The untold origin story of Frankenstein that inspired "Love & Other Monsters"
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
Emily Franklin's historical fiction novel, *Love & Other Monsters*, offers a reimagined perspective on the famous 1816 summer at Lake Geneva by shifting the narrative focus to Claire Clairmont, Mary Shelley's stepsister and Lord Byron's lover. While the story is grounded in factual events such as the gathering of young celebrity writers during the "year without summer" and the specific weather conditions that influenced the creation of *Frankenstein*, Franklin uses fiction to explore the hidden emotional dynamics between Claire and Mary. The novel argues that Claire was integral to the writing process but has been omitted from the official origin story, with the narrative structured as an elderly Claire looking back on her youth to examine themes of loss, love, and the monsters created through art and relationships.
Franklin's research involved triangulating surviving letters and journals from Byron, Mary, and John Polidori to reconstruct Claire's viewpoint, while she invented specific details like menus and interior scenes to add atmosphere without being constrained by strict non-fiction requirements. Through this approach, the book mirrors the themes of creation and ownership found in *Frankenstein* within the complex and manipulative relationship between the two women. This creative process reflects Franklin's broader belief that poetry teaches the discipline necessary for fiction writing, a sentiment echoed by the author's own literary journey which began with a period of poetry before their first collection was published in 2021.
The discussion also touches upon the evolution of the author's feelings toward historical figures, noting a shift from simple fondness to a "complicated love" for individuals who may have been admirable in their art or politics but mistreated others personally. This perspective raises broader questions about loving art created by flawed people, a theme that resonates with the novel's exploration of Claire's life. Looking ahead, the author shares plans for an upcoming book titled *The Side Effects of Happiness*, scheduled for release in spring 2028, which will feature medical short stories from women's perspectives described as a blend of George Saunders' style and the tone of their previous work.
To conclude the segment, the speaker reflects on their top three influential books, selecting childhood favorites such as Evelyn Scott's *The 14 Bears in Winter and Summer*, Elizabeth Enright's *Thimble Summer*, and Richard Scarry's *Cars, Trucks and Things That Go*, alongside a lifelong passion for poetry. These literary influences underscore the deep connection between early reading experiences and the development of a mature writing voice. The video ends with gratitude expressed to both the guest and the audience for joining this exploration of history, fiction, and the enduring legacy of Mary Shelley's circle.
Read the full video transcript
You know, I think about, you know, the
singer Nick Cave writes that um as we
grow older, loss becomes the primary
condition of living. And it doesn't mean
that we're sort of hopeless and
griefstricken. It just means that we
carry this deeper understanding of what
it means to be human. And I think
because both Frankenstein and Love and
Other Monsters are both novels about
that mix of wonder and loss baked into
being a person, that's really what I
carry around with me and think about a
lot.
Hello everyone. Welcome to GBH's Beyond
the Page with Emily Franklin. Emily
Franklin is the best-selling author of
25 books. Her newest novel, Love and
Other Monsters, which we're all here
for, is historical fiction told from the
perspective of Cla Claremont, Mary
Shel's forgotten stepsister, who is
integral to the creation of
Frankenstein. So without further ado,
please welcome to Beyond the Page with
Emily Franklin.
>> Hi everyone. Thanks Ben and thanks GBH
for hosting me and thanks to all of you
for being here.
>> So I'm just going to launch into some
questions because we actually don't have
so much time and then we have some
audience um some audience questions
coming in too. Um
we've spoken a lot about uh in in our
own time. we uh cross paths in south
coast Massachusetts about um the writing
life and uh writing historical fiction
which we both do. I always think when
you're engaging in historical fiction,
you are it's almost like you're writing
up a contract, an invisible, unwritten
contract really with the reader that a
few of those things they're about to few
of the aspects of this person's life
that they're about to engage in um are
true. And it's like this unwritten
contract. If you're writing about a
couple that goes on the Titanic, that
ship ship better sink by the end of that
novel, you know. Um, and so I was
wondering in this book, what were sort
of the contractual items? Where were the
facts that anchored this story that you
wanted to play around with in the world
of fiction?
>> Yeah. I mean, um, so I'll just say this,
the the barest facts for the beginning
that I started with, the simple truth.
Um, because the truth in for me in my
historical fiction, truth ends up being
really important. The facts are really
important. It takes years of research
for me to write these novels. Um, but
the the simple truth is that what I
started with was the summer of 1816,
which later became known as the year
without summer. A group of now celebrity
writers gathered on the shores of Lake
Geneva in Switzerland. And this was a
summer that was unlike any other summer.
And it was very dark and stormy and
cold. And in these unusual um months,
this group of artists create these very
lasting works of art. Frankenstein, the
modern vampire, and lots of that
romantic era poetry that's still read
and widely taught today. But the thing
about truth at least um what I'm asking
readers to consider in love and other
monsters and part of what I'm examining
in this particular novel is the fact
that even the barest truth um is often
very complicated.
So lots of different
>> what was the spark that set this book in
motion? What was your personal um
encounter with those set of facts? Yeah.
