Video summary
Matthew Syed, a former table tennis player and author who now writes for major British newspapers and hosts a BBC podcast, traces his diverse career back to two decades of competitive sports where he learned that monomaniacal dedication is essential for success in international environments. He argues that while businesses face more complex challenges than sport due to rapidly changing rules and technology, the psychological lessons regarding mindset are highly transferable. Syed recounts a pivotal failure at the Sydney Olympics when his overthinking caused him to choke on his opening match; this experience taught him the transformative power of viewing failure not as evidence of innate lack but as an opportunity for learning, a concept central to what is known as a growth mindset. He contrasts this with the historical "self-esteem movement," which he critiques for fostering fragile self-belief by shielding young people from difficulty, whereas true resilience requires early exposure to challenges and the ability to extract lessons from setbacks without crumbling under pressure. The conversation delves into the interplay between genetics, luck, environment, and deliberate practice in achieving excellence, challenging the simplistic "10,000-hour rule" as a sufficient explanation for success. Syed illustrates that reaching the top is often a multifactorial phenomenon requiring a perfect storm of circumstances, such as access to elite coaching like Peter Charters or specific genetic advantages depending on the sport. He also explores the psychological mechanism of self-handicapping, where individuals proactively create excuses—such as not practicing for an exam or claiming poor weather conditions—to protect their ego in case of failure. This behavior is linked to Carl Jung's concept of the "inner Citadel," a retreat into oneself when external fulfillment seems blocked, and Syed emphasizes that avoiding risk by creating easy paths to victory ultimately stifles innovation and personal growth. Syed further examines societal trends through the lens of time preference and hyperbolic discounting, noting how humans naturally prioritize immediate gratification over long-term investment, which can cripple economic progress if not managed. He connects this behavioral tendency to broader demographic shifts in the UK, citing a birth rate that suggests a significant population decline within a century unless productivity is maintained through technological advancement like AI and robotics. The discussion highlights a tension between objective scientific achievements and subjective human experiences; while science has mastered many empirical problems, it cannot yet guarantee meaning or well-being, leading to a sense of malaise where people feel entitled to mastery in areas beyond our control. Syed suggests that the decline in religious belief may have left individuals bereft of narrative structures for finding meaning, replacing comforting stories with sterile data that humans are not evolutionarily built to interpret emotionally. Addressing the existential dread surrounding mortality and uncertainty, Syed acknowledges that while science can extend life or manipulate environments like weather control in Dubai, it cannot reverse entropy or prevent death, which remains a fundamental limit of finite creatures facing an infinite universe. He references Einstein's view on thermodynamics as a key law unlikely to be overturned, noting that civilizations require high energy returns relative to investment to sustain their ability to locally reverse disorder. The dialogue concludes with Syed and his interviewer agreeing that life is best approached as a hypothesis to be tested rather than an argument to be proved, encouraging individuals to embrace risk and view the inevitable end of life not just with melancholy but by finding meaning in daily connections and relationships. Ultimately, they agree on the importance of maintaining a growth mindset to navigate both professional challenges and personal existential questions without retreating into self-defeating behaviors or complacency.
Read the full video transcript
how do you describe what you
do what I do now well it's it's quite uh
quite eclectic to be honest I write
columns for the times and the Sunday
Times two British newspapers uh I have a
podcast on BBC Radio 4 which sounds
quite establishment doesn't it the the
times in the BBC uh I also have a small
uh business and write books uh give the
occasional uh talk so I've got a um
quite a diverse career coming off the
back by the way um 20 years or so ago I
was a sports person a different sport to
you um but I was a ping ponger actually
you shouldn't call it ping pong it
sounds slightly offensive to people play
table tennis because it makes it sound
like a kind of like a parlor game like
Tiddly Winks um but like that was my
main thing for most of my early life
table tennis was was was everything
until I retired uh in my early 30s and
then that led to a career which has been
broadly interested in performance and
mindset and how we make the most of our
Lives is there a a single thread going
through that is it Excellence uh sort of
the psychological underpinnings of
becoming good at doing a thing yeah I I
think as I was coming to the end of my
table tennis career you know it's very
monomaniacal to be the best You Can Be
You privilege this rather arbitrary game
above everything else and if you don't
have that hunger and that uniqueness of
discipline you don't really have any
chance to win in an internationally
competitive environment um but then I I
did become curious about what it is
about people that helps them to become
successful and I'm not saying that I've
had uh you know a uniquely successful
life or career I hate uh trying to build
myself up in in those terms but that I
think is the thread I became very
interested in whether these um lessons
are transferable to things Beyond Sport
and trying to learn more after I retired
about psychology and culture and
teamwork how we evolve as individuals
institutions without wanting to sound
too Grand how societies evolve and
become successful uh so if there is any
logic thread then that that's probably
it do you think that people outside of
the sporting world could learn a lot by
treating themselves more like
athletes yes and no I mean I think big
picture often uh I found that Sports
people are invited to go and talk to
businesses about the lessons they
learned uh and there are certain
transferable lessons for
sure but what I think I would say now is
that businesses often are tackling more
complex challenges than sports teams and
that sport could probably learn more
from business than the other way around
um in sport the rules don't tend to
change very much uh football is still a
game of 11 against 11 as it has been for
probably more than a 100 years this is
soccer by the way uh crickets rules
haven't changed that much whereas in
business you're trying to change the
rules all the time technology is
changing um and there aren't really any
rules beyond the legal or potentially
Regulatory and so the domain of you know
the degrees of freedom I think are
higher in business the complexity is
higher and therefore some of the
challenges that businesses face are I
think more interesting and require
greater agility than perhaps in
sport one of the things that I've been
pretty fascinated in learning about from
yourself has been failure and how people
can learn better from failure how have
you come to conceptualize
that well the biggest table tennis event
of of my career was playing in the
Olympic Games in Sydney and the Olympics
is is interesting to be in because it's
a four-year buildup effectively for just
a few days of performance and I was in
with an outside chance of winning a
medal
and the preparation had been excellent
we uh went to the Gold Coast for the
preparation Camp I had a Leander from
Germany as my firstr opponent so we flew
two players out to the Gold Coast to
spar with in the buildup to the big day
both of whom were left-handers and
replicated the style I was going to face
and the hall had the same floor as the
competition venue the level of lighting
was the same so we were meticulous in
trying to make sure we had everything in
place for me to perform and deliver on
the day um
and I was at threat I was anxious like
you would expect uh with all of this
buildup but just before I went out to
play Peter France of Germany in The
Opening match my opening game at the
Sydney Olympics the competition venue
manager lovely guy called Neil came over
and said Matthew I just thought I'd let
you know we've heard from the
international broadcast Center that this
match is going out live on bbc1 which is
the biggest channnel in the UK and I was
like oh great
fantastic um and then my
coach Swedish guy uh called Surin said
Matthew what happens over the course of
the next 40 minutes will determine
whether the last four years were a waste
of time or not and he he insists to this
day that he's trying to Spur me on and
motivate me but I remember going out and
you there was a megawatt light and I
remember looking from behind the on the
corridor it was a quite a full
Auditorium and I saw some Union Jacks
out there and I went out to play we did
the warm-up and table tennis is very
subtle spin is a very important variable
in table tennis and you have to read the
spin in order to get the ball back in
quite small variations in racket angle
can have quite a big magnified effect on
where the ball lands and I remember
thinking right what I need to do here is
I need to get the racket angle
absolutely spot on in my first shot in
order to get the ball back into
play but I was so focused on getting the
racket angle right that I wasn't moving
my feet I wasn't reading my opponent I
wasn't anticipating what he was doing I
wasn't thinking strategically and it all
fell catastrophically apart I lost the
back then table tennis games were up to
21 and I lost the first game 212 this is
almost unheard of in Olympic competition
and then I lost a second game I think
217 and the dream was over very rapidly
