They Rebuilt the 2008 Crash Machine — And Put It In Your Retirement Account
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The video argues that the financial mechanics which caused the 2008 crash are re-emerging within a new vehicle: private credit, now valued at over $2 trillion compared to just $500 billion five years ago. Unlike traditional banking regulated by Basel III rules after the crisis, this shadow system operates with opacity, no public pricing, and minimal oversight. The speaker highlights that while official default rates are reported below 2%, the reality is likely closer to 5% when accounting for "payment in kind" (PIK) interest payments where borrowers skip cash outflows but debt balances grow. This practice masks distress until a liquidity crisis hits, exemplified by Blue Owl Capital locking investors out of funds and forcing asset sales at steep discounts after overextending on loans that were never designed to be liquidated quickly. The risk is particularly dangerous because the market structure has shifted from sophisticated institutional holders like pension funds with long time horizons to retail investors through semi-liquid vehicles promising quarterly withdrawals, creating a severe duration mismatch between illiquid 5-to-7-year assets and short-term redemption requests. This dynamic was exacerbated by an August 2025 executive order allowing 401(k) plans to invest in private markets, opening the door for $13 trillion in retirement savings to enter this high-risk sector. The speaker illustrates a "risk waterfall" where defaults at the bottom of the chain—such as mid-market software firms or auto parts suppliers disrupted by AI and inflation—cascade upward through funds, insurance companies, and banks that have lent hundreds of billions directly into private credit, threatening public markets when institutions are forced to sell stocks and bonds to meet capital calls. Evidence of systemic fragility is mounting with high-profile failures including First Brands Group filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy due to off-balance-sheet financing issues and Tricolor Holdings collapsing after regulatory citations for lending without proper titles or credit checks, resulting in massive losses for major banks like JPMorgan Chase, Barclays, and Fifth Third Bank. The speaker notes that over 40% of private credit borrowers now operate with negative free cash flow, a figure rising from 25% in 2021, while CEO Jamie Dimon compared the hidden dangers to cockroaches seen behind one wall implying many more are lurking unseen. These failures suggest that stress in this opaque sector will inevitably spill over into public markets, potentially triggering a global event comparable to 2008 if defaults rise and fire sales accelerate during an economic downturn or recession. Ultimately, the speaker concludes that understanding these causal chains is essential for maintaining financial sovereignty rather than relying on insider trading or luck like Michael Burry did in 2008. The current system functions as a wealth transfer mechanism where risk is displaced onto taxpayers through inflation and debt while profits concentrate at the top via money printing backstops available only to "too big to fail" entities. To protect against this, individuals must learn to trace who created specific risks, how they were packaged, sold downstream to retail investors, and ultimately left holding by those with fewest options when things go wrong. The video urges viewers to examine their retirement account holdings critically, recognizing that even without direct exposure to private credit loans, the interconnected nature of modern finance means a collapse in this shadow banking system could directly impact personal portfolios through forced liquidations across all asset classes.
Read the full video transcript
In 2008, the American financial system
didn't just crash, it almost ceased to
exist. And a similar danger is building
in the system once again. 12 of the 13
largest financial institutions in the
United States were at risk of total
failure. That was exactly what the
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke
told the Financial Crisis Inquiry
Commission. 12 out of 13. The United
Kingdom's Chancellor of the Exchequer
admitted Britain came within hours of
what he called a breakdown of law and
order. American households alone lost
$16 trillion in net worth. One quarter
of all families lost 75% [music] or more
of everything that they had. The stock
market fell by 57%. 7 and 1/2 million
jobs vanished essentially overnight. And
the Federal Reserve, in a move that had
no precedent in the history of this
country, printed 7.77
trillion dollars out of thin air to keep
the system from collapsing entirely.
Every single American lost an estimated
$70,000 in lifetime income because of
what happened. And for all of that, all
of the destruction, all of the fraud,
all of the recklessness,
exactly one banker went to jail. One. A
mid-level trader at Credit Suisse. 30
months. That was the price. Now, I'm
telling you all of this because the
mechanics that caused 2008 are running
again. And this time, odds are it's
already inside of your retirement
account. I'll prove it. And more
importantly, I'm going to give you the
framework that may help you avoid the
fallout if the market, as a whole, is
indeed at risk from this potential new
contagion that we're going to walk
through. Buckle up because here's what
this video is going to show you. Wall
Street has built [music] a two
trillion-dollar shadow banking system
that operates in dark with no public
pricing, no public reporting, and no
public oversight. It is a sector of the
economy known as private credit and
there are now significant warning signs
that it has a major issue.