So, um, in 2009, so quite many years
ago, um, I read an op-ed in the New York
Times written by somebody who many
people have now heard of or knew knew of
then, Gearmo del Toro, who of course has
his new Frankenstein adaptation that was
out this past year. And I've started
this book tour and people think because
of the timing of Love and Other Monsters
sort of coinciding with the film that
somehow GMO del Toro and I are good
friends. We are not. we do not know each
other, but um I read his op-ed in the
Times and it was called Why Vampires
Never Die. And he was really focused on
the mythical monsters that were created
that summer in 1816. And in the op-ed,
he talks about Mary Shelley. He talks
about her fiance Percy Shelley, uh
celebrity Lord Byron, who is there and
Lord Byron's personal physician, John
Polydori. And so I was really interested
in
the setting and the weather and the art
that was created. And so I went and I
immediately wanted to read more and
immediately came upon the fact that
there was somebody else there that
summer. And that some that somebody was
Claire Claremont and she was um actually
the person who brought them all together
and she was integral to the group. She
was intimately connected to everybody
there. And this is not really a spoiler
because you find it out on the back of
the book, but she was Lord Byron's lover
in addition to being um Mary Shel's
stepsister. And it it's critical also to
note that she is um the gobetween in
Mary and Shel's marriage. And we know
that she's there and this is very well
documented.
And yet when I went to my 1831 edition
of Frankenstein, which is really like
the school edition that you know
certainly that I read in high school,
there's a preface that Mary Shelley
writes that the publisher asked her to
write. They said, "Can you explain the
origin of how you came to write
Frankenstein?" So Mary Shelley tells
this origin story about how on a dark
and stormy, and I will add steamy night,
um, Lord Byron challenges everybody to
write a scary story. But Mary Shelley
goes on to say there were four of us
there that summer. And she lists herself
and Percy Shelley, Lord Byron, and John
Polydori.
So why would Mary Shelley write Claire,
her own stepsister, out of the story?
And that was really the starting point
for Love and Other Monsters. You know,
very quickly, um, in my research, I I
knew that Claire had left behind real
journals, but the journal from 1816 does
not exist. And so, um, one thing that I
was examining in this book was who might
have taken that journal because we know
she she wrote that summer and and who
might have destroyed or or stolen that
journal and why.
>> How what is your personal what is how do
you feel about Frankenstein and this
book and how it seems to it's a
difficult thing to tease out Mary Shel
and Frankenstein their sort of massive
gravitational pull from this story. I
think this when when it could almost be
like this that Love and Other Monsters
is people might think it's about
Frankenstein or Mary Shel, but it's
about this other person and it's the non
Frankenstein story. I mean, do you feel
like you're trying to give her sister a
fair chance at the narrative or are you
frustrated with the size of the
Frankenstein story and Mary Shelly or I
mean, it's almost impossible to separate
them. I mean,
>> yeah. Well, that I mean I think that's
my point is I think without Claire I
don't think Frankenstein exists. Um not
only because Cla is the person who
brought them all together that summer,
but because um you know Claire and Mary
have a very um complicated sibling
relationship. They are close and
competitive the way that sometimes
sisters are. And Claire was really
raised the way a lot of girls were and I
think still are, which is to really be
agreeable. And um she winds up being
manipulated and used although I think to
what extent even she doesn't quite grasp
at the time and Mary really needs
Claire. um you come to learn about the
sort of dynamics of their relationship
and Mary really needs her but she also
really resents Claire and I think um
Mary in some ways feels that she has um
created Claire and she feels a certain
degree of ownership over her sister and
she really doesn't like when Claire
begins to have a life of her own
which sounds familiar because that's
Frankenstein um you know and it's also
parenting and it's also art when make
something, it isn't ours anymore.
And so I I'm not sure that I can extract
Claire from Frankenstein. And I'm not
and and this novel really is sort of
that untold origin story of how even
maybe Mary's brain was mushing all of
these facts together and this
complicated love and turning it into her
own fiction.
>> You know, a fact that that people might
skip over might is may be hard to
understand for modern audience. And you
just said how girls were raised is do
you want to talk about how young these
people were?
>> Oh gosh, they were so young and it's
hard to keep a hold of that as maybe
when people read the novel. I just had
one reader write to me saying that she
had to just keep reminding herself that
Claire is 17 at the beginning of the
novel, then she turns 18, Mary is 18 and
19. Um, Polydori is a 20-year-old
physician. He's sort of a medical
prodigy. and Shelley is Percy Shel is 23
and Lord Byron is the wise old man at
28. So these are young sort of hot
celebrity writers and they're all
together and they're all just so young
um but really experiencing so much of
life at the same time during this
extraordinary summer.
