Turn Disruption Into Opportunity: Jonathan Fields on Building Antifragile Brands
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this episode of AdSpeak, Jonathan Fields explores how brands can transform market volatility and disruption into opportunities for growth by shifting from a protective mindset to one of possibility. He argues that in times of high uncertainty, organizations often default to anxiety and fear, which stifles creativity and leads to short-term, degraded decision-making. Instead of merely defending existing assets, leaders must adopt the role of "door finders," actively seeking new avenues for opportunity rather than holding back. Fields emphasizes a crucial paradox: disruption cannot exist without an equal amount of possibility; therefore, when stakes are high, so too is the potential for breakthroughs if leaders choose to lean into them rather than retreat into defense mechanisms.
To navigate this landscape effectively, Fields outlines five key principles centered on trust, strategic focus, and emotional well-being. He highlights that consumers currently trust individual humans more than faceless brands, urging companies to foster authentic, long-term partnerships with creators who can transfer their established trust to the brand. Furthermore, he advocates for "less but sharper" decision-making, warning against the trap of testing too many ideas simultaneously, which often leads to failure. By setting specific time triggers to narrow down initiatives and focusing on a few high-impact areas, brands can allocate resources with precision and avoid the chaos of spreading themselves too thin.
The conversation also delves deeply into the importance of addressing the "meta problem" of anxiety that plagues both employees and customers during crises. Fields suggests that brands should not just solve surface-level customer needs but also provide a sense of calm and safety, effectively helping people exhale in uncertain times. This approach builds deeper connections than traditional marketing tactics ever could. Ultimately, he posits that operationalizing mental health practices, such as mindfulness and breathing techniques like the "physiological sigh," is essential for building antifragile organizations. By prioritizing personal peace and downregulating nervous systems, teams can access their full creative potential, turning moments of stress into advantages that make brands stronger and more resilient in the future.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome to AdSe Week's podcast about the
business of marketing, media, and
creativity. In this episode, we're
sharing a conversation recorded live at
one of AdWeek's events featuring leaders
from across the industry discussing the
ideas shaping brands right now. Let's
get into it.
Morning. Oh my god, you actually
responded and it's so early. That's a
good sign already. Um, I'm excited to
speak to you this morning. I'm going to
speak to you from three different
perspectives. one, a multi-time founder.
Um, so I had been the brand many times
myself. Two, as the executive producer
and host of Good Life Project podcast
where we have partnered with more than
400 brands for over a dozen years. So
we've been in the space a long time and
we've done every possible variation of
collaboration.
three as an author and researcher who
spent a lot of time going deep into
uncertainty, how it affects individuals
and also leaders and organizations and
really it does a lot of different
things. So topic today is navigating
uncertainty. We are in a moment right
now um a moment where a lot of us are
experiencing a lot of volatility, a
rapid pace of change. I don't have to
tell you that. Um but how we respond to
this moment is everything.
Right now, we tend to default to what I
call the protection mindset. So, here's
what happens. We have a lot of
uncertainty in the world. Along with
that, high stakes. So, it's not just I'm
uncertain about what to order for
dinner, which can be pretty high stakes
depending on the evening, but it's
what's going to happen in business,
what's going to happen in brands, what's
going to happen in the market, what's
going to happen with AI. We don't know.
So, we have to live with that rather
than try and solve for it. But we have
to actually be constructive and perform
at the same time. What tends to happen
in these moments is not having enough
information, it leads us into a state of
anxiety and fear, right? So we feel the
stress kind of consuming us. The thing
is we actually don't have to feel that.
That's a default state that our brains
go to. But we can skill ourselves to
feel very differently. And the big
problem with this is that we feel awful
as individuals when we feel that. And as
a business, what it ends up doing is it
drops us into a protect and defend
stance. It stifles our creativity. It
leads to short-term decision-m and
tactics and really degraded decision-m.
These are all things we don't want. We
don't want it in marketing. We don't
want it as brands. We don't want it as
human beings. It feels bad. It fragments
our efforts because we don't know what
to say yes to or what to say no to. So
we say yes to everything hoping one
thing will work. And at the end of the
day what it does to us is it leads to a
situation where the brand suffers and
the human being within the brand
suffers. But the thing is volatility
doesn't have to destroy us. Volatility
doesn't break brands or us. It's an
opportunity to make brands or us to be
decision makers and leaders in the
marketplace and to telegraph to the
people on our teams
that actually we can figure this out
together and we're not just going to
leave you in a head spinning scenario
which is the opposite of what often
happens in these moments. Here's the big
paradox. Disruption cannot exist
without an equal and upper an equal and
opposite amount of possibility. They are
two sides of the same coin. So if you
are feeling high levels of disruption
and the stakes are high, there must be
an equal level of possibility where the
stakes are also high.
