TPES 2024: Dr Raffael Zamper "Select cases in liver transplantation"
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Dr. Raffael Zamper presented three critical cases from the 2024 Transplantation of the Pancreas and Esophagus Symposium to illustrate the indispensable role of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in managing unexpected hemodynamic complications during liver transplantation. In the first case, a patient experienced severe hypovolemia and right ventricular failure during the anhepatic phase due to insufficient collateral circulation, requiring aggressive fluid resuscitation. Upon reperfusion, the patient suffered a cardiac arrest caused by right ventricular ballooning and stasis, which was successfully managed with adrenaline, chest compressions, and mechanical support involving pulmonary vasodilation with nitric oxide. The second case involved a 50-year-old patient with cirrhosis who developed a massive thrombus extending from the inferior vena cava into the right atrium after reperfusion, leading to complete left ventricular emptying and hemodynamic collapse. TEE was crucial in identifying this obstruction, guiding emergency thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (TPA), and monitoring clot resolution despite significant bleeding complications that required massive transfusion and a return to the operating room for hemostasis.
The third case highlighted the phenomenon of systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve, which developed after inferior vena cava clamping and resulted in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and severe mitral regurgitation. This condition was initially exacerbated by hypovolemia but resolved with fluid administration, phenylephrine, beta-blockers, and isoproterenol, as confirmed by real-time TEE imaging showing the return of normal leaflet position and flow dynamics. The speaker emphasized that despite favorable preoperative investigations in all three patients, intraoperative hemodynamic instability was inevitable without continuous monitoring. These scenarios collectively demonstrate how TEE allows for the rapid detection of life-threatening issues such as right ventricular failure, massive thrombosis, and SAM, enabling immediate therapeutic interventions like thrombolysis or vasoactive drug adjustments that significantly contribute to procedural success and improved patient outcomes.
The subsequent Q&A session addressed broader clinical practices regarding pulmonary hypertension management, the routine use of TEE in transplantation centers, and anticoagulation strategies. Speakers from various institutions confirmed that while practices differ between regions, particularly concerning the aggressive use of left ventricular assist devices or the threshold for proceeding with transplants in patients with elevated pulmonary pressures, TEE has become a standard of care in many high-volume liver and lung transplant programs. Discussions also touched upon the challenges of interpreting flow velocities in pulmonary veins during lung transplantation, where surgeons often tolerate higher flows to avoid unnecessary surgical revisions on delicate structures. Furthermore, the panel debated the administration of antithrombotics like heparin and TPA doses, noting that while some centers are increasingly adopting prophylactic measures to reduce transfusion rates, others remain cautious due to bleeding risks, especially in patients with complex coagulation profiles.
In conclusion, the presentation reinforced the message that transesophageal echocardiography is an essential tool for liver transplant anesthesia, providing real-time guidance that bridges the gap between preoperative predictions and intraoperative realities. The cases shared underscored that even with optimized medical management, dynamic changes in hemodynamics can occur rapidly during surgery, making continuous imaging vital for survival. The consensus among the panelists was that while certification requirements and specific protocols vary, the ability to visualize cardiac function and guide interventions like thrombolysis or vasoactive support is paramount. Ultimately, the integration of TEE into routine practice empowers anesthesia teams to navigate complex scenarios with greater confidence, ensuring that critical complications are identified and treated promptly to facilitate successful graft function and patient recovery.
