The War Inside Women: How Hormones Influence Psychology - Dr Sarah Hill
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Dr. Sarah Hill argues in her discussion of *The Period Brain* and a previous work on birth control pills that women's psychological states are deeply influenced by their menstrual cycle, challenging the long-held scientific assumption that men and women are biologically identical except for reproductive organs. She explains that reproduction requires two distinct jobs: conception during high-estrogen phases and implantation/pregnancy maintenance via progesterone in the second half of the cycle. Consequently, female brains undergo significant shifts; while estrogen drives attraction, energy, and sexual desire to facilitate mating when fertility is highest, progesterone dominates later in the cycle to prepare for pregnancy by increasing sensitivity to threats, lowering motivation for outward activity, raising basal metabolic rate (increasing hunger), and promoting sleepiness through GABAergic calming effects. The transcript highlights that much of the misery associated with PMS or PMDD stems from a mismatch between these biological needs and modern lifestyle expectations, as well as a lack of public education on hormonal cycles. Dr. Hill notes that during the luteal phase (the second two weeks), women require more calories—approximately 150 to 200 extra per day—and face increased physical stress due to higher body temperature and heart rate variability. When society treats women as static entities rather than acknowledging these dynamic physiological changes, it leads to unnecessary suffering, poor medication efficacy, and worsening symptoms of chronic conditions like ADHD or autoimmune diseases during the luteal phase. Furthermore, she points out that medical research has historically excluded women from studies outside of low-hormone windows or used ovariectomized animal models, leading to a vast knowledge gap regarding how female physiology responds to drugs and surgery throughout their cycle. A significant portion of the conversation addresses evolutionary psychology, specifically why humans engage in sex during non-fertile periods despite it not aiding conception directly. Dr. Hill posits that this behavior serves pair-bonding functions essential for raising effortful human offspring, requiring heavy investment from both partners to ensure male parental involvement. She discusses research indicating that women's ability to detect fine-tuned differences in testosterone levels via scent and facial features is heightened during high fertility (the estrogenic phase) as a "good genes" marker, whereas this cognitive sharpness drops later when conception is impossible. This shift reflects an evolutionary trade-off where maintaining such sensory acuity becomes metabolically expensive once the window for reproduction closes. The dialogue also critiques modern cultural narratives and certain strands of feminism that deny biological sex differences in favor of gender equality based on a male standard, which Dr. Hill terms the "soft bigotry of male expectations." She argues that viewing cycling hormones as something to be fixed or suppressed—often through birth control pills—is not liberation but rather an attempt to force women into a static mold designed for men. While acknowledging that some women prefer predictable hormonal states via medication, she emphasizes that true empowerment comes from understanding and riding the wave of natural cycles rather than fighting them. Ultimately, Dr. Hill concludes that recognizing biological sex matters is crucial for better healthcare, legal standards (such as reasonable person definitions in harassment cases), and healthier relationships, urging a shift away from viewing female biology as broken or inferior to male norms.
Read the full video transcript
two books on the vagina.
Congratulations.
>> I think it's a little bit more complex
than that. I think it's a little more
complex than that, but thank you.
>> Why this one?
>> Well, you know, actually, you know, it
it was the biologist in me that kind of
led me to this one. Um, so the first
book was really more about my I ended up
in a rabbit hole because of my personal
experiences with the pill. And this one
I ended up in a rabbit hole because I
couldn't understand why women feel so
terrible during the last two weeks of
their cycle. Um, you know, and from an
evolutionary perspective, like it
doesn't make a lot of sense for women
like to all have a disorder, right? It
just doesn't make any sense because
generally if there's some sort of a
trait and it's causing problems, it'll
get selected out of the population. And
there's been all this really wonderful
work that's been done in our field
looking at, you know, the impact of
estrogen and how when estrogen is high
and rising across the cycle that it does
all these really amazing functional
things within the human, you know,
within the within women's brains and
then with their behavior and everything
else. But like there's nothing like that
about what goes on in the second half of
the cycle. Instead, it just seems like
women feel terrible. And so I was trying
to understand why that is. So like what
is the deep evolutionary wisdom behind
self-loathing
you know that that tends to go on during
the second half of the cycle and you
know so like why does it happen and and
is it supposed to and is there some way
that we can all feel better. So it was
really sort of an evolutionary puzzle
for me that I wanted to solve
>> like crazy to think that that's for some
maybe even most women 50% of their life.
>> Yeah, it is. It's like 50% of your life.
And it seems kind of crazy that, you
know, that we would be designed in a way
that we're supposed to be intentionally
feeling bad. And so I thought there had
to be something else going on, right?
That it probably didn't make sense that
we're just supposed to feel terrible.
>> What actually happens in the brain
across the month?
>> Well, so to introduce you to the cycle,
we just have to understand that, you
know, the whole purpose of having a
cycle in the first place is
reproduction. And for a male to
reproduce, all you have to do is one
thing, right? And that one thing is have
sex. Uh, and for a female, it's a little
bit more complicated that than that
because we're mammals. And that means
that we need to do two things in order
to successfully reproduce, right? One is
have sex, and that means doing things
like attracting partners, being able to
tell the difference between high quality
and lowquality partners, wanting to have
sex, looking sexy, you know, smelling
sexy, finding men sexy, etc., etc., etc.
And there's a whole bunch of research
that finds that in fact that that's
true, right? And that all of those
things tend to um correlate to times in
the cycle when estrogen is high and
rising, an egg is about to be released,
and sex can lead to conception, right?
So that's job one for reproduction if
you're a human female. Job two is
implantation and pregnancy, right? And
so this is where a female body has to
allow this, you know, foreign genetic
material, you know, half foreign genetic
material on this this embryo implant um
and then of course um be able to carry
it to term for 9 months. And this is the
set of activities that's coordinated by
our other sex hormone progesterone. And
this is the sex hormone nobody talks
about, right? It's like we think like
estrogen and then with guys we think
testosterone. And there's really not a
whole lot of talk about progesterone.
And so I was kind of curious about like
what actually goes on during the point
in the cycle when progesterone is the
dominant hormone, right? Are these
things actually trying to guide our our
brain and behavior in a way that will
help to facilitate pregnancy, right?
Because we find that you know human like
women are become very much oriented
toward men and towards sex um in the
first half of the cycle when estrogen is
high and rising. And so I was really
trying to figure out like is there some
method to our madness right during the
second half of the cycle um when
progesterone is dominant and might it be
um creating shifts in the way that we
feel and experience the world that might
be functional and might they feel a
little bit dysfunctional just simply
because we don't really give voice to
them and and by giving voice to them I
don't mean that we all need to sit
around and talk about how we feel during
the second half of the cycle but instead
it's this idea that you know the way
that women have been handled by science
and by medicine is that we're just like
small less hairy versions of men. And so
nobody's really given too much paid too
much attention to the fact that our
hormones cycle and that what our bodies
need and and the way that we experience
the world and even the way that we
experience symptoms of chronic diseases
or chronic conditions like ADHD and um
and things like diabetes and autoimmune
disease and that all of this might
actually shift across the cycle with our
shifting hormones. Um, and as it turns
out, and as I talk a lot about in the
new book, The Period Brain, is these
things do change across the cycle,
right? And it turns out that women are a
somewhat different version of themselves
during the last two weeks of the cycle
than they are during the first two weeks
of the cycle. And that a lot of the
misery that we experience is the result
of the fact that we've totally ignored
that, right? It's just like nobody wants
to acknowledge that biological sex
matters when it does. And the results of
this is that women have been absolutely
mishandled by science and by medicine.
And one of the results of that is PMS.
>> Right. Yes. A damning indictment of the
medical industry and modern culture as
well. All in all in one go there. So
categorize for me the these multiple
phases across the month. What's it
what's it like to be the female brain
going through this? What's happening
inside of the female brain?
>> Yeah. Well, so during the first half of
the cycle, which you know, starts on day
one, which is the day that you get your
period, and at that point, hormones are
pretty low, and you know, women are
generally feeling a little bit um rung
out because they just got through this
big hormonal shift in the ludal phase.
And during the first couple of days of
the cycle, um women tend to be
relatively tired. They're bleeding, they
don't feel their best. Um but usually
after a couple of days um est because
estrogen starts to rise um egg follicles
are being stimulated and as they get
stimulated estrogen gets released and it
makes women feel amazing right they
generally have more energy they have
higher sexual desire they have more sex
they're more drawn to men. um you know
there's just a whole lot of fun things
that go on during that point in the
cycle and it's just orienting women to
do the thing that their brains and
bodies need to do in order to reproduce
um at that point and that is have sex
right because that's going to get um an
egg in proximity with some sperm and
then voila you know magic can happen um
after ovulation occurs and that usually
happens about 2 weeks in so right around
day 14 is when we see ovulation happen
um that empty egg follicle actually
becomes a temporary endocrine structure
and it's called the corpus lutium and it
releases women's other sex hormone
progesterone and progesterone like the
experience of being in the state of this
hormone is one where we tend to be more
emotionally sensitive. So it actually
changes the connections with the
amygdala in the brain which is our fear
center and it makes it more
interconnected with a greater variety of
areas of our brain and it makes it more
sensitive to threat. And so what we find
um in research is that during uh the
ludal phase of the cycle, so again these
last two weeks of the cycle that it
actually lowers the threshold that
women's brains need to consider
something a threat. You know, sort of
like a smoke detector, right? Like you
can have a really sensitive smoke
detector where every time that you so
much as like make a pizza, it goes off
and goes crazy. Or you can have one
that's really insensitive, right? Where
your whole house would have to be on
fire before it goes off. And what the
ludal phase does is it kind of makes you
have a more finely tuned smoke detector.
And again, this is a period in the cycle
when women are incredibly vulnerable,
right? Um progesterone is the the
hormone of pregnancy, right? And this is
true whether or not we ever want to get
pregnant or whether our sex life would
even allow us to get pregnant at a given
point in our lives, right? But our body
is preparing for that. And part of that
is that it does lower the threshold on
what is considered threatening, right?