And if you're not feeling that or seeing
it, your job becomes to seek it. So I
want to share just five sort of short
ideas and we'll talk about them a little
bit more in the conversation, but let me
introduce them to you to help shift your
mindset into this space.
Five principles door finding trust
currency less but sharper com
communications and personal peace. So
let's go through these one at a time.
One door finding when we default to that
protection mindset it's all about how do
we protect and defend what we've already
accumulated market position brand equity
for an agency clients
all we want to do is not lose. That is a
disaster. An absolute disaster. In high
disruption, high stakes, fastmoving
environments, there is no middle.
There's only disrupt door or disrupted.
You must choose a side and start looking
for what are the doors that I can open.
Where is the possibility? So you become
a door finder, not a door holding back.
Principles two and three, trust in
decisions. Trust is something that is
absolutely critical in high volatility
times. Right now, we can lean on the
trust of our own brands. And if you have
a high trust brand, that's fantastic.
Deepen into that. What we're seeing, and
I know some of the conversations that
have been happening around here
yesterday, we're talking about really
leaning into the trust or what I call
trust transference from individuals,
from creators, from individual brands.
How do I borrow their trust? Because we
all know that trust and affinity are
different. What we're looking for now is
not affinity, but trust. And trust
ignores to people way more deeply and
quickly than it does to entities. So we
want to look for people to partner with
and let their trust transfer to us. On
the third metric here, decisions less
but sharper. There's a huge impulse in
these moments to throw everything up
against the wall to just test it all. We
don't know what's going to work. That's
not a bad thing. But at some point,
testing it all becomes failing at all.
We cannot do this. We can start there,
but at some point we have to actually
dial back, call and say, what matters
most? What are the one to three things
that I'm going to center and resource?
Because if you do more than that for
more than a short amount of time, it's
almost guaranteed all will fail. Last
two principles.
These tend to be the most ignored and in
my mind most important calm
communications.
Moments like this, we're used to leading
up to moments like this where we're
solving for the surface level problem of
our customers. What is their surface
level their felt their need where if you
ask them the question, they'll say this
is what I need. That's great. Keep
solving for that. But there's a second
meta level need problem that we can
solve for now that is so much deeper and
that will bring people into our fold in
a way that nothing else will. That's the
meta problem. The meta problem in high
uncertainty, high stakes environments
is anxiety and fear.
Everybody is feeling this right now. So
how do we do that? We want to solve for
that problem by really thinking through
our communications
and saying are we speaking not just to
the surface level problem which used to
be enough but are we taking the
opportunity to speak to the deeper level
meta problem which is people's anxiety
and fear. Can we in some way support
them in moving through this moment where
they can just exhale?
Because if we can do that in addition to
offering the products and services that
let us keep solving that surface level
problem, then as we move out of this
window or as we stay in it, now they're
connected to us in an entirely different
level. We want that. I want that, right?
As a brand, I wanted that. As somebody
who regularly partners with some of the
biggest brands in the world now and has
for many years, I want that, too. One of
the things that we know
our show has been around for a long
time. So we have a big audience. We have
have built a lot of trust with a lot of
people. We have introduced so many
people, so many concepts and so many
ideas that solve problems. Medicine,
health, well-being, relationships, life.
We're literally called the good life
project, right? But underneath that,
there's one consistent thread that we
get in feedback and we have for the
entire duration of the show, and that is
when we listen, we feel like everything
is going to be okay. There's apparently
something about the sound of my voice
that makes people like to listen to our
show when they're trying to go to sleep
at night. It's a bit of a mixed
blessing.
Um,
so we know that we're actually we've
been solving for the meta problem the
whole time. And I think that's also one
of the reasons why we've been able to
sustain really big long-term brand
relationships because we're going
another layer deeper. So think about how
you can solve for that. That brings us
to the last item before we drop into our
conversation and it's this personal
peace. Sounds really goofy. It sounds
really fluffy. Sounds really woo.