in other words I choked I had the
classic problem of overthinking one
component of the performance and
everything else falling apart it can
happen you know in a job interview that
you're really Keen to get where you just
can't get your tongue and mouth and
larynx working effectively you can't
think of the answer you freeze um and
that was a failure in a dramatic and
highly humiliating way and it could have
been that I thought okay I I don't have
what it takes to perform Under Pressure
I haven't got the you know the the
nerves of Steel that is required and I
could have given up putting myself in
pressurized situations what I think I
learned from that experience is that
when it comes to performing under
pressure or anything else if you have
what I call what's sometimes called a
growth mindset a willingness to see
failure as an opportunity to learn
rather than as evidence you lack some
innate gift that means he really
oughtn't to bother trying anymore that
that can have transformative impact in
how you engage with almost everything
that happens in life and that redefin
that redefinition of failure I think is
one of the one of the key attributes for
me of
life it's odd you know we the last few
years the glorification I think this
push back against uh Vicor Hood culture
against the kind of fragility that
everybody's every generation is adamant
that the future generation has and it
feels like uh maybe it is just more of
the same maybe it is whatever history
doesn't repeat itself but it Rhymes that
uh every generation's consideration of
the Next Generation doesn't repeat
itself but it Rhymes um and I think that
part of that has been trying to find an
acceptable Vector
to empower future Generations what is it
that we can do whether it's Nas t talb
with antifragility whether it's Shane
Parish teaching people about mental
models and about the fundamental
attribution era whether it's stuff like
Rick and Morty saying your booze mean
nothing I've seen what makes you cheer
you know lots of different ways to say
the social world isn't doesn't care that
much about you it's very much about how
you deal with setbacks as opposed to how
many setbacks that you have resilience
and and and the ability to sort of come
back from challenges is very important
but even with all of that is swimming in
this millu of very lovely very
positive uh Pro failure messaging I
imagine that that doesn't make the
experience of failure any more
comfortable at the time well that's
definitely true and I think it's worth
looking at this in a historical context
there was something called the
self-esteem movement that really
originated on the west coast of the
United States and then migrated around
the world where the idea was you try and
protect young people from failure you
give them easy success experiences so
they get used to succeeding and you
praise them lavishly for their talent
and they'll develop so much self-esteem
they'll be able to go out and change the
world and it was great in theory but it
failed in practice because if a young
person Associates life with being
perfect if they're only ever used to
succeeding then the first time they fail
it can be devastating and the walls of
their world can come crumbling down I
don't think we want young people to have
lots of fragile self-esteem we want them
to have I think the word used resilience
and that requires giving them difficult
challenges early in life so they learn
how to fail they learn to as it were
extract the lessons that can come from
failure and that way they're going to
cope much better with a world where
failure is baked in because if you think
about science and technology you're
putting ideas to the world you posit
theories and it's when they fail that
set sustain stage for growth you create
a prototype and you test it early to
find out where it's not working as well
as it could do and that enables you to
improve we when we perform experiments
if we know the result of the experiment
before we conduct it it is not an
experiment it a waste of time there has
to be a tolerance for failure when we're
seeking to innovate and to the extent
that we don't wish to fail that our
self-esteem is bound up with being
perfect we don't take the risks that are
at the absolute heart of how we develop
as individuals how science grows how
institutions get better so I think there
was a
fundamental uh era in the
1970s of which Echo still exist in
society but I think it's worth saying uh
Chris if I if I may that I don't think
we should fetishize failure in a certain
sense I think we need to be
sophisticated about how we think about
it you know if I'm on a flight you know
I flew back from Washington DC on on
Sunday just before we're we're speaking
today I wouldn't want the pilot to think
okay I'm going to try something new on
the Final Approach I'm going to try new
I'm going to try a new lever crashes a
plane kills all the passengers and we
say yeah great you know that's crazy
what would we want a pilot to do if he
or she had a hunch that trying something
new in the cockpit would improve the
safety of the aircraft as as you
doubtless say you want to test in a
simulator that way you're getting all
the benefits from failing without any
doubt side risk for anyone if it's a
sufficiently high fidelity simulator um
I think what we're trying to do when we
fail in The Innovation space is try and
surf the tradeoff between the massive
blessings that are conferred from
learning from failure while minimizing
the downside risk and it's that
strategic lens that we have to apply
because you know a retail company that
had a hunch that you know changing the
configuration of shelves might improve
customer experience
they wouldn't bet the whole equity on it
they'd want to test it in a pilot scheme
but what I found in my you know foray
into business is that it's very easy to
try and test it in the most conducive
conditions with the best store manager
the best loc but you're not learning
anything you're trying to corroborate
the hypothesis whereas you test it in
tough conditions you learn so much more
there's a I know I'm going on here but
EO Wilson who I think is one of the
Great
polyic intellects of the 20th century he
was someone who's interested in insect
Behavior but wrote beautifully about
society and and and human behavior said
you test a trivial Theory you get a
trivial answer what we should be doing
is testing ourselves our theories our
prototypes um in in tough empowering
environments so that we gain the most
learning we can and so long as we're
resilient to the failure is that are a
part of life in learning that's how we
drive progress in almost all of its uh
dimensions a lot of friends from the UK
have moved out to Dubai and it's a um
zero tax High Sun lots of fun place for
people to go and move especially young
people that haven't got any
responsibilities yet and uh a lot of the
time you go away and holiday to a place
and you have this phenomenal time uh but
I think that judging whether or not I
mean how many times have you been on a
holiday and someone decides to Proclaim
over dinner I could move here I could
live I would I would love I I'd move
here tomorrow um but they are the new
shelf strategy being deployed in the
best area with the best manager so my
advice to anybody before they move
anywhere is go during the shittest
season ask reliably when is the worst
weather too hot or too cold or too wet
or too dark or something and go and work
don't
allow yourself to be inflated by there's
a festival on
and this DJ that I love and we're going
to go and see this comedy show or
whatever it's like no no no no you want
to can I survive in this new environment
as [ __ ] as it's going to become at the
shittest it could be and if I still am
like yep Bravo it's better than where I
am at the moment then good um going back
to this whole self-esteem movement I I
have spent an awful lot of time thinking
about the real fundamental sort of
pinnings of confidence self-esteem
self-belief what have you learned from a
a scientific psychological lens about
the component parts of where self-esteem
self-belief genuinely come
from I still think it's an open question
um I do think that certain types of ways
of thinking about self-esteem can be
quite dangerous and self-defeating um
I'm not sure that self-esteem is as
great as it's cracked up to be I think
if we my own View and my life is far
from I'm 53 I I fail a lot with my
kids one of them sitting next door
watching Rocky four Rocky 4 at that
sounds like a success to me
personally the only thing that worried
me is when we watch Rocky one 2 and
three I thought Rocky 3 was the weakest
and my son 10-year-old thought Rocky 3
was the best so that that was slightly
disappointing you're concerned about his
fledgling career as a film critic
perhaps going down director even the
ambitious father I'm kidding on Master
Sayad do do you remember Rocky Rocky 3
was the one with Clubber Lang Mr T yeah
yeah yeah yeah yeah you you've watched
it I thought Rocky one was so great well
it it descended into parody briefly
right and I think Rocky 4 is
particularly perodic if if that is a
word um and cliched the the first one
was brilliant
I'm going to I've got to I've got to
teach you about this and we'll come back
to the self-esteem thing in a second so
uh I got taught by a film critic big
film critic on on YouTube called the
critical Drinker swey Scottish man who
who's very very cool um and he explained
to me the life cycle of movies and
franchises and and sort of uh sub uh
genres in that regard uh and you get um
introduction you get growth you get
maturity and then you get parody and
parody is the final stage so a good
example of this would be the Marvel
Cinematic Universe uh you get Captain
America and Iron Man it's kind of
revolutionary it's like sexy as a
superhero thing it's sort of witty and
cool it's not as dark or as serious as
Batman in the DC Universe was trying to
make things and then you get growth and
that's where it starts to establish
itself and you sort of you know it's uh
Captain America Winter Soldier it's the
number two and number three Iron Man
they start to sort of um create a trend