Read the full video transcript
hi everyone thank you for joining the
meeting today it's a pleasure to be part
of this event not only as a speaker but
as a member of the planning committee as
well uh in this presentation I'll
discuss some selective cases in liver
transplantation focusing on how interop
played a crucial role in managing
unexpected hemodynamic
complications uh before I begin I
declare that I have
no
e
e e
recording in progress
and this steel frame shows the flow
convergence in the uh Vina contractor
and we classified this TR as at least
moderate Med of AIO RV flow outflow
showing normal circumferential
shortening of the RV you can see the PA
catheter cles to the rvot down
there and here we appreciate the same TR
jet that we saw before four and the four
chambers with a minimo I say Trace Pi in
the
rvot continu wave doler of the TR jet
gave us an
[Music]
estimated recording in
progress e
heavy inflow outflow reinforc a
significant drop in the preload to the
heart two Chambers view showing empty LV
as well
and the long axis shows the same also
showing absence of Sam systolic interior
motion of the mitro valve and all this
find is they are quite common during
clamping they're compatible with severe
hypo hypovolemia which is usually
managed with some fluid administration
and vas oppressors however in this
patient specifically I'd say that a
larger than usual amount of fluids was
necessary to achieve a tolerable
hemodynamic situation um and um that was
possibly due to some lack of collateral
circulation or insufficient collateral
circulation so the patient received
approximately four liters of fluids and
that included crystalloids 5% alumin and
one unit of red cells and that was all
during the anhepatic
phase then as we proceed to the
reperfusion the situation became very
complicated so the EOC cardiogram
initially showed right ventricular
distension as you can see and that was
different from the initial
exam RV inflow outflow showed good
reperfusion of the graph with this uh
artifacts that resemble air bubbles but
actually are U Cod fluid mixed with
blood coming from the
raft and the LV now was uh last empty
than during the anhepatic phase but we
were expecting a larger chamber uh with
a you know as a surrogate of a higher
cardiac output due to the uh significant
increase in preload to the
RV and we had the same impression when
we look at the long access
View and then the right ventricle begin
to show signs of failure with the
lateral wall displaying reduced contra
ility now directly correlating with the
left ventricles difficulty in maintain
adequate card output due to under
feeling so you can see septo deviation
to the left
side and this patient eventually
progress to right ventricular ballooning
with almost no feeling on the left side
of the heart and that culminated with a
cardiac arrest in
PA so initiate did resusitation with
adrenaline and chest compressions and we
managed to restore spontaneous
circulation after couple rounds of
CPR still the EOC cardiogram revealed
signs of stasis possible small clot in
the right atan indicating potentially a
trombos formation due to low float State
during the cardiac
arrest and we use dyotropic support and
Pulmonary viso dilation with nitric
oxide to stabilize the patients and that
allowed the surgery to be
completed good cardiac output was
restored and at the end of the procedure
we basically had a hyperdynamic normal
functioning heart
RV showing basically a normal systolic
function the four chambers and kind of
an RV flow out
flow but you can see good fractional RF
shortening good circumferential
shortening
here and same for the LV on the four
chambers in two Chambers View
and here's a long axis uh although this
patient had an extended ICU length of
stay he eventually was discharged home
with a good function of the liver graft
no neurological deficits which was a
positive outcome given the extremely
critical intraoperative
scenario moving on to our second case
today we have a 50 years old patient
with curosis from metabolic disease M
score 25 Child Bug
C12 patient had a history of hepatic
compensation with enop and atis and a
recent GI scope showed large esophagi
overis with no signs of active bleeding
he also had a history of insulin
dependent diabetes hypertension
obstructive liap apnea asthma gird and
psoriasis uh this patient's preoperative
Echo also seem quite favorable showing a
hyperdynamic left ventricle with an EF
between 65 and 70% normal right heart
and coronary angiogram that showed no
coronary artery
disease so this is the interop echo that
initially showed normal B ventricular
systolic
function looking at the RV specifically
this again little enlarged due to fluid
overload overload from curosis that I
mentioned
before we even had this 3D of the RV
confirming normal systolic function you
can have a good you know sense of RV
