Video summary
The interview between host Jay Fidell and economist Paul Brewaker examines the precarious economic outlook of Hawaii against a backdrop of national challenges, including climate change, political shifts under the Trump administration, and post-pandemic recovery issues. Brewaker warns that Hawaii is currently "skating along the edge of a cliff," where increasing storm intensity and frequency due to carbon emissions compound risks for coastal communities in a scenario akin to a frog in boiling water. This environmental vulnerability is exacerbated by urbanization on steep slopes which threatens watersheds, creating a tension between development needs and geological resilience. Furthermore, the state's economy remains heavily reliant on external factors, with tourism accounting for approximately 17% of the state's GDP and federal military spending comprising about 30% in neighbor islands, leaving the region without a large-scale manufacturing base to diversify its income streams.
Political dynamics and policy decisions further complicate the economic landscape, as Brewaker critiques proposals that prioritize political preferences over sound economic theory, such as stimulus offers contingent on congressional control which he labels as corrupt rather than beneficial. He contrasts current protectionist trade policies with historical lessons from the Cold War era, arguing that tariffs hinder efficiency and violate the spirit of interstate commerce. The housing market in Honolulu illustrates these broader structural issues, where single-family home prices continue to rise while condo prices stagnate or decline; this divergence is particularly damaging on Maui, where bans on vacation rentals have caused a collapse in condo values, negatively impacting owners despite making them relatively more affordable. Additionally, the labor market has shifted dramatically since the 1970s, with unemployment rates dropping significantly so that only those unable to work or actively seeking employment are counted as unemployed, forcing workers to constantly adapt to rapid technological changes to avoid obsolescence.
To navigate these challenges, Brewaker emphasizes that Hawaii, as a small open economy, must compete globally because local production costs exceed international alternatives, urging businesses to focus on the leading edge of technology like artificial intelligence rather than competing solely on cost. He highlights the negative impact of network effects where dominance by tech giants widens income inequality and stresses that individual productivity is rooted in early cognitive development and requires continuous learning to remain relevant in a changing workforce. The discussion also points out that state and local governance often employs obstructive institutional mechanisms, such as outdated park systems, rather than facilitative ones, suggesting that technology like cap-and-trade algorithms could manage recreational resources more efficiently if citizens advocate directly with public officials to improve these structures.
In conclusion, while Hawaii demonstrated resilience during the pandemic, it has failed to recover its pre-2019 growth trajectory due to its heavy dependence on volatile sectors and demographic shifts where retiring Baby Boomers outnumber younger generations entering the workforce. Brewaker suggests that returning to fundamental economic principles and advocating for sound governance through voting is essential, even if current political climates make influencing policy difficult. He encourages individuals to embrace new skills and avoid becoming obsolete in a rapidly evolving technological landscape, acknowledging that while wealth distribution remains unequal due to technological evolution, proactive adaptation and direct civic engagement are necessary to secure the economic future of Hawaii's residents and subsequent generations.
Read the full video transcript
Welcome to Community Matters on Think
Tech Hawaii. I'm your host, Jay Fidell.
This episode is entitled Troubles in the
National Economic Outlook. What will
happen and how will it affect Hawaii?
Our guest for the show is Paul Brewaker,
principal of TZ Economics, a terrific
economist over many, many years. Welcome
to the show.
>> Got that right.
>> Thank you, Jay. It's been a while, but
always fun to get back on screen with
you. And uh I think you're one of the
original guys I know, by the way. You've
been doing this for 25 years.
>> Yeah.
>> Anyway, true fact.
>> You're you're really one of the first
people I knew who had what we would
today call a blog or a video, you know,
a vlog. And uh so thanks for inviting me
back for a conversation. I know we've
got a couple in the archives of YouTube
somewhere that I've seen over the past.
>> Oh, sure we do. Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> So, let's talk about 911. It's 911
today. And yes,
>> you know, that does affect the national
mood at least at some level and and
presumably maybe to a lesser extent it
affects the local mood. So, isn't
economics all about the mood, the
sentiment of the country and the state?
Joan Robinson in the 1930s, a Cambridge
economist, called it animal spirits,
the drove investor behavior. Yeah, the
vibe, I guess, is what we're calling it
nowadays. But, uh, I I am hoping that,
uh, this commemoration of the tragedy of
911 does bring us together. In a way,
911 itself did bring us together as a as
a country, as a people, as a nation. And
uh sadly we seem to have lost a lot of
that. Um on the other hand, it plunged
us into a decade or two of
uh geopolitical engagements that I'm not
sure we look back on as having been all
that fruitful.
And here we are maybe not having learned
as much as we should have from those
experiences notwithstanding our
deepseated deeply rooted desire to be
one as a nation and as a symbol of
democracy
uh for the world. So the struggle
continues in our 250th anniversary of
the declaration of independence. I guess
I don't know what else to say on the 911
anniversary.
>> There's plenty to say, but that's not
what we're here for. We're here for
economics and the outlook. And I want to
do a little speed dating with you, Paul.
>> Yeah.
>> Um speed dating on the various um you
know elements, the various processes and
and phenomena that are going on that
might affect the national and thus the
local economy. Let's talk about the
storms first. um the storms not only
here but on the mainland. We have
climate change. We have various things
that people actually don't recognize
very often. They don't recognize the
connection um between climate change and
the storms and the floods and the fires.
Um but that does affect the economics,
doesn't it?