but things are still growing then they
get into maturity that's when you
talking like Avengers end game Infinity
Wars stuff like that you you kind it's
like a comfortable leather pair of shoes
you know the Rhythm you know the Cadence
it's like ah this is where it's going to
be but then you get to parody and parody
would be a great example of this would
be the most recent Thor movie where Thor
is no longer the hero he's the butt of
all of the jokes you've taken the
established archetypes and cliches that
you've created and you use them it's a
meta nothing is about what the movie is
it's all a meta commentary about the
clich of the movie It's these sort of
stories within stories and stories about
stories and it's him doing the
jeanclaude vanam splits across two
dragons and it's him being a big oath
he's never competent he's never cool
he's never sexy he sort of Falls flat on
his face and only makes success sort of
in reference to previous success and
stuff but uh yeah I think you can tell
when any individual Creator commentator
genre movie series is on the decline
when you get to parody but don't you
think look that's a brilliant and
compelling analysis and I don't think
it's unreasonable to say that
civilizations follow a not completely
dissimilar path and the um work that's
been done on the creative
world I guess you could apply it to
musicians couldn't you who plow a
particular fough become highly
successful but then stay within that
that part of the fitness landscape and
then start losing popularity because
others are copying or they become
cliched and what they're doing I think
it's interesting that those um it's
quite rare but music writers who are
successful in um over many decades
refresh so they bring people with a
different point of view a different
perspective they leverage diversity of
thought in order to as it were move from
where they were but to connect what they
knew with new information in new ideas
they create a new synthesis that avoids
the cliche um I mean in a funny kind of
way it goes back to what we're talking
about before uh about
self-esteem you can sort of imagine that
if you see Life as a
journey rather than as a somewhere to
arrive as a
destination then the way one thinks
about mistakes the way one thinks about
perfection is different because each
time you get somewhere you think of it
as a staging post to somewhere
potentially new why would you want to
stay within the domain that one has
already created creatively and go back
to films why not think about how one can
move somewhere else but it's easy I
think when one is successful to um to
stay within one's comfort zone you have
lots to lose now you've got lots to lose
people are very differential uh people
are looking up to you um and so the idea
of taking a risk which is as we I think
agreed earlier part and parcel of how
one innovates becomes often tougher and
I think you see that in business where
complacency um and comfort you Sir Alex
Ferguson a famous football manager
described complacency as a virus and I
think it it is something that can
subvert the idea of having that
pioneering sense of I now want to
continue on this wonderful Journey we
only get one and then it ends why stay
uh where one is particularly if one's
self-esteem that's what worries me about
self-esteem can be bound up with uh
looking and sounding perfect so I think
one of the I love that I love that idea
and it makes me when I hear stories like
that when I'm reminded of the fact that
life is a hypothesis to be tested not an
argument to be proved I'm just going to
keep on sort of testing these things I'm
going to keep on isn't that interesting
I'm playing not taking things too
seriously I can feel my body
downregulate it's like a parasympathetic
Mantra of some kind but we can't deny
the fact that humans need validation
social acceptance they want prestige in
the eyes of people that are around them
and most of the time that involves doing
something in some form impressive or
competent or admirable or whatever and
how do you get there you get there by
finding a thing that works and then
rinsing the living [ __ ] out of it and
doing it over and over again at least if
you have a risk averse uh mindset
because you know this thing works even a
little bit and you have no evidence that
the new thing works quite as well yeah
that's definitely true and perhaps a
distinction we might make is between
exploit and
explore if if you have a solution even
if it's a can solution to a problem and
you can keep exploiting it again and
again keep producing that car of the
right size and dimensionality or keep
giving a podcast formula that's working
you can exploit The Living Daylights out
of it but if it the risk of course is
that people will get bored of what
you're producing but let's say they're
not getting bored all it takes is one
person in a highly diverse Market to
innovate and they can potentially take
the market away or a new
technology that one could be using to
make that formula even more exploitable
you might be Miss so only ever
exploiting and not
exploring seems to be a recipe for
stagnation potentially except in some
very unusual ecosystems I think the
faster the world is changing the the
more the division between exploit and
explore should be moved in the direction
of explore and it I suppose the only
thing I'd otherwise add is that as we
kind of discussed
the comfort zone is in the exploit doing
what we knew worked it it's a bit more
comfortable and therefore you know being
sufficiently tough to say hang on we
need to explore a bit more you know the
classic example forgive me uh of
Blockbuster Video exploiting the hell
out
of uh of VHS vide tapes when the world
is changing that's a recipe for nons
survival in the marketplace yeah how
can people have a better relationship
with the fear of risk which I think is
fear of failure masquerading with a
slightly nicer sounding word how can
they sort of re reframe that experience
because it's all well and good and how
many times have people heard it's not
about the destination it's the journey
it's not about how many times you get
knocked down but how many times you get
up you we can sort of Mantra our way
through this as much as possible have
you found anything tangible tacit
tactical that people can be like yes
that's a thing is a thing that I can use
that can help me to overcome that in
moment fear of risk fear of novelty fear
of failure Well we I'm very interested
in this concept that I I think alluded
to earlier of growth
mindset growth mindset I think is a
tremendous asset give one quick example
I don't think I've mentioned it so far
but I I when I was dropping down the
world rankings at table I'm still the
number one in England um but I'm moving
down the world rankings and I realize
I'm going to have have to reinvent so I
I did something that uh some of the
older British viewers or listeners will
know what I'm talking about I phone
directory
inquirers and this is uh you Chris do
you know what that is by the way yeah it
was you it was kind of like the Yellow
Pages but on the phone is that right
exactly exactly so problem a lots of
Americans listen to the show and they
won't know do they have yellow pages
over here maybe they do anyway it was
like a directory it's like a local
directory for businesses and and stuff
yeah you you'd phone it if you wanted to
get the telephone number of a company uh
in the sort of pre- Internet days so I
phon 192 and got the telephone numbers
of the times in Guardian two English
newspapers and I I phoned and phoned and
phoned and I eventually got through to
the sports editor of the times David
Chapel uh this is in 1999 I said look
would it be possible to write for the
sports pages of the time
um it's Matthew side here I said you
know British number one table tennis
player and he said I've never heard of
you which was a slightly disappointing
start start the conversation but he said
look this will tell you how long ago it
was he said could you fax in some
ideas so I went and bought a fax machine
faxed in some ideas um and kept faxing
articles until eventually one got
published in May
1999 um and that was thrilling
because I didn't think I'd ever be
published in in the Times newspaper uh
went and bought about 10 copies from the
local news agents have you still got
copy lying around somewhere I do I do
and a folder upstairs terrible this is
when it was broad sheet these huge huge
newspapers like not like the the
tabloids today um but an unintended side
effect of this is I get a call from
Goldman Sach uh the Investment Bank
saying look we've we've read your
article we thought it was great
would you come in and give a talk to our
top
Traders
and at our conferencing floor in Fleet
Street and I went to Chris a comp a
comprehensive school so this is a you
know a state school it's not like or
orrow you know completely banded
comprehensive in Suburban reading which
is about 40 miles west of London we
didn't do any public speaking at school
you know there was no debate in
society believe it or not Chris the the
the press conferences in pingpong were
not that well attended so so I'd done
I'd done no public speaking so you can I
had had the practice I hadn't failed at
speaking I hadn't had the chance to
develop my speaking ability my
communication skills so I remember going
very nervous I prepared hard but I was
tremendously nervous and I gave uh I
gave the talk um and it wasn't great and
I got heckled about 2third of the way
through and I remember my first reaction
was a fixed mindset response you know I
obviously don't have the talent for this
if I'm ever invited again by a big
company I I'll politely decline but then
I thought no let's have a growth mindset
response to this maybe I could improve
and I got a friend to to look into
public speaking practice it's sort of
early Yahoo search and the top uh
response was Toast Masters which is a
Global Network of public speaking clubs
and the nearest one to me in Southwest
London and Richmond where I'm still
living today was in
Twickenham a room in a place called York
house that was hired by toart 10 or 15
people trying to improve their
