Submind YouTube summaries
Thumbnail for The TRUTH of Magnus Carlsen vs Hans Niemann Cheating Scandal: An Analysis

The TRUTH of Magnus Carlsen vs Hans Niemann Cheating Scandal: An Analysis

Watch on YouTube

Video summary

The Magnus Carlsen versus Hans Niemann cheating scandal has dominated headlines, with a prevailing consensus suggesting that the young American player cheated during their matches. However, this analysis argues for a more nuanced perspective by challenging the certainty of these accusations and emphasizing the importance of considering alternate explanations before reaching conclusions. The narrator approaches the story from an outsider's viewpoint rooted in debunking conspiracy theories, noting that while it is possible Niemann cheated, the evidence presented often lacks rigorous scrutiny. A critical factor frequently overlooked is Magnus Carlsen's own mental health struggles; he has admitted to suffering from deep depression and questioning his abilities since 2017. This context raises questions about whether his decision to withdraw after losing or resigning prematurely was a reaction to suspected cheating or simply the behavior of an elite athlete experiencing a personal crisis during a period of decline in performance. The primary evidence cited by many for Niemann's guilt revolves around computer algorithms that analyze move correlations, which allegedly showed him performing at 100% accuracy compared to engine lines. The narrator highlights how such statistical anomalies can be misleading due to the nature of probability and "Black Swan" events—highly improbable occurrences that happen without being impossible or indicative of foul play. While Niemann admitted to using a chess engine when he was twelve years old, critics point out that this does not necessarily mean he is currently cheating at nineteen, as people grow and change over time. Furthermore, the reliance on body language analysis by experts like Carlsen is dismissed as unreliable; studies consistently show that even trained professionals are barely better than chance at detecting deception through non-verbal cues. The narrative suggests that interpreting subtle behaviors or lack of tension in a high-stakes game often falls prey to confirmation bias, where observers see evidence of cheating only because they have already decided the player must be guilty. Beyond the specific mechanics of chess and statistical data, the story raises broader concerns about power dynamics within the professional sports world and the potential for wrongful convictions based on circumstantial evidence. The narrator expresses skepticism regarding Chess.com's involvement in banning Niemann shortly after his victory over Carlsen, viewing it as a conflict of interest given that Magnus owns Play Magnus, which was acquired by the platform. There are also unfounded rumors about physical devices being used to cheat, such as anal beads for Morse code signaling, which remain speculative without concrete proof. The core argument concludes that shifting the burden of proof onto the accused and assuming guilt based on incomplete information mirrors dangerous patterns seen in criminal justice systems where innocent people have been wrongfully convicted. Ultimately, the video urges viewers to maintain skepticism toward sensational claims, recognize the fallibility of human intuition regarding deception, and advocate for a fair process before condemning an individual's character or future prospects without definitive evidence.
Read the full video transcript
never in a million years did I ever think that I'd be adding to the conversation about the happenings in the Chess World but here we are earlier today I saw that Magnus Carlson released a statement about resigning when playing Hans Neiman and although I had no clue who either of these guys was my recovering addict brain got hooked I ended up going down a rabbit hole to learn everything I could about the situation and now know more about professional chess than I ever thought I would this is a story of cheating past Behavior the pseudoscience of body language reading due process and so much more although I'm not someone in the Chess World I think it's important to get an outside perspective oftentimes someone who isn't quote unquote in it can provide a different angle of thought to a conversation and that's why I decided to sit down and discuss this story that's been dominating headlines since it seems like the consensus is that Hans cheated I'm going to be taking the opposite end of the argument I come from the world of debunking conspiracy theories and trying to teach people how to become better thinkers the best way to disprove a hypothesis is to come up with alternate explanations and to challenge the hell out of it so it is 100 possible that Hans cheated but we need to put the quote unquote evidence up to scrutiny to see how it holds up and also see if there are alternate explanations and the reason I'm saying this is because I don't want anybody coming across this video to assume that I'm saying haunt is innocent I'm not saying that I'm getting that out of the way early so please do not leave a comment that says you're defending Hans and saying he hasn't cheated what I'm going to argue is that we do not know and there are details of this story that we need to take into consideration because another topic that I am extremely invested in is wrongful convictions and most of the time wrongful convictions happen because entire juries and even prosecutors can't think of any alternate explanations well prosecutors can sometimes just be trying to get a conviction but oftentimes they are overlooking alternate explanations for those of you who are unaware let's get you caught up to speed Magnus Carlson is one of the best chess players in the world if not the best while getting caught up on this story and the main characters in it I also learned that magnus's mental health hasn't been doing well this is important to note and we'll come back to it soon because there are some things going on that definitely