“They Spied On Me” - Sec. Kristi Noem: Secret DHS File Room, El Mencho Fallout & Deep State Purge
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
In this high-stakes interview, Secretary Kristi Noem of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) outlines a comprehensive strategy to secure American soil against what she describes as an existential threat from China and domestic criminal networks. She asserts that China operates with a centuries-long plan to dominate the world by first dismantling the United States through economic infiltration, cyber warfare, and control over critical supply chains like food, fertilizer, and technology. Noem details her aggressive actions while Governor of South Dakota, including banning Chinese ownership of farmland in the state and prohibiting TikTok on government devices, arguing that controlling a nation's food supply equates to controlling its people. She emphasizes President Trump's role in countering these threats through tariffs, slowing fentanyl flows, and promoting "onshoring" essential industries like pharmaceuticals back to American soil to reduce vulnerability. A central pillar of Noem's tenure at DHS has been the enforcement of immigration laws to reverse record-breaking illegal crossings under previous administrations. She explains a dual-pronged approach: physically securing the border with increased ICE operations and detaining criminals, while simultaneously running international media campaigns in countries like Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico to discourage migration by promising that violators would be deported without future opportunity for return or citizenship. Noem highlights significant successes, noting that over two million individuals have voluntarily left the country due to these enforcement efforts and a shift in messaging. She addresses criticisms regarding family separations at the border by explaining the implementation of DNA testing protocols designed specifically to prevent human traffickers from exploiting children as "mules" to bypass detention centers, resulting in an 84% drop in missing children cases within twelve months. The conversation also touches on national security concerns beyond immigration, including cyber threats and domestic terrorism. Noem reveals that the DHS's Cyber Security and Infrastructure Agency (CISA) is currently underfunded by Congress despite facing relentless hacking attempts from foreign actors targeting electrical grids, water systems, and election infrastructure. She warns of sophisticated infiltration in ports like Los Angeles where Chinese-owned equipment could manipulate shipping data, urging vigilance against bad actors who may seek to exploit large-scale events like the upcoming World Cup or attempt another 9/11-style attack. Furthermore, she discusses the volatile situation in Mexico under President Claudia Sheinbaum (referred to as "Shine Bomb" and "Eleno" in the transcript), where cartel violence has escalated following the assassination of El Mencho, attributing this chaos to years of weak border enforcement that allowed criminal organizations to embed themselves deeply within Mexican society. Throughout the interview, Noem defends her leadership style against media attacks during the pandemic when she refused to mandate lockdowns or mask-wearing in South Dakota, framing those decisions as constitutional protections for business owners and personal liberty rather than negligence. She notes that despite facing intense criticism from national networks and political opponents who claimed thousands of lives would be lost, South Dakota's economy thrived while other states struggled. The discussion concludes with Noem addressing the "deep state" purges she has overseen to remove employees disloyal to America, as well as her personal commitment to fitness and law enforcement values. She reiterates that President Trump trusts his cabinet members implicitly to execute bold decisions without micromanagement, fostering an environment where responsibility is shared for making the United States safer from both external adversaries like China and internal threats posed by organized crime and terrorism.
Read the full video transcript
In 22, you said China was the enemy of
the United States.
>> The problem with China is they don't
just have a 5-year plan to damage the
United States. They have a hundreds, if
not thousand-year plan to become the
world dominating power.
>> Did you guys go back and look at all the
previous communication and emails to
say, "Wait a minute, they were talking
to China. This guy was bought."
>> Elon and his team were extremely helpful
to me. They helped me identify that some
of my own employees downloaded software
on my phone and my laptop to spy on me.
>> Stop it.
>> To record our meetings.
>> Wow.
>> I always believed when people talked
about the deep state that it existed. I
never would have dreamed that it was as
bad as it is.
>> WHAT DO WE WANT?
>> WHEN DO WE WANT IT? NOW.
>> I'm still every day trying to dig out
people who don't love America. I just
found the other day a whole room on this
campus that was a secret skiff secure
facility that had files. nobody knew
existed. There was individuals working
there that had secret files on some of
these most controversial topics.
>> Do you think Shine Bomb is an honest
player? Is there a narco state here
going on?
>> I've been disappointed in her
leadership. She could have shown more
strength in the last year. She may have
people within her own military which are
facilitating a lot of the work that the
cartels are doing.
seconds.
>> Did you ever think it
could?
>> Adam, what's your point?
>> The future looks bright.
>> My handshake is better than anything I
ever signed right here.
>> You are one of your
>> Secretary Christine, it's great to have
you on the show.
Oh man, we've been looking forward to
this. So, thank you for inviting me,
Patrick. I'm glad to be with you.
>> Thanks for I know we were trying to work
something out in DC a couple weeks ago,
but it's great to have you on. You know,
I'm sitting there going through uh uh
what it is to be with the DHS, and we
unpack all the different departments.
You have ICE, you have Secret Service,
you have TSA, you have uh Federal Law
Enforcement Training Center, you have
Cyber Security and Infrastructure, you
have CBP, you have Coast Guard during
peace time, you have Citizenship and
Immigration Services and many other
260,000 employees, uh less than 20
companies, private companies have more
than 260,000 employees. I sat there, I
asked myself, do you want more jobs? Are
you looking for additional
responsibility from the president? How
do you do it?
>> I think I've got I think I've got
plenty. Although he did just give me um
election security, too. So, and uh and
also this um sewage is issue that we
have just north of DC, too. So, we're
going to help clean that up in
partnership with the EPA and and the
Army Corps of Engineers and those local
individuals. But, you know, yeah,
Patrick, you talked about it. This
agency, the Department of Homeland
Security was created uh after 911. uh at
that time when that tragedy and
terrorist attack happened, they took all
the federal government agencies that had
to do with securing the homeland and put
them under one department. So that's why
I have 23 different agencies and
components that all have a focus on
making sure that Americans are safe
right here at home. You know, I wonder
when you guys are on the flight on Air
Force One and and I'm trying to
visualize because I read a story about
how, you know, uh, Secretary Rubio will
go out there and grab his blanket and
he'll kind of find some time to get some
rest. Do you guys say, "Oh my god, he's
going to come. We're probably going to
get some more responsibility, more jobs.
Does he stay up till 3:00 in the morning
strategizing saying, Christy, what do
you think about this?" What is it like
when you guys are all together on Air
Force One?
>> He does. You know, the president is
always thinking and always working. So,
a lot of times he'll come back to the
conference room and visit with
everybody, but I like to go sit up in
his office, too, and talk to him. That's
when he's going through whatever speech
he just gave, some of the feedback, some
of the press, people are calling him and
uh telling him what a great job he's
doing. But that's when we start talking
about the next day, the next week, all
the different challenges that are going
on in the country. And if you're sitting
there, um he will tend to say, you know,
Christy, you go do this or Marco, you go
take care of that. You'll take care of
it though, right? And that's what's
fantastic about President Trump is he
trusts us. He trusts his cabinet members
to go fix a problem. So, um, that's a
wonderful thing to have in a president
that will give you responsibility and
know that he can trust you to go take
care of it for the American people.
>> Yeah, that that's the vibe I get from an
outsider watching in what it's like. And
you'll see the numbers as well on how
turnover was on the first administration
versus this one after 12 months. I think
it was at 43 44. This time around 28.
Everybody seems to be enjoying working
together, which is great to hear. But
for the audience, I think a couple
things I'd want to start off with. We
got a lot of things to go through.
Mexico, ICE, different topics, but as
the governor of South Dakota, there's a
few things when I watched when you were
leading the state. It was so impressive.
I think you were the state that was the
most open. Uh, at first you got
criticized a lot and then you ended up
getting a lot of credit for making the
right moves. A lot of other states kind
of followed your lead. I remember there
was a story about being offered $300 a
week of unemployment they wanted to send
and you said, "No, no, we don't want to
take the payment. You know, we're doing
okay. Our unemployment is low." What was
your what was your processing as you
were going through a season that none of
us had gone through before?
