Video summary
Robert Pantano explores the profound paradox of self-awareness, arguing that while it is often viewed as a positive trait on a gradient where more awareness equals better functioning, he posits that mere consciousness of a "self" is actually a fundamental problem for human existence. This sense of self arises from an evolutionary process indifferent to our subjective experience and forces us into conflict with the chaotic, uncertain nature of reality. We attach ourselves to ideas and people within this fragile framework, yet we are destined to lose everything through time and decay. Consequently, Pantano describes self-awareness as a "poison" consumed at birth that is simultaneously horrific and beautiful; it generates dread regarding our inevitable suffering but also enables the conceptual understanding necessary for beauty, wonder, meaning, purpose, and hope. He suggests that while some may view life purely positively or negatively, the true human condition lies in holding these opposing truths simultaneously without universalizing one's own specific emotional spectrum of awe or dread. The discussion delves into how individuals process adversity, distinguishing between those who allow pain to calcify their identity through rumination and regret versus those who transmute suffering into fuel for growth. Pantano challenges the rationality of regret by pointing out that under identical physiological constraints, information, and circumstances, one could not have made different decisions; thus, regret is an illusion born from hindsight bias rather than a reflection of lost possibilities in a deterministic or constrained reality. He emphasizes that while survivorship bias highlights successful figures like J.K. Rowling who turned tragedy into triumph, ignoring the countless others crushed by similar adversity can be dangerous. The key differentiation lies not in destiny but in action: utilizing negative emotions as kinetic energy for change rather than letting them curdle into bitterness requires a "bias for action," often necessitating social support to lift burdens when personal capacity is diminished. Pantano further addresses the psychological toll of deep self-awareness, specifically choice anxiety and the paralysis that comes from recognizing infinite options versus limited outcomes. He proposes reducing decision fatigue by acknowledging the ceiling on how much choices affect one's quality of life, effectively decoupling awareness from desire to maintain momentum toward meaningful goals. This perspective extends to managing emotions like anger and anxiety; he characterizes them as tightly intertwined states where anxiety is foresight without control and anger is a denied desire for control. Rather than suppressing these feelings or viewing them solely as toxic, Pantano argues that they serve evolutionary functions—anger acts as a boundary signal when laws are absent—but must be distinguished between productive frustration regarding correctable issues and unproductive "blanketed" rage against existence itself. He suggests that while anger can warp judgment if unchecked, it is often better to feel the raw emotion than to convert it into passive depression or resentment, especially given how many people were disincentivized from expressing anger during their upbringing. Ultimately, Pantano concludes that life's worth is not found in escaping desire or achieving permanent satisfaction, which are impossible due to our hardwired dissatisfaction and the infinite hallway of open doors we inhabit. Instead, he advocates for a "pursuit of wonder" over the pursuit of happiness as the justification for enduring existence's troubles. By accepting uncertainty and the lack of objective truth accessible through our filtered consciousness, individuals can find certainty in their immediate experience to navigate life with humility and curiosity. The goal is not to eliminate suffering or self-doubt but to embrace them while actively seeking moments of aesthetic beauty, love, and connection that make the struggle worthwhile. Even though we are destined to lose this cosmic battle against reality's chaos, putting up a spirited fight as underdogs transforms our graphite-like sludge into something beautiful, proving that life is worth the trouble through self-produced meaning derived from wonder rather than fleeting happiness.
Read the full video transcript
Why is self-awareness a problem?
Self-awareness is a problem Well, first
of all, I think it's important to
recognize that we often think about
self-awareness as a good thing. Um we
generally think about it as a gradient.
So, we we might refer to somebody as
being more or less self-aware than
others and and more is is typically
assumed as better.
When I'm referring to self-awareness,
I'm referring to just the fact that we
are aware of a self at all. And so, the
mere fact that we have a certain form of
consciousness that provides us that
sense of self is a problem for a a
number of reasons. Um
first and foremost,
we've arrived with a sense of
self-awareness
um by a process of evolution that
doesn't really care. Um obviously, care
I'm using loosely there because
evolution doesn't care at all about
anything besides its just continuation
propagation, but the experience of
consciousness and self-awareness
from the first-person perspective is not
central to the reason for why
self-awareness and consciousness arrived
in the form that humans experience it.
And so,
we are often at odds with the
fundamental nature of reality and
existence by virtue of the
self-awareness, in my view at least. And
and the and the reason for that is
as a self who is aware of that self, we
attach to that self, we attach to the
ideas of that self, we attach to people
and things,
and our desire to make sense of our
perception and understanding through all
of the concepts that we form by nature
of having that degree of of awareness.
And yet,
reality and existence
is fickle,
chaotic, uncertain.
We're going to lose everybody and
everything
um
through time or distance, decay, age, or
illness, or death. Um
And so,
we we find ourselves in this sort of
cosmic ocean
where the waves are crashing on our our
heads constantly, and yet
we we must continue because we are also
a part of the same substrate that that
built us that needs continuation. So, it
puts us in this very peculiar position
where we can feel the intensity and pain
and suffering
that seems from a conscious individual
entity
terrible.
And yet we we we just refuse to give up.
We we must endure. And so, that's why
it's problematic.
But also, obviously I I I see the other
side of that coin. And the paradox of
self-awareness, in my view, is that
self-awareness, self-consciousness,
self-apprehension is the most horrific,
terrifying thing in the known universe.
And yet, it is the most
beautiful thing in the known universe
because, as far as we're aware, it's the
only thing that allows
conceptual understanding of existence
and reality. So, we can form the very
idea of beauty and wonder and meaning
and purpose and hope.
And it's seems to me to be necessary
that the first part, the other half of
that coin, is in the equation for the
second half to be possible. Mhm. Yeah,
you've got this line, "Self-awareness is
a sort of poison that we each consume
upon birth."
Yeah. Yeah. I I I believe that's our our
birthright is the the horrific qualities
of self-awareness a a
a poison,
but that we, as almost magicians or
alchemists, can transmute into
into gold, into art, and beauty, and
wonder, and love, and all that. And and
so, it
it makes you want to, you know, you love
and hate it in the fullest possible form
of those words at the same time. At
least, obviously, that's my perspective.
I know maybe some people might see life
and existence as purely positive and
beautiful. Some might see it as purely
negative and horrific and somewhere in
between. There's a spectrum, but in my
view, it sort of it has to be both at
the same time and and that is the
paradoxical nature of it.
How much of that do you think is just us
all
coming up with some
fancy philosophical explanation for our
own idiosyncratic experience of the
world that you have a bit of a grasp of
the awe and a bit of a grasp of the
dread. And some people are almost all
dread, and some people are almost all
awe, and each of them kind of create
their own philosophical views of the
world and the universe based around
just, well, this is this is my typical
daily affect. This is my typical
experience of things.
I I I think that it's
it's definitely important to not
universalize your own perspective, your
own experiences, and your own way of
thinking. It's it's easy to assume that
the way you think, both in the most
literal of sense and in the most
abstract of sense, is the way most
people do. And it it's not the case. Um
there's a huge spectrum and variety of
of
um modes of thought that people
experience and operate through. And so,
people might be more visually inclined,
people might be more linguistically
inclined, people might be a a more
feeling orientation of the world. So,
just on that level alone, there's a a
wide variety and spectrum of experience
of thought. And so, we have to start
there in recognizing that our own
fundamental experience of the world and
reality is not going to be universal um
in the way that we might project or
assume.