So women do become sort of more socially
astute to signs of potential threat. Um
you also tend to be sleepier and less
motivated to go out and do things. And
again this is part of the fact that um
progesterone is ushering in this you
know state that is optimized for
pregnancy. And this is a time that's
really vulnerable for women. And
especially you know throughout most of
our evolutionary history we were very
much dependent on our male partners for
provisioning. you know, if we were
living out in the wilderness, um, and we
were being chased by a, you know, a
mountain lion, it'd be more difficult to
get away. And so, we tend to be more,
um, sort of oriented toward being home
bodies. So, you actually find that
women's, um, motivation to like do
outward- facing approach type motivation
where you like want to go out and do
things and the idea of pursuing goals
feels really good. that area, those um
neurotransmitters get tap, the brakes
get tapped on them a little bit to make
women a little bit more introspective,
wanting to stay home, wanting to stay
safe. Again, having a heightened um
tendency to understand danger signals in
the environment. You also get hungrier
and sleepier um because progesterone
actually intentionally
um causes the brain to uh have an
increase in what's called gabaurgic
activity. So it's just like activating
the calming centers of our it's this
calming form of neurotransmission that
slows the brain down and chills it out
and it makes you again it sort of keeps
you at home, right? It's a very sort of
relaxing type of a hormonal state. It
makes it so you don't go out and expend
a bunch of energy unnecessarily. And
throughout most of our evolutionary
history, you know, there wasn't a fast
food place on every corner and it was
really difficult to get calories. And so
maintaining sufficient calorie stores
for pregnancy um was a very important
thing for the female body to do. So
you're sleepier, you're hungrier, your
basil metabolic rate increases. So um a
lot of times women report feeling
hungrier during the second half of the
cycle and that they're having these food
cravings. Um and it turns out that we're
hungrier and have food cravings because
we're probably not eating enough. Um
because even though we've all been given
sort of like one-sizefits-all
nutritional guidelines about like, you
know, hey Sarah, you with your activity
level and you know your height, you
should have about 2,000 calories a day.
And so if I'm a woman and I believe this
to be true of every day of my cycle, I'm
going to end up feeling kind of
miserable in the second half because
research finds that basil metabolic rate
increases by anywhere between 8 and 11%.
So, like if you need 2,000 calories a
day during the follicular phase or
during the first two weeks of the cycle,
you can need an extra almost like 150
calories close to 200 calories a day in
the second half of the cycle. And of
course, women aren't told this, right?
And instead, they're just like, why am I
so hungry? And why am I having why am I
craving food even though I already ate?
Um, and so that changes. We shift from a
pro-inflammatory type of an immune
response to an anti-inflammatory type of
immune response. And that changes the
way that our bodies respond to
everything ranging from medication that
we might be taking for chronic condition
or even the symptoms that we have from
chronic condition. Um so there's a lot
of research showing that women um that
women frequently experience uh
premenstrual they call it premenstrual
worsening of symptoms like asthma and uh
different types of autoimmune disease.
Um many women report that their ADHD
medication stops working um at at this
time in the cycle as well. and and it
appears um from the research that the
way that we even metabolize drugs is
different during this phase in the
cycle. And so there's all these changes
that go on um and because we're not told
about them and we don't know what we're
supposed to be looking out for and we're
not told things for example like oh you
know you need to eat more um your
calorie needs actually change as your
body temperature increases. Um, a lot of
times women walk around feeling pretty
miserable and a lot of that misery is
kind of unnecessary because if we
actually knew what was going on and what
we needed to do to optimize and and feel
our best. Um, I think that for a lot of
women PMS wouldn't be a thing.
>> So that's I guess what's happening
inside of the brain and body. Can you
just dig into the adaptive reasons for
that on both sides especially I mean you
know the obvious question here is how is
PMS adaptive if it makes women so
miserable but across the entire cycle
why are women predisposed to behave and
feel all of the different ways that they
do
>> right and again it's you know it's
because reproduction for us requires two
different jobs I mean when you consider
the fact that our body has to in the
course of and let's just assume a 28 day
menstrual cycle um ac across the course
of a 28 day cycle, a woman's body has to
completely shift it gears from first
being optimized for attraction and sex,
right? And so that's what estrogen does
is it like pulls out all the stops to
make us our sexiest, most energetic
version of ourselves. um and and you
know sort of at the top of our game of
being able to tell the difference
between you know a really high quality
mate and like a slightly less higher
quality mate. Like
>> what's some of the uh what's some of the
research that you've looked at around
this that sort of proves that this is to
be the case? There's there's some really
great research that finds that women's
ability to pick up on on the different
uh thresholds of a testosterone
metabolite actually differs across the
cycle and that um when estrogen is high
and fertility is high and conception is
possible, women can actually distinguish
between very fine tuned differences in
levels of of testosterone based on
scentbased cues of this metabolite that
it releases when it's broken down in the
body. And at other points in the cycle,
women aren't able to tell those
differences, right? It's kind of like
the difference between like you're
drinking wine with somebody who's like a
really, you know, like a like a wine
connoisseur, right? They can tell the
difference between a, you know, 2020 and
a 2021 Cabernet, right? Whereas somebody
who doesn't have a lot of experience
with with wine, you know, might not be
able to tell the difference at all. It
all kind of tastes the same. The same is
true for a woman in the estrogenic
versus progesteric phase of the cycle.
When you're in the estrogenic phase of
the cycle, it's like women can tell
clear differences between very
fine-tuned differences in testosterone
levels based on scent and also based on
physical appearance of facial features.
So, they've done um some research. This
was actually uh some research that was
done by one of my uh honor students
where we looked at women's ability. We
just like morphed faces by little tiny
minute differences. Um and then we ask
women, tell us when you start to notice
that these faces are changing. And what
we find is that near high fertility,
when estrogen is high, women it lowers
their threshold for where they're able
to see the differences, right? It's like
they're more attuned to the fine-tuned
differences in testosterone levels in
male faces. And you don't see this going
on in the second half of the cycle
because being able, you know, keeping
all of that um cognitive architecture
sharp is really metabolically expensive.
And and and what we tend to see in the
cycle, I mean, just at the level of the
brain is that at high fertility when you
have high levels of estrogen that it
causes our our neurons to sprout new
dendritic spines and actually makes our
brain more sensitive to the environment,
right? And it's because our brain, you
know, it's in in our eyeballs and our
noses. I mean, that's like the the
communication pathway between our brain
and the rest of the world, right? And so
our brain becomes very sharp on the
ability to be able to distinguish these
fine-tuned differences in the quality of
partners when estrogen is high because
this is the time in the cycle when uh
sex can lead to conception. Then during
the later phases in the cycle, it's like
having that ability is is a waste
because sex can no longer lead to
conception in the second half of the
cycle. Why would distinguishing levels
of testosterone through smell or through
face be something useful or important at
all?
>> Yeah. Well, it's important because it's
a hypothesized good genes marker, right?
And so the idea here is that um
testosterone provides a proxy cue to a
man's genetic quality. And and usually
when people are making this argument and
and the evidence that's been uh proposed
um in support of this general idea um is
has to do specifically with um
immunological uh immunological quality.
And the idea is this um we know that
testosterone is imunosuppressive, right?
It actually tamps the breaks down on the
immune system. And the reason for this
is because testosterone like shifts the
body toward all things sex and mating,
right? Right? And that takes energy away
from being able to fuel your immune
response. And so if a person has a lot
of testosterone markers, it indicates
the fact that their immune system is
well enough put together that their body
allowed high levels of testosterone to
be released during development leading
to the masculineization of these
features like masculineized facial
features, masculineized vocal cords and
so on. um a masculineized brain um that
you know that their bodies were in
sufficiently good shape that they were
allowed to release this high level of
testosterone despite the fact that they
were also having to manage you know
whatever types of um pathogens and
parasites were in their environment.
>> So interesting. So testosterone is not
necessarily the marker that women are
looking for itself. Testosterone is an
indication that the physiology of this
particular man is sufficiently robust
that he has surplus immune system
capacity. So much so that his body could
suppress some of it with this additional
testosterone and he would still survive
and still not be sick. Therefore, high
tea equals good immune system. Not
necessarily high tea is what we're after
directly.
>> Right. Exactly.
>> Yeah. No, I think that is both things
honestly. But yeah, so you you hit the
nail on the head and then obviously
there's some other benefits from high
tea directly. I mean just in terms of
somebody being able to be a good
protector and a good you know um
provider of resources because we know
that those things are correlated but in
terms of the developmental markers I
mean it's like whether somebody has a
masculineized face or masculineized
voice or masculineized build or a
masculineized personality. I mean all
that's you know determined during
childhood. And so that's the story of
their immune system being able to
withstand, you know, reliably being able
to withstand all these threats while
also releasing high levels of
testosterone leading to this
masculineized phenotype.
>> Right? Okay. And then
so the argument here is women are more
discerning of these sorts of traits.
They're
>> able to see with kind of a higher
resolution during the first during the
first two weeks. um they are being more
gregarious, being more outgoing, being
more sort of socially uh adept, I would
guess, and and and more out there. What
was that? Wasn't there a study about
strippers make more money during the
first two weeks of their cycle as well?
>> Yeah. No. So, yes, there's this really
great study that was done where they had
women keeping diaries and they they
would just like indicate, did you get
your period today? Yes or no. um they
you know obviously put down how much
time they spent at work and then how
much money they earned. And what they
found was that even after you control
for the number of hours they worked and
so on and so forth. What you found was
that those strippers who were naturally
cycling, so meaning that they were not
on birth control and they were able to
enjoy uh the nice estrogen rise that you
get prior to ovulation, that those women
earned significantly more money at high
fertility in the cycle when estrogen was
high relative to what they earned at
other points in the cycle when estrogen
is low. And they also earn more than
women who are on the pill because women
who were on the pill of course don't
ovulate. And so they never got that big
earning bump um per ovulatory, right? Or
right before um ovulation. Um and so
they were sort of missing out on on that
like free of cost um hotness surge uh
that women are able to get from
estrogen.
>> Wow. Okay. So,
what's I want to dig into. I want to
know what's happening with the ovulatory
shift hypothesis stuff because it seem
it seems like this is suggesting women
would almost certainly have different
partner choices across the month that if
you're able to detect cues of
testosterone during the first half, then
you're able to discern. And if you're
unable to detect them in the second
half, then that's definitely going to
have some sort of an impact on you. But
it seems to me looking at different
things that come across my Twitter feed
and my Substack feed uh that every week
there's some replication crisis around
ovulatory shift too. So given that
you've been me in this, where do you
come to sort of sit? I know this is kind
of a spicy topic in the world of EP at
the moment. It's it's always a spicy
topic and I mean and I think one of the
reasons that it's the spicy topic
honestly is because um
I I think that any research that's done
on things that are related to women
specifically I think get unduly
scrutinized um in a way that I I don't
really think is fair. But that being
said um yeah it is it is a spicy topic
and there's definitely been some um
issues like with replication. And I mean
there's just no question about it where
some research will some researchers will
find for example that near high
fertility in the cycle that women do
exhibit a heightened preference for
masculineized male faces voices and
behaviors. Other um research finding
using maybe different methods or you
know different types of um ways of
assessing whether you're at high or low
fertility um finding that they don't
find this effect or they find it for
some traits but not other traits. Um,
and so I think when you look at the to
like the totality of the evidence, I
think for sure, um, there's something
there, right? So, like one thing that I
can I can say for absolute certain that
I know is true because it's just been
replicated a zillion times is that yes,
women have an increase in sexual
motivation at this time, right? So,
women feel sexier, they smell sexier,
um, you know, etc., etc. And, and
there's pretty robust evidence on that.
