Kanal13

Ukraine keeps eating into Russia’s irreplaceable Tu-95 fleet—12 bombers now lost or damaged

Duration: 3:47 452 transcript words EN summary

Video summary

Russia is facing a critical shortage in its strategic bomber capabilities as it gradually loses its fleet of Tu-95 aircraft, which are essential for conducting missile strikes against Ukraine. According to reports from National Interest, the primary concern for Moscow is that these bombers are virtually impossible to replace due to the cessation of production over three decades ago. The Tu-95 was originally developed by the Tupolev Design Bureau in the 1950s, with more than 500 units built during the Soviet era; however, serial production ended in 1992, leaving Russia reliant on maintaining and cannibalizing its existing stockpile rather than building new ones. The impact of these losses has been severe, particularly following operations like Spider's Web in June 2025, where Ukrainian forces destroyed at least eight bombers and damaged three others, representing approximately 18% of the pre-war fleet. Data cited by the author indicates that Russian aviation suffered its most significant casualties during this period, with additional attacks on aircraft stored at Engels airbase in the Saratov region. Unlike the United States, which maintains reserved B-52s and dedicated storage facilities for older aircraft, Russia has no comparable reserve of Tu-95s to draw from, making each loss a permanent blow that cannot be quickly compensated. Although Russian officials have expressed intentions to repair damaged bombers, experts believe that fully replacing the destroyed airframes is practically unachievable. The Tu-95MS variant, which entered service in the 1980s, remains a core component of Russia's long-range aviation force capable of carrying Kh-55 cruise missiles and newer long-range weapons used in repeated strikes against Ukraine. Because Russia began the full-scale invasion with only a fraction of the originally manufactured bombers still operational, every permanent loss makes the fleet increasingly difficult to sustain, turning these aircraft into high-cost targets that Moscow simply cannot afford to lose. The strategic vulnerability of the Tu-95 fleet is further highlighted by comparisons to the US Air Force's B-52 Stratofortress, both of which are Cold War-era bombers that have remained operational through decades of modernization despite using different propulsion and design concepts. While more than 500 aircraft of the Tu-95 family were produced historically, the end of production means Russia must rely on maintaining its surviving aircraft rather than manufacturing new ones in large numbers. This fundamental difference makes Ukrainian strikes on the bomber fleet uniquely damaging compared to attacks on weapons systems that Russia can continue to produce, ensuring that each loss significantly degrades Russia's long-range strike capability without a viable path for recovery.

Read the full video transcript

Russia is gradually losing its two 95 strategic bombers, which play a vital role in its missile strikes against Ukraine. According to the National Interest, Moscow's main problem in this situation is that these aircraft are virtually impossible to replace. The two 95 was developed by the Tupolev Design Bureau. The first aircraft flew in 1952, and serial production began in 1956. More than 500 of these bombers were built. Production of the modernized two 95 MS version resumed in 1981, but ceased completely in 1992. Before the full-scale invasion, Russia had approximately 58 two 95 MS aircraft. According to Oryx data cited by the author, Ukraine destroyed at least eight of these aircraft and damaged three more. This represents approximately 18% of the pre-war fleet. Russian aviation suffered particularly severe losses during Operation Spider's Web in June 2025. Ukrainian forces destroyed eight bombers. Ukrainian drones subsequently also attacked aircraft at the Engels airbase in the Saratov region. The author notes that restoring Russia's lost fleet will be extremely difficult. Unlike the United States, which has reserved B-52s and dedicated storage facilities for older aircraft, Moscow has no comparable stockpile of 295s. Furthermore, production of these aircraft ceased more than three decades ago. This is precisely why, according to the publication, the destruction of each such aircraft is significant not only because of its combat use, but also because of the impossibility of quickly compensating for losses. The 295s will remain high-cost targets that Russia cannot afford to lose because they are simply irreplaceable, the publication states. Russian officials have stated their intention to repair damaged bombers. However, the author of the article believes that a full replacement of the destroyed aircraft is practically unachievable for Russia. The 295MS missile-carrying variant entered service in the 1980s and remains a core component of Russia's long-range aviation force. It can carry Kh-55 family cruise missiles and has been adapted to employ newer long-range weapons used in repeated Russian strikes against Ukraine. Although more than 500 295 family aircraft were produced during the Soviet period, production ended decades ago. Russia therefore relies on maintaining, modernizing, and cannibalizing its surviving aircraft rather than replacing destroyed airframes with newly built bombers. That makes Ukrainian strikes on the fleet fundamentally different from attacks on weapons Russia can continue manufacturing in large numbers. Russia began the full-scale invasion with only a fraction of the hundreds of 295s originally manufactured still operational, making each permanent loss increasingly difficult to absorb. The 295 is often compared with the US Air Force's B-52 Stratofortress. Both are Cold War era strategic bombers that have remained operational for decades through repeated modernization programs. Although the two aircraft use substantially different propulsion and design concepts.