Video summary
The speaker explains that he has ceased producing hyperpolyglot investigations primarily due to the extreme risk they pose to his YouTube channel's existence. Previously, these investigations were a staple of his content, but the process involved showing significant portions of the subjects' videos to provide context for viewers. This practice created a vulnerability where subjects who disagreed with the investigation's findings could file copyright strikes claiming theft of their content. The speaker describes living in a state of perpetual fear because receiving three simultaneous copyright strikes would result in the immediate deletion of his entire channel, including all his other projects like his Esperanto and Chinese language channels. Despite fighting off numerous false claims over the years, the constant threat of losing everything has forced him to stop making these videos to protect his massive catalog of work.
The situation has deteriorated further as YouTube's copyright enforcement mechanisms have become increasingly automated and less reliable, effectively allowing anyone to issue strikes without valid proof. The speaker illustrates this with a recent example where he was hit with a strike just eleven days after posting an explanation about why he stopped making such videos; the claim originated from a subject who apparently found his video only after it went viral through a screen recording by another user. He notes that while he does not mind if people react to or reuse his content, the subjects often ignore his requests for comment and retaliate once their videos gain traction. Furthermore, he highlights how the system has evolved to include "keyword claims" and even the hiring of third parties in foreign countries to generate fake court documents solely to trigger strikes, making it nearly impossible for smaller creators to defend themselves against these procedural attacks.
The speaker also references a clip from YouTuber PewDiePie regarding similar issues in the anime community, where channels were struck for merely mentioning titles or showing images without using actual footage, demonstrating how absurd and aggressive the current enforcement landscape has become. He points out that large creators with legal teams can easily navigate these strikes, but independent creators like himself are left to fight a losing battle against automated systems that no longer validate claims before issuing them. This environment has turned content creation into a high-stakes gamble where simply mentioning certain topics or displaying tattoos could lead to hundreds of strikes at once, exhausting the creator's resources and mental energy. Ultimately, he concludes that unless he moves all his content to parallel services—a strategy unlikely to succeed because most viewers only discover him through YouTube recommendations—he will continue to avoid investigations to ensure his channel survives in this hostile ecosystem.
Read the full video transcript
What's up, grinders? Welcome back to the
channel. So, today I want to talk about
hyperpolyglot investigations. All of you
guys down in the comment section from
time to time say, "Evil Deer, when's the
next hyperpolyglot investigation coming?
We miss the investigations. We need more
of them." Well, I would love to keep
providing them all for you, but
unfortunately, they are like playing
Russian [ __ ] roulette with my YouTube
channel, okay? So, last year when I was
deep in the polyglot investigation
sphere, okay? I was constantly living
with like a bead of sweat going down the
side of my face because I would at any
one time have one or two copyright
strikes against my YouTube channel. Now,
these are not valid copyright strikes,
but they were copyright strikes against
my YouTube channel usually because I was
making some type of a investigation
video, and let's just say the outcome of
the investigation was not to the benefit
of the person being investigated, okay?
For those who don't understand, doing a
polyglot investigation
obviously, I need to show some content
of the person that I'm making the
investigation about so you guys can make
a judgment call for yourselves to see
what you think, you know, if the
investigation is actually valid or not.
And that's where the little bit of a
loophole is. So, if you're the person
who's being investigated and you don't
like the outcome of said investigation,
you just claim that I'm stealing your
content and you submit a copyright
strike against me, okay? Now, as I said,
I was living in a constant state of
[ __ ] like perpetual fear because I
was like one to two copyright strikes,
and if you hit three copyright strikes
at any one time, your YouTube channel
basically gets notified that it will be
deleted within 10 days. Like, there's
literally nothing you can do when you're
a YouTube my channel my size, and if you
get those three strikes all at once and
you can't win those strikes, as in you
can't have them reversed,
you're gone. That's it. That's the end
of the [ __ ] channel, okay? So, there
is a reason why I stopped doing polyglot
investigations, and it's it's literally
just out of fear for like my massive
catalog of videos that I built up on
this channel, okay? So, I would love to
keep doing them. Love to be able to keep
exposing, but also lifting up people,
but it's just it's just too risky, okay?