If consciousness is a mystery that can't
understand itself,
does that mean that the human condition
is just fundamentally tragic?
Well, that that's that's at the heart or
a heart of the paradox. It's a
multi-hearted paradox, I would
Okay. Um so, it's it is a a part of the
tragedy or it is partly a tragedy
perhaps is a better way of putting it in
the sense that yeah, I I I I
I think that um consciousness from the
first-person perspective, which is
naturally the limit of consciousness,
right? You can't as far as I I could
possibly conceive, there's no reality,
world, being, entity, phenomenon in
which a consciousness could perceive
itself in the world without its
consciousness. And so, it's a feedback
loop in that sense. And so, it
it'll get increasingly
close to comprehending the nature of
itself, but it'll never breach. It's
sort of that Zeno's paradox of the arrow
where it'll get increasingly close, but
it's always infinitely far away. And And
that's that's sort of how I see
consciousness attempting to comprehend
itself. It's like, can you make sense of
an an inch with an inch? A minute with a
minute? No, it's it's just the same
thing um trying to, you know, measure
itself with itself. And so, that is
tragic in that sense, but also on the
flip side of it, it's what fuels the
unending inquiry about what it means to
be a conscious entity and what it means
to be, in our case, a human. And so,
that's the beauty if you see it that way
because what else is there
to do and make interesting about
existence other than the exploration of
the nature of existence? I mean, maybe
some people would think that we'll just
sort of sit around the surface and
that's fun with margaritas and and, you
know, sit by pool the pool and all that
and I I I totally get that. But I think
there's something very riveting and the
deepest experiences of wonder come from
those explorations that are
from my view
an infinite landscape of possibilities,
questions and answers that
will never
satisfy, will never fulfill, will never
reach some sort of peak. That landscape
is flat.
Um
but there's just you know, so much
territory to explore. Is there a way to
become self-aware without it becoming
self-destructive?
I I think so. I think I think that
it's a spectrum, it's a gradient of
you start from maybe a a very I don't
want to say a low level of
self-awareness cuz that reduces it. It's
not like that. But maybe a
reflectiveness about that self-awareness
where
you can realize that and then it might
there there's a certain experience of
difficulties and confusions and
sufferings that
they are just them they exist for
themselves and you struggle to justify
them. You struggle to deal with them and
I think if you continue on that path
you
you get to a point where
you become more comfortable with the
confusions and the uncertainties and you
become you don't be you don't get better
at justifying them.
You don't get better at dealing with the
problems of being
a conscious
entity in the world, but you get better
at at recognizing that the lack of
answers, the lack of stability, the lack
of rigidness is is par for the course
and par for the beauty of the course.
And that I think is is
the ultimate goal to strive for when it
comes to these sorts of topics and
questions. I think a lot of people
have this sense that the more that they
learn about themselves, the more
difficult life becomes. That there's a
kind of
enjoyment, freedom. There's a freedom in
naivety. Would be a way to put it. And
um that there
the the less naivety that they have, the
more challenging the world seems to be.
There's complexity and responsibility
and self-doubt and self-esteem issues
come in and there's an awareness of what
I could have done, standards kind of
begin to rise, but in kind of squirrely
ways about virtue.
Uh if you've got a critical mind, you
find an ever-increasing number of ways
to derogate success even if you manage
to achieve the success because you were
aware of all of the ways that you might
have lied or or or cajoled or coerced or
not been fully virtuous en route to
achieving the thing. Whereas previously,
you were just happy to have [ __ ] done
it. And then yeah, this tighter and
tighter spiral, this ever-increasing
resolution that you look at the world
with,
I think to a lot of people feels like a
personal curse. I think it feels like an
increase in self-awareness just equates
to an increase in suffering.
Yeah, I mean, I first of all, I resonate
with that reaction and I think there's
there's validity in that reaction and if
you feel that way,
um
that's justified. That makes sense to
me. I feel that way often. I think most
people feel that way when they start to,
like you said, unravel
um
the absurdity of a lot of what we are
and what we're doing. Um
and
there is perhaps a
better version of of being, of existence
from a human perspective that that
dulls that that dilutes that. But
unfortunately, you don't really get to
choose whether or not you are or are not
thinking about those things,
experiencing those thoughts and
feelings. So you you kind of you know,
you don't think in my view, you don't
think thoughts thoughts, you know,
arrive in your head after a sort of
conveyor belt of experiences and
neurology and all of that. And so you
ultimately wind up with these questions
and thoughts and concerns, these
you know, a certain proximity to those
thoughts and concerns
that become very difficult to to
experience and manage. And it might make
you
um
envious of
the idea of not feeling that way and not
experiencing that proximity. But
unfortunately, once you start worrying
about something or once you start
thinking about something, that that can
of worms is fully opened and you can't
you can't close it. You you have to
figure out how to how to deal with it,
how to move forward. And I find that the
the best way to deal with those sorts of
cans of worms or those tunnels is is
forward,
not back because backwards that that
that end is closed
in terms of the tunnel metaphor. You
can't return to some form of yourself,
some version of yourself that hasn't
already
um you know, wondered, questioned,
pondered or or become concerned about
those sorts of things. And so I see that
it's it's quintessential to
to not
put those things aside if you're
experiencing the sufferings and pains of
almost self-alienation and self
confusion. You have to move forward and
figure out how to
in some in some people's cases, it's
maybe resolving them through through
practical and tactical methodology. And
in other in other people's cases, it it
might be more of a
embracement of of those feelings and by
embracing certain thoughts and certain
experiences
if possible I do find that you can
reduce their
gravity their force on your head and
neck. What about regret? I think one of
the things that comes along as a side
dish with quite a lot of
um
quite a lot of self-awareness is
people's increase in rumination
uh
sort of whimsical
wistful remembering regret. What have
you learned about regret? Well, I think
regret is very interesting because
regret implies that you could have done
differently.
You could have done you know better than
you had in a particular moment of your
life
which in my view I get the I get the
impulse I get the the sentiment but
if you rewind the clock of reality
uh 100% of the time you're arriving at
that same moment as your same self with
the same brain the same physiology the
same information and the same external
circumstances there's no way you could
have made any different of a decision
and so regret
is sort of a
an understandable illusion of our
consciousness where it makes us feel
like there's a lot of possibilities and
we can be deluded by our hindsight and
our ability to reference back and forth
between time but there is there is no
world in which you didn't make all the
decisions you've made putting aside
maybe sort of quantum you know
multi-world theories but in this world
the world that we're talking about and
in there's no version that you could
have done anything differently and then
that brings into sort of
you know the the concept of free will
which personally I don't believe in in
the in the sense that we typically refer
to it as
um
but
if you consider free will as a part of
the equation and and even if you don't I
see no world I see no logic that makes
sense of of regret being
it's an understandable reaction but not
a
um
certainly not a rational reaction which
I know we oscillate between emotion
feeling and and and logic but I I just
think that you know regret exists in a
in an illusory realm of our perception.