>> Yeah. Well, my background is is that I'm
a business person, a farmer and rancher
who took over our family businesses
after the death of my dad. I became the
general manager at age 22. So making
decisions for me in South Dakota was
just common sense. Uh looking at the
facts on the ground and making the best
decisions for people around me. When I
got elected to be governor, uh our state
kind of was dying. People were moving
out of South Dakota. Our economy was
drying up. Jobs were drying up. Our kids
were leaving the state to go get an
education. And then they tended to stay
in in another state to get a job and and
pursue that future. So, I ran on making
sure that we were open for business. In
fact, that was my state of the state uh
title before CO ever hit South Dakota or
hit our country was that South Dakota
was open for business. So when that came
forward and uh we were sitting and
seeing that virus situation, I brought a
few of my adviserss together, my general
counsel, you know, some of my lieutenant
governor and some of my staff and just
said, you know, tell me about what
happens uh if we shut down our
businesses, if we shut down our schools,
you know, and talked about the
constitutional rights that people have
and that businesses have over a state,
over the federal government. And every
decision that we made in South Dakota
was based on the constitution and that
that was where our true foundation was
going to be. You know, in fact, even in
CO, we were the only state that never
once closed businesses. We never
mandated that anybody stay home or wear
masks. We kept life as normal. We said
that we were going to give people as
much information as possible and then
let them use personal responsibility to
take care of themselves and their
families and that we would get through
it together. I talked about how I didn't
have any right to go shut down a
business in South Dakota. That that
would be a taking. It be considered a
taking of their business if they were to
be hurt economically by that. And then
that business, that business owner would
have the opportunity to come back and to
sue the state of South Dakota for that
taking. And I didn't want to put us in
that situation where we would be taking
an unconstitutional action against our
residents and then putting the state at
a liability as far as making them whole
again. So every decision we made was um
that I made was was pretty matterof
fact. Although the rest of the world
just rained fire down on my head. I mean
I got every night remember
>> just destroyed on the national news
networks. You know they said I was
killing people. In fact even the federal
government when they called me told me I
would have over 300,000 of South Dotans
die if I didn't shut down my state. that
they would uh and was telling me that
that was going to be the consequences of
it. So, um even Saturday Night Live had
their opening skit was me being a
vampire um killing people and making
decisions uh that that were not going to
be good and were going to be demonized
by all those Elizabeth Warren and other
Rachel Maddo. Those folks were coming
after me every day. But but we did the
right thing and we had a lower loss of
life than most states. Our businesses
thrived. We grew like crazy. People
moved to our state by the thousands and
we really benefited from embracing our
freedom. I think that a lot of times
when you see a crisis or you see a tough
situation, uh people may be quick to
judge what leaders are deciding, but it
may take a while for them to really
realize that by trusting the citizens
that that our country will thrive. And
that's really what we need to do here as
well. Trust in our constitution, trust
in our laws, and make sure we enforce
them so that we can reap the benefits of
that. And and what that was is for for
the rest of us, we saw you on the
national scale because it was very
impressive how you handled yourself with
the media when the attacks were coming
and they said, "Wait a minute, she's got
very strong leadership qualities. How
did this person become the way she is?"
And uh uh obviously that led to the job
that you have today, which is comes with
a lot of different responsibility. But I
want to stay with South Dakota as well
because it's important for the audience
to know how many successes you had
there. One of the concerns that you hear
how China, a lot of private companies in
China tied to the government buy a lot
of land in America, some 277,000 acres
of land up to 300,000 acres. We'll see
that number. And South Dakota being one
where I don't know what the number is,
but it's 40 million plus acres which is
dedicated to that. How did you handle
China trying to come into South Dakota?
I know you guys have certain laws and
things you put in place that they were
not too happy about. How did you manage
your relationship with China in regards
to agriculture?
>> Yeah, we were very aggressive against
China, you know, recognizing. So I have
businesses and in farming and ranching.
So I had watched for decades as China
came in and tried to control our food
supply. They bought up our chemical
companies in the United States. They
bought our fertilizer companies and we
became reliant on China to make sure we
could even grow our crops. uh stole our
genetics and our IP when it cames to our
agric agricultural economy and inputs.
And then as I watched them come in and
start to buy up land across the country,
I recognize that the country that
controls our food supply uh will control
us and that that is China's goal every
day is to control the United States of
America. And the instant that they would
be able to control that entire supply
chain system for our food is when they
would control us. So, we banned China
from being able to own farmland in South
Dakota. I got aggressive on them as far
as our intellectual property and
technology as well. And then I even was
the first governor to ban uh Tik Tok and
from them to being able to be used on
our state devices that in to run our
government or being able to infiltrate
our systems. Now, President Trump has
been a very aggressive and Tik Tok and
making sure that it's a much safer uh
system and entity for us to utilize, but
but being the first one to go out and to
take those actions, I think gives other
people an opportunity to really examine
the issue to look at it and the security
of our food supply chain uh and how how
vulnerable we are to China. I think
really started to come to light during
that point in time when we were banning
it from owning our land. We saw that
many other states had already given up a
lot of their land to to China and we
weren't willing to do that in South
Dakota.
>> Were there other governors that were
calling you saying how are you managing
it for them to be able to duplicate some
of your policies?
>> I think so. We did the state uh we had
the law as well that first banned you
know men from uh being able to play in
girls sports and that m that bill and
that legislation was used in over a
dozen other states after that that
language that would withstand a
challenge in the court system that could
be uh give us case law that would be
helpful in making sure we could protect
it into the future. So many times I
learned during COVID because we had
phone calls and conference calls with
governors every single day, you know,
what are you doing? What decisions are
you making on what basis are you doing
that I realized that even a small state
like South Dakota um by being a leader
and and making the right decisions
influences the other states around you,
other leaders around you? And so that's
one of the things that President Trump
has been doing for us if and you've seen
it across the world as he makes bold
decisions to protect his country and to
embrace freedom. He's influencing other
countries and other world leaders as
well. We're seeing it happen in Europe
and with Italy and uh the UK with some
of their decisions. We're seeing it in
Central and South America with leaders
that are very proTrump. And that means
that they're recognizing how the United
States does better. Uh when someone
stands up and is strong for law and
order, uh for secure borders and for a
strong economy, that really makes a big
difference, not just here in our
country, but around the world.
>> In 22, you said China was the enemy of
the United States.
>> Has your position changed that now
you're a little bit more on the inside
and you're seeing everything?
>> No, not at all. I mean, I still believe
that China is a huge threat. They The
problem with China is they don't just
have a five-year plan to damage the
United States. They have a hundreds, if
not thousand-year plan to become the
world dominating power. That means that
in order to do that, they have to take
out the United States of America. So
that's why I appreciate President Trump
with his ability to call up leaders from
these countries and even she in China
and have conversations with them, show
that he is going to fight for Americans.
You know, he got extremely aggressive
with them on tariffs and um had had
worked with them to slow down the flow
of fentanyl and those those uh you know
ingredients that go into formulating
that poison that was killing off
Americans and our next generation of
citizens. Uh that makes a world of
difference to have a leader that
recognizes you don't have to go to war
and have bloodshed to protect your
country. You can use other tools in your
toolbox to go out there and influence
them uh to stay in their lane.
>> So this leads me to uh the next and
which I it's one of the departments that
falls uh uh under DHS and that's cyber
security. So for me when I think about
China, I'm in the same boat as you on
how I feel about China because of made
in China 2025 and they were going to be
number one in 2025. They fell for 25,
but they're long-term thinkers. You
know, when COVID took place,
nobody expected it. The president was
having a lot of momentum and then all of
a sudden CO then the virus was released.
Oh, it came from a bat. No, it came from
a, you know, this. No, it came from
this. And then later, years later, we
realized it came out from a Wuhan lab in
China. And they could have probably
moved faster to prevent that from
happening. 7 million people died. The
market lost roughly $16 trillion. But
they're very creative. They don't have
our military. We have the best navy,
best military, best army, nuclear power.
In every possible way, we have that. But
but they are very uh sneaky in the way
they'll go about beating you. So if
cyber security is one of them, when you
guys sit there and think about what
China is capable of doing if you push
them too hard, what are some areas you
sit there and say, "Well, they could do
a cyber warfare. They could do this.
They could do What what are some things
you guys think about?