>> Do you think I've gone totally off my
list of questions now but it is too
interesting. Do you do you think there
is some you think it's a teenager is
writing in their time and able to um I
mean 18 19 years old 20 years old these
are these that's an incredibly young
person today who we wouldn't expect to
write a massive work of um literary
genius. Um, how did that I mean as
you're going through the journals, do
you have any explanations for has our
time changed so much? Has expectations
changed so much? Like what what
>> how we think I think part of it is um
they had time, you know, they had fewer
there were fewer distractions. I mean,
Mary has a a baby and Claire's helping
with her baby. But in general, these
were artists who were encouraged to be
artists and to write and to sit and read
and they kept lists of all the things
that they read, all the books they read
that summer, all of the books that were
in the library of the villa that Byron
rents, which is this very fancy villa,
Diodati, where they're all together and
they're just spending hours and hours
reading and writing and discussing
literature. um the way we sort of
picture, you know, somebody just sitting
with a quill and paper and having just
so much time to sit and and of course
Claire in this moment is not one of
these extraordinary writers. She's not
considered to be part of their group
even though she is in their group. They
keep giving her all of these sort of
tasks to go do because she's a mere
mortal. So they keep having her walk to
the mail carriage or go she starts to
learn to forage for food because food is
so scarce that summer. But it is I think
um people were able to create
extraordinary works also with the time
afforded to them. The same way that some
writers that we both know um are very
productive when they go to writing
residencies um because they just have
fewer life life and household and job
distractions. I know. I love the goose
quill pens in this book and the the ink
that's on their fingertips and it's
really uh we were talking about it um
some point how uh physical writing seems
in the early 19th century almost like
painting that's a physical activity.
It's not a computer screenbased
activity. You're working with materials.
You're working with bird feathers and
ink to create something
>> and you're actually getting stained like
your your your hands, your fingers, your
arm from enviable in some way.
>> Yeah, it just feels indelible.
>> What is your writing day like? What is
your writing process like? Are you um ha
and have you tried to write a chapter
with a goosequil pen?
>> I I have I was a slightly you know odd
teenager and I did have a fascination
with fountain pens and I still love to
write with a fountain pen. Um I have
tried to write with a a quill. Um I will
not be writing a a long book with that.
that would take very very very many um
hours that I don't have. Um but my
writing sort of day starts very early.
Um I go to bed really really early like
toddler early and I wake up really
early. Um
>> you go to bed.
>> I mean everyone after this is over I'll
be going to bed.
>> Okay. Yeah.
>> No, I go to bed around 8:30 or 9 and I
wake
>> Yeah. It's early and I wake up a very
liberal parent. Yeah. Who's
>> Yeah. You know, I Yes. Really lights off
around 8:30 and I wake up at five and um
my writing um the way that I my brain
works I have a very big cup of coffee
and I I read a chapter of the book that
I'm reading, not that I'm writing, but
somebody else's book. And then I go for
a run. And it's on that run that my
brain starts to sort of open up and find
words. And it's very meditative, but
usually ideas are starting to come to
me. And if I'm in the middle of a
project, um that's when these sort of
voices will start to um make themselves
known and I sometimes have to take out
my phone and dictate. And then I come
back and you know, I have four kids so I
trained myself to sort of write during
school hours. Certainly when I'm when I
had four kids that were eight and under
with no child care, it was much more
catches catch can, like writing during
nap time. Um but now I have more time
and but I still keep to this sort of
school schedule and um by the by mid-
late afternoon my brain is ready to not
be writing.
>> Are you always writing on the computer?
Did you say
>> I write a lot on the computer? Um I
write um in lots of different genres and
I find that often when I'm writing
poetry I am writing with um paper and
pen and it it's more more uh portable
somehow.
>> Um are you outlining for novels? Are you
writing chapter by chapter? And then I
will smuggle another question in there.
Do you have a favorite chapter or
passage that you wrote that you remember
from Love and Other Monsters? Um, you
know, I outline a bit. Um, there are
novels that I've written where I've done
a real bullet point outline. Um, it's
always great when that happens because
then, you know, you sit down and you
know exactly what you're supposed to
write that day. But, um, this novel was
unlike any other novel that I've
written. Um, it came out, um, just in in
floods. And this is after years and
years of research, I have never felt
more um haunted by characters and more
um more in demand by characters. I mean,
I was getting woken up in the night by
them and my brain was just filled with
these voices. Um and originally I
thought this book might be narrated by
multiple points of view. you know, a
chapter from Byron and a chapter from
Mary, but every time I sat down to
write, Claire was coming out on the page
and making herself known. And um
initially I kept trying to control the
narrative and trying to write the book
the way I had written maybe The Lioness
of Boston and impose a certain structure
on it and it was kind of a fraught
experience and it was much less
enjoyable. And one day I just thought,
you know what? if I just let this be
sort of what Claire wanted it to be. And
as soon as I did that, it was exciting
and it was so fun and it just came
rushing out. And there was a mix of I
knew there were plot points that I
needed to to hit and I knew that there
was there were stuff that I uncovered in
my research that I had to get in there,
but in terms of how it came out, you
know, the way that I tend to research is
I I know I work so hard and I think a
lot about stuff and so by the time it
makes its way onto the page, it's sort
of synthesized and I was weaving
together all of these facts and um you
know, the funny thing is I'll get to
your question about the sort of um line
or scene that I I think about a lot. Um
the first line of the book um is it was
the first line of the book which is not
always right. Sometimes you write the
first line and then you scrap it
completely and you you just need to get
into the narrative. Sometimes what you
write first becomes the middle of the
book. This first line
um was really the beginning of the book.
