooperation rather than dividing people along identity lines or scapegoating minorities, a failure he argues has cost the party significant ground and trust among voters who are struggling with daily economic hardships.
Read the full video transcript
you mentioned before uh gay rights, women's bodies, uh ability for people to get married, immigration. In retrospect, how much of an own goal for Democrats do you think the focus on identity politics has been? >> How I'm sorry, how much >> an own goal or an unforced error has the focus on identity politics? >> Again, you use the word unforced. I wouldn't I I think it has been. >> Let's go with on goal. >> Okay. This is what I think. I think fighting to make sure that women can control their own bodies and are not secondass citizens, enormously important. The need to end all forms of bigotry in this country, enormously uh important. But you can, you know, chew bubble gum and walk at the same time. You could fight for women's rights and fight for an economy that works for the working class of this country, not just the billionaires. It's not either or. The Democrats have been strong on those social issues, identity politics, >> but they have not been strong in standing up for the working class of this country. >> I think that the focus on identity politics, unless the Democratic Party has a sane answer to questions around immigration, crime, trans activism, DEI, I think it's going to be difficult to get the electorate to resonate. I mean, look at the what was the most powerful ad that was run during the the campaign. Camala is for they them. Trump is for you. Why did that resonate so much? >> Oh, well, you're raising another question. I don't know. Maybe you know the answer. How many people are trans in America? Do you know what percent? >> It'll be it'll be less than a gay and that's between 1 and 3%. >> Yeah. Yeah. A tiny tiny number of people. >> So, why is so much attention >> I'll tell you why. Glad you asked that question. Now, what do demagogues always do? >> Demons. That's right. All right. So, here you have a country. We have massive income and wealth inequality. We got 60% of people struggling to put food on the table. You got a climate crisis. You have the United States in recent international exam. Our kids were 37th in the world in terms of math and science falling far behind China in terms of their educational attainments. uh have a health care system falling apart, etc. Same people. Now, you may disagree with me on an issue, but we put them on the table, right? Okay. Do we have a healthcare crisis? Yeah. Yes. What's your idea? Here's my idea. Argue it out. Let's do it. Correct or not? Correct. Got a housing crisis. All right. That's what democratic with a small D. >> That was not what was focused on. >> I know. I know. That is what real with a small D democratic politics is supposed to be about. How do we work together to solve those problems that we you and I and others recognize as real problems, right? >> Mhm. >> Okay. What does Trump do? >> Trump essentially >> but come on just on that. It doesn't need to be about what is it that Trump was focused on? This to me feels like an own goal. The focus was so much this wasn't being made up out of nowhere by the Republican party. This seemed to be things that were being said by the Dems. And the focus that was >> all right said by well first thought I am not going to argue with you as to whether or not the Democrats have by and large turn their backs on the economic needs of working people >> to focus on other issues. >> Yes. All right. I that's I've been making that point for quite a while. And the other critique of the Democrats is they have refused to recognize the severity of the crisis that we face. As you and I speak, there's real pain in this country, right? People are really struggling. >> It's kind of a double whammy, right? That you are focusing on something which only affects a minority of people, which is pretty horrendous in terms of messaging, which doesn't seem to resonate in the same way. And also, there are all of these problems that would be really good for you if you address them. >> Yeah. and probably would resonate with more people which is why I mean both me and you agree on this which is it does feel an awful lot like the Democrats are out of touch with the working class and is it surprising that they lost ground with them? The answer is I think after the election and I worked very hard for K Larrison after the election I said something to the effect that the uh we should not be surprised that having that after the Democrats abandoned the working class of this country the working class abandoned the Democrats. >> Yeah. >> All right. And and I believe that to be true. I would say that there's good news out there and you're seeing again with Mr. Mandani here in New York and elsewhere. some people are catching on that we got to deal with uh with that reality and but I want to get back to Trump because you talked about you know this these ads that success what demagogues always what do they do it's it's them and us you take a powerless minority right in the 30s in Germany it was the Jews it was gypsies in this country historically it has been blacks and gays you take a people and you say you can't afford housing you're not