>> Well, it's not even what I think about,
it's what I know now that I'm in this
department. I mean, being on the inside
and watching how they've infiltrated our
technologies. Um, how even when we have
devices that are used in our financial
systems that are implemented across our
country, just having their technology in
that makes it much more vulnerable. Uh,
we see it in our ports. You know, you
look at the Los Angeles port where a
vast majority of the goods that come
into this country, especially on the
western half of the country, come
through that port. Most of those um
machines and devices and technologies
that are utilized are owned by China. Uh
and they have the ability to know what's
coming in, what's leaving, manipulate
those shipments, if they're screened or
not screened. And that's one of the
things we've been focused on here at the
department is making sure that shipping
container uh that come into this country
into our ports are screened and that we
have the ability to trust that data uh
and not rely on just ch Chinese cranes
and and shipping systems that they have
developed and have the ability to
manipulate as well. I our one of the
jobs that's entrusted to the Department
of Homeland Security is securing our
critical infrastructure. That means our
electrical grid, our water systems, our
food supply chain. Um, our election
system is considered critical
infrastructure according to law and is
under the responsibility of this
department. But that means that you also
have to secure those systems. And every
day we still see people that are hacking
into our systems and making us more
vulnerable from China, from Iran, from
Russia. very coordinated, sophisticated
hacking attempts that the department
here under SISA, which is our cyber
security and information um agency works
with our state and local partners to
make sure that we're stopping those
hacking attempts. We're not losing
personal data and we're not allowing
them to come in and potentially shut
down one of the critical infrastructures
we need to make this country run. It's a
real threat every single day. And when
you don't hear about it, that means we
had a good day, that we did our our job.
But but they relentlessly are coming
after the United States by making us
more vulnerable. And that's why it's so
important right now, Patrick. That's one
of the agencies that's not funded by
Congress. They've chosen not to fund
those individuals that are out there
hunting down those bad actors.
>> Uh and so which one is not funded?
They're not here.
>> Which one?
>> Uh SISA, the cyber security agency. the
vast majority of those individuals that
hunt down bad actors and then help us
harden our systems so that we can't be
vulnerable to those hacking attempts,
uh, they're furoughed right now because,
um, Democrats in Congress have chosen
not to fund the Department of Homeland
Security.
>> Now,
how do you when you're when you're
handling some like this, you're saying
electrical, right? Food, election,
right? they want to get involved and
make sure they choose who they want to
be the president or even you know throw
it off or you know even uh the canal the
ports that we have Panama Canal because
they still have control over it.
Hutchinson still owns them and you know
they prevented us from being able to
transact and put that under Larry Finins
uh you know Black Rockck. So but how
much of it is things we can do for a
fact to prevent it from happening versus
how much of it is watching the screens
constantly to see movement here, action
here, action here. Is it a constant 20
247 thing?
>> It is. It's 24/7, 365 days a week or a
year. It's it's incredible. It never
stops and we can't ever not be diligent.
So, our Can you imagine if our
electrical grid went down? Um we have um
our military bases are vulnerable to a
hacking attempt. When you hear about our
telecoms going down, um 100% of the time
we're involved in trying to figure out
why that happened. Was it a hacking
attempt? Did they steal personal data
and information from US citizens? And
what can we do to ensure that that
doesn't happen again? So, you maybe have
heard about Salt Typhoon and Vault
Typhoon where we did have bad actors
hack into that critical infrastructure.
And CISA is the agency and the federal
government that's responsible to harden
our system so that doesn't happen. And
then also make sure that we're working
with local states and those communities
uh maybe you know rural cooperatives or
or water plants um because if we are
even participating with them and have
our systems connected if they get hacked
into it makes us vulnerable on a
nationwide scale. And so CISA spends
every day doing that and working with
those technology companies and those
entities to make sure that we're much
safer and that we are insulated from
those kind of bad actors.
>> Yes. in the financial industry. I've
been in it for 25 years. You can't go in
a meeting nowadays without them talking
about cyber security attacks with 2.2
million social security numbers were
stolen from this company. They logged
into the client accounts. They moved
this much money. So, it's a if that's
happening within insurance companies,
financial firms, I can only imagine what
it's like when you're going up against
uh, you know, a a country like China
that wants to see us fall and and them
get ahead of us. But I always think
about, you know, what what is the way to
fight against that? Can you catch them?
Because even if you if you talk to the
average person right now, you're at the
bar, you're having a cigar, and you say,
"So, what are the five issues that are
unanswered that you wanted to get
answered, right? Is it 9/11? Is it John
F. Kennedy assassination? Is it Epstein?
Is it this?" You'd be amazed how many
people say, "We still don't know what
happened with COVID, and why isn't China
being held accountable for it?" Is there
anything like you know when uh uh uh
Elon bought Twitter and they did
something called Twitter files Matt
Taibbe and all these guys that went in
and we saw the emails and you saw the
emails from the Biden administration
saying you can't put that up there you
can't let that article go viral you know
the laptop story with New York Post when
you got in did you guys run any kind of
a you know Department of Homeland
Security files to go back and look at
all the previous communication and
emails to say wait a minute they were
talking to China this guy was bought Did
you guys do anything like that?
>> Yes. I feel like that's all I do,
Patrick. Um, you wouldn't even believe
what I found since I've been in this
department. I just found the other day a
whole room in in on this campus that was
a secret skiff secure facility that had
files nobody knew existed. So, we just
happened to have a um an employee walk
by a door and wonder what it was and
started asking questions. We went in
there. There was individuals working
there that had secret files that nobody
knew about on some of these most
controversial topics like that. And now
I've got that turned over to attorneys
and we're getting to the bottom of what
exactly happened there. You know, we
have CBP, which is, you know, Customs
and Border Protection. They know every
traveler that comes into this country,
every good that comes in. They're the
ones who assess and collect all of the
tariffs. But the information that they
had on travelers that came in during
COVID uh but our national labs which I
also have national labs under my
jurisdiction their scientists that
participated with that Wuhan lab uh how
they were traveling back and forth
between each other and and working on
those experiments it's been eyeopening
and I'll tell you Patrick even from the
time I came into this office it was you
know Elon and his team were extremely
helpful to me they helped me identify
that that some of my own employees in my
department had downloaded software on my
phone and my laptop to spy on me. Stop
it.
>> To record our meetings. Wow.
>> They had done that to several of the
politicals. Um and so we ended up
bringing in people and
>> and that was something that if you
didn't have those technology experts
here in the department looking at all of
our laptops and our phones and
recognizing that kind of software, it
would still be happening today. So, one
of the things I need to do and continue
to do is partner with technology
companies and experts to bring them in
and help us because many times in
government um and especially in this
department which was extremely
neglected, we we were just behind and
not up to the standard we should be at.
Um it I remember the first four months I
couldn't even send a PowerPoint over
email from the Department of Homeland
Security servers that was longer than
six pages long. Um, so the the the
backwards thinking of protecting our
country was extremely detrimental to
keeping us safe and and and many times
the deep state I think what I what I
tell people most of the time is I always
believed when people talked about the
deep state before that it existed. Um, I
never would have dreamed that it was as
bad as it is. It's it is I'm still every
day trying to dig out people who don't
love America that not just work at this
department but also work throughout the
federal government.
>> Did you find anybody that was taking
money from uh uh foreign countries?
Anybody that was taking money from
China, anybody that was being funded?
>> I haven't found any of that. Um I
haven't found individuals like that. We
do have people that should not have had
security clearances that should not have
been able to have the information that
they have that were um able to access
information that that wasn't legal for
them to have. And and frankly, Patrick,
there's been a lot of news stories
written about it. But um you know, we
polygraph people because I'm a law
enforcement agency and a national
security agency. uh we bring people in
and if we think that they are bad actors
if they're not working in the best
interest of the United States and are
violating the law in their job duties,
you know, we have no problem
polygraphing them to find out if they're
telling the truth. And we've gone out
there and fired individuals. Um many of
them uh because they didn't have the
United States of America and their
constitutional duties um in hand. They
they were deceptive and needed to go.
What what happened to the individual
that was uh you know had your phone uh
uh uh that was being spied on? What
happened to those individuals?
>> Fired.
>> Brought in, polygraphed, fired. Yes.
Many of them out of that that arm of the
department that are in charge of
security on laptops, phones. Um also,
>> you know, you think that's enough.
>> We had to
>> we had to sweep my office on a regular
basis to make sure that there's not
listening devices in it. Um it's it's
very uh it was very prevalent and I
think that what happened at this
department was individuals
>> um had gotten away with for years spying
on people who were politically appointed
and and trying to stop an administration
that was coming in and trying to fix
this country and keep us safe.