And um you know Claire is 80 years old
at the beginning of Love and Other
Monsters. That's how the book is
structured like Lionus of Boston. And um
and she's looking back on the summer
that she was 18 that you know and and
this is the summer of 1816. And um I was
asked in a a radio interview recently
why I chose to frame it that way. And um
I really thought a lot about that sort
of that Kirkagard idea of life being
lived forward but understood backwards.
And so Claire for Claire the first line
of the the novel itself is all love
stories are ghost stories waiting to
happen.
And I think about that a lot um because
it's true for the characters in the book
but it's also true for all of us. you
know, everybody that we love will become
a ghost of memory. And you know, I I
lost my literary agent um right right
before this novel was published and we
worked on this book together. And so he
is also one of those ghosts of memory.
And um
>> yeah, and so you know, I think about you
the singer Nick Cave writes that um as
we grow older, loss becomes the primary
condition of living. And it doesn't mean
that we're sort of hopeless and
griefstricken. It just means that we
carry this deeper understanding of what
it means to be human. And I think
because both Frankenstein and Love and
Other Monsters are both novels about
that mix of wonder and loss baked into
being a person, that's really what I
carry around with me and think about a
lot.
>> Um, is there a question you wish people
asked you about your work, but they
never do?
Um,
I feel like I've gotten a lot of good
questions. Um, you know, one question
that that comes up sometimes is, um, you
know, how how does poetry sort of factor
into my, you know, fiction writing, my
pros writing. And it's funny because I
started off life as a poet. My first,
uh, the first pieces I ever published
were poems all the way back in high
school in the Globe and other places.
Um, and poetry is really the the
foundation for everything that I write,
whether it's a screenplay or historical
fiction. Um, I think that for me, poetry
is the best teacher for um, fiction
writing. It really teaches how to take
these very big ideas and winnow them
down into a very small space, how to be
a good editor. You know, line breaks
teach you about how to sort of create
tension and make sort of want to pull
you to the next line or the next page.
And so everything that I write is really
um structured and scaffolded by poetry.
And um you know I think Ada Leone the
poet says that um noticing is the
religion of the poets and I think that
that is something that I practice on a
daily basis and just being very aware
and try to be very present and notice
and so maybe a question is is just about
my poetry.
Yeah, there's a there's a lot of genres
that you hit. Did you ever consider
turning this into a non-fiction book?
>> No. Um I would not want to People ask me
that with The Lionus of Boston, too. Um
I I have this I I know how to write. Um
but and I like to research, but um I
also love to make things up and that is
generally frowned upon in the um
non-fiction world. So I because also,
you know, it's not that I'm making up,
you know, again, the Titanic isn't going
to the moon at the end of this. This is
sort of the story and and it's really
based on so much truth and so much
research, but we don't have the
transcripts, for example, between Mary
and Claire or between Byron and Clare.
We know what happened from the surviving
letters, from the surviving journals,
not just hers, but Byron's letters and
Polydori's journal, um Mary's journals,
all this stuff exists. There's so much
um academic work about these people. So,
um I never wanted to write anything
non-fiction about this, but um it's
certainly fun writing essays about it
because there's there's so much current
there's so many current events and
issues that are well um in place in
1816. So, you've got sort of celebrity
culture um being looked at. They're
being followed around by the paparazzi
of the era. You know, Dr. John Polydori
is paid £500, which is around $80,000 in
today's currency, to write gossip pages
back to London reporting on Byron. You
know, there's a lot of abuse of power in
this. So, we're seeing that
unfortunately um in the news all the
time still. And the idea of complicity
is still in here. And there's also this
is the time of Jane Austin. It's 1816,
so it's the Regency era. and their
carriages and corsets and so many cups
of tea and we're still fascinated with
Jane Austin and this is sort of more of
a um a little bit of a darker Jane
Austin look I guess.
>> Yeah. Can I double click on something
that you said which is you like to make
things up. I mean up your answer that
seemed to be the the only part that
really was about turning this into
fiction. All the other stuff you
mentioned was is true is non-fiction and
you know authors like David Grant or
Nathaniel Philick a b you know yourself
you know non-fiction authors can turn
stories
keeping to the truth with um make them
into enormous narrative adventures. So
what what is have you what part of it is
it that you want to mess with the story
a little bit? Is that you're more
interested through with the emotions? Is
it more interested in your the hidden
parts that you can never discover by
fact? Why?
>> Yeah. a little bit of those. Yeah, I
love being
>> Go ahead.
>> I love being a literary detective. So,
we have these facts, but then I can
triangulate from those and come up with
um my understanding of the truth and
then I can sort of say this is my
understanding of what actually happened
here. Is it possible that this is real
that I've discovered? And then can I now
do some more research and find other
people whose views and research might
support that? You know, for example,
Mark Twain, for example, Fiona Samson,
who's a, you know, Mary Shel expert. So,
you know, coming up with sort of um
these un untapped parts of the story.
