Video summary
The video presents a mixed analysis of the recent Swedish election results, characterized by what the speaker terms "bad news" and "good news." The primary bad news is that the Sweden Democrats have lost support for the first time in their history, dropping from 20.5% of the vote in 2022 to an estimated 17.8%. Despite this decline, the speaker argues that the party achieved significant "real political" success over the last four years by forcing reluctant traditional allies—the Moderates, Liberals, and Christian Democrats—to implement policies that improved Sweden. However, the speaker contends that these gains were insufficient because the party failed to stop the influx of third-world immigration, which ultimately secured a majority for left-wing parties if current alliances hold. The good news offered is the possibility that the historic Center Party might switch to a right-wing coalition, potentially preventing a socialist government from taking power.
A central theme of the critique is the failure of the Sweden Democrats' messaging and their deviation from core principles regarding immigration and citizenship. The speaker argues that while the party was more open about "remigration" and Swedish identity in 2022, they have since adopted confusing concepts like "open Swedishness," which the author finds nonsensical and unappealing. According to the transcript, the party's allies continued to grant citizenships to non-Europeans despite warnings that these individuals would vote for left-wing parties, a strategy the speaker views as a scam. By the time of this video in autumn 2026, citizenship grants have been restricted mostly to other Europeans and Nordics, but the speaker believes it is "too little, too late" because the party lost the election due to this inconsistency. The author insists that the party must redefine its identity around a clear Swedish ethnicity and majority status rather than trying to appease voters with vague inclusivity.
The speaker concludes by urging the Sweden Democrats to abandon passive conservatism and outdated aesthetics in favor of a powerful, forward-looking vision for Sweden. He criticizes the party for lacking "thumos" or aggression, describing their current approach as melancholy and unattractive compared to the desired image of Vikings, palaces, and genius. The core message is that the party's reason for existence is to ensure Sweden remains Swedish by repatriating nearly a million people who do not fit into Swedish society; failing to make this a top priority renders them merely a pale copy of the Moderates. While expressing compassion for the party members who have worked hard, the speaker demands they stand firm in their beliefs regarding remigration rather than trying to please individuals who do not genuinely support their cause. Ultimately, the video ends with a call for the party to analyze its shortcomings and a note that further updates on the final vote counts will be provided in upcoming podcast episodes.
Read the full video transcript
All right. Should I laugh or should I
cry? I don't know. I haven't decided
yet. Anyway, we have some good news and
some bad news. I will leave the good
news to last. I will get on to the bad
news so I get it over with. The Sweden
Democrats, they are losing support for
the first time ever. So, the votes, they
aren't all counted yet. So, this is just
my, you know, initial analysis. So, it
looks like they will receive 17.8 8% of
the votes and in the latest election
2022 they got um 20.5% of the votes. So
actually they have lost support. Now
this is hilarious and tragic in so many
ways. Now I will say the following that
the Sweden Democrats they did good in
terms of real politic. They made
Sweden better over this last four years.
It's just how it is. Sweden is better
now than it was four years ago. They
forced three very reluctant and stubborn
and stupid supposed allies, the Christ
Democrats, the Liberals, the moderates.
They forced them to make Sweden a bit
better. So despite only having 20.5% of
the votes, they made Sweden better. Is
it good enough? No, absolutely not. It's
not good enough. But fact of the matter
is that they made political changes for
the benefit of the Swedish people. So
when I say that the moderates
are now the second largest party that
the moderates they gained in support and
the Sweden Democrats lost in support not
really fair but such is life such as
politics. It's not a fair game in the
list. Now I will also say because I want
to criticize I want to critique the
Sweden Democrats of course. I have a few
things to say that yes they did well in
the real political arena.
But the great irony here as well is that
why did the right lose here? Again, all
of the votes are not counted. And there
is the possibility, and this is the good
news, by the way, that the center party,
a venerable old countryside party. They
might switch to the right, the
right-wing coalition. So, we might
actually avoid a socialist government,
which is, you know, would be absolutely
amazing if we can avoid that. So, those
are the good news. But anyway, as it
looks right now, if the old alliances
hold, then the left-wing side, they are
in a majority. And why is that? Yes,
because of third world immigration. So
if you only look at the non-white vote,
yeah, the uh the um the reds are in um
in the lid, unfortunately.
So what happened? Yes. The following
happened, and this is the great irony.
The Sweden Democrats, they said, "We
don't want to give out any more
citizenships." The um supposed allies,
the liberals, Christ democrats and
moderates, they still wanted to give out
citizenships.
And anyone with you know a modicum of
intelligence will understand that if you
give out citizenships to uh people from
the third world they will vote for
left-wing parties. That is the whole
scam. But anyway the uh supposed allies
of the Sweden Democrats they didn't
listen. They didn't want to you know
limit the amount of citizenships being
given out. It's only now as I make this
video in, you know, autumn 2026, now
we've gotten to the stage where
citizenships aren't really being given
out anymore, unless to other Europeans
and especially uh from the Nordic
countries. So now the changes have been
implemented. But too little, too late,
now they lost the election. And so I'm
just thinking like should anyone be
punished, it should be the other
right-wing parties, not the Sweden
Democrats. Now that being said, I also
want to aim some critique against the
Sweden Democrats because they have been
very bad with their messaging. Good Real
Politically speaking, bad when it comes
to their rhetoric. So back in 2022, they
were more open about remigration.