function using the 3D image at the top
of your
screen however after reperfusion you
know patient had a hemodynamic collapse
which we quickly identified through a te
to be caused by this massive trombosis
extending from the IVC into the right
atrian
ventricle but was practically blocking
the blood flow through the
heart you can note the U complete
deviation of the interal septum to the
left and the left ventricle completely
empty unable to be filled
adequately RV in flow outlow shows the
massive clot crossing the RV the
situation required an emergency
intervention we end up administering out
of plays in incremental doses while
perform in
CPR and te was crucial in monitoring the
response to autop plays uh and that
gradually show the clots decrease in
sign in size and uh normalization of
blood
flows you can see here size of a clot
smaller there's systolic activity in the
RV still dysfunctional but with
contractility
present here 30 minutes after the TPA
there's almost resolution of the clot
with what I would call a normal RV
systolic function at least in this
view close to the end of the procedure
we couldn't see clot in the heart
anymore and at that point patient had
minimal hemodynamic
support however the process as you could
imagine was not without any bleeding
complications the trombolisis with alpl
in the surgical setting led to a
bleeding of very difficult
control the patient required massive
blood transfusions to achieve a
reasonable hemostasia
and eventually was taken to the ICU with
the abdomen still open requiring a take
back to the a few days later for
hemostasis and procedure
completion this patient also did well
with the liver graft functioning
properly and no neurological deficits
being discharged home after a few
weeks and to wrap up the third
case this involves a 64 years old with a
complex history of decompensated
curosis this patient had a previous uh
TPS procedure due to refractory atis had
also an alcoholization of hepatic Nole
and additionally he presented with the
partial nonocclusive portal vein
thrombosis that was an incidental
finding at the time of the diagnosis of
HCC patients preop tte like in the other
cases did not show any significant
abnormalities
left ventricle with normal size
hyperdynamic EF 7075 right ventrical
completely normal in both size and
function and the intop at the beginning
of the procedure showed a normal lvot
without any signs of flow
acceleration um or lvot obstruction as
you can
see this patient had a normal mitro
valve with a normal mitro valve lifl
size as
well however patient develop systolic
anterior motion of the mitro valve which
we call Sam after the clamping of the
IVC that's a phenomenon where the
anterior LIF flat of the mitro valve
moves towards the lvot during syy and
this displacement can cause lvot
obstruction and significant MIT regurge
we usually use the four chambers in the
long view to identify
it that's a steel frame the M of A4
Chambers and it shows the the kink in
the interior mitro valve leflet towards
the
lvot in a gap in the coaptation of the
mitro
valve and that's the cause of a
significant posterior mitro regurg jet
with a prematur close closure of the AR
valve and low cardiac
output I understand this is a very busy
and clutter uh color flow
Doppler and so I have slowed down the
loop to let you appreciate DMR being
generated during late
CST and here's a steel frame
demonstrating the uh severe
jet posteriorly directed with
acceleration in the
lvot here's another loop now in Long
axis to show the deviation of the
citation point in the interior Mally
flat towards the
lot and this slow image so Loop shows
the generation of the mrr jet that you
can see now
and in this case hypovolemia contributed
to the development of sand after
clamping and so to treat it we gave
fluids phrine and also beta blocker to
control heart rate in this case we used
asmol um and as you can see te confirmed
the complete resolution of Sam after
these interventions with the anterior
mitro leaflet returning uh completely to
its normal
position the mitro regurge almost
completely disappeared now with a very
small uh Central jet that was probably
there before and normal flows in the LT
as
well in this Zoom the long axis view
shows normal mitro valve citation
complete resolution of Sam we still with
the clamp
on however U after the clamp was removed
and during reperfusion s reappeared but
now exacerbated by a significant drop in
the svr and peripheral Vis dilation
despite adequate Venus's
return once again Echo was crucial in
guiding our treatment which involved
strict heart rate control and peripheral
V constriction to avoid and we avoided
in this case volume overload because we
knew there was a lot of
preload and with these interventions we
managed to stabilize the patient who was
transferred to the ICU stable without