And to give you an example, I haven't
done a new polyglot investigation in
like a year at this point, and yet I am
still getting hit with [ __ ] copyright
strikes over them. For example, I posted
this 11 days ago. I was just randomly
letting you all know why I didn't make a
video. I scroll down here, okay? And I
got a comment, "Bro, I used one of your
video about the cleverest and spottiest
polyglot in the world. Uh I recorded
your video from the screen, and the
video went viral, and now she is about
to file a lawsuit." And then like
obviously little sweating bead, okay? I
don't know how many people are grateful
for exposing her, but she can't accept
the fact that her language and teaching
skills are extremely poor. When I saw
that comment, I was like,
that actually could be a few different
people.
>> [laughter]
>> It could be a few different people. But
then I was like, "Hey, bro, are you
admitting to like straight up stealing
my content and uploading it somewhere
else?" Whatever. I actually don't care
if people like just
you know, do a straight-up chair react
of me, okay? Like I honestly don't care.
Because, well, I'm a reactor, so it
would be it'd be [ __ ] rude if I
didn't care. Like if someone literally
just wants to sit there, watch my entire
video, say nothing, and just sit down in
the bottom left-hand corner just staring
at me as if like they're looking up at
me. I [ __ ] I honestly don't care,
okay? But obviously, other reactors have
different degrees of what they seem deem
to be acceptable. So, in this case,
apparently he recorded my video,
uploaded it somewhere else. I don't
care. Didn't didn't bother me at all.
But it must have got the attention of
said polyglot, okay? Because she filed
[laughter] some type of lawsuit. Now,
I'm not sure if it was an actual lawsuit
or if it was just a copyright claim
against this person, okay? So, I was
aware that this person in question, who
we're going to go check out in a second,
okay? It's listed on my channel. They
probably were only just at this point
finally paying attention to my video
because it went viral via someone else,
okay? And little would you believe it,
just today I got hit with a [ __ ]
copyright strike. Again, one of three,
okay? I thought I was finally safe from
the polyglot like copyright strikes
because I've been hit with like a ton of
them already, okay? And I've fought them
all off. And like I haven't made a video
in a year and yet they're still here
haunting me, okay? So, if I click on
this one, this is a copyright strike
against the video titled is this the
smartest hyperpolyglot in Kazakhstan,
okay? And it is this girl here. Now, I'm
not doxxing her by showing her name
because she literally goes by that name
online, okay? I won't show you anything
else, but she filed a copyright strike
against me. What I'll do is I'll open
this up on YouTube and we'll find a
picture of her just so you know who I'm
talking about, but I ain't reacting to
anything. I ain't reacting to anything,
okay? You see You see this girl?
This one, yeah? Yeah? This one here on
the right, right, right. This one right
here. A bunch of people actually claimed
in the video she's probably AI even
though that that video like the the
content we used from her came out before
AI was a big thing, like before AI was
even really publicly available. So,
she's not AI and she's not happy. She
finally found the Evil Deer video even
though as part of every investigation I
reach out to everyone and I say, "Hey,
there's an investigation happening on
you. What do you think about this?" Uh
and she just ignored me, okay? But
apparently the video got enough views
now, became viral that it is now a
problem. So, what happens now, okay? As
you can see, it says one copyright
strike. If you get three copyright
strikes, your channel along with any
associated channels will be subject to
removal. That means my channel, my
Esperanto random comprehensible input
channel would be deleted. My Chinese
channel would be deleted. Literally any
channel I have under my Google account
would just be straight up it'd be
goneskis, okay? Assuming that this
happens. Now, let's hope that by making
this video I don't uh
encourage anyone else to try hit me at
the same time. But I have submitted a
counter notification. Now, what does
that mean? Basically, when someone
submits a copyright strike against me,
they will usually just say I'm stealing
their content, and then YouTube
obviously there's no one [ __ ] like
checking anything nowadays. They just
like accept everything and just forward
it on, okay? So, straight up YouTube
goes, "Okay, your video it's deleted
because someone claimed a copyright
strike." And literally anyone could
claim a copyright strike. They just
[ __ ] straight up delete it, okay? And
then they say, "Oh, if you want to undo
this action, now I need to do a counter
claim against them." So, I have to fill
out this like a little bit of paperwork
that takes like 5 minutes to fill out.