>> Well, absolutely. I mean, right off the
top, it's the, you know, frog in the
slowly boiling water kind of a problem
where these things are happening over
geohysical
meteorological uh time scales that are a
little different from the ones we're
used to thinking about from year to year
or day to day. And um but the increasing
frequency and intensity in Hawaii's case
of tropical cyclonic events, you know,
tropical cyclones, uh are something
we've been thinking about and watching
for a quarter century or more. And um
this pattern, you know, take a right
turn at Albuqueres
hitting Kawaii has been in the case of
Lel uh the other day has been repeated
over the decades with Iniki and Eva and
even Hurricane Doc. Different different
turns, but they all end up at Breni's
beach in Pou for some reason, which is a
pattern. So yeah. Um the extent to which
sea rise is
uh con uh uh compounding the uh risks
along our our shorelines where most of
Hawaii's communities are located. Um
right the problem with urbanization is
steep slopes and water bodies and most
of us live on a coastal plane uh between
the two. We got to preserve the
watershed on each of the islands. And
that's why the kapoo uh on the
mountainous uh you know uh forested
uh highlands is so important and why
that interaction you know the aua to the
to the nearshore literal environment is
is so crucial thinking about these
cycles but
the heating of the atmosphere as we load
more carbon and other emissions uh into
the atmosphere over the decades and
centuries
um is creating a risk of not just storms
with greater intensity, more frequent uh
appearance, but greater amounts of
damage, just the the sheer geoysical
properties of the storms themselves. But
then on the other hand, everybody's
built themselves a nice little house on
the beach somewhere. You know, it's like
between urbanization, the human
development, and then these atmospheric
developments over long time scales, a
century or more, we're at a point where
we need to be uh thinking more wisely
about how we prepare and harden and make
more resilient and improve our
adaptation
uh to recover more quickly when the
events occur. and fundamentally engage
in economic activities that reduce the
risk for the next generations or the
next centuries that have been built up
since the industrial revolution.
>> You bet. So, um I want to break Trump
down because so much of the news uh you
know is derived from him. All of
national policy flows from him.
>> Yeah.
>> But first, let's talk about Trump
generally as a phenomenon. Um he does he
does affect sentiment um and people have
an impression of him whether they
understand the details of his policies
or not. So let me ask you that, you
know, Trump as a uh an unhinged kind of
mad mad mad president,
>> mad King George,
>> King George, right?
>> King George wannabe,
>> you know. I think to be fair, it is a
democracy. He did win at least one
election. you know,
looks like uh you know, uh maybe not the
popular vote, but the way the rules of
the game are constructed with the
electoral college as the final arbiter
of what individuals, citizens do in each
state. Um you know, he's he's come away
with two non-consecutive
uh victories. So he does my point here
is he does represent to the extent he's
a shift in the nature of the presidency
and the nature of presidents in America.
He does represent a shift in the nature
of the American
public's view of the economy, the
culture,
uh you know the history. And uh so I'm
not I'm not to give him credit for
picking up on the vibe, although he does
seem to be tuned in to a certain
vibe of a sort that with which I don't
selfidentify. Nonetheless,
um the interaction you talk about the
way he sort of determines the vi I'm not
sure I call it policy. He has
preferences and those are then
communicated in his various uh media
channels uh uh to a part of the
population that uh embraces the vibe and
uh in in some cases people who has who
whose views
it's my impression people whose views
have have evolved have swung back and
forth going way back over the decades uh
at least to the sort of the tea party
movement uh 10 or 15 years ago on one
side of the political aisle, the sort of
occupy uh agitation on the other side of
the aisle and then and what I think
fairly seems to be a polarization
although not really along traditional
political lines which then makes it all
the more confusing. So we have economic
policy as a consequence of enough people
at enough points of time to have uh
delivered his administration uh into
office
implementing
economic policies the part that I can
talk about that are uh let's say novel
uh at best and uh in my opinion uh
wouldn't have gotten you a high grade
when I taught macroeconomic theory at
the University of Hawaii and the
University of Wisconsin, which I had to
do back in the day because the joke
goes, if you work for a bank, you need a
second job.
You know, only this week he came up with
this thing about um he'll give $5,000 to
every American citizen who's um an
adult, he said. Um, if the if the
Congress remains uh swung in the
direction of the Republicans and
>> if Republicans keep the House and
Senate, I'll pay you 5,000 each.
>> Yeah.
>> Is that's like a bribe, right? Isn't
that?
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. Just
>> What does that mean economically though?
You know that that that translates into
trillions, doesn't it? Well, of course
it does, but it has no meaning because
it will never happen. It is indicative
of nothing in terms of economic
importance. But it is hugely revoly as
if you needed another thing on the list
of the pervasiveness of corruption as a
mindset.
um you know, separate from the legal
standard of what might have been
prosecuted if we had a justice
department that was actually engaged in
that. But what I'm thinking of is I'll
give you an example when I was back in
my days as uh you know supporting
commercial banking uh as a as a
financial risk analytic. I was a country
risk analy analyst when I first started.
along comes the Asian financial crisis.
And so the bank's sending me out to
Asia. In those days, Bank of Hawaii had
branches all over Asia, all over the
Pacific Islands. You know, it was the
Pacific Century. Remember that one? And
uh Hawaii, the crossroads of the
Pacific. And uh so I go on my little
journey from Tokyo to Soul to Taipei to
Hong Kong down to Singapore where we ran
a book in
in Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia.
offices in the Philippines and
everywhere I went. The thing that I came
away thinking about more than anything
else
was how much the
appearance of corruption within the
culture
spoke to the challenges that some
economies were having during this
financial regional financial crisis and
some worse than others. And not to pick
on anybody, but for example, when I got
to Indonesia, every time, you know, we
would drive around, we had a driver to
drive us to our meetings. When you get
to the car, I was the young kid riding
shotgun in the, you know, Mercedes and
the executives in the back. And my job
was to get out and pay the guy standing
in the parking stall to bribe him to get
out of the stall so we can park the car.
