"They Hate Jewish People!" - Problem With Islam Invading The West & Israel Palestine War | Gad Saad
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Gad Saad argues that the friction between Western societies and Islam stems from fundamental theological differences regarding proselytization and cultural values. He contrasts Judaism, which discourages conversion to ensure a "costly signal" of genuine commitment, with Islam's core tenet as a proselytizing religion aimed at uniting humanity under Allah. Saad cites Samuel Huntington's 1993 theory on the clash of civilizations to explain why this expansionist nature creates inevitable conflicts when Islamic populations grow in non-Islamic societies like Montreal or Canada. He asserts that because Islam does not grant individual freedom, it inherently clashes with Western values built on dignity and autonomy, predicting that as Muslim demographics rise from 2% to over 10%, the resulting social friction will become impossible to ignore without peaceful resolution. The discussion extends this analysis of colonization to the Middle East, where Saad contends that Islam has eradicated pre-existing societies more extensively than any other ideology in history. He points out that regions like Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon have shifted from Christian majorities to Muslim ones within a single lifetime through what he describes as brute force conquest rather than organic evolution. Under Islamic law, non-Muslims are historically tolerated only as third-class citizens known as *dhimmis*, living on a precarious footing where their status can be revoked at any moment. Saad emphasizes that this dynamic applies not just to Jews but also to Christians and other minorities who have been pushed out of the region over centuries, noting that no ideology has conquered so many countries or displaced indigenous populations as Islam has done across 56 nations in 1400 years. Regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict, Saad rejects the narrative of a simple tit-for-tat struggle and instead frames it through the lens of demographic expansion and canonical goals. He references Golda Meir's quotes to illustrate that for some leaders, peace is contingent on Palestinian hatred or Jewish military strength, while others believe disarming Israel would lead to genocide. Saad highlights the Islamic concept of *Dar al-Islam* (House of Islam) versus *Dar al-Harb* (House of War), arguing that any land not yet conquered by Islam is destined for conquest until a global unification under Allah is achieved. He notes that despite outnumbering Israel 100 to 1 in multiple wars since 1948, Arab nations failed to achieve their goal of eliminating the Jewish state, and even when militarily victorious or holding significant land like the Sinai Peninsula, they returned it after political concessions rather than expanding further. Saad supports his claims about anti-Semitism within Islamic texts by citing content analysis studies conducted by physicist Bill Warner at the Center for the Study of Political Islam. These analyses compare hate speech in religious scriptures to Adolf Hitler's *Mein Kampf*, finding that Jewish hatred is deeply embedded in canonical sources like the Quran, Hadith, and Sira. Saad explains that because Muhammad is viewed as a perfect moral model, his actions are considered inherently righteous regardless of modern ethical standards, leading believers to justify behaviors they might otherwise find reprehensible. He recounts personal experiences growing up in Lebanon facing anti-Semitism and notes historical precedents where Jewish families were expelled from Egypt, Syria, and Lebanon due to the precarious nature of their existence under Islamic rule, suggesting that specific animus toward Jews is canonical rather than incidental. Ultimately, Saad concludes that true peace will only be achieved when Palestinians abandon the goal of liberating Palestine "from the river to the sea" free of Jews and instead recognize the right of non-Muslim neighbors to exist alongside them. He argues that while many Muslims live peacefully in their daily lives without adhering strictly to canonical texts, the ideological framework itself does not promote coexistence or individual flourishing for those who do not convert. The path forward requires a shift away from teaching children to aspire toward holy jihad against Jews and Christians, acknowledging instead that history shows no fair world exists where everyone is Islamic unless through conversion or conquest. Until this internalization of tolerance occurs among the younger generation in Muslim-majority regions, Saad warns that any resolution will likely involve significant bloodshed rather than a peaceful auto-correction of societal values.
Read the full video transcript
I mean, Montreal is truly a
multicultural city. Tons of Jamaicans
and Haitian and Italians and Greeks and
Vietnamese and Korean and right? And
everybody gets along.