>> What what does accountability look like?
Let's just say we learn that China was
involved and you learn, right? Because
there's a difference when you're on the
outside, you're a business owner
yourself, you know, and you're like, you
know, I want to get into politics. Then
you do it and you were governor. You're
running the state. You do great work.
Then you get a bigger job, 260,000
employees. And then when you were a
civilian, you would say, you know what,
accountability to me is dot dot dot. And
then you're on the inside. How different
is it when as an outsider civilian, you
see what China did and you said, I
speculate they released this
intentionally because they wanted to
hurt the president's chances of getting
reelected. But now that you know what is
accountability, what does that look
like? if we find something.
>> Well, people want to see consequences
and they want to see um that they're
held to task. The president's being very
wise in his approach to this, continuing
to get to the truth, get as much
information as possible and then
continue to confront China as the real
threat or entity that it is and what we
have to interact with them. You know,
for years, uh China has gone after us in
different ways than just warfare. We all
know that China's been building up their
military, producing many more submarines
and aircraft and than typically in the
past. But they have also treated us
unfairly in trade agreements. They've
stolen our intellectual property.
They've manipulated their um monetary
policy and so they've used every tool
that they've had. And then when I look
at them being willing to send these uh
precursors and components to the
producing of fentanyl that we know is
going to come into our country and kill
off our next generation of Americans. Uh
we see that and they're hacking into our
financial systems and critical
infrastructure. They're using every
method that they possibly can um to
weaken America. They recognize that we
are the country that stands in the way
from them becoming the world dominating
power and uh they will use everything
and they are willing to wait a long
period of time for that to happen and to
continue to build that decades hundred
thousands of years long timeline to make
it happen. So President Trump has been
very wise and recognizing that our
economy relies on some of the components
because so much of it it's been
outsourced to China. But you've heard
him talk since he came into the White
House about onshoring our own supply
systems, bringing our food supply chain
home, making sure that our our drug and
prescription drugs are produced here in
the United States so that they're under
our own control, making sure that we're
aggressive in trade agreements and
punishing countries who treat us
unfairly. That's all strengthening
America so that we don't have those
vulnerabilities anymore.
>> Yeah. The concern is I I think first
time around when they got rid of the
president, they probably thought it'll
never happen for him to get elected
again. I'm sure you've seen that famous
clip by Hillary Clinton on Rachel Matto
when she says, "Hey, so I got a message
for you. If President Trump's going to
use Russia to help him collude in the
election, China, you should get his IRS
taxes. You should I mean, that's that is
a crime in itself when she did that,
right? So she's inviting China to come
into our system. So for me, I wonder
who's going to be for sale. And I wonder
if the president, as shrewd as he is,
and I voted for him all three times, I
wonder if he did know that China was
involved and he had access to that
information, is that more powerful in
negotiation than tariffs, especially now
that we learned the Supreme Court is not
allowing to, you know, use tariffs on
countries. And I'm sure China is
celebrating behind closed doors. What do
you think?
>> Well, the the Supreme Court clearly said
that President Trump does have the
authority to uh put in place tariffs
just using a different part of the
statute and the President Trump is u
very grateful uh for the Supreme Court
and affirming that he does have the
right to do it just referencing a
different part of the law. Um, you know,
I think that the president has
information, but we still have our
intelligence agencies, our FBI that has
files that they're going through and
cases that they're building because we
can uh expose it and talk about it in
the court of public opinion, but you the
real consequences come with criminal
prosecution or with real cases being
built that we can use against
individuals that have been undermining
the United States of America in a
criminal way. So, uh, he he certainly is
informed on where our vulnerabilities
are, and I trust President Trump to make
every decision he needs to to make sure
that people are accountable. He'll he'll
never forget and is still grieved over
every single life that was lost, not
just during COVID, but to the breaking
of so many other of our laws that we've
lost American lives under.
>> He uh if there is a guy I want in the
room negotiating on our behalf, it's
him. He He's the guy that I want in that
room negotiating. So, I agree with you
there. Let's talk about immigration.
When you know at first uh you were given
uh uh this job which comes with a lot of
responsibility. I I believe it's one of
the most important jobs and one that uh
you guys had some victories, some to
really brag about because the country
got safer. So I'm sure every mom in the
country is happier that she is safer
because of what happened on the borders.
But a couple things. When I first saw
the numbers, right, and it said, you
know, 12 to 20 million illegal
immigrants that came through the last
four years under Biden, we've all seen
the stats. We've seen the high numbers.
We've seen a low. We've seen what the
government tells us. We've seen the 20
million numbers. We've seen what Tom
Hman has said. And then you'll see and
it says in 2025,
319,000 immigrants were removed. This
year, roughly 470 to be removed. How do
you remove 12 to 20 million? I mean, you
have to do around 3 and a.5 million a
year to do that. H how do you do that?
How do you realistically accomplish that
mission?
>> Well, let me go back a little bit and
explain some of President Trump's
strategy because um when he won the
election uh and he called me up and
asked me if I wanted to have a role in
his new administration, you know, he
said, "Christy, you know, I've heard
that you might be interested in being in
my cabinet. would you you know some
people have mentioned egg some have
interior you know what are you thinking
and I said sir I would I would like to
be your homeland security secretary and
he said why would you want to do that
and I said sir because it's your number
one priority you have talked um for
years about us needing a secure border
about the fact that we had an invasion
coming into our country where millions
of people were let in unvetted we don't
even know who all is here and I said if
I'm going to have to leave my family in
South Dakota and spend time in DC and be
working. I want it to be a job of
significance that is consequential. And
I said, "And I think that's going to be
hard." And if and I I want to know that
you're going to have somebody there
that's actually tough enough to do it
that will be able to follow through on
everything that you've promised. And so
he gave me the honor of doing the job.
But one of the things he told me even
before I was sworn in sworn in is that
he said, "You know, Christy, those
commercials you ran in South Dakota
promoting South Dakota when the rest of
the country was locked down, uh, you ran
those commercials inviting everybody to
come to South Dakota. That you were open
for business. You wanted them to come
visit." And he said, "I want those for
the border. I want you to run
commercials in this country that shows
that we're enforcing our laws. We're not
going to allow this anymore and that
we're going to deport people." And so he
knew that not only was it going to have
to be a decision to secure our border
and that let our border patrol and let
our ICE agents do their job, but also we
had to message to the country and to the
world that it was going to be a priority
to enforce our laws. and he had me run
commercials in other countries where a
lot of that migration was coming from.
Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, um, and and
say to those folks there in commercials,
"Do not come to the United States
anymore illegally. Our border is closed.
If you come here, we will arrest you. We
will detain you, and we will take you
back home, and you'll never get the
chance to come to the United States."
So, I think that a lot of um the
strategic plan that President Trump has
had from the beginning is not just
arresting illegal criminals and getting
them off our streets and protecting
Americans. It's also messaging to the
world that there's a new sheriff in
town, that we're enforcing our laws. And
over two million I about two and a half
million people have voluntarily gone
home. So, when you ask how are you ever
going to get 15 to 20 million people to
leave this country that are here
illegally? Um, a lot of it is convincing
them. Um, a lot of it is going out and
enforcing the law, going after those
criminals and detaining them, and then
making sure that we're doing all of that
while we still continue to secure the
border and have the assets there,
showing it's a priority. H
>> how do you do that though? Because
convincing them to say, "Okay, uh,
Johnny and Mary, you guys are here
illegally. We suggest you go home and
try to come back here legally." If
somebody is willing to illegally break
the law to come here, you think they're
going to follow orders if we tell them
to go back? So then for me in 2024 when
the election was taking place and one of
the 20 promises that the president made
was, you know, getting rid of the 10 12
million 50 million illegals and I know
Tom Hman was the right person for that
job. I mean that's somebody that I
really was excited about getting back
into it. But the reality of it is how do
you do it without the optics? We saw
what happened with Alex Prey. We saw
what happened with the campaign. Be
good. We saw what happened with all this
stuff. And I was nasty. That nasty that
the pressures were very high on your
job. A lot of people were saying, "Hey,
Christy should resign. She should get
fired." The tensions were up to here,
right? But then now we see a little bit
has come down and the president even
said moving forward if states and cities
don't ask us to come in, we're not going
to come in. But then isn't that cuz some
of the folks that voted for it are
saying, "Wait a minute. Are you guys not
keeping a promise?" How do you balance
those two?