any uh need for beta blockers and with
minimal visal pressure
support this Loops shows U normal
outflow tracks colorflow dupler minimal
Central Mr and that's in the end of the
procedure and this patient had an
uneventful post-operative course and was
discharged from hosital within the
expected time
frame in conclusion three cases
presented today they demonstrate the
importance of uh intop te uh in patients
undergoing lever transplants in all
cases despite a normal extens preop
investigation the patients developed an
expected hemodynamic collapses during
surgery the first case right ventricular
failure poster
perfusion um second
case massive trombosis identified by
echo echo also used to guide trombolisis
and
resuscitation U third case the
development of Sam during surgery was
quickly diagnosed and treated
demonstrating how te can be vital for
early detection of complications and for
guiding realtime therapeutic
interventions this case they reinforce
the message that te is an indispensable
tool in the inop management of patients
undergoing liver transplants not only
allows rapid and accurate identification
of hemodynamic complications but also
effective guides therapeutic
interventions and that significantly
contributes to procedur of success and
improved patient outcomes
um i' would like to thank the organizing
committee for the invitation and the
opportunity to participate in this
highlevel event available for questions
during the QA session thank you very
much perfect Rafael thanks so much for
that and uh so I'm happy to move over to
the Q&A session where we have our
speakers uh Dr Cosman G join us this
afternoon but uh all the other speakers
are here to answer questions so I'll
just start rolling out by uh one of the
questions I have actually for Jake
something that we see at our Center
sometimes which is um in patients that
have uh secondary ponary hyper tension
due to LV failure um when you do
preoperative swans and you see that they
have elevated PA pressures uh what's the
Approach at your Center for normalizing
those before transplant in order to try
to minimize RV failure
um so I mean what usually I've had
experience with is if they're not
optimized beforehand either with
diuretics or pulmonary Vasa dilators
like
selenop um they're not even heart
transplant candidates so uh if they've
been optimized on medical management and
they've had an improvement or response
to the um
medications um then they'll obviously be
listed so then in the operating room
well usually I'll even start them on
Nitric as soon as we induce and then uh
if it's uh still severe depending on RV
dysfunction and things like that uh I
might even have the surgeons put in uh
wires into the groin before
inducing um so that's usually what I've
done in the past um I'm sure people have
many different opinions but um that's
usually the kind of stepwise i' I've
gone through with it
I think the situation that happens here
sometimes is that we have a patient that
is not necessarily known to have
supremely elevated pulmonary pressures
but then they're managed as an
outpatient they may or may not be on a
cardiomem system and when they come in
for their actual transplant the
pre-operative um PA line shows that they
do have elevated pressure so then the
question is you know we can aggressively
try to get those down with medical
management mown diuretics and the acute
period within like eight hours
transplant but then you know when you go
to sleep and you induce anesthesia and
you initiate positive pressure
ventilation is very different strategy
and I don't think we have a consistent
cut off where which we say okay we're
not going to go ahead with this
transplant versus the ones where we try
to get through um do you have a number
or like I know it's there's no like kind
of right answer but you have a number in
your head that that uh you usually try
to Target before
proceeding um I mean I I don't know of
any data behind the specific number um
but usually what I've dealt with is U
making sure that they're well sedated
have a lot of like opioids on board
they're
paralyzed um uh make sure the volume
status is good and then measure make
sure the number is real and then um if
they need dialysis I I have seen um us
do a inoperative CRT to try and get some
uh volume off uh quickly and see how the
uh uh pulmonary pressure change with it
um and then also with adding the Nitric
and seeing how they respond um and then
kind of just discussing with the surgeon
like is this a good patient do they have
other comorbidities involved is this
strictly just a a type two pulmonary
hypertention um is there renal failure
things like that um and then it's kind
of like a a multidisiplinary
decision um but it it's not an easy
answer I I think generally speaking
um like 2third systemic is probably
where I would kind of start thinking
like hey I don't know if this is a great
