The TRUTH of Magnus Carlsen vs Hans Niemann Cheating Scandal: An Analysis
Watch on YouTubeVideo summary
The Magnus Carlsen versus Hans Niemann cheating scandal has dominated headlines, with a prevailing consensus suggesting that the young American player cheated during their matches. However, this analysis argues for a more nuanced perspective by challenging the certainty of these accusations and emphasizing the importance of considering alternate explanations before reaching conclusions. The narrator approaches the story from an outsider's viewpoint rooted in debunking conspiracy theories, noting that while it is possible Niemann cheated, the evidence presented often lacks rigorous scrutiny. A critical factor frequently overlooked is Magnus Carlsen's own mental health struggles; he has admitted to suffering from deep depression and questioning his abilities since 2017. This context raises questions about whether his decision to withdraw after losing or resigning prematurely was a reaction to suspected cheating or simply the behavior of an elite athlete experiencing a personal crisis during a period of decline in performance.
The primary evidence cited by many for Niemann's guilt revolves around computer algorithms that analyze move correlations, which allegedly showed him performing at 100% accuracy compared to engine lines. The narrator highlights how such statistical anomalies can be misleading due to the nature of probability and "Black Swan" events—highly improbable occurrences that happen without being impossible or indicative of foul play. While Niemann admitted to using a chess engine when he was twelve years old, critics point out that this does not necessarily mean he is currently cheating at nineteen, as people grow and change over time. Furthermore, the reliance on body language analysis by experts like Carlsen is dismissed as unreliable; studies consistently show that even trained professionals are barely better than chance at detecting deception through non-verbal cues. The narrative suggests that interpreting subtle behaviors or lack of tension in a high-stakes game often falls prey to confirmation bias, where observers see evidence of cheating only because they have already decided the player must be guilty.
Beyond the specific mechanics of chess and statistical data, the story raises broader concerns about power dynamics within the professional sports world and the potential for wrongful convictions based on circumstantial evidence. The narrator expresses skepticism regarding Chess.com's involvement in banning Niemann shortly after his victory over Carlsen, viewing it as a conflict of interest given that Magnus owns Play Magnus, which was acquired by the platform. There are also unfounded rumors about physical devices being used to cheat, such as anal beads for Morse code signaling, which remain speculative without concrete proof. The core argument concludes that shifting the burden of proof onto the accused and assuming guilt based on incomplete information mirrors dangerous patterns seen in criminal justice systems where innocent people have been wrongfully convicted. Ultimately, the video urges viewers to maintain skepticism toward sensational claims, recognize the fallibility of human intuition regarding deception, and advocate for a fair process before condemning an individual's character or future prospects without definitive evidence.
Read the full video transcript
never in a million years did I ever
think that I'd be adding to the
conversation about the happenings in the
Chess World but here we are earlier
today I saw that Magnus Carlson released
a statement about resigning when playing
Hans Neiman and although I had no clue
who either of these guys was my
recovering addict brain got hooked I
ended up going down a rabbit hole to
learn everything I could about the
situation and now know more about
professional chess than I ever thought I
would this is a story of cheating past
Behavior the pseudoscience of body
language reading due process and so much
more although I'm not someone in the
Chess World I think it's important to
get an outside perspective oftentimes
someone who isn't quote unquote in it
can provide a different angle of thought
to a conversation and that's why I
decided to sit down and discuss this
story that's been dominating headlines
since it seems like the consensus is
that Hans cheated I'm going to be taking
the opposite end of the argument I come
from the world of debunking conspiracy
theories and trying to teach people how
to become better thinkers the best way
to disprove a hypothesis is to come up
with alternate explanations and to
challenge the hell out of it so it is
100 possible that Hans cheated but we
need to put the quote unquote evidence
up to scrutiny to see how it holds up
and also see if there are alternate
explanations and the reason I'm saying
this is because I don't want anybody
coming across this video to assume that
I'm saying haunt is innocent I'm not
saying that I'm getting that out of the
way early so please do not leave a
comment that says you're defending Hans
and saying he hasn't cheated what I'm
going to argue is that we do not know
and there are details of this story that
we need to take into consideration
because another topic that I am
extremely invested in is wrongful
convictions and most of the time
wrongful convictions happen because
entire juries and even prosecutors can't
think of any alternate explanations well
prosecutors can sometimes just be trying
to get a conviction but oftentimes they
are overlooking alternate explanations
for those of you who are unaware let's
get you caught up to speed Magnus
Carlson is one of the best chess players
in the world if not the best while
getting caught up on this story and the
main characters in it I also learned
that magnus's mental health hasn't been
doing well this is important to note and
we'll come back to it soon because there
are some things going on that definitely
need to be taken into consideration when
stepping back and getting a full view of