communication and their social
confidence and it's a wonderful thing
you go and if you're lucky enough to get
on the program you give a talk the first
one you ever give is called the ice
Breer where you tell the group about
yourself but you're trying to handle
your anxiety you stood in front of 10 or
15 people judging you as inevitably
happens when you're in front of a room
and you're trying to communicate to them
and you're learning how to handle the
anxiety and how to I wanted to learn to
speak without notes and then at the end
of it someone at Toast Masters always
comes to the front and gives you
feedback and a rule is they have to give
you at least one criticism fantastic
you're finding out what you could do
differently and better you know if you
think of Life as a hypothesis rather
than as an argument that needs to be how
did you put it
corroborated I think that's a wonderful
way of thinking about it um then there's
some spontaneous speaking two-third of
the way through where you you whoever's
hosting for the night writes a set of
topics on cards the name's go in a hat
and they pick out a name Matthew you
have to go to the front pick up the card
and extemporize on it immediately for 60
seconds the first time you do it it's
terrifying but because I was passionate
about journalism and I thought I'm going
to have to give the occasional talk I'd
love to be able to communicate by the
way I might get invited on The Today
program or the BBC News and being able
to think on one's feet is something that
will be of tremendous value a fantastic
asset but the point of this isn't to say
I'm the best Communicator in the world
because I'm I'm I know that I'm not the
best Communicator in the world I go to
conferences where there are off the
scale communicators but what it means is
you get to be the best that you can be
you reach the summit of your potential
and if it's something you care about
it's something that has a purpose view I
think that's an incredibly empowering
thing and that's why I think you said
practical tips you can measure yourself
on growth mindset and sometimes people
are fixed they're a bit worried about
trying new things about collaborating
with people they don't know about
leaving their comfort zone and it's
about liberating us from some of the
unconscious constraints we can place on
ourselves so that we can just live that
life is a hypothesis I you know love
that formulation yeah I remember I
started doing some striking boxing and
my ey and stuff I went out to Thailand
for a summer and and fought out there
and the first the most important lesson
that
novice Fighters learn according to the
coach the first coach that I had was
you're not made of glass when someone
punches you in the face and it always
sticks with me that because you you can
see somebody that isn't used to
necessarily being in a ring and sort of
when punches get thrown there's like a
that even if it's not much of a Flinch
even if it's not the whole body there's
a a closing of the eyes and then there's
that really famous sequence of Conor
McGregor winning the lightweight title
against Eddie Alvarez and Alvarez throws
this big overhand sort of looping uh
right like that and it his knuckles
touch the end of Conor McGregor's nose
and Conor watches this thing come in the
hallway [ __ ] just watches it glance off
the bottom of his nose and then just un
it's one of the most beautiful sequences
of striking his then counter it's
like five punches punctuated with two
kick it's gorgeous it's
beautiful and then Eddie just hits the
floor and that's how he finishes it and
that's how he becomes the UFC's first
double Champion right just phenomenal
like beautiful gorgeous story but it
makes me think about learning that
you're not made of glass right you're
not when
and that failure is again it's hard it's
hard we can talk about it and everyone
that's listening is go you rationally
that makes sense and then the the swell
of fear inside of them just one other
point that's I guess kind of salient I'm
going to uh Australia to do a live tour
I've got this live show thing so not too
dissimilar to your speaking although
hopefully less heckling and I've been
doing work in progress shows in Austin
uh at a comedy club East of town and
it's very small 40 people rooms like it
kind of basically invite only on a
mailing list and um the first week that
I went out I was R really really really
rusty I was like oh this isn't good then
the second week I had Stella before I
was like that's nine 10 out of 10 well I
haven't lost it fantastic so last night
was my final work in progress show and I
thought okay I know I've got the one
that I need to do in the tank which was
the second one why don't I just try and
be as experimental evening as possible
more jokes new stories trying to weave
things in a different way cutting out
the bits that I think kind of probably
don't need to be there but that I rely
on because they feel safe because I've
run them 30 times before or whatever it
might be and uh last night as I was
going out there I've got some jokes in
there that didn't land they were too
complex they were too like trying to be
too clever uh and usually you have that
especially trying to tell jokes in front
of a group of people you feel like oh my
God you sort of the inner British cringe
meter the to curl inside of your
trainers um but because I'd entered into
that environment as this is a hypothesis
to be tested as opposed to something to
be proved I just had this like ah well
if it doesn't work great because it
means I'm not going to use it in front
of three and a half thousand people in
London that's so interesting because one
of the other things um but first of all
I I love I love that story because I
used to do a podcast the the one
successful podcast that I that I did I I
shouldn't say that the BBC podcast of
sideways is doing okay but was with two
other sports people Fred flintoff who is
a cricketer former England cricket
captain and Robbie Savage uh who is a
soccer player and it was called
imaginatively flintoff Savage and the
pingpong guy and it was it was a
surprise smash it was a surprise smash
it it did really really well and
um two two things struck me about it the
one that I think was really interesting
is
flintoff um was worried he was a bit
self-conscious before a microphone or in
front of a camera and that's very easy
to be if anyone's ever had a you know an
an iPhone pointed at them they're
talking naturally and suddenly it's like
oh I think that's quite a natural
reaction might as well be the barrel of
a gun yeah exactly um and
flintoff he said uh we did one of the
podcast and I said what are you up to
next week he said I'm on a a tour of
provincial theaters and I'm doing this
um
musical he was in like pantomime type
stuff for a while right right and I said
what are you doing he said well I'm not
getting paid very much at all but if I'm
going to stand in front of an audience
dressed up and singing my heart out
that's going to help me lose my
self-consciousness and I really want to
go into broadcasting I want to be a
success and this is just a way of
learning how to do it and he went on
this tour and it wasn't long after that
he got a really good gig in television
the presenter of Top Gear I mean sadly
he he um had an accident during Top Gear
uh and it's been very difficult for him
but I watch him as a broadcaster now I
don't know if you saw any of the series
where he went on um he went to Preston
where he grew up quite a rough part of a
northern English town and worked with
well you'll know about this right this
wonderful series about young cricketers
and then he took them to India and just
seeing him flourish I think he's got a
wonderful wonderful growth mindset just
a tremendous person one of the uh other
areas of your work which I think ties in
with this quite nicely is this tension
between deliberate practice 10,000 hour
rule time and detention and genetics
Talent Advantage something innate
predisposition almost predetermination I
guess for the absolute magic athletes
amongst us where do you stand now after
spending two careers uh in in one form
or another thinking about this where do
you stand on 10,000 hour rule
versus genetics Talent advantages
Etc well um I don't think my views have
changed that much on this I think that
my experience in table tennis was for
people to say when they saw me playing
well you've got to give
you must have been born with
extraordinary reaction speeds and
athleticism but they hadn't seen the
hidden story which was I grew up I
mentioned in reading but on the street
that I grew up on it had 50% of the top
table tennis players in Britain this is
from a population of about a million
recreational players so I had a series
of
advantages in addition probably to
pretty good genes too which was um my
parents bought a table for the garage
when I was about eight so I'm practicing
like crazy with my brother who was two
years older and better than me so I'm
getting stretched the whole time I'm
losing a lot and learning a lot um then
the school teacher at the primary school
that I went to and reading which was on
the road that had all the top players
Silverdale Road was the best coach in
Britain Peter Charters um and he invited
me and my brother some other young
players to a club that was open 24 hours
a day you just had a set of keys and you
could let yourself in and practice
before school after school holidays and
weekends so did I have genes that were
conducive to Table Tennis yes but are
there other crucial factors in
explaining what enabled me to get to the
top absolutely and the relationship
between the contribution of genes and
the contribution of luck environment
circumstance probably changes depending
on the activity to be good at basketball
you definitely need to be I guess
reasonably tall that's highly uh
genetically
mediated um uh there's probably other
area other areas where the genetic
contribution may be a little bit less
but typically I would suggest it's a
multifactorial um phenomenon where you
really need to have the perfect storm of
lots of different things happening at