In terms of women's partner preferences,
the best studies that I've ever seen
looking at this topic, so looking at how
women's hormones change across the cycle
and looking at this within women
longitudinally, find that there is a
preference shift and in that women do
have a heightened preference for these
um cues related to testosterone. And so
to me, I think that I mean, and some of
the stuff like like you know, whether
it's also symmetry, that one's a little
bit up in the air. I'm not really sure
about that one. Um, and but but with the
um masculineization and testosterone, I
feel confident that there's something
there. Um, and like I said, there's
there's been, you know, there have been
some failures to replicate, but oftent
times when I've seen those failures to
replicate. The methods are a little bit
of a mess. And I think that this is
definitely something that you have to
look at longitudinally within individual
women because trying to make comparisons
between women. I mean when you look at
like levels of hormones and and I mean
this is something that frustrates women
no matter where they are like if they're
trying to get pregnant or they're think
that they're going into menopause or
whatever. But when you look at the range
of like what's normal for estrogen, it's
almost like the difference between like
if I were to say what's normal for a
range of earning is like between $30,000
a year and about a million and a half.
>> Mhm.
>> You know, and you're like, well, so then
you get a test result back and it says
you're normal, right? And it's like,
well, what the [ __ ] does that mean?
Yeah. Plus receptor receptor sensitivity
and your psychological profiles
predisposition which gets enhanced or
tuned down based on where your hormone.
Yeah, I I I can I can totally see how
that would be the case. What you
mentioned there um women have high
libido uh feel more sexy, smell more
sexy. How's that been tested?
>> So that's really interesting. That's
been tested in a variety of different
ways. um one of So they've done t-shirt
studies and with the t-shirt studies
they of course have women wearing
t-shirts that they wear at night that
they sleep in and they can't wear any
scented soap and no perfume and no
deodorant, right? And then they have men
um smell the t-shirts and what research
tends to find is that um when men smell
the t-shirt of women near high
fertility, so when estrogen is high
across the cycle, that they prefer the
scent of women at that time relative to
the exact same women. um in in the later
phases of the cycle when conception is
not possible. Um they've also studied
this looking at um panty liners. So in
one particularly provocative study they
had women wearing panty liners across
the cycle, right? So they would wear
this panty liner for a full day and um
and what the researchers did is they
actually put the the panty liners and
they they had them in groups, right? So
they had one group that was a high
fertility panty liners. So, these were
panty liners worn by women um right near
ovulation when conception is possible.
And then they had another group uh then
they had another group of panty liners
that were worn by the exact same women
during the ludal phase. And then they
put them in a nebulizer and a nebulizer.
No, I'm not. No. And they did this in
South America because I don't think that
we could get away with this in the US.
>> You the ethics board wouldn't be keen on
that.
>> Yeah. They'd be like, I don't know. You
want me to vaporize the smell of a
woman's panty liner and get men to
breathe it in so that you can look up,
right? Okay.
>> Yeah. They'd be like, "So, let me
understand where the panty liner is
going." Yeah. No, our ethics board would
not like it. Um, but so they did this
really wonderful it was it was a
wonderful study. It was a wonderful
study
>> and they had these men come in and they
didn't know what they were smelling
>> and so they just
>> Oh my god.
>> Wow. They they just sniffed they sniffed
this thing. They nebulize this thing and
breathe it in not knowing what it was.
>> Yeah. So, like breathing this this scent
in and um and this is probably going to
surprise you to learn. Um but men
preferred the scent, they preferred the
scent of the women's secretions at high
fertility compared to low fertility. And
the best part was in addition to just
like the liking score, it increased
men's testosterone and cortisol to be
exposed to that scent of high fertility.
And you know, and and it just really,
you know, goes to show you that if
there's like a little bit there's like a
whiff of mating in the air, right? And
and and and with, you know, estrogen and
and ovulation, I mean, this is the time
when a woman can get pregnant from sex,
you know, and if you have men whose like
bodies are able to just kind of pick up
on that, they don't know what's going
on. They're just like, "Wow, there's
just something about this woman, right?
And that's going to be something that's
very inheritable."
Was did that study replicate or has it
been done again the one where they got
silhouettes of women walking and showed
them to men?
>> Yeah. No, that was a great study and you
know I have not seen any replication
attempt on that if there like and and if
it's not already in the works I'm sure
that somebody is working on it um
because there seems to be a whole group
of researchers who's um seem to be
building their careers on
>> Yeah. Yeah. I'm trying to like I'm
trying to um say that women's hormones
actually somehow magically don't matter
and that um and that they we just
they're just an extra
>> that that was a really cool study. So
for the people that that didn't hear I
think we may even spoke about this on
our last episode. Um
>> there was a study done of women's
silhouettes walking. So they completely
kind of gotten rid of any of the the
features of the women and they just
asked men well which of these women do
you find most attractive? And even the
way that they moved was the women that
they chose were the ones who were
highest in fertility. It was that point
in their cycle. So yeah, I you know,
I find it fascinating. I'm glad that I'm
not in the industry, so to speak. I get
to be a sort of
>> willing cheerleader on the sidelines.
And I my my career is not at the mercy
of the waxes and waines of whether or
not ovulatory shift is is in vogue or
out of vogue or cancelled or brought
back in or whatever, resurrected. Um,
but okay, so that's the first half. To
summarize, women are more outgoing. Uh,
they're more likely to have sex, uh, sex
drive. They are more attractive to men.
So, they're both more discerning of men
and also found more attractive by men.
So, that's an interesting one. I also
haven't seen anybody
I haven't seen any evidence suggesting
that men's interpretation of female
ovulation stage doesn't replicate. So
yeah, there's there's there's uh
criticism around
>> do women's hormones do anything to
women, but there's no criticism around
do women's hormones do anything to men,
which is actually pretty pretty funny
when you think about it like that. Um uh
and then we get into the second half and
all of this is you are able to get
pregnant. Now's the time. Come on, get
cracking, lady. Um and then you pivot
into the second half. You have the
follicle release, the egg follicle
release, which does a thing. And then
what I'm interested in is the behavior
in that second half.
>> How is that how is that adaptive? How is
it being miserable and and being low
energy and needing more calories? Like
what is that um engendering? What is
that encouraging um in like an ultimate
uh outcome uh way?
>> Yeah. I know it's implantation and
pregnancy, you know, and and so the
first half is really about attraction,
right? So we talked about all those
things, sex, attraction, attraction,
sex. And then the second half is about
creating a space where you where an
embryo can safely implant, right? And is
gearing your body up for the possibility
of pregnancy. And you know even the
process of building and fortifying the
endometrial layer which is this you know
layer inside the uterus it's very unsexy
but it's um it's a lot of tissue that
gets built during this the second half
of the cycle where all of this tissue is
differentiating and it it's a really
metabolically expensive time. Right? So
women's body temperature increases
almost a full degree during the second
half of the cycle compared to the first.
And the reason for this is because our
body is like working very hard to get
all of the pieces in place that are
necessary for pregnancy to occur. And
so, you know, we see these shifts in
hunger, right? Where we become hungrier.
We become less outward facing, right?
Like we don't feel like going out and
like going out dancing all night with
our friends and, you know, going out and
seeing a bunch of people because all of
that is very energy expendit
energy expenditure.
>> Energy. Yeah.
>> Like that's not a word. Um, but it's it
it expends a lot of energy. Um, and so
it's like our bodies go into an energy
conservation mode, right? So we tend to
want to eat more, we want to sleep more,
we don't have as much energy for things
because our body is using a lot of fuel
to create all this new tissue and
differentiate this tissue to prepare for
the possibility of pregnancy. We're also
again like we're we're more cautious
during this time because our our
threshold for what is considered
threatening and not threatening changes,
right? as you said, it's it's it's
almost like the the resolution
increases. And this is why, you know, at
at one, you know, you could have
something happen during the first two
weeks of your cycle and it kind of rolls
off your back. So, let's say your
partner is like staying late at work a
couple nights a week that week and
you're like, "Oh, okay. All right. That
means I'll, you know, hang out and watch
um Netflix, the show I like that he
doesn't like or whatever." But, you
know, two weeks later, that can make it
can sound your alarm bells, right?
because what we consider what our brain
is willing to entertain or what the
alarm bells are kind of tuned to the the
amount of information that's needed to
cue it as a threat decreases.
>> Um and it's because our brain is in this
safety, you know, mode um during the
second half of the cycle in a way that
it's not during the first half of the
cycle. And so we also get greater social
sensitivity to threat. And this is true
both like with external threats but also
relationship threats. And again, you
know, when we think about the things
that are important for women and
especially historically in order to
promote a successful pregnancy, it is
having your village, right? It's having
a partner who's investing in you because
throughout most of history, single moms
didn't do very well, right? And it's
also having a community around you
that's investing in you because people
without a community didn't do very well
in terms of survival um outcomes of
themselves and their offspring either.
And so women become very dialed into
those things and get dialed into threats
so that way they can be able to
remediate, you know, and and and
>> Oh, it's that's an interesting it's an
interesting contrast with being more
extroverted, outgoing, party mode in the
first two weeks with still being
pro-social, but it's more sort of
aloparenty.
It's what's my place within the sort of
female hierarchy, hidden, who's who's
leaving me behind, who's not leaving me
behind. It's kind of similar, but also
superbly different.
>> Yeah. Yeah, it is. And and women
oftentimes feel more of a desire to to
stay sort of withdraw, a little bit
socially withdrawn, right? So, their
relationships are important, but they
don't want to be going out and hanging
out with their friends, right? And like
spending a bunch of time doing outward-
facing activities. it it is sort of more
of a internal time where we're in an
energy conservation mode. And what's
really funny is that um you know this
isn't something that is just specific to
humans because even there's been
research done on um on baboons and they
find that female baboons when they're in
like after ovulation and they're in the
sort of baboon equivalent of the ludal
phase rather than being on the ground
and grooming one another they sit up in
a tree
and like I identify with that baboon
sitting in the tree during the second
half of the cycle.
>> Screw everybody. I don't want to hang
out. like, "Yeah, I just don't want to
hang out. I just like need I just need a
moment, you know, and and it's really
interesting because even sex and and the
nature of the sex that we have tends to
shift in the across the cycle."