Islam comes in, we start seeing a
problem. Why? Because what is at the
root of the tenets of Islam? Is it one
that teaches that we should all get
along or is it one that says that we
will all be united peacefully under the
unifying flag of Allah? Oh, yeah, it's
the latter one. Now, is Islam a
proselytizing religion or is it one that
says, like in in Judaism, why is it by
the way that there are only 15 million
Jews in the world? I mean, we really
suck at
increasing our club. Well, it's because
if you tomorrow, Tom, decided that you
wanted to convert to Judaism,
canonically within the tenets of
Judaism, everything will be done to try
to dissuade you from converting. Let
alone the fact that the conversion
process is a very long one because the
idea is that you have to be truly pure
in soul in why you're converting. And
so, we're going to constantly test you
to dissuade you from coming into the the
club
as a as a as a costly signal of your
true wish to want to belong. Now,
imagine if another religion says that my
fundamental goal is to turn everyone who
is not like me like me, and all you need
to say is a single sentence publicly,
and voila, you become part of that club.
Therefore, you don't need to be a big
marketing genius to say which one is
going to attract more customers? Is it
the one that doesn't allow for many
conversions or the one that proselytizes
as its fundamental value? Well, Islam
does does that, right? And therefore,
there's always going to be frictions
once the two cultures
clash with each other. That's why
Samuel Huntington wrote a very famous
article in I think 1993 on the clash of
civilizations. He was talking about the
Islamic versus non-Islamic world. Again,
I don't need to be lectured by people
about the fact that Islam has done
wonderful Islamic architecture. There
was a time when there was Islamic
Renaissance where the it's true that
Europe was in the dark ages and of
course, I mean people are people, humans
are humans. They are smart and bad
people in every faith and so on. But the
codified tenants of Islam, do they allow
to use your terms you maximal human
flourishing? Well, nothing could be
clearer and the answer is no in that it
doesn't grant you the dignity of
individual freedom, right? And
therefore, it's going to clash with the
society that is built on individual
freedoms and individual dignity. Now
again, today when Islam in the United
States is at one, one and a half, 2%
you're not going to see it much. It's
not going to matter. When it's going to
be 10% and 12% and 15% you're going to
be sending me an email saying, "Ooh, I
think I should have listened to you." By
the way, to close the parenthesis on
that woman that I had sent her the clip
about 3 months ago Tom, she sends me an
email 14 years after that original
exchange and she goes, "I don't know if
you remember." Oh, I remember. You're in
the parasitic mind. Although I didn't
mention her name. I didn't I didn't
violate her identity, but she probably
didn't read the parasitic mind because
she's saying, "I don't know if you
remember we had a spicy exchange 14
years ago where and well, now I've kind
of come around to seeing it." Well,
yeah, because now you live in Montreal
and you're seeing the changes of the
past 14 years and probably your kids
were beaten up at school because they
were not Muslim. And so, that's the
regrettable part, which is we could
solve this problem today with less
bloodshed, or we'll solve it tomorrow
with more bloodshed. People will wake
up.
The problem is that the auto-correction
will not be peaceful. Mhm.
Yeah, so it's a
this is an intertwined web that I'm just
now beginning to think through, but I
one question that has to be asked is
to me, this is just how global movements
work. And so, we think we're at the end
of history, but the reality is that
we're not, and that people are
conquered, colonized,
just
savaged throughout all of history. And
if you look at migratory patterns, so
you're looking at Montreal and saying,
"Hey, I don't want to have a bunch of
people that don't share my values." I
have a feeling you'd feel that about any
place that was going to want you to live
under their values instead of just
leaving you be. So, can be Muslim, can
be whatever.
Yeah. Could be Martians. Right. So, I
just I don't want people to overly focus
on Muslims, though that is the reality
that we're talking about right now.
But
that is uncomfortable for you, but this
is exactly, from my early read, and tell
me if you think I'm getting something
wrong, exactly how Israel ended up
coming to be. Was like, "Hey, we want to
get more and more Jews that have been
scattered all over the world, come in."