Personal peace. See it on Insta all the
time. Protect your peace. Right? As
organizations, as brands, as agencies,
we do almost nothing to speak to this.
This is the single biggest lynch pin in
moving through moments like this. If you
do not address this, no matter how good
your strategy is, no matter how many
doors you see to open, no matter how
good your comms are and your
partnerships are, you will fail. The
reason is because your people will fail.
High uncertainty, high stakes
environments cause people to retreat, to
contract, to experience anxiety and
fear. And if you amplify that over days
and then weeks and then months, it is
devastating to individual mental health
and eventually physical health.
We tend to think of equipping people
with the right skills as something that
you just do to help out your people, to
show that you really care about them.
And yeah, we do and we want to do that.
We want to support people. Whether
you're a brand or an agency or a CMO or
a brand leader, we want to take care of
our people. We all know that. But I'll
give you a different reason to say yes
to this.
We also know high anxiety, high fear
states effectively are like putting on
creative and cognitive blinders. You are
asking teams to come up with their
biggest best new ideas
and you want them to innovate and step
out of the box and be creative. And if
you do not address their ability on the
most basic human level to be able to
breathe more easily and relax and
downregulate their nervous systems at
high uncertainty moments, their brains
will not be capable of solving the
problems you desperately need solved at
the level that they could be solving
them. We are hurting ourselves by not
helping our people and our teams and our
leaders gain the practices and skills
that let them move through this moment
in a more humane way and had the
beautiful side benefit of giving us
bigger and better ideas than we ever
imagined possible. So we want to
resource this in our organizations. And
when we do this right, then we get to
actually turn moments of disruption into
moments of great advantage to
effectively make us and our teams and
our brands antifragile so that if these
moments sustain or they repeat, we don't
get pummeled by them in the future. We
know how to move through them. So that's
my opening and I think we're gonna roll
into a little conversation now. I want
to talk about each of the five pillars
you just laid out and dive a little more
deeply. Um, starting with door finding.
So, often times when moments of
disruption hit, brands immediately move
to protect what they have and sort of
turn inwards versus trying to find these
different doors of opportunities. How
can leaders retrain themselves in that
sense?
>> Yeah. And and it is a default state. um
no matter how high you've gotten your
organization or how successful you've
been in the past. One, I think we need
to normalize the fact that door finding
actually is the thing we need to be
focusing on now and not protection. If
you've been in organization for a long
time, the stakes are high personally and
also organizationally and we get really
concerned about losing them.
Operationalizing it can look like a
couple of different things. One,
acknowledge the fact that we get to
choose and we have to ask the really big
leading question. Are we leading from a
protection mindset right now or a
possibility mindset right now? If you
actually literally overtly ask that
question to yourself and to your team,
give them an opportunity to answer that
question anonymously. By the way,
>> you will get a very different answer
than you'll get sitting around a table
or on a Zoom call where everybody is
sort of like being shown. You can
literally take take an online like video
conferencing thing, have everyone blank
their screens and change your names to
just like person
and then have them answer the question
in the chat. It will be remarkable what
you see happen there. also really
operationalizing
this great example of this actually is
Steven Bartlett who a lot of people know
from Diary of the CEOs you know just
this podcast that exploded onto the
scene really in the last 3 years or so
and he's building an a media entity in
the UK um flight studio he has what he's
effectively called a kill team he's
deputized a small number of people in
the organization to effectively try and
stop Klay Christensen's innovators
dilemma from touching down. He says,
"Look at everything that we're doing,
every every process, every product,
every person. Your job is to see if we
can make it all obsolete before somebody
else does. Can you deputize a person, a
group of people in the organization with
the power to speak truth to you in a way
that may end up dismantling things, but
you know that if your team can identify
that, then the wellunded startup
question is the final one, which is what
would a wellunded startup who needs to
deal with this same situation do right
now? Almost always, it's going to show
you all the things that you're not
seeing in the moment. M how do you make
this like a regular practice and not
just something that you do when
disruption is occurring?
>> Yeah, I mean I think you have to really
bake it into culture one. So literally
make it a part of your like a weekly
meeting agenda.
>> Anonymize feedback at least on a weekly
basis especially in super fast moving
times like this. And we see this so many
times. Organizations do not punish
identifying potential new doors that
would violate the current norms. A lot
of times people they see stuff but
they're not going to actually say
anything about it because they're really
afraid of actually being punished
because something brand new is going to
challenge something that exists and the
people who are associated with it.