the same time do you know the fine-tuned
theory of the universe you familiar with
this yeah yeah so it sounds to me like
uh your table tennis career was sort of
not too dissimilar to that so for the
people that don't know there's a I know
it's like 10 10 different numbers 10
different forces relationship between
the strong and weak nuclear force
electromagnetic gravity uh this sort of
weird uh cosmological constant like very
slight bit of expansion that's going on
and all of these things uh if only they
were out by some absurdly small fraction
of a lot of different numbers the uh
meal that was created from the
ingredients would not be a universe
conducive to having matter it would have
clumped together because gravity was too
strong or it would have blasted apart
because it was too weak or heavier atoms
heavier elements would have been able to
form for whatever reason and uh I I I
always think about that I've got Brian
Cox uh fellow coming on the showell soon
I I I think this is sometimes cited by
religious people as an argument for the
existence of God under the rubric of the
weak anthropic principle just one thing
I'd throw into the mix Chris is is
um explaining it in that way I think is
is completely valid and if your goal is
to become the best table tennis player
say an
England and that anything else is just a
disaster then you really want to have
all of those ingredients in order to
bother making the attempt to use the
limited time on Earth Earth to get there
in a zero sum environment if we all
improve by 10% the relative rankings
remain the same and if you're only
interested in the relative ranking
that's something that one needs to bear
in mind but my sense is that in many
things in life it's a positive sum game
if you and I and lots of other people
improve our ability to communicate
that's good for us probably good for the
institutions we work at and good for the
society if people
have a growth mindset attitude towards
mathematics and we'll become more
numerate that's great for us and it's
great for society um and for what it's
worth even though sport is often
pictured as a zero sum environment no
matter how much people improve at table
tennis there's only one person who can
win the gold at the Olympics every four
years the
Journey of trying to be the best that
you can be even if it doesn't mean that
you're the best in the world is a
fascinating and and often very beautiful
one and I worry a bit and you'll be more
connected to this um than perhaps I am
is said occasionally I heard PE people
saying you know what what's the point of
being the best you can be why not just
Coast in life quiet quitting just doing
the
minimum my sense from the evidence is
that's a much less satisfying life than
one where you're passionate about
something you try and be the best that
you can be you make a bigger
contribution
to the company to yourself to the
society and I think the dynamical power
of that when you scale it through a
society is is tremendous and I think it
does explain um certain Trends in
history are you familiar with Asia Bin's
idea of the inner
Citadel no this is I I'm a big admirer
of Berlin and have read the Hedgehog in
the fox and two concepts of Liberty but
go go on let me Citadel the inner
Citadel when the natural Road toward
human fulfillment is blocked human
beings Retreat into themselves become
involved in themselves and try to create
inwardly that world which some evil Fate
has denied them externally if you cannot
obtain from the world that which you
really desire you must teach yourself
not to want it if you cannot get what
you want you must teach yourself to want
what you can get this is a very frequent
form of spiritual retreat in depth into
a kind of inoc cadel in which you try to
lock yourself up against all the fearful
ills of the world the friend explained
it in a simple way if your leg is
wounded you can try to treat the leg and
if you can't then you cut off your leg
and announce that the desire for legs is
misguided and must be subdued basically
if you can't win at a game you stop
playing say that you never cared about
the game and create your own game with
rules which you can win more easily at
well that's a in Psychology it's often
goes under thank you by the way it's
really interesting Berlin was such a w
when I was at o I was at a college
called bael and I remember um Berlin
walking through the the the back quad no
way yeah and he he was a I I I knew
people who knew Berlin um I didn't agree
with everything he wrote about
philosophically but he was such a Humane
and rounded thinker which isn't often
the often always the way in Academia um
but but a great great person but in
Psychology for what it's worth there is
a phenomenon called self self
handicapping where if people are in a
fixed think of a young person in a bit
of a fixed mindset they want to be
perfect and the self-esteem is bound up
with being pretty perfect and they have
an exam for the piano let's say they
love the piano they've got an exam next
week and I think most parents will have
seen this at one time or another with
their kids suddenly the kid stops
practicing and you're like what why are
they not practicing they got the exam
next week they love the piano
and what's often happening is that
they're so worried about the possibility
they might fail in the
exam they want to
create proactively an excuse that they
can point to in the event of failure in
other words if I don't practice if I
said I'm not bothered about it if I
deliberately go out and get drunk the
night before I saw that in finals by the
way at Oxford some people this is like
three years of work for the exam which
is the only thing that determines your
grade and I'm not saying grades
important exams are important but these
people actually did care about their
exams but they were so worried about
failing and that it would call into
question their intellect they wanted to
be able to say you know what I got drunk
the night before they actually made the
outcome that they most feared more
likely as a consequence of what you're
describing and I think that is not
dissimilar to The Retreat into the in a
cadel I think it has very similar
underlying psychological Dynamics well
in that way
the upside of never trying is never
having to feel the pain of failure
exactly you avoid public failure by
assuring failure privately so you
mentioned before we got started uh
you've done your research I was
impressed um I was a cricketer that was
what I dedicated my teenage years to uh
and for the people that kind of know how
the CR cricket season Works um
especially as a a junior you can play
you know under 15s under 17s maybe a
Saturday game as you start to play
adults and a Sunday game too plus you're
netting two or three times a week so
this is a seven it's a full-time job
alongside going to school or whatever
and uh there was a period toward the end
of my teens where I did that purposeful
handicapping what was it called
self-handicapping self-handicapping so
um I would be called by the uh head of
Durham Academy Cricket on a on a Monday
he'd ring me every Monday he'd ask I get
on because I wasn't placed by uh the
Academy I hadn't been placed in a team I
was playing for the club that I'd always
grown up playing for and he would ask
how I'd got on and I knew he was going
to ask and I was so
worried about not performing that I was
a leg spinner right again for the non
crickety inducted it's a unique form of
bowling the conditions need to be very
specific the uh position of the game
needs to be very specific as well it's
kind of high risk but it's also
potentially High reward it's very
complex
anyway I often had what was called a TFC
a thanks for coming which is where you
don't bat and you don't bowl because I'd
be batting you know seven or8 and uh the
bowling um offering that I had was very
bespoke very very specific and often the
conditions wouldn't uh lend itself to
that especially being up north it was
raining a lot it was you know pitches
were wet Etc
and uh there was this oddd degree of
satisfaction that I would have when I
ended up having a
TFC that I knew when I got to speak to
Jeff or John on a Monday that I was able
to say you know I just really I I just
didn't get the opportunity like I really
wanted kind of the opportunity to do
this thing I didn't in some ways because
I was scared of doing it and by being
tested finding myself coming up short
that if I'd been handed the ball and I
wanted to and it's this odd duality you
know one week I was braver and I just
[ __ ] really wanted the captain and
maybe even try and push him a little bit
and nudge him and be like look I've got
this like put me in coach so to speak um
but then other ones on my you know my
weaker more um fragile sort of mental
weeks where I didn't have that same
amount of confidence in myself there
would be this sort of bizarre
melancholic satisfaction that uh I
didn't get the opportunity to succeed
but at least I didn't have to have the
threat of failure and I think it's yeah
it's really interesting Chris I think
it's worth saying that
um I I I should have perap said this
earlier it is understandable uh not
wanting to fail and I think it's perhaps
even more understandable in the digital
age where often people can post pictures
that makes their life look pretty
perfect and airbrush photographs and if
young people look at that and think life
is about looking and acting perfectly
you can see why it becomes more
difficult to take the risks that I think
we both agree are so important for for
growth in life the quote that I think
you might like is JK Rowling um this is
her 2008 Harvard Commencement Address
somebody I admire very much it is
impossible to live without failing at
something unless you live so cautiously
that you might as well not have lived at
all in which case you fail by default
yeah beautiful I mean what a
one other thing I'll just throw in Chris
if I may you may um something I've
become very interested in um and might
form my next book have you heard of the
concept of time
preference no th this is um if I asked
you would you rather have
uh1 or $100 now or 200 in a year's time
oh like hyperbolic discounting in a way