Just first, it's about numbers. It's
about getting people here slowly,
slowly, slowly. And so, how do you think
about that when it's like, "Okay, at one
point, for some people that you will
forever be tied to, whether you agree
with it or not." But
uh
Jews went and literally made a nation by
slowly moving into that space.
And now, I see it playing out across
Europe. I see it playing out in Canada.
I am sure it's going to start playing
out in the US. And I'm like, "Yeah, I
get the game." Like, we as Americans, we
did the exact same thing to the Native
Americans. We came in and we're like,
this place looks nice. And so, how do
you
how do you think through that problem?
Look, uh
Golda Meir, who was the Prime Minister
of Israel, I think maybe the fourth from
maybe 1969 to '73 or something something
around that. I I might get the numbers
wrong. She was the first uh female Prime
Minister.
Has a couple of quotes that really
capture the the the the dilemma in in
that region.
W- One thing she said is that uh if the
uh Palestinian learn to
uh love their children as much as they
hate ours or something like that, then
we'd have peace.
Uh I maybe I butchered that a bit. And
the second one is that if we put down
our arms, there would be a genocide. If
they put down their arms, there would be
peace.
It has nothing to do with a with piece
of land. It has nothing to do with
contested territories. Let me break it
down for you. I recently discussed this
on the Joe Rogan show, but it's worth
repeating here for those of you who
don't watch Joe Rogan. Islam has the
concept It's a It's a duality concept.
The world is divided into two. There is
Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb. Dar
al-Islam means the house of Islam. Dar
al-Harb Harb in Arabic means the house
of war. So, the entire world is broken
up into either blue or red. House of
Islam or house of war. What does that
mean?
Any land that Islam conquers
and then loses is forevermore
canonically under the house of Islam.
Any land that is not yet ever been
colonized and conquered by Islam is in
the house of war. It is to be conquered.
That's why the end result is that Islam
is peaceful because it seeks peace
through the unification of the entire
world under the unifying flag of Allah,
okay?
Now, in the Middle East,
every single society that had existed
prior to Islam has been eradicated,
right?
There
we're
In Egypt, Coptic Christians were the
majority. Now, they constitute 10% of
Egypt, okay? In Syria, there was huge
Christians. Lebanon used to be a
predominantly Christian country. Within
my lifetime and yours, Lebanon went from
being
predominantly Christian to now being
majority Muslim within our lifetime, not
500 years. What happened to the Iraqi
Christians?
Persia had a culture before Islam. Now,
it's become Islamic. So,
no ideology has conquered and colonized
as much as Islam has. So, if you're
worried about the colonization of
Zionism, then by any stretch of the
imagination, if you're going to be
logical, then you have to be worried and
upset about the colonization of 56
countries that didn't weren't were once
not Islamic, and in many cases, they
were they were they were they became
Islamized through brute force. That's
why there is the sword of Islam. It
doesn't capture that we're going to cut
bananas together. It captures that I put
the sword to your neck, and when I
conquer you, I give you choices. Three
choices. Either convert
or die or live as a dhimmi. Dhimmi means
as a not not even second-class citizen.
You're a third-class citizen, right? So,
for example, Jews and Christians have
often been tolerated under Islamic law.
So, for example, you hear about the
period the golden period of Andalusia,
right? Which is in current Spain. All
that that means is that you are
tolerated until you're not, right? But
you're always walking a precarious
high high wire, right? On any given
moment, you better put on your really
fast running shoes and run really fast
because your head's going to be
detached. So, we lived very nicely in
Lebanon until we didn't, right? And
that's the history of the entire region.
Now, Jews have existed in the Middle
East for thousands of years because the
before the word Islam ever came to be.
So, if we're going to use historic
historical precedents, it's a game that
the enemies of Judaism are going to
lose.
But here's what I propose.