now that and it was like fractions of a
penny because the currency had
depreciated by so much. The point is
that certain kinds of behavior
speak to a set of norms in which rules
don't apply. And to me, at least
philosophically, this is, you know, the
meta problem of the of Trump 2.0. We can
go through the economic policy
specifics. You know, tariffs probably
aren't a good idea. Tariffing the guy in
the country next door probably the worst
idea since it's uh they be like, you
know, California putting a tariff on
Arizona. It's crazy. But um more
recently uh you know, let's go have a
war on Iran because what
I I mean it's I shouldn't be laughing
because it's so serious and uh
remarkably or this thing of rounding up
people who you know don't I mean they're
literally permitted in the country. They
have a green card. What's up? Rounding
them up and sending them to Djibouti or
something. I don't know where these
people are getting sent. That's just
crazy. That's okay. That's like
Stormtrooper Jack boot, you know, Soviet
whatever. Uh I I when I was in my youth,
as they say, as a sophomore in college
50 years ago, I went and studied uh I
went and I went as close to the Iron
Curtain as I could get for my sophomore
year. I studied in Vienna,
traveled to uh Prague, you know, with
the Soviet tanks on this in the Soviet
stormtroopers and jack boots chomping,
goostepping, goostepping around the city
and uh
not quite as intensity as much intensity
in Budapest or Budapest, however
supposed to say it, where the Soviets
had invaded Budapest in 56,
had invaded Prague in or cracked down in
Prague in ' 68. eight and I'm there like
six or seven years later. So, um I I
hitchhiked to East Berlin. Check it out.
Behind the Iron Curtain.
But yeah, that's that's that world
was a world of
fear and terror and silence and uh
suppression of individual beliefs and
freedoms and the economic costs that
came with that kind of suppression. And
then literally as a wall like the Berlin
wall uh with respect to trade, nothing
goes through, right? the exact opposite
of what America has, which is the
interstate commerce clause of the US
Constitution. You're free to move around
the country. You're free to go send
stuff to the mainland, sell some holy
guys on the mainland, some pineapples
and macadamia nuts. You know what I
mean? Tell them, "Come on down, stay in
the hotel before the hurricane and we'll
sell you dinner and then you can get on
the plane and go back to the mainland
and go back out to the hurricane and
help us clean up." I mean, that freedom
of movement, that mobility, it's what
Europe's been trying to do forever, what
Britain probably made the mistake of
exiting uh 10 years ago, and what
tariffs
um
not just as a representation of an
impediment, but an actual impediment to
the movement of uh uh goods, not so much
services. But the worst part,
intermediate goods, it's the components
of the automobile, the components that
move back and forth across the border
from across the bridge from Detroit to
Ontario, Canada, while the vehicle is
being assembled. Put this component
together here, put it over there, just
as they would going across the street
from Klehi to the, you know, back of
Leha as you assemble whatever. and uh
I don't know unwinding
some of these um unraveling and
unwinding some of these mistakes and
trying to go back to you know point zero
as they say in in front of the notradam
there's there's a place in Paris it's
called point0
I didn't know until one day I'm standing
there I looked down like panto
um right go back to the origin where
were What did we learn in Econ 302 at uh
Manoa from that wacky part-time lecturer
Dr. Brewbaker about macroeconomic theory
and um you know what we learned is trade
is good. The founding fathers since
we're celebrating the 250th anniversary
of another great document they wrote the
the Declaration of Independence
uh they put it in the Constitution.
That's not an amendment,
right? It's the interstate commerce
clause. You are free to move around the
aircraft.
And uh
going in the other direction, it's not
just unamerican, it's just inefficient.
>> So, right,
>> well, we have all these things, these
factors that are all coming together and
all pretty negative. you know, not only
climate change, but Trump's monetary
policy,
>> uh, his position on his efforts to
derail the midterms.
>> Gosh, you know, who knows what that's
going to result in. And the wars, we
have a wars in Iran, Ukraine, thanks to
him. Canada, I love Canada, especially.
>> Um, but here's Hawaii. You know,
Hawaii's a long way away, but maybe not
such a long way away. All these things
that affect the mainland have at least a
derivative effect on Hawaii. Can you
talk about that? Are we are we
resisting? Are we resilient to these
things or or not?
>> Well, unfortunately, what the pandemic
has shown us most recently is that
unlike in the past, you can make a case
that Hawai's economy was as resilient as
the rest of the nation. But what's
happened um in the in the post pan
pandemic era, we've you know discovered
unfortunately that we didn't come back
the way the rest of the country did. And
you can see that for example, let's see
if I can show this to the audience here
by sharing my screen. You can see that
if you look at per capita, well, if you
look at uh GDP
adjusted for inflation per person, so
per capita, real GDP. And Hawaii was on
a path precoid in the 201s. We were
chugging along, right? We're on the
escalator going up with from
productivity growth. I've taken out the
inflation, right? I've measured it per
person. So, it's like literally a
measure of each individual's average
output. And then COVID hits and Hawaii
was more vulnerable because Hawaii is a
more travel oriented, tourism oriented
state. And that's one thing that people
cut when when the pandemic hit. But you
can see that we just haven't come back
the way the rest of the country has.
going back to the path you previously
were on is the definition of resilience,
right? The two the two pieces of this
are um you know how much were you able
to limit the down the impact of the
downturn for the US it was a little
easier for Hawaii for Las Vegas it was a
little harder because when people
stopped getting on the planes you're
kind of done um same thing after 911
which was one of these moments where at
the time if you were there you recall
people in Hawaii were freaking out for a
few days there wait a
Are people ever going to come back? Are
they Is this new world we've entered of
global
mass terrorism one in which people will
be feel comfortable traveling around um
over long distances when planes are
being hijacked and flown into buildings.