One of BlackRock's private credit funds
recently lost nearly 20% of its value in
a single quarter. We're not talking
about a small obscure company here. We
are talking about a load-bearing wall of
the global economy and if they're
already taking a hit, it stands to
reason that there's something much
bigger going on. And in fact, we already
have proof that there is. Recently, a
firm most Americans have never even
heard of, Blue Owl Capital, permanently
locked investors out of a fund that was
supposed to let them withdraw their
money every quarter. Instead, after
getting overextended on debt, they were
forced to sell 1.4 billion dollar in
loans, halt all redemptions, and tell
investors they'd get their money back
eventually.
The stock dropped 9% instantly and one
analyst called it, and I quote, "a
canary in the coal mine" and said the
private markets bubble is finally
starting to burst. Finally starting to
burst? How long has this problem been
building up? Most people have never even
heard of private credit. And even if
they have heard of it, they probably
couldn't explain it and this is exactly
like mortgage-backed securities and
subprime mortgages right before
everything blew up in 2008. There was a
ton of risk in the system that most
people were completely unaware of, but
that didn't stop it from becoming a
major threat to the economy. 15 years
ago, the private credit market barely
existed, but now it's roughly the same
size as the entire high-yield bond
market. Whether people know what it is
or not, pension funds have 5% to 15%
of their assets in private credit. Now,
this isn't a story about one fund
blowing up. This is a story about a
predatory pattern that keeps repeating.
In 2008, the vehicle was mortgage-backed
securities, and in 2026, the vehicle is
private credit. Risky assets get created
by sophisticated financial players,
repackaged under a new name, blessed by
rating agencies, and sold downstream to
the people least equipped to survive it
if something goes wrong. Pension funds,
retirement funds, and everyday investors
who were told this was safe, stable
income. I'm going to walk you through
exactly how it works, why it's breaking
right now, and what it reveals about a
much bigger pattern that's playing out
across the entire economy.
The US private credit market has
exploded from $500 billion to over $2
trillion in just 5 years. Pension funds
have billions parked in it, and last
August, the government opened the door
to putting your 401k money into it. Most
people have never even heard the term
private credit, and that's exactly how
Wall Street wants it. But, here's the
bad news. Goldman Sachs published data
showing that 15% of private credit
borrowers are no longer generating
enough cash to cover their interest
payments. One in six across the board.
And that number is almost certainly
understating the problem because the
IMF's own financial stability report
found that over 40%
of private credit borrowers are now
operating
>> [music]
>> with negative free cash flow. That's up
from 25% in 2021.
For all of the hype in the economy about
it booming, the reality on the ground is
that things are trending rapidly [music]
in the wrong direction. So, what happens
when a borrower can't make their
interest payment? In a normal market,
that's obviously a default. It is game
over. But in the private credit market,
there's a trick. The lender lets the
borrower skip the cash payment and
instead tack the interest onto the loan
balance. It's something called payment
in kind or PIK. The borrower doesn't
pay. The lender doesn't report a loss.
Everyone's numbers look clean. That's
why the official default rate in private
credit is reported at under 2%, but once
you account for these restructurings and
cute little extensions, analysts
estimate the real number is more than
double that at closer to 5%. The gap
between those two numbers is where this
escalating risk is hiding. Jamie Dimon,
CEO of JPMorgan Chase, the largest bank
in the United States, didn't mince words
on his October earnings call when he
compared the problems building in
private credit to cockroaches.
His meaning was plain. When you see one,
there are always more hiding in the
walls. Now,
how did we end up back here? After the
2008 financial crisis, regulators told
banks never again. They imposed strict
new rules known as Basel III that
essentially forced banks to stop making
these risky ass loans. Problem solved,
right? Not even close. The risky lending
didn't stop. It just moved somewhere the
regulators couldn't see it. The goal of
Basel III was to make it expensive and
difficult for banks to lend to mid-size
companies. The businesses too big for a
local bank, but too small to issue
public bonds. Private credit funds
stepped in to fill that gap. They raise
money from big investors, pension funds,
insurance companies, wealthy
individuals. They then pool it and lend
it out to these companies at higher
interest rates than banks would charge.