>> Right? So let's talk about trust. The
next the next pillar um you say that you
know consumers trust humans more than
brands right that's why we kind of see
the rise of the creator ecosystem how
can brands build real authentic
long-term creator relationships that
don't feel like oneoffs
>> yeah so three things come to mind one
David had the famous quote I'll get a
little bit wrong don't hire a dog then
bark for it and we see that happening
not infrequently in especially in the ad
space you know if you come to a creator
whether a podcaster or an influencer,
somebody on social, a video producer,
you're coming to them because they have
a voice. And if they stray from that
voice or the or the way that they show
up for their audience, for their
communities, their audience will feel
it.
>> They will lose trust with their
audience. So rather than telling a
creator how to actually communicate
something to their audience, tell them
what is the end state that you want from
them and let them use their language and
their presence to show up and do in a
way that's organic to them because then
their community will feel that. Um the
other thing that that pops out to me is
more creative collaborations. So rather
than just here's an ad spot, here's a
campaign, here's a bunch of postreads
and programmatic. Yes. And we love it
when people come to us and say, you
know, you said yes to this brand because
and we love you. We share values. We
share we're aligned in a lot of
different ways. How can we play
together? What can we create here? How
can we create entertainment and
information that is more collaborative?
So, we'll regularly do spots that are,
you know, 2 to four minutes. We
partnered with a major automotive brand
where my wife and I did a 3-day road
trip in Colorado. we called Oddities at
Altitude where we looked for the
weirdest human-made things and actually
like we visited a castle, four-story
castle made out of beer cans and a hub
caps at 7,000 ft of altitude and then we
get to share stories like this, you
know, and and that turned into like an
episode long road trip story. So,
opportunities to collaborate and be more
creative is something that I think it's
this huge untapped potential with right
now. Do you think are brands getting
more open to those types of
partnerships?
>> I mean, we're seeing it in relationships
that we have and and I think the more
that we do it, the more brands can see
what we're doing and that that's
possible.
>> And I know there was conversation
yesterday around quote Gen Z, which
don't call Gen Z, of course. And like
the notion of really just letting people
play together and drawing an affinity to
the brand and then over time if it it
turns into trust that is going to be
such a better long-term play than sort
of sell sell.
>> Yeah. Clarity filter. This one's super
important I think because in times of
disruption especially right now there's
often a lot going on and as marketers
we're tempted to just do more more and
be in more places. How do you get
leaders comfortable doing less and kind
of just focusing in on really specific
important areas?
>> Yeah. So, I think we have to twostep it,
right? One is in the early days,
nobody's going to do less because
everyone is sort of like the call to
action is always, you know, like we need
everyone around the table. We need your
best ideas. We need to brainstorm. We
need everything now because everything
we've been doing isn't working the way
that it used to. How do we get new,
better, great ideas? That's awesome. We
we actually want to do that. So we it's
okay to start wide. The challenge is we
often hold the window open to wide way
longer than is constructive. And not
because we're not seeing signals that
some ideas are actually good ideas to
deepening into, but because we're
terrified of deepening into the wrong
ideas and then being held to account in
a public way. So what we want to do is
basically have our own checks and
systems. say, "Okay, start wide." Great.
Get all the ideas we can, but give
yourself very specific triggers to
narrow. So, if you find yourself 3
months later, if you start with 50
ideas, right? And 3 months later, you've
still got 50 ideas on the table and
you're trying to resource 50 ideas, I
don't have to tell anyone. That is a
total disaster. It's a disaster for a
brand. It's a disaster for an agency,
right? Because you you cannot resource
all of those and have them succeed. It's
like the classic drilling 50 wells, none
will ever hit oil, right? So, I would
have time triggers. I say start wide.
Great. But we have to have a four-week,
a 6 week, and 8we time trigger where we
have to say if we still have all these
wide ideas, like we have a mandate to
narrow this by 50%. Every 6 weeks. Do it
as an experiment, you know, and see what
happens. Like 6 months, we start wide
and then every 6 to 8 weeks we narrow by
50%, we narrow by 50%. over a period of
time, very quickly, you're going to get
down to the like the three to five ideas
that keep showing up and keep saying,
"This is working, this is working, this
is working." And I think that's critical
because these moments aren't about
showing that you're busy. They're about
really allocating resources with
precision.