need to be taken into consideration when stepping back and getting a full view of this story the other main character in this story is Hans Neiman an extremely young chess player who has been seeing a meteoric rise in success something to know about Hans is that he admitted to cheating when he was about 12 or 13 years old while this may seem like it was a long time ago haunt is currently only 19. so this is something to note as well not long ago Hans and Magnus played in a quote-unquote over the board match which to my understanding is basically just a live match because now in the internet age a lot of matches are taking place online and so over the board they were playing live and in person during this match Hans wins and rather than continuing in the tournament Magnus decides to just straight up end his run and leave as you know this story involves cheating accusations but there's also something to be said about someone like Magnus Carlson leaving the tournament after losing it's important to ask questions when viewing this story in order to get closer to the truth after his loss it's easy to say Magnus left because Hans must have been cheating and Magnus has been suspicious for a while but more importantly we need to ask would Magnus have reacted the same if the match was closer or would he have acted the same if someone else had beaten him we don't know but is it possible Magnus is a multi-millionaire world champion chess player it's hard to imagine not having a massive ego when that's what you're working with Magnus is a sort of celebrity and hangs out with billionaires while we may not know how he would have acted if the loss played out in a different way I'm not sure how well he would have taken the loss against someone as young as Hans in any other situation after this haunted Magnus played in a different tournament online based on how the system is set up Magnus had to play at least one move before leaving and that's exactly what he did he resigned from the tournament after one move and then he went silent today at the time of recording this after a lot of silence and speculation from the public he released this lengthy statement and if you've already read this feel free to skip to the next part I'll leave a time stamp code down below but for those of you who haven't I'm going to go through and read this real quick dear Chess World at the 2022 sinkfield cup I made the unprecedented professional decision to withdraw from the tournament after my round three game against Hans Neiman a week later during the Champions chess tour I resigned against Hans Newman after playing only one move I know that my actions may have frustrated many in the chess Community I'm frustrated I want to play chess I want to continue to play Chess at the highest level in the best events I believe that cheating in chess is a big deal and an existential threat to the game I also believe that chess organizers and all those who care about the sanctity of the game we love should seriously consider increasing security measures and methods of cheat detection for over-the-board chess when Neiman was invited last minute to the 2022 sinkfield cup I strongly consider withdrawing prior to the event I ultimately chose to play I believe that Neiman has cheated more and more recently than he has publicly admitted his over-the-board progress has been unusual and throughout our game in the sinkfield cup I had the impression that he wasn't tense or even fully concentrating on the game in critical positions while playing me as black in a way I think only a handful of players could do this game contributed to changing my perspective we must do something about cheating and for my part going forward I don't want to play against people that have cheated repeatedly in the past because I don't know what they're capable of doing in the future there is more that I would like to say unfortunately at this time I am limited and what I can say without explicit permission from Neiman to speak openly so far I've only been able to speak with my actions and those actions as stated clearly that I am not willing to play chess with Neiman I hope the truth on this matter comes out whatever it may be sincerely Magnus Carlson World chess champion this is when I became interested in the story because I saw multiple people talking about it I became extremely curious about what's going on the primary question that I had as an outsider was how do you cheat at chess so quick little backstory in my younger days I was there for the start of competitive Esports with the game Counter-Strike this game came after some others like Quake but it's really what started taking Esports to the next level I used to travel around the world to different tournaments and all that fun stuff so due to these games being played on computers there were various ways to cheat I was a writer but I eventually became the coach of one of the best teams in the world so I needed to know about the different ways people could cheat in the game of course it was a lot easier to cheat online but most International tournaments were in person On LAN a local area network still people would cheat I will never forget going to a tournament where a team from Kazakhstan was caught cheating if I remember correctly they were either using thumb drives to try and upload illegal configs or their coach or somebody affiliated with the team was up in the stands behind opponents and signaling to them chess is completely different when you play in person it's just two people in a game board so I had to learn all the ways a person could possibly cheat as I dove into this story the first thing that shocked me by the way was just how many people love chess every video I came across about this story on YouTube had tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of views some of these channels discussing chess even had hundreds of thousands of subscribers and one even had over a million I don't know if this has been going on for a while or if like the Queen's Gambit really made chess more mainstream but the