making it up money you know whose fault it is hey Chris you know whose fault it It's the undocumented. >> I'm not convinced. Well, maybe the undocumented thing actually. Yes. Uh if you were going to say the trans side of stuff, uh which was the ad that we're talking about in particular. I think the finger was being pointed at Camala rather than being pointed at the group. It wasn't these people. This group of people are who's wrong >> that she was focusing and they took that out of, you know, do you think how many times during her campaign did she talk about that issue? You know, you take something >> a thousand hours of someone talking they're going to slip up every so often. >> Yeah. or you you say one thing and you take it out of but the point about demagogues is they do not address the real problems facing the overwhelming majority of the people they demonize I mean you listen to some of Trump's speeches and I was you heard them I was there at the state of the union you know a few feet away from them the horrible and ugly things he says un you know they're rapists they're murderers they're drug dealers truth is the crime rate in the undocumented community in America is lower than is for Native Americans, you know, they're hardworking people, all right? Should they, you know, etc., etc. But what he does successfully is takes people's frustrations and points them to a powerless minority. And that's kind of a horrific thing to do. >> Do you agree with the activists calling to abolish ICE? >> No, not right now. But you want But do I believe on the other hand that you should have ICE now running a muck, knocking down doors, dragging people? I mean, this is America. People with masks around themselves often in plain clothes, picking people picking people up off the street, throwing them in vans, and in some cases deporting them to Sedan. Really? Is that really America? So, you know, we we need to have sensible what we need and what we have needed for decades since Ronald Reagan, in fact, is a sane uh immigration comprehensive immigration policy. So, I think what ICE is doing right now under Trump's directive is horrific. Uh, and it is part of this movement toward authoritarianism. It's not dissimilar from sending the military into Portland, Oregon, or Chicago, wherever he's sending them >> to control a rebellion. Really, I'm not aware that the people of Portland are trying to overthrow the United States government. I saw a video from what looked like maybe the subway in New York of some guy that didn't look to have official credentials holding up a subway, flashing a light toward what must have been the driver and trying to accost some person that maybe didn't look like they were fully American in terms of heritage, but I don't think was in a ICE official uniform. What is this? Because in the UK there's this meme of citizen arrest. Have you ever heard of that? Right. What's happening? What is that? >> Look, if you have people and sometimes they have masks, sometimes they don't. No one disputes the fact that they are picking up people who are American citizens, right? But in this country, you have a history of due process. If I want to if I think you are guilty of something, you get arrested, you have due process, your right to an attorney, a right to defend yourself. Is this a grassroots? >> All right. And then what have to answer your question, if you have government agents do it, somebody else comes along and says, "Hey, they're doing it. You're under arrest." >> Really? And you're seeing some of that as well. And that is vigilanttheism and frightening. >> Exly, right? Okay. It's it's uh amateur bounty hunter type stuff. Okay. A quick aside. I've been drinking AG1 every morning for years. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. And it just got even better. AG1 NextGen keeps the same simplicity, one scoop once per day, but now comes with four clinical trials backing it. In those trials, AG1 NextGen was clinically shown to fill common nutrient gaps, improve key nutrient levels within 3 months, and increase healthy gut bacteria by 10 times even in healthy adults. Basically, they've upgraded the formula with better probiotics, more bioavailable nutrients, and clinical validation. And it's still NSF certified for sport, which means that, you know, the quality is legit. I actually got to meet the team that runs AG1, all of the top bods at a offsite a couple of months ago here in Austin and I was really impressed. They took my feedback on board. They were very receptive. Uh and I actually think that they put some of my ideas uh into the product and the new marketing. So uh any success that you see going forward from now can be exclusively attributed uh to me. So hooray for me. And if you're still unsure, they've got a 90-day money back guarantee. So, you can buy it and use it every single day for 3 months. And if you don't like it, they'll just give you your money back. Right now, you can get a year's free supply vitamin D3, K2, and five free AG1 travel packs, plus that 90-day money back guarantee by going to the link in the description below or heading to drinkag1.com/modernwisdom. That's drinkagg.com/modern wisdom. Thank you very much for tuning in. Did you enjoy that clip? Well, full length episode is available right here. Go on, give it a