And so, part of it is I'd like to be a
literary detective and part of it is um
really wanting to lean into the
description. And if and if um I want to
describe a meal or a scene in a
particular way um and we don't know what
the setting was in particular um what
the we don't know what the table looked
like where they were having all these
dinners. I can look up and I can make a
menu from what people might have been
eating at that time but I can't say for
sure that this is exactly what they ate.
So, if I were writing non-fiction, I
would really be beholden to um a
particular menu and I want to be able to
make up the menu.
>> Yeah. Yeah. It seems more more fun and
um adds a lot of texture and atmosphere
to a story. I know I think it was I just
brought up Nathaniel Filbrick, but I
think he had said once sometimes it
takes a month to write a single sentence
in non-fiction, especially if you're
writing about the deep past. I mean,
you're working on other things, but it
will take so long to verify every word.
Um,
are there other, speaking of fun, are
there other creative activities
um that uh assist your novel bookmaking
mind and process?
>> Absolutely. Um, well, you know, so
because of the extraordinary weather in
this book, as I said, Claire becomes a
forager. She learns about food and
cooking largely from the the books in
the library, but also from the cook in
the villa who is Elsa. And for people
who liked Mr. Valentine in in the Lionus
of Boston, he was sort of a favorite
character for some people, she is sort
of the Mr. Valentine of this novel.
She's Cla's friend on the page. And so I
got to write a lot about food. And I um
in an earlier iteration of my life was a
was a cook. And so I do write a lot
about food and I enjoy cooking very
much, but it's a lot of it comes from my
garden. So I grew up in my grandmother's
garden and do my own pickling and
canning and preserving and all of that
stuff and was just out there today. I
had a rare morning off and I just
planted tons of seeds and perennials and
um so I find it both meditative and
really exciting. And so yes, that is a
big joy for me. Oh, that's so that must
be so satisfying to be able to fold that
um into your work directly, too.
>> Absolutely. Very fun.
>> Um let me see the the um the one of the
most loved questions is um
if Oh, I do like this question. It says,
"If Claire's journals were lost, how do
you begin to work through the story?"
>> Yeah, that's a great question. Um, so
some of Claire's letters still survive,
so I could find out what her voice
really sounded like um and and the the
manner in which she wrote. She was a
beautiful writer. And um and then the
blessing for me is um you know there
were enough of her journals that
survived from other years that I could
sort of glean some information about
again just about her character, some of
her humor. She was quite funny. Um but
then um with reading the work um from
the other people that survived was how
so I can sort of again sort of I was
using the word triangulate if Mary is
talking about a particular day and Byron
is talking about a particular day and
it's the same day and they're both
referencing Claire. I have a pretty good
idea of what happened on that day. But I
can then start to use my imagination and
say, "Okay, well, this is Mary's view of
Claire and maybe is colored by Mary's
perspective and this is Byron's view of
Clare." And again, he had a particular
lens for her or Shelley, the same thing.
And I can come up with like what what
might Clare have been feeling at that
time, you know? And part of it was
again, we know these details. We know
that Claire was 17 in March of 1816, and
she writes a letter to the most famous
man really in all of Europe at that
point. Everybody is obsessed with Byron.
They have Byron mania it's called. He
can't walk down the street without being
mobbed. He's sort of like, you know, the
Beatles being rushed at, you know. And
she writes a letter to him and he was no
stranger to receiving fan mail. But this
time it was different. There was
something in Claire's words and the way
that she wrote that really touched him.
And it was different because he wrote
back and they meet and it's really
electric. And so, um, we have all of
this documented and so then I can really
I know when and where they met and then
I can imagine that scene. So, I don't
need Claire's journal to tell me all of
those things. I have lots of other ways
of finding out certain times and place
and then I get to use my real writerly
imagination of, you know, what did the
inside of the Drury Theater in London,
you know, I I can look up and actually
find out what it looked like inside, but
how am I going to describe that? and
what would it be like to be 17 and
meeting the biggest celebrity
um ever and being so excited about that
and also coming from a position where
Claire was in her own words young and
vain and poor and had no agency. The
only home she had at that point was with
Mary Shelley and her uh fiance Percy
Shelley. And again, it was a very
complicated relationship. Mary really
pushed Clare towards Percy in ways that
ended up being sort of disastrous for
everybody. And so it's a an interesting
amount of information to have and then
imagination to get to use.
>> Um
did you travel to any of the places you
just mentioned? Um some of the place did
you actually travel to any of the
wonderful places that you um that the
story is set?
>> Yeah. So um maybe in my bio probably
people heard I grew up um half in the
UK. So I've spent so much time there. Um
I did not need to go to Pimlo to know
how to describe Pimlo at this point. But
what was great was being able to do lots
of the research, which I love, and pull
up street maps of what shops were were
available, and the actual address where
they they rented this house at that
point in Pimlo. And being able to pull
up the actual exterior of Byron's um
house in London at the time, where
Claire is sort of going to visit him.
And I I could look at that. that I found
the real estate listing from that which
is actually hilarious um because at one
point it had been for sale. So I did I
did get to to use um my knowledge of the
UK pretty well. And then I've been I had
been to um Lake Geneva and Switzerland,
but I didn't go back for this time um
partly because of um pandemic stuff and
partly because I was touring for the
Lionus of Boston. So I I wouldn't have
been able to go there.