Um so that you know we've been through
this before. after the pandemic, Hawaii
just didn't get back on the same path
the way the US has. So you're
I'm overwhering the the part about
resilience, but um in terms of where we
go in the future, the two things we do,
the two things we export, the two things
we trade with the rest of the world
based on our comparative advantage that
are most important are travel and
tourism,
receipts from people who don't live
here. we acquire by inducing them to get
on a plane and enjoy the people, the
culture, and the environment that we're
blessed with in Hawaii. And occasionally
we have to convince them to maybe think
about coming back. The other big export
turns out in Hawaii is
federal military spending in the island
which is larger in Hawaii than anywhere
else as a percent of GDP and has the
particular characteristic that the
Department of Defense does not primarily
source
military material. We're not producing
uh we don't have defense industries at
the scale other important states for the
military have. Uh we have small guys
doing amazing things like Oceanit
just a totally innovative uh company uh
that is uh uh you know dialed in
understands the the military's needs as
well as other industries because of its
large force presence in the island. It's
really about maintaining a forward
position uh in the region. Um lessons
learned from the early 20th century the
hard way and lessons that we shouldn't
be forgetting. Uh thinking about
the contestability of the Taiwan
Straits.
uh thinking about how China has over 20
years now or 30 years absorbed
Hong Kong a formal uh you know former
beneficiary of a one state two system
pre-commitment my friends in Hong Kong
say no it's just China now it's not Hong
Kong anymore and and and then Taiwan
which has a much longer history of
independence and connected with you know
Changai I think it is, you know, hung
out in Chinatown in downtown Honolulu
for a few years there before he was able
his way back and Chancel right in the
postimperial
um um upheaval of the early 20th
century, mid 20th century in China. Um
anyway, tourism in the military uh are
as resilient
are as reliable for Hawaii as are the
circumstances abroad and within Hawaii
that make them viable uh economic
activities. And if people won't get on a
plane because of a wildfire or because
of a hurricane or can't get on a plane
because a wildfire or a hurricane have
destroyed the lodging in which they
would have uh um stayed on uh on their
travels. Um you know that's a problem.
So we're going to have you know these
are challenges that are unique to
Hawaii's economic structure. Um, you
know, as long ago as in third grade at
Monly Elementary School, I learned the
word diversification.
I remember it because it was good for
hangman. Remember hangman? The the
spelling game? Yeah, that was a killer
word. And supercalifragilistic
xpalidocious was not a word.
>> But I learned about diversification from
Mrs. Chun in third grade. And uh and uh
you know, here I am. You know, I I'll be
an old duffer for longer than I was a
young shredder. And I'm still waiting
for economic diversification. I'm sorry.
By the way, when I was a kid, tourism
was the way we diversified the economy.
So, give me a break. Now, it's the
reason people want to diversify away
from. So, to me, it's the lowhanging
fruit. You know, if we could if we could
just creatively manage uh the loading, I
get, you know, but I mean, I'm I'm here
in Colorado.
I get on my phone, you know, make my
time entry reservation for Rocky
Mountain National Park, you know, pay my
little fee and that's how you manage the
loading on a national park so that
everybody doesn't show up at the same
time on Saturday morning, you know. Um,
we don't do any of that in Hawaii. I
don't understand. That's a different
story. I'm just saying. No, no. It's a
story that you and I have talked about
many times. Diversification, it's almost
like a dirty word for a lot of people.
And I just wonder your thoughts now. You
know, could diversification have helped
us be less fragile?
I have to step back from that and ask
is it realistic to
is the counterfactual in which we
achieved whatever people are thinking
about which I don't know anymore um is
it is it likely that the counterfactual
could have existed rather than the arc
you know of my life from elementary
school or high school 50 years ago
where when I was a kid tourism was a
small part of the economy and you know
maybe five%
10% the military was 10 to 15% of the
economy and agricultural exports were um
at least as big as maybe not as big as
both of those combined but those
obviously have rotated. So technically
we did diversify the economy with
tourism. Your question and the one
younger generations are asking is
what do we do next? Because you're
always trying to mitigate the risks ex
to which you're exposed in the portfolio
you have at that moment. Right? We're
going to diversify. Don't put all the
eggs in one basket. We have a bunch of
different baskets. Well, we're not going
to have a manufacturing basket in Hawaii
at scale. We'll have it in niches like
Oceanit that can do amazing thing with a
bunch of brilliant engineers and
mathematicians and you know all those
guys. But you're not going to do you're
not going to assemble automobiles in
Hawaii.
And
we should be doing other things. My view
of the things we do now is that there
the reason we have an opportunity an
opportunity to try something else. But I
don't know what I'm I'm not the pick a
winner from the list guy. I don't I I
can't make the list. I I gave up pretty
early. I'm not sure anybody can. But I
am sure that entrepreneurship
and imagination
and as I suggested a second ago the
ability to chance if you've got a job
you've got a you know you go to work
every day at the resort and you do keep
the books you know or whatever you do um
maybe when you go home you can
start up something on the internet or I
don't know it's a different world we
live in now the pathways to the rest of
the world are different from the ones uh
when you know the at the time of
statehood where the pathway to the rest
of the world in 1959 at the time of
statehood was commercial passenger jet
aviation two things happened in 1959
statehood and the Boeing 707 the first
commercial commercial passenger jet able
to fly to Hawaii so yeah it is a
challenge It should always be a
challenge to try to do something else to
try to uncover to discover something
that we can do better than anybody else
and then add to the list of of things
and diversify the list of so yeah I I'm
a you know I'm a champion for the people
that are chancing it. I'm also kind of a
realist in that there is something to be
said to be said for specializing in your
comparative advantage. Don't not do that
to do the other things. Both are
possible at the same time.