yeah exactly exactly the yeah that's
another way of describing the discount
rate um and humans do tend to Discount
hyperbolically which is not dissimilar
to other other organisms we tend to want
to have the immediate gain even if we
could have more in the future but of
course in life we need to invest in
order to gain more in the long term you
know we save we get compound interest in
order to be fit we have to turn down the
instant gratification of watching the
movie and go for a run which is more
painful in the present but if we always
prioritize now over the future the
chocolate over the run the lying down
rather than the training the Netflix
rather than the homework the consuming
rather than the investing over the
course of a life it is crippling for a
society it's disastrous because you
can't have economic growth without the
willingness to defer gratification but
if you defer today and you get more in
the next period and then you defer again
you're constantly growing your life and
I think my hunch is it's not well
studied actually in economics are quite
interested in the discount rate and
hyperbolic discounting it's quite a
literature in Psychology they're
interested in
self-control and certain types of habit
formation as a way of enabling you to do
what's good in the long term and
overcoming the tempt not to do in the
short but I don't think there's a
sufficiently good integration between
these two things and my sense is that
for societ for individuals and for
societies reducing time preference in
other words
seeing the long term and deferring
gratification is absolutely Central and
that there are people and there may be
people listening who can do do it in one
part of life but not in others probably
familiar with the NFL players who must
have had incredible discipline in order
to be successful in a highly competitive
sport but a not in significant
proportion go bankrupt within a few
years of retiring they show that
discipline that long-termism that
deferment of gratification in their
sport but when it comes to the money
they've got it all at the end of their
career they they'll blow it and then
they'll blow up now this I think is
quite pervasive so when I talked about
growth mindset I I you know I think it's
great to be able to apply it more
broadly in one's life rather than just
necessarily to one thing I think you
have a better life a better Adventure a
better Journey a better um uh period of
hypothesis testing if you're able to be
low time preference in a more
generalized way and if you're I know
you're interested in politics I've been
listening to some of your podcasts today
I think if you look at Western
Civilization as a
whole you can explain the key Dynamics
through this prism how so
well um I I I hope it's not
controversial to say that the West Was
something of a a
Backwater for many thousands of years um
and was not the center of
innovation and creativity for much of
the period that we sometimes call the
Dark Ages um but that the West took off
in the early modern period and became
the dominant e ecomic and cultural power
on Earth this is sometimes as you know
called the Great Divergence between the
west and the rest now what is the
explanation for this now historians have
sought for a very long time to explain
the rise of the West you've interviewed
one of the great thinkers in this space
Joseph Henrik of Harvard University who
explains this Divergence through the ban
on cousin marriage that across the world
you had tribal societies and it's great
having a tribe you know you're working
together with your kin um in order to do
things but it also can restrict the
success of a society because if you have
lots of different tribes within a given
geographical area they're often fighting
with each other and don't trust each
other and the Roman Catholic ban on
cousin marriage which went up to six
cousins I think by the 10th Century
effectively forced people to marry
outside the tribe rather than within the
cousin group so you dissolve the tribes
and create a national identity and it
drives Innovation and change and I think
this is a great argument but he also
mentions in his book the weirdest people
in the world something that I think has
been
underplayed which is over the course of
the Middle Ages partly because of what
I've already mentioned about the
breakdown in the tribal structures the
interest rate in England drops
dramatically between about a, ad and
1500 you can think of the interest rate
as the society's time preference if that
makes sense if if you require 20%
interest in order to save you're
somebody who's more interested in now
than later but can you see that makes it
difficult to save and invest and do
great things but the interest rate uh
dropped from 20 30% in England to 5% by
1500 and I think and I there are some
economists who agree with this that
Western Europe was becoming more patient
puritanism the Protestant work ethic
these came later of course
um the bouro values of prudence and
self-restraint the industrious
Revolution this is all
indicative of Western
Consciousness prioritizing more than
other parts of the world the future
above the present allowing for
cumulative compound economic growth that
eventually takes off during the
Industrial Revolution now I think if I'm
not sending you to sleep yet Chris that
there is a reversal in about 1970
where I think Western Civilization
started becoming less
patient there was an advert for a credit
card called access one of the first two
credit cards which said access takes the
waiting out of wanting in other words
spend now don't worry about the future
let it look after itself I think this
came out in
1972 but if you look at England between
1670 and 1970
there was never a fiscal deficit outside
a major war ever because they're saving
for a rainy day during this period since
1970 the British government has run
deficits every year bar five they're
trying to consume and that means that
the national debt is rising to now above
100% of GDP America is maybe even a
better example where there has been a
deficit every year bar four we're
talking a few days out from the
presidential election both Trump and
Harris promising huge deficits according
to the Congressional office for I think
it's called budget
responsibility Trump will add they say
on their Central estimate 7.5 trillion
to the debt Harris 3.5 trillion two
sides of the same coin because the
public is not willing to hear that it's
no good consuming now because we're
putting problems onto future Generations
where it will become Starker and starer
isn't
it is it's so interesting this has
happened when life EXP expectancy has
been going up as well you know from 1670
to 1970 over that time you have ever
more reason yeah one of the arguments
for hyperbolic discounting is that if
you're in a uh High volatility
environment all well and good maybe
getting $200 in a year's time but you
don't know if you're going to be here in
in a year's time you know that you're
here right now and you know that it's
$100 that's exactly correct so a lot of
economists argue that uh time preference
it's not a great phrase we need to come
out with a need to be remed y exactly if
You' got any good ideas I'd love love to
hear it but it's partly to do with life
expectancy certain sections of American
society have suffered a reduction in
life expectancy but on average as you
say it has gone up so there has to be an
alternative explanation by the way
quantitative easing is another example
of this you're printing money enabling
consumption to continue in the here and
now but you're storing up lots of long
long term problems with capital
misallocation asset price inflation
making difficult for younger people to
get on the housing ladder that has been
a disaster I think um and and in some
ways that was permitted by coming off
the gold standard um complicated story
in itself but I do Wonder Chris if the
self-esteem movement comes from the same
basic place that we want kids to succeed
because it's so nice in the Here and Now
give them lots of success experiences
but what does it mean you're depriving
them of the resilience that is necessary
for
longterm growth and an interesting life
grade inflation and education starts
taking off in the 1970s it's lovely to
get a grade A and the here and now but
if everyone's getting a grade day you
can't really you're devaluing the
currency of all exams and I do wonder if
part of the and I'm only going to say
this tentatively part of the Mental
Health crisis that we're seeing is if
one is feeling anxious it's quite nice
to get a label in the Here and Now M for
why that is being um why you're not
feeling great
um but if everyone or or ever higher
proportion have mental health issues for
which they have a label it makes it very
difficult to provide the psychological
support for the people who are the most
so the most needy I could give you other
examples Chris but what fascinates me is
that many if not all of these start to
change around 197 70 fiscal monetary
policy the self-esteem movement um uh
mental health issues I have a whole list
of these things and I'm trying to drill
down at the moment into seeing whether
or not one can provide a convincing
unifying explanation for all this that
that doesn't diverge too far from but it
does a bit from henrik's analysis very
interesting have you got a potential
overarching Dynamic that's I think
explanation is
complacency the West has been near the
this is my tentative explanation if you
think about
Rome um Ancient Rome or many other
civilizations when they've been at the
top for all all your creative people
doing their movie
franchises you've been at the top for a
while your
expectations of your consumption start
to
rise but it becomes less easy to as it
were absorb the necessary costs in order
for that to continue and if you think
about Rome um you know they devalued
they they effectively had a you know 97
to 100% silver in the Denarius and they
just cut it they debase the currency and
it led to inflation um and Gibbon the
historian argues about this complacency
this decadence that had set in
and I think it as I say it's attentive