It's just a [ __ ] a bit of a pain in
the ass, okay? Saying that this is
completely fair under fair use,
critique, all that type of stuff. It's
not me stealing content. It's me
literally doing the commentary on her
language abilities. 90% of that video is
me talking about her abilities based on
our investigation, and then obviously
there's small little clips here and
there of her speaking um
you know, different languages. So, I I
submitted a counter claim, which means
that she now has 10 days
to either
take me to court
and provide proof of said action to
YouTube, which means my video stays
down, or just let it run its course, and
then YouTube will go, "Well, she hasn't
responded in 10 days, so you get your
video back." Like this has happened a
few times. It happened with the Polyglot
Effect. She did the same thing,
copyright strike. I counter claimed. We
waited 10 days. I got my video back. I
made more content out of her.
>> [laughter]
>> That's what I'm assuming is going to
happen here. I'll get my video back in
10 days, and then I'll make more [ __ ]
content out of her, okay? But there's
been something that's been happening in
the YouTube space with copyright strike
claims as of recently. A lot of
YouTubers are finding that there is now
services where you can go if you want to
take someone's channel out, okay? You
can hire people in specific countries to
raise court cases against someone, even
though like none of the parties are
involved, against that person, okay?
Just so you got evidence of a court case
that that person give to YouTube. So,
she could potentially and I've seen
this, okay? Go hire someone in Egypt to
raise a court case to get like just a
legal document to say that there's a
court case pending. Even though
nothing's going to happen, it's probably
just going to it will just, you know,
un- unless I'm notified
via the person, I would never know if
the court case even ended, okay? So,
just to raise a court case against me to
have a legal document to say, "See,
YouTube? I've done it." And that would
be enough for just YouTube to maintain
this copyright strike, okay? So, that is
also a possibility. And considering that
she's from [ __ ] Kazakhstan,
that might actually happen. I might
actually lose this video just due to
some [ __ ] [ __ ] Kazakhstani
[ __ ] court case saying, "Yeah, no,
he's she's suing Evil Deer in the High
Court of Kazakhstan." I don't know.
Like, this is a complete possibility.
But, I I've lost that whole video for
now, okay? And I just want to have a
[ __ ] about this because YouTube is
they have completely given up on trying
to manage these copyright strikes at
all. Like, historically, if you went
back a couple of years and someone did a
copyright strike, YouTube would actually
act as an intermediately tree and
actually check that this copyright
strike is valid. So, for example, is um
What's the name of that the Akram? Akram
raised a copyright strike against me,
okay? Um over It must have been over 2
years ago at this point. I don't
remember, but YouTube actually stepped
in and said, "No, this is not a valid
copyright strike." And they rejected on
my behalf. I didn't have to do anything.
But, since that one, every copyright
strike I've gotten, and I've gotten
about six, they just straight on
forward. They don't even check it
anymore, okay? And it's actually become
insane because the people who are
abusing the system realize that there's
actually really good ways to abuse the
system now. And I've opened up this
video, okay, I've got over here. This is
from Penguinz, talking about the
copyright strike situation getting out
of hand, okay? This person got hit with
109 copyright
strikes in 1 day. Which means that he
has to, because otherwise his channel
will be completely deleted within 10
days, okay? He has to now manually
respond to every single one of these
copyright strikes, and it takes about 5
minutes to fill out each one. And you
have to provide like a reasoning for
your counter claim and everything. Now,
no human on earth is submitting 109
copyright strikes against another
YouTuber in 1 day. This is clearly
completely AI-generated. And this person
just didn't hit one channel, okay? They
hit like a ton of channels in the anime
space, but it's not just anime. It's
It's gone [ __ ] everywhere, okay? So,
I'm going to jump to this point here
just so we can listen to Penguinz talk
about the situation a little bit.