>> How so?
>> And so, well, so you know, it's it's
really interesting because humans are
are kind of cool because most species
like a mammal uh females don't have sex
across the cycle. They just have sex in
estrus, right? So during this time when
uh sex can lead to conception and when
you look at most mammals that's the only
time that they have sex and the reason
for this is that it's sex is costly. I
mean it's metabolically costly just from
the act of it all but it's also
physiologically costly in terms of the
fact that you're going to have an
immunological event that occurs in your
vagina um because there's going to be
genetic material that enters there that
does not belong to you. Right? So this
creates inflammatory activity which is
imunologically I mean it's
physiologically costly and it also can
create um you know unnecessary
inflammation which can be not the best
thing to experience when you're getting
ready for the possibility of
implantation of an embryo. Right? So all
of these things make sex pretty costly
during the ludial phase. But nonetheless
human women have have sex during the
ludial phase. So even though we see that
sexual desire decreases um and women do
tend to have sex less frequently in the
second half of the cycle than they do in
the first half of the cycle, when women
do have sex is more often motivated by
the desire to connect with their partner
and and sort of pair bond than it is
from just like you know need to have it
right now sexual desire. And so they've
done some really interesting studies
where they've looked at um sex as a form
as sort of a mechanism of pair bonding
um in you know in in humans and in other
species like prairie bowls also have sex
across the cycle. And so they're oftent
times studied to better understand like
what is the function of a nonconceptive
sex that's had in the ludal phase. And
what they tend to find is that it it it
activates all these great brain regions
that are um related to pair bonding.
Right? So oxytocin and you know and it
helps to um uh seal the bond which again
you know for women who are in a state
when they could potentially become or
could be pregnant. this is something
that you need to do is like really work
on the relationship um and help to
ensure that you're going to have a good
relationship with your partner who
throughout most of our history we we
would have been very much dependent on
um during a state of pregnancy because
um you know women as hunter gatherers
when they're very pregnant um are not
usually able to get enough enough
calories to be able to feed themselves.
So um they're very reliant on men. It
helps to facilitate pair bonding.
They've done cool studies in humans just
even looking at um you know how women's
uh sexual motivation changes across the
cycle and um and what they find is that
for women who are feeling the greatest
need to connect with their partner. So
women who feel sort of
relationally insecure with their partner
and and report that that they care for
their partner more than they feel like
their partner cares for them. So people
who have the biggest gap in what we can
think of as like you know perceived um
care for one another in the
relationship. It's women who have the
biggest gap between how much they feel
like they care for their partner and how
much they feel like their partner cares
for them who have the most sex and are
most motivated for sex and have the
highest sexual desire in the ludial
phase suggesting that it it it you know
serves this totally other type of a
purpose um in the second half of the
cycle. And and what's interesting about
that I mean there's a lot of things that
are kind of interesting about this but
one of the things I think that this is
really useful for um especially I mean
well one it's useful for women to know
about themselves because I think a lot
of times you know our beliefs about like
sex sex drive and sexual desire and sex
and sex and sex is all very much based
on sort of a male understanding of
sexuality which is just that we should
be 100% you know super turnonable all of
the time and that any failure to
experience that is like there's
something wrong with us and that's just
not how female sexuality works. Um, and
that it is cyclical and that you do see
these big peaks and valleys with it
tending to peak um near high fertility
and it tending to valley during the mid
ludal phase. So about 3 weeks into your
cycle. But it's also really good for
communication, you know, and being able
to understand in yourself that
ludalphase sex is probably different.
Um, being able to con like explain to
your partner like, "Yeah, you know, last
week a really hot quickie right before
my afternoon meeting is exactly what I
needed." That would hit me the wrong way
right now, right? Cuz right now sex is
about connection. It's not about just,
you know, like let's have sex and then
get get out of here. Um, because that's
not going to feel right. Um, and
understanding these things and being
able to communicate these things, um,
especially to women who have male
partners, um, super helpful. Um and it
really can uh make the relationship a
lot better because women are be better
able to articulate their needs to their
partner and then of course their partner
is better able to meet their needs.
>> It does make sense. You know the
concealed ovulation thing for women. Why
is it that we have sex outside of the
time when you can conceive babies? Well,
it's that human babies are really
effortful to raise which means that you
need to have both partners very heavily
invested. Male parental investment is
relatively rare even in great apes. let
alone in mammals across the board. Most
dads are deadbeat dads. In fact, human
even the most deadbeat human dad was
probably more present than almost every
other mammal dad. Um, and okay, so we
need the bonding. That's why you got to
it's kind of hard to have sex. That's
potentially why ovulation is concealed.
Also, maybe so that your female
introsexual rivals can't [ __ ] with you
and mess with your like uh release of
eggs. And there's a bunch of different
reasons, right? Um, but
as soon as you accept the fact that sex
is not just for procreation in humans,
>> then this you don't even need really the
studies to be able to tell you that this
would be the case. You can just induce
it from that fact. Okay? Sex is not just
for procreation. Okay? So at least sex
is for two things, right? It's for the
procreation because if it wasn't for
that, you wouldn't get any future
generations. And it's for the for the
pair bonding. So all that you're saying
here is here are the building blocks of
how that looks what that looks like.
This is where and when this tends to
happen overall. Not that procreation sex
isn't bonding and not that maybe you
mistimed your cycle and h like an egg
did get released and like we got
pregnant in week three or whatever,
>> right? Yeah. No, absolutely. And and and
it's just more about like unconsciously
like what are the processes that's
guiding the behavior which I think can
be really helpful. So just to you know
give an example of this um you know if
we know that sort of ultimately right
and so we're just talking about like
ultim ultimate evolutionary reason that
women have sex outside of high fertility
is that it's pro it's promoting this
pair bonding function right and it's and
it is increasing connection. Um that's
probably not a really great time if
you're a woman who wants to just have
casual sex to just like have casual sex,
right? like if you're going to be having
casual sex and obviously you don't want
to have a lot of casual sex when you're
ovulating if you're not using some form
of birth control. But like if if if
that's true, it might impact the timing
of your decisions because I'm willing to
bet I have not seen this study. So
that's my caveat right there, but I
would be willing to place a bet on the
fact that it is more difficult for women
to avoid emotional entanglements of sex
as had specifically in the ludial phase
compared to outside of it. um just
because of that
>> pair bonding. If you if you have a one
night stand in the second two weeks of
your cycle, your brain is going to be
tricked into thinking this is someone
that you should be bonded with more
closely. So the sleep with him and not
catch feels may be able to work. I think
that's still pretty up for debate as
well. But if it can work, it may be more
likely to be able to work during the
first two weeks than in the second two
weeks.
>> Yeah, that would be my guess. And again,
it's like you're saying, it's not like
the the sex that we have in the first
two weeks of the cycle isn't also about
connecting. It it it is right. And and
and what our approximate level
motivations are aren't always
necessarily in step with the ultimate
reason why we inherited a trait in the
first place. Um but nonetheless, you
know, given that we know that especially
from the work in the prairie bowl that
this non-conceptive sex is serving this
like, you know, relationship cement
function by releasing all these
neurotransmitters that are related to
pair bonding. It just seems to me like
it would be a little bit more of a
catching feels high-risk um type in time
in the cycle. Um
>> I suppose one thing I was thinking as
you were talking there was what's the
likelihood of extrammarital extra
partner sex occurring. Um maybe it would
be the sort of good genes whatever
protective provider type mate switching
hypothesis thing. Um,
but then I also think how are you
supposed to separate out just I have
more sex drive in the first 2 weeks,
therefore I was more likely to do the
sex.
>> Um, you would somehow have to be able to
control for sex drive and adjust that
across the cycle and then be like, okay,
given same levels of libido, are women
more likely to sleep with another man
that isn't their main partner? That it
seems like a little bit of a difficult
one to arrive at.
>> Yeah, I think that one would be
difficult to arrive at. I know that
they've done the studies where they say
that, you know, lo and behold, women are
more likely to have sex with their
affair partners at high fertility in the
cycle, but as you noted, you know, women
are just more likely to have sex in
general. And so, you know, I don't know
that that anybody has found a really
smart way to tease those two things
apart.
>> So,
it doesn't sound to me, yeah, there's,
you know, you need more calories and you
don't want to hang with your friends and
go to brunch with the girlies and put
put heels on or whatever. Yeah, maybe
you're a little bit more sensitive to
your partner staying late at work or not
giving you a cuddle before he wakes up
in the morning. But, you know, largely
this just feels like a a sort of
relatively gentle swing between two
different types of womanhood.
>> Uh, and yet
>> PMS reliably makes lots of women
miserable. So, what's the disconnect
here? Is this just my male brain? Am I
unable to see it? or or is there is
there more when you put this sort of
suite of traits together that makes for
a particular type of existence?
>> Well, so I think it's a combination of
things. So I think one of the reasons
that it feels worse than it needs to is
just simply because women haven't been
given a blueprint for themselves that's
anything other than just a smaller, you
know, sort of pinker, you know, ver like
less hairy version of a male way of
being, right? And so I think that like
we've kind of downplayed the impact that
our hormones have on creating different
types of physical and psychological
states. And so I think that you know the
things that we do aren't necessarily
going to be optimizing ourselves during
that time and that can make us feel
worse. And just to give the example
again, you know, we need more calories.
Um if we're not eating those calories,
we're going to have food cravings. We're
going to be hungry and we're going to be
cranky, right? Another example is that,
you know, our recovery needs change
during the ludal phase. And if you're
just expecting that you're going to go
and do like a really hard hit workout
and then you're going to go for a run
and then you're going to get, you know,
x amount of sleep, um, and you're going
to feel great the next day, um, that's
not necessarily going to be as true in
the second half of the cycle as it is in
the first because your HRV gets lower
because your heart rate increases, your
body temperature is higher, your
respiration is faster. It's like so it's
harder for us to get, you know, calm
down during that time. And um and and so
that that too it's like a lot of women
are, you know, by doing like a one-size
one cycle phase like fits all like set
of like workout activities or, you know,
their their self-care routine. If all of
that is treating themselves as the same
version of themselves every day of the
cycle, it can make them feel pretty
terrible in the second half of the cycle
because it does require more care,
right? It requires more food. It
requires more rest. It's harder to work
out. You build less muscle from
resistance training during that time
because progesterone is catabolic and
estrogen is anabolic and so is
testosterone which tends to get
co-released at the same time that um
estrogen does in the cycle. And so it's
like we have all of these changes and
the fact that we aren't acknowledging
them, right, is culturally it's just
like oh hormones don't matter, you know,
whatever. Like men and women are the
same. Women are just small men. Um, so
these don't matter. And so I think part
of the reason that we feel bad is
because if we just made small
adjustments in the way that we treat
ourselves and understand what our body
is trying to do, I think that we can
feel a whole lot better. And the other
thing is that, you know, there's a lot
of things just because of an
evolutionary mismatch between the
environments we spent most of our
history and the ones that we live in now
that can really erode at our um ability
to be able to sort of w uh ride the wave
of hormonal change in a smooth
comfortable way. Um because being able
to as a woman who cycles be able to go
through these wild hormonal swings that
happen especially in the ludial phase
because the rise and fall of
progesterone um peaks at levels that are
10 times higher than the peak levels of
estrogen rising and falling in the first
half of the cycle. So, you have these
huge hormonal swings and being able to
um have all the cells in your body that
um pick up on sex hormones, be able to
adjust to those things in in a sort of
rapid fire way that allows you to kind
of smoothly transition through the
cycle. Those things get eroded by things
like bad diets, not enough sleep, not
enough sunlight, you know, um not
getting exercise. All of these things
that increase um and cause inflammation
in the body erode at our resilience to
hormonal changes and that also has the
tendency of making these things feel a
whole lot worse than what they need to.