first video that I came across had the strongest quote unquote evidence that I found of cheating and it made a little bit more sense to me about what's going on and I'm going to do my best to explain it to my capability but I'm gonna link the video down in the description below just in case you care to watch because I'm sure that they probably explain it a lot better than I ever could so basically humans can only be so good at chess computers on the other hand can do all sorts of math much faster than any human computers can come up with probabilities and all that jazz well this program can check how a human played and compare that to a computer it gives a correlation percentage and to put it into perspective here's the correlations for some of the best matches and the best people in the world Bobby Fischer during his 20-game consecutive winning streak had a 72 percent Magnus Carlson the guy we're talking about today at his best had 70 percent super top tier players AKA Grand Masters get about 62 to 67 percent and the average top tier players in the grand Masters they average about 57 to 62 percent one guy named Sebastian Feller got a 98 correlation in Paris 2010 and that guy was caught cheating well when they did this for Neiman they found that this dude was getting a hundred percent on quite a few games which is insanely suspicious and I will fully admit that but albeit suspicious we need to also take a look at the of probabilities anyone who's read a single book on probabilities has probably heard of Naseem taleb's best-selling book that everyone and their mom references the Black Swan the subtitle of this book is the impact of Highly improbable events why you may ask well up until a certain point people thought that there were only white swans then boom someone saw a Black Swan we need to separate the difference between impossible and improbable throughout this book telebliss a slew of quote unquote Black Swan events that nobody expected nor prepared for while I'm not a mathematician I think we can all get the basics down for probabilities do you have any idea how many people believe in the Supernatural and other strange things because they don't understand probabilities they think that just because they thought about an old friend the other day and then that friend calls them that it's some kind of sign they don't take into consideration all the times that they thought of a friend and they never ever got a phone call the best way that I heard this explained was someone saying that there are over 8 million people in New York City that means that every single day something happens to somebody that had a one in eight million chance now with chess this is different accidentally stumbling into such a crazy correlation rate isn't the same as a coincidence but I don't see anyone asking if this is even possible as an outsider I'm curious about how this algorithm Works what's it comparing it to does it need to be updated is it updated and is it possible that it's outdated I know nothing about how this software works and maybe it's bulletproof but again we need to come back to asking how does one cheat at chess chess is massive and it gets a ton of viewers they even checked Hans to see if he was smuggling in some kind of device into the tournament area but nothing was found Hans admitted that when he was 12 he cheated using a chess engine now it's seven years later and nothing was found on him when he played this over the board match and what's funny is I'm now learning why I saw anal beads trending on Twitter the other week There's speculation that Hans must have used some sort of anal device to cheat if this was the case it involved a second person who could Morse code moves to him while possible I personally cannot imagine asking a friend to control that sort of device for me so as of now the best evidence we have is hans's chess engine correlation and the speculation of this guy using some Next Level efforts to cheat at chess what I also learned is that Hans has made chess his life and it's pretty much what he eats and breeds the same is obviously said for Magnus but since Magnus has been in it for so long is getting to him when he's not at his best this is common amongst anyone who is playing at the highest level of any sport and we regularly hear stories of top athletes having mental breakdowns when I came across this one video I saw a clip of an interview magsis did where he discusses how he's been questioning his abilities since 2017. he also discusses how this led to a deep depression which resulted in him curling up in a fetal position and just not knowing how he's going to manage going forward um [Music] foreign [Music] by the time these two played you have Magnus on the decline and Neiman On The Rise I don't think it's too crazy to think Magnus wouldn't take the loss very well in any circumstance what I also learned while researching this story was that Magnus was the owner of play Magnus which was bought out for 85.5 million dollars by chess.com chess.com is another big character in this story and they banned Hans shortly after he beat Magnus as someone who has very little trust for the rich and anyone dealing with tens of millions of dollars this all seems extremely Shady to me and as a top player Hans clearly brings in a lot of money whenever he plays at these events I think everyone should be fairly skeptical as they learn about these details let's say that we're one 100 sure that Hans cheated even if that's the case this is beyond unethical I'm starting to wonder how magnets can even be a player with such a massive conflict of interest for anyone in the chess Community I'd be extremely concerned that Magnus has so much sway that he can get people banned without evidence I don't know much about this guy's character but that doesn't even really matter anyone with that much power that can influence decisions is never a good thing it's why I'm strongly against philancial capitalism do we really want billionaires in control of who gets resources and who needs help no thanks it's never good