explanation but the period of Western
dominance I think is now at a place
where people have
expectations that have run ahead of our
material capacity to meet them which
means we're effectively borrowing for
the future to continue consuming now
storing up the problems that we're now
facing ever more the crisis will get
bigger as we continue to build the
deficits continue with the QE continue
with diagnosing everyone or an Ever
growing population of people with mental
illness higher grade inflation and so on
and then when you fold birth rate
decline on top of this uh you know it's
a very unpopular it's a very I'm aware
that I I keep banging this drum and I
have done for a long time uh but this
week it's actually Justified because the
UK I'm sure that you saw the Census Data
just came out
1.4 uh is the birth rate for the UK
which means that for every
hundred British people today there will
be 30 great grandchildren or 36 I think
so you're talking about a 60% Extinction
rate within a 100 years which is wild
and then on top of that let's consider
and this always comes from like I often
get slime thrown at me that this is like
some Trad conon you need to go back to
being an armish version of a person like
talking point but almost everybody
agrees that economic Pro prosperity and
helping to raise up the lower classes is
something that's good I know that you
spent a good bit of time in my hometown
of Middlesboro uh along maybe a while
ago but um you know that's the most spit
and sawdust Rough Around the Edges
Northern British town that you're going
to find it's like the quintessential
sort of Northern British Town everybody
believes that we should be raising them
up where's that going to come from well
it's probably going to come from
spending it's going to come from
economic uh Freedom Independence the
opportunity to invest in the places that
need it tell me how we are going to
overcome not only this deficit not only
this sort of cultural predisposition
that we have now which I think you're
right which is this um kind of like a
sense
of honic entitlement uh Financial
entitlement uh uh uh life Mastery in
many ways and uh how are we going to do
that when you've got less than half of
the workforce I mean Ai and Robotics are
going to have to carry an awful lot of
that productivity burden and maybe they
can which is great but I don't know I we
we have enough room for the people so it
seems like a shame to get rid of them
just one other bit on that I've thought
about this an awful lot may add
something to your notion or fledgling
hypothesis which is I think
that the Scientific Revolution and the
Advent of rationality in technology has
an awful lot to answer for here because
it it made a lot of promises that it was
able to deliver on in many ways that are
objective and in almost no ways that are
subjective so um I can tell you what the
weather's going to be like in Venezuela
in 5 days
time but I can't guarantee that I'm not
going to get
cancer I can't guarantee that a car is
not going to hit me as I step out into
the street and maybe you know given uh
AI informed medicine and autonomous
driving vehicles and all the rest of it
maybe this is simply just a a slightly
more protracted timeline line and we're
in some sort of messy middle like Dark
Age technological Dark Age at the moment
and at some point we'll reach maybe
within two three decades we'll have
reached sort of full technological
maturity and will have mastered most of
the problems that people are feeling but
right now what we have is I was promised
or I feel like we know so much about the
world why do I encounter challenges
these feel more malignant you know if if
one in two or one in three children of
every couple that you know die before
age one or die in child birth because
it's 1,400 Yugoslavia or something and
you're a
surf what well what sort of degree of
entitlement do you have what sort of
Mastery do you think that you're
supposed to get from the world but when
all of the time all you're seeing is
that we've got these advances and we're
sending ships to Rocket and we can catch
them in a pair of tweezers and we can do
all of this stuff I think it sets humans
up
for an area that as yet we haven't been
able to create Mastery in which is the
subjective the meaning the day-to-day
experience of of the human so I think
that there is a uh tension and a
contrast uh like having one hand in hot
water one hand in cold water and then
putting them both into lukewarm water
and they both feel different things
coming from two different worlds one
being the objective one being the
subjective one being being science the
other being feeling and um you're not
getting what you were promised uh from
from one that the other can deliver yeah
I I I um I think it's perhaps I I would
say in response to that that you know
Middlesboro which I knew well there was
there was a table tennis hot bed back in
the day the Ormsby Table Tennis Club run
by Al I've been to I know Alan Ransom I
grew up I grew up playing squash around
Alan Ranson
Alan Ransom now this is somebody that
that people ought to know he's the table
tennis Guru I mean he's quite old now
but he ran that wonderful club and he
had a he had a sports um equipment
business you probably got you did you
get your I I used to get my I used to
get my cricket bats from Alan ransom's
place just uh just around the corner
from the Crown Pub in uh Middlesboro see
that was not a topic I was expecting to
talk about today but Alan Ransom I'm
glad he's got in I'm glad he's got in
but middlesbor um or anywhere else I I
if people think to themselves you know
it does feel quite pinched at the moment
it's difficult to get on the housing
ladder um I feel that my parents had it
a bit
easier than we're having it I think
they're
right I think that's a fair thing to say
but it's a
consequence of many years of putting the
now above the future at the level of
society and that becomes more and more
cumulatively difficult so in the British
general election not dissimilar to the
US election no one talked about the
debt uh both parties made promises that
were completely fictitious because they
knew that if they said the dead is too
high they wouldn't get elected in the
same way that I've just come back from a
week in Washington very curious about
how the election uh was going out there
no one mentioned the debt no one that I
spoke to did and yet the unfund you
mentioned demographics
Chris this means the unfunded
liabilities are absolutely
enormous because the dependency ratio of
the older people who are not working to
the younger people who are is going in
the wrong direction and yet even with
that context what should have been front
and center of the political debate no
one's interested in it much more
interested in culture War trivia and
things of really no historic
significance whatsoever I think it's a
distraction technique
from the genuine challenges that we face
now if somebody said to me Albert
economic growth is overrated you know
you can have a discussion about that but
to the extent that most politicians are
saying we want to have growth we want to
have Prosperity want to improve our
technology at the absolute heart of this
is time preference we need to remem it
but I think it's there now on the other
point that you made
about science thinking objectively about
the world world and that there's a
disconnect between our
subjective perception of it you know
tell me how you'd respond to this I
don't think
science ever wanted to be anything more
than trying to help us solve empirical
problems of various kinds and at that
job I think it's been the most
successful of all scientific uh forgive
me of all human
institutions and the the question of how
we engage with the world how we enjoy
the world our
relationships I'm not sure that's aable
um same way no it's not it's not it's
not the domain of science um but I think
that you know the new atheist movement
uh the increasing secularization of the
West the deration of a lot of the places
that people used to get meaning from uh
that has left people cut a drift bereft
of the the the typical explanations that
they would have relied on those maybe
being less objectively accurate but more
subjectively
reassuring uh have left people in more
malaise and I'm fascinated I'm
fascinated by this idea of things which
are literally true but functionally
false and functionally true but
literally false and it's yeah I I I well
I think it's it's um clearly the case
that you can have beliefs that are not
empirically true that are conducive to
success MH and vice versa you're
absolutely right about that and I I I
have the scars on my back here because I
grew up as a Christian my father was
born in India moved to pistan after
partition and came to England to study
law and he was grew up as a Muslim in
the Shia
tradition but he in his bedsit in in
southeast London in the early 1960s had
had a vision of Jesus Christ and
converted this is very unusual from Shia
Islam m to Evangelical Born Again
Christianity and he then he then met my
mom who is a red-headed Welsh girl from
a farming community in North Wales at a
church she had moved to London and she's
from an Evangelical background they met
in church and then they fell in love and
but by the way both families were
massively against the marriage because
they said you can't this is the 1960s I
said don't do it you'll actually have
mixed race children don't do that to
them um fortunately for my siblings and
I they rejected the advice had us and
they had a you know were married until
my father passed away three years ago my
mom's still alive going well coming
tomorrow um to London um but we I grew
up with this wonderful sense of
assurance that God
existed and that he was all loving and
that I had an eternal future and I love
church I'm one of those who went to
church really enjoyed it made great
friends but then decided that it was
empirically or what what's the word you
use
functionally un anyway untrue yes I
thought it was untrue and the problem is
I couldn't bring myself to believe it
just on pragmatic grounds this is one of
the difficulties with beliefs yes they