>> There you go. You know what? One of the
things I think we have to address is the
changes since statehood. in fact the
changes since co um so they they say we
have nearly full employment that's
pretty good but is that is that real can
we rely on that um and the numbers do
suggest right now that we have a kind of
no growth stagnation in terms of
development of business community
opportunities for young people all that
>> um and we have a brain drain especially
poignant for the medical profession and
they're all leaving town um we have
competition from other resort
destinations in the world who don't have
a problem in competing with us. And we
have a a strange change in the real
estate market. I mean, people more than
ever can't afford a first home and
people can spend people from offshore
can spend millions for some of these
condos and overlook the blue tents, the
blue tents of the homeless. And so these
these changes are visible. Um, and to
me, and then you walk down Bishop
Street, which used to be a place with
three-piece suits from Japan. Um, no
longer the case. Um, and you walk down
Bishop Street, there's nobody there.
Monday through Friday, don't even talk
about the weekend. And what I'm
suggesting is what the message I get is
that we are ready to fall off a cliff.
Even if it looks good on some metrics,
we are ready to fall off a cliff. What
do you think?
I'm not as
catastrophically inclined. Um, but I
will say that rather than climbing the
hill of success and achievement
and economic growth, we're kind of
skating along the edge of the cliff. The
difference is that
we could keep doing it, but the risk, as
you point out, is you could stumble and
fall off the cliff, or worse yet, a gust
of wind could come, you know, from
Middle East oil prices or from this
geohysical shock that we just went
through. We're It's like a bowling pin
of hurricane. worth the bowling pins of
hurricanes passing nearby the island of
Oahu and maybe hitting the other
islands. Big rain on the big island with
La
Beat down on Kauaii and Niha with you
know LOL and all the people on Aahu we
made it through. Okay. Yeah. No, that's
vulnerability.
But to be clear when I say not falling
off the cliff but sort of skating along
the edge of the cliff, let's just let's
look at some more of these data. So
here's job growth
which you can see in the last couple
years has just shriveled and shriveled
and is now kind of plus or minus
whatever the average is about zero. And
when you look at the totals, both Aahu
and the neighbor islands, just growth
fading from about two 1 to 2% per year
to 0 to 1% per year and then basically
on average closer to zero per year. That
flattening out of the job counts means
right now employment in Hawaii is not
that different from what it was 20 years
ago and it's less than it was about 8 to
10 years ago. And some of it is just
structural. When you look at the age
distribution of the population,
there just more residents
aged 65 to 74 than there are residents
aged 15 to 24. When you think about who
in the workforce among the boomers or
Gen X, so the I've got the female
population on the left side of this
chart and the male population on the
right side, the women live longer
because, you know, they're smarter. But
the boomers retiring
and the Gen Xers that follow us who will
be retiring over the next couple decades
outnumber absolutely
the Gen Z's and the Gen A's that are
coming up through the education system
to replace us. The millennials are
mostly in the workforce, but even their
numbers aren't bigger than ours. And
then there's a bunch of, you know,
external things that I'll get off the
slides here in a second. But, you know,
what are you going to do about the price
of petroleum? Nothing. You just got to
eat it until it goes away as a as a
challenge. So, as I say, we're in a
situation where by many measures, we're
just kind of going sideways in terms of
employment. Sometimes it's higher. Some
decades are higher, some decades are
lower. right now are sort of in between
where we've been over benchmarking to
the first 20 years of the century. And
we face these
risks from exogenous shocks like the
price of oil going from $70 to $120 a
barrel. And uh that uh then show up
everywhere else in our transportation
uh costs and our energy you know our
electricity costs in the cost of
producing the goods and services uh that
aren't primarily associated with energy
but are indirectly uh as we all are
affected by energy costs. That
vulnerability
I think is the the issue we can agree
upon that, you know, one false step. Off
the cliff you go. Uh that's to me the
real danger in Hawaii.
>> Yeah. Well, let's talk about what
happens. Let's talk about what happens
if, you know, as you say, we're on a
we're walking along the cliff and we we
fall off, we fall down, we somehow, you
know, the the worst case analysis is
realized or a bad case analysis is
realized. What does that look like? Can
can you paint a picture for me? When I
wake up in the morning, how is life
going to be different? How is my walking
on Bishop Street going to be different?
How is life in Wy Ki going to be
different? Um, can you give me a a
picture of that? Yeah, let me show you
two different pictures. How, you know,
some some things are pretty clearly
gnarly. That's a technical term in
economics, gnarly. And uh and then
another example that's kind of it's a
bit more of a headscratcher. So, here's
one just looking at passengers
deplaning airplanes. We get these data
on a daily basis. This is a really good
highfrequency real-time indicator of
what's going on in the tourism part of
the economy which is about 15% to 20%
you know maybe 17% of Hawaii GDP another
six percentage points is maybe the
military on the neighbor islands
places like uh Maui and and um and
Kauaii until this last weekend maybe uh
about 30% of GDP. So if you if you look
at arrivals relative to the trend from
the 201s, so just think about the last
decade as the benchmark. If you're on
trend, then there's no deviation from
the trend. So these are dtrended
arrivals. You're on the trend. So the
trend so it, you know, there's no
deviation from the trend. That's zero.
Then comes the mother of all deviations
from trend, the COVID pandemic.
Everybody has to hunker down everywhere
in the world. Tourism shuts down
essentially for about 6 months until we
figure out we adapt. We figure out
safety protocols in which if people can
demonstrate that they have received a
negative COVID test.