>> Yeah. When you're trying to narrow down
those ideas, like what is one question
CMOs or marketers should ask themselves
to understand like what's one I should
go after versus leave behind?
>> Yeah. I mean, I'm such a data person.
>> Um, so I'm always looking at as much
data as I can get. So I I want to know
like and I think part of it is setting
up your feedback mechanisms and your
data sources so that you actually know
what's working and what's not working.
Um, and again, this is a weird thing,
but a lot of times ideas get green lit
and they stay green lit because of the
person who presented them, not because
of the quality of the idea. And because
you don't want to challenge another
person's authority or perceived social
currency in organization, you keep ideas
alive, not because they're good ideas,
but because you don't want to actually
go through the dance of dealing with
that. So if you create a much more
objective is that like every 6 weeks
we're going to do an analysis. Here are
the five metrics that matter to us,
right? And I can't, it's going to be
different for every brand, for every
agency, but you've got to what are the
three to five analytics or metrics that
matter most? Make decisions based on
that, not based on personalities and
politics.
>> Yeah. So, calmcoms.
>> Yeah.
>> Love that phrase. Um,
>> from the person who puts all his
listeners to sleep. [laughter]
>> So, a lot of brands often they'll
escalate the noise in a crisis. talk
about how you you think they should
become the calmst voice in the room in
times of crisis. So, how can brands kind
of project certainty and calm without
sounding passive or out of touch?
>> Yeah, this is going to sound really
self- serving, but I think partnering is
a really really powerful thing in this
moment. So certain brands actually will
just have that if it's built into your
brand already, your brand voice, you
know, like that you're somebody who sort
of like eaten ke grounded as a brand and
that is that's part of your brief and
that's just the way that you always show
up. Great. Like to an extent keep on
keeping on that is that is actually not
a lot of the way that it shows up for a
lot of brands. That's not sort of like
their day-to-day voice. So if you try
and shift as a central brand proposition
to that voice in a time especially of
high volatility uncertainty is going to
read as pandering if you do it directly
and we've all seen that. So in my mind
one of the most effective ways to do
that is find the right voices who
already exist who represent a sense of
calm and groundedness and find ways to
partner them so that you can get the
transference from their voices to your
brand. To me, that's a faster, more
effective way to do it. And then, like I
was saying before, you're solving not
just for the surface level problem.
You're solving for the meta problem,
which you know, everybody is feeling and
nobody is talking about. They're all
freaked out. Yes, they have to report to
somebody and say like, we're solving
this particular business problem or if
it's a consumer, I'm solving this one
problem in you like my life and at the
same time there's a meta problem. If you
can speak to that by just making someone
be able to exhale transforms the nature
of your relationship and if you can
partner with people who do that on a
regular basis that again enores over
time to the benefit of your brand.
>> Yeah. It sort of you know plays on the
trust pillar too right because if you're
leveraging trusted calming voices like
creators or podcasters or whoever you
can kind of hit both of those levers.
>> Yeah. In in a huge way. And I think like
one of the questions that often will
come up for a brand or CMO is like well
how do we know who that person or who
that voice is and and we're looking for
all the the classic we we have
engagement metrics. You can see views,
you can see listens, you can see
comments and likes and right but trust
is a much harder thing and sort of like
com trust is a harder thing to gauge.
And one of the things that I think we
don't look at that we should be looking
at more is time in the game. You know,
like I said, affinity and trust are
related, but they're not the same thing.
You can build affinity very quickly. you
cannot build trust very quickly. So if
you have somebody who's actually
developed a large audience, who's been
in the game for a long time, chances are
the reason people are still with them is
because there's a high level of not just
affinity but trust. And if their brand
is one of groundedness and calm, then
you sort of like got the whole package.
So I think we should be looking at sort
of like time in the game a lot more and
and distinguish between affinity and
trust better.
>> Yeah. So personal piece which I know you
for you yeah is the most important
because it doesn't matter how brilliant
a strategy is or how good an idea is it
falls apart if leaders can't navigate
disruption. What's one thing everybody
in this room today can do to start
practicing calm in these moments of high
anxiety and change?
>> Yeah. So, number one thing not to do to
yourself and definitely don't do it to
anyone else is ever use the words, can
we just calm down already?
>> Oh god,
>> we've all been in those meetings.