have some kind of you don't really get
to choose whether or not you're going to
be convinced by them there's a do you
remember um Angels and Demons Dan
Brown's book and he made it into a movie
and uh there's this really phenomenal
scene so you and McGregor the the
calango is uh speaking to the
protagonist and he's trying to get in
Professor langdon's trying to get into
the Vatican archives he's adamant that D
Vinci or someone has left some secret
note and in the secret note he's going
to find out what the [ __ ] going on and
uh cango turns to Professor Langdon and
he says do you believe professor
and he starts to give a politicians
answer
saying Definition of belief blah blah
blah blah blah it's a very peterian uh
response actually and uh you and
McGregor's guy cango says I didn't ask
you that I asked whether or not you
believe he turns to the camera it's
supposed to be to you and McGregor but
he turns direct to the camera it's such
an awesome line and he says belief is a
gift that I am yet to be
given oh beautiful it's gor gous line
and I think that you know it's very
difficult to convince yourself of of
something in that regard but when we get
back to that sort of this tension
between rationality belief functionally
true literally false literally true
functionally false one of the things
that happened with the derogation of
belief in religion was that people were
asked to let go of the thing that felt
the most real to them which was story it
was Persona it was narrative it was
archetypes and story marks in place of
the thing which feels the least real to
us we have the least resonance with
which is statistics and graphs
data those things we are not built for
that we are built to understand and
interpret the World by story and the
stories were derated and they were
replaced with something perhaps much
more accurate but significantly more
sterile and that is something which is
maybe literally true but functionally
false well we we've talk talked a lot on
this about how
to get good at Stuff how to improve how
to make progress how to have an
interesting and empowering journey in
life and I hope what we've talked about
is you know has empirical Merit and will
help people but if you said to me at the
end of it what's the point of the
journey given that it comes to an end
and you then
die I honestly don't have an answer to
that I'm enjoying life
enormously but but I do think it's a
roller coaster that will come to an end
and there's nothing I can do about it um
I carry that with me all the time the
sense of impending mortality I do have
friends who have the same
visceral um awareness of it some don't I
don't know if it's an advantage or a
disadvantage um I mean in a way it does
imbue life with a certain preciousness
you're very consciously aware of the
importance of each day um but there is a
Melancholy in my heart that I you know I
would perfectly happily acknowledge more
than a Melancholy you know something of
a terror that it will end and I enjoy it
so much but I don't think I can do
anything about it there's no growth
mindset can help with not dying there's
no courage moral or otherwise so to the
extent that you know we we're moving
into philosophical terrain I would
wholly acknowledge that I'm at a loss to
understand
where the meaning comes from and I
certainly um even if I was to replace
the narrative the story The archetype of
God with something else wouldn't change
the fact that I'm going to die um and
that it's highly limited and that my
kids will grow up without me and that
once you die it's
forever the limitlessness of it I find
quite extraordinary and I you
know maybe this you might want to edit
this out it amazes me to an extent
there's a wonderful book called Brian
Mcgee the Confessions of a philosopher
where he talks about his midlife crisis
and the Quest for meaning is one of the
other chapters that we're not more
preoccupied with this impending doom
that we're all facing in very rapid time
you're a lot younger than me um but I've
probably had half my life already and
it's gone like a Flash and I know that
I'll soon be on my deathbed wondering
where it had gone and then that would be
it um I don't know where the meaning
comes from that the the the
transcendental meaning that forgive me
the transcendental meaning I think I do
get meaning from hanging out with my
friends and family doing things I enjoy
living is a hypothesis but here's the
thing you live as a
hypothesis it will end and and that's it
and that's very difficult for me perhaps
for you I don't know if you found a way
through it uh no I haven't um I think
one of the ways that people do is by
looking at the bereavements of other
people
around them you mentioned that your
mom's still alive uh you know one of the
fortunate things about being an only
child is that there aren't that many
family members that you need to deal
with dying one of the bad things about
being an only child is that you don't
get much practice at understanding the
role of death in life you know beyond
pets and Mom and Dad that's it unless
you know by some awful horrible Quirk
that my future wife ends up passing
before I do that's it and need friends
and stuff like that I guess but
yeah it's uh there are still a lot of
areas of human life sort of the
fundamental questions of why are we here
what constitutes a good life where do we
find meaning from how do we deal with
the inevitability of death how do we
deal with uncertainty where finite
creatures surrounded by an infinite
Universe um the asymmetry the anxiety
sees sword that we're always sort of
butting up
against these are not necessarily the
domains of Science and in a world where
we appear to have mastered so much and
we still have these problems mentally it
feels like a particularly vicious
pathology or some sort of personal curse
it feels unfair it's the best way to say
it it feels unfair wait hang on a second
you're telling me we con seed
rainclouds in
Dubai we can literally control the
weather in a
country and I still have to deal with
this low mood and I still have to feel
scared about this particular thing and I
still might get sick or I still might
die before my time and I think that um
yeah maybe future civilizations future
Generations will look back on us as this
sort
of I don't know with a Little Bit of
Sympathy that we knew enough to know
that we might be able to get Mastery but
we didn't yet have the the ability to to
answer the questions see I'm not sure I
I relate to that because um yeah we know
stuff about the weather and there's some
uncertainty about how I'll feel tomorrow
but no matter how much we learn we're
still going to be stuck with the
finitude of
life that it seems to me is not
something we can ever overcome you know
even with freezing our brains you know
the second law of Thermodynamics tells
us um that we are moving
towards um some kind of a heat death in
other words it will I think it will
inevitably be
finite um if you don't believe in some
spiritual I I used to have as my uh
Twitter bio um uh locally reversing
entropy and uh I love that idea I love
the idea of you know there is this sort
of force that's trying to rip everything
apart and it's trying to create disorder
and what do you get to do for this brief
window you get to locally reverse this
yeah Unstoppable
like
Eternal omnipotent Force you you get to
reverse it I that phrase is fantastic
and I rever entropy yeah yeah and and
but when when one looks extends the
boundary that local
reversal um yeah you're going be D soon
enough yeah it will eventually turn the
other way and you um the second law of
Thermodynamics I didn't learn any of
this at school but it does I think
Einstein described it as the key
fundamental law of the universe and was
it uh one of the other great Quantum
theorists said that it's the one least
likely to be overturned by new evidence
it does seem to be very deep by the way
that's the other thing that I think one
throws into the mix on civilizations is
that this local reversal of entropy does
require the ability to extract energy in
order to as it were perform the reverse
in other words um if you think of a a
cheater chasing a gazelle the cheater
has to get more energy from the CH needs
to get more meat from the kill than it
was expended in the chase in order to
survive yeah otherwise the entropy will
get them they need that meat to as it
were keep the cells going and to reverse
balance yeah yeah yeah but you have to
get a surplus MH so the this is
sometimes called the energy return on
energy invested you need to have that
high and civilization needs quite a big
return the problem with oil and gas at
the moment is that we're having to drill
deeper and Frack harder as opposed to
when we used to get oil from near the
surface yeah so the energy return on
energy invested is declining so the
energy net energy available to
civilization is going down making it
more difficult to locally reverse
entropy which might explain why
productivity has declined in the last
few decades it may do Matthew S ladies
and gentlemen Matthew I love you I feel
like we could do this for hours and
hours I have so much more to talk to you
about so we might need to get you back
on regularly so that we can keep on
chewing the fat and trying to put the
world to rights I really appreciate you
I really appreciate your work thank
thank you Chris and I I appreciate the
invitation and I've loved the
conversation where should people go if
they want to keep up to date with
everything you're
doing I have a website Matthew side uh
either. co.uk or.com if they Google my
name and then one of the things that I
am Keen for people to try is is measure
their growth mindset that's something
people can do practically and I I take
this tool every six months always gives
me insights that can help where can they
do that at Matthew that's on the website
that's on the website let me check it's
probably it's Matthews side. co.uk yeah
all right Matthew I appreciate you until
next time mate thanks thank you very
much for tuning in if you enjoyed that
episode there is something else you will
absolutely love right here
go on give it a tap