For a while, this worked great.
Companies got funding, investors got
high yields, and because the loans were
held by sophisticated institutional
players with long time horizons, the
illiquidity wasn't actually a problem.
It went wrong when three things happened
together. One, the market exploded in
size, the aforementioned 500 billion to
2 trillion plus in just 5 years. With
that much money pouring in, lending
standards just dropped. Also, lenders
have to put the money raised to work.
They have that obligation, but they
quickly ran out of good borrowers and
just started lending to riskier ones.
Remember the ultra-toxic subprime
mortgages that almost destroyed the
global economy? That's exactly what
subprime meant. It's a nice way of
saying people banks really should never
have lent money to. Two, they started
selling these loans to retail investors
through semi-liquid funds like Blue
Owl's OBDC II. Here's the problem. The
underlying loans are typically 5 to
7-year commitments to private companies
borrowing the money, and you can't cash
them out overnight to pay back impatient
investors. There's just no exchange.
There's no market maker. And foolishly,
the funds that hold these loans ended up
promising investors they could withdraw
their money every quarter. How is that
supposed to work? You have long duration
loans, illiquid assets, stuffed inside
of a vehicle that promises short-term
access to cash. How? That might work
fine when everyone is calm and only a
few people request to get their money
back. It falls apart though the second
people want their money back all at the
same time. Why? Because the fund has to
sell assets that were never designed to
be sold quickly.
>> [music]
>> Now, that's the same mechanic as a bank
run. Except there's no FDIC insurance
backing it up. The third converging
problem is that the government opened
the door to 401ks to hold these assets.
In August of 2025, an executive order
directed regulators to explore letting
401k plans invest in private markets.
The industry is already marketing to the
$13 trillion defined contribution
retirement market. So, the risk
waterfall is just being extended further
and further downstream. Now, I want you
to see the full chain of cause and
effect here because when you see it laid
out end to end, you will understand why
the people at the top of this system
sleep fine at night and why the people
at the bottom should be worried, but
don't even know what's happening. It all
starts with private equity. Let's say a
private equity firm wants to buy a
company. They need debt to finance the
deal, and before 2008, they just go to a
bank. But, the banks got regulated out
of that business. So, now they go to a
private credit fund. The private credit
fund writes the loan, but it doesn't use
its own money. It has to raise capital
from somewhere. So, it goes to pension
funds, insurance companies, endowments,
and sovereign wealth funds. That's the
traditional investor base. It's
sophisticated. They have long time
horizons. They understand what they're
actually buying. But, that wasn't enough
capital to feed a market that was
growing this fast. So, the funds created
a new product, semi-liquid vehicles
marketed directly to retail investors.
Everyday people with 401ks looking for
yield in a world where savings accounts
were just paying nothing. These are the
funds like Blue Owl, the ones that
promise quarterly access to your money
while holding loans that don't mature
for 5 to 7 years. And now, with last
August executive order, the door is just
wide open for people with 401ks to get
involved in this asset class. $13
trillion in defined contribution
retirement savings, the single largest
pool of retail money in the world
[music]
is being invited to the table. So,
follow the chain. A private equity firm
loads debt onto a company.
A private credit fund writes that loan
and packages it. The fund sells shares
to a pension fund who sells retirement
promises to a teacher in Ohio or an
insurance company who backs the annuity
your parents are living on. Or now,
potentially, directly into your 401k.
The company at the bottom of that chain,
the one that actually has to generate
the cash to service the debt that the
private markets are cramming on top of
it, might be a mid-market software firm
that's about to get disrupted by AI or
an auto parts supplier running on
razor-thin margins [music] or a
healthcare company that's been acquired
three times in five years and is
carrying more debt than revenue. This is
happening more and more frequently.
If that company can't pay, the loss
doesn't stay at the top. It waterfalls
down through the fund, through the
pension, into the retirement account of
someone who was never told this is what
they owned. I call this the risk
waterfall. Risk doesn't disappear. It
just flows downhill. And in this system,
it always ends up in the same place with
the people who have the least
information and the fewest options to
get out of the way.
We'll be back to the [music] show in a
second. But first, let's talk about lazy
money. Most people think owning gold is
smart. And it is, to [music] be honest.