>> Never tell a woman to calm down either.
>> There you
>> just my free advice.
>> I'm married 33 years. So, I learned that
very early in the U um Yeah. So, but it
like we do it to ourselves also. It's
like it doesn't work. You know, there's
a reason why we feel activated right
now. And so we actually need to change
the state of our nervous systems that
happens over two time frames. One is
long-term practices. And it's the boring
stuff that we've all heard of
mindfulness, meditation. These don't
work overnight, but over a period of
months and years they built. I do not I
know a lot of founders. I know a lot of
people who built big things. I do not
know a single highle leader who's built
really big things who does not have some
kind of consistent mind stealing
practice because it's too hard on a
sustained basis not to have it. But what
can we do? The flip side is
intervention. We're in a moment. In a
very very past life I was a lawyer. I
was in a huge firm in New York City. I
was on a phone call and I was a private
equity lawyer back in the day where they
called them hedge funds and securities.
And I remember picking up the phone on a
regular basis and getting screamed at by
people who had a lot of power and a lot
of money and I would freak out on the
phone. And I started learning breathing
techniques back then. So there's so many
different breathing techniques. And the
power of breathing is a direct beline to
your nervous system. So there's
something we can all do this right now.
If you want to try it, we'll have a
little fun to wrap up our session called
the physiological sigh which is about
the fastest thing that you can do to
downregulate your nervous system that
exists right now. It's free. Anyone can
do it. Do you want to try it?
>> Let's do it.
>> Okay. So, I'll kind of talk you through
it for a second first. And it literally
it takes 5 seconds to do it. First, you
inhale and then you do a final sniff
through your nose and then you exhale
through your mouth. So, it looks like
this.
[snorts]
So, not that hard, right?
right? Pretty accessible. A lot of
people, I'll have CDs out for you all
later. 1099. Um, anyone can do this.
This is a beautiful thing. And because
our breath is so directly connected to
the state of our nervous system and our
nervous system is directly to the state
connected to the state of our minds, it
has an amazingly rapid effect on letting
us come down to a place of where we're
shaking and freaked out to like, all
right, there's still a lot going on. I'm
still kind of freaked out and I'm okay.
>> So if you do that or some version your
version of that, whatever is accessible
to you do for a minute or so, it's
remarkable how quickly you can actually
come back to that place. So this is like
one tool in a whole toolbox of things
that I'll often talk about in different
ways. And when you have a whole toolbox
of things to access, it's it's
transformative in terms of how you can
step into and function in moments like
this, but also just as a human being,
your relationships with yourself, with
your friends, with your partners, like
and how you show up in your life. It
makes such a huge difference to have
that toolbox.
>> Yeah. So, you talk about becoming
anti-fragile, which kind of means going
becoming stronger in the face of
disruption and not weaker because of it.
So, if you could give one piece of
advice to everyone sitting in here today
about how to move from defense to
offense, what would it be?
>> So, physical sigh. Uh, I think it's a
great starting place, super easy for a
lot of people. But I'll just piggyback
on the last part of the conversation
that we're having cuz again, I think
this is such a touchstone for
everything. If you cannot find a way to
downregulate your nervous system and
steal your mind both in real time and
over time, nothing else that we've
talked about today will matter. it just
won't matter because you won't have
access to any of it. You won't be able
to find doors. You won't be able to
figure out how to partner the proper
way. You won't be able to know who's
like how to develop trusting
conversations because your brain won't
be online to handle that. So to me, the
the real key here is in becoming
anti-fragile as an organization, whether
you're a brand, a CMO, an agency, a
creator, is to operationalize mind
spilling practices as a part of culture.
Like say this matters. um demonstrate
it, live it as a leader, and then
resource it. To me, if we do that, and
almost nobody does this beyond lip
service, they'll bring in somebody to
lead a workshop here and there, but
nobody actually operationalizes it on
the level of culture. If you do that as
an organization, you won't see the
effect in the first month, but 6 months
later, all sorts of things will start
functioning better, and you'll wonder
why, and you'll be able to point a
finger back to it.
>> Awesome, Jonathan. Thank you so much.
>> Thank you.
That was a conversation recorded live at
an AdWeek event. You can find more
coverage, analysis, and interviews from
across the marketing and media world at
adweek.com. Thanks for listening to
Adspeak. If you like the show, be sure
to follow or subscribe wherever you get
your podcasts.