choice but um definitely the
conversation with the surgeon would be
at least with half
systemic I think one of the things that
maybe differs between Canada and the US
is that the well we hear anyway is that
the US surgeons are much more aggressive
in terms of putting them on lvads as
they wait for versus Canada but it's
just something that's going to be sent
are specific as well okay we have a
question from the chat which is has
anybody demonstrated improved outcomes
with the use of te for lung
transplant I'll open this up for yuliam
and Jen I think Jane already was um
addressing the question Jan you want to
go ahead and um yeah sure uh we have I
don't think there's anything that out
there that has demonstrated specifically
that te uh for lung transplant has
improved outcomes and I think that comes
that ties together with um a that's
question and Marchant who was texting me
about this as well um it's just the
decision-making process for addressing
stenosis compression a kinking of an an
asmosis it's not just we see it fix it
first of all you have all kinds of
things that affect your
measurements uh and two um you know just
because you fix something doesn't mean
that can make it better and so I think
it's just it's so specific to each
patient and the surgeon
uh and you know the donor lungs the
recipient lungs I don't I think it'd be
very hard to prove that this is going to
affect your
outcome I I mean I agree I think that uh
with the accent of uh randomized you
know control trial it's very hard to say
this is a standard of care you know uh
the te will you know uh definitely you
know improve Alon and whoever is not
using te you know is uh you under
standard of care we never can do that I
think that it's just a risk benefit
decision uh that you will you know uh
discuss with the patient the surgeons
the team um as Jane I think address in
the in the qia section if you have a
patient that is coming for a single long
transplant no RV dysfunction you know uh
I mean sick but not that sick probably a
te will not make a difference now when
you're talking uh you know about a
patient that has severe you know RB
failure coming for a double Lo
transplant patient that is in a uh Eggo
or will needo or cpv and you're going to
be doing canulation and you know a very
complex case so probably you know the
risk benefit you know will you know tell
you that te will be a good idea that
it's not
definite and just as a Paul just for
context would you say that like what
percentage of liver and lung transplants
at your Center get routine trans
esophagi eloc cardiography I'll say 100%
100% all of our L transplants
yes 100% 100% of livers as well the
surgeons actually loved it sometime they
want the answer of the complications you
know be given by all and by the te which
sometimes is impossible I mean I have to
be honest with you sometime we're doing
a a te in a long transplant and the
patient is so hyper dnamic and the heart
is so compressed that you can really see
anything and the answer is not there but
somehow they feel like okay if you can
give me own answers you know I know what
to do so it's sort of like you know
choice uh and do we we use it for every
case honestly justify probably not but
we do rapael how about at London
experience how many liver transplants
get te there routinely yeah it's close
to 100% Marcus yeah that's a routine um
standard of care here only if there's
any
contraindication I don't remember having
one recently
maybe active bleeding uh from the GI
tract but uh other than that all all
patients get we we one caveat to that is
that we don't do transgastric views here
okay we sit in the esophagus and we
believe that that's enough to guide us
with the um you know most uh complex
scenarios U as you saw my U slides many
of our patients not many but some of our
patients the secret once they still get
a PA
catheter uh which also guides us with
some uh you know management for svr
PVR um but the te is a standard of care
here
100% that's and Jen um just go to go
back to your slides about pulmonary vein
uh like flow velocities and evidence of
turbulence um that we often see that
here and we report it often I I say I
can't always convince the surgeon that
it's going to be hemo dynamically or
clinically significant though and and
what percent like you do they often
accept higher flows given the clinical
context or is it do you have a high
degree of revisions where they no no I I
I don't I can't even recall off the top
of my head anytime I've reported higher
flows that the surgeon has gone back and
fixed it I'm even trying to think back
in Toronto if they've gone back they're
like no it's gonna be
fine yeah I just I just want like so
makes me wonder whether we're using kind
of uh outdated values whether higher
flow velocities are acceptable in lung
transplant because it doesn't seem to