>> down videos that are just talking about
anime without showing a single image or
video from the anime they're talking
about.
>> Okay, so, I've sped him up a little bit.
Let me just slow this down. But
basically, as you heard, copyright
strikes are being raised against YouTube
channels that are just talking about
anime, not actually showing anything
anime in there. Maybe just mentioning
anime and like like specific anime
names, and they just get [ __ ]
copyright strike.
>> So, this channel here in particular is
having hundreds of their videos taken
down. I think they've lost like 600
videos that have been struck. And now
they also had a community post of theirs
get struck as well for
>> a [ __ ] community post? That is
insane. A community post is just me
going on YouTube and writing a message,
okay? Just writing something for all you
guys. I didn't even know it was actually
possible to copyright strike claim a
community post. That is just bizarre.
>> for copyright infringement because they
had an image of an anime in their post.
So, they're they're claiming the image
and then striking them for the usage
there, which I didn't even know was
something on the table. I
>> I didn't know about this. Penguin didn't
know about this. You know, it's it's
crazy. Like in my entire career, I've
probably had like
10 plus copyright strikes against me.
Most of them all within the last 2
years, okay? But even when I was an
Esprontos
pure YouTuber, I remember getting hit
with like one or two copyright strikes.
And back then, I knew nothing about
this. And YouTube makes it sound very
scary. Like if you want to counter
notify, they're like, "Oh, this is going
to lead to legal action, you know, you
got to be really sure about this. False
counter claim, you could lose your
channel." Like every action that they
offer you could result in your channel
being lost. So, I was just like, "Ah."
And like the only option that seems like
the good one is just to let the
copyright striker win and have your
video deleted. Back then, I was getting
like 300 views. And I was like,
"Okay, you can you can delete the
video." Cuz like I was [ __ ] I didn't
know any better. But nowadays, I'm just
like I I just go to war and I fight
against the type of thing. But it just
becomes tiring and then kind of
terrifying when you're just that one
strike off of losing your channel at any
one time.
>> I've never heard of that in my entire 20
years on this platform. That's [ __ ]
wild. It actually makes me somewhat
concerned even just showing that
community post here because of that
image. I wonder if they will try and hit
this video because
>> Now, here's the difference, okay? So,
PenguinZ would have a YouTube rep. And
if this got hit with like if he got hit
with it, he could literally talk with
his rep because he's so big, okay? The
amount of views he gets per video. And
the rep would just sort that situation
out right away. They'll be like,
"They'll just cancel it, okay?" But like
for someone who's like my size, yeah,
like the best option I've got is going
on Twitter or X and being like, "Hey
guys, help." You know, like because if
for example, if the counter claim the
counter claim's not something that's
automatically accepted, YouTube has to
approve me doing a counter claim. Now,
I'm hoping because they just allow
everything through that they just
automatically allow the counter claim
through as well.
>> Cuz I am covering it and that image is
there. That would be pretty outrageous
if you ask me. That is a promotional
image from what I can tell looking it up
on Google Images and I can even find
articles from outlets that have had that
same image in them. So, why have they
not been copyright struck? If you think
that's the extent of it and it can't go
lower, you're wrong. Get a load here.
So, I made a video like a year ago where
I was yapping about my disappointment
with One Punch Man Season 3's animation
and this same YouTube channel actually
made a reaction to my video where I was
talking about it. There is not even a
split second of footage from the One
Punch Man anime in my video and by
extension his reaction to my video also
has no footage. Yet, he still got a
copyright strike for it. Thus, it is now
like the impression like the what it
leads you to believe is that I copyright
struck him.