>> Is it right to say that women are more
hormonal than men? Like whose behavior
is more hormonally mediated?
>> No, I mean it's not. You know, it's like
our hormones are different but we both
have hormones. Um and our hormones
cycle, right? So for a man, you know,
testosterone uh lives um on a 24-hour
cycle. So testosterone peaks in the
morning hours and then it decreases over
the course of the day and then of course
uh testosterone unlike women's two
primary sex hormones changes dynamically
in response to things in the
environment, right? It's a reactive
hormone. So if you see a beautiful woman
or you smell a panty liner that somebody
that somebody
>> nebulizing by a South American
researcher
>> yes it's a nebulizer um your
testosterone will increase but men's
testosterone levels um I mean they they
change and and you know and and that
affects men's behavior. Women's sex
hormones change in very predictable ways
across the cycle and that changes
women's behavior. Um and they're
supposed to do these things. You know,
it's like women's bodies, we have two
jobs to do to reproduce. Sex, pregnancy.
And so a cycle is just orienting our
brain and our body toward those goals,
right? And so for a man, you just have,
you know, they have the primary sex
hormone testosterone. And it has that,
you know, nice circadian rhythmicity
where again it peaks in the morning and
then is lower at night. But then it also
changes in response to anything in the
environment that changes the benefits
from sex, you know. So if a man wins a
competition, it's like, "Oh yeah, no, I
just won a competition. So I'm at the
top of the heap, so now is a good time
to go find a girl cuz you know, women
like winners and so this is a great time
to mate." Or you see a beautiful woman,
like testosterone will go up like, "Oh
yeah, I know it's a good time to make."
>> It's also the same if if you were in a
room with weapons and then it goes up
even more if you pick the weapons up.
So, I I I I've already kind of swallowed
the uncomfortable like real maybe this
this is like the testosterone pill,
which is that men's behavior is
hormonally maybe even less predictable
than women's in that it responds to the
environment in ways that you can't. At
the start of the day, I don't know if
I'm going to be in a room with a ton of
axes, right? I don't know if I'm going
to get to wield one and pretend that I'm
a a mage for a small amount of time.
Whereas at least women have got this
idea across a cycle, I think I know
where I'm going to end up. Uh at least
in my experience, it's easier to lay it
at the feet of hormones because it is
more predictable. Like, but why was that
guy cranky that day? Why was I why was I
cranky today? Or why was I aggressive
today? Or why was I feeling a little bit
passive today? I don't know. Um, and you
know, if I I would have to guess though
that given women have got multiple
hormones acting on them uh more so than
men, that means that the swings in
behavior, I would expect to be more
progesterone is not going to be
impacting men in the same way as it does
for women. But I don't know, maybe
testosterone is so powerful that it it
causes swings in behavior that are
greater than simply estrogen,
progesterone. I'm not sure. I just um
>> I so I don't know. So, I'll say this,
you know, it's like like we have these
and as you noted, I mean, women's
hormones, they change in this incredibly
predictable way. And the thing I always
say is that if you tell me a woman's age
and when she had her the first day of
her last period, I can tell you with a
pretty decent degree of accuracy what's
happening with her primary sex hormones.
Whereas with men, I couldn't do the same
thing at all. You know, because I have
no idea. It's like, did you just see a
beautiful woman? Yeah. Were you in a
room with a bunch of axes? Like, I have
no idea. And so you get a lot more
volatility in male hormones just meaning
that they're less predictable than than
women's, right? Just because our primary
sex hormones change in a predictable
way. Men's primary sex hormone changes
in a relatively unpredictable way. But
yes, we do have two primary sex hormones
and men have one, right? And so this
does mean that we that we cycle, you
know, and it's because again, we've got
two jobs our bodies need to do in order
to reproduce instead of just one. and
you know and and and that's been used to
argue that there's something wrong with
us, right? Like, oh well, you know,
women are just more hormonal and you
don't know what you're going to get.
But, you know, the fact of the matter is
the only reason that we have that
narrative is because men came first, you
know, just in terms of understanding
what it means to be a human. And it's
like we could very quickly imagine a
world where women's biology was
understood first, right? And then we
would look at men and we'd say, "This is
too simple." like these guys, like how
can we know that he can make a good
decision when he only has one hormone,
you know, he can't even look at
something from two different angles
because he's just got this one primary
hormone. I mean, it's it's it's the idea
that we think that there's something
wrong with our way of being is just an
artifact of the fact that men were
studied first. And so that was like all
of our assumptions about what it means
to be normal and that for things to be
done right are are based on a male
standard. And it just doesn't work for
women. How many women understand what
their cycle does to them, do you think?
>> Not enough. You know, it's like we I
didn't I didn't learn about any of this
stuff until I was in graduate school,
you know. And at that point, I mean, I
guess I got my period when I was like 12
and a half. And so, I'd had it for a
really long time. And I had no idea what
was going on except that I knew that it
was, you know, related to the ability to
reproduce. And I know that it meant that
I had to buy tampons. But other than
that, I spent zero time thinking about
it. Most women aren't taught anything
about any of this stuff. And the result
is that um a lot of people are feeling,
you know, either confused um or, you
know, feeling bad.
>> Can we really expect men to understand
it if most women don't?
>> I think well so I think two things. I
think one I think that it's very
possible for us to do a better job of
educating women about what's going on
with their bodies. Um, and you know,
part of the reason I wrote my first book
was of, you know, with the birth control
pill was talking and and providing that
information because that's information
women oftent times aren't told. And the
reason I wrote the new book, the period
brain, is the same thing. It's just like
trying to educate women about here's
your biology because um, no, you know,
the public school system is not going to
teach it to you. So, I think that we can
do better in terms of um, educating
women. And in terms of educating men, I
mean, I would hope that if you're a man
that you'd want to know this information
and not only just in a like, oh, you
know, I love women and you know, want to
be supportive of women.
>> I'm a menstrual ally.
>> Yes, I'm a menstrual ally. You know what
I mean? like and it's so not just in
that way but it's like as my husband
says he is the most dangerous man in the
western hemisphere because of all of the
information that he has about the cycle.
>> Um because he I mean it's like when you
understand how women work it really does
I mean and obviously you could use that
to exploit women and that's not what I
would like to recommend to anyone but it
really helps you be a better partner. It
helps you be a better friend. It helps
you be a better father. I mean just
understanding how women's biology work.
Um I can't you know most men want to
understand women and this is this is the
key right here. It's like understand our
hormones, understand how those shape our
reality. Um and then I I really think
that it makes for better relationships.
>> A California jury found Meta in
violation of state privacy laws for
collecting health data from the users of
the Flow period tracking app without
consent. The class action lawsuit
claimed Meta used data such as menstrual
cycles, sexual activity, and fertility
goals to support its advertising tools,
internal communications presented in
court showed Meta employees, allegedly
discussing the collected data which
included information users entered into
the app from 2016 to 2019. So yes, you
may want men to better be able to
understand your cycle, but perhaps not
to be able to target you with that. That
literally happened yesterday. That
happened yesterday.
>> Yeah. No. Yeah. No, I had heard about
that. I didn't hear why. Like I I had
heard that there was a breach. I didn't
hear the details. So that I'm sure that
that they were trying to, you know,
>> they're pinning you with pink lace
doilies and [ __ ] cuddly toys when Oh,
she's in her she's in the second half of
her period. We can get her with all of
the fluffy stuff like tea cozies. She'll
love that. Um you you mentioned that the
pill. Um, talk to me about how the pill
impacts the period brain like tying
together book one and book two.
>> Yeah. So, the pill essentially takes,
you know, we've been talking about the
fact that women have our bodies have
these two jobs we have to do to
reproduce. And the result of this is
that we wax and wayne between these two
hormonal states, right? the estrogenic
state, which is like the wild sex kitten
version of ourselves, and then, you
know, progesterone and the ludal phase,
which shifts us into kind of our earth
mother, you know, mom jeans uh side of
ourselves. And so, for a naturally
cycling woman, you're kind of waxing and
waning between these two um these two
different but complimentary states. Uh
and when when you take the birth control
pill, it shuts all of that down. So
essentially what it does is um the
progesterine which is the money maker I
mean just in terms of the action that
prevents um pregnancy in uh different
types of hormonal birth control but that
progesterine is mimicking the acts of
progesterone which again is that hormone
that's released during the second half
of the cycle. Um, and it it activates
progesterone receptors in the brain. And
when the brain is reading when the
progesterone receptors are reading a
signal, so they're getting signal, that
tells the brain not to stimulate the
ovaries to not produce an egg. And then
of course, you don't produce estrogen.
And then if you don't ovulate, you don't
produce progesterone. And so, um, by
virtue of these synthetic, uh,
progesterines, which are very different
from progesterone, by the way, so I
don't, we don't need to get into the
weeds on all of that, but just, um, for
listeners to understand that the way
that you feel on a progesterine, which
most women feel pretty awful, is not the
same as the way that you feel on
progesterone. They actually are
completely different molecules and they
act very differently in the brain and
very differently in the body. But the
progesterines do get picked up by the
progesterone receptors in the brain
sufficiently enough to, you know,
inhibit um the brain from telling the
ovaries to release an egg. And so what
this does is it flatlines women's
hormone production. So women are no
longer producing high levels of their
own indogenous or internal sex hormones
and instead they're getting the same
daily dose of a relatively high level of
synthetic progesterone known as the
progesterine and then a relatively low
level of estrogen. And what this means,
of course, is that when you're on the
pill, you don't get that nice big
beautiful bump in estrogen that makes
women feel so sexy and alive. Um, and
instead, you're living in the state of
hormonal deja vu where you have a
relatively high level of progesterine
and a low level of estrogen. And this of
course, you know, it it has all kinds of
sweeping effects on the way that we
think and feel and experience the world
because our hormones of course um play a
really integral role in in what that
means for women.