necessarily correlate with worse
outcomes despite some of the papers from
maybe 10 years ago would suggest but I I
don't know the answer to no I I agree
well first of all I think you are gonna
see higher flows regardless even if
there is no problem uh you know they're
hyper dnamic you're on eemo maybe on
bypass like those are just going to
affect your flows so so I think you are
going to see that and um you know those
structures are obviously very delicate
to just say go fix it I don't know
there's a risk there I think there's a
big risk there also but but you know I
do rely on it for someone personally I'm
very stingy with fluid Management in
lung transplants it's really nice for me
to like okay we can do another 500 cc's
and and you know I'm Not Gon to blow up
the
RV yeah that's think that I remember um
one of our transplant surgeons uh when
we hir him uh and you know we did
interview and he was upset with
assessment of the pulmonary veins you
know during the transplant and the only
question that he asked about an doing
the te is that do they know how to do it
and he was so upset that's all he cares
he didn't care about any other you know
thing and it's funny because we do it in
every case so in one case I actually
told him like Hey listen you you know
the Velo are very very high and he
looked at me and say like okay what do
you want me to do about it and I was
like okay
oh it was like you have been obsessed
you know and now we finally are telling
you okay they are super high and you are
asking me what to do about it so yeah
usually they don't do anything they just
sort of like watch it and sometime we
get called to the uh unit later when the
patient is not doing well and there is
no other answer like why the patient is
not doing so well so we get called to
the ICU to could you please interrogate
the pulmonary veins uh again and see if
that is the answer so maybe we can
extent it or maybe we can do something
about it we had the issue and I don't
know if this is a happening any other
institution but we have an issue that
some of our cardiologists um
intervention of CI they are not really
used to make sure pumonary vein flows so
when they get called to the uh bedside
to do it they usually ask for the card
anesthesiology can you do it this is not
something that I do every day so that's
why we get involved you know later in
the ICU unless the ICU person is a card
you know an or someone that is you
t35 and just to appreciate difference
differences in practice um here an noen
will be able to to test to um in lung
transplant they're a little bit
resistant to use inotropy only because
they feel that uh it may uh contribute
to worsening of pulmonary pressures in
the post uh you know transplant period
um do you use Echo to guide your
inotropic decisions or do you tend to
use more vasil constrictors in the acute
peroperative period in then transition
later B was similar to what you guys do
we start with
Nori um and but the the difference is
that we hook up inhal nitric oxide for
everybody everyone yeah yeah yeah yeah
but if there's a question it's more of a
question later if there's ARB
dysfunction no one's going to complain
about noon or Epi I know that was a
thing where you had to have a just
discussion with the surgeons and tono
but here they're way more relaxed about
it but again we do start off in Hil
Nitric from the beginning with everybody
everybody routine Administration yeah
yeah okay I think Marin has a question
we'll go uh Marchin do you
wanna um thank you guys for your
excellent
presentations uh well it's uh you
partially answer my question it looks
like that practicing solid organ
transplantation mandates
Echo um that's true that in our Center
we we don't do it routinely for lungs or
livers but uh maybe we just become lazy
or or it's just believing in our own
practice but uh the examples Rafael
examples which shown we saw it many
times with our liers
some M yeah liver transplants we know
that 20% of candidates developed coron
artery disease
um thrombosis uh we have also
paradoxical emboli in patients with
portopulmonary syndrome where amount of
air going through collaterals was so big
that patients were going to RV failure
we could see it very clearly uh the
question is uh especially in States uh
what about
certification if you are lung transplant
anesthesiologist or liver transplant
anesthesiologist do you need to be
certified echo cardiographer or this is
just basic exams and findings are so
obvious that that maybe basic training
is enough what what is your
opinion uh I you know I in my residency
the liver team was not cardiac trained
and they put to ease for their liver
transplants and it was just there was
they were just expected to be able to
manage you know it was treated like a
rescue Echo but throughout the entire
case and they didn't have any major
issues if there was something some crazy