It's a weird one cuz I think the free
will argument is one of it's an in in an
interesting category it's something that
like might be uh
literally true but figuratively useless.
Um that it it might actually be we might
be a deterministic set of dominoes all
the way from the Big Bang until this
conversation right here.
But it's functionally pointless to
believe that as far as I can see. Um you
you need to go
so deep into non-
any differently but you need to not
overshoot into nihilism and fatalism and
it's just [ __ ] it's too hard. But if
we stay if we shelve
the discussion around determinism
and you say okay
you you get to go back
you didn't make a decision
before you got to the point at which you
made a decision.
Or you didn't do a thing or you did do a
thing
after or before you wish that you had.
And you want to do it differently. As
far as I can see sort of reading your
perspective regret is kind of like a a
refusal to accept the limits of
foresight.
Like you shouldn't you couldn't have
chosen differently under the same
conditions
and an acceptance of necessity kind of
helps to dissolve regret.
I think that's very well put. I think
and and to your point
you could even put aside the
deterministic the potential
deterministic nature of reality
you're still limited by the same
constraints in any given moment. Um it
doesn't mean that maybe there's some
sort of deterministic ultimate reality
that was going to pan out the way it has
and did, but it does mean that you are
always limited in every moment by a set
of constraints. Your physiology, your
your the condition of your mind, your
emotional state, the information you
have, the you know, the most recent
influences you've experienced. All of
that is going to cause you to make a
decision. And and and whether it's, you
know, built into the laws or the nature
of the unfolding of reality is is
irrelevant it it at that point. It's
just you are going to make the same
decision decision over and over again.
To regret having made that decision is
to deny the very fact that you're always
going to be limited by a set of
constraints. And unless you uh
intentionally decided to make the the
less
viable decision, the worst decision in
that moment, which I mean I obviously
there are masochists and so forth, but
for the most part people are trying to
make good decisions that make sense to
them in any given moment. And so you're
always trying your best given those
constraints. And and and it's absurd to
think that you could have done or would
have done any better. And like you put
very well, it's it's sort of this this
foresight hindsight equilibrium that you
just sort of stretch and contort to make
the most sense for your current reality.
And I also think I think another
important point of what regret tends to
point to is
is a lack of embrace around the fact
that there are no conditions of your
life that are going to resolve the
fundamental tensions that we often
experience, which is, you know, we want
a sense of certainty, a sense of
uh
happiness and and ultimate resolve, a
sense of having made all the right
decisions, having done everything right,
and and all these pieces are in order.
That's a a sort of underlying desire
that we all experience. Some, you know,
maybe recognize that that's not going to
be the case or not, but I think there's
a proportional relation to
how willing you are to accept that
you're never going to get out of
the the sort of hamster wheel of desire
and suffering and boredom and anxiety
and how much you like regret what you've
done and how your life has gone.
This episode is brought to you by Whoop.
I have been wearing Whoop for over 5
years now, way before they were partner
on the show. I've actually tracked over
1,600 days of my life with it according
to the app, which is
insane. And it's the only wearable I've
ever stuck with because it tracks
everything that matters, sleep,
workouts, recovery, breathing, heart
rate, even your steps. And the new 5.0
is the best version. You get all the
benefits that make Whoop indispensable,
7% smaller, but now it's also got a
14-day battery life and has health span
to track your habits, how they affect
your pace of aging. It's got hormonal
insights for ladies. I'm a huge, huge
fan of Whoop. That's why it's the only
wearable that I've ever stuck with. And
best of all, you can join for free. Pay
nothing for the brand new Whoop 5.0
strap, plus you get your first month for
free, and there's a 30-day money-back
guarantee. So, you can buy it for free,
try it for free. If you do not like it
after 29 days, they just give you your
money back. Right now, you can get the
brand new Whoop 5.0 and that 30-day
trial by going to the link in the
description below or heading to
join.whoop.com/modernwisdom.
That's join.whoop.com/modernwisdom.
You've got that you know that Cormac
McCarthy line, you never know what worse
luck your bad luck has saved you from? I
do not know that line, but I I love it.
I love how that sounds.
>> [ __ ] love that line. You never know
what worse luck your bad luck has saved
you from. That's beautiful. No, I love
that. Well, you've got that story about
the the guy asking for directions, which
is pretty similar. Yes, and so yeah, I
mean I've I've written a story called
the Nova effect
and I've also done a lot of similar
explorations around the idea that you
know, we basically never know this is
sort of playing off a Kurt Vonnegut
line. We never know the good luck from
the bad luck until this the story's over
and and for you know, for all of us, we
don't the story never ends until we're
not even around. And so you never quite
can discern what was good and what was
bad for you or for a collective until
it's reached its you know, automation.
And yeah, that goes for each of our
individual lives where it's it's the
same case. It's we we
feel in any given moment that good some
good fortune is going to lead ultimately
to good fortune forever thereafter. But
that's not how
life works or reality works. It's it's a
a sort of spurring off of multiple lines
that one good thing, one advantage could
lead you to
a misfortune or a disadvantage and vice
versa. And so
there is
you know, you always want to feel good
when good things happen, but there's and
you always you don't always want to feel
bad when bad things happen, but you do
ultimately tend to feel bad when bad
things happen. But there's here's the
dual-sided coin of a of a different
phenomenon where
you know
if you know that when good things
happen, it's still there's still more
more game to play, more life to live,
you're you're you're going to be going
to be willing to accept the potential
for more trials and errors and all that,
which is not so great. But knowing that
when bad things happen, that's not
it's not going to just just be
misfortune forever thereafter as well
gives you some some hope and gives you a
sense of you know, the possibility that
things could could be directly related
to that that ultimately save you in
whatever sense save you might mean.
Yeah, you never know what what's lucky
or bad luck has saved you from. I wrote
I wrote an essay today actually on I
want to read you this thing cuz I
thought it was really interesting.
All right.
Adversity is a terrible thing to waste.
Almost all of the biggest periods of
growth in your life have germinated from
your lowest points. Once shock, grief,
sadness, and fear subside, more
energetic emotions arise. Pain,
resentment, bitterness, anger, and a
chip on your shoulder. Change is hard
and deeply fundamental change requires
an insane amount of activation energy,
far more than is available by just
wanting it a lot.
This is why people change so much after
losing a parent, enduring a betrayal,
losing a job, or going through a
breakup. Not because the past version of
their world has been stripped away
alone, but because they finally have
enough fuel to get their new life off
the launchpad. In the mid-90s, there was
a single mother living in a near poverty
home in Edinburgh. When she left her
first marriage, it wasn't a quiet
parting. She's described the
relationship as abusive. She fled to
Portugal with her baby daughter and a
suitcase that contained the early
chapters of a book that she was working
on. At one point, her ex-husband hid
trying to prevent her from leaving with
it. She was clinically depressed and
contemplating suicide. She couldn't
afford to heat her flat properly, so she
pushed a pram to cafes to write while
her daughter slept. The manuscript was
rejected by 12 publishers. That's 12
people telling her in different ways
that it wasn't good enough.
The rejection wasn't abstract. It was
survival level. If the book failed, so
did her last attempt at building a life.