But, the question is, why aren't you
making it work for you? Monetary Metals
changes all of that. They've built a way
for your gold to earn yield, paid not in
dollars, but in more physical gold, up
to 4% per year. More ounces every single
month, compounding in hard money. Your
assets producing more of itself. And
unlike most precious metal programs,
storage and insurance are included, so
your yield isn't eaten up by hidden
fees. Monetary Metals is how you [music]
opt out of that game entirely and start
stacking more ounces, whether the price
moves or not. Click the link [music] in
the show notes or visit
monetary-metals.com/impact
[music]
to learn more. This is a paid
advertisement.
>> [music]
>> And now, let's get back to the show.
We'll get back to the show in a moment,
but first, let's talk about the unfair
advantage most entrepreneurs don't even
know that they have access to. 10 years
ago, if you wanted to compete with the
big brands, you needed their big budget.
Today, a solo founder operating out of
their spare bedroom can have the exact
same checkout technology, the same
AI-powered marketing tools, and the same
world-class commerce infrastructure as
the biggest names in the game. That
platform is Shopify. Brands like
Gymshark and Allbirds built empires on
it, and it powers 10% [music]
of all e-commerce in the US. Shopify
gives you everything. A beautiful
storefront, AI tools that write your
product descriptions and enhance your
photography, email and social campaigns,
inventory, shipping, returns, all of it
in one [music] place. The gap between
you and the big players just closed. The
only question is whether you're going to
use it. Sign up for your $1 per month
trial today at shopify.com/impact.
And [music] now, let's get back to the
show.
In the last quarter alone, private
credit investors have requested $2.77
billion in withdrawals. That's a 200%
increase from the prior quarter. When
that many people want out at the same
time and the underlying assets can't be
sold quickly, you have a structural
problem that no press release can fix.
So, that's the machine that's siphoning
wealth out of the working and middle
classes and shoving it up to the top.
Now, let me explain the environment this
machine is operating in so you
understand why things are suddenly
accelerating, why there is so much risk.
The global economy has been completely
destabilized by COVID-era money
printing, insane levels of deficit
spending, a rapidly changing
geopolitical world order, and the dawn
of AI. There are bubbles forming across
multiple asset classes at the same time.
AI valuations have blown past historical
benchmarks. Companies with minimal
revenue are being priced like they've
already won the AI race.
Some of that is genuine belief in a
technology that really is going to pay
off. Some of it is just an ocean of
capital swollen by years of artificially
low interest rates and historic levels
of money printing. So, smart money right
now knows that it must find a return
somewhere that outpaces the 25%
inflation of the last 5 years alone.
Meanwhile, people like Warren Buffett,
the most famous long-term value investor
alive, realizes the market is not in a
healthy place and has been pulling out
of the stock market and is sitting on
the largest cash reserve in Berkshire
Hathaway's history. Gold has blown past
$5,000 an ounce, a record high, and it's
not a sign of confidence in the market.
>> [music]
>> Gold surges when serious money is
looking for shelter from massive
uncertainty. Crypto's also pulled
sharply back from its highs. Consumer
spending patterns have gotten dangerous
due to the severe effects of a radically
K-shaped economy. The wealthier are
still spending and they're masking the
fact that middle- and working-class
Americans are pulling back hard. And all
of this is happening inside of a
geopolitical environment that is blowing
apart in real time. Trade wars, tariff
escalations, invasions, military
strikes, deposed regimes, a serious
global contest over the future of the
dollar as the world's reserve currency.
The entire architecture of the post-war
economic order is under pressure from
every direction all at once.
And layered on top of it is the arrival
of AI, which is disrupting job markets,
rewriting business models, and creating
a level of uncertainty in the workforce
that we haven't seen in at least a
generation. You put all of that
together, and what you get is a market
environment that has become incredibly
skittish, fragile, and reactive.
The kind of environment where bad news
travels fast and a contagion spreads
even faster. And that instability is
putting direct pressure on exactly the
kinds of companies that have borrowed
heavily through the private credit
market. Mid-size firms running on tight
margins in an economy that is squeezing
them from every direction. The question
is, how far down is the economy going to
go? Will the pressure dismantle the
private credit markets entirely? And is
private credit now big enough that its
failure could trigger a global event
like 2008? Let's look at the visible
cracks that are erupting as we speak.