this story the other main character in
this story is Hans Neiman an extremely
young chess player who has been seeing a
meteoric rise in success something to
know about Hans is that he admitted to
cheating when he was about 12 or 13
years old while this may seem like it
was a long time ago haunt is currently
only 19. so this is something to note as
well not long ago Hans and Magnus played
in a quote-unquote over the board match
which to my understanding is basically
just a live match because now in the
internet age a lot of matches are taking
place online and so over the board they
were playing live and in person during
this match Hans wins and rather than
continuing in the tournament Magnus
decides to just straight up end his run
and leave as you know this story
involves cheating accusations but
there's also something to be said about
someone like Magnus Carlson leaving the
tournament after losing it's important
to ask questions when viewing this story
in order to get closer to the truth
after his loss it's easy to say Magnus
left because Hans must have been
cheating and Magnus has been suspicious
for a while but more importantly we need
to ask would Magnus have reacted the
same if the match was closer or would he
have acted the same if someone else had
beaten him we don't know but is it
possible Magnus is a multi-millionaire
world champion chess player it's hard to
imagine not having a massive ego when
that's what you're working with Magnus
is a sort of celebrity and hangs out
with billionaires while we may not know
how he would have acted if the loss
played out in a different way I'm not
sure how well he would have taken the
loss against someone as young as Hans in
any other situation after this haunted
Magnus played in a different tournament
online based on how the system is set up
Magnus had to play at least one move
before leaving and that's exactly what
he did he resigned from the tournament
after one move and then he went silent
today at the time of recording this
after a lot of silence and speculation
from the public he released this lengthy
statement and if you've already read
this feel free to skip to the next part
I'll leave a time stamp code down below
but for those of you who haven't I'm
going to go through and read this real
quick dear Chess World at the 2022
sinkfield cup I made the unprecedented
professional decision to withdraw from
the tournament after my round three game
against Hans Neiman a week later during
the Champions chess tour I resigned
against Hans Newman after playing only
one move I know that my actions may have
frustrated many in the chess Community
I'm frustrated I want to play chess I
want to continue to play Chess at the
highest level in the best events I
believe that cheating in chess is a big
deal and an existential threat to the
game I also believe that chess
organizers and all those who care about
the sanctity of the game we love should
seriously consider increasing security
measures and methods of cheat detection
for over-the-board chess when Neiman was
invited last minute to the 2022
sinkfield cup I strongly consider
withdrawing prior to the event I
ultimately chose to play I believe that
Neiman has cheated more and more
recently than he has publicly admitted
his over-the-board progress has been
unusual and throughout our game in the
sinkfield cup I had the impression that
he wasn't tense or even fully
concentrating on the game in critical
positions while playing me as black in a
way I think only a handful of players
could do this game contributed to
changing my perspective we must do
something about cheating and for my part
going forward I don't want to play
against people that have cheated
repeatedly in the past because I don't
know what they're capable of doing in
the future there is more that I would
like to say unfortunately at this time I
am limited and what I can say without
explicit permission from Neiman to speak
openly so far I've only been able to
speak with my actions and those actions
as stated clearly that I am not willing
to play chess with Neiman I hope the
truth on this matter comes out whatever
it may be sincerely Magnus Carlson World
chess champion this is when I became
interested in the story because I saw
multiple people talking about it I
became extremely curious about what's
going on the primary question that I had
as an outsider was how do you cheat at
chess so quick little backstory in my
younger days I was there for the start
of competitive Esports with the game
Counter-Strike this game came after some
others like Quake but it's really what
started taking Esports to the next level
I used to travel around the world to
different tournaments and all that fun
stuff so due to these games being played
on computers there were various ways to
cheat I was a writer but I eventually
became the coach of one of the best
teams in the world so I needed to know
about the different ways people could
cheat in the game of course it was a lot
easier to cheat online but most
International tournaments were in person
On LAN a local area network still people
would cheat I will never forget going to
a tournament where a team from
Kazakhstan was caught cheating if I
remember correctly they were either
using thumb drives to try and upload
illegal configs or their coach or
somebody affiliated with the team was up
in the stands behind opponents and
signaling to them chess is completely
different when you play in person it's
just two people in a game board so I had
to learn all the ways a person could
possibly cheat as I dove into this story
the first thing that shocked me by the
way was just how many people love chess
every video I came across about this
story on YouTube had tens of thousands
or hundreds of thousands of views some
of these channels discussing chess even
had hundreds of thousands of subscribers
and one even had over a million I don't
know if this has been going on for a
while or if like the Queen's Gambit
really made chess more mainstream but
the first video that I came across had
the strongest quote unquote evidence