>> So, is it kind of like permanently being
in the final two weeks?
>> It's kind of like being in the final two
weeks um but with a caveat. And so I'm
I'll just quickly without getting into
the weeds too much um just say that you
know on the one hand it's like the last
two weeks of the cycle because you do
see a decreased sexual desire for
example and you do see less of a
preference for masculineized male faces,
voices and behaviors, right? And so you
do tend to see some of those um changes
in sexual psychology that are similar to
the second half of the cycle. But you
also get a bunch of other stuff that's
um that nobody's really bargaining for
when they're taking hormonal birth
control. And and the reason for this is
that the synthetic uh progesterone that
um is used in most commercially
available uh birth control is not
synthesized from progesterone. And in
fact, no progesterines that are used um
on the market are synthesized from
progesterone. They're um they're all
either synthesized from um from
testosterone. Most of them are
synthesized from testosterone or they're
synthesized from um spiralactylone which
is a diuretic. Um and this is important
this distinction between something you
know this progesterine which is
synthesized from not progesterone right
either testosterone or spiralone um and
progesterone ends up being really
important because when the body is
breaking down actual progesterone it
releases this um really calming uh
metabolite. is a neuroststereroid called
alop pregnanolone that's really good at
promoting mental health and um mood
stability and a bunch of other things
that um help women function and feel
pretty good. Um whereas these
progesterines
when they're being broken down in the
body because they are not made out of
progesterone you don't get the release
of alopregenolone. And so women who are
on the pill actually have a a really low
levels of this really calming
neurosteroid that does help to promote
um mood balance, mental health and other
things like that. And and it's actually
been argued that, you know, this is
probably one of the primary mechanisms
um by which hormonal birth control has
been linked with mood disorders and
anxiety disorders.
>> Contraceptives raise depression risk by
40% in teens and women.
>> Yes. Yeah. It's pretty it's pretty s uh
pretty substantial. It's a pretty
substantial increase. And it's something
that you know until recently and and
it's even now it's like only the
Europeans are actually stating this like
like their their um their group that you
know uh does the licensing for OBGYNS
finally you know acknowledge that yes
you can get mood related side effects
from hormonal birth control. The
American group is less to um less quick
to um accept that and like make that
something that they communicate to their
patients. But yeah, it's it's a real
issue for a lot of women, especially
teenagers. Um, teens are the ones who
are asymmetrically hit with the mental
health side effects from the pill. And
so, it's likely the result of those
funky progesterines and the fact that
they don't metabolize like a regular
progesterone.
>> Interesting. Okay.
Women on the pill show 10 to 20% lower
relationship satisfaction.
Where's that coming from?
>> Yeah, that's really interesting. So um
my guess is that what's happening with
that is is twofold is that one anytime
that you have some sort of a mental
health related thing like something like
depression or anxiety that might be
caused as a result of the the lack of
alop pregnanolone of pill users um that
can just decrease your satisfaction with
everything right so it might not
necessarily just be about your partner
it just might be that you're more
critical about everything and so that's
one possibility and another possibility
is that I I think that when you aren't
able to experience yourself as a
naturally cycling woman who's going
between these phases, you know, of
estrogen being high and then
progesterone being high, um it's like
when you're naturally cycling, you get
the full bandwidth of like what's good
in relationships, right? like you're
able to like really, you know, feel
sexual satisfaction and desire and
you're able to feel, you know, this like
emotional closeness and and desire and
um and I think that that is part of what
creates within us like the feeling that
we have a satisfying relationship. And
for women on the pill who generally have
lower levels of sexual desire, right?
And they've also tend to report lower
sexual satisfaction, less attraction in
their relationships, and not necessarily
because they chose the wrong partner,
right? Although there's some research
that indicates that that might be a risk
too, but instead because they're not
experiencing sexual desire, it's just
like turning the volume down on what is
a like a really important aspect of a
romantic relationship and so not to
really have much of a libido and then
not to really feel that much attraction
to your partner just because you know
attraction and sexual desire is all
fueled by estrogen you know suppressing.
>> Yeah. And it's suppressing that and so
it's like women are missing out. But
it's almost like you have a jigsaw
puzzle and you take out like half of the
pieces and then you're like, "How do you
like the puzzle?"
>> You're like, "I don't know. I guess it's
okay."
>> Is it right to say women on the pill
lose an authentic part of themselves?
>> Yeah, I do. I I do. I think that is
masking an authentic part of yourself,
you know, and this could be for better
or for worse, right? The same way that
we could say, you know, that taking an
SSRI or an anti-depressant is masking,
you know, a person like a real essence
of a person as well. um which I think is
true, but you know, some people prefer
the way that they feel on it and so they
want that to be masked, but it is
nonetheless masked, right? And the same
with the birth control pill. It's like
it's not, you know, you're not really
yourself when you're on the pill. And
and like I said, and that could be for
better or for worse. Some women feel
better when they're on it and and they
like that version of themselves. And and
you know, and if that's if that's how
they feel, God speed, you know, you can
be on it safely and it is um and it's
effective. So,
>> could oral contraceptives be the biggest
unexamined mental health experiment
that's ever happened?
>> Yeah. No, I think so. I do. I think that
and uh teenage anti-depressant use. I
think that both of those things are
>> and a lot of those are going to be
happening in collaboration with each
other as well.
>> Yeah. No, they are because the risk of
being prescribed an anti-depressant goes
up significantly after you start
hormonal birth control.
>> Oh, man. Well, look, I remember the
first conversation that we had when you
came out. It was at episode 550,
remembering that episode 1,000 comes out
next month, right? So,
>> oh my gosh,
>> I know. I was early. I was early to the
Dr. Sarah Hill party. Um,
>> I love it.
>> A bunch of things have sort of come to
mind as you've been talking. First one,
you mentioned, we both spoken about how
men's hormone levels are environmentally
mediated. Uh, so local ecology, wherever
you are that day, what's going on? Did
you just win the lottery? Did you win
the sports game? Did you get to touch an
axe? Was there a hot girl? Like, how big
were her boobs? That big or bigger? Wow.
Like more testosterone. Um, and one of
the things that we came up with, which
I've still never heard anybody actually
put forward as a theory, but I still
talk about this all the time, there is
an X factor that appears to be missing
from the decline in men's testosterone.
That it's the microplastics, it's the
fatness and obesity, it's the lack of
sunlight, it's the all the way down. And
still a lot of testosterone researchers
are going this can't be the whole
picture. What we said last time was well
given that men's testosterone levels are
mediated by the fertility of the women
around them. If men who smell panties
during the fertile phase get more
testosterone than men who smell the
panties from the second half phase. That
means that if you chronically globally
suppress female fertility signaling,
whether it's through smell or touch or
the way that they walk down the street
or the size of their boobs or how much
makeup they put on or how outgoing they
are, whether they come up and talk to
you in the B, all of these things,
right? This big suite. Um,
>> there is absolute it is I I would put
all of my money on the line that it is a
nonzero effect on men's testosterone.
So, not only
is birth control impacting female
hormone levels, but it is 100% impacting
male hormone levels as well.
>> Yeah. No, I totally think so. I I think
so. And actually, in two ways. So, it's
so funny that you say that because I
talk about this all the time, too. And
no, and and and there's still no
research on it and I talk about it. I
talk about it constantly.
>> It's our secret little I mean, not that
secret that we've spoken about it tons
of times.
>> I was going to say, yeah. No, I think
that I think that we need to like we
just need to put this to to bed and we
need to have a study. we need to do the
we need to do the research and and get
it done so we can um we can work on
collaborating on a project on this. I'm
actually fascinated by this. So, and
here's another piece of that, right? So,
one piece being that um and this was
something that just occurred to me last
year. So, I don't think that this made
it into our last our last conversation,
but with the um as you were noting, it's
like yes, we know that men are sensitive
to fertility cues, right? And and that
men's testosterone responds to fertility
cues. And so there is like almost no way
like I can't imagine a universe in which
men's testosterone levels are not being
impacted by the fact that so many women
are on the pill, right? Because you have
all this supp like suppressed fertility.
Of course, of course men's hormones are
going to respond to that. And of course
that has to be contributing to the
decrease in testosterone that we see in
men. Another piece of it is, and I think
this is interesting, and it's also
related to birth control, but
indirectly, and that is, you know,
there's this really great research that
has been done now for a couple of
decades now, looking at um looking at
male parental investment and
testosterone levels. Are you familiar
with this work?
>> Oh, no. Teach me. Teach me.
>> Okay. So, you ready? You ready for the
depressing facts? So, it's actually not.
No, it's actually brilliant. Like, this
is like brilliant design of the human.
This is how brilliant our our bodies
are. So, when men have like get into
long-term relationships, for example,
their testosterone goes down a little
bit,
>> right? And it does this because it's
obviously very adaptive to stop paying
attention to the next door neighbor
every time she's out watering the lawn,
right? If you're trying to maintain your
pair bond, right? And so, you get this
little bit of break tapping that goes on
with testosterone levels. Well, when men
have children, break gets tapped a
little bit more, right? And again, it's
counterproductive if you're a man who's
trying to, you know, who's in a
long-term pair bond that you care about
and you have children that you care
about. It's counterproductive to have
all of your energy focused on looking at
beautiful women, right? You should
instead, you know, have your energy
focused elsewhere. There's also research
showing that the more time you spend
caregiving, the more the break gets
tapped. Okay? So, your break just keeps
getting tapped. And um so they've done
these really great longitudinal studies
on fathers and they find that you know
over time men who become father like you
get this decrease in testosterone that
corresponds with fatherhood. It's the
greatest for men who do the greatest
amount of caregiving. And so one of the
things that the birth control pill has
done has allowed women to enter the
workforce and mass. Right? So women are
into the workforce and mass working
working. What are women doing if they
have children with their partners? Are
they saying well I'm also going to do
all of the mothering? No. Right?
Instead, we've become more egalitarian
with parenting. And now, even though
women still do the majority of child
care, um, and even though, you know, men
have kind of come a long way in terms of
being willing to chip in, women are
still shouldering most of it, but men
are doing more than they used to.
>> And with greater male child care, tap
tap tap goes testosterone.
And so, um, I think that,
>> god damn it, ladies, come on. We just
want to be able to gain some muscle.