We invite them to get on an airplane and
come on down here. And then within a few
months, COVID vaccines, which while we
didn't require that anybody get
vaccinated, reassured us as a
destination and other travelers who
would be exposed to communicable
disease. uh these adaptations made it
possible for us to recover the travel
volumes in relatively short order. I
mean it we're talking about years but by
2022 within two years of pandemic on
onset we have this shot at getting back
to what I've labeled here full
resilience getting back to the path we
were on in the 201s. Now you can see
subsequently that Hawai's drifted away
from that path. I use as an example of
what seems like an obvious
negative just looking at the picture,
but I have to remind the audience and
maybe even you, Jay, that some people
think this is a good thing in Hawaii,
and here's the weird part of
interpreting economic data. Some people
wanted there to be less tourism
straight up. They may couch it in they
want more diversification,
but making less of something as a way to
diversify what you've got is kind of the
bucks for Lolo way of doing it. Anyway,
that's a pattern I can't oops I can't,
you know, uh overemphasize in terms of
its relative relevance given the
structure of the Hawaii economy. But you
mentioned housing and let's let me show
you another one that I'm not sure people
have have recognized, but it's a real
thing. And uh now I'm starting to see
YouTube videos from Aahu realtors that
are saying, "Hey, check this out."
Because let's just say with high
mortgage rates, rising treasury yields,
higher inflation, and risk of higher
inflation expectations confronting us uh
as a as a macroeconomy. Maybe not the
best year for uh residential real
estate. Well, check out what's happening
with home prices on Aahu. It's the tale
of two segments.
On the left side of the screen, I have
single family prices and as you
indicated, these prices keep going up
and from an affordability standpoint
present a challenge. So for example, if
prices on the left, if single family
home prices are rising 4% per year,
then you need your income to rise in
round numbers 4% per year in order to
afford the same house you could have
afforded a year ago or a few years ago
at the same interest rates. There's
three elements that there there's three
ingredients to this dessert or dinner if
it's a main course. Your income, the
price of the housing unit, and the rate,
the mortgage interest rate at which you
can finance
leveraged purchases of the house. But as
long as everything's in alignment, if
you know home prices are rising at a
rate that between you're increasing
productivity over time, you become
better at your job, you learn new
skills, your income goes up because your
employer uh consciously
uh um compensates you for inflation in
some way, then maybe you're okay. On the
single family side of the market on the
left here, you see this big upward shift
in prices after COVID. And now after an
overshoot, now single family prices are
on a parallel track. They're still
rising at 4%.
But with an extra $100,000
of price increase that never went away
after the infla after the post-pandemic,
you know, bubbleicious overshoot. Now
look at the right side of the screen.
Look at condos. Condos are rising
slightly faster, maybe 5% in the 201s.
But then a couple years ago, they
completely derailed. They got on the
offramp. Median condo prices on Aahu
have been going sideways for the last
several years. And the inventories are
piling up, piling up. I think there's
something like six or seven months of
inventory remaining in the condo side of
Aahu's housing market. and only two to
three months of inventory remaining on
the single family side. What the hell
happened? Well, first let's just remind
our younger viewers or the young
professionals that are still hoping to
have a shot at housing. If condo prices
aren't rising and single family home
prices are on the island of Aahu, then
the condos are becoming relatively more
expens I'm sorry, relatively more
inexpensive.
other things equal keeping incomes and
mortgage rates etc. Hold those constant
for a minute. Just the fact that condo
prices are not rising while single
family home prices are means that condos
are becoming more affordable. Now, I
can't control what happens with interest
rates, and that's not a good story right
now, but presumably someday would get
better. I can't control what happens
with income, but you can control that.
you know, learn some AI skills, take
some night classes, watch some YouTube
videos, include your productivity and in
the market for labor, maybe you'll be
rewarded for in for raising your skills
and productivity. But I'm just saying
looking at these prices, it's just a
fact that condos
remarkably on Aahu have gotten less
expensive. By the way, um this is one of
these be careful what you wish for
things because let me just show you the
next couple slides. If you look at these
prices, single family on the left, Kano
on the right, across the Hawaiian
Islands, the neighbor islands have
gotten more expensive post pandemic
relative to a preandemic benchmark. I've
I've benchmarked 2019 is 100 for every
county. Now, let's drop Maui in.
Remember, single family on the left,
condos on the right. Without Maui, with
Maui, without Maui, with Maui, without
Maui,
with Maui. What the hell is happening on
Maui?
They ban vacation rentals.
So,
prices collapse. The problem for the
people on M and every Well, that means
they're more affordable. Yeah. Yeah, it
also means that everybody owns a condo
is poorer than they were before they
passed this bill. And he's these are the
actual home price distributions uh on
Maui. So be careful what you wish for.
Achieving it might be costly in other
ways. And by the way, you could just
build more housing units and then you'd
have more housing units. So what's the
problem here? But these two situations,
both the one involving
Maui condos versus the other islands in
general and the one involving single
family home price dynamics and condo
prices on Aahu are indicative of how
much
the underlying factors matter. mortgage
interest rates or whatever they are,
Treasury Secretary Bessant is going to
do this to the yield curve and and Fed
Chair Worsh, Kevin Worsh is going to do
the other thing. And maybe the president
will be happy, maybe he won't. Who
knows? We do nothing about that we can
control in Hawaii.
But condos are distinctively doing a
different thing on Aahu than single
family homes. One of the theories behind
it is remote work. Kanos on Aahu are
located in the urban core. If you can
work remotely in the suburbs and exerbs
and zoom town of Hal Eva, then maybe
selling your condo that's close to
downtown where you used to work as you
say
and moving to the country um where you
can
commute remote, you know, electronically
is more advantageous. The flip side of
that is that condos in the urban core
benefit from something
that that only happens in dense urban
environments. Proximity
is mobility,
right? Density is proximity. Proximity
is mobility. And if they slap a train
right down to your condo
sometime in the next couple years, well
then getting around getting to the
airport is not that big a problem. So
younger people, if you're looking young
couples, if you're looking to move out
of that four, you know, fourstory walk
up singer cinder block apartment
at the corner of McCully and Young
Streets. You know, we all lived in this
same apartment when we got out of
college or where our parents kicked us
out of the house. The cinder block walk
up apartment from 1959 that's all over
Moily. Um, if you're thinking, you know,
maybe this is a time to be looking at
moving up and take the advice that I did
not take when I first came back to
Hawaii. A wise man once told me, "Just
buy the crappiest
studio you can find because then the
appreciation is yours, not your
landlords, and you got to you got to get
on, you know, you got to get on the
escalator. Then you can jump up to a
one-bedroom apartment. Then you can jump
up to a two-bedroom townhouse in Ava.