The humiliation of those refusals became
momentum.
J.K. Rowling went on to sell 500 million
copies in the Harry Potter series
globally and became richer than the
Queen.
But here's the uncomfortable truth. Not
all adversity becomes growth. Some
people are crushed by it. Adversity is
fuel, not destiny.
The difference is what you do with the
surplus emotion. If that energy isn't
directed, it curdles into rumination.
The same fuel that could power a
transformation can just as easily power
self-destruction. There's also a time
window because pain calcifies. The chip
on your shoulder becomes your identity.
The story of what happened becomes the
story of who you are.
Anger gets you moving, but it can't
steer. It's rocket fuel, not guidance.
Eventually, the chip on your shoulder
has to become purpose. As a TLDR, the
worst thing that's happened to you might
be the only thing powerful enough to
change you.
Pain is temporary and fuel is rare. So,
if you're going through a hard time,
don't waste it. You never know what
worse luck your bad luck has saved you
from.
Beautiful. I think that's beautiful. I
I'm curious to think about or to ask you
about what you think allows someone to
to create that
um
differentiation or to act on that
differentiation between it becoming a
collapsible effect and a fueling effect.
What do What do you think it it is that
allows some people to to utilize
the those adversities versus
Yeah, go ahead. Great question. I'm I'm
always hesitant of giving some pithy
philosophical answer to this stuff
because I think so much of it is just
practical. Uh I I
spending less time on your own. Sounds
so dumb. You go through a breakup,
spend less time on your own. Man, like
you it's important for you to have your
friends come around with tacos and ice
cream and watch [ __ ] movies. Like that
is an important part of the healing
process. It's important for you to stay
busy. It's important for you to
reconnect with the hobbies that you had
as a kid. Like start playing football
again or or pickleball or whatever it is
that you like to do, martial arts or
running, whatever. And to do it in a
group. And that will carry a lot of the
difference between somebody who it that
pain calcifies and it it turns into
stasis.
Um
basically what I'm pushing toward is a
bias for action. But it's a bias for
action when your capacity for action has
been severely diminished. So you can't
act as easily. Your your one rep max has
been chopped down by 95%
and you're really going to struggle to
lift anything, even the smallest weight.
So what do you do when you have a weight
that you can't bear? Well, you spread
the load between other people. So I
think relying on other people but the
broader lesson you not everybody has
other people needs other people in this
way. The broad lesson I think is a bias
for action. How can I just
What's that line antidote anxiety hates
a moving target.
Right.
>> But action is the antidote to anxiety
and it's so [ __ ] true.
It sounds like maybe I'm running away
from my problems, you know, maybe I'm
hiding them in the fog and that's a
lesson that for a lot of people probably
is accurate. They they use busyness and
chaos as a way to sort of
force down whatever it is that they
should be
thinking about more deeply. But I I get
the sense that if anybody's a fan of
Pursuit of Wonder or Modern Wisdom that
that they have the opposite [ __ ]
problem, okay? They're like the David
Goggins of rumination. They're the
[ __ ] Bonnie they're the Bonnie Blue
of rumination.
They do not need
they do not need to be told to spend
more time thinking. Yeah.
>> to be told to have a bias for action. So
I think um
learning to trust yourself again is done
through
uh
experimentation and and and evidence. Um
once you've got just a little bit of
that moving um that that tends to help.
Uh I certainly think
not being afraid to use some of the more
negative emotions, some of the stuff
like bitterness and resentment and
anger.
This is one of the
paradoxes or one of the disadvantages of
self-awareness that you don't like these
sort of darker emotions. You think I
should transcend these. I should be
sufficiently elevated that I'm not I'm
not tapping into this. This is a more
base version of me. It's juvenile. It's
petty.
I you know, this is a version of me that
I don't like. Going, I get that.
But what did you use to get yourself
here?
Because for the most part, you probably
used that kind of fuel and then okay,
it's pretty toxic if I hold on to it for
too long. I probably shouldn't still be
thinking at 45 years old about what the
kid said to me in school. Fine.
But that also means that you don't have
that fuel tank anymore. And this fuel
isn't going to be there forever. It it
it's not. The anger will subside, the
resentment will wane, your bitterness
will eventually dissolve.
What are you going to be left with?
You will have the time will have passed
anyway and that's some pretty [ __ ]
potent fuel. So I I'm saying just you
know, go in and and maybe just [ __ ]
tap tap tap inside of the fuel tank for
a little bit and and make use of it and
yeah, I look, you're going to look back
on this period and it can either be some
you know, kinetic spark at the beginning
of growth. You can be your own primer
switch for a hydrogen bomb or
you can
self work your way through it and I'm
sure it'll be great, but I know, it was
just an idea and especially that JK
Rowling story so [ __ ] good and um
after I read that Cormac McCarthy quote,
which I've been wanting to write about
for ages. I need to [ __ ] put
something together. It's not true for
all people in all situations at all
times, but I do think it's pretty
[ __ ] useful. Yeah. No, and I agree. I
mean, I think that it's like you said,
obviously not true for everybody all the
time, but you don't know if it's true
for you until you do everything in your
power to attempt to make it so.
And and so you you ultimately are up
against um
zero possibility by not trying to take
everything in your power to make
adversity worth it for you and worth it
for your circumstances and your goals.
That's a 0% chance if you don't try and
then you have some percentage of chance
of things working out for you and being,
you know, able to transmute that
adversity into, you know, the ultimate
good fortune that you've, you know, the
most you've ever seen in in your life.
And so,
I agree that
approaching it from a fuel-minded
perspective it is is really the only
viable way.
Um and that's also that, you know,
brings up questions about whether or not
certain people can even
recognize that and and whether or not it
it's it's going to be, um you know,
there are degrees of
you know, um environmental factors that
weigh down on people that make it very
difficult to even if they, you know, if
you might recognize
good luck versus bad luck is not always
the end-all, be-all,
there is still, you know, there are
still environmental and external factors
that make it very challenging for
somebody to to actualize that
potentiality in adversity. And
continual adversity is one of those
things. Well, yeah, dude. I mean, it's
it's all well and good me talking about
the survivorship bias of J.K. Rowling's
500 million books. Right. But
there is a lot of people that have not
just one kick in the nuts, but a series
of them that are, you know, so frequent
that their ability to even lift the
lightest weight kind of gets degraded.
But, I mean, the alternative is is to
just keel over. And this is, you know,
me saying it as a guy that's been kicked
in the nuts a lot over the last couple
of years. Like, you literally do have
only two choices, and one of them is to
give up, and the other one is to do
whatever the opposite of that is. And
[ __ ] that, dude. Jesus Christ. Like,
absolutely [ __ ] that. What's that? Rage,
rage against the dying of the light?
Yep.
>> Um you might as well, because
because you've got literally got nothing
else to do, and the [ __ ] time is
going to pass in any case. Yeah, so you
might as well send it.
I agree 100%. I think it's important to
recognize
survivorship bias, but also to recognize
as an individual that if you're still
alive, you're you're a survivor in some
sense, and as long as you're alive,
there's hope. Well, give me Let me give
you this one. Do you know what the
[ __ ]
uh ultimate inversion of the
survivorship bias is? Every person that
gave up.