Leave us to it. Stop making us get into
relationships and stop [ __ ] tamping
your fertility down and work walking in
unsexy ways and making us hold babies.
Yeah, it's
>> terrible. Yeah, we're we're a really
we're a terrible group.
>> Well, what it shows what it what it
shows is kind of how um global this
impact is, how sort of macro and it's
lots of different things happening all
at the same time. I guess
something else which is kind of an
implication here is that in the past the
waxes and ways of how hard women worked
and how much they did ancestrally that
must have tracked more closely with or
at least this is what I'm reading as
your implication that women don't
understand that they need to kind of
have a different lifestyle setup in the
final two weeks versus the first two
weeks but by building a uh work
environment 9 to5 5 days a week four
weeks per month that that um doesn't
exactly allow for the flexibility and we
need to show like the meeting is
happening next Thursday whether you're
on your period or not whether you're
fertile or not like these things are
happening because
>> again men's changes in hormones uh don't
occur with the same sort of regular
swings in that kind of a way and because
maybe in that way you could argue
they're predictable or at least sorry
less subject to change like across a
month uh less predictable within a day.
Something like that would be an
interesting way to put it. Um,
I the I guess the rough question here is
does this mean that the highpowered
superw women boss [ __ ] career ladies
who are chasing down something that they
really want to do, are they going to be
subject to burnout more quickly because
they are pushing themselves and putting
themselves into a world that they
weren't designed for in that kind of a
way. They're not designed for this uh
like 2828
always on uh workflow style in the same
way that a man with his testosterone
level might be.
>> Right. Right. And I mean there's there's
a lot of research evidence that suggests
that women are suffering from burnout at
a greater rate than men. Um and I I do
think that that is part of the picture,
right? is that is that um is that it
it's easier physiologically for us to
get burned out than it is for men just
simply because we do have those um
cycling hormones. Now, the good news is
for women, you know, it's like you do at
some point go into menopause, right? And
then at that point,
>> there's a finish line, ladies. It just
happens to be menopause.
>> Yeah. No. And well, no. And and and you
know, and these things don't need to be
like it doesn't need to be the sort of
thing like when we're experiencing these
changes across the cycle. It doesn't
need to be the sort of thing where
you're like having to have, you know,
ask your boss to like schedule your
meetings around your period or whatever
because I mean that's like [ __ ] and
totally, you know, not the way that the
world works. And and it's not even
necessary. I mean, instead, it's just
about making sure that you're taking
care of yourself, you know, and and
especially during the second two weeks
of the cycle. I mean, it's it is easy to
get burned out during that time. I mean,
it's your your heart rate is up, your
HRV is low, your um it's harder to get
into deep sleep. I mean, there's all of
these
>> Don't more women uh leave their jobs?
They like resign from their jobs during
the second half of their their cycle. Is
that it? I have not seen that. But let
me like I would speculate that if that
is true that again it's because we I
think that we become a little bit more
exacting about um about our boundaries
at that time because of our sensitivity
to social related threats at that time.
But no, I've never heard that before.
>> An interesting one. But no, I I I think
uh this injection of women into the
workforce uh think about it this way.
You know, you mentioned the menopause
thing there. There can be a world if a
woman wants to be sexually active but
not have kids from the age of whatever
14, 15, 16, if she goes on hormonal
birth control, she can have this sort of
flattened
um wave hormonally, a a reduction of her
authentic self of being able to use the
uh yes, changeable but also pretty
insightful uh opportunities that those
changes in hormones all the way up until
menopause happened. Brilliant. Like at
no point in your life really as an adult
woman did you get to touch the sort of
full breadth of experience that is
available to you through this just as
you then came into land and now all the
hormones have stopped.
>> Yeah. No, and and you know what I mean
honestly you see that with some women
and and that's the way they like it, you
know? So I know women who have been on
birth control forever. They have no
children, right? And they're getting
ready to go into menopause. they're just
stay on birth control until they're in
their 50s and know that they're never
going to have to worry about a cycle
again. And the reason for that is they
like the predictability of it.
>> And so I guess it's kind of cool to be
alive at a time when that's an option,
right? Because
>> solution for Yeah.
>> Right. I mean it's like if that's what
you want to do then like I said, God
speed and we know that you can do it
safely as long as you don't, you know,
sort of have all these other different
types of contraindications. And so if
that's kind of the way that you want to
go, then you know, you can
>> in that way. Would being on birth
control
make uh I was going to I was going to
try and say something along the lines of
birth control is kind of like a
performance-enhancing drug for women
that want to be in the workforce 28 days
a month that it it is reducing the ways
but the problem is it's not necessarily
just reducing it's just shifting you
permanently into the second one. Um, so
yeah, maybe you're more predictable
across the month, but it's not allowing
you to have that, you know, hard
charging gusto that you might do during
the first two weeks. So, you don't
actually it's not actually a performance
enhancer in that regard, I don't guess.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Well, it's well, it's
interesting because you also I mean in
addition to the things that we talked
about with estrogen just in terms of
making you sexy and you smell good and
you walk sexy and the whole thing is it
also um it acts like miracle grow in the
brain and we kind of talked about this
with sensory thresholds and being able
to sniff out a good mate. Um but you
also get it um in other areas of the
brain that are related to learning and
memory. And um and so one could argue
that you're also then if you're just you
know flatlining your hormones with pill,
they also then lose out on the nice
benefits to learning and memory that you
can get um near high fertility as
estrogen you know causes the sprouting
of these beautiful dendritic spines on
our neurons.
>> There's a big denial of sex differences
happening at the moment uh in many
versions. Um but certainly one of them
is coming from women uh specifically
typically women on the left that women
are just the same as men uh but somehow
better like they're the same as men but
just better in some ways too. Yeah.
>> Is this a self-defeating approach given
what you're looking at now?
>> 100%. I mean look it's we've all been
led to believe anybody who believes that
you know women should be in the
workforce and you know and all this sort
of thing which I 100% do. I obviously am
in the workforce. I've been a scientist
for the last 20 years. Um, so, you know,
I obviously am a champion of women being
able to hold down positions um of of
authority. Um, but we've all been led to
believe that sort of the path to our
freedom, right, from the quote unquote
patriarchy, which is its own thing,
because the patriarchy a lot of times is
women. It's other women, but
>> it's not being enforced by men. It's
logically.
>> Yeah. No. Yeah. No, it's usually
enforced by other women. So, that's a
that's a that's a different podcast for
a different day. Um, is about the
patriarchy. But, um, but you know, we
we've all been led to believe that the
path to liberation is to deny that
biological sex matters and that, you
know, that hormones don't matter and
that biological sex doesn't matter and
that we're just the same. But the fact
is when we deny that we're the same,
then you know we have a bunch of medical
research that has been tested on men and
misapplied to women which has led to you
know eight out of 10 prescription drugs
are pulled from the market during the
first year of use because of
unanticipated side effects in women
because we're not being tested enough.
When when researchers actually include
women as subjects in research in only
about 20% of studies, this was a
neuroscience uh review that was just
done. when they include both men and
women, only about 20% of the studies
actually study them separately. They
actually test for sex differences. The
rest just lump males and females
together and just assume that that
they're going to be the same. And
they're not. And of course, you know,
and we know this because like when you
look at the risk of like depression, for
example, you know, the rates of
depression are twice in women what what
it is in men and then things like, you
know, autism spectrum disorder is like
twice in men what it is in women. And
the idea that we can be studying things
like depression and autis autism
spectrum disorder in men and women
together and not even looking for sex
differences is completely absurd. And so
no, I mean it's it's it's not the path
to enlightenment. And instead it just
really puts women at risk of everything
ranging from, you know, side effects
from medication to, you know, we just
learned that seat belts were designed
with a male in mind and they don't
protect female bodies the same way that
they protect male bodies. And so now
there's a cry to put, you know, um, seat
belts in place that are good are equally
as good at protecting a female body as a
male body.
>> The reason
>> Yeah. the reason seat belts that's
needed. No, but like I mean even like
the reasonable person standard in law
and I'm sure that David Bus has talked
with you about this if you've had
conversations with him, but you know in
the world of the law, there's this
reasonable person standard for things
like um for example sexual assault or or
um sexual harassment and sexual
harassment in particular. And the idea
is would a reasonable person find this
act harassing? Right? But the reasonable
person that's used in the mind of the
law is a reasonable man. And women and
men see things differently when it comes
to when it comes to whether or not
something constitutes sexual harassment.
So it's like all of these, you know,
things where we just like try to pretend
that biological sex doesn't matter. It
usually ends up coming and biting women
in the ass. And so I think that the
thing that we need to do is really
recognize sex matters, hormones matter,
and that that the fact that they matter
doesn't mean that, you know, one is
necessarily better than the other. It
just means that they're different. And I
think that if we start with that as a
starting point, it will actually get us
a whole lot farther than where we are
currently.
>> Is modern feminism ignoring or
overlooking biology by ignoring the
cycle?
>> I mean, I think that there's certain
elements of it, right? Because I I feel
like there's like a new new feminism,
right?
maternal feminists of the world,
>> which is like, hey, you know what? Men
and women are different, and that
doesn't mean that we need to, you know,
that one is better than the other, but
there are differences. And um and it's
okay. For example, if you're a woman and
you want to stay home with your kids,
like that's okay, right? Like whereas
the old school feminism was like women
and men are the same. And if you are a
woman and you want to do any of these,
you know, quote unquote stereotypically
female things, it means that you somehow
failed, right? or have been brainwashed
by the patriarchy. Um, and and I do
think that like true feminism is just
embracing, you know, the idea that yes,
biologically sex does matter. Um, but
that doesn't need to be limiting, right?
So sex is it matters, but it doesn't
need to be defining. It doesn't need to
be prescriptive. you know even you know
gender is something that I think matters
and and but it's different than sex you
know and and and yeah
>> there was a study that was done a set of
research that you would have come across
which was uh women female hunter
gatherers did just as much big game
hunting as men did and it was a
reassessment of some old data that had
already existed and this particular
group decided that they were going to
look at hunter gatherer data around how
much women contributed to big game
hunting and with their assessment of the
data they did just as much and in some
cases even more. And I always I always
thought about this and I thought it was
it was so interesting and it is similar
to a lot of the denials of sex
differences that we see in the modern
world as well. uh and I came up with
this name the soft bigotry of male
expectations
which is there is this assumption
among sort of high-powered modern women
especially sort of the of the boss [ __ ]
type that whatever men do or can do or
tend to do is the desirable thing or the
um the set point and that women are
somehow when you actually think about
the subtext of what they're saying
deficient by not doing that that it is
desirable to do what the men did and the
fact that we don't needs to be addressed
so that women can do what the men did,
not the other way round that what the
women do is in some way superior. So for
instance, this study that was done, they
[ __ ] with the data for a very long
time. It was one uh incident or one
level, one contribution to a big game
hunt was you are a big game hunter. It
didn't account for the number of times
that this happened. So men would go out
on the hunt a lot. women would have gone
out once and that would have been one
for one. Uh also the size of the hunt
and the size of the animal that was
brought down wasn't brought into
account. The total amount of calories
that were expanded, whether it was done
with small ra like women were typically
getting small rabbits doing the
gathering, men were still doing the
hunter. It was there was a lot of
[ __ ] that went on and it just made me
think like who's to say that gathering
the berries is less important than
killing the wilderbeast. And it's this
very strange kind of
like sex seepuku reverse sexism, but the
calls coming from inside of the house.