>> He wants to be asked to come in and to
surge operations in those cities. He
wants to if a if a mayor or a governor
recognizes that they have an
outofcontrol criminal element in their
city. If they have people that are
coming in and perpetuating fraud like
we've seen in Minneapolis, that when we
come in to have that cooperation of
local law enforcement is incredibly
important. But the president's been very
clear, too. We're going to enforce the
law. So, yes, we're going to prioritize
criminals, those murderers and those
rapists, individuals out there
trafficking our children and
proliferating uh drug abuse and and and
selling drugs. We're going to prioritize
them, but nobody is off the table. We're
going to if you're here illegally, you
may be detained if you're in one of
those situations where you're with those
criminals and removed from this country.
You know, clearly Patrick, millions of
people have gone home on their own. uh
they've seen what we're doing on our
streets. They've seen us go out there
and be strong in enforcing our laws and
they decided, you know what, maybe now
is a good time for me to go back to, you
know, Panama or go back to Ecuador, uh
or situations have changed in their
country. So, what we do is we we buy
them a plane ticket. We give them $2,600
when they land in their country and give
them some money to start going on. And
many of the times I've gone to dozens of
these countries and negotiated uh
repatriotation uh programs or programs
in their country. So in some of these
countries, they've set up housing for
these individuals. When they leave the
United States and go home, they'll help
them with housing. They'll get them
trained to fill a job that they need in
that country. They'll educate the
children. I think Guatemala put forward
a a scholarship so the kids there now
can get an education when they return
back home. and and making those
connections is something that I don't
think any administration has ever
facilitated before. President Trump's
put a lot of work into making sure that
we're encouraging people to go back home
and when they get there that they'll
recognize that their home country is the
best place to be. And we also are very
clear if you wait until we detain you
and remove you from this country, you
will never get the chance to come back
to the United States. You won't get to
be in a work program. You'll you won't
have the opportunity to come back with a
green card or to be a citizen. that that
you have shown that you will break our
laws and not follow the protocols and
that there will be consequences for it.
>> You know, you know, when the they
criticize the president because, you
know, there's different conservatives.
There's conservatives that are, you
know, the the rhinos, you have the
conservatives that are pro-life
conservatives, Christians. Then you have
the social media conservatives, the
Twitter conservative. There's many
different kinds, right? And I look at
each one of them as a different state
that you have to win over. And they have
different things that's important to
them. like the conservatives on X,
Epstein's number one, right? You you can
go to YouTube, maybe that's not a
priority for them. When when people say
about Epstein, I say it was never in his
20 promises that he made. It was a
promise that Cash Patel made. It was a
promise that Pam Bondi made, but you
never heard the president make that
promise. Even when he was interviewed by
Rachel Compos Duffy, he said yes to
9/11. He said yes to John F. Kennedy,
but he was a little bit slow to saying
to Epstein. So, let's set the Epstein
aside because that wasn't one of his 20
promises. But I think the fair criticism
is to because if you interview with CNN
or ABC or CBS, the the challenge you're
going to get is how harsh you guys are.
I cannot believe what you're doing. You
don't understand. You're separating
these kids and these families. Do you
not have a heart? What kind of a person
are you? Like they'll take that angle.
But to the people that voted for him,
the near, you know, 80 million, whatever
the number is, they're saying, "Wait a
minute. We said, you know, these
immigrants have to leave." And you said
that was one of your promises. And it
looks like because of the amount of push
back and media that you got, now you
guys are kind of backing off a little
bit and saying, "No, we're going to wait
till cities and states invite us in."
And if you do that, then that means
you're not going to reach the goal of 10
or 20 million that you promised. What do
you say to those people?
>> Nothing's changed. We're still enforcing
the law and we're still making sure that
every single person that's in this
country illegally uh knows that if we
>> But what if those cities that don't
invite you in? But respectfully, what if
those cities don't invite you? What if
these uh you know uh uh uh cities that
are saying, "Yeah, we don't have to
report the stuff to the states, the blue
cities that we know, the ones top 23 out
of 30 crime cities, they're like, "We're
not going to work with you. We're not
going to cooperate with you. We'll
cooperate with Obama and make it look
very nice when he deported the people.
will cooperate with Bill Clinton and
make you look, but there's no way in the
world we're going to cooperate with
Trump's administration. What do you say
to those?
>> Uh, we've never said that we wouldn't be
there. We've never said that we wouldn't
have a presence there and enforce the
law. What the president's talking about
is the surging operations, the the
sending many, many more entities and law
enforcement officers and the military
into a city. um while you're facing the
kind of sophisticated violent rioters
that we faced in Minneapolis, we see
those out in Portland. And Portland's a
little bit of a different element
because they have this Antifa element
that is so um professionalized over the
years. They allowed it to get
institutionalized and now they're dug in
and use it in such a way to manipulate
the situation and do damage that it's
become not just a nationwide network,
but a worldwide international network,
too. So in Minneapolis, you've seen
decadesl long corruption in fraud in
business and manipulating federal
taxpayers dollars and funneling it to
criminals and outside the country that
that facilitated a lot of this fraud
we've seen not just in the Medicaid
programs and delivery of services to
developmentally disabled individuals,
but also immigration fraud. Uh we've
uncovered hundreds of cases of
immigration fraud, not just in
Minnesota, but across the country. And
then uh that has allowed this anti-ICE
um entity to come in and establish
itself that was extremely sophisticated
and facilitated and funded by
individuals and nonprofits that
facilitated that kind of resistance.
President Trump recognizes how dangerous
that is and that it needs to be stopped.
We just need to do it in a way that
makes sure our law enforcement officers
are protected and they're not put in
situations uh that could help hurt them
uh and the operations themselves,
prevent us from being able to enforce
the law when we go in and go after these
bad criminals. We've had gosh thousands
of people that we've been able to take
just out of Minneapolis and St. Paul
area that are that are criminal illegals
uh that have been removed and that city
is much safer now because of President
Trump and those ICE officers being
there.
You know how you talk about 8020 issues
and 8515 issues. The more the left is
forced to defend ideas that are
ludicrous, the more we win, right? The
more they are out there defending our
what's wrong with them being here
illegal, you know, stolen land. We need
more of that because the elections are
won by the middle, right? The
independent folks in the middle, those
are the ones that can go this way. They
can go this way. I don't know. I'm going
to go a little bit this way. This year
I'm going to vote this way. if they can
see with their eyes, you don't make any
sense. What are you talking about? I
feel safer with Trump's administration.
I feel better for the economy. I just I
just hope that doesn't slow down and you
continue because, you know, we see
what's going on with Mexico, right?
We're seeing with Eleno and I know that
also kind of falls under your juris
jurisdiction as well.
>> If you love this country, show it. Lead
with pride in the valuement USA
collection.
Designed for freedom thinkers, built for
everyday leaders.
Red, white, blue. Purpose. Wear what you
believe in. Valueainment USA.
>> Uh, Mexico. One minute. Hey, everybody
goes to Cancun. It's a nice place to go.
We're going to go have some fun. Let's
go to Porttoarta. You turn on the, you
know, video. You're watching stuff on X.
It looks like a movie on what's going on
there. So, overnight, this El Mencho is
calling the police telling them, "You
guys better get out the way. you better
let us do this and now they're doing
that. So when you see that yourself, how
concerned are you for that not to leak
up? This is an organization that was
selling fentinel that was coming up to
us that we lost a lot of kids. A lot of
families were lost. How do you visualize
what's going on in Mexico right now with
the killing of Eleno?
>> Well, it's not just that, Patrick. It's
that President Trump had the foresight
to designate those cartels as foreign
terrorist organizations. He recognized
the true threat they were to the
American people. I look at Mexico and
how for years they have allowed these
cartels and these criminal elements to
gain strength. Uh Joe Biden's
administration allowed them to get rich.
Uh it's it's a billions and billions of
dollar industry that they've had on
trafficking people and children and
drugs. And by having that open border
and allowing the cartels to do whatever
they wanted to do to victimize people
and profit off the deaths of not just
Americans but people around the world.