Right.
>> Right? Every person that reaches
survivorship bias is a mark on the wall
for somebody that didn't give up. And
Absolutely. If you want If you want to
guarantee that you are not a part of the
survivorship bias numbers,
you can just give up, and that'll be
fine. Um and again, that creates a
pressure. I understand that that makes
people go, "Ah, [ __ ] it's all on me,
and that's not fair, and things are
hard, and it's hard for her. Wasn't as
hard for her as it is for me, and I've
got this thing, and"
Get it. I get it. But I want to see you
win, and I would rather see you win and
be in discomfort than see you lose and
[ __ ] keel over. So,
100%. I I mean, I think there's you you
can carry both
those thoughts in the same head at the
same time. You can recognize that there
is a survivorship bias. A lot of people
who try fully to the maximum ability are
going to face continual adversity, and
it's not going to It's not going to pan
out. And you can also recognize that as
an individual person, it's better to not
weigh that case heavily. It's better to
weigh the cases of the J.K. Rowlings
more heavily
in the pursuit of the counterbalance of
that dynamic to inspire you to try
everything you can and to continue
forward towards what makes, you know,
meaning out of the chaos of your life
more viable, more possible. And to do
that, in my view, and this is
I recognize there there's, you know,
maybe a tone here, but to do that until
the bitter end. You know, you you If you
want to do anything, and you have a a
preference a
a priority, a sense of meaning and
orientation toward meaning, whatever.
You, like you said, you have your time
and until the clock goes to zero, until
the lights turn out, they're still like
just just keep going for whatever it is
that you care about and whatever it is
that makes sense to you and is
worthwhile. And there's no prescription
to what that might be, what that source
of meaning and worthwhileness need not
be some sort of
you know, ungodly achievement from a
societal level. It could be
a a beautiful relationship, uh a
beautiful family. It could be a simple
quiet life. Whatever it is for you to to
continue onward towards achieving that,
maximizing that, working towards the
maintenance of that.
Whatever you're up against,
uh you have your time and and you ought
to use it wisely to to
manifest that. Before we continue, I am
a massive fan of reducing your alcohol
intake, but historically, non-alcoholic
brews taste like ass. You don't need to
be doing some big reset. Maybe you just
want to crack a cold one without feeling
like garbage the next morning, which is
why I am such a huge fan of Athletic
Brewing Co. They've got 50 types of NAs,
including IPAs, Goldens, and even
limited releases like a
cocktail-inspired Paloma and Moscow
Mule. And here's the thing, you can
drink them anytime. Late nights, early
mornings, watching sports, playing
sports, it doesn't matter. No Hangover,
no compromise, and that is why I
partnered with them. You can find
Athletic Brewing Co.'s best-selling
lineup at grocery or liquor stores near
you, or best option, get a full variety
pack of four flavors shipped right to
your door. Right now, you can get 15%
off your first online order by going to
the link in the description below, or
heading to
athleticbrewing.com/modernwisdom.
That's athleticbrewing.com
/ modernwisdom. Given the fact that we
can never step outside of our own minds,
How should that change the way that we
treat our beliefs?
I think that
and I obviously agree with the fact
that, you know, there's not only can we
not obviously step out of our own minds,
but there's a huge implication to that.
Um
we will never obtain
objective truth, in my view, as a
consequence of that fact. And so
I believe that
humility
and
almost a
a love of uncertainty is the only
appropriate response to the fact that
there's just no way that you can get out
of the tunnel vision
of your mind, your specific mind.
And then your own mind is
sort of been molded and mapped according
to a particular condition of geography,
of culture, of history. Um
and there's been no moment, as far as
you know, if we sort of rewind the clock
every stage of history has presented um
a similar ensemble of
ignorance, of futility, of wrongness,
all that. And so you you must recognize
that
as individuals and as a collective at
any given time and any given space we're
up against this contorted, chiseled out
view of of reality that's a pinhole
size. And and
to
have rigid beliefs, have a sense of
certainty
I think is a
mhm
a less than ideal response to that
condition. Um and this isn't to say that
someone ought to be
totally nebulous about everything they
think and feel and believe. You can be
convictive and confident in life, while
also not ever being dead-set and final
about a belief or set of beliefs.
And so, there's there's a sort of
essence of confidence and conviction
that can carry through across the
spectrum of
ideas and beliefs. And the importance is
is not the
individual belief, but the continuation
of
you know, exploration and curiosity and
openness and humility. I feel I feel
personally that that's a a sort of
essential fundamental quality, uh for
lack of better words, a sort of wisdom.
What about choice anxiety? Because I I I
get the sense that
people who have a lot of self-awareness,
again, we've sort of touched on
I know how much better I could have
been. I I know all of the different
optionality that lays out in front of
me. How do you come to think about
um
netting down choice anxiety as a deeply
self-aware person?
You You're sort of referring to the
paradox of choice, if you will, right?
Yeah.
See, I I don't know if I have a good
answer to that, because
first of all, I struggle with it. Um I
think the best way to deal with choice
anxiety is to
recognize
um
the degree of your you know, at what
point are your desires
no longer serving you?
And if
once you recognize that ceiling
the amount of choices that you need to
consider can reduce. So, if I think
that, you know, I'm on an infinite
conveyor belt of desires and
satisfaction, desire satisfaction over
and over and over, then there is an
infinite number of choices that can
satisfy or can play into that
conveyor belt phenomenon. But, if you
recognize that there is
a certain limit to which your your, you
know, minimum quality of experiences
achieved in life,
um
you can start to redirect your
decision-making towards a smaller number
of options for different reasons than
just like, you know, if you go to a
grocery store, you could there's so
obviously an infinite number of not
nearly, I mean, there's a not literally
but nearly an infinite number of choices
of cereal and everything else. And and
if you regard cereal as a
as a reasonable proxy of your quality of
life, you might stand in that aisle
forever. But, it if you recognize that
cereal is not going to serve you, it's
not going to serve your quality of life,
then you pick one and move on. And then
you recognize that there is still a
difficulty around decision-making in
other areas of your life
uh that you're going to ruminate on and
struggle with, but you can reduce the
amount of decisions that are relevant to
you by recognizing uh the sort of
ceiling around how much your decisions
are going to change the quality of your
experience. And I'm somebody who
believes that
it's much more
like I want to make decisions that allow
me to keep going. And I mean that in
both the most basic literal sense and
then sort of a more abstract sense,
which is, you know, I want to decouple
my awareness from my desire when I'm
making decisions about what's going to
allow me to get up in the morning and
still care. Um
And then also what's going to allow me
to experience some continual fuel, as
you put it in in in your essay. And so
there's no clean way of of totally
absolving yourself from the paradox of
choice and the anxiety around
decision-making
unless you sort of you can kind of uh
oscillate back and forth between the
foresight of or the anxiety around
decision-making and the hindsight of
regret. You can refer to your regrets
to remember the absurdity of your
anxiety right now. But I understand
there's a maybe a degree of
impracticality there. But I I do think
that just recognizing that there is like
every option in life for everything from
cars to cereal to clothes to to
relationship partners to friends to
careers, you can start to chisel those
down by recognizing that so much of that
is not what you care about. And and you
know, you decide what you care about or
you end up caring about what you care
about. But then you chisel those things
out and you're still left with a huge
chunk of decision making possibilities,
but it's maybe a little bit more
manageable. All of the bookmen had this
question, how much should you care about
things? Answer, I'm not sure, but I'm
pretty sure it's not as much as possible
about everything all of the time. Yeah,
I love it. And um
I think
Yeah, that that's like the curse of the
over optimizer.