Authanding target, the remigration
train, they were more open about Swedish
identity. And now, as of late, you know,
I still respect and admire Himokon. He's
been taking a lot of heat for a very
long time. He's been putting in a lot of
hard work over all of these years. So,
I'm not going to, you know, he probably
doesn't feel too good now. So, I'm not
going to be overly critical, but I still
want to say it. And if you want to have
a discussion, I'm not going to say a
debate, but a discussion, a
conversation. Let's do it at Ricks or
something. We can talk about this
concept of open Swedishness because when
you say stuff like that, it's just it's
a weird odd.
I will try to be polite. Had I not been
polite, I would have said an insane
concept. Open Swedishness. It doesn't
appeal to anyone. It's just an odd thing
to say. It's just a strange thing that
doesn't make sense that you can become
Swedish. No, you cannot become Swedish.
You can become a valued member of
society. But when you start to engage in
this really [sighs and gasps]
again just weird crazy theories, it
doesn't appeal to anyone. When you have
this well assimilated immigrants that
will vote for you, they will do so
because they don't want to live in the
third world. They want you to repatriate
people who can't behave, simply put. So
being Swedish or not, that's not a
selling point. It's just an old thing to
say. So please just skip that. Skip that
for the future. Please redefine your
definition. Just say that there is a
Swedish ethnicity. Swed should of course
be the majority in Sweden. This is our
land. This is our story. If anyone wants
to come here to contribute to that
story, fine. If they don't, they need to
live. And you need to be clear about
that because now I haven't really heard
anything about mass remigration. And
also I'm going to try to be as polite as
possible here, but if you are a white
man, if you are a European man, and if
you're not for remigration, there's
something wrong in your head. You are
insane. Very simple stuff. It's 2026.
The game is up. We know what is going
on. There's a great replacement. Don't
be afraid to say it. Don't be afraid to
say that I take the side of the Sweds
instead of these insane concepts such as
open Swedishness that appeals to
absolutely no one. So you need to be
firm with remigration. Otherwise you're
just a pale copy of the moderates. Then
why would anyone vote for you? You need
to be firmer. And also speaking of
aesthetics and messaging, you need to
live behind this dusty old conservatism.
You need to leave behind this parochial
small quaint aesthetics of a cottage in
the countryside. We want a palace in the
countryside. We want Jos Grippen. We
want Carolans. We want Vikings. We want
power. We want genius. We want a Sweden
that is going forward, not backwards. We
don't want to return to the 50s. We want
to go into the future with a Swedish
Sweden that is powerful and on top. You
need to have some thumos, some
aggression, not this passive melancholy.
it's not attractive. So, think about the
aesthetics. Now, I am a patient man. I
know that you have been working hard.
That's why I'm very generous here and
compassionate that I don't want to blame
things on you and blaming your supposed
allies for giving out all of their
citizenships. But also, everyone in the
Sweden Democrats, you need to understand
that your reason of being is that the
Swedish people, we want remigration. We
don't want to be replaced in our own
countries. We don't want all of these
bad areas. So we need to repatriate
almost a million people and you need to
be clear about that. So you can
absolutely not say that this is not the
top of your priorities because if it's
not a top priority and if you signal
that you're happy with your uh the work
you've done now I understand I
personally understand because I know
many of you you have been working hard
but you cannot communicate it to voters
that you're happy because then they
might think aha you're happy but we
still have almost a million people here
who aren't a good fit for Swedish
society. So you need to be clear to say
that our aim is to make Sweden Swedish
again and that includes deporting
repatriating many people. I understand
also it will take a long time. It's not
going to go over four years but there
still needs to be a clear vision of it
at least so people know aha if I support
this party this is the end goal the
Sweden will become majority Swedish
again. So very simple stuff indeed. So
anyway, hopefully the Sweden Democrats,
they can have um hard look in the mirror
and uh you know, analyze their
shortcomings. And I would say like don't
try to appease the middle. Stand firm in
your beliefs. Don't try to appease these
individuals because they don't really
like you to be honest. So anyway, the
good news again is that the socialists,
it looks like they might actually be
kept out of power should the center
party uh do the right thing and form a
coalition. Then we'll see how much
influence the Swan Democrats they will
get. We will see. Anyway, I will update
you. I'll make a podcast episode later
this week. So do subscribe. If you're
watching this on YouTube, which I
suppose the majority of you are, you can
become a channel member. Otherwise, you
can go to Spotify or Substack and you
can sign up there and I will discuss
everything in depth and then we'll know
all of the results as well. So, I'm
recording this on a Monday and on
Wednesday it looks like all of the votes
are uh counted.