>> Yeah. When did you start this book? you
were telling me it was or
>> Well, I mean, I I had the idea for it in
in 2009 and then just slowly chipped
away at it and then was writing it um as
soon as I turned I mean a little bit
here and there here and there and
research and different lines that I
would sort of set aside and then once I
turned in the lioness of Boston I I tend
to turn in a book and very quickly start
the next one.
>> Yeah. Um what book are you currently
reading as part of your routine, your
morning routine?
Oh. Um, I am not I'm not reading um a
novel right now. I'm reading Small Town
Girls by Jane Anne Phillips because I
will be in conversation with her at the
end of May. And so I'm reading her
memoir and um interspersing that with um
the collected uh poems of um James
Wright, who I like to go back to at this
time of year because he writes so well
about nature.
>> Right. Um,
somebody just mentions how much they
loved Lionus of Boston. How did your
research journey differ um with both
books?
>> Um, there there's actually sort of a
similar process for me in that I I
research very very widely. So I always
want to know sort of um the the wide
lens for this book and for Lionus. You
know, what's the artistic background?
what's happening in the arts, what's
happening politically, what's happening
um in in current events, and really get
a feel for the landscape of the world
that I'm I'm writing in. Not just the
physical landscape, but the emotional
landscape. Um what is it like for women
at that time for artists, for people who
are are different in some other way? Um
and then the actual characters
themselves. So, what do I know about
Byron? What do I know about Claire?
Sort of Mary's history and sort of their
own timelines. Um but then I I um allow
myself to go down these rabbit holes of
research which um is really helpful for
me because that's where scenes start to
suggest themselves. So um we were
talking about quills and it was during
one of you know a very very big deep
rabbit hole maybe more like a rabbit
warren that I sort of stumbled into
about the stationery and the supplies
because you can't just say um Byron sat
down to write okay what is he writing
with? Are pens invented? if it's a
quill, what kind of quill? Does it have
a metal tip? Is he writing with a glass
pen? You know, what are all these? What
does it look like? And so then I needed
to research quills. And it turns out,
you know, that quills are left and
right-handed.
And different quills were more or less
um expensive. Byron can afford Crow
quills, which are very, very fine or
swan and Claire cannot. So um it's
always a mix of finding out um these
very big sort of um movements like at
this time again because of the the
weather phenomena there was a global
climate disaster just you know sort of
sounds familiar and it was so cold that
um you know everybody was was freezing
and so there was no there were there was
crop failure nothing to feed the cattle
and so Claire is learning how to forage
for food. So, I'm researching both the
political uprising that's happening with
these blood and bread riots at the time
and bread being made out of sawdust in
Germany, but also then thinking, how
does this affect Claire? What is she
reading in the library? Is she reading
the books that are in the library,
teaching her about um the classification
of herbs and plants and vegetables, and
Elsa is teaching her how to forage? And
she's finding her purpose in this world
of artists, you know. So, I'm
researching all of this stuff.
and coming up with um great stuff that I
can use um in the book that you know
it's the year that the stethoscope is
invented and the metronome. Um but I'm
also aware that I'm not trying to
something that I was very aware of with
the Lionus of Boston and with this is I
don't want to just info dump and just
put all my research on the page. I find
that really distracting when I'm reading
and it sort of pulls me right out of a
novel if I can see the mechanations of
research. So I want it to feel very
organic to the story. And so that um
you're you might be learning as you're
reading but not in an obvious way. And
if it's just interesting to me, you
know, at one point with the Lionus of
Boston, I had written 10 pages on the
history of Boston street lamps in 1861.
And I thought, you know, who wants to
read that? No one. And so then I sort of
cut it and so it's just one sentence
describing accurately, I hope, um a
street lamp in 1861. But, you know, I
don't want to put um the metronome and
um the stethoscope into this book unless
it has a reason to be in there. But, of
course, with Dr. John Polydori carrying
a new invention, the stethoscope with
him to take care of Lord Byron and
Claire taking the stethoscope and trying
it on herself and putting it to Lord
Byron's heart. Lord Byron has rejected
her at this point and saying, "I think
this is broken for he has no heartbeat."
you know, those kinds of things where
it's like a cutting funny scene. It's a
use. It's useful to have that um comfort
with what I've researched.
>> I love that in historical fiction how
you can
look at everyday objects a new that were
maybe new inventions. I read somewhere
>> I like think about like the photograph
for you like the records, you know, like
all of those. I mean, I think the late
1700s or early 1800s is apparently the
last time that the average person in
Europe uh understood everything that
they encountered in the day. I mean,
just think about how we're using I don't
know how a radio works, you know, like
>> Right. Right. Right.
>> It was so long ago. Yeah. Um so, how did
you come up with uh the title um Love
and Other Monsters? And I'll cut that
question in two. How did you when did it
strike you? And when did it strike you
that that should be the title?