Then you can jump up to a threebedroom,
two and a half bath bath house in Milani
town. And then you can move up to Milani
Mala. And then after the kids leave, you
can sell your big ass house at the back
of Milani Mala and move down to a condo
in Kakaako and downsize. And you can
walk to the cafe for coffee every
morning. So that's a the circle of life
brought on. That's that's what's
happening on Aahu and and on a different
thing happening on the neighbor islands
obviously. Why condos on the neighbor
islands are in resort areas. Condos tend
to be in the vacation short-term rental
pool. Condos are appealing on the
neighbor islands to the digital nomads
who can work remotely.
Different kind of different kind of
remote worker on Aahu who who used to
commute downtown like you and I both did
for decades that and downtown dude
downtown when I met you in the 1980s
downtown was rocking it. You know what I
mean? Or maybe it's the 1990s. I'm just
saying when I came back to Hawaii in
1985, man, being downtown was awesome.
And uh where the action was, you could
drinking after work, you know what I
mean? Catch the bus home, so you know,
get ticket.
>> Come on.
>> Well, let's let's uh let me ask you my
my final question, Paul.
>> Yeah.
>> And that is um where where are we going
here? And more important, what can we do
about it? Now, there are three or four
what can we do about it elements here.
Number one is what can I do about it?
That's the individual person. Uh and
that's that's a lot of different
categories. I know.
>> Yeah.
>> Um and then what can the small business
do about it or large business in Hawaii?
What can they do about it?
>> Yeah.
>> And finally, what can government do
about it to help us out to be more
resilient, less vulnerable? And finally,
I don't know if we have time for this,
but finally, if you were advising the
president of the United States, whoever
he was, um, what to do about it, you
know, to make the economy better for
everyone in the country, what would you
advise? Okay, that's a fourpart. Did I
say four? Four part question. You got
some answers for me?
>> Yeah, sure. I I can make up answers, but
let me start. the president, the the
state or let's say county governance
government governance
in Hawaii uh the business at the
business enterprise level and then
individually at the top bro nobody going
to listen to me over there you know what
I mean I mean I'm sorry first of all
they kind of speak pigeons so and I'm
only kind of faking it you know what I
mean but um I'm a very conventional sort
of neoc classical economists, the
traditions that I was taught in are very
different from the ones embraced by the
current administration. And therefore,
other than a change of administration, I
don't see how anything I would have to
say would be worth the effort. Um, so I
will I will express my voice through my
vote and um and by advocating for the
things that I think in in economic
theoretic terms are the right way we
ought to be thinking about approaching
economic policy, state and county
governance. I would have to say there I
have a little bit I just realized how
dark it is where I'm sitting. I'm sorry
about that you guys. I need to shine a
light on myself. Um I have had the
extraordinary privilege of um being
asked to share uh you know my knowledge
and ideas uh at various points in my
life and my career with state and
government uh state and county
government officials and and so the and
I've always said sort of the same kind
of thing which is um
go back to econ 101. You know, economic
theory is there for a reason. There's a
lot of good ideas that sometimes are
counterintuitive, counterintuitive, like
they they don't make obvious sense until
you uh you know, have guys like me help
you walk through why it's important. Um,
broadly speaking, I would say that over
the arc of the last half century or so,
uh, in state and local governance, we've
adopted institutional mechanisms design
that, uh, institutional mechanism design
or designs that are obstructive on
balance
rather than facilitative. I used this
example a second ago about how how to
manage recreation. We all have
smartphones. We all can all can go on an
app and you can do cap and trade.
Basically, you can mitigate the loading
on our natural recreational resource
endowment
by moving people around by charging
higher prices when there's more people.
And that's just an algorithm, right? You
don't you don't have to just an
algorithm. The math will do that for
you. We should also be producing more
public goods. Why do we have the same
number of parks and recreation areas on
Aahu as we had when I was a kid? I where
I live, the parks are literally the same
parks that were there when I was in
elementary school. What up with that?
What up with all the people who've been
paying property taxes for 50 years? So
there are things we can do and advocate
at state and local um governance levels
and within these halls of state and
local government that my impression is
that leaders good leaders are happy to
uh hear from you. And so when asked,
show up and by all means uh reveal your
preferences through our our
opportunities uh to vote and to
communicate directly with public
officials. Businesses in Hawaii are
constrained
by the structure of the Hawaii economy.
By that I mean the structure
of economic activity itself, which I
think it's important to remember. So,
while I'm talking about this, I'll I'll
shine a light on it uh graphically
uh
in just a second. Um it is what it is.
The Hawaii economy is what it is. We all
have a role in changing it. That's
partly what we're talking about uh here.
But the fact of the matter is you wake
up in the morning and this is the pie
chart.
Tourism and the military are not too
big. Not on a This is Aahu. Okay. The
other islands, do I have those in here?
Yes, the other islands are more
dependent on tourism. I mentioned Maui
and Kauaii at about 30%. But yeah,
change it if you want. I'm just saying
the non-ourism part of the Aahu economy
is 80% of the economy. That means bro
you get chance figure something out
do it better than somebody else and
that's competition. Now another part of
so just look at the pie chart. There's a
reason why tourism is 30% of Maui and
Kauaii's economy.