Somebody who just for everything at
every opportunity. I have a friend who
is huge into
credit card points. Go to every
different airline and he knows to use
this card for this flight and then if he
goes to this supermarket he can get an
additional 3% and he then he gets to fly
his whole family for free and all of
this stuff.
One of his best friends is the most
simple person. Like I was like, oh, you
must have a complex system just like
just like a mutual friend. He's like,
no, I I I just decided that there was an
area I had to consciously be
de-optimized in and and that was just
one of the ones. I can't I can't pick it
for everything all of the time. And the
advantage of that is
when you make the big decision
around I'm not going to bother about
this at all
all of the sub decisions fall away if
you can sort of relinquish it. And there
is a there is a power in sort of letting
go. It's the same sensation anybody's
had if they've left a bad relationship
that they go that that thing and all of
the decisions and all of the rumination
around it wasn't serving me.
And by letting go of it, I feel
liberated. Isn't that great? Uh so
yeah, it's um
it's a funny it's a funny blend for
that. I think you mentioned anxiety
there. Do you think
anxiety's just a natural consequence of
seeing reality clearly and being a deep
thinker then?
I would even go so far to say that uh
you don't have to add that that last
part about being a deep thinker. I would
think anxiety is a um sort of
fundamental consequence of being aware
of reality on any level um and it only
goes up from there.
Um
I know that people have
worse
cases and experiences of anxiety
um but the idea that somebody could live
and not and this is me projecting my,
you know, own experience, universalizing
it and assuming everybody's the same and
I recognize that. But I do find it very
hard to imagine that anxiety is not a a
sort of building block of of
consciousness and self-awareness from a
human perspective because everything, I
mean, when we're talking about
decision-making, we're talking about
regrets, we're talking about um
adversity, all these things
everything is this
hodgepodge of of chaos and uncertainty
that a singular framework of perspective
is trying to control and make sense of.
And and what's what could be more
anxiety-inducing than that? Trying to
filter
a
ocean of possibility into a tiny, you
know,
pinhole of desire and preference and
hope and idealization. So
I would think that if you're if you're
that pinhole, there's a lot to be
worried about. Mhm.
Mhm.
Is
is the pursuit of truth really about
truth or or more about sort of a
psychological security then? It feel It
feels to me like our desire for truth is
uh a fear response to the uncertainty of
the future.
I absolutely agree. Yeah, I think that I
I Personally, I think that everything
that humans do and humanity has done is
is never in it of itself. It's never for
itself. It's It's based on some
preference. And so, the desire for truth
is not because we care so much about
truth. I In my view, it's because we
care so much about what truth will
provide us. And that is a quelling of
the uncertainty and the unknowability of
existence and our relationship with it.
We want to know that everything is going
to be okay both now and forever
thereafter. That's why heaven exists.
That's why religions exist. That's why
philosophies exist. And so, the
pursuit of truth is is an attempt to
bring down the heavens and make it make
sense right now so that we can feel
comfortable as as conscious beings. And
so, yeah, no, truth is not in my view uh
a desire in it of itself. It's It's a
It's a sort of
proxy byproduct of the desire to reduce
uncertainty and unknowability.
We'll get back to talking in just 1
second, but first, if you've been
feeling a bit sluggish, your
testosterone levels might be the
problem. They play a huge role in your
energy, focus, and performance, but most
people have no idea what theirs are or
what to do if something's off, which is
why I partnered with Function because I
wanted a smarter and more comprehensive
way to actually understand what's
happening inside of my body. Twice a
year, they run lab tests that monitor
over 100 biomarkers. They've got a team
of expert physicians that analyze the
data and give you actionable advice to
improve your health and lifespan. Seeing
your testosterone levels and dozens of
other biomarkers charted across the
course of a year with actionable
insights to genuinely improve them gives
you a clear path to making your life
better. Getting your blood work drawn
and analyzed like this would usually
cost thousands and be a nightmare, but
with Function it's just 499 bucks and
now you can get an additional $100 off
bringing it down to $399.
Get the exact same blood panels that I
get and save 100 bucks by going to the
link in the description below or heading
to functionhealth.com/
modern wisdom. That's a
functionhealth.com/modernwisdom.
I'm thinking about that anxiety and I
guess anger as well, which is
kind of a little bit like anxiety at
motion.
Anxiety is anger at rest in a way and
and anger is anxiety in motion. Seems
like anxiety
arises because of
foresight without control.
And then anger is desire for control
that gets denied.
Um
and I'm wondering what what you've come
to learn about how to sort of dissolve
or reduce the anger and the anxiety in
that way.
Yeah, so I mean they're they're pretty
tightly intertwined where
if you start to recognize maybe I I
would intertwine anger more closely with
something like regret because if you
start to recognize the absurdity of
regret um and your ability to control
the way things have gone
um
with a greater distance in time, there
are many cases of anger in which it
might be in real time that you're
experiencing an event, but it was an
event that you couldn't have controlled.
And so in the same way
it's it's a much more difficult thing to
quell in the moment, but you can sort of
start to shave off the edges of anger I
find by recognizing your lack of control
over everything else besides yourself
and perhaps even yourself. And that
takes it to a different degree and we
don't need to you know necessarily take
it there for the same point to be
cogent. No, I think the the lack of
control over yourself is the regret
point from earlier on even the one
that's been lobotomized from the [ __ ]
deterministic
perspective of the universe. Um that I'm
angry at me I should have done
differently.
Is you're right you're right to say that
it it it's closer to regret. It's like I
should have done differently. Well,
we didn't. You didn't and you're trying
to motivate yourself to do it more in
future. I understand and if your brain
ramps up the pain of the lesson from the
last mistake that you made, you will
make sure that you don't make that
mistake again. It's basically a
existential psychological equivalent of
I put my hand on that stove.
Close to this. I got
bit by a dog when I was five. The lesson
is don't go near dogs.
For the rest of
rest of time.
Um
that is what our brain is trying to
teach us and the sort of amplitude the
[ __ ] volume of the lesson is
proportional to how important we think
it was and how much pain we were in at
the time.
And if you're in a lot of pain
and then you realize that you are making
the pain worse by trying to sort of whip
yourself into submission so that you
will be reminded you cat of nine tails
your way through this thing.
Well,
in some ways you can kind of love that
part of you. That is a good thing.
That's a really [ __ ] cool thing to
love. Like thank you so much for trying
to keep me safe.
I understand that I'm fallible and
[ __ ] up and I consistently make
apparently the same mistakes over and
over again and they really have a great
like [ __ ] consecutive lineage of
often being similar sorts of things and
I I get it you're trying to keep me
safe. Thank you. Thank you for trying to
keep me safe. Thank you for trying to
make me
learn a lesson that my actions insist on
not [ __ ] detecting
and not updating themselves from. That's
That's great.