>> Um,
you know, um, a while ago. I don't I
know I don't know exactly when. Um, but
I knew that there were two parts to
this, right? There's there's this
intense love between Claire and Mary.
between Mary and Shelly, Shellyley and
Claire, Byron and and Claire. There's so
much love between everybody. And um but
it's really complicated. None of this is
really simple love. Um and there there's
also the love of making art
>> and um and sharing that art. And that at
the same time, there were these monsters
that were being created. And there were
the monsters being created on the page.
Frankenstein, the modern vampire is
created that summer. You know, the there
was a vampire before this summer, sort
of an ugly, hunched creature with claws,
but the sort of rich, sexy, alluring
vampire we think of when we think of a
vampire is actually based on Byron. And
that was created that summer. And so
there were these mythical monsters. Um,
but then there were the monster of
making art. How hard it is for people to
really make art and and get it out there
and be disciplined and um share it and
then be brave enough to share it and let
go of it. But then very clearly there's
also the monsters who are walking um on
the earth and those are without spoilers
um a a number of different people in
this book. And so I wanted to have both
of that. I always wanted to have the
sort of love and and monster element
happening and especially it's it has its
place in the Gothic tradition. So um
there is that element of of monstrosity
and hunt.
>> Yeah. Or the allimportant word that the
entire title hinges on love and other
monsters implying that love is perhaps a
monster. I mean was that
>> it can be. Yes. And I think for Claire
it really is. And I think um for Shel it
is it really is for all of them in
different ways.
>> Yes. And that's why there's that giant
amperand on the on the cover.
>> Yeah. Um what is there? Let me get this.
Is there any other art that helped
inspire this book? Um music that you
listened to or visual art that you um
came across while you were writing it?
Anything that helped you along? Um
there are there are a couple of pictures
of Diodati the villa um including one
that somebody has painted um at night
and that was really great because I
could see these historic and actually
you can take a little video tour of
Diodati as it stands today. Um, but it
was really great to see the contrast
between what it looked like in the day
and what it looked like at night because
Byron was up at all hours and um, a lot
of people were up with him at 3:00 in
the morning and he kept a very strange
schedule. So, that was very exciting.
But I always when I'm writing I I cannot
I can write anywhere. I can sit in a
cafe. I can sit at my in my my kitchen
tables where I most often write. Um, but
I cannot listen to music when I write
except for classical music because I end
up being so distracted by the words and
I love to sing. So I end up singing. Um,
and so I don't listen to music like that
while I'm writing. But when I'm running,
I listen to music all the time. And it's
really like a treat for my brain. And so
I actually made a Love and Other
Monsters Spotify playlist. And so most
of the songs that are influential for me
in terms of getting in a certain headsp
space or thinking about something are on
that playlist. So if people are curious,
you can go to Spotify and find it. But
um yeah, so there there are definitely
some songs that that make their way into
there.
>> Cool. Um this is not on the Q&A list,
but a question for you um that I have.
Uh did have you were you are you a fan
of Byron's writing? because I have tried
to read Lord Byron.
>> Yeah. You know, it's not um
I think his reputation might be more um
exciting than some of his work. I mean,
some of his work is has stood the test
of time, I guess, but um there's
actually a a a poem by Richard Armore
called Survey of the Romantic Poets. And
um I'll just I can I'll read it to you.
It's just
>> right
>> says Werdsworth who was fairly mild had
an illegitimate child. Cridge almost all
his life yearned for someone not his
wife. Shelley an immoral elf caused his
wife to drown herself. Byron who was
most impestuous went the limit was
incestuous. Keats who might have had the
gumption was affected by consumption.
Rarely did the great romantics equal in
their verse their antics.
And so
sometimes I think that um I don't know
what would be published today, but at
the time, you know, this was really
groundbreaking work and certainly the
idea of being captivated by nature and
and and love and being able to um
express it was really, you know,
formidable and exciting at the time. But
of course,
>> I'm sure there's somebody in an English
department somewhere shrieking, but uh I
uh it is so flowery and so hard to read
that writing and think that people were
moved to um such powerful emotion. I
mean, words, who doesn't love
Wordsworth? But Lord Byron's writing,
it's pretty tricky. It's like hard to
and you're right, his life and what you
uncover is so raw and weird and uh far
more bizarre and on the edge than than
his writing is. I wonder if it's like
one of those things when you see a movie
from 20 years ago and all the CGI looks
so fake. If if cultures just moved
forward a little bit and and what we
expect of real emotions versus flowery,
over-the-top, hyperbolic emotions has
moved so far into um realism that it
just doesn't register anymore. But I
wondered if you read the the poetry
while you were
>> Oh, I did. I had I had to go back and
reread their poetry, especially because
there were poems that, you know, Lord
Byron wrote for Claire. There were poems
that um Percy Shelley wrote for Claire
and that Mary Shelley later edited to
remove Claire's initials from the
dedication or remove mention of her
name. So there was a lot of again we're
going back to that truth you asked at
the beginning of our conversation which
is a lot of the truth was attempted to
be edited out. And so part of what I was
doing was trying to uncover that and
say, "Wait a second, just because you
cross out somebody's initial doesn't
change, you know, the dedication or the
story behind it." So what was the story
behind it? You know, and so I'm really
trying to to get at a lot of that.