How about you teach your children that
there could be people who live next to
you. We can debate where we draw the
line, but there is a group of people
that have
thousands of years of provenance to that
land. By the way, Palestine, when you
said Palestinians until recently, it
referred to the indigenous Jews of that
area called Palestine.
Palestine, as you hear it today, is a
concoction from the 1960s. There is no
Palestinian people. They're Jordanian.
They're Egyptian, right? There is no
such thing as Palestine other than it's
a territory that has been
mandated by different groups.
A while back by the Ottomans, more
recently British mandate, and so on. So,
imagine if we can teach the children of
our neighbors that Jews have a right to
exist. We can be neighbors. Let's love
each other. It's perfectly natural for
us to coexist.
Do you think that
Israel is actually interested in
committing a geno- genocide? Because if
they wanted to commit a genocide, well,
let's let's let's think it through.
It would take well less than the time
that I've been on this show today for
every single Palestinian to be
eradicated given Israel's might. Is that
Is that true? Is that a true statement?
It is. Sure.
Yet, they haven't done As a matter of
fact,
the Palestinian population has increased
fivefold. So, Jews are really at
the genocidal game because population
increased fivefold, right? When When the
Nazis were trying to exterminate the
Jews,
they were trying to get rid of them.
They got rid of 6 million. So,
the reality is that
Palestinians are taught that the highest
values to speak earlier about our what
we were talking about, what's your
value, what's driving you in the
morning. There is no greater goal than
to liberate
all of hence
free free Palestine from the river to
the sea, from the Jordanian River to the
Mediterranean Sea, free of Jews. I grew
up in that world. I speak to those
people. I mean, now it's harder for me
to speak to them in Arabic because they
recognize me. But, 25 years ago when I
wasn't as known and I could mix amongst
the folks who speak Arabic,
it was very clear
Jews are a cancer in that region and we
must get rid of them as we have all
other societies, right? So, there are
many other religions that had flourished
historically in that region. They've
magically disappeared. Where are they?
What happened to them? Crack a history
book, okay? What
hear things like Christians are a cancer
as well or is it just that their slow
march to get people to convert or leave
just
So, that's a great question. So, there
is an expression, a saying in in in the
Islamic context, "First, we come for the
Saturday people, then we come for the
Sunday people."
The Saturday people are the Jews, the
Sunday people are the Christians. So, it
always starts with the Jews, but it
never just ends with the Jews because
again, a fair world, a just world is
where everybody is Islamic. And I'll
tell you What I want to find though is
is there a specific animus for the Jews?
Because if you
if there's just like this sort of
rolling thing of like, okay, we're 90%
Christian now, but you know, in 500
years we're going to be 10% Christian
and that's just we are better at
propagating things, making people less
comfortable being here, whatever. And
so, over a long enough time period,
we're going to win in any region that we
go to. But there's no particular animus
for Christians or Jews. It's just like
we'll get rid of them. But if there's
specific animus for Jews that there
isn't for Christians, even though
they've both been pushed out of the
region, then obviously it begs the next
question, which is why a specific animus
is for the Jews.
It's it's canonical. It's in it's in the
teaching.
That's right. It Well, there are there
are three
three quote holy books in in in Islam.
There is the Quran, there is the Hadith,
and then there is the Sira, the the the
biography of Muhammad, okay? And now,
different people they could be Quranic
literalists who say, "No, no, no, I only
rely on the Quran." There are others who
The Hadith are basically the the deeds
and the sayings of Muhammad. But the the
and and then
there is a mechanism by which you assign
to a particular story in the Hadith
its veracity.
So, in in Arabic, sahih means
uh well, how true it is. And so, here is
a story that's narrated by such and such
about how Muhammad did such and such.
And by the way, because Muhammad is the
ultimate model to emulate forevermore,
then those stories are really important
because they become moral teachings
about how to act. So, if Muhammad did
behavior X,
one of the reasons why, now you may
think that that behavior is
reprehensible, but the reason why you
can't say that that behavior is
reprehensible because how could it be
that the most perfect moral person
that's ever lived would ever do
something that is reprehensible? That
That's why you get the mental gymnastics
of trying to justify why he did this and
and not that, okay? So, those are the
three books that you rely on, and we
don't have to guess.