It's just
It's such a [ __ ] all-encompassing
emotion.
Anger. So trying to think rationally
when you're in it is not easy.
It's definitely not. Do you think that
anger is necessary for what you just
described or do you think you can have
that
um
response without necessarily anger, the
anger tank, so to speak, filling all the
way up? I guess it depends. A lot of
people
convert anger into other emotions.
Right. Um and a lot of the time these
are people who for whom
anger wasn't allowed as a kid. It wasn't
allowed in the household. There wasn't a
safe place to express anger. Mhm. Maybe
there was a fragile parent or a an
overly disciplinarian parent or Uh a
parent who had anger problems of their
own or an absent parent who couldn't
really hold that for them. And you need
I I I think it's really important for
people to understand if
if there's something bubbling inside of
you, it the world is basically split
into two kinds of people. There's people
who get mad and people that get sad, but
both of them are generated from the same
place. Like the anger gets turned
outward
or the anger gets turned inward. Mhm.
And the anger that gets turned inward,
that's not the job of anger. The job of
anger, evolutionarily, is you crossed a
boundary and there's no police force
around. So I'm going to behave in a way
that shows you that you can't do it
again and shows anybody else who's
watching that they can't [ __ ] with me in
the same way that you did cuz we don't
have laws to enforce this. So my
emotional response to you is going to
show you how far you crossed over the
line and it's not going to happen again.
That's That's the the job of anger. So
for the
when it's
sad not mad,
it's usually because you were
disincentivized
in a I mean, everybody's disincentivized
from being angry, right? Like it's a
very antisocial behavior. It's a very
antisocial thing. Sadness is prosocial.
People come and give you a hug. Anger is
antisocial. It makes people run away.
But there should be a container for
that. And if you don't learn it There's
a lot very long-winded way of saying
lots of people are angry but don't feel
anger. And they turn it into other
things. They turn it into bitterness,
agitation, resentment,
uh depression, anxiety,
um like frustrations at at at at
themselves and at other people and at
and at the world or politics or you
know, whatever.
Um so, I don't think that you need
anger. I would actually go as far as to
say that maybe anger is a bit more
warping because it's so it's
it's the [ __ ] raw uncut version of
the fuel. And if you can have it just
bubble down a little bit, I think you
can make better decisions. Can make a
decision I mean, I
Is there any emotion that's worse to use
to make this Maybe being horny. Maybe
being horny is the only worse emotion to
utilize when trying to orient yourself
than anger is.
Uh I I can't think of many more.
Yeah, nothing come to mind for me
either. I think those are uh probably
the the two at the top of the list.
>> horsemen of the apocalypse.
No, but I think I think that's super
well put. I think that there's
absolutely a practical application for
anger. And to to just assume that you
should never be angry it is um
you're cursing yourself for for a life
of being taken advantage of and never
signaling to yourself and others when
when things are wrong and when things
have been um crossed in terms of your
boundaries and lines. Um there is a
separate category of anger
I might I personally would categorize,
you know, there's there's the anger
towards people and things that are
that can be corrected. And then there's
anger towards
existence or things that can't. Uh you
know, components of life that
things have gone wrong in your life that
nobody intended towards you. Nobody did
that to you. No no conscious being or
group was like, "I want this to happen
to you." And so there's no person or or
group to be angry at. There's just the
nature of
um misfortune, at least in so far as
you've experienced up until this point
in your life. And so that sort of
blanketed anger has a much different
ramification than if somebody does
something to me directly or a group does
something to a group that I associate
with that is tangibly um negative, that
is reasonably
uh
you know, a line is reasonably drawn
between that act um
and we can agree on that as people, then
then that anger is productive. But anger
of just sort of the the humming and
vibration in the back of your your skull
and neck and spine, I mean that's that's
an anger that I think is is totally
unproductive. So
is there's a difficulty in recognizing
those different kinds of angers maybe to
an extent? Um
but you you definitely don't want to be
so willing to be angry that you find
yourself angry about things that are are
totally useful to be angry about and and
so passive that you you you neglect the
expression and and you know, actually
recognizing an anger you feel and
experience about things that warrant um
a frustration that if you express it,
people will understand, people will
change, and by not expressing your
frustration and anger towards people or
or phenomena that can comprehend a
reasonable, you know, back and forth
between you and them, you're actually
doing you and them a disservice because
they don't have the information to
maintain a useful healthy relationship.
And so they're just going to assume
everything is is is kosher. Everything's
fine as is cuz you haven't expressed
otherwise. So you just you just sort of
um
propagate, you continue the the problem
by
being passive in those sorts of
situations. And so there you like I
said, I mean there's there's different
ways of considering anger and different
kinds of anger, but it's important to to
try to, you know, delineate those two.
In other news, this episode is brought
to you by RP Strength. This training app
has made a huge impact on my gains and
enjoyment in the gym over the last 2
years now. It's designed by Dr. Mike
Israetel and comes with over 45 pre-made
training programs, 250 technique videos,
takes all of the guesswork out of
crafting the ideal lifting routine by
literally spoon-feeding you a
step-by-step plan for every workout. It
guides you on the exact sets, reps, and
weight to use. Most importantly, how to
perfect your form so every rep is
optimized for maximum gains. It adjusts
your weight each week based on your
progress and there's a 30-day money-back
guarantee. So you can buy it, train with
it for 29 days, and if you do not like
it, they will give you your money back.
Right now, you can get up to $50 off the
RP hypertrophy app by going to the link
in the description below or heading to
rpstrength.com/modernwisdom
using the code modernwisdom at checkout.
That's rpstrength.com/modernwisdom
and modernwisdom at checkout.
What what's the desire trap?
In terms of what are you referring to?
Well, think about a
your relationship with desire and what
you've learned about it. Is it a trap?
Because it seems like
desire fuels suffering in many ways and
even the desire to escape desire is a
desire Mhm. as well. And then evolution
sort of hardwired dissatisfaction into
us. Mhm. Uh and we sort of may we may
secretly prefer striving over
satisfaction in many ways. Mhm.
So, how the [ __ ] do we survive this?
Uh well, we survive this because that uh
fuel survival in my view. It's
inescapable. I
mean, I know that there are people that,
you know,
maybe sit on mountainsides and and and
you know, do nothing all day long and
and they're able to live an ascetic life
and totally quell all desire. But, for
the vast majority of people, especially
those who might be watching or listening
to this, uh that that's not going to
probably happen. And and and it probably
shouldn't. It doesn't You don't have to
force some sort of romanticism around
ascetic life. And so, what you're left
with is
kind of comes back to what we're talking
about a moment ago when it comes to
understanding the
the constraints around your
decision-making and what matters to you.
Cuz you're never going to eliminate
desire and you're never going to
eliminate the continual pain
or dissatisfaction that comes from the
very substrate that desire
functions on. Because desire is is is
not something that you you you get, you
achieve, and then you're done. That
obviously that's not how that works.