that I found of cheating and it made a
little bit more sense to me about what's
going on and I'm going to do my best to
explain it to my capability but I'm
gonna link the video down in the
description below just in case you care
to watch because I'm sure that they
probably explain it a lot better than I
ever could so basically humans can only
be so good at chess computers on the
other hand can do all sorts of math much
faster than any human computers can come
up with probabilities and all that jazz
well this program can check how a human
played and compare that to a computer it
gives a correlation percentage and to
put it into perspective here's the
correlations for some of the best
matches and the best people in the world
Bobby Fischer during his 20-game
consecutive winning streak had a 72
percent Magnus Carlson the guy we're
talking about today at his best had 70
percent super top tier players AKA Grand
Masters get about 62 to 67 percent and
the average top tier players in the
grand Masters they average about 57 to
62 percent one guy named Sebastian
Feller got a 98 correlation in Paris
2010 and that guy was caught cheating
well when they did this for Neiman they
found that this dude was getting a
hundred percent on quite a few games
which is insanely suspicious and I will
fully admit that but albeit suspicious
we need to also take a look at the of
probabilities anyone who's read a single
book on probabilities has probably heard
of Naseem taleb's best-selling book that
everyone and their mom references the
Black Swan the subtitle of this book is
the impact of Highly improbable events
why you may ask well up until a certain
point people thought that there were
only white swans then boom someone saw a
Black Swan we need to separate the
difference between impossible and
improbable throughout this book
telebliss a slew of quote unquote Black
Swan events that nobody expected nor
prepared for while I'm not a
mathematician I think we can all get the
basics down for probabilities do you
have any idea how many people believe in
the Supernatural and other strange
things because they don't understand
probabilities they think that just
because they thought about an old friend
the other day and then that friend calls
them that it's some kind of sign they
don't take into consideration all the
times that they thought of a friend and
they never ever got a phone call the
best way that I heard this explained was
someone saying that there are over 8
million people in New York City that
means that every single day something
happens to somebody that had a one in
eight million chance now with chess this
is different
accidentally stumbling into such a crazy
correlation rate isn't the same as a
coincidence but I don't see anyone
asking if this is even possible as an
outsider I'm curious about how this
algorithm Works what's it comparing it
to does it need to be updated is it
updated and is it possible that it's
outdated I know nothing about how this
software works and maybe it's
bulletproof but again we need to come
back to asking how does one cheat at
chess chess is massive and it gets a ton
of viewers they even checked Hans to see
if he was smuggling in some kind of
device into the tournament area but
nothing was found Hans admitted that
when he was 12 he cheated using a chess
engine now it's seven years later and
nothing was found on him when he played
this over the board match and what's
funny is I'm now learning why I saw anal
beads trending on Twitter the other week
There's speculation that Hans must have
used some sort of anal device to cheat
if this was the case it involved a
second person who could Morse code moves
to him while possible I personally
cannot imagine asking a friend to
control that sort of device for me so as
of now the best evidence we have is
hans's chess engine correlation and the
speculation of this guy using some Next
Level efforts to cheat at chess what I
also learned is that Hans has made chess
his life and it's pretty much what he
eats and breeds the same is obviously
said for Magnus but since Magnus has
been in it for so long is getting to him
when he's not at his best this is common
amongst anyone who is playing at the
highest level of any sport and we
regularly hear stories of top athletes
having mental breakdowns when I came
across this one video I saw a clip of an
interview magsis did where he discusses
how he's been questioning his abilities
since 2017. he also discusses how this
led to a deep depression which resulted
in him curling up in a fetal position
and just not knowing how he's going to
manage going forward
um
[Music]
foreign
[Music]
by the time these two played you have
Magnus on the decline and Neiman On The
Rise I don't think it's too crazy to
think Magnus wouldn't take the loss very
well in any circumstance what I also
learned while researching this story was
that Magnus was the owner of play Magnus
which was bought out for 85.5 million
dollars by chess.com chess.com is
another big character in this story and
they banned Hans shortly after he beat
Magnus as someone who has very little
trust for the rich and anyone dealing
with tens of millions of dollars this
all seems extremely Shady to me and as a
top player Hans clearly brings in a lot
of money whenever he plays at these
events I think everyone should be fairly
skeptical as they learn about these
details let's say that we're one 100
sure that Hans cheated even if that's
the case this is beyond unethical I'm
starting to wonder how magnets can even
be a player with such a massive conflict
of interest for anyone in the chess
Community I'd be extremely concerned
that Magnus has so much sway that he can
get people banned without evidence I
don't know much about this guy's
character but that doesn't even really
matter anyone with that much power that
can influence decisions is never a good
thing it's why I'm strongly against
philancial capitalism do we really want
billionaires in control of who gets
resources and who needs help no thanks
it's never good when that much power is