finding you know there's always a
cardiac anesthesiologist around to ask
but I don't there was no issue and they
were expected to do it from basic
training I think from the survey that
they showed in my slides from 2024 most
of the people were not certified
actually for liver transplant so and
that was one of the
downsides I can share my experience here
in London um we are as small group of
Consultants that do lever uh there is as
Dr gut showed in his presentation there
is a significant overlap between cardiac
and uh Li transplants at a point that
right now five out of the eight are
cardia Consultants as well but the
requirements have been for the next
highes U have been it has been decided
that they have to be te certified the
for the ones right now that are not
certified they were grandfathered but
are still training te on a daily basis
with us and we always do the transplant
in two Consultants uh with one of them
being a te certified person so we're
moving towards uh a direction where te
is a requirement for T certifications a
requirement for Li transplant
anesthesia that's interesting to hear
Marin any follow-up
question no I think it's uh it's Rafael
this is a very good point Point um on
one hand as Jen mentioned this is rescue
which is and I know that in us most of
residents now I get a basic training but
because sometimes these decisions are so
difficult and we need to to make them
quickly probably having certification uh
it puts extra weight on on what comes
from our end because consequences from
surgical re intervention are sometimes
very significant for palman veins I
agree with you I mean we know that
outcome is worse the lung is congested
but the options what to do with them is
is very limited if they try to redo it
surgically it usually makes it even
worse and even if you do stenting it's
also not the most straightforward and
it's very
tricky um so uh but but I liver you are
right Rafa liver is so complex with with
lung or heart we can always crash back
on pump or NE more regroup I think with
liver we can just shoot ourselves yeah
there's no rescue so that's that's and
decision must be made very quickly so
it's a very good point you're correct we
had a five for the past I going to say
three four years we had five
interoperative massive trombosis after
release of the clamp uh all of them were
treated right away with TPA of course we
had to deal with the bleeding afterwards
but uh um none of the patients died in
the O and four of them were were
discharged from hospital eventually
which is way different from what you see
if you search a literature in terms of
mortality for interoperative uh
trombosis I think the administration of
out the plays in a very fresh clots
basically dissolves the clot
um for and and helps U you know
restablish hemodynamics at some
point it's very sobering to think about
um from our from our side only because I
would say we were still we're still at
the place where we use uh te in the
minority of liver transplants i'
probably say in the realm of kind of
like maybe 25% or less and only if
there's a really strong indication in
terms of uh you know cardiac dysfunction
preoperatively so it's uh it's you know
the it was absolutely life- saving in
these case scenarios that you showed and
it just uh you know gives us pause to
think about whether or not we're missing
opportunities to intervene more despite
the fact that you know as an S suggests
there's probably no widespread studies
that show significant clinical impact
but the numbers are probably going to
have to be huge in order for you to
catch a signal right so so it's just
interesting to to see we have another
question in the chat here from victtor
Nera from Halifax and he asks what dose
of TPA do you use in these
cases so hi hi Victor okay can you okay
can anyone do does anyone go first it's
fine I can so in in my place I usually
use I start with 2 milligrams and I go
to four if the clut is big and it
doesn't go away uh some of my colleagues
here actually prefer to start heparine
first they give 5,000 hearin they wait
for the clut to dissolve they say uh it
usually goes away I've noticed that in
their cases but if it doesn't work they
have to go to TPA also so that's the
first dose two milligrams and then four
I think that's what's in the literature
too
and reports Le that is exactly what we
do here in London and uh TPA is not in
the O it takes a couple minutes to
arrive so uh we uh we also give 5,000
uniters of Heering if we see a clot and
this became such a an interesting topic
here multidisciplinary discussed uh that
we end up deciding to administer um
heing 3 to 5,000 units before the clamp
for the high M patients so we do that in
our place too we give 2,000 of Heine on
every case and we we are monitoring the
acts just to see what happens and it's
varable it doesn't help Act is not a