If you believe and actively engage
in political advocacy
to diminish the absolute size of those
sectors of the economy, you are putting
people out of a job. You are taking
their income and the futures for their
children. So be mindful. Okay. The other
structural thing to think about has to
do with competition.
We're talking about business now and a
small
open economy. That's what Hawaii is. A
small open economy heavily exposed to
the rest of the world because the rest
of the world makes everything better
than we can
in that funky warehouse in the back of
Kapa Corey, you know, on Dump Road in
Kyua for God's sake. That's an actual
industrial site.
And so that's the nature of the the
structure of the economy in Hawaii.
We're a small open economy. We rely on
the rest of the world. We export these
things that we have to the rest of the
world in order to import our smartphones
and our cars and everything else. And
that structure need not be limiting as
long as you're focused in your business
on where the leading edge is. The
leading edge can be at the what's called
the
what is it called the exttrinsic margin
anyway outside on the frontier it can be
located inside the organization
in the tools that you're adopting to get
your work done that may be AI right now
it certainly was computers
back when you and I were young whippers
snappers and you know figuring out do I
have to do my on coding. No, not
anymore. Yay.
Um,
so and then finally, structure of
industry matters.
There are forces in the economy,
basically the most important one in the
re in the last few decades are what are
called network effects wherein if we're
all on the same network, it's way more
valuable to us than if we're on separate
networks. And so, I don't know if I can
say this on your channel, but Google and
Microsoft make a [ __ ] ton of money
because we're all on their network.
That sucks because it makes the income
distribution widen out and some tech bro
a-holes
make more money than they probably
should because the rest of us are doing
our searches on Google and learning a
lot from Google Gemini, let me tell you.
You know what I mean? So, embrace the
tools, but structure may mean that
you're down here duking it out with the
rest of the peasants on Google Gemini
trying to make your business more
productive, which then takes us, which
is the link to the individual level.
It's all about productivity.
It turns out it's deeply rooted in early
childhood non-cognitive and cog and
cognitive development. Like the roots go
all the way back there. Skills speak at
skills. So they build on each other
through life. And you have to keep
increasing your productivity. So, I'm
going to bite the bullet next week and
spend three and a half hours every day
taking an online course for which I paid
money
in
big data and data science and machine
learning and a bunch of stuff that I
like to pretend I know something about
because if I don't, I'm going to be a
dinosaur. You have to keep moving
forward. And these kids, I've got to
tell you, there may not have been very
many of them born. What's up with that?
But some of them are really smart.
I mean, it's too late to make new kids,
you know? We just have to deal with the
kids that are out there. But yeah, some
of them, I don't know. I've been
blessed. Again, I've been lucky in a lot
of ways. But I get these kids call up,
hey, can I be an intern? I'm like, I
can't pay you any money, but you're cool
with that. You can be my intern all day
long. And oh man, they're so smart. They
just it's amazing. It's a re it's
reassuring. Uh because let's face it, as
a 70some, you know, I walking down the
street a lot of time. I'm like why I
yada and uh young whippers snapper. Um I
turned into my grandfather. But uh so I
they're not going to listen to me, but I
got big ideas. State and local
government. I've been fortunate to been
able to make a contribution from time to
time when asked. Always ready to say
let's
my general message for St. Louis
government. It's about bandwidth and
boundaries. Credible boundaries to keep
it from doing the things they shouldn't
and more bandwidth so we can push more
stuff through so we can move faster. And
at the business level,
look at the structure of the economy.
Look at the structure of competition.
Look at the structure of the labor
force. There aren't bodies for you to
hire the way they were when I graduated
from Kylo High School in the 1970s and
the unemployment rate was 10%.
What's the unemployment rate now? Like 2
and a half%. 2 and a half% unemployment
means the only people that don't have a
job are people who are looking for a job
and people who will never get a job.
You know what I mean? So that's harder
work when when 10% when one out of 10
people is out of work, trust me, they'll
go, "Bro, I drove a forklift at Dole
Canary." You know what I mean? I I
worked on I worked at the end of the
printing press as a fly boy. You know
what a fly boy is? the guy who takes the
newspapers and ties them up and takes
the newspapers and ties them up eight
hours a day thinking they don't have a
machine for this.
It's a different world and you got to
keep at the forefront whether you're a
business, especially if you're an
individual in a period of rapid
technological change that is going to
create winners and losers. And the only
way to be a winner is to get out ahead
of it. Get right to the forefront and
learn something that keeps you
in demand.
I don't know. That's we all went through
it, you know. First came the mainframe
computer, then came the personal
computer, then came the internet, then
came the smartphone, then came the apps.
And I'll be happy to do a whole another
show with you about how much it sucks
that some people made way more money
because of the nature of that
technological evolution
from whatever would have been the
alternative but wasn't. That's the
reality of how things turned out. So get
in on it. Don't don't be the elevator
operator. That used to be a job.
Go watch the old movie. The bug is they
get on the elevator and so sixth floor
and the guy goes, "Okay, brother. Sixth
floor."
That was a job.
Happy that guy.
Oh, Paul, I so enjoy your energy. That's
fabulous. And this has been a fabulous
discussion. And I'm going to hold you to
the notion about doing another show that
I know there's a lot more. Uh, we didn't
we didn't cover all your slides and we
didn't cover all that you have to say.
So, I want to come back. We'll call it
economics 303.
>> Yeah, there you go. Oh, I think there is
one of those already. Anyway,
>> thank you so much, Paul. Our guest, Paul
Brewaker, principal of TZ Economics, for
this great discussion. I'm Jay Fidel,
host of Community Matters. The title of
this episode has been troubles in the
national economic outlook and what can
Hawaii do about it. Thanks to our
viewers for watching. We'll see you
again soon for the next one. Aloha.
Aloha Paul. Shah.