Bill Warner, who is by training a
physicist,
so he's trained in the scientific
method,
many years ago he he founded a center
called the Center for the Study of
Political Islam,
where he applies what's called content
analysis
to answer such questions. Does the Quran
and the Hadith have a lot of Jew hatred
in them? Well, I don't have to guess
that. I can use the scientific method to
gauge that. How do you do that? So, what
content analysis does is it allows you
to come up with a coding scheme to do
the hermeneutics, the the the the
content analysis of any text. So, for
example, if I want to study
literature, so never mind religious
text, I want to study how often in
classic canons of Western literature do
we
place greater a value on female beauty
in the protagonist versus male beauty?
So, there is a tool I can use called the
content analysis that would allow me to
say, out of these 100 classic literature
um novels,
79%
of all cases where a character is
described with regarding their beauty,
it is female. So, it's clear. It's
clean. So, I can go to those texts and
study what those texts say about Jews.
It's not pretty, Tom.
It's really not pretty. As a matter of
fact, Bill Warner compared the amount of
Jew hatred in Mein Kampf.
You know the guy with the little
mustache? I do.
him? Yeah, for better or worse.
Remember Remember him? Okay.
There So, Bill Warner does an analysis
of Jew hatred in Islamic text versus
Mein Kampf. Oops, it doesn't look too
good. So, you don't need to believe Gad
Saad, but you have to do something that
most people, to go back to our earlier
point, find very, very difficult to do.
It's called think. It It's very hard for
me to go and
apply my cognition. I'd rather just hear
Barack Obama tell me that Islam is peace
and it teaches peace. It doesn't, right?
I mean,
look,
have we talked on this show about the
Jew hatred that I faced growing up in
Lebanon? See, well, we certainly did the
first time. I can't remember if we did
last time, but the So, the Jew hatred
part we will certainly get to. What I'm
trying to tease out is
um
So, there's there is a
narrative going around about what's
happening with Israel that I think is
very difficult to tease apart. So, uh
one narrative is that this is really
just about this tit-for-tat back and
forth. You killed this person, we killed
that person. Take from If you start the
clock at October 7th, this really gets
uh
crazy making. But, if you take it back
from a just a question about whether um
more people were bombed on what side or
how people were killed,
uh uh it it really gets deranging. Now,
the way to start the clock for me is
looking at when Israel itself as a
nation was formed, that feels like it's
a very important moment of how did it
happen?
What would I expect people to have a
reaction to that, and then to spend time
on the question of
um
what are the consequences of Israel
existing? I won't even ask whether it
should exist because now I'll leak my
own bias. It does exist, it has existed
for a while, uh and just like um so my
wife's family lived in half the family
lived in the part of Turkey, sorry, the
part of Cyprus that got um invaded and
taken over by Turkey. They lost
everything in an instant. Turkey is what
religion? Uh I will assume it is Islam.
Yeah. Okay? So, anyway, setting that
aside for a second,
um
they came in, divided the island in
half, the north is now Turkish, and the
south is Greek.
Uh I
my mother stepmother-in-law
uh lost everything again in an instant,
and so I know somebody who will cry if
you even bring it up. It was a very
traumatic moment, obviously, for the
family. But the response has been it
it's divided, it's done, we're not going
to go in and lose a bunch of life trying
to reclaim this, we're, you know,
whatever, 50 years down the road. Uh so,
that's very much the take I have.
Hey, it how it came to be is a very
separate question from whether it should
exist. It does exist, it's there, like
it has a right to defend itself, all
that good stuff. But I can understand
from a um
you guys, uh Jewish people moved into
the area, slowly built up the
population, and now
Some Jewish people moved into the area.