It's the same with hunger. It's the same
with every every breath is a desire for
another breath. And and that doesn't
mean you're done. You're going to have
to find the next breath, the next meal,
the next everything. And so, you don't
escape that trap. That trap is
paradoxical in the same sense as many of
the other things we've discussed where
it's it's unfortunate because it makes
you you're you're kind of destined to
never feel an ultimate satisfaction, but
by virtue of that you end up pursuing a
ton of things, people, goals,
achievements, preferences, art
that you wouldn't otherwise ever care
about if you were done
after your first moment of achievement.
And so, the trap is also the open door.
I mean, it's it's it's both ways. It's
you're you're stuck in an infinite, you
know, hallway of open doors, but in each
door you can decide what you care about
and what meaning you might derive from
what's inside that room, and then you
get bored, unfortunately, and then you
move on to the next room. But there
seems to be, if you could keep moving,
uh
an unending hallway of doors. So, it's
it's not It doesn't have to be purely
tragic.
Okay. So, does that mean that happier
people are simply less aware? Or are
they
are they better at metabolizing
awareness?
Oh, that's a very good way of framing
that question.
I I
reluctant to answer that with conviction
because I I just don't know if I know
enough happy people to to say one way or
the other. Um
I think that
it could go It could be both. I don't I
don't know if it's binary. I'm not
saying you're presenting it as a binary
option, but I think that you can be
happy by being maybe
uh less reflective and less aware about
absurdity and futility and all that and
the sort of associated, um
you know, suffering with desire. You
could be happy that way. And you can be
Happy is maybe not the best word, but
you could be a kind of happy by also
knowing
um that everything you do is ultimately
absurd and futile, but but you're
you're still experiencing moments that
are enthralling and interesting, and
you're experiencing moments of love and
wonder, and those don't, you know, the
awareness of the futility of those
things for me doesn't negate them. Um
so, I see no reason why both kinds of
people, or all kinds of people, couldn't
find maybe not happiness, but a a
justification, a a wonder,
um
a reason to to keep moving.
Mhm.
I get I guess if everything is uncertain
and constructed,
why trust any of our conclusions?
Oh, I wouldn't.
You're saying why trust any conclusion.
I I I definitely
would not trust any conclusion. Um
at least in the absolute sense. Um when
you say trust, do you mean
believing wholly in its sort of
finality?
Yeah, I suppose.
How can we trust any of our insights?
Like
our own conclusions. Everything's
uncertain, everything's constructed, our
consciousness is filtering what we see
in the world, there's no such thing as
real truth.
How
are we not just permanently sort of
wallowing in our own uncertainty? Yeah,
so
I think I have a way out of that to some
extent. It
Everything isn't uncertain because what
you're experiencing now
is is
completely real and certain.
And so you have that basis always, that
tether to experience and selfhood and
existence
that
you know, maybe can't be extrapolated
out onto some sort of metaphysics
and you know, insight about some grander
picture, but you can know that you're
certainly feeling what you're feeling
and experiencing right now and you can
navigate a life and existence based on
those feelings to the best of your
ability and that doesn't provide
certainty and I think the way that we
often like to think of it, but it does
provide a
barometer, a compass that we can can
reference and
derive what we're really after from.
Mhm.
What do you think makes life worth the
trouble?
I would I would certainly
So,
pursuit of wonder is the name of of my
YouTube channel. The reason why I'm
bringing that up is because
um pursuit of happiness is is the common
phrasing.
And I believe that there's, you know,
that's that's the wrong way of
approaching
the justification around pursuits and
life in general. And so, I think what
makes life
the worth the trouble is
And it's by a very slim margin, I must
say, but the experience of wonder, the
experience of a self-produced
meaning. And the And you can experience
wonder from
through art, through relationships,
through friendships, through
um and it's, you know, aesthetic
experiences. Just a
walk through nature. And And if you
have enough of those moments,
and enough is relative, but if you have
enough of those moments,
you can draw
you can take the ingredients of the
trouble of existence.
You can take the graphite of of that
sort of sludge, and you can make it into
something beautiful and worthwhile. And
it's it's like I said, it's by
a certain margin for everybody how much
that actually feels like
you made it worthwhile in terms of all
the trouble, but
I think that's
you're kind of in a boxing match that
you're destined to lose, but you're
still putting up a hell of a good fight,
and there's, you know, there's so much
spirit in that. There's, you know,
everybody loves an underdog story, and I
believe each of us
are are the underdogs up against our
lives and existence, but we we put up a
hell of a fight, and that's
that makes it worth it. Mhm.
Do you think
self-awareness makes love deeper or more
fragile?
Probably more fragile if I had to pick.
Um the reason I would say that
is because
it it it makes you maybe more
self-conscious.
And obviously self-conscious and
self-awareness are almost synonyms, but
self-conscious in the more typical sense
of the word
where you're worried about how you're
coming off and how you're integrating
with somebody else's
um
preference preferences and desires.
However, on the flip side of that um
to be more self-aware is to recognize,
and this is one thing that I think is
useful in all areas of life, is to
recognize, you know, how
annoying you can be
and how neurotic you can be. And so when
you recognize uh uh a more granular
sense of your neuroses or your
annoyances or your all the sorts of
things that make you on a day-to-day
basis from inside your skull a little
bit challenging to deal with.
To be more aware of those qualities
makes you more understanding of another
person's
uh difficulties with dealing with those
qualities. And if you're not aware of
those qualities, then you might never
understand why is this person reacting
to me in such a way. Why are they
feeling this sort of way in relation to
my behavior. Um
you know that you have a certain outward
behavior, but without recognizing the
proper, you know, picture, the full
picture of those qualities and how they
become manifest and why they are the way
they are.
It it can be challenging to empathize
with somebody who is trying to be as
close to you as possible.
Um
and they
obviously you are as close to you as
possible
humanly possible.
And
if they're trying to get anywhere near
that
without recognizing those qualities, you
do tend to lack the empathy for their
perspective and experience. So, I think
ultimately this may be more of a
benefit, but it can be also very
challenging because you want to
you always want I mean, when you're
you're you're always seeking ideal
circumstances.
At least for me. And so, when you're
aware of all those negative qualities,
I'm always seeking to integrate them
fully and properly
um
into myself and in a way that makes
sense for other people that I'm close
with. And um that's a impossible goal.
And so, that also can make you, you
know, maybe over
overzealous, over
angered by by the lack of success in
certain areas like that. Mhm. Yeah.
Robert Pantano, ladies and gentlemen.
Dude, you rule. I love your YouTube
channel. The book's fantastic. Where
should people go to check out everything
you do? Appreciate it, Chris. Yeah, so I
have a new book, Terrible Paradox of
Self-Awareness. That's coming out
March 10th. So, depending on when you're
watching this, it's available for
pre-order now. After March 10th, it's
obviously available for regular order.
And then YouTube channel is Pursuit of
Wonder. Try to come out with videos a
couple times a month over there. And
then Pursuit of Wonder everywhere else
on all socials and pursuitofwonder.com.
[ __ ] yeah. Dude, I appreciate you, man.
Congratulations. Thanks so much, Chris.
I really appreciate you.
Congratulations. You made it to the end
of an episode. Your brain has not been
completely destroyed by the internet
just yet.
Here's another one that you should
watch.
Go on.