Last September, a company called First
Brands Group, a major auto parts
supplier backed by private credit, filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Creditors
alleged the company had borrowed against
the same invoices multiple times, using
what court filings described as
off-balance sheet financing to hide how
leveraged it actually was. The
Department of Justice opened a criminal
investigation. Total unpaid loans were
up to $2.3 billion. dollars.
later, Tricolor Holdings, a subprime
auto lender, also funded through private
credit, collapsed. Regulators had
previously cited them for selling cars
they didn't even have the titles to and
lending to borrowers without credit
scores or even a driver's license. JP
Morgan wrote off 170 million dollars on
that one. Barclays lost 147 million and
Fifth Third Bank, one of the largest
banks in the Midwest, lost 178 million.
These are big companies funded by
private credit loans that all blew up in
the span of just a few weeks. And every
one of those losses landed on the
balance sheets of institutions that
millions of Americans depend on. US
banks have lent 300 billion dollars
directly to private credit providers.
That's Moody's data. The same banks that
hold your deposits, that back your
mortgage, that underwrite the bonds in
your index fund, they've all lent money
into private credit and are subject
[music]
to whatever is about to happen to that
industry as the structural fragility
collides headlong with an unstable
economy. To put it bluntly, this
exposure means that stress in private
credit will not stay limited to private
credit. If defaults rise and fund values
drop, the banks that lent those funds
take losses. If pension funds face
capital calls on their private credit
commitments during a downturn, they may
be forced to sell their liquid holdings,
stocks, bonds, the stuff in your
brokerage account, to meet those
obligations. Private credit stress
>> [music]
>> becomes public market stress.
Your 401k doesn't need to hold a single
private credit loan for you to
potentially get hit. The Financial
Stability Oversight Council has
explicitly warned that a sustained
increase in private credit defaults
could create financial instability
through the entire system. Roughly 12%
of Blue Owl's OBDC2 portfolio was
invested in software companies. Across
the private credit market, software and
SaaS businesses were some of the most
popular borrowers over the past 5 years.
The thesis was pretty simple. Recurring
revenue, high margins, predictable cash
flow, great collateral. But that thesis
was built before AI started devouring
the economics of enterprise software as
a category. If AI disrupts the business
models these loans were unwritten
against, and there are serious reasons
to believe it will, then the collateral
underneath billions of dollars in
private credit loans is worth less than
the day the loans were made. That's a
slow-burning fuse on top of everything
else we've just walked through. Now, I'm
not saying this is guaranteed to be 2008
all over again. No one can see the
future that clearly. But what I am
telling you is that the mechanic is
identical to what happened in 2008.
Opacity, you can't see what's going on.
Misaligned incentives, risk created at
the top flowing downhill to the people
least equipped to understand it, and a
backstop of government printing if
everything goes pear-shaped. In 2008,
the vehicle was mortgage-backed
securities. Today, the vehicle is
private credit. The question is not
whether the mechanic is the same, it is.
The question is whether the private
credit market is big enough to blow up
the entire economy. And that's a big bet
to make. Here's what would need to
happen for this to become a systemic
event. A recession hits and triggers a
wave of defaults among private credit
borrowers. Companies that are already
struggling to cover their interest
payments. Funds facing a surge in
redemption requests are forced to sell
loans at steep discounts, not at the 99
cents in the dollar that Blue Owl just
managed, [music] but at 70 or 80 cents
on the dollar. Fire sale prices. Pension
funds and insurance companies hit with
capital calls they didn't expect are
forced to liquidate their public market
holdings to raise cash. Stocks and bonds
get sold, not because anything is wrong
with those companies, but because the
money is just needed somewhere else.
Banks that lent $300 billion to private
credit funds start pulling their credit
lines to protect themselves, which
accelerates the very stress they're
trying to avoid, and the selling feeds
on itself. Public markets drop, consumer
confidence drops, lending tightens, the
economy slows, and the borrowers who are
already struggling now have even less
revenue to service their debt. None of
these steps are guaranteed, but every
single one of them is plausible,
bordering on likely,
>> [music]
>> and the system is now structured in a
way where each one makes the next one
more likely. That's exactly how 2008
unfolded. Whether by conspiracy or
simple incentive structures, we find
ourselves in the middle of something I'm
calling the invisible coup that by
design or accident is siphoning the
wealth out of the middle and working
classes and funneling it up to the
wealthy. Everybody can feel it, you can
see it, it is patently obvious. It all
happens via a very simple set of
mechanisms, and the current structure of
the private credit market is just the
latest tool facilitating this wealth
transfer that you need to protect
yourself against. Here's how the coup is
playing out. The setup of our current
economic system uses central banking and
modern monetary theory, aka debt,
deficits, money printing, and inflation
to push risk, cost, and vulnerability
away from the banks who will be backed
up by money printing, and they shove it
onto anyone who holds a fiat currency
like the dollar. Then the system
insulates the banks from the downside of
these risks by classifying them as too
big to fail. This designation acts like
an insurance backstop [music]
paid for via money printing which causes
inflation. The one thing that the
average person does not understand well
enough to revolt against allowing
inflation to function as a hidden tax on
the working and middle classes. Anyone
who understands this structure, which
can effectively be rounded to the
wealthy, knows to put essentially their
money into assets to not only avoid the
hidden tax of inflation, but to benefit
from it. That's the game. And private
credit is just the most recent method of
displacing risk across as many taxpayers
as possible while concentrating the
wins, if there are any, at the top.