>> And look what we have here. I can't
believe
John Wick
he would sell out like this. He's now
corroborating with Viz Media. That's
right, he sold out to Viz Media to take
down a video about One Punch Man with
>> Yeah, this would just anger me if I was
Penguin Z where people reacting to my
video get copyright striked but I don't
and it's very obvious what's happening
here is that the person who's handing
out the copyright strikes is not going
to go after Penguin Z because
that would just be
he just wouldn't do that again. He's got
the resources. He's [ __ ] millionaire.
He's got the resources. He's got the
connections. He would deal with you.
But, some other random little YouTuber
>> zero anime footage. Now, if you can't
sense the sarcasm, please I need you to
understand something. There's a lot of
people in here that's just kind of mad
that I you think I actually think that
he did it. No, of course not.
>> No, well, he can see that I wasn't the
one that did that. It does still lead
you to believe like it's not far-fetched
to think that it was me behind it
because it's my video talking about One
Punch Man. Anyway, I just wanted to
bring this up. We're not going to watch
this whole video. I just wanted to show
you that the copyright situation on
YouTube, it's getting [ __ ] out of
hand. Cuz like I've got like, you know,
how many years now? Like since 2013
I've been uploading videos here. And
every day uploading a video is it's it's
a risk. Like there's a risk. And the
crazy thing is
I don't even have to be real like not
even reacting. Just mentioning other
things nowadays is a risk. Because these
copyright strikes are now being done by
keyword claims. Okay. Like I saw one
YouTuber. I don't know how valid this
is. Like maybe this guy was
bullshitting. But I saw him mention this
and I was like
that's a possibility. The guy
makes a video talking about a topic not
anything to do with anime anime, okay?
Now he said, "In this case, would I get
copyright strike?" Because he's got a
tattoo that's from an anime that he
likes on his arm, which is going to
appear in the video. You could get
copyright strike for that.
And because of YouTube how it's all just
automated now, that [ __ ] would probably
just go straight through. And imagine if
you got cuz you've probably got the same
tattoo in every video, you get hit with
like hundreds of copyright strikes all
at once. And then you got to sit there
for an entire day [ __ ] fighting
against that [ __ ] So that is kind of
why I have shied away in a lot of ways
from doing polyglot investigations. It's
just because it's just [ __ ] tiring
dealing with that type of [ __ ] over and
over and over. Cuz like everyone knows
none of this would stand up in a court
of law.
It's just they're just hitting you with
the procedural process to kind of screw
you over
enough
in the hope that you give up or that
enough other people do it at the same
time that it just it just kills your
channel. Like being a channel that does
a lot of exposure of frauds and stuff
like that historically is very risky.
And the only way I I think about I could
get back to my roots and do that stuff
kind of in maybe even safely would be if
every single video I upload here was on
a parallel service. But then even if
that happens and my entire YouTube
channel's deleted, 95% of you guys
aren't going to like go over there and
watch on another service because well,
you're on YouTube. This is where you're
at. You don't even look for my videos.
Most people don't look for my videos.
They just see recommended and they click
and watch. So, if my channel's
completely deleted, most of you would
not even think that oh, my channel's
deleted. You'd probably just think I
stopped posting or maybe you just
completely forget about me cuz like
that's a possibility. Like I don't want
to act like big [ __ ] important or
anything, okay? Most people just I would
disappear from their feed and they
wouldn't even notice. How do you deal
with the situation? Like what what do I
do?
Do I start an email list? That way I can
[ __ ] every single person who watches
a video, I can just go, "Hey guys, you
know, I'll add you to an email list and
then like if I my channel gets
obliterated, I can just email you videos
directly." How do you deal with this
situation? It's
Anyway, that's pretty much it. I should
be safe for at least the next month or
so because I'm going to China now and
I'm going to be just Then again, maybe
the Chinese government will [ __ ]
copyright strike me over [ __ ] showing
something. Who knows? Who knows? I'll
see you all next video.