There were many Jews who lived in that
area for thousands of years before Islam
existed. They are
people. Fair. Jews are indigenous to
that land.
wouldn't expect that to be any comfort
at all to the people that just like are
in Montreal right now, I don't expect it
to be comforting to you if we suddenly
found out that Muslims that lived there
a thousand years ago, right? It's like,
sure, but my family's here, my value
system reigns supreme,
uh and slowly but surely people are
coming in and asking me to live in their
way. So, let me let me contextualize
this for you with a very rich personal
history.
My brother-in-law is Egyptian, Egyptian
Jews, African Jews, North African.
His family is from Alexandria.
That's where a lot of the
Egyptian Jews were.
Then in the '50s, it became untenable to
be Jewish in
Egypt, so they escaped and left. So,
remember that story. So, kicked out of
Egypt. Never mind Egypt of the pharaohs
in many thousands of years ago. Okay.
My grandparents, some of them were
Syrian Jews. They were they left Syria
because it was now precarious to be
Jewish in Syria.
We ended up in Lebanon.
We're all Lebanese. We were kicked out
of Lebanon because we're Jewish.
My wife's family are is Lebanese
Armenian. They were kicked out of
Lebanon because they are Armenian
Christians.
Their ancestors, 1915, were exterminated
in Turkey.
Right? So, just within my family, I've
just given you Egypt, Syria, Lebanon,
and Turkey.
What's common to all those four is the
ideology that's driving them. What's
also common is that the victims of that
ideology were a minority in that bigger
land.
So, Israel, that's what happened to the
Jews when they had to flee. Some decided
to stay. So, in 1948, the civilized
world said, "Look, there are two peoples
who live here. Let's divvy it up."
We can debate about the the details, but
that'll put us into weeds that we'll
never solve.
The big 30,000-ft story, if I'm coming
from Mars, is that there are two people
who have historically lived there.
Sometimes nice together, sometimes not
so nice. And usually when it's not so
nice, there is a dynamic as to who's the
perpetrator and who's the victim. That's
unequivocal.
And then one day the civilized world, in
part precipitated by the fact that some
really bad things had happened to Jews
in the Holocaust, said, "You know, it
would be fair. All peoples of the world
have land that they call their own. It
would be fair if a slice were given to
these people and to these people."
The Jew said, "Perfect. Let's do it."
And they took a very, very uh less than
generous deal. The other group said,
"Absolutely not." And now the other
group doesn't include Palestinians. It's
the Arab world. That's why in 1948,
there was a war of annihilation, which
the Arabs lost. Then in 19 So, sorry.
This is going to fractal really fast.
And so, I want to take one issue at a
time. Sure.
Okay. I want to see if I understand your
position correctly on um
what it is like to encounter a Muslim
population. So, Muslims take over.
That's part of the ethos of the
religion.
Um and that you didn't say this, but I
have a feeling that this is part of what
you're trying to stop me from doing. Uh
not to get sucked into the level of the
conversation about um
how Israel was formed. That's you're
you're going to miss the bigger point,
which is
I get sad have a message to the West and
my message to the West is
Muslim is a proselytizing
religion. It will come into an area, it
will build its numbers up and it will
being generous using their own language,
they will unite us all in peace under
Allah. Exactly. Okay. Now, that doesn't
mean as I say that that 99% of Muslims
don't go about their day merrily living
peaceful good lives not caring about any
of the canonical text that call for
Islamic supremacy.
But that's to be distinguished from what
the dynamic of the demography will
result in, which is there is no place
that Islam has gone where there has been
an increase of flourishing of people who
were not Islamic. You know, we just have
to crack books. There's a lot of data.
There's 1400 years of data across 56
countries. Okay? So, Israel
the world decided it should exist
and Israel said, "Great. Let's live
together. Let's shake hands."
The other camp said, "That can't be
right." By the way, on his deathbed
Muhammad said, "Promise me that you will
rid Arabia of the Jews." That doesn't
sound very peaceful.
That seems like it's not a good idea.
Okay? So, now we have this bunch of Jews
who are
uh they have the gall and chutzpah of
being able to forge their own destiny,
of actually being militarily powerful.