Um that's the consequences that Mexico
is facing today. You look at those
pictures and those those videos of
Mexico, that's what happens in a country
that doesn't push back on criminals. It
doesn't enforce the law. That doesn't
stop those activities in their cities.
So that's the reality of what America
could look like in in just years to come
if President Trump wasn't doing what
he's doing. If you allow those criminals
to embed themselves and get root in our
cities, that's what happens is that you
have a a government like the Mexican
government now that's just fighting to
even survive. And I know from President
Shinbomb, her experience is down there.
She's partnering with the president now,
but she has absolutely recognized how
vulnerable she is, how she has people
around her and even in her cabinet that
she can't trust to necessarily do the
right thing to protect a Mexico. And
that's why we see this as such a
volatile situation today. The
>> I got two questions there. One of them
is I'm glad you you you said that. The
reason for me uh being excited about how
hard you guys were pushing for getting
rid of illegal immigrants is because
they're out here. They're everywhere,
right? And there's plenty of them that
are even trained by al-Qaeda that are
insiders. They're just waiting for an
opportunity. And if all of a sudden they
get bigger in a certain city,
Minneapolis being one of them, but
there's plenty of them out there around
the nation and another president comes
in that's not strong on crime, then what
happens to all those innocent people
that are living there. So, it's a very
tough job and I applaud you guys for
taking on this tough assignment. I don't
think there's any winning for you with
media when it comes onto this job. I
just don't think there is. I think
there's winning at the ballot polls. I
think there's winning with the families,
but I don't think you're going to win
the media race with this specific thing.
Going to Mexico, do you think Shine Bomb
is an honest player? Do you think she
is? I know you you sounded like you were
being fair with her, but you know, from
my end, some of the criticism when once
asked about, you know, how to deal with
the cartel, she was like, I don't want
us to be involved. Let us handle this.
We have this. Obviously, she doesn't
have any control of it. And some are
sometimes criticizing her saying, "Wait
a minute. Is there a narco state here
going on or is she a real player or is
she kind of controlled by them as well?"
What is your position on Shine Bomb?
>> Well, let me give you um my opinion on
it. I've had conversations with her, but
I also um will just say that that part
of my opinion on this situation is that
>> uh she uh is feels very much uh that she
doesn't know who she can trust in her
own government. I've been disappointed
in her leadership. she could have shown
more strength in the last year to
partner with President Trump when he
first offered it extensively. But I also
know that she recognizes that her
government is very tenuous. That uh if
she uses um wisdom and discernment and
and she can come to a better spot rather
than declaring a war with the cartels
when she knows that her military may not
even be willing to fight to defend the
country that she may have people within
her own military or in her own cabinet
which are facilitating a lot of the work
that the cartels are doing. So um yes, I
think she should be bold. Yes, I think
she should be strong. I've been
disappointed in her. I also recognize
she's got a different element going on
in Mexico than than what many leaders
have. She has embedded criminals in her
government that make it a very difficult
situation for her to really know that
she can be successful. I don't think she
knows that she can be successful because
she doesn't really know if the people
who are around her are on the team to
defend the country of Mexico.
>> What a way to run the What a job to
have. who wants that job, right? You
don't even know, right?
>> Uh but you appointed them, right?
Meaning her. So, how how how can US
>> help facilitate in finding out if some
of those guys are real players or not?
Is this somewhere where, you know, where
our intelligence can play a role on
giving intel to her to make her smarter,
but then you have to know if you 100%
trust her as well to give that intel to
her. Uh, is that a role we can play to
educate her with her team?
>> We do. We have some security agreements
with them where we share information. I
know our intelligence agencies work with
them as well. Um, but we recognize um
the individuals there as well and um
want to know that we're partnering with
people who will use it wisely and not
use it against the United States. But um
we the President Trump has been very
aggressive in building a relationship
with the president and letting her know
that if she truly wants to take out
these cartels and and destroy,
you know, their network of what they're
doing um to profit off of the
destruction of the people of Mexico and
the United States and stop the gun
running, the drug running, the human
trafficking, that he'll be there to
support her in that. I hope she grabs a
hold of that assistance while she has
the chance because uh this president has
been extremely aggressive in identifying
who those terrorists are and letting
them know that he's going to take them
out and and even this action that just
happened now in Mexico. Um that's a very
powerful action we haven't seen against
these cartels for a very long time. But
but it wouldn't necessarily be necessary
except the Biden administration allowed
them to get so strong. They allowed them
to become so profitable they will do
anything.
>> Why do you think
>> how why do you think
>> why do you think I think I think they
recognized that that may have been um
something that that they could uh allow
to have happen to let the amount of
people into this country that they
needed to get a corner on a powerhouse
to elect Democrats to office and control
the country. that invasion of people
that crossed our borders was millions of
people. And I think they believed that
no future president would have the
tenacity to truly deport people that
weren't supposed to be here to truly go
after those individuals who came in that
were dangerous. President Trump has
we've already with the department
partnered with other law enforcement
agencies. We've removed over a thousand
people I think 1500 people that have
been on the known and suspected
terrorist watch list. um people that are
known terrorists that were led into this
country through that Biden
administration open border policy uh
that we have to go out and find and make
sure that we're removing them before
they take a terrorist action against the
United States from our inside our own
borders.
>> Yeah. No, no question. And and for me,
the only way to be a an equalizer, like
the great equalizer to the 12 million
that came here illegally to 15 million
is the voter ID. If the voter ID goes
in, then that can cancel each other out,
right? Because then you're kind of like,
what's the point of deporting them in?
But then that's got to get through House
Senate. That's going to be complicated
for it to pass. Uh, it's going to be
tough to do that. But I think that is a
very, very necessary. If you need two
forms of ID and a social security to be
able to shovel snow in New York, you can
definitely find a way to get an ID to
vote. What are your thoughts there?
>> No, I wholeheartedly agree. I think uh
it's it is imperative to the future of
our country. We need to know that the
people who are elect our leaders are
people uh that say that they are uh that
there are people who live in this
country the United States citizens get
the opportunity to to register to vote
that they get the chance to cast their
vote and that we know we can trust it.
That is why under our statute, Congress
passed a law that said our critical
infrastructure that maintains the
integrity of our government that runs
our country on our very worst day if we
had a horrible terrorist attack or
something devastating happened um this
department under FEMA is the agency
that's entrusted to run the government
and the um making sure that our
elections are are in have that integrity
too is just as important to maintaining
the future future of our country as our
electricity, as our food supply chain,
as our military. All of those are
critically important, but Congress
itself put in law that our elections
need to be able to be trusted and
ensured as well to maintain that safety.
>> If that passes, we will put a very big
party together here in South Florida. If
it passes, it's a massive thing. We're
already planning on doing something big
on Fourth of July, but if it passes, I
think there's a lot of enemies that'll
push back on that. talking about rewards
for justice. I know that falls under
Department of State, but I was speaking
to a uh previous DOJ individual and he
says the rewards for justice is a very
big role. So for instance, right now we
have Iran going on. We saw Venezuela on
how smooth it was going in, boom, took
him, we woke up, wait a minute, what
happened? Nothing. So no thousands of US
soldiers for, you know, no. So no
19-year-old lost. No. Wow. And Maduro's
in America now. Yes. How was it done?
Well, you know, sometimes we have
different mechanisms of what we do when
it comes on to rewards for justice where
we give away, you know, million to $25
million whether we find the individual
or sometimes do we ever do this and you
may just shut it down at the beginning
or you say, "Yes, Iran right now we're
sending everybody, not everybody, but a
lot of folks that are going over there,
the B-52 bombers, all these things that
are going there getting ready to see
what's going to happen.
Would we in a situation like Iran
consider using rewards of justice to get
some of their lieutenants to turn
against the Ki or that wouldn't work
with a regime like Iran?
>> I can't speak to that uh in particular
and nor should I. Um, but I think that
the president recognizes the real threat
that the Iranian regime is and is
willing to use every authority that he
has um to make sure that the American
people can be safe. He's been very clear
about stating u where that red line is
and he's followed through on that every
single time. So, I think that's what's
so important right now is when you're
dealing with the Iranian regime or any
other country that's threatened us,
Russia, North Korea, um these countries,
is that they know that we have a
president that does what he says he's
going to do and is strong and will use
the authorities that he has. So, that
that could be something. Uh although I
haven't had that discussion in
particular with the president,
>> I would be I don't know if that tactic
works with radicals. Uh I I don't but
but listen, I would put it on the list
if I if I had a job like that working on
Pennsylvania. I may consider that uh
job. I think that could work in the
Western Hemisphere. I don't know if that
works with IRGC. Who knows?