>> Um there's a smattering of questions
that all touch on publishing a novel,
your your journey into a writing life.
Um do you want to talk about uh in in
any way you see fit how your journey
into um publishing books, how you
publish your first novel, how you find
the writing life, how you find um
uh inspiration for your next book? Just
the
>> Yeah.
>> Um again, how I find inspiration for the
next book is what I was saying about um
the the um importance of noticing and
being present and just taking things in.
So, um, for me, I don't walk and look at
my phone. Um, I just walk and and be or
if I'm standing in line somewhere, I try
really hard just to stand in line and
listen to people and talk to people and
notice um because ideas really are
everywhere. And I feel that we're losing
a little bit of this human connection
and our ability to be um bored and also
be present and make conversation. And
you know, um, my husband and I, we have
the two very, very large dogs and we
walk them every morning and we walk by
these kids waiting for the school bus
and they are all
head down looking at their phone and
then there's like one kid and she just
stands there and she's looking around
and I think, "Oh, I I wonder if you're
the writer." Because, you know, that's
that's what you're doing. You're you're
you're looking around and you're
noticing. And so that's where my ideas
come from. my my publishing path, you
know, um again, I started off life as a
poet. I I went to grad school and um
wrote uh fiction there as well as
screenplays. And um my my a lot of my
poems were narrative poems. So, I gave
myself a task to see if I could write
some short stories based on my own
poetry, starting with the same first
line and ending with the same last line.
That became a story collection. um my my
first novel was published and um I sort
of abandoned poetry for a long while and
then um back in 2021 my first poetry
collection was actually finally
published. So it felt like a coming full
circle in some ways and I just finished
a second poetry collection. Um and the
book actually that comes out after this
is done um that comes out in in I think
uh spring of 2028 and it is called the
side effects of happiness and it is uh
short stories told um it's sort of
basically the pit meets George Saunders.
So it's um medical short stories told
from the points of view of women in
medicine. And so, um, I'm always
writing, um,
>> except when I'm not writing, except when
I'm with my my my kids or or, um, in my
garden. Um, so
>> like what you said about that that um,
girl on the side of the road, I as as I
was reading this book, I I thought if
iPhones were around in the 18s, no way
Frankenstein would have ever been
written. Not because of who teenagers
are, but just the it it it would be
impossible. Um, these
>> just there's too much other stuff.
>> Too much other stuff. Um,
did your feelings about Mary Shel and
I'll expand this to all your characters
change in the process of writing this
book? Did you enter the idea? Yeah, go
ahead.
>> Yes, they did. They changed from the
beginning um until the end. And um like
Claire, I think I have complicated
feelings about them.
And um there are parts of all of these
characters that I really admire and feel
like I have a much better understanding
of.
And at the same time um I think just
like we're seeing um in the news now,
you know, I I think part of what this
novel is asking is like, you know, the
same question that we wrestle with like
can we love art created by people who
maybe don't act like great people? um
you know people who behave really
admirably in the political realm or the
artistic realm but then treat the people
in front of them pretty poorly. So it
gives it really provided um a different
a different lens for each of these
characters and within their their
circumstances. I still have great
fondness for all of them and um at the
same time it's it's a complicated love.
I feel like that was a very political uh
response. That was Did you um did did
you end up having more or less sympathy
for for Mary Shelley?
>> Oh, um I don't think that my my sympathy
level changed, but my understanding of
her changed and um some of the um
Yeah, I think I think Claire paid the
price for a lot of people'sions.
>> That's so interesting.
Um, okay. So, we're going to wrap up
soon. Um, but we like to end Beyond the
Page with one final question that every
guest is asked. If you were to share
your top three books that made you quote
unquote, what would they be? They don't
have to be literary masterpieces. They
could be guilty pleasures, childhood
favorites. Three books that stuck.
>> They would all just probably be
childhood books because I was read to a
lot as a kid and I read a lot as a kid.
And so I would start with um The 14
Bears in Winter and Summer, which um is
by Evelyn Scott. I think it's out of
print, but it's about a large bear
family and it just has their daily life
together in in two different seasons.
And I I just read that book so so many
times. Um tons of descriptions and and
character. Um and then there was a a
chapter book that I read over and over
again called Thimble Summer. It's by
Elizabeth Enright, and that has stuck
with me for years and years. Each
chapter is almost like a a short story
and a lot of um
setting and um humor and um real
beautiful writing. And then um I
probably something like Cars and Trucks
and things that go the world of Richard
Scary
>> was important to me growing up and I I
read Richard Scary to all four of my
kids and um yeah, so I'm I'm going to
say that and then just and then I know
this is four but then just lots and lots
of poetry. So
The Richard Scary one. That's a good
one. And it it makes sense you'd be a
historical fiction writer because it is
a whole world that you enter when you
enter.
>> Absolutely. Like what do people do all
day? I guess they write with quilts.
>> That's such a great answer. Um well,
thank you so much, Emily. We're at the
end of Beyond the Page. Um I want to
thank Emily for this thoughtful and
exciting conversation and for all of you
for joining this talk. Um have a great
night. Thanks for attending.
>> Thank you all so much.