No, I will tolerate the Jew as long as
you are a good dimmi.
And if I decide that your daughter is
really pretty and I'd like to marry her,
you're going to fork her, right, Jew?
That's what it's called to be a dhimmi.
Open dhimmi, by the way, you spell it in
English d h i m m i. Your viewers can go
and read it later, okay? So, yes, Jews
are tolerated in Islamic lands until
they're not tolerated. Know your place,
Jew. Be quiet. Don't cause trouble,
okay? So, in 1948
a bunch of Arab countries decided to
attack Israel and they were going to
solve the problem. And in which case we
would have free free Palestine. Free
free Palestine would not have been we're
going to allow the Jew It was an
extermination war. They lost it. Then
1956 came along. In 1956, the president
of Egypt was Gamal Abdel Nasser. He was
a very charismatic populist guy. He was
a pan-Arabist, meaning that he was
trying to unite the entire Arabic
nation. We're all one nation. In Islam,
there's the concept of the ummah. The
ummah is Islamic nation. I could be
Malaysian, I could be Indonesian, I
could be Albanian. We're all united
under the the the family of Islam. It
doesn't matter where I come from, okay?
So, he and the rest of the Arabic
countries in the region attacked Israel
again. So, now we have 1948,
a war of extermination, they lost. 1956,
war of extermination, they lost. 1967,
another war, Six-Day War, they lost.
1973,
Yom Kippur War, they lost. These are
wars where many Arab countries,
outnumbering the Israelis 100 to 1,
attacked to solve the problem, to have
free free Palestine, from the river to
the sea, done with the Jews. They lose.
Now, Israel, at in one of those wars,
had won the entire Sina- Sinai
Peninsula, which would make the land
mass of Israel 50 times bigger. So, if
they were a colonialist who that are who
are trying to
grab landmass, they would have kept that
land. You attacked us, we won it, it's
now part of our thing.
They gave it back to Anwar Sadat when in
1978 the Camp David Accords where Egypt
recognized Israel. So, Israel said,
"We're willing to give up a landmass
that is 50 times bigger than all of
current Israel, which we won in a war
that you attacked us, but please F off.
Can we live in peace?"
Okay?
And then since night since that point,
there's been several intifadas. Each of
the intifadas is to solve the Jewish
problem, right? In the Hamas Charter, it
says you're going to annihilate not just
the Jews in Israel, all Jews. There is a
Hadith that says the world will not end
until the tree speaks out and says, "Oh,
there's a Jew hiding behi-
behind me."
That's not You can go look it up, right?
Now, does that mean that every Muslim is
walking around wishing to kill Jews? Of
course not. Do I have tons of Muslim
friends who come to my house and don't
give a about any of this? Of
course, yes. But Islam as an ideology,
is it one that promotes individual
flourishing coexistence? No.
So, nothing could be clearer than that.
So, I You know, I didn't give a damn
about Israel until October 7th. I mean,
I have a lot of family there, but I
didn't even care so much about my
Judaism, but I know that the other folks
care about my Judaism. So, it became
really important for me to be Jewish
post October 7th and when I was running
really fast as a kid to not be
decapitated. Being Jewish is number 977
of interesting things about Gad Saad,
but you're forcing me to care about my
Judaism because when I'm afraid to walk
on campus because there is a bunch of
maniacs screaming from the river to the
sea, then I have to care about being
Jewish. But, if I could never hear about
being Jewish again, I would be perfectly
happy. So, this problem will be resolved
when the Palestinians decide that the
world life is short and there is such
incredible things to do together. When
they internalize that message and say,
"There are people over there who are not
Muslim and they have a right to exist
and I will no longer teach my children
to want to aspire to kill them in a holy
jihad," we will have peace. Until then,
we'll never have peace. Okay, I want to
say your position back to you to make
sure that I understand and
for giving me the opportunity to speak
for so long. Damn, and of course I this
obviously is one of the most uh
difficult and intractable problems of
our time.