>> Uh uh who knows? I don't know what you
can uh uh do with that money that's
given to his direct reports. I do know
at any given moment something could
happen and especially when uh you know
Whitoff and Kushner and by the way
forgive me by saying last names. I'm a
former military guy, so we call
everybody by their last names. But it
was very obvious when they went in and
they made the offer, oh, you want to
keep negotiating? We're out of here. And
now you see their foreign minister
coming in and saying, hey, you know
what? We we'll we'll be open to this and
we'll be open to that. It looks like
it's the point of no return. And I I
don't want to put you in a position to
answer for that one. So, we can move on
to the next story uh uh aside from
what's going on with Iran. Okay. So,
in regards to uh the Real ID mandates,
you'll get some folks that will
criticize and say, "Oh my god, I don't
want to do Real ID, you know,
surveillance. The states watching
everything I'm doing and you know,
they'll they'll criticize it. Why would
we do this? Why should we do this?"
That's already happened in many
different states. We all have that logo
that's already under What do you say to
critics when they criticize the the Real
ID mandates?
Well, Real ID has been law for over 20
years. I was just the first secretary
that actually um implemented it,
actually said that we were going to
enforce it. And what it does is give you
an opportunity to prove you really are
who you are and that you have legal
status in this country, that you should
be here and that you have the ability to
do it. So, under TSA, which I have under
the Department of Homeland Security, we
implemented it at our airlines and it's
amazing, Patrick. Um, I we have over 90%
compliance. I think the last time I
checked, 94% compliance with that, which
means they can use their real ID when
they get their ticket and check in
through the security checkpoints or they
can use their passport. They can use a
tribal or military ID. But we want to
know that when we're uh talking to an
individual or when they're flying on our
airlines that they are who they say they
are and that we make sure that they're
not using an ID that would be falsified.
So, uh, while many years leaders didn't
have, uh, the fortitude to enforce the
law, when President Trump said, "We're
going to be a nation of laws, uh, we
meant it." And here at the Department of
Homeland Security, uh, we followed
through on implementing that law and
making sure that people recognized that
we took our security, um, um, as a
number one priority. You know, a lot of
times those questions like what you were
talking about, people don't like the
biometrics being mandated. I hear some
push back on that, but we don't have
those mandated at the department or for
the federal government. That's optional
at some of those security programs uh if
people want to participate in it to
speed up the identifications, but it has
not been mandated under my leadership or
President Trump's.
>> The question becomes it's not whether
they trust you or not, it's who's coming
next and at what measures can they take
it. you know, they look at Palanteer and
a movie came out recently called Mercy
with uh Chris Pratt. I don't know if
you've seen it. I don't know if you have
time to watch movies. If you have a
chance to go see a movie, it's worth
watching because it's about how in the
future AI takes over and the judge
becomes an AI person. You sit in front
of him and you have 90 minutes to plead
to her while you're not guilty. So, some
people are worried about what happens if
a palunteer gets too deep into the
system and you know that that's a
concern that comes up. But next story I
want to talk to you about is World Cup.
World Cup is around the corner and it's
coming to the states and you know the
championship match is going to be in New
York. I think the July 19th the finals
will be there and there's even some
games in Halisco where the current
issues are going on right now. What what
are you doing? Because you know in a
setting like this all eyes on us 250
year anniversary the president's
birthday is going to be 4 weeks before
the world cup right when his birthday
happens right afterwards the world cup
begins you know 80 years old 250 America
25 year anniversary of 911 right around
that area some people are s if the enemy
wanted to really make an example of it
this is a great opportunity what do you
say to uh make the folks that are going
to these games feel safe. What are we
doing about it?
>> Well, I wish I could do more. Right now,
my department isn't funded. You know,
it's the Department of Homeland Security
that is supposed to be uh making sure
that these largecale events across the
country are safe. Um they're national
security events, SER 1 events, which
means they're the utmost priority and
making sure that we keep people safe.
Uh, and right now we're supposed to be
putting out contracts to purchase drones
and technology to keep each of those
matches safe during the World Cup. We're
supposed to be giving out grants to
cities so that they can invest in their
security to prepare for those matches
that are going to be happening not just
in the United States, but also
partnering in ways with Mexico and
Canada to make sure travel back and
forth uh can be facilitated for
individuals who want to go to matches in
Canada, but also the United States and
how we work with CBP to get people
through those different airports and
also ports of entry. So all of that is
supposed to be getting done right now,
but Congress, the Democrats have not
agreed to fund us. So it's at a
standstill. That's the devastating thing
is we have almost 280,000 employees in
this department and the law enforcement
officers in ICE and CBP, their salaries
are funded, but other uh in individuals
may be working without pay, but those
individuals that are supposed to be
filling out contracts and be working on
those security measures don't have
dollars. They are furoughed home right
now and so nothing's happened. I'm
hopeful that soon they will recognize
the importance of homeland security and
what we need to do to keep people safe
every day and give us the funding we
need to get this department back to
work,
>> especially with everything that's coming
up and uh with with the issues we have
around the world right now. I mean, if
there's one place to not mess around
with is Department of Homeland Security,
missing children. Well, Patrick, if you
think about it, we have, you know,
dozens and dozens of countries that'll
be coming here to play matches. They're
going to bring residents and citizens
from those countries here and citizens
where we know we have dangerous
individuals who would look for that
perfect opportunity to come to the
United States when we have millions of
people coming to visit. So, um, you
know, it's important that we be prepared
for that, that we have the investments
made that we need to and have it be
adequately staffed. That's that's the
World Cup you've quickly identified is
imperative that we we partner and make
sure that we're ready for all these
millions of people that want to visit.
>> Reports are Shane saying we're going to
get anywhere between 6 to 10 million
visitors.
>> 6 to 10 million. And how do you vet all
of them? How do you know who's coming?
How do you know what people's motives
are? Let's say 0.001%
is bad. We have to make sure we're
protected. This isn't something, you
know, when you put up an event, you you
need we need couple months to prepare
for some events that we do at MGM Grand
Arena. When you have six to 10 million
people coming to the biggest sporting
event every four years in America, you
want to make sure there's no issues and
it's safety. So, I hope both sides of
the aisle are working together for this
because we want safety.
If you ever want to know when I go to
work, which sporting event do I lose my
employees for a few hours at a time that
they're working, it's the World Cup.
I'll go to their desk. They're all
screaming. Somebody scored a goal.
They're running around. They're outside.
I'm like, "Guys, we got work to do. What
happened?" You won't believe we just
scored a goal. Look at this P. It's a
very different kind of I'm sure you've
been through it as well yourself with uh
having
>> passionate passionate passionate people
that want to come and and celebrate and
spend time enjoying the World Cup. Let's
hope that they can do that in a safe
environment. And I'm going to do all I
can to be prepared for it that we have
the ability to do that and provide that
for those families.
>> We're rooting for you. We're rooting for
you for that. Missing children, some
460,000
>> uh a year every year. So, you know, the
job of missing children, if you don't
mind taking it from two different
angles. One is what are we doing? Every
time we see reports, it's a celebration,
but could you give some feedback on the
preventative side to have 460,000
kids missing every single year? How are
these kids, you know, being taken? What
are some different stories you're
hearing about, whoever these child
traffickers are? What are some ways that
they they're doing it, America, that
you're finding?