good indicator it's all over the place
you know so it's it depends on the
fibrinogen it's very complicated but one
thing one interesting thing is that
these patients usually they have the
worst coagulation Arrangements because
they're so sick and although we give
Hein we didn't notice an increase in the
bleeding at a point that we we haven't
given protamine after reperfusion to any
of these patients that I can recall so
we never gave for
me so this leads to our next question
actually from the chat which are uh
which and what dose of antithrombotics
are using initially let's start by
answering this question for liver
transplant but I actually want to hear
what people's uh opinions and and um
experiences are with antithrombotics and
lung transplant especially those on ECMO
um just because we're starting to move
in that direction at our Center I would
love to hear what other people are doing
so first off we'll say what are the dose
of
antithrombotics uh that we're using in
liver transplant these days at the very
two to four milligrams we start with two
we go to four I think we have the same
practice so as boluses and fusion or
Bolis bis and is that informed At All by
uh what you see on the them or is it
just empiric is what we no just based on
a
te and in Miami is there any resistance
to administering some U coagulation
products such as octaplex which are a
little bit controversial in liver
transplant uh we do but only after uh
the artery is done I see I see but if if
it was indicated you would have no
problem giving that if we have to yeah
okay and uh
Raphael yeah same doses here to to for
milligrams we we try to avoid um
coagulation treatment as much as
possible before
reperfusion uh we don't have any cont
indications for we we still give
preference to
[Music]
ffb clot reposition and we do use a lot
of fibrinogen concentrate um but there's
no Contra there's no push back for
octaplex or other PCC use here which is
you know Center preference so we still
use ffp sure sure I understand and then
Jenny iiam um do you routinely use
antithrombotics in lung
transplant sorry you might be
muted no we don't we don't we don't use
that just out of curiosity so the
discussion that was happening here is
that we analyzed what the transfusion
rate was was within the first one or two
days of transplant and our transfusion
right here despite the fact that you
know um experientially we would think
that not many of our lung transplants
get blood products in the O it seems
that within the first you know 24 to 48
hours of transplant about 80% 70 80%
were getting transfused which kind of
initiated a quality assurance product of
whether we were missing an opport
project to determine whether we were
missing an opportunity to give
antithrombotics in in an attempt to try
to minimize some blood products
Administration in these patients um do
you have do you have any uh any similar
experience at Miami in terms of your
rate of transfusion I think uh I mean
this is anecdotal from what I've done
here versus in Toronto um I think that
you know if I see a hemoglobin of you
know 7.8 then I'm going to transfuse I
think it was here but I think in Toronto
they like just wait till it drift down a
little bit but I think that's what's
causing the PO that's my that was my
first thought that that's what's causing
the post transplant transfusion that
they got a little bit of fluid and then
they drop down right right I understand
and so also I noticed that it's very
much uh surgeon driven so surgeons will
tolerate a very low you know hemat
during the cases and they will be okay
to you just hold on on any products uh
some Ser will be asking you to you know
give you know blood get products so that
is you know it's a thing that I I I have
noted through the years that vares the
most who is doing the case you know and
what the preference
are and is there any resistance to use
of ffp in lung transplant given that it
has a high antigenic potential and and
potentially highest risk of developing
uh respiratory complications after or is
that not really a concern not not
between us and the surgeon I think the
limiting factors Pharmacy that when you
ask for it it takes so long for it to
arrive unless it's prediscussion
it's just just call for the ffp if you
need it okay I understand okay I'm just
checking the chats here doesn't look
like there's any additional questions
any any additional questions or comments
from our panelists at
all okay thank so much for having us
marus you for this opportunity no no
thank you guys for all your hard work
participation in our Symposium thank you
so
much okay so I think we'll wrap up the
session there and we'll move on to the
lunch break uh we have a a a little bit
of extended time I think we can probably
take about 50 minutes and we'll come
back for uh our next session at 2:00
okay see you all then you