concentrated what bothers me the most
about this story is the body language
reading and mind reading going on body
language experts are some of the biggest
grifters out there and the fact that
people think that they can detect
deception is just heartbreaking does
body language prove that Neiman cheated
to beat the reigning chess champion find
out next
and we're a back shakers time and time
again has been proven that even experts
barely fare better than chance when
trying to detect deception and if you
don't believe me I highly recommend you
go read the book duped by Tim Levine as
well as how emotions are made by Lisa
Feldman Barrett while researching the
story I kept coming across amateur body
language experts and human lie detectors
pointing at different things Hans has
done or said as their quote unquote
evidence of cheating I know I'm gonna
piss some of you chess players out there
off with what I'm about to say but it
needs to be said chess players are seen
as being extremely intelligent which
they are but if you're in the chess
community and thinking that you can read
body language you really need to widen
your scope of knowledge even in magnus's
statement he points to body language
reading in his statement he says the
following his over-the-board progress
has been unusual and throughout our game
in sync field cup I had the impression
that it wasn't tense or even fully
concentrating on the game in critical
positions while out playing me as black
in a way I think only a handful of
players can do if I'm being honest what
made me sit down to record this was
seeing a tweet with thousands of likes
saying something along the lines of
Imagine thinking you have better
intuition than Magnus Carlson and that
he wouldn't know when someone's acting
strange like do you people realize that
some of the smartest people in the world
believe in conspiracy theories I truly
don't think people understand how
insanely stupid smart people can be
throughout the entire coveted pandemic
we have seen people with literal medical
degrees push conspiracy theories there
are stories of Nobel Prize winners
believing in insane things and Geniuses
getting caught by their long distance
girlfriends that they've never even met
who turned out being dudes who who were
scamming them so yes Magnus has years of
experience and countless hours playing
against people but there's also a little
thing called confirmation bias that
nobody is immune to walking into a match
against someone you already assume is
cheating everything they do is going to
look like cheating why do you think the
cops focus on the wrong suspect for 12
hours straight of interrogations they
lock in on someone and then everything
the person does is just further evidence
that they did the crime let's also think
about this for just a minute sit back
and I want you to get into the mind of a
cheater Magnus says that Hans wasn't
quote unquote fully concentrating during
their match
now if it were to you if you were going
to cheat against one of the best players
in the world don't you think that you'd
be concentrating and if you were
cheating would you make it this
blatantly obvious Not only would Hans
need to be the best cheater in the world
but he'd also need to be the dumbest
this really reminds me of conspiracy
theorists thinking that these shadow
organizations and the Illuminati are
hiding clues in plain sight if these
people were actually trying to take over
the world why would they leave Clues to
get caught yes it is possible that Hans
cheated but the guy would have to be a
certified to be that obvious when
knowing that the entire chest world
would be looking and scrutinizing this
match repeatedly if he won against
Magnus as mentioned earlier I'm a
recovering addict so I get what it's
like to royally screw up Han soon up
when he was 12 and I saw one YouTuber
actually bring up the point that people
grow and change it's one of the reasons
that I'm very pro-prison reform we have
this crazy idea that people can't change
meanwhile even you yes you can recognize
how much that you've changed over the
years should someone be banned from
chess forever for cheating when they're
12. let's say even if they cheated when
they were in their 30s or 40s and quote
unquote No Better is it Justified to ban
the person forever due to the crazy idea
that they can't change I saw some people
say that if you don't have harsh
punishments it won't deter other
cheaters that's a terrible argument in
the United States we have capital
punishment yet murders still happen
clearly punishment isn't the best
deterrent this is why increasing
sentences is such a dumb idea to reduce
crime and I doubt it'd be much different
if you did it with chess again it's one
thousand percent possible that Hans
cheated maybe yeah got some Bluetooth
anal beads and a really good friend but
as a stand there's no evidence and this
multi-millionaire is blowing up this
kid's life the burden of proof has
somehow been shifted to the accused
rather than the accuser and that is
scary maybe you haven't been in that
position before but I sure have been and
it's awful so hopefully you gain some
new perspective on this situation and
hopefully people can chill out before
assuming this kid is guilty without any
real evidence alright everybody I hope
you enjoyed that video if you're new
here make sure you subscribe I make a
ton of videos a bunch of different video
essays I'm very curious and interested
in a lot of topics like I said I just
happen to go down this rabbit hole and
want to talk about it so make sure
you're subscribed and whether you're
subscribed or not make sure you follow
me over on Instagram and Twitter at the
rewire it's all that way you don't miss
any updates aside from creating these
YouTube videos I also write it on and I
work on other projects so follow me on
social media and more importantly I love
chatting with all of you so make sure
you follow me at the rewired Soul all
right but anyways that's all I got for
this video have an amazing rest of your
day and I'll see you next time you next
time