>> Well, one of the tools they used was
that open border for years. We saw over
400,000 children be lost under the last
administration. They came in uh moved by
human traffickers. Some of them were
even put into government programs under
the office of refugees um under HHS and
we paid people um sponsors they called
them to take these children in and then
those sponsors were so corrupt that they
were trafficking these children. So that
was happening under the Biden
administration that we were actually the
federal government was paying people who
went out and then trafficked these
children who came across the border and
were separated from their families. So,
we have since found over 150,000 of
those children uh and relocated many of
them and put them back with their
families and reunited them. But we've
got a lot more to find and they're
continuing to use them. We've seen those
numbers drop dramatically of new
children that are being trafficked
because of that secure border and not
allowing people to use those children to
come across and facilitate. if you
remember the policies was that if they
had a child underage um that whole group
of individuals got to come in um and not
be detained at all. And so you saw many
times the border patrol talking about
the fact that they had saw the same
child being used by um those mules um
moving different groups of people across
crossing the border multiple times
knowing that if they had a child in the
group and declared that they were a part
of the family or someone who was
responsible for them that they could be
immediately released into the interior
of the country. That's why as soon as
President Trump came into office and I
became Homeland Security Secretary, we
started using DNA testing again at the
border so that we would know if that
individual that came to the border, if
they said that child uh was theirs, we
DNA tested them to make sure. But people
quit coming to that border and quit
trafficking those children because they
knew no matter what they were not going
to be allowed to enter if they weren't
coming legally.
>> Yeah. I mean, to give you guys credit,
55 year low. The last time we saw
numbers like this was 1970. within 12
months there was an 84% drop off and
it's amazing because when uh Vice
President Kamala Harris was saying how
difficult it was and how comp you know
challenging of a job it is it took you
only a few months to get it done and
they could have done this the entire
time and they didn't want to do it again
you talked about a little bit earlier
but to me what sits at the top of
everything for every family am I safe to
have my kids go play outside the day I
can't feel safe to let my kids play
outside. We have a very big problem that
we got to address. And if we can't start
it with il illegal immigration here and
especially our kids, that's an area
where politics doesn't matter. Left,
right, center, nobody cares what
political party you're from when it
comes down to their kids and uh you guys
have done a great job with that and uh
uh we look forward to hearing continuous
updates on what you're doing there.
Next uh uh next story before we wrap up.
I got two more things I'll cover here.
And again, thank you for your time
before we wrap this up. Um
the next 911. The next 9/11, you know,
and how to prevent the next 911. You
hear about al-Qaeda, them still having
their, you know, their their hands here
on different areas, their training. You
go see what's going on with Minneapolis.
You're seeing what's going on in New
York City praying outside and well, it's
this is America. You're able to do this.
Where is the line to be able to prevent
another attack like that from happening?
Because sometimes when it doesn't happen
for a long time, you're like, "Oh, it's
not going to happen. America, we're
America. Nobody's going to touch us.
This will never happen to us." And
sometimes when you get too cocky, that's
when you get caught. How confident are
you with what we have going on today
that the next 9/11 cannot happen during
our watch, during your watch?
Well, I think people should wake up
every day being glad that they live in
the freest um most safe country in the
world and recognize all the work that
President Trump has done. I mean, we've
seen our murder rates drop by um
dramatically uh you know over the last
it's the lowest number of murders that
we've had in the country in 125 years.
So, what he's done to enforce the law
has been important in this department.
Uh, I have the intelligence agencies,
the weapons of mass destruction. I have,
um, the individuals that go out and
train everyone in the states and local
entities on detecting bombs or
explosives or knowing what those
networks are and um, following
individuals in this country who may wish
to perpetuate a terrorist attack around
this country. What I would tell you is
that um, I don't sleep well at night.
that I I think every day that I have to
hurry up and find those individuals
before they have an opportunity to harm
the United States. I think there's
systems that we have that are vulnerable
that I won't speak to the specifics on.
Um that there's areas that we need to
look at as far as um preventing
individuals from being able to
infiltrate not just our critical
infrastructure but also our cities and
our partnerships with them and how we
identify folks. But we've seen also
across the country, you know, fake
nonprofits or entities be set up to
train individuals to fly planes that
aren't real um real entities that do the
certification at all. Individuals that
have set up,
>> you know, driving schools and CDL
schools that aren't aren't real. They
just facilitate it to get the money and
then give someone a C certificate that's
never been through the training and
didn't complete one day of course work.
So we have to be vigilant not just on
the typical security measures that we
always have but also looking for how
would they try to attack us and what can
we do to ensure that those individuals
that would give them access to that are
doing their job correctly. Uh we have to
think three steps ahead of them uh to
ensure that we're safe and uh every day
this department is working to make sure
we're looking at all of that to let the
American people know that they can be
safe on our homeland. But but we have a
a country that has many friends uh and
and we are the bright shining star to
the rest of the world. That also means
that we have many enemies and many
people which with which to do us harm.
And being safe in our homeland is
important because those families that
can go to bed at night and know their
kids will be able to get up and go to
school safely. they can go to their jobs
and live the American dream. They need
to know that we're working every day to
ensure that that gets continued and we
don't end up looking like Mexico does
today or we don't let criminals um
overthrow our laws and our and our
constitution in order to become stronger
that try to prevent our way of life.
>> So I I have two uh fun questions for you
and uh let's see how this goes with the
fun question. So one time
>> I got pulled over. Okay. And um I am
famous for having a lot of speeding
tickets. Okay. I tried to be a cop. I
tried to be a cop and a firefighter.
They said I couldn't do it. I said, 'Why
not? I was in the military. I got out.
They said you have 16 speeding tickets
and your license was suspended once. You
can't be a cop, so I couldn't be a cop.
Is it true you like to drive fast and
you get a lot of speeding tickets? Is
that a Is that right what I'm what I'm
reading?
I used to uh I would say before I ever
got into politics and before I ran for
Congress. Yes. I grew up with a dad that
um was always in a hurry, you know, and
he we lived on a farm and a ranch and
and he would tell me, you know, Christy,
get to town and get those parts and get
back here as fast as you can. So, um in
our family, yes, had quite a few
speeding tickets. But when I ran for
Congress, it was quite an issue. people
would say, you know, how can you u write
the law when you uh knowingly break the
law? Uh and that really resonated with
me. It was true that even though I
didn't think at the time the way that I
grew up that speeding tickets were a big
deal,
>> um if people were going to trust me to
go out and to actually write the law in
Congress, then I needed to. So, I'm
completely reformed, Patrick. I hope you
are, too.
>> Are you fully I can't I can't say I'm
fully reformed. Listen, the the the the
some people the world's a safer place if
they don't drive.
>> They make fast cars for a reason.
Secretary No. I mean, these these cars
are built to drive them. For you to have
a car with a lot of power and you want
me to go 65, give me a flip and break. I
hope my kids never
>> I've driven I've driven some of those,
too. And it's been I mean that I I think
the first time I became a NASCAR fan was
when they let me uh go drive some some
cars at Lowe's Motor Speedway and I was
addicted. They also said that I missed
my calling that I should have. Really? I
I do I do love to uh drive, but uh I am
reformed. I
>> I no longer drive drive fast.
>> I want to try to follow your lead lead.
Hopefully, one of these days I'll give
up speeding.
>> Uh uh my son likes to f He'll say, "Dad,
slow down. That's not the speeding
limit." I'm like, "You are just like
your grandpa." But my older son, he
likes speed. So, last but not least,
with the schedule you have, what is your
fitness routine? How do you stay in
shape when do you train?
>> I kind of do everything. I like to run a
couple days a week. I I like my Pelaton
bike. I do that a couple days a week and
then I do some CrossFit, some weights as
well. Um so it uh but then you know I
like I like to do anything that's
outside. That's what the part is I've
learned that with this job I have to get
up early and work out. I'm usually up by
four and working out just so that I can
handle sitting in meetings all day and
and doing this much talking. I like to
move around and it keeps me busy. Most
people know I came from a a ranching
background. So, I spent all my days
before I got into politics outside. So,
doing this job and being inside a lot is
a little bit challenging.
>> Well, uh uh I can only imagine for
somebody that's on the outside, you have
to constantly be on the inside uh
working, but we appreciate you. You have
a tough job. We're rooting for you. The
the world's a safer place if you
succeed. And uh you got a group of
people here that are rooting for you to
succeed. Again, thank you so much for
your time. I really enjoy talking to
you. You're the best. I'll come down
there and visit with you in person
sometime soon. Um, appreciate it. Thanks
so much.
>> I look forward to it. Take care.
Bye-bye.
>> If you love this country, show it.
Lead with pride in the valuement USA
collection.
Designed for freedom thinkers. Built for
everyday leaders.
Red, white, blue. Purpose. Wear what you
believe in. Value tamement USA.