It's like you're doing this to yourself.
Like you're dergating your own sex's
innate tendency. And it's the same thing
with the well you I mean it's you've
been conned by the patriarchy into being
a domestic servant then. It's like
that's called being a mother. And and I
quite like doing that thing for some
women. But no, because men tend to go
out and tend to work, it's seen that
that is the sort of desirable uh thing
to go toward. And it's just a a real
interesting time where I can see why
this would make it quite unpopular to
talk about well women have these phases
and women change because again the soft
bigotry of male expectations. Men don't
have these changes across the month.
Maybe women maybe it's actually
desirable for women to be on the pill so
that they can be more predictable. they
can flatten out that hormonal change and
that means that they don't need to ride
the wave. And uh I hope that changes. I
think it's denying uh it's first off
it's making women like insufficient and
inferior just by the narrative. Like
it's not exactly helping women to feel
like oh I am a whole person. It's like
oh I'm like a broken man whilst also
being told in culture that I'm men but
better. Um like square that circle for
me. Uh yeah, it's just a real
interesting thing and I I I don't think
that it's particularly good.
>> Yeah. No, I agree. And and you said it
well. I mean, it's like we talked about
with the hormones, right? It's this idea
that having one primary sex hormone is
the right way to be, right? And that
there's something wrong with the fact
that our cycle and that that's something
that we need to be afraid of. And it all
just assumes, as you said, that the that
male is equals superior and that female
equals Yeah. Yeah. And that female
equals broken. And so part of the the
book is really trying to change that
narrative and and and say like this is
this is what it means to be us. And I
also spend a lot of time talking about
why that's not a dangerous idea, you
know, and and that that there is, you
know, we need to we need to change the
narrative around what it means to have
cycling hormones because it's not
lesser, right? And as I said before,
there is very much you could make the
case that it's better, you know? It's
it's just like nobody even thought to
make that case cuz everybody's just
assumed that the male way of being is
the way to be.
>> It's time to stop that.
>> Why
or why is this area so
underststudied? Like what is it? How why
did you have to do all this research? It
seems to me like given that pretty much
every woman every female at some point
will even if they start taking the pill
after their first period, they've gone
through one of them, right? to alert
them, oh, hey, by the way, you've hit
puberty. Um,
why why you why why is this why does
this not already exist?
>> Right. Well, I mean, honestly, it a lot
of it has to do with the history of
science. And I'm not going to like give
you a big long boring history lesson,
but I'll say that, you know, when when
science started as in in in medicine,
you know, sort of in tandem. Um, the
assumption was that, you know, the
female body and the male body are
essentially indistinguishable from one
another minus the reproductive organs,
right? So, it's this idea of like, you
know, bikini medicine, right? This idea
that everything else is the same except
for boobs and and, you know, penises and
vaginas, but then all the rest is the
same.
>> Okay? And um and so in science then you
know researchers for a long time just
studied men and it was easier to study
men. They didn't have to worry about
whether a man was pregnant. So you
wouldn't have to worry if he was
carrying you know a baby that could be
affected by whatever the experiment was.
And also because men don't cycle it
meant that any man that you came you
know had come in on a given day and you
give him a drug and then if you have a
different man come in on a different day
that they're going to be more or less
the same. Whereas, if you have two women
come in, right, one might be in the
first two weeks in her cycle, the other
one might be in the second two weeks of
her cycle, and God only knows what would
happen next, right? They'd be they might
be different from one another. So,
everybody assumed, all right, women are
just smaller, you know, smaller men with
boobs, and so we'll just study men and
then we'll apply what we learn to women.
And um and of course you know that
created some problems um and and it also
created um not only problems in terms of
you know research results not mapping on
to women um it created political
problems where people were saying you
know we need to like women need to be in
research. So researchers are like oh
yeah you know yeah like we're you know
we're feminists we want to include women
in research so let's do that. And so
rather than studying women like women,
um, which would mean studying the fact
that our hormones change and that as our
hormones change that we change, what
researchers decided to do is to try to
fit female subjects into a way of doing
science that was built around men,
right? And so rather than including
women as research subjects both in the
follicular phase when estrogen is the
dominant hormone and then also studying
them later in the uh progesterrogenic in
the in the lud in the ludal phase when
progesterone is the dominant hormone.
Instead researchers only study women um
generally in biomedical research during
the first nine days of the menstrual
cycle when hormone levels are low. And
so they only study women when hormones
are low to make sure that women are
maximally like men. All right? And when
they study female mice, they overrect
them. So they actually take out their
ovaries so they won't produce hormones.
So here scientists are patting
themselves on the back for final look.
We're including women and female
subjects in research, right? But they're
essentially removing our hormones from
the research. And the result of that, I
mean, and and so it's like we've
downplayed hormonal influence on
behavior for political reasons, right?
For the reasons that we talked about, we
just assume that men are superior and
therefore, you know, if you cycle and
have cycling hormones, there must be
something wrong with that because it's,
you know, it's not male, right? And so
there's that. And then it just made
things easier for scientists to assume
that men and women are essentially the
same. And so, you know, me since women
are just men with some lady hormones,
let's just statistically control for
those lady hormones. So, that way
everybody in our research study acts the
same way.
>> And so, the result of this is is that
like we've had this mass, you know,
delusion into believing that our
hormones don't matter, right? And that
they're not an integral part of who we
are. And I mean, and the result of it is
like women have been absolutely
mismanaged in science and then also in
medicine. It's like when when we're
included at all as research subjects,
it's either with our ovaries taken out
if we're a female mouse or um or in the
first couple of days of the menstrual
cycle when hormone levels are low. So,
we know very little about how women
respond to anything during the second
half of the menstrual cycle. And it's
completely ridiculous because when you
look at, and I've got a whole chapter on
this in the book, when you look at the
full cascade of changes that happen
physiologically to the female body in
the second half of the cycle, there's
every reason to believe that everything
ranging from, you know, to our responses
to anesthesia, to our responses to
surgery, to our responses to
prescription drugs are going to be a
little bit different in the last two
weeks than they are in the first two
weeks. And instead of studying it,
researchers decided to ignore it. And so
I guess that the short answer is
convenience.
>> What are the implications of this for
women? What would you say to someone
who's just had their mind blown about
the way that their own hormones work?
How should they show up in a different
way to be more effective? I mean
honestly I think that the first thing
that they need to do is just get a
better uh grasp of their own personal
relationship to their hormonal changes
because everybody you know even though
the average response for example to the
peak in estrogen that women experience
near high fertility is to feel really
good and have high energy and high
sexual desire um there is about 8 to 10%
of the population that feels terrible at
that time and that's actually when they
feel their worst. Um, and so if you're
one of those women, and and nobody knows
why, by the way. It's just it's it's
interesting. There's a lot of
idiosyncrasy in the way that we respond
to our hormones. Um, and so just to
start tracking your cycle and how you're
feeling on things that are important to
you. So things like energy level, sexual
desire, just how good you feel about
yourself, your appetite, your sleep,
etc. Track tracking that over the course
of a couple of cycles to start to
understand your relationship with your
hormones. And then being able to um and
and you can use this with
recommendations I make in the book
because I talk about how our needs shift
from one phase of the cycle to the
other. And I do make some
recommendations about things that you
can do to try to if you're having, for
example, low energy in the second half
of the cycle. Some of the things that
research supports can be really
supportive in terms of maintaining um
high energy levels during that time or
the changes in sexual desire and so on
and so forth. And so just like really
getting dialed in with what your own
body's relationship is with your
hormonal changes so that way a you
better understand yourself. Um b you can
better communicate about what's going on
with you with people who are important
to you. And then lastly so that way you
can take any steps necessary to make
that transition more like sort of riding
a wave instead of falling off a cliff.
>> So good. I I'm going to be fascinated to
see what happens with hormonal birth
control use over the next decade or so.
You know, how much of the research that
you highlighted is going to be
replicated and become even more popular.
And I guess that means that this stuff
is going to become ever more important
because more women are going to be at
the mercy of those monthly swings.
>> Yeah. You know, it's funny because one
of the things that really inspired me to
write this book is is one, I'd been
chewing on this question for a really
long time just as a biologist. It's it's
a really interesting question to ask
why, you know, women should feel
terrible half the time. But also, one of
the things that I heard a lot from women
who read my first book and decided that
they were going to begin naturally
cycling and living that way instead of
on the pill is that they absolutely
loved how they felt during the first
half of the cycle when estrogen was
high, but then during the second half of
the cycle, they were feeling a little
bit lost in the woods, right? And they
were feeling like they fell off a cliff
and that they couldn't understand like
what, you know, what am I feeling now?
Is this normal? Um, and so I, you know,
the hope is that this book will help,
uh, women have a guide book to the
second half of the cycle because it just
isn't something that's generally
provided, um, either, you know, in the
cultural conversation, right? Like if we
if you and I go on TikTok and look at
all the videos about hormones, it's all
about estrogen. You know, it's like
we've heard like we know so much about
estrogen, estrogen this, estrogen that.
And so this is really trying to provide
that blueprint and that guide book to
the second half of the cycle. Um, so
that way women can have a like a really
great like full 28 days of the cycle
instead of just the first 14.
>> Awesome. Dr. Sarah Hill, ladies and
gentlemen. Sarah, where should people
go? They're going to want to check out
all of your stuff online.
>> Um, my website is uh sarahehill.com and
that's Sarah with an H as it always
should be. Sorry, Sarah with an A. Um,
and then Sarah Ehillphd um on all
platforms. I'm most active on Instagram.
>> Heck yeah. Sarah, I appreciate you.
until the next time that you come and
upend everybody's world with some more
research.
>> Thanks, Chris.
>> Congratulations. You made it to the end
of the episode. And if you want more,
well, why don't you press right here?
Come on.