Heads they win, tails you lose.
Now, the question becomes, what do you
do about it? Obviously, master the rules
of the game, even if the game is rigged.
I've talked about that many, many times.
Next, remember this is about more than
just portfolio management. The people
who get crushed by these systems aren't
the ones who pick the wrong fund.
They're the ones who never learned to
trace the chain of cause and effect that
makes the entire world go round. Think
about the chain of logic we just walked
through with private debt. We started
with a company most people have never
heard of, Blue Owl, locking investors
out of a fund. And from that single data
point, we traced a chain that runs
through private equity,
through private credit, through pension
funds, through insurance companies,
through the banking system, through the
executive branch, and into your
retirement account. Every link is
knowable because they're all causal
links. That's the skill. Not picking
better investments, learning to trace
chains of logic and cause and effect.
Learn to maintain your sovereignty by
learning to ask, who created this risk?
Who packaged it? Who sold it? And who's
left holding it right now?
Because if you can answer those four
questions, and you know who's going to
be protected by inflation, money
printing, and debt, you will know which
financial product, policy, or headline
is going to potentially hurt or help
you. You will see the waterfall of risk
before you're standing at the bottom of
it. That is what separated the people
who saw 2008 coming from the people who
got buried by it. It wasn't insider
information. It wasn't luck. People like
Michael Burry read the loan documents.
They traced the chain from the homeowner
who couldn't afford the mortgage,
through the bank that didn't care
because the government was backing the
loans, through the rating agency that
rubber-stamped it, to the pension fund
that bought it. They saw the waterfall.
And while people were being assured that
the system was sound, people who
understood the causal chain bet against
it and won. Your goal is to master that
same framework, not necessarily the
trading expertise, the mental model. You
need to know what a risk waterfall looks
like. You need to know how payment in
kind adds risk and hides distress. And
when you know how liquidity promises are
dangerous when you have a duration
mismatch between the loaners and the
lenders, and when you know how
interconnection turns a private credit
problem into a public market problem,
you're in a much better position.
Mastering things like that is the
difference between being manipulated by
a system and at least maintaining some
level of coherent optionality while
others are just led to slaughter. As you
think through all of this stuff, pull up
your retirement account, your 401k, your
IRA, your pension summary, whatever you
have, and don't just look at the
balance. Look at the holdings. Look at
what's inside the funds you own and ask
yourself, can I trace the sequence of
cause and effect as to why these are or
are not reasonable positions to hold?
You'll never be able to drive risk to
zero. The markets are best understood as
a casino for a reason, but you can
certainly improve your odds of success
and avoid the obvious traps that
virtually everyone else will get sucked
into. That's sovereignty, not a bunker
in Hawaii, a bug out bag, a gun, or a
bunch of water. Sovereignty is the
ability to see the system clearly enough
to make your own decisions instead of
being funneled blindly [music]
into someone else's and it's built on
the back of first principles thinking.
All right, if you want to see me explore
ideas like this in real time, be sure to
hit the subscribe button and join me
live Monday, Wednesdays, and Fridays at
7:00 a.m. Pacific Time. You can either
debate people in the comments or just
sit back and enjoy as we go through the
most important topics of our time. All
right, until next time my friends, be
legendary. Take care. Peace.
If you like this conversation, check out
this episode to learn more.
The price of Bitcoin was being
manipulated by the same company that
trained convicted felon Sam
Bankman-Fried of FTX fame. At least
that's the claim in a recent lawsuit.
Now, as we go through the