when that much power is concentrated what bothers me the most about this story is the body language reading and mind reading going on body language experts are some of the biggest grifters out there and the fact that people think that they can detect deception is just heartbreaking does body language prove that Neiman cheated to beat the reigning chess champion find out next and we're a back shakers time and time again has been proven that even experts barely fare better than chance when trying to detect deception and if you don't believe me I highly recommend you go read the book duped by Tim Levine as well as how emotions are made by Lisa Feldman Barrett while researching the story I kept coming across amateur body language experts and human lie detectors pointing at different things Hans has done or said as their quote unquote evidence of cheating I know I'm gonna piss some of you chess players out there off with what I'm about to say but it needs to be said chess players are seen as being extremely intelligent which they are but if you're in the chess community and thinking that you can read body language you really need to widen your scope of knowledge even in magnus's statement he points to body language reading in his statement he says the following his over-the-board progress has been unusual and throughout our game in sync field cup I had the impression that it wasn't tense or even fully concentrating on the game in critical positions while out playing me as black in a way I think only a handful of players can do if I'm being honest what made me sit down to record this was seeing a tweet with thousands of likes saying something along the lines of Imagine thinking you have better intuition than Magnus Carlson and that he wouldn't know when someone's acting strange like do you people realize that some of the smartest people in the world believe in conspiracy theories I truly don't think people understand how insanely stupid smart people can be throughout the entire coveted pandemic we have seen people with literal medical degrees push conspiracy theories there are stories of Nobel Prize winners believing in insane things and Geniuses getting caught by their long distance girlfriends that they've never even met who turned out being dudes who who were scamming them so yes Magnus has years of experience and countless hours playing against people but there's also a little thing called confirmation bias that nobody is immune to walking into a match against someone you already assume is cheating everything they do is going to look like cheating why do you think the cops focus on the wrong suspect for 12 hours straight of interrogations they lock in on someone and then everything the person does is just further evidence that they did the crime let's also think about this for just a minute sit back and I want you to get into the mind of a cheater Magnus says that Hans wasn't quote unquote fully concentrating during their match now if it were to you if you were going to cheat against one of the best players in the world don't you think that you'd be concentrating and if you were cheating would you make it this blatantly obvious Not only would Hans need to be the best cheater in the world but he'd also need to be the dumbest this really reminds me of conspiracy theorists thinking that these shadow organizations and the Illuminati are hiding clues in plain sight if these people were actually trying to take over the world why would they leave Clues to get caught yes it is possible that Hans cheated but the guy would have to be a certified to be that obvious when knowing that the entire chest world would be looking and scrutinizing this match repeatedly if he won against Magnus as mentioned earlier I'm a recovering addict so I get what it's like to royally screw up Han soon up when he was 12 and I saw one YouTuber actually bring up the point that people grow and change it's one of the reasons that I'm very pro-prison reform we have this crazy idea that people can't change meanwhile even you yes you can recognize how much that you've changed over the years should someone be banned from chess forever for cheating when they're 12. let's say even if they cheated when they were in their 30s or 40s and quote unquote No Better is it Justified to ban the person forever due to the crazy idea that they can't change I saw some people say that if you don't have harsh punishments it won't deter other cheaters that's a terrible argument in the United States we have capital punishment yet murders still happen clearly punishment isn't the best deterrent this is why increasing sentences is such a dumb idea to reduce crime and I doubt it'd be much different if you did it with chess again it's one thousand percent possible that Hans cheated maybe yeah got some Bluetooth anal beads and a really good friend but as a stand there's no evidence and this multi-millionaire is blowing up this kid's life the burden of proof has somehow been shifted to the accused rather than the accuser and that is scary maybe you haven't been in that position before but I sure have been and it's awful so hopefully you gain some new perspective on this situation and hopefully people can chill out before assuming this kid is guilty without any real evidence alright everybody I hope you enjoyed that video if you're new here make sure you subscribe I make a ton of videos a bunch of different video essays I'm very curious and interested in a lot of topics like I said I just happen to go down this rabbit hole and want to talk about it so make sure you're subscribed and whether you're subscribed or not make sure you follow me over on Instagram and Twitter at the rewire it's all that way you don't miss any updates aside from creating these YouTube videos I also write it on and I work on other projects so follow me on social media and more importantly I love chatting with all of you so make sure you follow me at the rewired Soul all right but anyways that's all I got for this video have an amazing rest of your day and I'll see you next time you next time